Re: [Asterisk-Users] multiple asterisk process ?
On 18 Apr 2006, at 09:27, Dave Cotton wrote: On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 09:13 +0100, Lee Archer wrote: Any thoughts as to why only 1 of my boxes has this problem? Is it really a problem? I'm on a 2.6 kernel so any more ideas? Can someone answer what was the original purpose of the "export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1" in the asterisk script? We have it set on Fedora Core 1 systems (and equivalent vintage RHEL) because RedHat backported the 2.6 kernel threads to their 2.4 kernel, and loads of things broke (oracle 9i, java 1.3 etc) so we had LD_ASSUME_KERNEL 2.4.1 set to force the old (i.e. normal for a 2.4 kernel) behavior. If you are running asterisk on a stable 2.6 kernel you shouldn't set it. By the way, the cat /proc/*asterisk proc number*/environ | strings | grep LD_ASSUME_KERNEL only works if you are root, or whoever asterisk is running as. It gives an empty result if it has not got permission to read. Tim Panton [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] multiple asterisk process ?
All I can figure is that something I haven't yet figured is causing these processes to be created, and after a while there is so many that outgoing calls over zap can't be made. It only applies to 1 system out of 7, running Suse 10 and a 2.6 kernel. Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Cotton Sent: 18 April 2006 10:02 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] multiple asterisk process ? On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 09:33 +0100, Lee Archer wrote: > Yes it is a problem cos after a while of just leaving it the system is > unable to make calls out via the PSTN, which is why I have spent time > with the telco, more like wasted time, and played with zaptel's > make options. After trying a few things I came to the temporary > conclusion that it was the zaptel watchdog trying and failing to > restart a hung channel. I recompiled zaptel without the watchdog and > a few days later it did the same so I'm back to sq 1. Ok, I'll ask it another way. Is it _the_ problem because I've an uptime of 209 days on a system with no problems and multiple asterisk processes. -- Dave Cotton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ### This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange. For more information, connect to http://www.f-secure.com/ ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] multiple asterisk process ?
I've tried cat /proc/*asterisk proc number*/environ | strings | grep LD_ASSUME_KERNEL and it returns nothing..:( And just for confirmation : I had the same problem as Lee had (unable to make calls out) :( Regards, Stevanus Lee Archer wrote: Yes it is a problem cos after a while of just leaving it the system is unable to make calls out via the PSTN, which is why I have spent time with the telco, more like wasted time, and played with zaptel's make options. After trying a few things I came to the temporary conclusion that it was the zaptel watchdog trying and failing to restart a hung channel. I recompiled zaptel without the watchdog and a few days later it did the same so I'm back to sq 1. Regards Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dave Cotton Sent: 18 April 2006 09:27 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] multiple asterisk process ? On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 09:13 +0100, Lee Archer wrote: Any thoughts as to why only 1 of my boxes has this problem? Is it really a problem? I'm on a 2.6 kernel so any more ideas? Can someone answer what was the original purpose of the "export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1" in the asterisk script? Perhaps Gregory Boehnlein, the author, will be able to tell us. -- Dave Cotton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ### This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange. For more information, connect to http://www.f-secure.com/ ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] multiple asterisk process ?
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 09:33 +0100, Lee Archer wrote: > Yes it is a problem cos after a while of just leaving it the system is > unable to make calls out via the PSTN, which is why I have spent time > with the telco, more like wasted time, and played with zaptel's make > options. After trying a few things I came to the temporary conclusion > that it was the zaptel watchdog trying and failing to restart a hung > channel. I recompiled zaptel without the watchdog and a few days later > it did the same so I'm back to sq 1. Ok, I'll ask it another way. Is it _the_ problem because I've an uptime of 209 days on a system with no problems and multiple asterisk processes. -- Dave Cotton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] multiple asterisk process ?
