Re: [asterisk-users] x100p card
2009/10/4 Alan Zheng machinecat1...@gmail.com Hi All: I have a x100p card and asterisk installed to my computer, can I use this card and a softphone to call other phone? yes Thanks -- Refer to: http://www.microsuncn.com Best Regards Alan Zheng ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Card in OFFHOOK state
Hi, The settings provided did not work...the state is still OFF HOOK... ANy other ideas? --- On Tue, 8/26/08, Guillermo Salas M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Guillermo Salas M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Card in OFFHOOK state To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Date: Tuesday, August 26, 2008, 11:15 PM El mar, 26-08-2008 a las 19:46 -0700, Jay Ray escribió: Any pointers on this one? --- On Tue, 8/26/08, Jay Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Jay Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [asterisk-users] X100P Card in OFFHOOK state To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Date: Tuesday, August 26, 2008, 12:24 PM After I make a call o n the Zaptel Card X100P FXO moduleit remains offhook state as shown here... Signalling Type: FXS Kewlstart Radio: 0re2uk*CLI Owner: None*CLI Real: Nonek*CLI Callwait: NoneI Threeway: NoneI Confno: -12uk*CLI Propagated Conference: -1 Real in conference: 0 DSP: noore2uk*CLI Relax DTMF: noCLI Dialing/CallwaitCAS: 0/0 Default law: ulaw Fax Handled: noLI Pulse phone: noLI Echo Cancellation: 128 taps, currently OFF Actual Confinfo: Num/0, Mode/0x Actual Confmute: No Hookstate (FXS only): Offhook -- Sometimes it still takes a new call while in this state and sometimes rejects it... How to correct it such that after I hangup a call it goes back to onhook state... reloading wcfxo module using modprobe clears the issue Sounds like your card is not detecting the busy tone, try adding the following line at your zapata.conf file: busydetect=yes busycount=6 Best regards, -- Guillermo Salas M. Telconet S.A. Calle 15 y Avenida 24 Esq Edificio Barre #2 Primer Piso Telefono : +593 5 262 8071 Celular : +593 9 985 5138 e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] www : http://www.manta.telconet.net http://www.telcocarrier.net SIP : [EMAIL PROTECTED] FWD : 558563 USA : 1 360 968 1701 Linux User: 255902 Beat me, whip me, make me use Windows! Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html Please avoid the Top Posting, see http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-posting ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Card in OFFHOOK state
This an FXO card, but for some reason it is configured as an FXS card on asteriskas per asterisk install Guide... --- On Tue, 8/26/08, Eric ManxPower Wieling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Eric ManxPower Wieling [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Card in OFFHOOK state To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Date: Tuesday, August 26, 2008, 11:22 PM It would be clearer if it said Hookstate (FXS ports only): Offhook i.e. the state information is not valid for FXO ports. Jay Ray wrote: Any pointers on this one? --- On Tue, 8/26/08, Jay Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Jay Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [asterisk-users] X100P Card in OFFHOOK state To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Date: Tuesday, August 26, 2008, 12:24 PM After I make a call o n the Zaptel Card X100P FXO moduleit remains offhook state as shown here... Signalling Type: FXS Kewlstart Radio: 0re2uk*CLI Owner: None*CLI Real: Nonek*CLI Callwait: NoneI Threeway: NoneI Confno: -12uk*CLI Propagated Conference: -1 Real in conference: 0 DSP: noore2uk*CLI Relax DTMF: noCLI Dialing/CallwaitCAS: 0/0 Default law: ulaw Fax Handled: noLI Pulse phone: noLI Echo Cancellation: 128 taps, currently OFF Actual Confinfo: Num/0, Mode/0x Actual Confmute: No Hookstate (FXS only): Offhook -- Sometimes it still takes a new call while in this state and sometimes rejects it... How to correct it such that after I hangup a call it goes back to onhook state... reloading wcfxo module using modprobe clears the issue ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Consulting for Asterisk, Polycom, Sangoma, Digium, Cisco, LAN, WAN, QoS, T-1, PRI, Frame Relay, Linux, and network design. Based near Birmingham, AL. Now accepting clients worldwide. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Card in OFFHOOK state
Thx I will try that. --- On Tue, 8/26/08, Guillermo Salas M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Guillermo Salas M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Card in OFFHOOK state To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Date: Tuesday, August 26, 2008, 11:15 PM El mar, 26-08-2008 a las 19:46 -0700, Jay Ray escribió: Any pointers on this one? --- On Tue, 8/26/08, Jay Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Jay Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [asterisk-users] X100P Card in OFFHOOK state To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Date: Tuesday, August 26, 2008, 12:24 PM After I make a call o n the Zaptel Card X100P FXO moduleit remains offhook state as shown here... Signalling Type: FXS Kewlstart Radio: 0re2uk*CLI Owner: None*CLI Real: Nonek*CLI Callwait: NoneI Threeway: NoneI Confno: -12uk*CLI Propagated Conference: -1 Real in conference: 0 DSP: noore2uk*CLI Relax DTMF: noCLI Dialing/CallwaitCAS: 0/0 Default law: ulaw Fax Handled: noLI Pulse phone: noLI Echo Cancellation: 128 taps, currently OFF Actual Confinfo: Num/0, Mode/0x Actual Confmute: No Hookstate (FXS only): Offhook -- Sometimes it still takes a new call while in this state and sometimes rejects it... How to correct it such that after I hangup a call it goes back to onhook state... reloading wcfxo module using modprobe clears the issue Sounds like your card is not detecting the busy tone, try adding the following line at your zapata.conf file: busydetect=yes busycount=6 Best regards, -- Guillermo Salas M. Telconet S.A. Calle 15 y Avenida 24 Esq Edificio Barre #2 Primer Piso Telefono : +593 5 262 8071 Celular : +593 9 985 5138 e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] www : http://www.manta.telconet.net http://www.telcocarrier.net SIP : [EMAIL PROTECTED] FWD : 558563 USA : 1 360 968 1701 Linux User: 255902 Beat me, whip me, make me use Windows! Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html Please avoid the Top Posting, see http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-posting ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Card in OFFHOOK state
Any pointers on this one? --- On Tue, 8/26/08, Jay Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Jay Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [asterisk-users] X100P Card in OFFHOOK state To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Date: Tuesday, August 26, 2008, 12:24 PM After I make a call o n the Zaptel Card X100P FXO moduleit remains offhook state as shown here... Signalling Type: FXS Kewlstart Radio: 0re2uk*CLI Owner: None*CLI Real: Nonek*CLI Callwait: NoneI Threeway: NoneI Confno: -12uk*CLI Propagated Conference: -1 Real in conference: 0 DSP: noore2uk*CLI Relax DTMF: noCLI Dialing/CallwaitCAS: 0/0 Default law: ulaw Fax Handled: noLI Pulse phone: noLI Echo Cancellation: 128 taps, currently OFF Actual Confinfo: Num/0, Mode/0x Actual Confmute: No Hookstate (FXS only): Offhook -- Sometimes it still takes a new call while in this state and sometimes rejects it... How to correct it such that after I hangup a call it goes back to onhook state... reloading wcfxo module using modprobe clears the issue ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Card in OFFHOOK state
El mar, 26-08-2008 a las 19:46 -0700, Jay Ray escribió: Any pointers on this one? --- On Tue, 8/26/08, Jay Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Jay Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [asterisk-users] X100P Card in OFFHOOK state To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Date: Tuesday, August 26, 2008, 12:24 PM After I make a call o n the Zaptel Card X100P FXO moduleit remains offhook state as shown here... Signalling Type: FXS Kewlstart Radio: 0re2uk*CLI Owner: None*CLI Real: Nonek*CLI Callwait: NoneI Threeway: NoneI Confno: -12uk*CLI Propagated Conference: -1 Real in conference: 0 DSP: noore2uk*CLI Relax DTMF: noCLI Dialing/CallwaitCAS: 0/0 Default law: ulaw Fax Handled: noLI Pulse phone: noLI Echo Cancellation: 128 taps, currently OFF Actual Confinfo: Num/0, Mode/0x Actual Confmute: No Hookstate (FXS only): Offhook -- Sometimes it still takes a new call while in this state and sometimes rejects it... How to correct it such that after I hangup a call it goes back to onhook state... reloading wcfxo module using modprobe clears the issue Sounds like your card is not detecting the busy tone, try adding the following line at your zapata.conf file: busydetect=yes busycount=6 Best regards, -- Guillermo Salas M. Telconet S.A. Calle 15 y Avenida 24 Esq Edificio Barre #2 Primer Piso Telefono : +593 5 262 8071 Celular : +593 9 985 5138 e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] www : http://www.manta.telconet.net http://www.telcocarrier.net SIP : [EMAIL PROTECTED] FWD : 558563 USA : 1 360 968 1701 Linux User: 255902 Beat me, whip me, make me use Windows! Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html Please avoid the Top Posting, see http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-posting smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Card in OFFHOOK state
It would be clearer if it said Hookstate (FXS ports only): Offhook i.e. the state information is not valid for FXO ports. Jay Ray wrote: Any pointers on this one? --- On Tue, 8/26/08, Jay Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Jay Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [asterisk-users] X100P Card in OFFHOOK state To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Date: Tuesday, August 26, 2008, 12:24 PM After I make a call o n the Zaptel Card X100P FXO moduleit remains offhook state as shown here... Signalling Type: FXS Kewlstart Radio: 0re2uk*CLI Owner: None*CLI Real: Nonek*CLI Callwait: NoneI Threeway: NoneI Confno: -12uk*CLI Propagated Conference: -1 Real in conference: 0 DSP: noore2uk*CLI Relax DTMF: noCLI Dialing/CallwaitCAS: 0/0 Default law: ulaw Fax Handled: noLI Pulse phone: noLI Echo Cancellation: 128 taps, currently OFF Actual Confinfo: Num/0, Mode/0x Actual Confmute: No Hookstate (FXS only): Offhook -- Sometimes it still takes a new call while in this state and sometimes rejects it... How to correct it such that after I hangup a call it goes back to onhook state... reloading wcfxo module using modprobe clears the issue ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Consulting for Asterisk, Polycom, Sangoma, Digium, Cisco, LAN, WAN, QoS, T-1, PRI, Frame Relay, Linux, and network design. Based near Birmingham, AL. Now accepting clients worldwide. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] x100p card or similar in India
Hello All, Anyone purchased a asterisk card, x100p or similar in India, if yes from where and what model ? I am interested in setting up a Asterisk Server at home, for single line at the moment and if things work out great, I would like to migrate that to my business and replace the aging pbx solution. Thankx, Amit. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] x100p card or similar in India
We have been using Sangoma A200 for about an year now with BSNL connection. I don't know if you can get it in India directly as in our case it was brought from US directly. Regards, Sanjay Rajdev - Original Message - From: Amit Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 8:12:37 PM GMT +05:30 Chennai, Kolkata, Mumbai, New Delhi Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] x100p card or similar in India Hello All, Anyone purchased a asterisk card, x100p or similar in India, if yes from where and what model ? I am interested in setting up a Asterisk Server at home, for single line at the moment and if things work out great, I would like to migrate that to my business and replace the aging pbx solution. Thankx, Amit. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Burnouts
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Brent Davidson wrote: That 3 foot cable run passes behind a 21 monitor that was connected to the server. When the line tests showed everything OK, I decided the monitor might be a long shot but I could understand how the degaussing coil coil could possibly induce a surge on the phone line if the monitor was somehow degaussing nightly, so I unplugged the monitor's power cable and left everything else as it was. So far so good. X100p #4 is still working this morning, so it looks like the problem is solved. Hope this helps someone else later on. Indicative, but not conclusive. It would be interesting to disconnect the pairs from the x100p's and plug them into an oscilloscope or something similar and power-cycle, auto-tune, sleep-mode, and degauss the tube to see if your assumption is reasonable. Thanks in advance, Steve Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: +1-760-468-3867 PST Newline Fax: +1-760-731-3000 ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Burnouts
I considered doing just that, but since I didn't have my scope with me and it's an hour's drive away it didn't seem worth it at this point. If we have trouble again I may take the scope down there and test it. -Brent Steve Edwards wrote: On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Brent Davidson wrote: That 3 foot cable run passes behind a 21 monitor that was connected to the server. When the line tests showed everything OK, I decided the monitor might be a long shot but I could understand how the degaussing coil coil could possibly induce a surge on the phone line if the monitor was somehow degaussing nightly, so I unplugged the monitor's power cable and left everything else as it was. So far so good. X100p #4 is still working this morning, so it looks like the problem is solved. Hope this helps someone else later on. Indicative, but not conclusive. It would be interesting to disconnect the pairs from the x100p's and plug them into an oscilloscope or something similar and power-cycle, auto-tune, sleep-mode, and degauss the tube to see if your assumption is reasonable. Thanks in advance, Steve Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: +1-760-468-3867 PST Newline Fax: +1-760-731-3000 ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Burnouts
