Re: Why ITIL is not standardize till now?
Thanks a lot for your information. Thanks & Regards Amanullah IT Enterprise Applications -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Elry Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 5:10 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Why ITIL is not standardize till now? Well... In the past I have completed a lot of R&D on ITIL software vendors for pure research or for the creation/response to RFP's. Amanullah if it is research you are doing - then I would suggest EMA. I don't know how well funded you are to do research, but you can set up a free account with EMA and look at some of the free advice they offer: (1) Website http://www.enterprisemanagement.com (2) ITIL Process Research http://www.enterprisemanagement.com/coverage/ITIL.php (3) IT Vendor Research http://www.enterprisemanagement.com/vendors/subscriptions.php (4) IT Management Solution Center (This is a free tool for getting some basic knowledge on vendors). http://itsolutions.enterprisemanagement.com/ I hope this helps. Good luck on the research. Be sure to send me a copy when you are done. On Sep 28, 11:38 am, David Sanders wrote: > For a list of ITIL processes and toolsets take a look > athttp://www.pinkelephant.com/PinkVERIFY/ > And follow the 4 links at the bottom of the page... there are many more > products than the four you list. The pages list which ITIL processes each > vendor is verified for > > David Sanders > Solution Architect > Enterprise Service Suite @ Work > == > > tel +44 1494 468980 > mobile +44 7710 377761 > email david.sand...@westoverconsulting.co.uk > > webhttp://www.westoverconsulting.co.uk > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > > [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of IT (Amanullah Bashir Ahmed) > Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 2:16 PM > To: arsl...@arslist.org > Subject: Re: Why ITIL is not standardize till now? > > Hi Elry, > > Thanks for your response. I am doing research on it, my research topic is > "Towards ITIL Processes Standardization". I want to study the processes of > all companies(e.g. BMC Remedy, HP Openview, IBM Tivoli, and CA inc) which > are using ITIL concepts. For BMC Remedy I have all processes of Incident > Management, Problem Management, Change Management, Service Level Management, > and Release Management. I don't have processes of HP Openview, IBM Tivoli, > and CA inc. How can I get documents of processes? After studying all > processes I can write something on my topic. > Again thanks for your response and waiting for again response. > > Thanks & Regards > > Amanullah > IT Enterprise Applications > > -Original Message- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Elry > Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 4:19 PM > To: arsl...@arslist.org > Subject: Re: Why ITIL is not standardize till now? > > Good Question... > > They seem to like to deal only with the academic generalities and > refuse to roll up their sleeves and do the real work. > I was fortunate do my ITIL Masters with one of the original founders > of ITIL. He intimated that their goal was to provide > a blueprint with general guidelines that could be adapted to various > organizations; therefore, to actually get into the > details would deter from their "prime directive"; ergo, organizations > like "Pink Elephant" and guidelines like "Pink Verify". > > Maybe in time as ITIL V3 matures - there will be more conclusive > guidelines. > > On Sep 28, 1:15 am, "IT (Amanullah Bashir Ahmed)" > wrote: > > Hi there, > > I visited the link and got good information thanks for the link. But my > query is Why ITIL itself is not making its own standards? > > > Thanks & Regards > > > Amanullah > > IT Enterprise Applications > > > -Original Message- > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Elry > > Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 12:45 AM > > To: arsl...@arslist.org > > Subject: Re: Why ITIL is not standardize till now? > > > To further add to that - check the following links see if they help... > > > 1) Pink Verify Standards > > >http://www.pinkelephant.com/pinkverify/ > > > 2) OGC Standards > > >http://www.itil-officialsite.com/SoftwareScheme/ITILSoftwareScheme.aspx > > > 3) BMC is gold level member of the OGC Standards. >
Re: Why ITIL is not standardize till now?
Well... In the past I have completed a lot of R&D on ITIL software vendors for pure research or for the creation/response to RFP's. Amanullah if it is research you are doing - then I would suggest EMA. I don't know how well funded you are to do research, but you can set up a free account with EMA and look at some of the free advice they offer: (1) Website http://www.enterprisemanagement.com (2) ITIL Process Research http://www.enterprisemanagement.com/coverage/ITIL.php (3) IT Vendor Research http://www.enterprisemanagement.com/vendors/subscriptions.php (4) IT Management Solution Center (This is a free tool for getting some basic knowledge on vendors). http://itsolutions.enterprisemanagement.com/ I hope this helps. Good luck on the research. Be sure to send me a copy when you are done. On Sep 28, 11:38 am, David Sanders wrote: > For a list of ITIL processes and toolsets take a look > athttp://www.pinkelephant.com/PinkVERIFY/ > And follow the 4 links at the bottom of the page... there are many more > products than the four you list. The pages list which ITIL processes each > vendor is verified for > > David Sanders > Solution Architect > Enterprise Service Suite @ Work > == > > tel +44 1494 468980 > mobile +44 7710 377761 > email david.sand...@westoverconsulting.co.uk > > webhttp://www.westoverconsulting.co.uk > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > > [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of IT (Amanullah Bashir Ahmed) > Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 2:16 PM > To: arsl...@arslist.org > Subject: Re: Why ITIL is not standardize till now? > > Hi Elry, > > Thanks for your response. I am doing research on it, my research topic is > "Towards ITIL Processes Standardization". I want to study the processes of > all companies(e.g. BMC Remedy, HP Openview, IBM Tivoli, and CA inc) which > are using ITIL concepts. For BMC Remedy I have all processes of Incident > Management, Problem Management, Change Management, Service Level Management, > and Release Management. I don't have processes of HP Openview, IBM Tivoli, > and CA inc. How can I get documents of processes? After studying all > processes I can write something on my topic. > Again thanks for your response and waiting for again response. > > Thanks & Regards > > Amanullah > IT Enterprise Applications > > -Original Message- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Elry > Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 4:19 PM > To: arsl...@arslist.org > Subject: Re: Why ITIL is not standardize till now? > > Good Question... > > They seem to like to deal only with the academic generalities and > refuse to roll up their sleeves and do the real work. > I was fortunate do my ITIL Masters with one of the original founders > of ITIL. He intimated that their goal was to provide > a blueprint with general guidelines that could be adapted to various > organizations; therefore, to actually get into the > details would deter from their "prime directive"; ergo, organizations > like "Pink Elephant" and guidelines like "Pink Verify". > > Maybe in time as ITIL V3 matures - there will be more conclusive > guidelines. > > On Sep 28, 1:15 am, "IT (Amanullah Bashir Ahmed)" > wrote: > > Hi there, > > I visited the link and got good information thanks for the link. But my > query is Why ITIL itself is not making its own standards? > > > Thanks & Regards > > > Amanullah > > IT Enterprise Applications > > > -Original Message- > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Elry > > Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 12:45 AM > > To: arsl...@arslist.org > > Subject: Re: Why ITIL is not standardize till now? > > > To further add to that - check the following links see if they help... > > > 1) Pink Verify Standards > > >http://www.pinkelephant.com/pinkverify/ > > > 2) OGC Standards > > >http://www.itil-officialsite.com/SoftwareScheme/ITILSoftwareScheme.aspx > > > 3) BMC is gold level member of the OGC Standards. > > >http://www.itil-officialsite.com/SoftwareScheme/EndorsedSoftwareTools... > > > On Sep 25, 7:25 am, Brian Pancia wrote: > > > Look at ISO 2. This is pretty much the standard for ITIL. > > > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > > > [mailto:arsl...@arslist.or
Re: Why ITIL is not standardize till now?