Yes it is a problem cos after a while of just leaving it the system is unable to make calls out via the PSTN, which is why I have spent time with the telco, more like wasted time, and played with zaptel's make options. After trying a few things I came to the temporary conclusion that it was the zaptel watchdog trying and failing to restart a hung channel. I recompiled zaptel without the watchdog and a few days later it did the same so I'm back to sq 1. Regards Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Cotton Sent: 18 April 2006 09:27 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] multiple asterisk process ? On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 09:13 +0100, Lee Archer wrote: > Any thoughts as to why only 1 of my boxes has this problem? Is it really a problem? > I'm on a > 2.6 kernel so any more ideas? Can someone answer what was the original purpose of the "export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1" in the asterisk script? Perhaps Gregory Boehnlein, the author, will be able to tell us. -- Dave Cotton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ### This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange. For more information, connect to http://www.f-secure.com/ ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] multiple asterisk process ?
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 09:13 +0100, Lee Archer wrote: > Any thoughts as to why only 1 of my boxes has this problem? Is it really a problem? > I'm on a > 2.6 kernel so any more ideas? Can someone answer what was the original purpose of the "export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1" in the asterisk script? Perhaps Gregory Boehnlein, the author, will be able to tell us. -- Dave Cotton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] multiple asterisk process ?
Any thoughts as to why only 1 of my boxes has this problem? I'm on a 2.6 kernel so any more ideas? Regards Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Cotton Sent: 18 April 2006 09:00 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] multiple asterisk process ? On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 08:29 +0100, Tim Panton wrote: > > I'd guess you have a startup script for asterisk that is setting the > LD_ASSUME_KERNEL environment variable. > > To check, find the 'main' asterisk process id (almost always the > lowest numbered asterisk process) then look (as root) in the /proc > entry, eg: > > cat /proc/13098/environ | strings | grep LD_ASSUME_KERNEL Now we're getting somewhere. In some old contribs/init.d asterisk scripts there is the following:- # Leave this set unless you know what you are doing. #export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 While others have nothing or this # Uncomment this ONLY if you know what you are doing. # export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 -- Dave Cotton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ### This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange. For more information, connect to http://www.f-secure.com/ ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] multiple asterisk process ?
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 08:29 +0100, Tim Panton wrote: > > I'd guess you have a startup script for asterisk that is setting the > LD_ASSUME_KERNEL environment variable. > > To check, find the 'main' asterisk process id (almost always the > lowest numbered asterisk process) > then look (as root) in the /proc entry, eg: > > cat /proc/13098/environ | strings | grep LD_ASSUME_KERNEL Now we're getting somewhere. In some old contribs/init.d asterisk scripts there is the following:- # Leave this set unless you know what you are doing. #export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 While others have nothing or this # Uncomment this ONLY if you know what you are doing. # export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 -- Dave Cotton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] multiple asterisk process ?
On 18 Apr 2006, at 03:20, stevanus wrote: Hmm...my output for getconf GNU_LIBPTHREAD_VERSION is NPTL 2.3.4.. I don't know what it's mean anyway :P And for Lee, I'm configuring my asterisk through amp (now freepbx), but I do some custom configuration manually too ;) I guess Paul is right, I suspect there are bugs in asterisk that haven't been solved like "avoiding deadlock on iax" problem which I had mentioned before.. Unfortunately, I don't know how to recreate the problem so all I can do if the problem is happened just do some killall - 9 asterisk :(... Regads, Stevanus I'd guess you have a startup script for asterisk that is setting the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL environment variable. To check, find the 'main' asterisk process id (almost always the lowest numbered asterisk process) then look (as root) in the /proc entry, eg: cat /proc/13098/environ | strings | grep LD_ASSUME_KERNEL Tim Panton [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] multiple asterisk process ?
