[gsl-issues] [Issue 98599] PDF/A export produces alwa ys invalid PDF files
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98599 --- Additional comments from beppe...@openoffice.org Mon Nov 9 14:18:43 + 2009 --- May be this is the same as issue 106523? The problem solved in issue 106523 IMHO should solve the reopening of this issue as well, it was solved for all the 64 bit versions. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@gsl.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@gsl.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[l10n-issues] [Issue 85651] [IT] Bad translations in P DF export dialog, links
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85651 --- Additional comments from beppe...@openoffice.org Fri Jul 31 07:33:26 + 2009 --- @pescetti: I think that the current translation is correct. More precise, actually. There is no need to reopen the issue. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@l10n.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@l10n.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[api-issues] [Issue 87496] Publish storage related se rvices.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87496 User beppec56 changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'mba' |'beppec56,mba' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@api.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@api.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[api-issues] [Issue 87496] Publish storage related se rvices.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87496 --- Additional comments from beppe...@openoffice.org Mon Mar 30 14:43:26 + 2009 --- mm, just a question about the current implementation of the subject objects (storage services). Can I use it as they are or will they be changed in the 3.2 implentation? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@api.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@api.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[gsl-issues] [Issue 98599] PDF/A export produces alwa ys invalid PDF files
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98599 --- Additional comments from beppe...@openoffice.org Thu Jan 29 18:29:11 + 2009 --- Cannot confirm the issue in OOo 3.0.1. Test carried out in Debian lenny, used Acrobat reader 8.1.3 to test. At a quick analysis it seems that the test.pdf file attached to #desc3 has a ICC color profile with a different content then the standard one provided with vanilla OOo. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@gsl.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@gsl.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 97288] Custom numbering of headin gs in a document is lost when the document is linked in from a master document
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97288 --- Additional comments from beppe...@openoffice.org Sun Jan 25 15:46:17 + 2009 --- @mru. This this week end I had to possibility to check in Linux with 3.0.1rc2: it's fixed all right. Thanks. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[gsl-issues] [Issue 97696] DEV300_m38, PDF export: a part 3.0.x password functionality is lost
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97696 --- Additional comments from beppe...@openoffice.org Wed Jan 7 11:16:41 + 2009 --- -> pl. Thanks for the quick response. I built a patch of the fix from vcl98 and I'll try to use it on m38. Thanks to svn, getting patches for small fix like this is much simpler now. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@gsl.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@gsl.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 97491] "soffice" now being binary instead of shellscript
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97491 User beppec56 changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'ccheney,doko,mh' |'beppec56,ccheney,doko,mh' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[gsl-issues] [Issue 97696] DEV300_m38, PDF export: a part 3.0.x password functionality is lost
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97696 Issue #|97696 Summary|DEV300_m38, PDF export: a part 3.0.x password function |ality is lost Component|gsl Version|DEV300m37 Platform|PC URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|code Assigned to|pl Reported by|beppec56 --- Additional comments from beppe...@openoffice.org Thu Jan 1 10:29:15 + 2009 --- I tried in Dev300_m38 the new PDF password security UI, I think the set/unset behavior of the buttons is handy, but I miss the possibility to set the permission password only (and have the file encrypted) and at the same time have the file read by everyone. That is, in specification at http://specs.openoffice.org/appwide/pdf_export/PDFExportDialog2.odt , on row 146, the sentence “Setting only the permission password will force the open password to be the same” has a side effect: you can no longer export a PDF file that can be read by everyone and at the same time have some permission set through a permission password. IMHO , this is the vast majority of the PDF files available on the web. Another observation is about the new strings. According to 3.5 of PDF 1.4 specification, the document is encrypted as well when you specify access restrictions (e.g. the possible use of only the owner password). Then you can have four level of access to a PDF document: a) no password: PDF is not encrypted, then no access restrictions (print, copy, etc...): anyone can read anyone can change the document; b) permission password only: PDF is encrypted, access restriction can be applied (limited print, cannot copy, etc...), only if you know the permission password you can change access restriction: print, copy, etc..; but anyone can read it; c) open password only: PDF is encrypted, you can open the PDF document only if you know the open password. In this case the user who knows the open password has no access restriction because the OOo PDF export filter enables all the access rights (see 3.5.2 of PDF 1.4 spec, for an explanation of expected PDF viewer action); d) both open and permission password set: PDF is encrypted, points b) and c) both apply together. May be strings at #3 and #5 on table 4 of the OOo PDF export specification need to be adjusted? In any case it seems that the change was only made in the UI, the API behavior seems unchanged. This was first exposed in issue 69923 but I missed the point then, sorry. I had time to build a 3.1 targeted version only now. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@gsl.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@gsl.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 97288] Custom numbering of headin gs in a document is lost when the document is linked in from a master document
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97288 --- Additional comments from beppe...@openoffice.org Mon Dec 15 21:32:24 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=58834) zip archive containing the above described files - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 97288] Custom numbering of headin gs in a document is lost when the document is linked in from a master document
