Re: [Bacula-users] 'label barcodes' command question?
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 16:52, Rudolf Cejka wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote (2006/01/19):
> > > --- src/dird/ua_label.c.orig Thu Jan 19 10:05:21 2006
> > > +++ src/dird/ua_label.c Thu Jan 19 10:07:50 2006
> > > @@ -305,7 +305,9 @@
> > > }
> > >
> > > if (!relabel && (i=find_arg_keyword(ua, barcode_keyword)) >= 0) {
> > > - *ua->argk[i] = 0; /* zap barcode keyword */
> > > + i = find_arg(ua, barcode_keyword[i]);
> > > + if (i > 0)
> > > + *ua->argk[i] = 0; /* zap barcode keyword */
> > >label_barcodes = true;
> > > }
> >
> > I have, however, applied your patch, and will most likely release a
> > 1.38.5 ...
>
> Hello, did you really applied the patch above? I'm looking even in 1.38.8
> and still could not find it in ua_label.c.
Yes, I did add it, but somehow it got lost. Strange. That rarely happens.
Anyway, I have added it back, and it is now committed, so unlikely to get lost
again. Thanks for checking this, and sorry for the confusion on my part.
--
Best regards,
Kern
(">
/\
V_V
---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] 'label barcodes' command question?
Kern Sibbald wrote (2006/01/19):
> > --- src/dird/ua_label.c.origThu Jan 19 10:05:21 2006
> > +++ src/dird/ua_label.c Thu Jan 19 10:07:50 2006
> > @@ -305,7 +305,9 @@
> > }
> >
> > if (!relabel && (i=find_arg_keyword(ua, barcode_keyword)) >= 0) {
> > - *ua->argk[i] = 0; /* zap barcode keyword */
> > + i = find_arg(ua, barcode_keyword[i]);
> > + if (i > 0)
> > + *ua->argk[i] = 0; /* zap barcode keyword */
> >label_barcodes = true;
> > }
>
> I have, however, applied your patch, and will most likely release a 1.38.5 ...
Hello, did you really applied the patch above? I'm looking even in 1.38.8
and still could not find it in ua_label.c.
???
--
Rudolf Cejka http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/~cejkar
Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Information Technology
Bozetechova 2, 612 66 Brno, Czech Republic
---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] "label barcodes" command question
On 8 Mar 2006 at 10:11, Gregory Orange wrote: > Chris Wilson wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I just added some tapes to my autochanger. If I do a "label barcodes" > > command, will it re-label the existing tapes too, or only label the new > > tapes? The documentation isn't clear on that topic. > > > > Figured I'd ask before I inadvertently wipe out the existing tapes... > > It didn't relabel all the tapes for me - in fact it inserted all the > tapes in turn and gave "tape already labelled" where relevant, then > moved on. Quite a helpful and sensible behaviour, as far as I'm > concerned. By design, Bacula will not label a labeled tape. This is for your protection. You must erase the tape manually. -- Dan Langille : Software Developer looking for work my resume: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] "label barcodes" command question
Chris Wilson wrote: Hi, I just added some tapes to my autochanger. If I do a "label barcodes" command, will it re-label the existing tapes too, or only label the new tapes? The documentation isn't clear on that topic. Figured I'd ask before I inadvertently wipe out the existing tapes... It didn't relabel all the tapes for me - in fact it inserted all the tapes in turn and gave "tape already labelled" where relevant, then moved on. Quite a helpful and sensible behaviour, as far as I'm concerned. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] "label barcodes" command question
Hi, I just added some tapes to my autochanger. If I do a "label barcodes" command, will it re-label the existing tapes too, or only label the new tapes? The documentation isn't clear on that topic. Figured I'd ask before I inadvertently wipe out the existing tapes... Thanks, Chris Chris Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] <>
Re: [Bacula-users] 'label barcodes' command question?
On Thursday 19 January 2006 10:27, Rudolf Cejka wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote (2006/01/18):
> > > > I have tested both Bacula-1.38.3 and Bacula-1.38.4 now too:
> > > > Unfortunately they are broken as Bacula-1.38.2 too - the first
> > > > argument is discarded. As a workaround, you can use
> > > > label ANYTHING slots=NNN storage=SSS pool=PPP barcodes
> > > > for now - ANYTHING is simply discarded and all other arguments are
> > > > taken into an account.