Hmm...my output for getconf GNU_LIBPTHREAD_VERSION is NPTL 2.3.4.. I don't know what it's mean anyway :P And for Lee, I'm configuring my asterisk through amp (now freepbx), but I do some custom configuration manually too ;) I guess Paul is right, I suspect there are bugs in asterisk that haven't been solved like "avoiding deadlock on iax" problem which I had mentioned before.. Unfortunately, I don't know how to recreate the problem so all I can do if the problem is happened just do some killall - 9 asterisk :(... Regads, Stevanus Moises Silva wrote: Thanks for clarifying that Paul. my output for getconf is: linuxthreads-0.10 so i guess is "normal" to have several threads shown by "ps axu" right? On 4/17/06, Dave Cotton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 19:12 +0200, Paul Hewlett wrote: This is incorrect. Asterisk is a multithreaded system but how the threads are handled by the OS depends on the version of threads that is being used. For Linuxthreads (kernel 2.4), one would see a separate entry for each thread when executing 'ps aux'. For NPTL (linux 2.6) one does not see each thread as a separate entry. So the OP must tell us which kernel version he is using. Alternatively type getconf GNU_LIBPTHREAD_VERSION as root. For NPTL u should get something like NPTL 2.3.5 or suchlike. If you are using NPTL and there is more than one entry for asterisk, then asterisk has spawned an extra process for some reason. If extra processes keep appearing then I would say that he has a bug or error somewhere and asterisk is respawning that separate process. Are you sure? root 2532 0.0 0.2 2532 620 ?S17:22 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/sbin/safe_asterisk root 2539 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2542 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2544 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2545 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2546 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2547 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2548 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2549 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2550 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2551 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2552 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2553 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2554 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2555 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2556 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2557 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2558 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2559 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2560 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2561 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2562 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2563 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2564 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:01 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2565 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2566 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2567 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c With NPTL 2.3.6 If that is the case * is totally hosed, no? -- Dave Cotton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- "Su nombre es GNU/Linux, no solamente Linux, mas info en http://www.gnu.org" ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] multiple asterisk process ?
Thanks for clarifying that Paul. my output for getconf is: linuxthreads-0.10 so i guess is "normal" to have several threads shown by "ps axu" right? On 4/17/06, Dave Cotton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 19:12 +0200, Paul Hewlett wrote: > > > This is incorrect. Asterisk is a multithreaded system but how the threads > > are handled by the OS depends on the version of threads that is being used. > >For Linuxthreads (kernel 2.4), one would see a separate entry for each > > thread when executing 'ps aux'. For NPTL (linux 2.6) one does not see each > > thread as a separate entry. So the OP must tell us which kernel version he > > is > > using. Alternatively type > > > > getconf GNU_LIBPTHREAD_VERSION > > > > as root. For NPTL u should get something like > > > > NPTL 2.3.5 > > > > or suchlike. > > > > If you are using NPTL and there is more than one entry for asterisk, then > > asterisk has spawned an extra process for some reason. If extra processes > > keep appearing then I would say that he has a bug or error somewhere and > > asterisk is respawning that separate process. > > > > Are you sure? > > root 2532 0.0 0.2 2532 620 ?S17:22 > 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/sbin/safe_asterisk > root 2539 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 > asterisk -n -vvvg -c > root 2542 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 > asterisk -n -vvvg -c > root 2544 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 > asterisk -n -vvvg -c > root 2545 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 > asterisk -n -vvvg -c > root 2546 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 > asterisk -n -vvvg -c > root 2547 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 > asterisk -n -vvvg -c > root 2548 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 > asterisk -n -vvvg -c > root 2549 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 > asterisk -n -vvvg -c > root 2550 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 > asterisk -n -vvvg -c > root 2551 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 > asterisk -n -vvvg -c > root 2552 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 > asterisk -n -vvvg -c > root 2553 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 > asterisk -n -vvvg -c > root 2554 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 > asterisk -n -vvvg -c > root 2555 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 > asterisk -n -vvvg -c > root 2556 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 > asterisk -n -vvvg -c > root 2557 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 > asterisk -n -vvvg -c > root 2558 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 > asterisk -n -vvvg -c > root 2559 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 > asterisk -n -vvvg -c > root 2560 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 > asterisk -n -vvvg -c > root 2561 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 > asterisk -n -vvvg -c > root 2562 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 > asterisk -n -vvvg -c > root 2563 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 > asterisk -n -vvvg -c > root 2564 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:01 > asterisk -n -vvvg -c > root 2565 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 > asterisk -n -vvvg -c > root 2566 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 > asterisk -n -vvvg -c > root 2567 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 > asterisk -n -vvvg -c > > With NPTL 2.3.6 > > If that is the case * is totally hosed, no? > > -- > Dave Cotton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > ___ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > -- "Su nombre es GNU/Linux, no solamente Linux, mas info en http://www.gnu.org"; ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] multiple asterisk process ?
On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 19:12 +0200, Paul Hewlett wrote: > This is incorrect. Asterisk is a multithreaded system but how the threads > are handled by the OS depends on the version of threads that is being used. >For Linuxthreads (kernel 2.4), one would see a separate entry for each > thread when executing 'ps aux'. For NPTL (linux 2.6) one does not see each > thread as a separate entry. So the OP must tell us which kernel version he is > using. Alternatively type > > getconf GNU_LIBPTHREAD_VERSION > > as root. For NPTL u should get something like > > NPTL 2.3.5 > > or suchlike. > > If you are using NPTL and there is more than one entry for asterisk, then > asterisk has spawned an extra process for some reason. If extra processes > keep appearing then I would say that he has a bug or error somewhere and > asterisk is respawning that separate process. > Are you sure? root 2532 0.0 0.2 2532 620 ?S17:22 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/sbin/safe_asterisk root 2539 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2542 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2544 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2545 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2546 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2547 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2548 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2549 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2550 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2551 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2552 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2553 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2554 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2555 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2556 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2557 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2558 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2559 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2560 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2561 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2562 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2563 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2564 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:01 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2565 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2566 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c root 2567 0.0 2.8 17716 7316 ?S17:22 0:00 asterisk -n -vvvg -c With NPTL 2.3.6 If that is the case * is totally hosed, no? -- Dave Cotton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] multiple asterisk process ?
On Monday 17 April 2006 16:03, Moises Silva wrote: > Asterisk is a multithreaded system. I have not in mind how many > threads open and where. But ie, if you have enabled pbx_spool.so to > generate calls from files, that module launch its own thread to > monitor the calls directory, MOH launch other thread, every channel > has its own thread, the CLI has its own thread, to listen for calls in > SIP, IAX, you need specific threads etc, etc, i would say what you see > is normal. > > Regards This is incorrect. Asterisk is a multithreaded system but how the threads are handled by the OS depends on the version of threads that is being used. For Linuxthreads (kernel 2.4), one would see a separate entry for each thread when executing 'ps aux'. For NPTL (linux 2.6) one does not see each thread as a separate entry. So the OP must tell us which kernel version he is using. Alternatively type getconf GNU_LIBPTHREAD_VERSION as root. For NPTL u should get something like NPTL 2.3.5 or suchlike. If you are using NPTL and there is more than one entry for asterisk, then asterisk has spawned an extra process for some reason. If extra processes keep appearing then I would say that he has a bug or error somewhere and asterisk is respawning that separate process. Paul Hewlett > > On 4/17/06, Lee Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I had this and no one could really answer it. I only get it 1 of my > > systems. I've tried a few things, from removing zaptel watchdog - since > > I contacted the telco and they said I had a hung channel, to rebuilding > > * with different options. Are you configuring * manually or using a > > GUI? > > > > Lee > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of stevanus > > Sent: 17 April 2006 10:10 > > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] multiple asterisk process ? > > > > Hi, > > > > Why does my asterisk keep forking instances at random times everyday? > > > > When I do ps aux, I got this: > > > > asterisk 13068 2.2 5.1 25924 12276 ? Sl 06:00 13:18 asterisk > > -vvvg -c > > asterisk 23558 0.0 5.1 26040 12248 ? S09:57 0:00 asterisk > > -vvvg -c > > asterisk 29832 0.0 5.1 25924 12208 ? S11:48 0:00 asterisk > > -vvvg -c > > asterisk 31872 0.0 5.1 25924 12208 ? S12:32 0:00 asterisk > > -vvvg -c > > asterisk 2520 0.0 5.1 25928 12228 ? S13:21 0:00 asterisk > > -vvvg -c > > asterisk 4638 0.0 5.1 25924 12232 ? S13:50 0:00 asterisk > > -vvvg -c > > asterisk 5126 0.0 5.1 25932 12240 ? S13:57 0:00 asterisk > > -vvvg -c > > asterisk 6487 0.0 5.1 26016 12336 ? S14:23 0:00 asterisk > > -vvvg -c > > > > Is this normal? > > Does anyone experience this? > > > > Thanks.. > > > > Regards, > > > > Stevanus > > ___ > > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > > > > ### > > > > This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft > > Exchange. For more information, connect to http://www.f-secure.com/ > > ___ > > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > -- > "Su nombre es GNU/Linux, no solamente Linux, mas info en > http://www.gnu.org"; ___ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] multiple asterisk process ?
