Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What is the best top end player now ?

2015-07-01 Thread Julf

jh901 wrote: 
 As of now, I disagree with the few of you who claim that there are no EE
 principles which explain audible differences.

I think we all are eagerly waiting for you to explain what EE principles
explain audible differences.

 I also disagree, at this time, that I'm a victim of psychological
 effect.

Likewise, I think we are keen to hear what you base that claim on.



To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people - Paul W Klipsch, 1953

Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96407

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What is the best top end player now ?

2015-07-01 Thread jh901

arnyk wrote: 
 Other than for a very few pathological speakers, 12 guage zip cord in
 reasonable lengths gives ideal, non-improvable performence.
 
 
 

I do not believe that my speakers are among the pathological, so I'm
going to enjoy second guessing myself.


arnyk wrote: 
 
 
 If you can't provide a coherent explanation of your beliefs that is
 consistent with the laws of physics, then there is little but blind
 faith to explain your situation.
 

I do not associate my beliefs as being inconsistent with laws of
physics.


arnyk wrote: 
 
 
 
 Getting spendy at the local Rat Shack store or high end audio emporium
 is no way comparable with the effort required to obtain a basic or
 advanced degree in EE.  It's really pretty insulting to suggest such a
 thing.
 
 

Yeah, that was my suggestion.  Exactly.  I continue to be baffled by
your negativity.  Maybe start respecting forum members in the same way
that you wish to be respected?  You aren't the only one with family and
friends holding advanced degrees.  If that should matter.


arnyk wrote: 
 
 
 
 Hopefully you won't, because IMO its a waste of your time under the
 conditions.

Such a great attitude.  Appreciated!  You've gotta a nice little
situation there where you tell me I can't be right and that I can never
show that perhaps I am.  If you adopted a new approach, then you could
send out an email or two and help me make some contacts in my area.



Cary Audio 306 SACD Pro | Cary Audio SLP-05 | Cary Audio SA-200.2 |
Focal Diablo Utopia III
__Acoustic treatment: DIY Cylinder Bass traps | Rule of Thirds for
speaker  sweet spot position
__Speaker Cables: Analysis Plus Big Silver Oval | Shunyata Venom series
power cords and power conditioning

jh901's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18175
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96407

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What is the best top end player now ?

2015-07-01 Thread SBGK

Archimago wrote: 
 Bell wire? What is that 20AWG or thinner? I did say a decent length of
 copper did I not as speaker cables?
 
 As for golden ears, you, like some others seem to claim/insist you have
 them (based on what you claim to hear on your blog with OS
 optimizations)... Is this self-proclamation? Or do
 friends/family/wife/kids agree?

just relating my experience, think that's allowed on this forum.



Touch optimisations http://touchsgotrythm.blogspot.co.uk/

SBGK's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=52003
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96407

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What is the best top end player now ?

2015-07-01 Thread jh901

Julf wrote: 
 I think we all are eagerly waiting for you to explain what EE principles
 explain audible differences.
 

Would it matter?  If I cite various links, then you know what will
happen.  We could hold a conference call with a bunch of Phds who
actually design cables and there would nothing said which a few of you
wouldn't declare marketing or otherwise BS.

The hardcore self-proclaimed audiophile objectivists come across as
bitter and angry.  Hopefully, we can rise above that here.



Cary Audio 306 SACD Pro | Cary Audio SLP-05 | Cary Audio SA-200.2 |
Focal Diablo Utopia III
__Acoustic treatment: DIY Cylinder Bass traps | Rule of Thirds for
speaker  sweet spot position
__Speaker Cables: Analysis Plus Big Silver Oval | Shunyata Venom series
power cords and power conditioning

jh901's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18175
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96407

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What is the best top end player now ?

2015-07-01 Thread Julf

jh901 wrote: 
 Would it matter?  If I cite various links, then you know what will
 happen.  We could hold a conference call with a bunch of Phds who
 actually design cables and there would nothing said which a few of you
 wouldn't declare marketing or otherwise BS.

