Re: [AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

[That One Guy /sarcasm]

What he released was what it was. If there is no consequence we end up with
no security. You have to be certain what you're blowing the whistle on is
actually serious. Draft anything is not (talking about policy and whatnot)
draft is just an idea.
Had snowden taken even one step to go down a legitimate channel I wouldn't
have issue to the degree I do. Even if that was nothing more than a
deadline to come clean. I would prefer he released through a team that
could spot national security issue, but it's here nor there at this point,
he needs to die now.
Whistleblowers might lose a career, but almost always will get a book deal,
so it's not like income will be an issue. But those who choose to go
outside the protected channel stand to lose a lot more, like getting robbed
ala democrats. At least I want to publicly acknowledge we killed them.


On Feb 26, 2017 11:04 PM, "Josh Reynolds"  wrote:

> Which wouldn't have matter wether he did use his chain of command
> (debatable depending on how you read the hearing reports), as it's been
> pointed out several places that the whistleblower protections don't
> actually protect contractors - only federal employees. Tie that together
> with a historical retaliation on whistleblowers that had destroyed careers
> even after people were exonerated and I can see why.
>
> Note, I'm not saying what he did, the going to other countries etc is
> right or wrong, I'm simply saying I understand why someone in his situation
> blew the whistle the way that he did.
>
> I mean, his uncovering of mass surveillance that was so bad it was
> retroactively made legal is mind blowing. Blatant disregard of law by the
> US government, and instead of prosecuting anyone they're like "nah it's
> fine, oh here's a hall pass to cover the last couple of years".
>
> I'm very, very bothered that people are so up in arms over Snowden that
> nobody gives a fuck what he actually uncovered. That's a big warning flag
> to me about the state of our country.
>
>
> On Feb 26, 2017 10:48 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <
> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I have to clarify, that response I just made came across very shitty to
>> Jaime, was intended tongue in cheek.
>>
>> But releasing information about treason is not an issue initially for the
>> media, whistleblower programs are in place and nobody uses them, if they do
>> and they fail, then the press is fine, but it used to be the press would
>> investigate it, verify it where possible, now its a direct to the plate
>> scenario. Snowden needs to never come back, because he should be shot, he
>> never attempted a formal channel, and he had the tech prowess to dead man
>> switch an insurance data dump.
>> The leaker who got our seal killed needs blacksited and never seen again.
>> These leakers of everything just need a bullet in the head and their
>> bodies left for the raccoons.
>>
>> Yeah, I do bluff a lot in poker, mainly because I drink a lot and forget
>> how to play mid game.
>>
>> On Feb 26, 2017 10:22 PM, "Jeremy"  wrote:
>>
>> Quite a slippery slope there.  I think if they are leaking an attempt at
>> covering up treason, then it is probably more important that we prosecute
>> the person who committed the ACTUAL treason, rather than the person who
>> leaked the attempt at covering it up.  I don't think any of them deserves a
>> bullet.  As a strong second amendment-supporting liberal, I find it hard to
>> grasp the quick rush to murder people from the political party that
>> supposedly champions a 'right to life'.  Let me guess, you probably support
>> running over protesters in the streets too, right?
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 9:10 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> If they will leak insignificant information for free, they'll release
>>> devastating intelligence for a fee. All reports on the Yemen raid indicate
>>> they were prepared for our boys arrival. We lost a navy seal because of
>>> leaks. So I don't think it's extreme at all.
>>> The fact you think leaks are ok makes you much more a piece of work. Do
>>> you spit on veterans too?
>>>
>>> On Feb 26, 2017 9:11 PM, "Jeremy"  wrote:
>>>
>>> Wow, you are really a piece of work Steve.  Those people who released
>>> the trivial BS deserve to die??  There is the far right, and then there is
>>> bat shit crazy.  Where do you think you fall?
>>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 8:04 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
 Seems like they have no loyalty to their nation. Hopefully many of them
 he killed during a "robbery" democrat style

 On Feb 26, 2017 8:41 PM, "Jaime Solorza" 
 wrote:

> Seems like they have no respect or loyalty to Trumporino and
> friends...I agree it is bad to leak high security stuff but maybe finally
> the truth about Roswell will be leaked ...
>
> On Feb 26, 2017 

Re: [AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

[Josh Reynolds]

Which wouldn't have matter wether he did use his chain of command
(debatable depending on how you read the hearing reports), as it's been
pointed out several places that the whistleblower protections don't
actually protect contractors - only federal employees. Tie that together
with a historical retaliation on whistleblowers that had destroyed careers
even after people were exonerated and I can see why.

