Re: DIS: Re: BUS: i am an interchangeable part
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:13 AM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:04 PM, John Smith spamba...@yahoo.com wrote: CfJ, inquiry: The Executor of the message quoted in the evidence cannot be determined with reasonable effort except by judicial declaration Gratuitous: IRRELEVANT, as Mister Snuggles has never attempted to support any intents, and the identity of the Executor does not otherwise decide anything that could be ratified without an accompanying declaration (which cannot be included in a judicial declaration) that the message's sender is a first-class person. : do you want me to make it relevant? mister snuggles
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: i am an interchangeable part
On 03/25/2012 10:44 PM, Mister Snuggles wrote: On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:13 AM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:04 PM, John Smith spamba...@yahoo.com wrote: CfJ, inquiry: The Executor of the message quoted in the evidence cannot be determined with reasonable effort except by judicial declaration Gratuitous: IRRELEVANT, as Mister Snuggles has never attempted to support any intents, and the identity of the Executor does not otherwise decide anything that could be ratified without an accompanying declaration (which cannot be included in a judicial declaration) that the message's sender is a first-class person. : do you want me to make it relevant? mister snuggles Too late. Inquiry cases are evaluated as of their calling.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: i am an interchangeable part
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Mister Snuggles mr.snu...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:13 AM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:04 PM, John Smith spamba...@yahoo.com wrote: CfJ, inquiry: The Executor of the message quoted in the evidence cannot be determined with reasonable effort except by judicial declaration Gratuitous: IRRELEVANT, as Mister Snuggles has never attempted to support any intents, and the identity of the Executor does not otherwise decide anything that could be ratified without an accompanying declaration (which cannot be included in a judicial declaration) that the message's sender is a first-class person. : do you want me to make it relevant? i wouldn't dream of imposing.
DIS: Re: BUS: i am an interchangeable part
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:04 PM, John Smith spamba...@yahoo.com wrote: CfJ, inquiry: The Executor of the message quoted in the evidence cannot be determined with reasonable effort except by judicial declaration Gratuitous: IRRELEVANT, as Mister Snuggles has never attempted to support any intents, and the identity of the Executor does not otherwise decide anything that could be ratified without an accompanying declaration (which cannot be included in a judicial declaration) that the message's sender is a first-class person. :
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: i am an interchangeable part
On 14 March 2012 21:48, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: Lying is not illegal anymore. Man, stop changing the ruleset behind my back!
DIS: Re: BUS: i am an interchangeable part
Can we just drop all messages sent to the lists from mr.snu...@gmail.com? (Speaking of which, did anything come of the list hosting thing?)
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: i am an interchangeable part
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:40 AM, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote: Can we just drop all messages sent to the lists from mr.snu...@gmail.com? (Speaking of which, did anything come of the list hosting thing?) Umm, right. I promised to bring up a new set of mailing lists within a couple of days. And, uh... that promise is still in effect. I promise. —Machiavelli
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: i am an interchangeable part
I am not Mister Snuggles.
On Mar 14, 24 Heisei, at 12:43 AM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Mister Snuggles mr.snu...@gmail.com wrote:
i am not a player.
i register.
cfj arguments: to agora, all nonplayers are interchangeable.
mister snuggles
Huh, and I always thought it was G..
This message appears to have been sent from Gmail (also, the DKIM
signature is correct, although unlike in my messages, it does not
contain X-Google-Sender-Auth). If it is by the same author as the
original Mister Snuggles message and e is telling the truth, e must be
one of {BobTHJ, Droowl, Flameshadowxeroshin, Math321, Tiger, Turiski}.
The time zone listed on the message is -0400, which is not consistent
with any of their messages (based on the archive of a-b); the time
itself (17:27 UTC) is not particularly inconsistent with any of their
messaging habits (where there is sufficient data).
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: i am an interchangeable part
On 14 March 2012 13:16, FSX flameshadowxeros...@gmail.com wrote: I am not Mister Snuggles. You and everybody else. Posting it to a-b might give it more weight in the form of the illegality of lying, though.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: i am an interchangeable part
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote: On 14 March 2012 13:16, FSX flameshadowxeros...@gmail.com wrote: I am not Mister Snuggles. You and everybody else. Posting it to a-b might give it more weight in the form of the illegality of lying, though. Lying is not illegal anymore.
DIS: Re: BUS: i am an interchangeable part
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Mister Snuggles mr.snu...@gmail.com wrote:
i am not a player.
i register.
cfj arguments: to agora, all nonplayers are interchangeable.
mister snuggles
Huh, and I always thought it was G..
This message appears to have been sent from Gmail (also, the DKIM
signature is correct, although unlike in my messages, it does not
contain X-Google-Sender-Auth). If it is by the same author as the
original Mister Snuggles message and e is telling the truth, e must be
one of {BobTHJ, Droowl, Flameshadowxeroshin, Math321, Tiger, Turiski}.
The time zone listed on the message is -0400, which is not consistent
with any of their messages (based on the archive of a-b); the time
itself (17:27 UTC) is not particularly inconsistent with any of their
messaging habits (where there is sufficient data).
