[asterisk-users] Redundancy
Dears Do any one have an idea to make a redundant plan for asterisk ,if a call established between two points and the server interface became down ,do we you have an idea how to let the call established till the collie or the caller hang-up. Regards * No employee or agent is authorized to conclude any binding agreement on behalf of Xplorium with another party by e-mail without express written confirmation by an officer of Xplorium. Any views expressed by an individual in this electronic message do not necessarily reflect views of Xplorium or its subsidiaries and associates. This electronic message and its attachments are solely addressed to the addressee(s), and contain confidential information protected from disclosure belonging to Xplorium. If you are not the intended addressee of this electronic message and its attachments, kindly delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender by electronic mail. You must not copy this message or attachment or disclose its content to any other person. Xplorium does not guarantee the integrity of this electronic message and any of its attachments, or that they are free from computer viruses or other defects. *___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] caller id not transferred to SIP device
Hello, I'm wondering why asterisk is not transferring the callerid to the sip device. Scenario as follows: sangoma --- zaptel --- asterisk --- sip --- SIP-Device zaptel is reporting the callerid, but in the sip packages the sip-address shows unknown as user part, as this sip debug package shows: Executing Dial(Zap/62-1, SIP/123|25|d) in new stack We're at 172.31.253.80 port 10460 Adding codec 0x2 (gsm) to SDP Adding codec 0x4 (ulaw) to SDP Adding codec 0x8 (alaw) to SDP Adding non-codec 0x1 (telephone-event) to SDP 13 headers, 12 lines Reliably Transmitting (no NAT) to 192.168.11.47:2075: INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2075;line=gv8x1x75 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.31.253.80:5060;branch=z9hG4bK5e96f554;rport From: Unknown sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as14f7c144 To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2075;line=gv8x1x75 Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 102 INVITE User-Agent: Asterisk PBX Max-Forwards: 70 Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:58:09 GMT Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 265 -- Versions: asterisk 1.2.14 zaptel 1.2.12 linux 2.6.15.7 asterisk addons 1.2.4 SIP-Device: I set CallingPress to allowed also, no effect. I think this is for the outgoing caller id presentation. (?) SIP device config(sip show peer) * Name : 123 Secret : Set MD5Secret: Not set Context : wahlplan_international Subscr.Cont. : Not set Language : de AMA flags: Unknown CallingPres : Presentation Allowed, Not Screened Callgroup: 5 Pickupgroup : 5 Mailbox : 123 VM Extension : asterisk LastMsgsSent : 0/0 Call limit : 0 Dynamic : Yes Callerid : Expire : 3010 Insecure : no Nat : RFC3581 ACL : No CanReinvite : No PromiscRedir : No User=Phone : No Trust RPID : No Send RPID: No DTMFmode : rfc2833 LastMsg : 0 ToHost : Addr-IP : 192.168.11.47 Port 2069 Defaddr-IP : 0.0.0.0 Port 2069 Def. Username: 123 SIP Options : (none) Codecs : 0x8000e (gsm|ulaw|alaw|h263) Codec Order : (none) Status : Unmonitored Useragent: snom360/6.5.1 Reg. Contact : sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2069;line=h9dxgpnb -- Tobias Unsleber VoIP Consultant focus::voip GmbH http://www.focus-voip.de Hausadresse: Robert-Koch-Strasse 9 D-64331 weiterstadt Postfach 10 01 21 D-64201 Darmstadt Tel.: +49 61 51 / 90 67 - 256 FAX : +49 61 51 / 90 67 - 299 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] IAX vs SIP trunks between Asterisk boxes
Brad Templeton wrote: On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 04:12:27PM +, Thomas Kenyon wrote: Brad Templeton wrote: For SIP phone calling * box, relay to other * box and out to SIP phone, you definitely want SIP all the way. Unless bandwidth between the * servers is a concern, then you're better off keeping the link between servers as IAX. (preferably trunked) The bandwidth of the audio stream dwarfs the bandwidth of signalling traffic by orders of mangitude. So in fact, I think this is exactly wrong. If bandwidth to or between the servers is a concern, that's where you most want to not be in the audio path. But if you have multiple RTP streams emnbedded in an IAX trunk, then the IP overhead is significantly reduced. AFAIK video should work for IAX2, there is explicit support for it. (unlike h323). Asterisk will only be able to pass the raw RTP traffic though, since it doesn't have any video codecs (just format definitions). ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] ooh323c calls
Hello, Thanks you for your reply. The number in context test of asterisk B is 150. exten = 15,n,Dial(OOH323/150/mypeer1);or exten = 15,n,Dial(OOH323/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) I dont know how to write the Dial parameters to say that I want to call number 150 of test context in asterisk B server. So, I always fall into asterisk B default context. Do anyone know how to write it? Thanks you Ngo Duc Loi a écrit : dear miche, pls place your number of softphone B into the context test dial plan. with best regards, osochebol - Original Message From: Michel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Tuesday, January 9, 2007 9:44:20 AM Subject: [asterisk-users] ooh323c calls Hi, I have two asterisk servers where softphone A is connected to asterisk A. On those two asterisk servers, ooh323c is installed. I tried to call a test context on asterisk B from softphone A. But I always fall into context default of asterisk B. ( I don't know how to tell asterisk A extensions.conf to call asterisk B test context) Here are conf files on asterisk A : ooh323.conf [softA] ; softphone A uses this channel type=user context=test ip=10.0.0.1 port=1720 disallow=all allow=gsm allow=ulaw [mypeer1] type=peer ip=10.0.0.2 port=1720 extensions.conf [test] exten = 15,1,Answer() exten = 15,n,Playback(vm-hello) exten = 15,n,Dial(OOH323/150/mypeer1);or exten = 15,n,Dial(OOH323/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) exten = 15,n,Hangup() May I use a gatekeeper? I learnt that ooh323c can act as gatekeeper, but I didn't success to configure it (I have gatekeeper is not responding error!). Can one of my server acts as gatekeeper and gateway? Do anyone success to configure gatekeeper with ooh323c ? Thanks you for you help! ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Which H323 module for asterisk
Hello, I need your advice about H323 and asterisk! ;) Which one do you advice me to choose H323 (only gateway mode)? ooh323? ooh323c? Which one is the best H323 module to use with asterisk? Which one did you choose and why? What is your return on experience? For more informations : http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+H323+channels Thanks you for your replies! ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] one way audio when forwarding from ser to asterisk
Hi all, i have ser and asterisk on the same box with a public ip address. When an UA behind NAT registred on SER try to call the Voicemail or another UA registred on Asterisk i have one way audio (caller cannot hear the callee). [UA/SER]--[router/nat]--[SER/Asterisk] UA has private IP(192.168.204.19) and public IP is 89.106.xxx.yyy SER/ASterisk has public ip (89.106.yyy.zzz). In the sip trace one can see that signaling is ok but Asterisk sends RTP from 89.106.xxx.zzz to 192.168.204.19 not to 89.106.xxx.yyy ps: when UA registred on SER try to call UA2 registred on SER every thing works fine. how can i fix this issue. thx Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. http://new.mail.yahoo.com ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] DTMF on Snom
Hi all, I have problem using DTMF on Snom Phones (300, 320 and 360) I read they use in preference out-of-band DTMF , and if the remote system does not support it they default back to inband. I would like to use DTMF as out of band , and I defined dtmfmode=rfc2833 in the peer configuration. Nope, I am no able to access any ouside services using DTMF; Another kind of phones, ATCOM AT320, can be configured as inbond or out of band; Again, If I use out of band (rfc2833) I am not able to use DTMF If I use dtmfmode=inband in the peer definition and in the phone configuration, it works ( I am using g711 codec) Anyway I wouldn't like to use inband, I would prefer to use gsm codec as I know inband does not work very well with gsm codec So the problem is: why my asterisk box defect on using rfc2833 ? It is not a phone problem (4 phones of 2 different brands behave in the same way) What can I check in my asterisk configuration ? thanks in advance, Andrea Chi ricevesse questa mail per errore e' gentilmente pregato di cancellarla. Visitate il sito http://www.frameweb.it ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Sip dynamic host question
Hi all, My asterisk box have some peers with as host the name of a dynamic dns resolver ex: foo.dyndns.org. All works fine, until the host foo.dyndns.org for some reason change his ip, asterisk didn't resolve again the new ip until a sip relolad Actually, i use a cron with a bash script to track the ip and eventually reload the sip.conf. Any tips for Asterisk ? Something like externrefresh for a peer? Thanks, Alessandro ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Sip dynamic host question
Asterisk can manage dynamic hostnames itseld type dnsmgr refresh in asterisk cli . Also see /etc/asterisk/dnsmgr.conf On 10/01/07, Ale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, My asterisk box have some peers with as host the name of a dynamic dns resolver ex: foo.dyndns.org. All works fine, until the host foo.dyndns.org for some reason change his ip, asterisk didn't resolve again the new ip until a sip relolad Actually, i use a cron with a bash script to track the ip and eventually reload the sip.conf. Any tips for Asterisk ? Something like externrefresh for a peer? Thanks, Alessandro ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Snom side car annoyance
Hi, On 1/9/07, J. Oquendo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone got this annoying sidecar to illuminate when users are on the phone? Yup, works fine. I've tried Context: Line, still no dice. In extensions.conf I have: exten = 4000,hint,SIP/4000,name Make sure that the hint is not the first line referring to exten 4000. That seems to make a difference. Also, what is ,name doing at the end of the line? I've never seen that done before. Using Asterisk 1.2.13 on FC5, Snom: Phone Type: snom360-SIP Kernel Version: snom360 linux 3.25 Application-Version: snom360-SIP 6.5.2 Rootfs-Version: snom360 jffs2 v3.36 I have a similar setup. Regards, Steve ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Which H323 module for asterisk
I prefer h323 included in asterisk tree, I have caller id issues with ooh323 and nobody answer to bugreports oh323 from inaccessible network is unmaintained/death project, incompatible with asterisk 1.4. PJ Michel wrote: Hello, I need your advice about H323 and asterisk! ;) Which one do you advice me to choose H323 (only gateway mode)? ooh323? ooh323c? Which one is the best H323 module to use with asterisk? Which one did you choose and why? What is your return on experience? For more informations : http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+H323+channels Thanks you for your replies! ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Is there a low cost cell phone base station for asterisk ?
M.Hockings wrote: I don't really know the name of what I want to look for but maybe someone could tell me if it would be available. I have a number of old analogue cell phones laying about here and I was thinking it would be useful if I could set up a short range base station for them that would cover maybe an acre or so. What I would like to be able to do is use it to connect into Asterisk and this way have a useful wireless extension-phone range. I do know that there are WiFi IP phones available but based on the connection range to our WiFi access points it seems limited as is our existing wireless handset (POTS). Any thoughts, suggestions ? Mike You have a few options... Firstly I would suggest throw away or donate the old phones. There is much better technology then Analog Cellular. Simple Choice 1: Get new GSM phones subscribed on the same carrier and a GSM terminal. Make sure the phones all have free in-network calling (assuming that option is available in your country). Also setup the GSM terminal on the same group and hook it up to your asterisk server (think of it as a cellular extension). Lock the phones so that they can only call each other and the GSM terminal. Cost: (assuming 5 phones 1 terminal) ~$2000 to start and $150-200/mo. YMMV More complex choice 2: Get an RF engineer to design you a real WiFi coverage footprint and Wifi phones. Cost: $4000-7000 (or more) for consultation, hardware and setup. No reoccuring charges (hopefully). ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] libpri Calling Line ID
Hey users, i've got a question about calling line id in libpri - zaptel with switchtype q.sig. My Q.Sig partner is a Siemens F900 (HiPoint). If I enable span debug i see messages from type CONNECT with some kind of bit field: Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8) len=87 Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 86/0x56) (Terminator) Message type: CONNECT (7) [1c 1d 9f aa 06 80 01 00 82 01 00 8b 01 00 a1 0f 02 02 4b 36 02 01 55 30 06 82 04 06 1c 08 40] Facility (len=31, codeset=0) [ 0x9f, 0xaa, 0x06, 0x80, 0x01, 0x00, 0x82, 0x01, 0x00, 0x8b, 0x01, 0x00, 0xa1, 0x0f, 0x02, 0x02, 'K6', 0x02, 0x01, 'U0', 0x06, 0x82, 0x04, 0x06, 0x1c, 0x08, 0x40 ] [1c 29 9f aa 06 80 01 00 82 01 00 8b 01 00 a1 1b 02 02 4b 45 02 01 02 a1 12 04 0d 4e 4f 52 44 4d 41 4e 4e 2c 45 52 49 43 02 01 01] Facility (len=43, codeset=0) [ 0x9f, 0xaa, 0x06, 0x80, 0x01, 0x00, 0x82, 0x01, 0x00, 0x8b, 0x01, 0x00, 0xa1, 0x1b, 0x02, 0x02, 'KE', 0x02, 0x01, 0x02, 0xa1, 0x12, 0x04, 0x0d, 'NORDMANN', 0x2c, 'ERIC', 0x02, 0x01, 0x01 ] [4c 06 00 80 32 35 37 37] Connected Number (len= 8) [ Ext: 0 TON: Unknown Number Type (0) NPI: Unknown Number Plan (0) Ext: 1 Presentation: Presentation permitted, user number not screened (0) '2577' ] There is also a name included: NORDMANN ERIC. Is there any way in asterisk to get this name in a variable or by any applikation command ? Thanks for your help in advance! Cheers, Michael Konietzny ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Fax through Sangoma A102
Thank you all, we succeeded to make the fax working synchronizing the clocks. Regards, Jeremi On 1/9/07, Lee Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jeremij jerome wrote: The problem is with the fax. We just want to send and receive faxes from/to our fax machine connected to the Siemens (without needing any interaction with our VoIP network, the faxes are sent to/received from PSTN). Unfortunately we are experiencing a lot of problems: the faxes not always work and when they work, it's likely to have incomplete pages. What are you using to fax? Fax machines connected to ATAs? txfax/rxfax? IAXmodem and HylaFAX? If you are using IAXmodem and HylaFAX a fax session log (HylaFAX) would be quite revealing. Lee. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] getting tones during conversation
after the Dial has connected, I want the caller (on a SIP phone) to be able to press keys in order to record call status. is this possible? Have a look here : http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+config+features.conf applicationmap is what you are looking for hth ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Calls die when the answering party transfers
Dear All, I am facing a strange problem that I can't find any matches for while googling, sometimes while a call initiated from asterisk to the PSTN is answered and the answering party say the receiptionist tries to transfer the call to someone else, the call dies, the full log shows nothing useful and I am really unable to move forward on this issue, so can some one suggest anything? My zapata.conf is below also we are using Digium TDM400P with FXO modules to connect to the PSTN. [channels] callerid = asreceived usecallerid=yes hidecallerid=no callwaiting=yes usecallingpres=yes callwaitingcallerid=yes threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes cancallforward=yes callreturn=yes echocancel=yes echocancelwhenbridged=yes echotraining=400 rxgain=0.0 txgain=0.0 busydetect=yes immediate=no faxdetect=both busycount=4 callgroup=1 pickupgroup=1 pridialplan = local prilocaldialplan = local nationalprefix = 1 internationalprefix = 1011 group = 0 context=from-pstn signalling=pri_cpe switchtype = euroisdn language=en channel = 1-15,17-31 signalling=fxs_ks context=from-zaptel group=3 channel = 63-74 signalling=fxs_ks context=from-zaptel group=4 channel = 75-78 -- Thx MAG ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: Re: [asterisk-users] Zap 1.4 error line 0: Unable to open master device '/dev/zap/ctl'
This page should help: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+CentOS-4.0+Zaptel Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] rcom.com To Sent by: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com asterisk-users-bo cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] m.com Subject [SPAM] Re: [asterisk-users] Zap 1.4 error line 0: Unable to open master 10/01/2007 06:23 device '/dev/zap/ctl' Please respond to Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] ists.digium.com On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 05:50:52PM -0600, Chris Bullock wrote: I've looked over EVERY resource I can find, but have run short of a solution. I'm running CentOS 4.4. Just installed Asterisk 1.4 and Zaptel 1.4 and libpri, but when I run ztcfg I get this error: line 0: Unable to open master device '/dev/zap/ctl' This is a generic error message ztcfg gives when it fails to open /dev/zap/ctl. It is followed by the error string of the error code it got (usually: no such file or no such device). No such file: the file /dev/zap/ctl is simply not there. No such device: The file is there, but there is no device to support it. If you use udev (or the older devfs) and have not created the device file yourself manually with mknod, you probably won't get the latter. I realize this is a udev error (or from what I've read), but I cannot find out how to resolve this. I've reinstalled zaptel several times. I read a lot about having to read the README.udev file in the zaptel source, but I don't even have that file on my system. If anyone has any ideas I'd love to hear from them. It may be because the module zaptel has failed to load. Do you have the directory /proc/zaptel ? lsmod | grep zaptel -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Zap 1.4 error line 0: Unable to open
Here is the complete output of ztcfg: Notice: Configuration file is /etc/zaptel.conf line 0: Unable to open master device '/dev/zap/ctl' 1 error(s) detected It appears that none of the zaptel devices have been created. I did not notice any errors during the make install. Does anyone have any suggestions? I know the hardware works, because it was working as my asterisk 1.2 test system before I reloaded it completely and installed asterisk 1.4 I appreciate the help. -Chris ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Zap 1.4 error line 0: Unable to open
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 08:03:07AM -0600, Chris Bullock wrote: Here is the complete output of ztcfg: Notice: Configuration file is /etc/zaptel.conf line 0: Unable to open master device '/dev/zap/ctl' 1 error(s) detected It appears that none of the zaptel devices have been created. I did not notice any errors during the make install. Does anyone have any suggestions? I know the hardware works, because it was working as my asterisk 1.2 test system before I reloaded it completely and installed asterisk 1.4 I appreciate the help. /me repeats the followup-question: It may be because the module zaptel has failed to load. Do you have the directory /proc/zaptel ? lsmod | grep zaptel -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Where is this hilarious Allison Smith file? (Also: Interview with Allison)
Jerry Glomph Black wrote: I cannot find this file anywhere, despite thorough searching. Certainly not in the two usual big sound tarfiles. I have a great place for this file in my extensions.conf, no doubt. It has not been made available for distribution, sorry. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Problem with zaptel drivers or card
On Jan 9, 2007, at 7:01 PM, Administrator wrote: I have an Asterisk box running Fedora Core 4, Asterisk 1.4, Lippri, 1.4, and Zaptel 1.4 The Digium cards installed are TDM2400 and TE110P. Everything was working fine until I upgraded to zaptel 1.2.12 from 1.2.9 Now when I run ztcfg I get the following error message: (CAS signalling on span 2 conflicts with Clear channel on channel 40) --NOTE: signaling was spelled wrong in the error message-- I have since upgraded to 1.4 with the same problem. Channel 40 is a standard bchan configuration and our provider sees no problem with the channel. When I disable the channel everything works fine. My assumption is that something is wrong with the TE110P card. Has anyone seen anything else like this? What's in your zaptel.conf and can you post the output of `cat /proc/zaptel/1` and `cat /proc/zaptel/2`? Matthew Fredrickson ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Best inexpensive home office router for VoIP (QoS with maybe PoE)
Mark Coccimiglio wrote: Marty, Where are you paying $1000 for a 1600 series Cisco? I can get you 20% off that price on any quantity (note: Sarcasam). Its not the 1990's anymore. You can get them on eBay ($50-150) for only slightly more then the Linksys. The performance is rock solid. Three-quarters of the world have used them for decades. I know of units running 2 and 3 YEARS between reboots. The power company reboots my equipment more then I do. Ok it is true that Cisco does not support the models anymore, but you can't buy a services contract for a linksys router either. It can sometimes be a little difficult to configure without any technical knowledge but that is what most of us get paid for. It does impress the customer when you bring in the grey box labled Cisco. As for performance just try to put 50 people behind a linksys/netgear/dlink. I've used 1605R supporting +100 users. Not even a blink. Finally, untill everyone is using 10Mps FTTH the broad band link is still the slowest part of the connection. Not to shabby for antiquated technology. Mark C Martin Joseph wrote: On 2007-01-06 00:48:11 -0800, Mark Coccimiglio [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Mike I'm using a Cisco 1605R [running IOS 12.3(5a)] small office router with Fair-Weight queueing enabled. Works great. The nice thing about Fair-Weight queueing is that it dynamically adapts to lower the priority of higher demand traffic (e.g. large downloads). If you want quality stick with quality stuff. Mark C Reread the subject line please. $1000 (US) isn't inexpensive by any stretch. Marty ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users Mark, Do these 1600 series Cisco routers you mention that you find on eBay for $50-$150 support Layer3 routing? I have a managed switch setup on my home network with several VLANs defined. (work subnet, home subnet, VOIP subnet) I currently have to use a Linux box to route between the VLANs. I'd like to move to Gigabit routing, but I'd need to replace the Linux box(more processor power and new NICs) and that gets expensive. I'd much rather have a router or smart switch for that matter that does Gigabit Layer3 routing all in one unit. Do you have any recommendationsthat wouldn't break the bank? Thanks, Ed ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] SPA-3000 and Asterisk 1.4.0
Has anyone else had any difficulty with calls Originating from the PSTN being passed to asterisk 1.4.0 unsing a linksys SPA-3000? I've not had enough time to track down what's happening but with 1.4.0, When a call comes in, it is passed to asterisk and then forwarded to the extension that rings, but when the extension is lifted the call hangs up. This does not happen with 1.4.0b2 (which I have rolled back to for now, but will try again soon when I get some free downtime). ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Asterisk HA
Hi all, I have to make for a client an asterisk system for process up to 250 calls between conference and normal call. At disposition I have 4 xserver 346 with dual xeon 3.0Ghz and the client require a failover system. Anyone have experience for this type of solution? Is better ultramonkey, dundi or SER proxy in front of * server? Thanks Enrico P.S. Now during all this year I have to work with this type of solution, why not make a fork of this ml for example [EMAIL PROTECTED], for write some docs too. -- Pasqualotto 'Pasqu' Enrico enrico AT pasqualotto DOT org web: http://www.pasqualotto.org skype: epasqualotto ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] how to realize chief - secretary (or Manager - Assistant) setup with Asterisk?
Hello, we are running a Asterisk (1.2) installation with about 80 snom phones (300,320,360). Now have the demand for a special manager - assistant setup for a few extensions. Since Shared Line Appearance is not available in 1.2 I´m wondering how to realize this... What we need is that the manager can decide whether he wants to get calls or not. If not he must have the possibility to redirect all incoming calls to his secretary. The secretary itself answers all calls and decides if the call is important enough to disturb the manager. If so she/he transfers the call to the manager. So the secretary can filter the calls for the manager... The only way I can imagine so far is via a redirect by AstDB on the manager extension. The managers phone has two different lines - the official and a secret one only the secretary uses... Or are there any other solutions? Any hint will be appreciated ... Michael ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Attended Transfer on queue_log
Yes, I have de same problem...I dont know if there is an error... Regards On 12/15/06, Miguel Paolino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using asterisk blind/attended transfer feature on a queue (also tried with sip phones feature), and both type of transfers work fine. The problem is that attended trasfers doesn't get logged to queue_log, but blind transfers are logged just fine. Anyone knows if this is the correct behavior? -- Regards, Miguel Paolino ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Best inexpensive home office router for VoIP (QoS with maybe PoE)
I'd wager to say yes, it does support layer 3 routing :) That's a bit of a redundant term (though you can route above layer 3). Depending on how many interfaces you have on your router, you may be sending multiple vlans over a trunk port (I'm pretty sure the 1600 series support trunk ports -- you may want to google 'router on a stick'). Most of the layer 3 gigabit switches will still be very expensive, though Catalyst 3500's may be getting 'cheaper' -- most of the 3500 and 3700 series switch have multi-gigabit backplanes (usually 16 - 32 gigabits) and can usually route packets are wire speed, or very close to it. If you are looking for a gigabit port or two for uplink, I believe they even made a 2900G, though that won't have PoE. And now that I think about it, probably doesn't support layer 3 routing :( That's the Cisco world, I'm sure you can find other vendors that have hardware for much cheaper, though this is an advantage to using the same networking equipment most other people are using. Also, most of this is overkill for a handful of network devices. On 1/10/07, Ed Rubright - mail lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do these 1600 series Cisco routers you mention that you find on eBay for $50-$150 support Layer3 routing? I have a managed switch setup on my home network with several VLANs defined. (work subnet, home subnet, VOIP subnet) I currently have to use a Linux box to route between the VLANs. I'd like to move to Gigabit routing, but I'd need to replace the Linux box(more processor power and new NICs) and that gets expensive. I'd much rather have a router or smart switch for that matter that does Gigabit Layer3 routing all in one unit. Do you have any recommendationsthat wouldn't break the bank? Thanks, Ed ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Send email notification
Hi group, I'm trying to configure the email notification when a user leave a voicemail, but don't work (send email notification). I configured esmtp in my linux box, if a try to use it with command line, it works fine. (echo Hello | sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] -f [EMAIL PROTECTED]). My voicemail.conf [general] format=wav49 attach=yes [EMAIL PROTECTED] fromstring=Asterisk mailcmd=/usr/sbin/sendmail -t [my_home] 100 = ,number100,[EMAIL PROTECTED] My sip.conf [100] type=friend secret=pass qualify=yes nat=no host=dynamic canreinvite=no context=internal [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can you see the problem?. Do you know any documentarion on internet where can i solve the problem? Regards, ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] RTP directly
Is there a way to configure the Asterisk so that the RTP goes directly between the Endpoints as opposed to going through the asterisk? -Dave ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Get dialed numbers in AGI
Hi, I'm trying to write a AGI in PHP to get the numbers dialed (with read()), save it into a variable to insert it into a SQL server database. But I cannot see results into the variable, it always return NULL. Here is a piece of the AGI. fwrite(STDOUT,exec Read my_var|/sound_to_play|5|||15 \n); fflush(STDOUT); $conn=odbc_connect('MSSQL', 'USER', 'PASS'); $query = odbc_exec($conn, INSERT INTO dialed(number) VALUES('$my_var')); Even if I only show my_var value or try to use it inside asterisk, the value is NULL. There is another way to do it? Am I doing a mistake here? I'm using Asterisk 1.2.13. Thank you all. -- Ralph Liebessohn ICQ: 74835911 Skype: liebessohn ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] how to realize chief - secretary (or Manager - Assistant) setup with Asterisk?