Note, I'm not saying what he did, the going to other countries etc is right
or wrong, I'm simply saying I understand why someone in his situation blew
the whistle the way that he did.

I mean, his uncovering of mass surveillance that was so bad it was
retroactively made legal is mind blowing. Blatant disregard of law by the
US government, and instead of prosecuting anyone they're like "nah it's
fine, oh here's a hall pass to cover the last couple of years".

I'm very, very bothered that people are so up in arms over Snowden that
nobody gives a fuck what he actually uncovered. That's a big warning flag
to me about the state of our country.


On Feb 26, 2017 10:48 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" 
wrote:

> I have to clarify, that response I just made came across very shitty to
> Jaime, was intended tongue in cheek.
>
> But releasing information about treason is not an issue initially for the
> media, whistleblower programs are in place and nobody uses them, if they do
> and they fail, then the press is fine, but it used to be the press would
> investigate it, verify it where possible, now its a direct to the plate
> scenario. Snowden needs to never come back, because he should be shot, he
> never attempted a formal channel, and he had the tech prowess to dead man
> switch an insurance data dump.
> The leaker who got our seal killed needs blacksited and never seen again.
> These leakers of everything just need a bullet in the head and their
> bodies left for the raccoons.
>
> Yeah, I do bluff a lot in poker, mainly because I drink a lot and forget
> how to play mid game.
>
> On Feb 26, 2017 10:22 PM, "Jeremy"  wrote:
>
> Quite a slippery slope there.  I think if they are leaking an attempt at
> covering up treason, then it is probably more important that we prosecute
> the person who committed the ACTUAL treason, rather than the person who
> leaked the attempt at covering it up.  I don't think any of them deserves a
> bullet.  As a strong second amendment-supporting liberal, I find it hard to
> grasp the quick rush to murder people from the political party that
> supposedly champions a 'right to life'.  Let me guess, you probably support
> running over protesters in the streets too, right?
>
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 9:10 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If they will leak insignificant information for free, they'll release
>> devastating intelligence for a fee. All reports on the Yemen raid indicate
>> they were prepared for our boys arrival. We lost a navy seal because of
>> leaks. So I don't think it's extreme at all.
>> The fact you think leaks are ok makes you much more a piece of work. Do
>> you spit on veterans too?
>>
>> On Feb 26, 2017 9:11 PM, "Jeremy"  wrote:
>>
>> Wow, you are really a piece of work Steve.  Those people who released the
>> trivial BS deserve to die??  There is the far right, and then there is bat
>> shit crazy.  Where do you think you fall?
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 8:04 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Seems like they have no loyalty to their nation. Hopefully many of them
>>> he killed during a "robbery" democrat style
>>>
>>> On Feb 26, 2017 8:41 PM, "Jaime Solorza" 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Seems like they have no respect or loyalty to Trumporino and
 friends...I agree it is bad to leak high security stuff but maybe finally
 the truth about Roswell will be leaked ...

 On Feb 26, 2017 7:35 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <
 thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:

> This should have been taking place the first time sensitive
> information leaked, I always assumed the white house would be a secure
> place.
> Leakers need to be prosecuted, preferrably executed. Leak in to the
> press is not whistle blowing. Bypassing all of the many existing 
> mechanisms
> to go right to the media should earn a bullet
>
> On Feb 26, 2017 6:58 PM, "Lewis Bergman" 
> wrote:
>
>> Funny that they leaked the steps they are taking to track down the
>> leaks.
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017, 5:58 PM Jaime Solorza <
>> losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxn
>>> ews.com%2Fpolitics%2F2017%2F02%2F26%2Fspicer-checks-wh-staff
>>> ers-phones-for-leaks-vows-more-searches-coming.amp.html#pt0-638843
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

[That One Guy /sarcasm]

And we believe right to life for people who haven't had a chance to do
anything wrong.