Quoting Brent Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I considered doing just that, but since I didn't have my scope with me and it's an hour's drive away it didn't seem worth it at this point. If we have trouble again I may take the scope down there and test it. unless the cable is in the same spot (relative to coil, ground, other metal), loaded with the same impedance characteristics as an x100p, etc etc you might not measure anything meaningful anyway. you'd have to wire the scope across it somehow in place without destroying the experiment with the scope leads themselves adding another end of line leg that is not the x100p. I would say you are probably correct in the assumption, and everyone should just bear this sort of thing in mind. if in doubt its easy to plug in through a power bar with phone surge supressor close to the end of the run, or one of the many other devices that do the same thing. -Brent Steve Edwards wrote: On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Brent Davidson wrote: That 3 foot cable run passes behind a 21 monitor that was connected to the server. When the line tests showed everything OK, I decided the monitor might be a long shot but I could understand how the degaussing coil coil could possibly induce a surge on the phone line if the monitor was somehow degaussing nightly, so I unplugged the monitor's power cable and left everything else as it was. So far so good. X100p #4 is still working this morning, so it looks like the problem is solved. Hope this helps someone else later on. Indicative, but not conclusive. It would be interesting to disconnect the pairs from the x100p's and plug them into an oscilloscope or something similar and power-cycle, auto-tune, sleep-mode, and degauss the tube to see if your assumption is reasonable. Thanks in advance, Steve Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: +1-760-468-3867 PST Newline Fax: +1-760-731-3000 ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users Jon Pounder _/_/_/ _/_/ _/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/ _/_/ _/_/ _/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/ Inline Internet Systems Inc. Thorold, Ontario, Canada Tools to Power Your e-Business Solutions www.inline.net www.ihtml.com www.ihtmlmerchant.com www.opayc.com ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] x100p Asterisk 1.4.17 and Zaptel 1.4.7
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 01:12:56AM +1100, Mark Huff wrote: I am finding that with the combination above, the zap channel will hang up, though the call has hung up. There seems to be a typo in the above line. I am make all changes in my zapata.conf file that I can find on the internet with nothing fixing this issue. I have added busydetect=yes, busycount=6, and made sure that the signalling is set for fxs_ks Where are you from? these setting worked fine with zaptel 1.2 but not with the newest zaptel drivers. Is there something i can do or change or check (besides getting rid of the x100p) that can fix this annoying issue? busydetect could be further tuned. KNowing where you're from can help. -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] x100p wcfxo hangup on outgoing calss
Hi Miguel, i'm in Spain like you. For a normal operational system inmediate should be set to no. Busycount and Busydetect can be improved performance with busypattern. The pattern should be shown in the CLI, just take a look. In Spain we use Kewlstart. If you card allows it try use Julian J. Menendez patch for AnswerOnPolarity... If your provider allows it also, you won't haver further issues, just tune the echo with fxotune. Disable echotraining. Not needed. Disable fax detection. Will work, let's see ;) Regards, Jonathan GF On Jan 4, 2008 11:18 PM, Miguel A Felipe Rodríguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have changed the signalling of the x100p to a fxsls, now i can make outgoing calls, but now I have another problem, cant detect hangup. I post the zapara.conf and the zaptel.conf so if any has idea of waht to change y have tested changing busydetect, busypattern, callprogress, etc.. but no whet results. zaptel.conf fxsls=1 loadzone= es defaultzone = es zapata.conf [channels] language=es context=incoming switchtype=national signalling=fxs_ls usecallerid=yes cidsignalling=dtmf cidstart=polarity hidecallerid=no callwaiting=yes usecallingpres=yes callwaitingcallerid=no threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes canpark=yes cancallforward=yes callreturn=yes echocancel=yes echotraining=yes rxgain=2.0 txgain=1.0 group=1 callgroup=1 pickupgroup=1 immediate=yes callerid=asreceived busydetect=yes busycount=6 callprogress=no faxdetect=incoming channel = 1 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Woes
On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 16:39:44 -0600, Bob Smither [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After some frustrating times, I began to suspect the cards. Doing more careful testing, keeping track of the cards, confirmed that two of four cards I was trying had problems. I had the same issue with three brand new, identical cards. Some were DOA. Thanks for the trouble shooting suggestions from this list! Generally speaking, X100/101P cards are a waste of time. If you don't want to spend the money to buy a Sangoma or even a Digium, OpenVox makes nice clones of Digium for less money. I bough the single-FXO-port model for $80. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] x100p wcfxo hangup on outgoing calss
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 04:00:30PM +0100, Miguel A Felipe Rodríguez wrote: Hi, Im getting mad with this error, I have a x100p installed with wcfxo module loaded perfectly, I can receive incoming calls and detect very good the hangup for incoming calls. But for outgoing calls its a mess. When I place a call for outgoing, i heard the ringing, my cell or phone rings and when I pick up the phone it hangs: -- Called g1/91xxx -- Hungup 'Zap/1-1' == Everyone is busy/congested at this time (1:0/0/1) -- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:2] Hangup(SIP/michelvd-b7b005b8, ) in new stack == Spawn extension (internal, 91xxx, 2) exited non-zero on 'SIP/michelvd-b7b005b8' If you want to ask Asterisk to tell you why it chose to hangup, enable debug loggin (e.g: unrem the line 'full' in logger.conf sample), and then run: asterisk -rx 'logger reload' asterisk -rx 'core set debug 10' Now see what messages you get in the relevant log file (e.g: /var/log/asterisk/full ) when there's a hangup. And the other one, that I think its related, is that when I place a call for me cell, and I discard (I think its call like that) the call, asterisk doesnt understand it. I post my zaptel.conf fxsks=1 loadzone= es defaultzone = es and my zapata.conf [channels] language=es context=incoming switchtype=national signalling=fxs_ks usecallerid=yes hidecallerid=no callwaiting=yes usecallingpres=yes callwaitingcallerid=yes threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes canpark=yes cancallforward=yes callreturn=yes echocancel=no rxgain=8.0 txgain=5.0 group=1 callgroup=1 pickupgroup=1 immediate=no answeronpolarityswitch=yes This is probably useless with an X100P, as it does not detect polarity events. hanguponpolarityswitch=no faxdetect=incoming channel = 1 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] x100p wcfxo hangup on outgoing calss
I have changed the signalling of the x100p to a fxsls, now i can make outgoing calls, but now I have another problem, cant detect hangup. I post the zapara.conf and the zaptel.conf so if any has idea of waht to change y have tested changing busydetect, busypattern, callprogress, etc.. but no whet results. zaptel.conf fxsls=1 loadzone= es defaultzone = es zapata.conf [channels] language=es context=incoming switchtype=national signalling=fxs_ls usecallerid=yes cidsignalling=dtmf cidstart=polarity hidecallerid=no callwaiting=yes usecallingpres=yes callwaitingcallerid=no threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes canpark=yes cancallforward=yes callreturn=yes echocancel=yes echotraining=yes rxgain=2.0 txgain=1.0 group=1 callgroup=1 pickupgroup=1 immediate=yes callerid=asreceived busydetect=yes busycount=6 callprogress=no faxdetect=incoming channel = 1 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Woes
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 17:47 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 08:38:31AM -0600, Bob Smither wrote: On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 07:27 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: Just to stress the point: you mention that you don't see the card on lspci. If this is so: the problem is not with Zaptel - it is below. Zaptel doesn't even get a chance. Thanks Tzafrir. The last thing I tried was to downgrade Zaptel and during the boot, Zaptel reported success(*). What version of Zaptel reported success? Which version has failed? After some frustrating times, I began to suspect the cards. Doing more careful testing, keeping track of the cards, confirmed that two of four cards I was trying had problems. I am able to get the two working cards to be properly configured and they seem to work well. Thanks for the trouble shooting suggestions from this list! One last question if someone has an answer - Using Kwelstart signaling * can detect incoming calls and can detect hang ups, but doesn't seem to be able to detect when an outgoing (over a Zap channel) call is answered. Is this correct, or have I not configured something? I am comparing this to what I have seen with IAX channels. When using call files, when the IAX channel answers that event in noted on the CLI. I don't see this with the Zap channel using call files. Thanks! ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Woes
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 04:39:44PM -0600, Bob Smither wrote: One last question if someone has an answer - Using Kwelstart signaling * can detect incoming calls and can detect hang ups, but doesn't seem to be able to detect when an outgoing (over a Zap channel) call is answered. Is this correct, or have I not configured something? Right. This is a known limitation. -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Woes
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 07:27 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: Just to stress the point: you mention that you don't see the card on lspci. If this is so: the problem is not with Zaptel - it is below. Zaptel doesn't even get a chance. Thanks Tzafrir. The last thing I tried was to downgrade Zaptel and during the boot, Zaptel reported success(*). Using lspci -v does show the card - however, a cat /proc/interrupts does not show any interrupt assigned to it and if I run ztcfg the machine hangs. * - Another difference may be that I powered the machine off before booting rather than simply restarting (which I had done before). I suspect that was actually the significant difference between attempts. It was late so I stopped - will further investigate this today. Thanks for all the help from this list. -- Bob Smither, PhD Circuit Concepts, Inc. = Grief is not a sign of weakness, nor lack of faith. It is the price we pay for Love --Darcie Sims = [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.C-C-I.Com 281-331-2744(office) -4616(fax) ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Woes
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 15:46 +1000, Mattt wrote: Sounds like a PCI bus version issue ;-) Thanks Matt, but could you elaborate? The card supposedly supports both 5 and 3.3 volt PCI slots, and the slots on the older system that works with the card appear the same as on the board giving me grief. The connectors in both systems have a single key while the card has two keys. An further explanation of your comment would be appreciated! ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Woes
bob, look on p20 of 'the book' edition 2, or p16 edition 1 this explains the 3.3v vs 5.0v issue with motherboard slots http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/9780596510480/ daveC Bob Smither wrote: On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 15:46 +1000, Mattt wrote: Sounds like a PCI bus version issue ;-) Thanks Matt, but could you elaborate? The card supposedly supports both 5 and 3.3 volt PCI slots, and the slots on the older system that works with the card appear the same as on the board giving me grief. The connectors in both systems have a single key while the card has two keys. An further explanation of your comment would be appreciated! ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- My wife's sister is in California. I should buy her a Videophone2008! Truly, The Next Best Thing to Being There! -- WorldWideVideoPhones.com 856.380.0894 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Woes
On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 08:38:31AM -0600, Bob Smither wrote:
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 07:27 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Just to stress the point: you mention that you don't see the card on
lspci. If this is so: the problem is not with Zaptel - it is below.
Zaptel doesn't even get a chance.
Thanks Tzafrir. The last thing I tried was to downgrade Zaptel and
during the boot, Zaptel reported success(*).
What version of Zaptel reported success? Which version has failed?
Using lspci -v does show the card - however, a cat /proc/interrupts does
not show any interrupt assigned to it and if I run ztcfg the machine
hangs.
* - Another difference may be that I powered the machine off before
booting rather than simply restarting (which I had done before). I
suspect that was actually the significant difference between attempts.
It was late so I stopped - will further investigate this today.
Testing should be easy: stop asterisk. remove all relevant modules
('/etc/init.d/zaptel stop' in recent versions is effective). And then
from the build directory:
insmod ./zaptel.ko
insmod ./wcfxo.ko
cat /proc/zaptel/1
If it passes, that version is clearly good and maybe something is
strange with the setup.
If the problem is indeed not related to anything else, I'd interested to
get from you the exact revision where this has stopped working.