Hi Michael, in practice I think that the managers extension should default to the assistant who can screen the call or call forward it. Call Forward - always or Call Forward - no answer would give you the flexability required. Henry L.Coleman CEO *VoIP-PBX* 1-866-415-5355 Toronto Ontario Canada Hello, we are running a Asterisk (1.2) installation with about 80 snom phones (300,320,360). Now have the demand for a special manager - assistant setup for a few extensions. Since Shared Line Appearance is not available in 1.2 I´m wondering how to realize this... What we need is that the manager can decide whether he wants to get calls or not. If not he must have the possibility to redirect all incoming calls to his secretary. The secretary itself answers all calls and decides if the call is important enough to disturb the manager. If so she/he transfers the call to the manager. So the secretary can filter the calls for the manager... The only way I can imagine so far is via a redirect by AstDB on the manager extension. The managers phone has two different lines - the official and a secret one only the secretary uses... Or are there any other solutions? Any hint will be appreciated ... Michael ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Adding 4000 Lines to asteriskdb via asterisk -rx ?
Option A: Use the manager interface. Tzafrir , Thanks, the idea to use the manager interface is wonderful. It is really fast and no data gets lost. I don't think 4000 Rows are a noticeable amaount of data for a db1 database. I coded this: #!/usr/bin/perl use Asterisk::Manager; my $astman = new Asterisk::Manager; $astman-user('admin'); $astman-secret('bla'); $astman-host('localhost'); $astman-connect || die Could not connect to . $astman-host . !\n; foreach $num(1..5000) { $astman-command(database put callerids willi$num $num); } $astman-disconnect; -- Two hours of trial and error can save ten minutes of manual reading. GATWORKS GmbH [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internetloesungen vom Feinsten Fon. +49 2166 9149-32 Fax. +49 2166 9149-10 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk build for Suse 10.1
Thanks for the help. I was concerned because I tried once before and it formatted my hard disk. I wanted to be sure that did not happen again.\ Bob Rawlinson On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 11:04 -0500, Robert A. Rawlinson wrote: Has anyone heard of a build or instructions for installing Asterisk on a Suse 10.1 system? Bob Rawlinson ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Directory too difficult?
I have a group of users whos complaint about Asterisk is that the directory application is too hard too use. (yeah, yeah, I know. For the record, they're Calgarians) Now I'm in a pickle: I don't want to have to create a custom directory for these guys. Anyone have any tips for making the directory easier, maybe re-record the prompts so they are more verbose? We go by first name. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] how to realize chief - secretary (or Manager - Assistant) setup with Asterisk?
Am Mittwoch, den 10.01.2007, 16:37 +0100 schrieb Michael Hamann: Hello, we are running a Asterisk (1.2) installation with about 80 snom phones (300,320,360). Now have the demand for a special manager - assistant setup for a few extensions. Since Shared Line Appearance is not available in 1.2 I´m wondering how to realize this... What we need is that the manager can decide whether he wants to get calls or not. If not he must have the possibility to redirect all incoming calls to his secretary. The secretary itself answers all calls and decides if the call is important enough to disturb the manager. If so she/he transfers the call to the manager. So the secretary can filter the calls for the manager... The only way I can imagine so far is via a redirect by AstDB on the manager extension. The managers phone has two different lines - the official and a secret one only the secretary uses... Or are there any other solutions? Any hint will be appreciated ... Hello Michael, as I see it, the most obvious setup would be - have SIP accounts, e.g. sip123 for the secretary phone, sip456 and sip789 for the manager phone. - the official/public extension number for the manager might be 4321, so exten = 4321,1,Dial(SIP/sip123SIP/sip456) would ring both the secretary phone and the manager phone on the public id (which most probably can have a separate ringtone than the private id). You would also want a private extension like exten = 4901,1,Dial(SIP/sip789) for the secretary to reach the manager. A few thoughts: - The Callerid setting for both secretary and chief should be 4321, no matter which line the chief chooses to call out through. - Do not choose an obvious private number, like 4321 and 4322 - You could even choose a real long number, that only is available from internal phones, and put it to a speed dial button on the secretary phone If you want the manager to be able to selectively not be disturbed by public number calls, but only by his secretary, some AstDB logic could come into the game. This can be highly dynamic, or you just configure a few extensions by hand to do exactly this: exten = 770/4321,1,Set(DB(list/4321)=SIP/sip123SIP/sip456) exten = 770/4321,2,Playback(feature-donotdisturb-off) exten = 771/4321,1,Set(DB(list/4321)=SIP/sip123) exten = 771/4321,2,Playback(feature-donotdisturb-on) exten = 4321,1,Dial(${DB(list/4321)}) So either the chief or the secretary could activate do-not-disturb by dialing 771, and deactivate with 770. Just examples; choose those codes from a range that is not in use as extensions; for my personal setup, the 2*/3*/4*/5*/6* internal numbering for SIP devices, OOH devices, IAX devices etc.pp., 8* being applications (like 888 the talking clock), 9* experimental and 0* PSTN calls (how 80's! :-). A somehow similar function (divert to VoiceMail delay in seconds can be set from any phone, between 0 and 60 seconds) is available here as 811x. Choose whatever suits you best. Of course one could imagine also that the manager phone number NOT rings the secretary while the manager is there and ready to take calls - just edit the 770/771 lines (or add 772 for that function) - in that case, the secretary could make use of an extension number for him/herself, but her phone also has several lines, so why not. HTHBR Anselm ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Service Level Compliance
Hello all, We have a slight issue to resolve. We have a client who we are drafting an SLA for the delivery of telephony services using Asterisk. Nothing extraordinary. However, we do need a way to measure our service availability. We currently use Nagios and Cacti to monitor server availability as well as asterisk and mysql responsiveness, and last, ping availability to our origination VoIP providers. In an ideal world, this should be fine. However, there are a few cases we have noticed this setup not to be enough. Our particular setup is origination traffic comes into Asterisk box A, where the call goes through some AGI-based IVR. After navigating thru the IVR, the call is transfered to Asterisk box B, where the call is put in a queue and distributed to SIP-based agents. The issues we would like to resolve are the following: 1) We can ping our originating SIP providers. However, that doesn't guaratee us that we can receive calls from them. In several occasions, some of our SIP providers have had routing (SIP) problems and when we dial any of the DIDs, they would not even hit our box. The call would simply die somewhere in their network or their providers' networks. How can we proactively confirm that they are actually routing calls to us? We thought we could probably dial out through any of our other providers so the call comes in via a different provider and maybe hit an AGI script. This script could update a MySQL table with a timestamp of the last successful test. We could then take the data from that table and bring it to Nagios and/or Cacti. Is there a better approach? 2) We can test Asterisk responsiveness by doing something like 'asterisk -rx show uptime' and parse the results. We can also connect to MySQL and execute a test query. However, how can we verify that Asterisk is actually talking to MySQL and that it's connection hasn't died? 3) As stated above, we can test the responsiveness of asterisk. However, we have noticed in, at least, one occasion, that even though asterisk seems to be responsive, it would not accept or place any calls. Somehow it's call engine was locked and we had to restart asterisk. How can we verify that asterisk is actually capable of receiving and placing calls? 4) We have no Digium boards and all kernels are 2.6 or above, so we end us using ztdummy, if needed. The client's agents are in a different country and the average lantency is around 250ms. Most of the time, call quality is good. However, there are a few situations where people complaint about echo. Is there a way to measure or improve this? I know it has been a topic discussed at lenght and if we could probably script a way to measure some sort of a MOS value, that would be great. Any ideas? 5) Anything else that you could think of we could measure to make sure all components are working? You input is greatly appreciated it. I promise that whatever solution is best recommended and scriptable, we will post our development and working solutions for the community to benefit from. Thanks again, Daniel ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Send email notification
Am Mittwoch, den 10.01.2007, 11:46 -0400 schrieb H Aranguren: Hi group, I'm trying to configure the email notification when a user leave a voicemail, but don't work (send email notification). I configured esmtp in my linux box, if a try to use it with command line, it works fine. (echo Hello | sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] -f [EMAIL PROTECTED]). You could look wether a voicemail triggers something to happen inside the mail system at all (logfiles...). In that case, chances are that the mail cannot be parsed because of misconfiguration in the mail server / restricted usage of the sendmail -t command or whatever. In my setup (SMTP server listening on port 25 of the same machine) the mailcmd is commented out, and It Just Works(tm). If you need mail system specific help, there sure are lots of forums and info, but I cannot tell where to connect to esmtp people. Exim is my favourite ;) My voicemail.conf [general] format=wav49 attach=yes [EMAIL PROTECTED] fromstring=Asterisk mailcmd=/usr/sbin/sendmail -t [my_home] 100 = ,number100,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Can you see the problem?. Do you know any documentarion on internet where can i solve the problem? BR Anselm ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Get dialed numbers in AGI
you could use one of the AGI libraries... then you can just call a function to get the number. AF. Ralph Liebessohn wrote: Hi, I'm trying to write a AGI in PHP to get the numbers dialed (with read()), save it into a variable to insert it into a SQL server database. But I cannot see results into the variable, it always return NULL. Here is a piece of the AGI. fwrite(STDOUT,exec Read my_var|/sound_to_play|5|||15 \n); fflush(STDOUT); $conn=odbc_connect('MSSQL', 'USER', 'PASS'); $query = odbc_exec($conn, INSERT INTO dialed(number) VALUES('$my_var')); Even if I only show my_var value or try to use it inside asterisk, the value is NULL. There is another way to do it? Am I doing a mistake here? I'm using Asterisk 1.2.13. Thank you all. -- Ralph Liebessohn ICQ: 74835911 Skype: liebessohn ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Problem with zaptel drivers or card
Results From cat /proc/zaptel/* Span 1: WCTDM/0 Wildcard TDM2400P Board 1 IRQ misses: 24 1 WCTDM/0/0 FXOKS (In use) 2 WCTDM/0/1 FXOKS (In use) 3 WCTDM/0/2 FXOKS (In use) 4 WCTDM/0/3 FXOKS (In use) 5 WCTDM/0/4 FXOKS (In use) 6 WCTDM/0/5 FXOKS (In use) 7 WCTDM/0/6 FXOKS (In use) 8 WCTDM/0/7 FXOKS (In use) 9 WCTDM/0/8 FXOKS (In use) 10 WCTDM/0/9 FXOKS (In use) 11 WCTDM/0/10 FXOKS (In use) 12 WCTDM/0/11 FXOKS (In use) 13 WCTDM/0/12 FXOKS (In use) 14 WCTDM/0/13 FXOKS (In use) 15 WCTDM/0/14 FXOKS (In use) 16 WCTDM/0/15 FXOKS (In use) 17 WCTDM/0/16 FXOKS (In use) 18 WCTDM/0/17 FXOKS (In use) 19 WCTDM/0/18 FXOKS (In use) 20 WCTDM/0/19 FXOKS (In use) 21 WCTDM/0/20 FXOKS (In use) 22 WCTDM/0/21 FXOKS (In use) 23 WCTDM/0/22 FXOKS (In use) 24 WCTDM/0/23 FXOKS (In use) Span 2: WCT1/0 Digium Wildcard TE110P T1/E1 Card 0 B8ZS/ESF 25 WCT1/0/1 Clear (In use) 26 WCT1/0/2 Clear (In use) 27 WCT1/0/3 Clear (In use) 28 WCT1/0/4 Clear (In use) 29 WCT1/0/5 Clear (In use) 30 WCT1/0/6 Clear (In use) 31 WCT1/0/7 Clear (In use) 32 WCT1/0/8 Clear (In use) 33 WCT1/0/9 Clear (In use) 34 WCT1/0/10 Clear (In use) 35 WCT1/0/11 Clear (In use) 36 WCT1/0/12 Clear (In use) 37 WCT1/0/13 Clear (In use) 38 WCT1/0/14 Clear (In use) 39 WCT1/0/15 Clear (In use) 40 WCT1/0/16 41 WCT1/0/17 Clear (In use) 42 WCT1/0/18 Clear (In use) 43 WCT1/0/19 Clear (In use) 44 WCT1/0/20 Clear (In use) 45 WCT1/0/21 Clear (In use) 46 WCT1/0/22 Clear (In use) 47 WCT1/0/23 Clear (In use) 48 WCT1/0/24 HDLCFCS (In use) zaptel.conf file: fxoks=1-24 span=2,1,0,esf,b8zs bchan=25-39 #bchan=40 bchan=41-47 dchan=48 loadzone=us defaultzone=us James -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tzafrir Cohen Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 11:25 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Problem with zaptel drivers or card On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 06:01:55PM -0700, Administrator wrote: I have an Asterisk box running Fedora Core 4, Asterisk 1.4, Lippri, 1.4, and Zaptel 1.4 The Digium cards installed are TDM2400 and TE110P. Everything was working fine until I upgraded to zaptel 1.2.12 from 1.2.9 Now when I run ztcfg I get the following error message: (CAS signalling on span 2 conflicts with Clear channel on channel 40) --NOTE: signaling was spelled wrong in the error message-- I have since upgraded to 1.4 with the same problem. Channel 40 is a standard bchan configuration and our provider sees no problem with the channel. When I disable the channel everything works fine. My assumption is that something is wrong with the TE110P card. Has anyone seen anything else like this? What do you get from: cat /proc/zaptel/* What do you have on /etc/zaptel.conf ? -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] 1.4 and zap bugs
We're currently running 1.4 r48326 - a little while before the full 1.4 release. We are having some problems (crashes) with attended transfers and some other stuff, and was going to move to the latest svn 1.4 as I beleive that the attended transfer bug has been fixed. However, I note that #8763 (http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=8763) has some problems with the zap channels in the 1.4.0 release (which we *don't* have). My question is, are the problems with zap also theoretically present in r48326 (it's just that we don't have them) or were they introduced after r48326 (and therefore we will have them if we upgrade). Any thoughts / takers / advice ? Julian. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk build for Suse 10.1
Formated your hardisk... wow that is nasty, but I also cannot understand how that could ever happen. There must be some other HW problem going on or you got a hold of some really bad code. What code (source or binary) and what were you doing when that happenned? Doug On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Robert A. Rawlinson wrote: Thanks for the help. I was concerned because I tried once before and it formatted my hard disk. I wanted to be sure that did not happen again.\ Bob Rawlinson On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 11:04 -0500, Robert A. Rawlinson wrote: Has anyone heard of a build or instructions for installing Asterisk on a Suse 10.1 system? Bob Rawlinson ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users k ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] app_system.c:105 system_exec_helper: Unable to execute '/sbin/zapscan.bin'
When I load the asterisk 1.4 gui and log into /asterisk/static/config/setup/install.html, it tells me No Analog ports has been detected on your system. I have 2 Wildcard X100P cards that are properly installed. Ztcfg shows no problems. I also get the following message from the asterisk console app_system.c:105 system_exec_helper: Unable to execute '/sbin/zapscan.bin' when I log into the web interface. Any ideas? -Chris ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Zap 1.4 error line 0: Unable to open master device '/dev/zap/ctl'
Ok. I finally got past this. After doing all the relevant udev stuff, I ran a make config from the zaptel sources, and got the service to install. I'm still quiet an asterisk newbie, and defiantly a huge Linux newbie, so thanks for the help. -Chris ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Directory too difficult?
