[no subject]
I have SP running using directory container. Does anyone know how it generates the SUR usage? I have a cronjob that runs what did you do in the last 24h and once a week I get this output: SUR_ARCH_OCCUPANCY 1 0.00 SUR_OCCUPANCY 1 125290.75 SUR_RET_OCCUPANCY 1 0.00 I suspect is doing something like: gen dedupst "directorypool" * and then q dedupst "directorypool" *. Then going thru every node and computing how much unique data is in every node and summing it up. I can't seem to find a v8.1x macro that does this on the interwebs
[no subject]
Greetings to all. I have questions about creating versions of PXE boot iso's. I successfully created an is on for bare metal restore of an x64 Win 2012 VM hosted server. Now I need to restore two other servers, both Win 2008 R2 X64 VMs. They have different baclient versions installed; one is 6.4.2 (EoL, we know), while the other is 7.1.6.4. I have been trying to rtfm to determine if I can make one PXE iso for both servers, at 7.1.6.5 for example, because I have a bunch of those too. Making the PXE iso was low on my list of fun stuff to do. I know that my x86 2008 servers will need a different iso, and my Win 2008 non R2 probably another, same for Win 2016, but I want to make as few as necessary. I have 7.1.x.x, 7.1.8.x, 8.1.0.x, 8.1.2, and 8.1.4. also. I get that the baclient version on the PXE iso needs to be >= the vrl of the baclient used to back up files, but how far back can I expect to go from a particular uplevel version on a matching OS? Point me to what to read. I have read and re-read the best practices guide for recovering Win Server 2012 and Windows 8. I have not read the earlier doc pertaining to 2008...yet. What else. They all back up to SP 7.1.8.0 on AIX. ...well, most do, some backup to another AIX server running a 6.x TSM server version. Again, we know that is out of support. It is what we have to work with for now. I am not so worried about that population, they are rather stable. So, how much work do I have ahead? I miss when I could call Wanda with my questions! George Huebschman
[no subject]
pts rule name description -- -- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTEDPassed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -0.2 RP_MATCHES_RCVDEnvelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 BAYES_20 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 5 to 20% [score: 0.1500] 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECTMissing Subject: header X-Barracuda-Connect: mail1.sun.ac.za[146.232.64.12] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1386684113 X-Barracuda-Encrypted: AES256-SHA X-Barracuda-URL: http://148.100.49.28:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at marist.edu X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1 X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 1.29 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=1.29 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=5.5 tests=MISSING_SUBJECT, MISSING_SUBJECT_2 X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.142987 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description -- -- 0.01 MISSING_SUBJECTMissing Subject: header 1.28 MISSING_SUBJECT_2 Missing Subject: header unsubscribe E-pos vrywaringsklousule Hierdie e-pos mag vertroulike inligting bevat en mag regtens geprivilegeerd wees en is slegs bedoel vir die persoon aan wie dit geadresseer is. Indien u nie die bedoelde ontvanger is nie, word u hiermee in kennis gestel dat u hierdie dokument geensins mag gebruik, versprei of kopieer nie. Stel ook asseblief die sender onmiddellik per telefoon in kennis en vee die e-pos uit. Die Universiteit aanvaar nie aanspreeklikheid vir enige skade, verlies of uitgawe wat voortspruit uit hierdie e-pos en/of die oopmaak van enige lC*s aangeheg by hierdie e-pos nie. E-mail disclaimer This e-mail may contain confidential information and may be legally privileged and is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that you may not use, distribute or copy this document in any manner whatsoever. Kindly also notify the sender immediately by telephone, and delete the e-mail. The University does not accept liability for any damage, loss or expense arising from this e-mail and/or accessing any files attached to this e-mail.
[no subject]
INFO REFCARD Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID
[no subject]
REVIEW Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID
[no subject]
REVIEW ADSM-L Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID
[no subject]
Unsubscribe adsm-l Sent from my BlackBerry® powered by Sinyal Kuat INDOSAT -Original Message- From: Daniel Sparrman daniel.sparr...@exist.se Sender: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2011 09:46:04 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Reply-To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Check signals on Power vs. x86... A Toyota Prius easily beats a Porsche in a price / performance comparison. However, would you still buy the Prius? Daniel Sparrman Exist i Stockholm AB Växel: 08-754 98 00 Fax: 08-754 97 30 daniel.sparr...@exist.se http://www.existgruppen.se Posthusgatan 1 761 30 NORRTÄLJE -ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU skrev: - Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Från: Shawn Drew Sänt av: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager Datum: 10/07/2011 17:20 Ärende: Re: [ADSM-L] Check signals on Power vs. x86... I think he was looking for Power vs x86 in price/performance. I.E If you spend 50K on Power systems and 50K on x86 systems. which could produce more I/O throughput. (If not, that's what I'd like to hear an update on) From what I remember from previous discussions, x86/linux would come out on top for pure price/performance, but managing many x86 systems vs a single/fewer Power systems certainly has some value. I'm sure there are many other intangibles when it comes to value. Regards, Shawn Shawn Drew Internet howard.co...@ardenthealth.com Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 10/07/2011 09:44 AM Please respond to ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU To ADSM-L cc Subject Re: [ADSM-L] Check signals on Power vs. x86... Yes, it is. There are very few things I would say this about, but this is one of 'em. For a RHEL box to match the performance capabilities it would have to be installed on Power as well (which it can be). I think the evidence I've seen both in experience and raw numbers has shown the power boxes can sustain higher levels of throughput and performance. Because to get an x86 box to perform at those levels you would have to spend just as much, buying one really powerful x86 box, or spreading it across multiple boxes. All that said, if we didn't have a good AIX guy here, I'd go RHEL on multiple boxes, or on a really powerful x86 box. I can admin AIX, but I'm much more comfortable on Linux. So, as someone else said, it all depends on what you're good at. See Ya' Howard Coles Jr. John 3:16! -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Allen S. Rout Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 3:46 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Check signals on Power vs. x86... I'm looking around for an update on my expectations that power hardware and AIX is more performant per memory/CPU/IO than x86 and RHEL. I know this topic comes up from time to time; I don't think I've seen it rehashed particularly recently. I'm an advocate of AIX for this, but I wanted to check signals and experiences, again. - Allen S. Rout DISCLAIMER: This communication, along with any documents, files or attachments, is intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain legally privileged and confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of any information contained in or attached to this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy the original communication and its attachments without reading, printing or saving in any manner. Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. This message and any attachments (the message) is intended solely for the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message if modified. Please note that certain functions and services for BNP Paribas may be performed by BNP Paribas RCC, Inc. DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments.
[no subject]
Thomas, I am not sure if not having a backup of this file will prevent recovery. It would seem that this is part of the C: drive and not a nominal part of the system state. However, one thing I would suggest (and I am personally starting to think of it as a 'best practice') is to use SNAPSHOTPROVIDERFS VSS so that all volumes (not just system state) are backed up via snapshot. This will ensure that files are not skipped because if they are opened for exclusive use by some other application. I would also suggest periodic DR testing in order to verify that the backup and restore procedures are working. Best regards, Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Product Development Level 3 Team Lead Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Hartford/IBM@IBMUS Internet e-mail: stor...@us.ibm.com IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support web page: http://www.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/Overview/Software/Tivoli/Tivoli_Storage_Manager ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu wrote on 2011-03-25 14:40:33: From: Thomas Denier thomas.den...@jeffersonhospital.org To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu Date: 2011-03-25 14:47 Subject: Re: Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu We are seeing activity log messages like the following: ANE4987E (Session: 326356, Node: STMEDIA) Error processing '\\stmedia\c$\Windows\System32\SMI\Store\Machine\SCHEMA.DAT.LOG1': the object is in use by another process for a number of Windows 2008 client systems with 6.2.1.0 client code. Is this going to compromise our ability to recover these systems?
[no subject]
We are seeing activity log messages like the following: ANE4987E (Session: 326356, Node: STMEDIA) Error processing '\\stmedia\c$\Windows\System32\SMI\Store\Machine\SCHEMA.DAT.LOG1': the object is in use by another process for a number of Windows 2008 client systems with 6.2.1.0 client code. Is this going to compromise our ability to recover these systems?
[no subject]
I have an issue I need to find a solution for. We use EMC's Diskxtender on two Windows servers. At some point in the past a Diskxtender option was changed that had detrimental effect on backups..TSM started backing up Diskxtender stub files instead of the actual files. That option has been corrected, but I need to find out what files exist on TSM that are stubs. I cannot simply re-backup all the data as it would all have to be recalled from Diskxtender and we are talking about many terabytes of data. I tried doing queries from the client (QUERY BACKUP) and then comparing the dates backed up versus the create/mod date, but that does not help because Robocopy has been used to populate some of the filesystems and the create/mod dates were copied and not updated. Thus my TSM backup date is nowhere near either of those dates as it would normally be. The actual issue is that if one of the stub files is restored from TSM - the length is zero and due to the fact that TSM does not backup/restore the Diskxtender metadata that is stored either in an alternate data stream or some non-standard file metadata - the file is basically garbage. I have tried looking from the server side with SQL queries but cannot find anything that will help in this quest. Anyone have any thoughts? Thanks in advance.. -Tom This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the original message (including attachments).
[no subject]
Hi Tom, I'm not familiar with Diskextender Is there a difference in the names of the filespaces that are being backed up in TSM ? A q filespace nodename on the TSM server. If the bad backups are listed as a different filespace you can just delete the filespace. Do the stubs have a different extension ? -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Melton, Tom Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 8:50 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: I have an issue I need to find a solution for. We use EMC's Diskxtender on two Windows servers. At some point in the past a Diskxtender option was changed that had detrimental effect on backups..TSM started backing up Diskxtender stub files instead of the actual files. That option has been corrected, but I need to find out what files exist on TSM that are stubs. I cannot simply re-backup all the data as it would all have to be recalled from Diskxtender and we are talking about many terabytes of data. I tried doing queries from the client (QUERY BACKUP) and then comparing the dates backed up versus the create/mod date, but that does not help because Robocopy has been used to populate some of the filesystems and the create/mod dates were copied and not updated. Thus my TSM backup date is nowhere near either of those dates as it would normally be. The actual issue is that if one of the stub files is restored from TSM - the length is zero and due to the fact that TSM does not backup/restore the Diskxtender metadata that is stored either in an alternate data stream or some non-standard file metadata - the file is basically garbage. I have tried looking from the server side with SQL queries but cannot find anything that will help in this quest. Anyone have any thoughts? Thanks in advance.. -Tom This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the original message (including attachments).
[no subject]
http://sites.google.com/site/tsovcxtmht/gj0cmdyo7r
[no subject]
Subject: FYI: 64-bit installer of TDP for MS-SQL v5.5.3 ate our license file Thread-Topic: 64-bit installer of TDP for MS-SQL v5.5.3 ate our license file Thread-Index: AcrRFgqHG0UwUEK5RhmmHrLCRJW9QwoArwT5 Message-ID: c81c520e.57d8f%r...@cornell.edu In-Reply-To: of1f1a4206.7053630d-on852576f7.007335fc-852576f7.0073b...@us.ibm.com Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.4.0.100208 acceptlanguage: en-US x-additional-recipients-added: 1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-PMX-CORNELL: hermes30 X-Barracuda-Connect: soapstone1.mail.cornell.edu[128.253.83.143] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1274468816 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.1551 1. -1.0725 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam Virus Firewall at marist.edu X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -1.07 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-1.07 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=5.5 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.30424 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description -- -- We just upgraded our TPD for MS-SQL from v5.5.1 (the initial install version, complete with license file) on a 64-bit machine, and discovered that the installer ate our license file (the name of which escapes me just now). Our Windows admin eventually found a workaround - upgrading to v5.5.3 by running the MSI installer directly, rather than through the setup.exe. We are opening a ticket with IBM on this, but just wanted to share.
[no subject]
Hello Everybody, I was supporting test TSM Server for all 6.1.X versions (last was 6.1.3). Finally I have lost test server and uninstalled it at all. I am looking for TSM 6.2 test server, because I am not going to upgrade to 6.1 now. What is the current status of 6.2? Have somebody used it? I am interesting, is it possible to upgrade 5.5.4 to 6.2 straight (without 6.1)? I will deeply appreciate any comments or suggestions. Regards, Grigori G. Solonovitch Senior Technical Architect Information Technology Ahli United Bank Kuwait http://www.ahliunited.com.kw Phone: (+965) 2231-2274 Mobile: (+965) 99798073 E-Mail: grigori.solonovi...@ahliunited.commailto:grigori.solonovi...@ahliunited.com Please consider the environment before printing this Email CONFIDENTIALITY AND WAIVER: The information contained in this electronic mail message and any attachments hereto may be legally privileged and confidential. The information is intended only for the recipient(s) named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that any use, disclosure, copying or distribution is prohibited. If you have received this in error please contact the sender and delete this message and any attachments from your computer system. We do not guarantee that this message or any attachment to it is secure or free from errors, computer viruses or other conditions that may damage or interfere with data, hardware or software. Please consider the environment before printing this Email.