Method:
Initial setup:
svn co http://svn.digium.com/svn/zaptel/branches/1.4 zaptel-svn
cd zaptel-svn
./configure
# optionally: 'make menuconfig' and disable all modules except zaptel
# and wcfxo
To check out specific revision :
svn update -r
Test for each version:
make modules
rmmod wcfxo zaptel
insmod ./zaptel.ko insmod ./wcfxo.ko cat /proc/zaptel/1 echo OK
--
Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Woes
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 10:22 -0500, dave cantera wrote: bob, look on p20 of 'the book' edition 2, or p16 edition 1 this explains the 3.3v vs 5.0v issue with motherboard slots http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/9780596510480/ daveC The slots are 5V PCI on both motherboards. The X100P cards (ordered from X100P.com) have two keys and are advertised to work in both 5 and 3.3 V slots. Thanks, -- Bob Smither [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Woes
On Wednesday 26 December 2007 12:37:19 Bob Smither wrote: On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 10:22 -0500, dave cantera wrote: bob, look on p20 of 'the book' edition 2, or p16 edition 1 this explains the 3.3v vs 5.0v issue with motherboard slots http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/9780596510480/ daveC The slots are 5V PCI on both motherboards. The X100P cards (ordered from X100P.com) have two keys and are advertised to work in both 5 and 3.3 V slots. I would suggest that you continue your pursuit by contacting the reseller from whom you purchased the hardware directly, as they should have more specific instructions if you're unable to get their hardware working. -- Tilghman ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Woes
On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 09:40 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 01:02:25AM -0600, Bob Smither wrote: On Mon, 2007-12-24 at 22:19 -0500, Alex Balashov wrote: Does it show up in 'lspci'? No - With PnPOS = yes, card in first PCI slot - lspci -v does not show the card. There are several unused interrupts. So until you see it there, no point in wasting your time on drivers. Can you boot from a different kernel and check if you see the card? Try various kernel / BIOS options? I think I have tried all the BIOS options. I believe I will try an older Zaptel version and if that doesn't work simply start from scratch and use the CentOS 4.4 / older Zaptel that does work on another (AMD) box. Many thanks for the feedback. Another list member posted privately that he had similar problems, but did find an older Zaptel that works on CentOS 5.1 I will let the list know if I find a solution. -- Bob Smither, PhD Circuit Concepts, Inc. = Whenever a man has cast a longing eye on them (public offices), a rottenness begins in his conduct - Thomas Jefferson = [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.C-C-I.Com 281-331-2744(office) -4616(fax) ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Woes
On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 08:41:21PM -0600, Bob Smither wrote: On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 09:40 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 01:02:25AM -0600, Bob Smither wrote: On Mon, 2007-12-24 at 22:19 -0500, Alex Balashov wrote: Does it show up in 'lspci'? No - With PnPOS = yes, card in first PCI slot - lspci -v does not show the card. There are several unused interrupts. So until you see it there, no point in wasting your time on drivers. Can you boot from a different kernel and check if you see the card? Try various kernel / BIOS options? I think I have tried all the BIOS options. I believe I will try an older Zaptel version and if that doesn't work simply start from scratch and use the CentOS 4.4 / older Zaptel that does work on another (AMD) box. Many thanks for the feedback. Another list member posted privately that he had similar problems, but did find an older Zaptel that works on CentOS 5.1 I will let the list know if I find a solution. Just to stress the point: you mention that you don't see the card on lspci. If this is so: the problem is not with Zaptel - it is below. Zaptel doesn't even get a chance. -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Woes
Sounds like a PCI bus version issue ;-) Cheers, Mattt. SpotSafe - WiFi Hotspot solution - http://spotsafe.net My other computer is your Windows machine ;-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tzafrir Cohen Sent: Wednesday, 26 December 2007 3:28 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Woes On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 08:41:21PM -0600, Bob Smither wrote: On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 09:40 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 01:02:25AM -0600, Bob Smither wrote: On Mon, 2007-12-24 at 22:19 -0500, Alex Balashov wrote: Does it show up in 'lspci'? No - With PnPOS = yes, card in first PCI slot - lspci -v does not show the card. There are several unused interrupts. So until you see it there, no point in wasting your time on drivers. Can you boot from a different kernel and check if you see the card? Try various kernel / BIOS options? I think I have tried all the BIOS options. I believe I will try an older Zaptel version and if that doesn't work simply start from scratch and use the CentOS 4.4 / older Zaptel that does work on another (AMD) box. Many thanks for the feedback. Another list member posted privately that he had similar problems, but did find an older Zaptel that works on CentOS 5.1 I will let the list know if I find a solution. Just to stress the point: you mention that you don't see the card on lspci. If this is so: the problem is not with Zaptel - it is below. Zaptel doesn't even get a chance. -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Woes
Does it show up in 'lspci'? On Mon, 24 Dec 2007, Bob Smither wrote: I am out of things to try on getting an X100P card to work. I have a P4 system with CentOS 5.1 installed (network install). After adding required packages I compiled (apparently successful) and installed Zaptel in anticipation of installing Asterisk. I simply cannot get the X100P card to be recognized. I have tried bios setting of PnPOS no and PnPOS yes, tried the card in different slots, disabled all the unused motherboard devices to free up interrupts, etc. The card works flawlessly in a CentOS 4.4 install on an old K6-2 motherboard. If I put an ethernet card in a PCI slot (in addition to the one on the motherboard), it is recognized and configured during boot so I assume the interrupt hardware is working on the mother board. I would really appreciate any suggestions of what I could try here. Thanks! -- Bob Smither [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Alex Balashov Evariste Systems Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/ Tel: +1-678-954-0670 Direct : +1-678-954-0671 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Woes
On Mon, 2007-12-24 at 22:19 -0500, Alex Balashov wrote: Does it show up in 'lspci'? No - With PnPOS = yes, card in first PCI slot - lspci -v does not show the card. There are several unused interrupts. I should have included earlier: Zaptel 1.4.7.1 Thanks. -- Bob Smither, PhD Circuit Concepts, Inc. = Foreign aid might be defined as a transfer from poor people in rich countries to rich people in poor countries. --Douglas Casey (1992) = [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.C-C-I.Com 281-331-2744(office) -4616(fax) ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Woes
On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 01:02:25AM -0600, Bob Smither wrote: On Mon, 2007-12-24 at 22:19 -0500, Alex Balashov wrote: Does it show up in 'lspci'? No - With PnPOS = yes, card in first PCI slot - lspci -v does not show the card. There are several unused interrupts. So until you see it there, no point in wasting your time on drivers. Can you boot from a different kernel and check if you see the card? Try various kernel / BIOS options? -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Fxo card headaches
Chris Boczko wrote: Hello List, Hello Chris, Im just dipping my feet into the asterisk world, and im having major fxo problems Im running Asterisk (from svn) + libpri (from svn) + asterisk-addons (from svn) + asterisk gui (svn 1.4 branch) + zaptel (svn 1.4) on a Debian Etch box, with 1gb ram, running all of the services for my home server (web / db / music server etc), and i would like to run my PSTN line from Kingston Comms, but i can't get this box the recoginsie this line! The X100p is a cheap clone i got off ebay for a tenner, so im not expecting much, i know they have echo issues, but im going to upgrade to a SPA3012 / TDM400B when i have the cash. I bought a cheap clone from eBay in the US for about £15 inc. postage that has two sockets on the back. One for the PSTN line and one as a passthrough for a phone. The board is from VOX I think and looks to be quite a recent design - all surface mount components and not that many... It's a low-profile card and slot connector as I am running asterisk and other apps on a low power VIA 1.2Ghz CN700 board - just 7W! Ztcfg -vv reports orange:~# ztcfg -vv Zaptel Version: SVN-branch-1.4-r3374 Echo Canceller: MG2 Configuration == Channel map: Channel 01: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01) 1 channels to configure. That looks fine: Mine says basically the same thing (extra lines removed). # ztcfg -vv Zaptel Version: 1.4.6 Echo Canceller: OSLEC Configuration == Channel map: Channel 01: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01) 1 channels to configure. and my zaptel.conf file contains /etc/zaptel.conf fxsks=1 loadzone=uk defaultzone=uk Here's mine: loadzone=uk defaultzone=uk fxsks=1 but zap show status in the command line shows orange*CLI zap show status Description Alarms IRQbpviol CRC4 Fra Codi Options LBO Wildcard X100P Board 1 OK 0 0 0 CAS Unk YEL 0 db (CSU)/0-133 feet (DSX-1) orange*CLI Mine: Description Alarms IRQ bpviolCRC4 Wildcard X100P Board 1 OK 0 00 Does anyone have any ideas on how to get this line to work, ive followed every howto i can find, and google seems to be comming up short, as far as i can see, ztcfg should report the card as configured, but it isn't, and ive no idea why. Your settings look fine to me. My zapata.conf ; Zapata telephony interface ; ; Configuration file [channels] ;Hardware defaults for the x100p card usecallerid=yes hidecallerid=no ;callwaiting=no threewaycalling=yes ;usedistinctiveringdetection=yes transfer=yes ;usecallingpres=yes ;callwaitingcallerid=yes ;cancallforward=yes ;callreturn=yes echocancel=yes echotrainingwhenbridged=no ;echotraining=400 ;rxwink=300 ; Atlas seems to use long (250ms) winks cidsignalling=v23 ; Added for UK CLI detection ;cidstart=usehist ; After patching the driver from here : ; http://www.lusyn.com/resources/asterisk/usehist.htm callerid=asreceived ; propagate the CID received from BT rxgain=6.0 txgain=6.0 ;define channel context=main_menu language=en signalling=fxs_ks channel = 1 ;Our x100p You don't show how your zapata.conf is set up and whether you have the context and channel defined correctly. (Note quite a lot of the options in mine are commented out - still playing around to see what things do) In my extension.conf I have a context called main_menu that presents a fairly simple Automated Attendant system. Can you make outgoing calls? What happens if you set debugging to a reasonably high number and you try to ring in? You should at least see ringing detection etc... In the asterisk console you should have something like this.: vimes*CLI zap show channels Chan Extension Context Language MOH Interpret pseudomain_menu en default 1main_menu en default If/when you do get the card working, I'd recommend you change your echo canceller to OSLEC. It works a treat! I have written a few articles about setting it up on my blog: as below. -- The way out is open! http://www.theopensourcerer.com ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Fxo card headaches
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:09:34 +, Chris Boczko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Im just dipping my feet into the asterisk world, and im having major fxo problems I'm no Asterisk expert. The X100p is a cheap clone i got off ebay for a tenner, so im not expecting much, i know they have echo issues, but im going to upgrade to a SPA3012 / TDM400B when i have the cash. OpenVox makes OK clones of Digium. You can get a one-FXO port model for $85. The outputs from ztcfg looks like I have. orange*CLI zap show status Description Alarms IRQbpviol CRC4 Fra Codi Options LBO Wildcard X100P Board 1 OK 0 0 0 Looks like the X100P is OK. Does anyone have any ideas on how to get this line to work as far as i can see, ztcfg should report the card as configured, but it isn't, and ive no idea why. You should post your zapata.conf as well, just in case. And post your extensions.conf as well, for good measure. Good infos here: http://www.the-asterisk-book.com http://downloads.oreilly.com/books/9780596510480.pdf ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Fxo card headaches
Chris Boczko wrote: Hello List, Im just dipping my feet into the asterisk world, and im having major fxo problems Im running Asterisk (from svn) + libpri (from svn) + asterisk-addons (from svn) + asterisk gui (svn 1.4 branch) + zaptel (svn 1.4) on a Debian Etch box, with 1gb ram, running all of the services for my home server (web / db / music server etc), and i would like to run my PSTN line from Kingston Comms, but i can't get this box the recoginsie this line! The X100p is a cheap clone i got off ebay for a tenner, so im not expecting much, i know they have echo issues, but im going to upgrade to a SPA3012 / TDM400B when i have the cash. Ztcfg -vv reports orange:~# ztcfg -vv Zaptel Version: SVN-branch-1.4-r3374 Echo Canceller: MG2 Configuration == Channel map: Channel 01: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01) 1 channels to configure. orange:~# and my zaptel.conf file contains orange:~# more /etc/zaptel.conf fxsks=1 loadzone=uk defaultzone=uk orange:~# but zap show status in the command line shows orange*CLI zap show status Description Alarms IRQbpviol CRC4 Fra Codi Options LBO Wildcard X100P Board 1 OK 0 0 0 CAS Unk YEL 0 db (CSU)/0-133 feet (DSX-1) orange*CLI and i think the Unk means unknown...? Does anyone have any ideas on how to get this line to work, ive followed every howto i can find, and google seems to be comming up short, as far as i can see, ztcfg should report the card as configured, but it isn't, and ive no idea why. Hope you can help Chris Try adding channels=1 to the end of your zaptel.conf to assign the settings you have made to a channel. regards, Drew -- Drew Gibson Systems Administrator OANDA Corporation www.oanda.com ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Fxo card headaches
Hello List, Thanks for the replies...currently Still doing the same after adding channel=1 to the /etc/zaptel.conf my zapata.conf looks like orange:~# more /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf [trunkgroups] [channels] usecallerid=yes hidecallerid=no callwaiting=no threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes echocancel=yes echotraining=yes context=incoming signaling=fxs_ks group=1 channel=1 orange:~# Im getting pretty sure now that its the card, i borrowed a TDM400B (the 3port model) from a friend, and it came up just fine (with a quick change to zaptel.conf and zapata.conf)im thinking. duff card Ive got a linksys SPA-3102 on order to replace this card... but i would still like to confirm if it is the card thats duff or something with my config, more of a geeky pride excercise than anything else. Cheers Chris On 11/12/2007, Drew Gibson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris Boczko wrote: Hello List, Im just dipping my feet into the asterisk world, and im having major fxo problems Im running Asterisk (from svn) + libpri (from svn) + asterisk-addons (from svn) + asterisk gui (svn 1.4 branch) + zaptel (svn 1.4) on a Debian Etch box, with 1gb ram, running all of the services for my home server (web / db / music server etc), and i would like to run my PSTN line from Kingston Comms, but i can't get this box the recoginsie this line! The X100p is a cheap clone i got off ebay for a tenner, so im not expecting much, i know they have echo issues, but im going to upgrade to a SPA3012 / TDM400B when i have the cash. Ztcfg -vv reports orange:~# ztcfg -vv Zaptel Version: SVN-branch-1.4-r3374 Echo Canceller: MG2 Configuration == Channel map: Channel 01: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01) 1 channels to configure. orange:~# and my zaptel.conf file contains orange:~# more /etc/zaptel.conf fxsks=1 loadzone=uk defaultzone=uk orange:~# but zap show status in the command line shows orange*CLI zap show status Description Alarms IRQbpviol CRC4 Fra Codi Options LBO Wildcard X100P Board 1 OK 0 0 0 CAS Unk YEL 0 db (CSU)/0-133 feet (DSX-1) orange*CLI and i think the Unk means unknown...? Does anyone have any ideas on how to get this line to work, ive followed every howto i can find, and google seems to be comming up short, as far as i can see, ztcfg should report the card as configured, but it isn't, and ive no idea why. Hope you can help Chris Try adding channels=1 to the end of your zaptel.conf to assign the settings you have made to a channel. regards, Drew -- Drew Gibson Systems Administrator OANDA Corporation www.oanda.com ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Fxo card headaches