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97288 Issue #|97288 Summary|Custom numbering of headings in a document is lost whe |n the document is linked in from a master document Component|Word processor Version|OOo 3.0 Platform|PC URL| OS/Version|Linux Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|code Assigned to|writerneedsconfirm Reported by|beppec56 --- Additional comments from beppe...@openoffice.org Mon Dec 15 21:30:29 + 2008 --- When you assign a custom numbering on a heading on a slave document, the custom numbering is lost when the document is used in a master document. To present the case I uploaded a zip file containing the following files: doc-template-master-for-bug.ott the template used for all docs, contains the custom numbering style, named Appendix. slave-doc1.odt first slave document, heading numbering standard 1,2,3..., no custom numbering. Row six in this document contains a custom numbering applied to a couple of paragraphs. slave-doc-appendix.odt second slave document, heading numbering standard 1,2,3..., custom numbering (Appendix A,B,C...) the-master-document.odm the master document linking the two previous ones, into which the custom numbering on 'slave-doc-appendix.odt' slave document headings is ignored; the custom numbering on paragraphs (see row 14) is honored instead. the-master-document.odt a standard writer document, showing the desired numbering effect. In all documents the outline level is assigned to the same paragraph styles, only the first three styles are used. It doesn't seem a clone of issue 96092. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 96288] Disabling the command “D igital Signature” does not disable a button with the same function.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96288 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 30 14:14:45 + 2008 --- The two attached files are: - an updated version of the extension to be used to test, and - a patch that changes the way the pushbutton “Digital Signature...” reacts to the enable/disable state of the menu “Digital Signature...” command (in the menu it's a dispatched command). A better method could be to have the pushbutton reacting dynamically to the enable/disable state of the “Signature” command, as the menu does, but I didn't implement it. The idea of disabling the pushbutton came out because while writing an extension for custom digital signature of the document, I realized that for a normal user to have two different signature methods can be confusing. So I need to disable the OOo standard signature method. May be the contribution of a security/digital signature expert developer it's useful. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 96288] Disabling the command “D igital Signature” does not disable a button with the same function.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96288 User beppec56 changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment is patch| |Created an attachment (id= | |58407) Patch, a proposed s | |olution/to start a discuss | |ion. --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 30 14:09:57 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=58407) Patch, a proposed solution/to start a discussion. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 96288] Disabling the command “D igital Signature” does not disable a button with the same function.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96288 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 30 14:07:58 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=58406) Extension to be used for testing. With a better chosen node path (more general). - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 96287] Disabling any menu command disables menu item Tools > Macros > Organize Macros
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96287 User beppec56 changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment is patch| |Created an attachment (id= | |58394) patch for discussio | |n. See [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |ffice.org. --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 30 08:35:45 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=58394) patch for discussion. See [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 96287] Disabling any menu command disables menu item Tools > Macros > Organize Macros
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96287 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 29 15:19:34 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=58385) Extension for testing, see comment above - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 96287] Disabling any menu command disables menu item Tools > Macros > Organize Macros
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96287 User beppec56 changed the following: What|Old value |New value Summary|Disabling the command "Mac|Disabling any menu command |ro Digital Signature" disa| disables menu item Tools |bles another macro menu it|> Macros > Organize Macros |em as well. | --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 29 15:17:01 + 2008 --- After some more testing I found that the issue is general, it applies when any command is disabled, so changed summary to a more correct one. Issue can be checked with the attached minimal extension, that will disable the Tools > Customize... menu item. The extension implements what it's explained in the Developer's Guide (http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/WritingUNO/Disable_Commands) Using a running OOo 3.0 with no opened documents, check if Tools > Customize... is enabled, the Tools > Macros > Organize Macros should be there as well. Install the attached extension, check again Tools > Customize... it should be gone. Check Tools > Macros > Organize Macros it's still there (correct so far). Now open an empty text document, close it and check again Tools > Macros > Organize Macros : it disappeared whereas it shouldn't have. To restore things back, remove the installed “CommandDisableToolsCustomize” extension, check again Tools > Customize...: it should be there, whereas Tools > Macros > Organize Macros still wasn't enabled whereas it should be enabled. Open an empty document, close it and check again Tools > Macros > Organize Macros : it returned. The issue seems confined to dynamic menus bound to menu bar, it shows up when menus are recreated due to change of frame. I'll try to investigate further and to build a patch for discussion. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 96287] Disabling the command "Mac ro Digital Signature" disables another macro m enu item as well.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96287 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 28 12:55:25 + 2008 --- @cd: thanks, First a more precise information: in #desc1 I didn't explain correctly the menu item at 2.1: it's Tools > Macros > Digital Signatures...; not the one reported there. Sorry for that. In the meantime I modified slightly the extension to check with another command (InsertAVMedia, menu item: Insert > Movie and Sound). This command has no problem, so it seems confined to the the Macro submenu. I'll try to investigate the matter further into the code, in case I have trouble in understanding the program flow, I'll ask in the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 96288] Disabling the command “D igital Signature” does not disable a button with the same function.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96288 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 17 19:39:43 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=58063) Extension to be used for testing - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 96288] Disabling the command “D igital Signature” does not disable a button with the same function.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96288 Issue #|96288 Summary|Disabling the command “Digital Signature” does not | disable a button with the same function. Component|framework Version|OOo 3.0 Platform|PC URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|code Assigned to|tm Reported by|beppec56 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 17 19:36:35 + 2008 --- Check carried out in Debian GNU/Linux and Windows. To be sure I removed the user local OOo configuration before testing. To reproduce: 1.prepare a text document with whatever text you like 2.save the file and check the following items: 2.1.Tools > Digital Signatures... 