[asterisk-users] Remote-Party-ID implementation on trunk

2009-06-21 Thread Yehavi Bourvine
Hello,

  For a long tmie I am using patch 8824 in order to display the name of the
called party. I do a database query and then call CONNECTEDLINE function and
all works ok.

  I've tried the latest trunk (202183) with the same config file. It works
ok for local extensions, but for extensions routed via a gateway no name is
displayed. Any idea?

 Thanks! __Yehavi:
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Called party name with Cisco-2,811 gateway

2009-06-11 Thread Yehavi Bourvine
Sorry for the delay...

2009/6/7 David Backeberg dbackeb...@gmail.com

  On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 4:20 AM, Yehavi
 Bourvineyehavi.bourv...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hello,
 
I am using a Cisco 2,811 gateway to connect Asterisk over PRI to our
  Nortel TX-1 PBX. Up to now I had only the calling party names passed both
  ways. After upgrading the Cisco to the latest release (12.4.24T) it began
  honoring the remote-part-ID field sent by Asterisk and sends the called
  name to the Nortel. However, I still do not get the called name from the
  Nortel to Asterisk.
 
  Has anyone managed to make this working?

 There are a lot of choices when you set up your interconnectivity
 between your Cisco gear and the T1/PRI channels. If you post your
 dialpeer for this I'll take a look, although strictly speaking this
 isn't really an asterisk question.

Here is the extract from the configuratio of the gateway:


voice service voip

clid network-provided

qsig decode

allow-connections sip to sip

fax protocol t38 ls-redundancy 4 hs-redundancy 2 fallback pass-through

g711alaw

controller E1 0/0/0

pri-group timeslots 1-31

!

interface Serial0/0/0:15

no ip address

encapsulation hdlc

isdn switch-type primary-qsig

isdn overlap-receiving

isdn not-end-to-end 64

isdn incoming-voice voice

isdn supp-service name calling profile Network-Extension operation-value-tag
local

isdn negotiate-bchan

isdn outgoing ie facility

isdn outgoing ie extended-facility

no isdn outgoing ie notify-indicator

isdn outgoing display-ie

isdn outgoing ie caller-number

isdn outgoing ie called-number

no cdp enable

!

dial-peer voice 2 pots

destination-pattern 0T

progress_ind setup enable 3

no digit-strip

direct-inward-dial

port 0/0/0:15



Thanks, __Yehavi:
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Called party name with Cisco-2,811 gateway

2009-06-07 Thread Yehavi Bourvine
Hello,

  I am using a Cisco 2,811 gateway to connect Asterisk over PRI to our
Nortel TX-1 PBX. Up to now I had only the calling party names passed both
ways. After upgrading the Cisco to the latest release (12.4.24T) it began
honoring the remote-part-ID field sent by Asterisk and sends the
*called*name to the Nortel. However, I still do not get the called
name from the
Nortel to Asterisk.

Has anyone managed to make this working?

  Thanks! __Yehavi:
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] RPID on SNOM phones?

2009-05-24 Thread Yehavi Bourvine
Hello,

  I am running Asterisk 1.4 with the RPID patch (8824) in order to display
the name of the *called* person. It works on Cisco and Polycom phones, but
not on SNOM. The local SNOM dealer claims that he saw it working, but he
cannot give me more details. Has anyone managed to make it working?

 Thanks, __Yehavi:
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] how to avoid call waiting? Or check DIALSTATUS before Dial()?

2009-05-14 Thread Yehavi Bourvine
You check for BUSY. Check for IN_USE instead. That's what I do here (on 1.4,
but I guess that 1.6 behaves similarly).

When an extension is in IN_USE state I have a decision tree after consulting
a database:


   - If the user wants waiting call - dial him/her/
   - If the user doesn;t want waiting call but wants voicemail answer - send
   to voicemail with B prefix.
   - If niether is wanted - play busy.

  Regards, __Yehavi:

2009/5/15 sean darcy seandar...@gmail.com

 I have two internal analogue extensions off a TDM400P. If the first is
 busy, I'd like to ring the second. So:

 [incoming]
 exten =s,1,Answer()
 exten =s,n,Dial(${mainline},60)
 exten =s,n,ExecIf($[${DIALSTATUS} = BUSY]?Dial(${secondline},30))

 But it doesn't work because * first tries Call Waiting on the main line.
 Here I dial out:

 -- Starting simple switch on 'DAHDI/1-1'
 -- Executing [...@internal:1] Answer(DAHDI/1-1, ) in new stack
 -- Executing [...@internal:2] Set(DAHDI/1-1, CALLERID=house
 2127873453) in new stack
 -- Executing [...@internal:3] Dial(DAHDI/1-1,
 .

 And now an incoming call:

 -- Executing [...@incoming:1] Answer(IAX2/nhi-10929, ) in new stack
 -- Executing [...@incoming:2] Dial(IAX2/nhi-10929, DAHDI/1,60) in
 new stack
 -- Called 1
 -- IAX2/nhi-10929 requested special control 20, passing it to DAHDI/1-2
 -- IAX2/nhi-10929 requested special control 20, passing it to DAHDI/1-2
 -- IAX2/nhi-10929 requested special control 20, passing it to DAHDI/1-2
 -- DAHDI/1-2 is ringing
 -- IAX2/nhi-10929 requested special control 20, passing it to DAHDI/1-2
 -- IAX2/nhi-10929 requested special control 20, passing it to DAHDI/1-2
 -- CPE supports Call Waiting Caller*ID.  Sending 'Seandarcy/212 573
 1432'


 Is there a way to check the status of a dahdi channel _before_ dialing it?

 exten =s,n,ExecIf($[DAHDI/1${DIALSTATUS} =
 BUSY]?Dial(${secondline},30)) ??

 What's special control 20  ??

 Any help appreciated.

 sean


 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Polycom-330 not displaying line buddy label?

2009-05-11 Thread Yehavi Bourvine
Hello,

  I have so far Polycom 501 and 403 which displays the label of a key and
the name of a buddy near its key. Today I received new 330's and they do not
display the name, only 1  2. Besides that they work correctly. Anyone
has an idea, or is it a known feature?

Thanks! __Yehavi:
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] issue with sip 180 responses

2009-04-19 Thread Yehavi Bourvine
 Maybe it is buffering issues with the kernel? Does it happen only when
there is a peak in the new calls rate? Do all 180 messages get dropped?

   __Yehavi:

2009/4/19 Nir Levi n...@bezeqint.co.il



  Hello,

 SIP invites are accepted from imitator , but 'SIP 180'  is not  responded
 back  to imitator.



 By inspecting the issue , we can **see** the response is generated and
 sent from asterisk (via asterisk logger (sip debug )) , but while sniffing
 the interface with tcpdump, we can't see 180 response on the interface.



 We don’t have errors on the interface, firewall is disabled , seems there's
 no packet lost  (checked with ping with low interval ) , and routes are ok …




 By our tests we can see there is a direct connection between the mass of
 the calls, and between the lost of sip 180 responses.



 We're using Asterisk 1.4.4, with real-time configuration, also we made few
 **modifications** in asterisk source code (changed app_dial.c,
 /app_macro.c, /func_cdr.c)…



 We're not sure if the problem on the OS Level (Centos 5.2) or in the
 asterisk application.

 Please assist…

 ~Nir






  --
 This message was enriched by Impactia Technologies Ltd.
 www.impactia.com
 Please do not 
 enrichhttp://impactia.bezeqint.co.il/exclude.asp?email=asterisk-us...@lists.digium.comdomain=bezeqint.co.ilid=777emails
  sent to me.

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk is not designed for University with largeuser base?

2009-04-12 Thread Yehavi Bourvine



Hello,

   After a long time we had a meeting with our university's management and
got a green light to have a proof of concept with open source telephony. Now
I have to select the right software to experiment with...

  Up to now I thought of going with OpenSER for the masses and Asterisk for
voicemail and other media related things. However, from reading around it
seems like FreeSwitch can give me the benefits of both packages. Anyone has
an experience with it?

  Thanks, __Yehavi:
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk is not designed for University with largeuser base?

2009-03-19 Thread Yehavi Bourvine
Hello,

  Sorry for the delay - was out of office. I also cross-posting it to
OpenSIPS list.

I have a small pilot (20-30 phones) which also does some sort of SIP to PRI
transcode for our old PBX. The pilot is base on Asterisk and mostly
Polycom-501 phones. It works quite well, but I have a few minor/missing
issues:
- I have the RPID patch, and unattended transfers fails with it.
- No SLA, only BLF. I know there is SLA, but it is cumbersome to deploy.
- Confference is limited to 3 participants. I guess I can do more with
external server but didn't
  manage yet to make it working.
- No busy dial again which is required by our users.

Now, to the original issue: I tried adding 1000 extensions to the SIP
database, and then use SIPP to send one REGISTER for each extension. After
doing so Asterisk still worked, but it was continously accessing the
database for all these extensions, just polling them. This raised a red flag
to me, and I decided to check the following config: OpenSIPS/Kamailo/etc. as
registrar and SIP switch for the phones, while using Asterisk only for
media related issues (which is the common suggestion here). Now, I have new
problems:

- SLA works, but very fragile.
- Not BLF, although I think it will be solve with the dialog handling on
OpenSIPS 1.5
- Same confference and busy dial problem.

Next week our management is going to decide (I hope...) how to proceed: Do
nothing (stay with the Nortel as we are tight on budget), go to open source
or to a commercial solution.

Although a commercial solution allows me so sleep well at night, I am going
to recommend the open source direction. If accepted, then I will continue
the development and you'll hear me quite a lot here asking hard questions
:-)

BTW, If I didn't say so far: we have around 8,000 extensions on 4 Notel
PBX'es, using around 10 PRI's to the world.

Regards, __Yehavi:

2009/3/17 Vincent Li vincent.mc...@gmail.com



 On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Yehavi Bourvine wrote:

 Hello'

  I am at the same situation as you. I also work at a university and we
 have
 over 8.000 extensions on a Nortel PBX. I also run a small Asterisk pilot.

  I am using a realtime users database and the main problem is that
 Aaterisk
 does too mcuh database access to inquire for the currently registered
 users.
 (I am using direct RTP path between the phones so this is not  a limiting
 issue here).

  I am checking now a combination of OpenSIPS and Asterisk, where OpenSIPS
 will serve the phones and Asterisk the more complicate things (voicemail,
 transcoding, etc.). OpenSIPS still lacks some of Asterisk features, but
 they
 are being worked on.

   Regards, __Yehavi:


 Hi Yehavi,

 Could you please keep us informed with your research, That would be very
 interesting case that all other Universities could study. There seems no
 known large Asterisk deployment in University enviroment at this time.