> > >
> > > One very important question - will you report that at bugs.bacula.org
> > > or should I do so?
>
> Let's wait on word from Kern ;o)
>
> > I am unable to reproduce this on version 1.38.4, so if someone submits it
> > to the bugs database, be sure to include "proof" that there is a bug.
> > You might
>
> It seems, that you have tried "barcode" instead of our "barcodes".
> When "barcode" is used, zeroth "label" is zapped, which seems to be
> further ignored. However when "barcodes" is used, first argument is
> zapped, because i = find_arg_keywords() returns an index of found
> keyword and not an index of found argument as in find_arg(). As
> one of possible solutions, here is my version of somewhat defensive
> patch (*ua->argk[find_arg(ua, barcode_keyword[i])] = 0; can be safely
> used too):
>
> --- src/dird/ua_label.c.orig Thu Jan 19 10:05:21 2006
> +++ src/dird/ua_label.c Thu Jan 19 10:07:50 2006
> @@ -305,7 +305,9 @@
> }
>
> if (!relabel && (i=find_arg_keyword(ua, barcode_keyword)) >= 0) {
> - *ua->argk[i] = 0; /* zap barcode keyword */
> + i = find_arg(ua, barcode_keyword[i]);
> + if (i > 0)
> + *ua->argk[i] = 0; /* zap barcode keyword */
>label_barcodes = true;
> }
>
> Should I fill a bug report, or is this sufficient? ;o)
It is always better to file a bug report because it permits users to get
notification of bugs and bug fixes in a more systematic way, and it provides
better tracking of the project's bugs.
I have, however, applied your patch, and will most likely release a 1.38.5 ...
>
> Regards.
--
Best regards,
Kern
(">
/\
V_V
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] 'label barcodes' command question?
Kern Sibbald wrote (2006/01/18):
> > > I have tested both Bacula-1.38.3 and Bacula-1.38.4 now too: Unfortunately
> > > they are broken as Bacula-1.38.2 too - the first argument is discarded.
> > > As a workaround, you can use
> > > label ANYTHING slots=NNN storage=SSS pool=PPP barcodes
> > > for now - ANYTHING is simply discarded and all other arguments are
> > > taken into an account.
> > One very important question - will you report that at bugs.bacula.org or
> > should I do so?
Let's wait on word from Kern ;o)
> I am unable to reproduce this on version 1.38.4, so if someone submits it to
> the bugs database, be sure to include "proof" that there is a bug. You might
It seems, that you have tried "barcode" instead of our "barcodes".
When "barcode" is used, zeroth "label" is zapped, which seems to be
further ignored. However when "barcodes" is used, first argument is
zapped, because i = find_arg_keywords() returns an index of found
keyword and not an index of found argument as in find_arg(). As
one of possible solutions, here is my version of somewhat defensive
patch (*ua->argk[find_arg(ua, barcode_keyword[i])] = 0; can be safely
used too):
--- src/dird/ua_label.c.origThu Jan 19 10:05:21 2006
+++ src/dird/ua_label.c Thu Jan 19 10:07:50 2006
@@ -305,7 +305,9 @@
}
if (!relabel && (i=find_arg_keyword(ua, barcode_keyword)) >= 0) {
- *ua->argk[i] = 0; /* zap barcode keyword */
+ i = find_arg(ua, barcode_keyword[i]);
+ if (i > 0)
+ *ua->argk[i] = 0; /* zap barcode keyword */
label_barcodes = true;
}
Should I fill a bug report, or is this sufficient? ;o)
Regards.
--
Rudolf Cejka http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/~cejkar
Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Information Technology
Bozetechova 2, 612 66 Brno, Czech Republic
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] 'label barcodes' command question?
Kern Sibbald wrote (2006/01/18): > I am unable to reproduce this on version 1.38.4, so if someone submits it to > the bugs database, be sure to include "proof" that there is a bug. You might > want to include output with the Director's debug level set to 400. Ok, when my bacula server is idle, I'll debug it and hopefully send some patch. -- Rudolf Cejka http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/~cejkar Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Information Technology Bozetechova 2, 612 66 Brno, Czech Republic --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] 'label barcodes' command question?
On Wednesday 18 January 2006 11:02, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 1/18/2006 10:42 AM, Rudolf Cejka wrote:
> > Rudolf Cejka wrote (2006/01/18):
> >>I wanted to test Bacula-1.38.3 and/or Bacula-1.38.4, however
> >>I haven't sufficient time yet.
> >
> > I have tested both Bacula-1.38.3 and Bacula-1.38.4 now too: Unfortunately
> > they are broken as Bacula-1.38.2 too - the first argument is discarded.
> > As a workaround, you can use
> >
> > label ANYTHING slots=NNN storage=SSS pool=PPP barcodes
> >
> > for now - ANYTHING is simply discarded and all other arguments are
> > taken into an account.
>
> One very important question - will you report that at bugs.bacula.org or
> should I do so?
I am unable to reproduce this on version 1.38.4, so if someone submits it to
the bugs database, be sure to include "proof" that there is a bug. You might
want to include output with the Director's debug level set to 400.
The Director will ignore any arguments that it does not understand (something
I will correct possibly on the next release), but with very few exceptions,
none of the arguments are position dependent.
--
Best regards,
Kern
(">
/\
V_V
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] 'label barcodes' command question?
Hello, On 1/18/2006 10:42 AM, Rudolf Cejka wrote: Rudolf Cejka wrote (2006/01/18): I wanted to test Bacula-1.38.3 and/or Bacula-1.38.4, however I haven't sufficient time yet. I have tested both Bacula-1.38.3 and Bacula-1.38.4 now too: Unfortunately they are broken as Bacula-1.38.2 too - the first argument is discarded. As a workaround, you can use label ANYTHING slots=NNN storage=SSS pool=PPP barcodes for now - ANYTHING is simply discarded and all other arguments are taken into an account. One very important question - will you report that at bugs.bacula.org or should I do so? Arno -- IT-Service Lehmann[EMAIL PROTECTED] Arno Lehmann http://www.its-lehmann.de --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] 'label barcodes' command question?
Rudolf Cejka wrote (2006/01/18): > I wanted to test Bacula-1.38.3 and/or Bacula-1.38.4, however > I haven't sufficient time yet. I have tested both Bacula-1.38.3 and Bacula-1.38.4 now too: Unfortunately they are broken as Bacula-1.38.2 too - the first argument is discarded. As a workaround, you can use label ANYTHING slots=NNN storage=SSS pool=PPP barcodes for now - ANYTHING is simply discarded and all other arguments are taken into an account. -- Rudolf Cejka http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/~cejkar Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Information Technology Bozetechova 2, 612 66 Brno, Czech Republic --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] 'label barcodes' command question?
Evan Kaufman wrote (2006/01/17): > Is the long syntax of the 'label barcodes' console command fully > functional? Hello, interesting - I had exactly the same problem as you yesterday too :o) It seems, that label [storage=xxx] [pool=yyy] [slots=1-10] barcodes is broken in Bacula-1.38.2, but in Bacula-1.36.3 it was functional. > In other words, can I specify the slots i want labeled, > in which storage resource, & in which pool, all from a one-line > command? I wanted to test Bacula-1.38.3 and/or Bacula-1.38.4, however I haven't sufficient time yet. -- Rudolf Cejka http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/~cejkar Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Information Technology Bozetechova 2, 612 66 Brno, Czech Republic --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] 'label barcodes' command question?
Is the long syntax of the 'label barcodes' console command fully functional? In other words, can I specify the slots i want labeled, in which storage resource, & in which pool, all from a one-line command? >From what i could understand from the manual, it should be something similar to this: label [storage=xxx] [pool=yyy] [slots=1-10] barcodes however, bacula seems picky about the order the arguments go in, and in the above order, it doesnt seem to see the storage argument. and if i try rearranging them: label [pool=yyy] [slots=1-10] [storage=xxx] barcodes then bacula doesnt see one of the other arguments (in the above example, it doesnt see pool). i ask about this because i'm trying to call this command from an automated script. is this command broken or not yet implemented, is that why I can't get it to work? because i thought i saw someone using this in the mailing list archives...I appreciate any help... -- Life is good when the most you have to worry about is whether or not you're wearing pants. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642 ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
