Re: [AMRadio] Using Heath SB 610 Monitor Scope tomonitormodulationonAM transmitter

2008-02-12 Thread Peter Markavage
The 620 is a panadapter. It requires a connection to the mixer plate (or
input side of an IF chain). The 610 (for receive) requires a connection
to the output side of the IF chain.

Pete, wa2cwa
http://www.manualman.com

On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:49:28 -0600 Jim Wilhite [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
 Bingo you are right Bob.  I just traded my 620 and did have them 
 backwards.  The 620 requires a connection to the IF of the 
 receiver.
 
 
 Jim/W5JO
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


[AMRadio] Using Heath SB 610 Monitor Scope to monitor modulation

2008-02-12 Thread D. Chester
I use a highly modified HO-10, which is basically the same scope in a 
different package.


I used to use the trapezoid pattern all the time.  Mine is wired up with the 
t/r relay system to deflect the spot off the tube when the transmitter is in 
standby mode.  But I found that with the trapezoid that the unmodulated 
carrier eventually burnt a vertical line on the scope tube, even though it 
registered only briefly between syllables.  I now use the envelope pattern 
to monitor modulation, and use the trapezoid only to check modulation 
linearity.  In evelope pattern, the horizontal base line appears only on cw, 
during key-up conditions.  I work some cw, but not enough to burn a line on 
the scope.  I  like to monitor my cw waveform just like I monitor my 
modulated waveform on phone.


Don k4kyv 


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Todays Toy - Elmac PS-2V

2008-02-12 Thread Mike WE0H

Wow, very clean. Where did you score this purchase?

Mike
WE0H


JT Croteau wrote:

FedEx just delivered me an Elmac PS-2V power supply that I plan to use
with an AF-68 transmitter that should be arriving any day now.  It
is very clean and includes the CFS-1 cable and PTR-1 relay kit.  It
has had one mod done to it however.  Someone has added another 6.3V
filament transformer under the hood and a 3-prong male connector to
the CFS-1 cable,  Have not investigated the reason for both of these
yet.

Pics: http://n1ese.qrpradio.com/Elmac/
  


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Todays Toy - Elmac PS-2V

2008-02-12 Thread JT Croteau
On Feb 12, 2008 3:35 PM, Greg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The original relay probably pooped out and was substituted with a six volt
 DC relay.

Well, that would make sense but the relay installed is a 24V relay.  Heh.

-- 
JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manchester, NH (FN42gx)
Contest Manager, TARA Skirmish
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Todays Toy - Elmac PS-2V

2008-02-12 Thread Greg
The original relay probably pooped out and was substituted with a six volt 
DC relay.  The extra connector on the end of the cable is most likely for 
the mobile receiver or front end converter.  I got a bad feeling that the AF 
54 67 and 68 will be going up in price soon due to the demand for quality 
plate modulated stuff.

Thanks for the FB pic's JT
73's
Greg
WA7LYO
Kinston NC
- Original Message - 
From: JT Croteau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service 
amradio@mailman.qth.net

Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 2:58 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Todays Toy - Elmac PS-2V



Update on my PS-2V..

The relay kit installed is not the original PTR-1 kit that was put
together by Multi-Products.  This relay is a Western Electric 24V unit
where the original supplied was a 24V Potter  Brumfield unit.  The
relay is supposed to be powered by the 24V tap coming off the filament
transformer.  However, this installation is powered by the dedicated
6.3V transformer that has been mounted to the top of the plate tranny.
There are then three diodes and a big 1000 uF capacitor in between
the 6.3V tranny and the relay.  I don't understand why it was done
like this at all.

--
JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manchester, NH (FN42gx)
Contest Manager, TARA Skirmish
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body. 


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


[AMRadio] Collins 21-E FS on QTH

2008-02-12 Thread Joe Crawford
K6OR has a Collins 21-E BC transmitter for sale on QTH(ad#646866).Has crystals 
for 75m ghetto, 5kW high, 1100 watts low.$5K.Usual disclaimers apply.
 Joe W4AAB
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] HT-32/SX-101/NC-183D

2008-02-12 Thread Jim Wilhite

He is in Amarillo, TX.

Jim/W5JO


WA5NKP has the above for sale on QTH(ad#646751). Usual disclaimers 
apply.

  Joe W4AAB
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/

List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.



__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


RE: [AMRadio] RE: Using a Ranger as a driver

2008-02-12 Thread doxemf

Gary,

That is exactly what I meant by the sweet spot in the final current. By 
dropping the screen voltage only, it would allow better modulation and 
also reduce saturation. I found that my VKII had the best audio and mod 
% when run at about 90 watts on the TenTec tuner meter. Reference only 
really.Plate current was reading no more than 190-200ma and mod current 
swinging to about the same on peaks. Not sure just how accurate the 
stock meter is. The meters had different dynamics in the 2 VKs that I 
used to run.  Been about 5 years ago and the 807s were driven by a UTC 
line to grid directly from the audio rack.


This has been a great thread !
Thanks,
Bill, KB3DKS in 1 land

-Original Message-
From: Gary Schafer Subject: RE: [AMRadio] RE: Using a Ranger as a driver


SNIP


When reducing power by reducing screen voltage the plate voltage is 
going to

remain the same and plate current is going to be less, so the plate
impedance will be higher and the modulator will see a higher impedance 
also.


