Re: TSM 5.2 AIX client - DB2/SAP R3 Direct Archiving
Hi Lindy I guess your using the SAP supplied db2uext2. I suggest you contact SAP for assistance. Oss note 104019 provides some good information regarding the return codes Cheers Troy Tudor -Original Message- From: Crawford, Lindy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 July 2003 12:14 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TSM 5.2 AIX client - DB2/SAP R3 Direct Archiving Hi TSMers, DB2 direct archiving to tsm does not work it comes up with the following error messages, it show target as disk even although I have changed it to ADSM:DISKPOOL after I upgraded to tsm 52 aix 64bit 5.2:- Time Started: Mon Jul 21 12:03:40 2003 (20030721120340) Parameters Passed: db2uext2 -OSAIX 64BIT -RLSQL07026 -RQARCHIVE -DBPRD -NNNODE -LP/db2/PRD/log_dir/ -LNS008.LOG System Action : ARCHIVE Target :DISK RC : 104||| ERROR ||| Time Completed :Mon Jul 21 12:03:42 2003 (20030721120342) Time of Error: Mon Jul 21 12:03:42 2003 Action:ARCHIVE Database Name: PRD Log File Path: /db2/PRD/log_dir/ Log File Name: S008.LOG Audit Log File:/db2/PRD/db2dump/db2uext2.log.NODE Media Type:Disk User Exit RC: 23 Error isolation: Creating log file id failed. Reason: DB6CliExecute(): [IBM][C LI Driver][DB2/AIX64] SQL0204N SAPR3.DB6LOGFILE_PLACE is an undefined name. SQLSTATE=42704 Please help. Lindy Crawford Information Technology Nedbank Corporate - Property Asset Finance *+27-31-3642185 +27-31-3642946 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Stats
This should also show you the amount of active data on a node in MB: select sum(capacity*pct_util/100) from filespaces where node_name='' -Original Message- From: William Rosette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 July 2003 19:36 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Stats Thanks, Good one, Bill Rosette Data Center/IS/Papa Johns International WWJD Richard Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: cc: Dist StorSubject: Re: Stats Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] .EDU 07/21/2003 01:39 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager I am looking for a way to figure a total Gb of active files on a particular node. ... Hello, Bill - This question came up a few weeks ago, and the excellent suggestion was the expedient: Active files, number and bytes Do 'EXPort Node NodeName FILESpace=FileSpaceName FILEData=BACKUPActive Preview=Yes' Message ANR0986I will report the number of files and bytes. (This is immortalized in http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ADSM.QuickFacts) Richard Sims, BU Any e-mail message from the European Central Bank (ECB) is sent in good faith but shall neither be binding nor construed as constituting a commitment by the ECB except where provided for in a written agreement. This e-mail is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. Any unauthorised disclosure, use or dissemination, either in whole or in part, is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately via e-mail and delete this e-mail from your system.
Re: move nodedata
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 22:59:28 -0400 bizzorg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What happened to the move Nodedata function? We're running on z/OS 1.2 TSM server at 5.1.6.4. I read that there would be a move nodedata funtion startingat V5.1.5. It's there tsm: BASKEThelp move nodedata MOVE NODEDATA MOVE NODEDATA (Move Data by Node in a Sequential Access Storage Pool) Use this command to move data located in a sequential-access storage pool. snip (at least on aix it is...) -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Remco Post SARA - Stichting Academisch Rekencentrum Amsterdamhttp://www.sara.nl High Performance Computing Tel. +31 20 592 8008Fax. +31 20 668 3167 I really didn't foresee the Internet. But then, neither did the computer industry. Not that that tells us very much of course - the computer industry didn't even foresee that the century was going to end. -- Douglas Adams
Re: Space reclamation
Questions: (j) Can I use reclaimation when I have got only i1 tape drive and the reclamation pool is to another sequential stgpool? We can do manual reclamation using file device class(sequential), ref Admin guide for instructions. (ii) what is the meaning of insufficient mount points in the message. For info, my client nodes are defined with a max no of 2 mount points. For auto reclamation you must have minimum two tape drives in your library. (iii) Why TSM is not loading the required volume when the tape is alaready in the library? Library does not have two drives to load source and target tapes for auto reclamation. CRC, C.R.Chandrasekhar. Systems Executive. Tivoli Certified Consultant (TSM). TIMKEN Engineering Research - INDIA (P) Ltd., Bangalore. Phone No: 91-80-5536113 Ext:3032. Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: RAMNAWAZ NAVEEN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 6:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Space reclamation Hi, I am quite new to TSM and trying to configure some setups by myself currebntly facing some problems. My setup is as follows: I run a daily backup for around 200 GB on LTO tapes. I permanently have 3 tapes in a 3590 library defined to a stgpool (UATPOOL). I want to keep the last 3 copies. So I am using the expiry features and want to use reclamation to recover the recalimable space so that my automated backups goes continuosly on these 3 volumes. My problem is that I am geeting the following messages : ANR1040I Space reclamation started for volume UATHOT01, storage pool UAT_POOL (process number 39). ANR1044I Removable volume UATHOT01 is required for space reclamation. ANR0985I Process 39 for SPACE RECLAMATION running in the BACKGROUND completed with completion state FAILURE at 16:13:35. ANR1082W Space reclamation terminated for volume UATHOT01 - insufficient number of mount points available for removable media. ANR1042I Space reclamation for storage pool UAT_POOL will be retried in 60 seconds. ANR1043I Space reclamation retry delay ended; checking volume reclamation status for storage pool UAT_POOL. Questions: (j) Can i use reclaimation when i have got only i1 tape drive and the reclamation pool is to another sequential stgpool? (ii) what is the meaning of insufficient mount points in the message. For info, my client nodes are defined with a max no of 2 mount points. (iii) Why TSM is not loading teh required volume when the tape is alaready in the library? All assistance will be much appreciated Thansk regards ### This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange. For more information, connect to http://www.F-Secure.com/
Re: TDP Oracle config question
So is this an expected error message every time we run the TDP? Does that mean it can be ignored? -Original Message- From: Neil Rasmussen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TDP Oracle config question Steve, The reason that you are seeing this error is that Oracle/Rman first tries to delete the backuppiece that it is about to create on the TSM Server. In this way Oracle/Rman ensures that only one copy of the backuppiece exists on the Backup Media so Rman tries to delete the backuppiece in case it already exists. The Rman specifications state that only one copy of a backuppiece will exist at one time on Media Manager (DP for Oracle). Unfortunately, Oracle/Rman also specifies that the delete routine act as single and seperate operation, so when Oracle tries to delete a backuppiece that does not exist, that is an error and DP for Oracle returns that error. There is no way for DP for Oracle to determine if the deletion is a true delete of a backuppiece or if Oracle is checking for backuppiece existence prior to backup. Hope this helps clear things up. -- Date:Wed, 16 Jul 2003 13:13:39 -0600 From:Conko, Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TDP Oracle config question Thanks for that bit of information... it definitely clears some things up. According to the docs, we should be using unique TDPO_FS names for each node we are backing up using TDP, correct? After doing the query and some further investigation into the BACKUPS table, it appears we are getting this message because of a missing - When I do a select in the BACKUPS table, the LL_NAME shows up as: c-3756527612-2003-0714-02 However, in the error we are getting, the name of the object is: c-3756527612-20030714-02 Any idea why this is?? Steve Regards, Neil Rasmussen Software Development TDP for Oracle
Re: 5.2 bug?