I wish had some pearl of wisdom here, but I don't. I will simply share my sympathy. Sounds like an ESU situation to me. Bryan M. Johns Partner Shelton | Johns Technology Group office: 678:248:2637 x:1500 direct: 678:229:1809 mobile: 404.259.9216 iaxtel: 700:248:2637 x:1500 http://www.sheltonjohns.com On Jan 10, 2007, at 11:10 AM, Colin Anderson wrote: I have a group of users whos complaint about Asterisk is that the directory application is too hard too use. (yeah, yeah, I know. For the record, they're Calgarians) Now I'm in a pickle: I don't want to have to create a custom directory for these guys. Anyone have any tips for making the directory easier, maybe re-record the prompts so they are more verbose? We go by first name. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Which H323 module for asterisk
Pavel wrote: I prefer h323 included in asterisk tree, I have caller id issues with ooh323 and nobody answer to bugreports oh323 from inaccessible network is unmaintained/death project, incompatible with asterisk 1.4. PJ Response to ooh323c bugs is very slow, and patches can take some time to be applied if you manage to fix the issue for yourself. That said I prefer ooh323c, as it does not require OpenH323 or PWlib. I find building it easier. Michel wrote: Hello, I need your advice about H323 and asterisk! ;) Which one do you advice me to choose H323 (only gateway mode)? ooh323? ooh323c? Since you mention gateway mode, then ooh323c is worth testing. The bugs that I am aware of are mostly gatekeeper related (but not all). Since the channel doesn't have any external dependencies, it is the easiest to test. If it doesn't work for your setup, there's a very good chance that chan_h323 included with Asterisk will and then you can deal with getting the OpenH323 and PWlib dependencies meet. (Not a major issue, but one I have preferred to avoid) Which one is the best H323 module to use with asterisk? Which one did you choose and why? What is your return on experience? Bugs happen. I've found that the code for chan_ooh323c is reasonably easy to read and make patches for. The current release seems stable and I have it running on four light to moderately loaded servers. Dan ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Proper use of the Local channel
Is there any documentation you guys can point us to in order to learn more about the proper use of the Local channel? We don't currently use it. However, while evaluating other people's billing and management systems for Asterisk, we noticed they make extensive use of it. Thanks, Daniel ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Problem with zaptel drivers or card
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 09:39:47AM -0700, Administrator wrote: Results From cat /proc/zaptel/* Span 1: WCTDM/0 Wildcard TDM2400P Board 1 IRQ misses: 24 1 WCTDM/0/0 FXOKS (In use) 2 WCTDM/0/1 FXOKS (In use) 3 WCTDM/0/2 FXOKS (In use) 4 WCTDM/0/3 FXOKS (In use) 5 WCTDM/0/4 FXOKS (In use) 6 WCTDM/0/5 FXOKS (In use) 7 WCTDM/0/6 FXOKS (In use) 8 WCTDM/0/7 FXOKS (In use) 9 WCTDM/0/8 FXOKS (In use) 10 WCTDM/0/9 FXOKS (In use) 11 WCTDM/0/10 FXOKS (In use) 12 WCTDM/0/11 FXOKS (In use) 13 WCTDM/0/12 FXOKS (In use) 14 WCTDM/0/13 FXOKS (In use) 15 WCTDM/0/14 FXOKS (In use) 16 WCTDM/0/15 FXOKS (In use) 17 WCTDM/0/16 FXOKS (In use) 18 WCTDM/0/17 FXOKS (In use) 19 WCTDM/0/18 FXOKS (In use) 20 WCTDM/0/19 FXOKS (In use) 21 WCTDM/0/20 FXOKS (In use) 22 WCTDM/0/21 FXOKS (In use) 23 WCTDM/0/22 FXOKS (In use) 24 WCTDM/0/23 FXOKS (In use) Span 2: WCT1/0 Digium Wildcard TE110P T1/E1 Card 0 B8ZS/ESF 25 WCT1/0/1 Clear (In use) 26 WCT1/0/2 Clear (In use) 27 WCT1/0/3 Clear (In use) 28 WCT1/0/4 Clear (In use) 29 WCT1/0/5 Clear (In use) 30 WCT1/0/6 Clear (In use) 31 WCT1/0/7 Clear (In use) 32 WCT1/0/8 Clear (In use) 33 WCT1/0/9 Clear (In use) 34 WCT1/0/10 Clear (In use) 35 WCT1/0/11 Clear (In use) 36 WCT1/0/12 Clear (In use) 37 WCT1/0/13 Clear (In use) 38 WCT1/0/14 Clear (In use) 39 WCT1/0/15 Clear (In use) 40 WCT1/0/16 41 WCT1/0/17 Clear (In use) 42 WCT1/0/18 Clear (In use) 43 WCT1/0/19 Clear (In use) 44 WCT1/0/20 Clear (In use) 45 WCT1/0/21 Clear (In use) 46 WCT1/0/22 Clear (In use) 47 WCT1/0/23 Clear (In use) 48 WCT1/0/24 HDLCFCS (In use) Is it supposed to be T1 or E1? The card behaves as E1 but you attempt to configure it as T1. zaptel.conf file: fxoks=1-24 span=2,1,0,esf,b8zs bchan=25-39 #bchan=40 bchan=41-47 dchan=48 loadzone=us defaultzone=us James -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tzafrir Cohen Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 11:25 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Problem with zaptel drivers or card On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 06:01:55PM -0700, Administrator wrote: I have an Asterisk box running Fedora Core 4, Asterisk 1.4, Lippri, 1.4, and Zaptel 1.4 The Digium cards installed are TDM2400 and TE110P. Everything was working fine until I upgraded to zaptel 1.2.12 from 1.2.9 Now when I run ztcfg I get the following error message: (CAS signalling on span 2 conflicts with Clear channel on channel 40) --NOTE: signaling was spelled wrong in the error message-- I have since upgraded to 1.4 with the same problem. Channel 40 is a standard bchan configuration and our provider sees no problem with the channel. When I disable the channel everything works fine. My assumption is that something is wrong with the TE110P card. Has anyone seen anything else like this? What do you get from: cat /proc/zaptel/* What do you have on /etc/zaptel.conf ? -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk build for Suse 10.1
he is probably tried to install one of these All in one Asterisk CDs, that effectively formats the hard drive and installs everything from scratch, including the OS ;) And, yes, it will happen again, if he re-runs this CD... AF. Doug Crompton wrote: Formated your hardisk... wow that is nasty, but I also cannot understand how that could ever happen. There must be some other HW problem going on or you got a hold of some really bad code. What code (source or binary) and what were you doing when that happenned? Doug On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Robert A. Rawlinson wrote: Thanks for the help. I was concerned because I tried once before and it formatted my hard disk. I wanted to be sure that did not happen again.\ Bob Rawlinson On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 11:04 -0500, Robert A. Rawlinson wrote: Has anyone heard of a build or instructions for installing Asterisk on a Suse 10.1 system? Bob Rawlinson ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users k ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] VIA EPIA DeadLock Issues
Greetings, I've been having a large number of deadlock issues lately on chan_sip occurring only on VIA EPIA ML6000 boards. I'm curious if anyone else is having similar issues. My Config (have multiple systems all running the same hardware with the same problem) VIA EPIA ML6000 1GB RAM 80GB HDD Various Digium Cards (T1 and TDM cards) Trixbox 1.2.2 (though running stock asterisk code) Asterisk Versions 1.2.12 - 1.2.14 - with and without metermaid patch Problem seems to happen more on systems that use parking lots. The system will run for around 24 hours or so fine, and then mysteriously, without any errors leading up to it, will stop being able to send calls to the chan_sip. System from that point on reports the following in the logs. Dec 13 12:07:04 DEBUG[16415] chan_zap.c: Took Zap/1-1 off hook Dec 13 12:07:04 VERBOSE[16415] logger.c: -- Executing Wait(Zap/1-1, 1) in new stack Dec 13 12:07:04 DEBUG[2049] channel.c: Avoiding initial deadlock for 'SIP/100-09883f80' Dec 13 12:07:04 DEBUG[2049] channel.c: Avoiding initial deadlock for 'SIP/100-09883f80' Dec 13 12:07:04 DEBUG[2049] channel.c: Avoiding initial deadlock for 'SIP/100-09883f80' Dec 13 12:07:04 DEBUG[2049] channel.c: Avoiding initial deadlock for 'SIP/100-09883f80' Dec 13 12:07:04 DEBUG[2049] channel.c: Avoiding initial deadlock for 'SIP/100-09883f80' Dec 13 12:07:04 DEBUG[2049] channel.c: Avoiding initial deadlock for 'SIP/100-09883f80' Dec 13 12:07:04 DEBUG[2049] channel.c: Avoiding initial deadlock for 'SIP/100-09883f80' Dec 13 12:07:04 DEBUG[2049] channel.c: Avoiding initial deadlock for 'SIP/100-09883f80' Dec 13 12:07:04 DEBUG[2049] channel.c: Avoiding initial deadlock for 'SIP/100-09883f80' Dec 13 12:07:04 DEBUG[2049] channel.c: Avoiding initial deadlock for 'SIP/100-09883f80' Dec 13 12:07:04 WARNING[2049] channel.c: Avoided initial deadlock for '0x9896848', 10 retries! Dec 13 12:07:04 DEBUG[2049] channel.c: Avoiding initial deadlock for 'SIP/100-09883f80' Dec 13 12:07:04 DEBUG[2049] channel.c: Avoiding initial deadlock for 'SIP/100-09883f80' Dec 13 12:07:04 DEBUG[2049] channel.c: Avoiding initial deadlock for 'SIP/100-09883f80' Dec 13 12:07:04 DEBUG[2049] channel.c: Avoiding initial deadlock for 'SIP/100-09883f80' Dec 13 12:07:04 DEBUG[2049] channel.c: Avoiding initial deadlock for 'SIP/100-09883f80' Dec 13 12:07:04 DEBUG[2049] channel.c: Avoiding initial deadlock for 'SIP/100-09883f80' Dec 13 12:07:04 DEBUG[2049] channel.c: Avoiding initial deadlock for 'SIP/100-09883f80' Dec 13 12:07:04 DEBUG[2049] channel.c: Avoiding initial deadlock for 'SIP/100-09883f80' Dec 13 12:07:04 DEBUG[2049] channel.c: Avoiding initial deadlock for 'SIP/100-09883f80' Dec 13 12:07:04 DEBUG[2049] channel.c: Avoiding initial deadlock for 'SIP/100-09883f80' Dec 13 12:07:04 WARNING[2049] channel.c: Avoided initial deadlock for '0x9896848', 10 retries! attempting to stop asterisk from the CLI causes the CLI to become unresponsive and a trace shows chan_sip goes into a mutex_wait state. Anybody seen this? Have a fix? Raymond McKay President RAYNET Technologies LLC http://www.raynettech.com (860) 693-2226 x 31 Toll Free (877) 693-2226___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Get dialed numbers in AGI
From: Anton Frolov [EMAIL PROTECTED] you could use one of the AGI libraries... then you can just call a function to get the number. AF. Ralph Liebessohn wrote: Hi, I'm trying to write a AGI in PHP to get the numbers dialed (with read()), save it into a variable to insert it into a SQL server database. But I cannot see results into the variable, it always return NULL. Here is a piece of the AGI. fwrite(STDOUT,exec Read my_var|/sound_to_play|5|||15 \n); fflush(STDOUT); $conn=odbc_connect('MSSQL', 'USER', 'PASS'); $query = odbc_exec($conn, INSERT INTO dialed(number) VALUES('$my_var')); Even if I only show my_var value or try to use it inside asterisk, the value is NULL. Then there must be an error somewhere. The variable READ() in Asterisk should be usable. Should be able to use SayDigits() to play it back - or no value is read. Yuan Liu There is another way to do it? Am I doing a mistake here? I'm using Asterisk 1.2.13. Thank you all. -- Ralph Liebessohn ICQ: 74835911 Skype: liebessohn ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Send email notification
Thanks for your answer Anselm, But, why do you think that the problem is in the mail server, if I can send mails with esmtp, with the command /usr/sbin/sendmail without problem. But the Voicemail app never sends the notification. I used ethereal and i couldn't see any message from asterisk box to my smtp server when i leave a voicemail Thanks Am Mittwoch, den 10.01.2007, 11:46 -0400 schrieb H Aranguren: Hi group, I'm trying to configure the email notification when a user leave a voicemail, but don't work (send email notification). I configured esmtp in my linux box, if a try to use it with command line, it works fine. (echo Hello | sendmail a at b.com -f b at c.com). You could look wether a voicemail triggers something to happen inside the mail system at all (logfiles...). In that case, chances are that the mail cannot be parsed because of misconfiguration in the mail server / restricted usage of the sendmail -t command or whatever. In my setup (SMTP server listening on port 25 of the same machine) the mailcmd is commented out, and It Just Works(tm). If you need mail system specific help, there sure are lots of forums and info, but I cannot tell where to connect to esmtp people. Exim is my favourite ;) My voicemail.conf [general] format=wav49 attach=yes serveremail=anonymous at abc.com fromstring=Asterisk mailcmd=/usr/sbin/sendmail -t [my_home] 100 = ,number100,number100 at abc.com Can you see the problem?. Do you know any documentarion on internet where can i solve the problem? BR Anselm ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] dundi ENCREJ
hi list, i have the same problem as mentioned here: http://forums.digium.com/viewtopic.php?t=2678view=nextsid=bd94cefd823b23156c5748843febb3ab my asterisk version is 1.2.12.1 any ideas? ___ Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Directory too difficult?