Now the modulator will not be able to produce as much power as it did 
before

because the modulator plates will flat top (go into limiting) with the
lighter load on them. That is if you try to pull the same amount of 
audio

out of them as you did before when they were working into the lower load
impedance.
But this is not a bad thing because with reduced power in the final you
don't need as much audio to modulate it with.

The load impedance that the modulator tubes see is not important as 
long as
it is low enough to be able to produce enough power to fully modulate 
the

transmitter before the modulator tubes voltage swings to the saturation
point. If the load impedance is too low the tubes will work too hard 
trying
to produce enough power out and will operate in the non linear part of 
the

plate curve.

Some transmitters are deliberately designed to have the modulator tubes 
flat
top and act as limiters to keep the modulation percentage below 100%. 
The
venerable Johnson Viking 2 is such an example. The modulation 
transformer
that they chose provides a little too high a load impedance to the 
modulator

tubes so that they go into clipping before 100% modulation is achieved.
Their idea of a soft clipper.

73
Gary  K4FMX





More new features than ever.  Check out the new AOL Mail ! - 
http://webmail.aol.com

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


RE: [AMRadio] RE: Using a Ranger as a driver

2008-02-12 Thread Gary Schafer
Hi Jim,

I think what John is saying is that you do NOT want to retune when you lower
the plate voltage in order to maintain the same plate impedance.

If you were to half the plate voltage with a modification to the transmitter
then during tune up you would want to tune up to half the plate current that
you had with full voltage before the modification. That will give you the
same plate load impedance and the modulator tubes will see the same
impedance. You are now operating at 1/4 the power you were when you had
twice the plate voltage.

But maintaining the same load impedance on the modulator is not necessarily
important: See below.

When reducing power by reducing screen voltage the plate voltage is going to
remain the same and plate current is going to be less, so the plate
impedance will be higher and the modulator will see a higher impedance also.

Now the modulator will not be able to produce as much power as it did before
because the modulator plates will flat top (go into limiting) with the
lighter load on them. That is if you try to pull the same amount of audio
out of them as you did before when they were working into the lower load
impedance. 
But this is not a bad thing because with reduced power in the final you
don't need as much audio to modulate it with. 

The load impedance that the modulator tubes see is not important as long as
it is low enough to be able to produce enough power to fully modulate the
transmitter before the modulator tubes voltage swings to the saturation
point. If the load impedance is too low the tubes will work too hard trying
to produce enough power out and will operate in the non linear part of the
plate curve.

Some transmitters are deliberately designed to have the modulator tubes flat
top and act as limiters to keep the modulation percentage below 100%. The
venerable Johnson Viking 2 is such an example. The modulation transformer
that they chose provides a little too high a load impedance to the modulator
tubes so that they go into clipping before 100% modulation is achieved.
Their idea of a soft clipper.

73
Gary  K4FMX


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:amradio-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Wilhite
 Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 10:00 PM
 To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
 Subject: Re: [AMRadio] RE: Using a Ranger as a driver
 
 Ok John,
 
 I have but a few observations and questions that might steer everyone
 through this.  I am having trouble understanding how the Z the modulator
 see is greater if the plate load impedance goes down.  If the Plate Z is
 = to the Ep divide by 2 times the Ip and you change one value how does
 the Z remain the same.  Even if you maintain the same ratio doesn't the
 plate Z change as a result?  In your example you change both at the same
 ration which maintains the same impedance.
 
 Ep   600
 Ip200 ma.
 
 Zp= 600 divided by 2 times .2 = 600/.4 = 1500
 
 Ep300
 Ip100 ma.
 
 Zp = 300 divided by 2 times .1 = 300/.2 = 1500
 
 The ratios stay the same, but what I question is if you reduce the plate
 voltage of a tube but load it to the same value of Ip or near it, the
 impedance changes on the secondary of the mod transformer, which I
 guess, is where the divide is.  I have seen many people make this
 mistake.  Because if you do, to maximize power or whatever reason, the
 impedance seen by the primary of the mod transformer is not optimum.
 
 In the discussion of the way to drive the amplifier no one pointed out
 that you must maintain the ratio of Ep to Ip.  This is where I kept
 sticking.  Now the question becomes, why did Johnson say to load the
 Ranger to rated plate voltage and current but insert the pad between the
 transmitter and amplifier?  Just guessing here, but I would bet that
 amateurs of the 50s were much like those of today.  All knobs and stated
 reading must be to the right.  Or is there something that is seen on the
 primary of the mod transformer by the Class A or B modulator tubes we
 haven't discussed yet?
 
 Jim/W5JO
 
 
 
 
 
  Hi Jim,
  What I said was, or tried to say, when a Class C rig is unloaded so
  as to draw less current, that is, to tune the loading and plate
  circuit so
  that the plate dip is lower current than it was when it is tune up for
  max.
  The plate voltage will stay about the same but the plate current is
  less and
  you have less RF output as well of course.  In this scenario the ratio
  of Ep
  / Ip is greater.  The Z that the modulator sees is greater.
 
  Now if the plate voltage is lowered with out retuning anything, the
  plate current will fall as the plate voltage falls and the ratio of
  the two
  remains the same.
 
  Basically when a class C rig is set and not retuned, the Ep:Ip ratio
  is set and the plate current should follow the plate voltage up and
  down
  linearly.  The RF should follow the plate voltage up and down as well.
  Some
  tubes and circuits need a little help with this.  Such as using grid

Re: [AMRadio] 1N91 Substitution

2008-02-12 Thread Jim Wilhite

NTE 116 is the generic cross.