[no subject]
I am investigating the proxy backup for VMware vSphere 4 VMs and the redbook states that the proxy must have adequate space allocated for interim storage of the backup data (images, files, etc.). Is there a way to stream the data directly to the TSM backup server which has EMC SAN as primary storage? Would prefer to try and eliminate the additional cost for proxy storage. Am I off my rocker, or does anyone know if this is possible/supported? All feedback welcome... Thanks! ~Rick
[no subject]
yahoo.com 1c63ffb4e7581f4e9cb6476a096367f788b0848...@a2xmxs1v1.a2x.lan.at 2266722b-923f-40bb-a65e-ac6be2747...@bu.edu X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: [ADSM-L] AW: [ADSM-L] AW: [ADSM-L] Deleting EXPORT tape Subject: RE: [ADSM-L] AW: [ADSM-L] AW: [ADSM-L] Deleting EXPORT tape Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 10:07:40 -0600 Message-ID: 375a530911ce4d8580a582cf23fd8...@wgo.local MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: 2266722b-923f-40bb-a65e-ac6be2747...@bu.edu Thread-Index: AcqPp28dRYew7QOGRua/biAkpn6h1QAC90Sw x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new on lnxsrvu at winnebagoind.com X-Copyrighted-Material: Please visit http://www.company.com/privacy.htm X-Barracuda-Connect: lnxsrvu.winnebagoind.com[69.66.77.165] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1262880490 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0. 1. -2.0210 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam Virus Firewall at marist.edu X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.02 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.02 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=5.5 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.19196 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description -- -- You might try this. DELETE VOLHISTORY typ=export volume=## force=yes todate=today It has worked for me to delete a backupset. I haven't tried it on an export. Bob. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Richard Sims Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 8:37 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] AW: [ADSM-L] AW: [ADSM-L] Deleting EXPORT tape On Jan 7, 2010, at 9:33 AM, VOJTA Othmar wrote: I have tried it now. FORCE=YES supports TYPE=DBB, but not TYPE=EXPORT. Sorry, no ideas any longer. If you perform one more, trivial Export, the bad one would be old and so could then be deleted. The prevailing problem with Delete Volhistory, of course, is that the most selectivity it offers is everything before this date/time. Richard Sims This electronic transmission and any documents accompanying this electronic transmission contain confidential information belonging to the sender. This information may be legally privileged. The information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on or regarding the contents of this electronically transmitted information is strictly prohibited.
[no subject]
Hello All, From time to time we are having issues where clients trying to configure client based encryption on their servers can't get TSM to prompt them to generate an encryption key. This seems to be a problem that has been occurring only on clients running various levels of Windows OS and different levels of the TSM ba client. I am wondering if anyone else has experienced periodic failures when having clients' setup encryption, and if so what do you do to correct this problem? The steps we are using to have clients configure encryption are below; please let us know if we are doing something incorrect in the process. 1.Add these statements to dsm.opt encryptiontype aes128 encryptkey save include.encrypt *\...\* 2.Run 'dsmc q sched' to confirm the client can communicate with tsmin01 3.Run a very small backup to initiate the encryption key creation routine. 4.When prompted at the bottom of the screen, choose the option to: Generate an encryption key. 5.Enter the encryption key and confirm it. You will see your backup run to completion and the encryption key will be stored in your Windows registry. Thanks, Chad Harris
Subject: how can I find out when a volume on a stgpool was last written to?
Subject: how can I find out when a volume on a stgpool was last written to?
Re: Subject: how can I find out when a volume on a stgpool was last written to?
On 14/10, Erwin Zavala wrote: Subject: how can I find out when a volume on a stgpool was last written to? q vol volname f=D Check out HELP QUERY VOLUME for syntax. Last written date is only recorded for volumes in sequential storage pools. -km
Re: Subject: how can I find out when a volume on a stgpool was last written to?
Erwin,
You could run q vol VOLUMENAME f=d; you could also run this SQL query,
feel free to improve the query as needed.
select volume_name, stgpool_name, pct_utilized, last_write_date from
volumes where volumes.stgpool_name in ('STORAGEPOOLNAME') and
volumes.volume_name in ('VOLUMENAME')
BERTAUT TCHUISE
TSM/NetApp Storage Administrator
Legg Mason Technology Services
*410-580-7032
btchu...@leggmason.com
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Erwin Zavala
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 2:01 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Subject: how can I find out when a volume on a stgpool
was last written to?
Subject: how can I find out when a volume on a stgpool was last written
to?
IMPORTANT: E-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Legg Mason
therefore recommends that you do not send any confidential or sensitive
information to us via electronic mail, including social security numbers,
account numbers, or personal identification numbers. Delivery, and or timely
delivery of Internet mail is not guaranteed. Legg Mason therefore recommends
that you do not send time sensitive
or action-oriented messages to us via electronic mail.
This message is intended for the addressee only and may contain privileged or
confidential information. Unless you are the intended recipient, you may not
use, copy or disclose to anyone any information contained in this message. If
you have received this message in error, please notify the author by replying
to this message and then kindly delete the message. Thank you.
Re: Subject: how can I find out when a volume on a stgpool was last written to?
q vol VOLSER f=d There is a value there Approx. Date Last Written Regards, Shawn Shawn Drew Internet erwin.zav...@gmail.com Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 10/14/2009 02:00 PM Please respond to erwin.zav...@gmail.com To ADSM-L cc Subject [ADSM-L] Subject: how can I find out when a volume on a stgpool was last written to? Subject: how can I find out when a volume on a stgpool was last written to? This message and any attachments (the message) is intended solely for the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message if modified. Please note that certain functions and services for BNP Paribas may be performed by BNP Paribas RCC, Inc.
[no subject]
Running TSM 5.5 on z/OS. Run nightly backups to disk storage pools, then migrate those to tape the next day. Last night, one of our disk storage pools filled up due to a mass dump of data on one of the clients being backed up to that pool The high and low migration limits on this pool were ser to 85% and 60% respectively. Automatic migration of this storage pool kicked on as configured, with four processes starting to migrate the data in this pool to tape. Three of the process finished within a couple of hours. The fourth, however, is still running seven hours later. This morning, I tried to start another migration process on this pool, but it will not initiate. Only the one that is still running from last night is active. My questions: 1) Since this is an auto migration process kicked off by the thresholds, does it have to complete before any new migration processes can start? Is there any way to change/override that if that is the case? Is only one process running because the only data remaining in that pool is likely, as far as I can see, from a single node? 2) Could I safely cancel this migration session, then restart four (or six, or eight) new migration sessions? It sometimes takes as long to cancel a migration session as it would be to let it complete, and I wouldn't want to take another six hours to cancel it and get back where I started. 3) Will this auto migration session complete when it gets to the lower threshold (60%) or will it keep going until the pool is empty? Kevin Kinder State of WV
[no subject]
I have a copygroup set up for a domain that is strictly a bunch of nodes for a document imaging application, millions of files each. I am going to change the backups from the incremental-forever to image backups. Also, I am going to change the retention to where I would only keep the active copy of each, and that's it. I don't want any inactive copies, and I don't want to keep them around for ANY amount of time, only the active. Reason being, the files in those NTFS file systems never change, and they are only archives. Here is the current config Versions Data Exists2 Versions Data Deleted 1 Retain Extra Versions 30 Retain Only Version60 Based on my comments above, would that need to be?: Versions Data Exists1 Versions Data Deleted 0 Retain Extra Versions 0 Retain Only Version0 Please help...This is one of the parts I hate about TSM. I know it's probably simple, but I never can seem to remember what each retention parameter (as shown above) MEANS! J God bless you!!! Chip Bell Network Engineer I IBM Tivoli Certified Deployment Professional (ITSM) Baptist Health System Birmingham, AL
[no subject]
Hello All, I recently started using resourceutil 7 in opt file and maxnummp=3 for doing very large restores using the GUI and I would see the advantage where I had 3 or more restore sessions with up to 3 tapes being used. If I were to use the cmd line would I see the same ? TSM Server 5.4.2.0 Windows Environment. Thanks Bill _ View your Twitter and Flickr updates from one place – Learn more! http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/137984870/direct/01/
[no subject]
of course, none of the parameters AFAIK are bound to GUI, maxnump is node propertie and resourceutil is dsm.sys|opt parameter (for example) cli reads dsm.sys|opt and connects to the server as node which has maxnump allowed value i hope im right // g George Burns - I spent a year in that town, one Sunday. On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 11:03 AM, william dourado bdour...@hotmail.com wrote: Hello All, I recently started using resourceutil 7 in opt file and maxnummp=3 for doing very large restores using the GUI and I would see the advantage where I had 3 or more restore sessions with up to 3 tapes being used. If I were to use the cmd line would I see the same ? TSM Server 5.4.2.0 Windows Environment. Thanks Bill _ View your Twitter and Flickr updates from one place – Learn more! http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/137984870/direct/01/
[no subject]
HI-MB.w i le! [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]A[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-ASG-Orig-Subj: AW: [ADSM-L] Question about group collocation Subject: AW: [ADSM-L] Question about group collocation Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:02:51 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thread-Index: AclLCPutulWfoZefRTeCteX968Jr/wAC2v/rAPXuQQAAAEH64A== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.93.3/8677/Tue Nov 25 04:52:25 2008 on maud.srv.meduniwien.ac.at X-Virus-Status: Clean X-PMX-Version: 5.4.3.345767, Antispam-Engine: 2.6.0.325393, Antispam-Data: 2008.11.25.104923 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Barracuda-Connect: maud.srv.meduniwien.ac.at[149.148.224.13] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1227610972 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0. 1. -2.0210 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam Firewall at marist.edu X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.02 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.02 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=5.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.1.0 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description -- -- Nodes who are not in a group are collocated by node. - If you specify COLLOCATE=3DGROUP but do not define any collocation groups or if you specify COLLOCATE=3DGROUP but do not add nodes to a collocation group, data is collocated by node. Be sure to consider tape usage when organizing client nodes into collocation groups. For example, if a tape-based storage pool consists of data from grouped and ungrouped nodes and you specify COLLOCATE=3DGROUP, the server does the following: + Collocates by group the data for grouped nodes only. Whenever possible, the server collocates data belonging to a group of nodes on a single tape or on as few tapes as possible. Data for a single node can also be spread across several tapes associated with a group. + Collocates by node the data for ungrouped nodes. Whenever possible, the server stores the data for a single node on a single tape. All available tapes that already have data for the node are used before available space on any other tape is used. -=20 -Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht- Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag = von Minns, Farren - Chichester Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. November 2008 11:57 An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Betreff: [ADSM-L] Question about group collocation Hi all I currently have a tapepool collocated by node. I have created my first collocation group and added three client nodes = to it. So, if I now update the tapepool to collocate by 'group', am I right in thinking it will still collocate all nodes NOT in the collocation group = by node? Thanks Farren Minns -= --- This email (and any attachment) is confidential, may be legally = privileged and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom = it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient please do not disclose, copy or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this = message in error please tell us by reply and delete all copies on your system. =20 Although this email has been scanned for viruses you should rely on your = own virus check as the sender accepts no liability for any damage arising = out of any bug or virus infection. Please note that email traffic data may be monitored and that emails may be viewed for security reasons. John Wiley Sons Limited is a private limited company registered in = England with registered number 641132. Registered office address: The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ. -= ---
[no subject]
HI-MB.w i le! [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]A[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: [ADSM-L] Question about group collocation Subject: RE: [ADSM-L] Question about group collocation Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:22:40 -0600 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 Thread-Index: AclLCPutulWfoZefRTeCteX968Jr/wAC2v/rAPXuQQAABPCFgA== In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new on lnxsrvu at winnebagoind.com X-Copyrighted-Material: Please visit http://www.company.com/privacy.htm X-Barracuda-Connect: lnxsrvu.winnebagoind.com[69.66.77.165] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1227619391 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0. 1. -2.0210 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam Firewall at marist.edu X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.02 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.02 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=5.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.1.9 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description -- -- That's how it works. All of our nodes belong to a group, even if there is only one node in the group. This makes it easy to catch a node added where the group assignment was missed. We also do some collocation local by filespace or node and offsite by group. Bob. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Minns, Farren - Chichester Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:57 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Question about group collocation Hi all I currently have a tapepool collocated by node. I have created my first collocation group and added three client nodes to it. So, if I now update the tapepool to collocate by 'group', am I right in thinking it will still collocate all nodes NOT in the collocation group by node? Thanks Farren Minns This email (and any attachment) is confidential, may be legally privileged and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient please do not disclose, copy or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message in error please tell us by reply and delete all copies on your system. Although this email has been scanned for viruses you should rely on your own virus check as the sender accepts no liability for any damage arising out of any bug or virus infection. Please note that email traffic data may be monitored and that emails may be viewed for security reasons. John Wiley Sons Limited is a private limited company registered in England with registered number 641132. Registered office address: The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ. This electronic transmission and any documents accompanying this electronic transmission contain confidential information belonging to the sender. This information may be legally privileged. The information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on or regarding the contents of this electronically transmitted information is strictly prohibited.