2.2.File > Properties > General button “Digital Signatures...” All the 2 items should be available/enabled 3.Now install the attached minimal extension, it should disable the menu command 2.1 above and the button. Install the extension using Tools > Extension Manager... browse to the extension and confirm. Now close the office, as well as the quickstarter if it's running, restart the office. Open the document saved at point 2 above and check the menu items 2.1, 2.2 above. Item 2.1 disappeared and item 2.2 is still enabled, whereas in my opinion it should be disabled. As a side effect it seems that the menu item Tools > Macros > Organize Macros disappeared as well, it seems somehow related to issue 96287. To reenable the items, simply remove the extension and restart the office and quickstarter. I wrote the DisableCommands.xcu configuration file inside the extension following what I learned in this page: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/WritingUNO/Disable_Commands - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 96287] Disabling the command "Mac ro Digital Signature" disables another macro m enu item as well.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96287 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 17 18:24:53 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=58061) Extension to be used for testing - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 96287] Disabling the command "Mac ro Digital Signature" disables another macro m enu item as well.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96287 Issue #|96287 Summary|Disabling the command "Macro Digital Signature" disabl |es another macro menu item as well. Component|framework Version|OOo 3.0 Platform|PC URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|ui Assigned to|tm Reported by|beppec56 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 17 18:20:29 + 2008 --- Test check carried out in Debian GNU/Linux and Windows. To be sure I removed the user local OOo configuration before testing. To reproduce: 1.prepare a text document with whatever text you like 2.save the file and check the following menu items: 2.1.Tools > Digital Signatures... 2.2.Tools > Macros > Organize Macros All the 2 items should be there 3. Now install the attached minimal extension, it should only disable the menu command 2.1 above. Install the extension using Tools > Extension Manager... browse to the extension and confirm. At this time item 2.1 disappeared from menu, as it should be, whereas item 2.2 is still in place. Now close the office, as well as quickstarter if it's running, restart the office. Open the document saved at point 2 above and check the menu items 2.1, 2.2 above. They all disappeared, but only 2.1 should have gone, item 2.2 in my opinion shouldn't have. Or is my extension embedded configuration file (DisableCommands.xcu) doing something wrong? To reenable the menu items, simply remove the extension and restart the office and quickstarter. I wrote the DisableCommands.xcu configuration file inside the extension following what I learned in this page: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/WritingUNO/Disable_Commands - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 94258] pdf/a export validates as invalid
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94258 User beppec56 changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment is patch| |Created an attachment (id= | |57463) Proposed patch to p | |artial fix of the issue, f | |ixes “string object inva | |lid” error only, ooo300_ | |m9 based. --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 26 14:18:52 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=57463) Proposed patch to partial fix of the issue, fixes “string object invalid” error only, ooo300_m9 based. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 94258] pdf/a export validates as invalid
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94258 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 26 14:15:34 + 2008 --- Thank you guys for testing. I was able to build a patch for the string object issue, attachment for discussion follows. It seems that the image palette had unwanted spaces and line terminators, even though “Example 4.10” in PDF 1.4 spec, page 200 seems to allow spaces. The validators seem to check strictly for the length: “...the string should be 768 bytes long.” (I guess it must be read as “..the string _must_ be 768 bytes long.”). I'm still working on the array stuff problem. It seems lurking somewhere in the PDF tag structure generation (PDFWriterImpl::emitStructureAttributes), that emitted an array of over 12k elements for the document pointed out in #desc7. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 94258] pdf/a export validates as invalid
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94258 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 24 10:15:23 + 2008 --- The two preceding files can be used to generate the 'string object invalid' error on pdfa validation. The PDFA was emitted with OOo 3.0.0. @wheinsohn. If you have some spare time, could you please cross-check it with you installation? @pl. do you think someone at your side can cross-check with Acro? Thank you. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 94258] pdf/a export validates as invalid
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94258 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 24 10:08:58 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=57431) resulting pdfa of the above - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 94258] pdf/a export validates as invalid
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94258 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 24 10:08:21 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=57430) text file with 'string object invalid' error in the resulting PDF/A - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 94258] pdf/a export validates as invalid
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94258 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 23 13:03:05 + 2008 --- Heck, it seems I was wrong I misread some of the validator output. The error is there all right. @pl. This seems tricky, so I'll try to isolate the document part that triggers it. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 94258] pdf/a export validates as invalid
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94258 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 23 12:00:15 + 2008 --- I did a first series of test with OOo 3.0.0 on Debian Linux, I used callas pdfapilot 1.1.066 on Windows XP for validation. But on the large file (the ODF 1.0 spec pointed out in #desc7) the validator didn't find any problem. Being on OOo 3.0.0 I was showed the warning about transparency when the pdfa export ended. I'm going to carry out the same tests with 2.4.1. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 94258] pdf/a export validates as invalid
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94258 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 22 13:41:05 + 2008 --- @pl. Ok. I'll try to set up a PDF/A test bed using the directions provided by wheinsohn. @wheinsohn. Can you upload the Java Eclipse project you used to carry out the PDF/A validation? I need only the Java code using the pdf-tools validation library. I downloaded the VALA180PreWIN32Eval.zip eval pack myself. If issuezilla complains about the attachment size, please sent it to [EMAIL PROTECTED], where I have 1Gb size available. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 94258] pdf/a export validates as invalid
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94258 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 22 12:57:07 + 2008 --- @pl. Do you need help on this? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 95147] The attached Writer form t akes longer to open in 3.0.0 than in 2.4.1
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=95147 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 19 18:52:30 + 2008 --- Could someone close this issue as a duplicate of 94033? Thanks. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 95147] The attached Writer form t akes longer to open in 3.0.0 than in 2.4.1
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=95147 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 19 18:46:52 + 2008 --- Confirmed, opening in design mode the behavior is as in 2.4.1. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 95147] The attached Writer form t akes longer to open in 3.0.0 than in 2.4.1
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=95147 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 19 08:35:00 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=57264) offending Writer file - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 95147] The attached Writer form t akes longer to open in 3.0.0 than in 2.4.1
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=95147 Issue #|95147 Summary|The attached Writer form takes longer to open in 3.0.0 | than in 2.4.1 Component|Word processor Version|OOo 3.0 Platform|PC URL| OS/Version|Linux Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|open-import Assigned to|mru Reported by|beppec56 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 19 08:33:35 + 2008 --- The attached Writer form takes a longer time to open in OOo 3.0.0 than in 2.4.1. Using the same PC, in 2.4.1 takes around five seconds, in 3.0.0 takes around three minutes. On my Quad core PC, using a system monitor, I noted that 3.0.0 uses one of my CPU core 100% while opening the file. Test carried out on Debian Linux testing, KDE 3.5.9. First discovered on Windows Vista with 3.0.0, where I was forced to downgrade to 2.4.1 because of this issue. Further checks need to be carried out on other platforms and OS. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[www-issues] [Issue 94002] Migrate sshkeys to SVN cod e repository
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94002 User beppec56 changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'beppec56,ericb,hr' |'ericb,hr' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 94257] Incorrect hyperlink in PDF export
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94257 User beppec56 changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|''|'beppec56' --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 27 14:32:27 + 2008 --- cc myself. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 94258] pdf/a export validates as invalid
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94258 User beppec56 changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|''|'beppec56' --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 27 14:26:06 + 2008 --- cc myself - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 85986] (SRC680_m246) scext missin g from OpenOffice2 cvs alias
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85986 User beppec56 changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'beppec56,christophnoack,h|'christophnoack,hub,maho,m |ub,maho,mh,rt,sparcmoz,st,|h,rt,sparcmoz,st,vq' |vq' | - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gsl-issues] [Issue 88013] Broken relative path when exporting to pdf
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88013 User beppec56 changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'beppec56,rainerbielefeld'|'rainerbielefeld' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 86124] Security buttons enabled w ithout activation box checked
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86124 User beppec56 changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'beppec56'|'' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gsl-issues] [Issue 59651] PDF/A (ISO 19005-1) suppor t would be helpful
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59651 User beppec56 changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'beppec56,eberlein,jeongky|'eberlein,jeongkyu,joergwa |u,joergwartenberg,laurentg|rtenberg,laurentgodard,mmp |odard,mmp,pescetti,thing' |,pescetti,thing' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gsl-issues] [Issue 56629] PDF convert tool - relativ e links to files from file system are converte d as URLs not
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56629 User beppec56 changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'beppec56,mmp,pescetti' |'mmp,pescetti' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[graphics-issues] [Issue 40318] Slide titles should be boo kmarks when exported to PDF.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=40318 User beppec56 changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'beppec56,jbfaure'|'jbfaure' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[www-issues] [Issue 94002] Migrate sshkeys to SVN cod e repository
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94002 User beppec56 changed the following: What|Old value |New value IssuesThisDependsOn|2473,18828,19859,23777,267|2473,18828,19859,23777,267 |23,27875,48869,51393,60496|23,27875,48869,51393,60496 |,62341,76325,76386,91383,9|,62341,76325,76386,91383,9 |1634,93346,94021,94084,940|1634,93346,94021,94084,940 |91,94093 |91,94093,94095 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[www-issues] [Issue 94095] SVN ssh public key
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94095 User beppec56 changed the following: What|Old value |New value OtherIssuesDependingOnTh| |94002 is| | --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 19 19:03:51 + 2008 --- About 10 days ago I came across this message: http://tools.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=6641 so I uploaded this same public key to EIS following the procedure described into the mail. I don't know if this issue qualify as a duplicate operation. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[www-issues] [Issue 94095] SVN ssh public key
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94095 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 19 19:00:55 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=56652) beppec56's svn ssh public key - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[www-issues] [Issue 94095] SVN ssh public key
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94095 Issue #|94095 Summary|SVN ssh public key Component|www Version|current Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|TASK Priority|P3 Subcomponent|openoffice.org SVN Assigned to|hr Reported by|beppec56 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 19 18:57:45 + 2008 --- beppec56's OOo svn public key, attached. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[www-issues] [Issue 94002] Migrate sshkeys to SVN cod e repository
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94002 User beppec56 changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'ericb,hr'|'beppec56,ericb,hr' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[api-issues] [Issue 93203] Some of the OOo configurat ion elements are not updated synchronously usi ng the API
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93203
Issue #|93203
Summary|Some of the OOo configuration elements are not updated
| synchronously using the API
Component|api
Version|OOo 2.4.1
Platform|All
URL|
OS/Version|All
Status|UNCONFIRMED
Status whiteboard|
Keywords|
Resolution|
Issue type|DEFECT
Priority|P3
Subcomponent|code
Assigned to|jsc
Reported by|beppec56
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 28 11:30:54 +
2008 ---
It seems that some of the elements on the OOo configuration tree reachable by
API are not updated correctly on the rest of OOo application if changed through
API.
To check, follow this sequence on OOo 2.4.1 with en-US user interface, operating
system Debian, en-US user interface on KDE desktop
1) check in Tools > Options – Load/Save – General – “Save” group, the “Always
create backup copy” checkbox is unchecked.
2) check in Tools > Options – Language Settings – Languages – “Language of”
group, the “User interface” listbox is set to “Default”. The two listboxes
“Locale setting” and “Default currency” should be at “Default”
If not, then set all of them and restart OOo as appropriate.
3) use the following chunk of OOo macro code on 2.4.1 version and run it:
Sub Main
GlobalScope.BasicLibraries.LoadLibrary("Tools")
oTheConfigRoot = GetRegistryKeyContent("org.openoffice.Office.Common/",
true)
oTheConfigRoot.Save.Document.CreateBackup = true
oTheConfigRoot.commitChanges()
oTheSetupRoot = GetRegistryKeyContent("org.openoffice.Setup/", true)
oTheSetupRoot.L10N.ooSetupSystemLocale = "it-IT"
oTheSetupRoot.L10N.ooSetupCurrency = "EUR-it-IT"
oTheSetupRoot.L10N.DecimalSeparatorAsLocale = true
oTheSetupRoot.commitChanges()
End Sub
4) now check again the settings:
the one set in 1) above is unchanged, whereas it should have been checked,
the ones set in 2) are correctly changed:
The two listboxes “Locale setting” and “Default currency” are at “Italian
(Italy)” and “EUR € Italian (Itally)” as expected.
If you restart OOo the setting described in 1) above is shown correctly changed
to checked state.
In my opinion after the commitChanges() method returns, the setting described in
1) above should be changed as the other two, without the need to restart OOo.
-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 91378] PDF export option 'PDF/A-1 ' should read 'PDF/A-1a' or 'PDF/A-1b
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=91378 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 4 19:43:26 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=54949) Proposed patch, IMHO there's no need to translate - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 91378] PDF export option 'PDF/A-1 ' should read 'PDF/A-1a' or 'PDF/A-1b
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=91378 User beppec56 changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'beppec56'|'beppec56,pl' --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 4 17:17:24 + 2008 --- Some more technical PDF/A stuff can be found here: http://www.pdfa.org/doku.php?id=pdfa:en duncan_nz is right. We should be more precise, in this case the correct string is 'PDF/A-1a' that's the level of PDF/A conformance of OOo. CC pl. beppec56 -> pl. Target? Is 3.0 still possible? Or 3.1 ? I have not see plan for 3.0.1, yet. In any case I'll provide a small patch ASAP. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 90967] Impossible to add other Bi blio structure entry then CI
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90967 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 1 11:20:42 + 2008 --- beppec56 -> os. Can you have a look? The patch consists of a single changed line of code; I think that can be easily added to one open cws out there before code freeze. Thanks. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 90967] Impossible to add other Bi blio structure entry then CI
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90967 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 30 19:18:30 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=54845) Proposed patch, DEV300_m21 based - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 90967] Impossible to add other Bi blio structure entry then CI
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90967 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 30 19:17:32 + 2008 --- A patch to fix this issue follows. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 90967] Impossible to add other Bi blio structure entry then CI
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90967 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 30 10:51:56 + 2008 --- I'll have a look this evening. I don't have OOo sources available where I'm currently working... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ui-issues] [Issue 91077] Pdf options in export to P DF has windows that need to be enlarged
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=91077 User beppec56 changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'delorea,paolopoz,pescetti|'beppec56,delorea,paolopoz |' |,pescetti' --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 27 06:34:16 + 2008 --- cc myself - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 89791] Some of the index chapter information attributes written to ODF 1.1 and 1.2 don't reflect the displaying
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89791 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 26 12:44:13 + 2008 --- beppec56 -> OD. I formed a patch from the cws sw30bf07, some doubts popped up: if I recall, the reason I put the chapter format swap at the UNO level, was that the ChapterInfo at the xml level is the same for both the TokenEntryNumber UNO index token and the TokenChapterInfo UNO index token. Whereas the swaps 'CF_NUMBER =-> CF_NUM_NOPREPST_TITLE' and 'CF_NUM_TITLE =-> CF_NUMBER_NOPREPST' should be performed only with TokenChapterInfo token, not in TokenEntryNumber. I'm not sure if the adapted patch takes this into account, I had time for a quick review only. This evening I'll have more time to spare to have a look at the complete cws. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gsl-issues] [Issue 90373] pdf generated with unicode password could not be opened
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90373 User beppec56 changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|''|'beppec56' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 90246] When saving to ODF 1.0/1.1 the new ODF 1.2 index features are not remove d.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90246 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 5 06:57:34 + 2008 --- @mba. The issue described here didn't surface when I implemented issue 53420. I don't know if od (or someone else :-) ) is addressing it or not. So I thought to post an issue to describe it. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 90246] When saving to ODF 1.0/1.1 the new ODF 1.2 index features are not remove d.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90246 User beppec56 changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment is patch| |Created an attachment (id= | |54180) proposed patch, may | | be not final. OOo 1.x is | |not solved --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 2 16:55:49 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=54180) proposed patch, may be not final. OOo 1.x is not solved - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 89791] Some of the index chapter information attributes written to ODF 1.1 and 1.2 don't reflect the displaying