Some of us have Phds in stuff like EE and transmission theory. 

Would you know the difference between marketing BS and actual
engineering theory?

Anyway, you claimed , I am simply asking for an explanation based in EE
principles to explain audible differences. You seem to think that the
difference between actual scientific evidence and marketing material is
a question of opinion/viewpoint. What would be *your* criteria for
telling one from the other?

 The hardcore self-proclaimed audiophile objectivists come across as
 bitter and angry.

Have you ever stopped to think why that might be?



To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people - Paul W Klipsch, 1953

Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96407

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What is the best top end player now ?

2015-07-01 Thread arnyk

SBGK wrote: 
 In the early days I tried bell wire, 1.5 mm and 2.5 mm 2 core and earth
 cable as speaker cable, they all sounded different. Guess I must have
 golden ears.

Bell wire has enough series resistance to actually make some speakers
sound different.

The listning evaluations were probably subject to one or more of the
following 5 invalidating influences:

(1) Audiophile Sighted Casual Evaluations are invalid because they are
not tests. That is, they do not involve comparison to a fixed, reliable
standard.

(2) Audiophile Sighted Casual Evaluations are invalid because they
involve excessively long switchover times, which makes them highly
susceptible to false negatives because they desensitize the listeners.

(3) Audiophile Sighted Casual Evaluations are invalid because the do not
involve proper level matching, which makes them highly susceptible to
false positives because people report the level mismatches as sonic
differences.

(4) Audiophile Sighted Casual Evaluations are invalid because they do
not involve listening to the identical same piece of music or drama
within a few milliseconds, creating false positives because people
report the mismatched music as sonic differences in the equipment.

(5) Audiophile Sighted Casual Evaluations are not admissible because
they constantly reveal the true identity of the UUTs to the listener,
creating false positives because people report their prejudices and
preconceived notions as sonic properties of the equipment



arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96407

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What is the best top end player now ?

2015-07-01 Thread SBGK

Archimago wrote: 
 Good luck with the zip cords...
 
 Bottom line is that physics predicts that the demands of accurate
 transmission of audio from 20Hz-20kHz in -speaker cables- is a rather
 low standard that can be fulfilled more than easily by a decent length
 of copper!
 
 THE CLAIM OF AUDIBLE DIFFERENCE (IE. THAT SOMEHOW SOMETHING IS BEING
 CHANGED IN THAT TRANSMISSION FROM 20HZ-20KHZ) BECAUSE OF EXOTIC
 MATERIALS/DIELECTRICS, ETC. THAT IS SOMEHOW \BETTER\ OR MORE \TRUE\
 TO THE SIGNAL IS AKIN TO DECLARING THAT THESE LAWS OF PHYSICS ARE BEING
 VIOLATED.
 
 Since cable companies are claiming that they have found some special
 secret sauce that makes their cables better (rather than purposely
 distorting the signal), I think the onus is on them to show just what is
 going on that the result is at least different from what the laws of
 physics predicts! So far, I have yet to see any evidence of an actual
 change beyond human testimony.
 
 Remember, this is audio frequency... We're not talking MHz, GHz
 transmissions here where gauge, material, dielectrics, geometry could
 truly be essential elements to successful signal integrity... And where
 concepts like jitter truly could be a meaningful problem!

In the early days I tried bell wire, 1.5 mm and 2.5 mm 2 core and earth
cable as speaker cable, they all sounded different. Guess I must have
golden ears.



Touch optimisations http://touchsgotrythm.blogspot.co.uk/

SBGK's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=52003
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96407

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What is the best top end player now ?

2015-07-01 Thread cliveb

jh901 wrote: 
 I'm certainly not of the view that known science must be violated in
 order for it to be true that there are audible differences between
 speakers connected to a power amp with 12g OFC zip cord versus specialty
 cable.
The way you make this statement it sounds as if you think you have have
a choice over whether you consider the known laws of nature to be
violated if there is an audible difference. You have no such choice. The
laws of nature apply to everyone, regardless of their willingness to
submit to them.