 Regards,



___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk is not designed for University with largeuser base?

2009-03-16 Thread Yehavi Bourvine
Hello'

  I am at the same situation as you. I also work at a university and we have
over 8.000 extensions on a Nortel PBX. I also run a small Asterisk pilot.

  I am using a realtime users database and the main problem is that Aaterisk
does too mcuh database access to inquire for the currently registered users.
(I am using direct RTP path between the phones so this is not  a limiting
issue here).

  I am checking now a combination of OpenSIPS and Asterisk, where OpenSIPS
will serve the phones and Asterisk the more complicate things (voicemail,
transcoding, etc.). OpenSIPS still lacks some of Asterisk features, but they
are being worked on.

Regards, __Yehavi:

2009/3/17 Jay Milk ast-us...@skimmilk.net

 Danny Nicholas wrote:
  Sounds like a personal preference to me.  Here is the Wiki for SipX.
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SipX
 
  Reading this, it's just another flavor of the same medicine.  Both are
  open-source with Commercial support available.
 
 I'd contend that the business model says very little about
 implementation, reliability, scalability.

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] SIP DTMF problem with SNOM

2009-01-20 Thread Yehavi Bourvine
I have a similar problem with Snom. Since I've upgraded from version 6 to
version 7 I cannot call IVR systems. The first DTMF goes ok, but after that
others are not accepted nor I am heard by the operator at the other side.

Since I am the only one who has Snom here I didn't bother to debug it...

 __Yehavi:
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Need help registering Cisco 7960 Phones on Asterisk

2009-01-19 Thread Yehavi Bourvine
 From my experience it won't register to the second box, only to the first
one. Why? god knows...

__Yehavi:

2009/1/20 D Tucny d...@tucny.com

  2009/1/20 Zeeshan Zakaria zisha...@gmail.com

 Hi everyone,

 I googled this followed the instructions, but it hasn't work for me yet.

 I have universal setting in SIPDefault.cnf and phone specific settings in
 SIPXX.cnf. But it doesn't get registered.

 I need to register it on two different asterisk boxes. So my
 SIPXX.cnf looks like this:

 phone_label: Zeeshan A Zakaria

 line1_name: 523
 line1_displayname: Zeeshan A Zakaria
 line1_authname: 523
 line1_password: 523
 line1_shortname: x523

 line2_name: 523
 line2_displayname: Zeeshan
 line2_authname: 523
 line2_password: 523
 line2_shortname: x523

 line3_name: 224
 line3_displayname: Zeeshan
 line3_authname: 224
 line3_password: 224
 line3_shortname: x224

 SIPDefault.cnf contains default settings along with proxy info like this:

 proxy1_address: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
 proxy1_port: 5060

 proxy2_address: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
 proxy2_port: 5060

 proxy3_address: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
 proxy3_port: 5060


 Same settings work fine from Grandstream phone, and X-lite. What am I
 missing on this Cisco phone configuration?


 That all looks fine, though I don't think the ports need quotes...

 You do have
 proxy_register: 1
 too don't you?

 If so, check the debug output from sip set debug on, or, sip set debug peer
 224 to see if it's reaching the server but not authenticating etc... Also,
 you can log into the phone using telnet to check status and restart
 registration (and many more things)

 d


 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] How to transfer a call from one AsteriskServerto another

2009-01-17 Thread Yehavi Bourvine
 Who sends the 500 failure code? Asterisk or the VOIP supplier through which
you got the call? Note that Asterisk has the basic mechanism for call
trasnsfer, just as you transfer a call, so the problem is either in using
Transfer() inside IVR context, or the provider.

As David noted - use canreinvite=yes

And last word: If you get the error from the local Asterisk then raise the
verbosity level - probably you'll find some hint there.

  Good luck, __Yehavi:


2009/1/17 David fire ddf...@gmail.com

 and canreinvite=yes ?


 2009/1/17 Lenz Emilitri lenz.lo...@gmail.com

  Are you sure that the TRANSFER is supported by the other side at all? see
 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.telephony.pbx.asterisk.devel/15267

 Thanks

 l.


 2009/1/16 Paul bulkm...@monafamily.com

  Yes, this is the first method I tried.  The transfer only works if it
 is done before a media path is set up to the first box (not answered by the
 IVR).  If it is answered then transferred, I get a 500 internal server error
 back from the ITSP and the call dies.  I never see anything hit the second
 box.



  --
  *From:* asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:
 asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *Lenz Emilitri
 *Sent:* Friday, January 16, 2009 10:09 AM
 *To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 *Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] How to transfer a call from one
 AsteriskServerto another

  I guess you already tried this?

 http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+cmd+Transfer

 Thanks

 l.



 2009/1/16 Paul bulkm...@monafamily.com

  I do have it functioning with Dial().   I was looking for a way to
 completely move the call from the first box though.  When using Dial() 
 media
 moves, but the call is still tied to the first box.  In looking at captures
 when the call is ended, the first box invites out to the ITSP again, then
 after receiving a 200ok sends a bye.

 Also while testing, once the call was up on the second box, I stopped
 Asterisk on the first box which kills the call.



  --
 *From:* asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:
 asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *Lenz Emilitri
 *Sent:* Friday, January 16, 2009 12:17 AM
 *To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 *Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] How to transfer a call from one
 AsteriskServer to another

  Why don't you simply Dial() the call to a separate box keeping
 Asterisk out of the audio path?

 l.

 2009/1/16 Paul bulkm...@monafamily.com

  Can anyone tell me how I can completely move an established call off
 of one Asterisk server to another?

 In our case we have a server with our IVR.  Depending upon digits
 entered, the call can be transferred to any of our other servers depending
 where the extension or queue reside.
 We would like to completely move the call off of the first box so we
 don't tie up resources on it.

 In our lab we are testing with 1.4.22.1

 Our provider which delivers inbound calls to us uses a Sonus gateway.
 So far, testing has shown that if we transfer the inbound call prior to 
 any
 media playback, it works.  But, if the IVR plays media, then it is 
 failing,
 with a 500 internal server error being returned.

 Thanks for any help




 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




 --
 Loway - home of QueueMetrics - http://queuemetrics.com


 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




 --
 Loway - home of QueueMetrics - http://queuemetrics.com


 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




 --
 Loway - home of QueueMetrics - http://queuemetrics.com


 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




 --
 (\__/)
 (='.'=)This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
 ()_()signature to help him gain world domination.


 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by 

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA and Polycom

2009-01-08 Thread Yehavi Bourvine
I also need SLA for hundreds of phones. Looking at Asterisk's way of doing
it I got cold legs... I am now playing with OpenSIPS; didn't manage to make
it working there, but it should be much simpler.

And no, I am not telling you to drop Asterisk - it is good for other things,
and even some things are done easily on it...

 __Yehavi:

2009/1/8 Noah Miller noahisaacmil...@gmail.com

  I don't believe that Polycom's version of SLA does anything with
  Asterisk.  You have to use asterisk's SLA implementation
  (http://www.asterisk.org/node/48342).
 
  So asterisk can't do SLA with Polycom phones?

 Asterisk can do SLA with Polycom, just not using Polycom's SLA
 implementation (in other words, don't bother setting up shared lines
 in the polycom cfg files - it won't do anything).  You use asterisk's
 SLA implementation.


 - Noah

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Good comparisons on cheaper VOIP phones

2008-12-23 Thread Yehavi Bourvine
I'll have to run some TCPDUMP to see what happens. I'll also try this with
OpenSIPS where there is more flexbility with the header fields.

   Thanks, __Yehavi:

 2008/12/23 Olivier oza-4...@myamail.com



 2008/12/23 Yehavi Bourvine yehavi.bourv...@gmail.com

  I have one ST2030 bought for testing. Indeed it has a very intuitive
 user's interface, bue I've found two drawbacks:

- Its sound quality has some place to be improved...
- It has no RPID support (displaying the name of the called party).

 Hi,

 Have you tried P-Asserted-Identity features (from latest Asterisk and
 ST2030) ?
 I
 'm hoping that using this feature, you can have your ST2030 displaying the
 name of the person you're calling : whenever, Asterisk is acking the INVITE
 message it received from the ST2030, it should include the name of called
 party.

 To be honest, I really don't know how you can teach Asterisk to behave this
 way (ie to include called party name in ACK replies) but I'm sure the phone
 support displaying names from trusted parties.

 It's on my TODO list, anyway, as I would also like to let this phone
 display caller's name when picking up a call (instead of the dialed string).

 Regards


-

 If these two issues are fixed, then it might be the better choice
 for cheaper price.

   __Yehavi:

 2008/12/21 Olivier oza-4...@myamail.com

 I don't know if Thomson ST2030 SIP phones are distributed where you live
 but those have the best feature set-price ratio.
 They integrate smoothly with Asterisk (one touch pickup, BLF, MWI, ...)
 with up to 5 simultaneous calls.

 Here in France, those are selected everywhere ...

 I would recommend them without any hesitation.

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Good comparisons on cheaper VOIP phones

2008-12-23 Thread Yehavi Bourvine
 We have one 7912 which we bought for evaluation. The main drawback is that
it has hands free speaker but no microphone.

__Yehavi:

2008/12/23 Mikel Lindsaar raasd...@gmail.com

 Thanks all for your replies.
 I have an aastra 9133i here for testing and am getting a polycom 320 to try
 out.

 But today, I got my hands on an older Cisco 7912G with SIP software
 installed.  It connected fine to the Asterisk box, works with the PoE stuff
 I have, sounds good and doesn't seem to have any problems.  Best all, I can
 buy near new for about $60 each in Australian dollars (thats about 45USD
 with the Aussie dollar being what it is :)

 The handsets look OK, they are nice and solid feeling and very easy to use
 / not complex.

 Any reason not to use the 7912G ?  Seems with the SIP image they work just
 dandy...


 Mikel

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Good comparisons on cheaper VOIP phones

2008-12-22 Thread Yehavi Bourvine
I have one ST2030 bought for testing. Indeed it has a very intuitive user's
interface, bue I've found two drawbacks:

   - Its sound quality has some place to be improved...
   - It has no RPID support (displaying the name of the called party).

If these two issues are fixed, then it might be the better choice
for cheaper price.

  __Yehavi:

2008/12/21 Olivier oza-4...@myamail.com

 I don't know if Thomson ST2030 SIP phones are distributed where you live
 but those have the best feature set-price ratio.
 They integrate smoothly with Asterisk (one touch pickup, BLF, MWI, ...)
 with up to 5 simultaneous calls.