On Feb 26, 2017 10:47 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" 
wrote:

> I have to clarify, that response I just made came across very shitty to
> Jaime, was intended tongue in cheek.
>
> But releasing information about treason is not an issue initially for the
> media, whistleblower programs are in place and nobody uses them, if they do
> and they fail, then the press is fine, but it used to be the press would
> investigate it, verify it where possible, now its a direct to the plate
> scenario. Snowden needs to never come back, because he should be shot, he
> never attempted a formal channel, and he had the tech prowess to dead man
> switch an insurance data dump.
> The leaker who got our seal killed needs blacksited and never seen again.
> These leakers of everything just need a bullet in the head and their
> bodies left for the raccoons.
>
> Yeah, I do bluff a lot in poker, mainly because I drink a lot and forget
> how to play mid game.
>
> On Feb 26, 2017 10:22 PM, "Jeremy"  wrote:
>
> Quite a slippery slope there.  I think if they are leaking an attempt at
> covering up treason, then it is probably more important that we prosecute
> the person who committed the ACTUAL treason, rather than the person who
> leaked the attempt at covering it up.  I don't think any of them deserves a
> bullet.  As a strong second amendment-supporting liberal, I find it hard to
> grasp the quick rush to murder people from the political party that
> supposedly champions a 'right to life'.  Let me guess, you probably support
> running over protesters in the streets too, right?
>
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 9:10 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If they will leak insignificant information for free, they'll release
>> devastating intelligence for a fee. All reports on the Yemen raid indicate
>> they were prepared for our boys arrival. We lost a navy seal because of
>> leaks. So I don't think it's extreme at all.
>> The fact you think leaks are ok makes you much more a piece of work. Do
>> you spit on veterans too?
>>
>> On Feb 26, 2017 9:11 PM, "Jeremy"  wrote:
>>
>> Wow, you are really a piece of work Steve.  Those people who released the
>> trivial BS deserve to die??  There is the far right, and then there is bat
>> shit crazy.  Where do you think you fall?
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 8:04 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Seems like they have no loyalty to their nation. Hopefully many of them
>>> he killed during a "robbery" democrat style
>>>
>>> On Feb 26, 2017 8:41 PM, "Jaime Solorza" 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Seems like they have no respect or loyalty to Trumporino and
 friends...I agree it is bad to leak high security stuff but maybe finally
 the truth about Roswell will be leaked ...

 On Feb 26, 2017 7:35 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <
 thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:

> This should have been taking place the first time sensitive
> information leaked, I always assumed the white house would be a secure
> place.
> Leakers need to be prosecuted, preferrably executed. Leak in to the
> press is not whistle blowing. Bypassing all of the many existing 
> mechanisms
> to go right to the media should earn a bullet
>
> On Feb 26, 2017 6:58 PM, "Lewis Bergman" 
> wrote:
>
>> Funny that they leaked the steps they are taking to track down the
>> leaks.
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017, 5:58 PM Jaime Solorza <
>> losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxn
>>> ews.com%2Fpolitics%2F2017%2F02%2F26%2Fspicer-checks-wh-staff
>>> ers-phones-for-leaks-vows-more-searches-coming.amp.html#pt0-638843
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

[That One Guy /sarcasm]

I have to clarify, that response I just made came across very shitty to
Jaime, was intended tongue in cheek.

But releasing information about treason is not an issue initially for the
media, whistleblower programs are in place and nobody uses them, if they do
and they fail, then the press is fine, but it used to be the press would
investigate it, verify it where possible, now its a direct to the plate
scenario. Snowden needs to never come back, because he should be shot, he
never attempted a formal channel, and he had the tech prowess to dead man
switch an insurance data dump.
The leaker who got our seal killed needs blacksited and never seen again.
These leakers of everything just need a bullet in the head and their bodies
left for the raccoons.

Yeah, I do bluff a lot in poker, mainly because I drink a lot and forget
how to play mid game.

On Feb 26, 2017 10:22 PM, "Jeremy"  wrote:

Quite a slippery slope there.  I think if they are leaking an attempt at
covering up treason, then it is probably more important that we prosecute
the person who committed the ACTUAL treason, rather than the person who
leaked the attempt at covering it up.  I don't think any of them deserves a
bullet.  As a strong second amendment-supporting liberal, I find it hard to
grasp the quick rush to murder people from the political party that
supposedly champions a 'right to life'.  Let me guess, you probably support
running over protesters in the streets too, right?