The old x100p cards where 5 volt pci cards. I had this same problem and it was the type of pci slot that I had the card plugged into. Jonn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Boczko Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 1:02 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Fxo card headaches Hello List, Thanks for the replies...currently Still doing the same after adding channel=1 to the /etc/zaptel.conf my zapata.conf looks like orange:~# more /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf [trunkgroups] [channels] usecallerid=yes hidecallerid=no callwaiting=no threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes echocancel=yes echotraining=yes context=incoming signaling=fxs_ks group=1 channel=1 orange:~# Im getting pretty sure now that its the card, i borrowed a TDM400B (the 3port model) from a friend, and it came up just fine (with a quick change to zaptel.conf and zapata.conf)im thinking. duff card Ive got a linksys SPA-3102 on order to replace this card... but i would still like to confirm if it is the card thats duff or something with my config, more of a geeky pride excercise than anything else. Cheers Chris On 11/12/2007, Drew Gibson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris Boczko wrote: Hello List, Im just dipping my feet into the asterisk world, and im having major fxo problems Im running Asterisk (from svn) + libpri (from svn) + asterisk-addons (from svn) + asterisk gui (svn 1.4 branch) + zaptel (svn 1.4) on a Debian Etch box, with 1gb ram, running all of the services for my home server (web / db / music server etc), and i would like to run my PSTN line from Kingston Comms, but i can't get this box the recoginsie this line! The X100p is a cheap clone i got off ebay for a tenner, so im not expecting much, i know they have echo issues, but im going to upgrade to a SPA3012 / TDM400B when i have the cash. Ztcfg -vv reports orange:~# ztcfg -vv Zaptel Version: SVN-branch-1.4-r3374 Echo Canceller: MG2 Configuration == Channel map: Channel 01: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01) 1 channels to configure. orange:~# and my zaptel.conf file contains orange:~# more /etc/zaptel.conf fxsks=1 loadzone=uk defaultzone=uk orange:~# but zap show status in the command line shows orange*CLI zap show status Description Alarms IRQbpviol CRC4 Fra Codi Options LBO Wildcard X100P Board 1 OK 0 0 0 CAS Unk YEL 0 db (CSU)/0-133 feet (DSX-1) orange*CLI and i think the Unk means unknown...? Does anyone have any ideas on how to get this line to work, ive followed every howto i can find, and google seems to be comming up short, as far as i can see, ztcfg should report the card as configured, but it isn't, and ive no idea why. Hope you can help Chris Try adding channels=1 to the end of your zaptel.conf to assign the settings you have made to a channel. regards, Drew -- Drew Gibson Systems Administrator OANDA Corporation www.oanda.com ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Fxo card headaches
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 10:09:34AM +, Chris Boczko wrote: Hello List, Im just dipping my feet into the asterisk world, and im having major fxo problems Im running Asterisk (from svn) + libpri (from svn) + You don't really need libpri, as you have a simple analog card. Actually it only serves to confuse you later on... asterisk-addons (from svn) + asterisk gui (svn 1.4 branch) + zaptel (svn 1.4) on a Debian Etch box, with 1gb ram, running all of the services for my home server (web / db / music server etc), and i would like to run my PSTN line from Kingston Comms, but i can't get this box the recoginsie this line! The X100p is a cheap clone i got off ebay for a tenner, so im not expecting much, i know they have echo issues, but im going to upgrade to a SPA3012 / TDM400B when i have the cash. Ztcfg -vv reports orange:~# ztcfg -vv Zaptel Version: SVN-branch-1.4-r3374 Echo Canceller: MG2 Configuration == Channel map: Channel 01: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01) 1 channels to configure. orange:~# and my zaptel.conf file contains orange:~# more /etc/zaptel.conf fxsks=1 loadzone=uk defaultzone=uk orange:~# but zap show status in the command line shows orange*CLI zap show status Description Alarms IRQbpviol CRC4 Fra Codi Options LBO Wildcard X100P Board 1 OK 0 0 0 CAS Unk YEL 0 db (CSU)/0-133 feet (DSX-1) orange*CLI I don't see anything wrong here. What is the output of: zap show channels -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Fxo card headaches
See Inline On Tuesday December 11 2007 2:20 pm, Jonn R Taylor wrote: The old x100p cards where 5 volt pci cards. I had this same problem and it was the type of pci slot that I had the card plugged into. Jonn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Boczko Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 1:02 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Fxo card headaches Hello List, Thanks for the replies...currently Still doing the same after adding channel=1 to the /etc/zaptel.conf my zapata.conf looks like orange:~# more /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf [trunkgroups] [channels] usecallerid=yes hidecallerid=no callwaiting=no threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes echocancel=yes echotraining=yes context=incoming signaling=fxs_ks group=1 channel=1 I believe this should be channel=1 JohnM orange:~# Im getting pretty sure now that its the card, i borrowed a TDM400B (the 3port model) from a friend, and it came up just fine (with a quick change to zaptel.conf and zapata.conf)im thinking. duff card Ive got a linksys SPA-3102 on order to replace this card... but i would still like to confirm if it is the card thats duff or something with my config, more of a geeky pride excercise than anything else. Cheers Chris On 11/12/2007, Drew Gibson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris Boczko wrote: Hello List, Im just dipping my feet into the asterisk world, and im having major fxo problems Im running Asterisk (from svn) + libpri (from svn) + asterisk-addons (from svn) + asterisk gui (svn 1.4 branch) + zaptel (svn 1.4) on a Debian Etch box, with 1gb ram, running all of the services for my home server (web / db / music server etc), and i would like to run my PSTN line from Kingston Comms, but i can't get this box the recoginsie this line! The X100p is a cheap clone i got off ebay for a tenner, so im not expecting much, i know they have echo issues, but im going to upgrade to a SPA3012 / TDM400B when i have the cash. Ztcfg -vv reports orange:~# ztcfg -vv Zaptel Version: SVN-branch-1.4-r3374 Echo Canceller: MG2 Configuration == Channel map: Channel 01: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01) 1 channels to configure. orange:~# and my zaptel.conf file contains orange:~# more /etc/zaptel.conf fxsks=1 loadzone=uk defaultzone=uk orange:~# but zap show status in the command line shows orange*CLI zap show status Description Alarms IRQbpviol CRC4 Fra Codi Options LBO Wildcard X100P Board 1 OK 0 0 0 CAS Unk YEL 0 db (CSU)/0-133 feet (DSX-1) orange*CLI and i think the Unk means unknown...? Does anyone have any ideas on how to get this line to work, ive followed every howto i can find, and google seems to be comming up short, as far as i can see, ztcfg should report the card as configured, but it isn't, and ive no idea why. Hope you can help Chris Try adding channels=1 to the end of your zaptel.conf to assign the settings you have made to a channel. regards, Drew -- Drew Gibson Systems Administrator OANDA Corporation www.oanda.com ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Fxo card headaches
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 03:25:05PM -0500, John Millican wrote: See Inline On Tuesday December 11 2007 2:20 pm, Jonn R Taylor wrote: orange:~# more /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf [trunkgroups] [channels] [snip] channel=1 I believe this should be channel=1 Those two would have the same effect. -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P pass through questions
That is correct. The X100P only detects voltage drop, not polarity reversal. Walter Willis wrote: i am have x100p and not work fine, no detect polarity, and much problems with asterisk 1.2 to up. :S On 7/25/07, Mike Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John Novack wrote: Mike Wright wrote: Just purchased a Motorola Wildcard X100P ... but the button pressed generates no tone; on button release dialtone returns. Sure sounds like polarity reversal. Indeed it was. Punch block in the basement had tip and ring reversed. Probably been that way for thirty years. Amazing that the dsl installer that replaced the inside wiring didn't catch it. For years I've had intermittent problems using IVR. Some phones would work, some would not. Now I know why. Thanks to John Novack and Eric ManxPower Wieling for your help. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P pass through questions
i am have x100p and not work fine, no detect polarity, and much problems with asterisk 1.2 to up. :S On 7/25/07, Mike Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John Novack wrote: Mike Wright wrote: Just purchased a Motorola Wildcard X100P ... but the button pressed generates no tone; on button release dialtone returns. Sure sounds like polarity reversal. Indeed it was. Punch block in the basement had tip and ring reversed. Probably been that way for thirty years. Amazing that the dsl installer that replaced the inside wiring didn't catch it. For years I've had intermittent problems using IVR. Some phones would work, some would not. Now I know why. Thanks to John Novack and Eric ManxPower Wieling for your help. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P pass through questions
John Novack wrote: Mike Wright wrote: Just purchased a Motorola Wildcard X100P ... but the button pressed generates no tone; on button release dialtone returns. Sure sounds like polarity reversal. Indeed it was. Punch block in the basement had tip and ring reversed. Probably been that way for thirty years. Amazing that the dsl installer that replaced the inside wiring didn't catch it. For years I've had intermittent problems using IVR. Some phones would work, some would not. Now I know why. Thanks to John Novack and Eric ManxPower Wieling for your help. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P pass through questions
Mike Wright wrote: With PC on or off: When analog phone is off hook I can hear dialtone but cannot dial out. When I press any button the dialtone quiets to barely audible but the button pressed generates no tone; on button release dialtone returns. However the telephone does ring on incoming calls and performs as though the X100P were not there. When the phone line is plugged back into the analog telephone it works correctly. Questions: Is this normal? Must Asterisk be in control of the X100P in order for the passthru phone to dial out? If it's supposed to be able to dial out what could explain its symptoms? Polarity error with the green/red wires? Bad X100P? Loathe to go messing with something that could fry 1)me, 2)my new FXO card, 3)my pc, 4)the telco, etc, etc. Anybody feel up to helping a noobie? The X100P has not been made for years. No, what you are experiencing is not normal. The two ports on the card are electrically wired togather, much like a standard phone splitter you would buy at a store. The only cause I can think of for what is happening is either a bad X100P, a card that claims to be an X100P, but is not, or (maybe) your red/green are swapped. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P pass through questions
Mike Wright wrote: snip Just purchased a Motorola Wildcard X100P Most probably you will be disappointed. and installed it into a clone PC running Fedora Core 6. Another disappointment Not to begin a religious argument, but CentOS 4 or 5 would be a better choice. Search the list archives for reported issues. Analog telephone plugged into PASS THRU and phone line plugged into FXO. Make sure Tip and Ring are not reversed with this card, or a bad modular to modular card made so that TR are NOT reversed. With PC on or off: When analog phone is off hook I can hear dialtone but cannot dial out. Here I assume you mean DTMF dialing. IS the phone of an age that it is sensitive to line polarity reversal? Most modern phones have built in polarity guard, but older POTS sets did not. When I press any button the dialtone quiets to barely audible The dial pad normally mutes audio to the ear so the necessary loud DTMF towards the network isn't objectionable. There is also usually a limiting varistor on the receiver as well. but the button pressed generates no tone; on button release dialtone returns. Sure sounds like polarity reversal. Loathe to go messing with something that could fry 1)me, Doubtful 2)my new FXO card, A blessing. 3)my pc, Normal cautions will prevent that happening. 4)the telco, VERY WELL PROTECTED, not going to happen.etc, etc. Anybody feel up to helping a noobie? Buy yourself a Sangoma A200 card, save your configuration files, install CentOS 4 or 5 and use the X100 as a paperweight. I suppose it is OK for a timing source, but not much more. My opinions, worth what you paid for them. John Novack -- Dog is my co-pilot ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Clone
On 6/6/07, John Novack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Henry Cobb wrote: Why would anybody plug a telephone line into an X100P clone? ??? What else would one plug into it? We just use them as clock cards for MeetMe and trunking. -HJC ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Clone
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 05:27:50PM -0400, John Novack wrote: Henry Cobb wrote: On 6/5/07, Jared Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Most of the clone cards don't support far-end disconnect supervision, so you'll have problems where Asterisk can't tell that the other party has hung up the phone. You'd be better off to buy a modern Asterisk telephony card. Why would anybody plug a telephone line into an X100P clone? ??? What else would one plug into it? The X100 isn't all that bad, at least for a starter card. It can have issues with long loops, doesn't work well in the UK. I support several users with VERY SHORT loops where it simply works. What do you want for 20 bucks anyway?? And when will Digium offer affordable one-port cards again? Probably never. If you already have a X100P at home, some echo problems and some spare time, take a look at http://www.rowetel.com/ucasterisk/oslec.html http://www.rowetel.com/blog/?p=33 -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Clone
On 6/5/07, Jared Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Most of the clone cards don't support far-end disconnect supervision, so you'll have problems where Asterisk can't tell that the other party has hung up the phone. You'd be better off to buy a modern Asterisk telephony card. Why would anybody plug a telephone line into an X100P clone? And when will Digium offer affordable one-port cards again? -HJC ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Clone
Henry Cobb wrote: On 6/5/07, Jared Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Most of the clone cards don't support far-end disconnect supervision, so you'll have problems where Asterisk can't tell that the other party has hung up the phone. You'd be better off to buy a modern Asterisk telephony card. Why would anybody plug a telephone line into an X100P clone? ??? What else would one plug into it? The X100 isn't all that bad, at least for a starter card. It can have issues with long loops, doesn't work well in the UK. I support several users with VERY SHORT loops where it simply works. What do you want for 20 bucks anyway?? And when will Digium offer affordable one-port cards again? Probably never. John Novack -HJC ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Clone