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89791 User beppec56 changed the following: What|Old value |New value OtherIssuesDependingOnTh| |90246 is| | - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 90246] When saving to ODF 1.0/1.1 the new ODF 1.2 index features are not remove d.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90246 User beppec56 changed the following: What|Old value |New value IssuesThisDependsOn| |89791 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 2 16:54:12 + 2008 --- I'm going to attach a patch that partially solves the issue. I say partially, because I wasn't able to find a way to catch the exporting to old OOo 1.x formats. The resolution for issue 89791 is needed before this one, because the correct importing and values for chapter info are needed, see issue 89791 for details. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[www-issues] [Issue 90256] Extensions3 misses the -a modifier?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90256 Issue #|90256 Summary|Extensions3 misses the -a modifier? Component|www Version|1.0.1 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|TASK Priority|P3 Subcomponent|openoffice.org CVS Assigned to|mh Reported by|beppec56 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 2 13:02:14 + 2008 --- I'm not sure if this is the problem, but trying to check out anonymously the Extensions3 module collection, I got the error: cvs [checkout aborted]: there is no repository /cvs/scext The CVSROOT/modules Extensions3 line looks: Extensions3 scext sdext swext tomcat apache-commons reportdesign jfreereport Shouldn't it be: Extensions3 -a scext sdext swext tomcat apache-commons reportdesign jfreereport right? Or may be it's work in progress, in this case feel free to close this. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 90246] When saving to ODF 1.0/1.1 the new ODF 1.2 index features are not remove d.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90246 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 2 09:49:52 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=54165) The error log generated by the test - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 90246] When saving to ODF 1.0/1.1 the new ODF 1.2 index features are not remove d.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90246 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 2 09:48:41 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=54164) File obtained from the previous attachement and saved in ODF 1.0/1.1 using OOo 3.0 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 90246] When saving to ODF 1.0/1.1 the new ODF 1.2 index features are not remove d.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90246 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 2 09:45:52 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=54163) ODF 1.2 document created with OOo DEV300_m14 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 90246] When saving to ODF 1.0/1.1 the new ODF 1.2 index features are not remove d.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90246 Issue #|90246 Summary|When saving to ODF 1.0/1.1 the new ODF 1.2 index featu |res are not removed. Component|Word processor Version|DEV300m14 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|code Assigned to|mru Reported by|beppec56 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 2 09:44:15 + 2008 --- When you save to ODF 1.0/1.1 an ODF 1.2 document containing the new index feature implemented in issue 53420, the new elements are not removed. The resulting ODF 1.0/1.1 document will be read by OOo 2.4, but will fail a check using the 1.1 ODF schema. Furthermore opening with OOo 2.4 the file saved in version 1.0/1.1 with 3.0 will result in extraneous fields in some of the indexes (Index of figures, for instance) being displayed. To test, prepare a document in 3.0, using the new index features. An example document in ODF 1.2 format is attached. Save it in ODF 1.0/1.1 format, using the Tools > Options - Load/Save - General ODF Format version setting to ODF 1.0/1.1. The resulting document is attached. Then, dowload the ODF 1.1 schema from the OASIS site: http://www.oasis-open.org/specs/index.php#opendocumentv1.1 using a Java application as the one that can be downloaded at: http://www.thaiopensource.com/relaxng/jing.html unzip the ODF document and check the xml document content.xml. Some error will be displayed, an error log is attached. The test carried out with a home build DEV300_m14, GNU/Linux, Debian lenny. I'm not sure this is the suggested way of testing the ODF conformity. Please have a look. I'm trying to prepare a patch for this issue; unless it has already been addressed under another number/subject. Let me know... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 89791] Some of the index chapter information attributes written to ODF 1.1 and 1.2 don't reflect the displaying
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89791 User beppec56 changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment is patch| |Created an attachment (id= | |53882) Patch, a proposed s | |olution. To be checked. --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 23 11:06:39 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=53882) Patch, a proposed solution. To be checked. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 89791] Some of the index chapter information attributes written to ODF 1.1 and 1.2 don't reflect the displaying
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89791 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 23 11:05:02 + 2008 --- I'm going to attach a patch, still rough around the edges, that can be tough as a proposed solution to the issue. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 89791] Some of the index chapter information attributes written to ODF 1.1 and 1.2 don't reflect the displaying
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89791 User beppec56 changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment is patch| |Created an attachment (id= | |53877) patch file pointing | | out the differences --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 23 09:06:35 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=53877) patch file pointing out the differences - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 89791] Some of the index chapter information attributes written to ODF 1.1 and 1.2 don't reflect the displaying
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89791 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 23 09:05:15 + 2008 --- The patch file I'm going to attach points out the differences between the Writer document attached in #desc3 and a file in which the text:display values of the text:index-entry-chapter elements are the ones I think correct (e.g. a correct display <-> ODF 1.2 association). Please have a look. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 89791] Some of the index chapter information attributes written to ODF 1.1 and 1.2 don't reflect the displaying