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 9:10 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:

> If they will leak insignificant information for free, they'll release
> devastating intelligence for a fee. All reports on the Yemen raid indicate
> they were prepared for our boys arrival. We lost a navy seal because of
> leaks. So I don't think it's extreme at all.
> The fact you think leaks are ok makes you much more a piece of work. Do
> you spit on veterans too?
>
> On Feb 26, 2017 9:11 PM, "Jeremy"  wrote:
>
> Wow, you are really a piece of work Steve.  Those people who released the
> trivial BS deserve to die??  There is the far right, and then there is bat
> shit crazy.  Where do you think you fall?
>
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 8:04 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Seems like they have no loyalty to their nation. Hopefully many of them
>> he killed during a "robbery" democrat style
>>
>> On Feb 26, 2017 8:41 PM, "Jaime Solorza" 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Seems like they have no respect or loyalty to Trumporino and friends...I
>>> agree it is bad to leak high security stuff but maybe finally the truth
>>> about Roswell will be leaked ...
>>>
>>> On Feb 26, 2017 7:35 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <
>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
 This should have been taking place the first time sensitive information
 leaked, I always assumed the white house would be a secure place.
 Leakers need to be prosecuted, preferrably executed. Leak in to the
 press is not whistle blowing. Bypassing all of the many existing mechanisms
 to go right to the media should earn a bullet

 On Feb 26, 2017 6:58 PM, "Lewis Bergman" 
 wrote:

> Funny that they leaked the steps they are taking to track down the
> leaks.
>
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017, 5:58 PM Jaime Solorza 
> wrote:
>
>> https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxn
>> ews.com%2Fpolitics%2F2017%2F02%2F26%2Fspicer-checks-wh-staff
>> ers-phones-for-leaks-vows-more-searches-coming.amp.html#pt0-638843
>>
>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

[Josh Reynolds]

And one person's rebel is another person's patriot.

On Feb 26, 2017 10:30 PM, "Bill Prince"  wrote:

> One person's leaker is another's whistle blower.
>
> bp
> 
>
>
> On 2/26/2017 8:22 PM, Jeremy wrote:
>
> Quite a slippery slope there.  I think if they are leaking an attempt at
> covering up treason, then it is probably more important that we prosecute
> the person who committed the ACTUAL treason, rather than the person who
> leaked the attempt at covering it up.  I don't think any of them deserves a
> bullet.  As a strong second amendment-supporting liberal, I find it hard to
> grasp the quick rush to murder people from the political party that
> supposedly champions a 'right to life'.  Let me guess, you probably support
> running over protesters in the streets too, right?
>
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 9:10 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If they will leak insignificant information for free, they'll release
>> devastating intelligence for a fee. All reports on the Yemen raid indicate
>> they were prepared for our boys arrival. We lost a navy seal because of
>> leaks. So I don't think it's extreme at all.
>> The fact you think leaks are ok makes you much more a piece of work. Do
>> you spit on veterans too?
>>
>> On Feb 26, 2017 9:11 PM, "Jeremy"  wrote:
>>
>> Wow, you are really a piece of work Steve.  Those people who released the
>> trivial BS deserve to die??  There is the far right, and then there is bat
>> shit crazy.  Where do you think you fall?
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 8:04 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Seems like they have no loyalty to their nation. Hopefully many of them
>>> he killed during a "robbery" democrat style
>>>
>>> On Feb 26, 2017 8:41 PM, "Jaime Solorza" 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Seems like they have no respect or loyalty to Trumporino and
 friends...I agree it is bad to leak high security stuff but maybe finally
 the truth about Roswell will be leaked ...

 On Feb 26, 2017 7:35 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <
 thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:

> This should have been taking place the first time sensitive
> information leaked, I always assumed the white house would be a secure
> place.
> Leakers need to be prosecuted, preferrably executed. Leak in to the
> press is not whistle blowing. Bypassing all of the many existing 
> mechanisms
> to go right to the media should earn a bullet
>
> On Feb 26, 2017 6:58 PM, "Lewis Bergman" 
> wrote:
>
>> Funny that they leaked the steps they are taking to track down the
>> leaks.
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017, 5:58 PM Jaime Solorza <
>> losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxn
>>> ews.com%2Fpolitics%2F2017%2F02%2F26%2Fspicer-checks-wh-staff
>>> ers-phones-for-leaks-vows-more-searches-coming.amp.html#pt0-638843
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

[Bill Prince]

One person's leaker is another's whistle blower.

bp


On 2/26/2017 8:22 PM, Jeremy wrote:
Quite a slippery slope there.  I think if they are leaking an attempt 
at covering up treason, then it is probably more important that we 
prosecute the person who committed the ACTUAL treason, rather than the 
person who leaked the attempt at covering it up.  I don't think any of 
them deserves a bullet. As a strong second amendment-supporting 
liberal, I find it hard to grasp the quick rush to murder people from 
the political party that supposedly champions a 'right to life'.  Let 
me guess, you probably support running over protesters in the streets 
too, right?


