Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC?

2007-11-15 Thread Rahul AR User
yes... I agree with Charles, it is J Shankar([EMAIL PROTECTED])

On Nov 15, 2007 6:54 PM, Howard Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> All,
>
> Georgeann left some time ago. I am not sure who is the overall director.
>
> Howard
>
> On Mar 14, 2007 3:53 PM, Julie Kanakanui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I believe address for Georgeann is [EMAIL PROTECTED], if that's
> who
> > you're trying to contact..
> >
> >
> ___
> > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> > Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Howard Richter
> ITIL Foundation Certified
> Red Hat Certified Technician
> CompTIA Linux+ Certified
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Resume = http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/resumes/hrichter_1/resumeofhoward
>
>
> ___
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
>



-- 
Regards
Rahul

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"


Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC?

2007-11-15 Thread Howard Richter
All,

Georgeann left some time ago. I am not sure who is the overall director.

Howard

On Mar 14, 2007 3:53 PM, Julie Kanakanui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe address for Georgeann is [EMAIL PROTECTED], if that's who
> you're trying to contact..
>
> ___
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
>



-- 
Howard Richter
ITIL Foundation Certified
Red Hat Certified Technician
CompTIA Linux+ Certified
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resume = http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/resumes/hrichter_1/resumeofhoward

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"


Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC?

2007-11-15 Thread Charles Roth
The director of Technical Support is Jayanthi Shankar.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Charles Roth
Sealed Air Corporation
Office (864) 433-2429
Cell (864) 431-2961

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"


Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC?

2007-11-15 Thread Julie Kanakanui
I believe address for Georgeann is [EMAIL PROTECTED], if that's who 
you're trying to contact..

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"


Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

2007-03-19 Thread Lammey, Peter A.
That is unacceptable.  I would consider other partner support rather
than BMC and say to BMC closer to your support contract renewal that you
are looking elsewhere for support. 

Thanks
Peter Lammey
ESPN MIT Technical Services & Applications Management
860-766-4761

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Opela, Gary L Contr
OC-ALC/ITMA
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 4:47 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

Fast Track.. Does that mean 1 week response time?

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lammey, Peter A.
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 2:15 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

Whats your support level?  Fast Track?  Continuous? 



Thanks
Peter Lammey
ESPN MIT Technical Services & Applications Management
860-766-4761

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Opela, Gary L Contr
OC-ALC/ITMA
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 2:58 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

Wow, still no response. I wonder what would happen if our helpdesk
people had this response time? Four days and I've not even had them
suggest anything!

-Original Message-
From: Opela, Gary L Contr OC-ALC/ITMA
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 2:06 PM
To: 'arslist@ARSLIST.ORG'
Subject: RE: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)



Okay, I agree that the top level support is great and all, but they
should at least hold to their level of support for which we're paying.

Example:

I opened a ticket with Remedy on Tuesday Morning at 9:37 AM regarding
some database connectivity issues I've been having (See thread entitled
"MS SQL Linked Server error" for full information).

They did not respond until the next day. I got to work on Wednesday at
7:00 and there was an email from them asking for, guess what, log files.

Note that in my original emails, I had pasted the errors I was seeing,
so they would not have anything to find in the log files. Additionally,
in my original email, I had stated that this was affecting my entire
user base.

So, I sent them the files at 7:37AM on Wednesday. I wait all day,
nothing.. I get to work this morning, and still nothing! I emailed them
back and said their response time was not acceptable and asked that they
elevate the priority of the ticket. That was at 7:47 AM this morning. 

They still have yet to respond. So, now I'm 4 days into the issue, and
it's 2.5 days since I opened the ticket, and where am I? My users still
cannot use a core functionality of their application!

Now, granted, the issue may or may not be with remedy, but remedy is the
only thing that is being affected. I can use all of the functionality
directly within SQL Server Enterprise Manager and Query tool, but only
remedy is experiencing issues.

I pay for support, I expect to get support, not a generic canned
response asking me for data which I've already provided just so they can
put me on the ignore list! 

David, I hope you read this and take it to heart. You have a large
customer base that is not happy.

I hope you guys realize that due to your less than acceptable level of
support, you are going to lose customers. There are other products out
there that, while they may not be as good as remedy, have good enough
support to make it worth it!

Remedy, although it is great, is of no use to me if I cannot get it to
work!


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where
the Answers Are"


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where
the Answers Are"


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where
the Answers Are"

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"


Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

2007-03-19 Thread Lammey, Peter A.
So can BMC put their tickets in a Status Pending with a Pending Reason
"We Don't Care"?
I find it annoying myself when we have certain tickets and you don't
hear from the Support rep for some time and that you send emails asking
for updates but just because the ticket is in a Pending status they
don't have an obligation to respond and follow their response goals and
you're left hanging.

Thanks
Peter Lammey
ESPN MIT Technical Services & Applications Management
860-766-4761

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Axton
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 5:54 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

Hours of Operation:
Local Business Hours
12 hours x 5 days
(Excludes published holidays)

Initial Response Goals:
S1 = 1 Business Hour
S2 = 4 Business Hours
S3 = 8 Business Hours
S4 = 12 Business Hours

Always check the status of your tickets.  If it gets slipped into
pending, it will sit there outside their sla coverage.

Axton Grams

On 3/16/07, Opela, Gary L Contr OC-ALC/ITMA
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fast Track.. Does that mean 1 week response time?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lammey, Peter A.
> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 2:15 PM
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)
>
> Whats your support level?  Fast Track?  Continuous?
>
>
>
> Thanks
> Peter Lammey
> ESPN MIT Technical Services & Applications Management
> 860-766-4761
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Opela, Gary L Contr 
> OC-ALC/ITMA
> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 2:58 PM
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)
>
> Wow, still no response. I wonder what would happen if our helpdesk

> people had this response time? Four days and I've not even had them 
> suggest anything!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Opela, Gary L Contr OC-ALC/ITMA
> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 2:06 PM
> To: 'arslist@ARSLIST.ORG'
> Subject: RE: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)
>
>  feelings of my employer>
>
> Okay, I agree that the top level support is great and all, but they 
> should at least hold to their level of support for which we're paying.
>
> Example:
>
> I opened a ticket with Remedy on Tuesday Morning at 9:37 AM regarding 
> some database connectivity issues I've been having (See thread 
> entitled "MS SQL Linked Server error" for full information).
>
> They did not respond until the next day. I got to work on Wednesday at

> 7:00 and there was an email from them asking for, guess what, log
files.
>
> Note that in my original emails, I had pasted the errors I was seeing,

> so they would not have anything to find in the log files. 
> Additionally, in my original email, I had stated that this was 
> affecting my entire user base.
>
> So, I sent them the files at 7:37AM on Wednesday. I wait all day, 
> nothing.. I get to work this morning, and still nothing! I emailed 
> them back and said their response time was not acceptable and asked 
> that they elevate the priority of the ticket. That was at 7:47 AM this
morning.
>
> They still have yet to respond. So, now I'm 4 days into the issue, and

> it's 2.5 days since I opened the ticket, and where am I? My users 
> still cannot use a core functionality of their application!
>
> Now, granted, the issue may or may not be with remedy, but remedy is 
> the only thing that is being affected. I can use all of the 
> functionality directly within SQL Server Enterprise Manager and Query 
> tool, but only remedy is experiencing issues.
>
> I pay for support, I expect to get support, not a generic canned 
> response asking me for data which I've already provided just so they 
> can put me on the ignore list!
>
> David, I hope you read this and take it to heart. You have a large 
> customer base that is not happy.
>
> I hope you guys realize that due to your less than acceptable level of

> support, you are going to lose customers. There are other products out

> there that, while they may not be as good as remedy, have good enough 
> support to make it worth it!
>
> Remedy, although it is great, is of no use to me if I cannot get it to

> work!
>
> __
> __
> ___
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org 
> ARSlist:&qu

Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

2007-03-16 Thread Axton

Hours of Operation:
Local Business Hours
12 hours x 5 days
(Excludes published holidays)

Initial Response Goals:
S1 = 1 Business Hour
S2 = 4 Business Hours
S3 = 8 Business Hours
S4 = 12 Business Hours

Always check the status of your tickets.  If it gets slipped into
pending, it will sit there outside their sla coverage.

Axton Grams

On 3/16/07, Opela, Gary L Contr OC-ALC/ITMA
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Fast Track.. Does that mean 1 week response time?

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lammey, Peter A.
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 2:15 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

Whats your support level?  Fast Track?  Continuous?



Thanks
Peter Lammey
ESPN MIT Technical Services & Applications Management
860-766-4761

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Opela, Gary L Contr
OC-ALC/ITMA
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 2:58 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

Wow, still no response. I wonder what would happen if our helpdesk
people had this response time? Four days and I've not even had them
suggest anything!

-Original Message-
From: Opela, Gary L Contr OC-ALC/ITMA
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 2:06 PM
To: 'arslist@ARSLIST.ORG'
Subject: RE: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)



Okay, I agree that the top level support is great and all, but they
should at least hold to their level of support for which we're paying.

Example:

I opened a ticket with Remedy on Tuesday Morning at 9:37 AM regarding
some database connectivity issues I've been having (See thread entitled
"MS SQL Linked Server error" for full information).

They did not respond until the next day. I got to work on Wednesday at
7:00 and there was an email from them asking for, guess what, log files.

Note that in my original emails, I had pasted the errors I was seeing,
so they would not have anything to find in the log files. Additionally,
in my original email, I had stated that this was affecting my entire
user base.

So, I sent them the files at 7:37AM on Wednesday. I wait all day,
nothing.. I get to work this morning, and still nothing! I emailed them
back and said their response time was not acceptable and asked that they
elevate the priority of the ticket. That was at 7:47 AM this morning.

They still have yet to respond. So, now I'm 4 days into the issue, and
it's 2.5 days since I opened the ticket, and where am I? My users still
cannot use a core functionality of their application!

Now, granted, the issue may or may not be with remedy, but remedy is the
only thing that is being affected. I can use all of the functionality
directly within SQL Server Enterprise Manager and Query tool, but only
remedy is experiencing issues.

I pay for support, I expect to get support, not a generic canned
response asking me for data which I've already provided just so they can
put me on the ignore list!

David, I hope you read this and take it to heart. You have a large
customer base that is not happy.

I hope you guys realize that due to your less than acceptable level of
support, you are going to lose customers. There are other products out
there that, while they may not be as good as remedy, have good enough
support to make it worth it!

Remedy, although it is great, is of no use to me if I cannot get it to
work!


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where
the Answers Are"


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where
the Answers Are"

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers 
Are"



___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers 
Are"


Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

2007-03-16 Thread Opela, Gary L Contr OC-ALC/ITMA
Fast Track.. Does that mean 1 week response time?

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lammey, Peter A.
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 2:15 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

Whats your support level?  Fast Track?  Continuous? 



Thanks
Peter Lammey
ESPN MIT Technical Services & Applications Management
860-766-4761

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Opela, Gary L Contr
OC-ALC/ITMA
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 2:58 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

Wow, still no response. I wonder what would happen if our helpdesk
people had this response time? Four days and I've not even had them
suggest anything!