Asterisk is a multithreaded system. I have not in mind how many threads open and where. But ie, if you have enabled pbx_spool.so to generate calls from files, that module launch its own thread to monitor the calls directory, MOH launch other thread, every channel has its own thread, the CLI has its own thread, to listen for calls in SIP, IAX, you need specific threads etc, etc, i would say what you see is normal. Regards On 4/17/06, Lee Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I had this and no one could really answer it. I only get it 1 of my > systems. I've tried a few things, from removing zaptel watchdog - since > I contacted the telco and they said I had a hung channel, to rebuilding > * with different options. Are you configuring * manually or using a > GUI? > > Lee > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of stevanus > Sent: 17 April 2006 10:10 > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] multiple asterisk process ? > > Hi, > > Why does my asterisk keep forking instances at random times everyday? > > When I do ps aux, I got this: > > asterisk 13068 2.2 5.1 25924 12276 ? Sl 06:00 13:18 asterisk > -vvvg -c > asterisk 23558 0.0 5.1 26040 12248 ? S09:57 0:00 asterisk > -vvvg -c > asterisk 29832 0.0 5.1 25924 12208 ? S11:48 0:00 asterisk > -vvvg -c > asterisk 31872 0.0 5.1 25924 12208 ? S12:32 0:00 asterisk > -vvvg -c > asterisk 2520 0.0 5.1 25928 12228 ? S13:21 0:00 asterisk > -vvvg -c > asterisk 4638 0.0 5.1 25924 12232 ? S13:50 0:00 asterisk > -vvvg -c > asterisk 5126 0.0 5.1 25932 12240 ? S13:57 0:00 asterisk > -vvvg -c > asterisk 6487 0.0 5.1 26016 12336 ? S14:23 0:00 asterisk > -vvvg -c > > Is this normal? > Does anyone experience this? > > Thanks.. > > Regards, > > Stevanus > ___ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > ### > > This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange. > For more information, connect to http://www.f-secure.com/ > ___ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > -- "Su nombre es GNU/Linux, no solamente Linux, mas info en http://www.gnu.org"; ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] multiple asterisk process ?
