Re: [backstage] Guardian article about iPhone iPlayer

2008-06-27 Thread Arkham.p77
 The BBC has issued a fix to stop people downloading programmes from
the iPlayer website that were intended for streaming on an iPhone or
iPod only 

A fix? But the hack still works..
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] Guardian article about iPhone iPlayer

2008-06-27 Thread Matt Barber
random reply
I would like the iPlayer to work on my N95, but I don't think it would have
as much impact as the iPhone release, aside from the ease of use that the
iPhone tends to give to all activities it provides, the screen is much
bigger, warranting the effort to bring the iPlayer to that platform.
The N95 does have video output right out of the box, literally the box comes
with the cable to connect it up to RCA jacks. Not saying the quality would
be at all acceptable on a screen bigger than a postage stamp, but that's a
cool feature that I have never used apart from novelty value for 5 minutes.
With reliably updated, well sourced material (like the iPlayer), I think
more features like that would get used.

What would be excellent, is if the N95 could output a higher res to the
video out jack. It might be able to when viewing photos, but I doubt video
would scale up any higher than it's native screen res.
Then we could send decent iPlayer content to it over wifi, and watch it on
TV even easier than hooking up a laptop.
/random reply (It's been a long day...) :)

So has anyone got any thoughts on this, and can think of other devices with
video output that could make life easier to watch in the living room,
without having to use a laptop?

(loving the mashed photos by the way everyone, keep putting them up :))

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Arkham.p77 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  The BBC has issued a fix to stop people downloading programmes from
 the iPlayer website that were intended for streaming on an iPhone or
 iPod only 

 A fix? But the hack still works..
 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
 visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
  Unofficial list archive:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/



Re: [backstage] Guardian article about iPhone iPlayer

2008-03-13 Thread Andy Halsall
On Thursday 13 March 2008 12:25:38 Steve Jolly wrote:
 Thought that people might find this interesting:

 http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/mar/13/digitalvideo.television

 S


And the BBC reply:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7293988.stm


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [backstage] Guardian article about iPhone iPlayer

2008-03-13 Thread Sean DALY
Well, H.264/AAC is great for preventing technically challenged Windows
users from avoiding DRM, since it is used by everybody worldwide with
one exception... Microsoft Media Player. Well, WMP supports MPEG-1,
that's already something.

H.264/AAC *is* supported in the Xbox, which has a magnetic field
around it to prevent any connection to a computer (joke)

Sean


On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Andy Halsall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Thursday 13 March 2008 12:25:38 Steve Jolly wrote:
   Thought that people might find this interesting:
  
   http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/mar/13/digitalvideo.television
  
   S
  

  And the BBC reply:

  http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7293988.stm

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] Guardian article about iPhone iPlayer

2008-03-13 Thread vijay chopra
I like the way that the article suggests I'm suddenly a 1337 h4x0r because I
can chnge the user agent on my browser.

Vijay.

On 13/03/2008, Steve Jolly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Thought that people might find this interesting:

 http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/mar/13/digitalvideo.television

 S
 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
 visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
 Unofficial
 list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/



Re: [backstage] Guardian article about iPhone iPlayer

2008-03-13 Thread Steve Jolly

vijay chopra wrote:
I like the way that the article suggests I'm suddenly a 1337 h4x0r 
because I can chnge the user agent on my browser.


See? I knew people would appreciate it. :-)

S
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] Guardian article about iPhone iPlayer

2008-03-13 Thread vijay chopra
Yep! I'm going off to pWn the Gruniad's site now by downloading it to my PC
using the 1337 h4x0r tool known as Firefox!

Seriously that article is downright funny in how it goes out of it's way to
avoid how these hackers are circumvent[ing] the BBC's anti-piracy
systems.
My guess is that the stupid journo doesn't either actually understand the
issues or didn't bother to find out how people were getting the DRM free
stream; stupid or lazy, take your pick.

The BBC response article is only marginally better, again referring to
hackers for no apparent reason though they at least have a motive to
mislead: propaganda. Though I probably shouldn't attribute to malice what's
adequately explained by stupidity.

Vijay

On 13/03/2008, Steve Jolly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 vijay chopra wrote:
  I like the way that the article suggests I'm suddenly a 1337 h4x0r
  because I can chnge the user agent on my browser.


 See? I knew people would appreciate it. :-)


 S
 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
 visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
 Unofficial
 list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/



Re: [backstage] Guardian article about iPhone iPlayer

2008-03-13 Thread Steve Jolly

vijay chopra wrote:
The BBC response article is only marginally better, again referring to 
hackers for no apparent reason though they at least have a motive to 
mislead: propaganda. Though I probably shouldn't attribute to malice 
what's adequately explained by stupidity.


Personally, I can think of explanations that don't insult the journalist 
in question. :-)  That aside though, the BBC News website has a form for 
people to report factual errors which you could use if you felt 
sufficiently strongly about the matter.


S
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] Guardian article about iPhone iPlayer

2008-03-13 Thread vijay chopra
I'm sorry I just despair for the journalists in this country. In theory they
should be a paragon of virtue, holding authority to account, uncovering
misdeeds and campaigning on behalf of the citizenry.
Instead we get dumbing down and catering to the lowest common denominator;
and then they wonder why they have falling circulation.
The only dead tree press I buy now is Private Eye.

Vijay.

On 13/03/2008, Steve Jolly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Personally, I can think of explanations that don't insult the journalist
 in question. :-)  That aside though, the BBC News website has a form for
 people to report factual errors which you could use if you felt
 sufficiently strongly about the matter.


 S
 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
 visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
 Unofficial
 list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/



Re: [backstage] Guardian article about iPhone iPlayer

2008-03-13 Thread Steve Jolly

vijay chopra wrote:
I'm sorry I just despair for the journalists in this country. In theory 
they should be a paragon of virtue, holding authority to account, 
uncovering misdeeds and campaigning on behalf of the citizenry.
Instead we get dumbing down and catering to the lowest common 
denominator; and then they wonder why they have falling circulation.

The only dead tree press I buy now is Private Eye.


You sure know how to make friends with people who work for the country's 
largest news-gathering organisation. ;-)


S
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] Guardian article about iPhone iPlayer

2008-03-13 Thread Ivan Pope
You have to bear in mind that these 'journalists' are or start out as good
people wanting to do a good job. Their employers are driven by market
demand. So the pressure is to tailor output to market demand. Market demand
is us. All of us, en masse. That's the capitalist system. If you are unhappy
with the output of journalists you have to look at why they are (allegedly)
so crap at it. The answer is to overthrow the system, man!Cheers,
Ivan

On 3/13/08, vijay chopra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Sorry, I was probably being overly broad in my use of the term
 journalists I was referring in the main to those that work of our so
 called newspapers (we did start with an article from the Gurniad). To be
 fair to them, the BBC are much better at actually reporting on the facts,
 even when they're at they're worst (such as the Panorama episode on wi-fi)
 they remain streaks ahead of the headline writers of Fleet Street, to whom
 the terms fact checking and research are bizarre things that other
 people do.

 Vijay.

 On 13/03/2008, Steve Jolly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  vijay chopra wrote:
   I'm sorry I just despair for the journalists in this country. In
  theory
   they should be a paragon of virtue, holding authority to account,
   uncovering misdeeds and campaigning on behalf of the citizenry.
   Instead we get dumbing down and catering to the lowest common
   denominator; and then they wonder why they have falling circulation.
   The only dead tree press I buy now is Private Eye.
 
 
  You sure know how to make friends with people who work for the country's
  largest news-gathering organisation. ;-)
 
 
  S
  -
  Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe,
  please visit
  http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  Unofficial
  list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
 




-- 
Ivan Pope
Snipperoo
50 Providence Place
BN1 4GE Brighton

01273808458

blog.snipperoo.com
directory.snipperoo.com

Widget Conference
http://widgetwebexpo.com