On 6/5/07, Ronaldo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I'm planning to buy a X100P clone and would like some feedback about this card. Does anyone already used this card? Does anyone recommend it ? or not? I'd appreciate any comments. If you have a new 3.3v only motherboard then make very sure that the brand that you buy supports this or your system will refuse to boot with the card inserted. A lot of X100P clone cards have the 3.3v notch in their PCI interface, but do not support 3.3v operation. -HJC ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Clone
I've been using one for several years now. It works ok but not spectacular. You can almost forget ever sending or receiving faxes thru it tho. They only work about 5% of the time. Henry Cobb wrote: On 6/5/07, Ronaldo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I'm planning to buy a X100P clone and would like some feedback about this card. Does anyone already used this card? Does anyone recommend it ? or not? I'd appreciate any comments. If you have a new 3.3v only motherboard then make very sure that the brand that you buy supports this or your system will refuse to boot with the card inserted. A lot of X100P clone cards have the 3.3v notch in their PCI interface, but do not support 3.3v operation. -HJC ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P Clone
On 6/5/07, Ronaldo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm planning to buy a X100P clone and would like some feedback about this card. Most of the clone cards don't support far-end disconnect supervision, so you'll have problems where Asterisk can't tell that the other party has hung up the phone. You'd be better off to buy a modern Asterisk telephony card. -Jared ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] x100p not showing in core show channels
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 11:17:57PM +0200, bram kortleven wrote: Hi, I recently decided to change my setup from AsteriskNow to plain-asterisk 1.4, which I wanted to set up and configure myself on a server running Debian Etch 64bit version. Hardware: Asrock motherboard, model 775Dual880-Pro, with a Celeron D running at 2.8GHz, 1GB memory, standard Nvidia GF4MX videocard, and one X100P clone card. Running the AsteriskNow, everything worked fine, except for incoming calls, not being routed right, but they entered the system, and mostly they ended up into the voicemail. To change that behaviour and to have more control of what I'm doing, I reinstalled the same machine with Debian Etch, the 64bit version, as the CPU (and the replacing one in a few weeks) runs EM64T nicely... The setup ran OK, compilation etc too, except for zttool which I still cannot compile. apt-get build-dep zaptel Or specifically: apt-get install libncurses-dev (or something similar) When configging the server, I used several HowTo's and guides, but no solution: hereby the config parts that I did/changed: /etc/zaptel.conf: # Autogenerated by /usr/sbin/genzaptelconf -- do not hand edit # Zaptel Configuration File # This file is parsed by the Zaptel Configurator, ztcfg # It must be in the module loading order # Span 1: WCFXO/0 Generic Clone Board 1 fxsks=1 # Global data loadzone= be defaultzone = be /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf: [channels] signalling=fxs_ks group=1 context=incoming channel=1 ;X100P /etc/asterisk/extensions.conf: [incoming] exten = s,1,Echo ;for testing the connection ;exten = s,1,Playback,demo-thanks ;for playing a file Nothing happens when dialing in. BUT: ztmonitor 01 -vv gives levels, and when dialing in, the levels change according to dialtone in my phone I use for calling the server. AND: core show channels gives me this: asterisk*CLI core show channels verbose Channel Context ExtensionPrio State Application Data CallerIDDuration Accountcode BridgedTo 0 active channels 0 active calls What am I doing wrong??? Anyone that can give a hand? What is the output of: zap show channels -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P ring detection failure
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 05:59:39PM -0800, Scott Call wrote: My home * system I use for test/dev stuff has recently started to miss all calls. I have two of the X100P boards from x100p.com that are about a year old in it. They both have worked in the past no problem. At some point in the past couple of weeks they both stopped answering the phone. I don't have a specific date because only I and a couple of other people call in on those lines. Dialing out on the channels works just fine. I took the opportunity to reinstall 1.4.0 (zaptel and asterisk) to see if maybe it was a software issue, and I also swapped around the analog lines and made sure that they were still ringing if plugged into other equipment. I checked with ztmonitor and you can see the RX level go up when the ring comes in, but still no detection in *. Try setting both modules: zaptel and wcfxo, with debug=1 . Anything on the kernel logs? (make sure you log kernel debug messages. What Linux distribution is it?) I don't get the Starting simple switch message or anything like that anymore. Can you try setting the debug level to , say, 5[1], and log debug messages (in logger.conf). Do you see anything? [1] What's the maximal sensible value for debug and for verbose? -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] X100P - zttools says red status
The card that I have got only has one port. I assume there are two versions? Thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leo Ann Boon Sent: 27 January 2007 00:58 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] X100P - zttools says red status Charlie Grosvenor wrote: Yes the line is connected, a standard phone works fine when connected to the line. There're 2 ports on the card. Which port are you using? One of the ports is for connecting another phone in parallel to the card. Leo ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P - zttools says red status
Charlie Grosvenor wrote: The card that I have got only has one port. I assume there are two versions? Thanks NOPE There really is only one port. two modular jacks, one marked line, which should go to the PSTN or FXS device, one with battery on it. The second, upper? port is simply in parallel, and in some modems ( can't say for sure on the X100 ) is opened when the modem goes off hook. If you have a card with only ONE modular jack, then perhaps you don't really have an X100?? Remember the X100 is really a simple WinModem that has a specific chipset that the Zaptel driver was written for, If you were to remove it and place it in a Windows machine with the proper drivers, you would have a run of the mill 56K dial up modem Red alarm in the X100 means it doesn't see battery from the PSTN -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leo Ann Boon Sent: 27 January 2007 00:58 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] X100P - zttools says red status Charlie Grosvenor wrote: Yes the line is connected, a standard phone works fine when connected to the line. There're 2 ports on the card. Which port are you using? One of the ports is for connecting another phone in parallel to the card. Leo ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P - zttools says red status
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 08:42:36PM -, Charlie Grosvenor wrote: I have an X100P which I have set up as per the guidelines: http://www.x100p.com/support/doc/quick_start_fxo.php The card is recognized by the system: Zaptel Version: 1.4.0 Echo Canceller: MG2 Configuration == Channel map: Channel 01: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01) 1 channels configured. However when I run zttools it says its status is red, which my understanding of is that it has not detected the line. I am in the uk and using a standard BT line (with ADSL). Any suggestions? Is the line plugged in? Can you connect a standard phone to the same line? -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] X100P - zttools says red status
Yes the line is connected, a standard phone works fine when connected to the line. Thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tzafrir Cohen Sent: 26 January 2007 23:45 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] X100P - zttools says red status On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 08:42:36PM -, Charlie Grosvenor wrote: I have an X100P which I have set up as per the guidelines: http://www.x100p.com/support/doc/quick_start_fxo.php The card is recognized by the system: Zaptel Version: 1.4.0 Echo Canceller: MG2 Configuration == Channel map: Channel 01: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01) 1 channels configured. However when I run zttools it says its status is red, which my understanding of is that it has not detected the line. I am in the uk and using a standard BT line (with ADSL). Any suggestions? Is the line plugged in? Can you connect a standard phone to the same line? -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P - zttools says red status
Charlie Grosvenor wrote: Yes the line is connected, a standard phone works fine when connected to the line. There're 2 ports on the card. Which port are you using? One of the ports is for connecting another phone in parallel to the card. Leo ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] X100P how do i recieve incomming calls?
There is only one x100p card in the system thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tzafrir Cohen Sent: 22 January 2007 23:40 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] X100P how do i recieve incomming calls? On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 08:08:16PM -, Charlie Grosvenor wrote: I have just purchased a 2nd hand X100P, Is there another X100P card in the same system? if I do a ztcfg -vv I get: Zaptel Version: 1.4.0 Echo Canceller: MG2 Configuration == Channel map: Channel 01: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01) 1 channels configured. My understanding of the above is that the zaptel driver has detected the card. What do I now need to do, in order to get an incoming call to work with asterisk? I assume I need to make some sort of change to /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf in order to tell asterisk about the card? -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] X100P how do i recieve incomming calls?
Dmesg reports: Zapata Telephony Interface Registered on major 196 Zaptel Version: 1.4.0 Echo Canceller: MG2 ACPI: PCI interrupt :00:0c.0[A] - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 185 wcfxo: DAA mode is 'FCC' Found a Wildcard FXO: Wildcard X100P Capability LSM initialized When I run zttool it says that alarms: red. The card is connected to the phone line. Anybody any idea what the problem is? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charlie Grosvenor Sent: 22 January 2007 20:08 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] X100P how do i recieve incomming calls? I have just purchased a 2nd hand X100P, if I do a ztcfg -vv I get: Zaptel Version: 1.4.0 Echo Canceller: MG2 Configuration == Channel map: Channel 01: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01) 1 channels configured. My understanding of the above is that the zaptel driver has detected the card. What do I now need to do, in order to get an incoming call to work with asterisk? I assume I need to make some sort of change to /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf in order to tell asterisk about the card? Thanks ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] X100P how do i recieve incomming calls?
From:"Charlie Grosvenor" [EMAIL PROTECTED]I have just purchased a 2nd hand X100P, if I do a ztcfg -vv I get:... Channel 01: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01)1 channels configured."My understanding of the above is that the zaptel driver has detected thecard. What do I now need to do, in order to get an incoming call to workwith asterisk?I assume I need to make some sort of change to /etc/asterisk/zapata.confin order to tell asterisk about the card? You want todefine a contextto use withthis channel, match the signaling with your channel driver (see examples in zapata.conf); if you create a new context, you'll need to also create a dial plan for it. Yuan Liu Thanks ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P how do i recieve incomming calls?
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 08:08:16PM -, Charlie Grosvenor wrote: I have just purchased a 2nd hand X100P, Is there another X100P card in the same system? if I do a ztcfg -vv I get: Zaptel Version: 1.4.0 Echo Canceller: MG2 Configuration == Channel map: Channel 01: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01) 1 channels configured. My understanding of the above is that the zaptel driver has detected the card. What do I now need to do, in order to get an incoming call to work with asterisk? I assume I need to make some sort of change to /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf in order to tell asterisk about the card? -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P rings randomly when phone line makes call
Yuan LIU wrote: Not sure if anyone experienced the same - or if anyone ever connected a POTS phone to the Phone jack on an X100P card. The POTS phone rings normally when the FXO receives a call. The POTS phone can also make outgoing calls when FXO is not holding the line. This is desired. But if a call connected to the POTS phone lasts longer than a couple of minutes, Asterisk would receive ring conditions from X100P at seemingly random intervals, and kick off incoming dialplan associated with the Zap channel. I experienced a similar problem, when my FXO was not the only port terminating the PSTN-interface, but I had a normal phone set connected in parallel as well. I turned verbose to 6 and debug to 6, but all I could see was: -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/1-1' Any idea how I can find the cause? Thank you. System is Asterisk 1.2.13 on Ubuntu 6. Yuan Liu ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] X100P clone dial problems.
Well I finally got it to work. I changed the DSL filter and it started to work. Very strange. Thanks for everyone's suggestions. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Lowndes Sent: Tuesday, 12 December 2006 5:17 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone dial problems. Well, my PSTN card has: signalling-fxs_ks and that works for me. Klaverstyn, David C wrote: Thanks for your help. This is my file. [channels] language=au context=from-pstn signalling=fxo_ks ;rxwink=300 usecallerid=yes hidecallerid=no callwaiting=yes usecallingpres=yes callwaitingcallerid=yes threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes canpark=yes cancallforward=yes callreturn=yes echocancel=yes echocancelwhenbridged=yes rxgain=0.0 txgain=0.0 callgroup=1 pickupgroup=1 immediate=no channel = 1 Upon reloading asterisk I get the following errors. Dec 11 19:03:45 WARNING[5265]: chan_zap.c:10874 setup_zap: Ignoring signalling Dec 11 19:03:45 ERROR[5265]: chan_zap.c:10305 setup_zap: Unable to reconfigure channel '1' -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Lowndes Sent: Monday, 11 December 2006 6:00 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone dial problems. Klaverstyn, David C wrote: I have since added fxs_ks=1 This is meaningless. Follow the example that I posted. and channel = 1 This has not fixed the problem. I do notice a warning on the reload of asterisk. WARNING[4296]: chan_zap.c:10874 setup_zap: Ignoring signalling -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tzafrir Cohen Sent: Monday, 11 December 2006 4:47 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone dial problems. On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 04:18:20PM +1100, Klaverstyn, David C wrote: I'm not sure if I have a configuration problem or not. I am unable to dial out. When I try to dial in I can hear the phone ring on the dialling phone but Asterisk does not register anything. In zaptel.conf I have loadzone = au defaultzone=au fxsks=1 In zapata.conf language=au context=from-pstn Those need to be in the section [channels] and be followed by a channel = 1 to actually have any effect. You also must set signaling (signalling = fxs_ks; in your case). -- Howard. LANNet Computing Associates - Your Linux people http://lannetlinux.com When you want a computer system that works, just choose Linux; When you want a computer system that works, just, choose Microsoft. -- Flatter government, not fatter government; abolish the Australian states. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Howard. LANNet Computing Associates - Your Linux people http://lannetlinux.com When you want a computer system that works, just choose Linux; When you want a computer system that works, just, choose Microsoft. -- Flatter government, not fatter government; abolish the Australian states. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone dial problems.
