Re: [AFMUG] Happy New Year to all

2014-12-31 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
Is that your son?

-Ty

On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Jaime Solorza via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 Be safe

 Jaime Solorza



Re: [AFMUG] Happy New Year to all

2014-12-31 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
Awesome. Great pic.

-Ty

On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Jaime Solorza via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 Yes.  Air Force Combat Veteran  and Sgt military police. .

 Jaime Solorza
 On Dec 31, 2014 11:39 AM, Ty Featherling via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 Is that your son?

 -Ty

 On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Jaime Solorza via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:

 Be safe

 Jaime Solorza





Re: [AFMUG] North Korea is down....

2014-12-23 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
After seeing suspicious traffic I have dropped UDP port 1900 globally with
no ill-effects. I have dropepd over 300 GB of that traffic this month.

-Ty

On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Ken Hohhof via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

   I read somewhere, I think maybe Ars, that the DDoS attack has been
 going on for several days and is using primarily NTP and SSDP (UPnP
 discovery protocol) amplification.  And that SSDP has succeeded NTP and DNS
 as the amplification method for big ( 1Gbps) DDoS attacks.  Apparently
 because the industry jumped on securing open NTP servers.  And even though
 SSDP provides less amplification than NTP, there are more targets and they
 are mostly home routers which consumers are not going to patch even if
 there is patched firmware available.  Plus UDP makes it easier to spoof the
 source IP.

 So I must have missed that UDP port 1900 is the new target for
 amplification.

 I did a quick torch and saw a bunch of traffic on udp/1900, some inbound
 only which I assume are scans, some bidirectional which I’m thinking is
 suspicious but maybe some port 1900 traffic is normal because it is in the
 1024 ephemeral port range.

 I went and signed up for ShadowServer, figuring they will tell me what IPs
 were responding to SSDP requests on what date and I can track down the
 customer.  Anyone have a better approach?  If you identify customers with
 UPnP open to the outside, are you contacting them and pushing them to fix
 it?

 It’s just amazing to me that some routers would have UPnP open on the WAN
 side.  What’s wrong with these companies?  I saw DLink mentioned, and sure
 enough, when I torched for udp/1900, I saw a lot of connections for a
 customer that I seem to remember has a DLink DIR-655.


  *From:* Jaime Solorza via Af af@afmug.com
 *Sent:* Monday, December 22, 2014 7:58 PM
 *To:* Animal Farm af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] North Korea is down

  linksys modems for backhauls

  Jaime Solorza
 Wireless Systems Architect
 915-861-1390

 On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Tyson Burris @ Internet Communications
 Inc via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

  No! No! They have Comcast Cable and Century Link DSL.  Normal stuff.



 *Tyson Burris, President*
 *Internet Communications Inc.*
 *739 Commerce Dr.*
 *Franklin, IN 46131*

 *317-738-0320 317-738-0320 Daytime #*
 *317-412-1540 317-412-1540 Cell/Direct #*
 *Online: **www.surfici.net* http://www.surfici.net



 [image: ICI]

 *What can ICI do for you?*


 *Broadband Wireless - PtP/PtMP Solutions - WiMax - Mesh Wifi/Hotzones -
 IP Security - Fiber - Tower - Infrastructure.*

 *CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail is intended for the*
 *addressee shown. It contains information that is*
 *confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review,*
 *dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by*
 *unauthorized organizations or individuals is strictly*
 *prohibited.*



 *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Travis Johnson
 via Af
 *Sent:* Monday, December 22, 2014 4:24 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] North Korea is down



 The FBI setup a P2P server in North Korea with the Sony movie as the only
 download. LOL

 Travis

 On 12/22/2014 2:08 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller via Af wrote:


 What did we do? Lol. How did we do it ?

 Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone







Re: [AFMUG] North Korea is down....

2014-12-23 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
Both. I'm rate-limiting SNMP and DNS for dDOS reasons as well.

-Ty

On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Ken Hohhof via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

   I guess it could be treated like 137/138/139/445 which do not belong on
 the public Internet, I would feel better about blocking if it was a low
 numbered port.

 Are you blocking it inbound to your network, or also outbound?


  *From:* Ty Featherling via Af af@afmug.com
 *Sent:* Tuesday, December 23, 2014 9:06 AM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] North Korea is down

  After seeing suspicious traffic I have dropped UDP port 1900 globally
 with no ill-effects. I have dropepd over 300 GB of that traffic this month.

 -Ty

 On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Ken Hohhof via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

   I read somewhere, I think maybe Ars, that the DDoS attack has been
 going on for several days and is using primarily NTP and SSDP (UPnP
 discovery protocol) amplification.  And that SSDP has succeeded NTP and DNS
 as the amplification method for big ( 1Gbps) DDoS attacks.  Apparently
 because the industry jumped on securing open NTP servers.  And even though
 SSDP provides less amplification than NTP, there are more targets and they
 are mostly home routers which consumers are not going to patch even if
 there is patched firmware available.  Plus UDP makes it easier to spoof the
 source IP.

 So I must have missed that UDP port 1900 is the new target for
 amplification.

 I did a quick torch and saw a bunch of traffic on udp/1900, some inbound
 only which I assume are scans, some bidirectional which I’m thinking is
 suspicious but maybe some port 1900 traffic is normal because it is in the
 1024 ephemeral port range.

 I went and signed up for ShadowServer, figuring they will tell me what
 IPs were responding to SSDP requests on what date and I can track down the
 customer.  Anyone have a better approach?  If you identify customers with
 UPnP open to the outside, are you contacting them and pushing them to fix
 it?

 It’s just amazing to me that some routers would have UPnP open on the WAN
 side.  What’s wrong with these companies?  I saw DLink mentioned, and sure
 enough, when I torched for udp/1900, I saw a lot of connections for a
 customer that I seem to remember has a DLink DIR-655.


  *From:* Jaime Solorza via Af af@afmug.com
 *Sent:* Monday, December 22, 2014 7:58 PM
 *To:* Animal Farm af@afmug.com
  *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] North Korea is down

   linksys modems for backhauls

  Jaime Solorza
 Wireless Systems Architect
 915-861-1390

 On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Tyson Burris @ Internet Communications
 Inc via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

  No! No! They have Comcast Cable and Century Link DSL.  Normal stuff.



 *Tyson Burris, President*
 *Internet Communications Inc.*
 *739 Commerce Dr.*
 *Franklin, IN 46131*

 *317-738-0320 317-738-0320 Daytime #*
 *317-412-1540 317-412-1540 Cell/Direct #*
 *Online: **www.surfici.net* http://www.surfici.net



 [image: ICI]

 *What can ICI do for you?*


 *Broadband Wireless - PtP/PtMP Solutions - WiMax - Mesh Wifi/Hotzones -
 IP Security - Fiber - Tower - Infrastructure.*

 *CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail is intended for the*
 *addressee shown. It contains information that is*
 *confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review,*
 *dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by*
 *unauthorized organizations or individuals is strictly*
 *prohibited.*



 *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Travis Johnson
 via Af
 *Sent:* Monday, December 22, 2014 4:24 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] North Korea is down



 The FBI setup a P2P server in North Korea with the Sony movie as the
 only download. LOL

 Travis

 On 12/22/2014 2:08 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller via Af wrote:


 What did we do? Lol. How did we do it ?

 Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone








Re: [AFMUG] North Korea is down....

2014-12-23 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
Yes Steve. It is easy.

-Ty

On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 11:18 AM, That One Guy via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 So when we get our mikrotiks on the edge of our network we will be able to
 easily do this magic blocking too?

 On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Mark Radabaugh via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:

 UDP 1900 is ephemeral port, and a low number.

 Many network stacks pick ports sequentially above 1025 which means some
 portion of legitimate traffic is going to be dropped if you block just
 based on UDP 1900.   It will cause intermittent and unpredictable failures
 for applications and it will likely be very difficult to troubleshoot since
 the issue will be short lived in most cases.

 You probably want to consider a more specific filter looking deeper in
 the packet.

 Mark





 On Dec 23, 2014, at 10:06 AM, Ty Featherling via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 After seeing suspicious traffic I have dropped UDP port 1900 globally
 with no ill-effects. I have dropepd over 300 GB of that traffic this month.

 -Ty

 On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Ken Hohhof via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

   I read somewhere, I think maybe Ars, that the DDoS attack has been
 going on for several days and is using primarily NTP and SSDP (UPnP
 discovery protocol) amplification.  And that SSDP has succeeded NTP and DNS
 as the amplification method for big ( 1Gbps) DDoS attacks.  Apparently
 because the industry jumped on securing open NTP servers.  And even though
 SSDP provides less amplification than NTP, there are more targets and they
 are mostly home routers which consumers are not going to patch even if
 there is patched firmware available.  Plus UDP makes it easier to spoof the
 source IP.

 So I must have missed that UDP port 1900 is the new target for
 amplification.

 I did a quick torch and saw a bunch of traffic on udp/1900, some inbound
 only which I assume are scans, some bidirectional which I’m thinking is
 suspicious but maybe some port 1900 traffic is normal because it is in the
 1024 ephemeral port range.

 I went and signed up for ShadowServer, figuring they will tell me what
 IPs were responding to SSDP requests on what date and I can track down the
 customer.  Anyone have a better approach?  If you identify customers with
 UPnP open to the outside, are you contacting them and pushing them to fix
 it?

 It’s just amazing to me that some routers would have UPnP open on the
 WAN side.  What’s wrong with these companies?  I saw DLink mentioned, and
 sure enough, when I torched for udp/1900, I saw a lot of connections for a
 customer that I seem to remember has a DLink DIR-655.


  *From:* Jaime Solorza via Af af@afmug.com
 *Sent:* Monday, December 22, 2014 7:58 PM
 *To:* Animal Farm af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] North Korea is down

  linksys modems for backhauls

  Jaime Solorza
 Wireless Systems Architect
 915-861-1390

 On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Tyson Burris @ Internet Communications
 Inc via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

  No! No! They have Comcast Cable and Century Link DSL.  Normal stuff.



 *Tyson Burris, President*
 *Internet Communications Inc.*
 *739 Commerce Dr.*
 *Franklin, IN 46131*

 *317-738-0320 317-738-0320 Daytime #*
 *317-412-1540 317-412-1540 Cell/Direct #*
 *Online: **www.surfici.net* http://www.surfici.net/



 image001.png

 *What can ICI do for you?*


 *Broadband Wireless - PtP/PtMP Solutions - WiMax - Mesh Wifi/Hotzones -
 IP Security - Fiber - Tower - Infrastructure.*

 *CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail is intended for the*
 *addressee shown. It contains information that is*
 *confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review,*
 *dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by*
 *unauthorized organizations or individuals is strictly*
 *prohibited.*



 *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Travis Johnson
 via Af
 *Sent:* Monday, December 22, 2014 4:24 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] North Korea is down



 The FBI setup a P2P server in North Korea with the Sony movie as the
 only download. LOL

 Travis

 On 12/22/2014 2:08 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller via Af wrote:


 What did we do? Lol. How did we do it ?

 Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone








 --
 All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the
 parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you
 can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
 use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925



Re: [AFMUG] Friday Funny (belated)

2014-12-16 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
We have a few of them left as well. They just won't go away. We have
offered free installs even and they won't budge. I can't even imagine using
dialup for just email now-a-days. *Shivers*

-Ty

On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Kade Sullivan via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 We had a Virgil and Johana [last name redacted] come in for dial up
 service years and years ago.  Same situation, they had no idea what they
 wanted for an email address.  They decided to combine their first names and
 came up with Virghana...Our sales guy almost lost it after he wrote it down
 on the paper and read it out loud.

 Oh the good ol dial up days.  We actually still have like 4 dial up
 customers...

 On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Ken Hohhof via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

   Good Chinese name.
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dong_people


  *From:* Shayne Lebrun via Af af@afmug.com
 *Sent:* Tuesday, December 16, 2014 1:11 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Friday Funny (belated)


 One day, way back in the dialup days, when people would sign up for an
 account, they’d have no idea what to use for an email address.  So we
 suggested ‘first name, initial of last name.’



 One day, an older gent comes in, signs up.  My coworker brings me the
 form, I start to set it all up.  Then I notice the email address.



 ‘Doug,’ I say, to my older, straight-laced, religious-type co-worker,
 ‘are you sure about this email address?’

 ‘Yes,’ he says.

 ‘Really?’  says I.

 ‘Yes, ‘ he says.  ‘Don G.  That’s his name.’