On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 9:10 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm 
> wrote:


If they will leak insignificant information for free, they'll
release devastating intelligence for a fee. All reports on the
Yemen raid indicate they were prepared for our boys arrival. We
lost a navy seal because of leaks. So I don't think it's extreme
at all.
The fact you think leaks are ok makes you much more a piece of
work. Do you spit on veterans too?

On Feb 26, 2017 9:11 PM, "Jeremy" > wrote:

Wow, you are really a piece of work Steve.  Those people who
released the trivial BS deserve to die??  There is the far
right, and then there is bat shit crazy. Where do you think
you fall?

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 8:04 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm
>
wrote:

Seems like they have no loyalty to their nation. Hopefully
many of them he killed during a "robbery" democrat style

On Feb 26, 2017 8:41 PM, "Jaime Solorza"
> wrote:

Seems like they have no respect or loyalty to
Trumporino and friends...I agree it is bad to leak
high security stuff but maybe finally the truth about
Roswell will be leaked ...

On Feb 26, 2017 7:35 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm"
> wrote:

This should have been taking place the first time
sensitive information leaked, I always assumed the
white house would be a secure place.
Leakers need to be prosecuted, preferrably
executed. Leak in to the press is not whistle
blowing. Bypassing all of the many existing
mechanisms to go right to the media should earn a
bullet

On Feb 26, 2017 6:58 PM, "Lewis Bergman"
> wrote:

Funny that they leaked the steps they are
taking to track down the leaks.


On Sun, Feb 26, 2017, 5:58 PM Jaime Solorza
> wrote:


https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com%2Fpolitics%2F2017%2F02%2F26%2Fspicer-checks-wh-staffers-phones-for-leaks-vows-more-searches-coming.amp.html#pt0-638843

Re: [AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

[Bill Prince]

Every White House as long as I can remember has had leaks. It comes with 
the territory. I will say that this White House seems to be leaking more 
than those in the past.



bp


On 2/26/2017 6:35 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
This should have been taking place the first time sensitive 
information leaked, I always assumed the white house would be a secure 
place.
Leakers need to be prosecuted, preferrably executed. Leak in to the 
press is not whistle blowing. Bypassing all of the many existing 
mechanisms to go right to the media should earn a bullet


On Feb 26, 2017 6:58 PM, "Lewis Bergman" > wrote:


Funny that they leaked the steps they are taking to track down the
leaks.


On Sun, Feb 26, 2017, 5:58 PM Jaime Solorza
> wrote:


https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com%2Fpolitics%2F2017%2F02%2F26%2Fspicer-checks-wh-staffers-phones-for-leaks-vows-more-searches-coming.amp.html#pt0-638843

Re: [AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

[Chuck McCown]

Ya missed the bait.  “robbery” democrat style.  Like those that betrayed HRC 
came up dead now and then
I would love to play poker with Steve.  I think we would both probably bluff 
every hand for fun.  

From: Jeremy 
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2017 9:22 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OTwowno decoding ring for you.Spicer checks WH 
staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

Quite a slippery slope there.  I think if they are leaking an attempt at 
covering up treason, then it is probably more important that we prosecute the 
person who committed the ACTUAL treason, rather than the person who leaked the 
attempt at covering it up.  I don't think any of them deserves a bullet.  As a 
strong second amendment-supporting liberal, I find it hard to grasp the quick 
rush to murder people from the political party that supposedly champions a 
'right to life'.  Let me guess, you probably support running over protesters in 
the streets too, right?  

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 9:10 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm 
 wrote:

  If they will leak insignificant information for free, they'll release 
devastating intelligence for a fee. All reports on the Yemen raid indicate they 
were prepared for our boys arrival. We lost a navy seal because of leaks. So I 
don't think it's extreme at all.
  The fact you think leaks are ok makes you much more a piece of work. Do you 
spit on veterans too?


  On Feb 26, 2017 9:11 PM, "Jeremy"  wrote:

Wow, you are really a piece of work Steve.  Those people who released the 
trivial BS deserve to die??  There is the far right, and then there is bat shit 
crazy.  Where do you think you fall?

