Re: Dornachian reactions?/certification

2003-06-25 Thread Hugh Lovel
>Hi Glen,
>I do agree with much that you say here, but you start with saying no 
>one is criticising anyone except the organisations but this is not 
>true.  People are singling out individuals (just re-read recent posts
>in this thread, including your own comments below).  It just makes 
>the genuine points of criticism seem like sour grapes.
>
>But the certification issue is a big one.  I have just been involved. . . 


Dear List,

Of course, writers on this list sometimes disparrage others either on this list or off it. A couple cases in point are:

>>  People are using the real preps,  (as though homeopathic and radionically prepared preps are not real)

and

> One or two people
>dominate to the detriment of all others.  (as though assuming the role of victim was the chief if not the only option in this situation)

I myself am far from immune to falling into such traps, and in pointing out the above I too am tarred with the above as everyone will recognize the authors of these statements. I happen to have an extremely critical nature which I have to work hard on keeping in check and often fall short. This is at least humbling if not (usually) humiliating. But Hamish has the best point I've heard voiced on this list in a long time:

Yes Biodynamics is growing in Australia.  We have a number of Biodynamic associations around the country and the 2 biggest have very different cultures.  to me that matters not.  what matters is that people are "having a go". 
 
The second most important is that we share our experiences in the light of the laws of the free spiritual life.  when our sharing descends below this level it does no-one any credit, but even then we need to have some modesty and tolerance.  Like our Biodynamic practices we don't always get it 
right first go.



With that said, please let me address certification. We are free to certify or not to. 

Here in the US some of the better known pioneers of the organic movement--Elliott Coleman and myself for two--have opted out of certification now that the government has taken it over by force. Why? We don't want to lend our good names to what we perceive as a prostitution of the founding ideals of the movement. I don't think it has so much to do with size. Some very large growers have a reputation for reliable quality--Lundberg rice, Coleman beef, etc. that far transcends the organic label. Arrowhead Mills had it at one time and hasn't entirely lost it after changing hands.

What does organic certification mean to me?, and I routinely buy certified organic when presented with a choice that is otherwise not clear. 

If you can imagine this, recently the congressman of my home district, Nathan Deal, attached a rider to a key appropriation bill allowing chicken raisers to feed whatever feed was available to their birds and still label them organic under the government standards. This measure passed and took several months to repeal, though it created a rather vocal public outcry.

Personally I love such shenanigans because they point up the folly of government certification as a means of assuring the consumer gets quality products. It always has been and will be necessary for buyers to be wary. Certification in my view is no substitute for grower integrity, and buyers might best become acquainted with their growers, whether large or small, and buy from the growers they know have integrity whenever possible. 

I relish each and every opportunity to tell inquirents that now we are not certified organic. We opted out of that process after many years of pioneering participation because we feel it has cashed in its heritage for a mess of porridge. 

Is life any worse for me today than when the public hardly knew organic existed? No. Selling quality is still the same. You only get across to those who really tune in to quality and have educated their taste for it and are willing to pay, whatever the cost of it. Sometimes it is cheap, sometimes dear, but they seek it out and you don't fool them with certified garbage.

I treasure having such customers--the celebs who buy a year's supply of my garlic every year because it is the best they've ever had, to the 6 year old who eats four helpings of my mashed potatoes and throws up his thumb with, "The BEST I've evah had!"

Certification, whether I chose to go for it or not, was never even close to being as satisfying as such knowledgable, discerning customers whose allegiance I knew I had won by being uncompromising about quality. 

There is no substitute for quality food. Steiner envisioned it would lift those who ate it above their "personal ambition, illusions and petty jealousies."

It was the vision of such food that led me into farming, eventually to discover biodynamics as an answer to my sincerest prayers. Biodynamic farmers do not always achieve this ideal such as I envisioned, and biodynamic certification does not guarantee it. I have not always achieved it myself--far from it--and there are times when I fail

Re: keeping focussed

2003-06-25 Thread Garuda



Yes thank you Hamish
What you are doing / attempting in OZ sounds 
refreshing.
 
> is that we share our experiences in the 
light of the laws of the free spiritual life
 
I trust that your inclusive vision and spirit grows 
and infects our fine shores very soon. I look forward to it.
 
You suggest a state beyond right and 
wrong
I guess we in NZ must ask ourselves if our 
associations life is functioning beyond what & who is right and 
wrong.
 
Are we even attempting to accept at least our own 
memberships varied insights and practices? Or are some very right 
and others very wrong? 
If yes, then what would it take for us to aspire to 
Hamish's challenge?
MAybe this should become one of the central tenants 
of the associations constitution. Openness rather than protection
GA
___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow


Fw: Gouranga

2003-06-25 Thread Garuda
From: "NitaiGouranga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 12:14 AM
Subject: Gouranga


> Call out Gouranga be happy!!!
> Gouranga Gouranga Gouranga 
> That which brings the highest happiness!!
> 

___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow


Re: Glen Re: Dornachian reactions?

2003-06-25 Thread Garuda
Graeme

> Yes.  There you go again Glen.  But no matter. Seems to me if these
> groups are so irrelevant, why do they survive -

Are they /we being all we could be???

>
> >This is why quality based certification regardless of production method
is
> >the way of the future.

Twas thingking about this this morning and it may not be that hard.
ie
growers supplies
 a SFW certificate to indicate his soil health
other parameters re brix test and the like
a chroma tography
a mineral and vitamin analysis
or the like

I am sure others have suggestions for this.
Hardly a need for the farm to be inspected. Most enterprises are being
inspected by a govt dept for something now so basic management
environementally etc will be done there

Quality is the key, however you get it.
The market is wide open at present.
GA

___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow


water consumption

2003-06-25 Thread Hamish Mackay



Can anyone give me some hard data on reduction of 
water requirements on Biodynamic land?
 
would be appreciated
 
aye
 
Hamish Mackay
___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow


Re: Solstice

2003-06-25 Thread Liz Davis
Hi Eric

A grey, wet, cold day for solstice had me wonder if any would turn up for
the celebrations.  A thick heavy fog rolled in around 4pm and no calls to
verify if celebrations were still happening.  As darkness began to fall many
people, at least 50 arrived to  light the fire and celebrate the solstice.
It did end up to be one heck of a party for young and old, with laughter,
poetry, warmth, good food and good company.

L&L
Liz

on 21/6/03 1:52 PM, Eric Myren at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> May you all have a peaceful Solstice celebration.
> or one heck of a party!
> 
> Namaste
> Eric
> 
> ___
> BDNow mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
> http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow
> 

___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow


Alex Podolinsky

2003-06-25 Thread Liz Davis
Hi all

Finally have heard word that Alex Podolinsky will be talking at the uni in
Orange on the first weekend of August.  Unsure of the details but will post
these when confirmed.  I'd be happy to put questions to him on behalf of
others.  Keeping in mind what Hamish has written; I can't help but think if
not for this man would there be any Biodynamic groups in Australia today?

Allan I'll do my best to tape the talk, but you may have to wait to hear it
on our website?

L&L
Liz

___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow


Re: Dornachian reactions? A glimmer of hope

2003-06-25 Thread Peter Michael Bacchus
Hi Tony,
  That is great news, I hope the meeting goes well.
warm regards,
Peter.
>
>  Hi Glen   Maybe there is a glimmer of change on the horizon. I  was
> contacted yesterday by a NZBD assoc member  and was asked 'How can the
NZBD
> assoc help people like me who organise  workshops and international
speakers
> to come to NZ." I am having a meeting on Sunday.
>
>  Cheers Tony Robinson
> NZ
>
> ___
> BDNow mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
> http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow

___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow


Re: Lloyd Re: Dornachian reactions?

2003-06-25 Thread Lloyd Charles

- Original Message -
From: "Resonant Info" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Biodynamic Food and Farming Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 8:07 AM
Subject: Lloyd Re: Dornachian reactions?


Hi Graeme> - just a few comments - I also have stuff to do!
> Yes, his approach is of course better than commercial growers'.  What
> does his stuff taste like?  I wouldn't buy it.  My partner and i went
> down there to have a look and get a few vegies - but the smell of
> urea, the blue nitrogen puffed leaves
Given the above comment of yours I find it difficult to believe that he can
produce without in crop chemicals?
Either that or he has been extremely luck to date!

> As to consumers.  There are kids in their twenties whose only
> experience of "fresh" food is the plastic wrapped chilled and watered
> commercially grown stuff in the supermarket.  They can't smell, taste
> or even touch half of it before they buy it.  They never in their
> lives picked an apple or dug up a carrot.  They don't know what real
> food really tastes like, looks like or how it is grown.  This is not
> just a mistake, but the result of what may as well have been
> conditoning/education program that has been going on for years.

I really dont know what you do about this, we have been 'consumers' of
alternative medicine for twenty years and despite the fact that we dont eat
near as much good food as we should, our little family has enjoyed much
better health than most, on top of which we have been taught (or learnt) how
to look after our selves when things do go off course. We have close family
members who we cannot get interested in alternatives, they remain locked in
the conventional doctor knows best mindset, it is really frustrating when
you see someone you care for being slowly poisoned by a well meaning
doctor - long term medication for a simple problem that my naturapath friend
could have fixed easily- and I could not do a damn thing about it.
Nutritionally we have the grey haired doctor lady yapping on the tv about
how there is no proven difference in favour of organic food - very careful
to appear not to be biased - (just like the farmers associations when they
promote GM) - I get mad every time I see her face - but she is an authority
figure - a 'qualified Nutritionist' - and has science to back up those
opinions.
> Now, starting from that point, how can u expect such people to be
> able to judge good food, ask the right questions of the grower,
> figure out what is good practise in agriculture?  Certification IS a
> paternalistic, cotton wool approach. But what practical alternative
> is there for the time being.  We need something to get us out of this
> dead end.
I agree! and if certification does nothing else other than guarantee a more
or less chemical free source of fruit and vegetables, then its a worthwhile
excercise - trouble is its being hi-jacked by the big boys and in another
five years or so organic will be shipped all over the world out of season,
shrink wrapped, pre packed, ethylene ripened, irradiated, adulterated, ---
and how will a consumer know if it started out organic or not? (good article
on this in the latest acres USA magazine)

> That is a problem
> of education and my hope is that certifiers are contributing to the
> re-education of the public.
> If I am wrong about the education thing, then why are people still
> buying supermarket food?
For the same reasons they eat at mcdonalds and drive too fast - most people
have yet to figure out that they can eat better, live longer and have more
time to do the stuff they dont have time for.
>
> Okay, I do agree about organic certification not conveying much -
> even BD certification here is no guarantee of quality.  Go and try
> some supermarket food - it tastes a LOT better than much of the
> organically certified food I can buy at twice the price.
Happily I have not found this to be the case, we dont have access to a lot
of organic produce but what I have had in the last year or two has been
better taste than the chemical version most times. Maybe I have become a
more discerning buyer (probably so)

> Finally, growers who are anti certification fall into 3 groups, in my
> experience:
> 1). Those that don't need it, they have their regular customers who
> know them and trust them and they are doing fine
> 2). Those that think it costs too much/can't afford it/resent the
> certifiers taking money
> 3) Those who are excluded by the certifiers.  Either because their
> management just isn't de rigeur.  e.g. "Live without Roundup?  Are u
> joking?" or their practises or skills don't meet the demands of the
> certifiers. (Who wants to join a club that wouldn't have you?)
>
> The first one is fine, but isn't really an argument against
> certification.  The second doesn't recognise the economic realities
> of running a bureaucracy, and the third is where a lot of the
> arguments on this list come from, as far as I can tell.
Man you dont miss a t

Demeter International on BD Preps and the EU

2003-06-25 Thread Allan Balliett
Thanks to Ferdinand for going to the root of this matter (I am 
contracting for the missing references. Please be patient):

Regulations regarding Bio-Dynamic Preparations in the EU



To your question concerning the preparations: a new EC hygiene 
regulation (1774/2002) enter into force as from 30th April 2003 in 
the whole EC. With  this regulation the using of some covers for bd 
preparations is forbidden.

Horns can be used as before as well as stag bladders. The bovel of 
bovines is risico material and can be only used from BSE-free 
countries. That means, that the bovel must be imported as well as the 
mesenterium. But the  peritoneum can be used because it belongs to 
foodstuff.

The using of skulls of domestic animals is differenet. Skulls of 
bovines under the age of 1 year can be used as well as skulls of 
pigs. Skulls of older bovines, sheeps and goats may not used.

Attached please find some information to this regulation and the 
activities  of the biodynamic associations in the EC.

With best regards,

Ute Bucholski
Demeter International
___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow


Re: keeping focussed

2003-06-25 Thread Gil Robertson




Well said Hamish.

I too think we should celebrate our variations within the theme, rather than
seeking to prove my guru is a better guru than your guru.

There can be no doubt that the best food available, is that grown Biodynamically.
Should it not be our task to do that which we are able, to extend it's availability,
and not waste energy on infighting.

For any who may not know, Hamish has been a key figure in one of the two
biggest of the several BD Camps in Oz. His dedication to the cause has been
an inspiration to many over a long period. I get emails from people who at
some time past visited Oz and saw Hamish in one of his several roles and
they ask how he keeps up the good fight for all this time without burning
out. I suggest it is the food he eats.

Gil

(N.B. We are yet to meet, but like many, I am familiar with his work.)

Hamish Mackay wrote:
  
  
 
  
 

  Graeme
Gerard  wrote:
 
  "If
your  interest is in biodynamics, you may be wondering if you are 
subscribed to  the right group!
Despite the numerous claims to the contrary that you may  read on the 
BDNow group, biodynamics is thriving, here in Australia at  least. 
People are using the real preps, as described and recommended by  
Rudolf Steiner, as practised for decades all over the world. 
Although  some think this is some kind of old  school, bogged down and 
in decay,  it is still a living culture.
If you are interested in agriculture,  biodynamics, growing food for 
people to help in the recovery of the Earth,  seek it out.  If you are 
interested in subtle energies, radionics,  homoeopathic dilutions and 
such, there is a lot of very interesting  information to be found on 
this list.
It would be great if we could get  above the contemptible slagging 
that goes on about "the other" and keep the  focus on the many 
practical and helpful suggestions people have.
regards  all,"
 
   
 
  Yes
let's keep  focussed on the challenges we all face in different landscapes
and different  cultures.  bdnow is a wonderful tool for sharing with and
supporting each  other in our Biodynamic work and striving.
 
   
 
  Yes Biodynamics is growing in  Australia. 
We have a number of Biodynamic associations around the country  and the 2
biggest have very different cultures.  to me that matters  not.  what matters
is that people are "having a go".   
 
   
 
  The second most important is that
we share  our experiences in the light of the laws of the free spiritual
life.  when  our sharing descend below this level it does no-one any credit,
but even then we  need to have some modesty and tolerance.  Like our Biodynamic
practices we  don't always get it right first go.
 
   
   
 
   
   
  I recently read "Nature and our Ideals" - a letter
from Rudolf  Steiner to Marie delle Grazie in response to her poem  "Nature"
 
   
 
  in the preface was a quote from Rudolf Steiner's  autobiography,
The Course of My Life:
 
   
 
   
  “I
felt that I  was in a spiritual atmosphere which was of genuine benefit to
me.  For this purpose I did not need  agreement in
ideas; I needed earnest and spiritual striving humanity,  susceptible to
the spiritual.”
 
   
 
  aye
 
   
 
  Hamish Mackay
 
   
 
   
 
   
  
  
 
  
  
  
  

___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow
  




___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow


keeping focussed

2003-06-25 Thread Hamish Mackay



Graeme Gerard 
wrote:
"If your 
interest is in biodynamics, you may be wondering if you are subscribed to 
the right group!Despite the numerous claims to the contrary that you may 
read on the BDNow group, biodynamics is thriving, here in Australia at 
least. People are using the real preps, as described and recommended by 
Rudolf Steiner, as practised for decades all over the world. Although 
some think this is some kind of old  school, bogged down and in decay, 
it is still a living culture.If you are interested in agriculture, 
biodynamics, growing food for people to help in the recovery of the Earth, 
seek it out.  If you are interested in subtle energies, radionics, 
homoeopathic dilutions and such, there is a lot of very interesting 
information to be found on this list.It would be great if we could get 
above the contemptible slagging that goes on about "the other" and keep the 
focus on the many practical and helpful suggestions people have.regards 
all,"
 
Yes let's keep 
focussed on the challenges we all face in different landscapes and different 
cultures.  bdnow is a wonderful tool for sharing with and supporting each 
other in our Biodynamic work and striving.
 
Yes Biodynamics is growing in 
Australia.  We have a number of Biodynamic associations around the country 
and the 2 biggest have very different cultures.  to me that matters 
not.  what matters is that people are "having a go".  

 
The second most important is that we share 
our experiences in the light of the laws of the free spiritual life.  when 
our sharing descend below this level it does no-one any credit, but even then we 
need to have some modesty and tolerance.  Like our Biodynamic practices we 
don't always get it right first go.

 
 
I recently read "Nature and our Ideals" - a letter from Rudolf 
Steiner to Marie delle Grazie in response to her poem 
"Nature"
 
in the preface was a quote from Rudolf Steiner's 
autobiography, The Course of My Life:
 

“I felt that I 
was in a spiritual atmosphere which was of genuine benefit to me.  For this purpose I did not need 
agreement in ideas; I needed earnest and spiritual striving humanity, 
susceptible to the spiritual.”
 
aye
 
Hamish Mackay
 
 
 

___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow


Re: Dornachian reactions? A glimmer of hope

2003-06-25 Thread Garuda
Tony
A second thought
Best ask wether this person has support from the BD Pope, as he has stated
clearly at a recent AGM, that if he does not want it, it will not happen.
This could be a well meaning person, who ultimately still has to run his
impulse past daddy.
:}
GA
BdMax distributors of ThermoMax -THE proven frost protection
www.bdmax.co.nz
- Original Message -
From: "Rambler Flowers LTD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Biodynamic Food and Farming Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 8:44 AM
Subject: Re: Dornachian reactions? A glimmer of hope


>
>  Glen wrote
>
>
> > Upon reflection I do not hear people knocking the use of traditional
> preps.
> > They are knocking the organisations who seem to be isolating themselves
> from
> > their members and the wider BD community,
>
>  Hi Glen   Maybe there is a glimmer of change on the horizon. I  was
> contacted yesterday by a NZBD assoc member  and was asked 'How can the
NZBD
> assoc help people like me who organise  workshops and international
speakers
> to come to NZ." I am having a meeting on Sunday.
>
>  Cheers Tony Robinson
> NZ
>
> ___
> BDNow mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
> http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow
>

___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow


Glen Re: Dornachian reactions?

2003-06-25 Thread Resonant Info
Yes.  There you go again Glen.  But no matter. Seems to me if these 
groups are so irrelevant, why do they survive - I mean, there must be 
some people who think they are still doing something useful.
(I think I remember the Marinus la Rooij name from that book BD 
Perspectives?  I can't remember the details of his articles but I 
thought the book was great - focused on good agricultural and animal 
management practises, not just on the preps.)

This is why quality based certification regardless of production method is
the way of the future.
Absolutely agree with you on this one.  But who judges the quality? 
If you have to go around and try all your certified grower's food - 
it won't be long before there's a group of disaffected people saying 
Glen is a !#$*, his preps don't work and he is old school and out of 
touch.
There needs to be objective measures if the system is to be robust 
and fair - I once thought it would be chromatography, but I was 
mistaken.  You can't look at every apple grown!


.  People are singling out individuals (just re-read recent posts
 in this thread, including your own comments below).
Graeme
Podolinsky is the organisation, just as in NZ there are one or two people
who have 'stolen' the association. It is often the way. One or two people
dominate to the detriment of all others. The system they institute keeps
them there, especially in a association where no one actually meets and AGMs
attract less than 1% of the membership. If they can be identified then name
them.
In NZ we have one Marinus la Rooij being the major stick in the mud here.
Funny thing is he has had several fellow council members ask him to resign,
(as well as his wife), and he has not yet taken the hint. Seems its his
divinely inspired purpose to block any development, and especially my work.
Like dear old Hussein looks like he will have to be removed unceremoniously.
The only question is how much further will the association die before he or
the other members get it. At present it is little more than a cultist club
that lives on all sorts of faith and internal legislation of course. Other
groups are already forming around them, sidestepping them and of course
making them irrelevant. Hughs coming tour for example, the biggest thing to
happen in NZBD in 10 years is organised by these groups.
 > What do you do about such situations?  I don't know.
This is why quality based certification regardless of production method is
the way of the future.
Here it is the government organic mark that is screwing organics the most.
At present they have great regs on paper, but no real inspection, and they
are undercutting $ wise 'the peoples mark' BioGro (which is actually only a
little bit better),,  so it will be broke in a couple of years max, then we
are left with only an immoral govt backed joke. Add GE to this and organics
is dead. All we have left is real quality parameters, however you can get
them.
This will have to come from a peoples movement again no doubt.
Glen A


--
Graeme Gerrard
1480 Sapphire Coast Drive
Wallagoot 2550
PO Box 39 Bega 2550
ph 6494 1191/0414 396 754
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow


Lloyd Re: Dornachian reactions?

2003-06-25 Thread Resonant Info
Lloyd,
(On rading this thru - it needs re-organising, but I have to rush out 
and do stuff.  I hope you can get the main points.)

Yes, his approach is of course better than commercial growers'.  What 
does his stuff taste like?  I wouldn't buy it.  My partner and i went 
down there to have a look and get a few vegies - but the smell of 
urea, the blue nitrogen puffed leaves and the roundup comment put us 
both off.  I don't know if he tells the truth - he *seemed* to be 
genuine and honest, even in his comments like "The only thing wrong 
with organics is that you just can't get enough N."
As to consumers.  There are kids in their twenties whose only 
experience of "fresh" food is the plastic wrapped chilled and watered 
commercially grown stuff in the supermarket.  They can't smell, taste 
or even touch half of it before they buy it.  They never in their 
lives picked an apple or dug up a carrot.  They don't know what real 
food really tastes like, looks like or how it is grown.  This is not 
just a mistake, but the result of what may as well have been 
conditoning/education program that has been going on for years.

Now, starting from that point, how can u expect such people to be 
able to judge good food, ask the right questions of the grower, 
figure out what is good practise in agriculture?  Certification IS a 
paternalistic, cotton wool approach. But what practical alternative 
is there for the time being.  We need something to get us out of this 
dead end.

We here (on this list)  are all into food and growing and see it as 
important.  Most people are raised to only consider price and 
presentation.  Food is just titilation or "fuel".  That is a problem 
of education and my hope is that certifiers are contributing to the 
re-education of the public.
If I am wrong about the education thing, then why are people still 
buying supermarket food?

Okay, I do agree about organic certification not conveying much - 
even BD certification here is no guarantee of quality.  Go and try 
some supermarket food - it tastes a LOT better than much of the 
organically certified food I can buy at twice the price.  It's true. 
30 years ago we all said the opposite as we ate shrunken wormy (shop 
boughten) apples - but a lot has changed in recent years, I have 
found.  I never said certification was perfect, just better than any 
alternatives I am aware of (except CSAs and similar small scale 
things).

Finally, growers who are anti certification fall into 3 groups, in my 
experience:
1). Those that don't need it, they have their regular customers who 
know them and trust them and they are doing fine
2). Those that think it costs too much/can't afford it/resent the 
certifiers taking money
3) Those who are excluded by the certifiers.  Either because their 
management just isn't de rigeur.  e.g. "Live without Roundup?  Are u 
joking?" or their practises or skills don't meet the demands of the 
certifiers. (Who wants to join a club that wouldn't have you?)

The first one is fine, but isn't really an argument against 
certification.  The second doesn't recognise the economic realities 
of running a bureaucracy, and the third is where a lot of the 
arguments on this list come from, as far as I can tell.


 > There's a guy down the road from me who sells "organic" vegetables to
 people.  He makes his compost by mixing urea and sawdust together and
 leaving it for 3 weeks, then puts it on the plants.  He told me he
 doesn't use any pesticides or chemicals - "only a bit of roundup at
 the start, of course".
Hello Graeme
If this guy is only using a bit of roundup at the start
he's a mile in front of his commercial chemical counterparts, and if he
really manages to produce his vegetable crops without any in crop
pesticides, he is doing a lot of things right!
What does his stuff taste like?
And most importantly does he tell the truth when he sells his produce? If he
does then I'd suggest he's not much of a problem.
Organic certification tells the consumer that there is less toxic chemical
present in the food but it says nothing (or very little)about the
nutritional quality, and until consumers wake up and start to buy on taste
rather than appearance nothing much will change.
 His clients are just as poorly informed - either they don't know or
 simply don't ask about his practices.
 What do you do about such situations?  I don't know.
Certification cant fix this - only quality testing by the end consumer - if
your neighbor's produce looks good, tastes great, and is grown without
chemicals in crop he is most of the way home and his consumers will figure
it out, If it is rubbish and tastes like cardboard and he tells lies then
they will probably figure that out too.
Cheers
Lloyd Charles