Jim/W5JO

http://www.nteinc.com/






What can I substitute today for a 1N91 rectifier?

Thanks

--
JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manchester, NH (FN42gx)


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] RE: Using a Ranger as a driver

2008-02-12 Thread Jim Wilhite

Ok John,

I have but a few observations and questions that might steer everyone 
through this.  I am having trouble understanding how the Z the modulator 
see is greater if the plate load impedance goes down.  If the Plate Z is 
= to the Ep divide by 2 times the Ip and you change one value how does 
the Z remain the same.  Even if you maintain the same ratio doesn't the 
plate Z change as a result?  In your example you change both at the same 
ration which maintains the same impedance.


Ep   600
Ip200 ma.

Zp= 600 divided by 2 times .2 = 600/.4 = 1500

Ep300
Ip100 ma.

Zp = 300 divided by 2 times .1 = 300/.2 = 1500

The ratios stay the same, but what I question is if you reduce the plate 
voltage of a tube but load it to the same value of Ip or near it, the 
impedance changes on the secondary of the mod transformer, which I 
guess, is where the divide is.  I have seen many people make this 
mistake.  Because if you do, to maximize power or whatever reason, the 
impedance seen by the primary of the mod transformer is not optimum.


In the discussion of the way to drive the amplifier no one pointed out 
that you must maintain the ratio of Ep to Ip.  This is where I kept 
sticking.  Now the question becomes, why did Johnson say to load the 
Ranger to rated plate voltage and current but insert the pad between the 
transmitter and amplifier?  Just guessing here, but I would bet that 
amateurs of the 50s were much like those of today.  All knobs and stated 
reading must be to the right.  Or is there something that is seen on the 
primary of the mod transformer by the Class A or B modulator tubes we 
haven't discussed yet?


Jim/W5JO






Hi Jim,
What I said was, or tried to say, when a Class C rig is unloaded so
as to draw less current, that is, to tune the loading and plate 
circuit so
that the plate dip is lower current than it was when it is tune up for 
max.
The plate voltage will stay about the same but the plate current is 
less and
you have less RF output as well of course.  In this scenario the ratio 
of Ep

/ Ip is greater.  The Z that the modulator sees is greater.

Now if the plate voltage is lowered with out retuning anything, the
plate current will fall as the plate voltage falls and the ratio of 
the two

remains the same.

Basically when a class C rig is set and not retuned, the Ep:Ip ratio
is set and the plate current should follow the plate voltage up and 
down
linearly.  The RF should follow the plate voltage up and down as well. 
Some
tubes and circuits need a little help with this.  Such as using grid 
leak
resistance instead of a fixed supply if the stage is to be modulated. 
The
grid leak resistance will allow the grid voltage to fluctuate a little 
with
the audio as the plate current goes up and down.  This actually helps 
to
keep the ration of IP to EP constant.  The grid leak resistor is 
something
of a self regulator for the ratio.  The screen grid tubes have a whole 
other
set of things that can be done to help the plate current to plate 
voltage

ratio remain constant.

There was a discussion awhile back about the plate voltage to plate
current ratios.  Some one was saying that a circuit will lose 
efficiency if
the plate voltage is reduced.  This is only true if the person changes 
the
loading or tuning.  What they probably meant was that if you reduce 
the
voltage and try to retune to get the same power out that you would 
have less
efficiency.  The only thing that should happen when plate voltage is 
reduced
is that the power input goes down and the RF power also goes down.  If 
a rig
with a plate supply of 600V is putting out 100 watts into 50 ohms the 
RF
voltage would be 70.7 volts RMA.  When the plate voltage is reduced to 
300V
the rig should put out 25 watts with RF voltage of 35.35 RMS on the 
load.


Here is a chart.
600V EP
200ma IP
DC input power = 120 watts
RF output 100 watts
Plate dissipation = 20 watts
EFF = 83 percent
EP/IP = 3000 ohms modulator load Z

Now let's go down to 300 volts on the plate

300V EP
100ma IP
DC input power = 30 watts
RF output 25 watts
Plate dissipation = 5 watts
EFF = 83 percent
EP/IP = 3000 ohms modulator load Z


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


[AMRadio] 1N91 Substitution

2008-02-12 Thread JT Croteau
What can I substitute today for a 1N91 rectifier?

Thanks

-- 
JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manchester, NH (FN42gx)
Contest Manager, TARA Skirmish
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


[AMRadio] HT-32/SX-101/NC-183D

2008-02-12 Thread Joe Crawford
WA5NKP has the above for sale on QTH(ad#646751). Usual disclaimers apply.
   Joe W4AAB
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Todays Toy - Elmac PS-2V

2008-02-12 Thread Joe Crawford
I just bought an AF-67. I have two A-54H(not AF)transmitters I need to get 
sold or traded once I get them working.Nothing like plate modulation.

Joe W4AAB
- Original Message - 
From: Greg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service 
amradio@mailman.qth.net

Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Todays Toy - Elmac PS-2V


The original relay probably pooped out and was substituted with a six volt 
DC relay.  The extra connector on the end of the cable is most likely for 
the mobile receiver or front end converter.  I got a bad feeling that the 
AF 54 67 and 68 will be going up in price soon due to the demand for 
quality plate modulated stuff.