I had this and no one could really answer it. I only get it 1 of my systems. I've tried a few things, from removing zaptel watchdog - since I contacted the telco and they said I had a hung channel, to rebuilding * with different options. Are you configuring * manually or using a GUI? Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of stevanus Sent: 17 April 2006 10:10 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [Asterisk-Users] multiple asterisk process ? Hi, Why does my asterisk keep forking instances at random times everyday? When I do ps aux, I got this: asterisk 13068 2.2 5.1 25924 12276 ? Sl 06:00 13:18 asterisk -vvvg -c asterisk 23558 0.0 5.1 26040 12248 ? S09:57 0:00 asterisk -vvvg -c asterisk 29832 0.0 5.1 25924 12208 ? S11:48 0:00 asterisk -vvvg -c asterisk 31872 0.0 5.1 25924 12208 ? S12:32 0:00 asterisk -vvvg -c asterisk 2520 0.0 5.1 25928 12228 ? S13:21 0:00 asterisk -vvvg -c asterisk 4638 0.0 5.1 25924 12232 ? S13:50 0:00 asterisk -vvvg -c asterisk 5126 0.0 5.1 25932 12240 ? S13:57 0:00 asterisk -vvvg -c asterisk 6487 0.0 5.1 26016 12336 ? S14:23 0:00 asterisk -vvvg -c Is this normal? Does anyone experience this? Thanks.. Regards, Stevanus ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ### This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange. For more information, connect to http://www.f-secure.com/ ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Multiple asterisk process
Hi Il giorno mer, 24-11-2004 alle 19:48 +0100, Ming-Wei Shih ha scritto: > Hong Kim wrote: > > >I'm running * on Redhat9 with E100P and ISDN PRI. > >When I executed asterisk, I could see about 25 > >asterisk processes. > >Did someone experienced this? > > > >Regards, > >Hong > I only see one :) > > $ ps -ef |grep asterisk > root 12536 1 0 Nov22 ?00:00:00 /opt/asterisk/sbin/asterisk > xming 7486 7481 0 19:44 pts/000:00:00 grep asterisk > $ > > let me guess, you are using 2.4.x kernel? In 2.4 kernel, all threads are > listed ad processes not only kernel, but depends also on "ps" version. On rh9 I see only 1 proc, of FC1 (also kern 2.4, but newer "ps") I see all the threads. Matteo. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Multiple asterisk process
Hong Kim wrote: I'm running * on Redhat9 with E100P and ISDN PRI. When I executed asterisk, I could see about 25 asterisk processes. Did someone experienced this? Regards, Hong __ Do you Yahoo!? The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free! http://my.yahoo.com ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users I only see one :) $ ps -ef |grep asterisk root 12536 1 0 Nov22 ?00:00:00 /opt/asterisk/sbin/asterisk xming 7486 7481 0 19:44 pts/000:00:00 grep asterisk $ let me guess, you are using 2.4.x kernel? In 2.4 kernel, all threads are listed ad processes Ming-Wei ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Multiple asterisk process
David Boyd wrote: [snip] > > Greg, you need chill; take a deep breath; now say to yourself, let it > g!! > Does "hypertensio arteriale" and "myocardial infarction" ring a bell..? > Critch, has the right to respond, anyway he desires. People need to > be responsible for themselves and their actions, and in particular > they need to defend themselves if they feel attacked or insulted. > > I have not seen a response from the individual who posted the original > question (Hong) reply at all to the thread; if he isn't concerned then > why are you? > He probably resigned from the maillinglist screaming... > Why do you think the list as a whole reflects something about you, > only your posts say anything about you. > > I don't wonder at all about Linux catching on, it is, one informed > user at a time! > Can we conclude that the following chinese proverb still is valid ?? "He who asks may be a fool for five minutes. But he who does not ask remains a fool forever." On the other hand... This may be more appropriate... "Accept that some days you're the pigeon, and some days you're the statue." Scott Adams. :-) /Soren ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Multiple asterisk process
On 10:42 AM 11/20/2004, Jose Hernandez wrote: > >>Did you bother using google? > >I searched google but could not find an answer. Any other suggestions? > http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2004-April/043852.html ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Multiple asterisk process
On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 01:32, Gregory Junker wrote: > > Add to it, my message wasn't a flame but rather a terse comment. Your > > Never said it was a flame. I said it was in a tone virutally guaranteed > to make the guy consider you and everyone on the list to be a conceited > jackass. > > The difference in your perception of your replies (the one I snipped > included) and the way you actually come off in public, is the problem. > You think you are being terse. You actually thought your post directed > the guy to the "answer repository". He probably did end up going to > Google, but I'll bet he loses interest in Asterisk before long. I guess > your work is done here then, right? If they guy isn't an expert, he has > no hope of learning, huh? > > And they wonder why Linux doesn't catch on... > > > Greg > ___ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users Greg, you need chill; take a deep breath; now say to yourself, let it g!! Critch, has the right to respond, anyway he desires. People need to be responsible for themselves and their actions, and in particular they need to defend themselves if they feel attacked or insulted. I have not seen a response from the individual who posted the original question (Hong) reply at all to the thread; if he isn't concerned then why are you? Why do you think the list as a whole reflects something about you, only your posts say anything about you. I don't wonder at all about Linux catching on, it is, one informed user at a time! Dave P.s. Sorry for bottom posting in my reply;) ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Multiple asterisk process