 Here in France, those are selected everywhere ...

 I would recommend them without any hesitation.

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] how to set the busy signal usign softphones

2008-12-20 Thread Yehavi Bourvine
I use the dev_state() function to find the status of the called phone. If it
is BUSY then I call the busy() application to signal a busy tone.
Firthermore, I also consult a MySQL table to see whether the user wants
waiting calls or not and decide accordingly.

   __Yehavi:

2008/12/20 nik600 nik...@gmail.com

 On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Benoit maver...@maverick.eu.org wrote:
 
  Have you tried to set the call-limit to 10 or 2 for example, i know it's
  what's needed for the queue system to detect
  busy on sip softphone
 
 
 Yes, but if i set the call-limit to 2 the user receive more than 1
 call (correctly...up to 2 calls), even when he is busy.

 --
 /*/
 nik600
 http://www.kumbe.it

 ___
  -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Country numbering plan resources

2008-12-12 Thread Yehavi Bourvine
Here is the data for Israel:

+972 is the international prefix, and then:

2,3,4,8,9 and then 7 digits: Landline, according to the dialling area;
usually copper connected phones.

7x and then 7 digits: Landline, country wide numbering (usually IP based
operators).
   x: 2=Golden lines (012), 3=Barak (013), 4=Globecall  Partner, 6=Bezeq,
7=HOT.

5x and then 7 digits: Cellulars.
   x: 0=Pelephone, 2=Cellcom, 4=Orange, 7=MIRS, 9=Jawwal (Palestenian
operator).

159 and then 6 digits - Country wide numbering. Used usually by small
service providers who has more than one branch
   (like computer labs, etc.).

17xx and then 6 digits: Usually call centers; local call tariff.

18xx and then 6  digits - Toll free numbers.

19xx and then 6 digits - Premuim services.

10x - Emergency services (police, first aid, fire).

12xx - Special long term services with national importance to have short
number (like psychological first aid).
   This is also used for temporary numbers assigned for short period (like
hospital number just after some disaster).

* (can also be reached with 1222) - commercial services who want
short dialling string.

Maybe there are more, but these are the mostly used ones.

  regards, __Yehavi:
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Large Asterisk installations (~10, 000 extensions), preferably at universities

2008-11-27 Thread Yehavi Bourvine
I did a test yesterday and did 1,000 registrations to Asterisk using SIPP. I
did the register test since I am using the realtime DB and asterisk does
periodic quesries to it for each registered user. Although Asterisk
continued to function as usuall, it was in a steady loop querying the DB for
the 1,000 users.

OK, you convinced me to look at some front end to it. There are mainly three
front ends mentioed here: OpenSer, SipExpress and FreeSwitch. Is there some
comparison available which will save me from testing all three of them? Is
there one which is more used than the others? (so it has more public QA :-)

 Thanks! __Yehavi:

2008/11/24 Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fronting with OpenSER or FS, you should have no problems providing you
 plan to use SIP extensions.

 What is critical are the max simultaneous trunks you are going to use.

 I would go TDM although universities have good bandwidth, and SUPERIOR
 bandwidth between others.

 I would think a TDM DS3 or two just to be safe.  It should be pretty
 trivial besides gotchas, like cat3 to the rooms, although channel
 banks may be an even better solution if phones are already in place.

 Then you just use SIP when needed or wanted, and Asterisk is simple,
 although more costly.
 --
 Thanks,
 Steve Totaro
 +18887771888 (Toll Free)
 +12409381212 (Cell)
 +12024369784 (Skype)


  On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Wilton Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
  Yet another option is a commercial system with in-house staff.  I used to
  maintain a NEC (NEAX 2400) for many years.  I went to factory training
 and
  had total responsibility for it. Some manufacturers discourage or prevent
  this, but others are open to it.  There are also 3rd party organizations
  (such as Source) that can supply parts and even expertise for those going
  that direction.  Whether the result would be higher availability than
  Asterisk, I don't know.  Given I'm both a telco guy and a computer guru
 (CS
  degree) I'd probably go the Asterisk route myself, because its open and I
  would have more control.
 
  Wilton
 
 and bug fixes than any commercial product sold in the intra-industrial
  channel
 
  ... and they won't charge you a $30,000 license fee for the upgrade.

  ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Softphones with RPID and BLF

2008-11-26 Thread Yehavi Bourvine
Hello,

  I am looking for a softphone which supports RPID (displaying the called
party name) and BLF features. I couldn't find one so far...
Any idea whether such a softphone exists?

Thanks! __Yehavi:
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Disabling Call-Waiting

2008-11-25 Thread Yehavi Bourvine
Try looking at the DEV_STATE function (available separately on
Asterisk-1.4). It will tell you the status of the phone before you call the
Dial() application.

  __Yehavi:

2008/11/25 Sebastian [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 If is deprecated how do you treat a queue (realtime), that has to have just
 one call for agent??

 Thanks



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tilghman
 Lesher
 Sent: martes, 25 de noviembre de 2008 03:37 p.m.
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Disabling Call-Waiting

  On Tuesday 25 November 2008 10:46:49 Elliot Murdock wrote:
  Thanks for the responses.  I'll look into the phone devices themselves.
 
  I am wondering, if call-limit did not solve my problem, what is the
  call-limit parameter supposed to do anyway?

 The call-limit is actually kind of deprecated.  Using the GROUP() function
 is now the preferred way to do this.

 exten = 1234,1,Set(GROUP()=foo)
 exten = 1234,n,GotoIf($[${GROUP_COUNT(foo)}1]?voicemail)
 exten = 1234,n,DIal(SIP/tilghman,30)
 exten = 1234,n(voicemail),Voicemail(1234,
 ${IF($[${DIALSTATUS}=BUSY]?b:u)})

 --
 Tilghman

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
 database 2911 (20080229) __

 The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

 http://www.eset.com



 __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
 database 2911 (20080229) __

 The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

 http://www.eset.com



 ___
  -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Large Asterisk installarions (~10, 000 extensions), preferably at universities

2008-11-21 Thread Yehavi Bourvine
Thanks to everyone who replies so far!

We have Nortel PBX'es with a support contract from one of the local VARs
(Nortel does not give direct support here). In the last two weeks we had one
of our exchanges down for three half days; one was after a failure, and the
other two were when the technician came to fix remainders of the original
problem and just did a 5 seconds restart which won't even cut calls. Yeh,
the 5 seconds took 6-7 hours... BTW, they still do not know what was the
original problem.

So, why won't we save the big bucks we pay them, hire two professionals (who
cost less) and support an open source code by ourselves? This way we depend
on ourselves only.

 Thanks, __Yehavi:


 2008/11/21 Grygoriy Dobrovolskyy [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 2008/11/21 Yehavi Bourvine [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   Hello,

   Our university has to upgrade soon its old Nortel PBX's which holds
 around 10,000 extensions tied to 5 PBXes. Up to now we thought about
 commercial solutions but now there is a window openning for open source
 solution. However, I need examples to convince that this solution is
 feasible, and preferably at other universities.

 Are there any pointers for such installations?

Thanks! __Yehavi:

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


 Hello very interesting project you have, however asterisk is not a registry
 server, i suggest that you use opensips/opense/kamalio for your registrar,
 from where you dispatch to you asterisk servers, inside a good environment
 with a controlled network and nice tagged voip flow you could acheve a good
 results.

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Large Asterisk installarions (~10, 000 extensions), preferably at universities

2008-11-21 Thread Yehavi Bourvine
  I know that in the past there have been people on this list who have

 done very large scale asterisk deployments.  Not sure if any of them
  are still around to comment.
 
  With that many extensions, I'll second using a SIP registrar like
  Freeswitch or OpenSer.  Just use asterisk to provide the services.


OK, but I still did not get a reply to my original question: Why using SIP
registrar in front of Asterisk and not simply use bare Astersik? can't it
handle the load? (remember - in my case it doesn't handle the RTP, only
signalling). Can't it handle so much registrations? (I am using realtime DB,
it is has any relevance).

   Thanks! __Yehavi:
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Large Asterisk installarions (~10, 000 extensions), preferably at universities

2008-11-20 Thread Yehavi Bourvine
Hello,

  Our university has to upgrade soon its old Nortel PBX's which holds around
10,000 extensions tied to 5 PBXes. Up to now we thought about commercial
solutions but now there is a window openning for open source solution.
However, I need examples to convince that this solution is feasible, and
preferably at other universities.

Are there any pointers for such installations?

   Thanks! __Yehavi:
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Asterisk with or without OpenSER

2008-11-18 Thread Yehavi Bourvine
Hello,

  I am running a small installation of asterisk and looking for future
expansion of it to handle thousands of users. From what I read I see that
usually large installation place OpenSER (or similar solution) in front of
Asterisk in order to provide high call rate because OpenSER does only
signalling while Asterisk does all. My question is: If Asterisk also does
only signalling (i.e. the voice traffic goes directly between the phones and
not via asterisk) is it still that slow? I preffer to have one software
package rather than dealing with two.

  Thanks! __Yehavi:
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk with or without OpenSER

2008-11-18 Thread Yehavi Bourvine
Thanks!

2008/11/18 John Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  Hints: Will SIP redirection work for you?  How about re-INVITEs?  Does
 Linux HA give any solutions?  L3 load sharing?


1. What do you mean by SP redirection in this context?
2. I am using re-invites, and made sure that the audio does not pass via the
asterisk server.
3. L3 load sharing: I did some work on this and this is the method I came
with:
   - I use MySQL with replication between two servers.
   - Some of the phones register to one server and the others to the other
(i.e., this way I load balance).
   - Since the MySQL database is replicated, each server knows where the
destination is registered. If it is registered on the other
 sevrer then the caller is redirected there.
4. HA? didn't give too much thought to it yet, but it is on my list.

BTW, how do you emulate large number of clients without buying some test
equipment like IXIA?

  Thanks! __Yehavi:
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] One way voice after call transfer (bugs 9305, 13120)

2008-10-17 Thread Yehavi Bourvine
Yes, the problem is there as well...

 __Yehavi:

 2008/10/17 broadband Voice [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Is anyone seeing it in 1.4.22? I plan to upgrade to that version, my fear
 is zaptel compatibility.

 On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 1:08 AM, Yehavi Bourvine 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  unfortunately I still see it in 1.6.0...

   __Yehavi:

  2008/10/17 broadband Voice [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  I am having a similar problem and I'm using Asterisk 1.4.19 and have
 that problem on some calls through our calling card platforms. Someone
 suggested we use 1.4.3 and have not tried it yet. Any comments from the
 group.

 On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 1:19 AM, Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hello,

  I am having an issue here that after an attended call transfer there is
 no
 audio on one way; the problem is caused by Asterisk sending two INVITE
 messages
 without waiting for an ack for the first one.

  The issue has been reported on bug 9305, has been fixed and the fix is
 now
 included inside the main stream (version 1.4.21). However, I still get
 this
 behaviour, so I opened a new bug (13120). This bug sits there for over a
 week
 with no reponse...

  Has anyone else noticed this behaviour? Any idea what I can do? My
 users are
 angry on me...

Thanks! __Yehavi:

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
 Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] One way voice after call transfer (bugs 9305, 13120)

2008-10-16 Thread Yehavi Bourvine
unfortunately I still see it in 1.6.0...

  __Yehavi:

 2008/10/17 broadband Voice [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 I am having a similar problem and I'm using Asterisk 1.4.19 and have that
 problem on some calls through our calling card platforms. Someone suggested
 we use 1.4.3 and have not tried it yet. Any comments from the group.

 On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 1:19 AM, Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hello,

  I am having an issue here that after an attended call transfer there is
 no
 audio on one way; the problem is caused by Asterisk sending two INVITE
 messages
 without waiting for an ack for the first one.

  The issue has been reported on bug 9305, has been fixed and the fix is
 now
 included inside the main stream (version 1.4.21). However, I still get
 this
 behaviour, so I opened a new bug (13120). This bug sits there for over a
 week
 with no reponse...

  Has anyone else noticed this behaviour? Any idea what I can do? My users
 are
 angry on me...

Thanks! __Yehavi:

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
 Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] ATA for large networks

2008-09-29 Thread Yehavi Bourvine
Try AudioCodes MP-124 which is 24 ports FXS. I have one but haven't used it
much yet, so I cannot comment about its quiality.

  __Yehavi:
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco + Asterisk

2008-09-16 Thread Yehavi Bourvine
Hello,

  I've done similar thing with SIP. If you are interested then write me and
I'll dig the details.

  __yehavi:

 2008/9/16 Guilherme Loch Waltrick Góes [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 I have a Cisco 3845 with a ISDN PRI port connected to my legacy PBX, this
 router is running IOS 12.4(5) T5. I'm trying to integrate Asterisk with this
 router through H.323, I tried ooh323 (comes with asterisk-addons) and it
 works partially, I can make calls from Cisco to Asterisk, but the other way
 around dosn't work.
 Does anybody have any hints of what could be wrong ?

 --
 Guilherme Loch Góes

 Notícias e Fórum sobre VoIP com software livre:
 http://www.voipexperts.com.br

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
 Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] One way voice after call transfer (bugs 9305, 13120)

2008-07-28 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Hello,

  I am having an issue here that after an attended call transfer there is no
audio on one way; the problem is caused by Asterisk sending two INVITE messages
without waiting for an ack for the first one.

  The issue has been reported on bug 9305, has been fixed and the fix is now
included inside the main stream (version 1.4.21). However, I still get this
behaviour, so I opened a new bug (13120). This bug sits there for over a week
with no reponse...

  Has anyone else noticed this behaviour? Any idea what I can do? My users are
angry on me...

Thanks! __Yehavi:

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Changinf Polycom-501 config server from remote?

2008-07-18 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Hello,

  Our Polycom-501 phones are set to retreive their config for the server by a
static configuation defined at the phones (boot servers). Is there any way to
change it remotely? I found no relevant field in the internal WEB browser, nor
anything in the configuration files (sip.conf and phone1.conf).

  Thanks! __Yehavi:

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] imap voicemail

2008-04-17 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
 Hello. I'm trying to use gmail's imap feature w/ asterisk imap voicemail.

 I compiled c-client with the following settings: make lr5 IP6=4
 and asterisk with: ./configure --with-imap=/usr/src/imap-2007a/
  However if i enable any if the imap settings in voicemail.conf, asterisk
 starts acting funny and dosent allow any calls

 imapserver=imap.gmail.com
 imapport=993
 mapfolder=Voicemail

 Where did I go wrong?

Note that port 993 is IMAPS and I think you are telling it to use IMAP. Note
also that Asterisk can get hung once in  a while when using IMAP storage. Try
netstat -an | grep 5060  and see whether you have a queue building there.

  __Yehavi:

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Ring back when free?

2008-04-05 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
 Has anyone here implemented Ring back when free in Asterisk?

Here is what I do; the dialplan enclosed is in AEL2 format, but you can get the
idea.

When a call is originated I save the called and callee numbers in a database.
If the user gets busy he/she hangs up and dial *41. I then retreive the last
number they dialled and place a flag in the database that someone is camping on
it. The H extension checks this flag and if found generates a .call file.

First, I have a macro to save the for each extension who is the last they
called and the last who called them:

// Save the calling and called numbers in To and From and in the database so
// they can be used by *41 and *42. This way the h extension can acecss this
// database for all destinations.
macro Save_From_to ( ) {
// To and From are used in the dialplan, since we might change ${EXTEN}
Set(_To=${MACRO_EXTEN});
Set(_From=${CALLERID(num)});
NoOp(= ${From} - ${To});
// Save them in database for later use.
// Save the caller number at the called extension for *42 usage.
Set(DB(${To}/LastCaller)=${From});
// Where we called for *41
Set(DB(${From}/LastCalled)=${To});
};


This macro is called at the beginning of the normal dialplan.

Now, the *41 which registers the camp-on using the data saved above:
// *41: Camp on the last extension dialled
*41 = {
Set(tmp=${DB(${CALLERID(num)}/LastCalled)});
// Save it so when the other side hangs it will see it and dial us.
Set(DB(${tmp}/CallBack)=${CALLERID(num)});
// Say the number to caller so he can verify...
SayDigits(${tmp});
Hangup();
};

And now the H extension for handling it:

// The Hangup extension which is called when the call is hanged. See whether
// we have some waiting callback waiting on this extension.
h = {
ResetCDR(w);// To make the CDR correct.
NoOp(${From});

// We have to check the two sides of the call: Those who camp on the calling
and
// those who camp on the called.
Set(tmp=${DB(${From}/CallBack)}); // The calling.
if(${tmp} != ) {// Something is there.
DBdel(${From}/CallBack); // And delete it...
// Create the callfile and then move it to the spool directory to make the
call.
System(echo Channel:  SIP/${tmp} 
/tmp/test.tmp${From})
;
System(echo WaitTime: 20  /tmp/test.tmp${From});
System(echo Extension: ${From} 
/tmp/test.tmp${From});
System(echo CallerID: Callback \\\${tmp}\\\ 
/tmp/te
st.tmp${From});
System(mv /tmp/test.tmp${From}
/var/spool/asterisk/outgo
ing/);
};

Set(tmp=${DB(${To}/CallBack)}); // The called
if(${tmp} != ) {// Something is there
DBdel(${To}/CallBack); // And delete it...
// Create the callfile and then move it to the spool directory to make the
call.
System(echo Channel:  SIP/${tmp}  /tmp/test.tmp${To});
System(echo WaitTime: 20  /tmp/test.tmp${To});
System(echo Extension: ${To}  /tmp/test.tmp${To});
System(echo CallerID: Callback \\\${tmp}\\\ 
/tmp/te
st.tmp${To});
System(mv /tmp/test.tmp${To}
/var/spool/asterisk/outgoin
g/);
};
};


  Good luck!  __Yehavi:

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] BLF and Snom phones

2008-03-25 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
 Sorry for the hijack, but I was wondering if I could be pointed at how
 to get BLF and pickup working with Polycoms? I can use their Buddy
 option to get a basic BLF system working, but that does not understand
 the ringing state, and does not allow call pickup.

This is what I do (it works most of the times...). Our extension numbers are 5
digits, and I'll take as example making a BLF for extension 89444:

1. In the buddies list, instead of setting the BLF to be 89444, set it to be
   *789444 (i.e preppend *7 to the number).

2. change the Hint to be (I am using AEL):
hint(Sip/89444) *789444 = NoOp();

   This allows the phone to send subsciptions for *789444 which is translated
   to the real extension's state.

3. Define the extension *7x:

// Directed pickup by *7. When we want a line key on the phone to be both
// speed dial and direct pickup we program it to dial *7num; We strip off
// the *7 and then check the destination status; if it is ringing - pick it;
// if not - dial it.
// When picking up - Set the callerID to be the orignaly calling station.
_*7X = {
NoOp();
Set(_To=${EXTEN:-5});
Set(_From=${CALLERID(num)});
if(${DEVSTATE(SIP/${To})} == RINGING) {
Set(CALLEDID(all)=${DB(${To}/CallingID)});
Pickup([EMAIL PROTECTED]);
Hangup();
} else {
goto huji-local|_8|StartLocal;
};
}

  If the destination is ringing, pick it up. If not, strip the *7 and dial it.
  I am using To and From since I need them for other places.

4. At your regular dialplan set the PICKUPMARK to the extension number:
   Set(_PICKUPMARK=${EXTEN});

 good luck, __Yehavi:

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Realtime replication!!!!!

2008-03-25 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
  what do you think is the best way to replicate an asterisk  mysql realtime
 database  ,
 i'm setting up  a cluster , and i obviously need to ensure the database high
 availability
 i've been reading about DRBD and the internal replication functionality of
 mysql , but i dont really know if its the proper solution, i'm looking for
 advices on how to replicate the mysql realtime database
 so then when the main server is down , the second replace it .

I won't call it best way but I am using two-way master-slave repliaction of
MySQL.

__Yehavi:

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Re: [asterisk-users] OT How to Change Polycom Web Admin User:Pass via Web

2008-03-06 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
I am using version 2.2.0.

__Yehavi:


 Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 15:01:26 +1100
 From: Lee, John (Sydney) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] OT How to Change Polycom Web Admin User:Pass

 As far as I recall it can be done from the config file only. Here is
 the
 relevant line from sip.cfg:

  device  device.set=1 device.auth.localAdminPassword.set=1
 device.auth.loc
 alAdminPassword=YOUR-PASSWORD-HERE /

 What sip release are you referring to?
 I am looking at sip 1.6.x and sip.cfg only allows you to set the length
 of the user and admin passwords.  You cannot set the password in cfg.

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] How to restrict a Polycom from receiving unauthorized calls

2008-03-05 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Hello,

  I've found that my Polycom-501 accepts INVITES from any server in the
world... I would like to restrict it to accept calls only from the servers
listed in its config file, but I cannot find anything in the documentation. Any
idea?

  Thanks, __Yehavi:

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] OT How to Change Polycom Web Admin User:Pass via Web

2008-03-05 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
 I could be mistaken, but I think this has to be done physically from
 the phone.  I don't think you can do this with central provisioning or
 from the web interface.

