Re: [Bacula-users] Where did BAT go?

2008-01-31 Thread belen

Hi,
I think it shouldn't be considered a bug becuase the bacula manual mentions it 
(configure options: --enable-bat  If you have Qt4 = 4.2 installed on your 
computer including the libqt4 and libqt4-devel (libqt4-dev on Debian) 
libraries, and you want to use the Bacula Administration Tool (bat) GUI Console 
interface to Bacula, you must specify this option. Doing so will build 
everything in the src/qt-console directory. In addition to the Qt4 libraries, 
bat needs the qwt package installed on your system. Please see the next 
configure item for the details.).

Belén


El Jueves, 31 de Enero de 2008 00:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
 I saw this as well on 2.2.6, but didn't file a bug report on it (sorry.)
 You could file a bug report for the next guy...

 Clint

 On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
  belen wrote:
  El Miércoles, 30 de Enero de 2008 14:45, Dan Langille escribió:
  Hi,
 
  My install directory is bacula-2.2.7 and the directory of bat is
  bacula-2.2.7/src/qt-console/bat
 
  [snip]
  Thanks a lot. I thought that was source but I see now that it actually IS
  the program. It makes me a little uneasy that it ended up there but I'll
  copy it to what I think should be its proper place and see if it behaves
  the way it should :-)
 
  --
  Erik.
 
  -
  This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
  Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
  http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
  ___
  Bacula-users mailing list
  Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

-- 
 Mª Belén Sánchez de la Piedad 
 Administradora de Sistemas 
 Silice Tecnología y Servicios 
 C/Avda. José Fernández López,44 
 06800 Merida 
 Tfno: 924 31 41 15 Movil: 691 661 326 
 Web: www.silicetelecom.com-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Where did BAT go?

2008-01-31 Thread bacula


Hi,

The bug is related to the fact that 'make install' installs everything 
(bat.conf, etc.) except the executable. If this truly is the authors 
intent, the bug is in the documentation.


Regards,
Clint

On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, belen wrote:



Hi,
I think it shouldn't be considered a bug becuase the bacula manual mentions it 
(configure options: --enable-bat  If you have Qt4 = 4.2 installed on your 
computer including the libqt4 and libqt4-devel (libqt4-dev on Debian) libraries, 
and you want to use the Bacula Administration Tool (bat) GUI Console interface to 
Bacula, you must specify this option. Doing so will build everything in the 
src/qt-console directory. In addition to the Qt4 libraries, bat needs the qwt 
package installed on your system. Please see the next configure item for the 
details.).

Belén


El Jueves, 31 de Enero de 2008 00:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:

I saw this as well on 2.2.6, but didn't file a bug report on it (sorry.)
You could file a bug report for the next guy...

Clint

On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Erik P. Olsen wrote:

belen wrote:

El Miércoles, 30 de Enero de 2008 14:45, Dan Langille escribió:
Hi,

My install directory is bacula-2.2.7 and the directory of bat is
bacula-2.2.7/src/qt-console/bat


[snip]
Thanks a lot. I thought that was source but I see now that it actually IS
the program. It makes me a little uneasy that it ended up there but I'll
copy it to what I think should be its proper place and see if it behaves
the way it should :-)

--
Erik.

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


--
Mª Belén Sánchez de la Piedad
Administradora de Sistemas
Silice Tecnología y Servicios
C/Avda. José Fernández López,44
06800 Merida
Tfno: 924 31 41 15 Movil: 691 661 326
Web: www.silicetelecom.com-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Where did BAT go?

2008-01-31 Thread Erik P. Olsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 The bug is related to the fact that 'make install' installs everything 
 (bat.conf, etc.) except the executable. If this truly is the authors 
 intent, the bug is in the documentation.

Something is definately wrong. It is correct that BAT is found in 
bacula-2.2.8/src/qt-console/bat and that it is mentioned in the manual. But at 
the same time the manual states that it is found in the 
installation-directory 
see for example the testing procedure on page 37 of the January 26, 2008 manual.

-- 
Erik.
 
 Regards,
 Clint
 
 On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, belen wrote:
 

 Hi,
 I think it shouldn't be considered a bug becuase the bacula manual 
 mentions it (configure options: --enable-bat  If you have Qt4 = 4.2 
 installed on your computer including the libqt4 and libqt4-devel 
 (libqt4-dev on Debian) libraries, and you want to use the Bacula 
 Administration Tool (bat) GUI Console interface to Bacula, you must 
 specify this option. Doing so will build everything in the 
 src/qt-console directory. In addition to the Qt4 libraries, bat needs 
 the qwt package installed on your system. Please see the next 
 configure item for the details.).

 Belén


 El Jueves, 31 de Enero de 2008 00:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
 I saw this as well on 2.2.6, but didn't file a bug report on it (sorry.)
 You could file a bug report for the next guy...

 Clint

 On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
 belen wrote:
 El Miércoles, 30 de Enero de 2008 14:45, Dan Langille escribió:
 Hi,

 My install directory is bacula-2.2.7 and the directory of bat is
 bacula-2.2.7/src/qt-console/bat

 [snip]
 Thanks a lot. I thought that was source but I see now that it 
 actually IS
 the program. It makes me a little uneasy that it ended up there but 
 I'll
 copy it to what I think should be its proper place and see if it 
 behaves
 the way it should :-)

 -- 
 Erik.

 - 

 This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
 Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
 http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
 ___
 Bacula-users mailing list
 Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

 -- 
 Mª Belén Sánchez de la Piedad
 Administradora de Sistemas
 Silice Tecnología y Servicios
 C/Avda. José Fernández López,44
 06800 Merida
 Tfno: 924 31 41 15 Movil: 691 661 326
 Web: www.silicetelecom.com


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


[Bacula-users] Where did BAT go?

2008-01-30 Thread Erik P. Olsen
I have just installed bacula ver 2.2.8 on fedora 7 and have configured BAT 
using 
--enable-bat. I can find bat.conf in its proper place but I can't find any 
trace 
of the BAT program itself. It's not in the install directory and locate doesn't 
find it. The configure program exits with return code 0, so everything ought to 
be correct except BAT is not there.

Is this a bug or is there something I have overlooked that I should have done?

-- 
Erik.

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Where did BAT go?

2008-01-30 Thread Dan Langille
Erik P. Olsen wrote:
 I have just installed bacula ver 2.2.8 on fedora 7 and have configured BAT 
 using 
 --enable-bat. I can find bat.conf in its proper place but I can't find any 
 trace 
 of the BAT program itself. It's not in the install directory and locate 
 doesn't 
 find it.

Did you refresh the locate database after your install?

 The configure program exits with return code 0, so everything ought to 
 be correct except BAT is not there.
 
 Is this a bug or is there something I have overlooked that I should have done?

Have you tried find?

-- 
Dan Langille

BSDCan - The Technical BSD Conference : http://www.bsdcan.org/
PGCon  - The PostgreSQL Conference: http://www.pgcon.org/

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Where did BAT go?

2008-01-30 Thread Rupen Momaya
I believe its a bug...It happened with me too while installaing Bacula 
2.2.6 using tarball. Finally, i had to install bat rpm for my 
distribution (CentOS 5) seperately after downloading the same from  
sourceforge..


Regards
Rupen

Dan Langille wrote:

Erik P. Olsen wrote:
  
I have just installed bacula ver 2.2.8 on fedora 7 and have configured BAT using 
--enable-bat. I can find bat.conf in its proper place but I can't find any trace 
of the BAT program itself. It's not in the install directory and locate doesn't 
find it.



Did you refresh the locate database after your install?

  
The configure program exits with return code 0, so everything ought to 
be correct except BAT is not there.


Is this a bug or is there something I have overlooked that I should have done?



Have you tried find?

  


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Where did BAT go?

2008-01-30 Thread Erik P. Olsen
belen wrote:
 El Miércoles, 30 de Enero de 2008 14:45, Dan Langille escribió:
 Hi,
 
 My install directory is bacula-2.2.7 and the directory of bat is 
 bacula-2.2.7/src/qt-console/bat
 
[snip]
Thanks a lot. I thought that was source but I see now that it actually IS the 
program. It makes me a little uneasy that it ended up there but I'll copy it to 
what I think should be its proper place and see if it behaves the way it should 
:-)

-- 
Erik.

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Where did BAT go?

2008-01-30 Thread Erik P. Olsen
Dan Langille wrote:
 Erik P. Olsen wrote:
 Dan Langille wrote:
 Erik P. Olsen wrote:
 I have just installed bacula ver 2.2.8 on fedora 7 and have 
 configured BAT using --enable-bat. I can find bat.conf in its proper 
 place but I can't find any trace of the BAT program itself. It's not 
 in the install directory and locate doesn't find it.
 Did you refresh the locate database after your install?
 Yes.
 The configure program exits with return code 0, so everything ought 
 to be correct except BAT is not there.

 Is this a bug or is there something I have overlooked that I should 
 have done?
 Have you tried find?

 Yes.

 BTW, do you know if there is a standalone way of building BAT?
 
 You saw no errors?  BAT is notoriously finicky to build.
 
I saw no errors. But I may have found why it didn't build. I took a closer look 
at qt4. It comes as a part of the fedora 7 install but looking for the qt4 
libraries it reveales that both qt4 AND qt-3.3 are installed and moreover it's 
qt-3.3 which is made active. For example the variable QTDIR contains 
/usr/lib/qt-3.3 where bacula probably wants /usr/lib/qt4.

Well, what do I do? I could probably try again after export of QTDIR with the 
right value but do I really have to build the entire enchilada just to get BAT 
built?

-- 
Erik.

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Where did BAT go?

2008-01-30 Thread Erik P. Olsen
Dan Langille wrote:
 Erik P. Olsen wrote:
 I have just installed bacula ver 2.2.8 on fedora 7 and have configured 
 BAT using --enable-bat. I can find bat.conf in its proper place but I 
 can't find any trace of the BAT program itself. It's not in the 
 install directory and locate doesn't find it.
 
 Did you refresh the locate database after your install?
Yes.
 
 The configure program exits with return code 0, so everything ought to 
 be correct except BAT is not there.

 Is this a bug or is there something I have overlooked that I should 
 have done?
 
 Have you tried find?
 
Yes.

BTW, do you know if there is a standalone way of building BAT?

-- 
Erik.


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Where did BAT go?

2008-01-30 Thread belen
El Miércoles, 30 de Enero de 2008 14:45, Dan Langille escribió:
Hi,

My install directory is bacula-2.2.7 and the directory of bat is 
bacula-2.2.7/src/qt-console/bat



 Erik P. Olsen wrote:
  Dan Langille wrote:
  Erik P. Olsen wrote:
  I have just installed bacula ver 2.2.8 on fedora 7 and have configured
  BAT using --enable-bat. I can find bat.conf in its proper place but I
  can't find any trace of the BAT program itself. It's not in the
  install directory and locate doesn't find it.
 
  Did you refresh the locate database after your install?
 
  Yes.
 
  The configure program exits with return code 0, so everything ought to
  be correct except BAT is not there.
 
  Is this a bug or is there something I have overlooked that I should
  have done?
 
  Have you tried find?
 
  Yes.
 
  BTW, do you know if there is a standalone way of building BAT?

 You saw no errors?  BAT is notoriously finicky to build.

-- 
 Mª Belén Sánchez de la Piedad 
 Administradora de Sistemas 
 Silice Tecnología y Servicios 
 C/Avda. José Fernández López,44 
 06800 Merida 
 Tfno: 924 31 41 15 Movil: 691 661 326 
 Web: www.silicetelecom.com

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Where did BAT go?

2008-01-30 Thread Dan Langille
Erik P. Olsen wrote:
 Dan Langille wrote:
 Erik P. Olsen wrote:
 I have just installed bacula ver 2.2.8 on fedora 7 and have configured 
 BAT using --enable-bat. I can find bat.conf in its proper place but I 
 can't find any trace of the BAT program itself. It's not in the 
 install directory and locate doesn't find it.
 Did you refresh the locate database after your install?
 Yes.
 The configure program exits with return code 0, so everything ought to 
 be correct except BAT is not there.

 Is this a bug or is there something I have overlooked that I should 
 have done?
 Have you tried find?

 Yes.
 
 BTW, do you know if there is a standalone way of building BAT?

You saw no errors?  BAT is notoriously finicky to build.

-- 
Dan Langille

BSDCan - The Technical BSD Conference : http://www.bsdcan.org/
PGCon  - The PostgreSQL Conference: http://www.pgcon.org/

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Where did BAT go?

2008-01-30 Thread bacula


I saw this as well on 2.2.6, but didn't file a bug report on it (sorry.) 
You could file a bug report for the next guy...


Clint

On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Erik P. Olsen wrote:


belen wrote:

El Miércoles, 30 de Enero de 2008 14:45, Dan Langille escribió:
Hi,

My install directory is bacula-2.2.7 and the directory of bat is
bacula-2.2.7/src/qt-console/bat


[snip]
Thanks a lot. I thought that was source but I see now that it actually IS the
program. It makes me a little uneasy that it ended up there but I'll copy it to
what I think should be its proper place and see if it behaves the way it should 
:-)

--
Erik.

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users