Thanks for the FB pic's JT
73's
Greg
WA7LYO
Kinston NC
- Original Message - 
From: JT Croteau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service 
amradio@mailman.qth.net

Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 2:58 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Todays Toy - Elmac PS-2V



Update on my PS-2V..

The relay kit installed is not the original PTR-1 kit that was put
together by Multi-Products.  This relay is a Western Electric 24V unit
where the original supplied was a 24V Potter  Brumfield unit.  The
relay is supposed to be powered by the 24V tap coming off the filament
transformer.  However, this installation is powered by the dedicated
6.3V transformer that has been mounted to the top of the plate tranny.
There are then three diodes and a big 1000 uF capacitor in between
the 6.3V tranny and the relay.  I don't understand why it was done
like this at all.

--
JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manchester, NH (FN42gx)
Contest Manager, TARA Skirmish
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.



__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Todays Toy - Elmac PS-2V

2008-02-12 Thread JT Croteau
On Feb 12, 2008 4:28 PM,  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 24VDC relay installed vs. 24VAC original (just guessing)?

24VDC in both - Original schematic shows a 24VDC relay connected to
the 24V tap on the tranny with a 1N91 rectifier and filter cap.  This
replacement relay says 24V as well but wired to a dedicated 6.3V
tranny with 3 diode rectifiers and two filter caps.  Not sure what the
values are on the diodes as I haven't dissected yet.

-- 
JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manchester, NH (FN42gx)
Contest Manager, TARA Skirmish
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


RE: [AMRadio] RE: Using a Ranger as a driver

2008-02-12 Thread John Coleman
Hi Jim,
What I said was, or tried to say, when a Class C rig is unloaded so
as to draw less current, that is, to tune the loading and plate circuit so
that the plate dip is lower current than it was when it is tune up for max.
The plate voltage will stay about the same but the plate current is less and
you have less RF output as well of course.  In this scenario the ratio of Ep
/ Ip is greater.  The Z that the modulator sees is greater. 

Now if the plate voltage is lowered with out retuning anything, the
plate current will fall as the plate voltage falls and the ratio of the two
remains the same.  

Basically when a class C rig is set and not retuned, the Ep:Ip ratio
is set and the plate current should follow the plate voltage up and down
linearly.  The RF should follow the plate voltage up and down as well.  Some
tubes and circuits need a little help with this.  Such as using grid leak
resistance instead of a fixed supply if the stage is to be modulated.  The
grid leak resistance will allow the grid voltage to fluctuate a little with
the audio as the plate current goes up and down.  This actually helps to
keep the ration of IP to EP constant.  The grid leak resistor is something
of a self regulator for the ratio.  The screen grid tubes have a whole other
set of things that can be done to help the plate current to plate voltage
ratio remain constant.

There was a discussion awhile back about the plate voltage to plate
current ratios.  Some one was saying that a circuit will lose efficiency if
the plate voltage is reduced.  This is only true if the person changes the
loading or tuning.  What they probably meant was that if you reduce the
voltage and try to retune to get the same power out that you would have less
efficiency.  The only thing that should happen when plate voltage is reduced
is that the power input goes down and the RF power also goes down.  If a rig
with a plate supply of 600V is putting out 100 watts into 50 ohms the RF
voltage would be 70.7 volts RMA.  When the plate voltage is reduced to 300V
the rig should put out 25 watts with RF voltage of 35.35 RMS on the load.

Here is a chart.
600V EP
200ma IP
DC input power = 120 watts
RF output 100 watts
Plate dissipation = 20 watts
EFF = 83 percent 
EP/IP = 3000 ohms modulator load Z

Now let's go down to 300 volts on the plate

300V EP
100ma IP
DC input power = 30 watts
RF output 25 watts
Plate dissipation = 5 watts
EFF = 83 percent
EP/IP = 3000 ohms modulator load Z





  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Wilhite
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 11:36 AM
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [AMRadio] RE: Using a Ranger as a driver

I forgot to mention John, you might explain how a Class C final sees 
higher impedance when the plate voltage is lowered.  As I recall Zp is = 
Ep/(2X) Ip.  So a Ranger with 600 V. on the plate with 120 ma. is seeing 
~ 2500 ohms.  With 300 volts at the same current, it should be seeing 
~1250. Zp.

Maybe this will help some of these people and you are much more eloquent 
than I.

Jim/W5JO 

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


AM Mobile Rig (was Re: [AMRadio] Todays Toy - Elmac PS-2V)

2008-02-12 Thread ne1s
- Original Message -
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Todays Toy - Elmac PS-2V
Date: Tue, February 12, 2008 16:32
From: Todd, KA1KAQ [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 I was thinking of your mobile set up Larry, and wondering if it was
 somehow meant to work with a Gonset converter or ?

 ~ Todd,  KA1KAQ

Hi Todd,

Not sure I understand the question. My mobile station is an Elmac A54-H
XMTR, with the RCVR being a Gonset Super-6 converter feeding the AM
broadcash radio. The output of the converter is somewhere near 1400 Kc/s.
Antenna is the convenient but innefficient Webster Bandspanner.

The A54-H is powered from a PE-103 dynamotor, and the Gonset converter has
its own transistorized multivibrator supply strapped on the back to
provide plate voltage.

If you look at the photo on my homepage (ne1s.rfburn.org), the box below
the transmitter takes care of such things as TR switching, RX muting,
frequency spotting, switching the AM broadcash radio between antenna and
converter, etc. Even have a noise clipper down there, but it wasn't very
effective, so I don't use it.