That said, you are in luck. The known laws of nature do indeed allow for
there to be an audible difference between different speaker cables. Bear
in mind, however, that the known science that explains this audible
difference isn't part of physics. It's part of psychology.

jh901 wrote: 
 I don't know how skin effect comes into play, for example.
It doesn't at audio frequencies.

jh901 wrote: 
 I'm not one to ascribe to magic or blind faith, but I recognize that I'm
 human.  I'm also an audiophile, but that doesn't mean that I'm among
 those who are desperate to believe just about anything in order to
 perceive an upgrade in sound quality.
Since you have admitted that you are human, you're half way to
understanding why different speaker cables sound different to you. To
complete the journey, all you need to do is expand your search for an
explanation beyond the boundaries of audio engineering and consider the
known science that deals with how human perception is influenced by all
manner of extraneous factors.



Transporter - ATC SCM100A

cliveb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=348
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96407

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What is the best top end player now ?

2015-07-01 Thread jh901

I'm certainly not of the view that known science must be violated in
order for it to be true that there are audible differences between
speakers connected to a power amp with 12g OFC zip cord versus specialty
cable.  I don't know how skin effect comes into play, for example.  I'm
not one to ascribe to magic or blind faith, but I recognize that I'm
human.  I'm also an audiophile, but that doesn't mean that I'm among
those who are desperate to believe just about anything in order to
perceive an upgrade in sound quality.

I will not be earning a Phd in EE in this lifetime, but at the same time
at least I'm making an effort.  I am running 12g OFC zip cord from Radio
Shack and I'll be doing so for several weeks.  Hopefully, I'll be able
to engage in a proper blinded ABX at some point.



Cary Audio 306 SACD Pro | Cary Audio SLP-05 | Cary Audio SA-200.2 |
Focal Diablo Utopia III
__Acoustic treatment: DIY Cylinder Bass traps | Rule of Thirds for
speaker  sweet spot position
__Speaker Cables: Analysis Plus Big Silver Oval | Shunyata Venom series
power cords and power conditioning

jh901's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18175
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96407

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What is the best top end player now ?

2015-07-01 Thread Archimago

SBGK wrote: 
 just relating my experience, think that's allowed on this forum.

Of course. However it's important to remember that objective testing
will show inadequacy of poor quality wires with high resistance. No
magic there.

While I can appreciate your hearing acuity to tell the difference
between bell wire and something better, there is no need to invoke
golden earism... It's certainly a different kind of claim than the one
we're debating about here like audibility of 12AWG vs. expensive
exotics...



Archimago's Musings: (archimago.blogspot.com) A 'more objective'
audiophile blog.

Archimago's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2207
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96407

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What is the best top end player now ?

2015-07-01 Thread Archimago

jh901 wrote: 
 Would it matter?  If I cite various links, then you know what will
 happen.  We could hold a conference call with a bunch of Phds who
 actually design cables and there would nothing said which a few of you
 wouldn't declare marketing or otherwise BS.
 
 The hardcore self-proclaimed audiophile objectivists come across as
 bitter and angry.  Hopefully, we can rise above that here.

Actually, now that we're 60 pages deep in this discussion which started
with best top end player, maybe you can start a new thread with what
you consider as the BEST, most CONVINCING links to articles that report
the importance of cables on sound?

This way, we can all have a look at them and either agree or critique.
Furthermore, it may help reduce personal insults and name-calling.
Indeed there is no need to get angry or bitter.

Going back to the previous suggestion about getting an (objectivist)
audiophile friend to come over to help with some testing rather than
bothering a PhD candidate, I think you will realize -very quickly- (like
after 3 or 4 cable switches) how there's no significant difference
assuming your friend is honest and take precaution to make sure you
can't see what's happening behind the scene. After that, go for a
beer... As I mentioned before, I've done this with subjectivist friends
and they have always changed their tune; usually having sold off all
the expensive cable stuff within a year :-).