More like a ID-10-T error. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bryan M. Johns Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 11:57 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Directory too difficult? I wish had some pearl of wisdom here, but I don't. I will simply share my sympathy. Sounds like an ESU situation to me. Bryan M. Johns Partner Shelton | Johns Technology Group office: 678:248:2637 x:1500 direct: 678:229:1809 mobile: 404.259.9216 iaxtel: 700:248:2637 x:1500 http://www.sheltonjohns.com http://www.sheltonjohns.com/ On Jan 10, 2007, at 11:10 AM, Colin Anderson wrote: I have a group of users whos complaint about Asterisk is that the directory application is too hard too use. (yeah, yeah, I know. For the record, they're Calgarians) Now I'm in a pickle: I don't want to have to create a custom directory for these guys. Anyone have any tips for making the directory easier, maybe re-record the prompts so they are more verbose? We go by first name. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Best inexpensive home office router for VoIP (QoS with maybe PoE)
Mark, Do these 1600 series Cisco routers you mention that you find on eBay for $50-$150 support Layer3 routing? I have a managed switch setup on my home network with several VLANs defined. (work subnet, home subnet, VOIP subnet) I currently have to use a Linux box to route between the VLANs. I'd like to move to Gigabit routing, but I'd need to replace the Linux box(more processor power and new NICs) and that gets expensive. I'd much rather have a router or smart switch for that matter that does Gigabit Layer3 routing all in one unit. Do you have any recommendationsthat wouldn't break the bank? Thanks, Ed Ed, Layer3 routing is a fundamental function of a router which is supported by the Cisco 1600 series (1605R specifically) router. However VLAN definitations are not supported in the 1600 series. You would need to moveup to the 1700 or 2500 series for that function. As for Gigabit support the 1600 and 1700 series do not support that high speed interface. These router are designed around WAN style routing operating at ~1.5Mbps. Gigabit routing is a rather cutting edge capablity that is only seen in newer hardware. I would checkout a Cisco Catalyst 3500 series for something like that. Be carefull and look closely some systems only support 2 ports on 1000baseT and the rest are 100BaseT. Good luck and happy hunting, Mark Coccimiglio ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Problem with zaptel drivers or card
It is a T1 and I am not sure what you mean by behaves like an E1. The connection is a T1 with 23 b-channels and 1 d-channel. I think it just so happens that the problem channel is 16 on the card. This worked fine for over a year before the upgrade to the zaptel drivers. James -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tzafrir Cohen Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 10:06 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Problem with zaptel drivers or card On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 09:39:47AM -0700, Administrator wrote: Results From cat /proc/zaptel/* Span 1: WCTDM/0 Wildcard TDM2400P Board 1 IRQ misses: 24 1 WCTDM/0/0 FXOKS (In use) 2 WCTDM/0/1 FXOKS (In use) 3 WCTDM/0/2 FXOKS (In use) 4 WCTDM/0/3 FXOKS (In use) 5 WCTDM/0/4 FXOKS (In use) 6 WCTDM/0/5 FXOKS (In use) 7 WCTDM/0/6 FXOKS (In use) 8 WCTDM/0/7 FXOKS (In use) 9 WCTDM/0/8 FXOKS (In use) 10 WCTDM/0/9 FXOKS (In use) 11 WCTDM/0/10 FXOKS (In use) 12 WCTDM/0/11 FXOKS (In use) 13 WCTDM/0/12 FXOKS (In use) 14 WCTDM/0/13 FXOKS (In use) 15 WCTDM/0/14 FXOKS (In use) 16 WCTDM/0/15 FXOKS (In use) 17 WCTDM/0/16 FXOKS (In use) 18 WCTDM/0/17 FXOKS (In use) 19 WCTDM/0/18 FXOKS (In use) 20 WCTDM/0/19 FXOKS (In use) 21 WCTDM/0/20 FXOKS (In use) 22 WCTDM/0/21 FXOKS (In use) 23 WCTDM/0/22 FXOKS (In use) 24 WCTDM/0/23 FXOKS (In use) Span 2: WCT1/0 Digium Wildcard TE110P T1/E1 Card 0 B8ZS/ESF 25 WCT1/0/1 Clear (In use) 26 WCT1/0/2 Clear (In use) 27 WCT1/0/3 Clear (In use) 28 WCT1/0/4 Clear (In use) 29 WCT1/0/5 Clear (In use) 30 WCT1/0/6 Clear (In use) 31 WCT1/0/7 Clear (In use) 32 WCT1/0/8 Clear (In use) 33 WCT1/0/9 Clear (In use) 34 WCT1/0/10 Clear (In use) 35 WCT1/0/11 Clear (In use) 36 WCT1/0/12 Clear (In use) 37 WCT1/0/13 Clear (In use) 38 WCT1/0/14 Clear (In use) 39 WCT1/0/15 Clear (In use) 40 WCT1/0/16 41 WCT1/0/17 Clear (In use) 42 WCT1/0/18 Clear (In use) 43 WCT1/0/19 Clear (In use) 44 WCT1/0/20 Clear (In use) 45 WCT1/0/21 Clear (In use) 46 WCT1/0/22 Clear (In use) 47 WCT1/0/23 Clear (In use) 48 WCT1/0/24 HDLCFCS (In use) Is it supposed to be T1 or E1? The card behaves as E1 but you attempt to configure it as T1. zaptel.conf file: fxoks=1-24 span=2,1,0,esf,b8zs bchan=25-39 #bchan=40 bchan=41-47 dchan=48 loadzone=us defaultzone=us James -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tzafrir Cohen Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 11:25 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Problem with zaptel drivers or card On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 06:01:55PM -0700, Administrator wrote: I have an Asterisk box running Fedora Core 4, Asterisk 1.4, Lippri, 1.4, and Zaptel 1.4 The Digium cards installed are TDM2400 and TE110P. Everything was working fine until I upgraded to zaptel 1.2.12 from 1.2.9 Now when I run ztcfg I get the following error message: (CAS signalling on span 2 conflicts with Clear channel on channel 40) --NOTE: signaling was spelled wrong in the error message-- I have since upgraded to 1.4 with the same problem. Channel 40 is a standard bchan configuration and our provider sees no problem with the channel. When I disable the channel everything works fine. My assumption is that something is wrong with the TE110P card. Has anyone seen anything else like this? What do you get from: cat /proc/zaptel/* What do you have on /etc/zaptel.conf ? -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and
Re: [asterisk-users] Send email notification
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 01:41:39PM -0400, H Aranguren wrote: Thanks for your answer Anselm, But, why do you think that the problem is in the mail server, if I can send mails with esmtp, with the command /usr/sbin/sendmail without problem. But the Voicemail app never sends the notification. But you use a different command. Why do you need to override the default sendmail command, BTW? I used ethereal and i couldn't see any message from asterisk box to my smtp server when i leave a voicemail What is /usr/sbin/sendmail? sendmail? postfix? any other MTA? What do you see in its logs? -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Send email notification
Am Mittwoch, den 10.01.2007, 13:41 -0400 schrieb H Aranguren: Thanks for your answer Anselm, But, why do you think that the problem is in the mail server, if I can send mails with esmtp, with the command /usr/sbin/sendmail without problem. But the Voicemail app never sends the notification. I used ethereal and i couldn't see any message from asterisk box to my smtp server when i leave a voicemail My experience with people setting up a mail server is that they tend to forget small but important things - I often enough do myself, with all that complexity. Like the possibility that the sendmail command, run as user asterisk, will not be allowed to send mail from any e-mail-adress but [EMAIL PROTECTED] or so. If you use the sendmail -t command as you wrote, then the first step of any e-mail to be sent will be local and not appear in ethereal. Have you looked in the log files? Are you _sure_ notifications are not sent? When you replace sendmail -t with something like cat /tmp/1, will that file appear? Might you have a PATH issue, like sendmail living in /usr/bin instead of /usr/sbin/? Just guessing in the dark, and naming things that would most probably happen in a debug session if I sat in front of the machine. Hth Anselm ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk build for Suse 10.1
Yes you are correct. I do NOT plan to use it again. I have downloaded the latest version and plan to do an install. I was hoping there might be an rpm for it but does not seem to be. Thanks all. Bob Rawlinson On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 18:25 +0100, Anton Frolov wrote: he is probably tried to install one of these All in one Asterisk CDs, that effectively formats the hard drive and installs everything from scratch, including the OS ;) And, yes, it will happen again, if he re-runs this CD... AF. Doug Crompton wrote: Formated your hardisk... wow that is nasty, but I also cannot understand how that could ever happen. There must be some other HW problem going on or you got a hold of some really bad code. What code (source or binary) and what were you doing when that happenned? Doug On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Robert A. Rawlinson wrote: Thanks for the help. I was concerned because I tried once before and it formatted my hard disk. I wanted to be sure that did not happen again.\ Bob Rawlinson On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 11:04 -0500, Robert A. Rawlinson wrote: Has anyone heard of a build or instructions for installing Asterisk on a Suse 10.1 system? Bob Rawlinson ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users k ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] dundi ENCREJ
Hi Ramon, Please post your peer details from dundi.conf so we can see what your setup is. Also, have you tried regenerating your keys? I wound up generating my keys twice, they just didn't work the first time, I'm not sure why. Alex On 1/10/07, Ramon Schönborn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi list, i have the same problem as mentioned here: http://forums.digium.com/viewtopic.php?t=2678view=nextsid=bd94cefd823b23156c5748843febb3ab my asterisk version is 1.2.12.1 any ideas? ___ Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Alex Robar [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Zap calls
I have 8 Zap channels, 25-32, all of which have their own line. My zapata.conf file looks similar to: group=1 context=context_1 signalling=fxs_ks channel = 25 group=2 context=context_2 signalling=fxs_ks channel = 26 and so forth for all 8 lines, where each channel has its own group and incoming context. The first 4 channels are our primary trunk lines. If we have to make an outgoing call on a trunk line, how can I have it pick the first available line of the 4? My first thought would be to have another group that includes the first 4 channels, and then use that group in the Dial() command like so: group=9 context=whatever signally=fxs_ks channel = 25-28 and Dial(Zap/g9/${EXTEN},60) Can I repeat channels like that or will it cause Asterisk to choke? If I can't do it that way, can someone suggest a way to do it? Thanks in advance, Jay ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Best inexpensive home office router for VoIP (QoS with maybe PoE)
Quoting Mark Coccimiglio [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Mark, Do these 1600 series Cisco routers you mention that you find on eBay for $50-$150 support Layer3 routing? I have a managed switch setup on my home network with several VLANs defined. (work subnet, home subnet, VOIP subnet) I currently have to use a Linux box to route between the VLANs. I'd like to move to Gigabit routing, but I'd need to replace the Linux box(more processor power and new NICs) and that gets expensive. I'd much rather have a router or smart switch for that matter that does Gigabit Layer3 routing all in one unit. Do you have any recommendationsthat wouldn't break the bank? Do you actually know how utilized the linux box is now ? its probably near zero and all you need is a couple cards. Routing even with complex rules takes very little cpu. Thanks, Ed Ed, Layer3 routing is a fundamental function of a router which is supported by the Cisco 1600 series (1605R specifically) router. However VLAN definitations are not supported in the 1600 series. You would need to moveup to the 1700 or 2500 series for that function. As for Gigabit support the 1600 and 1700 series do not support that high speed interface. These router are designed around WAN style routing operating at ~1.5Mbps. Gigabit routing is a rather cutting edge capablity that is only seen in newer hardware. I would checkout a Cisco Catalyst 3500 series for something like that. Be carefull and look closely some systems only support 2 ports on 1000baseT and the rest are 100BaseT. Good luck and happy hunting, Mark Coccimiglio ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users Jon Pounder _/_/_/ _/_/ _/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/ _/_/ _/_/ _/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/ Inline Internet Systems Inc. Thorold, Ontario, Canada Tools to Power Your e-Business Solutions www.inline.net www.ihtml.com www.ihtmlmerchant.com www.opayc.com This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Get dialed numbers in AGI