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89791 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 22 13:49:30 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=53855) test document created with DEV300_m13, contains wrong attributes. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 89791] Some of the index chapter information attributes written to ODF 1.1 and 1.2 don't reflect the displaying
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89791 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 22 13:54:18 + 2008 --- The two document just uploaded should be enough to give an idea of the problem. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 89791] Some of the index chapter information attributes written to ODF 1.1 and 1.2 don't reflect the displaying
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89791 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 22 13:46:48 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=53854) test document created with 2.4, contains wrong attributes - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 89791] Some of the index chapter information attributes written to ODF 1.1 and 1.2 don't reflect the displaying
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89791 Issue #|89791 Summary|Some of the index chapter information attributes writt |en to ODF 1.1 and 1.2 don't reflect the displaying Component|Word processor Version|DEV300m13 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|code Assigned to|mru Reported by|beppec56 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 22 13:19:43 + 2008 --- There is an incompatibility between the way OOo displays certain chapter information index attributes and the saved ODF attributes. To reproduce: Prepare a document with some chapters, at different outline levels, enable the outline numbering. Add a prefix and a suffix to the outline numbering style. Add an alphabetical index and use the three Chapter Info types available. Save the file. To check: - unzip the odt file, - locate the contents.xml file, - open it with a text editor (better if you can have xml syntax highlight enabled), and: - look for the text:alphabetical-index-source element. Please check the text:display values of the subordinate text:index-entry-chapter elements: the text:display attribute value is not the right one according to ODF specification. This problem is present in Dev300_m13 and it extends to other index types that now have the chapter information functionality added. The problem is present in OOo 2.4 as well, in alphabetical index only. I'm going to attach a couple of documents, one produced with OOo 2.4 that exploit the behavior and contains a table with a better explanation of what happens, and another one produced with OOo 3.0 DEV300_m13 where all the involved indexes are inserted (and the ODF 1.2 file has the wrong attributes). Please have a look at them. At the moment, I'm trying to figure out a patch to address the issue: to read older file with the bug (using 680 code line as divider), and save both the ODF 1.1 and ODF 1.2 with the right attribute value. I don't know if this problem exists in 645 code line (when files are converted to ODF, I mean). On the API side, at a first quick check, the com.sun.star.text.ChapterFormat.* constants (http://api.openoffice.org/docs/common/ref/com/sun/star/text/ChapterFormat.html) appear correct. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gsl-issues] [Issue 88919] Signature support for PDF export
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88919 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 5 10:06:56 + 2008 --- @pl. Double to issue 47895? Just to not loose the votes there, having a single issue for the same topic and the right component... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 20370] Q-PCD MSInteroperability-3 3: embedd fonts into the document
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20370 User beppec56 changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'bh,cloph,cmc,ggs,ikonst,i|'beppec56,bh,cloph,cmc,ggs |kuya,jlp,maho,sforbes,tora|,ikonst,ikuya,jlp,maho,sfo |' |rbes,tora' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gsl-issues] [Issue 87968] font embedding control for PDF export
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87968 User beppec56 changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|''|'beppec56' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gsl-issues] [Issue 59651] PDF/A (ISO 19005-1) suppor t would be helpful
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59651 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 17 11:31:01 + 2008 --- @windl > I did not open a new issue, because this one is about implementing PDF/A, > and it seems the implementation is incomplete at least. Reopening the > issue seems right to me. I suggested to open a new issue simply because it is better and more quickly investigated. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gsl-issues] [Issue 59651] PDF/A (ISO 19005-1) suppor t would be helpful
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59651 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 14 06:56:52 + 2008 --- @windl. If I where you, I'd check the PDF/A-1 checkbox status on PDF export dialog box. If the problem's still there, then, as I said in #desc39 above, can you open a new issue? Component gsl, subcomponent code. Thanks. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gsl-issues] [Issue 88123] Non conformance of PDF/A-1 a produced by OOo.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88123 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 10 14:29:53 + 2008 --- @fjuillet. thanks for the tests. @pl. Yes the patch seems good, but to test it I still need to download the Callas tools. Unless you have the means to test it differently :-). - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gsl-issues] [Issue 88123] Non conformance of PDF/A-1 a produced by OOo.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88123
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 10 12:48:36 +
2008 ---
I carried out some quick check, without downloading the Callas pdfaPilot, and it
seems that the only thing that can give that kind of error is the following
Group dictionary, at the page level:
/Group<>
It seems that the page is marked as containing transparent elements while there
are not, hence the check tool complains since it found no transparent object on
the page.
This would explain the error, it checks quite strictly against clause 6.4 of ISO
19005-1:2005 Norm.
@pl.
Is the following code (in PDFWriterImpl::PDFPage::emit):
if( m_pWriter->getVersion() > PDFWriter::PDF_1_3 )
{
aLine.append( "/Group<>" );
}
correct?
IMHO we should add that Group dictionary only if the page actually contains
transparencies.
@fjuillet, a couple of questions.
Just for confirmation, is the number of occurrences per document equal to the
page number?
Do you have the same error with an empty page, e.g. a blank page, in this case
with a single occurrence?
Another test would be to check the PDF/A-1 of a document with a single page
containing a single graphical element with a transparency. This last case
shouldn't rise an error.