You see, we can all get -pedantic -about whether your test fully meets
criteria for ABX, DBT, whatever test you choose... But so what? If you
really want to make a splash, go practice, then 'win $1,000,000 from the
Amazing Randi'
(http://gizmodo.com/305549/james-randi-offers-1-million-if-audiophiles-can-prove-7250-speaker-cables-are-better).
Then we'll all shut up and proclaim that we knew you before you became
universally acclaimed as a true Golden Ear with the cash to prove it!



Archimago's Musings: (archimago.blogspot.com) A 'more objective'
audiophile blog.

Archimago's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2207
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96407

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] RC (Inguz etc.)

2015-07-01 Thread Apesbrain

Getting the error Cannot initialize Silverlight:
createSilverlightControl is not defined when accessing the Inguz
settings page.  Tried IE11, Chrome and Firefox all with same result.  Is
there a solution for this?  Thanks.



Apesbrain's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=738
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=77084

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What is the best top end player now ?

2015-07-01 Thread cliveb

jh901 wrote: 
 I also disagree, at this time, that I'm a victim of psychological
 effect.
But earlier on you admitted that you are human. To deny that you are
susceptible to your perceptions being influenced by outside factors, you
are declaring yourself to be some kind of freak. Victim is totally the
wrong word to use here - we are ALL susceptible to these factors, even
when we know what they are. You can't avoid them - it's basic human
nature.

To a certain extent it isn't important why you perceive specialist
speaker cables to sound better than ordinary ones. They do to you, and
so they are a valid component in your system. Just because they sound
better because of your psychological response rather than due to any
change in the sound field generated isn't really important. What you
hear is your response to all the stimuli available to you.

But please don't try to suggest that specialist speaker cables sound
better for some engineering reason. THAT is the false claim made by far
too many audiophiles that some of us here will continue to challenge
whenever it is proposed.



Transporter - ATC SCM100A

cliveb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=348
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96407

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What is the best top end player now ?

2015-07-01 Thread SBGK

arnyk wrote: 
 Yes.
 
 
 
 One little problem. There is no such thing as ...a bunch of PhDs (in
 electrical engineering) that actually design cables.
 
 Getting a PhD in EE or a related area has a prerequisite - learning
 enough about EE to understand why audiophile cables are a myth.
 
 Prove me wrong - give us a link to a PhD Thesis in EE from an accredited
 University supporting the idea that audiophile cables have any solid
 technology behind them.
 
 
 
 I don't know who you are talking about. However, if we changed topics to
 self-proclaimed audiophile subjectivists who are deflecting and avoiding
 relevant questions that they can't answer and making it up as they go
 along, a lot of people would know exactly what is being discussed. ;-)

what is it about phds ?

Here is one, first class honours and his own cable company, what's not
to like.

http://www.custom-hifi-cables.co.uk/about-us



Touch optimisations http://touchsgotrythm.blogspot.co.uk/

SBGK's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=52003
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96407

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What is the best top end player now ?

2015-07-01 Thread arnyk

jh901 wrote: 
 Would it matter? 
 

Yes.

 
 If I cite various links, then you know what will happen.  We could hold
 a conference call with a bunch of Phds who actually design cables and
 there would nothing said which a few of you wouldn't declare marketing
 or otherwise BS.
 

One little problem. There is no such thing as ...a bunch of PhDs (in
electrical engineering) that actually design cables.

Getting a PhD in EE or a related area has a prerequisite - learning
enough about EE to understand why audiophile cables are a myth.

Prove me wrong - give us a link to a PhD Thesis in EE from an accredited
University supporting the idea that audiophile cables have any solid
technology behind them.

 
 The hardcore self-proclaimed audiophile objectivists come across as
 bitter and angry.  Hopefully, we can rise above that here.