[no subject]
HI-MB.w i le! [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] D4B07980AD4F! [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: [ADSM-L] Collocation question Subject: RE: [ADSM-L] Collocation question Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:33:30 -0600 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 Thread-Index: AclL2OtUeB88DCAQT0Gxau3IffSyKwACVIoA X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new on lnxsrvu at winnebagoind.com X-Copyrighted-Material: Please visit http://www.company.com/privacy.htm X-Barracuda-Connect: lnxsrvu.winnebagoind.com[69.66.77.165] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1227278040 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0035 1. -1.9983 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam Firewall at marist.edu X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=5.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.1.10780 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description -- -- We do collocation by groups, nodes, filespaces, or none depending on the storage pool. Here is our query to see if we've got any volumes that are out of spec as far as our collocation strategy is concerned. select - cast(vu.stgpool_name as char(9)) as Pool, - (select access from volumes where volume_name=vu.volume_name) as Access, - cast(vu.volume_name as char(9)) as Volume, - cast(count(distinct nd.collocgroup_name) as decimal(4,0)) as Groups, - cast(count(distinct vu.node_name) as decimal(3,0)) as Nodes, - cast(count(distinct vu.filespace_name) as decimal(5,0)) as FSpaces, - (select pct_utilized from volumes where volume_name=vu.volume_name) as Util, - (select pct_reclaim from volumes where volume_name=vu.volume_name) as Recl - from - volumeusage vu, nodes nd - where - vu.node_name=nd.node_name - group by - vu.stgpool_name, vu.volume_name - order by - Groups desc, Nodes desc, FSpaces desc In this query, we should see a 1 in the column corresponding to the collocation type for a storage pool. For example, the 2 in the groups column for tcopy2b shows me that this volume has information from 2 groups. This should be remedied for fastest recovery in a DR situation. TARCH1 is not collocated, so WG1016 is fine with 4 groups and 5 nodes. TPOOL2 is collocated by node, so the 3rd volume is fine, since it shows just 1 node on the volume. TCOPY3B has directory information on it and is collocated none, so it also is fine with 131 filespaces and 84 nodes. Pool Access Volume Groups Nodes FSpacesUtil Recl - -- - -- - --- -- -- TCOPY2BOFFSITE WG1095 2 6885.4 14.6 TARCH1 READWRITE WG1016 4 5697.1 2.8 TPOOL2 READWRITE WG1002 1 15 0.6 0.0 TCOPY3BREADWRITE WG1062 6 84 131 1.4 0.0 Bob -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Sims Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 6:58 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Collocation question -- -- On Nov 21, 2008, at 6:20 AM, Minns, Farren - Chichester wrote: Hi all Quick question. Am I right in thinking that if I have collocation set for a primary storage pool and I run out of scratch volumes that TSM will just try to put data on any other volumes with free space? The Administration Guide manual is must-reading for understanding how the product works. See How the Server Selects Volumes with Collocation Enabled therein for the rules table. Richard Sims This electronic transmission and any documents accompanying this electronic transmission contain confidential information belonging to the sender. This information may be legally privileged. The information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on or regarding the contents of this electronically transmitted information is strictly prohibited.
[no subject]
Subject: ANR1315E Vary-on failed for disk volume /opt/tivoli/tsm/server/bin/diskvol -,invalid label block. Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=060202000908080609050008 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Aug 2008 03:30:15.0256 (UTC) FILETIME=[BAC08D80:01C900E2] X-Barracuda-Connect: UNKNOWN[210.0.232.103] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1219030309 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.4510 1. 0. X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam Firewall at marist.edu X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.10 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.10 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE, RDNS_NONE X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.1.2973 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description -- -- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.10 RDNS_NONE Delivered to trusted network by a host with no rDNS This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --060202000908080609050008 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi all: I want reinstall my OS(centos4.4) and TSM(tsm 5.3.2). I do the following steps: before reinstall OS TSM: 1.backup /opt/tivoli/tsm/server/bin/dsmserv.opt devcnfg.out volhis.out dsmserv.dsk 2.backup db devclass=dbbackupfile type=full (on TSM command line) 3.record information about the dbvol and logvol 4.halt the TSM server reinstall OS(centos4.4) and TSM. after reinstall: 1.cp dsmserv.opt devcnfg.out volhis.out dsmserv.dsk to /opt/tivoli/tsm/server/bin/ 2.dsmfmt -db db1 100 3.dsmfmt -data diskvol 5000 3.dsmserv extend db db1 100 (db1 is the dbvol's name) 4.dsmserv restore db todate=today than, when I start my TSM,and : tsm: CENTOS1.DONGGUA.COMq vol Volume Name Storage Device Estimated Pct Volume Pool Name Class Name Capacity Util Status --- -- - - /opt/tivoli/tsm/server/- ARCHIVEPOOL DISK 5.0 0.1 On-Line bin/archive.dsm /opt/tivoli/tsm/server/- BACKUPPOOL DISK 10.0 0.0 On-Line bin/backup.dsm _/opt/tivoli/tsm/server/- DISKPOOL DISK 0.0 0.0 Off-Line (mark) bin/diskvol _ TSM1 NEWPOOL NEWDEVCLA- 24,006.8 100.0 Full SS TSM2 NEWPOOL NEWDEVCLA- 40,960.0 2.8 Filling SS TSM3 NEWPOOL NEWDEVCLA- 40,960.0 16.6 Filling SS TSM4 NEWPOOL NEWDEVCLA- 0.0 0.0 Empty SS why /opt/tivoli/tsm/server/bin/diskvol OFF-Line ? and when i vary online /opt/tivoli/tsm/server/bin/diskvol, i got the message ANR1315E Vary-on failed for disk volume /opt/tivoli/tsm/server/bin/diskvol - invalid label block. How to fix it? Please help me ~! DONG DONG YU --060202000908080609050008 Content-Type: text/html; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN html head /head body bgcolor=#ff text=#00 span lang=EN-USHi all:br nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; I want reinstall my OS(centos4.4) and TSM(tsm st1:chsdate year=1899 month=12 day=30 islunardate=False isrocdate=False w:st=on5.3.2/st1:chsdate). I do the following steps: br before reinstall OS amp; TSM:br nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; 1.backup /opt/tivoli/tsm/server/bin/dsmserv.opt amp; devcnfg.out amp; volhis.out amp; dsmserv.dskbr nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; 2.backup db devclass=dbbackupfile type=full (on TSM command line)br nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; 3.record information about the dbvol and logvolbr nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; 4.halt the TSM serverbr br reinstall OS(centos4.4) and TSM.br br after reinstall:br nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; 1.cp dsmserv.opt amp; devcnfg.out amp; volhis.out amp; dsmserv.dsknbsp; to /opt/tivoli/tsm/server/bin/br nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; 2.dsmfmt -db db1 100br nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; 3.dsmfmt -data diskvol 5000br nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; 3.dsmserv extend db db1 100 (db1 is the dbvol's name)br nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; 4.dsmserv restore db todate=todaybr nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; br than, when I start my TSM,and :br br tsm: CENTOS1.DONGGUA.COMgt;q volbr br Volume Namenbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; Storagenbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; Devicenbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; Estimatednbsp;nbsp;nbsp; Pctnbsp;nbsp; Volume br nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; Pool Namenbsp;nbsp;nbsp; Class Namenbsp;nbsp; Capacitynbsp;nbsp; Utilnbsp;nbsp; Status br nbsp; ---nbsp; --nbsp; -nbsp; -nbsp; br /opt/tivoli/tsm/server/-nbsp; ARCHIVEPOOLnbsp; DISKnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; 5.0nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; 0.1nbsp; On-Line br nbsp;bin/archive.dsmnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp
[no subject]
I just got this today and was wondering if the errors being reported
indicate there is more than one problem with this client. The client is
running version 5.4.1.6 on Windows 2003. The entry
SNAPSHOTCACHELocation seems odd because so far the info I have found
on it refers to Windows 2000 use only. This is the first time I have run
across any of these errors so I'm a bit confused, and I'm sure since
there is not much in the way of questions it looks that way.
06/24/2008 20:38:14 ANS1228E Sending of object
'\\domweb\e$\Lotus\Domino\data\http-logs\access-log06242008.log' failed
06/24/2008 20:38:14 ANS4047E There is a read error on
'\\domweb\e$\Lotus\Domino\data\http-logs\access-log06242008.log'. The
file is skipped.
06/24/2008 20:57:44 ANS1802E Incremental backup of '\\domweb\e$'
finished with 1 failure
06/24/2008 20:57:44 ANS1802E Incremental backup of '\\domweb\e$'
finished with 1 failure
06/24/2008 21:02:23 ANS1228E Sending of object 'f:' failed
06/24/2008 21:02:23 ANS1378E The snapshot operation failed. The
SNAPSHOTCACHELocation does not contain enough space for this snapshot
operation.
06/24/2008 21:02:53 ANS1228E Sending of object 'c:' failed
06/24/2008 21:02:53 ANS1349E The Logical Volume Snapshot Agent could not
take a snapshot of the specified volume.
06/24/2008 21:03:14 ANSE ntrc.cpp(928): Received Win32 RC 31
(0x001f) from CreateFile. Error desription: A device attached to the
system is not functioning.
06/24/2008 21:03:14 ANSE ntrc.cpp(928): Received Win32 RC 31
(0x001f) from GetBackupStreamSize(): uc_CreateFile. Error
desription: A device attached to the system is not functioning.
06/24/2008 21:03:14 PrivIncrFileSpace: Received rc=653 from
fioGetDirEntries:
\\?\tsmlvsa_Volume{84beb4c0-2a28-11da-9509-806d6172696f}
06/24/2008 21:03:14 ANS1999E Incremental processing of '\\domweb\c$'
stopped.
06/24/2008 21:03:20 ANS1375E The snapshot operation failed.
06/24/2008 21:03:21 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'CLIENT_2000_SUN-FRI'
failed. Return code = 12.
06/25/2008 20:14:47 ANS1228E Sending of object 'c:' failed
06/25/2008 20:14:47 ANS1349E The Logical Volume Snapshot Agent could not
take a snapshot of the specified volume.
06/25/2008 21:20:46 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'CLIENT_2000_SUN-FRI'
failed. Return code = 12.
06/26/2008 20:08:08 ANS1228E Sending of object 'c:' failed
06/26/2008 20:08:08 ANS1349E The Logical Volume Snapshot Agent could not
take a snapshot of the specified volume.
06/26/2008 20:08:17 ANS1999E Incremental processing of '\\domweb\c$'
stopped.
06/26/2008 20:08:17 ANS1228E Sending of object 'SYSTEM
SERVICES\EVENTLOG' failed
06/26/2008 20:08:17 ANS1375E The snapshot operation failed.
06/26/2008 20:08:24 ANS1375E The snapshot operation failed.
06/26/2008 20:08:29 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'CLIENT_2000_SUN-FRI'
failed. Return code = 12.
06/27/2008 20:13:21 ANS1228E Sending of object 'c:' failed
06/27/2008 20:13:21 ANS1349E The Logical Volume Snapshot Agent could not
take a snapshot of the specified volume.
06/27/2008 20:13:26 ANS1999E Incremental processing of '\\domweb\c$'
stopped.
06/27/2008 20:13:26 ANS1228E Sending of object 'SYSTEM
SERVICES\EVENTLOG' failed
06/27/2008 20:13:26 ANS1375E The snapshot operation failed.
06/27/2008 20:13:34 ANS1375E The snapshot operation failed.
06/27/2008 20:13:36 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'CLIENT_2000_SUN-FRI'
failed. Return code = 12.
06/29/2008 20:10:30 ANS1327W The snapshot operation for 'F:' failed with
error code: 657.
06/29/2008 20:10:30 ANS1380W The snapshot operation failed. The
filesystem write activity prevented the Logical Volume Snapshot Agent
from satisfying the SNAPSHOTFSIDLEWait and SNAPSHOTFSIDLERetries
options.
06/29/2008 20:10:30 ANS1377W The client was unable to obtain a snapshot
of '\\domweb\f$'. The operation will continue without snapshot support.
06/29/2008 20:25:58 ANS1228E Sending of object 'c:' failed
06/29/2008 20:25:58 ANS1349E The Logical Volume Snapshot Agent could not
take a snapshot of the specified volume.
06/29/2008 20:26:04 ANS1375E The snapshot operation failed.
06/29/2008 20:26:05 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'CLIENT_2000_SUN-FRI'
failed. Return code = 12.