Just as an aside, the fix for this is supposedly available in 5.1.7.1, which is now available from the ftp site. We saw this problem show up when we upgraded to 5.1.7.0. ..Paul At 01:16 PM 7/18/2003 +0200, Remco Post wrote: Hi all, I have a small test-server that I upgraded from 5.1.7 to 5.2 last week. To be able to do that I had to upgrade the OS from AIX 4.3.3 to AIX 5.1 (ml4), ever since, migration does not seem to work (I have no tapes in that box, just a bunch of old disks) Actlog tells me: 07/18/03 08:01:05 ANR1000I Migration process 23 started for storage pool BACKUPPOOL. 07/18/03 08:01:05 ANR8340I FILE volume /tsm/data/027A.BFS mounted. 07/18/03 08:01:08 ANR8341I End-of-volume reached for FILE volume /tsm/data/027A.BFS. 07/18/03 08:01:09 ANR8340I FILE volume /tsm/data/0283.BFS mounted. 07/18/03 08:01:25 ANRD ssutil.c(1636): ThreadId35 Invalid format code - 1. 07/18/03 08:01:25 ANR1032W Migration process 23 terminated for storage pool BACKUPPOOL - internal server error detected. 07/18/03 08:01:25 ANR0985I Process 23 for MIGRATION running in the BACKGROUND completed with completion state FAILURE at 08:01:25. I deleted (del vol) a previous filedev volume (was empty), thinking that might have been corrupted, unfortunately, that did not help. The filesystem is a plain old JFS. -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Remco Post SARA - Stichting Academisch Rekencentrum Amsterdamhttp://www.sara.nl High Performance Computing Tel. +31 20 592 8008Fax. +31 20 668 3167 I really didn't foresee the Internet. But then, neither did the computer industry. Not that that tells us very much of course - the computer industry didn't even foresee that the century was going to end. -- Douglas Adams -- Paul Zarnowski Ph: 607-255-4757 719 Rhodes Hall, Cornell UniversityFx: 607-255-8521 Ithaca, NY 14853-3801 Em: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can anyone help?
Sorry gang!! Didn't mean to send that out to the whole group!! Marco Spagnuolo System Administrator University of Windsor (IT Services) 401 Sunset Windsor, Ontario N9B 3P4 (519) 253-4232 Ext. 2769 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with the W2k 5.2.0.1 Client?
Just one of my Windows 2000 SP3 servers to the 5.2.0.1 client. My server is 5.1.1.6 on AIX 4.3.3. ... 07/22/2003 08:39:31 ANSE ntrc.cpp(890): Received Win32 RC 1450 from FileRead(): ReadFile ... I was also receiving errors on my old version 5.1.6.0 on this server. Is the problem with the client or the journal engine? Also anybody have any ideas on how to fix this? Refer to your Windows Return Codes reference when encountering such problems: 1450 Insufficient system resources exist ERROR_NO_SYSTEM_RESOURCES to complete the requested service. Is this an undersized PC, perhaps - too little real memory or paging space? This would explain it occurring regardless of client level, as it is endemic to the PC configuration. (Have your Windows admins get that machine to SP4 when opportune, for safety.) Richard Sims, BU
Re: Problem with the W2k 5.2.0.1 Client?
SP4 is not an option until the vendor certifies it... Also it is a quad Xeon system with hyper threading (looks like 8 to the OS) 8Gig of memory pagefile size 2046-4092. The average CPU utilization is 10% memory 25% -- Bruce Kamp Midrange Systems Analyst II Memorial Healthcare System E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] P: (954) 987-2020 x4597 F: (954) 985-1404 --- -Original Message- From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 10:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Just one of my Windows 2000 SP3 servers to the 5.2.0.1 client. My server is 5.1.1.6 on AIX 4.3.3. ... 07/22/2003 08:39:31 ANSE ntrc.cpp(890): Received Win32 RC 1450 from FileRead(): ReadFile ... I was also receiving errors on my old version 5.1.6.0 on this server. Is the problem with the client or the journal engine? Also anybody have any ideas on how to fix this? Refer to your Windows Return Codes reference when encountering such problems: 1450 Insufficient system resources exist ERROR_NO_SYSTEM_RESOURCES to complete the requested service. Is this an undersized PC, perhaps - too little real memory or paging space? This would explain it occurring regardless of client level, as it is endemic to the PC configuration. (Have your Windows admins get that machine to SP4 when opportune, for safety.) Richard Sims, BU
Database numbers don't add up
TSM server V5.1.6.2 on z/OS. Can someone explain why these numbers from a Q DB F=D don't add up (at least they don't make sense to me ?): Available Space (MB): 35,160 Assigned Capacity (MB): 35,160 Maximum Extension (MB): 0 Maximum Reduction (MB): 5,372 Page Size (bytes): 4,096 Total Usable Pages: 9,000,960 Used Pages: 4,968,239 Pct Util: 55.2 Max. Pct Util: 55.2 Physical Volumes: 15 In summary, it says that of the roughly 35GB DB, only 55% is used. In round numbers, 20GB is in use. This means that 15GB is not. However, the Maximum Reduction value is 5GB. Where is the other 10GB ? Even if TSM kept the reduction values based on the volume sizes (roughly 2.3GB per 3390-3 volume is what it is reporting), I should still be able to reduce the size by 6-volumes, or roughly 13GB !
Re: Database numbers don't add up
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 10:27:04 -0400 Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: TSM server V5.1.6.2 on z/OS. Can someone explain why these numbers from a Q DB F=D don't add up (at least they don't make sense to me ?): Available Space (MB): 35,160 Assigned Capacity (MB): 35,160 Maximum Extension (MB): 0 Maximum Reduction (MB): 5,372 Page Size (bytes): 4,096 Total Usable Pages: 9,000,960 Used Pages: 4,968,239 Pct Util: 55.2 Max. Pct Util: 55.2 Physical Volumes: 15 In summary, it says that of the roughly 35GB DB, only 55% is used. In round numbers, 20GB is in use. This means that 15GB is not. However, the Maximum Reduction value is 5GB. Where is the other 10GB ? 'In between', some people refer tot this as database fragmentation. There are appereantly in your case, a lot op pages unused, but that cannot be freed for database reduction. This probably has something to do with how TSM allocates a fresh db page when it needs one, I'm guessing that it tries to allocate pages in a way that leaves you with a as good as possible performance. As long as you don't really need the diskspace, I wouldn't worry. If you really do need the disks, I guess unloading than loading the db will temporarely resolve this problem (and in the end will leavy you with a db that performs far less than currently). Even if TSM kept the reduction values based on the volume sizes (roughly 2.3GB per 3390-3 volume is what it is reporting), I should still be able to reduce the size by 6-volumes, or roughly 13GB ! -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Remco Post SARA - Stichting Academisch Rekencentrum Amsterdamhttp://www.sara.nl High Performance Computing Tel. +31 20 592 8008Fax. +31 20 668 3167 I really didn't foresee the Internet. But then, neither did the computer industry. Not that that tells us very much of course - the computer industry didn't even foresee that the century was going to end. -- Douglas Adams
Re: Can anyone help? (someone certainly needs help...)
ENOUGH! It is one thing to post a commercial message on this list, eventually turning it into a combined ADSM/misc.jobs.tivoli list; another to be able to do so unflamed. But it is unbelievable to me that *anyone* would reply to such a post *TO THE LIST* when the ing email address of the job listing poster is right there for the taking? Is this the way anyone on this list would want to advertise themselves? Or is it the group consensus that any and everyone may have such a useful resume that it would be in the best interest of all the list if we all posted our resumes here on a regular basis. Maybe I'm missing something here. Currently there are about 1600 subscribers. Even if it only takes two seconds to recognize and delete such posts, that is about one person-hour wasted. Multiply this be about three dozen posts per day minimum of what passes on this list. A little consideration, PLEASE! And I thought Usenet had deteriorated over the years. Thanks to the people who really post useful things here that aren't *EASILY* (and that *is* the key word!) found elsewhere, but let me be the first to suggest that a separate list etiquette post probably should be posted here *daily*, with a subject line something like: LOOK! READ ME BEFORE POSTING!. Can I get a second on that? I used to build filters to filter out certain noise. In all seriousness, I am considering building a filter to only filter in certain posts for this list, with Richard Sims and *.us.ibm.com as the only immediate candidates. Can anyone else suggest a few more names I might want to leave in? -- Dan Goodman Systems Engineer Specialist Thomas Jefferson University Hospital 215-503-6808 Daniel.Goodman AT mail.tju.edu When you throw a rock into a pack of dogs, the one that yelps the loudest is usually the one that got hit. Marco Spagnuolo wrote: Heather, I may be interested in a position. Attached is my resume. Please contact me with further details if you feel my qualifications and experience match your customer's needs. Thanks, (See attached file: CDI-Corp-resume.doc) Marco Spagnuolo System Administrator University of Windsor (IT Services) 401 Sunset Windsor, Ontario N9B 3P4 (519) 253-4232 Ext. 2769 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bartel, Heather [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] dicorp.com cc: Sent by: ADSM: Subject: Can anyone help? Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] .edu 07/21/2003 03:44 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager Hello. I don't know much about this list, other than I'm told those who utilize Tivoli are subscribed to it. I'm wondering if there is anyone out there who may be seeking Tivoli work and may be interested in a contract-to-hire situation for our premier client in Auburn Hills, MI. We are seeking a Tivoli Administrator. If you may be interested or know someone who may be, please let me know and I can provide all the details. Regards, Heather L. Bartel Technical Recruiter CDI Professional Services A division of CDI Corporation 1960 Research Drive Suite 200 Troy, MI 48083 Phone: (248) 786-5922 Fax: (248) 786-5722 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Check us out on the web at www.cdicorp.com http://www.cdicorp.com/ This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information on a proactive email security service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
Re: Strange query output, using ODBC interface with M$ Access ...