I don't know who you are talking about. However, if we changed topics to
self-proclaimed audiophile subjectivists who are deflecting and avoiding
relevant questions that they can't answer and making it up as they go
along, a lot of people would know exactly what is being discussed. ;-)



arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96407

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What is the best top end player now ?

2015-07-01 Thread arnyk

jh901 wrote: 
 As of now, I disagree with the few of you who claim that there are no EE
 principles which explain audible differences.  I also disagree, at this
 time, that I'm a victim of psychological effect.

What is the rational basis of your disagreement?



arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96407

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What is the best top end player now ?

2015-07-01 Thread jh901

cliveb wrote: 
 
 
 That said, you are in luck. The known laws of nature do indeed allow for
 there to be an audible difference between different speaker cables. Bear
 in mind, however, that the known science that explains this audible
 difference isn't part of physics. It's part of psychology.
 
 

As of now, I disagree with the few of you who claim that there are no EE
principles which explain audible differences.  I also disagree, at this
time, that I'm a victim of psychological effect.



Cary Audio 306 SACD Pro | Cary Audio SLP-05 | Cary Audio SA-200.2 |
Focal Diablo Utopia III
__Acoustic treatment: DIY Cylinder Bass traps | Rule of Thirds for
speaker  sweet spot position
__Speaker Cables: Analysis Plus Big Silver Oval | Shunyata Venom series
power cords and power conditioning

jh901's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18175
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96407

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What is the best top end player now ?

2015-07-01 Thread arnyk

jh901 wrote: 
 I'm certainly not of the view that known science must be violated in
 order for it to be true that there are audible differences between
 speakers connected to a power amp with 12g OFC zip cord versus specialty
 cable.  
 

Other than for a very few pathological speakers, 12 guage zip cord in
reasonable lengths gives ideal, non-improvable performence.

 
 I don't know how skin effect comes into play, for example. 
 

I do know how skin effect comes into play, and the general answer is not
so much.

 
 I'm not one to ascribe to magic or blind faith, 
 

If you can't provide a coherent explanation of your beliefs that is
consistent with the laws of physics, then there is little but blind
faith to explain your situation.

 
 but I recognize that I'm human. 
 

Which in turn puts you under the influence of the 5 problems with casual
sighted audiophile evaluations that I've been listing out.

 
 I'm also an audiophile, but that doesn't mean that I'm among those who
 are desperate to believe just about anything in order to perceive an
 upgrade in sound quality.
 

Then, you aren't human.

 
 I will not be earning a Phd in EE in this lifetime, but at the same time
 at least I'm making an effort.
 

Getting spendy at the local Rat Shack store or high end audio emporium
is no way comparable with the effort required to obtain a basic or
advanced degree in EE.  It's really pretty insulting to suggest such a
thing.


 
 I am running 12g OFC zip cord from Radio Shack and I'll be doing so for
 several weeks.  Hopefully, I'll be able to engage in a proper blinded
 ABX at some point.

Hopefully you won't, because IMO its a waste of your time under the
conditions.



arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96407

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What is the best top end player now ?

2015-07-01 Thread Julf

jh901 wrote: 
 Pseudoscience is dangerous, but declaring science as if you are GOD is
 also wrong.

The difference is that science not only provides the evidence, and
allows it to be questioned, but actually provides the tools to do it
(and encourages it). 

We go back to Theory of Knowledge 101: How do I know what I know?



To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people - Paul W Klipsch, 1953

Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96407

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What is the best top end player now ?

2015-07-01 Thread arnyk

jh901 wrote: 
 I intend to avoid your pitfalls, so it doesn't make sense that you have
 such passion for your faith.
 

There are no such pitfalls, and there is no such faith.

I'm following Conventional Science (the Science  that helped us send men
into space and survive and even thrive).

The guys who run the Magic Cable companies are the guys who flunked
their EE courses or never took them in the first place. They were not
the class stars. Take Noel Lee, for example.