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 06:53:19PM +1100, Klaverstyn, David C wrote: I have since added fxs_ks=1 and channel = 1 This has not fixed the problem. I do notice a warning on the reload of asterisk. WARNING[4296]: chan_zap.c:10874 setup_zap: Ignoring signalling Right. reload of chan_zap will only change settings of channels, but not add new channels or change their signalling type. You need to restart asterisk for that, sadly. asterisk -rx 'restart now' (BTW: I'm not saying that Howard's example is not good. I'm trying to give you a direct answer to your question with minimal voodoo values). -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] X100P clone dial problems.
Thanks for your help. This is my file. [channels] language=au context=from-pstn signalling=fxo_ks ;rxwink=300 usecallerid=yes hidecallerid=no callwaiting=yes usecallingpres=yes callwaitingcallerid=yes threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes canpark=yes cancallforward=yes callreturn=yes echocancel=yes echocancelwhenbridged=yes rxgain=0.0 txgain=0.0 callgroup=1 pickupgroup=1 immediate=no channel = 1 Upon reloading asterisk I get the following errors. Dec 11 19:03:45 WARNING[5265]: chan_zap.c:10874 setup_zap: Ignoring signalling Dec 11 19:03:45 ERROR[5265]: chan_zap.c:10305 setup_zap: Unable to reconfigure channel '1' -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Lowndes Sent: Monday, 11 December 2006 6:00 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone dial problems. Klaverstyn, David C wrote: I have since added fxs_ks=1 This is meaningless. Follow the example that I posted. and channel = 1 This has not fixed the problem. I do notice a warning on the reload of asterisk. WARNING[4296]: chan_zap.c:10874 setup_zap: Ignoring signalling -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tzafrir Cohen Sent: Monday, 11 December 2006 4:47 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone dial problems. On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 04:18:20PM +1100, Klaverstyn, David C wrote: I'm not sure if I have a configuration problem or not. I am unable to dial out. When I try to dial in I can hear the phone ring on the dialling phone but Asterisk does not register anything. In zaptel.conf I have loadzone = au defaultzone=au fxsks=1 In zapata.conf language=au context=from-pstn Those need to be in the section [channels] and be followed by a channel = 1 to actually have any effect. You also must set signaling (signalling = fxs_ks; in your case). -- Howard. LANNet Computing Associates - Your Linux people http://lannetlinux.com When you want a computer system that works, just choose Linux; When you want a computer system that works, just, choose Microsoft. -- Flatter government, not fatter government; abolish the Australian states. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone dial problems.
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 04:18:20PM +1100, Klaverstyn, David C wrote: I'm not sure if I have a configuration problem or not. I am unable to dial out. When I try to dial in I can hear the phone ring on the dialling phone but Asterisk does not register anything. In zaptel.conf I have loadzone = au defaultzone=au fxsks=1 In zapata.conf language=au context=from-pstn Those need to be in the section [channels] and be followed by a channel = 1 to actually have any effect. You also must set signaling (signalling = fxs_ks; in your case). -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] X100P clone dial problems.
I have since added fxs_ks=1 and channel = 1 This has not fixed the problem. I do notice a warning on the reload of asterisk. WARNING[4296]: chan_zap.c:10874 setup_zap: Ignoring signalling -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tzafrir Cohen Sent: Monday, 11 December 2006 4:47 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone dial problems. On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 04:18:20PM +1100, Klaverstyn, David C wrote: I'm not sure if I have a configuration problem or not. I am unable to dial out. When I try to dial in I can hear the phone ring on the dialling phone but Asterisk does not register anything. In zaptel.conf I have loadzone = au defaultzone=au fxsks=1 In zapata.conf language=au context=from-pstn Those need to be in the section [channels] and be followed by a channel = 1 to actually have any effect. You also must set signaling (signalling = fxs_ks; in your case). -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working
One last thing: Playback sounds now like MickeyMouse, much to slow One sanity check: try zttest . See that it gives values ov 100% or very close to that. --- Results after 141 passes --- Best: 99.499512 -- Worst: 83.691406 -- Average: 95.715467 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 02:21:01PM +0200, Frank Darner wrote: What is the output from 'cat /proc/zaptel/*' After delete of all Asterisk files and complete new install I got something: # modprobe zaptel modprobe wcfxo linux:/proc/zaptel # cat /proc/zaptel/* Span 1: WCFXO/0 Generic Clone Board 1 RED 1 WCFXO/0/0 but # ztcfg - is still no channels. any ideas? No channel defined in /etc/zaptel.conf, naturally. /me points to xpp/utils/genzaptelconf in the source tree. OK, I have now an output. For some reason ztcfg was not looking in /etc/asterisk for the zaptel.conf. After using the option -c /etc/asterisk/zaptel.conf everythink was fine. No. It looks for zaptel.conf in /etc/zaptel.conf . This is what the man page reads. This is what strace will tell you. This is even documented in voip-info.org. Zaptel is not part of Asterisk. It's a kernel module. Asterisk's zaptel channel configuration is /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf and has a totally different syntax (e.g: ; for comments). One last thing: Playback sounds now like MickeyMouse, much to slow One sanity check: try zttest . See that it gives values ov 100% or very close to that. -- Tzafrir Cohen sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] icq#16849755 iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working
Tzafrir Cohen: On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 09:02:48PM +0200, Frank Darner wrote: Hi, I have problem to set up an X100P clone card. Installation of zaptel was successful. Also modprobe of zaptel, ztdummy and wcfxo without problems. kernel: wcfxo: module not supported by Novell, setting U taint flag. kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:04.0[A] - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 193 kernel: wcfxo: DAA mode is 'FCC' kernel: Found a Wildcard FXO: Generic Clone kernel: Registered tone zone 0 (United States / North America) But if I do #ztcfg -vvv no channels will be found. Hi, OK, I do # modprobe zaptel modprobe wcfxo What is the exact output from that command? linux:/proc/zaptel # ztcfg -vvv Zaptel Configuration == Channel map: 0 channels configured. What is the output from 'cat /proc/zaptel/*' nothing dir /proc/zaptel but is empty BUT, if I do additional # modprobe ztdummy linux:/proc/zaptel # cat /proc/zaptel/* Span 1: ZTDUMMY/1 ZTDUMMY/1 1 any ideas ? thanks ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working
configs look fine to me it has to be a module problem im guessing may be, but I dont know whats wrong Zaptel (1.2.6.) installation was without errors and I did not get an error when loading the modules try rmmod for zaptel and wctfxo or w/e then modprobing again(must be root) if that does not work(which is does on my system, so i added it into a startup conf) kernel: wcfxo: module not supported by Novell are you sure that wcfxo is the correct module for that device?? Yes, I doublechecked with other sites ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working
Am Sunday 23 July 2006 06:39 schrieb Tzafrir Cohen: On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 09:02:48PM +0200, Frank Darner wrote: Hi, I have problem to set up an X100P clone card. Installation of zaptel was successful. Also modprobe of zaptel, ztdummy and wcfxo without problems. kernel: wcfxo: module not supported by Novell, setting U taint flag. kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:04.0[A] - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 193 kernel: wcfxo: DAA mode is 'FCC' kernel: Found a Wildcard FXO: Generic Clone kernel: Registered tone zone 0 (United States / North America) But if I do #ztcfg -vvv no channels will be found. What is the exact output from that command? What is the output from 'cat /proc/zaptel/*' After delete of all Asterisk files and complete new install I got something: # modprobe zaptel modprobe wcfxo linux:/proc/zaptel # cat /proc/zaptel/* Span 1: WCFXO/0 Generic Clone Board 1 RED 1 WCFXO/0/0 but # ztcfg - is still no channels. any ideas? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working
What is the output from 'cat /proc/zaptel/*' After delete of all Asterisk files and complete new install I got something: # modprobe zaptel modprobe wcfxo linux:/proc/zaptel # cat /proc/zaptel/* Span 1: WCFXO/0 Generic Clone Board 1 RED 1 WCFXO/0/0 but # ztcfg - is still no channels. any ideas? OK, I have now an output. For some reason ztcfg was not looking in /etc/asterisk for the zaptel.conf. After using the option -c /etc/asterisk/zaptel.conf everythink was fine. One last thing: Playback sounds now like MickeyMouse, much to slow also Calls SIP to SIP are not any more possible any ideas? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working
perhaps not what you're looking for, but reading thru your config, it looks like you've mis-spelled 'echo cancel' as 'echo cancle'On 7/23/06, Frank Darner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the output from 'cat /proc/zaptel/*' After delete of all Asterisk files and complete new install I got something: # modprobe zaptel modprobe wcfxo linux:/proc/zaptel # cat /proc/zaptel/* Span 1: WCFXO/0 Generic Clone Board 1 RED1 WCFXO/0/0 but # ztcfg - is still no channels. any ideas?OK, I have now an output.For some reason ztcfg was not looking in /etc/asterisk for the zaptel.conf.After using the option -c /etc/asterisk/zaptel.conf everythink was fine. One last thing:Playback sounds now like MickeyMouse, much to slowalso Calls SIP to SIP are not any more possibleany ideas?___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working
Tom Lynn: perhaps not what you're looking for, but reading thru your config, it looks like you've mis-spelled 'echo cancel' as 'echo cancle' you are right, typo thank you ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working
look udev rules???On 7/23/06, Frank Darner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tom Lynn: perhaps not what you're looking for, but reading thru your config, it looks like you've mis-spelled 'echo cancel' as 'echo cancle'you are right, typothank you___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working
Am Sunday 23 July 2006 20:58 schrieb Walter Willis: look udev rules??? the problem was related that ztcfg did not find zaptel.com -c /etc/asterisk/zaptel.conf has solved this issue #ztcfg --help -c filename -- Use filename instead of /etc/zaptel.conf my failure, I should read man page more carefully now am trying to get it working, the sound is still unreliable ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE : [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working
Hi Franck, NOACPI and the sound must be more clear. And, of course, have you tell to /usr/src/zaptel/zconfig.h and /usr/src/asterisk/Makefil what kind of processor you have and enabled MMX if possible before to compile ? Good Luck ! Francois BERGERET, France. -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Frank Darner Envoyé : dimanche 23 juillet 2006 23:41 À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working Am Sunday 23 July 2006 20:58 schrieb Walter Willis: look udev rules??? the problem was related that ztcfg did not find zaptel.com -c /etc/asterisk/zaptel.conf has solved this issue #ztcfg --help -c filename -- Use filename instead of /etc/zaptel.conf my failure, I should read man page more carefully now am trying to get it working, the sound is still unreliable ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working
dmesg | grep x100p also im almost positive(correct me if im wrong anyone) you do NOT need ztdummy i repeat, do NOT need ztdummy with x100p then rmmod zaptel rmmod wctdm modprobe zaptel modprobe wctdm or wctfxo or w/e let me know how this works out (post the section for your x100p from zaptel.conf and zapata.conf if you could m8) Hi, I have problem to set up an X100P clone card. Installation of zaptel was successful. Also modprobe of zaptel, ztdummy and wcfxo without problems. kernel: wcfxo: module not supported by Novell, setting U taint flag. kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:04.0[A] - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 193 kernel: wcfxo: DAA mode is 'FCC' kernel: Found a Wildcard FXO: Generic Clone kernel: Registered tone zone 0 (United States / North America) But if I do #ztcfg -vvv no channels will be found. the log file reports me: kernel: Registered tone zone 0 (United States / North America) Iam quite sure that zaptel.conf is correct. fxsks=1 loadzone=us defaultzone=us So Iam not sure what happened here, I have found that this clone as used by many others, so it should work. thanks best regards Frank ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working
Hi, i tried w/o ztdummy but nothing changed. any ideas? zaptel.conf -- fxsks=1 loadzone=us defaultzone=us zapata.conf [channels] language=en context=incoming signalling=fxs_ks usecallerid=yes echocancle=yes transfer=yes echocanclewhenbridged=yes channel = 1 # modprobe zaptel modprobe wcfxo kernel: zaptel: module not supported by Novell, setting U taint flag. kernel: Zapata Telephony Interface Registered on major 196 kernel: Zaptel Version: SVN-tag-1.2.6-r1096 Echo Canceller: KB1 kernel: wcfxo: module not supported by Novell, setting U taint flag. kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:04.0[A] - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 193 kernel: wcfxo: DAA mode is 'FCC' kernel: Found a Wildcard FXO: Generic Clone kernel: Registered tone zone 0 (United States / North America) # lsmod | grep zaptel zaptel201732 1 wcfxo crc_ccitt 2176 1 zaptel # ztcfg -v Zaptel Configuration == 0 channels configured. dmesg | grep x100p also im almost positive(correct me if im wrong anyone) you do NOT need ztdummy i repeat, do NOT need ztdummy with x100p then rmmod zaptel rmmod wctdm modprobe zaptel modprobe wctdm or wctfxo or w/e let me know how this works out (post the section for your x100p from zaptel.conf and zapata.conf if you could m8) Hi, I have problem to set up an X100P clone card. Installation of zaptel was successful. Also modprobe of zaptel, ztdummy and wcfxo without problems. kernel: wcfxo: module not supported by Novell, setting U taint flag. kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:04.0[A] - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 193 kernel: wcfxo: DAA mode is 'FCC' kernel: Found a Wildcard FXO: Generic Clone kernel: Registered tone zone 0 (United States / North America) But if I do #ztcfg -vvv no channels will be found. the log file reports me: kernel: Registered tone zone 0 (United States / North America) Iam quite sure that zaptel.conf is correct. fxsks=1 loadzone=us defaultzone=us So Iam not sure what happened here, I have found that this clone as used by many others, so it should work. thanks best regards Frank ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working