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 8:04 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm 
 wrote:

  Seems like they have no loyalty to their nation. Hopefully many of them 
he killed during a "robbery" democrat style

  On Feb 26, 2017 8:41 PM, "Jaime Solorza"  
wrote:

Seems like they have no respect or loyalty to Trumporino and 
friends...I agree it is bad to leak high security stuff but maybe finally the 
truth about Roswell will be leaked ...

On Feb 26, 2017 7:35 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" 
 wrote:

  This should have been taking place the first time sensitive 
information leaked, I always assumed the white house would be a secure place. 
  Leakers need to be prosecuted, preferrably executed. Leak in to the 
press is not whistle blowing. Bypassing all of the many existing mechanisms to 
go right to the media should earn a bullet

  On Feb 26, 2017 6:58 PM, "Lewis Bergman"  
wrote:

Funny that they leaked the steps they are taking to track down the 
leaks. 



On Sun, Feb 26, 2017, 5:58 PM Jaime Solorza 
 wrote:

  
https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com%2Fpolitics%2F2017%2F02%2F26%2Fspicer-checks-wh-staffers-phones-for-leaks-vows-more-searches-coming.amp.html#pt0-638843

Re: [AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

[Jeremy]

Quite a slippery slope there.  I think if they are leaking an attempt at
covering up treason, then it is probably more important that we prosecute
the person who committed the ACTUAL treason, rather than the person who
leaked the attempt at covering it up.  I don't think any of them deserves a
bullet.  As a strong second amendment-supporting liberal, I find it hard to
grasp the quick rush to murder people from the political party that
supposedly champions a 'right to life'.  Let me guess, you probably support
running over protesters in the streets too, right?

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 9:10 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:

> If they will leak insignificant information for free, they'll release
> devastating intelligence for a fee. All reports on the Yemen raid indicate
> they were prepared for our boys arrival. We lost a navy seal because of
> leaks. So I don't think it's extreme at all.
> The fact you think leaks are ok makes you much more a piece of work. Do
> you spit on veterans too?
>
> On Feb 26, 2017 9:11 PM, "Jeremy"  wrote:
>
> Wow, you are really a piece of work Steve.  Those people who released the
> trivial BS deserve to die??  There is the far right, and then there is bat
> shit crazy.  Where do you think you fall?
>
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 8:04 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Seems like they have no loyalty to their nation. Hopefully many of them
>> he killed during a "robbery" democrat style
>>
>> On Feb 26, 2017 8:41 PM, "Jaime Solorza" 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Seems like they have no respect or loyalty to Trumporino and friends...I
>>> agree it is bad to leak high security stuff but maybe finally the truth
>>> about Roswell will be leaked ...
>>>
>>> On Feb 26, 2017 7:35 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <
>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
 This should have been taking place the first time sensitive information
 leaked, I always assumed the white house would be a secure place.
 Leakers need to be prosecuted, preferrably executed. Leak in to the
 press is not whistle blowing. Bypassing all of the many existing mechanisms
 to go right to the media should earn a bullet

 On Feb 26, 2017 6:58 PM, "Lewis Bergman" 
 wrote:

> Funny that they leaked the steps they are taking to track down the
> leaks.
>
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017, 5:58 PM Jaime Solorza 
> wrote:
>
>> https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxn
>> ews.com%2Fpolitics%2F2017%2F02%2F26%2Fspicer-checks-wh-staff
>> ers-phones-for-leaks-vows-more-searches-coming.amp.html#pt0-638843
>>
>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

[That One Guy /sarcasm]

If they will leak insignificant information for free, they'll release
devastating intelligence for a fee. All reports on the Yemen raid indicate
they were prepared for our boys arrival. We lost a navy seal because of
leaks. So I don't think it's extreme at all.
The fact you think leaks are ok makes you much more a piece of work. Do you
spit on veterans too?

On Feb 26, 2017 9:11 PM, "Jeremy"  wrote:

Wow, you are really a piece of work Steve.  Those people who released the
trivial BS deserve to die??  There is the far right, and then there is bat
shit crazy.  Where do you think you fall?