Probably more than you wanted to know :-)

73,
-Larry/NE1S
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Todays Toy - Elmac PS-2V

2008-02-12 Thread Todd, KA1KAQ
On Feb 12, 2008 4:28 PM,  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 - Original Message -

 24VDC relay installed vs. 24VAC original (just guessing)?

I was thinking of your mobile set up Larry, and wondering if it was
somehow meant to work with a Gonset converter or ?

~ Todd,  KA1KAQ
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Todays Toy - Elmac PS-2V

2008-02-12 Thread ne1s
- Original Message -
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Todays Toy - Elmac PS-2V
Date: Tue, February 12, 2008 15:43
From: JT Croteau [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 On Feb 12, 2008 3:35 PM, Greg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  The original relay probably pooped out and was substituted with a six
volt
  DC relay.

 Well, that would make sense but the relay installed is a 24V relay.  Heh.


24VDC relay installed vs. 24VAC original (just guessing)?

-Larry/NE1S



__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Todays Toy - Elmac PS-2V

2008-02-12 Thread JT Croteau
Update on my PS-2V..

The relay kit installed is not the original PTR-1 kit that was put
together by Multi-Products.  This relay is a Western Electric 24V unit
where the original supplied was a 24V Potter  Brumfield unit.  The
relay is supposed to be powered by the 24V tap coming off the filament
transformer.  However, this installation is powered by the dedicated
6.3V transformer that has been mounted to the top of the plate tranny.
 There are then three diodes and a big 1000 uF capacitor in between
the 6.3V tranny and the relay.  I don't understand why it was done
like this at all.

-- 
JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manchester, NH (FN42gx)
Contest Manager, TARA Skirmish
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Todays Toy - Elmac PS-2V

2008-02-12 Thread JT Croteau
On Feb 12, 2008 2:00 PM, Mike WE0H [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Wow, very clean. Where did you score this purchase?

qth.com  :-)

-- 
JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manchester, NH (FN42gx)
Contest Manager, TARA Skirmish
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


[AMRadio] RE: Using Heath SB 610 Monitor Scope to monitor modulation

2008-02-12 Thread D. Chester

From: W6OM [EMAIL PROTECTED]
... I have two, one connected to the plate of
the 2nd IF on an NC 300 for monitoring the incoming signals and for 
transmit

it monitors a Ranger driving an SB 220 on AM.

The second on is connected to the grid of the 2nd detector stage on my 
75A4
to monitor incoming signals and also watch my transmit signal on a Bauer 
707

converted to 75 meters.


You are  much better off monitoring your transmitted signal using a sample 
of the signal goind directly to the antenna, than using the output of the 
detector stage of your receiver.  The receiver will inevitably alter the 
waveform of the signal.  There are nonlinearities in the amplifier stages, 
but most significantly, the i.f. transformers and selectivity filters may 
completely change the appearance of the envelope pattern.  The only way to 
avoid this would be to use a selectivity that is many times wider than your 
transmitted signal.  Selectivity in the i.f. will cause phase shifts, as 
well as filter away higher frequency components of the waveform, leaving you 
a false image of your signal.


I don't even like to use the built-in vertical amplifier.  The most accurate 
image is obtained by feeding the deflection plates of the scope tube 
directly with the rf sample.  I use a  highly modified HO-10.  I believe it 
is the same scope, with a different style cabinet.  It even has the same 
problem with those 1600V caps.


Mine had loads of built-in hum and the image was fuzzy when I first got it 
going.  The Heath manual says not to worry about that; it's inherent to the 
design, and won't make the scope any less useful for modulation monitoring 
purposes.  What a  load of crock!  The designers were either incompetent, 
too lazy or in too much of a hurry get the thing into production, and they 
probably didn't want to run up the cost any more by using a real magnetic 
shield for the CRT.  I was able to get a sharper image by adding astigmatism 
control to the scope tube  circuitry, and to get rid of the hum (which was 
modulating not only the horizontal pattern, but the brightness of the 
pattern, too), I re-routed the filament wiring, using a wire lead for both 
sides of the filament line, not the chassis base for one side (figured those 
mods out, one at a time, by trial-and-error).  The piece of tin they wrap 
around the neck of the scope tube is totally worthless as a magnetic 
shield.  I found an old military surplus gadget in my junk pile, that used 
the same size scope tube (I think it was some kind of RTTY monitor), and 
used the black anodised metal magnetic shield that was in that unit.  That 
fixed probably 75% of the  rest of the hum.  I then further reduced the 
remaining hum by beefing up the power supply filtering.




Hard to imagine a more versatile inexpensive monitor scope available now
days as they sell for anywhere from $60.00 to $80.00 on eBay and else 
where.

If the face plate is good, cabinet paint is available from a couple of
sources and if needed  to match a vintage IF strip 455Khz IF cans are 
cheap

and plentiful at Tubes and More in Phoenix for less than $3.00.

One word of caution, every one I have owned has had the 1600V mylar caps 
go
bad, so if you buy an SB610 order some replacements ($12.00 from Mouser) 
and

replace them first.