Add to it, my message wasn't a flame but rather a terse comment. Your Never said it was a flame. I said it was in a tone virutally guaranteed to make the guy consider you and everyone on the list to be a conceited jackass. The difference in your perception of your replies (the one I snipped included) and the way you actually come off in public, is the problem. You think you are being terse. You actually thought your post directed the guy to the "answer repository". He probably did end up going to Google, but I'll bet he loses interest in Asterisk before long. I guess your work is done here then, right? If they guy isn't an expert, he has no hope of learning, huh? And they wonder why Linux doesn't catch on... Greg ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Multiple asterisk process
On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 01:02 -0500, Gregory Junker wrote: > This was addressed in a different thread, as I recall, regarding > "newbie" posters, and it was decided, as far as I could tell, that no > benefit would be had of such a thing. The feeling was that newbies > should benefit from veteran experience too. Must have been covered in a thread I didn't see worthy of me looking into. Probably had something in the subject line that was totally unrelated to the subject discussed or was part of the whining annoyance that was the top-posting thread that I ignored most of. As many of us do actually skip a fair number of the messages that do make it out, I guess it might have been decided by such a small percentage of people as to be meaningless. Add to it that no one that probably decided had any authority to enforce it on anyone. Add to it, my message wasn't a flame but rather a terse comment. Your complaint about me being terse has caused you to look like an ass. The veterans of this group have put our effort into getting the questions answered. They are in the archive. Most of the veterans are programmers, and the lot of a programmer is to make a computer do the work instead of a person. So when we say use google, we are routing the user to the already in place answer repository. -- Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Multiple asterisk process
oh hell I give up, this is the third time that THunderbird would have sent my mail on its own, what am I on a timer? At any rate, the point is that I'll bet that even you, Steve, didn't fall out of the crib knowing everything there is to know, and that at some point, you even asked questions of someone who felt the same way you do (at least at times)but the difference was, he either answered your questions to your satisfaction, or politely directed you to where the answer could be found? I'll bet you didn't get many responses along the lines of "Jesus dude, don't you have a clue? What are you, a damn moron? Why are you bothering me with this sh*t? Go find out for yourself!!!" And if you did, I'll bet you didn't ask him again. Problem is, when you respond like that, it reflects, unfortunately, poorly on the whole list body politic. And since I am not as world-weary as you are, I simply ask that if you cannot be polite, then don't reply to newb questions. It's really that simple. Greg Gregory Junker wrote: This was addressed in a different thread, as I recall, regarding "newbie" posters, and it was decided, as far as I could tell, that no benefit would be had of such a thing. The feeling was that newbies should benefit from veteran experience too. Steven Critchfield wrote: On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 00:42 -0500, Gregory Junker wrote: And Steve provides yet another cordial, extremely helpful reply. Really, friend, does it do *that* much for your ego to step on people in public? If you can't be friendly, just ignore the damn email, no matter how many times the question has been asked. And what benefit is it to the list for someone who isn't going to be bothered to spend 2 minutes on a path of self enlightenment? 2 minutes might even be more than necessary for one who has spent any time on that path. The level of sophistication needed for running a asterisk box needs someone who at least exhibits more than a second grade education. What grade did your school actually quit spoon feeding you every fact and start asking you to use the tools in front of you to answer questions? ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Multiple asterisk process
This was addressed in a different thread, as I recall, regarding "newbie" posters, and it was decided, as far as I could tell, that no benefit would be had of such a thing. The feeling was that newbies should benefit from veteran experience too. Steven Critchfield wrote: On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 00:42 -0500, Gregory Junker wrote: And Steve provides yet another cordial, extremely helpful reply. Really, friend, does it do *that* much for your ego to step on people in public? If you can't be friendly, just ignore the damn email, no matter how many times the question has been asked. And what benefit is it to the list for someone who isn't going to be bothered to spend 2 minutes on a path of self enlightenment? 2 minutes might even be more than necessary for one who has spent any time on that path. The level of sophistication needed for running a asterisk box needs someone who at least exhibits more than a second grade education. What grade did your school actually quit spoon feeding you every fact and start asking you to use the tools in front of you to answer questions? ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Multiple asterisk process
I *do* do the same for his posts. Every hundredth one or so, I feel it necessary to let the poor guy or gal who was unlucky enough to ask a simple question that "Critch" felt the need to answer, that we all were not like that. As a result, that person might even ask another question someday. Instead of being an ass about it, Steve could just as easily said: "You can find the information you seek on Google.". It's only a few more words, and far more cordial. Greg Matt Riddell wrote: Gregory Junker wrote: And Steve provides yet another cordial, extremely helpful reply. Really, friend, does it do *that* much for your ego to step on people in public? If you can't be friendly, just ignore the damn email, no matter how many times the question has been asked. Maybe you could do the same for his posts. 8000 messages for first post (poster should have checked google - BTW its ok) 8000 messages for post telling him to search google 8000 messages for post telling Steven to ignore the mail 8000 messages for this post I am currently sending. 1. The first message shouldn't have been sent. (If everybody had ignored him he would have ended up at google anyway) 2. The 2nd, 3rd and 4th messages shouldn't have been sent (an extra 24,000 mails sent out) - and yes I know the 4th is my mail. 3. Maybe a new rule :-) Don't flame, but if someone does, don't respond to it. It will go away if you ignore it. Oh yeah, and sorry for polluting the net with this post...hopefully it'll be the last on the subject. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Multiple asterisk process
On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 00:42 -0500, Gregory Junker wrote: > And Steve provides yet another cordial, extremely helpful reply. > > Really, friend, does it do *that* much for your ego to step on people in > public? If you can't be friendly, just ignore the damn email, no matter > how many times the question has been asked. And what benefit is it to the list for someone who isn't going to be bothered to spend 2 minutes on a path of self enlightenment? 2 minutes might even be more than necessary for one who has spent any time on that path. The level of sophistication needed for running a asterisk box needs someone who at least exhibits more than a second grade education. What grade did your school actually quit spoon feeding you every fact and start asking you to use the tools in front of you to answer questions? -- Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Multiple asterisk process
Gregory Junker wrote: And Steve provides yet another cordial, extremely helpful reply. Really, friend, does it do *that* much for your ego to step on people in public? If you can't be friendly, just ignore the damn email, no matter how many times the question has been asked. Maybe you could do the same for his posts. 8000 messages for first post (poster should have checked google - BTW its ok) 8000 messages for post telling him to search google 8000 messages for post telling Steven to ignore the mail 8000 messages for this post I am currently sending. 1. The first message shouldn't have been sent. (If everybody had ignored him he would have ended up at google anyway) 2. The 2nd, 3rd and 4th messages shouldn't have been sent (an extra 24,000 mails sent out) - and yes I know the 4th is my mail. 3. Maybe a new rule :-) Don't flame, but if someone does, don't respond to it. It will go away if you ignore it. Oh yeah, and sorry for polluting the net with this post...hopefully it'll be the last on the subject. -- Cheers, Matt Riddell ___ http://www.sineapps.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html) http://www.sineapps.com/rssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss) ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Multiple asterisk process
And Steve provides yet another cordial, extremely helpful reply. Really, friend, does it do *that* much for your ego to step on people in public? If you can't be friendly, just ignore the damn email, no matter how many times the question has been asked. Greg Steven Critchfield wrote: On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 21:08 -0800, Hong Kim wrote: I'm running * on Redhat9 with E100P and ISDN PRI. When I executed asterisk, I could see about 25 asterisk processes. Did someone experienced this? Did you bother using google? ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Multiple asterisk process
On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 21:08 -0800, Hong Kim wrote: > I'm running * on Redhat9 with E100P and ISDN PRI. > When I executed asterisk, I could see about 25 > asterisk processes. > Did someone experienced this? Did you bother using google? -- Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