ADSM-L reject my original response due to size, so I have removed the attachments and sent them to Arnaud privately. But they aren't really critical to my response. Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. - Forwarded by Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM on 07/22/2003 07:43 - Andrew Raibeck 07/22/2003 07:39 To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: From: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: Strange query output, using ODBC interface with M$ Access ... Hello Arnaud, I am unable to reproduce your problem. Attached is a .jpg file (tmodbc.jpg) showing my results. My TSM server is version 5.1.7.0, ODBC driver is 5.1.6.0, Access is 2002 version 10.4302.4219 SP-2. I have also tried this with the 5.2.0.0 ODBC driver and Access 2000 version 9.0.3821 SR-1, and it works for me. Here are the messages that appear on my TSM console when I run the query: ANR0407I Session 47 started for administrator SHERIDAN (WinNT) (Tcp/Ip 9.11.153.65(1078)). ANR2017I Administrator SHERIDAN issued command: DEFINE CURSOR C358701c SQL=SELECT START_TIME ,END_TIME ,ACTIVITY ,ENTITY ,BYTES FROM ADSM.SUMMARY WHERE (ACTIVITY = 'STGPOOL BACKUP' ) ANR2017I Administrator SHERIDAN issued command: DISPLAY CURSOR C358701c ANR2017I Administrator SHERIDAN issued command: OPEN CURSOR C358701c ANR2017I Administrator SHERIDAN issued command: FETCH NEXT 50 ANR2017I Administrator SHERIDAN issued command: CLOSE CURSOR ANR2017I Administrator SHERIDAN issued command: DELETE CURSOR C358701c ANR0405I Session 47 ended for administrator SHERIDAN (WinNT). Here are the steps I used to attempt to reproduce your scenario: 1) Start Microsoft Access. 2) Create a new blank database. 3) Link to SUMMARY table. When presented with list of columns to choose for unique record identifier, I just clicked OK. 4) Select View/Database Objects/Queries menu item. 5) Double-click Create query in Design view. In the Show Table dialog, I selected SUMMARY and clicked Add, then Close. 6) Select View/SQL View menu item. 7) Copy and paste your exact SQL (as shown in your original post) into the Select Query window. FYI, I have attached a .jpg file, design.jpg, that shows the resulting design view. 8) Select View/Datasheet View menu item. I get the results shown in the attached .jpg file. .. Try this: a) From the same machine you run Access on, start the Admin client in console mode: dsmadmc -console This will allow you to watch the commands sent to the TSM server as they occur. b) Try my steps above (create a new Access database, do not use an existing database). Watch the Admin console when you perform step #8. What do you get? Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. PAC Brion Arnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/21/2003 08:33 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Strange query output, using ODBC interface with M$ Access ... Hi list, I'm currently using TSM ODBC (V 5.1.6.0) interface with an Access 2002 database (V 10.4302.4219 sp-2), and built a query looking like : SELECT SUMMARY.START_TIME, SUMMARY.END_TIME, SUMMARY.ACTIVITY, SUMMARY.ENTITY, SUMMARY.BYTES, DateDiff(w,[START_TIME],Now()) AS timediff FROM SUMMARY WHERE (((SUMMARY.ACTIVITY)=STGPOOL BACKUP) AND ((DateDiff(w,[START_TIME],Now()))1)); Basically, this should extract all stgpool backup jobs registered in summary table, which have been started during the last day. Now, this is what that query returned (snippet of it, sorry for bad formating) : 1/7/2003 11:04:11 1/7/2003 11:04:17 BACKUP PACRS270 102604912 15/7/2003 5:00:14 15/7/2003 8:59:32 STGPOOL BACKUP TAPELTO1_INF_DB - COPYLTO1_INF_DB 2023371194890 15/7/2003 8:59:32 15/7/2003 8:59:50 STGPOOL BACKUP DISKPOOL_ARCH - COPYLTO1_ARCH 0 0 15/7/2003 8:59:32 15/7/2003 9:00:46 STGPOOL BACKUP DISKPOOL_SQL_LOGS - COPYLTO1_SQL_LOGS 553779200 15/7/2003 8:59:32 15/7/2003 9:01:32 STGPOOL BACKUP DISKPOOL_DB2_L0 - COPYLTO1_DB2_L0 798760960 1/7/2003 11:04:57 1/7/2003 11:05:03 BACKUP PACRS270 102604912
Re: 5.2 bug?
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 09:42:39 -0400 Paul Zarnowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just as an aside, the fix for this is supposedly available in 5.1.7.1, which is now available from the ftp site. We saw this problem show up when we upgraded to 5.1.7.0. ..Paul or on 5.2.0.1 that just showed up Thanks ;-) At 01:16 PM 7/18/2003 +0200, Remco Post wrote: Hi all, I have a small test-server that I upgraded from 5.1.7 to 5.2 last week. To be able to do that I had to upgrade the OS from AIX 4.3.3 to AIX 5.1 (ml4), ever since, migration does not seem to work (I have no tapes in that box, just a bunch of old disks) Actlog tells me: 07/18/03 08:01:05 ANR1000I Migration process 23 started for storage pool BACKUPPOOL. 07/18/03 08:01:05 ANR8340I FILE volume /tsm/data/027A.BFS mounted. 07/18/03 08:01:08 ANR8341I End-of-volume reached for FILE volume /tsm/data/027A.BFS. 07/18/03 08:01:09 ANR8340I FILE volume /tsm/data/0283.BFS mounted. 07/18/03 08:01:25 ANRD ssutil.c(1636): ThreadId35 Invalid format code - 1. 07/18/03 08:01:25 ANR1032W Migration process 23 terminated for storage pool BACKUPPOOL - internal server error detected. 07/18/03 08:01:25 ANR0985I Process 23 for MIGRATION running in the BACKGROUND completed with completion state FAILURE at 08:01:25. I deleted (del vol) a previous filedev volume (was empty), thinking that might have been corrupted, unfortunately, that did not help. The filesystem is a plain old JFS. -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Remco Post SARA - Stichting Academisch Rekencentrum Amsterdamhttp://www.sara.nl High Performance Computing Tel. +31 20 592 8008Fax. +31 20 668 3167 I really didn't foresee the Internet. But then, neither did the computer industry. Not that that tells us very much of course - the computer industry didn't even foresee that the century was going to end. -- Douglas Adams -- Paul Zarnowski Ph: 607-255-4757 719 Rhodes Hall, Cornell UniversityFx: 607-255-8521 Ithaca, NY 14853-3801 Em: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Remco Post SARA - Stichting Academisch Rekencentrum Amsterdamhttp://www.sara.nl High Performance Computing Tel. +31 20 592 8008Fax. +31 20 668 3167 I really didn't foresee the Internet. But then, neither did the computer industry. Not that that tells us very much of course - the computer industry didn't even foresee that the century was going to end. -- Douglas Adams
Re: Problem with the W2k 5.2.0.1 Client?
Yes, SP4 is only recently available so we do not know what, if any, incompatibilities may exist between TSM and SP4. However, for those who choose to install SP4, we will support it to as great an extent as possible, i.e. if you report a problem and it turns out to be a bug in TSM, we will take an APAR for it. I don't know what the RC 1450 problem is off-hand, but a quick review of similar reported problems suggest looking at the following MS KB articles: 142719 - Windows Reports Out Of Resources Error When Memory Is Available 192409 - Open Files Can Cause Kernel to Report INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES 236964 - Delayed Return of Paged Pool Causes Error 1450 Insufficient Resources 247904 - How To Configure the Paged Address Pool and System Page Table Entry Memory Areas 304101 - Backup Fails with Event ID 1450 You might check these out, though I can not say for sure whether they will help. However, Q142719 was helpful in resolving in at least one case. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. Kamp, Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/22/2003 07:22 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Problem with the W2k 5.2.0.1 Client? SP4 is not an option until the vendor certifies it... Also it is a quad Xeon system with hyper threading (looks like 8 to the OS) 8Gig of memory pagefile size 2046-4092. The average CPU utilization is 10% memory 25% -- Bruce Kamp Midrange Systems Analyst II Memorial Healthcare System E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] P: (954) 987-2020 x4597 F: (954) 985-1404 --- -Original Message- From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 10:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Just one of my Windows 2000 SP3 servers to the 5.2.0.1 client. My server is 5.1.1.6 on AIX 4.3.3. ... 07/22/2003 08:39:31 ANSE ntrc.cpp(890): Received Win32 RC 1450 from FileRead(): ReadFile ... I was also receiving errors on my old version 5.1.6.0 on this server. Is the problem with the client or the journal engine? Also anybody have any ideas on how to fix this? Refer to your Windows Return Codes reference when encountering such problems: 1450 Insufficient system resources exist ERROR_NO_SYSTEM_RESOURCES to complete the requested service. Is this an undersized PC, perhaps - too little real memory or paging space? This would explain it occurring regardless of client level, as it is endemic to the PC configuration. (Have your Windows admins get that machine to SP4 when opportune, for safety.) Richard Sims, BU
Re: Can anyone help? (someone certainly needs help...)
Quite a rant Dan... But I think if you filter everyone else, you might as well go to IBM.com for your answers... Besides we all just *READ* your message ( 5 minutes) and deleted for a loss of about 133 person-hours for a message that has nothing to do with ADSM. Both senders E-mail was in the messages and you also sent to the list how is that different ? Sorry for the response but I had to say something. -Original Message- From: Dan Goodman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 9:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Can anyone help? (someone certainly needs help...) ENOUGH! It is one thing to post a commercial message on this list, eventually turning it into a combined ADSM/misc.jobs.tivoli list; another to be able to do so unflamed. But it is unbelievable to me that *anyone* would reply to such a post *TO THE LIST* when the ing email address of the job listing poster is right there for the taking? Is this the way anyone on this list would want to advertise themselves? Or is it the group consensus that any and everyone may have such a useful resume that it would be in the best interest of all the list if we all posted our resumes here on a regular basis. Maybe I'm missing something here. Currently there are about 1600 subscribers. Even if it only takes two seconds to recognize and delete such posts, that is about one person-hour wasted. Multiply this be about three dozen posts per day minimum of what passes on this list. A little consideration, PLEASE! And I thought Usenet had deteriorated over the years. Thanks to the people who really post useful things here that aren't *EASILY* (and that *is* the key word!) found elsewhere, but let me be the first to suggest that a separate list etiquette post probably should be posted here *daily*, with a subject line something like: LOOK! READ ME BEFORE POSTING!. Can I get a second on that? I used to build filters to filter out certain noise. In all seriousness, I am considering building a filter to only filter in certain posts for this list, with Richard Sims and *.us.ibm.com as the only immediate candidates. Can anyone else suggest a few more names I might want to leave in? -- Dan Goodman Systems Engineer Specialist Thomas Jefferson University Hospital 215-503-6808 Daniel.Goodman AT mail.tju.edu When you throw a rock into a pack of dogs, the one that yelps the loudest is usually the one that got hit. Marco Spagnuolo wrote: Heather, I may be interested in a position. Attached is my resume. Please contact me with further details if you feel my qualifications and experience match your customer's needs. Thanks, (See attached file: CDI-Corp-resume.doc) Marco Spagnuolo System Administrator University of Windsor (IT Services) 401 Sunset Windsor, Ontario N9B 3P4 (519) 253-4232 Ext. 2769 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bartel, Heather [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] dicorp.com cc: Sent by: ADSM: Subject: Can anyone help? Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] .edu 07/21/2003 03:44 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager Hello. I don't know much about this list, other than I'm told those who utilize Tivoli are subscribed to it. I'm wondering if there is anyone out there who may be seeking Tivoli work and may be interested in a contract-to-hire situation for our premier client in Auburn Hills, MI. We are seeking a Tivoli Administrator. If you may be interested or know someone who may be, please let me know and I can provide all the details. Regards, Heather L. Bartel Technical Recruiter CDI Professional Services A division of CDI Corporation 1960 Research Drive Suite 200 Troy, MI 48083 Phone: (248) 786-5922 Fax: (248) 786-5722 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Check us out on the web at www.cdicorp.com http://www.cdicorp.com/ This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information on a proactive email security service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
Re: Can anyone help? (someone certainly needs help...)
Perhaps this list should remove the Reply-To: header? This is the only list that I am on that replies to the list instead of the sender of the message. Ochs, Duane wrote: Quite a rant Dan... But I think if you filter everyone else, you might as well go to IBM.com for your answers... Besides we all just *READ* your message ( 5 minutes) and deleted for a loss of about 133 person-hours for a message that has nothing to do with ADSM. Both senders E-mail was in the messages and you also sent to the list how is that different ? Sorry for the response but I had to say something.
TSM web client gave BLUE screen on Win2K SP3 server
Experts, Trying to installl TSM baclient 5.1.0.0 on Windows 2000 SP3 server with oslevel 5.0. When start web client managed by CAD gave a BLUE screen that said .. no exception handling...and a bunch of 0 numbers. Event from Windows shows the followings; Event Type: Error Event Source: Service Control Manager Event Category: None Event ID: 7023 Date: 7/21/2003 Time: 4:19:02 PM User: N/A Computer: GIS Description: The TSM Remote Client Agent service terminated with the following error: %%4294967295 Event Type: Error Event Source: Service Control Manager Event Category: None Event ID: 7024 Date: 7/21/2003 Time: 4:20:43 PM User: N/A Computer: GIS Description: The TSM Scheduler service terminated with service-specific error 12. Anybody experienced a similar thing happend or any known bug? Thanks again your help. TSM server 5.1.6 on AIX 4.3.3 Gus
Re: Database numbers don't add up
Hi Zoltan! There is a formula to check your 'fragmentation' level to verify Remco's explanation: SELECT CAST((100 - (CAST(MAX_REDUCTION_MB AS FLOAT) * 256 ) / (CAST(USABLE_PAGES AS FLOAT) - CAST(USED_PAGES AS FLOAT) ) * 100) AS DECIMAL(4,2)) AS PERCENT_FRAG FROM DB Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines -Original Message- From: Remco Post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 16:42 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Database numbers don't add up On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 10:27:04 -0400 Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: TSM server V5.1.6.2 on z/OS. Can someone explain why these numbers from a Q DB F=D don't add up (at least they don't make sense to me ?): Available Space (MB): 35,160 Assigned Capacity (MB): 35,160 Maximum Extension (MB): 0 Maximum Reduction (MB): 5,372 Page Size (bytes): 4,096 Total Usable Pages: 9,000,960 Used Pages: 4,968,239 Pct Util: 55.2 Max. Pct Util: 55.2 Physical Volumes: 15 In summary, it says that of the roughly 35GB DB, only 55% is used. In round numbers, 20GB is in use. This means that 15GB is not. However, the Maximum Reduction value is 5GB. Where is the other 10GB ? 'In between', some people refer tot this as database fragmentation. There are appereantly in your case, a lot op pages unused, but that cannot be freed for database reduction. This probably has something to do with how TSM allocates a fresh db page when it needs one, I'm guessing that it tries to allocate pages in a way that leaves you with a as good as possible performance. As long as you don't really need the diskspace, I wouldn't worry. If you really do need the disks, I guess unloading than loading the db will temporarely resolve this problem (and in the end will leavy you with a db that performs far less than currently). Even if TSM kept the reduction values based on the volume sizes (roughly 2.3GB per 3390-3 volume is what it is reporting), I should still be able to reduce the size by 6-volumes, or roughly 13GB ! -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Remco Post SARA - Stichting Academisch Rekencentrum Amsterdamhttp://www.sara.nl High Performance Computing Tel. +31 20 592 8008Fax. +31 20 668 3167 I really didn't foresee the Internet. But then, neither did the computer industry. Not that that tells us very much of course - the computer industry didn't even foresee that the century was going to end. -- Douglas Adams ** For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. **
Re: SV: Restore of a NetWare Cluster... what's happening?