With the HO10, and I assume with the SB-610, the power transformer is 
another troublesome component.  The xfmr in my original one crapped out with 
a dead short somewhere in the winding.  I found another HO-10 at a hamfest 
that had been dropped, for $10.  The cabinet was mangled, but all the 
components were still there and intact, including the scope tube.  I used it 
as a parts rig, and dropped the xfmr into my original one and restored it to 
operation.  Since then, I have found another one for a back-up parts rig. 
So I have a spare power xfmr, compactron tubes, and a couple of spare scope 
tubes.


Since I don't use mine with SSB, and don't use the vertical amplifier, I 
pulled the tubes from both of those stages, just keeping the tubes that 
operate the horizontal sweep circuitry.  That liberated some spare 
compactrons, plus it lightens the  load on the power transformer, and 
hopefully that will make it  last longer.  So for, after nearly 10 years, 
that replacement transformer has held up.


Don k4kyv 


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] RE: Using a Ranger as a driver

2008-02-12 Thread Jim Tonne


Jim:

I was under the impression it was   *screen*   voltage
that was lowered.  So plate voltage stays put and plate
current goes down, yielding a higher load impedance
on the modulator.

- Jim WB6BLD



__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


[AMRadio] A productive Morning

2008-02-12 Thread Geoff/W5OMR

Good morning, troops!

Today
Today, I was able to wake up, walk, talk and complain about things I can 
-not- change!

Today, I am TOO Blessed, to be Stressed!
:-)

So, while we're on the positive side of things, I think I've managed to 
incorporate new/old technology out in the ham-shack.


Hear me out.

The final is home-brewed.  I'm sure you already knew that, and it runs a 
pair of 250TH's in push-pull, class C.


Well, what you may not know is that now I have -two- RF finals, that 
incorporate the 250TH tubes.  The original was built by a dear friend of 
W5BU/Dan(sk) back in the mid 50's.  This one I'm using now, was built by 
Mike/W5IMF in the early/mid 60's.  Thanks to my good friend, Duie/K5KZQ, 
I was able to obtain this good ol' boat-anchor and put it back on the 
air after 40 years of collecting dust.  Works great, too ;-)


NORMALLY, I would drive it with the Viking II, like I do the Titanic 
final, but the grid input is different on the 'new' final.  In order to 
maintain around 125mA of grid drive (250TH's require 45mA per, for Class 
C.  That's 90mA for a pair.  Running another 15mA of grid drive on each 
ain't gonna hurt them big jugs ;-)) Using the Viking II, this wasn't an 
issue for the plug-in coil and swinging link arrangement on the original 
final.  On the 'new' one, I've got to slip in the 160m coil, re-dip the 
final, unload it as much as possible and then back off of the grid 
drive.  You know what happens to tubes in Class C when they don't have 
sufficient grid drive, and full plate voltage... run-a-way current 
shoots sky-high and there's nothing to stop it.  There's protective bias 
on the 6146 finals of the Viking II, and I'm -sure- that's the only 
thing that's kept those tubes from shooting up outta their sockets like 
little glass rockets! 

What I have done in the past, with this 'new' final, was to use my 
little Kenwood TS-450S, all band/all mode xcvr as the RF driver.  But, 
it takes around 35~40w to get the grid drive to the 125mA level.  Kinda 
hard to tame a Viking II down to that level, and it's kinda hard on a 
solid-state rig, with the long ol' buzzard transmissions I tend to make 
(so I'm told) ;-)


Soo...

A while back, Rick/K5IAR and I made a deal on a Globe Linear.  This 
thing uses 4 sweep tubes, something like 6DQ6's or some such.  So, I got 
it out, hooked it up, fed RF into the darn thing, and hung it on an 
antenna.  It'll produce around 200w output with 50w of drive from the 
solid-state exciter.  Not bad.  Then, I backed off on the carrier and 
power controls on the little solid-state exciter and got the exciter/amp 
lash-up down to a more 'reasonable' level for driving the final.  Then, 
I connected it to the final, made some minor tuning adjustments on the 
grid input and voila(!) the solid-state exciter is making around 4 or 5 
watts output, (no danger of hurting anything there) the Globe linear 
amplifier is making enough output at about 1/4th (or less) of it's 
maximum output, and that drives the 250TH grids right to 125mA, and it 
-stays- there.  Nothing is wavering.  Kewl!


All that's left to do now, is find a set of relay contacts that I can 
use to key the exciter, or use the exciter to key a relay that will, in 
turn, activate the 110vAC T/R relay.  I think the last thing I want to 
do, is try to make/break 110vAC out of the back of the solid state rig 
;-)   I think what I -really- need to try to find, is one of the dual 
SO-239 Dow-Key T/R Relays, and that way I could also use the Solid-state 
rig as the station receiver, as well.   The Globe Linear does -not- have 
T/R switching in it.


Currently, the original T/R relay is doing a good job of switching the 
antenna between the RCA AR-88 (Thanks to Jim/WD5JKO for the receiver) 
and the transmitting side of the relay.


With it's 'direct frequency entry' keypad, I'd like to be able to use 
the Kenwood as a receiver, also.  Maybe instead of, as opposed to 'in 
addition to'.

(no, the AR-88 is -not- for sale).

So, after the story, what I'm asking for is; does anyone have a dual 
SO-239 Dow-Key T/R relay they would be willing to part with?


As always, 'deal' mails should be sent off-list.  Discussion about the 
setup would be encouraged to be conducted -on-list-.


Thanks for your time, patience and consideration.