 ‘Look at the form, Doug,’ I urge.  ‘Look at it.’

 He looks.

 ‘Don G at ourdomain.com.  Looks fine to me,’ he says.

 ‘Keep looking,’ I say, and I wait.

 Tick.

 Tick.

 Tick.

 “OH NO! “ and out he races to attempt to catch the man who just signed up
 for an email address of ‘d...@ourdomain.com’.



 *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Rory Conaway via
 Af
 *Sent:* Sunday, December 14, 2014 2:59 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Friday Funny (belated)



 Seriously, that would have been very cool.



 Rory



 *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com af-boun...@afmug.com] *On
 Behalf Of *Jeremy via Af
 *Sent:* Sunday, December 14, 2014 12:48 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Friday Funny (belated)



 That's funny.  My wife wanted to name our son Arrow until I made her say
 that one out loud.  Arrow SmithI don't think so.



 On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Craig House via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 My last name is House.   When my son was on the way my wife and I  were
 discussing names for him.   She suggested Porter.   She was serious until I
 made her say his whole name out loud.



 Craig




  --

 *From: *Ben Wirch via Af af@afmug.com
 *To: *af@afmug.com
 *Sent: *Saturday, December 13, 2014 4:14:37 PM


 *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Friday Funny (belated)



 I have a Brenda Titsworth as a sub.

 On Dec 13, 2014, at 2:58 PM, Ken Hohhof via Af af@afmug.com wrote:



 But I really have a customer D. Cline, and his card really was declined,
 otherwise it wouldn’t be all that amusing.



 There’s no accounting for what people name their kids, though.  I worked
 with a Howard Johnson, a Ronald McDonald, a Rusty Steele, and a Harry
 Dyke.  I went to school with a Jerry Ferry.  Oh, and I’ll bet Ben Dover
 downloads a lot of software from Cambium’s website.



 *From:* Craig House via Af af@afmug.com

 *Sent:* Saturday, December 13, 2014 3:23 PM

 *To:* af@afmug.com

 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Friday Funny (belated)



 And the twins Ben and Ilene Dover




  --

 *From: *Jon Bruce via Af af@afmug.com
 *To: *af@afmug.com
 *Sent: *Saturday, December 13, 2014 3:19:16 PM
 *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Friday Funny (belated)



 Can't forget good old Harry Showerdrain.





 On 12/13/2014 3:48 PM, Jaime Solorza via Af wrote:

 I heard Cheech use it a movie but not sure where it comes from.  Like
 I.P. Freely.   Seymour Butts  juvenile stuff.

 Jaime Solorza

 On Dec 13, 2014 1:38 PM, Chuck McCown via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 It took me a moment...



 *From:* Jaime Solorza via Af af@afmug.com

 *Sent:* Saturday, December 13, 2014 1:36 PM

 *To:* Animal Farm af@afmug.com

 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Friday Funny (belated)



 My favorite is Chuck U. Farley

 Jaime Solorza

 On Dec 13, 2014 12:16 PM, Ken Hohhof via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 I have a customer D. Cline whose credit card was declined.



 Oh, and note that today 12/13/14 is the last sequential date of the 21st
 century.














Re: [AFMUG] Friday Funny (belated)

2014-12-14 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
We have a Rusty Johnson. I smirk every time.

-Ty
 On Dec 13, 2014 7:21 PM, Jaime Solorza via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 You forgot kico for Francisco.   My pops name his girlfriend called him...

 Jaime Solorza
 On Dec 13, 2014 5:59 PM, Ken Hohhof via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

   So why Jose/Pepe and Francisco/Paco/Pancho?

 Hah, that made me remember watching The Cisco Kid on TV long ago.
 Probably considered offensive today, like Speedy Gonzalez?  I liked it when
 I was a kid.

 Trivia question:  what were the names of Cisco and Pancho’s horses?

  *From:* Tyler Treat via Af af@afmug.com
 *Sent:* Saturday, December 13, 2014 6:27 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Friday Funny (belated)

  Because John is his dad's name?

 ___
 Mangled by my iPhone.
 ___

 Tyler Treat
 Corn Belt Technologies, Inc.

 tyler.tr...@cornbelttech.com
 ___


 On Dec 13, 2014, at 6:21 PM, Jaime Solorza via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

  Lupe is nickname for Guadalupe.  The one I could never figure is how
 Jack is nickname for John.

 Jaime Solorza
 On Dec 13, 2014 4:59 PM, Ken Hohhof via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

   I’m actually glad you mentioned that, I got a new customer a couple
 weeks back and he said his name was Guadalupe Vasquez and I wondered if he
 was giving me his wife’s name or something.  I always though Guadalupe was
 a girl’s name.  Or just Lupe.

 I guess it’s the Spanish version of the boy named Sue?


  *From:* Jaime Solorza via Af af@afmug.com
 *Sent:* Saturday, December 13, 2014 5:50 PM
 *To:* Animal Farm af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Friday Funny (belated)


 It was  amusing his name was D Cline and card declined.   Names are a
 funny thing ...many Mexican families name boys with Guadalupe which is
 traditionally a girls name.  Kids are mean.  Kid name was Abundio but they
 called him Fundio.

 Jaime Solorza
 On Dec 13, 2014 4:37 PM, Hardy, Tim via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

  An actual OB Gyn here in NOVA - Dr. Harry C. Beaver


 http://www.wellness.com/dir/2471590/obgyn/va/fairfax/harry-beaver-md%23referrer

 Sent from my iPad

 On Dec 13, 2014, at 6:22 PM, Craig House via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

   And I heard somewhere that the owner of the lear jet company who's
 last name was Lear named his daughter Chanda

 Craig


 --
 *From: *Craig House via Af af@afmug.com
 *To: *af@afmug.com
 *Sent: *Saturday, December 13, 2014 5:20:16 PM
 *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Friday Funny (belated)

  My last name is House.   When my son was on the way my wife and I
 were discussing names for him.   She suggested Porter.   She was serious
 until I made her say his whole name out loud.

 Craig


 --
 *From: *Ben Wirch via Af af@afmug.com
 *To: *af@afmug.com
 *Sent: *Saturday, December 13, 2014 4:14:37 PM
 *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Friday Funny (belated)

 I have a Brenda Titsworth as a sub.
  On Dec 13, 2014, at 2:58 PM, Ken Hohhof via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

   But I really have a customer D. Cline, and his card really was
 declined, otherwise it wouldn’t be all that amusing.

 There’s no accounting for what people name their kids, though.  I
 worked with a Howard Johnson, a Ronald McDonald, a Rusty Steele, and a
 Harry Dyke.  I went to school with a Jerry Ferry.  Oh, and I’ll bet Ben
 Dover downloads a lot of software from Cambium’s website.

  *From:* Craig House via Af af@afmug.com
 *Sent:* Saturday, December 13, 2014 3:23 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Friday Funny (belated)

  And the twins Ben and Ilene Dover


 --
 *From: *Jon Bruce via Af af@afmug.com
 *To: *af@afmug.com
 *Sent: *Saturday, December 13, 2014 3:19:16 PM
 *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Friday Funny (belated)

 Can't forget good old Harry Showerdrain.


 On 12/13/2014 3:48 PM, Jaime Solorza via Af wrote:

 I heard Cheech use it a movie but not sure where it comes from.  Like
 I.P. Freely.   Seymour Butts  juvenile stuff.

 Jaime Solorza
 On Dec 13, 2014 1:38 PM, Chuck McCown via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

   It took me a moment...

  *From:* Jaime Solorza via Af af@afmug.com
 *Sent:* Saturday, December 13, 2014 1:36 PM
 *To:* Animal Farm af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Friday Funny (belated)


 My favorite is Chuck U. Farley

 Jaime Solorza
 On Dec 13, 2014 12:16 PM, Ken Hohhof via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 I have a customer D. Cline whose credit card was declined.

 Oh, and note that today 12/13/14 is the last sequential date of the
 21st century.












Re: [AFMUG] FS: netonix WISP switch 400B

2014-12-12 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
LOL. I wish I could buy it from you right now. I love the one I have and
intend to get many more.

-Ty

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 10:27 AM, josh--- via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 Congrats, first wispswitch to trade hands after sale. You're the proud
 owner of that record, way to read the data sheet =)

 J/K!


 On December 12, 2014 6:03:55 AM AKST, Kurt Fankhauser via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:

 I have a brand new netonix wisp switch 400b for sale, only reason I am
 selling is I thought it was a 48v on all ports instead of just half of
 them. Price is $425 including shipping.

 email k...@wavleinc.com

 Kurt Fankhauser

 Wavelinc Communications

 P.O. Box 126

 Bucyrus, OH 44820

 http://www.wavelinc.com

 tel. 419-562-6405

 fax. 419-617-0110


 --
 Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.



Re: [AFMUG] FS: netonix WISP switch 400B

2014-12-12 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
+1000. Great device, great company. I can't wait for the Tower Switch!

-Ty

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Kurt Fankhauser via Af af@afmug.com
wrote:

 oh i love the wisp switch, i think its been the best thing that has come
 along in years, i plan on putting them on everything

 Sent from my iPhone

 Kurt Fankhauser
 Wavelinc Communications
 P.O. Box 126
 Bucyrus, OH 44820
 http://www.wavelinc.com
 tel. 419-562-6405
 fax. 419-617-0110

 On Dec 12, 2014, at 11:27 AM, josh--- via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 Congrats, first wispswitch to trade hands after sale. You're the proud
 owner of that record, way to read the data sheet =)

 J/K!

 On December 12, 2014 6:03:55 AM AKST, Kurt Fankhauser via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:

 I have a brand new netonix wisp switch 400b for sale, only reason I am
 selling is I thought it was a 48v on all ports instead of just half of
 them. Price is $425 including shipping.

 email k...@wavleinc.com

 Kurt Fankhauser

 Wavelinc Communications

 P.O. Box 126

 Bucyrus, OH 44820

 http://www.wavelinc.com

 tel. 419-562-6405

 fax. 419-617-0110


 --
 Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.




Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik brute force

2014-12-10 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
Note to self, double check all API services are OFF.

-Ty

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Mike Hammett via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 I have seen an increase in API attacks lately.



 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com

 --
 *From: *George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af af@afmug.com
 *To: *af@afmug.com
 *Sent: *Tuesday, December 9, 2014 3:51:18 PM
 *Subject: *[AFMUG] Mikrotik brute force

 Nice. WTF.

 http://mkbrutusproject.github.io/MKBRUTUS/




Re: [AFMUG] Portable power rig

2014-12-10 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
Yeah, what Steve said. LOL.

-Ty

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 9:11 AM, That One Guy via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 we have IP aliases on the WAN side for all the different radio systems
 with the interface still set to DHCP, this way we only need one ESSID and
 DHCP Pool on the inside. the techs can plug the radio into it to manage the
 radio until its provisioned, then still access it via the pop router after
 its been provisioned

 On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Vlad Sedov via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 This is the product of boredom, some dremel bits, and a large collection
 of old power tools..

 The switch controls DC polarity, so UBNT and Cambium radios can be
 powered from the same jack.
 The router is set up with several SSIDs, and each one has its own DHCP
 pool. That way, you can attach to the proper SSID with your mobile device,
 and it will put you on the same subnet as the radio. Yet another SSID is
 used basically as a home wifi router, so if the radio is moved to the WAN
 port, the rig can be used to get online.
 This is a very crude prototype, but it works great, and battery lasts a
 very long time. Going to migrate it all into a belt pouch.
 Being able to charge battery packs on their original charging dock is
 also pretty handy.


 peace

 Vlad


 ---
 This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
 protection is active.
 http://www.avast.com




 --
 All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the
 parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you
 can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
 use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925



Re: [AFMUG] Portable power rig

2014-12-10 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
Nice. I like the multiple SSID idea. You could have the Mikrotik have
addresses in all of the networks you might want to talk to (192.168.1.x/24,
169.254.1.x/24, etc) and when you get DHCP it gives you an address from a
different pool and the Mikrotik, as your gateway, can get you to all of the
networks at once.

-Ty

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Vlad Sedov via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 This is the product of boredom, some dremel bits, and a large collection
 of old power tools..

 The switch controls DC polarity, so UBNT and Cambium radios can be powered
 from the same jack.
 The router is set up with several SSIDs, and each one has its own DHCP
 pool. That way, you can attach to the proper SSID with your mobile device,
 and it will put you on the same subnet as the radio. Yet another SSID is
 used basically as a home wifi router, so if the radio is moved to the WAN
 port, the rig can be used to get online.
 This is a very crude prototype, but it works great, and battery lasts a
 very long time. Going to migrate it all into a belt pouch.
 Being able to charge battery packs on their original charging dock is also
 pretty handy.


 peace

 Vlad


 ---
 This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
 protection is active.
 http://www.avast.com



Re: [AFMUG] Portable power rig

2014-12-10 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
Sure. No different than your SSID method really. Just a trick to reach
those subnets.