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 8:04 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Seems like they have no loyalty to their nation. Hopefully many of them he
> killed during a "robbery" democrat style
>
> On Feb 26, 2017 8:41 PM, "Jaime Solorza" 
> wrote:
>
>> Seems like they have no respect or loyalty to Trumporino and friends...I
>> agree it is bad to leak high security stuff but maybe finally the truth
>> about Roswell will be leaked ...
>>
>> On Feb 26, 2017 7:35 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <
>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This should have been taking place the first time sensitive information
>>> leaked, I always assumed the white house would be a secure place.
>>> Leakers need to be prosecuted, preferrably executed. Leak in to the
>>> press is not whistle blowing. Bypassing all of the many existing mechanisms
>>> to go right to the media should earn a bullet
>>>
>>> On Feb 26, 2017 6:58 PM, "Lewis Bergman" 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Funny that they leaked the steps they are taking to track down the
 leaks.

 On Sun, Feb 26, 2017, 5:58 PM Jaime Solorza 
 wrote:

> https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxn
> ews.com%2Fpolitics%2F2017%2F02%2F26%2Fspicer-checks-wh-staff
> ers-phones-for-leaks-vows-more-searches-coming.amp.html#pt0-638843
>

Re: [AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

[Jeremy]

Wow, you are really a piece of work Steve.  Those people who released the
trivial BS deserve to die??  There is the far right, and then there is bat
shit crazy.  Where do you think you fall?

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 8:04 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Seems like they have no loyalty to their nation. Hopefully many of them he
> killed during a "robbery" democrat style
>
> On Feb 26, 2017 8:41 PM, "Jaime Solorza" 
> wrote:
>
>> Seems like they have no respect or loyalty to Trumporino and friends...I
>> agree it is bad to leak high security stuff but maybe finally the truth
>> about Roswell will be leaked ...
>>
>> On Feb 26, 2017 7:35 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <
>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This should have been taking place the first time sensitive information
>>> leaked, I always assumed the white house would be a secure place.
>>> Leakers need to be prosecuted, preferrably executed. Leak in to the
>>> press is not whistle blowing. Bypassing all of the many existing mechanisms
>>> to go right to the media should earn a bullet
>>>
>>> On Feb 26, 2017 6:58 PM, "Lewis Bergman" 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Funny that they leaked the steps they are taking to track down the
 leaks.

 On Sun, Feb 26, 2017, 5:58 PM Jaime Solorza 
 wrote:

> https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxn
> ews.com%2Fpolitics%2F2017%2F02%2F26%2Fspicer-checks-wh-staff
> ers-phones-for-leaks-vows-more-searches-coming.amp.html#pt0-638843
>

Re: [AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

[Josh Reynolds]

You have a rather extreme viewpoint on this. We're talking about leaks that
are closer in relevance to colonel Sanders secret recipe than we are lists
of active nuclear launch sites.

On Feb 26, 2017 9:04 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" 
wrote:

> Seems like they have no loyalty to their nation. Hopefully many of them he
> killed during a "robbery" democrat style
>
> On Feb 26, 2017 8:41 PM, "Jaime Solorza" 
> wrote:
>
>> Seems like they have no respect or loyalty to Trumporino and friends...I
>> agree it is bad to leak high security stuff but maybe finally the truth
>> about Roswell will be leaked ...
>>
>> On Feb 26, 2017 7:35 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <
>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This should have been taking place the first time sensitive information
>>> leaked, I always assumed the white house would be a secure place.
>>> Leakers need to be prosecuted, preferrably executed. Leak in to the
>>> press is not whistle blowing. Bypassing all of the many existing mechanisms
>>> to go right to the media should earn a bullet
>>>
>>> On Feb 26, 2017 6:58 PM, "Lewis Bergman" 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Funny that they leaked the steps they are taking to track down the
 leaks.

 On Sun, Feb 26, 2017, 5:58 PM Jaime Solorza 
 wrote:

> https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxn
> ews.com%2Fpolitics%2F2017%2F02%2F26%2Fspicer-checks-wh-staff
> ers-phones-for-leaks-vows-more-searches-coming.amp.html#pt0-638843
>

Re: [AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

[That One Guy /sarcasm]

Seems like they have no loyalty to their nation. Hopefully many of them he
killed during a "robbery" democrat style

On Feb 26, 2017 8:41 PM, "Jaime Solorza"  wrote:

> Seems like they have no respect or loyalty to Trumporino and friends...I
> agree it is bad to leak high security stuff but maybe finally the truth
> about Roswell will be leaked ...
>
> On Feb 26, 2017 7:35 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <
> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This should have been taking place the first time sensitive information
>> leaked, I always assumed the white house would be a secure place.
>> Leakers need to be prosecuted, preferrably executed. Leak in to the press
>> is not whistle blowing. Bypassing all of the many existing mechanisms to go
>> right to the media should earn a bullet
>>
>> On Feb 26, 2017 6:58 PM, "Lewis Bergman"  wrote:
>>
>>> Funny that they leaked the steps they are taking to track down the
>>> leaks.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017, 5:58 PM Jaime Solorza 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxn
 ews.com%2Fpolitics%2F2017%2F02%2F26%2Fspicer-checks-wh-staff
 ers-phones-for-leaks-vows-more-searches-coming.amp.html#pt0-638843

>>>

Re: [AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

[Ken Hohhof]

Did the leaks come from John Miller, or John Baron?

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Bill Prince
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2017 7:08 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OTwowno decoding ring for you.Spicer checks WH 
staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

 

The new administration has been consistently inconsistent. Old Mr. Orange was 
that way before the election, so no one should be surprised.

 

bp

 

On 2/26/2017 4:58 PM, Lewis Bergman wrote:

Funny that they leaked the steps they are taking to track down the leaks. 

 

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017, 5:58 PM Jaime Solorza  > wrote:

https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com%2Fpolitics%2F2017%2F02%2F26%2Fspicer-checks-wh-staffers-phones-for-leaks-vows-more-searches-coming.amp.html#pt0-638843

 

Re: [AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

[Jaime Solorza]

Seems like they have no respect or loyalty to Trumporino and friends...I
agree it is bad to leak high security stuff but maybe finally the truth
about Roswell will be leaked ...

On Feb 26, 2017 7:35 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" 
wrote:

> This should have been taking place the first time sensitive information
> leaked, I always assumed the white house would be a secure place.
> Leakers need to be prosecuted, preferrably executed. Leak in to the press
> is not whistle blowing. Bypassing all of the many existing mechanisms to go
> right to the media should earn a bullet
>
> On Feb 26, 2017 6:58 PM, "Lewis Bergman"  wrote:
>
>> Funny that they leaked the steps they are taking to track down the leaks.
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017, 5:58 PM Jaime Solorza 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxn
>>> ews.com%2Fpolitics%2F2017%2F02%2F26%2Fspicer-checks-wh-staff
>>> ers-phones-for-leaks-vows-more-searches-coming.amp.html#pt0-638843
>>>
>>

Re: [AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

[That One Guy /sarcasm]

This should have been taking place the first time sensitive information
leaked, I always assumed the white house would be a secure place.
Leakers need to be prosecuted, preferrably executed. Leak in to the press
is not whistle blowing. Bypassing all of the many existing mechanisms to go
right to the media should earn a bullet

On Feb 26, 2017 6:58 PM, "Lewis Bergman"  wrote:

> Funny that they leaked the steps they are taking to track down the leaks.
>
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017, 5:58 PM Jaime Solorza 
> wrote:
>
>> https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.
>> foxnews.com%2Fpolitics%2F2017%2F02%2F26%2Fspicer-checks-wh-
>> staffers-phones-for-leaks-vows-more-searches-coming.amp.html#pt0-638843
>>
>

Re: [AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

[Bill Prince]

The new administration has been consistently inconsistent. Old Mr. 
Orange was that way before the election, so no one should be surprised.



bp


On 2/26/2017 4:58 PM, Lewis Bergman wrote:


Funny that they leaked the steps they are taking to track down the leaks.


On Sun, Feb 26, 2017, 5:58 PM Jaime Solorza > wrote:



https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com%2Fpolitics%2F2017%2F02%2F26%2Fspicer-checks-wh-staffers-phones-for-leaks-vows-more-searches-coming.amp.html#pt0-638843

Re: [AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

[Lewis Bergman]

Funny that they leaked the steps they are taking to track down the leaks.

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017, 5:58 PM Jaime Solorza 
wrote:

>
> https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com%2Fpolitics%2F2017%2F02%2F26%2Fspicer-checks-wh-staffers-phones-for-leaks-vows-more-searches-coming.amp.html#pt0-638843
>

[AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

[Jaime Solorza]

https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com%2Fpolitics%2F2017%2F02%2F26%2Fspicer-checks-wh-staffers-phones-for-leaks-vows-more-searches-coming.amp.html#pt0-638843