RE: Can the Baha'i Faith be a Big Tent or not?

2004-12-11 Thread dlmbrt
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 Bahai's insistence on being
 non-partisan in political matters seems odd to me. I'm not sure how to
 put it but it smells like complacency to me.

[D.A.L.] Stepping back totally from political matters has been one of my
greatest challenges as a Baha'i.  The way I take it is twofold:  first it
avoids a whole range of temptations, most of them having to do with various
forms of corruption; and second, it places the emphasis on social actions
that speak directly to others.  In addition, it clarifies for us the fact
that political action can never save the world.  That is in the hands of
God, and we must be willing to have faith in that fact.
 
 Jesus on the other was from a humbler background. Even as a child, he
 was a refugee, lived in Africa, didn't come from a humble background,
 didn't have servants, associated with the outcasts of society. He was
 homeless, poor. He knew Nicodemus and Joseph of Arimathea but
 otherwise didn't seem to have many connections or familiarity with
 powerful people. He was a big mouth, often spoke out against the
 authorities, overturned the tables of the money-changes and used whips
 to get them out of the Temple. And similar things could be said of
 John the Baptist.

[D.A.L.] I'm not entirely sure that is fully established about Jesus' life
and circumstances.  His minstry was supported by donations, some of which
came from wealthy patrons.  Hw had a home base in Capernaum, which He may
not have owned outright, but it was there.  Bahá'u'lláh's background was
more like the Buddha's.  God's Manifestations have come from many
backgrounds.

Dave Lambert



__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Can the Baha'i Faith be a Big Tent or not?

2004-12-11 Thread Khazeh Fananapazir
[kf]
Most respectfully this servant [kf] would add that although the background
of Jesus Christ and His holiness Bahá'u'lláh are important, the background
of these Sanctified Beings is in no way determinative, defining, or
de-limiting.

Consider for example Jesus Christ.
In Samaria the Samaritan woman thought He was a Jew.
But simultaneously in Jerusalem the Jerusalem people thought that that
sanctified Being was a Samaritan

John 4:9
Then saith the woman of Samaria unto him, How is it that thou, BEING A JEW,
askest drink of me, which am a woman of Samaria? FOR THE JEWS HAVE NO
DEALINGS WITH THE SAMARITANS.


John 8:48
Then answered the Jews, and said unto him, Say we not well THAT THOU ART A
SAMARITAN?

In the Islamic Dispensation too

***
025.007 
YUSUFALI: And they say: WHAT SORT OF A MESSENGER IS THIS, WHO EATS FOOD,
AND WALKS THROUGH THE STREETS? Why has not an angel been sent down to him to
give admonition with him? 
PICKTHAL: And they say: WHAT AILETH THIS MESSENGER (OF ALLAH) THAT HE EATETH
FOOD AND WALKETH IN THE MARKETS? Why is not an angel sent down unto him, to
be a warner with him. 
SHAKIR: AND THEY SAY: WHAT IS THE MATTER WITH THIS MESSENGER THAT HE EATS
FOOD AND GOES ABOUT IN THE MARKETS; why has not an angel been sent down to
him, so that he should have been a warner with him?

And yet in this Dispensation

The learning current amongst men I studied not; THEIR SCHOOLS I ENTERED NOT.
Ask of the city wherein I dwelt, that thou mayest be well assured that I am
not of them who speak falsely.

(Baha'u'llah, The Summons of the Lord of Hosts)

And although this is a longer quotation it is so profoundly inspiring I
thought we could read it together.

Sorry to interfere in your conversation [lowliest khazeh]




The term heaven denoteth loftiness and exaltation, inasmuch as it is the
seat of the revelation of those Manifestations of Holiness, the Day-springs
of ancient glory.  These ancient Beings, THOUGH DELIVERED FROM THE WOMB OF
THEIR MOTHER, have in reality descended from the heaven of the will of God.
THOUGH THEY BE DWELLING ON THIS EARTH, yet their true habitations are the
retreats of glory in the realms above.  Whilst WALKING AMONGST MORTALS, THEY
SOAR in the heaven of the divine presence. Without feet they tread the path
of the spirit, and without wings they rise unto the exalted heights of
divine unity.  WITH EVERY FLEETING BREATH THEY COVER THE IMMENSITY OF SPACE,
AND AT EVERY MOMENT TRAVERSE THE KINGDOMS OF THE VISIBLE AND THE INVISIBLE.
Upon their thrones is written:  Nothing whatsoever keepeth Him from being
occupied with any other thing; and on their seats is inscribed:  Verily,
His ways differ every day.  They are sent forth through the transcendent
power of the Ancient of Days, and are raised up by the exalted will of God,
the most mighty King.  This is what is meant by the words:  coming in the
clouds of heaven. 
 ...
  Wert thou to cleanse the mirror of thy heart from the dust of malice, thou
wouldst apprehend the meaning of the symbolic terms revealed by the
all-embracing Word of God made manifest in every Dispensation, and wouldst
discover the mysteries of divine knowledge.  NOT, HOWEVER, UNTIL THOU
CONSUMEST WITH THE FLAME OF UTTER DETACHMENT THOSE VEILS OF IDLE LEARNING,
THAT ARE CURRENT AMONGST MEN, CANST THOU BEHOLD THE RESPLENDENT MORN OF TRUE
KNOWLEDGE. 
(Baha'u'llah:  The Kitab-i-Iqan, Pages: 67-69) [Emphasis added with
humble respect]






-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 December 2004 20:32
To: Baha'i Studies
Subject: RE: Can the Baha'i Faith be a Big Tent or not?

  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 Bahai's insistence on being
 non-partisan in political matters seems odd to me. I'm not sure how to
 put it but it smells like complacency to me.

[D.A.L.] Stepping back totally from political matters has been one of my
greatest challenges as a Baha'i.  The way I take it is twofold:  first it
avoids a whole range of temptations, most of them having to do with various
forms of corruption; and second, it places the emphasis on social actions
that speak directly to others.  In addition, it clarifies for us the fact
that political action can never save the world.  That is in the hands of
God, and we must be willing to have faith in that fact.
 
 Jesus on the other was from a humbler background. Even as a child, he
 was a refugee, lived in Africa, didn't come from a humble background,
 didn't have servants, associated with the outcasts of society. He was
 homeless, poor. He knew Nicodemus and Joseph of Arimathea but
 otherwise didn't seem to have many connections or familiarity with
 powerful people. He was a big mouth, often spoke out against the
 authorities, overturned the tables of the money-changes and used whips
 to get them out of the Temple. And similar things could be said of
 John the Baptist.

[D.A.L.] I'm not entirely sure that is fully established about Jesus' life

Re: Can the Baha'i Faith be a Big Tent or not?

2004-12-11 Thread Popeyesays




In a message dated 12/11/2004 1:14:37 PM Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I should 
  probably read more about the life of the Bab and Bahaullahbefore saying 
  much about it. (So I'm factually wrong please point meto where I can get 
  accurate information)

Balyuzi wrote a four volume biography of Baha`u'llah which is an excellent 
place to begin.

 But my impression is that hestill had servants and a place to live 
for a good chunk of his life.He came from a noble, elite background, private 
tutors. 

He was the son of the Vizier of the Shah, a man largely in charge of the 
Shah's "Department of State". He was the descendant of the old dynasty of 
Persia, and yes his family had large holdings in Mazindaran and in Teheran. His 
father fell out of favor with the court, and when a replacement was sought it 
was suggested that Baha`u'llah should fill the post. He declined. The vizier who 
recommended Him was a bitter enemy of the Bab. He had servants, land rural and 
urban all these things, yet after the death of His father He chose to be known 
as the "Father of the Poor".

When He was arrested and cast into the Siyah Chal, All His possessions were 
confiscated. The only reason He was not among the executed (other than it seems 
to be the will of God from a Baha`i's point of view that He be preserved) was 
that one of his sisters was married to an important official in the Russian 
embassy to the Shah who led a delegation to the Shah's court to demand that 
Baha`u'llah's guilt be proven or He be released.

When He was banished to Baghdad, His possessions were gone. The only 
servant who followed Him did so voluntarily. His exile in Baghdad was very 
pecunious - for all the Babi's there. Eventually He was sent to COnstantinople 
and was given an allowance as a political exile from Iran, by that time funds 
were apparently being contributed to the cause by adherents near and far, so 
when He was exiled to Akka, it was planned to fund His transfer and only four 
followers. He refused any money at that time and paid His own way and the way of 
His family and followers to go with Him.

Where did that money come from? From believers who chose to contribute 
their own wealth to perpetuate the Faith.

I would suggest that Jesus also existed during His ministry by the 
contributions of others. His was not a formal exile or imprisonment, but a 
voluntary abandonment of wealth.

Regards,

Scott
__

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Mail - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st

News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st

Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net

New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu




Re: Can the Baha'i Faith be a Big Tent or not?

2004-12-10 Thread Ronald Stephens
 Oh, one other point I wanted to make but I forgot.

It is my impression that, in the Book of Certitude, Baha'u'llah makes a case 
that the over-emphasis on literalism by proponents of relgion is a leading 
cause for the decline of religious faith and the declining respect for 
religion. Am I correct in my impression?

I believe that Baha'u'lah would make the same criticism today of Baha'i 
attitudes, that He made when He wrote the Book of Certitude.


On Friday, December 10, 2004, at 09:27AM, Ronald Stephens [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 While encouraging those Baha’is who are upset about the Ruhi Method to get 
 over it and move on, Dick Detweiler wrote :

 “Surely the tent is big enough for that?”

I agree with him and I am not too concerned about the Ruhi methods. I have 
attended Ruhi classes and they don’t bother me, although I fail to see how 
much good will come out of them either. To me, Ruhi is irrelevant to the big 
picture, but the question of whether or not the Baha’I Faith can be a big tent 
is relevant. 

I believe than the Faith is shirking in numbers and in general failing to 
excite enthusiasm because we are projecting ourselves as a very small tent. I 
believe that there could be a big demand for a Faith that allows people to 
believe in religion but also in science and reason. I also believe that the 
Writings of the Faith offer us the option to be just that sort of community. 

But in practice, I believe we project an image of being another literal, 
inerrant religion like evangelical Christianity or ultra-conservative Islam. I 
don’t think there is a market for such a new religion because there are 
already an excess of such religions, and people can readily see the problems 
they bring about. 

If we believe in a literally inerrant scripture (which we call the Writings) 
then how do we differ from evangelical Christians who believe the same about 
the Bible, or ultra conservative Muslims who believe the same about the Quran? 
Of course, we can just say our scriptures are inerrant and theirs aren’t, but 
they say the same themselves about their scriptures.

And, most importantly, doesn’t Baha’u’llah caution against precisely such a 
literal inerrant approach in His Book of Certitude? This major theme of the 
Book of Certitude seems to be something that never gets discussed and never is 
taken seriously. 

It’s hard to even discuss this topic, but if we ignore it because of the pain 
and sensitivity involved, then we will continue to be seen as being far to the 
right of evangelical Christianity, a sort of return-to-Medieval attitudes 
religion, rather than a viable religion for the future.

Ron


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Can the Baha'i Faith be a Big Tent or not?

2004-12-10 Thread Mark A. Foster
Ron,

At 11:27 AM 12/10/2004, you wrote:
I don’t think there is a market for such a new religion because there are 
already an excess of such religions, and people can readily see the problems 
they bring about.

I am just guessing, but ...

The Baha'i Faith is a religion which *appears* to be to the left on political, 
economic, and social issues and which *appears* (perhaps without a closer 
inspection) to be to the right on questions of morality. To many European 
Americans, and in the framework of conventional social norms and definitions of 
categories, the Baha'i Faith may appear inconsistent.

However, perhaps this explains, in part, why, in South Carolina, a couple of 
predominantly African American evangelical churches became Baha'i centers 
(along with the preachers and their congregations), but why nothing similar has 
ever, to my knowledge, happened with predominantly European American churches. 
In other words, it is fairly common for African American, but not European 
American, evangelicals to be liberal, or radical, on social issues but 
conservative on theological ones.

Why, officially or not, did most of those African American Baha'is in the deep 
South leave the Faith? I think that there are at least two reasons:

1. There was nothing to replace the neighborhood Black church which, for many 
people (especially those in rural areas), functions as a kind of community 
center.

2. The emphasis on Jesus was replaced by an emphasis on Baha'u'llah. Although 
Dr. Hedi Ahmadiyya attempted, in his teaching booklet, to remedy this problem 
by focusing on the suffering of Baha'u'llah and the Bab, I don't think it did 
the trick. The historical attachment to Jesus as someone who suffered like we 
have was simply too strong.

If we believe in a literally inerrant scripture (which we call the Writings) 
then how do we differ from evangelical Christians who believe the same about 
the Bible, or ultra conservative Muslims who believe the same about the 
Quran? Of course, we can just say our scriptures are inerrant and theirs 
aren’t, but they say the same themselves about their scriptures.

Those Baha'is are really a fundamentalist, evangelical, or reformed Protestant 
definition of infallibility on the Baha'i texts.

Mark A. Foster * http://markfoster.net
Sacred cows make the tastiest hamburger 
-- Abbie Hoffman 


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Can the Baha'i Faith be a Big Tent or not?

2004-12-10 Thread Mark A. Foster
Hi, Richard,

At 12:38 PM 12/10/2004, you wrote:
I read the entire above selection to a Baha'i friend who gives workshops and 
lectures regarding African-Americans and Blacks.  She has told me that 
everything you have written above is right on the money and that your 
conversation on this subject should be encouraged
I hope that you are hereby encouraged.

Thanks. I have actually discussed these the ideas I raised in that posting with 
members of the House of Justice, with members of the American NSA, and at 
district conventions (back when that term was used). Perhaps they didn't agree 
with me, or it never came up in consultations.

Mark A. Foster * http://markfoster.net
Sacred cows make the tastiest hamburger 
-- Abbie Hoffman 


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Can the Baha'i Faith be a Big Tent or not?

2004-12-10 Thread Susan Maneck

But in practice, I believe we project an image of being another literal,
inerrant religion like evangelical Christianity or ultra-conservative
Islam.

Dear Ron,

I know you have this impression at present, but I think if you did a survey
of the general population who have some familiarity with Baha'i, this would
not be the terms in which they would describe us.

warmest, Susan


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Can the Baha'i Faith be a Big Tent or not?

2004-12-10 Thread Smaneck




In a message dated 12/11/2004 12:30:05 A.M. Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If I 
  am honst, I have this same issue. The sufferigof Jesus on the cross is a 
  powerful story. Try as I might, I can not see Baha'u'llah's imprisonment for 
  decades as equivalent. It just isnt' the same kind of powerful imagery. 
  

Dear Ron, 

I'm not so sure. Remember that the African slave experience is that of a 
lifetime of suffering, not a few hours on the cross. That is closer to 
Baha'u'llah's suffering. If the imagery of the cross is more powerful in 
Christianity it is because Christians themselves have made it such. 

warmest, Susan 
__

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Mail - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st

News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st

Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net

New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu




Re: Can the Baha'i Faith be a Big Tent or not?

2004-12-10 Thread Mark A. Foster
Patti,

At 09:12 PM 12/10/2004, you wrote:
I think that the point of it is that people might be interested in the Faith 
with their heads, but their hearts  spirits need to be touched 

I won't comment on the Ruhi part. However, I agree that the above is important, 
and, to that extent, Hedi Ahmadiyya was on the right track. What was missing, 
in my view was:

1. The absence of permanent community centers in each neighborhood.

2. The fact that the teachers immediately left. Consolidation teams would only 
show up months or years later. Sometimes they would never show up. In my view, 
the mass teachers should, ideally, be homefront pioneers who themselves will be 
involved in the consolidation. (In fact, Ahmadiyya suggested that the same 
people involved in mass teaching needed to do the consolidation.)

Mark A. Foster * http://markfoster.net
Sacred cows make the tastiest hamburger 
-- Abbie Hoffman 


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Can the Baha'i Faith be a Big Tent or not?

2004-12-10 Thread Popeyesays




In a message dated 12/10/2004 11:27:37 AM Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And, most 
  importantly, doesnt Bahaullah caution against precisely such a literal 
  inerrant approach in His Book of Certitude? This major theme of the Book of 
  Certitude seems to be something that never gets discussed and never is taken 
  seriously. 

I think all the sacred texts can be taken as inerrant in context. It is 
when we clip verses and hold them up as "union placards" that we run into 
trouble. We are in effect taking the verse out of context. Study of the word 
shows that interpretation of the word must be inclusive of other 
interpretations. When we cannot find a way to include an interpretation into our 
understanding of the word then it is our understanding that is deficient, not 
the word itself.
This is why (in my understanding) the sacred text demands that we bring our 
scientific and spiritual understandings of creation into a synchronized state, 
because those "interpretations" of creation must be inclusive.

Literalism is the great foe of such an understanding. It is a set of chains 
and shackles which an individual dons voluntarily and then extolls to others. 
For myself, no thank you, I am not interested. It is firmly set in my personal 
view of reality that my misunderstandings are inerrant, the word will not be if 
I can change my understanding.

Regards,

Scott
__

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Mail - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st

News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st

Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net

New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu




Re: Can the Baha'i Faith be a Big Tent or not?

2004-12-10 Thread Mark A. Foster
Hi, Ron,

At 11:40 AM 12/10/2004, you wrote:
It is my impression that, in the Book of Certitude, Baha'u'llah makes a case 
that the over-emphasis on literalism by proponents of relgion is a leading 
cause for the decline of religious faith and the declining respect for 
religion. Am I correct in my impression?

IMHO, literalism can, from one standpoint, be defined as an attachment to 
names, i.e., regarding them (including our Sacred Texts) as being 
representations, or manifestations, or reality.

I believe that Baha'u'lah would make the same criticism today of Baha'i 
attitudes, that He made when He wrote the Book of Certitude.

I think that is a very good point. I suspect He would make a similar criticism.

Mark A. Foster * http://markfoster.net
Sacred cows make the tastiest hamburger 
-- Abbie Hoffman 


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu