[asterisk-users] X100P clone card problem
Hi, I have problem with X100P clone card.I can not force it to work under Asterisk 1.4.27.1 and DAHDI Version: 2.2.0.2. I looked over and over on configuration and could not see any mistakes. Here are relevant configuration files. /etc/dahdi/system.conf fxsks=1 echocanceller=mg2,1 loadzone= hu defaultzone = hu dahdi_tool OK Wildcard X100P Board 1 dahdi_tool (After select select) Current Alarms: No alarms ( Should I see OK here instead ? Is it normal ?) Sync Source:Internally clocked IRQ Misses: 0 Bipolar Viol: 0 Tx/Rx Levels: 0/ 0 Total/Conf/Act: 1/ 1/ 1 1 TxA - TxB - TxC - TxD - RxA - RxB - RxC - RxD - dahdi_cfg -vv DAHDI Tools Version - 2.2.0 DAHDI Version: 2.2.0.2 Echo Canceller(s): MG2 Configuration == Channel map: Channel 01: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Echo Canceler: mg2) (Slaves: 01) 1 channels to configure. Setting echocan for channel 1 to mg2 lsmod dahdi_echocan_mg2 9992 0 dahdi 193576 2 dahdi_echocan_mg2,wcfxo crc_ccitt 5888 1 dahdi wcfxo 14496 0 dahdi 193576 2 dahdi_echocan_mg2,wcfxo cat /proc/interrupts 18: 818521 IO-APIC-fasteoi wcfxo dmseg (after /etc/init.d/dahdi start) wcfxo :01:08.0: PCI INT A - Link[APC3] - GSI 18 (level, low) - IRQ 18 Found a Wildcard FXO: Wildcard X100P dahdi_echocan_mg2: Registered echo canceler 'MG2' dahdi: Registered tone zone 21 (Hungary) /etc/asterisk/chad_dahdi.conf [trunkgroups] [channels] language=nl rxwink=300 ; Atlas seems to use long (250ms) winks usecallerid=yes hidecallerid=no callwaiting=yes usecallingpres=yes callwaitingcallerid=yes threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes canpark=yes cancallforward=yes callreturn=no echocancel=yes echocancelwhenbridged=yes rxgain=0.0 txgain=0.0 immediate=no busydetect=yes busycount=4 signalling=fxs_ks callgroup=1 pickgroup=1 group=1 context=pozivi channel = 1 /etc/asterisk/extensions.conf [agents] exten = 001,1,AgentLogin(1) exten = 001,2,Hangup [pozivi] exten = s,1,Answer exten = s,2,Queue(poziv|tTH) exten = s,3,Hangup exten = 2,1,Dial(dahdi/g1/0641842717) exten = 2,2,Hangup localhost*CLI dahdi show channels Chan Extension Context Language MOH Interpret pseudodefaultdefault 1pozivi nl default localhost*CLI dahdi show channel 1 Channel: 1CLI File Descriptor: 20 Span: 1 Extension: Dialing: no Context: pozivi Caller ID: Calling TON: 0 Caller ID name: Destroy: 0 InAlarm: 0 Signalling Type: FXS Kewlstart Radio: 0 Owner: None Real: None Callwait: None Threeway: None Confno: -1 Propagated Conference: -1 Real in conference: 0 DSP: no Relax DTMF: no Dialing/CallwaitCAS: 0/0 Default law: ulaw Fax Handled: no Pulse phone: no Echo Cancellation: 128 taps, currently OFF Actual Confinfo: Num/0, Mode/0x Actual Confmute: No Hookstate (FXS only): Onhook localhost*CLI console dial 2 == Console is full duplex -- Executing [...@default:1] Dial(Console/dsp, dahdi/g1/0641842717) in new stack -- Called g1/0641842717 -- DAHDI/1-1 answered Console/dsp Console call has been answered ,but my mobile does not ring...Nothing happends. I checked wall phone socket with ordinary phone and I can get signal and call, but X100P plugged in at same socket gave me above result.. What's wrong ? Is it broken card or misconfiguration or removed support for X100P in dahdi ? Thank you, Uros -- Use Free Software http://www.fsf.org/ --- Four essential software freedoms: 1) To study source code 2) To copy program 3) To modify source code 4) To redistribute modified program under condition that new user has all 4 freedoms. Richard M. Stallman ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Clone
On 6/6/07, John Novack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Henry Cobb wrote: Why would anybody plug a telephone line into an X100P clone? ??? What else would one plug into it? We just use them as clock cards for MeetMe and trunking. -HJC ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Clone
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 05:27:50PM -0400, John Novack wrote: Henry Cobb wrote: On 6/5/07, Jared Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Most of the clone cards don't support far-end disconnect supervision, so you'll have problems where Asterisk can't tell that the other party has hung up the phone. You'd be better off to buy a modern Asterisk telephony card. Why would anybody plug a telephone line into an X100P clone? ??? What else would one plug into it? The X100 isn't all that bad, at least for a starter card. It can have issues with long loops, doesn't work well in the UK. I support several users with VERY SHORT loops where it simply works. What do you want for 20 bucks anyway?? And when will Digium offer affordable one-port cards again? Probably never. If you already have a X100P at home, some echo problems and some spare time, take a look at http://www.rowetel.com/ucasterisk/oslec.html http://www.rowetel.com/blog/?p=33 -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Clone
On 6/5/07, Jared Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Most of the clone cards don't support far-end disconnect supervision, so you'll have problems where Asterisk can't tell that the other party has hung up the phone. You'd be better off to buy a modern Asterisk telephony card. Why would anybody plug a telephone line into an X100P clone? And when will Digium offer affordable one-port cards again? -HJC ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Clone
Henry Cobb wrote: On 6/5/07, Jared Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Most of the clone cards don't support far-end disconnect supervision, so you'll have problems where Asterisk can't tell that the other party has hung up the phone. You'd be better off to buy a modern Asterisk telephony card. Why would anybody plug a telephone line into an X100P clone? ??? What else would one plug into it? The X100 isn't all that bad, at least for a starter card. It can have issues with long loops, doesn't work well in the UK. I support several users with VERY SHORT loops where it simply works. What do you want for 20 bucks anyway?? And when will Digium offer affordable one-port cards again? Probably never. John Novack -HJC ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] X100P Clone
Hi all, I'm planning to buy a X100P clone and would like some feedback about this card. Does anyone already used this card? Does anyone recommend it ? or not? I'd appreciate any comments. Thanks. Ronaldo. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Clone
On 6/5/07, Ronaldo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I'm planning to buy a X100P clone and would like some feedback about this card. Does anyone already used this card? Does anyone recommend it ? or not? I'd appreciate any comments. If you have a new 3.3v only motherboard then make very sure that the brand that you buy supports this or your system will refuse to boot with the card inserted. A lot of X100P clone cards have the 3.3v notch in their PCI interface, but do not support 3.3v operation. -HJC ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Clone
I've been using one for several years now. It works ok but not spectacular. You can almost forget ever sending or receiving faxes thru it tho. They only work about 5% of the time. Henry Cobb wrote: On 6/5/07, Ronaldo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I'm planning to buy a X100P clone and would like some feedback about this card. Does anyone already used this card? Does anyone recommend it ? or not? I'd appreciate any comments. If you have a new 3.3v only motherboard then make very sure that the brand that you buy supports this or your system will refuse to boot with the card inserted. A lot of X100P clone cards have the 3.3v notch in their PCI interface, but do not support 3.3v operation. -HJC ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Clone
On 6/5/07, Ronaldo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm planning to buy a X100P clone and would like some feedback about this card. Most of the clone cards don't support far-end disconnect supervision, so you'll have problems where Asterisk can't tell that the other party has hung up the phone. You'd be better off to buy a modern Asterisk telephony card. -Jared ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] X100P clone dial problems.
Well I finally got it to work. I changed the DSL filter and it started to work. Very strange. Thanks for everyone's suggestions. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Lowndes Sent: Tuesday, 12 December 2006 5:17 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone dial problems. Well, my PSTN card has: signalling-fxs_ks and that works for me. Klaverstyn, David C wrote: Thanks for your help. This is my file. [channels] language=au context=from-pstn signalling=fxo_ks ;rxwink=300 usecallerid=yes hidecallerid=no callwaiting=yes usecallingpres=yes callwaitingcallerid=yes threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes canpark=yes cancallforward=yes callreturn=yes echocancel=yes echocancelwhenbridged=yes rxgain=0.0 txgain=0.0 callgroup=1 pickupgroup=1 immediate=no channel = 1 Upon reloading asterisk I get the following errors. Dec 11 19:03:45 WARNING[5265]: chan_zap.c:10874 setup_zap: Ignoring signalling Dec 11 19:03:45 ERROR[5265]: chan_zap.c:10305 setup_zap: Unable to reconfigure channel '1' -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Lowndes Sent: Monday, 11 December 2006 6:00 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone dial problems. Klaverstyn, David C wrote: I have since added fxs_ks=1 This is meaningless. Follow the example that I posted. and channel = 1 This has not fixed the problem. I do notice a warning on the reload of asterisk. WARNING[4296]: chan_zap.c:10874 setup_zap: Ignoring signalling -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tzafrir Cohen Sent: Monday, 11 December 2006 4:47 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone dial problems. On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 04:18:20PM +1100, Klaverstyn, David C wrote: I'm not sure if I have a configuration problem or not. I am unable to dial out. When I try to dial in I can hear the phone ring on the dialling phone but Asterisk does not register anything. In zaptel.conf I have loadzone = au defaultzone=au fxsks=1 In zapata.conf language=au context=from-pstn Those need to be in the section [channels] and be followed by a channel = 1 to actually have any effect. You also must set signaling (signalling = fxs_ks; in your case). -- Howard. LANNet Computing Associates - Your Linux people http://lannetlinux.com When you want a computer system that works, just choose Linux; When you want a computer system that works, just, choose Microsoft. -- Flatter government, not fatter government; abolish the Australian states. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Howard. LANNet Computing Associates - Your Linux people http://lannetlinux.com When you want a computer system that works, just choose Linux; When you want a computer system that works, just, choose Microsoft. -- Flatter government, not fatter government; abolish the Australian states. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone dial problems.
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 06:53:19PM +1100, Klaverstyn, David C wrote: I have since added fxs_ks=1 and channel = 1 This has not fixed the problem. I do notice a warning on the reload of asterisk. WARNING[4296]: chan_zap.c:10874 setup_zap: Ignoring signalling Right. reload of chan_zap will only change settings of channels, but not add new channels or change their signalling type. You need to restart asterisk for that, sadly. asterisk -rx 'restart now' (BTW: I'm not saying that Howard's example is not good. I'm trying to give you a direct answer to your question with minimal voodoo values). -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] X100P clone dial problems.
Thanks for your help. This is my file. [channels] language=au context=from-pstn signalling=fxo_ks ;rxwink=300 usecallerid=yes hidecallerid=no callwaiting=yes usecallingpres=yes callwaitingcallerid=yes threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes canpark=yes cancallforward=yes callreturn=yes echocancel=yes echocancelwhenbridged=yes rxgain=0.0 txgain=0.0 callgroup=1 pickupgroup=1 immediate=no channel = 1 Upon reloading asterisk I get the following errors. Dec 11 19:03:45 WARNING[5265]: chan_zap.c:10874 setup_zap: Ignoring signalling Dec 11 19:03:45 ERROR[5265]: chan_zap.c:10305 setup_zap: Unable to reconfigure channel '1' -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Lowndes Sent: Monday, 11 December 2006 6:00 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone dial problems. Klaverstyn, David C wrote: I have since added fxs_ks=1 This is meaningless. Follow the example that I posted. and channel = 1 This has not fixed the problem. I do notice a warning on the reload of asterisk. WARNING[4296]: chan_zap.c:10874 setup_zap: Ignoring signalling -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tzafrir Cohen Sent: Monday, 11 December 2006 4:47 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone dial problems. On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 04:18:20PM +1100, Klaverstyn, David C wrote: I'm not sure if I have a configuration problem or not. I am unable to dial out. When I try to dial in I can hear the phone ring on the dialling phone but Asterisk does not register anything. In zaptel.conf I have loadzone = au defaultzone=au fxsks=1 In zapata.conf language=au context=from-pstn Those need to be in the section [channels] and be followed by a channel = 1 to actually have any effect. You also must set signaling (signalling = fxs_ks; in your case). -- Howard. LANNet Computing Associates - Your Linux people http://lannetlinux.com When you want a computer system that works, just choose Linux; When you want a computer system that works, just, choose Microsoft. -- Flatter government, not fatter government; abolish the Australian states. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] X100P clone dial problems.
I'm not sure if I have a configuration problem or not. I am unable to dial out. When I try to dial in I can hear the phone ring on the dialling phone but Asterisk does not register anything. In zaptel.conf I have loadzone = au defaultzone=au fxsks=1 In zapata.conf language=au context=from-pstn When I do: zap show channels I get: Chan Extension Context Language MusicOnHold pseudo from-pstn au running ztcfg -vv shows Zaptel Configuration == Channel map: Channel 01: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01) 1 channels configured. when I try to make a call I get: -- Executing Dial(SIP/201-08c237c0, Zap/1/1800456456|70) in new stack Dec 9 13:52:54 NOTICE[4697]: app_dial.c:1056 dial_exec_full: Unable to create channel of type 'Zap' (cause 0 - Unknown) == Everyone is busy/congested at this time (1:0/0/1) Please help. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone dial problems.
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 04:18:20PM +1100, Klaverstyn, David C wrote: I'm not sure if I have a configuration problem or not. I am unable to dial out. When I try to dial in I can hear the phone ring on the dialling phone but Asterisk does not register anything. In zaptel.conf I have loadzone = au defaultzone=au fxsks=1 In zapata.conf language=au context=from-pstn Those need to be in the section [channels] and be followed by a channel = 1 to actually have any effect. You also must set signaling (signalling = fxs_ks; in your case). -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] X100P clone dial problems.
I have since added fxs_ks=1 and channel = 1 This has not fixed the problem. I do notice a warning on the reload of asterisk. WARNING[4296]: chan_zap.c:10874 setup_zap: Ignoring signalling -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tzafrir Cohen Sent: Monday, 11 December 2006 4:47 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone dial problems. On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 04:18:20PM +1100, Klaverstyn, David C wrote: I'm not sure if I have a configuration problem or not. I am unable to dial out. When I try to dial in I can hear the phone ring on the dialling phone but Asterisk does not register anything. In zaptel.conf I have loadzone = au defaultzone=au fxsks=1 In zapata.conf language=au context=from-pstn Those need to be in the section [channels] and be followed by a channel = 1 to actually have any effect. You also must set signaling (signalling = fxs_ks; in your case). -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] X100P Clone card in JAPAN
Did anyone success to install X100P Clone card on Asterisk to work with Japan stanadards for Analog line over ISDN TA. I can't make call when the call is ringing is OK and in the moment when the call is pick up the line is droped. I have hang ups all the time. I can't make call. Did anyone else have this problem. Is it depends on the Japanes provider or ? Help Please. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working
One last thing: Playback sounds now like MickeyMouse, much to slow One sanity check: try zttest . See that it gives values ov 100% or very close to that. --- Results after 141 passes --- Best: 99.499512 -- Worst: 83.691406 -- Average: 95.715467 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 02:21:01PM +0200, Frank Darner wrote: What is the output from 'cat /proc/zaptel/*' After delete of all Asterisk files and complete new install I got something: # modprobe zaptel modprobe wcfxo linux:/proc/zaptel # cat /proc/zaptel/* Span 1: WCFXO/0 Generic Clone Board 1 RED 1 WCFXO/0/0 but # ztcfg - is still no channels. any ideas? No channel defined in /etc/zaptel.conf, naturally. /me points to xpp/utils/genzaptelconf in the source tree. OK, I have now an output. For some reason ztcfg was not looking in /etc/asterisk for the zaptel.conf. After using the option -c /etc/asterisk/zaptel.conf everythink was fine. No. It looks for zaptel.conf in /etc/zaptel.conf . This is what the man page reads. This is what strace will tell you. This is even documented in voip-info.org. Zaptel is not part of Asterisk. It's a kernel module. Asterisk's zaptel channel configuration is /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf and has a totally different syntax (e.g: ; for comments). One last thing: Playback sounds now like MickeyMouse, much to slow One sanity check: try zttest . See that it gives values ov 100% or very close to that. -- Tzafrir Cohen sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] icq#16849755 iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working
Tzafrir Cohen: On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 09:02:48PM +0200, Frank Darner wrote: Hi, I have problem to set up an X100P clone card. Installation of zaptel was successful. Also modprobe of zaptel, ztdummy and wcfxo without problems. kernel: wcfxo: module not supported by Novell, setting U taint flag. kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:04.0[A] - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 193 kernel: wcfxo: DAA mode is 'FCC' kernel: Found a Wildcard FXO: Generic Clone kernel: Registered tone zone 0 (United States / North America) But if I do #ztcfg -vvv no channels will be found. Hi, OK, I do # modprobe zaptel modprobe wcfxo What is the exact output from that command? linux:/proc/zaptel # ztcfg -vvv Zaptel Configuration == Channel map: 0 channels configured. What is the output from 'cat /proc/zaptel/*' nothing dir /proc/zaptel but is empty BUT, if I do additional # modprobe ztdummy linux:/proc/zaptel # cat /proc/zaptel/* Span 1: ZTDUMMY/1 ZTDUMMY/1 1 any ideas ? thanks ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working
configs look fine to me it has to be a module problem im guessing may be, but I dont know whats wrong Zaptel (1.2.6.) installation was without errors and I did not get an error when loading the modules try rmmod for zaptel and wctfxo or w/e then modprobing again(must be root) if that does not work(which is does on my system, so i added it into a startup conf) kernel: wcfxo: module not supported by Novell are you sure that wcfxo is the correct module for that device?? Yes, I doublechecked with other sites ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working
Am Sunday 23 July 2006 06:39 schrieb Tzafrir Cohen: On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 09:02:48PM +0200, Frank Darner wrote: Hi, I have problem to set up an X100P clone card. Installation of zaptel was successful. Also modprobe of zaptel, ztdummy and wcfxo without problems. kernel: wcfxo: module not supported by Novell, setting U taint flag. kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:04.0[A] - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 193 kernel: wcfxo: DAA mode is 'FCC' kernel: Found a Wildcard FXO: Generic Clone kernel: Registered tone zone 0 (United States / North America) But if I do #ztcfg -vvv no channels will be found. What is the exact output from that command? What is the output from 'cat /proc/zaptel/*' After delete of all Asterisk files and complete new install I got something: # modprobe zaptel modprobe wcfxo linux:/proc/zaptel # cat /proc/zaptel/* Span 1: WCFXO/0 Generic Clone Board 1 RED 1 WCFXO/0/0 but # ztcfg - is still no channels. any ideas? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working
What is the output from 'cat /proc/zaptel/*' After delete of all Asterisk files and complete new install I got something: # modprobe zaptel modprobe wcfxo linux:/proc/zaptel # cat /proc/zaptel/* Span 1: WCFXO/0 Generic Clone Board 1 RED 1 WCFXO/0/0 but # ztcfg - is still no channels. any ideas? OK, I have now an output. For some reason ztcfg was not looking in /etc/asterisk for the zaptel.conf. After using the option -c /etc/asterisk/zaptel.conf everythink was fine. One last thing: Playback sounds now like MickeyMouse, much to slow also Calls SIP to SIP are not any more possible any ideas? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working
perhaps not what you're looking for, but reading thru your config, it looks like you've mis-spelled 'echo cancel' as 'echo cancle'On 7/23/06, Frank Darner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the output from 'cat /proc/zaptel/*' After delete of all Asterisk files and complete new install I got something: # modprobe zaptel modprobe wcfxo linux:/proc/zaptel # cat /proc/zaptel/* Span 1: WCFXO/0 Generic Clone Board 1 RED1 WCFXO/0/0 but # ztcfg - is still no channels. any ideas?OK, I have now an output.For some reason ztcfg was not looking in /etc/asterisk for the zaptel.conf.After using the option -c /etc/asterisk/zaptel.conf everythink was fine. One last thing:Playback sounds now like MickeyMouse, much to slowalso Calls SIP to SIP are not any more possibleany ideas?___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working
Tom Lynn: perhaps not what you're looking for, but reading thru your config, it looks like you've mis-spelled 'echo cancel' as 'echo cancle' you are right, typo thank you ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working
look udev rules???On 7/23/06, Frank Darner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tom Lynn: perhaps not what you're looking for, but reading thru your config, it looks like you've mis-spelled 'echo cancel' as 'echo cancle'you are right, typothank you___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working
Am Sunday 23 July 2006 20:58 schrieb Walter Willis: look udev rules??? the problem was related that ztcfg did not find zaptel.com -c /etc/asterisk/zaptel.conf has solved this issue #ztcfg --help -c filename -- Use filename instead of /etc/zaptel.conf my failure, I should read man page more carefully now am trying to get it working, the sound is still unreliable ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE : [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working
Hi Franck, NOACPI and the sound must be more clear. And, of course, have you tell to /usr/src/zaptel/zconfig.h and /usr/src/asterisk/Makefil what kind of processor you have and enabled MMX if possible before to compile ? Good Luck ! Francois BERGERET, France. -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Frank Darner Envoyé : dimanche 23 juillet 2006 23:41 À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working Am Sunday 23 July 2006 20:58 schrieb Walter Willis: look udev rules??? the problem was related that ztcfg did not find zaptel.com -c /etc/asterisk/zaptel.conf has solved this issue #ztcfg --help -c filename -- Use filename instead of /etc/zaptel.conf my failure, I should read man page more carefully now am trying to get it working, the sound is still unreliable ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] X100P clone not working
Hi, I have problem to set up an X100P clone card. Installation of zaptel was successful. Also modprobe of zaptel, ztdummy and wcfxo without problems. kernel: wcfxo: module not supported by Novell, setting U taint flag. kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:04.0[A] - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 193 kernel: wcfxo: DAA mode is 'FCC' kernel: Found a Wildcard FXO: Generic Clone kernel: Registered tone zone 0 (United States / North America) But if I do #ztcfg -vvv no channels will be found. the log file reports me: kernel: Registered tone zone 0 (United States / North America) Iam quite sure that zaptel.conf is correct. fxsks=1 loadzone=us defaultzone=us So Iam not sure what happened here, I have found that this clone as used by many others, so it should work. thanks best regards Frank ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working
dmesg | grep x100p also im almost positive(correct me if im wrong anyone) you do NOT need ztdummy i repeat, do NOT need ztdummy with x100p then rmmod zaptel rmmod wctdm modprobe zaptel modprobe wctdm or wctfxo or w/e let me know how this works out (post the section for your x100p from zaptel.conf and zapata.conf if you could m8) Hi, I have problem to set up an X100P clone card. Installation of zaptel was successful. Also modprobe of zaptel, ztdummy and wcfxo without problems. kernel: wcfxo: module not supported by Novell, setting U taint flag. kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:04.0[A] - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 193 kernel: wcfxo: DAA mode is 'FCC' kernel: Found a Wildcard FXO: Generic Clone kernel: Registered tone zone 0 (United States / North America) But if I do #ztcfg -vvv no channels will be found. the log file reports me: kernel: Registered tone zone 0 (United States / North America) Iam quite sure that zaptel.conf is correct. fxsks=1 loadzone=us defaultzone=us So Iam not sure what happened here, I have found that this clone as used by many others, so it should work. thanks best regards Frank ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working
Hi, i tried w/o ztdummy but nothing changed. any ideas? zaptel.conf -- fxsks=1 loadzone=us defaultzone=us zapata.conf [channels] language=en context=incoming signalling=fxs_ks usecallerid=yes echocancle=yes transfer=yes echocanclewhenbridged=yes channel = 1 # modprobe zaptel modprobe wcfxo kernel: zaptel: module not supported by Novell, setting U taint flag. kernel: Zapata Telephony Interface Registered on major 196 kernel: Zaptel Version: SVN-tag-1.2.6-r1096 Echo Canceller: KB1 kernel: wcfxo: module not supported by Novell, setting U taint flag. kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:04.0[A] - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 193 kernel: wcfxo: DAA mode is 'FCC' kernel: Found a Wildcard FXO: Generic Clone kernel: Registered tone zone 0 (United States / North America) # lsmod | grep zaptel zaptel201732 1 wcfxo crc_ccitt 2176 1 zaptel # ztcfg -v Zaptel Configuration == 0 channels configured. dmesg | grep x100p also im almost positive(correct me if im wrong anyone) you do NOT need ztdummy i repeat, do NOT need ztdummy with x100p then rmmod zaptel rmmod wctdm modprobe zaptel modprobe wctdm or wctfxo or w/e let me know how this works out (post the section for your x100p from zaptel.conf and zapata.conf if you could m8) Hi, I have problem to set up an X100P clone card. Installation of zaptel was successful. Also modprobe of zaptel, ztdummy and wcfxo without problems. kernel: wcfxo: module not supported by Novell, setting U taint flag. kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:04.0[A] - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 193 kernel: wcfxo: DAA mode is 'FCC' kernel: Found a Wildcard FXO: Generic Clone kernel: Registered tone zone 0 (United States / North America) But if I do #ztcfg -vvv no channels will be found. the log file reports me: kernel: Registered tone zone 0 (United States / North America) Iam quite sure that zaptel.conf is correct. fxsks=1 loadzone=us defaultzone=us So Iam not sure what happened here, I have found that this clone as used by many others, so it should work. thanks best regards Frank ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working
configs look fine to me it has to be a module problem im guessing try rmmod for zaptel and wctfxo or w/e then modprobing again(must be root) if that does not work(which is does on my system, so i added it into a startup conf) kernel: wcfxo: module not supported by Novell are you sure that wcfxo is the correct module for that device?? hoping to help `KruZ~ From: Frank Darner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussionasterisk-users@lists.digium.com To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussionasterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 21:47:03 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from lists.digium.com ([69.16.138.164]) by bay0-mc3-f8.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Sat, 22 Jul 2006 12:48:30 -0700 Received: from digium-69-16-138-164.phx1.puregig.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])by lists.digium.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5410F2FC983;Sat, 22 Jul 2006 12:47:07 -0700 (MST) Received: from psmtp.com (exprod8mx18.postini.com [64.18.3.118])by lists.digium.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6DAB82FC955for asterisk-users@lists.digium.com;Sat, 22 Jul 2006 12:47:01 -0700 (MST) Received: from source ([64.233.182.188]) by exprod8mx18.postini.com([64.18.7.10]) with SMTP; Sat, 22 Jul 2006 12:47:01 PDT Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id p48so1178324nfafor asterisk-users@lists.digium.com;Sat, 22 Jul 2006 12:47:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.80.20 with SMTP id d20mr1795637nfb;Sat, 22 Jul 2006 12:47:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p54BA06B2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ( [84.186.6.178])by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id k9sm3536321nfc.2006.07.22.12.47.00;Sat, 22 Jul 2006 12:47:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt3YNIQZusOzLxRY86S1M78tl0qZUvrd8nA= X-Original-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Delivered-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=googlemail.com;h=received:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id:from;b=f6RdXsFUO93pZRYKfL8kkf1zq7II8QbilI7EIicBctd1pQiFP1oSzU3gqXz4bivjrA/7blsBUpPAviR79NWfa49+Pw0aTIr073H/bQV+Q7VvhfOdlDRNw0QYj+mjXA6AZ5GFGBnlO2OjnhLgMpPjwBX00xkxIE1GXyAJtuF0ZMs= User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-pstn-levels: (S:99.9/99.9 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 R:95.9108 P:95.9108M:96.8350 C:98.4741 ) X-pstn-settings: 3 (1.:1.) s fc lc gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] [db-null] X-BeenThere: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussionasterisk-users.lists.digium.com List-Unsubscribe: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users,mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Archive: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users List-Post: mailto:asterisk-users@lists.digium.com List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Subscribe: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users,mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jul 2006 19:48:31.0136 (UTC) FILETIME=[CF1A9200:01C6ADC7] Hi, i tried w/o ztdummy but nothing changed. any ideas? zaptel.conf -- fxsks=1 loadzone=us defaultzone=us zapata.conf [channels] language=en context=incoming signalling=fxs_ks usecallerid=yes echocancle=yes transfer=yes echocanclewhenbridged=yes channel = 1 # modprobe zaptel modprobe wcfxo kernel: zaptel: module not supported by Novell, setting U taint flag. kernel: Zapata Telephony Interface Registered on major 196 kernel: Zaptel Version: SVN-tag-1.2.6-r1096 Echo Canceller: KB1 kernel: wcfxo: module not supported by Novell, setting U taint flag. kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:04.0[A] - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 193 kernel: wcfxo: DAA mode is 'FCC' kernel: Found a Wildcard FXO: Generic Clone kernel: Registered tone zone 0 (United States / North America) # lsmod | grep zaptel zaptel201732 1 wcfxo crc_ccitt 2176 1 zaptel # ztcfg -v Zaptel Configuration == 0 channels configured. dmesg | grep x100p also im almost positive(correct me if im wrong anyone) you do NOT need ztdummy i repeat, do NOT need ztdummy with x100p then rmmod zaptel rmmod wctdm modprobe zaptel modprobe wctdm or wctfxo or w/e let me know how this works out (post the section for your x100p from zaptel.conf and zapata.conf if you could m8) Hi, I have problem to set up an X100P clone card. Installation of zaptel was successful. Also modprobe of zaptel, ztdummy and wcfxo without problems. kernel: wcfxo: module not supported by Novell, setting U taint flag. kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:04.0[A] - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 193 kernel: wcfxo: DAA mode is 'FCC' kernel: Found a Wildcard FXO: Generic Clone
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working
here is some more information http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/X100P+clone From: Frank Darner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussionasterisk-users@lists.digium.com To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussionasterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 21:47:03 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from lists.digium.com ([69.16.138.164]) by bay0-mc3-f8.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Sat, 22 Jul 2006 12:48:30 -0700 Received: from digium-69-16-138-164.phx1.puregig.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])by lists.digium.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5410F2FC983;Sat, 22 Jul 2006 12:47:07 -0700 (MST) Received: from psmtp.com (exprod8mx18.postini.com [64.18.3.118])by lists.digium.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6DAB82FC955for asterisk-users@lists.digium.com;Sat, 22 Jul 2006 12:47:01 -0700 (MST) Received: from source ([64.233.182.188]) by exprod8mx18.postini.com([64.18.7.10]) with SMTP; Sat, 22 Jul 2006 12:47:01 PDT Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id p48so1178324nfafor asterisk-users@lists.digium.com;Sat, 22 Jul 2006 12:47:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.80.20 with SMTP id d20mr1795637nfb;Sat, 22 Jul 2006 12:47:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p54BA06B2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ( [84.186.6.178])by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id k9sm3536321nfc.2006.07.22.12.47.00;Sat, 22 Jul 2006 12:47:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt3YNIQZusOzLxRY86S1M78tl0qZUvrd8nA= X-Original-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Delivered-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=googlemail.com;h=received:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id:from;b=f6RdXsFUO93pZRYKfL8kkf1zq7II8QbilI7EIicBctd1pQiFP1oSzU3gqXz4bivjrA/7blsBUpPAviR79NWfa49+Pw0aTIr073H/bQV+Q7VvhfOdlDRNw0QYj+mjXA6AZ5GFGBnlO2OjnhLgMpPjwBX00xkxIE1GXyAJtuF0ZMs= User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-pstn-levels: (S:99.9/99.9 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 R:95.9108 P:95.9108M:96.8350 C:98.4741 ) X-pstn-settings: 3 (1.:1.) s fc lc gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] [db-null] X-BeenThere: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussionasterisk-users.lists.digium.com List-Unsubscribe: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users,mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Archive: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users List-Post: mailto:asterisk-users@lists.digium.com List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Subscribe: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users,mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jul 2006 19:48:31.0136 (UTC) FILETIME=[CF1A9200:01C6ADC7] Hi, i tried w/o ztdummy but nothing changed. any ideas? zaptel.conf -- fxsks=1 loadzone=us defaultzone=us zapata.conf [channels] language=en context=incoming signalling=fxs_ks usecallerid=yes echocancle=yes transfer=yes echocanclewhenbridged=yes channel = 1 # modprobe zaptel modprobe wcfxo kernel: zaptel: module not supported by Novell, setting U taint flag. kernel: Zapata Telephony Interface Registered on major 196 kernel: Zaptel Version: SVN-tag-1.2.6-r1096 Echo Canceller: KB1 kernel: wcfxo: module not supported by Novell, setting U taint flag. kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:04.0[A] - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 193 kernel: wcfxo: DAA mode is 'FCC' kernel: Found a Wildcard FXO: Generic Clone kernel: Registered tone zone 0 (United States / North America) # lsmod | grep zaptel zaptel201732 1 wcfxo crc_ccitt 2176 1 zaptel # ztcfg -v Zaptel Configuration == 0 channels configured. dmesg | grep x100p also im almost positive(correct me if im wrong anyone) you do NOT need ztdummy i repeat, do NOT need ztdummy with x100p then rmmod zaptel rmmod wctdm modprobe zaptel modprobe wctdm or wctfxo or w/e let me know how this works out (post the section for your x100p from zaptel.conf and zapata.conf if you could m8) Hi, I have problem to set up an X100P clone card. Installation of zaptel was successful. Also modprobe of zaptel, ztdummy and wcfxo without problems. kernel: wcfxo: module not supported by Novell, setting U taint flag. kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:04.0[A] - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 193 kernel: wcfxo: DAA mode is 'FCC' kernel: Found a Wildcard FXO: Generic Clone kernel: Registered tone zone 0 (United States / North America) But if I do #ztcfg -vvv no channels will be found. the log file reports me: kernel: Registered tone zone 0 (United States / North America) Iam quite sure that zaptel.conf is correct. fxsks=1 loadzone=us
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 09:02:48PM +0200, Frank Darner wrote: Hi, I have problem to set up an X100P clone card. Installation of zaptel was successful. Also modprobe of zaptel, ztdummy and wcfxo without problems. kernel: wcfxo: module not supported by Novell, setting U taint flag. kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:04.0[A] - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 193 kernel: wcfxo: DAA mode is 'FCC' kernel: Found a Wildcard FXO: Generic Clone kernel: Registered tone zone 0 (United States / North America) But if I do #ztcfg -vvv no channels will be found. What is the exact output from that command? What is the output from 'cat /proc/zaptel/*' -- Tzafrir Cohen sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] icq#16849755 iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone not picking up incoming calls. [POTS]
Hello All,
I have this strange problem,
I can dial out with my sip phone and it seems to work relatively well, but
when I call in, the line just rings and rings, I get no indication in
asterisk that it's detecting an incoming call.
The strange thing is that in ztmonitor 1 -vv the rx volume goes from around
99% when the line is idle to 0% as soon as the line starts ringing.
I'm located in iceland, and have set my country settings to no[rway] which
should be the same.
I've even edited the [no] signaling section in indications.conf from 425 to
440 (tone A) (and 450 too) but no success.
I've tried using the OSS and ALSA sound systems in case there was some error
decoding the tone.
I've tried revesing ring and tip on the POTS line itself.
I've tried starting the zap driver in all modes (ks, ls, gs)
If anyone has any idea what's wrong, please reply asap, especially if any
norwegians see this :)
Snippets from conf files:
/etc/zaptel.conf
loadzone=no
defaultzone=no
fxsls=1
/etc/asterisk/zapata.conf
[channels]
context=pots
signalling=fxs_ls
echocancel=yes
echocancelwhenbridged=yes
rxgain=1.0
txgain=1.0
immediate=yes
busydetect=yes
busycount=3
channel = 1
/etc/asterisk/extensions.conf
[global]
CONSOLE=Console/dsp
TRUNK=Zap/1
[local]
;ignorepat = 9
exten = _9.,1,Dial,Zap/1/${EXTEN:1}
exten = _9.,2,Congestion
exten = 2000,hint,SIP/2000 ; Channel hints for presence
[pots]
exten = s,1,Answer
exten = s,2,DigitTimeout,5
exten = s,3,ResponseTimeout,10
exten = s,4,Playback(groovy)
exten = s,5,Playback(goodbye)
exten = s,6,Hangup
Regards,
K.Reykdal.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone any hints for recognizing RINGing ?
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: It has absolutely nothing to do with what economically suits them best -- it has everything to do with the fact that when you buy a clone X100P you DO NOT KNOW what you're getting. The chipset may be the same but as you can clearly see from searching this very list, the hybrid circuitry (a crucial crucial part of the design) can be VERY different, and even if the hybrid's fine, there are subtle variations in the chipset that can bite you in the ass. Hi everyone, I made the same mistake and bought a cheap clone. I do understand that these cheap X100P cards do not work well enogh for production use. But as I already bought this card, can anyone give me some advice regarding the following: Dialing out from Asterisk works like a charm, but recognizing a RING is much more different. It works in 1 of 10 cases that Asterisk recognizes the ringing on the phone :-) Where could I change which parameters to make Asterisk a little more sensible ? Please help and do not tell me to buy another card - I do understand what I bought, but now I already have it and want to use it. Thanks a lot! Christoph ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone any hints for recognizing RINGing ?
Hi Chris, I've had A LOT of experience with the cheap X100Ps in the last few weeks. I myself bought two of them off ebay. $6.95 special! I also had problems with them and within the past 12 hours have replaced them with a TDM22B that so far(1 phone call) has worked great. I would suggest turning verbosity on and watching the asterisk console when the call comes in. If it is not showing that there is a ring on your Zap device, then it's not a problem with your dial plan. I would say that it's likely that the modem would be defective if sometimes it detected a ring and other times not. If asterisk is always showing that there is a ring, then I would take another good look at the context in your extensions.conf that matches the one set for your zap device in Zapata.conf. While trying to sort out my X100P clone problem's on here, a user rudely told me to buy a real card. Ended up being good advice, just not tactful. I could have saved WEEKS of headaches had I not tried to save some $$. I guess I learned the hard way that you get what you pay for. I'm not telling you to buy another card, I'm just sharing my experience with X100P. Hope this helps, Paul -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christoph Rothe Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 01:24 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone any hints for recognizing RINGing ? On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: It has absolutely nothing to do with what economically suits them best -- it has everything to do with the fact that when you buy a clone X100P you DO NOT KNOW what you're getting. The chipset may be the same but as you can clearly see from searching this very list, the hybrid circuitry (a crucial crucial part of the design) can be VERY different, and even if the hybrid's fine, there are subtle variations in the chipset that can bite you in the ass. Hi everyone, I made the same mistake and bought a cheap clone. I do understand that these cheap X100P cards do not work well enogh for production use. But as I already bought this card, can anyone give me some advice regarding the following: Dialing out from Asterisk works like a charm, but recognizing a RING is much more different. It works in 1 of 10 cases that Asterisk recognizes the ringing on the phone :-) Where could I change which parameters to make Asterisk a little more sensible ? Please help and do not tell me to buy another card - I do understand what I bought, but now I already have it and want to use it. Thanks a lot! Christoph ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone, Which one?
Hi All, Googling X100P Clone I found several information about these cards and seems that some winmodem has the same chip used from the original X100P. Here below a list winmodem which should work as X100P clone: 1057 Motorola5608 SM56 PCI Fax Voice ModemE159 Tiger Jet Network Inc0001 Tiger 300/320 PCI interface I boughtone "Trust 56k V92 PCI Internal Modem MD-1100" which has the 1057 Motorola Chip, and I installed it on my linux box. in my /proc/pci list it is recognized like 1057:3052 (Motorola) (rev 4)., IRQ 11, I/O at 0x6c00 [0x6cff] When I try to load the module wcfxo, I cannot load it (zaptel is already loaded): [EMAIL PROTECTED] misc]# modprobe wcfxo/lib/modules/2.4.22/misc/wcfxo.o: init_module: No such deviceHint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, including invalid IO or IRQ parameters. You may find more information in syslog or the output from dmesgmodprobe: insmod /lib/modules/2.4.22/misc/wcfxo.o failedmodprobe: insmod wcfxo failed I cannot undertand if: 1) the message occours because the FXO card use the same IRQ of the VGA card 2) it occurs because the winmodem installed is not a valid FXO card. Some one as experienced this kind of card? Regards MY PCI DEVICES: [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cat /proc/pciPCI devices found: Bus 0, device 0, function 0: Host bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX Host bridge (rev 3). Master Capable. Latency=64. Prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xe000 [0xe7ff]. Bus 0, device 1, function 0: PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX AGP bridge (rev 3). Master Capable. Latency=64. Min Gnt=129. Bus 0, device 7, function 0: ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ISA (rev 2). Bus 0, device 7, function 1: IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 IDE (rev 1). Master Capable. Latency=64. I/O at 0xf000 [0xf00f]. Bus 0, device 7, function 2: USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 USB (rev 1). IRQ 11. Master Capable. Latency=64. I/O at 0x6400 [0x641f]. Bus 0, device 7, function 3: Bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI (rev 2). IRQ 9. Bus 0, device 10, function 0: Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c590 10BaseT [Vortex] (rev 0). IRQ 10. Master Capable. Latency=248. Min Gnt=3.Max Lat=8. I/O at 0x6800 [0x681f]. Bus 0, device 13, function 0: VGA compatible controller: Matrox Graphics, Inc. MGA 1064SG [Mystique] (rev 2). IRQ 11. Master Capable. Latency=64. Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xe800 [0xe8003fff]. Prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xe900 [0xe97f]. Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xea00 [0xea7f]. Bus 0, device 14, function 0: Modem: PCI device 1057:3052 (Motorola) (rev 4). IRQ 11. Master Capable. Latency=64. Min Gnt=1.Max Lat=62. Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xeb00 [0xeb000fff]. I/O at 0x6c00 [0x6cff]. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone, Which one?
On March 5, 2005 08:14 am, Androtech wrote: I bought one Trust 56k V92 PCI Internal Modem MD-1100 which has the 1057 Motorola Chip, and I installed it on my linux box. When I try to load the module wcfxo, I cannot load it (zaptel is already loaded): Not to rub salt in the wound, but do you honestly expect the people on a Digium-run mailing list to rush out and help you after you consciously went and bought a clone card? You specifically denied Digium any income on the purchase of this hardware, and now you're asking them for help! You've got a lot of nerve. Caveat Emptor. As far as I'm concerned, you're on your own. If you're not experienced enough to figure this out on your own, you should have purchased the Dev Kit Lite, which comes with support from Digium for specifically these types of problems. Maybe someone else on this list is more forgiving than I am but I really hope not. -A. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone, Which one?
On Sat, 2005-03-05 at 11:01 -0500, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: On March 5, 2005 08:14 am, Androtech wrote: I bought one Trust 56k V92 PCI Internal Modem MD-1100 which has the 1057 Motorola Chip, and I installed it on my linux box. When I try to load the module wcfxo, I cannot load it (zaptel is already loaded): Not to rub salt in the wound, but do you honestly expect the people on a Digium-run mailing list to rush out and help you after you consciously went and bought a clone card? You specifically denied Digium any income on the purchase of this hardware, and now you're asking them for help! You've got a lot of nerve. Caveat Emptor. As far as I'm concerned, you're on your own. If you're not experienced enough to figure this out on your own, you should have purchased the Dev Kit Lite, which comes with support from Digium for specifically these types of problems. Maybe someone else on this list is more forgiving than I am but I really hope not. Just a question, where's the Dev Lite Kit on Digium's site? The PCI Dev kit would give him an FXO and an FXS which may be more than some people want, perhaps the single FXO option could be pushed as this would then be around the same price as the old X100 card and give the same initial connectivity with the possibility of future expansion. -- Dave Cotton [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone, Which one?
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: On March 5, 2005 08:14 am, Androtech wrote: I bought one "Trust 56k V92 PCI Internal Modem MD-1100" which has the 1057 Motorola Chip, and I installed it on my linux box. When I try to load the module wcfxo, I cannot load it (zaptel is already loaded): Not to rub salt in the wound, but do you honestly expect the people on a Digium-run mailing list to rush out and help you after you consciously went and bought a clone card? You specifically denied Digium any income on the purchase of this hardware, Since Digium no longer suppliers this card, they were denied NOTHING! and now you're asking them for help! You've got a lot of nerve. Caveat Emptor. There is a LOT of traffic on this list about products that are not supplied by Digium. Do you want to exclude those also? Not to mention the 40-50 percent of traffic that does NOTHING to further the project, but is simple carping about this person not being able to find X, or that person is a dumbass because he asked Y. As far as I'm concerned, you're on your own. Ultimately we are ALL on our own. The hardware that Digium DOES supply is poorly supported. John Novack ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone, Which one?
Ummm... This isn't a Digium Run list. This is a Digium sponsored list. My understanding (someone please correct me if I'm wrong) is that this list *is not* a Digium support list. This list is a forum for Asterisk discussion by users. As such, I would suggest that all topics of discussion for all hardware manufacturers are fair game. If one isn't supposed to talk about clone cards in this forum, then this list should not be called Asterisk Users, it should be called Digium Discussion. Asterisk is an OSS product, and as such should be heavily promoted for use with all products, not just Digium's. If Digium is going to take offence to that, then they shouldn't be OSSing the software. There's plenty of discussion around non Digium hardware on this list. If you're going to get pissed off about people discussing non-Digium hardware then get pissed off about *all* of it, not just the X100P clone cards. Heck, Digium doesn't even make the X100P any more. And it's generally accepted on this list that the TDM cards have problems. So I can't say I blame people for looking for cheap alternatives. In any event, if this is a Digium Only list, then it needs to be identified as such, rather than promoted as an Asterisk list. And if that's the case, then I beg someone to start a non-Digium affilitated list so that we can have free and open discussion without worrying about getting slammed on regards, Paul - Original Message - From: Andrew Kohlsmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 9:01 AM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone, Which one? On March 5, 2005 08:14 am, Androtech wrote: I bought one Trust 56k V92 PCI Internal Modem MD-1100 which has the 1057 Motorola Chip, and I installed it on my linux box. When I try to load the module wcfxo, I cannot load it (zaptel is already loaded): Not to rub salt in the wound, but do you honestly expect the people on a Digium-run mailing list to rush out and help you after you consciously went and bought a clone card? You specifically denied Digium any income on the purchase of this hardware, and now you're asking them for help! You've got a lot of nerve. Caveat Emptor. As far as I'm concerned, you're on your own. If you're not experienced enough to figure this out on your own, you should have purchased the Dev Kit Lite, which comes with support from Digium for specifically these types of problems. Maybe someone else on this list is more forgiving than I am but I really hope not. -A. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone, Which one?
Ummm... This isn't a Digium Run list. This is a Digium sponsored list. My understanding (someone please correct me if I'm wrong) is that this list *is not* a Digium support list. This list is a forum for Asterisk discussion by users. As such, I would suggest that all topics of discussion for all hardware manufacturers are fair game. Actually the list is maintained/managed by digium (Martin does most of the work, more or less on a part time basis). Really don't care whose servers or networks it might run on, but they are the defacto owners of the list. If one isn't supposed to talk about clone cards in this forum, then this list should not be called Asterisk Users, it should be called Digium Discussion. There seems to be about a half dozen self-appointed list cops, and none of them speak for Mark, digium or asterisk. Several of those are lurking on this list only to find fresh meat to sell their services to. It's obvious who they are. Much easier to config the mail reader to send those to your favorite trash bucket then it is to keep reading their BS day after day. If there really were any official-sponsored restrictions on the list, the words would come from Mark, Digium, etc. Come to think of it, maybe all of us that are fed up with their postings should just forward those back to their email address. Maybe they would get the hint and some manners. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone, Which one?
Rich Adamson wrote: snip There seems to be about a half dozen self-appointed list cops, and none of them speak for Mark, digium or asterisk. Several of those are lurking on this list only to find fresh meat to sell their services to. It's obvious who they are. Indeed. Much easier to config the mail reader to send those to your favorite trash bucket then it is to keep reading their BS day after day. Agreed. They contribute NOTHING! If there really were any official-sponsored restrictions on the list, the words would come from Mark, Digium, etc. Come to think of it, maybe all of us that are fed up with their postings should just forward those back to their email address. Maybe they would get the hint and some manners. Nah! They were never taught any social skills, and it's too late now. John Novack ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone, Which one?
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: On March 5, 2005 08:14 am, Androtech wrote: I bought one Trust 56k V92 PCI Internal Modem MD-1100 which has the 1057 Motorola Chip, and I installed it on my linux box. When I try to load the module wcfxo, I cannot load it (zaptel is already loaded): Not to rub salt in the wound, but do you honestly expect the people on a Digium-run mailing list to rush out and help you after you consciously went and bought a clone card? You specifically denied Digium any income on the purchase of this hardware, and now you're asking them for help! You've got a lot of nerve. Caveat Emptor. As far as I'm concerned, you're on your own. If you're not experienced enough to figure this out on your own, you should have purchased the Dev Kit Lite, which comes with support from Digium for specifically these types of problems. Maybe someone else on this list is more forgiving than I am but I really hope not. Funny thing is that it was the digium website that first led me to the asterisk website and then on this page: http://www.asterisk.org/index.php?menu=hardware I found the link to the X100P clone card. Some searching led me to a vendor where I got 6 of these with shipping fro about $56 total. I got them for experimentation. I am actually hoping that Digium will develop a standalone FXO-IAX2 adaptor someday. I like external standalone stuff because I don't like shutting down servers and removing the covers too much. Anyway, I don't feel guilty at all. I will buy any G.729 licenses I need from them. If they don't ever do a standalone fxo device, I will probably create one using a mini-ITX mainboard and their 4-port card. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone, Which one?
On March 5, 2005 12:22 pm, Rich Adamson wrote: There seems to be about a half dozen self-appointed list cops, and none of them speak for Mark, digium or asterisk. Several of those are lurking on this list only to find fresh meat to sell their services to. It's obvious who they are. I have *never* claimed to speak for Digium. Actually I don't think any of the self appointed list cops do. If you can provide me with archive URLs that prove otherwise I'd be surprised. And I also don't think that any of us self appointed list cops actively solicit our services. Again, if you'll care to peruse the list archives you'll find I am very helpful on this list, just as you are. If I was out to make a killing with Asterisk consulting I wouldn't do that, so your argument fails on this point. As I'm not subscribed to asterisk-biz I think that's an even further failure of that point. I think it comes down to tolerances. Some days I am far less tolerant than others when it comes to people who just don't want to put forward any effort. Today was particularly bad and if I was a smarter person, would probably refrain from reading the list at all. I don't always self-regulate so well, and this particular thread's a good example. Perhaps I was a little harsh when I said I hoped that nobody would help this guy out. In fact, I know I was, and I do apologize for that. I do not, however, apologize for saying if he's not able to solve these kinds of problems that he should be buying Digium hardware. When you buy outside you are on your own, and buying a clone X100P is particularly bad for this since there are so many different PCI IDs. Whether the X100P is available from Digium or not is irrelavent, there are solutions Digium has that would solve this guy's particular problem, support Digium *and* enable him to obtain support which was included in the cost of the hardware. Is it as cheap as a $20 clone X100P without its PCI ID in the driver? Hell no, but he would have functioning hardware. How much is his time worth? Digium (well Mark, but he *is* Digium) has provided the PCI IDs of several of the popular clones in the driver already. It seems our original poster either didn't buy one that was compatible, or it's even more out there than the clones Mark's already added support for. Again -- I wonder if it still feels like such a shit-hot deal. Either way -- he's gone and done his research and is stuck. I personally won't help him out of this jam, but others, perhaps even you, will. Aside: I find it an interesting datapoint that you (and everyone else, but you in particular) would reply to this thread to bitch about me rather than giving this guy his solution, especially since I'm so wrong in berating him. Much easier to config the mail reader to send those to your favorite trash bucket then it is to keep reading their BS day after day. Feel free to do so, it won't affect me in any way shape or form. If there really were any official-sponsored restrictions on the list, the words would come from Mark, Digium, etc. Totally agreed. Come to think of it, maybe all of us that are fed up with their postings should just forward those back to their email address. Maybe they would get the hint and some manners. I have plenty of manners, but sometimes I forget them and say stupid things like I did to the original poster. Further, I'm sure you'd know that any kind of stupid auto-reply like that would just escalate into an auto-reply-reply (I'm not beneath tit-for-tat if you care to play that game) and just continue until both of us had our mail filters tuned up so well that we'd just ignore each other's immature flooding, and our auto-repliers would end up wasting the available bandwidth between us, essentially proving nothing. :-) Just in case you missed it, I am sorry that I wrote that I hope that nobody helps this guy. I stand behind my other points in the original email, though. Clone/alternative hardware can work great, but if it doesn't you find yourself in this guy's shoes. -A. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone, Which one?
On March 5, 2005 11:01 am, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: specifically these types of problems. Maybe someone else on this list is more forgiving than I am but I really hope not. I apologize for this remark. I still do feel, though, that if you're this new to asterisk that you should have purchased hardware which offered support from Digium. Once your system is up and running and you have some experience under your belt, feel free to be as cheap as you like. -A. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone, Which one?
On March 5, 2005 11:57 am, Dave Cotton wrote: Just a question, where's the Dev Lite Kit on Digium's site? I meant Dev Kit and you're right, it's an FXO and FXS on the carrier card. US$195. The PCI Dev kit would give him an FXO and an FXS which may be more than some people want, perhaps the single FXO option could be pushed as this would then be around the same price as the old X100 card and give the same initial connectivity with the possibility of future expansion. Agreed. A TDM400P with 1 FXO would run him US$133 at the Yahoo! store, and perhaps cheaper if he can find one on Ebay. Still not as cheap as the (I'm guessing $20) winmodem that doesn't work, but is the $113 he saved worth it? -A. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone, Which one?
On March 5, 2005 12:02 pm, John Novack wrote: Since Digium no longer suppliers this card, they were denied NOTHING! They offer comparable hardware. TDM410P is $113. There is a LOT of traffic on this list about products that are not supplied by Digium. Do you want to exclude those also? The Sangoma guys typically handle support for their own product, even on this list. Atacomm's card hasn't hit the market yet. The Sipura people sell hardware that Digium doesn't have similar hardware for. I guess my specific beef was that he spent the time to research clone cards, bought one and is now asking for help solving his problem where if he just bought the Digium hardware he'd be up and running. He's not stupid, and I'm willing to bet he's quite the opposite. Not to mention the 40-50 percent of traffic that does NOTHING to further the project, but is simple carping about this person not being able to find X, or that person is a dumbass because he asked Y. Feel free to modify your mail filters to adjust the reality to your liking. I've already apologized for my remark about hoping nobody'd help him. I still feel my point stands. And if nobody's going to educate the newbies, then how will they ever learn? Do you believe in letting your children do whatever they want, too? There are 'defacto' rules for any system. No, I don't have my shiny ListCoptm badge and I'm not, nor have I ever claimed to, speak on behalf of Digium or anyone else. I'm taking time to try and educate people on what I perceive as normal and proper list ettiquette. Not everyone agrees with me, this I will admit. However most people do, and that's why lists are how they are. You can easily see that I spend a great deal of time not only here but also on IRC helping people out. Sometimes, like my original reply to this thread, I go overboard, but I generally have the decency to apologize. Maybe you don't agree but I feel that my contributions to this list far outweigh what I detract from it. You take the good with the bad. Ultimately we are ALL on our own. The hardware that Digium DOES supply is poorly supported. I've generally had nothing but good support from Digium. Now mind you I haven't had all that many problems with their hardware, so YMMV. -A. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone, Which one?
- Original Message - There is a LOT of traffic on this list about products that are not supplied by Digium. Do you want to exclude those also? The Sangoma guys typically handle support for their own product, even on this list. Atacomm's card hasn't hit the market yet. The Sipura people sell hardware that Digium doesn't have similar hardware for. Very true, but I guess the point I'm trying to make is that whether or not Digium supports or runs this list, my understanding is that this list isn't intended to be a Digium hardware support forum, it's intended to be a general Asterisk Users Discussion forum. I would never expect someone to call up Digium's support channels and expect to get support for setting up a clone card. But this isn't Digium Support. The guy wasn't asking Digium to help solve his problem, he was asking 'people who use Asterisk' to help solve his problem. I'd be willing to bet there are a lot of people reading this list who have at least one clone card sitting in a server at home. It's a Users Discussion. ie. People who use Asterisk converge here to talk about Asterisk in all it's forms. Whether or not Digium runs/supports the list is beside the point. I don't really disagree with you about the cost factor - often times the pain saved by buying a $125 device is worth the extra money. However, not everyone has that luxury. While some of us (myself included) prefer to simply fix the problem by throwing money at it, a lot of people use Linux and OSS products not only because it interests them but because they're scraping out a living that doesn't let them work on anything more than the hand-me-down hardware that they've coersed off of the various people they've helped over the years, and they spend the time making it all work because time is what they've got - not money. regards, Paul ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone, Which one?
And if nobody's going to educate the newbies, then how will they ever learn? Do you believe in letting your children do whatever they want, too? There are 'defacto' rules for any system. No, I don't have my shiny ListCoptm There is a difference when you are that childs father or mother but you are neither? Do you stop people in the street when you see them doing things wrong and try and tell them you shouldn't be doing it like that, this is how you should do it. I hope not :) Essentially this list is the same. There are lots of very helpful people, keen to provide help and enthusiasm to new asterisk people, then there are those who seem to have so much time on there hands they have to reply to every newbies question telling them to go and look at google before asking that here! badge and I'm not, nor have I ever claimed to, speak on behalf of Digium or anyone else. I'm taking time to try and educate people on what I perceive as normal and proper list ettiquette. Not everyone agrees with me, this I will admit. However most people do, and that's why lists are how they are. And how exactly is that? Mike ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone, Which one?
On Sat, 2005-03-05 at 19:30 +, Mike Dent wrote: And if nobody's going to educate the newbies, then how will they ever learn? Do you believe in letting your children do whatever they want, too? There are 'defacto' rules for any system. No, I don't have my shiny ListCoptm There is a difference when you are that childs father or mother but you are neither? Seems shop owners don't mind telling a person how to behave or leave. Any time you are in an enclosed space, people attempt to enforce rules. Do you stop people in the street when you see them doing things wrong and try and tell them you shouldn't be doing it like that, this is how you should do it. I hope not :) Essentially this list is the same. While you may not stop people who haven't asked for help, but once you enter a public forum and request the help you need to be following the rules or at the least be respectful of those willing to give the help. -- Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone, Which one?
Mike Dent wrote: And if nobody's going to educate the newbies, then how will they ever learn? Do you believe in letting your children do whatever they want, too? There are 'defacto' rules for any system. No, I don't have my shiny ListCoptm There is a difference when you are that childs father or mother but you are neither? Do you stop people in the street when you see them doing things wrong and try and tell them you shouldn't be doing it like that, this is how you should do it. I hope not :) Essentially this list is the same. There are lots of very helpful people, keen to provide help and enthusiasm to new asterisk people, then there are those who seem to have so much time on there hands they have to reply to every newbies question telling them to go and look at google before asking that here! Maybe one of the free web-based forum packages will eventually offer an elitist or impatient mode. Before you can post, you do the required reading and pass online exams. The idea is to weed out people who think README is just another geek buzzword. You have to know what a FAQ is and you have to know what RTFM means. Most of those people who tend to scold every newbie are probably elitist pretenders. If they were truly elite, they would be too busy to read and reply to such posts. Of course some of us are just impatient, regardless of our skill level. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone, Which one?
On March 5, 2005 02:30 pm, Mike Dent wrote: There is a difference when you are that childs father or mother but you are neither? You have a point, but... (read on) Do you stop people in the street when you see them doing things wrong and try and tell them you shouldn't be doing it like that, this is how you should do it. I hope not :) Essentially this list is the same. It's not the same at all -- Random people in the street aren't in a forum asking for help. If you're making a ruckus in a public library I can and have asked if you could tone it down, as it's a library and there are certain de-facto rules which the majority of people adhere to. c.f. for movie theatres, bars, strip clubs, sports avenues, etc. There are lots of very helpful people, keen to provide help and enthusiasm to new asterisk people, then there are those who seem to have so much time on there hands they have to reply to every newbies question telling them to go and look at google before asking that here! I implore you to go do some of this research yourself before trying to paint me with a certain brush. This thread aside, what percentage of my posts to -users are helpful, and what percentage are for educating newbies in ettiquette? Finally, what percentage are me just out-and-out flaming a newbie? Perhaps it's just my rants that seem to catch your eye? And how exactly is that? A generally helpful forum for people WHO HAVE SHOWED A MODICUM OF RESEARCH to obtain assistance in setting up, running and diagnosing problems with their Asterisk installations. Without some form of rules or policing as you want to call it, this forum would not be as effective as it is. I think where the problem comes in is that people take this forum to be asterisk-biz half the time. I need X done **RIGHT NOW**!! I DEMAND HELP!! -- take it to -biz, there are dozens if not hundreds of consultants who will happily exchange money for experience. This forum is for people who want to learn. Really really want to learn, not just gesticulate the intention. -A. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone, Which one?
On March 5, 2005 02:46 pm, Paul wrote: Maybe one of the free web-based forum packages will eventually offer an elitist or impatient mode. Before you can post, you do the required reading and pass online exams. The idea is to weed out people who think README is just another geek buzzword. You have to know what a FAQ is and you have to know what RTFM means. That wouldn't help. If you're unwilling to learn, then this list isn't for you. Plain and simple. OSS grows when people learn. Most of those people who tend to scold every newbie are probably elitist pretenders. If they were truly elite, they would be too busy to read and reply to such posts. Of course some of us are just impatient, regardless of our skill level. Believe what you want, and I'l continue using my Asterisk servers and providing service to my customers. As I mentioned to another poster, feel free to manipulate your MUA's filters to adjust reality to your liking. FWIW, I think only the truly elite possess the time to help out others, since the elitist pretenders are too busy fiddling with their systems and trying to get them to work properly to be able to help. :-) -A. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone, Which one?
Well, considering I'm on topic, I shouldn't get flamed to badly for this. I have a bunch of these working well in my home experiments: http://www.laptops4me.com/product_info.php/products_id/1444 And yes that price is correct and they do arrive. :) Not everyone can justify buying the supported hardware to kick the tires and try it out * at home. On the commercial side support is worth every penny I'm sure. However I think it helps the community to have low cost entry options for people to learn. I know it helped me. -James ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone, Which one?
- Original Message - From: Andrew Kohlsmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think where the problem comes in is that people take this forum to be asterisk-biz half the time. I need X done **RIGHT NOW**!! I DEMAND HELP!! -- take it to -biz, there are dozens if not hundreds of consultants who will happily exchange money for experience. This forum is for people who want to Geepers man. Looking at the last couple of times you tried to 'educate' someone, I don't see anything in their messages that sound like I need X done **RIGHT NOW**!! I DEMAND HELP!!. Uneducated and demanding are not necessarily the same thing. Whatever, we're just going around in endless circles here. I'll get out of this discussion now and leave it up to those who wish to continue it regards, Paul ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone, Which one?
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: On March 5, 2005 02:46 pm, Paul wrote: Maybe one of the free web-based forum packages will eventually offer an elitist or impatient mode. Before you can post, you do the required reading and pass online exams. The idea is to weed out people who think README is just another geek buzzword. You have to know what a FAQ is and you have to know what RTFM means. That wouldn't help. If you're unwilling to learn, then this list isn't for you. Plain and simple. OSS grows when people learn. I was merely attempting to be sarcastically humorous. Most of those people who tend to scold every newbie are probably elitist pretenders. If they were truly elite, they would be too busy to read and reply to such posts. Of course some of us are just impatient, regardless of our skill level. Believe what you want, and I'l continue using my Asterisk servers and providing service to my customers. As I mentioned to another poster, feel free to manipulate your MUA's filters to adjust reality to your liking. FWIW, I think only the truly elite possess the time to help out others, since the elitist pretenders are too busy fiddling with their systems and trying to get them to work properly to be able to help. :-) FWIW - some of us have paying customers and helping them takes absolute over helping newbies who won't try to help themselves first. Some of them actually are capable of reading and studying the information already out there, but they are also selfish and lazy. A good illustration of this attitude happened last week: I had 3 paid technicicians who didn't have enough common sense to pick up a phone and listen for modem tone when a customer had problems with a dedicated dialup. The customer had neglected to pay the long distance carrier. Do you think the majority of us want to babysit people like this for free? ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone, Which one?
On March 5, 2005 04:57 pm, Paul wrote: FWIW - some of us have paying customers and helping them takes absolute over helping newbies who won't try to help themselves first. Some of them actually are capable of reading and studying the information already out there, but they are also selfish and lazy. paying customer == entitled to support. A good illustration of this attitude happened last week: I had 3 paid technicicians who didn't have enough common sense to pick up a phone and listen for modem tone when a customer had problems with a dedicated dialup. The customer had neglected to pay the long distance carrier. Do you think the majority of us want to babysit people like this for free? I can't tell if you're on my side of this debate or not, because you sure sound like it. :-) -A. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone, Which one?
On March 5, 2005 04:49 pm, Paul Fielding wrote: Geepers man. Looking at the last couple of times you tried to 'educate' someone, I don't see anything in their messages that sound like I need X done **RIGHT NOW**!! I DEMAND HELP!!. Uneducated and demanding are not necessarily the same thing. The thread moved to a more general bitch and moan, I agree. I guess it can be satated a little differently. Willfuly ignorant and ignorant are two very different things. I'll gladly help the latter if they show they are willing to overcome their ignorance. The former I'll reply with a rate sheet. Whatever, we're just going around in endless circles here. I'll get out of this discussion now and leave it up to those who wish to continue it heh, come on, this was just getting settled! :-) -A. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone, Which one?
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: I can't tell if you're on my side of this debate or not, because you sure sound like it. :-) I'm on my side and always on the side of the serious and earnest end user. I live in a sparsely populated rural area. Most of the locals can't afford to pay for computer help. I have told several of them that I am willing to give free classes as long as somebody volunteers to do the announcements and all that. Problem is that nobody is interested enough to give some of their own time. I mean I am even willing to do this at my own facilities and throw in free coffee. I would cover topics like protecting their wintel boxes from virus and other threats and FOSS for win32. The local school district offers paid continuing education classes that focus on things that most of these people can't afford like MS-Office. I would love the opportunity to show more win users things like openoffice and firefox. So I am willing to give one evening a week to help others but that's not good enough. They want to be able to call me anytime of day for free advice. Same thing applies to some of the people seeking help on lists like this. I think it is reasonable to expect people to RTFM before they start asking for help. The only exception I make is for pay or for a good cause. I should mention that I did two infected PC cleanups for locals last week. I don't even try to find them but somehow they find me. Both were so badly hosed that I just pulled the hard drive and mounted it on a linux box to make a copy of everything, then reinstalled win XP from scratch. I only charged $120 for this. Both customers would have benefited from a free class in how not to get the PC infected. Neither of them are the type that would be willing to do anything like posting flyers in order to make such a free class happen. No guilt here. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone, Which one?
Most of those people who tend to scold every newbie are probably elitist pretenders. If they were truly elite, they would be too busy to read and reply to such posts. Of course some of us are just impatient, regardless of our skill level. Very well said! Now back to helping those that need it. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone, Which one?
I think it comes down to tolerances. Some days I am far less tolerant than others when it comes to people who just don't want to put forward any effort. Today was particularly bad and if I was a smarter person, would probably refrain from reading the list at all. I don't always self-regulate so well, and this particular thread's a good example. Okay, so paste a little sticky note on your monitor as a reminder. It really would help the noise level a bunch by simply ignoring some of the posts instead of ranting over and over about research, etc. The rants don't really do any good; you've been around the list long enough to know that. Perhaps I was a little harsh when I said I hoped that nobody would help this guy out. Okay, lets all get back to helping out where we can. Rich ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone
Ten dollars! Someone please figure this out, I've got a modem here I'd like to try out! On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 18:30:24 -0500, Glenn Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Razvan Turtureanu wrote: I'm new to asterisk and fror a cupple of days I heave been googleing the net for digium clones, because it's very hard for me to get a digium card (X100P). Does anyone Know another substitute for X100P (I know that intel based modem with chip 537/MD3200 is working but I did not find any of those) ? ebay.com: search for digium cheers, glenn ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone
I'm new to asterisk and fror a cupple of days I heave been googleing the
net for digium clones, because it's very hard for me to get a digium
card (X100P).
Does anyone Know another substitute for X100P (I know that intel based
modem with chip 537/MD3200 is working but I did not find any of those) ?
I made it work with an Intel 536 (with a costumised driver that I found
on the asterisk-users archive*) voice modem but the voice from the PSTN
is not routed thought the SIP channels, you can only hear it in the
modem's speaker.
Does anyone know how to fix the problem...
modified this function in:
/usr/src/asterisk/channels/chan_modem.c
int ast_modem_send(struct ast_modem_pvt *p, char *cmd, int len)
{
int i;
usleep(5000);
if (!len) {
for(i = 0; cmd[i];)
{
if (fwrite(cmd + i,1,1,p-f) != 1)
{
if (errno == EWOULDBLOCK) continue;
return -1;
}
i++;
usleep(5000);
}
tcdrain(fileno(p-f));
fprintf(p-f,\r\n);
return 0;
} else {
if (fwrite(cmd, 1, len, p-f) len)
return -1;
return 0;
}
}
in /usr/src/asterisk/channels/chan_modem_bestdata.c I heave substitute
bestdata_ with intel_ and also this function:
static char *intel_idents[] = {
/* Identify BestData Modem */
536EP,
NULL
};
and I modified the /usr/src/asterisk/channels/Makefile for it to compile
the new chan_modem_intel.c
CHANNEL_LIBS=chan_modem.so chan_sip.so \
chan_modem_aopen.so \
chan_modem_bestdata.so \
chan_modem_intel.so \
chan_agent.so chan_mgcp.so chan_iax2.so \
chan_local.so chan_skinny.so chan_features.so
Any help will be wery welcome
--
Universitatea Politehnica din Bucuresti
Serviciul de Informatizare si Comunicatii
--
Razvan Turtureanu
Administrator de Sistem
Tel. fix: (402) 9666
Tel. mobil:0723637714
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone
I got mine from http://www.digitnetworks.com
On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 15:40:50 +0200, Razvan Turtureanu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm new to asterisk and fror a cupple of days I heave been googleing the
net for digium clones, because it's very hard for me to get a digium
card (X100P).
Does anyone Know another substitute for X100P (I know that intel based
modem with chip 537/MD3200 is working but I did not find any of those) ?
I made it work with an Intel 536 (with a costumised driver that I found
on the asterisk-users archive*) voice modem but the voice from the PSTN
is not routed thought the SIP channels, you can only hear it in the
modem's speaker.
Does anyone know how to fix the problem...
modified this function in:
/usr/src/asterisk/channels/chan_modem.c
int ast_modem_send(struct ast_modem_pvt *p, char *cmd, int len)
{
int i;
usleep(5000);
if (!len) {
for(i = 0; cmd[i];)
{
if (fwrite(cmd + i,1,1,p-f) != 1)
{
if (errno == EWOULDBLOCK) continue;
return -1;
}
i++;
usleep(5000);
}
tcdrain(fileno(p-f));
fprintf(p-f,\r\n);
return 0;
} else {
if (fwrite(cmd, 1, len, p-f) len)
return -1;
return 0;
}
}
in /usr/src/asterisk/channels/chan_modem_bestdata.c I heave substitute
bestdata_ with intel_ and also this function:
static char *intel_idents[] = {
/* Identify BestData Modem */
536EP,
NULL
};
and I modified the /usr/src/asterisk/channels/Makefile for it to compile
the new chan_modem_intel.c
CHANNEL_LIBS=chan_modem.so chan_sip.so \
chan_modem_aopen.so \
chan_modem_bestdata.so \
chan_modem_intel.so \
chan_agent.so chan_mgcp.so chan_iax2.so \
chan_local.so chan_skinny.so chan_features.so
Any help will be wery welcome
--
Universitatea Politehnica din Bucuresti
Serviciul de Informatizare si Comunicatii
--
Razvan Turtureanu
Administrator de Sistem
Tel. fix: (402) 9666
Tel. mobil:0723637714
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
--
Dr. Matthew Roller
9355 S 1300 E
Sandy, UT 84094
801-255-3925
http://www.rollerchiropractic.com
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone
I found At www.ebay.com 7 $US
Max Rivera
- Original Message -
From: Razvan Turtureanu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 11:40 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone
I'm new to asterisk and fror a cupple of days I heave been googleing the
net for digium clones, because it's very hard for me to get a digium
card (X100P).
Does anyone Know another substitute for X100P (I know that intel based
modem with chip 537/MD3200 is working but I did not find any of those) ?
I made it work with an Intel 536 (with a costumised driver that I found
on the asterisk-users archive*) voice modem but the voice from the PSTN
is not routed thought the SIP channels, you can only hear it in the
modem's speaker.
Does anyone know how to fix the problem...
modified this function in:
/usr/src/asterisk/channels/chan_modem.c
int ast_modem_send(struct ast_modem_pvt *p, char *cmd, int len)
{
int i;
usleep(5000);
if (!len) {
for(i = 0; cmd[i];)
{
if (fwrite(cmd + i,1,1,p-f) != 1)
{
if (errno == EWOULDBLOCK) continue;
return -1;
}
i++;
usleep(5000);
}
tcdrain(fileno(p-f));
fprintf(p-f,\r\n);
return 0;
} else {
if (fwrite(cmd, 1, len, p-f) len)
return -1;
return 0;
}
}
in /usr/src/asterisk/channels/chan_modem_bestdata.c I heave substitute
bestdata_ with intel_ and also this function:
static char *intel_idents[] = {
/* Identify BestData Modem */
536EP,
NULL
};
and I modified the /usr/src/asterisk/channels/Makefile for it to compile
the new chan_modem_intel.c
CHANNEL_LIBS=chan_modem.so chan_sip.so \
chan_modem_aopen.so \
chan_modem_bestdata.so \
chan_modem_intel.so \
chan_agent.so chan_mgcp.so chan_iax2.so \
chan_local.so chan_skinny.so chan_features.so
Any help will be wery welcome
--
Universitatea Politehnica din Bucuresti
Serviciul de Informatizare si Comunicatii
--
Razvan Turtureanu
Administrator de Sistem
Tel. fix: (402) 9666
Tel. mobil:0723637714
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone
Razvan Turtureanu wrote: I'm new to asterisk and fror a cupple of days I heave been googleing the net for digium clones, because it's very hard for me to get a digium card (X100P). Does anyone Know another substitute for X100P (I know that intel based modem with chip 537/MD3200 is working but I did not find any of those) ? ebay.com: search for digium cheers, glenn ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] X100P Clone - Can't load moddule
Hello! I'm trying to install Zaptel module so I can run a X100P clone (Intel 537, MD 3200) as an FXO interface. The problem is that after compilling and installing (successfull, aparently) I can't load the module. I tried (almost) every tip I was able to find on Google, Voip-Info and this mailing-list, no success until now. Anyone here got lucky with that? I hope so... Running system is an old AMD 500Mhz with 64MB RAM on SuSE Linux 8.2 (no plans to upgrade unless extremely necessary) with most packages updated. Thanks in advance, -Dhennys woody sources/zaptel-1.0.2# uname -a Linux woody 2.4.20-4GB #1 Tue Aug 10 10:44:07 UTC 2004 i586 unknown unknown GNU/Linux woody sources/zaptel-1.0.2# woody sources/zaptel-1.0.2# ztcfg -vv Zaptel Configuration == Channel map: Channel 01: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01) 1 channels configured. Notice: Configuration file is /etc/zaptel.conf line 145: Unable to open master device '/dev/zap/ctl' woody sources/zaptel-1.0.2# woody sources/zaptel-1.0.2# lspci -vv 00:0a.0 Communication controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Intel 537 Subsystem: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 0003 Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- Status: Cap+ 66Mhz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- Latency: 32 (250ns min, 32000ns max) Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 10 Region 0: I/O ports at d800 [size=256] Region 1: Memory at de80 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2 Flags: PMEClk- DSI+ D1- D2+ AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0+,D1-,D2+,D3hot+,D3cold-) Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME- woody sources/zaptel-1.0.2# lsmod | grep 537 Intel537 3695396 1 woody sources/zaptel-1.0.2# cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 0: 621189 XT-PIC timer 1: 4 XT-PIC keyboard 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade 5: 0 XT-PIC usb-ohci 8: 2 XT-PIC rtc 9: 1 XT-PIC acpi 10: 611199 XT-PIC 537 11: 72090 XT-PIC eth0 14: 96205 XT-PIC ide0 NMI: 0 LOC: 0 ERR: 0 MIS: 0 woody sources/zaptel-1.0.2# woody sources/zaptel-1.0.2# modprobe zaptel /lib/modules/2.4.20-4GB/misc/zaptel.o: couldn't find the kernel version the module was compiled for /lib/modules/2.4.20-4GB/misc/zaptel.o: insmod /lib/modules/2.4.20-4GB/misc/zaptel.o failed /lib/modules/2.4.20-4GB/misc/zaptel.o: insmod zaptel failed woody sources/zaptel-1.0.2# ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