Geoff Gill
TSM Administrator
PeopleSoft Sr. Systems Administrator
SAIC M/S-G1b
(858)826-4062
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[no subject]
query adsm-l Gallair e-bost yma gynnwys gwybodaeth gyfrinachol a/neu ddeunydd hawlfraint. Os ydych chin meddwl eich bod wedi derbyn yr e-bost yma drwy gamgymeriad rydym yn ymddiheuro am hyn; peidiwch os gwelwch yn dda â datgelu, anfon ymlaen, printio, copïo na dosbarthu gwybodaeth yn yr e-bost yma na gweithredu mewn unrhyw fodd drwy ddibynnu ar ei gynnwys: gwaherddir gwneud hynnyn gyfan gwbl a gallai fod yn anghyfreithlon. Rhowch wybod ir anfonwr fod y neges yma wedi mynd ar goll cyn ei dileu. Mae unrhyw safbwynt neu farn a gyflwynir yn eiddo ir awdur ac nid ydynt o anghenraid yn cynrychioli safbwynt neu farn Ymddiriedolaeth GIG Gogledd Orllewin Cymru. Gallai cynnwys yr e-bost yma gael ei ddatgelu Ir cyhoedd o dan Ddeddf Rhyddid Gwybodaeth 2000. Ni does modd gwarantu cyfrinachedd y neges ac unrhyw ateb Bydd y neges yma ac unrhyw ffeiliau cysylltiedig wedi cael eu gwirio gan feddalwedd canfod firws cyn eu trosglwyddo. Ond rhaid ir sawl syn derbyn wirio rhag firws ei hun cyn agor unrhyw ymgysylltiad. Nid ywr Ymddiriedolaeth yn derbyn unrhyw gyfrifoldeb am unrhyw golled neu niwed a allai gael ei achosi gan firws meddalwedd. This e-mail may contain confidential information and/or copyright material. If you believe that you have received this e-mail in error please accept our apologies; please do not disclose, forward, print, copy or distribute information in this e-mail or take any action in reliance on its contents: to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Please inform the sender that this message has gone astray before deleting it. Any views or opinions presented are to be understood as those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the North West Wales NHS Trust. The contents of this e-mail may be subject to public disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. The confidentiality of the message and any reply cannot be guaranteed. This message and any attached files will have been checked with virus detection software before transmission. However, recipients must carry out their own virus checks before opening any attachment. The Trust accepts no liability for any loss or damage, which may be caused by software viruses.
[no subject]
I will be out of the office starting 02/06/2008 and will not return until 10/06/2008. I will respond to your message when I return. Attorney General's Department of NSW - Promoting a Just and Safe Society Visit us at www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au Please consider our environment before printing this email. This email and any attachments may be confidential and contain privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or distribute this communication. If you have received this message in error please delete and notify the sender. When communicating by email you consent to the monitoring and recording of that correspondence.
[no subject]
Hi, Can I share library between 2 innstance's ? I work's with win 2003 server tsm 5.5 Thanks Hana Hana Darzi Computation Center Ben Gurion University Email - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel - 972-8-6461160 Hana Darzi Computation Center Ben Gurion University Email - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel - 972-8-6461160
[no subject]
Hello, I just wanted to tell you guys that I love you all and I am so grateful to have each of you in my life. I hope you all have a wonderful and blessed day. It was difficult for me to decide who I thought would DO this because many people claim to pray, but not everyone does. I hope I chose the right twelve. May everyone who receives this message be blessed. REMEMBER to pray. That's all you have to do. There is nothing attached. Just send this to twelve. Prayer is one of the best free gifts we receive. There is no cost but a lot of reward. Make sure you pray, and pray believing that God will answer. May today be all that you need it to be today. May the peace of God and the freshness of the Holy Spirit rest in your thoughts, rule in your dreams tonight and conquer all your fears. May God manifest himself today in ways that you have never experienced. May your joys be fulfilled, your dreams be closer and your prayers be answered. I pray that faith enters a new height for you, I pray that your territory is enlarged and I pray that you step into your destiny within the ministry. I pray for peace, health, happiness and true and undying love for God. Now, send this to 12 people within the next 5 minutes and remember to send this back...I count as 1...you'll see why. Suggestion: copy and paste rather than just forwarding it Regards, James W. Brents Jr. Valero Energy Corporation 210-345-4441
[no subject]
My apologize for getting this in the mail list I clicked on the wrong email. From: Brents, James Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 10:39 AM To: Brazell, Joe; Griffis, Rob; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; Landry, Dave; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; 'Oliver, Brian'; ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Higgins, Bobby; Noble David W Civ AETC/SGPSNoble David W Civ AETC/SGPS; Don Crook; Philip Nelson Subject: Hello, I just wanted to tell you guys that I love you all and I am so grateful to have each of you in my life. I hope you all have a wonderful and blessed day. It was difficult for me to decide who I thought would DO this because many people claim to pray, but not everyone does. I hope I chose the right twelve. May everyone who receives this message be blessed. REMEMBER to pray. That's all you have to do. There is nothing attached. Just send this to twelve. Prayer is one of the best free gifts we receive. There is no cost but a lot of reward. Make sure you pray, and pray believing that God will answer. May today be all that you need it to be today. May the peace of God and the freshness of the Holy Spirit rest in your thoughts, rule in your dreams tonight and conquer all your fears. May God manifest himself today in ways that you have never experienced. May your joys be fulfilled, your dreams be closer and your prayers be answered. I pray that faith enters a new height for you, I pray that your territory is enlarged and I pray that you step into your destiny within the ministry. I pray for peace, health, happiness and true and undying love for God. Now, send this to 12 people within the next 5 minutes and remember to send this back...I count as 1...you'll see why. Suggestion: copy and paste rather than just forwarding it
[no subject]
Hi all, I started to backup my data via encryption from an AIX system via the following extra lines in the dsm.sys file; encryptkey save encryptiontype aes128 include.encrypt/ros/BACKUP/.../*cr_servers_one_year I've checked the data in TSM and all this data is being backupped to the DEFAULT mgmtclass??? Does anyone has the same experience or is there something else I have to put in the dsm.sys file? Thanks, Oscar Kolsteren UNIX / TSM Administrator | ING Direct 410 Thames Valley Park Drive, Reading, Berkshire, RG6 1RH Tel: 0118 938 1990 l Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ingdirect.co.uk --- ATTENTION: The information in this electronic mail message is private and confidential, and only intended for the addressee. Should you receive this message by mistake, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or use of this message is strictly prohibited. Please inform the sender by reply transmission and delete the message without copying or opening it. Messages and attachments are scanned for all viruses known. If this message contains password-protected or encrypted attachments, the files have NOT been scanned for viruses by the ING mail domain. Always scan attachments before opening them. ING Direct NV is limited liability company incorporated in The Netherlands. Registered in England Wales, Branch Ref BR7357, 410 Thames Valley Park Drive, Reading, Berkshire, RG6 1RH. ---
[no subject]
Sign off
[no subject]
Hi, did you try TDPO 5.3.3 with TSM Server 5.2.9? Thanks.
[no subject]
We have ibm 3580 ibm tape autoloader with out bar code reader How to define library,drive,storage pool ,volumes Pl advice
[no subject]
Is there a way to create a list of all files that are using a particular management class? 5.3.3 windows server
[no subject]
It's in the BACKUPS table. You can do a SELECT on the backups table, but it's the slowest query you can do. The BACKUPS table is indexed by nodename, so you will generally do better running the query 1 nodename at a time. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Whitlock, Brett Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 2:34 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Is there a way to create a list of all files that are using a particular management class? 5.3.3 windows server
[no subject]
I have experienced a missed backup and reviewed the DSMSCHED.log file on the machine that missed the backup. However, after reviewing the log file, I am still puzzled. It looks like it was skipped because some other process was running in the background. Nothing has changed on the machine and no schedule changes have occurred. I have included part of the messages from the log file below. As always, any help is appreciated. Thanks, Kerry 12/19/06 13:15:22 --- SCHEDULEREC QUERY BEGIN 12/19/06 13:15:22 --- SCHEDULEREC QUERY END 12/19/06 13:15:22 Next operation scheduled: 12/19/06 13:15:22 12/19/06 13:15:22 Schedule Name: TOTAL_SYSTEM 12/19/06 13:15:22 Action:Incremental 12/19/06 13:15:22 Objects: 12/19/06 13:15:22 Options: -subdir=yes 12/19/06 13:15:22 Server Window Start: 01:00:00 on 12/20/06 12/19/06 13:15:22 12/19/06 13:15:22 Scheduler has been stopped. 12/19/06 23:13:35 Scheduler has been started by Dsmcad. 12/19/06 23:13:35 Querying server for next scheduled event. 12/19/06 23:13:35 Node Name: LPAR188 12/19/06 23:13:35 ANS2050E TSM needs to prompt for the password but cannot prompt because the process is running in the background. 12/19/06 23:13:35 ANS2050E TSM needs to prompt for the password but cannot prompt because the process is running in the background. *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE*** This message and any included attachments are from MedSynergies, Inc. and are intended only for the addressee. The contents in this message contain confidential information belonging to the sender that is legally protected. Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution, or use of such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the addressee, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the delivery error by e-mail or contact MedSynergies, Inc. at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[no subject]
Review your TSM server and see if the machine is associated with multiple schedules. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kerry Campbell Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 9:29 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: I have experienced a missed backup and reviewed the DSMSCHED.log file on the machine that missed the backup. However, after reviewing the log file, I am still puzzled. It looks like it was skipped because some other process was running in the background. Nothing has changed on the machine and no schedule changes have occurred. I have included part of the messages from the log file below. As always, any help is appreciated. Thanks, Kerry 12/19/06 13:15:22 --- SCHEDULEREC QUERY BEGIN 12/19/06 13:15:22 --- SCHEDULEREC QUERY END 12/19/06 13:15:22 Next operation scheduled: 12/19/06 13:15:22 12/19/06 13:15:22 Schedule Name: TOTAL_SYSTEM 12/19/06 13:15:22 Action:Incremental 12/19/06 13:15:22 Objects: 12/19/06 13:15:22 Options: -subdir=yes 12/19/06 13:15:22 Server Window Start: 01:00:00 on 12/20/06 12/19/06 13:15:22 12/19/06 13:15:22 Scheduler has been stopped. 12/19/06 23:13:35 Scheduler has been started by Dsmcad. 12/19/06 23:13:35 Querying server for next scheduled event. 12/19/06 23:13:35 Node Name: LPAR188 12/19/06 23:13:35 ANS2050E TSM needs to prompt for the password but cannot prompt because the process is running in the background. 12/19/06 23:13:35 ANS2050E TSM needs to prompt for the password but cannot prompt because the process is running in the background. *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE*** This message and any included attachments are from MedSynergies, Inc. and are intended only for the addressee. The contents in this message contain confidential information belonging to the sender that is legally protected. Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution, or use of such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the addressee, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the delivery error by e-mail or contact MedSynergies, Inc. at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[no subject]
Kerry - First, use a Subject line, to track posting threads. Second, refer to the Messages manual, or 'dsmc help', for the basic explanation of message meanings, which in this case tells you that it was 'dsmc sched' that itself was a background process, and because it is running in the background it can't prompt for the password it needs in order to proceed. Before you run any schedules, you need to perform a basic client- server interaction, like 'dsmc q sess', as root, to have the client password stored locally for it to be used automatically in schedules. See the manuals regarding setting up scheduled processes. Richard Sims On Dec 20, 2006, at 10:28 AM, Kerry Campbell wrote: It looks like it was skipped because some other process was running in the background. Nothing has changed on the machine and no schedule changes have occurred. I have included part of the messages from the log file below. ... 12/19/06 23:13:35 ANS2050E TSM needs to prompt for the password but cannot prompt because the process is running in the background.
[no subject]
Hi, Do a 'q vol 22 f=d' to find out if the tape have data on it. And do a 'q volhist t=dbb' to find out if the tape is a db backup tape. Check in the tape with 'checkin libv medslib 22 status=pri checkl=yes' Update your admin schedule which deletes volume history, ex 'del volhist t=dbb todate=today-7'. -7 should match your sites requirement ie -14 days or what ever. Get back to the list if you still have a problem. PS. Use subject field. //Henrik -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kerry Campbell Sent: den 18 december 2006 14:51 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: I was trying to check in a tape received from off-site storage to our library. The following command was issued: checkin libv medslib 22 status=scr checkl=yes Some of my tapes would check in just fine but other gave me the following error message: ANR8443E CHECKIN LIBVOLUME 22 IN Library MEDSLIB cannot be assigned a status of scratch ANS8001I Return Code 12 Any help is appreciated. Kerry *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE*** This message and any included attachments are from MedSynergies, Inc. and are intended only for the addressee. The contents in this message contain confidential information belonging to the sender that is legally protected. Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution, or use of such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the addressee, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the delivery error by e-mail or contact MedSynergies, Inc. at [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
[no subject]
Hi Kerry! This means that the volume is not a scratch volume, probably because it's still in TSM's volume inventory. Check the volume's current status by issuing a q vol 00022 f=d. If you are using DRM, you should use the DRM commands to return the volume. Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kerry Campbell Sent: maandag 18 december 2006 14:51 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: I was trying to check in a tape received from off-site storage to our library. The following command was issued: checkin libv medslib 22 status=scr checkl=yes Some of my tapes would check in just fine but other gave me the following error message: ANR8443E CHECKIN LIBVOLUME 22 IN Library MEDSLIB cannot be assigned a status of scratch ANS8001I Return Code 12 Any help is appreciated. Kerry *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE*** This message and any included attachments are from MedSynergies, Inc. and are intended only for the addressee. The contents in this message contain confidential information belonging to the sender that is legally protected. Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution, or use of such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the addressee, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the delivery error by e-mail or contact MedSynergies, Inc. at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 33014286 **
[no subject]
We recently upgraded pc desktops to internet explorer 7.0. This mandated update does not appear to be compatible with the TSM web based admin interface currently in use. We are at TSM 5.2.3. When the command line is opened and an admin command is entered there is no view available to show results. The current release of Java has been installed and this had no impact. Has anyone seen this??
[no subject]
Hello All, I am filling in as the TSM guy while we search for a new employee that has this and other skills.This morning I received the message below and am wondering what I would need to do from here. Thanks! Server name: TSM1, platform: AIX-RS/6000, version: 5.3.2.0, date/time: 12/12/2006 08:30:01 Issues and Recommendations -- Too many client schedules have failed. Condition (1 0) Recommendation: Ensure that a scheduler is running on each client and ensure that the scheduler's option file is pointing to the correct server. Kerry *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE*** This message and any included attachments are from MedSynergies, Inc. and are intended only for the addressee. The contents in this message contain confidential information belonging to the sender that is legally protected. Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution, or use of such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the addressee, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the delivery error by e-mail or contact MedSynergies, Inc. at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[no subject]
Hi, Read the manual? Q event * * begind=-1 endd=today begint=now endt=now ex=yes Regards, Karel -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kerry Campbell Sent: dinsdag 12 december 2006 15:39 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Hello All, I am filling in as the TSM guy while we search for a new employee that has this and other skills.This morning I received the message below and am wondering what I would need to do from here. Thanks! Server name: TSM1, platform: AIX-RS/6000, version: 5.3.2.0, date/time: 12/12/2006 08:30:01 Issues and Recommendations -- Too many client schedules have failed. Condition (1 0) Recommendation: Ensure that a scheduler is running on each client and ensure that the scheduler's option file is pointing to the correct server. Kerry *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE*** This message and any included attachments are from MedSynergies, Inc. and are intended only for the addressee. The contents in this message contain confidential information belonging to the sender that is legally protected. Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution, or use of such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the addressee, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the delivery error by e-mail or contact MedSynergies, Inc. at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ÿþD i t b e r i c h t i s v e r t r o u w e l i j k e n k a n g e h e i m e i n f o r m a t i e b e v a t t e n e n k e l b e s t e m d v o o r d e g e a d r e s s e e r d e . I n d i e n d i t b e r i c h t n i e t v o o r u i s b e s t e m d , v e r z o e k e n w i j u d i t o n m i d d e l l i j k a a n o n s t e m e l d e n e n h e t b e r i c h t t e v e r n i e t i g e n . A a n g e z i e n d e i n t e g r i t e i t v a n h e t b e r i c h t n i e t v e i l i g g e s t e l d i s m i d d e l s v e r z e n d i n g v i a i n t e r n e t , k a n A t o s O r i g i n n i e t a a n s p r a k e l i j k w o r d e n g e h o u d e n v o o r d e i n h o u d d a a r v a n . H o e w e l w i j o n s i n s p a n n e n e e n v i r u s v r i j n e t w e r k t e h a n t e r e n , g e v e n w i j g e e n e n k e l e g a r a n t i e d a t d i t b e r i c h t v i r u s v r i j i s , n o c h a a n v a a r d e n w i j e n i g e a a n s p r a k e l i j k h e i d v o o r d e m o g e l i j k e a a n w e z i g h e i d v a n e e n v i r u s i n d i t b e r i c h t . O p a l o n z e r e c h t s v e r h o u d i n g e n , a a n b i e d i n g e n e n o v e r e e n k o m s t e n w a a r o n d e r A t o s O r i g i n g o e d e r e n e n / o f d i e n s t e n l e v e r t z i j n m e t u i t s l u i t i n g v a n a l l e a n d e r e v o o r w a a r d e n d e L e v e r i n g s v o o r w a a r d e n v a n A t o s O r i g i n v a n t o e p a s s i n g . D e z e w o r d e n u o p a a n v r a a g d i r e c t k o s t e l o o s t o e g e z o n d e n . T h i s e - m a i l a n d t h e d o c u m e n t s a t t a c h e d a r e c o n f i d e n t i a l a n d i n t e n d e d s o l e l y f o r t h e a d d r e s s e e ; i t m a y a l s o b e p r i v i l e g e d . I f y o u r e c e i v e t h i s e - m a i l i n e r r o r , p l e a s e n o t i f y t h e s e n d e r i m m e d i a t e l y a n d d e s t r o y i t . A s i t s i n t e g r i t y c a n n o t b e s e c u r e d o n t h e I n t e r n e t , t h e A t o s O r i g i n g r o u p l i a b i l i t y c a n n o t b e t r i g g e r e d f o r t h e m e s s a g e c o n t e n t . A l t h o u g h t h e s e n d e r e n d e a v o u r s t o m a i n t a i n a c o m p u t e r v i r u s - f r e e n e t w o r k , t h e s e n d e r d o e s n o t w a r r a n t t h a t t h i s t r a n s m i s s i o n i s v i r u s - f r e e a n d w i l l n o t b e l i a b l e f o r a n y d a m a g e s r e s u l t i n g f r o m a n y v i r u s t r a n s m i t t e d . O n a l l o f f e r s a n d a g r e e m e n t s u n d e r w h i c h A t o s O r i g i n s u p p l i e s g o o d s a n d / o r s e r v i c e s o f w h a t e v e r n a t u r e , t h e T e r m s o f D e l i v e r y f r o m A t o s O r i g i n e x c l u s i v e l y a p p l y . T h e T e r m s o f D e l i v e r y s h a l l b e p r o m p t l y s u b m i t t e d t o y o u o n y o u r r e q u e s t
[no subject]
Hello All, I'am having problems with backups and restores for Novell Cluster Volumes with Tivoli 5.2.8.0 and Tivoli Novell client 5.3.3. The restore database shows me not the full names of the directories and files. The all are presented with an ~ How can I make this restore names with their full name? Thx, Peter Schrijvers BASF-IT-Services N.V. Peter Schrijvers BIS IN-PA Tel. +32-3/561.24.77 Fax +32-3/561.32.20 ===
[no subject]
When I do a select on the events table to get status of scheduled events into the past, the table suggests nodes missed their schedule even before they were associated with it! I need help here, as my statistics for missed backups look terrible!!! Does it assume a node was associated for ever, even though it was associated recently: EG: THE RETURN FROM THE SELECT: (Note the date) MONTHLYMTH_SUN_0300 LONS131001_MONTHLY Missed 2006-10-01 03:00:00.00 ONLY ASSOCIATED ON the 4th!! 10/04/2006 16:36:02 ANR2017I Administrator SMITHI issued command: DEFINE ASSOCIATION monthly MTH_SUN_0300 lons131001_monthly,lons131019_monthly,lons131024_monthly (SESSION: 158168) NB: When I do a q eve, it returns the following: tsm: LONTSM1q eve * * begind=-60 endd=today nodes=LONS131001_MONTHLY Scheduled Start Actual Start Schedule Name Node Name Status - - - 11/05/2006 03:00:00 11/05/2006 03:15:38 MTH_SUN_0300 LONS131001_M- Completed ONTHLY _ Ian Smith SAN/TSM Specialist _ This email (including any attachments to it) is confidential, legally privileged, subject to copyright and is sent for the personal attention of the intended recipient only. If you have received this email in error, please advise us immediately and delete it. You are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. Although we have taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, we cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the viruses in this email or attachments. We exclude any liability for the content of this email, or for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of the information provided in this email or its attachments, unless that information is subsequently confirmed in writing. If this email contains an offer, that should be considered as an invitation to treat. _
[no subject]
Hi all, I am having problems writing a TSM Script or command finding the number of empty slots in an IBM 3584 Library, I am running TSM 5.2.4 on Win2K, and any help will be appreciated. Thank You, Matt Martinez Systems Administrator IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. Phone:207-856-0656 Fax:207-856-8320 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[no subject]
Hi Matt, I run this command in a script to check free cells tsm: LIBRARY_MANAGERselect 678 - count(*) as Free cells from libvolumes Free cells --- 44 '678' is the number of cells in my library. Plug in the number of cells in a 3584. Bill Colwell Draper Lab -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martinez, Matt Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 11:23 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Hi all, I am having problems writing a TSM Script or command finding the number of empty slots in an IBM 3584 Library, I am running TSM 5.2.4 on Win2K, and any help will be appreciated. Thank You, Matt Martinez Systems Administrator IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. Phone:207-856-0656 Fax:207-856-8320 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[no subject]
Thanks for all your help. It is relatively simple. I feel like an idiot for not thinking of it myself. Thank You, Matt Martinez Systems Administrator IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. Phone:207-856-0656 Fax:207-856-8320 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Colwell, William F. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 11:38 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Hi Matt, I run this command in a script to check free cells tsm: LIBRARY_MANAGERselect 678 - count(*) as Free cells from libvolumes Free cells --- 44 '678' is the number of cells in my library. Plug in the number of cells in a 3584. Bill Colwell Draper Lab -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martinez, Matt Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 11:23 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Hi all, I am having problems writing a TSM Script or command finding the number of empty slots in an IBM 3584 Library, I am running TSM 5.2.4 on Win2K, and any help will be appreciated. Thank You, Matt Martinez Systems Administrator IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. Phone:207-856-0656 Fax:207-856-8320 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[no subject]
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006 11:49:19 -0600, Whitlock, Brett [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I looked at the adsm archive before I wrote. The domain does not exist on the new server so it places the node in to the STANDARD domain. I also set up some pools for this domain to use. Does it have to go into the same domain? Most precisely, no. But it's going to be subjected to the retention characteristics of the domain to which you inserted it. In most cases, folks duplicate the administrative domain on the target server first, so that the target environment is the same as the source. - Allen S. Rout
[no subject]
I'm trying to do an export/import of the archive data on a client. I am using server to server volumes. The source is a TSM 5.1.5 server on z/os. The target is 5.3 Windows. The export completes successfully...1 file space and 15 archive files 10/31/2006 15:26:53 ANR0617I EXPORT NODE: Processing completed with status SUCCESS. 10/31/2006 15:26:53 ANR0626I EXPORT NODE: Copied 1 node definitions. 10/31/2006 15:26:53 ANR0627I EXPORT NODE: Copied 1 file spaces 15 archive files, 0 backup files, and 0 space managed files. 10/31/2006 15:26:53 ANR0629I EXPORT NODE: Copied 332160 bytes of data. 10/31/2006 15:26:53 ANR4006I EXPORT NODE: Volume 1 written by process is C2BAK002_SERVER1.EXP.162329953. 10/31/2006 15:26:53 ANR0986I Process 86 for EXPORT NODE running in the BACKGROUND processed 17 items for a total of 332,160 bytes with a completion state of SUCCESS at 15:26:53. The import completes successfully or so it says. However, all I get is the node definition. It says 0 file spaces and 0 archive files?? It clearly found the input volume from the export because it got the client name. Why no filespace or files? I've tried filedata=archive and filedata=all? Can someone point me in the right direction?? 10/31/2006 15:59:07 ANR0620I IMPORT NODE: Copied 0 domain(s).(SESSION: 770, PROCESS: 9) 10/31/2006 15:59:07 ANR0621I IMPORT NODE: Copied 0 policy sets.(SESSION: 770, PROCESS: 9) 10/31/2006 15:59:07 ANR0622I IMPORT NODE: Copied 0 management classes.(SESSIO- N: 770, PROCESS: 9) 10/31/2006 15:59:07 ANR0623I IMPORT NODE: Copied 0 copy groups.(SESSION: 770, PROCESS: 9) 10/31/2006 15:59:07 ANR0624I IMPORT NODE: Copied 0 schedules.(SESSION: 770, PROCESS: 9) 10/31/2006 15:59:07 ANR0625I IMPORT NODE: Copied 0 administrators.(SESSION: 770, PROCESS: 9) 10/31/2006 15:59:07 ANR0891I IMPORT NODE: Copied 0 optionset definitions.(SES- SION: 770, PROCESS: 9) 10/31/2006 15:59:07 ANR0626I IMPORT NODE: Copied 1 node definitions.(SESSION: 770, PROCESS: 9) 10/31/2006 15:59:07 ANR0627I IMPORT NODE: Copied 0 file spaces 0 archive files, 0 backup files, and 0 space managed files.(SESSIO- N: 770, PROCESS: 9) 10/31/2006 15:59:07 ANR0628I IMPORT NODE: Used 0 volume(s).(SESSION: 770, PROCESS: 9) 10/31/2006 15:59:07 ANR0629I IMPORT NODE: Copied 158 bytes of data.(SESSION: 770, PROCESS: 9) 10/31/2006 15:59:07 ANR1364I Input volume C2BAK002_SERVER1.EXP.162329953 closed.(SESSION: 770, PROCESS: 9) 10/31/2006 15:59:07 ANR0515I Process 9 closed volume C2BAK002_SERVER1.EXP.162- 329953.(SESSION: 770, PROCESS: 9) 10/31/2006 15:59:07 ANR0986I Process 9 for IMPORT NODE running in the BACKGROUND processed 1 items for a total of 158 bytes with a completion state of SUCCESS at 15:59:07.(SESSION: 770, PROCESS: 9)
[no subject]
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006 10:58:48 -0600, Whitlock, Brett [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I'm trying to do an export/import of the archive data on a client. I am using server to server volumes. The source is a TSM 5.1.5 server on z/os. The target is 5.3 Windows. The export completes successfully...1 file space and 15 archive files Does the policy domain exist on the target server, with the configuration behavior you want? You haven't even shown the command you ran. Awfully hard to help you. - Allen S. Rout
[no subject]
We have an IBM X346 with a server raid card. We backup server to TSM and then restore. Did not work. ASR is not working. TSM server v5.2.7.3 TSM client is V5.3.4.6 Server OS is MS 2003 R2 Enterprise addition
[no subject]
Will someone verify my thinking? Here's the scenario...A primary pool tape was damaged. After performing a restore volume from the copy pool I got a message saying: ANR1256W Volume volume name contains files that could not be restored. Will TSM back these files up during the next incremental? Brett Whitlock Storage Management Group COUNTRY(r) Insurance and Financial Services (309)821-4162 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[no subject]
You might also try running an Audit Volume before the restore volume command. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark Stapleton Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 8:41 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Whitlock, Brett Here's the scenario...A primary pool tape was damaged. After performing a restore volume from the copy pool I got a message saying: ANR1256W Volume volume name contains files that could not be restored. Will TSM back these files up during the next incremental? No. What that means is that there were files on the (damaged) primary tape volume that cannot be accessed using the copy pool volumes supplied for the restore. One of two things happened here. 1. Either you didn't bring back all the copy pool volumes needed to do a full restore of the damaged primary pool volume, or 2. there are files on the primary pool volume that never got copied to the copy pool (or were deleted from the copy pool later). The first scenario can be tested by running RESTORE VOL badvolserial PREVIEW=YES If that comes back with additional copy pool volumes, you can perform further restores. If it doesn't, the second option above is true, and you've restored as much as you can. -- Mark Stapleton Senior TSM Engineer Evoloving Solutions, Minneapolis
[no subject]
Hello, Just thought I would chime in I have a situation similar to this also. I tried to do an Restore Volume on the tape and It ended with success but No files were restored from the rmpool and it was marked as access Destroyed, as it should. I then change the status back to readwrite. There was a message that the volume contains files that could not be restored ok I knew that. I also tried a move process on the tape and it ended with a failure. Process 91 for RESTORE VOLUME running in the BACKGROUND completed with completion state SUCCESS ANR1240I Restore of volumes in primary storage pool LT1POOL has ended. Files Restored: 0, Bytes Restored: 0, Unreadable Files: 0, Unreadable Bytes: 0 ANR1256W Volume 100113 contains files that could not be Restored. ANR2017I Administrator issued command: MOVE DATA 100113 STGPOOL=LT1POOL WAIT=NO RECONSTRUCT=YES ANR1157I Removable volume 100113 is required for move Process. ANR0984I Process 189 for MOVE DATA started in the BACKGROUND ANR1140I Move data process started for volume 100113 ANR1161W The move process is skipping a damaged file on Volume 100113: ANR1141I Move data process ended for volume 100113. ANR0985I Process 189 for MOVE DATA running in the BACKGROUND completed with completion state FAILURE. Mark Stapleton wrote: From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Whitlock, Brett Here's the scenario...A primary pool tape was damaged. After performing a restore volume from the copy pool I got a message saying: ANR1256W Volume volume name contains files that could not be restored. Will TSM back these files up during the next incremental? No. What that means is that there were files on the (damaged) primary tape volume that cannot be accessed using the copy pool volumes supplied for the restore. One of two things happened here. 1. Either you didn't bring back all the copy pool volumes needed to do a full restore of the damaged primary pool volume, or 2. there are files on the primary pool volume that never got copied to the copy pool (or were deleted from the copy pool later). The first scenario can be tested by running RESTORE VOL badvolserial PREVIEW=YES If that comes back with additional copy pool volumes, you can perform further restores. If it doesn't, the second option above is true, and you've restored as much as you can. -- Mark Stapleton Senior TSM Engineer Evoloving Solutions, Minneapolis
[no subject]
windows server admin is trying to configure his client to backup only a specific directory on his c: disk. Server = AIX 5.2.7 on AIX 5.3.4 Client = Version 5.3.3 on Windows 2003 He is using the following dsm.opt file. PASSWORDACCESS GENERATE DOMAIN SYSTEMSERVICES DOMAIN SYSTEMSTATE include c:\program files\research in motion\...\* TCPSERVERADDRESS 10.7.100.109 MANAGEDSERVICES WEBCLIENT COMPRESSIONYES DFSBACKUPMNTPNT NO This is the syntax in the TSM implementation course book for the include and this is what support says should work but NO WORKY!! When the backup occurs, it pretends not to see this include entry at all. We have tried several permutations of the syntax and they all seem to be ignored. This client is a part of a schedule that contains other clients so we cannot use the objects field on the server definition of the schedule. We are restarting the client after each attempted correction and rerunning the schedule through the server not manually. We also tried to run it manually and the same thing occurred but I think that is the supposed behavior when doing a manual. Any assistance will be appreciated!! Thank You Very Much!! Nicholas This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
[no subject]
On Thursday 12 October 2006 19:15, RODOLFICH, NICHOLAS wrote: windows server admin is trying to configure his client to backup only a specific directory on his c: disk. Server = AIX 5.2.7 on AIX 5.3.4 Client = Version 5.3.3 on Windows 2003 He is using the following dsm.opt file. Try this: PASSWORDACCESS GENERATE DOMAIN ALL-LOCAL include c:\program files\research in motion\...\* exclude \...\* Stef
[no subject]
Hello All, We are using a 3583(LTO1) that is not very reliable. We also have a 3584(LTO1) that was freed up from elsewhere in the company and I will be replacing the 3583 with the 3584. TSM version 5.3.0 on AIX 5.3.4 What is the safest way to transition the data from the 3583 to the 3584. Both libraries will be online at one pint and I am trying to devise a way to do this with TSM safely! Any assistance will be appreciated!! Nicholas This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
[no subject]
REVIEW ADSM-L This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
[no subject]
Hello, I was just wondering if anyone knows of a place where I can find the latest default include/exclude list for various platforms, specially for windows nodes. Help would be greatly appreciated. Kamran H. Rao Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
[no subject]
Does anyone have experience with backing up MUMPS style databases? In particular, I am interested in optimizing backups on InterSystems Cache. Orville L. Lantto Glasshouse Technologies, Inc.
[no subject]
This is a test reply, delete it please
[no subject]
Hello TSMers, I've been getting messages like the following on several drives and for several cartridges: 06/28/06 10:16:58 ANR8948S Device /dev/rmt/16m, volume 205975 has issued the following Critical TapeAlert: The tape just unloaded could not write its system area successfully: 1. Copy data to another tape cartridge. 2. Discard the old cartridge. (SESSION: 4514) 06/28/06 10:16:58 ANR8948S Device /dev/rmt/16m, volume 205975 has issued the following Critical TapeAlert: The operation has failed because the media cannot be loaded and threaded. 1. Remove the cartridge, inspect it as specified in the product manual, and retry the operation. 2. If the problem persists, call the tape drive supplier help line. (SESSION: 4514) We have been having more and more drive and tape problems over the last six months or so, after a couple years of solid performance. I'm trying to figure out the root cause or causes. I suspected drives, because I also saw write errors on specific drives... we swapped them out, and it seemed better for a while... now I don't see the write errors, but I see the messages above. Some clues... these seem to be occurring only on recently purchased, new tapes. We did change vendors about a year ago to get better pricing. I have to collect some stats on how many tapes have problems, but my guess is only a dozen or so among the 4000 tapes we purchased over the past year from this vendor. The only other thing I can think of is changing the library to autolabel. Oh, and we upgraded from TSM 5.2 to 5.3 in April '06. Is this a tape problem (bad batch or low quality), or a drive or library problem? My environment: TSM 5.3.2.0 on HP-UX 11i. Big server (HP rp7410, 8 CPU, 12GB RAM, HP XP512 RAID5 disk) Five TSM servers on this box -- one library manager, four data handlers. The errors above are in the library manager's activity log. STK L700 library w/ six DLT7000 (not being used) and 14 IBM LTO2. 618 slots, library is usually full. We have about 3000 tapes onsite. Library is doing tape cleaning, one universal cleaning tape in the library. Sometimes I see Tapealerts saying the cleaning tape is not data grade... was TSM trying to write to it? Should we let TSM do the cleaning instead? TIA Robin Sharpe Berlex Labs
[no subject]
SET ADSM-L CONCEAL
[no subject]
Hi, One of our clients has is in the process of putting in a system that includes TSM 5.3 running on W2K3. Before this my background has been predominantly Netbackup/backup exec. Can you guys recommend reading material / FAQs for a newbie to get up and running asap. Trying to get to grips with retentions and thing, for example how do I work out when offsite tapes will expire, the consultancy firm have recommended an initial 30 LTO-3 tapes, but the copypools send 3 (1 per pool) off a day, so how do I work out how many tapes I'll be using? TIA Gary This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
[no subject]
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tivihelp/v1r1/index.jsp?topic=/ com.ibm.itsmc.doc/ans6541.htm And, don't forget the ITSM database back-up tape(s) send of site (minimum 1 per day). Regards, Karel -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthews, Gary Sent: donderdag 18 mei 2006 11:22 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Hi, One of our clients has is in the process of putting in a system that includes TSM 5.3 running on W2K3. Before this my background has been predominantly Netbackup/backup exec. Can you guys recommend reading material / FAQs for a newbie to get up and running asap. Trying to get to grips with retentions and thing, for example how do I work out when offsite tapes will expire, the consultancy firm have recommended an initial 30 LTO-3 tapes, but the copypools send 3 (1 per pool) off a day, so how do I work out how many tapes I'll be using? TIA Gary This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you. Dit bericht is vertrouwelijk en kan geheime informatie bevatten enkel bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien dit bericht niet voor u is bestemd, verzoeken wij u dit onmiddellijk aan ons te melden en het bericht te vernietigen. Aangezien de integriteit van het bericht niet veilig gesteld is middels verzending via internet, kan Atos Origin niet aansprakelijk worden gehouden voor de inhoud daarvan. Hoewel wij ons inspannen een virusvrij netwerk te hanteren, geven wij geen enkele garantie dat dit bericht virusvrij is, noch aanvaarden wij enige aansprakelijkheid voor de mogelijke aanwezigheid van een virus in dit bericht. Op al onze rechtsverhoudingen, aanbiedingen en overeenkomsten waaronder Atos Origin goederen en/of diensten levert zijn met uitsluiting van alle andere voorwaarden de Leveringsvoorwaarden van Atos Origin van toepassing. Deze worden u op aanvraag direct kosteloos toegezonden. This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos Origin group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. On all offers and agreements under which Atos Origin supplies goods and/or services of whatever nature, the Terms of Delivery from Atos Origin exclusively apply. The Terms of Delivery shall be promptly submitted to you on your request.
[no subject]
Hi to all I tried to run a LanFreeBackup on a Windows client version 5.3.2.0 On the Tsm server side: 1. Define server with lla=1502 (EXCHANGE_SA TCPIP 132.74.1.78 1502 1 Yes No No) 2. Define path (EXCHANGE_SA SERVER I2000DRV1 DRIVE Yes ) On the client side: 1. Add on the dsm.opt: enablelanfreeyes lanfreecommmethod tcpip lanfreetcpserveraddress 132.74.1.48 lanfreetcpport 1502 2. On the dsmsta.opt: COMMmethod TCPIP TCPPort 1502 DEVCONFIG devconfig_sa.txt SANDISCOVERY ON SERVERNAME ADSM 3. I run the wizard to create the devconfig_sa.txt Here the syntax: SET STANAME EXCHANGE_SA SET STAPASSWORD 21f11864ecc5337c2f08045b1b36e31f50 SET STAHLADDRESS 132.74.1.78 DEFINE SERVER ADSM HLADDRESS=132.74.1.48 LLADDRESS=1500 SERVERPA=216893d5d8fde6508e93e186f0498c787f I check the connection on the Tsm server by running: validate lanfree exchsrv01_dbexchange_sa Here the output: tsm: ADSMrun val_sa exchsrv01_db exchange_sa ANR0387I Evaluating node EXCHSRV01_DB using storage agent EXCHANGE_SA for LAN-free data movement. Node Name Storage Agent Operation Mgmt Class Destination LAN-Free Explanation capable? - - -- - - EXCHSERV01_DB EXCHANGE_SABACKUP MGWEXCHANGEF I-WINDOWS Yes ANR1706I Ping for server 'EXCHANGE_SA' was able to establish a connection. ANR0388I Node EXCHSRV01_DB using storage agent EXCHANGE_SA has 1 storage pools capable of LAN-free data movement . ANR1462I RUN: Command script VAL_SA completed successfully. I ping from the client the Tsm server too without any problem: Pinging 132.74.1.48 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 132.74.1.48: bytes=32 time1ms TTL=255 Reply from 132.74.1.48: bytes=32 time1ms TTL=255 Reply from 132.74.1.48: bytes=32 time1ms TTL=255 Reply from 132.74.1.48: bytes=32 time1ms TTL=255 Ping statistics for 132.74.1.48: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms But when to try a backup (lanFreeBackup) got this error: 03/15/2006 19:42:48 ANS5216E Could not establish a TCP/IP connection with address '132.74.1.48:1502'. The TCP/IP error is 'Unknown error' (errno = 10061). 03/15/2006 19:42:48 Error -50 opening session 03/15/2006 19:42:48 cuSignOnResp: Error -72 reading SignOn response from server. 03/15/2006 19:42:48 sessOpen: Error -72 receiving IdentifyResp verb from server 03/15/2006 19:42:48 ANS9201W LAN-free path failed. 03/15/2006 19:42:52 ANS9201W LAN-free path failed. My Tsm server version is 5.3.2.4 on Aix Any idea how to resolve this problem Regards Ouzen Robert Haifa University
[no subject]
Dear colleagues, It's time for us to split our TSM into several new instances because our database is now just too large -- 509GB -- and still growing. My initial plan is to create five TSMs - four plus a library manager - on the existing server (an 8-way, 12GB HP rp7410 with 15 PCI slots). This is cost effective since no additional hardware or license is needed - just lots of SAN disk for the databases, which we have available. But, I've been thinking what do you think about the following: A more creative approach is to place the new TSM servers on existing large clients. This has several advantages: - eliminates need to acquire new servers, saving physical room, power and cooling requirements, additional maintenance. - client benefits by sending its backup to local disk using shared memory protocol. Eliminates potential network bottleneck. - Client sends data to tapes using library sharing; no need for storage agent. - Use of local disk eliminates the need for SANergy - heavy clients pay for their usage by providing backup services for smaller clients. There are also some concerns (not necessarily disadvantages): - May require CPU, memory, and/or I/O upgrades (still cheaper than buying a server) - TSM operation may impact client's primary app. Can be controlled by PRM on HP-UX. - Incurs licensing cost. Thanks for any insights Robin Sharpe Berlex Labs
[no subject]
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 12:03:04 -0500, Robin Sharpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: [...] I've got 12 servers on 2 boxes at the moment, 6 of which are more or less application-specific. The more TSM server instances, the more complexity, and the more you must depend on automation and automatic validation and monitoring. Because of this, I would recommend against calving off a TSM server only because there is a powerful box running app X. I split one app off to its' own TSM server because of database overhead: WebCT 'Campus Edition' which has some unsavory habits with its' filesystem, and caused lockups. I split one app off because it was excessively sensitive to outages: Content Manager. I split off my Cyrus back ends because each single node of them had big databases (though they're teeny compared to yours). So, if you have application Q which you would tend to split off even if the split instance were to stay on your main TSM server, then I'd consider that a candidate for motion to the other box. --- Another thing to consider is that this opens up application Q to the union of the upgrade / outage / maintenance issues of Q and TSM. This might be a non-issue, but could possibly be a big deal. (What, we need new tape drivers, to match the microcode applied yesterday morning on the drives? Well, you can schedule a production outage for next tuesday...) --- Once you're over the automation/planning/monitoring hump for multiple servers, and the additional hump associated with servers on multiple hosts, you'll find that lots of concepts become much easier: DR for the TSM infrastructure gets more straightforward because there's much less implicit state, you've made much more of it explicit. This is a lot of work, but gives good value. - Allen S. Rout
[no subject]
Folks is anyone out there using TSM (ndmp for net apps) we seem to have struck a bug/limitation with netbackup and are looking at moving to TSM.need to be confident that it will not bug out at less than 3 TB Allan Mills | AIX and TSM Administrator Business Technology Services | New South Wales Police 8835 9286 (internal 29286) This message and any attachment is confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received it by mistake, please let us know by reply and then delete it from your system; you should not copy the message or disclose its contents to anyone.
[no subject]
Hi, Have used it. But, what are the limitations and bugs you speak off? Regards, Karel -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Allan Mills Sent: woensdag 8 maart 2006 5:21 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Folks is anyone out there using TSM (ndmp for net apps) we seem to have struck a bug/limitation with netbackup and are looking at moving to TSM.need to be confident that it will not bug out at less than 3 TB Allan Mills | AIX and TSM Administrator Business Technology Services | New South Wales Police 8835 9286 (internal 29286) This message and any attachment is confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received it by mistake, please let us know by reply and then delete it from your system; you should not copy the message or disclose its contents to anyone. Dit bericht is vertrouwelijk en kan geheime informatie bevatten enkel bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien dit bericht niet voor u is bestemd, verzoeken wij u dit onmiddellijk aan ons te melden en het bericht te vernietigen. Aangezien de integriteit van het bericht niet veilig gesteld is middels verzending via internet, kan Atos Origin niet aansprakelijk worden gehouden voor de inhoud daarvan. Hoewel wij ons inspannen een virusvrij netwerk te hanteren, geven wij geen enkele garantie dat dit bericht virusvrij is, noch aanvaarden wij enige aansprakelijkheid voor de mogelijke aanwezigheid van een virus in dit bericht. Op al onze rechtsverhoudingen, aanbiedingen en overeenkomsten waaronder Atos Origin goederen en/of diensten levert zijn met uitsluiting van alle andere voorwaarden de Leveringsvoorwaarden van Atos Origin van toepassing. Deze worden u op aanvraag direct kosteloos toegezonden. This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos Origin group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. On all offers and agreements under which Atos Origin supplies goods and/or services of whatever nature, the Terms of Delivery from Atos Origin exclusively apply. The Terms of Delivery shall be promptly submitted to you on your request.
[no subject]
On Feb 27, 2006, at 4:03 PM, Whitlock, Brett wrote: Can someone share or point me towards the excruciating detail of what goes on during a restore? That's what Client Tracing does. The TSM Problem Determination Guide provides details on tracing. Richard Sims
[no subject]
Hey all, Windows Server 5.2.4 and client 5.2.4 We are looking at a restore of a common folder. 90,000 objects to restore. The restore took 2 hours. My client guy was closely watching the restore. He says 99% of the files restore quickly. Then the DB drives work really hard for an hour and finally after a very long wait, the last bit finishes. Anyone seen this? Can someone share or point me towards the excruciating detail of what goes on during a restore? Is this the no query restore vs. classic restore issue or is that only confined to unix/aix/solaris? Thanks in advance Brett
[no subject]
Hi all, Wondering why the volume status is filling when the pct utilization is 100%? A00629LTOEUSAPDB LTODRCLASS0.00.0 Empty _DR A00631LTOEUSAPDB LTODRCLASS0.00.0 Empty _DR A00632LTOEUSAPDB LTODRCLASS0.00.0 Empty _DR A00634LTORTPOOLLTOCLASS660,562.1 100.0 Filling A00635LTORTPOOLLTOCLASS381,468.0 26.9 Filling A00636LTORTPOOLLTOCLASS616,647.7 85.9 Full A00637LTOUNIXFIL LTOCLASS381,468.02.9 Filling ES A00638LTORTPOOLLTOCLASS604,211.7 67.6 Full A00639LTORTPOOLLTOCLASS381,468.0 38.2 Filling Thanks and Warmest Regards, ___ DKSH Market Intelligence Liew Callie DKSH Corporate Shared Services Center Sdn Bhd Lot L4-E-3A, Enterprise 4, Technology Park Malaysia, 57000 Kuala Lumpur. Phone: +603 8992 2855 Fax: +603 8992 2999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.dksh.com
[no subject]
x
[no subject]
Set dig
[no subject]
I dig... Do you dig? ;-) You sent the message to the wrong e-mail address... But I still dig... -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Deschenes, Ellen Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 11:26 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Set dig
[no subject]
LISTSERV
[no subject]
Tim, Thanks for the feedback. We also have two other Netware servers which complete their backups within the backup window. The three are identical except for the Volume/Data sizes. The offending server is considerably larger than the other two in terms of data volume. Like you these other two were recieving the Terminating Session errors until we changed the COMMtimeout value. But we're still experienceing slow backups on the offending server. The client seem's to spend 95% of it's time scaning the FS. I didn't think scaning the FS would be affected by network performance, except for the initial interrogation of the TSM Server DB for the client specific FS info??? Does anyone know how the FS scaning component works for a client? Regards Cameron Timothy Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] IT.STATE.NJ.USTo Sent by: ADSM: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Dist Stor cc Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject .EDU 07/10/2005 10:58 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] .EDU Cameron, I am experiencing extreme slowness for a Tivoli backup on a Netware 6.5 SP2 server. TSM Client 5.2.2 TSM Server 5.3.1.4 We tried Swapping Tivoli patch cables and it did not make a difference. Also tuning options in the dsm.opt file has not made a difference. We are getting the following message also ANR0482W Session 77993 for node DOCUSRS (NetWare) terminated - idle for more than 180 minutes. (SESSION:77993) But there are backups that gets the above message also and they all finish at a normal time. Also we have 5 other Novell Clients with the same dsm.opt and client version and they complete at successfully at a normal time. it is just this one backup that is extremely slow. Cameron Ambrose wrote: Hello, We're currently experiencing backup failures/extreme slowness on a Netware 6.5 SP2 server TSM Client 5.3.0 TSM Server 5.2.0 TSA's up to date as recommended by Client Doco Client Logs 10/05/2005 14:43:19 ANS1809W Session is lost; initializing session reopen procedure. 10/05/2005 14:43:19 ANS1809W Session is lost; initializing session reopen procedure. 10/05/2005 14:44:15 sessRecvVerb: Error -50 from call to 'readRtn'. 10/05/2005 14:44:15 ANS1999E Incremental processing of 'SYS:' stopped. 10/05/2005 14:48:24 ANS1999E Incremental processing of 'INF:' stopped. 10/05/2005 14:48:25 ANS1017E Session rejected: TCP/IP connection failure Server Logs 10/05/05 14:39:53 ANR0481W Session 2177 for node SERVERNAME (NetWare) terminated - client did not respond within 180 seconds. 10/05/05 14:41:10 ANR0406I Session 2178 started for node SERVERNAME (NetWare) (Tcp/Ip xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx(19578)). Currently we have had a backup running for 24 hours and all that has been transfered is 4.19 gig and 255,000 files scanned. Has anyone else experienced similar issue's Any help on this would be appreciated Regards Cameron
[no subject]
Hello, We're currently experiencing backup failures/extreme slowness on a Netware 6.5 SP2 server TSM Client 5.3.0 TSM Server 5.2.0 TSA's up to date as recommended by Client Doco Client Logs 10/05/2005 14:43:19 ANS1809W Session is lost; initializing session reopen procedure. 10/05/2005 14:43:19 ANS1809W Session is lost; initializing session reopen procedure. 10/05/2005 14:44:15 sessRecvVerb: Error -50 from call to 'readRtn'. 10/05/2005 14:44:15 ANS1999E Incremental processing of 'SYS:' stopped. 10/05/2005 14:48:24 ANS1999E Incremental processing of 'INF:' stopped. 10/05/2005 14:48:25 ANS1017E Session rejected: TCP/IP connection failure Server Logs 10/05/05 14:39:53 ANR0481W Session 2177 for node SERVERNAME (NetWare) terminated - client did not respond within 180 seconds. 10/05/05 14:41:10 ANR0406I Session 2178 started for node SERVERNAME (NetWare) (Tcp/Ip xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx(19578)). Currently we have had a backup running for 24 hours and all that has been transfered is 4.19 gig and 255,000 files scanned. Has anyone else experienced similar issue's Any help on this would be appreciated Regards Cameron
[no subject]
Cameron, I am experiencing extreme slowness for a Tivoli backup on a Netware 6.5 SP2 server. TSM Client 5.2.2 TSM Server 5.3.1.4 We tried Swapping Tivoli patch cables and it did not make a difference. Also tuning options in the dsm.opt file has not made a difference. We are getting the following message also ANR0482W Session 77993 for node DOCUSRS (NetWare) terminated - idle for more than 180 minutes. (SESSION:77993) But there are backups that gets the above message also and they all finish at a normal time. Also we have 5 other Novell Clients with the same dsm.opt and client version and they complete at successfully at a normal time. it is just this one backup that is extremely slow. Cameron Ambrose wrote: Hello, We're currently experiencing backup failures/extreme slowness on a Netware 6.5 SP2 server TSM Client 5.3.0 TSM Server 5.2.0 TSA's up to date as recommended by Client Doco Client Logs 10/05/2005 14:43:19 ANS1809W Session is lost; initializing session reopen procedure. 10/05/2005 14:43:19 ANS1809W Session is lost; initializing session reopen procedure. 10/05/2005 14:44:15 sessRecvVerb: Error -50 from call to 'readRtn'. 10/05/2005 14:44:15 ANS1999E Incremental processing of 'SYS:' stopped. 10/05/2005 14:48:24 ANS1999E Incremental processing of 'INF:' stopped. 10/05/2005 14:48:25 ANS1017E Session rejected: TCP/IP connection failure Server Logs 10/05/05 14:39:53 ANR0481W Session 2177 for node SERVERNAME (NetWare) terminated - client did not respond within 180 seconds. 10/05/05 14:41:10 ANR0406I Session 2178 started for node SERVERNAME (NetWare) (Tcp/Ip xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx(19578)). Currently we have had a backup running for 24 hours and all that has been transfered is 4.19 gig and 255,000 files scanned. Has anyone else experienced similar issue's Any help on this would be appreciated Regards Cameron
[no subject]
unsubcribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar get it now! http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
[no subject]
I'm trying to install tsm 5.3 netware client from cd Working from the netware server. I selected the product options then install a product not listed During the install process I get the error message..product database failed error 2 (nwconfig -6-354) I know the data is on the cd tsmnw530c_netware.exe can't get a successful install. Any suggestion how I can install tsm 5.3 on my netware client Gary
[no subject]
Hi SMers, Perhaps I'm being a little silly, but I cannot understand these filespaces and platforms results. tsm: TSML003Aq fi not* Node Name Filespace FSIDPlatformFilespace Name Type ------- NOTL001M COMail1.DO- 1TDP Dom-API:Domi- MDBS ino noData NOTL001M COMail1.DO- 2TDP Dom-API:Domi- MLOGS ino noData NOTL001M_INFRA \\notl001m- 1WinNT NTFS \c$ NOTL001M_MONTH-COMail1.DO- 1WinNT API:Domi- LY MDBS noData NOTL002M COMail2.DO- 1TDP Dom-API:Domi- MDBS ino noData NOTL002M COMail2.DO- 2TDP Dom-API:Domi- MLOGS ino noData NOTL002M_INFRA \\notl002m- 1WinNT NTFS I can appreciate that the API filespaces are sent data by the TDP platform, but the one server NOTL001M_MONTHLY seems to have a platform of WinNT and I cannot for the life of me figure out why. Can anyone shed any light on this? perhaps I'm just looking through the wrong lens. Thanks, Regards, Matthew Aviva plc Registered Office: St. Helen's, 1 Undershaft, London EC3P 3DQ Registered in England Number 02468686 www.aviva.com This message and any attachments are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please telephone or e-mail the sender and delete this message and any attachment from your system. Also, if you are not the intended recipient you must not copy this message or attachment or disclose the contents to any other person.
[no subject]
Matthew, The Platform is set to whatever client-type connected last using that NODENAME. In this case, it was probably the BA client scheduler, this WinNT. Thanks, Del ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 08/18/2005 11:05:25 AM: Hi SMers, Perhaps I'm being a little silly, but I cannot understand these filespaces and platforms results. tsm: TSML003Aq fi not* Node Name Filespace FSIDPlatformFilespace Name Type ------- NOTL001M COMail1.DO- 1TDP Dom-API:Domi- MDBS ino noData NOTL001M COMail1.DO- 2TDP Dom-API:Domi- MLOGS ino noData NOTL001M_INFRA \\notl001m- 1WinNT NTFS \c$ NOTL001M_MONTH-COMail1.DO- 1WinNT API:Domi- LY MDBS noData NOTL002M COMail2.DO- 1TDP Dom-API:Domi- MDBS ino noData NOTL002M COMail2.DO- 2TDP Dom-API:Domi- MLOGS ino noData NOTL002M_INFRA \\notl002m- 1WinNT NTFS I can appreciate that the API filespaces are sent data by the TDP platform, but the one server NOTL001M_MONTHLY seems to have a platform of WinNT and I cannot for the life of me figure out why. Can anyone shed any light on this? perhaps I'm just looking through the wrong lens.
[no subject]
Is anyone using ERRM with TSM at their locations? If so, and you would be interested in sharing the process of what you have done, please contact me. Thanks, Brenda Collins, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph: 612-342-3839
[no subject]
Hi, I have an interesting TDP for SQL problem. Similar issues have been addressed many times on the forum, but this is a bit different, i think. I have: Windows server running multiple (x2) SQL server instances SQL server called SERVERX One instance called INSTANCE1 and the other called INSTANCE2 TDP TSM 5.2.2 server on Z/os 1.5 My configuration: I have defined two TDP nodes, i.e. TDPNODE1 and TDPNODE2 Two DSM.OPT files (TDPNODE1.opt and TDPNODE2.opt) with appropraite node names Command files (one for log, one for incremental and one for full backups). This is the contents of the LOG command file: @ECHO OFF set sql_dir=C:\Tsm\TDPSql cd /d %sql_dir% echo Current date is: C:\TSM\tdpsql\logs\sqlbkup.log date /t NUL C:\TSM\tdpsql\logs\sqlbkup.log echo Current time is: C:\TSM\tdpsql\logs\sqlbkup.log time /t NUL C:\TSM\tdpsql\logs\sqlbkup.log start /b /wait tdpsqlc backup * log /tsmoptfile=c:\tsm\tdpsql\tdpnode1.opt /logfile=c:\tsm\tdpsql\logs\sqlbkup.log start /b tdpsqlc backup * log /tsmoptfile=c:\tsm\tdpsql\tdpnode2.opt /logfile=c:\tsm\tdpsql\logs\sqlbkup.log /sqlserver=serverx\instance2 Scheduled service TSM schedule with OBJECTS field using a command file on the windows server I backup logs, daily incr and full weekly This configuration works just fine. I get two filespaces for each nodename (meta and data for each). Node name is TDPNODE1 Filespace name of SERVERX\TDPNODE1\meta\ Filespace name of SERVERX\TDPNODE1\data\0001 and Node name is TDPNODE2 Filespace name of SERVERX\TDPNODE2\meta\ Filespace name of SERVERX\TDPNODE2\data\0001 My problem? Running via the schedule is good. The backups run and are written to the correct filespaces. If i run a backup for TDPNODE1 from the GUI, this works fine. But, if i run a backup for TDPNODE2 from the GUI, it creates filespaces with TDPNODE1 as the node name but filespace names of SERVERX\TDPNODE2\meta\ and SERVERX\TDPNODE2\data\0001, and increments the fsid count. So, the problem only occurs at the GUI. Yes, i have followed the red book where it states clearly that to use the GUI for operations of another SQL server instance, create a shortcut to tdpsql.exe and specify another instance: /sqlserver=server_instance_name. I can get by because the normal method of backup, via the schedules, works good. But if the DBA decides to do a manual/GUI backup, the data is written to a different filespace. I noted Del's comments last month that perhaps some subscribers on the list will share experiences of their environment, so i though i'd ask the question. Any thoughts? Jeff White * This e-mail may contain confidential information or be privileged. It is intended to be read and used only by the named recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please notify us immediately so that we can make arrangements for its return: you should not disclose the contents of this e-mail to any other person, or take any copies. Unless stated otherwise by an authorised individual, nothing contained in this e-mail is intended to create binding legal obligations between us and opinions expressed are those of the individual author. The CIS marketing group, which is regulated for Investment Business by the Financial Services Authority, includes: Co-operative Insurance Society Limited Registered in England number 3615R - for life assurance and pensions CIS Unit Managers Limited Registered in England and Wales number 2369965 - for unit trusts and PEPs CIS Policyholder Services Limited Registered in England and Wales number 3390839 - for ISAs and investment products bearing the CIS name Registered offices: Miller Street, Manchester M60 0AL Telephone 0161-832-8686 Internet http://www.cis.co.uk E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] CIS Deposit and Instant Access Savings Accounts are held with The Co-operative Bank p.l.c., registered in England and Wales number 990937, P.O. Box 101, 1 Balloon Street, Manchester M60 4EP, and administered by CIS Policyholder Services Limited as agent of the Bank. CIS is a member of the General Insurance Standards Council CIS the CIS logo (R) Co-operative Insurance Society Limited
[no subject]
unsubscribe
[no subject]
We have an AIX client that does a nightly scheduled incremental backup. It has failed the last three nights, but if we schedule it during the day it runs fine. ANS4023E Error processing '/': file input/output error Tim DeBolt ISD UNIX Support American Honda Motor Co., Inc. Mail Stop 600-2W-179 1919 Torrance Blvd., Torrance, Ca. 90501 Phone: (310) 783-2440 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[no subject]
Most likely this is an NFS mount that goes away or maybe a CD ROM Mount that has a problem of some kind. Look at dsmerror.log on the client and see. It would probably say something about stale NFS handle or similar. There should be more than the one line error you put in email. David B. Longo System Administrator Health First, Inc. 3300 Fiske Blvd. Rockledge, FL 32955-4305 PH 321.434.5536 Pager 321.634.8230 Fax:321.434.5509 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/23/05 2:19 PM We have an AIX client that does a nightly scheduled incremental backup. It has failed the last three nights, but if we schedule it during the day it runs fine. ANS4023E Error processing '/': file input/output error Tim DeBolt ISD UNIX Support American Honda Motor Co., Inc. Mail Stop 600-2W-179 1919 Torrance Blvd., Torrance, Ca. 90501 Phone: (310) 783-2440 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ## This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary, or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it, and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Health First reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any views or opinions expressed in this message are solely those of the individual sender, except (1) where the message states such views or opinions are on behalf of a particular entity; and (2) the sender is authorized by the entity to give such views or opinions. ##
[no subject]
hi all ! there is a need to now all archived files from a special node, so i tried the following: select LL_NAME,count(*) from archives where NODE_NAME='cob03' group by LL_NAME ...it worked fine. but now i want this output in a file (linux), so i typed select LL_NAME,count(*) from archives where NODE_NAME='cob03' group by LL_NAME /path/filename the result is ANR8038E ...unable to open file '/path/filename' for redirection i wondered, and tried select LL_NAME,count(*) from archives where NODE_NAME='cob03' group by LL_NAME /filename the result seems to be allright, but the file 'filename' is not on the system - 'find' couldn't find it anywhere can anyone tell me, what the solution is ?? any idea is welcome thank you very much! regards, Dierk
[no subject]
You are aware of the fact that the redirect will go to the local machine you're sitting on? So if you're on a Windows box, redirecting to a path with '/' in it will fail? If so, do you have write authority to the specified path? Have you tried redirecting to another location? Best Regards Daniel Sparrman --- Daniel Sparrman Exist i Stockholm AB Propellervgen 6B 183 62 TBY Vxel: 08 - 754 98 00 Mobil: 070 - 399 27 51 Dierk Harbort [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 2005-06-16 16:52 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject hi all ! there is a need to now all archived files from a special node, so i tried the following: select LL_NAME,count(*) from archives where NODE_NAME='cob03' group by LL_NAME ...it worked fine. but now i want this output in a file (linux), so i typed select LL_NAME,count(*) from archives where NODE_NAME='cob03' group by LL_NAME /path/filename the result is ANR8038E ...unable to open file '/path/filename' for redirection i wondered, and tried select LL_NAME,count(*) from archives where NODE_NAME='cob03' group by LL_NAME /filename the result seems to be allright, but the file 'filename' is not on the system - 'find' couldn't find it anywhere can anyone tell me, what the solution is ?? any idea is welcome thank you very much! regards, Dierk
[no subject]
Good morning ! My tsm client on a w2k prof workstation does not work. The message is: Incremental backup of volume '\\pc01130\c$' Incremental backup of volume '\\bwi_1\user1\usr\bwihab' Incremental backup of volume '\\bwi_1\user1\edvdoc' ANS1999E Incremental processing of '\\pc01130\c$' stopped ANS1449E A required NT privilege is not held But: Any Systemobject is excluded. Only a few logfiles from drive C: should be saved, those files are owned by a user not by an administrator. The drives W: and H: are backed up propperly, but only if domain C: is excluded. So i think there is a problem with permissions on drive C: ?! Who has an idea to solve this problem? Thank you very much!
[no subject]
(from the Windows Administrator's Guide, page 201) [When checking in a single volume into an automated library,] a REPLY command is not required if you specify a wait time of zero using the optional WAITTIME parameter on the CHECKIN LIBVOLUME command. The default wait time is 60 minutes. -- Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Office 262.521.5627