--
Driving your AM Rig without a scope, 
is like driving your car at night, without headlights. (K4KYV)


--
73 = Best Regards,
-Geoff/W5OMR

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


[AMRadio] Todays Toy - Elmac PS-2V

2008-02-12 Thread JT Croteau
FedEx just delivered me an Elmac PS-2V power supply that I plan to use
with an AF-68 transmitter that should be arriving any day now.  It
is very clean and includes the CFS-1 cable and PTR-1 relay kit.  It
has had one mod done to it however.  Someone has added another 6.3V
filament transformer under the hood and a 3-prong male connector to
the CFS-1 cable,  Have not investigated the reason for both of these
yet.

Pics: http://n1ese.qrpradio.com/Elmac/

-- 
JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manchester, NH (FN42gx)
Contest Manager, TARA Skirmish
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Ranger driving SB220

2008-02-12 Thread Jim Wilhite


It is also easy for the modulator

to over modulate because it doesn't need to deliver as much current.

John, WA5BXO



This is probably the main cause of trouble using an amp with a driver as 
described.  I constantly hear crappy audio on the bands with the 
configuration.  Many do not understand meter readings of Class A, AB and 
B amps anyway so they tend to overdrive them with audio.


Not only that they do not monitor the output waveform.  Additionally 
many do not know how to interpert what they see.  So all in all, I 
believe, the best way to avoid hidden troubles is to operate an exciter 
or transmitter is near its design parameters and reduce power with the 
attenuator.


Last night was a perfect example.  One station who was using a solid 
state exciter to drive a tube amp was splattering all over the place and 
the person (s) he was in contact with could not hear the problems.  If 
they did, they either wouldn't tell him or did not know what was 
happening.  I was about 5 kc below and when I heard the buckshot tuned 
up to see who it was.  They were all telling him that he sounded fine 
and what the meters should read.  Wrong of course.


All this assumes the exciter is operating properly.  That can be a crap 
shoot with a lot of this old gear.  Especially a transmitter pulled from 
a barn and put on the air with mimimual rework.


Jim/W5JO

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Using Heath SB 610 Monitor Scopeto monitor modulationonAM transmitter

2008-02-12 Thread Jim Wilhite
Ron, I suggest you hook the monitor scope to the grid of the 1st. IF 
tube.  The reasoning behind this is non-linearity is reduced to some 
extent.  I had a hookup to my receiver one time and when people found 
out they wanted reports on their envelope.  Well there are many things 
that will affect that pattern.  The SB 614 I owned had some 60 cycle hum 
in it and it is very difficult to get out.  If you notice in the manual 
of the 614 Heath said to put an RCA plug with a very short piece of wire 
attached from the center pin to ground into the Vertical Input jack. 
The purpose is to eliminate any 60 cycle pickup and introducing 
additional distortion on the displayed pattern.


So after a couple of times of people wanting reports, I disconnected it 
to keep from trying to explain what I was seeing.  Most people wanted 
quality reports and I wasn't comfortable explaining that what I saw 
might not be what they were transmitting.  To be accurate you need to 
check the linearity of all the stages preceding the attach point.  If 
you seen much, be hesitant about giving reports.  This hook up is kind 
of all right for baseline reports but the linearity of the received wave 
will be affected by the distortion you have in your receiver.  If the 
distortion is low, you are good to go, if it is high then you won't be 
telling the guy the entire picture.


Get a distortion analyzer and check your receiver to get an estimate of 
how much distortion is present before you get to technical.  Don/K4KYV 
found some problems with his HO 10 and had to modify it to correct the 
problems.  He might explain which would help you.


Jim/W5JO





Thanks Jim

You make excellent and insight points as always.  I have encountered 
the

issues you speak about in interfacing my 610's with various vintage
receivers like my NC-300 and 75A4.

Thank goodness that I stumbled across small 455Khz and other 
frequencies
IF cans at Antique Electronics Supply in Phoenix.  With some minor 
surgery
both 610's are monitoring received signals on my receivers.  On the 
NC-300 I
went directly to the plate of the 2nd IF and coupled it through a 5PF 
mica.


On the 75A4 I went to the grid of the 2nd detector tube and used 4.3 
PF
mica.   Both have full deflection and ad a bit of fun to monitoring 
by

being able to see the everyone's signal.

But then, it has been mentioned from time to time that I am a tad
obsessive about these beautiful old boat anchors.

Cheers my friend

Ron Weaver   W6OM


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


RE: [AMRadio] Ranger driving SB220

2008-02-12 Thread John Coleman
Hi Jim,
Yes, if you change the loading so as to draw less current in the
final then the modulation circuit will see higher impedance.  In this case,
the change to a higher Z load for the modulator is not a bad thing.  Audio
out put stages will generally produce cleaner audio when they don't need to
work so hard at delivering the current.  It is easier for them to get the
modulation audio voltage necessary for 100 percent modulation when the
impedance they see is higher and less current is on demand. 

OTOH, lowering the voltage to the final (only the final) with out changing
the loading will reduce current and voltage so that the load resistance that
the modulator sees is the same as before.  But less modulation voltage will
be required to hit 100 percent of the new DC voltage.

The thing to watch on tetrode finals is the screen current.  As you reduce
the loading on the plate the screen current will rise.  This is not to bad
(although worth looking in to) if the screen gets its DC and modulation from
the plate supply point, but if there is a separate screen supply then you
will need to adjust it down to prevent excessive screen current. 

All in all, the best way to reduce power for a driver /linear combo is to
reduce the plate / screen supply voltage for the driver final only, via a
dropping resistor or a separate power supply for that tube only. 

There are other considerations about reducing the load on a final, as the RF
voltage at the plate of the tube will increase and may cause arcing of the
plate tuning cap or some other component.  It is also easy for the modulator
to over modulate because it doesn't need to deliver as much current.

John, WA5BXO



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Wilhite
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 8:16 AM
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Ranger driving SB220

I see this discussion every so often and wonder something.  If you lower 
the plate voltage or current the final (s) draw, what is happening to 
the impedance the modulation transformer sees?

The design of a class C final looks at the plate load impedance of the 
final.  If you alter that, the modulation transformer sees another 
impedance and may not work properly.  Some instruction manuals point 
this out in them.

The manual for my Globe Champ says to load to 320 ma. plate current @ 
1kv.  In another paragraph it says to load the plate current to no less 
than 275 ma. for the reason specified, plate load impedance.

So it seems to me that one would want to load a driver to the proper 
output designed into the rig.  If you need less driving power then 
dissipate with the attenuator like Johnson built or build an exciter for 
the power level you need.  Another approach I have seen is to feed the 
transmitter into a dummy load with a T connector and use the other T 
output to go the an amplifier input.  The HT 32/37/44 are low power and 
can be used easily to drive an amp.  They only give about 25 watts out 
which is about right for most amps.

The bad thing about sloppy modulation from an exciter is that a Class A, 
AB or B amp will just amplify it and you really don't want that going 
out over the airwaves.

Jim/W5JO



__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Ranger driving SB220

2008-02-12 Thread Jim Wilhite
I see this discussion every so often and wonder something.  If you lower 
the plate voltage or current the final (s) draw, what is happening to 
the impedance the modulation transformer sees?


The design of a class C final looks at the plate load impedance of the 
final.  If you alter that, the modulation transformer sees another 
impedance and may not work properly.  Some instruction manuals point 
this out in them.


The manual for my Globe Champ says to load to 320 ma. plate current @ 
1kv.  In another paragraph it says to load the plate current to no less 
than 275 ma. for the reason specified, plate load impedance.


So it seems to me that one would want to load a driver to the proper 
output designed into the rig.  If you need less driving power then 
dissipate with the attenuator like Johnson built or build an exciter for 
the power level you need.  Another approach I have seen is to feed the 
transmitter into a dummy load with a T connector and use the other T 
output to go the an amplifier input.  The HT 32/37/44 are low power and 
can be used easily to drive an amp.  They only give about 25 watts out 
which is about right for most amps.


The bad thing about sloppy modulation from an exciter is that a Class A, 
AB or B amp will just amplify it and you really don't want that going 
out over the airwaves.


Jim/W5JO





Ron,
Yes, the VKII uses a pair of 6146s and it has a 6AQ5 adjustable screen 
clamp tube.
I see no reason to wast power with an attenuator and there is a sweet 
spot in the final current thru the mod iron that requires a less than 
full rated final current to avoid saturation.
 It seems to me that a fine adjust here would allow power reduction 
for use with an amp and also enable fine tuning the final current 
without reducing optimum drive current when used barefoot.


Just an idea. I like the ability of the DSB transmitters like the HT 
37, FT101,etc to lower the output power without having to retune the 
final.


73,


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Using Heath SB 610 Monitor Scope tomonitor modulationonAM transmitter

2008-02-12 Thread EP Swynar
Hi Geoff,

It sure does pay to read ...the fine print, n'est ce pas...? Hi Hi

~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ


*


- Original Message - 
From: Geoff/W5OMR [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 10:18 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Using Heath SB 610 Monitor Scope tomonitor
modulationonAM transmitter


 Jim Wilhite wrote:
  To anyone considering an SB 610 or 614, keep in mind they must be
  constructed to match the IF frequency of the receiver to which they
  will be interfaced.

 Uh...
 I was under the impression that the 610 / 614 monitor scopes were for
 monitoring the 'transmitted' signal.

 
  Some of them were built to work with the Heath receivers with the 3
  meg IF and those that were built for 455 Kc. had the coils that would
  do so.
 
  If you find one for with the 3 Kc IF coils,

 kc?  you said 3meg(sic).  Which is it?

  it won't work properly with a NC 300 or NC 183D for example.  Heath
  packaged the coils for both with the units and the builder chose which
  he wanted.  I doubt you will receive the coils that were not used
  during construction.   Check them out before you find you have
  something that won't work with your receiver.


 So...
 I was under the impression that the 610 / 614 monitor scopes were for
 monitoring the 'transmitted' signal.  Since I wasn't sure, I went looking.


 http://web.comhem.se/~u87540545/Heathkit/Products/pageSB610.htm
 Heathkit SB-610
 The Heathkit SB-610 monitor scope is primarily designed for monitor the
 RF-signals, on-the-air signals, from the local transmitter. It can also
 be used to monitor received signals when connected to a receiver.
 It monitors RF-envelop, RF-trapezoid and RTTY pattern. SB-610 has also a
 built-in two-tone sinewave AF-oscillator for SSB-transmitter adjustment.

 The Monitor-Scope matches the SB-line.




 -- 
 Driving your AM Rig without a scope,
 is like driving your car at night, without headlights. (K4KYV)

 --
 73 = Best Regards,
 -Geoff/W5OMR

 __
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
 Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body.

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.