configs look fine to me it has to be a module problem im guessing try rmmod for zaptel and wctfxo or w/e then modprobing again(must be root) if that does not work(which is does on my system, so i added it into a startup conf) kernel: wcfxo: module not supported by Novell are you sure that wcfxo is the correct module for that device?? hoping to help `KruZ~ From: Frank Darner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussionasterisk-users@lists.digium.com To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussionasterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 21:47:03 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from lists.digium.com ([69.16.138.164]) by bay0-mc3-f8.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Sat, 22 Jul 2006 12:48:30 -0700 Received: from digium-69-16-138-164.phx1.puregig.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])by lists.digium.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5410F2FC983;Sat, 22 Jul 2006 12:47:07 -0700 (MST) Received: from psmtp.com (exprod8mx18.postini.com [64.18.3.118])by lists.digium.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6DAB82FC955for asterisk-users@lists.digium.com;Sat, 22 Jul 2006 12:47:01 -0700 (MST) Received: from source ([64.233.182.188]) by exprod8mx18.postini.com([64.18.7.10]) with SMTP; Sat, 22 Jul 2006 12:47:01 PDT Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id p48so1178324nfafor asterisk-users@lists.digium.com;Sat, 22 Jul 2006 12:47:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.80.20 with SMTP id d20mr1795637nfb;Sat, 22 Jul 2006 12:47:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p54BA06B2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ( [84.186.6.178])by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id k9sm3536321nfc.2006.07.22.12.47.00;Sat, 22 Jul 2006 12:47:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt3YNIQZusOzLxRY86S1M78tl0qZUvrd8nA= X-Original-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Delivered-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=googlemail.com;h=received:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id:from;b=f6RdXsFUO93pZRYKfL8kkf1zq7II8QbilI7EIicBctd1pQiFP1oSzU3gqXz4bivjrA/7blsBUpPAviR79NWfa49+Pw0aTIr073H/bQV+Q7VvhfOdlDRNw0QYj+mjXA6AZ5GFGBnlO2OjnhLgMpPjwBX00xkxIE1GXyAJtuF0ZMs= User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-pstn-levels: (S:99.9/99.9 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 R:95.9108 P:95.9108M:96.8350 C:98.4741 ) X-pstn-settings: 3 (1.:1.) s fc lc gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] [db-null] X-BeenThere: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussionasterisk-users.lists.digium.com List-Unsubscribe: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users,mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Archive: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users List-Post: mailto:asterisk-users@lists.digium.com List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Subscribe: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users,mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jul 2006 19:48:31.0136 (UTC) FILETIME=[CF1A9200:01C6ADC7] Hi, i tried w/o ztdummy but nothing changed. any ideas? zaptel.conf -- fxsks=1 loadzone=us defaultzone=us zapata.conf [channels] language=en context=incoming signalling=fxs_ks usecallerid=yes echocancle=yes transfer=yes echocanclewhenbridged=yes channel = 1 # modprobe zaptel modprobe wcfxo kernel: zaptel: module not supported by Novell, setting U taint flag. kernel: Zapata Telephony Interface Registered on major 196 kernel: Zaptel Version: SVN-tag-1.2.6-r1096 Echo Canceller: KB1 kernel: wcfxo: module not supported by Novell, setting U taint flag. kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:04.0[A] - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 193 kernel: wcfxo: DAA mode is 'FCC' kernel: Found a Wildcard FXO: Generic Clone kernel: Registered tone zone 0 (United States / North America) # lsmod | grep zaptel zaptel201732 1 wcfxo crc_ccitt 2176 1 zaptel # ztcfg -v Zaptel Configuration == 0 channels configured. dmesg | grep x100p also im almost positive(correct me if im wrong anyone) you do NOT need ztdummy i repeat, do NOT need ztdummy with x100p then rmmod zaptel rmmod wctdm modprobe zaptel modprobe wctdm or wctfxo or w/e let me know how this works out (post the section for your x100p from zaptel.conf and zapata.conf if you could m8) Hi, I have problem to set up an X100P clone card. Installation of zaptel was successful. Also modprobe of zaptel, ztdummy and wcfxo without problems. kernel: wcfxo: module not supported by Novell, setting U taint flag. kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:04.0[A] - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 193 kernel: wcfxo: DAA mode is 'FCC' kernel: Found a Wildcard FXO: Generic Clone
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working
here is some more information http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/X100P+clone From: Frank Darner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussionasterisk-users@lists.digium.com To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussionasterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 21:47:03 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from lists.digium.com ([69.16.138.164]) by bay0-mc3-f8.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Sat, 22 Jul 2006 12:48:30 -0700 Received: from digium-69-16-138-164.phx1.puregig.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])by lists.digium.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5410F2FC983;Sat, 22 Jul 2006 12:47:07 -0700 (MST) Received: from psmtp.com (exprod8mx18.postini.com [64.18.3.118])by lists.digium.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6DAB82FC955for asterisk-users@lists.digium.com;Sat, 22 Jul 2006 12:47:01 -0700 (MST) Received: from source ([64.233.182.188]) by exprod8mx18.postini.com([64.18.7.10]) with SMTP; Sat, 22 Jul 2006 12:47:01 PDT Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id p48so1178324nfafor asterisk-users@lists.digium.com;Sat, 22 Jul 2006 12:47:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.80.20 with SMTP id d20mr1795637nfb;Sat, 22 Jul 2006 12:47:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p54BA06B2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ( [84.186.6.178])by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id k9sm3536321nfc.2006.07.22.12.47.00;Sat, 22 Jul 2006 12:47:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt3YNIQZusOzLxRY86S1M78tl0qZUvrd8nA= X-Original-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Delivered-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=googlemail.com;h=received:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id:from;b=f6RdXsFUO93pZRYKfL8kkf1zq7II8QbilI7EIicBctd1pQiFP1oSzU3gqXz4bivjrA/7blsBUpPAviR79NWfa49+Pw0aTIr073H/bQV+Q7VvhfOdlDRNw0QYj+mjXA6AZ5GFGBnlO2OjnhLgMpPjwBX00xkxIE1GXyAJtuF0ZMs= User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-pstn-levels: (S:99.9/99.9 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 R:95.9108 P:95.9108M:96.8350 C:98.4741 ) X-pstn-settings: 3 (1.:1.) s fc lc gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] [db-null] X-BeenThere: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussionasterisk-users.lists.digium.com List-Unsubscribe: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users,mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Archive: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users List-Post: mailto:asterisk-users@lists.digium.com List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Subscribe: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users,mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jul 2006 19:48:31.0136 (UTC) FILETIME=[CF1A9200:01C6ADC7] Hi, i tried w/o ztdummy but nothing changed. any ideas? zaptel.conf -- fxsks=1 loadzone=us defaultzone=us zapata.conf [channels] language=en context=incoming signalling=fxs_ks usecallerid=yes echocancle=yes transfer=yes echocanclewhenbridged=yes channel = 1 # modprobe zaptel modprobe wcfxo kernel: zaptel: module not supported by Novell, setting U taint flag. kernel: Zapata Telephony Interface Registered on major 196 kernel: Zaptel Version: SVN-tag-1.2.6-r1096 Echo Canceller: KB1 kernel: wcfxo: module not supported by Novell, setting U taint flag. kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:04.0[A] - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 193 kernel: wcfxo: DAA mode is 'FCC' kernel: Found a Wildcard FXO: Generic Clone kernel: Registered tone zone 0 (United States / North America) # lsmod | grep zaptel zaptel201732 1 wcfxo crc_ccitt 2176 1 zaptel # ztcfg -v Zaptel Configuration == 0 channels configured. dmesg | grep x100p also im almost positive(correct me if im wrong anyone) you do NOT need ztdummy i repeat, do NOT need ztdummy with x100p then rmmod zaptel rmmod wctdm modprobe zaptel modprobe wctdm or wctfxo or w/e let me know how this works out (post the section for your x100p from zaptel.conf and zapata.conf if you could m8) Hi, I have problem to set up an X100P clone card. Installation of zaptel was successful. Also modprobe of zaptel, ztdummy and wcfxo without problems. kernel: wcfxo: module not supported by Novell, setting U taint flag. kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:04.0[A] - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 193 kernel: wcfxo: DAA mode is 'FCC' kernel: Found a Wildcard FXO: Generic Clone kernel: Registered tone zone 0 (United States / North America) But if I do #ztcfg -vvv no channels will be found. the log file reports me: kernel: Registered tone zone 0 (United States / North America) Iam quite sure that zaptel.conf is correct. fxsks=1 loadzone=us
Re: [asterisk-users] X100P clone not working
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 09:02:48PM +0200, Frank Darner wrote: Hi, I have problem to set up an X100P clone card. Installation of zaptel was successful. Also modprobe of zaptel, ztdummy and wcfxo without problems. kernel: wcfxo: module not supported by Novell, setting U taint flag. kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:04.0[A] - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 193 kernel: wcfxo: DAA mode is 'FCC' kernel: Found a Wildcard FXO: Generic Clone kernel: Registered tone zone 0 (United States / North America) But if I do #ztcfg -vvv no channels will be found. What is the exact output from that command? What is the output from 'cat /proc/zaptel/*' -- Tzafrir Cohen sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] icq#16849755 iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] x100p buying advice
I would guess the card is actually a http://www.x100p.com/products_1.htm and may be x100p selling it on ebay themselves. I have one of these cards itself and it works fine. There is a bit of echo initially but it gets cancelled our fairly quickly. Apart from turning on echo cancellation I have not adjusted any other settings. On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 01:16, Rod Morison wrote: I'm looking to get an x100p off ebay and am not particularly familar with the life cycle of the card.. An Authentic X100P listing has a buy it now of $29.95 and says There are 3 types of cards Asterisk would recognize: *Screenshots from the official, original driver install Cheap OEM X100P,Clones, Compatibles, Knock-Offs Found a Wildcard FXO: Generic Clone The X101P (note the 101, not 100) is a Low-end version of X100P which uses low grade chips Found a Wildcard FXO: X101P Authentic, Original X100P Speaks for Itself! Found a Wildcard FXO: X100P From what I gather clone's and knockoffs will have trouble with callerid. Is the Found a Wildcard FXO: X100P enough to establish full featured hardware (assuming an honest seller)? Is there another recommended source besides ebay in this price range? Thanks ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE : [Asterisk-Users] x100p buying advice
Hello, Ridiculous business argumentation... By changing 2 resistors maping on the same card you can say to system that is any response as X100P, X101P, or Clone. No proof to good quality or if it realy run ! Take a look to voip-info.org about X100P and X101P, you will learn more about the chipsets, which is only the available information. Use this kind of cards (WinModem) for tests or curses only, no production. Good Luck. Francois BERGERET, France. -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Rod Morison Envoyé : mardi 27 juin 2006 02:16 À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Objet : [Asterisk-Users] x100p buying advice I'm looking to get an x100p off ebay and am not particularly familar with the life cycle of the card.. An Authentic X100P listing has a buy it now of $29.95 and says There are 3 types of cards Asterisk would recognize: *Screenshots from the official, original driver install Cheap OEM X100P,Clones, Compatibles, Knock-Offs Found a Wildcard FXO: Generic Clone The X101P (note the 101, not 100) is a Low-end version of X100P which uses low grade chips Found a Wildcard FXO: X101P Authentic, Original X100P Speaks for Itself! Found a Wildcard FXO: X100P From what I gather clone's and knockoffs will have trouble with callerid. Is the Found a Wildcard FXO: X100P enough to establish full featured hardware (assuming an honest seller)? Is there another recommended source besides ebay in this price range? Thanks ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P fails to initialize