Ralph Liebessohn wrote: Hi, I'm trying to write a AGI in PHP to get the numbers dialed (with read()), save it into a variable to insert it into a SQL server database. But I cannot see results into the variable, it always return NULL. Here is a piece of the AGI. fwrite(STDOUT,exec Read my_var|/sound_to_play|5|||15 \n); fflush(STDOUT); $conn=odbc_connect('MSSQL', 'USER', 'PASS'); $query = odbc_exec($conn, INSERT INTO dialed(number) VALUES('$my_var')); Even if I only show my_var value or try to use it inside asterisk, the value is NULL. There is another way to do it? Am I doing a mistake here? I'm using Asterisk 1.2.13. I'm not a php guy, but aren't we missing the part that retrieves the value saved into my_var from the call to READ? // In this part you run the read command and asterisk // stores the value into the channel variable my_var fwrite(STDOUT,exec Read my_var|/sound_to_play|5|||15 \n); // In this part you are constructing your sql statement // with a null value cause you didn't make a call to // GET VARIABLE before constructing your sql. $query = odbc_exec($conn, INSERT INTO dialed(number) VALUES('$my_var')); -- Warm Regards, Lee ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Get dialed numbers in AGI
On 1/10/07, Yuan LIU [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Then there must be an error somewhere. The variable READ() in Asterisk should be usable. Should be able to use SayDigits() to play it back - or no value is read. Yuan Liu Hi Yuan and Anton, Let's put here all AGI for test: #!/usr/bin/php -q ?php ob_implicit_flush(false); error_reporting(0); $stdin = fopen( 'php://stdin', 'r' ); if (!defined('STDIN')) { define('STDIN',fopen('php://stdin','r')); } if (!defined('STDOUT')) { define('STDOUT',fopen('php://stdout','r')); } if (!defined('STDERR')) { define('STERR',fopen('php://stderr','r')); } while(!feof($stdin)) { $temp=trim(fgets(STDIN,4096)); if (($temp==) || ($temp=\n)) { break; } $s=split(:,$temp); $nome=str_subst(agi_,,$s[0]); $agi[$nome]=trim($s[1]); } foreach($agi as $chave=$valor) { fwrite(STDERR,--$chave=$valor\n); fflush(STDERR); } $my_var=123; fflush(STDERR); fwrite(STDERR,Just testing\\\n); fflush(STDERR); fwrite(STDOUT,exec read my_var|//usr/share/asterisk/sounds/please-wait-connect-oncall-eng|5|||15 \n); fwrite(STDOUT,exec saydigits ${my_var} \n); fflush(STDOUT); $conn=odbc_connect('MSSQL', 'asterisk', '123456'); $query = odbc_exec($conn, INSERT INTO usuario(nome) VALUES('$my_var')); ? If I not startup $my_var=123; Saydigits receives a NULL as options. And so nothing was inserted into db. I tried to use WAIT FOR DIGIT but it makes no sense, asterisk passed through it directly like Joel Lansden Joel AT digitalparadise DOT net reported on 9/14/06. Is there another function or way to test it or I must try in another asterisk box? -- Ralph Liebessohn ICQ: 74835911 Skype: liebessohn ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Problem with zaptel drivers or card
Administrator a écrit : It is a T1 and I am not sure what you mean by behaves like an E1. The connection is a T1 with 23 b-channels and 1 d-channel. I think it just so happens that the problem channel is 16 on the card. This worked fine for over a year before the upgrade to the zaptel drivers. I`ve got similar problem and look like the patch #7860 is responsable of this issue... like if this patch doesnt check if the line is an E1 or T1. I have reverse the patch on 1.2.12 and all work perfectly now. -- Joel Vandal, CTO ScopServ Inc. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk build for Suse 10.1
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 01:25:31PM -0500, Robert A. Rawlinson wrote: Yes you are correct. I do NOT plan to use it again. I have downloaded the latest version and plan to do an install. I was hoping there might be an rpm for it but does not seem to be. Thanks all. Bob Rawlinson suse 10.1 actually includes a package of Asterisk 1.2.5 . 10.2 includes 1.2.13 . I have no idea if security updates bothered updating 1.2.5 . -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Random dropped calls...
I have a customer running Asterisk 1.2.13 with Zaptel 1.2.11 that is having calls dropped. Sometimes you can stay on the phone for a long time and sometimes the call is dropped within a minute. There are 9 lines connected to 3 TDM04B cards. The Panasonic Pbx we replaced did not have this problem. There are 8 SIP phones and 16 analog phones connected to two Astribank-8 units and everyone claims that their calls are dropped several times a day. Any suggestions? Here is my zapata.conf: language=es context=default ;rwink=300 usecallerid=yes hidecallerid=no callwaiting=no usecallingpres=yes callwaitingcallerid=yes threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes cancallforward=yes callreturn=yes echocancel=yes echotraining=yes ;echocancelwhenbridged=yes rxgain=-1.0 txgain=0.0 busydetect=yes callprogress=no accountcode=Telmex amaflags=default signalling=fxs_ls group=1 faxdetect=none callerid=asreceived channel = 1-6 -- Telecomunicaciones Abiertas de Mexico S.A. de C.V. Carlos Chàvez Prats Director de Tecnologìa +52-55-91169161 ext 2001 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] SIP invite and sip.conf relationship?
I'm having a bit of trouble setting up my sip.conf entries to accept calls from a particular provider, and the problem really is that I am unclear exactly what parts of the INVITE are supposed to match what parts of sip.conf. I couldn't find this info on the wiki, so if someone here can shed some light, I would be very grateful! Here are the relevant lines from the INVITE (from sip debug): -- SIP read from 213.166.5.130:5060: INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0 From: 01234567890 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=2F6B6198-D3D To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:18:22 gmt CSeq: 101 INVITE Remote-Party-ID: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060 How do the items above, such as source address, INVITE URL, From, To, etc., relate to items in sip.conf in a type=user section, such as [sectionname], user=username, host=hostname or host=dynamic, etc? My provider gives me the option to set the invite URL, such as sip:sip.mydomain.com or sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED], but does not use a secret to authenticate. Does the myuser part get used at all? Thanks for any insight. Cheers Tony -- Tony Mountifield Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.softins.co.uk Play: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://tony.mountifield.org ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk build for Suse 10.1
There is certainly an rpm. Not sure about 1.4, but at least for 1.2. AF. Robert A. Rawlinson wrote: Yes you are correct. I do NOT plan to use it again. I have downloaded the latest version and plan to do an install. I was hoping there might be an rpm for it but does not seem to be. Thanks all. Bob Rawlinson ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Get dialed numbers in AGI
hi I never really programmed in PHP, I use Perl for my purposes. I found a good AGI library for Perl and is happy with it. It allows me to call functions instead of parsing the input. While looking for my library, I saw at least one for PHP. So why not to use it? In Perl it looks like: my %agiArgs = $AGI-ReadParse(); my $callerNum = $agiArgs{callerid}; // Got the caller id $retval = $AGI-exec('Dial', $CHANNEL.|.$CALL_OPTIONS); // Placing a call it's so simple... (and you have the error checking built in!) I'm sure you could find such a library for PHP as well! AF. Ralph Liebessohn wrote: On 1/10/07, *Yuan LIU* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Then there must be an error somewhere. The variable READ() in Asterisk should be usable. Should be able to use SayDigits() to play it back - or no value is read. Yuan Liu Hi Yuan and Anton, Let's put here all AGI for test: #!/usr/bin/php -q ?php ob_implicit_flush(false); error_reporting(0); $stdin = fopen( 'php://stdin', 'r' ); if (!defined('STDIN')) { define('STDIN',fopen('php://stdin','r')); } if (!defined('STDOUT')) { define('STDOUT',fopen('php://stdout','r')); } if (!defined('STDERR')) { define('STERR',fopen('php://stderr','r')); } while(!feof($stdin)) { $temp=trim(fgets(STDIN,4096)); if (($temp==) || ($temp=\n)) { break; } $s=split(:,$temp); $nome=str_subst(agi_,,$s[0]); $agi[$nome]=trim($s[1]); } foreach($agi as $chave=$valor) { fwrite(STDERR,--$chave=$valor\n); fflush(STDERR); } $my_var=123; fflush(STDERR); fwrite(STDERR,Just testing\\\n); fflush(STDERR); fwrite(STDOUT,exec read my_var|//usr/share/asterisk/sounds/please-wait-connect-oncall-eng|5|||15 \n); fwrite(STDOUT,exec saydigits ${my_var} \n); fflush(STDOUT); $conn=odbc_connect('MSSQL', 'asterisk', '123456'); $query = odbc_exec($conn, INSERT INTO usuario(nome) VALUES('$my_var')); ? If I not startup $my_var=123; Saydigits receives a NULL as options. And so nothing was inserted into db. I tried to use WAIT FOR DIGIT but it makes no sense, asterisk passed through it directly like Joel Lansden Joel AT digitalparadise DOT net reported on 9/14/06. Is there another function or way to test it or I must try in another asterisk box? -- Ralph Liebessohn ICQ: 74835911 Skype: liebessohn ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Proper use of the Local channel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any documentation you guys can point us to in order to learn more about the proper use of the Local channel? We don't currently use it. However, while evaluating other people's billing and management systems for Asterisk, we noticed they make extensive use of it. Did you read localchannel.txt in the asterisk docs directory in the source tree? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] RTP directly
David Alcott wrote: Is there a way to configure the Asterisk so that the RTP goes directly between the Endpoints as opposed to going through the asterisk? That is the default if Asterisk believes it will work. Things that might not make it work is tTwW options to Dial, protocol transation (one leg is SIP, the other is IAX2, transcoding, NAT, or many other things that make the two legs of the call not compatible with reinvites. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Get dialed numbers in AGI
On 1/10/07, Lee Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ralph Liebessohn wrote: Hi, I'm trying to write a AGI in PHP to get the numbers dialed (with read()), save it into a variable to insert it into a SQL server database. But I cannot see results into the variable, it always return NULL. Here is a piece of the AGI. fwrite(STDOUT,exec Read my_var|/sound_to_play|5|||15 \n); fflush(STDOUT); $conn=odbc_connect('MSSQL', 'USER', 'PASS'); $query = odbc_exec($conn, INSERT INTO dialed(number) VALUES('$my_var')); Even if I only show my_var value or try to use it inside asterisk, the value is NULL. There is another way to do it? Am I doing a mistake here? I'm using Asterisk 1.2.13. I'm not a php guy, but aren't we missing the part that retrieves the value saved into my_var from the call to READ? // In this part you run the read command and asterisk // stores the value into the channel variable my_var fwrite(STDOUT,exec Read my_var|/sound_to_play|5|||15 \n); // In this part you are constructing your sql statement // with a null value cause you didn't make a call to // GET VARIABLE before constructing your sql. $query = odbc_exec($conn, INSERT INTO dialed(number) VALUES('$my_var')); -- Warm Regards, Lee Hi Lee, thanks for the tip. I tried other methods trying to get the variable value, but no success. Doing a GET VARIABLE my_var after READ the get variable returns the value I dialed, but doesn't give the exact value to it. I got Resource ID #1 instead. Using: fwrite(STDOUT,exec read my_var|//usr/share/asterisk/sounds/please-wait-connect-oncall-eng|5|||15 \n); fwrite(STDOUT,get variable my_var \n); fflush(STDOUT); $my_var=STDIN; fwrite(STDOUT,exec saydigits $my_var \n); I got it: AGI Rx exec read my_var|//usr/share/asterisk/sounds/please-wait-connect-oncall-eng|5|||15 -- AGI Script Executing Application: (read) Options: (my_var|//usr/share/asterisk/sounds/please-wait-connect-oncall-eng|5|||15) -- Accepting a maximum of 5 digits. -- Playing '//usr/share/asterisk/sounds/please-wait-connect-oncall-eng' (language 'en') -- User entered '85214' AGI Tx 200 result=0 AGI Rx get variable my_var AGI Tx 200 result=1 (85214) AGI Rx exec saydigits Resource id #1 -- AGI Script Executing Application: (saydigits) Options: (Resource) AGI Tx 200 result=0 AGI Rx exec Resource id #1 -- AGI Script Executing Application: (Resource) Options: (id) Jan 10 17:31:33 WARNING[4867]: res_agi.c:1147 handle_exec: Could not find application (Resource) AGI Tx 200 result=-2 I also tried: $my_var=fwrite(STDOUT,get variable my_var \n); But always I get 21 as value. More tries? -- Ralph Liebessohn ICQ: 74835911 Skype: liebessohn ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk build for Suse 10.1
Strange! I had checked on both my DVD and on the Suse site and I have not been able to find it. Do you happen to know where it is located? Bob Rawlinson On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 21:03 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 01:25:31PM -0500, Robert A. Rawlinson wrote: Yes you are correct. I do NOT plan to use it again. I have downloaded the latest version and plan to do an install. I was hoping there might be an rpm for it but does not seem to be. Thanks all. Bob Rawlinson suse 10.1 actually includes a package of Asterisk 1.2.5 . 10.2 includes 1.2.13 . I have no idea if security updates bothered updating 1.2.5 . ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Random dropped calls...