For a list of ITIL processes and toolsets take a look at http://www.pinkelephant.com/PinkVERIFY/ And follow the 4 links at the bottom of the page... there are many more products than the four you list. The pages list which ITIL processes each vendor is verified for David Sanders Solution Architect Enterprise Service Suite @ Work == tel +44 1494 468980 mobile +44 7710 377761 email david.sand...@westoverconsulting.co.uk web http://www.westoverconsulting.co.uk -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of IT (Amanullah Bashir Ahmed) Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 2:16 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Why ITIL is not standardize till now? Hi Elry, Thanks for your response. I am doing research on it, my research topic is "Towards ITIL Processes Standardization". I want to study the processes of all companies(e.g. BMC Remedy, HP Openview, IBM Tivoli, and CA inc) which are using ITIL concepts. For BMC Remedy I have all processes of Incident Management, Problem Management, Change Management, Service Level Management, and Release Management. I don't have processes of HP Openview, IBM Tivoli, and CA inc. How can I get documents of processes? After studying all processes I can write something on my topic. Again thanks for your response and waiting for again response. Thanks & Regards Amanullah IT Enterprise Applications -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Elry Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 4:19 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Why ITIL is not standardize till now? Good Question... They seem to like to deal only with the academic generalities and refuse to roll up their sleeves and do the real work. I was fortunate do my ITIL Masters with one of the original founders of ITIL. He intimated that their goal was to provide a blueprint with general guidelines that could be adapted to various organizations; therefore, to actually get into the details would deter from their "prime directive"; ergo, organizations like "Pink Elephant" and guidelines like "Pink Verify". Maybe in time as ITIL V3 matures - there will be more conclusive guidelines. On Sep 28, 1:15 am, "IT (Amanullah Bashir Ahmed)" wrote: > Hi there, > I visited the link and got good information thanks for the link. But my query is Why ITIL itself is not making its own standards? > > Thanks & Regards > > Amanullah > IT Enterprise Applications > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Elry > Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 12:45 AM > To: arsl...@arslist.org > Subject: Re: Why ITIL is not standardize till now? > > To further add to that - check the following links see if they help... > > 1) Pink Verify Standards > > http://www.pinkelephant.com/pinkverify/ > > 2) OGC Standards > > http://www.itil-officialsite.com/SoftwareScheme/ITILSoftwareScheme.aspx > > 3) BMC is gold level member of the OGC Standards. > > http://www.itil-officialsite.com/SoftwareScheme/EndorsedSoftwareTools... > > On Sep 25, 7:25 am, Brian Pancia wrote: > > Look at ISO 2. This is pretty much the standard for ITIL. > > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > > [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of IT (Amanullah Bashir Ahmed) > > Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2011 3:31 AM > > To: arsl...@arslist.org > > Subject: Why ITIL is not standardize till now? > > > ** > > > Hi, > > > Why ITIL is not standardize till now? > > > If we see IEEE, they have their standards but ITIL don't have. > > > Anybody knows about white paper on ITIL Standardization. Standards work > > best when they describe something in measureable terms that can be > > independently tested and verified. Standards define a definite output in > > unambiguous language to prevent miscommunications and misunderstandings. > > > Thanks & Regards > > > Amanullah > > > IT Enterprise Applications > > > DISCLAIMER:"This e-mail message including any of its attachments is intended > > solely for the addressee(s) and may contain privileged information. If you > > are not the addressee or you have received this email message in error, > > please notify the sender who will remove your details from its database. You > > are not authorized to read, copy, disseminate, distribute or use this e-mail > > message or any attachment to it in any manner and must delete the email and > > destroy any hard copies of it. Thi
Re: Why ITIL is not standardize till now?
Hi Elry, Thanks for your response. I am doing research on it, my research topic is "Towards ITIL Processes Standardization". I want to study the processes of all companies(e.g. BMC Remedy, HP Openview, IBM Tivoli, and CA inc) which are using ITIL concepts. For BMC Remedy I have all processes of Incident Management, Problem Management, Change Management, Service Level Management, and Release Management. I don't have processes of HP Openview, IBM Tivoli, and CA inc. How can I get documents of processes? After studying all processes I can write something on my topic. Again thanks for your response and waiting for again response. Thanks & Regards Amanullah IT Enterprise Applications -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Elry Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 4:19 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Why ITIL is not standardize till now? Good Question... They seem to like to deal only with the academic generalities and refuse to roll up their sleeves and do the real work. I was fortunate do my ITIL Masters with one of the original founders of ITIL. He intimated that their goal was to provide a blueprint with general guidelines that could be adapted to various organizations; therefore, to actually get into the details would deter from their "prime directive"; ergo, organizations like "Pink Elephant" and guidelines like "Pink Verify". Maybe in time as ITIL V3 matures - there will be more conclusive guidelines. On Sep 28, 1:15 am, "IT (Amanullah Bashir Ahmed)" wrote: > Hi there, > I visited the link and got good information thanks for the link. But my query > is Why ITIL itself is not making its own standards? > > Thanks & Regards > > Amanullah > IT Enterprise Applications > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Elry > Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 12:45 AM > To: arsl...@arslist.org > Subject: Re: Why ITIL is not standardize till now? > > To further add to that - check the following links see if they help... > > 1) Pink Verify Standards > > http://www.pinkelephant.com/pinkverify/ > > 2) OGC Standards > > http://www.itil-officialsite.com/SoftwareScheme/ITILSoftwareScheme.aspx > > 3) BMC is gold level member of the OGC Standards. > > http://www.itil-officialsite.com/SoftwareScheme/EndorsedSoftwareTools... > > On Sep 25, 7:25 am, Brian Pancia wrote: > > Look at ISO 2. This is pretty much the standard for ITIL. > > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > > [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of IT (Amanullah Bashir Ahmed) > > Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2011 3:31 AM > > To: arsl...@arslist.org > > Subject: Why ITIL is not standardize till now? > > > ** > > > Hi, > > > Why ITIL is not standardize till now? > > > If we see IEEE, they have their standards but ITIL don't have. > > > Anybody knows about white paper on ITIL Standardization. Standards work > > best when they describe something in measureable terms that can be > > independently tested and verified. Standards define a definite output in > > unambiguous language to prevent miscommunications and misunderstandings. > > > Thanks & Regards > > > Amanullah > > > IT Enterprise Applications > > > DISCLAIMER:"This e-mail message including any of its attachments is intended > > solely for the addressee(s) and may contain privileged information. If you > > are not the addressee or you have received this email message in error, > > please notify the sender who will remove your details from its database. You > > are not authorized to read, copy, disseminate, distribute or use this e-mail > > message or any attachment to it in any manner and must delete the email and > > destroy any hard copies of it. This e-mail message does not contain > > financial instructions or commitments of any kind. Any views expressed in > > this message are those of the individual sender and do not necessarily > > reflect the views of Emirates NBD PJSC, or any other related subsidiaries, > > entities or persons." > > > _attend WWRUG11www.wwrug.comARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"_ > > > ___ > > > > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives atwww.arslist.org > > attend wwrug11www.wwrug.comARSList:"Where the Answers Are" > > ___ > > UNSUBSCRIBE or access
Re: Why ITIL is not standardize till now?
ITIL is a collection (Library) of "Best Practices" and it continues to evolve. We can influence these best practices. Refer to http://www.itlibrary.org/ to see how you can get involved with the ITIL evolution. Best regards, Rich 謝 謝 你 。 GIS-ISS-SEM Service Technology Development Manager ITIL Practisioner Certified: Support and Restore -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Elry Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 8:19 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Why ITIL is not standardize till now? Good Question... They seem to like to deal only with the academic generalities and refuse to roll up their sleeves and do the real work. I was fortunate do my ITIL Masters with one of the original founders of ITIL. He intimated that their goal was to provide a blueprint with general guidelines that could be adapted to various organizations; therefore, to actually get into the details would deter from their "prime directive"; ergo, organizations like "Pink Elephant" and guidelines like "Pink Verify". Maybe in time as ITIL V3 matures - there will be more conclusive guidelines. On Sep 28, 1:15 am, "IT (Amanullah Bashir Ahmed)" wrote: > Hi there, > I visited the link and got good information thanks for the link. But my query > is Why ITIL itself is not making its own standards? > > Thanks & Regards > > Amanullah > IT Enterprise Applications > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Elry > Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 12:45 AM > To: arsl...@arslist.org > Subject: Re: Why ITIL is not standardize till now? > > To further add to that - check the following links see if they help... > > 1) Pink Verify Standards > > http://www.pinkelephant.com/pinkverify/ > > 2) OGC Standards > > http://www.itil-officialsite.com/SoftwareScheme/ITILSoftwareScheme.aspx > > 3) BMC is gold level member of the OGC Standards. > > http://www.itil-officialsite.com/SoftwareScheme/EndorsedSoftwareTools... > > On Sep 25, 7:25 am, Brian Pancia wrote: > > Look at ISO 2. This is pretty much the standard for ITIL. > > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > > [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of IT (Amanullah Bashir Ahmed) > > Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2011 3:31 AM > > To: arsl...@arslist.org > > Subject: Why ITIL is not standardize till now? > > > ** > > > Hi, > > > Why ITIL is not standardize till now? > > > If we see IEEE, they have their standards but ITIL don't have. > > > Anybody knows about white paper on ITIL Standardization. Standards work > > best when they describe something in measureable terms that can be > > independently tested and verified. Standards define a definite output in > > unambiguous language to prevent miscommunications and misunderstandings. > > > Thanks & Regards > > > Amanullah > > > IT Enterprise Applications > > > DISCLAIMER:"This e-mail message including any of its attachments is intended > > solely for the addressee(s) and may contain privileged information. If you > > are not the addressee or you have received this email message in error, > > please notify the sender who will remove your details from its database. You > > are not authorized to read, copy, disseminate, distribute or use this e-mail > > message or any attachment to it in any manner and must delete the email and > > destroy any hard copies of it. This e-mail message does not contain > > financial instructions or commitments of any kind. Any views expressed in > > this message are those of the individual sender and do not necessarily > > reflect the views of Emirates NBD PJSC, or any other related subsidiaries, > > entities or persons." > > > _attend WWRUG11www.wwrug.comARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"_ > > > ___ > > > > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives atwww.arslist.org > > attend wwrug11www.wwrug.comARSList:"Where the Answers Are" > > ___ > > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives atwww.arslist.org > attend wwrug11www.wwrug.comARSList: "Where the Answers Are" > > ___ > > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives atwww.arslist.org > attend wwrug11www.wwrug.comARSList: "Where the Answers Are" ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are" ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
Re: Why ITIL is not standardize till now?
Good Question... They seem to like to deal only with the academic generalities and refuse to roll up their sleeves and do the real work. I was fortunate do my ITIL Masters with one of the original founders of ITIL. He intimated that their goal was to provide a blueprint with general guidelines that could be adapted to various organizations; therefore, to actually get into the details would deter from their "prime directive"; ergo, organizations like "Pink Elephant" and guidelines like "Pink Verify". Maybe in time as ITIL V3 matures - there will be more conclusive guidelines. On Sep 28, 1:15 am, "IT (Amanullah Bashir Ahmed)" wrote: > Hi there, > I visited the link and got good information thanks for the link. But my query > is Why ITIL itself is not making its own standards? > > Thanks & Regards > > Amanullah > IT Enterprise Applications > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Elry > Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 12:45 AM > To: arsl...@arslist.org > Subject: Re: Why ITIL is not standardize till now? > > To further add to that - check the following links see if they help... > > 1) Pink Verify Standards > > http://www.pinkelephant.com/pinkverify/ > > 2) OGC Standards > > http://www.itil-officialsite.com/SoftwareScheme/ITILSoftwareScheme.aspx > > 3) BMC is gold level member of the OGC Standards. > > http://www.itil-officialsite.com/SoftwareScheme/EndorsedSoftwareTools... > > On Sep 25, 7:25 am, Brian Pancia wrote: > > Look at ISO 2. This is pretty much the standard for ITIL. > > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > > [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of IT (Amanullah Bashir Ahmed) > > Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2011 3:31 AM > > To: arsl...@arslist.org > > Subject: Why ITIL is not standardize till now? > > > ** > > > Hi, > > > Why ITIL is not standardize till now? > > > If we see IEEE, they have their standards but ITIL don't have. > > > Anybody knows about white paper on ITIL Standardization. Standards work > > best when they describe something in measureable terms that can be > > independently tested and verified. Standards define a definite output in > > unambiguous language to prevent miscommunications and misunderstandings. > > > Thanks & Regards > > > Amanullah > > > IT Enterprise Applications > > > DISCLAIMER:"This e-mail message including any of its attachments is intended > > solely for the addressee(s) and may contain privileged information. If you > > are not the addressee or you have received this email message in error, > > please notify the sender who will remove your details from its database. You > > are not authorized to read, copy, disseminate, distribute or use this e-mail > > message or any attachment to it in any manner and must delete the email and > > destroy any hard copies of it. This e-mail message does not contain > > financial instructions or commitments of any kind. Any views expressed in > > this message are those of the individual sender and do not necessarily > > reflect the views of Emirates NBD PJSC, or any other related subsidiaries, > > entities or persons." > > > _attend WWRUG11www.wwrug.comARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"_ > > > ___ > > > > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives atwww.arslist.org > > attend wwrug11www.wwrug.comARSList:"Where the Answers Are" > > ___ > > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives atwww.arslist.org > attend wwrug11www.wwrug.comARSList: "Where the Answers Are" > > ___ > > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives atwww.arslist.org > attend wwrug11www.wwrug.comARSList: "Where the Answers Are" ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
Re: Why ITIL is not standardize till now?
Hi there, I visited the link and got good information thanks for the link. But my query is Why ITIL itself is not making its own standards? Thanks & Regards Amanullah IT Enterprise Applications -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Elry Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 12:45 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Why ITIL is not standardize till now? To further add to that - check the following links see if they help... 1) Pink Verify Standards http://www.pinkelephant.com/pinkverify/ 2) OGC Standards http://www.itil-officialsite.com/SoftwareScheme/ITILSoftwareScheme.aspx 3) BMC is gold level member of the OGC Standards. http://www.itil-officialsite.com/SoftwareScheme/EndorsedSoftwareTools/EndorsedSoftwareTools.aspx On Sep 25, 7:25 am, Brian Pancia wrote: > Look at ISO 2. This is pretty much the standard for ITIL. > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of IT (Amanullah Bashir Ahmed) > Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2011 3:31 AM > To: arsl...@arslist.org > Subject: Why ITIL is not standardize till now? > > ** > > Hi, > > Why ITIL is not standardize till now? > > If we see IEEE, they have their standards but ITIL don't have. > > Anybody knows about white paper on ITIL Standardization. Standards work > best when they describe something in measureable terms that can be > independently tested and verified. Standards define a definite output in > unambiguous language to prevent miscommunications and misunderstandings. > > Thanks & Regards > > Amanullah > > IT Enterprise Applications > > DISCLAIMER:"This e-mail message including any of its attachments is intended > solely for the addressee(s) and may contain privileged information. If you > are not the addressee or you have received this email message in error, > please notify the sender who will remove your details from its database. You > are not authorized to read, copy, disseminate, distribute or use this e-mail > message or any attachment to it in any manner and must delete the email and > destroy any hard copies of it. This e-mail message does not contain > financial instructions or commitments of any kind. Any views expressed in > this message are those of the individual sender and do not necessarily > reflect the views of Emirates NBD PJSC, or any other related subsidiaries, > entities or persons." > > _attend WWRUG11www.wwrug.comARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ > > ___ > > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives atwww.arslist.org > attend wwrug11www.wwrug.comARSList: "Where the Answers Are" ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are" ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
Re: Why ITIL is not standardize till now?
To further add to that - check the following links see if they help... 1) Pink Verify Standards http://www.pinkelephant.com/pinkverify/ 2) OGC Standards http://www.itil-officialsite.com/SoftwareScheme/ITILSoftwareScheme.aspx 3) BMC is gold level member of the OGC Standards. http://www.itil-officialsite.com/SoftwareScheme/EndorsedSoftwareTools/EndorsedSoftwareTools.aspx On Sep 25, 7:25 am, Brian Pancia wrote: > Look at ISO 2. This is pretty much the standard for ITIL. > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of IT (Amanullah Bashir Ahmed) > Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2011 3:31 AM > To: arsl...@arslist.org > Subject: Why ITIL is not standardize till now? > > ** > > Hi, > > Why ITIL is not standardize till now? > > If we see IEEE, they have their standards but ITIL don't have. > > Anybody knows about white paper on ITIL Standardization. Standards work > best when they describe something in measureable terms that can be > independently tested and verified. Standards define a definite output in > unambiguous language to prevent miscommunications and misunderstandings. > > Thanks & Regards > > Amanullah > > IT Enterprise Applications > > DISCLAIMER:"This e-mail message including any of its attachments is intended > solely for the addressee(s) and may contain privileged information. If you > are not the addressee or you have received this email message in error, > please notify the sender who will remove your details from its database. You > are not authorized to read, copy, disseminate, distribute or use this e-mail > message or any attachment to it in any manner and must delete the email and > destroy any hard copies of it. This e-mail message does not contain > financial instructions or commitments of any kind. Any views expressed in > this message are those of the individual sender and do not necessarily > reflect the views of Emirates NBD PJSC, or any other related subsidiaries, > entities or persons." > > _attend WWRUG11www.wwrug.comARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ > > ___ > > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives atwww.arslist.org > attend wwrug11www.wwrug.comARSList: "Where the Answers Are" ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
Re: Why ITIL is not standardize till now?
Look at ISO 2. This is pretty much the standard for ITIL. From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of IT (Amanullah Bashir Ahmed) Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2011 3:31 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Why ITIL is not standardize till now? ** Hi, Why ITIL is not standardize till now? If we see IEEE, they have their standards but ITIL don't have. Anybody knows about white paper on ITIL Standardization. Standards work best when they describe something in measureable terms that can be independently tested and verified. Standards define a definite output in unambiguous language to prevent miscommunications and misunderstandings. Thanks & Regards Amanullah IT Enterprise Applications DISCLAIMER:"This e-mail message including any of its attachments is intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain privileged information. If you are not the addressee or you have received this email message in error, please notify the sender who will remove your details from its database. You are not authorized to read, copy, disseminate, distribute or use this e-mail message or any attachment to it in any manner and must delete the email and destroy any hard copies of it. This e-mail message does not contain financial instructions or commitments of any kind. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and do not necessarily reflect the views of Emirates NBD PJSC, or any other related subsidiaries, entities or persons." _attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