 
 Pseudoscience is dangerous, but declaring science as if you are GOD is
 also wrong.
 

Who is declaring science as if they are God?  You are making the
accusation, now back it up!  I'm am merely a messenger of Science. Don't
shoot me.

 
 None of you can explain how the laws of physics are being violated.

I already have, but the issues and arguments went flying high!  I'm
dealing with people who take the pseudoscience of the magic wire
industry as if they were revealed truth, not the false claims and
distortions of the truth that they are.

The problem is one of denial and lack of proper education. The
explanation of the effect of wavelength on how audio signals flow
through cables on the proper way to analyze cables was an explanation of
the laws of physics are being violated by the claims of the magic wire
industry. It was stated the simplest way I can think of. However, it
still takes an understanding of High School Physics to get it.

No true believer in magic wires will ever get it because it violates
their religious beliefs.



arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96407

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What is the best top end player now ?

2015-07-01 Thread jh901

Julf wrote: 
 
 
 Anyway, you claimed , I am simply asking for an explanation based in EE
 principles to explain audible differences. You seem to think that the
 difference between actual scientific evidence and marketing material is
 a question of opinion/viewpoint. What would be *your* criteria for
 telling one from the other?
 

My interest in this topic is sincere.  Since I can't explain why there
is an audible difference in my past experiences, then it seems like a
good idea to seek out an answer.  The first step will be to participate
in a proper ABX.  Depending on the result, there will be further
examination.




Julf wrote: 
 
 
 Have you ever stopped to think why that might be?

No comment.



Cary Audio 306 SACD Pro | Cary Audio SLP-05 | Cary Audio SA-200.2 |
Focal Diablo Utopia III
__Acoustic treatment: DIY Cylinder Bass traps | Rule of Thirds for
speaker  sweet spot position
__Speaker Cables: Analysis Plus Big Silver Oval | Shunyata Venom series
power cords and power conditioning

jh901's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18175
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96407

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What The Future Of Audio Might Look Like In A Digital World

2015-07-01 Thread Gandhi

Archimago wrote: 
 Hey Gandhi,
 I used REW and parametric EQ until earlier this year. I used to just
 apply 20-150Hz or so; leaving the rest of the mids and trebles since it
 was relatively accurate already.
 
 Last few months, I've been use DRCDesigner to do the measurements,
 target curve adjustment and it incorporates the free DRC package to
 calculate the filters... I've experimented a bit and generally like the
 traditional BK target curves (either BK1 or BK3) and I've had great
 success with applying correction through the whole 20Hz-20kHz spectrum!
 I've been using the JRiver convolution engine (a bit of a twisted route
 with DLNA/UPnP to access the Squeezebox library).
 
 Have used REW to verify the frequency response improvement as well as
 verified significantly improved impulse response in the time domain with
 each channel so know that what I'm hearing corresponds to objective
 accuracy. :-)

Hello Archi!
I have never tried DRCDesigner and only just now checked the how-to on
their website. But I'm not sure I understand the benefit of using
DRCDesigner instead of for instance REW (which is incredibly
comprehensive). Does it make better measurements or calculations? Or is
it perhaps the convolver plugin you are after?



Best Regards,
Gandhi

not often enough well recorded and mastered cds *|* dbpoweramp with
accuraterip *|* flac *|* fanless asrock z77e-itx intel i5-3570t *|*
ubuntu 12.04.1 lts 32-bit *|* lms 7.8.0 *|* brutefirdrc 3.0 (rewv5) *|*
transporter (balanced out) *|* thule ia252b *|* audio physic scorpio *|*
no fancy cables. *+* also some booms. *+* harmony 525s for them all,
including waking the server from s3.