Hi! On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 01:14:59PM -0600, Carlos Chavez wrote: I have a customer running Asterisk 1.2.13 with Zaptel 1.2.11 that is having calls dropped. Sometimes you can stay on the phone for a long time and sometimes the call is dropped within a minute. There are 9 lines connected to 3 TDM04B cards. The Panasonic Pbx we replaced did not have this problem. There are 8 SIP phones and 16 analog phones connected to two Astribank-8 units and everyone claims that their calls are dropped several times a day. Any suggestions? Here is my zapata.conf: language=es context=default ;rwink=300 usecallerid=yes hidecallerid=no callwaiting=no usecallingpres=yes callwaitingcallerid=yes threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes cancallforward=yes callreturn=yes echocancel=yes echotraining=yes ;echocancelwhenbridged=yes rxgain=-1.0 txgain=0.0 busydetect=yes callprogress=no accountcode=Telmex amaflags=default signalling=fxs_ls group=1 faxdetect=none callerid=asreceived channel = 1-6 Those are 6 channels of the 9? What is the configuration of the other three? What is the configuration of the 16 Astribank channels? You don't set busycount. This uses the default value (3?). Can you try setting it to a higher value? -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk build for Suse 10.1
Could you point me to where it is located? I had tried Suse and sourceforge. Bob Rawlinson On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 20:18 +0100, Anton Frolov wrote: There is certainly an rpm. Not sure about 1.4, but at least for 1.2. AF. Robert A. Rawlinson wrote: Yes you are correct. I do NOT plan to use it again. I have downloaded the latest version and plan to do an install. I was hoping there might be an rpm for it but does not seem to be. Thanks all. Bob Rawlinson ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk and Avaya IP Office
In this case I would need to purchase an E1 card for the Avay PBX an an other for the *. To save costs, I would like to intent the interconnection over the FXO port. Anyone has done this configuration so far? Robert Boardman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just done this for a client using an E1 Pri card in the avaya box and a sangoma a102, using qsig , works fine, I wouls recommend this to any oneits been up and stable for two months now Regards Robb housi mueller wrote: The main goal is that any extension from the Avaya PBX can make long distance calls using the asterisk server as VoIP gateway (using a SIP Provider). It would be also great if from a remote IP Phone (in an other location), a user could use the Asterisk server to dial in and the * forwards the call to an Avaya extension. The Avaya has an VCM card an IP Phones (5610) as extensions. First I thought to connect the * to the Avaya through the ethernet interface but then I was reading in forums that there are for Avaya third party IP phone licence needed and that the communication with oh323 is not stable. I thought also putting the Asterisk in front of the Avaya. Telco T1 - Asterisk - T1 - Avaya PBX This could be a solution for later one. Right know for testing it would be to expensive. That's why I thought about the Avaya analog Asterisk FXO interconnection. Any suggestions..? */Thomas Kenyon /* wrote: housi mueller wrote: I would like to connect an Asterik server to an Avaya IP Office IP406 and use the * as an VoIP Gateway. The IP Office has two Analog extensions available. I thought connecting this analog extensions to 2 FXO ports in the * to interconnect the PBXs. What sort of interaction are you after? It may be a better idea to try to intercept the line card with asterisk, or if the IP406 has a VCM card then to talk to it through the ethernet interface. Is this possible? Does any one have experience with such a configuration? Thanks in advance for all recommandations and suggestions.. Housi Mueller asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users - Check out the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster.___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Possibility to catch DTMF when 2 users are in a conversation
Hello, I will expose my problem here. Please tell me if it is not the right place as I am really new to that list. I use Asterisk as a SIP proxy. I have two users connected to it, Let's call them 1234 and 5678 In my dialplan I have two lines: exten = 1234,1,Dial(SIP/1234) exten = 5678,1,Dial(SIP/5678) The SIP phones (X-lite) are configured to send DTMF's using RFC 2833 mechanism. I want to know if it is possible in Asterisk to catch a DTMF event sent by one of the phone to trigger an action, for example to play a sound/video clip to one of the phones. Thank you very much in advance for your help, Antoine ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Directory too difficult?
Exactly. ESU = Equipment Superior to Users ;-) Bryan M. Johns Partner Shelton | Johns Technology Group office: 678:248:2637 x:1500 direct: 678:229:1809 mobile: 404.259.9216 iaxtel: 700:248:2637 x:1500 http://www.sheltonjohns.com On Jan 10, 2007, at 12:47 PM, Alexander Lopez wrote: More like a ID-10-T error….. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bryan M. Johns Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 11:57 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Directory too difficult? I wish had some pearl of wisdom here, but I don't. I will simply share my sympathy. Sounds like an ESU situation to me. Bryan M. Johns Partner Shelton | Johns Technology Group office: 678:248:2637 x:1500 direct: 678:229:1809 mobile: 404.259.9216 iaxtel: 700:248:2637 x:1500 http://www.sheltonjohns.com On Jan 10, 2007, at 11:10 AM, Colin Anderson wrote: I have a group of users whos complaint about Asterisk is that the directory application is too hard too use. (yeah, yeah, I know. For the record, they're Calgarians) Now I'm in a pickle: I don't want to have to create a custom directory for these guys. Anyone have any tips for making the directory easier, maybe re-record the prompts so they are more verbose? We go by first name. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Re: Best inexpensive home office router forVoIP (QoS with maybe PoE)
Regardless of the 1600's spec's which are outdated in many ways by todays standards, ANY cheap 1600 or PIX etc. you buy on Ebay will likely have MANY MANY hours on it. Sure, they are built to last but they do not last forever. I would consider ANY of these boxes as somewhat unreliable for high availability requirements. -Original Message- From: Ed Rubright - mail lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 7:28 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Best inexpensive home office router forVoIP (QoS with maybe PoE) Mark Coccimiglio wrote: Marty, Where are you paying $1000 for a 1600 series Cisco? I can get you 20% off that price on any quantity (note: Sarcasam). Its not the 1990's anymore. You can get them on eBay ($50-150) for only slightly more then the Linksys. The performance is rock solid. Three-quarters of the world have used them for decades. I know of units running 2 and 3 YEARS between reboots. The power company reboots my equipment more then I do. Ok it is true that Cisco does not support the models anymore, but you can't buy a services contract for a linksys router either. It can sometimes be a little difficult to configure without any technical knowledge but that is what most of us get paid for. It does impress the customer when you bring in the grey box labled Cisco. As for performance just try to put 50 people behind a linksys/netgear/dlink. I've used 1605R supporting +100 users. Not even a blink. Finally, untill everyone is using 10Mps FTTH the broad band link is still the slowest part of the connection. Not to shabby for antiquated technology. Mark C Martin Joseph wrote: On 2007-01-06 00:48:11 -0800, Mark Coccimiglio [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Mike I'm using a Cisco 1605R [running IOS 12.3(5a)] small office router with Fair-Weight queueing enabled. Works great. The nice thing about Fair-Weight queueing is that it dynamically adapts to lower the priority of higher demand traffic (e.g. large downloads). If you want quality stick with quality stuff. Mark C Reread the subject line please. $1000 (US) isn't inexpensive by any stretch. Marty ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users Mark, Do these 1600 series Cisco routers you mention that you find on eBay for $50-$150 support Layer3 routing? I have a managed switch setup on my home network with several VLANs defined. (work subnet, home subnet, VOIP subnet) I currently have to use a Linux box to route between the VLANs. I'd like to move to Gigabit routing, but I'd need to replace the Linux box(more processor power and new NICs) and that gets expensive. I'd much rather have a router or smart switch for that matter that does Gigabit Layer3 routing all in one unit. Do you have any recommendationsthat wouldn't break the bank? Thanks, Ed ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk build for Suse 10.1
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 02:48:41PM -0500, Robert A. Rawlinson wrote: Strange! I had checked on both my DVD and on the Suse site and I have not been able to find it. Do you happen to know where it is located? Bob Rawlinson I simply checked the list of source RPMs availble from the first suse mirror I could find at opensuse.org . -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Get dialed numbers in AGI
From: Ralph Liebessohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi Yuan and Anton, Let's put here all AGI for test: #!/usr/bin/php -q ?php ... $my_var=123; fflush(STDERR); fwrite(STDERR,Just testing\\\n); fflush(STDERR); fwrite(STDOUT,exec read my_var|//usr/share/asterisk/sounds/please-wait-connect-oncall-eng|5|||15 \n); fwrite(STDOUT,exec saydigits ${my_var} \n); fflush(STDOUT); $conn=odbc_connect('MSSQL', 'asterisk', '123456'); $query = odbc_exec($conn, INSERT INTO usuario(nome) VALUES('$my_var')); ? If I not startup $my_var=123; Saydigits receives a NULL as options. And so nothing was inserted into db. I did a quick test and it seems that everything passed to AGI is by value, and there is no apparent relationship between variable named used in two different AGI commands. However, a small adaption of dial plan could accomplish what you wanted, that is, to read the variable in dial plan, then pass its value to AGI. Hope this helps. Yuan Liu I tried to use WAIT FOR DIGIT but it makes no sense, asterisk passed through it directly like Joel Lansden Joel AT digitalparadise DOT net reported on 9/14/06. Is there another function or way to test it or I must try in another asterisk box? -- Ralph Liebessohn ICQ: 74835911 Skype: liebessohn ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk build for Suse 10.1
well, I'm not rpm user anymore for several years already... Isn't it http://www.rpmfind.com/ that is used to find the rpms? AF. Robert A. Rawlinson wrote: Could you point me to where it is located? I had tried Suse and sourceforge. Bob Rawlinson On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 20:18 +0100, Anton Frolov wrote: There is certainly an rpm. Not sure about 1.4, but at least for 1.2. AF. Robert A. Rawlinson wrote: Yes you are correct. I do NOT plan to use it again. I have downloaded the latest version and plan to do an install. I was hoping there might be an rpm for it but does not seem to be. Thanks all. Bob Rawlinson ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk build for Suse 10.1
here it is, mainly for suse http://rpmseek.com/rpm-pl/asterisk.html?hl=comcs=asterisk:PN:0:0:0:0 it's only one of the rpms (the basic one). You should make the search yourself (try asterisk) to locate all of them. AF. Robert A. Rawlinson wrote: Could you point me to where it is located? I had tried Suse and sourceforge. Bob Rawlinson On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 20:18 +0100, Anton Frolov wrote: There is certainly an rpm. Not sure about 1.4, but at least for 1.2. AF. Robert A. Rawlinson wrote: Yes you are correct. I do NOT plan to use it again. I have downloaded the latest version and plan to do an install. I was hoping there might be an rpm for it but does not seem to be. Thanks all. Bob Rawlinson ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk build for Suse 10.1
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 09:43:01PM +0100, Anton Frolov wrote: well, I'm not rpm user anymore for several years already... Isn't it http://www.rpmfind.com/ that is used to find the rpms? It's meant to find rpm pckages not from your distribution that are not supported and may be incompatible with it. Yeah. -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Proper use of the Local channel
No, I haven't. I'll start there. Thanks On Wed, January 10, 2007 2:38 pm, Eric \ManxPower\ Wieling [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any documentation you guys can point us to in order to learn more about the proper use of the Local channel? We don't currently use it. However, while evaluating other people's billing and management systems for Asterisk, we noticed they make extensive use of it. Did you read localchannel.txt in the asterisk docs directory in the source tree? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Problem with zaptel drivers or card
How did you, or do go about reversing the patch? James -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joel Vandal Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 11:52 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Problem with zaptel drivers or card Administrator a écrit : It is a T1 and I am not sure what you mean by behaves like an E1. The connection is a T1 with 23 b-channels and 1 d-channel. I think it just so happens that the problem channel is 16 on the card. This worked fine for over a year before the upgrade to the zaptel drivers. I`ve got similar problem and look like the patch #7860 is responsable of this issue... like if this patch doesnt check if the line is an E1 or T1. I have reverse the patch on 1.2.12 and all work perfectly now. -- Joel Vandal, CTO ScopServ Inc. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Best inexpensive home office router forVoIP (QoS with maybe PoE)
shadowym wrote: Regardless of the 1600's spec's which are outdated in many ways by todays standards, ANY cheap 1600 or PIX etc. you buy on Ebay will likely have MANY MANY hours on it. Sure, they are built to last but they do not last forever. I would consider ANY of these boxes as somewhat unreliable for high availability requirements. Buzzwrong answer! Don't answer on things you have no idea. and stop providing bad information. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] generating SIP errors
I have a DID vendor that wants me to be able to generate specific SIP error messages under certain conditions and I'm completely stumped on how to do these: #1 - They want to see a SIP 503 error response(service unavailable) when they send the call in to an active extension and and the service is not available, I don't have a clue on how to simulate this. #2 - When they send in a call to an extension that doesn't exist they want to see a SIP 100 TRYING message before the receive the 404 NOT FOUND error. Currently I have only been able to generate the 404 error. Any help, clues, tips or tricks are greatly appreciated in advance. I've searched the web for hours begging for scraps and still have come up empty handed ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Round Robin Queue
Hi Folks, I implemented an Asterisk 1.2.10 on a Debian GNU/Linux, and I have implemented a round robin queue (and a memory round robin queue too). Here I have one simple problem: - agent 1 (busy) - agent 2 (busy) - agent 3 (free) When someone call to my queue, the action of the queue is this: call agent 1, then call agent 2, and then call agent 3, that is free and finally ring. There is someway to my queue only call free agents? Thank you, Felipe Neuwald. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Best inexpensive home office router forVoIP (QoS with maybe PoE)
Quoting Mark Coccimiglio [EMAIL PROTECTED]: shadowym wrote: Regardless of the 1600's spec's which are outdated in many ways by todays standards, ANY cheap 1600 or PIX etc. you buy on Ebay will likely have MANY MANY hours on it. Sure, they are built to last but they do not last forever. I would consider ANY of these boxes as somewhat unreliable for high availability requirements. Buzzwrong answer! Don't answer on things you have no idea. and stop providing bad information. you should take your own advice - an acre is 200ft x 200ft - what idiot would pay a consultant $7000 to tell them they need one access point in the middle. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users Jon Pounder _/_/_/ _/_/ _/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/ _/_/ _/_/ _/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/ Inline Internet Systems Inc. Thorold, Ontario, Canada Tools to Power Your e-Business Solutions www.inline.net www.ihtml.com www.ihtmlmerchant.com www.opayc.com This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] caller id not transferred to SIP device
From: Tobias Unsleber [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, I'm wondering why asterisk is not transferring the callerid to the sip device. Scenario as follows: sangoma --- zaptel --- asterisk --- sip --- SIP-Device zaptel is reporting the callerid, but in the sip packages the sip-address shows unknown as user part, as this sip debug package shows: Have you set up a callerid for your Asterisk box? (Could be anything.) I got Asterisk as caller ID before setting callerid. Afterward (as I recall the sequence of events) I get caller's ID. Yuan Liu Executing Dial(Zap/62-1, SIP/123|25|d) in new stack We're at 172.31.253.80 port 10460 Adding codec 0x2 (gsm) to SDP Adding codec 0x4 (ulaw) to SDP ... -- Tobias Unsleber VoIP Consultant ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Get dialed numbers in AGI
Ralph Liebessohn wrote: Hi Lee, thanks for the tip. I tried other methods trying to get the variable value, but no success. Doing a GET VARIABLE my_var after READ the get variable returns the value I dialed, but doesn't give the exact value to it. I got Resource ID #1 instead. Using: fwrite(STDOUT,exec read my_var|//usr/share/asterisk/sounds/please-wait-connect-oncall-eng|5|||15 \n); fwrite(STDOUT,get variable my_var \n); fflush(STDOUT); $my_var=STDIN; fwrite(STDOUT,exec saydigits $my_var \n); I got it: AGI Rx exec read my_var|//usr/share/asterisk/sounds/please-wait-connect-oncall-eng|5|||15 -- AGI Script Executing Application: (read) Options: (my_var|//usr/share/asterisk/sounds/please-wait-connect-oncall-eng|5|||15) -- Accepting a maximum of 5 digits. -- Playing '//usr/share/asterisk/sounds/please-wait-connect-oncall-eng' (language 'en') -- User entered '85214' AGI Tx 200 result=0 AGI Rx get variable my_var AGI Tx 200 result=1 (85214) AGI Rx exec saydigits Resource id #1 -- AGI Script Executing Application: (saydigits) Options: (Resource) AGI Tx 200 result=0 AGI Rx exec Resource id #1 -- AGI Script Executing Application: (Resource) Options: (id) Jan 10 17:31:33 WARNING[4867]: res_agi.c:1147 handle_exec: Could not find application (Resource) AGI Tx 200 result=-2 I also tried: $my_var=fwrite(STDOUT,get variable my_var \n); But always I get 21 as value. More tries? Again, I'm not familiar with php, but can you try enclosing your variable in either single or double quotes? Like this? fwrite(STDOUT,exec saydigits \$my_var\ \n); ...or whatever it is that you guys used to escape literals. I use pascal mostly and it's strings are encased in single quotes so it's easy ;) I looks almost like the php interpreter is handing over the literal pointer to the string instead of the string reference itself. That is why I suggested the quotes around the string. As another posted suggested, you should consider using a wrapper class/object if you're using PHP. They've done all the work for you already. If I had to write every single little piece of code that I used to develop software, I'd never get anything done! Sorry can't help you more. Hopefully someone with real php experience will see your post and give you a hand. -- Warm Regards, Lee ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Get dialed numbers in AGI
Ralph Liebessohn wrote: Using: fwrite(STDOUT,exec read my_var|//usr/share/asterisk/sounds/please-wait-connect-oncall-eng|5|||15 \n); fwrite(STDOUT,get variable my_var \n); fflush(STDOUT); $my_var=STDIN; fwrite(STDOUT,exec saydigits $my_var \n); I got it: Also you might try concatenating the values together like this: fwrite(STDOUT,exec saydigits + $my_var + \n); Of course, that might not be the correct operator (+) to glue together strings, but I bet this has something to do with it. Your version above puts the variable name in the string itself and probably the php engine ignores it (unlike asterisk which seems to replace ${VAR} symbols within quotes). So try bringing the variable out of the quoted string like the example that I gave above. Just another suggestion. -- Warm Regards, Lee ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Problem with zaptel drivers or card
Hi, How did you, or do go about reversing the patch? I have put the patch (simple) available at : http://www.scopserv.com/download/patches/zaptel-1.2.12-reverse7860.patch Go on your zaptel src directory and do : patch -p0 zaptel-1.2.12-reverse7860.patch It is a T1 and I am not sure what you mean by behaves like an E1. The connection is a T1 with 23 b-channels and 1 d-channel. I think it just so happens that the problem channel is 16 on the card. This worked fine for over a year before the upgrade to the zaptel drivers. I`ve got similar problem and look like the patch #7860 is responsable of this issue... like if this patch doesnt check if the line is an E1 or T1. I have reverse the patch on 1.2.12 and all work perfectly now. -- Joel Vandal, CTO ScopServ Inc. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Directory too difficult?
I got a requirement list just now, with my comments inline: (showing it just for a giggle) User requirement: 1) Directory set up by name - If person calling does not know employee's name, how will they access? -Why, using app_telepathy.so of course! User requirement: 2) Directory set by first /or last name?? -Yes. Now decide which one. User requirement: 3) Not all mobile phones have the albphabet on their dialpads, how do they access our directory? -Shout really loud. Telus should have a class action against it for selling Razrs with no DTMF. -Original Message- From: Bryan M. Johns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 1:19 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Directory too difficult? Exactly. ESU = Equipment Superior to Users ;-) Bryan M. Johns Partner Shelton | Johns Technology Group office: 678:248:2637 x:1500 direct: 678:229:1809 mobile: 404.259.9216 iaxtel: 700:248:2637 x:1500 http://www.sheltonjohns.com/ http://www.sheltonjohns.com On Jan 10, 2007, at 12:47 PM, Alexander Lopez wrote: More like a ID-10-T error….. _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] On Behalf Of Bryan M. Johns Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 11:57 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Directory too difficult? I wish had some pearl of wisdom here, but I don't. I will simply share my sympathy. Sounds like an ESU situation to me. Bryan M. Johns Partner Shelton | Johns Technology Group office: 678:248:2637 x:1500 direct: 678:229:1809 mobile: 404.259.9216 iaxtel: 700:248:2637 x:1500 http://www.sheltonjohns.com/ http://www.sheltonjohns.com On Jan 10, 2007, at 11:10 AM, Colin Anderson wrote: I have a group of users whos complaint about Asterisk is that the directory application is too hard too use. (yeah, yeah, I know. For the record, they're Calgarians) Now I'm in a pickle: I don't want to have to create a custom directory for these guys. Anyone have any tips for making the directory easier, maybe re-record the prompts so they are more verbose? We go by first name. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk build for Suse 10.1
but some of the packages are labeled to be for SuSe 10.1 ... AF. Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 09:43:01PM +0100, Anton Frolov wrote: well, I'm not rpm user anymore for several years already... Isn't it http://www.rpmfind.com/ that is used to find the rpms? It's meant to find rpm pckages not from your distribution that are not supported and may be incompatible with it. Yeah. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Adding 4000 Lines to asteriskdb via asterisk -rx ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 What is needed is a family of astdb manipulation commands: astdbput family key value astdbget family [key] astdbdel family [key] any others? - -- Ron Wellsted [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wellsted.org.uk N 52.567623, W 2.137621 Linux Counter No. 202120 FWD:519961 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQEVAwUBRaVpXUtP/KMNOfRbAQLagQf+LVq3xPgwatLShzkm53+Uy+/oRN3IfnY6 bW1OcO1fhy0uhQXVY9BysDiJxvryqCOZBNMQqGpeqQA9jzvAVuGxf7heJeqDSeo4 hfidqyW+o2N1VtvhLEKNLsxucgZ76dzkvnKv6+zPVtOArSc4XTMveDFMj6CSM5yQ 3ljCzCSZpNviZjZpSXAIo3PozKaKlWJtMw9FyBQP2BPzULIOVR2VAaq4T7jEyFoT tT5PUIRKUIzRuCRUBR+2DPdRZeif+RGd8vb9ScOROFiMmmuIxLy4UpGjFRuJajaM pxLO2rAgLnWVhGzXQMCk6gx1hj0ovP63hXmEpUrScCR7q2J479XwGQ== =kECV -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Best inexpensive home office router forVoIP (QoS with maybe PoE)
Jon Pounder wrote: you should take your own advice - an acre is 200ft x 200ft - what idiot would pay a consultant $7000 to tell them they need one access point in the middle. I have a BA in Electronic Engineering, a Masters in Computer Science and I'm an FCC licensed radio operator. I think I know what I'm talking about. Life isn't always as simple as that. What if its a warehouse that is 60x800ft. still about an acre (I've seen this one myself). How will the system perform once the empty space is occupied with inventory? How will metal shelving effect performance. What hardware should you use? Netgear, dLink, Linksys, Cisco (they are different), Alvarion, Proxima? If its an outside area an AP in the middle is not necessarly practicle. You can't just use any antenna combination you want There are rules governing use. Are you certified to assemble and test such a system for Part 15 compliance? Do you know the specs and ERP limits? Who has presidence FCC or OSHA regs? What about other ISM bands? How long can you make your ethernet runs or should you use Fiber Optics? These are the types of things that an Engineer addresses. ...one access point in the middle. It may work it may not. One thing for sure is that the system probably won't perform as you expect it. Mark C ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk build for Suse 10.1
On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 11:04 -0500, Robert A. Rawlinson wrote: Has anyone heard of a build or instructions for installing Asterisk on a Suse 10.1 system? Bob Rawlinson Hi Bob, Afair, asterisk was not on the cdrom's (which some people use to make their own dvd), but it was on the original DVD, aswell as on several ftp-sites. As long as you don't intend to use isdn-bra (isdn-2) the rpm's seems to contain all you need. Not just the binaries, but also about 50 config files in /etc/asterisk you need to configure. The graphical config-tool yast won't assist you here... Neither for 10.2, nor will there be for 10.3 :-( (btw, for 10.2 is asterisk-1.2 included on the cdrom's) Hans -- pgp-id: 926EBB12 pgp-fingerprint: BE97 1CBF FAC4 236C 4A73 F76E EDFC D032 926E BB12 Registered linux user: 75761 (http://counter.li.org) ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Re: Is there a low cost cell phone base station for asterisk ?
Dumpolid Exeplish wrote: It is true what Eric and Steve have said, you do need a licensed GSM frequency to operate and sell GSM services (even for rural areas). however, this link might be of interest to you http://rfdesign.com/mag/radio_field_trials_allsoftware/ That is more what I was thinking of but it is still a cell provider type of hardware. In my mind I was thinking of something very low powered and turning off the roaming, etc on the phone so they only work with the one base. Think single cell base-station transceiver that can talk to a cell phone and turn it into a sip conversation to Asterisk. Here in Canada, and back years ago, when I worked with radio I think the law was something like less than 100mw of input power didn't require a license. However, with the advent of cell phones that could very well not be the case in those bands. But one never knows... In any case I'll probably lean towards something like the Engenius wireless phones. http://www.engeniustech.com/telecom/products/details.aspx?id=107 But it would have been slick to be able to use the old analogue cell phones as we have several unused here and I am sure they would be cheap or free to pick up more. Thanks to all for your input Mike ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users