-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gsl-issues] [Issue 88123] Non conformance of PDF/A-1 a produced by OOo.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88123 User beppec56 changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|''|'beppec56' --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 10 10:26:31 + 2008 --- cc to myself. @pl. I'll have a look into this. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gsl-issues] [Issue 59651] PDF/A (ISO 19005-1) suppor t would be helpful
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59651 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 10 09:50:22 + 2008 --- @fjuillet. Could you open a new issue for this? It would ease the investigation into the problem. Assign it to gsl component, code subcomponent. Thanks. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gsl-issues] [Issue 88013] Broken relative path when exporting to pdf
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88013 User beppec56 changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment is patch| |Created an attachment (id= | |52659) proposed patch --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 8 16:20:55 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=52659) proposed patch - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gsl-issues] [Issue 88013] Broken relative path when exporting to pdf
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88013 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 8 16:19:58 + 2008 --- I'm going to attach a path that solves the issue. @pl. Do you think this can make it into 3.0 beta? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gsl-issues] [Issue 88013] Broken relative path when exporting to pdf
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88013 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 7 18:56:46 + 2008 --- @rainerbielefeld. >Another effect I saw (bug or feature?) that with preferences like shown in >"i88013.png" file name extension ".odt" was changed to ".pdf" in hyperlink, >when >document containing link was exported to PDF. A feature, useful if you have some linked ODF documents and want to maintain the links in OOo (e.g. traversing them). It's governed by the checkbox 'Convert document references to PDF targets'. >No idea what "PDF/A-1" might mean. Your OS is top secret? By PDF/A-1 I meant that this issue should not be present exporting to PDF/A-1 (ISO 19005-1:2005) format. I tested on Linux Debian but IMHO this the issue is present on all OS. I don't know about ftoth OS beppec56 here ;-). @pl. I'm going to build a debug dev300-m5 version, figuring out a patch. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gsl-issues] [Issue 88013] Broken relative path when exporting to pdf
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88013 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 7 17:29:15 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=52626) PDF export dialog link set-up needed. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gsl-issues] [Issue 88013] Broken relative path when exporting to pdf
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88013 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 7 17:28:30 + 2008 --- -> rainerbielefeld. I'm attaching the PDF dialog set up as image. Please check with this. Confirm that PDF/A-1 is not checked. In any case it seems that the GoToR PDF command inside the PDF file is badly formed. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gsl-issues] [Issue 88013] Broken relative path when exporting to pdf
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88013 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 7 16:22:33 + 2008 --- I'll have a look into it. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gsl-issues] [Issue 56629] PDF convert tool - relativ e links to files from file system are converte d as URLs not
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56629 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 6 07:14:40 + 2008 --- ->ftoth. It would be better to open a new issue, narrowed down to your problem. Don't forget to attach test documents in order to be able to reproduce the behavior. Assign it to component gsl, subcomponent code. Remember that currently this feature works for 'file://' protocol only (e.g. no 'smb://' or others). - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gsl-issues] [Issue 59651] PDF/A (ISO 19005-1) suppor t would be helpful
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59651 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 21 09:26:38 + 2008 --- @stef4o: I checked the file you attached on #desc30 above against: http://www.datalogics.com/products/utils/callaspdfA-onlinedemo.asp and it passed the test. I didn't test it with the other tool you mentioned in #desc28 above. In any case if you feel there is some problem please feel free to open another issue. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gsl-issues] [Issue 59651] PDF/A (ISO 19005-1) suppor t would be helpful
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59651 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 21 09:19:49 + 2008 --- @stef4o: I just generated the OpenDocument 1.0 ed.2 PDF/A, it's about 11 Mb, so please attach only the smaller of the two, if you can. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gsl-issues] [Issue 59651] PDF/A (ISO 19005-1) suppor t would be helpful
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59651 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 21 09:14:20 + 2008 --- @stef4o: can you attach the resulting PDF documents, the ones not passing the PDF/A tests? I'd like to have a look. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[api-issues] [Issue 87123] publish com.sun.star.uri s tuff
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87123 User beppec56 changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|''|'beppec56' --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 17 11:18:50 + 2008 --- -> sb. I suppose that on 2.4 I can consider it as published? I mean from the point of view of using it in an extension. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xml-issues] [Issue 86651] Adapt digital signatures t o ODF 1.2
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86651 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 5 13:08:47 + 2008 --- -> jl. Just out of curiosity, is this issue somehow related to the thread I started on [EMAIL PROTECTED] list at: http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=21872 ? Or it is the porting of the current OOo signature method to 3.0 version? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[tools-issues] [Issue 86612] Build fails in instsetoo_n ative: File not found: libsolverli.so
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86612 User beppec56 changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 2 19:03:49 + 2008 --- Closing... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[tools-issues] [Issue 86612] Build fails in instsetoo_n ative: File not found: libsolverli.so
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86612 User beppec56 changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 2 19:03:23 + 2008 --- Sorry folks, I forgot that because of issue 85986 scext need to be checkout outside OpenOffice2 alias. Checking it out, solved this issue. Set to fixed. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[tools-issues] [Issue 86612] Build fails in instsetoo_n ative: File not found: libsolverli.so
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86612 User beppec56 changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment is patch| |Created an attachment (id= | |51850) patch to fix build --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 2 14:21:22 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=51850) patch to fix build - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