As far as I recall it can be done from the config file only. Here is the
relevant line from sip.cfg:

 device  device.set=1 device.auth.localAdminPassword.set=1 device.auth.loc
alAdminPassword=YOUR-PASSWORD-HERE /

  regards, __Yehavi:

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] load balancing

2008-02-28 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
  If i have this kind of setup, what do i need to make it's load balance.

  [ asterisk 1 ] -- [ asterisk 2 ] -- [ asterisk 3 ] -- [ asterisk 4 ]
| | | |
  -
  | mysql cluster |
  -

  I plan on doing it via DNS SRV only, but if a user register on asterisk
  1 how can users at asterisk 4 reach that user. Thank You

  Regards,
  Ron


 Hi Ron,

 If you're using realtime each Asterisk server will know where every
 user is irrespective of which Asterisk server they registered on. The
 problem is NAT, if a client is behind NAT and registers on server 1
 then server's 2,3  4 are unlikely to be able to get through to it.
 Last time I lookedthe Asterisk realtime engine doesn't record which
 server an account registered on in the database so the only option I

See the discussion a few days ago. The Asterisk server saves the value of
SYSNAME (defined in asterisk.conf) in the field REGSERVER inside MySQL.

Regards, __Yehavi:

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Load balancing SIP extensions.

2008-02-24 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Hello,

  Here is how I do this. The prerequisits are:

- MySQL to hold the extensions realtime database. MySQL is synchronized
  among all servers using the Master/slave replication model.

- The phones are spread by some external algorithm over the Asterisk servers
  (statefull load balancer, statically defined in the config file of the
  phone, etc.).

The idea is to locate on which server the destination phone is registered and
redirect the call to it. For this:
/etc/asterisk/asterisk.conf has the parameter sysname set to its IP address
   (you can use also a DNS name, but I want to be independent of name
   resolution). This causes the server to set the field regserver to be
   saved in the MySQL database to the IP address of the server.

/etc/asterisk/extensions: The logic to check whether the value of regsever
   is different from sysname and if so - redirect the call. The code
   fragments are (I am using AEL):

   To get the regserver from the database:

 MYSQL(Query resID ${connid} SELECT regserver from sip_users where
name='${EXTEN}');
 MYSQL(Fetch FetchId ${resID} RegServer);
 MYSQL(Clear ${resID});

   so now RegServer contains the server where the phone is registered. Next:

if((${DEVSTATE(SIP/${EXTEN})} == UNAVAILABLE) ||
   (${DEVSTATE(SIP/${EXTEN})} == INVALID)) {
if(${SYSTEMNAME} != ${RegServer}) {
Transfer(SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED]);
return;
 };
};

I check for the device state so in case the phone has double registration
(primary and backup server) it will be processed localy.

Regards, __Yehavi:

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] load balancing SIP extensions

2008-02-22 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
 What I would like to do is have two identical *
 servers which accept registrations of sip extensions
 4000-4999.

 If I define a rrDNS or LinuxHA then I should have
 load-balanced registrations.

 However, say ext. 4001 is registered on *1 and 4002 is
 registered on *2, if 4001 tries to call 4002 then I
 would like to do something like:
 - lookup 4002 on *1, try to establish a call if it's
 REGISTERED here
 - if it's not registered here then try to look it up
 on *2 and establish the call there
...

I've tried doing something similar and came with two options. The common to
them is that I use MySQL for realtime extensions, and set systemname
parameter to the IP address of the server where the phone registers.

When a call arrives I check whether the REGSERVER coloumn is the same as the
local server or not. If not, then there are two options:

- Pass the call via IAX to the other servers; this makes both server process
  the call and the audio.

- Send a refer message to the caller to contact the other server.

I had this working in the lab but not in production yet. If you want the
dialplan code for this then email me.

   __Yehavi:

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] NOKIA E series Phone for SIP-VOIP calling

2008-02-22 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Hello,

 I've one nokia E65 that works very well with my asterisk box.

The people here don't let me even try it as they are afraid it will consume the
battery more than when it is used the usual way. Is this true?

  Thanks, __Yehavi:

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco SIP Gateway

2008-02-18 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
 Is anyone using a cisco router as an ISDN gateway with Asterisk?
 As you might have seen from a couple of my threads, I have been looking at
 Fritz! and Cologne cards, both of which require development against a
 specific version of asterisk/zaptel (e.g. chan_capi), which is intrusdive
 and causes a lag in deployment.
 I was thinking a better approach might be to use a seperate gateway, such as
 a Cisco 1751 with VIC-2BRI-NT/TE talking SIP to Asterisk, much like like an
 SPA3K in the analogue world.
 Any success stories?

I am using a Cisco router as a PRI gateway with SIP. I have no experience with
BRI, but it should work as long as you have DSP cards for voice processing
(the BRI card can do only data calls, and DSPs are needed for voice).

   __Yehavi:

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] IMAP client in asterisk not trying to contact IMAP server

2008-01-16 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
 I'm trying to test IMAP in 1.4.17 and it appears to be not working.

 I've compiled imap-2007 with the following on a CentOS 5 box:

 make slx EXTRACFLAGS=-I/usr/include/openssl -fPIC

 and I've configured and compiled asterisk with the following:

 ./configure --with-imap=/usr/local/src/imap-2007

And now in make menuselect you have to go to voicemail options and set IMAP
support to on.

 Here's my voicemail.conf:

 [general]
 imapserver=localhost
 imapfolder=Inbox
 ;pollmailboxes=yes
 ;pollfreq=30
 imapflags=notls
 authuser=asttest
 expungeonhangup=yes
 authpassword=whatever

I had to enable pollmailboxes in order to update MWI.

   __Yehavi:

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] disable call waiting by default

2008-01-08 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
 I've connected some analogic phone to some fxs modules on an analogic card.

 I want to disable by default the call waiting sound.

 I know that dialing *70 before to call the call waiting is disabled
 until the next call, but isn't there a setting or a dialplan command
 to set up this automatically?

If you mean that there is no waiting call then use DEV_STATE function to see
whether the called extension is in a call; if so - call the Busy() application.
If you need more details then search in the lists's history - I;ve posted a
code fragment about  a month ago.

 __yehavi:

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] b2bua

2008-01-04 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
 On Friday 04 January 2008 16:45:00 ameel wrote:
 Is there a way to disable the b2bua feature in asterisk.
 I would like asterisk to work as a sip server and not be involved in the
 RTP path between phones.

 No.  And by the way, b2bua is not a feature.  It's is literally what Asterisk
 is.

If I understand correctly the question the RTP can be established directly
between the phones and does not have to pass through the Asterisk PBX. Just set
CANREINVITE=YES and use the same CODECs for both phones.

__Yehavi:

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] enable eyeBeam to accept only one call

2007-12-04 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
 Hello
 I'm using eyeBeam, and Asterisk keeps sending my clients a second call,
 when they are still in one call (because eyeBeam has lots of channels).
 I was using X-Lite (with 3 channels) and Asterisk never sent the client
 a second call.

 How can I force Asterisk (or eyeBeam) just to send one call at each time.
 Is this a configuration I need to do in eyeBeam or Asterisk?

 Please contact Eyebeam and request this feature - The more people who
 ask for it the better. I have requested it previously to no avail.

 It is possible to emulate this in asterisk using inuse counting, but I
 still get the occasional off-by-one that requires an asterisk restart
 to bring a phone back to life.

I am doing that on 1.4.15 and it works fine so far. The code fragment is:

   if(${DEVSTATE(SIP/${To})} != NOT_INUSE) {
Busy();
};

Note that for function DEVSTATE you have to install the relevant function. See
http://www.asterisk.org/node/48360

   Regards, __Yehavi:

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] retrieve last number dialled

2007-11-28 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
 What is the easiest (simplest) way to do this?

I do it in two steps: Save the dialled number in Asterisk DB and have a
special extension (*41) which redials it.

Here is the abstract from the dialplan where I save it:

Set(_To=${EXTEN});  // Save the original extension dialled.
Set(_From=${CALLERID(num)}); // Save the caller.
Set(DB(${To}/LastCaller)=${From});
Set(DB(${From}/LastCalled)=${To});

and then the special extension:
*41 = {
Set(tmp=${DB(${CALLERID(num)}/LastCalled)});
SayDigits(${tmp});
// Save it so when the other side hangs it will see it and dial us.
Dial(SIP/${tmp});
};


  Regards, __Yehavi:

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Finding the status of an extension

2007-11-27 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Hello,

  I would like to check whether an extension is busy or not before calling the
Dial() application to it (for example - to play a Busy if it is on
conversation).

  How do I check it? In the trunk version there was a function
DEVSTATE(SIP/123), however it does not exist on version 1.4.13... What is the
equivalent of it?

  Thanks, __Yehavi:

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Need T1 crossover cable?

2007-10-27 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
 I'm connecting a T1 PCI card to a Nortel Option 61 switch T1 card.  My
 Sangoma A102D shipped with 2 T1 cables - which I assume are straight
 through.  Do I need to make crossover cables for this scenario?

As people answered here you need a crossed cable; Note that T1/E1 cables are
different than Ethernet.

T1/E1 uses pins 1,2,4,5 (while Ethernet uses 1,2,3,6). A crossed T1 cable is:

1    4
2    5
4    1
5    2

   Regards, __Yehavi:

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Polycom phones and corporate phone directory

2007-10-27 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Hello,

  A few days ago I've posted two questions about Polycom phones: How to access
corporate phone directory from the phone and how to use a conference server
with it. After I got zero responses I tried openning a support call in
Polycom's site. Here are the replies I got from them:

- Corporate directory: They are thinking about it, probably will use LDAP. I was
  asked to open a feature request to which I got no response yet.

- conference server: I asked it because there is a a parameter to set an
  external conference server, and when I tried it only the initiator was
  transfered to the server; the other parties were left in hold state.
  Polycom replied that it is not supported and only the phone's internal
  conference feature should be used.

   Regards, __Yehavi:

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Unlocking Cisco 7921

2007-10-27 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
 I've got a few Cisco 7921 wifi phones to use with an Asterisk pilot.  For
 the purpose of the pilot (i.e. low investment) I want to configure the
 phones from the keypad.

 Each phone shows settings locked! whenever I try to edit the network
 profiles.  I can't seem to unlock them!  Hopefully there is a secret button
 combination...I would hate to have to go to a Cisco Unified CallManager just
 to unlock a few phones...

On other Cisco modemls the sequence to unlock them (as long as you did not set
a password) is **# (star, star, pound sign). I hope it works on them as well.

 __Yehavi:

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] IMAP usage with Asterisk

2007-10-21 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
 Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444 wrote:
   In any case, I'll try this week to upgrade to 1.4.6 version and then add 
 IMAP
 support and inform what happens.

 There have been _many_ IMAP related fixes sine 1.4.6.  Please try the latest
 version, 1.4.13, instead.

 --
 Russell Bryant

Sorry, I had a typing mistake - I meant 1.4.13...

Anyway, I tried it at the lab today and it works ok. There is one minor problem
when parsing the IMAP headers (files a bug at ID 11043).

I'll be able to move it to the production system only next week.

 Thanks, __Yehavi:

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Questions about Plycom phones and Asterisk

2007-10-21 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Hello,

  I have two issues which I would like to know whether someone has an answer to
them:

1. Our institute has over 8,000 phone numbers and I would like to allow
   people to search it from the phone. I am willing to write some XHTML
   scripts to run through the microbrowser, but I cannot find at the
   documentation what format it should be in order for the phone to understand
   the output and allow dialling of the numbers returned.

2. Polycom supports external conference server via the parameter
   voIpProt.SIP.conference.address. Any idea how should I include in it the
   conference room number (so I can pass it to MeetMe() application)?

 Thanks! __Yehavi:

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk and Cisco

2007-10-20 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Isee no one has answered you so far, so I'll try:

I have asterisk ip-pbx on my network, with some grandstream ip phone
and i have cisco gateway that is connetced to VOIP service providers .
Cisco is 3700 series and is using H323 .
i have compiled H323 on asterisk . now i want to make a call from ip
 phone that is registerd to asterisk , and route call to VOIP provider
so this call should goes to teh cisco from asterisk and then go to the
 VOIP serviece provider network

ip-phone -asterisk-cisco-voip netwrok

how can i do that , whats asterisk config file ( H.323, sip and
 extensions.conf ) and how is cisco configuration for this setup?
 Thanks
 Giti

I've done this with Cisco-2,811 (the exact model should not matter) and with
SIP (H.323 should be quite similar).

On Asterisk you have to add a rule in the dialplan to direct the outgoing calls
to the Cisco. In the most simple way it should be something like:

   Dial([EMAIL PROTECTED])

On the Cisco gateway you should have a dial-peer which calls the PSTN. For
example:

dial-peer voice 2 pots
 destination-pattern 0T
 progress_ind setup enable 3
 no digit-strip
 direct-inward-dial
 port 0/0/0:15

(this will direct any call to 0xxx to voice card 0/0/0:15).

If you need a more detailed config please contact me off-list.

  Regards, __Yehavi:

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] IMAP usage with Asterisk

2007-10-19 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Hello,

  I tried a few months ago to use IMAP with Asterisk; I used either 1.4 or the
latest SVN at that time (sorry, don't remember).

  After a day I had to remove it since Asterisk crashed, mostly in the IMAP
client code (the code of UW IMAP). My users wants IMAP back (they loved it) but
not in the price of crash...

  I could not reproduce the crashes at the lab. They only occour on the live
system with users.

  I suggest to write the IMAP client code by the Asterisk developers and not
depend on external code.

  In any case, I'll try this week to upgrade to 1.4.6 version and then add IMAP
support and inform what happens.

   Thanks! __Yehavi:

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Difference between trunk and released versions

2007-10-11 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Hello,

  Up to a while ago I thought that the released versions are checkpoints of
the trunk versions; however, now I understand they are not, as I see
differences between the two trains. So, what is the relation between them?

  Examples for differences:

- When the language is different than Engligh the trunk version is reading
  numbers from /var/lib/asterisk/sounds/Lang-Name/digits while the release
  version is using  /var/lib/asterisk/sounds/digits/Lang-Name

- MAILBOX_EXISTS function is replaced with MailboxExists application.

- External IVR has no way to exit from the program under the release version...
  The documentation is correct with the trunk version.

 Thanks! __Yehavi:

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Difference between trunk and released versions

2007-10-11 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Hello Sean,

 Does this clear things up?

Yes! Thanks!

   __Yehavi:

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] extensions.conf vs. AEL

2007-10-02 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Hello,

  I see that most people are using the extensions.conf syntax (most of the
examples and questions here use that syntax). recently I've translated all my
dial plan to AEL syntax and I find it much easier, especially when you need
IFs.

   Why most people don't use it? Am I missing something?

  Thanks! __Yehavi:

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] online active call watching

2007-09-10 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
try the astman command.

   __Yehavi:

___

Sign up now for AstriCon 2007!  September 25-28th.  http://www.astricon.net/ 

--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Show Callee name on Display

2007-09-08 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
 SInce no one else has brought this up, just thought I'd let you know that it
 is being worked on...

 http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=8824

And it works - I am using it for months already.

Note that not all phones support it. Cisco and Policom supports it, while Snom
does not.

__Yehavi:

___

Sign up now for AstriCon 2007!  September 25-28th.  http://www.astricon.net/ 

--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] ExternalIVR() broken in 1.4.9?

2007-07-31 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Hello,

  After upgrading to 1.4.9 the above function does not work anymore; it claims
that child went away while the child is probably not born at all...

  Before I open a bug on it, anyone has a clue?

 Thanks! __Yehavi:

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Looking for a USB phone handset or headset

2007-07-10 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Hello,

  I would like people to use soft phone, but they are used to have the standard
phone handset in their hands... Is there a USB handset or a handset that
connects to the audio card?

   Thanks! __Yehavi:

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] TCP-UDP SIP proxy?

2007-06-06 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Hello,

   One of our faculties have Microsoft's LCS and would like to connect it to
our Asterisk system. the problem is that Asterisk talks SIP over UDP while LCS
talks SIP over TCP with TLS. Anyone can recommend a gateway between these two
protocols?

  Thanks! __Yehavi:
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] SLA with SIP-only environment

2007-05-24 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Hello,

  All the examples of SLA talk about Zap channels from one side and SIP on the
other side, while my system is a pure SIP one.

I would like to have two phones having extensions 1  2 defined on them, and
when someone calls extension 1 it rings on both, each one can see its status,
and when one station puts line 1 on hold the other one can pick it.  Is it
possible at all?  If so, can someone give the relevant fragments for sla.conf,
sip.conf and extensions.conf?


 Thanks! __Yehavi:
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Re: Call waiting tone

2007-05-08 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Hello,

  A few days ago I've asked about the ability to play a stuttered ringing
tone when the called party is already on the phone. I've found a partial
solution for it.

  To describe again the problem: When a user is on a call and someone else
calls him, the caller does not know that the called party is on the phone
(while the called party wants to know that someone else is calling him/her and
not just play busy). On our public PSTN the caller is notified by a stuttered
ringing tone (thus he can decide whether to wait or hangup and call later).

What's I've done is that when the called party is on the phone a short message
is sent to the caller (may be also a recording of the stuttered ringing) and
then the call is passed. Here is the code fragment:

exten = _806XX,n,Set(Status=${DEVSTATE(SIP/${EXTEN})}) ; Get his status
exten = _806XX,n,GotoIf($[${Status} == NOT_INUSE]?OK:WAITING_CALL)
exten = _806XX,n(WAITING_CALL),Playback(waiting-call)
exten = _806XX,n(OK),Dial(SIP/${EXTEN}${aEXTEN},20,)   ; Dial the phone for 20

Hope it helps someone...

 Regards, __Yehavi:
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Call waiting tone when calling a busy station?

2007-05-06 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Hello,

  When dialling a SIP phone which is already in a call the caller hears a
regular ringing tone and does not know that the called party is engaged in
another call. Is there a supported way inside SIP to tell the calling party to
play a stuttered ringing tone?

   Thanks! __Yehavi:
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Call waiting tone when calling a busy station?

2007-05-06 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
 this is a SIP phone configuration issue.

 You should tell the UAC to not accept a second call while the line is
 engaged (look for a 'Call Waiting' option in the configuration of the UAC)
 The UAC will send back a 486 Busy Here error code and the calling
 party will get a busy signal  from asterisk

This is not what I meant. I want the called party to get a sign of a waiting
call and answer it if he/she wants. I want the caller to know that he on a
waiting call (here it is customary to play a stuttered ring tone).

in short - can I signal in the 183 ringing packet that this is a second call?

  Thanks! __Yehavi:
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Called party identification - where to take called name?

2007-05-03 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Hello,

  I am trying to apply the called party identification patch (patch 8824) and
managed to make it work with a static data. Where do I take the name of the
called person (the equivalent of CALLERID, but the other way...)?

BTW, one note to the above patch: To make it work the device should have the
parameter sendrpid set to true.

 Thanks, __Yehavi:
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] Called party identification - where to takecalledname?

2007-05-03 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Yehavi wrote:
   I am trying to apply the called party identification
  patch (patch 8824) and managed to make it work with a
  static data. Where do I take the name of the called person
  (the equivalent of CALLERID, but the other way...)?

Asnwering myself: I am using realtime extensions, so I've added call to
MYSQL() application to get the called user callerid field.

  __Yehavi:
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] MYSQL application in dial plan

2007-05-01 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Hello,

  I would like to implement a few decision making process inside the dialplan
using information stored in MySQL (like LCR, etc.). I see the MYSQL()
application, but as far as I understand I have to connect to the database each
time I want to query it; this seems a CPU eater to me. Is this indeed the case,
or can I open it once Asterisk starts and leave it open?

  Thanks, __Yehavi:
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] [OT] How to find out line that you are on from Bezeq

2007-04-26 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
 Does anyone know the code to dial in Israel on Bezeq to get back the number 
 of the line that you are on ?

Dial 110 and it will tell you your number.

   __Yehavi:
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] SLA with SIP only configuration

2007-04-19 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Hello,

  I would like to understand how SLA is working, but all the examples are using
trunk of ZAP type and stations of SIP. However, in my case the stations are SIP
and the outgoing connection to PSTN is SIP also (link to a Cisco gateway).

  can anyone send me a simple configuration of how to make SLA between two SIP
phones without dependency of anything else? It seems I lack some basic
understanding of thios feature and maybe such an example can help.

  Thanks! __Yehavi:
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Connection between Asterisk - Cisco 2851

2007-04-17 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
 Hello from Greece. I have an assignment related to Cisco. Specifically, i 
 have to connect an asterisk server (VoIP) to a Cisco Router 2851 in a way 
 that the router will handle some calls. I have not found any manuals
 that would be helpful to me. On the other hand, i found some manuals for 
 connection between asterisk and Cisco Call Managers. I would like to know if 
 the call manager is a part of the router or is an extra element.
 I would appriciate if you could help me.

I'll just add one more thing: Your Cisco must have DSPs in order to allow the
E1 to have voice calls (on 2,811 it is called PVDM). Without the DSPs your E1
can do only data calls...

  __Yehavi:
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco GW, PRI CallerID Name

2007-04-09 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
 Does anybody have callerid name coming in on a Cisco PRI via a Cisco
 gateway via SIP to *?  I've seen a few people ask and a few people that
 say it should work, but I've never seen an actual working config.

I have it working, but it depends on the specific configuration. I have it
working via PRI/Q.sig to a Nortel TX-1. The key issue here is that the name can
be sent in two ways: via the Q.931 and via Q.sig. Nortel supports only Q.sig,
and you need to enable it on the Cisco. If this is your case then tell me and
I'll send the config.

 __Yehavi:
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] SIP - Automatic Redial on No Answer

2007-04-06 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Here are the relevant parts from extensions.conf file. It works only for local
extensions whose number id 806xx. Note one thing: When you use the H extension
the generated CDR is wrong - the destination extension is H and not the
original number. I've done some small code change in Asterisk and has to file a
bug about it.


; regular local extensions:
; The flow is: If not available or no answer send to mailbox if exists,
; send busy if no mailbox. Same for busy.
; We try to avoid the n+101 rule whenever possible, but it is not always
; possible as HasVoiceMailbox() does only n+101 jump.
;;; First, save the caller and called numbers for *41 and *42 features.
exten = _806XX,1,Set(_To=${EXTEN}) ; Save the original extension dialled.
exten = _806XX,n,Set(_From=${CALLERID(num)}) ; Save the caller.

; Save the caller number at the called extension for *42 usage.
exten = _806XX,n,Set(DB(${To}/LastCaller)=${From})
; Where we called for *41
exten = _806XX,n,Set(DB(${From}/LastCalled)=${To})

; See whether this extension needs to ring at others as well. To define such
; an extension do inside the command prompt of Asterisk:
; database set  EXT-NUMBER MoreLinesToRing  SIP/firt-lineSIP/Second-line
exten = _806XX,n,Set(aEXTEN=${DB(${EXTEN}/MoreLinesToRing)})

; Now dial the extension.
exten = _806XX,n,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN}${aEXTEN},20,)   ; Dial the phone for 20 
seconds.
; No answer or busy
exten = _806XX,n,GoTo(s-${DIALSTATUS},1)   ; Jump according to the failure 
mode
exten = _806XX,n,Hangup()  ; Just to be sure...

; No answer:
exten = s-NOANSWER,1,MailboxExists(${To}|j); Has a mailbox?
exten = s-NOANSWER,n,Busy(); No maibox = play busy.
exten = s-NOANSWER,102,VoiceMail(${To}|u) ; Has mailbox - send the call to 
there

; Busy:
exten = s-BUSY,1,MailboxExists(${To}|j); Has a mailbox?
exten = s-BUSY,n,Busy(); No maibox = play busy.
exten = s-BUSY,102,VoiceMail(${To}|b) ; Has mailbox - send the call to there

; Congestion: Handle the same a busy.
exten = s-CONGESTION,1,MailboxExists(${To}|j); Has a mailbox?
exten = s-CONGESTION,n,Busy()  ; No maibox = play busy.
exten = s-CONGESTION,102,VoiceMail(${To}|b) ; Has mailbox - send the call to 
there

; Unavailable channel - act as busy:
exten = s-CHANUNAVAIL,1,Goto(s-BUSY,1);


; Called here when the call is successfull and the user hanged the phone.
; Check whether the user has a waiting callback queued on him/her
exten = h,1,NoOp(${From} ${To} ${EXTEN})
exten = h,2,Set(tmp=${DB(${From}/CallBack)}) ; Get who is waiting for us
exten = h,3,NoOp(${From} ${tmp})
exten = h,4,GotoIf($[ ${tmp}  ]?5:103) ; Anyone waiting for us?
exten = h,5,DBdel(${From}/CallBack); And delete it...
; Create the callfile and then move it to the spool directory to make the call.
exten = h,6,System(echo Channel:  SIP/${tmp}  /tmp/test.tmp${To})
exten = h,7,System(echo WaitTime: 20  /tmp/test.tmp${To})
exten = h,8,System(echo Extension: ${From}  /tmp/test.tmp${To})
exten = h,9,System(echo CallerID: Callback \\\${tmp}\\\  
/tmp/test.tmp${To})
exten = h,10,System(mv /tmp/test.tmp${To} /var/spool/asterisk/outgoing/)

; No one is waiting for us...
exten = h,103,NoOp(Nothing to call)

; The activation codes for the above code.
; *42: Get the last number who called us, say it and call it.
exten = *42,1,Set(tmp=${DB(${CALLERID(num)}/LastCaller})
exten = *42,n,SayDigits(${tmp})
exten = *42,n,Goto(${tmp},1)

; *41: Camp on the last extension dialled
exten = *41,1,Set(tmp=${DB(${CALLERID(num)}/LastCalled)})
exten = *41,n,SayDigits(${tmp})
; Save it so when the other side hangs it will see it and dial us.
exten = *41,n,Set(DB(${tmp}/CallBack)=${CALLERID(num)})
exten = *41,n,Hangup()


 Good luck, __Yehavi:
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] SIP - Automatic Redial on No Answer

2007-04-03 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Hello,

  I've wrote a dialplan script which uses the H extension to do something
similar to what you want. In general it uses the internal ASTDB for this:

- When there is no answer (or busy) the caller hangs up, initiate a new call
  with some special code (*41 is used here by the public carrier, so I am using
  it also). Asterisk registers the data in its DB.

- When the user disconnects the H extension is called. It then looks in ASTDB
  to see whether there is a user camoing on this extension. If so, a call file
  is created and Asterisk initiates the call.

If this is what you need please tell me and I'll post the code on Thursday.
I've already posted it in the past so you might search the archives in the
meantime.

__Yehavi:
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Conference server (or how to make a call with more than 3 u

2007-03-19 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
 On Sun, 18 Mar 2007, Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444 wrote:

 Hello,


  On most SIP phones a conference call is done on the phone and is limited to 
 3
 participants. Polycom phones has a configuration option to use a conference
 server instead of the internal conferencing feature. I guess I need some
 conference server; any experience with such a server which can interact with
 Asterisk?

 Why not use the MeetMe feature of asterisk?

I need the person who initiated the conference call to call the others and join
them by herself. If I understand correctly, with the MeetMe you have to
initialize the conference and then people dial by themselves into it. This
won't be acceptable by the secretaries here...

  Thanks, __Yehavi:
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] Conference server (or how to make a call withmore than 3 u

2007-03-19 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
 Use Snom phones.
 We have had around 6 participants, without problems. In theory you should be 
 able to have around 12 people on a conference on a snom phone.

I have a few Snom phones here - people do not like them...

   Thanks, __Yehavi:
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Conference server (or how to make a call with more than 3 u

2007-03-19 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
 Yehavi,

 Can you make a script that uses call files to get everyone into the
 conference?
 --

 Warm Regards,

 Lee

Possible, but looks too much cumbersome... However, that's a nice idea.

   Thanks! __Yehavi:
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Conference server (or how to make a call with more than 3 users)

2007-03-18 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Hello,


  On most SIP phones a conference call is done on the phone and is limited to 3
participants. Polycom phones has a configuration option to use a conference
server instead of the internal conferencing feature. I guess I need some
conference server; any experience with such a server which can interact with
Asterisk?

Thanks, __Yehavi:
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk and Cisco PRI gateway config

2007-02-26 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
 That was exactly what I meant.
 Your setup is :

 Nortel --- Cisco --- Asterisk

 What I was thinking about is:
 Nortel --- Asterisk1 --Asterisk2

 In previous case, your are using Cisco's QSIG features.
 In the latter one, you could use Asterisk QSIG features.

 I was asking because, I was wondering how Cisco and Asterisk QSIG features
 compare.

Sorry, I have no idea...

 __Yehavi:
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] SetCIDNum is not available on 1.4svn

2007-02-26 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Hello,

  I am using the SetCIDNum dialplan application on 1.2 and 1.4.0; I've tried it
on 1.4svn 56126 and it does not recognise this application. Any idea?...

Thanks! __Yehavi:
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk and Cisco PRI gateway config

2007-02-24 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
 do you have some info, about what platforms supports qsig decode? I
 found, that first supported in 12.4.(9)T, but I don't know, if only on
 28xx or also in older routers (like 3660) with NM-HDV-E1...

I assume that it is a hardware independent but I do not have the hardware to
test...

I see refernce to this command in 12.3T documentation, so it should be inside
the normal 12.4 version. I moved to 12.4T due to TAC request before I tried the
above command, so I did not test it on 12.4.

   __yehavi:
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk and Cisco PRI gateway config

2007-02-23 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
 Do you think it could have been done with another T1/E1Asterisk box between
 the Nortel PBX and the other Asterisk server ?

Sorry, I do not understand exactly what you are asking. Do you mean using an
Asterisk with PRI card instead of Cisco? If so, I have no experience with this.

 Which features would you then loose or gain, given current status of QSIG
 support in Asterisk ?

In my case the Cisco did all the Q.sig work so Asterisk's Q.sig functionality
was not used.

 __Yehavi:
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Asterisk and Cisco PRI gateway config

2007-02-22 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Hello,

  I am using a Cisco-2,811 router with PRI as a gateway between Asterisk and
Nortel TX-1. I had problems with name transfer and with the help of Cisco
support I've fixed it. Enclosed here are the definitions needed for it.

BTW, Cisco's CCM is using MGCP thus the Q.sig is handled by CCM. Here I am using
SIP so the router must decode/encode the Q.sig.

  The Nortel should be defined to send and receive names via Q.sig. The
definition fragments on Cisco are:

isdn switch-type primary-qsig  (so it will use Q.sig signalling).

...

voice service voip
 qsig decode(This sends names out via Q.sig)
 fax protocol pass-through g711alaw
 sip



controller E1 0/0/0
 pri-group timeslots 1-31

...

interface Serial0/0/0:15  (This is for E1 PRI).
 no ip address
 encapsulation hdlc
 isdn switch-type primary-qsig
 isdn overlap-receiving
 isdn not-end-to-end 64
 isdn incoming-voice voice
 isdn supp-service name calling  (This receives names via Q.sig)
 isdn negotiate-bchan
 isdn outgoing ie facility
 isdn outgoing ie caller-number
 isdn outgoing ie called-number
 no cdp enable

Anc the rest is quite standard.
Regards, __Yehavi:
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk and Cisco PRI gateway config

2007-02-22 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
 interesting!
 so it means, that you can now see caller id names between sip phones
 connected to asterisk and phones connected to pbx?

Yes!

   __Yehavi:
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Lastest SVN (1.4) and realtime call limit

2007-02-22 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Hello,

  I am running version 1.4 with realtime support. I've set (for Snom phones
300/320/360) a call limit of 1 (incominglimit and outgoinglimit fields in the
database).

- When I used 1.4 SIP SHOW PEER show that it has a call limit of 1. The problem
  was that when such a phone received a call and did attended transfer it
  was left in use and could not receive new calls.

- After seeing reference to similar problem on this list I;ve downloaded today
  the latest SVN source code and installed it. The problem is that it shows
  the call limit as 0 and not as 1.

Any idea?

 Thanks, __yehavi:
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] 7912 phones loosing registration

2007-02-15 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
I had a similar problem with Asterisk-1.4; After digging slightly I've found
that sterisk crashed (safe_asterisk restarted it and I did not notice) and this
caused the phones to lose registrations until the next expiration...

I am not sure this is your case, but try TCPDUMP of port 5060 from these
phones. It might give a clue.

__Yehavi:

 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:57:47 -0500
 From: Jerry Geis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Subject: [asterisk-users] 7912 phones loosing registration

 I have a handful of 7912's connected to my asterisk 1.2.14 server. (6 to
 be exact).

 I get the X on the display sometimes for loosing registration.

 I have the config file for the 7912's
 SipRegInterval: 60

 and asterisk is the default.
 ; maxexpirey=3600
 ;defaultexpirey=120

 I've not changed them.

 How can I keep these phones online and stop loosing registration?
 Thanks,

 Jerry
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco Router for supply a connection from PABX to Asterisk

2007-02-11 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
 anyone know if they have a solution in Cisco for:

 1- Connect old PABX (with BRI or PRI) to a cisco router
 2- Connect this cisco router in SIP to a Asterisk Server

 I am search if cisco can this and what is the modele for this

I am using a Cisco to connect Asterisk via PRI to our Nortel TX-1. The Cisco is
a voice bundle of 2,811 + E1 + PDLM card. Note that you need PDLMs as the
same number as the PRI channels you are going to define (i.e. 32 PDLMs for each
PRI).

I am controlling the Cisco via SIP; it works, but a few problems:

- Only basic connectivity. No additional features (like names) as the Cisco
  supports them only via MGCP (in MGCP is passes all the Q.sig signals to the
  PBX - Asterisk in this case - and it should do all the handling, but
  I did not find how to do it with Asterisk).

- Cisco has no authentication mechanism, so anyone which has access to port
  5060 of it can generate calls. Asterisk is not better when it concerned in
  such sutiations...

 Regards, __Yehavi:
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] SNOM phones stay in use after transfer

2007-02-05 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Hello,

  Before I dig into the SIP traces maybe someone has a clue:
We have a few Snom phones, and the call-limit on the extension associated with
them is set to 1 (so the other Snom phones can blink the relevant LED).

 When I call a SNOM phone (300 with the latest firmware) and the call is
answered the phone is in in use state (verbose printing from Asterisk). When
I hit the transfer button it gets into hold state in Asterisk. I dial the
new extension and the call seems to be transferred (actually it goes to
hell...). Anyway, the Snom is now in left in hold state forever, and
Asterisk won't accept new calls to it since it has max calls of 1...

  Similar thing happens with attended transfer (putting the call on hold,
calling the other party and either disconnecting or pressing Transfer).

  Any idea?

Thanks! __Yehavi:

BTW, any idea when 1.4.1 is scheduled to be released? I need the SLA feature
desperately...
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Cisco PRI gateway with MGCP control

2007-01-29 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Hello,

  Anyone managed to control a Cisco voice gateway (2,811 in my case) using
MGCP? I cannot make the PRI going on-line (while with SIP I can).

  If you ask why I want to use MGCP and not SIP: it is because Cisco uses
different Q.sig signalling when you manage it with different protocols, and I
need the other Q.sig...

  Thanks, __Yehavi:
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] OT - Cisco 7960 functionality

2007-01-24 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
 The users do not want to push the new call softkey or the speaker button
 in order to dial a call.  They want to be able to just begin dialing the
 number.

 The users do not want to push the answer softkey after they pickup the
 handset in order to answer a call.

Doesn;t it answers when you pick up the handset? Here it does so...

 The users want the transfer softkey on the screen while on a call.
 Currently it is acessable via the more softkey.

I've asked Cisco whether all the above can be done and got a negative reply.

 __Yehavi:
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] PRI/Q.sig between Cisco Nortel

2007-01-23 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Hello,

  I am using a Cisco-2,811 as a gateway between the Asterisk PBX and our Nortel
TX-1 university's PBX. It is working but no names are exchanged. From the debug
mode I see that the Cisco sends the display name (which does not appear on the
Nortel's phones) and the Nortel does not bother to send it at all.

  I recall that when I had a pilot with Cisco CCM two years ago we had to set
the siganlling to ESGF on the Nortel and use MGCP on Cisco (since MGCP protocol
forces the Cisco to use ESGF signalling). We could not use H.323 as it forces
the Cisco to use ISGF. I suspect that SIP is the same, but setting ISGF
signalling on Nortel doesn't help.

  Anyone had some luck with this configuration?

   Thanks, __Yehavi:
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Callback/ringback

2007-01-17 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Enclosed bellow is the fragment from extenstions.conf which does two things:

*41 - Does the ring-back staff.
*42 - Calls back the last one who called you.

   Regards, __Yehavi:

; regular local extensions:
; The flow is: If not available or no answer send to mailbox if exists,
; send busy if no mailbox. Same for busy.
; We try to avoid the n+101 rule whenever possible, but it is not always
; possible as HasVoiceMailbox() does only n+101 jump.
exten = _999XX,1,Set(_To=${EXTEN}) ; Save the original extension dialled.
exten = _999XX,n,Set(_From=${CALLERID(num)}) ; Save the caller.

; Save the caller number at the called extension for *42 usage.
exten = _999XX,n,Set(DB(${To}/LastCaller)=${From})
; Where we called for *41
exten = _999XX,n,Set(DB(${From}/LastCalled)=${To})

; Now dial the extension.
exten = _999XX,n,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN},20,)   ; Dial the phone for 20 seconds.
; No answer or busy
exten = _999XX,n,GoTo(s-${DIALSTATUS},1)   ; Jump according to the failure 
mode
exten = _999XX,n,Hangup()  ; Just to be sure...

; No answer:
exten = s-NOANSWER,1,MailboxExists(${To}|j); Has a mailbox?
exten = s-NOANSWER,n,Busy(); No maibox = play busy.
exten = s-NOANSWER,102,VoiceMail(u${To}) ; Has mailbox - send the call to there

; Busy:
exten = s-BUSY,1,MailboxExists(${To}|j); Has a mailbox?
exten = s-BUSY,n,Busy(); No maibox = play busy.
exten = s-BUSY,102,VoiceMail(b${To}) ; Has mailbox - send the call to there

; Unavailable channel - act as busy:
exten = s-CHANUNAVAIL,1,Goto(s-BUSY,1);


; Called here when the call is successfull and the user hanged the phone.
; Check whether the user has a waiting callback queued on him/her
exten = h,1,NoOp(${From} ${To} ${EXTEN})
exten = h,2,Set(tmp=${DB(${From}/CallBack)}) ; Get who is waiting for us
exten = h,3,NoOp(${From} ${tmp})
exten = h,4,GotoIf($[ ${tmp}  ]?5:103) ; Anyone waiting for us?
exten = h,5,DBdel(${From}/CallBack); And delete it...
; Create the callfile and then move it to the spool directory to make the call.
exten = h,6,System(echo Channel:  SIP/${tmp}  /tmp/test.tmp${To})
exten = h,7,System(echo WaitTime: 20  /tmp/test.tmp${To})
exten = h,8,System(echo Extension: ${From}  /tmp/test.tmp${To})
exten = h,9,System(echo CallerID: Callback \\\${tmp}\\\  
/tmp/test.tmp${To})
exten = h,10,System(mv /tmp/test.tmp${To} /var/spool/asterisk/outgoing/)

exten = h,103,NoOp(Nothing to call)

; *42: Get the last number who called us, say it and call it.
exten = *42,1,Set(tmp=${DB(${CALLERID(num)}/LastCaller})
exten = *42,n,SayDigits(${tmp})
exten = *42,n,Goto(${tmp},1)

; *41: Camp on the last extension dialled
exten = *41,1,Set(tmp=${DB(${CALLERID(num)}/LastCalled)})
exten = *41,n,SayDigits(${tmp})
; Save it so when the other side hangs it will see it and dial us.
exten = *41,n,Set(DB(${tmp}/CallBack)=${CALLERID(num)})
exten = *41,n,Hangup()

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Disallowing unauthorized calls to Cisco Polycom phones

2007-01-16 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Hello,

  I would like the IP phones to not accespt SIP requests (like INVITE) from any
device other than its proxy. Snom phones ignore this while Cisco  Polycom
accepts the call. Any idea what to do to disable it?

 Thanks! __Yehavi:
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] real life example of SLA definition

2007-01-11 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Hello,

  I am looking for a real life example of using SLA lines under Asterisk.
I'll describe my environment and would like to know how I define it in
Asterisk (version 1.4 final).

   Suppose I have two multi lines phones. The first phone has extension 1
assigned to it, and the second phone has extension 2 assigned to it. Now, I
want extension 3 to be available on both phones as additional shared extension.
What shall I define on the phone? (define extension 3 on both doesn't work as
only one can register with it). What should sla.conf file have? Do I have to
change extensions.conf? (To make it simple let's assume that it contains only
Dial(SIP/${EXTEN}) as the dialplan).

  Thanks! __Yehavi:
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] real life example of SLA definition

2007-01-11 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
 You say you can't put 'extension 3' on both phones because only one can
 register to it, but that is incorrect. Extensions and SIP devices are
 not the the same thing; extensions exist in the dialplan, and SIP
 devices are in the SIP channel driver.

 Create two SIP friends for the two phones to use for their 'extension 3'
 line appearance (call them 'phone1-ext3' and 'phone2-ext3' or
 something), get them both to register, and then dial both devices from
 the dialplan when extension 3 is called.

OK, but how do I make that when extension 3 is being used on one phone the
other one can see its status, and when it is placed on hold then it can be
picked-up on the other phone by just hitting the line button?

I am trying to emulate the current phone system behaviour, as this is what the
users want...

  Thanks! __Yehavi:
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


  1   2   >