--
Graeme Gerrard
1480 Sapphire Coast Drive
Wallagoot 2550
PO Box 39 Bega 2550
ph 6494 1191/0414 396 754
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe

Re: Dornachian reactions? A glimmer of hope

2003-06-25 Thread Garuda
Great news Tony
Good luck
GA



BdMax distributors of ThermoMax -THE proven frost protection
www.bdmax.co.nz
- Original Message -
From: "Rambler Flowers LTD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Biodynamic Food and Farming Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 8:44 AM
Subject: Re: Dornachian reactions? A glimmer of hope


>
>  Glen wrote
>
>
> > Upon reflection I do not hear people knocking the use of traditional
> preps.
> > They are knocking the organisations who seem to be isolating themselves
> from
> > their members and the wider BD community,
>
>  Hi Glen   Maybe there is a glimmer of change on the horizon. I  was
> contacted yesterday by a NZBD assoc member  and was asked 'How can the
NZBD
> assoc help people like me who organise  workshops and international
speakers
> to come to NZ." I am having a meeting on Sunday.
>
>  Cheers Tony Robinson
> NZ
>
> ___
> BDNow mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
> http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow
>

___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow


Re: Dornachian reactions?

2003-06-25 Thread Garuda
.  People are singling out individuals (just re-read recent posts
> in this thread, including your own comments below).

Graeme
Podolinsky is the organisation, just as in NZ there are one or two people
who have 'stolen' the association. It is often the way. One or two people
dominate to the detriment of all others. The system they institute keeps
them there, especially in a association where no one actually meets and AGMs
attract less than 1% of the membership. If they can be identified then name
them.
In NZ we have one Marinus la Rooij being the major stick in the mud here.
Funny thing is he has had several fellow council members ask him to resign,
(as well as his wife), and he has not yet taken the hint. Seems its his
divinely inspired purpose to block any development, and especially my work.
Like dear old Hussein looks like he will have to be removed unceremoniously.
The only question is how much further will the association die before he or
the other members get it. At present it is little more than a cultist club
that lives on all sorts of faith and internal legislation of course. Other
groups are already forming around them, sidestepping them and of course
making them irrelevant. Hughs coming tour for example, the biggest thing to
happen in NZBD in 10 years is organised by these groups.

 > What do you do about such situations?  I don't know.
This is why quality based certification regardless of production method is
the way of the future.

Here it is the government organic mark that is screwing organics the most.
At present they have great regs on paper, but no real inspection, and they
are undercutting $ wise 'the peoples mark' BioGro (which is actually only a
little bit better),,  so it will be broke in a couple of years max, then we
are left with only an immoral govt backed joke. Add GE to this and organics
is dead. All we have left is real quality parameters, however you can get
them.
This will have to come from a peoples movement again no doubt.
Glen A

___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow


Re: Dornachian reactions?

2003-06-25 Thread Rambler Flowers LTD



 

  
  Our newer (Biodynamic 
  Agriculture) organisation has taken a more open and educational position and 
  many farmers are learning to do things for themselves. There will be more 
  mistakes made for sure, but learning always involves 
  mistakes. 
   
   Hi Lloyd I get there NewsLeaf 
  magizine  and the workshops and  seminars they run are 
  inspiring  and exciting . One day i will be tempted to grab a cheap 
  airfare across the ditch  and attend one or two we get nothing like this 
  in NZ.
  
If the traditionalists manage to take over that 
organisation (and its likely, politics being what it is ) then there are 
enough of us free thinking loonies on the outside to carry things forward 
whatever happens. 
I believe that homeopathic remedies and what I 
term low level radionics - field broadcasters, potentiser instruments, (and 
probably some of the paper based systems),  combined with dowsing and 
basic soil remineralising are the way of the future for agriculture. Energy 
farming!
 
 You have hit it on the nail and it is a 
lot more fun to do as well
 
I sure have met some interesting people in the 
last few years! 
Cheers all 
Lloyd Charles 
  
   Lloyd you are one of them 
   Cheers Tony Robinson NZ
  

  ___BDNow mailing 
  list[EMAIL PROTECTED]You can unsubscribe or change your options 
  at:http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow
___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow


Re: Dornachian reactions? A glimmer of hope

2003-06-25 Thread Rambler Flowers LTD

 Glen wrote


> Upon reflection I do not hear people knocking the use of traditional
preps.
> They are knocking the organisations who seem to be isolating themselves
from
> their members and the wider BD community,

 Hi Glen   Maybe there is a glimmer of change on the horizon. I  was
contacted yesterday by a NZBD assoc member  and was asked 'How can the NZBD
assoc help people like me who organise  workshops and international speakers
to come to NZ." I am having a meeting on Sunday.

 Cheers Tony Robinson
NZ

___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow


Re: C Timings

2003-06-25 Thread Turtle Bend
Title: Re: C Timings



Eric,
Yah, As is said "the meaning of life is what our thirdgrade teacher told us "pay Attention""
ie being present is everything. 
As the ancient Marcus Aurealius hung it out ' If one pays attention, everything happens as it should.'
As you may rightly point out that Socrates was put to death much earlier for asking 'Why not pay attention.'

On a different tack have you read Larry Leastheatmoon's PrairyErth?
On the flint hills of Kansas neat book on really paying attention.

back to your writing - note I said whirlwind as in some time the smoke gets in my eyes.

In Love & BD501ish Light
Markess



From: Eric Myren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Biodynamic Food and Farming Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 12:58:01 -0600
To: Biodynamic Food and Farming Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: C Timings


You are one who is well versed in the ancient ways. So what you saying is you know your own brain and how fast it can move. 
Unlike some people who do not know whether they are in Kansas any more, you know when to keep your feet on the ground.  

Peace  
Eric 

On Sunday, June 22, 2003, at 09:09 AM, Turtle Bend wrote: 

I'm finding this defining and pointing clearly were the whirl wind is in my personal, local & world touch. 

L*L 
Markess 

- 
from 
___ 
BDNow mailing list 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
You can unsubscribe or change your options at: 
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow 


___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow






___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow


Re: Dornachian reactions?

2003-06-25 Thread Lloyd Charles

> There's a guy down the road from me who sells "organic" vegetables to
> people.  He makes his compost by mixing urea and sawdust together and
> leaving it for 3 weeks, then puts it on the plants.  He told me he
> doesn't use any pesticides or chemicals - "only a bit of roundup at
> the start, of course".

Hello Graeme
If this guy is only using a bit of roundup at the start
he's a mile in front of his commercial chemical counterparts, and if he
really manages to produce his vegetable crops without any in crop
pesticides, he is doing a lot of things right!
What does his stuff taste like?
And most importantly does he tell the truth when he sells his produce? If he
does then I'd suggest he's not much of a problem.
Organic certification tells the consumer that there is less toxic chemical
present in the food but it says nothing (or very little)about the
nutritional quality, and until consumers wake up and start to buy on taste
rather than appearance nothing much will change.

> His clients are just as poorly informed - either they don't know or
> simply don't ask about his practices.
> What do you do about such situations?  I don't know.
Certification cant fix this - only quality testing by the end consumer - if
your neighbor's produce looks good, tastes great, and is grown without
chemicals in crop he is most of the way home and his consumers will figure
it out, If it is rubbish and tastes like cardboard and he tells lies then
they will probably figure that out too.
Cheers
Lloyd Charles


___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow


Re: Rust

2003-06-25 Thread SBruno75

In a message dated 6/25/03 6:06:34 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

<< Can you give more details, Steve? -Allan >>

Add requisite 501 to stirring vessel, have some clay at hand, local is best 
as you stir the 501 crumble the clay into the water.  As you stir clockwise 
sing in ascending tones into the stirring pot and as you stir counter clock wise 
sing in descending tones.  Do not do this with garlic breath.  After an hour 
fill your sprayer and apply to foliage in a drenching manner so spray drips 
from foliage.  For best results do this before rust appears...sstorch
___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow


Re: BD in Hawai'i

2003-06-25 Thread Merla Barberie



Hi Tony,
I just sent some valerian flowers to Ellen Sugawara, HC 01, Box 900,
Kaurakakai, HI 95748.  She grows taro and ginger Bio-Dynamically. 
She's tried to get valerian flowers there, but the climate isn't right
for flowering, it seems.  She was outgoing and knowledgeable.
Best,
Merla
Rambler Flowers LTD wrote:

 Hi
folks  I have  had a group of 8 young people from the Wai'anae
Organic AG Centre visit  me as part of their 10 day visit to New Zealand
. They left with big smiles on there faces, a heap of information and a
promise from me to email them details about BDNOW and a list of some of
the interesting info that comes from this list. Which I have done so.Who
are the BD contacts in Hawaii's please.  These are keen young people
who want to repair the damage been done to their fragile environment. They
want to learn more about BD in  the tropics. Thanks
for any helpCheers Tony
RobinsonNewZealand

___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow




___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow


Re: BD in Hawai'i

2003-06-25 Thread SBruno75

Contact is Patrick Moser, you may get details through jpi or bda...sstorch
___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow


Rabbit Pepper

2003-06-25 Thread Allan Balliett
Anyone selling rabbit peppers here in the US? -Allan
___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow


Re: equisetum

2003-06-25 Thread Allan Balliett
Until I have more time to spare, I'll follow Courtney;s advice to 
leave the leaves on (I have never had too much activity from a 
batch.) and Kolisko's recommendation to go anaerobic.

What I'm trying to find out, I guess, is if it is possible for a 'sun 
tea' of equisetum (whatever the term: made as one would make stinging 
nettle tea) to be as effective as a boiled tea.

I finally have a good sprayer and I have A LOT of area that needs 
equisetum regularly.

-Allan

In a message dated 6/20/03 3:53:55 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

<< Also, has anyone on the list made an anaerobic tea from equisetum? I
think it w.b.nice to have 50gals of fermented equisetum sitting
around, but would this be of prep quality? >>
equisetum:  make the tea and remove the leaves, that helps depress the
intense anaerobic situation.  I drop an airstone in and bubble it up 
with a small
aquarium air pump.  sstorch
___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow
___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow


Re: Rust

2003-06-25 Thread Allan Balliett
try clay and 501 on the rust, I have had success with that...sstorch
Can you give more details, Steve? -Allan
___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow


Re: Thun on Herb Teas for the Garden

2003-06-25 Thread Allan Balliett
Do you have a wild patch of equisetum or did
you establish a bed for the purpose of harvesting?
A natural patch I recently discovered

As an aside, what is the benefit / effect of tansy tea?
I'd expect to use it as an insect repellent, but I do not know what 
the experience of others has been

The teas are not fully in the Thun book.

-Allan

___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow


Re: Dornachian reactions?

2003-06-25 Thread Resonant Info
Hi Glen,
I do agree with much that you say here, but you start with saying no 
one is criticising anyone except the organisations but this is not 
true.  People are singling out individuals (just re-read recent posts 
in this thread, including your own comments below).  It just makes 
the genuine points of criticism seem like sour grapes.

But the certification issue is a big one.  I have just been involved 
in 2 inspections for certification thru different certifiers here and 
so have some knowledge of the process.  It is tough; different 
certifiers may have different emphases, but in Australia they all 
must adhere to the National Organic Standards set by AQIS (Australian 
Quarantine Inspection Service).  Some of the regs are just dumb 
bureaucracy and I know people who have opted out of certification 
after many years.  However, in all cases I'd say their certification 
DID get them their regular clients and their good name and helped 
them get established.
There's a guy down the road from me who sells "organic" vegetables to 
people.  He makes his compost by mixing urea and sawdust together and 
leaving it for 3 weeks, then puts it on the plants.  He told me he 
doesn't use any pesticides or chemicals - "only a bit of roundup at 
the start, of course".
This guy isn't trying to deceive anyone - he *believes* he is growing 
organic food!  What distinguishes his practise from those that are 
certified is that a certified grower has to be aware of a lot of 
things and take appropriate action, while my neighbour is free to do 
whatever he does, in ignorance and without anyone pulling him up. 
His clients are just as poorly informed - either they don't know or 
simply don't ask about his practices.
What do you do about such situations?  I don't know.

regards,

Graeme
Upon reflection I do not hear people knocking the use of traditional preps.
They are knocking the organisations who seem to be isolating themselves from
their members and the wider BD community, yet maintain relevance because of
their trademark and its apparant value.
The fact is trademarks are near on irrelevant anyway. The real practise they
are supporting is garbage ( check out NZ BD apple production - 28 Lime
Sulphurs a season) and so its a matter of time till they are dead.
Discussion hear in NZ is post organic registration quality based trademarks.
The search is on for relevant quality parameters, regardless of the
production method. eg SFW tests for soil, brix and chromas etc
The present organisations are basically corrupt. Here in NZ, one or two old
council members protested a fellow members right to be elected onto council
because of 'conflict of interest', as he worked part time with me. Somehow
it seems I am working against the economic good of Biodynamics.?
In the US we have the 'biodynamic' ownership debacle. In Australia we have
Podolinsky setting up his kingdom, in Europe we have them suggesting illegal
actions
Who do these people think they are, and sadly they seem to believe they are
beyond reproach or criticism. While they controlled the BD media they were,
now they dont and so they are not. Seems the best they can do is stay away
from the forum and keep their heads in the sand. Their choice.
Good luck to them and good luck to the free thinkers who look at all the
options, apply them to their properties and prosper.
The reality is this list offers biodynamics without limitations. Pick up
what you want and go for it. Aquarian anarchy. Yahoo.
GA


BdMax distributors of ThermoMax -THE proven frost protection
www.bdmax.co.nz
- Original Message -
From: "Resonant Info" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Biodynamic Food and Farming Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 11:16 PM
Subject: Re: Dornachian reactions?

 If your interest is in biodynamics, you may be wondering if you are
 subscribed to the right group!
 Despite the numerous claims to the contrary that you may read on the
 > BDNow group, biodynamics is thriving, here in Australia at least.
 People are using the real preps, as described and recommended by
 Rudolf Steiner, as practised for decades all over the world.
 Although some think this is some kind of old  school, bogged down and
 in decay, it is still a living culture.
 If you are interested in agriculture, biodynamics, growing food for
 people to help in the recovery of the Earth, seek it out.  If you are
 interested in subtle energies, radionics, homoeopathic dilutions and
 such, there is a lot of very interesting information to be found on
 this list.
 It would be great if we could get above the contemptible slagging
 that goes on about "the other" and keep the focus on the many
 practical and helpful suggestions people have.
 regards all,
 Graeme Gerrard
 --
 ___
 BDNow mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
 http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow
___
BDN