-Original Message-
From: Opela, Gary L Contr OC-ALC/ITMA
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 2:06 PM
To: 'arslist@ARSLIST.ORG'
Subject: RE: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)



Okay, I agree that the top level support is great and all, but they
should at least hold to their level of support for which we're paying.

Example:

I opened a ticket with Remedy on Tuesday Morning at 9:37 AM regarding
some database connectivity issues I've been having (See thread entitled
"MS SQL Linked Server error" for full information).

They did not respond until the next day. I got to work on Wednesday at
7:00 and there was an email from them asking for, guess what, log files.

Note that in my original emails, I had pasted the errors I was seeing,
so they would not have anything to find in the log files. Additionally,
in my original email, I had stated that this was affecting my entire
user base.

So, I sent them the files at 7:37AM on Wednesday. I wait all day,
nothing.. I get to work this morning, and still nothing! I emailed them
back and said their response time was not acceptable and asked that they
elevate the priority of the ticket. That was at 7:47 AM this morning. 

They still have yet to respond. So, now I'm 4 days into the issue, and
it's 2.5 days since I opened the ticket, and where am I? My users still
cannot use a core functionality of their application!

Now, granted, the issue may or may not be with remedy, but remedy is the
only thing that is being affected. I can use all of the functionality
directly within SQL Server Enterprise Manager and Query tool, but only
remedy is experiencing issues.

I pay for support, I expect to get support, not a generic canned
response asking me for data which I've already provided just so they can
put me on the ignore list! 

David, I hope you read this and take it to heart. You have a large
customer base that is not happy.

I hope you guys realize that due to your less than acceptable level of
support, you are going to lose customers. There are other products out
there that, while they may not be as good as remedy, have good enough
support to make it worth it!

Remedy, although it is great, is of no use to me if I cannot get it to
work!


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where
the Answers Are"


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where
the Answers Are"

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"


Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

2007-03-16 Thread Lammey, Peter A.
Whats your support level?  Fast Track?  Continuous? 



Thanks
Peter Lammey
ESPN MIT Technical Services & Applications Management
860-766-4761

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Opela, Gary L Contr
OC-ALC/ITMA
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 2:58 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

Wow, still no response. I wonder what would happen if our helpdesk
people had this response time? Four days and I've not even had them
suggest anything!

-Original Message-
From: Opela, Gary L Contr OC-ALC/ITMA
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 2:06 PM
To: 'arslist@ARSLIST.ORG'
Subject: RE: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)



Okay, I agree that the top level support is great and all, but they
should at least hold to their level of support for which we're paying.

Example:

I opened a ticket with Remedy on Tuesday Morning at 9:37 AM regarding
some database connectivity issues I've been having (See thread entitled
"MS SQL Linked Server error" for full information).

They did not respond until the next day. I got to work on Wednesday at
7:00 and there was an email from them asking for, guess what, log files.

Note that in my original emails, I had pasted the errors I was seeing,
so they would not have anything to find in the log files. Additionally,
in my original email, I had stated that this was affecting my entire
user base.

So, I sent them the files at 7:37AM on Wednesday. I wait all day,
nothing.. I get to work this morning, and still nothing! I emailed them
back and said their response time was not acceptable and asked that they
elevate the priority of the ticket. That was at 7:47 AM this morning. 

They still have yet to respond. So, now I'm 4 days into the issue, and
it's 2.5 days since I opened the ticket, and where am I? My users still
cannot use a core functionality of their application!

Now, granted, the issue may or may not be with remedy, but remedy is the
only thing that is being affected. I can use all of the functionality
directly within SQL Server Enterprise Manager and Query tool, but only
remedy is experiencing issues.

I pay for support, I expect to get support, not a generic canned
response asking me for data which I've already provided just so they can
put me on the ignore list! 

David, I hope you read this and take it to heart. You have a large
customer base that is not happy.

I hope you guys realize that due to your less than acceptable level of
support, you are going to lose customers. There are other products out
there that, while they may not be as good as remedy, have good enough
support to make it worth it!

Remedy, although it is great, is of no use to me if I cannot get it to
work!


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where
the Answers Are"

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"


Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

2007-03-16 Thread Opela, Gary L Contr OC-ALC/ITMA
Wow, still no response. I wonder what would happen if our helpdesk
people had this response time? Four days and I've not even had them
suggest anything!

-Original Message-
From: Opela, Gary L Contr OC-ALC/ITMA 
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 2:06 PM
To: 'arslist@ARSLIST.ORG'
Subject: RE: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)



Okay, I agree that the top level support is great and all, but they
should at least hold to their level of support for which we're paying.

Example:

I opened a ticket with Remedy on Tuesday Morning at 9:37 AM regarding
some database connectivity issues I've been having (See thread entitled
"MS SQL Linked Server error" for full information).

They did not respond until the next day. I got to work on Wednesday at
7:00 and there was an email from them asking for, guess what, log files.

Note that in my original emails, I had pasted the errors I was seeing,
so they would not have anything to find in the log files. Additionally,
in my original email, I had stated that this was affecting my entire
user base.

So, I sent them the files at 7:37AM on Wednesday. I wait all day,
nothing.. I get to work this morning, and still nothing! I emailed them
back and said their response time was not acceptable and asked that they
elevate the priority of the ticket. That was at 7:47 AM this morning. 

They still have yet to respond. So, now I'm 4 days into the issue, and
it's 2.5 days since I opened the ticket, and where am I? My users still
cannot use a core functionality of their application!

Now, granted, the issue may or may not be with remedy, but remedy is the
only thing that is being affected. I can use all of the functionality
directly within SQL Server Enterprise Manager and Query tool, but only
remedy is experiencing issues.

I pay for support, I expect to get support, not a generic canned
response asking me for data which I've already provided just so they can
put me on the ignore list! 

David, I hope you read this and take it to heart. You have a large
customer base that is not happy.

I hope you guys realize that due to your less than acceptable level of
support, you are going to lose customers. There are other products out
there that, while they may not be as good as remedy, have good enough
support to make it worth it!

Remedy, although it is great, is of no use to me if I cannot get it to
work!

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"


Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

2007-03-15 Thread Lammey, Peter A.
Ive had many occasions where I had an issue and I submitted the issue to
BMC and ARSList at the same time.
BMC would send a basic response with very little insight and typically
they will suggest patching the server since that patch "might include
some fixes that might fix your problem".

Unless it includes a SW bug that is addressed by the patch that
resembles your issue, my experience has been that the patch accomplishes
nothing.

Most of my issues sent to BMC and ARSList have ended up with better
advice and help from ARSList vs BMC.

We pay thousands of dollars every year for BMC with worse support than a
distribution list that provides great advice and responses for no
chargeGo figure.

And to top if off, BMC could care less that you found the solution
without their help.
They look to close your ticket as soon as possible to get you off their
backs rather than assure their supported customers are satisfied with
the assistance and help provided.

Thanks
Peter Lammey
ESPN MIT Technical Services & Applications Management
860-766-4761

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kaiser Norm E CIV USAF 96
CG/SCWOE
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 3:28 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

Yes, I have to agree there.  I don't open many support requests--maybe
three or four a year--but the last ones I submitted I experienced pretty
much exactly what you describe.  Pretty much Remedy support--from my
experience--goes something like this:

- User submits a request for help.
- User gets a canned "we got your request for help" message.
- A day or two later a support tech emails you for copies of the log
files.
- A day or two later a support tech asks you to apply a patch that
addresses bugs totally unrelated to your issue.
- They sit on your ticket.
- Meanwhile you Google or turn to ARSList for help.
- After tons of research, you solve the problem yourself.
- A Remedy support agent contacts you and asks you how you solved the
problem.
- You fill out the automated customer satisfaction survey and nothing
happens.


-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Opela, Gary L Contr
OC-ALC/ITMA
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 2:06 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)



Okay, I agree that the top level support is great and all, but they
should at least hold to their level of support for which we're paying.

Example:

I opened a ticket with Remedy on Tuesday Morning at 9:37 AM regarding
some database connectivity issues I've been having (See thread entitled
"MS SQL Linked Server error" for full information).

They did not respond until the next day. I got to work on Wednesday at
7:00 and there was an email from them asking for, guess what, log files.

Note that in my original emails, I had pasted the errors I was seeing,
so they would not have anything to find in the log files. Additionally,
in my original email, I had stated that this was affecting my entire
user base.

So, I sent them the files at 7:37AM on Wednesday. I wait all day,
nothing.. I get to work this morning, and still nothing! I emailed them
back and said their response time was not acceptable and asked that they
elevate the priority of the ticket. That was at 7:47 AM this morning. 

They still have yet to respond. So, now I'm 4 days into the issue, and
it's 2.5 days since I opened the ticket, and where am I? My users still
cannot use a core functionality of their application!

Now, granted, the issue may or may not be with remedy, but remedy is the
only thing that is being affected. I can use all of the functionality
directly within SQL Server Enterprise Manager and Query tool, but only
remedy is experiencing issues.

I pay for support, I expect to get support, not a generic canned
response asking me for data which I've already provided just so they can
put me on the ignore list! 

David, I hope you read this and take it to heart. You have a large
customer base that is not happy.

I hope you guys realize that due to your less than acceptable level of
support, you are going to lose customers. There are other products out
there that, while they may not be as good as remedy, have good enough
support to make it worth it!

Remedy, although it is great, is of no use to me if I cannot get it to
work!


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where
the Answers Are"


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where
the Answers Are"

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"


Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

2007-03-15 Thread Opela, Gary L Contr OC-ALC/ITMA


Well, Norm, my process is a little different than yours :)


- <> you Google or turn to ARSList for help.
- After tons of research, you  solve the
problem yourself .
- User submits a request for help.
- User gets a canned "we got your request for help" message.
- A day or two later a support tech emails you for copies of the log
files.
- They sit on your ticket.

- A day or two later a support tech asks you to apply a patch that
addresses bugs totally unrelated to your issue.
- A Remedy support agent contacts you and asks you how you solved the
problem.
- You  the automated customer satisfaction survey 
 nothing happens.

I would prefer your scenario over mine, because at least you got your
problem fixed. 

As long as remedy has the corner in this niche market, they have no
reason to spend more money on support. I mean, I wonder how many
accounts they've really lost? I doubt they've lost very many. It's a sad
fact that they give this level of support just because they can.

You can't treat your prize flower like a dandelion and expect it to win
any shows. I think I'll make this my new saying.

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kaiser Norm E CIV USAF 96
CG/SCWOE
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 2:28 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

Yes, I have to agree there.  I don't open many support requests--maybe
three or four a year--but the last ones I submitted I experienced pretty
much exactly what you describe.  Pretty much Remedy support--from my
experience--goes something like this:

- User submits a request for help.
- User gets a canned "we got your request for help" message.
- A day or two later a support tech emails you for copies of the log
files.
- A day or two later a support tech asks you to apply a patch that
addresses bugs totally unrelated to your issue.
- They sit on your ticket.
- Meanwhile you Google or turn to ARSList for help.
- After tons of research, you solve the problem yourself.
- A Remedy support agent contacts you and asks you how you solved the
problem.
- You fill out the automated customer satisfaction survey and nothing
happens.

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"


Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

2007-03-15 Thread Kaiser Norm E CIV USAF 96 CG/SCWOE
Yes, I have to agree there.  I don't open many support requests--maybe
three or four a year--but the last ones I submitted I experienced pretty
much exactly what you describe.  Pretty much Remedy support--from my
experience--goes something like this:

- User submits a request for help.
- User gets a canned "we got your request for help" message.
- A day or two later a support tech emails you for copies of the log
files.
- A day or two later a support tech asks you to apply a patch that
addresses bugs totally unrelated to your issue.
- They sit on your ticket.
- Meanwhile you Google or turn to ARSList for help.
- After tons of research, you solve the problem yourself.
- A Remedy support agent contacts you and asks you how you solved the
problem.
- You fill out the automated customer satisfaction survey and nothing
happens.


-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Opela, Gary L Contr
OC-ALC/ITMA
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 2:06 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)



Okay, I agree that the top level support is great and all, but they
should at least hold to their level of support for which we're paying.

Example:

I opened a ticket with Remedy on Tuesday Morning at 9:37 AM regarding
some database connectivity issues I've been having (See thread entitled
"MS SQL Linked Server error" for full information).

They did not respond until the next day. I got to work on Wednesday at
7:00 and there was an email from them asking for, guess what, log files.

Note that in my original emails, I had pasted the errors I was seeing,
so they would not have anything to find in the log files. Additionally,
in my original email, I had stated that this was affecting my entire
user base.

So, I sent them the files at 7:37AM on Wednesday. I wait all day,
nothing.. I get to work this morning, and still nothing! I emailed them
back and said their response time was not acceptable and asked that they
elevate the priority of the ticket. That was at 7:47 AM this morning. 

They still have yet to respond. So, now I'm 4 days into the issue, and
it's 2.5 days since I opened the ticket, and where am I? My users still
cannot use a core functionality of their application!

Now, granted, the issue may or may not be with remedy, but remedy is the
only thing that is being affected. I can use all of the functionality
directly within SQL Server Enterprise Manager and Query tool, but only
remedy is experiencing issues.

I pay for support, I expect to get support, not a generic canned
response asking me for data which I've already provided just so they can
put me on the ignore list! 

David, I hope you read this and take it to heart. You have a large
customer base that is not happy.

I hope you guys realize that due to your less than acceptable level of
support, you are going to lose customers. There are other products out
there that, while they may not be as good as remedy, have good enough
support to make it worth it!

Remedy, although it is great, is of no use to me if I cannot get it to
work!


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where
the Answers Are"

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"


Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

2007-03-15 Thread Opela, Gary L Contr OC-ALC/ITMA


Okay, I agree that the top level support is great and all, but they
should at least hold to their level of support for which we're paying.

Example:

I opened a ticket with Remedy on Tuesday Morning at 9:37 AM regarding
some database connectivity issues I've been having (See thread entitled
"MS SQL Linked Server error" for full information).

They did not respond until the next day. I got to work on Wednesday at
7:00 and there was an email from them asking for, guess what, log files.

Note that in my original emails, I had pasted the errors I was seeing,
so they would not have anything to find in the log files. Additionally,
in my original email, I had stated that this was affecting my entire
user base.

So, I sent them the files at 7:37AM on Wednesday. I wait all day,
nothing.. I get to work this morning, and still nothing! I emailed them
back and said their response time was not acceptable and asked that they
elevate the priority of the ticket. That was at 7:47 AM this morning. 

They still have yet to respond. So, now I'm 4 days into the issue, and
it's 2.5 days since I opened the ticket, and where am I? My users still
cannot use a core functionality of their application!

Now, granted, the issue may or may not be with remedy, but remedy is the
only thing that is being affected. I can use all of the functionality
directly within SQL Server Enterprise Manager and Query tool, but only
remedy is experiencing issues.

I pay for support, I expect to get support, not a generic canned
response asking me for data which I've already provided just so they can
put me on the ignore list! 

David, I hope you read this and take it to heart. You have a large
customer base that is not happy.

I hope you guys realize that due to your less than acceptable level of
support, you are going to lose customers. There are other products out
there that, while they may not be as good as remedy, have good enough
support to make it worth it!

Remedy, although it is great, is of no use to me if I cannot get it to
work!

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"


Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

2007-03-15 Thread James Van Sickle
We used to have problems with sales reps several years ago during and shortly 
after the Peregrine/BMC transition, but our current and previous account 
representatives have been absolutely outstanding.  We are currently assigned to 
Rick Finkle, and were previously with Lance Haile.  Both have helped us resolve 
outstanding issues that we had with licensing and purchasing new 
products/licenses.

As for the Remedy Support, I have to say that "send me the log (or DEF) files" 
has been the mantra ever since I began working with support nearly 7 years ago. 
 There is a limited amount they can fix without knowing what else is going on 
in the background.  That's like calling a mechanic, telling him your car is 
constantly overheating, and expecting the guy to fix the problem over the 
phone.  At some point, he will need to physically look inside the engine, which 
is what logs and DEF files are to Remedy Support.
 
I have had my share of support calls with the technician who insists on "going 
through the script" on a dozen things I have already checked.  Playing devil's 
advocate though, the Remedy Support staff have no idea who I or any other 
caller actually is.  They don't know whether we are senior Remedy Developers 
who can design forms and workflow in our sleep, or some schmuck on the Help 
Desk who was given the manuals 10 minutes ago and told "Read this, and have our 
new Help Desk system ready for implementation in two weeks."  We may know some 
of the more senior techs who also know us, but they are not the front-line 
support people taking all of the calls that come in everyday.
 
If you have a problem with Remedy Support, I highly recommend you call up their 
support line and ask to speak with a manager.  If they don't help you or seem 
indifferent, then go to that person's manager.  Eventually, you are either 
going to get the help you are looking for, or be talking to CEO Robert 
Beauchamp himself.
 
Good luck,

-James

- Original Message 
From: Rick Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 12:55:42 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSLIST] Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)


I bet if I took a show of hands as to who was happy with Remedy engineering
and support right now, it would be a small minority - no surprise there.

Would it also be a minority of those who could say their BMC sales rep is
either unknown to them or ineffective in serving them?

Houston - YOU have a problem.  For details, see your closest mirror.

Rick


 

TV dinner still cooling? 
Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV.
http://tv.yahoo.com/

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"


Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? THIS WORKED FOR ME!

2007-03-15 Thread Joel Sender
I too, am greatly disappointed with the level of support BMC provides:
Remedy Corp really spoiled us.

I have, however, found someone there who actually can do something about it.
The manager of Customer Support is a gentleman named WADE (last name
withheld to protect his family and allow him to take a break from work).

In order to get his attention, prefix the SUBJECT of your email with his
name.
for example, the subject of this email ( if sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) WOULD
be

WADE: RE: Who's in charge of support at BMC? THIS WORKED FOR ME!

Anyone receiving an email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] knows to forward a message
prefixed with WADE directly to him. Wade is a good guy trying to cope with a
bad
situation, so be nice to him.

(and don't tell him where you learned this trick)

Joel
___
Joel D. Sender
Director of Western Operations
QMX SUPPORT SERVICES, INC.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chris Williams
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 11:04 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

If you can afford it, then I'm sure its greatbut quality should never
depend on
contract level!

Chris

> Everone,
>
> I know that my support experiences are not the "norm" at BMC.  I know
> that we all pay large amounts in maintenance and support and then a
> premium for Enterprise support.  I also know that using the "normal"
> support channels can be non-productive and frustrating.
>
> All this being said, If your company can afford it, I would highly
> recommend Enterprise Support.  Not only do you get a single contact for
> all of you support issues 24x7, but you get their cell and home numbers.
> You get quick access to the engineering and resolution teams.  You get
> weekly status calls and routine health checks.  You even get 7 on site
> visits per year and your Remedy Support person gets money to build a
> "mock up" of your environment.
>
> Since purchasing Enterprise Support, I can honestly say that I have
> never had a better support relationship or experience.
>
>
> Kelly Gatewood


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the
Answers Are"

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"


Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? ((one more)

2007-03-15 Thread Don McClure
And, I just received this line from a BMC tech rep concerning an open issue:
 


Are we able to "Close" this ticket (the ticket status will not affect the bug 
in any way) with the bug attached to it?
 


 
This message only mentioned recording a known bug, and contained no other 
suggestions on fixing the broken 
non-functionality.  The interchanges on this issue are only the latest 
installment in BMC communications, numerous 
issues involved,  which follow a pattern all too familiar to other listers.
 
I am now reluctantly convinced that a significant part of the BMC user support 
environment is only concerned with the
 paperwork mill of closing tickets--the substantive solution development for 
issues is secondary.  My engineering
background finds the latter situation totally unacceptable.  I am remembering 
that some individuals at BMC
are shining stars and solid contributors--and have been helpful to this 
customer.  
 
BTW--the 'bug' mentioned in the snip above is relatively minor--but a bug 
nonetheless, one that renders certain 
reports unusable in their present form.  Further, the malfunction should be 
relatively easy to isolate and correct in a well-architected product suite--and 
I would not insult a customer by suggesting that the 'reports can be accepted
as-is, then reformatted to suit'.  This 'feature' contributes to the 
nondeployability of ITSM7 to our user community
in its current form.  
 
 
 
 
 
Don W. McClure, P.E.
Systems Engineer
University of North Texas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
940.565.3287

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"


Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

2007-03-15 Thread Tim Widowfield
I, too, have had mostly good experience with support of the past few years.  
However, I have to admit that by the time my customers, BMC support, and I are 
all on the same phone call together, we're talking to veteran analysts and 
engineers.

I'm just relaying what other people keep telling me.  That is, if you have a 
general application problem or licensing issue, support just "ain't what it 
used to be."
 
--Tim 

- Original Message 
From: Jason Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 1:26:57 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSLIST] Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

Some good points Tim. Especially regarding a HD application provider not
being able to provide customer support. A company that is pushing IT Service
Management as a product apparently doesn't have any ITSM internally? 

I must admit that I have only talked to support a time or two in recent
history. My last contact regarding a technical issue in November was just
what I would expect from top notch support. I must be a lucky boy?

Does anybody on the list use other BMC products (we are just implementing ID
Management but haven't call support for it yet)? Is support consistent for
other their products? Maybe the Remedy product line just is not as important
(as big a revenue generator) as their other products? Is the Remedy
community seeing a lack of interest in Remedy or a BMC support issue as a
whole?

Jason

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Widowfield
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 9:28 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

The only thoughts I can add have to do with the irony of the whole thing.
Can it really be that the company that sell the premier help desk
application can't provide decent customer support?  I mean, it just seems
like yesterday that BMC/Remedy marketing was telling us how customer support
should be thought of as a profit center.  That is, you can retain customers
and drive up new sales by treating people well and providing quality
service.  

>From my own experience, I actually think that's true.  Last summer I spent
over two hours on the phone with a certain airline, just trying to change a
flight.  I have nothing against anyone who happens to live and work in
Bangalore.  However, it appears the call-takers for this airline aren't
empowered to do *anything* on their own.  "Let me talk to my supervisor" is
their mantra.  (At BMC it's: "Send me your log files.")  The likelihood that
I will ever choose to use that airline again is now extremely low.

On the other hand, every time I've called DirecTV I'm astonished at how good
their customer service is.  They actually know how their products work, and
they have the patience to walk customers through time-consuming tasks like
rebooting an HD receiver/recorder.  Would I ever switch to Dish Network or
digital cable?  Are you crazy?

I hope the current support debacle at BMC will be rectified soon.  However,
I've seen this scenario played out before.  Organizations get fixated on the
idea that saving money is the same as making money.  It isn't.  It's a
delusion that accompanies the death spiral.  First they start cutting costs
by firing all their competent employees.  Next they sell off all their
profitable assets, just to keep the bottom line from looking anemic.  In the
end, there's nothing left but the name and the dim memory of what used to
be.  

"Will the last one out of the building please turn out the lights?"
 


--Tim 

- Original Message 
From: "Joran, Peter P, CTR, OSD-CIO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 10:38:38 AM
Subject: Re: [ARSLIST] Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

UNCLASSIFIED


This has been going on long enough. There seems to be a lack of planning
and stakeholder analysis. Perhaps the time is right for a signed
petition listing the issues, demanding change and requiring that BMC
address the problems at RUG. 

What a painful post. It's right there with the parental saying 'This
hurts me more than it hurts you.'
Any thoughts?

Pete


-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carey Matthew Black
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 8:23 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC?

Bing,

I appreciate the offer for special assistance. ( You will likely not be
surprised to know that you are actually not the first member of this
community to offer such help. Have I mentioned lately that this is the
best group of "co-workers" that I have ever had the pleasure of working
with? )

However the details of the technical issue are, at this point, not
rea

Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

2007-03-15 Thread Chris Williams
If you can afford it, then I'm sure its greatbut quality should never 
depend on
contract level!

Chris

> Everone,
>
> I know that my support experiences are not the "norm" at BMC.  I know
> that we all pay large amounts in maintenance and support and then a
> premium for Enterprise support.  I also know that using the "normal"
> support channels can be non-productive and frustrating.
>
> All this being said, If your company can afford it, I would highly
> recommend Enterprise Support.  Not only do you get a single contact for
> all of you support issues 24x7, but you get their cell and home numbers.
> You get quick access to the engineering and resolution teams.  You get
> weekly status calls and routine health checks.  You even get 7 on site
> visits per year and your Remedy Support person gets money to build a
> "mock up" of your environment.
>
> Since purchasing Enterprise Support, I can honestly say that I have
> never had a better support relationship or experience.
>
>
> Kelly Gatewood

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"


Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

2007-03-15 Thread Rick Cook
Well, I hope you're in the majority, Peter.  I do hear some that aren't as
lucky as you, but was really trying to get an idea of whether it was an
isolated problem or an(other) common one.

Rick

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joran, Peter P, CTR, OSD-CIO
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 10:24 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

I agree. My sales reps and sales engineers have been and remain tops.
Today that's Tom Beckett and David Quinn. Thanks fellas!!

Pete 

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Dudley
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 1:06 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

**
For the record -
 
Our sales rep is the best I've dealt with thus far.  As for support...
well, they never seem to be able to fix my issues - this could be caused by
the fact that when I have to contact support, I've exhausted every avenue
prior to contacting them and I wind up fixing the issues myself and then
telling them how I did it. 
 
Only my 2 cents... 
 
Rob

 
On 3/15/07, Rick Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 

I bet if I took a show of hands as to who was happy with Remedy
engineering
and support right now, it would be a small minority - no surprise
there. 

Would it also be a minority of those who could say their BMC sales
rep is
either unknown to them or ineffective in serving them?

Houston - YOU have a problem.  For details, see your closest mirror.

Rick

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Widowfield
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 9:28 AM 
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
    Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

The only thoughts I can add have to do with the irony of the whole
thing.
Can it really be that the company that sell the premier help desk 
application can't provide decent customer support?  I mean, it just
seems
like yesterday that BMC/Remedy marketing was telling us how customer
support
should be thought of as a profit center.  That is, you can retain
customers 
and drive up new sales by treating people well and providing quality
service.

From my own experience, I actually think that's true.  Last summer I
spent
over two hours on the phone with a certain airline, just trying to
change a 
flight.  I have nothing against anyone who happens to live and work
in
Bangalore.  However, it appears the call-takers for this airline
aren't
empowered to do *anything* on their own.  "Let me talk to my
supervisor" is 
their mantra.  (At BMC it's: "Send me your log files.")  The
likelihood that
I will ever choose to use that airline again is now extremely low.

On the other hand, every time I've called DirecTV I'm astonished at
how good 
their customer service is.  They actually know how their products
work, and
they have the patience to walk customers through time-consuming
tasks like
rebooting an HD receiver/recorder.  Would I ever switch to Dish
Network or 
digital cable?  Are you crazy?

I hope the current support debacle at BMC will be rectified soon.
However,
I've seen this scenario played out before.  Organizations get
fixated on the
idea that saving money is the same as making money.  It isn't.
It's a 
delusion that accompanies the death spiral.  First they start
cutting costs
by firing all their competent employees.  Next they sell off all
their
profitable assets, just to keep the bottom line from looking anemic.
In the 
end, there's nothing left but the name and the dim memory of what
used to
be.

"Will the last one out of the building please turn out the lights?"



--Tim

- Original Message  
From: "Joran, Peter P, CTR, OSD-CIO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 10:38:38 AM 
Subject: Re: [ARSLIST] Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

UNCLASSIFIED


This has been going on long enough. There seems to be a lack of
planning and
stakeholder analysis. Perhaps the time is right for a signed
petition 
listing the issues, demanding change and requiring that BMC address
the
problems at RUG.

What a 

Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

2007-03-15 Thread Shawn Rosenberry

I seem to recall, two years ago when the RUG (yes it was still the RUG back
then) was in San Jose, that at one meeting with BMC brass there were a large
number of complaints about user support.  I remember that they seemed
surprised and that they promised they would look into the issues and
complaints.  Sadly it seems that instead of improving, things have only
gotten worse.  I seriously hope that BMC takes note of the complaints from
the ARS list and takes another look at their current support policies before
its too late.

Shawn Rosenberry RSP


On 3/15/07, Rick Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


I bet if I took a show of hands as to who was happy with Remedy
engineering
and support right now, it would be a small minority - no surprise there.

Would it also be a minority of those who could say their BMC sales rep is
either unknown to them or ineffective in serving them?

Houston - YOU have a problem.  For details, see your closest mirror.

Rick

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Widowfield
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 9:28 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

The only thoughts I can add have to do with the irony of the whole thing.
Can it really be that the company that sell the premier help desk
application can't provide decent customer support?  I mean, it just seems
like yesterday that BMC/Remedy marketing was telling us how customer
support
should be thought of as a profit center.  That is, you can retain
customers
and drive up new sales by treating people well and providing quality
service.

From my own experience, I actually think that's true.  Last summer I spent
over two hours on the phone with a certain airline, just trying to change
a
flight.  I have nothing against anyone who happens to live and work in
Bangalore.  However, it appears the call-takers for this airline aren't
empowered to do *anything* on their own.  "Let me talk to my supervisor"
is
their mantra.  (At BMC it's: "Send me your log files.")  The likelihood
that
I will ever choose to use that airline again is now extremely low.

On the other hand, every time I've called DirecTV I'm astonished at how
good
their customer service is.  They actually know how their products work,
and
they have the patience to walk customers through time-consuming tasks like
rebooting an HD receiver/recorder.  Would I ever switch to Dish Network or
digital cable?  Are you crazy?

I hope the current support debacle at BMC will be rectified
soon.  However,
I've seen this scenario played out before.  Organizations get fixated on
the
idea that saving money is the same as making money.  It isn't.  It's a
delusion that accompanies the death spiral.  First they start cutting
costs
by firing all their competent employees.  Next they sell off all their
profitable assets, just to keep the bottom line from looking anemic.  In
the
end, there's nothing left but the name and the dim memory of what used to
be.

"Will the last one out of the building please turn out the lights?"



--Tim

- Original Message 
From: "Joran, Peter P, CTR, OSD-CIO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 10:38:38 AM
Subject: Re: [ARSLIST] Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

UNCLASSIFIED


This has been going on long enough. There seems to be a lack of planning
and
stakeholder analysis. Perhaps the time is right for a signed petition
listing the issues, demanding change and requiring that BMC address the
problems at RUG.

What a painful post. It's right there with the parental saying 'This hurts
me more than it hurts you.'
Any thoughts?

Pete


-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carey Matthew Black
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 8:23 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC?

Bing,

I appreciate the offer for special assistance. ( You will likely not be
surprised to know that you are actually not the first member of this
community to offer such help. Have I mentioned lately that this is the
best
group of "co-workers" that I have ever had the pleasure of working with? )

However the details of the technical issue are, at this point, not really
the more important issue. I think the BMC support process is broke and
their
customers have little to no apparent way to actually receive any
functional
resolution to their problems.

On this technical issue:

I have been patient and sent in the same set of useless log files,
multiple times, at the request of Tech support.

I have answered the same set of useless questions, multiple times, at the
request of Tech support.

I have asked to have the issue transferred to another Tech support person.
(That request has gone no

Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

2007-03-15 Thread Davis, David CTR NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552
Ditto:  Janet Taylor and Marcia Summers have both provided a great deal
of assistance in keeping us as a customer despite our support issues. 

I just want to add this comment. Once we reach Tier III, we usually get
great support.  The problem is getting to that level of expertise.  This
is where support fails most of the time.  It appears that all Tier I and
some Tier II support personnel are not educated in the products that
they supporting.

Dave

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joran, Peter P, CTR, OSD-CIO
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 12:24
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

I agree. My sales reps and sales engineers have been and remain tops.
Today that's Tom Beckett and David Quinn. Thanks fellas!!

Pete 

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Dudley
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 1:06 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

**
For the record -
 
Our sales rep is the best I've dealt with thus far.  As for support...
well, they never seem to be able to fix my issues - this could be caused
by the fact that when I have to contact support, I've exhausted every
avenue prior to contacting them and I wind up fixing the issues myself
and then telling them how I did it. 
 
Only my 2 cents... 
 
Rob

 
On 3/15/07, Rick Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 

I bet if I took a show of hands as to who was happy with Remedy
engineering
and support right now, it would be a small minority - no
surprise there. 

Would it also be a minority of those who could say their BMC
sales rep is
either unknown to them or ineffective in serving them?

Houston - YOU have a problem.  For details, see your closest
mirror.

Rick

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Widowfield
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 9:28 AM 
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
    Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

The only thoughts I can add have to do with the irony of the
whole thing.
Can it really be that the company that sell the premier help
desk 
application can't provide decent customer support?  I mean, it
just seems
like yesterday that BMC/Remedy marketing was telling us how
customer support
should be thought of as a profit center.  That is, you can
retain customers 
and drive up new sales by treating people well and providing
quality
service.

From my own experience, I actually think that's true.  Last
summer I spent
over two hours on the phone with a certain airline, just trying
to change a 
flight.  I have nothing against anyone who happens to live and
work in
Bangalore.  However, it appears the call-takers for this airline
aren't
empowered to do *anything* on their own.  "Let me talk to my
supervisor" is 
their mantra.  (At BMC it's: "Send me your log files.")  The
likelihood that
I will ever choose to use that airline again is now extremely
low.

On the other hand, every time I've called DirecTV I'm astonished
at how good 
their customer service is.  They actually know how their
products work, and
they have the patience to walk customers through time-consuming
tasks like
rebooting an HD receiver/recorder.  Would I ever switch to Dish
Network or 
digital cable?  Are you crazy?

I hope the current support debacle at BMC will be rectified
soon.  However,
I've seen this scenario played out before.  Organizations get
fixated on the
idea that saving money is the same as making money.  It isn't.
It's a 
delusion that accompanies the death spiral.  First they start
cutting costs
by firing all their competent employees.  Next they sell off all
their
profitable assets, just to keep the bottom line from looking
anemic.  In the 
end, there's nothing left but the name and the dim memory of
what used to
be.

"Will the last one out of the building please turn out the
lights?"



--Tim

- Original Message  
From: "Joran, Peter P, CTR, OSD-CIO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 10:38:38 AM 
Subject: Re: [ARSLIST] Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

UNCLASSIFIED


This has been going on long enough. There see

AW: AW: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

2007-03-15 Thread Christian Janovic
Tim, I am being cynical out of despair...

As many participants in this thread show a lack of understanding I recommend
Joel Spolsky excellent AND insightful article:
http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/customerservice.html

Ok, that's a small, owner-run, bootstrapping software company. Still a lot
of thruth there...




-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Tim Widowfield
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. März 2007 18:28
An: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Betreff: Re: AW: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

However, I would submit to you that eve
Hmmm...  You may have a point.

However, I would submit to you that even the quintessential Pointy-Haired
Boss (or simian decider) can understand that something is wrong when his
Remedy administrator tells him that they can't upgrade the server because
BMC support can't seem to cut a license in a timely manner.

 
--Tim

- Original Message 
From: Christian Janovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 1:02:01 PM
Subject: [ARSLIST] AW: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

Well, I think you mix things up...

BMC right now sells C-Level-Out-Of-The-Box-Tools. I.e. that they address
"deciders" and not those guys that have something irrelevant as support
problems - as YOU are.

Then again choosing an airline is YOUR personal decision.

Has anybody replaced BMC because of bad support? If not, they are right...

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Tim Widowfield
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. März 2007 17:28
An: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Betreff: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

The only thoughts I can add have to do with the irony of the whole thing.
Can it really be that the company that sell the premier help desk
application can't provide decent customer support?  I mean, it just seems
like yesterday that BMC/Remedy marketing was telling us how customer support
should be thought of as a profit center.  That is, you can retain customers
and drive up new sales by treating people well and providing quality
service.  
...


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the
Answers Are"





___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the
Answers Are"

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"


Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

2007-03-15 Thread Axton

Sad but true.  Have you ever worked at a company where your position
was the breadwinner (e.g., a software company or consulting firm) and
also worked at a company where you were classified as overhead?
Notice a difference in your perceived value when operating in those
different scenarios?  On one side you have the power to make change,
in the other you are subject to what is dictated as important.  Why?
Because in one case you are making the money and the other you cost
money.

Bottom line is that BMC will act/react in response to their bottom
line; read as sales and shareholder perception.  Why?  Because that is
how they are able to continue to operate.

Until the people that make the decision to buy or not to buy BMC
products (C level people) start to show change, BMC will probably not
change.  There are certain individuals inside BMC that do read these
things and want to make things better, but back to the bottom line,
they are operating in a limited capacity.  Why?  Because the people in
the field are not the people buying the products or making the
decision to buy products.

What does this all translate to?  Stop buying BMC products if you are
not happy with the current state of events or you think better
alternatives are available.  As Christian stated, if you or yours are
not doing this (moving away from BMC products), then BMC is making the
right decision in how they are handling things.  Whether you think the
status quo is good or bad is not relavent to the people that have to
sign off on change.

One would like to see things get better before it comes to this
(people moving away), but companies (large and/or old companies in
particular) are reactionary by nature.

Axton Grams

On 3/15/07, Christian Janovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Well, I think you mix things up...

BMC right now sells C-Level-Out-Of-The-Box-Tools. I.e. that they address
"deciders" and not those guys that have something irrelevant as support
problems - as YOU are.

Then again choosing an airline is YOUR personal decision.

Has anybody replaced BMC because of bad support? If not, they are right...

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Tim Widowfield
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. März 2007 17:28
An: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Betreff: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

The only thoughts I can add have to do with the irony of the whole thing.
Can it really be that the company that sell the premier help desk
application can't provide decent customer support?  I mean, it just seems
like yesterday that BMC/Remedy marketing was telling us how customer support
should be thought of as a profit center.  That is, you can retain customers
and drive up new sales by treating people well and providing quality
service.
...

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers 
Are"



___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers 
Are"


Re: AW: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

2007-03-15 Thread Tim Widowfield
However, I would submit to you that eve
Hmmm...  You may have a point.

However, I would submit to you that even the quintessential Pointy-Haired Boss 
(or simian decider) can understand that something is wrong when his Remedy 
administrator tells him that they can't upgrade the server because BMC support 
can't seem to cut a license in a timely manner.

 
--Tim

- Original Message 
From: Christian Janovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 1:02:01 PM
Subject: [ARSLIST] AW: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

Well, I think you mix things up...

BMC right now sells C-Level-Out-Of-The-Box-Tools. I.e. that they address
"deciders" and not those guys that have something irrelevant as support
problems - as YOU are.

Then again choosing an airline is YOUR personal decision.

Has anybody replaced BMC because of bad support? If not, they are right...

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Tim Widowfield
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. März 2007 17:28
An: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Betreff: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

The only thoughts I can add have to do with the irony of the whole thing.
Can it really be that the company that sell the premier help desk
application can't provide decent customer support?  I mean, it just seems
like yesterday that BMC/Remedy marketing was telling us how customer support
should be thought of as a profit center.  That is, you can retain customers
and drive up new sales by treating people well and providing quality
service.  
...

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"




___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"


Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

2007-03-15 Thread Jason Miller
Some good points Tim. Especially regarding a HD application provider not
being able to provide customer support. A company that is pushing IT Service
Management as a product apparently doesn't have any ITSM internally? 

I must admit that I have only talked to support a time or two in recent
history. My last contact regarding a technical issue in November was just
what I would expect from top notch support. I must be a lucky boy?

Does anybody on the list use other BMC products (we are just implementing ID
Management but haven't call support for it yet)? Is support consistent for
other their products? Maybe the Remedy product line just is not as important
(as big a revenue generator) as their other products? Is the Remedy
community seeing a lack of interest in Remedy or a BMC support issue as a
whole?

Jason

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Widowfield
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 9:28 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

The only thoughts I can add have to do with the irony of the whole thing.
Can it really be that the company that sell the premier help desk
application can't provide decent customer support?  I mean, it just seems
like yesterday that BMC/Remedy marketing was telling us how customer support
should be thought of as a profit center.  That is, you can retain customers
and drive up new sales by treating people well and providing quality
service.  

>From my own experience, I actually think that's true.  Last summer I spent
over two hours on the phone with a certain airline, just trying to change a
flight.  I have nothing against anyone who happens to live and work in
Bangalore.  However, it appears the call-takers for this airline aren't
empowered to do *anything* on their own.  "Let me talk to my supervisor" is
their mantra.  (At BMC it's: "Send me your log files.")  The likelihood that
I will ever choose to use that airline again is now extremely low.

On the other hand, every time I've called DirecTV I'm astonished at how good
their customer service is.  They actually know how their products work, and
they have the patience to walk customers through time-consuming tasks like
rebooting an HD receiver/recorder.  Would I ever switch to Dish Network or
digital cable?  Are you crazy?

I hope the current support debacle at BMC will be rectified soon.  However,
I've seen this scenario played out before.  Organizations get fixated on the
idea that saving money is the same as making money.  It isn't.  It's a
delusion that accompanies the death spiral.  First they start cutting costs
by firing all their competent employees.  Next they sell off all their
profitable assets, just to keep the bottom line from looking anemic.  In the
end, there's nothing left but the name and the dim memory of what used to
be.  

"Will the last one out of the building please turn out the lights?"
 


--Tim 

- Original Message 
From: "Joran, Peter P, CTR, OSD-CIO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 10:38:38 AM
Subject: Re: [ARSLIST] Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

UNCLASSIFIED


This has been going on long enough. There seems to be a lack of planning
and stakeholder analysis. Perhaps the time is right for a signed
petition listing the issues, demanding change and requiring that BMC
address the problems at RUG. 

What a painful post. It's right there with the parental saying 'This
hurts me more than it hurts you.'
Any thoughts?

Pete


-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carey Matthew Black
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 8:23 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC?

Bing,

I appreciate the offer for special assistance. ( You will likely not be
surprised to know that you are actually not the first member of this
community to offer such help. Have I mentioned lately that this is the
best group of "co-workers" that I have ever had the pleasure of working
with? )

However the details of the technical issue are, at this point, not
really the more important issue. I think the BMC support process is
broke and their customers have little to no apparent way to actually
receive any functional resolution to their problems.

On this technical issue:

  I have been patient and sent in the same set of useless log files,
multiple times, at the request of Tech support.

  I have answered the same set of useless questions, multiple times, at
the request of Tech support.

  I have asked to have the issue transferred to another Tech support
person. (That request has gone nowhere.)

  I have been patient and waited for a "debug server" to actually have
some extra logging to diagno

Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

2007-03-15 Thread Joran, Peter P, CTR, OSD-CIO
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

I agree. My sales reps and sales engineers have been and remain tops.
Today that's Tom Beckett and David Quinn. Thanks fellas!!

Pete 

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Dudley
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 1:06 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

**
For the record -
 
Our sales rep is the best I've dealt with thus far.  As for support...
well, they never seem to be able to fix my issues - this could be caused
by the fact that when I have to contact support, I've exhausted every
avenue prior to contacting them and I wind up fixing the issues myself
and then telling them how I did it. 
 
Only my 2 cents... 
 
Rob

 
On 3/15/07, Rick Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 

I bet if I took a show of hands as to who was happy with Remedy
engineering
and support right now, it would be a small minority - no
surprise there. 

Would it also be a minority of those who could say their BMC
sales rep is
either unknown to them or ineffective in serving them?

Houston - YOU have a problem.  For details, see your closest
mirror.

Rick

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Widowfield
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 9:28 AM 
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
    Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

The only thoughts I can add have to do with the irony of the
whole thing.
Can it really be that the company that sell the premier help
desk 
application can't provide decent customer support?  I mean, it
just seems
like yesterday that BMC/Remedy marketing was telling us how
customer support
should be thought of as a profit center.  That is, you can
retain customers 
and drive up new sales by treating people well and providing
quality
service.

From my own experience, I actually think that's true.  Last
summer I spent
over two hours on the phone with a certain airline, just trying
to change a 
flight.  I have nothing against anyone who happens to live and
work in
Bangalore.  However, it appears the call-takers for this airline
aren't
empowered to do *anything* on their own.  "Let me talk to my
supervisor" is 
their mantra.  (At BMC it's: "Send me your log files.")  The
likelihood that
I will ever choose to use that airline again is now extremely
low.

On the other hand, every time I've called DirecTV I'm astonished
at how good 
their customer service is.  They actually know how their
products work, and
they have the patience to walk customers through time-consuming
tasks like
rebooting an HD receiver/recorder.  Would I ever switch to Dish
Network or 
digital cable?  Are you crazy?

I hope the current support debacle at BMC will be rectified
soon.  However,
I've seen this scenario played out before.  Organizations get
fixated on the
idea that saving money is the same as making money.  It isn't.
It's a 
delusion that accompanies the death spiral.  First they start
cutting costs
by firing all their competent employees.  Next they sell off all
their
profitable assets, just to keep the bottom line from looking
anemic.  In the 
end, there's nothing left but the name and the dim memory of
what used to
be.

"Will the last one out of the building please turn out the
lights?"



--Tim

- Original Message  
From: "Joran, Peter P, CTR, OSD-CIO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 10:38:38 AM 
Subject: Re: [ARSLIST] Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

UNCLASSIFIED


This has been going on long enough. There seems to be a lack of
planning and
stakeholder analysis. Perhaps the time is right for a signed
petition 
listing the issues, demanding change and requiring that BMC
address the
problems at RUG.

What a painful post. It's right there with the parental saying
'This hurts
me more than it hurts you.'
Any thoughts?

Pete


-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carey Matthew Black 
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 8:23 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC?

Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

2007-03-15 Thread Rob Dudley

For the record -

Our sales rep is the best I've dealt with thus far.  As for support... well,
they never seem to be able to fix my issues - this could be caused by the
fact that when I have to contact support, I've exhausted every avenue prior
to contacting them and I wind up fixing the issues myself and then telling
them how I did it.

Only my 2 cents...

Rob


On 3/15/07, Rick Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


I bet if I took a show of hands as to who was happy with Remedy
engineering
and support right now, it would be a small minority - no surprise there.

Would it also be a minority of those who could say their BMC sales rep is
either unknown to them or ineffective in serving them?

Houston - YOU have a problem.  For details, see your closest mirror.

Rick

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Widowfield
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 9:28 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

The only thoughts I can add have to do with the irony of the whole thing.
Can it really be that the company that sell the premier help desk
application can't provide decent customer support?  I mean, it just seems
like yesterday that BMC/Remedy marketing was telling us how customer
support
should be thought of as a profit center.  That is, you can retain
customers
and drive up new sales by treating people well and providing quality
service.

From my own experience, I actually think that's true.  Last summer I spent
over two hours on the phone with a certain airline, just trying to change
a
flight.  I have nothing against anyone who happens to live and work in
Bangalore.  However, it appears the call-takers for this airline aren't
empowered to do *anything* on their own.  "Let me talk to my supervisor"
is
their mantra.  (At BMC it's: "Send me your log files.")  The likelihood
that
I will ever choose to use that airline again is now extremely low.

On the other hand, every time I've called DirecTV I'm astonished at how
good
their customer service is.  They actually know how their products work,
and
they have the patience to walk customers through time-consuming tasks like
rebooting an HD receiver/recorder.  Would I ever switch to Dish Network or
digital cable?  Are you crazy?

I hope the current support debacle at BMC will be rectified
soon.  However,
I've seen this scenario played out before.  Organizations get fixated on
the
idea that saving money is the same as making money.  It isn't.  It's a
delusion that accompanies the death spiral.  First they start cutting
costs
by firing all their competent employees.  Next they sell off all their
profitable assets, just to keep the bottom line from looking anemic.  In
the
end, there's nothing left but the name and the dim memory of what used to
be.

"Will the last one out of the building please turn out the lights?"



--Tim

- Original Message 
From: "Joran, Peter P, CTR, OSD-CIO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 10:38:38 AM
Subject: Re: [ARSLIST] Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

UNCLASSIFIED


This has been going on long enough. There seems to be a lack of planning
and
stakeholder analysis. Perhaps the time is right for a signed petition
listing the issues, demanding change and requiring that BMC address the
problems at RUG.

What a painful post. It's right there with the parental saying 'This hurts
me more than it hurts you.'
Any thoughts?

Pete


-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carey Matthew Black
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 8:23 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC?

Bing,

I appreciate the offer for special assistance. ( You will likely not be
surprised to know that you are actually not the first member of this
community to offer such help. Have I mentioned lately that this is the
best
group of "co-workers" that I have ever had the pleasure of working with? )

However the details of the technical issue are, at this point, not really
the more important issue. I think the BMC support process is broke and
their
customers have little to no apparent way to actually receive any
functional
resolution to their problems.

On this technical issue:

I have been patient and sent in the same set of useless log files,
multiple times, at the request of Tech support.

I have answered the same set of useless questions, multiple times, at the
request of Tech support.

I have asked to have the issue transferred to another Tech support person.
(That request has gone nowhere.)

I have been patient and waited for a "debug server" to actually have some
extra logging to diagnose the issue. (That has gone nowhere.)

I have asked for my

AW: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

2007-03-15 Thread Christian Janovic
Well, I think you mix things up...

BMC right now sells C-Level-Out-Of-The-Box-Tools. I.e. that they address
"deciders" and not those guys that have something irrelevant as support
problems - as YOU are.

Then again choosing an airline is YOUR personal decision.

Has anybody replaced BMC because of bad support? If not, they are right...

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Tim Widowfield
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. März 2007 17:28
An: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Betreff: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

The only thoughts I can add have to do with the irony of the whole thing.
Can it really be that the company that sell the premier help desk
application can't provide decent customer support?  I mean, it just seems
like yesterday that BMC/Remedy marketing was telling us how customer support
should be thought of as a profit center.  That is, you can retain customers
and drive up new sales by treating people well and providing quality
service.  
...

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"


Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC?

2007-03-15 Thread Warren Baltimore

Folks,


At the risk of being a "me too" posting

ME TOO!!!

Support bites these days.  Not that there are some shining stars out there,
but the overall support process is a total wreck.

Is BMC trying to smother the baby in the crib?

I'll be glad to add my name to any complaint.

Recently, I sent the following to our sales rep.  Still haven't heard
back...


*Stephanie,*

**

*I'm with the University of Washington's School of Medicine's office. I'm
working as a Sr. Remedy Developer on our SOMAS Projects.*

**

*I received this email today from BMC, and it was kind of the last straw for
me. Now, thankfully, I was already aware of the problems with DST, and have
taken the appropriate precautions, HOWEVER, had I not been aware of the
issue with the BMC AR System's vulnerability, receiving this email 3 days
prior to the event would have been an absolute disaster.*

**

*This type of slapdash approach to supporting the Remedy customers has
become indicative of an overall lack of support...period. With the continued
re-organization of our support structures, we continue to see drop in the
quality that we had come to expect from the old Remedy Company.*

**

*When BMC first bought the Remedy wing of Peregrine, they made statements
that reflected and understanding of what the Remedy company had once been
and voiced a desire to bring it back.*

**

*As far as support goes, BMC is failing miserably.*

**

*If there is anything that I can do going forward, please feel free to call
on me. *

I sure would like to hear back from them


On 3/15/07, Scott Glass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


**

Matt White Wrote:

"I have very similar experiences with support as you and others have
described. It's become routine. Entry-level "support" person asking
rudimentary, unrelated questions, usually in broken English, demonstrating

little/no understanding of the issue itself. Repeated phone calls/e-mails
until "max frustration". Ultimately, we're worn down and give up."





Matt, I absolutely agree that having to repeat the same thing four or five
times does get VERY annoying, VERY fast...

Of course then there's the "what?!?!?!?" that comes out of my mouth in
response to their response… 



I miss the California crew.



Scott



*Scott Glass*

Enterprise Management Development

SunGard Availability Services

401 North Broad Street

MS-MC122

Philadelphia, PA 19108



office: 215 378-5016

cell: 215 208-2450

email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___

Keeping People and Information Connected(r)

http://www.availability.sungard.com

CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain
confidential, proprietary and privileged information, and unauthorized
disclosure or use is prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error,
please notify the sender and delete this e-mail from your system.


__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___





--
Warren R. Baltimore II
Remedy Developer
UW Medicine IT Services
School of Medicine
University of Washington
Box 358220
1325 Fourth Ave, Suite 2000
Seattle, WA 98101

The opinions expressed in this e-mail are in no way those of the University
of Washington, or the State of Washington.  They are my own.

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers 
Are"


Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

2007-03-15 Thread Rick Cook
I bet if I took a show of hands as to who was happy with Remedy engineering
and support right now, it would be a small minority - no surprise there.

Would it also be a minority of those who could say their BMC sales rep is
either unknown to them or ineffective in serving them?

Houston - YOU have a problem.  For details, see your closest mirror.

Rick

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Widowfield
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 9:28 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

The only thoughts I can add have to do with the irony of the whole thing.
Can it really be that the company that sell the premier help desk
application can't provide decent customer support?  I mean, it just seems
like yesterday that BMC/Remedy marketing was telling us how customer support
should be thought of as a profit center.  That is, you can retain customers
and drive up new sales by treating people well and providing quality
service.  

>From my own experience, I actually think that's true.  Last summer I spent
over two hours on the phone with a certain airline, just trying to change a
flight.  I have nothing against anyone who happens to live and work in
Bangalore.  However, it appears the call-takers for this airline aren't
empowered to do *anything* on their own.  "Let me talk to my supervisor" is
their mantra.  (At BMC it's: "Send me your log files.")  The likelihood that
I will ever choose to use that airline again is now extremely low.

On the other hand, every time I've called DirecTV I'm astonished at how good
their customer service is.  They actually know how their products work, and
they have the patience to walk customers through time-consuming tasks like
rebooting an HD receiver/recorder.  Would I ever switch to Dish Network or
digital cable?  Are you crazy?

I hope the current support debacle at BMC will be rectified soon.  However,
I've seen this scenario played out before.  Organizations get fixated on the
idea that saving money is the same as making money.  It isn't.  It's a
delusion that accompanies the death spiral.  First they start cutting costs
by firing all their competent employees.  Next they sell off all their
profitable assets, just to keep the bottom line from looking anemic.  In the
end, there's nothing left but the name and the dim memory of what used to
be.  

"Will the last one out of the building please turn out the lights?"
 


--Tim 

- Original Message 
From: "Joran, Peter P, CTR, OSD-CIO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 10:38:38 AM
Subject: Re: [ARSLIST] Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

UNCLASSIFIED


This has been going on long enough. There seems to be a lack of planning and
stakeholder analysis. Perhaps the time is right for a signed petition
listing the issues, demanding change and requiring that BMC address the
problems at RUG. 

What a painful post. It's right there with the parental saying 'This hurts
me more than it hurts you.'
Any thoughts?

Pete


-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carey Matthew Black
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 8:23 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC?

Bing,

I appreciate the offer for special assistance. ( You will likely not be
surprised to know that you are actually not the first member of this
community to offer such help. Have I mentioned lately that this is the best
group of "co-workers" that I have ever had the pleasure of working with? )

However the details of the technical issue are, at this point, not really
the more important issue. I think the BMC support process is broke and their
customers have little to no apparent way to actually receive any functional
resolution to their problems.

On this technical issue:

  I have been patient and sent in the same set of useless log files,
multiple times, at the request of Tech support.

  I have answered the same set of useless questions, multiple times, at the
request of Tech support.

  I have asked to have the issue transferred to another Tech support person.
(That request has gone nowhere.)

  I have been patient and waited for a "debug server" to actually have some
extra logging to diagnose the issue. (That has gone nowhere.)

  I have asked for my sales rep to help. (That has gone nowhere.)

  As a last resort, I have appealed to the community in the hopes that
others that suffer the same fate might be brave enough to stand next to me.
(And hope that such a display might show BMC that their process is really
broke.)



FWIW: I appear to have a voice mail this AM from a different person about
this issue. I will have to wait to see if they might actual

Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

2007-03-15 Thread Gatewood Kelly
Everone,

I know that my support experiences are not the "norm" at BMC.  I know
that we all pay large amounts in maintenance and support and then a
premium for Enterprise support.  I also know that using the "normal"
support channels can be non-productive and frustrating.

All this being said, If your company can afford it, I would highly
recommend Enterprise Support.  Not only do you get a single contact for
all of you support issues 24x7, but you get their cell and home numbers.
You get quick access to the engineering and resolution teams.  You get
weekly status calls and routine health checks.  You even get 7 on site
visits per year and your Remedy Support person gets money to build a
"mock up" of your environment.

Since purchasing Enterprise Support, I can honestly say that I have
never had a better support relationship or experience.


Kelly Gatewood

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Widowfield
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 11:28
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

The only thoughts I can add have to do with the irony of the whole
thing.  Can it really be that the company that sell the premier help
desk application can't provide decent customer support?  I mean, it just
seems like yesterday that BMC/Remedy marketing was telling us how
customer support should be thought of as a profit center.  That is, you
can retain customers and drive up new sales by treating people well and
providing quality service.  

>From my own experience, I actually think that's true.  Last summer I
spent over two hours on the phone with a certain airline, just trying to
change a flight.  I have nothing against anyone who happens to live and
work in Bangalore.  However, it appears the call-takers for this airline
aren't empowered to do *anything* on their own.  "Let me talk to my
supervisor" is their mantra.  (At BMC it's: "Send me your log files.")
The likelihood that I will ever choose to use that airline again is now
extremely low.

On the other hand, every time I've called DirecTV I'm astonished at how
good their customer service is.  They actually know how their products
work, and they have the patience to walk customers through
time-consuming tasks like rebooting an HD receiver/recorder.  Would I
ever switch to Dish Network or digital cable?  Are you crazy?

I hope the current support debacle at BMC will be rectified soon.
However, I've seen this scenario played out before.  Organizations get
fixated on the idea that saving money is the same as making money.  It
isn't.  It's a delusion that accompanies the death spiral.  First they
start cutting costs by firing all their competent employees.  Next they
sell off all their profitable assets, just to keep the bottom line from
looking anemic.  In the end, there's nothing left but the name and the
dim memory of what used to be.  

"Will the last one out of the building please turn out the lights?"
 


--Tim 

- Original Message 
From: "Joran, Peter P, CTR, OSD-CIO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 10:38:38 AM
Subject: Re: [ARSLIST] Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

UNCLASSIFIED


This has been going on long enough. There seems to be a lack of planning
and stakeholder analysis. Perhaps the time is right for a signed
petition listing the issues, demanding change and requiring that BMC
address the problems at RUG. 

What a painful post. It's right there with the parental saying 'This
hurts me more than it hurts you.'
Any thoughts?

Pete


-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carey Matthew Black
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 8:23 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC?

Bing,

I appreciate the offer for special assistance. ( You will likely not be
surprised to know that you are actually not the first member of this
community to offer such help. Have I mentioned lately that this is the
best group of "co-workers" that I have ever had the pleasure of working
with? )

However the details of the technical issue are, at this point, not
really the more important issue. I think the BMC support process is
broke and their customers have little to no apparent way to actually
receive any functional resolution to their problems.

On this technical issue:

  I have been patient and sent in the same set of useless log files,
multiple times, at the request of Tech support.

  I have answered the same set of useless questions, multiple times, at
the request of Tech support.

  I have asked to have the issue transferred to another Tech support
person. (That request has gone nowhere.)

  I have been patient and waited for a &quo

Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

2007-03-15 Thread Tim Widowfield
The only thoughts I can add have to do with the irony of the whole thing.  Can 
it really be that the company that sell the premier help desk application can't 
provide decent customer support?  I mean, it just seems like yesterday that 
BMC/Remedy marketing was telling us how customer support should be thought of 
as a profit center.  That is, you can retain customers and drive up new sales 
by treating people well and providing quality service.  

>From my own experience, I actually think that's true.  Last summer I spent 
>over two hours on the phone with a certain airline, just trying to change a 
>flight.  I have nothing against anyone who happens to live and work in 
>Bangalore.  However, it appears the call-takers for this airline aren't 
>empowered to do *anything* on their own.  "Let me talk to my supervisor" is 
>their mantra.  (At BMC it's: "Send me your log files.")  The likelihood that I 
>will ever choose to use that airline again is now extremely low.

On the other hand, every time I've called DirecTV I'm astonished at how good 
their customer service is.  They actually know how their products work, and 
they have the patience to walk customers through time-consuming tasks like 
rebooting an HD receiver/recorder.  Would I ever switch to Dish Network or 
digital cable?  Are you crazy?

I hope the current support debacle at BMC will be rectified soon.  However, 
I've seen this scenario played out before.  Organizations get fixated on the 
idea that saving money is the same as making money.  It isn't.  It's a delusion 
that accompanies the death spiral.  First they start cutting costs by firing 
all their competent employees.  Next they sell off all their profitable assets, 
just to keep the bottom line from looking anemic.  In the end, there's nothing 
left but the name and the dim memory of what used to be.  

"Will the last one out of the building please turn out the lights?"
 


--Tim 

- Original Message 
From: "Joran, Peter P, CTR, OSD-CIO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 10:38:38 AM
Subject: Re: [ARSLIST] Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

UNCLASSIFIED


This has been going on long enough. There seems to be a lack of planning
and stakeholder analysis. Perhaps the time is right for a signed
petition listing the issues, demanding change and requiring that BMC
address the problems at RUG. 

What a painful post. It's right there with the parental saying 'This
hurts me more than it hurts you.'
Any thoughts?

Pete


-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carey Matthew Black
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 8:23 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC?

Bing,

I appreciate the offer for special assistance. ( You will likely not be
surprised to know that you are actually not the first member of this
community to offer such help. Have I mentioned lately that this is the
best group of "co-workers" that I have ever had the pleasure of working
with? )

However the details of the technical issue are, at this point, not
really the more important issue. I think the BMC support process is
broke and their customers have little to no apparent way to actually
receive any functional resolution to their problems.

On this technical issue:

  I have been patient and sent in the same set of useless log files,
multiple times, at the request of Tech support.

  I have answered the same set of useless questions, multiple times, at
the request of Tech support.

  I have asked to have the issue transferred to another Tech support
person. (That request has gone nowhere.)

  I have been patient and waited for a "debug server" to actually have
some extra logging to diagnose the issue. (That has gone nowhere.)

  I have asked for my sales rep to help. (That has gone nowhere.)

  As a last resort, I have appealed to the community in the hopes that
others that suffer the same fate might be brave enough to stand next to
me. (And hope that such a display might show BMC that their process is
really broke.)



FWIW: I appear to have a voice mail this AM from a different person
about this issue. I will have to wait to see if they might actually have
transferred the issue to a different agent. Let me also give credit
where it is due. If I had not have to leave the office early yesterday
to attend a funeral, they would have actually been able to reach me at
the time that they called. ( Most calls I get here on the east cost are
after the normal business hours of  8AM - 5PM. This call was actually in
the normal business hours window. :) Now I get to wait until they are
"open" and give them a call. The phone number is a California number. :)

Maybe I have a little hope of improvement at this

Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC? (U)

2007-03-15 Thread Joran, Peter P, CTR, OSD-CIO
UNCLASSIFIED


This has been going on long enough. There seems to be a lack of planning
and stakeholder analysis. Perhaps the time is right for a signed
petition listing the issues, demanding change and requiring that BMC
address the problems at RUG. 

What a painful post. It's right there with the parental saying 'This
hurts me more than it hurts you.'
Any thoughts?

Pete


-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carey Matthew Black
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 8:23 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC?

Bing,

I appreciate the offer for special assistance. ( You will likely not be
surprised to know that you are actually not the first member of this
community to offer such help. Have I mentioned lately that this is the
best group of "co-workers" that I have ever had the pleasure of working
with? )

However the details of the technical issue are, at this point, not
really the more important issue. I think the BMC support process is
broke and their customers have little to no apparent way to actually
receive any functional resolution to their problems.

On this technical issue:

  I have been patient and sent in the same set of useless log files,
multiple times, at the request of Tech support.

  I have answered the same set of useless questions, multiple times, at
the request of Tech support.

  I have asked to have the issue transferred to another Tech support
person. (That request has gone nowhere.)

  I have been patient and waited for a "debug server" to actually have
some extra logging to diagnose the issue. (That has gone nowhere.)

  I have asked for my sales rep to help. (That has gone nowhere.)

  As a last resort, I have appealed to the community in the hopes that
others that suffer the same fate might be brave enough to stand next to
me. (And hope that such a display might show BMC that their process is
really broke.)



FWIW: I appear to have a voice mail this AM from a different person
about this issue. I will have to wait to see if they might actually have
transferred the issue to a different agent. Let me also give credit
where it is due. If I had not have to leave the office early yesterday
to attend a funeral, they would have actually been able to reach me at
the time that they called. ( Most calls I get here on the east cost are
after the normal business hours of  8AM - 5PM. This call was actually in
the normal business hours window. :) Now I get to wait until they are
"open" and give them a call. The phone number is a California number. :)

Maybe I have a little hope of improvement at this point.
I wonder if this thread had anything to do with the change in direction
for how BMC is handling the issue? Or maybe I was just "to impatient" to
wait for a response. Hum...

--
Carey Matthew Black
Remedy Skilled Professional (RSP)
ARS = Action Request System(Remedy)

Love, then teach
Solution = People + Process + Tools
Fast, Accurate, Cheap Pick two.


On 3/15/07, Bradford Bingel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No guarantees but I know some people in Support.  What's the issue?
>
> -- Bing
>
> Bradford Bingel ("Bing")
> ITM3 California
> http://www.itm3.com/
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (email)
> 925-260-6394 (mobile)


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where
the Answers Are"

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"


Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC?

2007-03-15 Thread Scott Glass
**








Matt White Wrote:

“I have very similar experiences with
support as you and others have 
described. It's become routine. Entry-level "support" person asking 
rudimentary, unrelated questions, usually in broken English, demonstrating 
little/no understanding of the issue itself. Repeated phone calls/e-mails 
until "max frustration". Ultimately, we're worn down and give up.”

 

 

Matt, I absolutely agree that having to repeat the same thing
four or five times does get VERY annoying, VERY fast...

Of course then there’s the “what?!?!?!?”
that comes out of my mouth in response to their response… 

 

I miss the California
crew.

 

Scott

 

Scott
Glass

Enterprise Management Development

SunGard Availability Services

401
  North Broad Street 

MS-MC122

Philadelphia, PA 19108

 

office: 215 378-5016

cell: 215 208-2450

email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___

Keeping
People and Information Connected®

http://www.availability.sungard.com 

CONFIDENTIALITY:
This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential, proprietary
and privileged information, and unauthorized disclosure or use is prohibited.
If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and delete this
e-mail from your system.

 






__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in it___


Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC?

2007-03-15 Thread Mike White
I'm right there with you, Matt.  If making noise will help, I'll make some,
too.  More than likely, though, BMC will need to see a financial impact
before they change behavior.

I have very similar experiences with support as you and others have
described.  It's become routine.  Entry-level "support" person asking
rudimentary, unrelated questions, usually in broken English, demonstrating
little/no understanding of the issue itself.  Repeated phone calls/e-mails
until "max frustration".  Ultimately, we're worn down and give up.

We changed servers a couple of months ago, which didn't used to be a big
deal.  Simple license replacement.  It went on for weeks.  I got tangled on
Floating Full Text Search licenses, which nearly cost me my Fixed Write
licenses as well.  The BMC support person was sure that FTS licenses aren't
issued for ARS 6.0.1 - even after I slowly and carefully explained that
we're running the same release and patch level on the new server.  The
originals had been issued for the same release.  Two months later we still
don't have the FTS licenses, my users have learned to accept the funky
pop-up message, and we've given up.

Just a recent example.  I'd escalate to my account/sales rep. but I don't
know him.  BMC has changed our rep a couple of times.  They don't advise us
of these changes, so we find out when we try to contact "the old rep".
That's one way to insulate support, I suppose.

It's risky to run mission-critical applications on a platform with suspect
support.

Mike White
Office:  813-978-2192
E-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



   
  "Carey Matthew
   
  Black"   To:   arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
   
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]cc: 
                        
  COM> Subject:  Re: Who's in charge of 
support at BMC?
  Sent by: "Action  
   
  Request System
   
  discussion
   
  list(ARSList)"
   
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  ORG>  
   

   

   
  03/15/2007 08:23  
   
  Please respond to 
   
  arslist   
   

   

   




Bing,

I appreciate the offer for special assistance. ( You will likely not
be surprised to know that you are actually not the first member of
this community to offer such help. Have I mentioned lately that this
is the best group of "co-workers" that I have ever had the pleasure of
working with? )

However the details of the technical issue are, at this point, not
really the more important issue. I think the BMC support process is
broke and their customers have little to no apparent way to actually
receive any functional resolution to their problems.

On this technical issue:

  I have been patient and sent in the same set of useless log files,
multiple times, at the request of Tech support.

  I have answered the same set of useless questions, multiple times,
at the request of Tech support.

  I have asked to have the issue transferred to another Tech support

Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC?

2007-03-15 Thread Carey Matthew Black

Bing,

I appreciate the offer for special assistance. ( You will likely not
be surprised to know that you are actually not the first member of
this community to offer such help. Have I mentioned lately that this
is the best group of "co-workers" that I have ever had the pleasure of
working with? )

However the details of the technical issue are, at this point, not
really the more important issue. I think the BMC support process is
broke and their customers have little to no apparent way to actually
receive any functional resolution to their problems.

On this technical issue:

 I have been patient and sent in the same set of useless log files,
multiple times, at the request of Tech support.

 I have answered the same set of useless questions, multiple times,
at the request of Tech support.

 I have asked to have the issue transferred to another Tech support
person. (That request has gone nowhere.)

 I have been patient and waited for a "debug server" to actually have
some extra logging to diagnose the issue. (That has gone nowhere.)

 I have asked for my sales rep to help. (That has gone nowhere.)

 As a last resort, I have appealed to the community in the hopes that
others that suffer the same fate might be brave enough to stand next
to me. (And hope that such a display might show BMC that their process
is really broke.)



FWIW: I appear to have a voice mail this AM from a different person
about this issue. I will have to wait to see if they might actually
have transferred the issue to a different agent. Let me also give
credit where it is due. If I had not have to leave the office early
yesterday to attend a funeral, they would have actually been able to
reach me at the time that they called. ( Most calls I get here on the
east cost are after the normal business hours of  8AM - 5PM. This call
was actually in the normal business hours window. :) Now I get to wait
until they are "open" and give them a call. The phone number is a
California number. :)

Maybe I have a little hope of improvement at this point.
I wonder if this thread had anything to do with the change in
direction for how BMC is handling the issue? Or maybe I was just "to
impatient" to wait for a response. Hum...

--
Carey Matthew Black
Remedy Skilled Professional (RSP)
ARS = Action Request System(Remedy)

Love, then teach
Solution = People + Process + Tools
Fast, Accurate, Cheap Pick two.


On 3/15/07, Bradford Bingel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


No guarantees but I know some people in Support.  What's the issue?

-- Bing

Bradford Bingel ("Bing")
ITM3 California
http://www.itm3.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (email)
925-260-6394 (mobile)


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers 
Are"


Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC?

2007-03-14 Thread Bradford Bingel
No guarantees but I know some people in Support.  What's the issue?

-- Bing

Bradford Bingel ("Bing")
ITM3 California
http://www.itm3.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (email)
925-260-6394 (mobile)


-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carey Matthew Black
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 8:49 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC?

David,

That is strange

I tried that path, (as was suggested by Tech support) on an issue recently.

I tried to escalate the issue on "2/27/2007" to my sales rep. (after a month
of back and forth on the issue and getting nowhere fast.)

I received no response.

So I re-emailed my sales rep again on 3/5/2007 and finally got a "I will get
answers immediately" email in just over two hours from my second cry for
help to my sales rep.

Then I have heard nothing after that.

"Immediately" appears to mean (at least) "more than a business week".

And I am still waiting.

--
Carey Matthew Black
Remedy Skilled Professional (RSP)
ARS = Action Request System(Remedy)

Love, then teach
Solution = People + Process + Tools
Fast, Accurate, Cheap Pick two.

On 3/14/07, Shellman, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> **
>
> Scott,
>
> In the past I've escalated through our Sales Rep and they can put me 
> in contact with the necessary people to get past any issues we were
having.
>
> Dave
>  
>
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Glass
> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 11:08 AM
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> Subject: Who's in charge of support at BMC?
>
>
> **
>
> Does anyone know the email address of the person in charge of support 
> over at BMC?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Scott


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the
Answers Are"

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"


Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC?

2007-03-14 Thread Shellman, David
I guess we may be the exception then.  I've only needed to invoke this
once since he was assigned to us again.  I was contacted by others
within the day.

Robert is was a sales rep under Remedy back before the dark days.  For a
period of time we had a different one and he was from the BMC side of
the house.  Dealing with that one was like beating our head on a brick
wall.

Getting Robert back was a breath of fresh air.

Dave

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carey Matthew Black
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 11:49 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC?

David,

That is strange

I tried that path, (as was suggested by Tech support) on an issue
recently.

I tried to escalate the issue on "2/27/2007" to my sales rep. (after a
month of back and forth on the issue and getting nowhere fast.)

I received no response.

So I re-emailed my sales rep again on 3/5/2007 and finally got a "I
will get answers immediately" email in just over two hours from my
second cry for help to my sales rep.

Then I have heard nothing after that.

"Immediately" appears to mean (at least) "more than a business week".

And I am still waiting.

-- 
Carey Matthew Black
Remedy Skilled Professional (RSP)
ARS = Action Request System(Remedy)

Love, then teach
Solution = People + Process + Tools
Fast, Accurate, Cheap Pick two.

On 3/14/07, Shellman, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> **
>
> Scott,
>
> In the past I've escalated through our Sales Rep and they can put me
in
> contact with the necessary people to get past any issues we were
having.
>
> Dave
>  
>
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Glass
> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 11:08 AM
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> Subject: Who's in charge of support at BMC?
>
>
> **
>
> Does anyone know the email address of the person in charge of support
over
> at BMC?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Scott


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where
the Answers Are"

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"


Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC?

2007-03-14 Thread Carey Matthew Black

David,

That is strange

I tried that path, (as was suggested by Tech support) on an issue recently.

I tried to escalate the issue on "2/27/2007" to my sales rep. (after a
month of back and forth on the issue and getting nowhere fast.)

I received no response.

So I re-emailed my sales rep again on 3/5/2007 and finally got a "I
will get answers immediately" email in just over two hours from my
second cry for help to my sales rep.

Then I have heard nothing after that.

"Immediately" appears to mean (at least) "more than a business week".

And I am still waiting.

--
Carey Matthew Black
Remedy Skilled Professional (RSP)
ARS = Action Request System(Remedy)

Love, then teach
Solution = People + Process + Tools
Fast, Accurate, Cheap Pick two.

On 3/14/07, Shellman, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

**

Scott,

In the past I've escalated through our Sales Rep and they can put me in
contact with the necessary people to get past any issues we were having.

Dave
 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Glass
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 11:08 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Who's in charge of support at BMC?


**

Does anyone know the email address of the person in charge of support over
at BMC?

Thanks,

Scott


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers 
Are"


Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC?

2007-03-14 Thread Shellman, David
Scott,
 
In the past I've escalated through our Sales Rep and they can put me in
contact with the necessary people to get past any issues we were having.
 
Dave


From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Glass
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 11:08 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Who's in charge of support at BMC?


** 

Does anyone know the email address of the person in charge of support
over at BMC?

 

Thanks,

Scott

__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___ 

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"


Re: Who's in charge of support at BMC?

2007-03-14 Thread Rick Cook
I believe that would be Georgeanne Beville - her email address should be
buried somewhere in the support site.
 
Rick 
  _  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Glass
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 8:08 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Who's in charge of support at BMC?


** 

Does anyone know the email address of the person in charge of support over
at BMC?

 

Thanks,

Scott

__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"


Who's in charge of support at BMC?

2007-03-14 Thread Scott Glass
**








Does anyone know the email address of the person in charge
of support over at BMC?

 

Thanks,

Scott






__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in it___