-Ty

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Vlad Sedov via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

  we use PPPoE, but that might still work..


 Vlad


 On 12/10/2014 9:11 AM, That One Guy via Af wrote:

 we have IP aliases on the WAN side for all the different radio systems
 with the interface still set to DHCP, this way we only need one ESSID and
 DHCP Pool on the inside. the techs can plug the radio into it to manage the
 radio until its provisioned, then still access it via the pop router after
 its been provisioned

 On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Vlad Sedov via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 This is the product of boredom, some dremel bits, and a large collection
 of old power tools..

 The switch controls DC polarity, so UBNT and Cambium radios can be
 powered from the same jack.
 The router is set up with several SSIDs, and each one has its own DHCP
 pool. That way, you can attach to the proper SSID with your mobile device,
 and it will put you on the same subnet as the radio. Yet another SSID is
 used basically as a home wifi router, so if the radio is moved to the WAN
 port, the rig can be used to get online.
 This is a very crude prototype, but it works great, and battery lasts a
 very long time. Going to migrate it all into a belt pouch.
 Being able to charge battery packs on their original charging dock is
 also pretty handy.


 peace

 Vlad


 ---
 This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
 protection is active.
 http://www.avast.com




  --
  All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the
 parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you
 can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
 use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925




 --
http://www.avast.com/

 This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
 http://www.avast.com/ protection is active.




Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik brute force

2014-12-10 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
Why even turn the service on is my thought.

-Ty

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Sterling Jacobson via Af af@afmug.com
wrote:

  Butch Evans has a nice inexpensive script for Mikrotik that takes care
 of this nicely.



 Why even let it through the input chain is my thought.





 *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Ty Featherling
 via Af
 *Sent:* Wednesday, December 10, 2014 7:30 AM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik brute force



 Note to self, double check all API services are OFF.



 -Ty



 On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Mike Hammett via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 I have seen an increase in API attacks lately.



 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


  --

 *From: *George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af af@afmug.com
 *To: *af@afmug.com
 *Sent: *Tuesday, December 9, 2014 3:51:18 PM
 *Subject: *[AFMUG] Mikrotik brute force

 Nice. WTF.

 http://mkbrutusproject.github.io/MKBRUTUS/







Re: [AFMUG] Well there goes all our bandwidth. Amazon streaming 4K now.

2014-12-10 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
Me neither. My Plex server doesn't have any high quality material to stream
to my Rokus and Chromecasts. It's a wasteland out there.

-Ty

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Josh Luthman via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 All I know is whatever these companies are doing is definitely working.  I
 can't find a single movie to pirate online.  Definitely can't find mp4
 videos of Bluray rips that are a roughly 2 GBs and work with my
 Chromecast/Xbox/TV.


 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Chuck Hogg via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 Some variation of FRAPS if I remember correctly..

 Regards,
 Chuck

 On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Chris Wright via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:

 It isn’t. I fondly recall the first pirated blu-ray discs (before the
 encryption keys were leaked) were copied by script kiddies who had the
 playback computer pause and print-screen the video frame-by-frame.



 Chris Wright

 Velociter Wireless http://www.velociter.net/



 *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Nate Burke via
 Af
 *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2014 8:35 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Well there goes all our bandwidth. Amazon
 streaming 4K now.



 I've always thought that all this hype of digital encryption and copy
 protection was a little lacking.  Ultimately it's still an analog medium
 (you viewing the picture) so it could always be 'copied' at that level.
 Interpret the signal passed to the actual LCD Panel, Pixel 1342x975
 displaying color E0 at timestamp 58:44:13.221  Maybe I'm naive, but it
 doesn't seem like it should be that hard.

 On 12/9/2014 10:18 PM, Jason McKemie via Af wrote:

 I'd think if someone could figure out a way to get the movies from RAM,
 they could also figure out a way to capture them from a stream.



 On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Travis Johnson via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:

 Because then people could save the movies in RAM, and someone would
 figure out a way to be able to download them and put them on the Internet
 for free.

 It's a licensing issue... that's why streaming is OK.

 Travis

 On 12/9/2014 7:00 PM, Bill Prince via Af wrote:

 That 187MB translates to only about 11.25 GB per hour.  Why not stick in
 a 32GB memory and be done?  That would be almost 3 hours of buffer.


 --

 bp

 part {dash} 15 {at} SkylineBroadbandService {dot} com



 On 12/9/2014 4:50 PM, Travis Johnson via Af wrote:

 It's really too bad that the devices that support all these streaming
 services can't have a larger buffer. I'm sure it's part of their licensing
 deals, but if they could buffer 60 seconds of stream (at any quality), they
 would have much fewer support calls for streaming issues, etc.

 Using Netflix's 25Mbps for 4k, that works out to 187.5MB of storage
 space. At current RAM prices, you can buy a 256MB module for $15 full
 retail... so places like Samsung can probably buy them in quantity for less
 than $2. Seems like it would be worth it to pay an extra $10 for a
 TV/DVD/PS4/Wii-U device that could handle 60 seconds of video.

 Travis

 On 12/9/2014 5:34 PM, Sterling Jacobson via Af wrote:

 That’s pretty cool.



 You can do 4k direct from Youtube.



 Several of the ones I’ve tested are sustained around 20-30Mbps.



 But on my network it tends to burst to 90Mbps then sit around for a
 while, then burst back to 90Mbps.



 I think the 4k will require a lot of optimizations before it works on
 the built in TV’s.







 *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com af-boun...@afmug.com] *On
 Behalf Of *Jerry Richardson via Af
 *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2014 5:12 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Well there goes all our bandwidth. Amazon
 streaming 4K now.



 Lovely



 *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com af-boun...@afmug.com] *On
 Behalf Of *Ryan Ghering via Af
 *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2014 3:38 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* [AFMUG] Well there goes all our bandwidth. Amazon streaming
 4K now.



 http://www.cnet.com/news/amazon-starts-4k-uhd-streams/



 --

 Ryan Ghering
 Network Operations - Plains.Net
 Office: 970-848-0475 - Cell: 970-630-1879














Re: [AFMUG] Well there goes all our bandwidth. Amazon streaming 4K now.

2014-12-10 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
That is the kicker for sure. The biggest drop-off in music piracy wasn't
lawsuits or raids, it was iTunes and similar services making it easy to
find and buy music online. The same hasn't happened for movies/tv yet.
Netflix is great but the selection isn't ubiquitous. It has still made
streaming video easy and affordable. A la carte is the big change to come I
think. HBO Go for instance no longer going to require a cable subscription.
You can pay for it separately and enjoy your HBO content on the internet.
No cable company necessary. Of course as ISPs we have a different battle on
our hands.

-Ty

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Josh Luthman via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 It's a shame those services are 1000% easier to use than products you pay
 for.  Oh well...


 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Ty Featherling via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:

 Me neither. My Plex server doesn't have any high quality material to
 stream to my Rokus and Chromecasts. It's a wasteland out there.

 -Ty

 On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Josh Luthman via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:

 All I know is whatever these companies are doing is definitely working.
 I can't find a single movie to pirate online.  Definitely can't find mp4
 videos of Bluray rips that are a roughly 2 GBs and work with my
 Chromecast/Xbox/TV.


 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Chuck Hogg via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 Some variation of FRAPS if I remember correctly..

 Regards,
 Chuck

 On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Chris Wright via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:

 It isn’t. I fondly recall the first pirated blu-ray discs (before the
 encryption keys were leaked) were copied by script kiddies who had the
 playback computer pause and print-screen the video frame-by-frame.



 Chris Wright

 Velociter Wireless http://www.velociter.net/



 *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Nate Burke
 via Af
 *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2014 8:35 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Well there goes all our bandwidth. Amazon
 streaming 4K now.



 I've always thought that all this hype of digital encryption and copy
 protection was a little lacking.  Ultimately it's still an analog medium
 (you viewing the picture) so it could always be 'copied' at that level.
 Interpret the signal passed to the actual LCD Panel, Pixel 1342x975
 displaying color E0 at timestamp 58:44:13.221  Maybe I'm naive, but 
 it
 doesn't seem like it should be that hard.

 On 12/9/2014 10:18 PM, Jason McKemie via Af wrote:

 I'd think if someone could figure out a way to get the movies from
 RAM, they could also figure out a way to capture them from a stream.



 On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Travis Johnson via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:

 Because then people could save the movies in RAM, and someone would
 figure out a way to be able to download them and put them on the Internet
 for free.

 It's a licensing issue... that's why streaming is OK.

 Travis

 On 12/9/2014 7:00 PM, Bill Prince via Af wrote:

 That 187MB translates to only about 11.25 GB per hour.  Why not stick
 in a 32GB memory and be done?  That would be almost 3 hours of buffer.


 --

 bp

 part {dash} 15 {at} SkylineBroadbandService {dot} com



 On 12/9/2014 4:50 PM, Travis Johnson via Af wrote:

 It's really too bad that the devices that support all these streaming
 services can't have a larger buffer. I'm sure it's part of their licensing
 deals, but if they could buffer 60 seconds of stream (at any quality), 
 they
 would have much fewer support calls for streaming issues, etc.

 Using Netflix's 25Mbps for 4k, that works out to 187.5MB of storage
 space. At current RAM prices, you can buy a 256MB module for $15 full
 retail... so places like Samsung can probably buy them in quantity for 
 less
 than $2. Seems like it would be worth it to pay an extra $10 for a
 TV/DVD/PS4/Wii-U device that could handle 60 seconds of video.

 Travis

 On 12/9/2014 5:34 PM, Sterling Jacobson via Af wrote:

 That’s pretty cool.



 You can do 4k direct from Youtube.



 Several of the ones I’ve tested are sustained around 20-30Mbps.



 But on my network it tends to burst to 90Mbps then sit around for a
 while, then burst back to 90Mbps.



 I think the 4k will require a lot of optimizations before it works on
 the built in TV’s.







 *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com af-boun...@afmug.com] *On
 Behalf Of *Jerry Richardson via Af
 *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2014 5:12 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Well there goes all our bandwidth. Amazon
 streaming 4K now.



 Lovely



 *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com af-boun...@afmug.com] *On
 Behalf Of *Ryan Ghering via Af
 *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2014 3:38 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* [AFMUG] Well there goes all our bandwidth. Amazon

[AFMUG] simulating interference

2014-12-10 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
What is the easiest way to simulate noise in a lab environment. I would
like to play with a couple Rocket AC Lites I have here and see what
throughput looks like with some noise adjacent to their channel. Can I just
turn up another AP on the necessary channel or does it need a client
associated? If so, does their need to be traffic passing to the client?
Does an AP get noisier when talking to more clients or with more
throughput?

-Ty


Re: [AFMUG] simulating interference

2014-12-10 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
Thanks. That was my gut feeling but I was hoping it would be easier. Do you
really think the bridge loop might work? Are the two radios really going to
send/respond to that many broadcasts?

-Ty

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Josh Luthman via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 AP simply on without stations is nearly no noise
 AP with an SM associated is a bit more noise, but it's just beacons and
 whatever broadcast traffic
 AP with an SM passing traffic (speed test, real customer traffic, etc)
 will be the best way to introduce noise.

 If you want to go full throttle plug the AP into the SM (so it creates a
 bridge loop)


 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Ty Featherling via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:

 What is the easiest way to simulate noise in a lab environment. I would
 like to play with a couple Rocket AC Lites I have here and see what
 throughput looks like with some noise adjacent to their channel. Can I just
 turn up another AP on the necessary channel or does it need a client
 associated? If so, does their need to be traffic passing to the client?
 Does an AP get noisier when talking to more clients or with more
 throughput?

 -Ty





Re: [AFMUG] simulating interference

2014-12-10 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
I'm going to try that. Thanks.

-Ty

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Josh Luthman via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 If you have a 100 meg ethernet port and your wireless link can hold say 50
 megs, you're going to have 50 megs of traffic going across it.

 I'm not sure if the Ubnt radios would be accessible in this situation but
 the RF end of things would be totally hammered full.  Just take a 5 port
 switch, plug the AP/SM into it and plug your laptop into a port.  If you
 can manage to log into the radios, watch the throughput graphs.


 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Ty Featherling via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:

 Thanks. That was my gut feeling but I was hoping it would be easier. Do
 you really think the bridge loop might work? Are the two radios really
 going to send/respond to that many broadcasts?

 -Ty

 On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Josh Luthman via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:

 AP simply on without stations is nearly no noise
 AP with an SM associated is a bit more noise, but it's just beacons and
 whatever broadcast traffic
 AP with an SM passing traffic (speed test, real customer traffic, etc)
 will be the best way to introduce noise.

 If you want to go full throttle plug the AP into the SM (so it creates a
 bridge loop)


 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Ty Featherling via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:

 What is the easiest way to simulate noise in a lab environment. I would
 like to play with a couple Rocket AC Lites I have here and see what
 throughput looks like with some noise adjacent to their channel. Can I just
 turn up another AP on the necessary channel or does it need a client
 associated? If so, does their need to be traffic passing to the client?
 Does an AP get noisier when talking to more clients or with more
 throughput?

 -Ty







Re: [AFMUG] simulating interference

2014-12-10 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
Maybe. Or I might discover a sustainable fuel source.

-Ty

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 4:50 PM, That One Guy via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 dont do it, it will shut off the sun

 On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Ty Featherling via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:

 I'm going to try that. Thanks.

 -Ty

 On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Josh Luthman via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:

 If you have a 100 meg ethernet port and your wireless link can hold say
 50 megs, you're going to have 50 megs of traffic going across it.

 I'm not sure if the Ubnt radios would be accessible in this situation
 but the RF end of things would be totally hammered full.  Just take a 5
 port switch, plug the AP/SM into it and plug your laptop into a port.  If
 you can manage to log into the radios, watch the throughput graphs.


 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Ty Featherling via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:

 Thanks. That was my gut feeling but I was hoping it would be easier. Do
 you really think the bridge loop might work? Are the two radios really
 going to send/respond to that many broadcasts?

 -Ty

 On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Josh Luthman via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:

 AP simply on without stations is nearly no noise
 AP with an SM associated is a bit more noise, but it's just beacons
 and whatever broadcast traffic
 AP with an SM passing traffic (speed test, real customer traffic, etc)
 will be the best way to introduce noise.

 If you want to go full throttle plug the AP into the SM (so it creates
 a bridge loop)


 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Ty Featherling via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:

 What is the easiest way to simulate noise in a lab environment. I
 would like to play with a couple Rocket AC Lites I have here and see what
 throughput looks like with some noise adjacent to their channel. Can I 
 just
 turn up another AP on the necessary channel or does it need a client
 associated? If so, does their need to be traffic passing to the client?
 Does an AP get noisier when talking to more clients or with more
 throughput?

 -Ty








 --
 All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the
 parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you
 can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
 use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925



Re: [AFMUG] Animal Farm List weirdness/requests

2014-12-08 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
Oh me too! That is a minor thing but a real annoyance. I feel like Dory
from Finding Nemo sometimes; Send a message.. Oh look, a new message!

-Ty

On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:29 PM, That One Guy via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 youre the man on that #1 thing, its been driving me batty

 On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Josh Luthman via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 Ye!


 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Sean Heskett via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 aaah THANK YOU JOSH!  i owe you a beer at AF ;-)


 On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Josh Luthman via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:

 In regards to 1 go here and disable sending yourself your own messages

 http://afmug.com/mailman/options/af



 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Mike Hammett via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:

 I haven't noticed #1.

 PDMNet was going to fix #2 back in September, but things came up.



 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com

 --
 *From: *Sean Heskett via Af af@afmug.com
 *To: *af@afmug.com
 *Sent: *Monday, December 8, 2014 4:12:18 PM
 *Subject: *[AFMUG] Animal Farm List weirdness/requests


 Hello,

 Whomever is now the list manager I have two requests (gripes)

 1.  for some reason when i send a message it shows up in the
 conversation thread twice (i'm using Gmail) I'm not sure if everyone else
 sees it twice or just me.  i only get one message from other users (which
 is the expected behavior).

 2.  It only shows the name of the person who sent the message and
 strips out their email.  Is there any way we can add this back in.  It's
 really frustrating when a cambium or UBNT employee will post a reply and i
 don't immediately recognize that this is a response from the manufacturer.
  even if it stripped the email but put back in user at domain dot com
 instead of u...@domain.com if the reason from it's removal was to
 prevent spam etc.

 2a. For the manufacturers, would y'all mind adding a signature file
 until this is fixed so we know it's an official response???

 thanks for listening,

 Sean








 --
 All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the
 parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you
 can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
 use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925



Re: [AFMUG] This is a Japanese commercial

2014-12-07 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
That was great. Reminds me of the Mythbusters painting the Mona Lisa with
paintballs in under a second.

-Ty
On Dec 7, 2014 4:16 PM, Jaime Solorza via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 Hai Hai!!

 Jaime Solorza
 On Dec 7, 2014 12:35 PM, Rory Conaway via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 This was sent to me by Esme Vos to promote the speeds of LTE.



 “Riffing on the popular Japanese TV segment 3 Minute Cooking, the cell
 phone carrier DOCOMO has created an ad called 3 Second Cooking to promote
 the fast speeds of their Full LTE service. The “fried shrimp version” of
 the ad starts off just like the original cooking show with the list of
 ingredients: shrimp, flour, bread crumbs, eggs, but then takes a
 unexpected, technical twist: 2 LTE lanes, 1 total control computer, 6 air
 pressure adjustment devices, heat-proof goggles and any sort of
 shock-absorbent material”



 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lkaIoH6Um60



 Rory






Re: [AFMUG] OPEN SLOT TODAY on ISPRADIO

2014-12-03 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
Oh wow. That commercial is depressing.

-Ty

On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Chuck McCown via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 (the periwinkle reference)

 http://www.ispot.tv/ad/7rk6/justfab-com-buy-1-get-1-free-
 they-arent-just-shoes

 -Original Message- From: Chuck McCown via Af
 Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 8:43 AM

 To: af@afmug.com
 Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OPEN SLOT TODAY on ISPRADIO

 You need periwinkle...

 -Original Message- From: Seth Mattinen via Af
 Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 8:41 AM
 To: af@afmug.com
 Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OPEN SLOT TODAY on ISPRADIO

 On 12/3/14, 7:39 AM, Mike Hammett via Af wrote:

 Have someone from Ubiquiti on to explain why in God's name they thought a
 cloud platform is what people wanted.



 CLOUD: because you will want it.

 ~Seth




Re: [AFMUG] OPEN SLOT TODAY on ISPRADIO

2014-12-03 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
You're right I'm sure. After Black Friday this year I am a little put off
by blind consumerism. The plain idea of I need more things is off-putting
to me. It'll pass.

-Ty

On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Gino Villarini via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

   Why?

  Let the girls be girls and have all the shoes they want… as long as you
 can have how many x you what

  In my case, I have a wall of lego star wars.. 5 drones, 5 cars … so you
 get the point



  Gino A. Villarini
 President
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 www.aeronetpr.com
 @aeronetpr



   From: af@afmug.com af@afmug.com
 Reply-To: af@afmug.com af@afmug.com
 Date: Wednesday, December 3, 2014 at 11:49 AM
 To: af@afmug.com af@afmug.com
 Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OPEN SLOT TODAY on ISPRADIO

   Oh wow. That commercial is depressing.

  -Ty

 On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Chuck McCown via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 (the periwinkle reference)

 http://www.ispot.tv/ad/7rk6/justfab-com-buy-1-get-1-free-
 they-arent-just-shoes

 -Original Message- From: Chuck McCown via Af
 Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 8:43 AM

 To: af@afmug.com
 Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OPEN SLOT TODAY on ISPRADIO

 You need periwinkle...

 -Original Message- From: Seth Mattinen via Af
 Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 8:41 AM
 To: af@afmug.com
 Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OPEN SLOT TODAY on ISPRADIO

 On 12/3/14, 7:39 AM, Mike Hammett via Af wrote:

 Have someone from Ubiquiti on to explain why in God's name they thought
 a cloud platform is what people wanted.



 CLOUD: because you will want it.

 ~Seth





Re: [AFMUG] groundcontrol project

2014-12-03 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
This is exciting. Fittingly it has a very Animal Farm vibe. Rise up! Take
the power back! I am glad to help any way I can. I can't say though that I
have any skills that would get you anywhere. I look forward to seeing this
take shape.

-Ty

On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:40 PM, James Howard via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 You’re not Major Tom are you?



 *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Chuck McCown via
 Af
 *Sent:* Wednesday, December 03, 2014 1:32 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] groundcontrol project



 Cool, I thought I felt a disturbance in the force...



 *From:* Josh Reynolds via Af af@afmug.com

 *Sent:* Wednesday, December 03, 2014 12:20 PM

 *To:* WISPA General List wirel...@wispa.org ; Ubiquiti Users Group
 ubnt_us...@wispa.org ; af@afmug.com

 *Subject:* [AFMUG] groundcontrol project



 For those of you who haven't heard, several of us started a new project
 yesterday.

 https://github.com/esseph/groundcontrol

 Licensing is tentatively set as falling under GPLv2.

 We have already been offered code snippets, a dev box, a db server, and
 several people have decided to volunteer time to make this happen.

 The initial idea is that the system itself will be free, with a possibly
 paid support/features option, or maybe a model similar to observium where
 the is a community (free as in beer) version that comes out every 6mo
 or so, and a paid version with newer features and direct support. We're
 not sure yet, but we want to make this project accessible and fairly
 vendor-neutral.

 If any of you could volunteer time, support, code, documentation, ideas,
 etc. it would be greatly appreciated. This is a project by and for the
 WISP community. Thank you!

 --

 josh reynolds :: chief information officer

 spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com

 --

 *Total Control Panel*

 Login https://asp.reflexion.net/login?domain=litewire.net

 To: ja...@litewire.net
 https://asp.reflexion.net/address-properties?aID=242260993domain=litewire.net

 From:
 014a11a39556-785dab88-e25c-4c00-9b67-2b95697c65c0-000...@amazonses.com
 https://asp.reflexion.net/address-properties?aID=2885598898domain=litewire.net

 Remove
 https://asp.reflexion.net/FooterAction?ver=2un-wl-sender-domain=1rID=242260993aID=2885598898domain=litewire.net
 amazonses.com from my allow list

 *You received this message because the domain amazonses.com
 http://amazonses.com is on your allow list.*





Re: [AFMUG] groundcontrol project

2014-12-03 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
I agree.

-Ty

On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Chuck McCown via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

   Yeah, I think perhaps there should be a spot on the schedule for this
 project?

  *From:* Ty Featherling via Af af@afmug.com
 *Sent:* Wednesday, December 03, 2014 12:56 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] groundcontrol project

  This is exciting. Fittingly it has a very Animal Farm vibe. Rise up!
 Take the power back! I am glad to help any way I can. I can't say though
 that I have any skills that would get you anywhere. I look forward to
 seeing this take shape.

 -Ty

 On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:40 PM, James Howard via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

  You’re not Major Tom are you?



 *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Chuck McCown via
 Af
 *Sent:* Wednesday, December 03, 2014 1:32 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] groundcontrol project



 Cool, I thought I felt a disturbance in the force...



 *From:* Josh Reynolds via Af af@afmug.com

 *Sent:* Wednesday, December 03, 2014 12:20 PM

 *To:* WISPA General List wirel...@wispa.org ; Ubiquiti Users Group
 ubnt_us...@wispa.org ; af@afmug.com

 *Subject:* [AFMUG] groundcontrol project



 For those of you who haven't heard, several of us started a new project
 yesterday.

 https://github.com/esseph/groundcontrol

 Licensing is tentatively set as falling under GPLv2.

 We have already been offered code snippets, a dev box, a db server, and
 several people have decided to volunteer time to make this happen.

 The initial idea is that the system itself will be free, with a possibly
 paid support/features option, or maybe a model similar to observium
 where the is a community (free as in beer) version that comes out
 every 6mo or so, and a paid version with newer features and direct
 support. We're not sure yet, but we want to make this project accessible
 and fairly vendor-neutral.

 If any of you could volunteer time, support, code, documentation, ideas,
 etc. it would be greatly appreciated. This is a project by and for the
 WISP community. Thank you!

 --

 josh reynolds :: chief information officer

 spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com

  --

 *Total Control Panel*

 Login https://asp.reflexion.net/login?domain=litewire.net

 To: ja...@litewire.net
 https://asp.reflexion.net/address-properties?aID=242260993domain=litewire.net

 From:
 014a11a39556-785dab88-e25c-4c00-9b67-2b95697c65c0-000...@amazonses.com
 https://asp.reflexion.net/address-properties?aID=2885598898domain=litewire.net

 Remove
 https://asp.reflexion.net/FooterAction?ver=2un-wl-sender-domain=1rID=242260993aID=2885598898domain=litewire.net
 amazonses.com from my allow list

 *You received this message because the domain amazonses.com
 http://amazonses.com is on your allow list.*







Re: [AFMUG] Thanksgiving Funny

2014-11-26 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
LMAO.

-Ty

On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Rory Conaway via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 A young man named John received a parrot as a gift. The parrot had a bad

 attitude and an even worse  vocabulary.

 Every word out of the bird's mouth was rude, obnoxious and laced with
 profanity. John tried and tried to change the bird's attitude by

 consistently saying only polite words, playing soft music and anything
 else he could think of to 'clean up' the bird's vocabulary.

 Finally, John was fed up and he yelled at the parrot. The parrot yelled
 back.

 John shook the parrot and the parrot got angrier and even more rude. John,
 in desperation, threw up his hand, grabbed the bird and put him in the
 freezer.

 For a few minutes the parrot squawked and kicked and screamed. Then
 suddenly there was total quiet. Not a peep was heard for over a minute.

 Fearing that he'd hurt the parrot, John quickly opened the door to the
 freezer. The parrot calmly stepped out onto John's outstretched arms and

 said I believe I may have offended you with my rude language and actions.

 I'm sincerely remorseful for my inappropriate transgressions and I fully
 intend to do everything I can to correct my rude and unforgivable behavior.

 John was stunned at the change in the bird's attitude.

 As he was about to ask the parrot what had made such a dramatic change in
 his behavior, the bird spoke-up, very softly,



 May I ask what the turkey did?











 Rory



Re: [AFMUG] LOUD 5 Ghz

2014-11-24 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
Gotta join the group to see the post.

-Ty

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Mike Hammett via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 http://on.fb.me/11Pp5lV



 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com

 https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL
 https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb
 https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions
 https://twitter.com/ICSIL




Re: [AFMUG] Where I am - I being Chuck McCown

2014-11-20 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
Jay, that had my actually laughing at my desk. Well done.

-Ty

On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 12:19 AM, CBB - Jay Fuller via Af af@afmug.com
wrote:


 WHY ARE YOU MOCKING ME?!?!?!?!?!?!?!


 - Original Message -
 *From:* Nate Burke via Af af@afmug.com
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Sent:* Wednesday, November 19, 2014 6:21 PM
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Where I am - I being Chuck McCown

 Has the MPAA Officer come and found you in the theater yet?


 On 11/19/2014 6:14 PM, Traci via Af wrote:


   Please post this to the list. I am so special...







Re: [AFMUG] epmp 1000 only PPPOE Filter

2014-11-19 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
Is there any downside to dropping all multicast from the customers? My
brain says no but my other end says don't try it without confirming.

-Ty

On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 5:36 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af 
af@afmug.com wrote:

 We do only bridge mode and DHCP to the customer's equipment. But I do
 check the PPPoE filter because it lets me easily see when a customer's
 router is configured for PPPoE (Stats  Filter). I also use the filters for
 BootP server, SNMP, SMB and multicast. This is some of the best stuff about
 Canopy. So I would prefer the ePMP to work like Canopy, for the most part
 anyway.


 On 11/18/2014 3:13 PM, Matt via Af wrote:

 I am Dan Sullivan and I am the software manager for ePMP at Cambium.

 Why do you want to filter PPPoE?  Can you explain the use case more for
 me.

 When our SM is set up as a PPPoE client and is talking to a PPPoE
 server, it will only accept traffic from the PPPoE server over the wireless
 interface.  With this in mind, why do you need a PPPoE filter for the
 wireless interface?

 One other item, when NAT mode is enabled we can set up a L2 filter for a
 source MAC and EtherType as indicated below, but only the source MAC filter
 will work.  There is a warning message that indicates this when in NAT mode.

 I think the desired affect is the same as:

 On Canopy 450 SM
 Config / Protocol Filtering
 Packet Filter Configuration

 Packet Direction: Filter Direction Upstream Checked
 Packet Filter Types: Check Everything BUT PPPoE

 This way the customer router/PC they plug into the ethernet port on
 the SM can only successfully send PPPoE traffic onto our network.





Re: [AFMUG] For love of all that is evil (mikrotik/routerboard)

2014-11-13 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
I know on Mikrotik if you copy a config from one device to another and you
do not sanitize any MAC addresses in it you can rewrite the MACs on the new
device. Any chance you did something like that? If so a reset to default
config should restore the original MACs.

-Ty

On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Chuck McCown via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

   I recommend you use different MACs on Ethernet devices that are
 connected to other Ethernet devices.  Especially if they are all on the
 same collision domain.

 Improper operation may result in having both devices use the same MAC.

 Of course this will continue to be a problem until MAC-V6 is widely
 implemented, but try to find different MACs.  I know they are hard to come
 by, but it is sure to make you life easier...

 (I used to have a block of MACs assigned to my company.  Not sure if I had
 to pay Xerox for them or what.  Been a long time ago.)

  *From:* That One Guy via Af af@afmug.com
 *Sent:* Thursday, November 13, 2014 11:48 AM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] For love of all that is evil (mikrotik/routerboard)

  I always wondered how manufactures reuse their MACs, apparently all in
 the same batch

 On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Sterling Jacobson via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:

 Freaking hell, I just spent 30 minutes trying to unravel a router mystery.

 Ended up that both of my CCR Mikrotik routers had THE SAME MAC ADDRESSES
 between them!

 They are identical. Every port had a consecutive MAC number, but they
 were the same numbers for both the SFP and GigE ports across the two
 routers.

 I'm guessing they flashed them both at the manufacturer the exact same,
 then didn't make it through a MAC renumbering.

 Or is this common with Mikrotik now days?

 I'm sure I've encountered it before, but like once every five years.

 Just a FYI for all y'all who use Mikrotiks.

 Watch your backs (I mean MACs)!




 --
  All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the
 parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you
 can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
 use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925



Re: [AFMUG] dc-dc step up / power supply

2014-11-07 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
True but he emphasized cheap.

-Ty

On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 3:50 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af 
af@afmug.com wrote:

  I would not use the SD. Get an RSD instead.

 On 11/7/2014 3:46 PM, Ty Featherling via Af wrote:

  24V - 48V DC/DC converter 200W SD-200B-48 Meanwell

 https://www.jameco.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/Product_10001_10001_1953911_-1

  This is from my parts list. More than you are asking for and about $80
 but I bet you can look at others in that series to find a better fit.

  -Ty


 On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Josh Reynolds via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

  Need some part numbers for cheap 24VDC - 48VDC ~72W din mount
 step-up/power supplies.

 Throw some part numbers out there :)
 --

 Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
 SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com






Re: [AFMUG] development platform for data/control system

2014-11-06 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
Good point Chuck. Just use SNMP for the data. Keefe, I'm sorry but I have
zero faith that mFi will be around for all that long. How long since launch
and it hasn't been updated or spoken of again? You can only just now get
parts without months of waiting.

Cameron, I will look into that thanks.

Anyone else have any thoughts on microcontollers?

-Ty

On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Chuck McCown via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

   You could do much of this with a site monitor.

  *From:* Cameron Crum via Af af@afmug.com
 *Sent:* Thursday, November 06, 2014 1:26 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] development platform for data/control system

  Sorry, forgot the link
 http://www.embeddedcontrolconcepts.com/products.html

 On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Cameron Crum via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 How many IO connections? I use a BCS-460 for my little brewery. It was
 designed with brewers in mind, but could be used for any application
 needing web based control for relays and such. There are a couple models
 with different numbers of inputs and outputs, has a built in web server for
 controlling it all, and they have an API so you could write your own. I
 wrote an andoid app called Brew Mate on the android market so I can use my
 phone with it. It might be worth looking at before re-inventing the wheel.

 Cameron

 On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Ty Featherling via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:

 I have been asked what the feasibility is of us developing a controller
 that can control some servos and relays to control a few things in a comm
 building. Basically be able to turn the lights on and off, monitor the
 temperature, turn on a heater, and control a magnetic door lock. The
 products are all lined out for controlling each of those but we need a
 controller that can deal with the IO and be able to be run from a webpage.

 My first though was Arduino or Beagleboard. Anyone have any experience
 with these things that could recommend a platform to build off of? The
 basic requirements are ethernet interface, a number of digital and analog
 IO connections and the ability to communicate with a web-server backend.

 -Ty







Re: [AFMUG] Cacti POLL

2014-11-05 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
Same here. I don't understand what you are proposing David. My graphs are
manually sorted in the graph tree. What does your plugin do?

-Ty

On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Bill Prince via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

  Sort of like a manage plugin that works?

 We've arranged our graphs to be grouped by POP/AP/Subscriber, but it's
 done more-or-less manually.  When a new subscriber is added, we add them to
 the appropriate graph tree.  This way, someone not in the know can see the
 organization of the infrastructure.

 Not clear if this is significantly different by your description.

 bp

 On 11/5/2014 5:06 AM, David Milholen via Af wrote:

 For those of you using cacti..
 Out of necessity I am going to be working a plugin that will do Host
 groups or views for the hosts
 displayed.
  For example instead of all hosts in one view you can group them by
 infrastructure or subscribers and set permissions on
 who is allowed to view infrastructure and subs or just subs.
  There are some other plugins that let you add them to a tab and view but
 I want a drop down like on the host page
 to display only what I need.
  Of course you can place a tag in the name of each host and search by this
 tag. I am just being lazy I guess I want a simple
 drop down that will give me the groups I want.
 Since we use nagios to watch majority of infrastructure for alerting I
 want cacti to only show that infrastructure.

 I am just taking poll to see how many use or could use something like this.

 --





Re: [AFMUG] UBNT: fails to respond to SNMP?

2014-11-04 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
Newer hardware type is XW including xxBeams and AC products as well as new
generation of Titanium Rockets. All of the other M gear is XM.

XW gear should not accept XM firmware and vice versa. Not sure what
happened with yours. Glad you got it fixed though.

-Ty

On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Bill Prince via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

  It was fixed by installing 5.6.beta5.

 Sometimes ya gotta wonder.

 Oh.� What's the difference between the XW series and the M series?

 The radio was an M5 (implying the M series), but the software loaded on it
 was XM.v5.5.6 (implying XW series).

 I loaded the XW series, and SNMP is now responding.� Not sure if it
 would (or wouldn't) load the M series, and since it's working (after a
 fashion), I'm not willing to gamble too much more on a new subscriber.


 bp

 On 11/4/2014 10:39 AM, Simon Westlake via Af wrote:

 I'm pretty sure the Ubiquiti gear uses OpenWRT, but I'm not 100% sure. It
 is possible to install new packages onto an OpenWRT device using 'opkg' but
 you would need a binary built for that particular CPU type.

 Probably more trouble than it is worth to troubleshoot a single device.

 On 11/4/2014 12:33 PM, Bill Prince via Af wrote:

 Not that I can find.� The only things I found snmp-ish were the config
 files and the snmpd.� It's running some flavor of linux.� When I run
 nmap from outside, it shows port 161 not open, but on the other hand other
 CPEs of the same model show the same thing (and they're working).

 uname -a returns this:

 uname -a
 Linux hostname 2.6.32.60 #1 Wed Oct 1 16:43:27 EEST 2014 mips unknown


 bp

 On 11/4/2014 10:07 AM, Simon Westlake via Af wrote:

 Does the radio have snmpget available? You could see if it can query
 itself.

 On 11/4/2014 11:47 AM, Bill Prince via Af wrote:

 I don't really need an SNMP tester. I've run snmpget/snmpwalk from the
 CLI, and traced the interaction.� The requests are going in, just nothing
 is coming out.

 I have a hard time believing that some sort of hardware problem is causing
 this, as the unit seems to be performing as expected in all other respects.

 I've also exhausted all the software-related issues that I can think
 of.� Just very peculiar.

 bp

 On 11/4/2014 9:21 AM, Ken Hohhof via Af wrote:

 The makers of PRTG have a freeware tool that I have sometimes found
 helpful:
 http://www.paessler.com/tools/snmptester



 -Original Message- From: Bill Prince via Af Sent: Tuesday,
 November 04, 2014 11:06 AM To: Motorola III Subject: [AFMUG] UBNT: fails to
 respond to SNMP?


 This seems to be the week for weird shit problems.�� We have a new
 installation at a remote site using a UBNT nanobeam.� When we went to add
 the new CPE to our cacti system, we got a timeout on the SNMP query.

 No problem, probably something wrong with the SNMP settings. Nope, they
 are exactly as needed (configuration comes from a template anyway, so what
 could have gone wrong?).

 Well, the nanobeam was from inventory, so it was running a down-rev
 version of AirOS (5.5.6).� So I upgraded it to 5.5.10. No change.

 I then ran a trace from the local POP router.� The SNMP requests are
 most definitely going to the radio, just no response.

 So I quadruple-checked the SNMP settings.� All OK.

 No firewall is running on the radio.

 ssh'd into the radio, and the tinysnmpd is running with the correct
 parameters.

 block management access is NOT checked.

 What in the world am I missing?




 --
  Simon Westlake
 *Powercode* - The smart choice in ISP billing and OSS
 powercode.com
 P: 920-351-1010
 E: si...@powercode.com



 --
  Simon Westlake
 *Powercode* - The smart choice in ISP billing and OSS
 powercode.com
 P: 920-351-1010
 E: si...@powercode.com





Re: [AFMUG] first approved licensed link mounting

2014-10-29 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
Steve you are truly one of my favorite people. Keep on keepin' on.

-Ty

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 1:20 AM, That One Guy via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 ... also, I dont know if any have noticed. I have the spelling and grammar
 of a two year old of late, thats a side effect of medication Im on for me
 not to be stabbing people, I apologize if it gets confusing and I forget
 the spellchecker

 On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 12:24 AM, That One Guy via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:

 I have two goals, mounting the bastard and grounding the bastard
 If you knew the volume of fecal matter I have had to ea tot get this
 achieved you would understand my very short fuse about dealing with
 dickheads like me that I have.


 I need to first mount this thing. Its likely to be a SAF link, and thats
 that.

 Im going to take a moment to say that regardless of what this final
 project ends up being, if you want one hell of a sales guy to work with,
 Jerrod from Moonblink(Jarrod Washington [jarrod.washing...@moonblink.com
 ]) is the shit, if you badmouth him, I will come to your house, I will
 castrate you, I will fry your man parts in olive oil, give them a slight
 garlic and rosemary seasoning and serve them to you over some white rice
 with a cane vinegar brandy. I float out told this guy that after he did all
 the work, my bosses would likely flat out price shop his parts list. He
 didnt blink and kept on doing his thing. If my daughter was old enough, Id
 marry her to him.

 In a perfect world, both sites will be non penetrating mounts. One side
 is 3' the other 4'. The side that wiull have the 4' hast the option of
 being mounted on a set of 25g we have running up the wall. The problem is
 the wall mount is currently only secured every 20' with a 2 deep concrete
 anchor, Im pretty sure this wont be sufficient for a 4' antenna (currently
 we only mount 2' parabolics to it)

 We have the option to plow through the wall with plates, but if we go to
 that expenses we might as well go to a full non pen for a 4 antenna at the
 top.

 Any advice on a non pen mount that can support a 4 parabolic? This side
 we can do pretty much whatever, but still want the smallest footprint.

 The other side, for non pen, our partner claims to have an 8' x 8'
 footprint mount, the best I ever specced was 10x10 so Im suspiscious.


 Both sites are grain elevators. Im looking for the minimum grounding to
 achieve a respectable level of protection. If you send me an NEC link, you
 have no value to me, Im not asking because I already know the NEC spec and
 just want to brag about my testicles. I just want a rough Idea of what it
 would take to get to a point where with factory spec installation of a
 Lumina I can meet the minimum ground/bond at an elevator and grow from
 there.



 --
 All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the
 parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you
 can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
 use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925




 --
 All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the
 parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you
 can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
 use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925



Re: [AFMUG] Touughswitch 5 reset all connected radios!!

2014-10-28 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
Yes it does disable reset via POE. It does still leave recovery mode
enabled but I don't know if that works both via POE and the hardware button
or just the hardware button. Anyone?

-Ty

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:28 PM, That One Guy via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 yes it does, that has become standard after reprogramming an AP cluster
 that werent labelled at the bottom end which radio was which in a snowstorm
 at 8 oclock at night we wont be doing that again.

 On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Jerry Richardson (airCloud) via Af 
 af@afmug.com wrote:

 Had a very strange issue last night where all of the AP’s and a backhaul
 attached to a TS5 reset to defaults.



 We are unclear as to what the cause was, we suspect it happened while a
 backhaul was being moved from one mount to another. It’s possible there is
 a little corrosion on the pins that shorted POE to Ethernet, but that
 should not have reset all of the radios through the switch.



 Replaced the switch and reconfigured the radios but it is certainly
 disconcerting that this can even happen.



 Does anyone know if disabling the reset button in the software also
 disables the ability to reset over the Ethernet?



 SMH



 Jerry






 --
 All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the
 parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you
 can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
 use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925



Re: [AFMUG] PTP450 + Epmp100 dish _ Mtow

2014-10-28 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
Is that mount serious? I mean it may be convenient to mount on the other
side but c'mon. Any no place for the radio? Could have at least made a nice
spot on there for a radio on one of those plates so that you can put the
radio on the non-mount side. Weird.

-Ty

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Gino Villarini via Af af@afmug.com
wrote:





  Gino A. Villarini
 President
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 www.aeronetpr.com
 @aeronetpr





Re: [AFMUG] PTP450 + Epmp100 dish _ Mtow

2014-10-28 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
Ok okay so that circle with the 4 holes around it at the top maybe? If so
that's not so bad.

-Ty

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Mathew Howard via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

  They are setup for an ePMP radio to attach to the plate on the non-mount
 side, it's just not designed for a 450... looks like it worked fine to do
 it that way though.

  --
 *From:* Af [af-boun...@afmug.com] on behalf of Ty Featherling via Af [
 af@afmug.com]
 *Sent:* Tuesday, October 28, 2014 1:01 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PTP450 + Epmp100 dish _ Mtow

   Is that mount serious? I mean it may be convenient to mount on the
 other side but c'mon. Any no place for the radio? Could have at least made
 a nice spot on there for a radio on one of those plates so that you can put
 the radio on the non-mount side. Weird.

  -Ty

 On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Gino Villarini via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:





  Gino A. Villarini
 President
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 www.aeronetpr.com
 @aeronetpr






Re: [AFMUG] PTP450 + Epmp100 dish _ Mtow

2014-10-28 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
I haven't used the ePMP line at all. I will educate myself.

-Ty

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Mike Hammett via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 I take it you haven't assembled one of these before...

 At least watch their demonstration video to know what's going on.



 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com

 https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL
 https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb
 https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions
 https://twitter.com/ICSIL

 --
 *From: *Ty Featherling via Af af@afmug.com
 *To: *af@afmug.com
 *Sent: *Tuesday, October 28, 2014 1:13:28 PM
 *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] PTP450 + Epmp100 dish _ Mtow

 Ok okay so that circle with the 4 holes around it at the top maybe? If so
 that's not so bad.

 -Ty

 On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Mathew Howard via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:

  They are setup for an ePMP radio to attach to the plate on the
 non-mount side, it's just not designed for a 450... looks like it worked
 fine to do it that way though.

  --
 *From:* Af [af-boun...@afmug.com] on behalf of Ty Featherling via Af [
 af@afmug.com]
 *Sent:* Tuesday, October 28, 2014 1:01 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PTP450 + Epmp100 dish _ Mtow

   Is that mount serious? I mean it may be convenient to mount on the
 other side but c'mon. Any no place for the radio? Could have at least made
 a nice spot on there for a radio on one of those plates so that you can put
 the radio on the non-mount side. Weird.

  -Ty

 On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Gino Villarini via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:





  Gino A. Villarini
 President
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 www.aeronetpr.com
 @aeronetpr








Re: [AFMUG] Holy Grail

2014-10-27 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
What is the latency of an unladen swallow?

-Ty

On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Jaime Solorza via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 What do you mean? African or European?

 Jaime Solorza
 On Oct 26, 2014 1:19 PM, Chuck Macenski via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 I would agree that, at the moment, OFDM techniques dominate the
 discussion...

 On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Chuck McCown via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:

   Yeahbut, it appears QAM has won?  Yes?
 LTE doesn’t  have much in common with CDMA anymore.

  *From:* Chuck Macenski via Af af@afmug.com
 *Sent:* Saturday, October 25, 2014 2:43 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Holy Grail

  Actually...CDMA techniques (PN modulation) re-channel a band based on
 time rather than frequency. In a multi point environment, this allows
 multiple people to share a frequency bandwidth in a not terribly
 inefficient way when all of the simultaneous communication paths are
 considered.

 On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Chuck McCown via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:

   Yeah, isochronous pseudorandom noise mod/demod techniques will pull
 info from sewer.  I think  the deep  space network uses some of those
 techniques.  But PN modulation does not help throughput.  It wastes
 bandwidth.

 Speed/interference immunity/narrow channels – pick one.

  *From:* Bill Prince via Af af@afmug.com
 *Sent:* Saturday, October 25, 2014 11:27 AM
  *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Holy Grail

   The holy grail would be the ability to modulate a signal and receive
 it correctly in the face of withering interference.

 The GPS system accomplishes that through the technique of encoding the
 data within pseudo noise.  The only problem being that GPS data is
 relatively static compared to what we deal with.


 bp

 On 10/25/2014 10:15 AM, Chuck McCown via Af wrote:

  I think folks without deep experience in either 1) operating a WISP
 or 2)without deep experience in electrodynamics and modulation (99.999% of
 the general population) somehow think that Moore’s Law applies to
 wireless.

 The only way to scale this this stuff in a way approximating Moore’s
 Law is to just keep adding cell/ap sites.

 I read a book back in 1990 that outlined this problem for the nascent
 cell phone industry.  The book is still spot on.

   *From:* Rory Conaway via Af af@afmug.com
 *Sent:* Friday, October 24, 2014 11:41 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Holy Grail


 Or looky, looky, AC PTMP MU-MIMO.  Imagine what that would do for White
 Space.



 Rory



 *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com af-boun...@afmug.com] *On
 Behalf Of *That One Guy via Af
 *Sent:* Friday, October 24, 2014 10:22 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Holy Grail



 Sterling, thank you! I think you and me must be the only ones who can
 see the elephant.. OH LOOKY LOOKY AC PTMP!!



 On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Sterling Jacobson via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:

 Is it just me, or is no one realizing that we are still not that far
 from 2005 with wireless.



 Yes, we have 300-1Gbps capable radios.

 But they trade that for larger channel allocations and even more signal
 to noise requirements.



 But the spectrum allocations haven’t changed enough to use these new
 features to their fullest in a radio dense environment.



 When doing cost analysis in my area last year for wireless I realized I
 had to forklift upgrade most of my network, and build towers out in a half
 mile range.



 This was to get the 30Mbps plan rates to really work.



 The costs were skyrocketing because of all the towers and sectors.



 I think the real winners of late are still the rural and low density
 wireless provider domains.

 They are the ones with clean enough spectrum to cost this competitively.







 *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jaime Solorza
 via Af
 *Sent:* Friday, October 24, 2014 6:41 PM
 *To:* Animal Farm
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Holy Grail



 Bring out the Holy Grenade of Antioch...

 Jaime Solorza

 On Oct 24, 2014 5:56 PM, Jayson Baker via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

  Anyone else get this email?



 Anyone know what it is?





 --

 All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that
 the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you
 can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
 use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925








Re: [AFMUG] questions about filters

2014-10-27 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
And enough impacts.. lol.

-Ty

On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Chuck McCown via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

   We are all “rough stones rolling” we knock the sharp edges off each
 other given enough time.

  *From:* Josh Reynolds via Af af@afmug.com
 *Sent:* Sunday, October 26, 2014 11:09 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] questions about filters

  Sidenote: I lack something called soft skills.

 It may come from having a father with a light case of Aspergers, a southern
 upbringing, and almost a decade of service in the Army.

 Probably a shitty trifecta towards developing interpersonal skills. It's
 not intentional.

 Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
 SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com
 On 10/26/2014 08:46 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af wrote:

 Josh, you have strong opinions and there's nothing wrong with that, but at
 times you come off very confrontational, IMO.

 Ken is one of the smartest people I know and I have great respect for him.
 I think most others here would agree.

 On 10/26/2014 11:28 PM, Josh Reynolds via Af wrote:

 If you're not fixing to the problem, you're contributing to it.

 You have some valid points about weaknesses in the formulas used in that
 chart.

 Do you talk to everyone this way?

 Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
 SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com
 On 10/26/2014 07:16 PM, Ken Hohhof via Af wrote:

  Are you trying to be annoying, or just succeeding?

  *From:* Josh Reynolds via Af af@afmug.com
 *Sent:* Sunday, October 26, 2014 10:14 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] questions about filters

  Then post the correct formula, IYHO, so it can be fixed.

 Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
 SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com
 On 10/26/2014 06:20 PM, Ken Hohhof via Af wrote:

  That doesn’t address my complaints about the USE of those formulas.  Do
 you agree that WiFi bits/sec/Hz should be divided by 3 but LTE should not,
 because of assumptions about frequency reuse?  In the context of a WISP
 application which may use GPS sync?  How about assuming one spatial stream
 for WiFi but 8 for LTE?  And what about treating LTE Advanced like a
 current technology but 802.11ac as a future technology?

 And 802.11n is capable of more than 1.2 bits/sec/Hz.  If the formula
 disagrees with reality, it’s the formula (or the numbers plugged into the
 formula) that must change, not reality.  It’s not like a Looney Toons
 cartoon where the character falls to the ground once you point out they
 can’t walk on air.


  *From:* Josh Reynolds via Af af@afmug.com
 *Sent:* Sunday, October 26, 2014 8:59 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] questions about filters

  The formulas are at the top of the chart.

 Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
 SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com
 On 10/26/2014 05:31 PM, Ken Hohhof via Af wrote:

  I think those numbers are flawed.  Especially dividing the 802.11n
 numbers by 3 due to “frequency reuse” factor.  And using SISO for 802.11n
 but 8x8 MIMO for LTE.  Not to mention using 802.11n and not 802.11ac.

 Saying 802.11n is only good for 1.2 bits/sec/Hz is saying it can only do
 24 Mbps in a 20 MHz channel.  Hogwash.


  *From:* Josh Reynolds via Af af@afmug.com
 *Sent:* Sunday, October 26, 2014 5:49 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] questions about filters

  Well...

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectral_efficiency

 802.11n has a spectral efficiency of around 1.2. LTE advanced has a
 spectral efficiency of _30_.

 If we could get some fairly cheap radio chipsets with even a 10-15 in
 spectral efficiency at this point, we would probably all be incredibly
 happy.

 Doing that would likely cause us to (A) Not be compatible with 802.11
 (fine by me), and (B) would require mass market adoption.

 Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
 SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com
 On 10/26/2014 02:40 PM, Mike Hammett via Af wrote:

 That's what I was hoping for but I was told to sit down.



 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com




 - Original Message -
 From: Bill Prince via Af mailto:af@afmug.com af@afmug.com
 To: af@afmug.com
 Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2014 12:36:58 PM
 Subject: Re: [AFMUG] questions about filters


 Perhaps some innovation in improving efficiency? Maybe takes someone thinking 
 outside of the current box(es).

 bp On 10/26/2014 9:55 AM, Chuck McCown via Af wrote:





 I was just going to mention that. Make a clean signal and you don’t have to 
 filter so much. Anyone remember what a Class A amplifier is? (45% efficient 
 at best) Cavity filters?

 I would think that in this day and age, you ought to be able to go DSP direct 
 to antenna up to a 5 volt p-p signal. Or if you had to use a PA, inject a 
 pre-distortion component. The cable TV guys have been dealing with these 
 issues for decades.

 And then there is the issue with physical size of filters. A nice filter, 
 with decent response and low insertion loss is large. SAW 

Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 dual slant panel;

2014-10-25 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
ITElite has options.\

http://www.itelite.net/en/Katalog/33-37GHz-80216-Wimax/

-Ty

On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Gino Villarini via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

  Search for

  3.5 dual pol panel



 Gino A. Villarini
 @gvillarini



 On Oct 25, 2014, at 5:48 PM, Sean Heskett via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

  That would be nice for doing some nLOS shots thru a tree branch where a
 dish is to focused and a bare sm doesn't have enough gain.

 On Friday, October 24, 2014, Ken Hohhof via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 I think there was a thread about 3.65 dual slant panels for PMP450 SMs,
 but I don't remember anyone being able to recommend anything, and I don't
 see anything out there except maybe something real expensive from MTI.

 I don't have a problem using a dish if I need the gain, just wondering if
 there is something more like 12x12 inches and 14-16 dBi.




Re: [AFMUG] Holy Grail

2014-10-25 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
I know Kung-Fu.

-Ty

On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Jaime Solorza via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 I know GSM

 Jaime Solorza
 On Oct 25, 2014 3:38 PM, Gino Villarini via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

   Atts network is not cdma



  Gino A. Villarini
 President
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 www.aeronetpr.com
 @aeronetpr



   From: af@afmug.com af@afmug.com
 Reply-To: af@afmug.com af@afmug.com
 Date: Saturday, October 25, 2014 at 5:25 PM
 To: af@afmug.com af@afmug.com
 Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Holy Grail

   Dr. Fehrer's book from U of San Diego or Robert Winch's one.  Both
 covered this.Isnt this what ATT is pushing in commercial about
 Picocells?

 Jaime Solorza
 On Oct 25, 2014 2:43 PM, Chuck Macenski via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 Actually...CDMA techniques (PN modulation) re-channel a band based on
 time rather than frequency. In a multi point environment, this allows
 multiple people to share a frequency bandwidth in a not terribly
 inefficient way when all of the simultaneous communication paths are
 considered.

 On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Chuck McCown via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:

   Yeah, isochronous pseudorandom noise mod/demod techniques will pull
 info from sewer.  I think  the deep  space network uses some of those
 techniques.  But PN modulation does not help throughput.  It wastes
 bandwidth.

 Speed/interference immunity/narrow channels – pick one.

  *From:* Bill Prince via Af af@afmug.com
 *Sent:* Saturday, October 25, 2014 11:27 AM
  *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Holy Grail

   The holy grail would be the ability to modulate a signal and receive
 it correctly in the face of withering interference.

 The GPS system accomplishes that through the technique of encoding the
 data within pseudo noise.  The only problem being that GPS data is
 relatively static compared to what we deal with.


 bp

 On 10/25/2014 10:15 AM, Chuck McCown via Af wrote:

  I think folks without deep experience in either 1) operating a WISP
 or 2)without deep experience in electrodynamics and modulation (99.999% of
 the general population) somehow think that Moore’s Law applies to
 wireless.

 The only way to scale this this stuff in a way approximating Moore’s
 Law is to just keep adding cell/ap sites.

 I read a book back in 1990 that outlined this problem for the nascent
 cell phone industry.  The book is still spot on.

   *From:* Rory Conaway via Af af@afmug.com
 *Sent:* Friday, October 24, 2014 11:41 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Holy Grail


 Or looky, looky, AC PTMP MU-MIMO.  Imagine what that would do for White
 Space.



 Rory



 *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com af-boun...@afmug.com] *On
 Behalf Of *That One Guy via Af
 *Sent:* Friday, October 24, 2014 10:22 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Holy Grail



 Sterling, thank you! I think you and me must be the only ones who can
 see the elephant.. OH LOOKY LOOKY AC PTMP!!



 On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Sterling Jacobson via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:

 Is it just me, or is no one realizing that we are still not that far
 from 2005 with wireless.



 Yes, we have 300-1Gbps capable radios.

 But they trade that for larger channel allocations and even more signal
 to noise requirements.



 But the spectrum allocations haven’t changed enough to use these new
 features to their fullest in a radio dense environment.



 When doing cost analysis in my area last year for wireless I realized I
 had to forklift upgrade most of my network, and build towers out in a half
 mile range.



 This was to get the 30Mbps plan rates to really work.



 The costs were skyrocketing because of all the towers and sectors.



 I think the real winners of late are still the rural and low density
 wireless provider domains.

 They are the ones with clean enough spectrum to cost this competitively.







 *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jaime Solorza
 via Af
 *Sent:* Friday, October 24, 2014 6:41 PM
 *To:* Animal Farm
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Holy Grail



 Bring out the Holy Grenade of Antioch...

 Jaime Solorza

 On Oct 24, 2014 5:56 PM, Jayson Baker via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

  Anyone else get this email?



 Anyone know what it is?





 --

 All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that
 the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you
 can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
 use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925






Re: [AFMUG] Easy way to determine LOS

2014-10-23 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
Why doesn't everyone know about heywhatsthat.com? Their Path Profiler tool
is used everyday in our office and I use the Panorama tool for quick and
easy viewsheds. Great stuff and free.

-Ty
On Oct 23, 2014 6:21 PM, Glen Waldrop via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

  I use Terrain Navigator Pro.

 It isn't perfect, but it is pretty good. The elevation data around here is
 close, but not perfect. Places where there aren't people aren't terribly
 accurate, but it uses USGS elevation data, has the option for a line of
 sight, options to change the elevation above ground level at each point.

 The newer versions account for curvature of the Earth, but I'm using an
 antiquated version on XP.



 - Original Message -
 *From:* Shayne Lebrun via Af af@afmug.com
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Sent:* Thursday, October 23, 2014 3:21 PM
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Easy way to determine LOS

  Path profile software with clutter data, and bear in mind that ‘I can
 see it’ and ‘RF Line-Of-Sight’ are two very separate things.



 *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *TJ Trout via Af
 *Sent:* Thursday, October 23, 2014 3:27 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* [AFMUG] Easy way to determine LOS



 Need to do a ptp shot but can't tell if I have clear LOS, any tricks with
 a telescope or something I can do without someone on the other side with a
 mirror or laser?




Re: [AFMUG] Rflelements announcement

2014-10-15 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
So you're saying this is more marketing than innovation?

-Ty

On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Chuck McCown via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

   Angle is pretty much solely dependent upon gain.  So a typical horn is
 about as good as the best patch array or a smaller parabolic reflector.
 But they are worse than both in the mechanical sense.

 The higher the frequency the more practical horns become.

  *From:* Stefan Englhardt via Af af@afmug.com
 *Sent:* Wednesday, October 15, 2014 1:51 AM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* [AFMUG] Rflelements announcement


 This is realy something I did not expect: They announce Systems with Horn
 antennas.

 A quite different approach. Their sectors are directional antennas so
 coverage is not as good

 as with traditional antennas (Their marketing argues the opposite). But
 horn antennas

 should have very low sidelobes, a good FB-Ratio and allow small angles. So
 it should be possible

 to make a more dense deployment.

 What make me scare is the big opening where water and ice may cause damage.







Re: [AFMUG] Rflelements announcement

2014-10-15 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
For anyone curious the rundown is on their site already. It looks slick as
hell but that doesn't mean much.

http://simper.rfelements.com/

-Ty

On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Ty Featherling via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 So you're saying this is more marketing than innovation?

 -Ty

 On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Chuck McCown via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

   Angle is pretty much solely dependent upon gain.  So a typical horn is
 about as good as the best patch array or a smaller parabolic reflector.
 But they are worse than both in the mechanical sense.

 The higher the frequency the more practical horns become.

  *From:* Stefan Englhardt via Af af@afmug.com
 *Sent:* Wednesday, October 15, 2014 1:51 AM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* [AFMUG] Rflelements announcement


 This is realy something I did not expect: They announce Systems with Horn
 antennas.

 A quite different approach. Their sectors are directional antennas so
 coverage is not as good

 as with traditional antennas (Their marketing argues the opposite). But
 horn antennas

 should have very low sidelobes, a good FB-Ratio and allow small angles.
 So it should be possible

 to make a more dense deployment.

 What make me scare is the big opening where water and ice may cause
 damage.









Re: [AFMUG] Microwave Backhaul Ethernet Grommets- Feedback Wanted

2014-10-11 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
No idea.

-Ty

On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Ken Hohhof via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

   Why does this thread make me think of Wallace and Gromit?

  *From:* Mike Hammett via Af af@afmug.com
 *Sent:* Saturday, October 11, 2014 10:43 AM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] [QUAR] Re: Microwave Backhaul Ethernet Grommets-
 Feedback Wanted

  +1!  ;-)



 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com

 https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL
 https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb
 https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions
 https://twitter.com/ICSIL

 --
 *From: *Daniel White via Af af@afmug.com
 *To: *af@afmug.com
 *Sent: *Saturday, October 11, 2014 10:37:52 AM
 *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] [QUAR] Re: Microwave Backhaul Ethernet Grommets
 -Feedback Wanted

  Integra and Integra-S has 2x SFP +1 RJ-45 PoE.



 [image: cid:image001.jpg@01CE2975.BD4B6370]

 *Daniel White* | Managing Director

 *SAF North America LLC*



 *Cell:*



 (303) 746-3590

 *Skype:*

 danieldwhite

 *E-mail:*

 daniel.wh...@saftehnika.com





 *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett via
 Af
 *Sent:* Friday, October 10, 2014 6:23 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] [QUAR] Re: Microwave Backhaul Ethernet Grommets -
 Feedback Wanted



 I look for radios with 2x SFP. I don't find them as often as I'd like.

 I'm not going to bed with the radio, so I don't care what it feels like.



 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


  --

 *From: *Charles Wu via Af af@afmug.com
 *To: *af@afmug.com
 *Sent: *Friday, October 10, 2014 4:54:33 PM
 *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] [QUAR] Re: Microwave Backhaul Ethernet Grommets -
 Feedback Wanted

 I'm ok with plastic,
 put a spare in each..
 they often get lost anyway..

 Economically, the plastic connectors make a lot of sense, but there's just
 something about it

 Some additional thoughts...

 The radio has a total of 4 holes (3 RJ-45 and 1 SFP connector for fiber)

 What if I were to include 1 metal connector, which will probably work for
 most since I imagine most people are still only using a single connector
 per radio (correct me if I'm wrong and you guys actually use NMS ports /
 etc)

 Regarding extra and/or spare connectors, it seems to make sense to include
 some extra plastic ones, and have an option for people who prefer * metal
 connectors* to pay extra for those (vs charging everyone an extra $100 /
 radio to include 3-4 extra connectors that might never be used).  And if
 someone is ok with the plastic connector option, I'd probably just set it
 up a box of them customer service so they could just grab a handful and
 ship them out as necessary.

 Would having plastic *spare* connectors included make the Microwave radio
 feel *cheap* ?

 -Charles






Re: [AFMUG] Purchasing another WISP

2014-10-08 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
C'mon Dennis, do the work for him! Give him the link to the right place
directly. I thought self-promotion was your thing?

;)

-Ty

On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Dennis Burgess via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 Ispradio.com, hit the archive button, third from the left, (file cabinet
 thing) top link J





 Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc.

 den...@linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 – www.linktechs.net



 *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Gino Villarini
 via Af
 *Sent:* Wednesday, October 08, 2014 2:47 PM

 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Purchasing another WISP



 Were is the link?







 Gino A. Villarini

 President

 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.

 www.aeronetpr.com

 @aeronetpr







 *From: *af@afmug.com af@afmug.com
 *Reply-To: *af@afmug.com af@afmug.com
 *Date: *Wednesday, October 8, 2014 at 3:29 PM
 *To: *af@afmug.com af@afmug.com
 *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Purchasing another WISP



 We just went though a great ISP Radio episode with Jeff Kohler from Jab
 Wireless on Acquisitions!  Check out the download!





 Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc.

 den...@linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 – www.linktechs.net



 *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com af-boun...@afmug.com] *On
 Behalf Of *Jerry Richardson (airCloud) via Af
 *Sent:* Wednesday, October 08, 2014 1:06 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Purchasing another WISP



 It's all in how you manage the changes.



 Send a letter welcoming them to the family. Outline some of the steps you
 have taken to improve service, and that your company takes a very proactive
 approach to network monitoring, uptime, and performance. Let them know how
 to get customer support and how to contact your various departments. Taking
 these steps will increase retention, and sets the tone for what they can
 expect from their new provider.



 Additionally, describe the new plan options are and what plan they will be
 transferred to. If someone doesn't like their new plan, let them know what
 the upgrade options are. They can choose to upgrade or go somewhere else.







 On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:02 AM, That One Guy via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 Take a page out of JABs handbook and just tell them to go ^%$ themselves
 if they dont like it



 On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Mathew Howard via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:

 I would probably just match it to the rest of your system. my guess is the
 majority of them won't even notice the difference... if you've cleaned up a
 lot of self interference issues, a lot of them will likely work better than
 they did before with the all the self interference issues. You probably
 will get a few that are mad they can't get 10mbps on a speed test at 2am
 anymore though...
 --

 *From:* Af [af-boun...@afmug.com] on behalf of Glen Waldrop via Af [
 af@afmug.com]
 *Sent:* Wednesday, October 08, 2014 11:51 AM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* [AFMUG] Purchasing another WISP

 I just bought another WISP, negotiating with another.

 The previous owners set up the system using Rocket M900 using 20MHz
 channels on everything, stomping all over itself and everyone else in the
 band. I changed that, did my best to stop the self interference, smaller
 channels, etc...

 This was just a tiny bit of back story to show what I've gotten myself in
 to.

 Everyone has unlimited access to their 10Mb fiber, which I have replaced
 by tying it into my network.

 There was no traffic shaping, no speed limits, no QoS. Most of them aren't
 heavy users, just a couple that run torrents 24/7. The P2P folks have been
 limited already. Not terribly worried about upsetting them.

 I'm a bit concerned I'm going to anger my new customers by matching the
 same config I have for my system of 1Mb/4Mb.

 How did/would you guys handle situations like this? My main QoS at the
 edge prevents any one person from hogging all the bandwidth.

 I'm currently torn between QoS at the tower and uncapping the CPE or
 limiting the CPE as I've always done.





 --

 All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the
 parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you
 can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
 use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925





Re: [AFMUG] Belkin routers going nuts

2014-10-07 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
I've been pinging hearbeat.belkin.com for a couple of hours now and it just
went down hard.


-Ty

On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Josh Reynolds via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

  http://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-1369/Belkin.html

 Take your pick.

 Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
 SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com
  On 10/07/2014 06:11 AM, Mark Radabaugh via Af wrote:

 13 customers so far today - all Belkin.

 Powned?

 Mark

 On 10/7/14, 10:04 AM, Darren Shea via Af wrote:

 Is anyone else getting inundated with a flood of customers who can't
 connect to the internet through their Belkin routers this
 morning?
 �� What's the deal with that?,
 �� Darren









[AFMUG] Platypus + invalid packets

2014-10-06 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
Any reason why my Platypus client won't connect to the server with this
firewall rule active?


add action=drop chain=forward comment=drop invalid packet types
connection-state=\
invalid disabled=ye

I disable that rule and everything is fine. I enable it and the connection
times out and the client hangs/crashes.

-Ty


[AFMUG] 320SM drop dhcp with firewall

2014-09-30 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
Any reason this wouldn't catch DHCP server traffic from the customer? I
just tried it and the packets are still hitting the firewall on the tower
router.

-Ty


Re: [AFMUG] 320SM drop dhcp with firewall

2014-09-30 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
Should I define the source address? I often see DHCP server packets with
source of 192.168.1.1 or others. For instance in this case the packets the
Mikrotik is catching look like this:

forward: in:bridgeWAN(ether5) out:bridgeWAN(sfp1), src-mac
00:16:b6:85:26:b8, proto UDP, 192.168.1.1:67-255.255.255.255:68, len 328

-Ty

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Eric Muehleisen via Af af@afmug.com
wrote:

 Have you tried adding the src=0.0.0.0, dst=255.255.255.255 ?

 On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Ty Featherling via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:

 Any reason this wouldn't catch DHCP server traffic from the customer? I
 just tried it and the packets are still hitting the firewall on the tower
 router.

 -Ty





Re: [AFMUG] Tower Top Switch Surge Protection Question

2014-09-29 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
That is why we haven't used surge protection for tower-top switches. If I
were using more expensive switches up there I might reconsider.

-Ty

On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Gino Villarini via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

   That was my first thought, but then it requieres a tower climb to
 change blown supressors..



  Gino A. Villarini
 President
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 www.aeronetpr.com
 @aeronetpr



   From: af@afmug.com af@afmug.com
 Reply-To: af@afmug.com af@afmug.com
 Date: Monday, September 29, 2014 at 4:13 PM
 To: af@afmug.com af@afmug.com
 Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Tower Top Switch Surge Protection Question

   We do the Beehive APC surges.


  Gerard

 On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Gino Villarini via Af af@afmug.com
 wrote:

  Those putting Switches at the tower top, what kind of protection are
 you using for the Ethernet ports?

  Are you using surge suppressors?

  I was thinking of using Industrial POE switches at the top, feed DC and
 fiber, then short runs to the radios (epmp and 450 are poe compliant)

  Should I go straigt to the radios?



  Gino A. Villarini
 President
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 www.aeronetpr.com
 @aeronetpr






Re: [AFMUG] Bash specially-crafted environment variables code injection attack

2014-09-25 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
Noob question but how can I easiest update my linux boxes to get the latest
patches?

-Ty

On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Josh Reynolds via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

  Upgraded our systems at 6am yesterday for this. Also pulled the bash
 .deb out of debian-stable/security for our ubiquiti edgerouters. (I made
 on a post on the UBNT forum with the CVE info yesterday.)

 Side note: TONS of things are affected by this...

 Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
 SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com
  On 09/25/2014 10:25 AM, Peter Kranz via Af wrote:

 PS.. This vulnerability can be exploited via HTTP/Apache attack vectors, so 
 you need to patch any vulnerable system running Apache.

 Peter Kranz
 Founder/CEO - Unwired Ltdwww.UnwiredLtd.com
 Desk: 510-868-1614 x100
 Mobile: 510-207-pkr...@unwiredltd.com

 -Original Message-
 From: Af [mailto:af-bounces+pkranz=unwiredltd@afmug.com 
 af-bounces+pkranz=unwiredltd@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt via Af
 Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 10:27 AM
 To: af@afmug.com
 Subject: [AFMUG] Bash specially-crafted environment variables code injection 
 attack

 Bash specially-crafted environment variables code injection attack
 https://securityblog.redhat.com/2014/09/24/bash-specially-crafted-environment-variables-code-injection-attack/





Re: [AFMUG] Bash specially-crafted environment variables code injection attack

2014-09-25 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
Yeah I am trying to figure out what else I may be operating that is
vulnerable. UBNT? Mikrotik? Cisco?

-Ty

On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Josh Baird via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 It can be exposed by anything that invokes bash - which is a ton of stuff
 typically on Linux systems.

 On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Peter Kranz via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 PS.. This vulnerability can be exploited via HTTP/Apache attack vectors,
 so you need to patch any vulnerable system running Apache.

 Peter Kranz
 Founder/CEO - Unwired Ltd
 www.UnwiredLtd.com
 Desk: 510-868-1614 x100
 Mobile: 510-207-
 pkr...@unwiredltd.com

 -Original Message-
 From: Af [mailto:af-bounces+pkranz=unwiredltd@afmug.com] On Behalf
 Of Matt via Af
 Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 10:27 AM
 To: af@afmug.com
 Subject: [AFMUG] Bash specially-crafted environment variables code
 injection attack

 Bash specially-crafted environment variables code injection attack


 https://securityblog.redhat.com/2014/09/24/bash-specially-crafted-environment-variables-code-injection-attack/





Re: [AFMUG] Bash specially-crafted environment variables code injection attack

2014-09-25 Thread Ty Featherling via Af
Cool. Sounds like only my Linux boxes are vulnerable really. Already
patched them up.

-Ty

On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Josh Reynolds via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

  UBNT not vulnerable as AirOS doesn't have bash, it uses busybox (already
 tested this myself).

 EdgeRouters all vulnerable. You can either download bash from debian
 stable/security, or wait for an incoming patch.

 Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
 SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com
  On 09/25/2014 12:04 PM, Ty Featherling via Af wrote:

 Yeah I am trying to figure out what else I may be operating that is
 vulnerable. UBNT? Mikrotik? Cisco?

  -Ty

 On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Josh Baird via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 It can be exposed by anything that invokes bash - which is a ton of stuff
 typically on Linux systems.

 On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Peter Kranz via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 PS.. This vulnerability can be exploited via HTTP/Apache attack vectors,
 so you need to patch any vulnerable system running Apache.

 Peter Kranz
 Founder/CEO - Unwired Ltd
 www.UnwiredLtd.com
 Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 510-868-1614%20x100
 Mobile: 510-207-
 pkr...@unwiredltd.com

 -Original Message-
 From: Af [mailto:af-bounces+pkranz=unwiredltd@afmug.com] On Behalf
 Of Matt via Af
 Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 10:27 AM
 To: af@afmug.com
 Subject: [AFMUG] Bash specially-crafted environment variables code
 injection attack

 Bash specially-crafted environment variables code injection attack


 https://securityblog.redhat.com/2014/09/24/bash-specially-crafted-environment-variables-code-injection-attack/