So I took a chance with an X100P knock-off on eBay. I'm running Asterisk + FreePBX on a PowerMac G3 (beige desktop) using Slackintosh 10.2 and kernel 2.6.16.16. Everything has been fine up until now. I compile the 1.2.5 Zaptel drivers without a problem, get the udev configuration in, modprobe zaptel, and finally modprobe wcfxo. At this point, I get the message: ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 1: No such device or address (6) FATAL: Error running install command for wcfxo dmesg gives me: Zapata Telephony Interface Registered on major 196 Zaptel Version: 1.2.5 Echo Canceller: MG2 Failed to initailize DAA, giving up... wcfxo: probe of :00:0e.0 failed with error -5 this is a problem if the card shares interrupt with something on MOtherBOard. configure the slot to other irq, or move the card to other irq. lspci -v will be your friend. Check if someone uses same IRQ as motorola card. -- WoodOO-[P]an[G]alaktikan[A]gent-People ][ http://shadow.pganet.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]@RedHat.users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P fails to initialize
Hello. ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 1: No such device or address (6) I think that this error, is saying that its X100P is not connected in slot PCI correctly. He makes a test, he changes the X100P of slot and he sends for the list the commands lspci, dmesg, cat /proc/interrupts. I wait to have helped. Best RegardsJosué 2006/6/3, Woodoo People .pGa! [EMAIL PROTECTED]: So I took a chance with an X100P knock-off on eBay. I'm running Asterisk + FreePBX on a PowerMac G3 (beige desktop) using Slackintosh 10.2 and kernel 2.6.16.16. Everything has been fine up until now. I compile the 1.2.5 Zaptel drivers without a problem, get the udev configuration in, modprobe zaptel, and finally modprobe wcfxo. At this point, I get the message: ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 1: No such device or address (6) FATAL: Error running install command for wcfxo dmesg gives me: Zapata Telephony Interface Registered on major 196 Zaptel Version: 1.2.5 Echo Canceller: MG2 Failed to initailize DAA, giving up... wcfxo: probe of :00:0e.0 failed with error -5this is a problem if the card shares interrupt with something on MOtherBOard. configure the slot to other irq, or move the card to other irq.lspci -v will be your friend. Check if someone uses same IRQ as motorola card.--WoodOO-[P]an[G]alaktikan[A]gent-People ][ http://shadow.pganet.com[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --Asterisk-Users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P fails to initialize
Zapata Telephony Interface Registered on major 196 Zaptel Version: 1.2.5 Echo Canceller: MG2 Failed to initailize DAA, giving up... wcfxo: probe of :00:0e.0 failed with error -5 these lines means, your x100p is not initialized - therefore cannot be used by zaptel. the problem below, reported by ztconfig. as the usage of zaptel device is following: modprobe zaptel modprobe module_of_card (like wcfxo) if it found, ztcfg if you see the device in /proc/zaptel/1 (or 2 or so) you can start asterisk and enjoy the device. you can believe me, this problem is in relation with irq sharing. (as i meet with that problem every time i have installed more than one card in a box - what i did more than 20 times) Hello. ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 1: No such device or address (6) I think that this error, is saying that its X100P is not connected in slot PCI correctly. He makes a test, he changes the X100P of slot and he sends for the list the commands lspci, dmesg, cat /proc/interrupts. I wait to have helped. Best Regards Josué 2006/6/3, Woodoo People .pGa! [EMAIL PROTECTED]: So I took a chance with an X100P knock-off on eBay. I'm running Asterisk + FreePBX on a PowerMac G3 (beige desktop) using Slackintosh 10.2 and kernel 2.6.16.16. Everything has been fine up until now. I compile the 1.2.5 Zaptel drivers without a problem, get the udev configuration in, modprobe zaptel, and finally modprobe wcfxo. At this point, I get the message: ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 1: No such device or address (6) FATAL: Error running install command for wcfxo dmesg gives me: Zapata Telephony Interface Registered on major 196 Zaptel Version: 1.2.5 Echo Canceller: MG2 Failed to initailize DAA, giving up... wcfxo: probe of :00:0e.0 failed with error -5 this is a problem if the card shares interrupt with something on MOtherBOard. configure the slot to other irq, or move the card to other irq. lspci -v will be your friend. Check if someone uses same IRQ as motorola card. -- WoodOO-[P]an[G]alaktikan[A]gent-People ][ http://shadow.pganet.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ RedHat.users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- WoodOO-[P]an[G]alaktikan[A]gent-People ][ http://shadow.pganet.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]@RedHat.users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P fails to initialize
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 11:15:57PM +0200, Woodoo People .pGa! wrote: Zapata Telephony Interface Registered on major 196 Zaptel Version: 1.2.5 Echo Canceller: MG2 Failed to initailize DAA, giving up... wcfxo: probe of :00:0e.0 failed with error -5 these lines means, your x100p is not initialized - therefore cannot be used by zaptel. the problem below, reported by ztconfig. as the usage of zaptel device is following: modprobe zaptel modprobe module_of_card (like wcfxo) if it found, ztcfg if you see the device in /proc/zaptel/1 (or 2 or so) you can start asterisk and enjoy the device. you can believe me, this problem is in relation with irq sharing. (as i meet with that problem every time i have installed more than one card in a box - what i did more than 20 times) In one at least one board the problem was resolved by adding the boot parameter 'pci=noacpi' , IIRC. Which is, indeed, something in the neighbourhood of IRQ assignments. -- Tzafrir Cohen sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] icq#16849755 iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P fails to initialize
Thanks to everyone for their tips and suggestions. I finally got the card working by using the YellowDog Linux kernel from ppckernel.org. There must have been some setting in the kernel config that made a difference because the card suddenly started working after that, even after a kernel recompile of 2.6.16.18 using the same config. On 6/3/06, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 11:15:57PM +0200, Woodoo People .pGa! wrote: Zapata Telephony Interface Registered on major 196 Zaptel Version: 1.2.5 Echo Canceller: MG2 Failed to initailize DAA, giving up... wcfxo: probe of :00:0e.0 failed with error -5 these lines means, your x100p is not initialized - therefore cannot be used by zaptel. the problem below, reported by ztconfig. as the usage of zaptel device is following: modprobe zaptel modprobe module_of_card (like wcfxo) if it found, ztcfg if you see the device in /proc/zaptel/1 (or 2 or so) you can start asterisk and enjoy the device. you can believe me, this problem is in relation with irq sharing. (as i meet with that problem every time i have installed more than one card in a box - what i did more than 20 times) In one at least one board the problem was resolved by adding the boot parameter 'pci=noacpi' , IIRC. Which is, indeed, something in the neighbourhood of IRQ assignments. -- Tzafrir Cohen sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] icq#16849755 iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P fails to initialize
Lachek Butalek wrote: So I took a chance with an X100P knock-off on eBay. I'm running Asterisk + FreePBX on a PowerMac G3 (beige desktop) using Slackintosh 10.2 and kernel 2.6.16.16 http://2.6.16.16. Everything has been fine up until now. I compile the 1.2.5 Zaptel drivers without a problem, get the udev configuration in, modprobe zaptel, and finally modprobe wcfxo. At this point, I get the message: ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 1: No such device or address (6) FATAL: Error running install command for wcfxo dmesg gives me: Zapata Telephony Interface Registered on major 196 Zaptel Version: 1.2.5 Echo Canceller: MG2 Failed to initailize DAA, giving up... wcfxo: probe of :00:0e.0 failed with error -5 syslog tells me: May 25 21:28:20 asterisk kernel: Failed to initailize DAA, giving up... May 25 21:28:20 asterisk kernel: wcfxo: probe of :00:0e.0 failed with error -5 ztcfg -vv says: Channel 01: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01) 1 channels configured. ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 1: No such device or address (6) and lspci -vv tells me this: 00:0e.0 Communication controller: Motorola: Unknown device 5608 Subsystem: Motorola: Unknown device Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- On an Intel machine, it reports a Tigerjet chip. Looks as if you may have the wrong modem chip? John Novack ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P not recognised on FreeBSD system
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 09:30:33AM +0100, Chris Hastie wrote: I've just received an OEM Wildcard X100P FXO card. Installing into my FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE box it doesn't appear to be recognised at all. Since it's the first time I've put a PCI card in this machine I've just dropped a Netgear ethernet card in to make sure there isn't something fundamentally wrong with the motherboard, but that works fine. Is there anything else I should check / try before assuming the X100P is faulty? Output of pciconf -l -v below (after the Netgear card went back to where it belongs): [snip log list. The X100P is not listed] The card should appear on th list of PCI devices. I don't know FreeBSD, but I assume that the problem here is not related to the Zaptel driver itself. Either a hardware problem or some strange problem with the kernel support of the PCI bus (not likely). -- Tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P not recognised on FreeBSD system
On 05/19/06 16:30 Chris Hastie said the following: I've just received an OEM Wildcard X100P FXO card. Installing into my FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE box it doesn't appear to be recognised at all. Since have you downloaded, compiled and installed the zaptel-bsd drivers ? if you haven't, instructions for getting them are at http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-FreeBSD+zaptel for the X100P, you'd need to kldload zaptel.ko and wcfxo.ko, though be warned that the wcfxo.ko driver has not had much development in yonks. -- Regards, /\_/\ All dogs go to heaven. [EMAIL PROTECTED](0 0) http://www.openmalaysiablog.com/ +==oOO--(_)--OOo==+ | for a in past present future; do| | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b. | | done; done | +=+ ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P not recognised on FreeBSD system
On Fri, 19 May 2006, Dinesh Nair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 05/19/06 16:30 Chris Hastie said the following: I've just received an OEM Wildcard X100P FXO card. Installing into my FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE box it doesn't appear to be recognised at all. Since have you downloaded, compiled and installed the zaptel-bsd drivers ? if you haven't, instructions for getting them are at http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-FreeBSD+zaptel for the X100P, you'd need to kldload zaptel.ko and wcfxo.ko, though be warned that the wcfxo.ko driver has not had much development in yonks. Yes, I have these. The modules load, but ztcfg complains ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 1: No such device or address (6) and as I said, it doesn't appear that the card has been recognised by the kernel. -- Chris Hastie ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P not recognised on FreeBSD system
On 05/19/06 18:57 Chris Hastie said the following: Yes, I have these. The modules load, but ztcfg complains ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 1: No such device or address (6) and as I said, it doesn't appear that the card has been recognised by the kernel. could you try the X100P in anther system to rule out issues with the Via board you're using ? -- Regards, /\_/\ All dogs go to heaven. [EMAIL PROTECTED](0 0) http://www.openmalaysiablog.com/ +==oOO--(_)--OOo==+ | for a in past present future; do| | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b. | | done; done | +=+ ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P not recognised on FreeBSD system
On Fri, 19 May 2006, Dinesh Nair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote On 05/19/06 18:57 Chris Hastie said the following: Yes, I have these. The modules load, but ztcfg complains ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 1: No such device or address (6) and as I said, it doesn't appear that the card has been recognised by the kernel. could you try the X100P in anther system to rule out issues with the Via board you're using ? best I can manage is a very old dell optiplex gxi, and it's not recognised in that either. Time to assume a dodgy card? -- Chris Hastie ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P support on POTS around the world (Slovakia)
Marcel Hecko napisał(a): Hello everybody, does anybody use P100P FXO card on POTS lines in Poland, I need to know if those cards work especially in Slovakia or if you can reccomend FXO cards for Slovak POTS lines. For Slovak I don't know. For POLAND, I use them with TPSA (Main, the biggest one, Telco operator) aka France Telecom -- Poland division. Btw: everything depends on you Area PABX, so you experience in any location may (and i proablly will) be diffrent in diffrent cities. kd, -- Krzysztof Drewicz Affordable 2/4 span E1/T1 PCI-cards. 100% Asterisk compatible. See http://4e1.pl ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P Polarity Reverse Detection
The X100 and clones will detect polarity reversal and momentary drop in loop current. Not sure if it knows the difference, though It all depends on your telco if and when you get those. You need to use the so called kewlstart in your configuration John Novack Enky wrote: Hi, I have read many postings but still can not understand - is it possible the X100P to detect a polarity reverse, when the call is answered and when it ends? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P support on POTS around the world (Slovakia)
If there any way to find out if they will work? (If I ask the local telco) Or just buy and test the card out? :) Marcel Krzysztof Drewicz wrote: Marcel Hecko napisał(a): Hello everybody, does anybody use P100P FXO card on POTS lines in Poland, I need to know if those cards work especially in Slovakia or if you can reccomend FXO cards for Slovak POTS lines. For Slovak I don't know. For POLAND, I use them with TPSA (Main, the biggest one, Telco operator) aka France Telecom -- Poland division. Btw: everything depends on you Area PABX, so you experience in any location may (and i proablly will) be diffrent in diffrent cities. kd, ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