Or could the reason be at this web link? http://groups.google.ca/groups?q=tivoli+backup+of+NSShl=enlr=ie=UTF-8oe=UTF-8selm=3CBF1527.133BD849%40email.unc.edurnum=4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/17/03 04:19AM .. by the way - if I make a restore of 1 file, size around 6 kb - it cannot be restored before any migration and/or databasebackup has been stopped... So I'm certain the problem is related to the filespace made by a NetWare Cluster! Regards Flemming -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 16. juli 2003 13:54 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: Re: Restore of a NetWare Cluster... what's happening? ... On server: ANR0481W Session 49492 for node NODENAME (NetWare)terminated - client did not respond within 300 seconds. ... Sounds like your server COMMTimeout value is unrealistically low for major client operations. Richard Sims, BU
Tape performance
I am wondering if there is something in TSM that throttles the tape performance we should be getting. I can do a dd test from the operating system to the tape drive and with that receive 2 GB per minute (32 MB/sec) but when I do a test through TSM, I only get 1 GB per minute. My environment is: TSM 5.7.0 on Solaris 8 Server: Sunfire 880 Tape drives are 9840 Fibre attached. As a result, we are questioning the value of putting in the more expensive tape drives when we can't seem to pump the data through as expected. Any ideas of what I might look at would be appreciated. Thanks, Brenda Collins ING
Tivoli and Novell NSS
We are considering adding Novell NSS volumes to our servers. Does anyone have any experience with backing up NSS volumes? We are using NetWare 6.0 SP2, are there any issues Tivoli vs NSS we should be aware of prior to taking on the migration to NSS? Does Tivoli work well with NSS when backing up data, what about restore? Thanks in advance. Lee Wilson CNA Network Server Support Specialist Computing and Network Services Grant MacEwan College Phone(780)497-5591 Cell (780)982-2114 or Fax (780)497-5595 http://www.MacEwan.ca
Re: Tape performance
I am wondering if there is something in TSM that throttles the tape performance we should be getting. I can do a dd test from the operating system to the tape drive and with that receive 2 GB per minute (32 MB/sec) but when I do a test through TSM, I only get 1 GB per minute. My environment is: TSM 5.7.0 on Solaris 8 Server: Sunfire 880 Tape drives are 9840 Fibre attached. As a result, we are questioning the value of putting in the more expensive tape drives when we can't seem to pump the data through as expected. Any ideas of what I might look at would be appreciated. Now, why did you not tell us what the test was? :-) Perspective and context is everything when trying to respond to postings. You very much did the right thing in getting isolated benchmark numbers first. Was the test a single, very large file so as to keep database updating out of the picture, rather than many small files? Was the client co-resident on the server system as to keep network contention out of the picture? All them factors. Richard Sims, BU
Re: Tivoli and Novell NSS
Lee, You actually pointed to the key for NSS volume backup with the link in your earlier post regarding Flemming's restore situation. Novell's TID 10065605 and patch NW6SMS1A.EXE are needed. In particular, you need the following entry in the smsrun.bas file: nlmArray = Array(SMDR, TSA600 /cluster=off, TSAPROXY)in order for TSM to recognize the clustered volumes. Lee Wilson wrote: We are considering adding Novell NSS volumes to our servers. Does anyone have any experience with backing up NSS volumes? We are using NetWare 6.0 SP2, are there any issues Tivoli vs NSS we should be aware of prior to taking on the migration to NSS? Does Tivoli work well with NSS when backing up data, what about restore? Thanks in advance. Lee Wilson CNA Network Server Support Specialist Computing and Network Services Grant MacEwan College Phone(780)497-5591 Cell (780)982-2114 or Fax (780)497-5595 http://www.MacEwan.ca -- Jim Kirkman AIS - Systems UNC-Chapel Hill 966-5884
Re: Tape performance
The test to move data from the operating system was just a 10GB file, although it was all zero's. The tape performance on TSM was achieved by doing a disk to tape. We took the ratings from doing a backup storagepool to tape. We tried it with storagepools that had filesystems and databases, the results are fairly close to the same. Our disk is on the SAN so we do not go through the network. Here are results from some new tests we just performed today. (Our drives are 9840B) DD Test with CBN and RMT drivers # mt -f /dev/rmt/6cbn status StorageTek 9840B tape drive: sense key(0x6)= Unit Attention residual= 0 retries= 0 file no= 0 block no= 0 # time dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rmt/6cbn bs=256k count=4 4+0 records in 4+0 records out RESULT: 38.78 MB/Sec real4m24.29s user0m0.17s sys 1m13.05s # time dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rmt/15mt bs=256k count=4 4+0 records in 4+0 records out real5m15.57s user0m0.19s sys 1m50.37s # RESULT: 32.5 MB/Sec Here is a core file used to test performance, with 453 MBytes, it take average of 2.2 minutes... # time tar -cvf /dev/rmt/14mt core a core 453736K real2m22.37s user0m0.44s sys 0m28.28s # time tar -cvf /dev/rmt/14mt core a core 453736K real2m19.16s user0m0.25s sys 0m28.79s |-+ | | Richard Sims | | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | || | | 07/22/2003 12:23 | | | PM | | | Please respond to| | | ADSM: Dist Stor | | | Manager | | || |-+ --| | | | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: Re: Tape performance | --| I am wondering if there is something in TSM that throttles the tape performance we should be getting. I can do a dd test from the operating system to the tape drive and with that receive 2 GB per minute (32 MB/sec) but when I do a test through TSM, I only get 1 GB per minute. My environment is: TSM 5.7.0 on Solaris 8 Server: Sunfire 880 Tape drives are 9840 Fibre attached. As a result, we are questioning the value of putting in the more expensive tape drives when we can't seem to pump the data through as expected. Any ideas of what I might look at would be appreciated. Now, why did you not tell us what the test was? :-) Perspective and context is everything when trying to respond to postings. You very much did the right thing in getting isolated benchmark numbers first. Was the test a single, very large file so as to keep database updating out of the picture, rather than many small files? Was the client co-resident on the server system as to keep network contention out of the picture? All them factors. Richard Sims, BU
Re: Tape performance
I am wondering if there is something in TSM that throttles the tape performance we should be getting. I can do a dd test from the operating system to the tape drive and with that receive 2 GB per minute (32 MB/sec) but when I do a test through TSM, I only get 1 GB per minute. The test to move data from the operating system was just a 10GB file, although it was all zero's. ... Thanks, that extra info helps a lot... The T9840B FICON Tape Drive Specifications that I see on the vendor web site quote Performance, native 19 MB/sec. I thought the 32 MB/s was a high number. I suspect that you did not disable tape drive compression in your all-zero's test, and so ended up with a number which was a great test of your FC, but not the drive-media. In context, your ~16 MB/s TSM speed seems excellent, then. I'd be happy with that number. Customers who also have 9840B drives might want to chime in on their experiences. Richard Sims, BU
Complete a SQL statement
I have a domain admin who'd like to find obsolete filespaces. This is his
SQL script:
select filespaces.node_name,filespaces.filespace_name,filespaces.backup_end
from -
filespaces where (($1 -
days(current_timestamp) - days(backup_end) or -
backup_end is null) and filespaces.node_name in (select nodes.node_name
from nodes where domain_name=upper('$2'))
And this is the result:
tsm: TSMrun sincelast_fs 30 csm
ANR2909E The SQL statement is incomplete; additional tokens are required.
ANR1463E RUN: Command script SINCELAST_FS completed in error.
ANS8001I Return code 4.
What is missing??
Re: Complete a SQL statement
Fred
the number of parens is not balanced. You're missing a right paren
somewhere.
Fred Johanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
07/22/03 02:34 PM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Complete a SQL statement
I have a domain admin who'd like to find obsolete filespaces. This is his
SQL script:
select
filespaces.node_name,filespaces.filespace_name,filespaces.backup_end
from -
filespaces where (($1 -
days(current_timestamp) - days(backup_end) or -
backup_end is null) and filespaces.node_name in (select nodes.node_name
from nodes where domain_name=upper('$2'))
And this is the result:
tsm: TSMrun sincelast_fs 30 csm
ANR2909E The SQL statement is incomplete; additional tokens are required.
ANR1463E RUN: Command script SINCELAST_FS completed in error.
ANS8001I Return code 4.
What is missing??
Re: fiber attached 3590's for mksysb under AIX ?
We tested the SCSI process that you described but did not carry it over to fibre. However, there really isn't all that much difference in the way AIX recognizes fibre drives verses SCSI drives. You shouldn't have any trouble converting the SCSI process to fibre. Ken -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dwight Cook Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 07:44 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fiber attached 3590's for mksysb under AIX ? Kind of off topic but it is protection of TSM servers... We are still running with all SCSI attached 3590's both B1A's and E1A's nice thing is you can use mtlib to mount a tape, then cut a mksysb to that drive tape Two TSM environments require capacity increases and I'm wondering if that occurs with upgrades of B1A's to newer E's or H's, and if I go with fiber attached this time if the drives will still be valid devices to cut mksysb's to ? ? ? so are any TSM'ers with aix boxes fiber attached drives doing this ? ? ? (it makes for a real slick automated monthly mksysb process to better protect your TSM environments) just wondering... Dwight
help:server recovery
Hi all,I deleted my logvol form my OS,my logmode is normal and I don't backup my db also.How can I recovery the server? Thanx! liming [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-07-23
Re: help:server recovery
I s your resume up to date :-) I am sure someone else here will help you. Cheeers Stephen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 July, 2003 11:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: help:server recovery Hi all,I deleted my logvol form my OS,my logmode is normal and I don't backup my db also.How can I recovery the server? Thanx! liming [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-07-23
FW: fiber attached 3590's for mksysb under AIX ?
We have fibre attached 3590's attached to RS/6000 Model F80. We can cut mksysb on these drives but can not boot from this mksysb tape using fibre attached 3590. we are working with IBM H/W to make it work (as this is supported config.), but still no success. Is there anybody tested booting using mksysb tape using fibre attached 3590? Rane -Original Message- From: Kenneth Susan Bury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed, July 23, 2003 3:04 AM Subject: Re: fiber attached 3590's for mksysb under AIX ? We tested the SCSI process that you described but did not carry it over to fibre. However, there really isn't all that much difference in the way AIX recognizes fibre drives verses SCSI drives. You shouldn't have any trouble converting the SCSI process to fibre. Ken -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dwight Cook Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 07:44 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fiber attached 3590's for mksysb under AIX ? Kind of off topic but it is protection of TSM servers... We are still running with all SCSI attached 3590's both B1A's and E1A's nice thing is you can use mtlib to mount a tape, then cut a mksysb to that drive tape Two TSM environments require capacity increases and I'm wondering if that occurs with upgrades of B1A's to newer E's or H's, and if I go with fiber attached this time if the drives will still be valid devices to cut mksysb's to ? ? ? so are any TSM'ers with aix boxes fiber attached drives doing this ? ? ? (it makes for a real slick automated monthly mksysb process to better protect your TSM environments) just wondering... Dwight
Error in deleting filespace
Hi all, I got the error in deleting filespace, please see the log from activity log. I hope everybody can help me. thanks. Zosi Noriega 07/23/03 08:33:59 ANR2017I Administrator ZBN3669 issued command: DELETE FILESPACE SAPPLIBP1 3 NAMETYPE=FSID TYPE=ANY DATA=ANY WAIT=NO 07/23/03 08:33:59 ANR0984I Process 2546 for DELETE FILESPACE started in the BACKGROUND at 08:33:59. 07/23/03 08:33:59 ANR0802I DELETE FILESPACE Registries (fsId=3) (backup/arc- hive data) for node SAPPLIBP1 started. 07/23/03 08:33:59 ANR0800I DELETE FILESPACE Registries (fsId=3) for node SAPPLIBP1 started as process 2546. 07/23/03 08:33:59 ANR0609I DELETE FILESPACE started as process 2546. 07/23/03 08:33:59 ANR0104E imutil.c(7529): Error 2 deleting row from table Expiring.Objects. 07/23/03 08:33:59 ANRD imfsdel.c(1863): ThreadId79 Error 19 deleting group leader 0 48984968. 07/23/03 08:33:59 ANR0985I Process 2546 for DELETE FILESPACE running in the BACKGROUND completed with completion state FAILURE at 08:33:59. This e-mail may contain confidential and/or priviledged information. If you are not the intended recepient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail.