Gandhi's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=58909
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103847

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What The Future Of Audio Might Look Like In A Digital World

2015-07-01 Thread Archimago

Gandhi wrote: 
 Hello Archi!
 I have never tried DRCDesigner and only just now checked the how-to on
 their website. But I'm not sure I understand the benefit of using
 DRCDesigner instead of for instance REW (which is incredibly
 comprehensive). Does it make better measurements or calculations? Or is
 it perhaps the convolver plugin you are after?

I see DRCDesigner as a cheap man's AudioLense, Acourate, or Dirac.
Simple but reasonable UI, easy way to measure room impulse up to 24/96
for each stereo channel separately, simple design of target curve and
easy batch creation of FIR filters for convolution plug-ins like the one
in JRiver. Works well and you can customize the strength of the
correction used by DRC to calculate these FIR filters.

Although I use REW to do a number of measurements, and in the past have
used it to calculate parametric EQ settings for my room, is it capable
of producing FIR filters these days?

JRiver DSP upsamples my music and calculations performed in 96kHz...
Perfect for the Transporter on playback. I like the results better than
my Onkyo's Odyssey MultEQ XT (not XT32) result.

Has anyone seen a good writeup comparing DRC packages like the
aforementioned AudioLens/Acourate/Dirac vs. DRC? One limitation of the
free DRC/Designer is that only one location can be measured. For me, I
think this is fine for stereo - I just care about the sweetspot and
doubt this is a significant problem.



Archimago's Musings: (archimago.blogspot.com) A 'more objective'
audiophile blog.

Archimago's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2207
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103847

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What is the best top end player now ?

2015-07-01 Thread induna

Archimago wrote: 
 Good luck with the zip cords...
 
 
 THE CLAIM OF AUDIBLE DIFFERENCE (IE. THAT SOMEHOW SOMETHING IS BEING
 CHANGED IN THAT TRANSMISSION FROM 20HZ-20KHZ) BECAUSE OF EXOTIC
 MATERIALS/DIELECTRICS, ETC. THAT IS SOMEHOW \BETTER\ OR MORE \TRUE\
 TO THE SIGNAL IS AKIN TO DECLARING THAT THESE LAWS OF PHYSICS ARE BEING
 VIOLATED.
 
 

I just wanted to quote this again because it really is the key. The
second part of the sentence is the important one. Undoubtably cables can
be (mis)designed to sound different. Some people may even perceive that
difference as better for various reasons, perhaps not the least of which
is that they have spent  significant amount of money on them and don't
wish to feel like a rube. However, conflating that perceived difference
with greater accuracy or musical truth is false within the current
understanding of physical laws. Unless someone can provide a testable
theory that leads to convincing and repeatable experimental results that
explain why a certain speaker cable design is audibly different that 12
gauge zip cord in reasonable lengths to a human listener it is perfectly
correct to say that all such claims of audible superiority are a priori
false.



induna's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=34626
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96407

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What is the best top end player now ?

2015-07-01 Thread jh901

Michanders are first class!  I sent my cables out Monday and Analysis
Plus called today to confirm that they'll be shipping them back so that
I might get them before the holiday.  Great service.

Meantime, I've added -Monk's Dream- and -Tijuana Moods- (Mingus) to my
jazz collection.  ORG has released these two with original mastering
work and the result is fantastic.

As to the original thread topic, well, I wouldn't know how to get a
productive discussion going.  I did try.  The market for audiophile
servers is heating up and with any luck the competition will result in
affordable excellence in no time.  Of course, that leads us into a DAC
discussion of the top units today.  Nagra, for example, worked with
Andreas Koch in the somewhat recent past.  I wonder how theirs will
compare to the hot products from Lampizator?



Cary Audio 306 SACD Pro | Cary Audio SLP-05 | Cary Audio SA-200.2 |
Focal Diablo Utopia III
__Acoustic treatment: DIY Cylinder Bass traps | Rule of Thirds for
speaker  sweet spot position
__Speaker Cables: Analysis Plus Big Silver Oval | Shunyata Venom series
power cords and power conditioning

jh901's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18175
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96407

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles