Re: Check for neew with ajax
That's a really good idea, but I have never done this. Can you tell me
a bit more about the "{ move:[4, 1], to: [4, 3] } "? How do I use it?
On Jun 22, 3:58 am, "Dardo Sordi Bogado" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why don't you poll for coordinates in JSON and update the board with
> javascript?
>
> ie: advance the fifth pawn two positions:
>
> { move:[4, 1], to: [4, 3] }
>
> 0 1 2
> +---+-+
> 0 |___|___|___
> 1 | | |
> 2
>
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 9:09 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I made a chess game using Ajax. It updates the table every 5 seconds.
> > The problem is that the HTML code for the table is huge and causes a
> > lot of bandwidth. Now I am thinking of a new method: polling server
> > for new moves in the game and update only if a move was done. But I
> > can't imagine any easy way for doing this.
> > What I want to do is: poll the server every 5 seconds and update
> > contents of a div tag only if any move has been done. Any help will be
> > appreciated.
> > Thanks in advance!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Check for neew with ajax
Why don't you poll for coordinates in JSON and update the board with javascript?
ie: advance the fifth pawn two positions:
{ move:[4, 1], to: [4, 3] }
0 1 2
+---+-+
0 |___|___|___
1 | | |
2
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 9:09 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I made a chess game using Ajax. It updates the table every 5 seconds.
> The problem is that the HTML code for the table is huge and causes a
> lot of bandwidth. Now I am thinking of a new method: polling server
> for new moves in the game and update only if a move was done. But I
> can't imagine any easy way for doing this.
> What I want to do is: poll the server every 5 seconds and update
> contents of a div tag only if any move has been done. Any help will be
> appreciated.
> Thanks in advance!
> >
>
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Check for neew with ajax
I made a chess game using Ajax. It updates the table every 5 seconds. The problem is that the HTML code for the table is huge and causes a lot of bandwidth. Now I am thinking of a new method: polling server for new moves in the game and update only if a move was done. But I can't imagine any easy way for doing this. What I want to do is: poll the server every 5 seconds and update contents of a div tag only if any move has been done. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks in advance! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: content-based ACL
I was not talking about you, I was talking about the first response you got, from leo, that is a common response in this topic. Cheers, mbavio On Jun 21, 3:50 pm, gripen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Latelly, I dont understand many users that complain about "ACL > > Component is too hard, so I wont use it". The funny part is that they > > end writing some system that is harder to get than Cake ACL > > Componente, and absolutely cero re-usable. Come on, guys, it´s not > > that hard, I dont consider myself a clever cake coder (actually, I > > think I´m one of the dumbest :)) and I get it! It´s just a matter of > > keep reading, and trying, and making mistakes, and it can be hard, but > > the reward is not worrying about this topic anymore, because Cake > > already solve for you! > > > Cheers, > > mbavio > > Thanks for the idea. I was thinking about something similar.Actually I > WANT to use ACL, that's the reason why I ask this question. I just > wanted to know if someone else had the same problem and how he solved > it. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: have any project source code using CakePHP
Theres tons of resources online and cakeforge is one of them, Is there any specific solutions you are looking for? On Jun 21, 9:31 am, "Marcin Domanski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here is a great place to find them :http://tinyurl.com/1c2 > You've got a page here (google groups) with apps built in cake and you > have cakeforge.org - do some research/search before asking questions. > > On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 8:11 AM, sumon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I m a beginner of cakephp. Now i need a prject which has completed > > using CakePHP. Specially I m working on e-mail and chat management web > > application. So if there have any source code (using CakePHP) plz send > > me the link to download. > > > Cheers > > -- > Marcin Domanskihttp://kabturek.info --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
how to do custom exception handling
hi can any one tell me abt the built in mechanism of exception handling in cake php thanks. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
cake connect problem
so i am trying to use the bakery in terminal. i have os x 10.5.2 and i run MAMP (www.mamp.info) for my development environment. i had the bakery working before and was able to bake one model fine, and then when i tried to bake another model it couldnt find a table or something and gave me all kinds of errors. i decided to start a new project folder and just restart to see what would happen. i created a project in the bakery in '/dev/iny' (cake console is in '/dev/cake/ cake/console'). got the thing working when i browse to http://localhost i get that cake is able to connect the the database, but when i go back to the bakery and execute 'cake bake model' while in '/dev/iny' i get an error that it 'Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket'. then it gives me a couple more warnings, claims 'Error: Your database doesn't have any tables.' and it stops the script. this is going on 2 days i hasnt worked and has been driving me crazy. thanks in advance --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: inserting more layers into cake php
Nate wrote: > On Jun 20, 10:24 am, Ian Zepp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Unlike Zend (with uses an Action suffix to designate controller >> actions), Cake doesn't have any such thing and instead uses a blacklist >> of 'private' controller actions (defined in the dispatcher). > > Here at the Cake project, we tend to prefer "simple and intuitive" > over "ugly method names" and "extra pain in the ass that I shouldn't > have to put up with". > Wow, and I thought I was grumpy in the morning. >> As such, be aware that new methods defined in the controller could >> 'potentially' be called as an action, even if that is not the expected >> behavior. > > Yup, if they're public methods, they should be callable. If they're > private or protected methods, they should be prefixed with _. Isn't > it awesome that you don't have to be a rocket surgeon to use Cake? > As mentioned in my other post, the prefix syntax makes sense, as long as you use it consistently. As an aside and off the top of my head, the session component is an area that doesn't use it consistently: Called from line 493 @ session.php, and defined in numerous places, are __gc, __open, __close, __read, __write, and __destroy. These are all private members, and prefixed as such, but called from a public static scope. >> My firm actually uses a full-blown domain model / pattern, and uses Cake >> only for the active record layer, while the Business Logic is largely >> held in a separate layout above Cake's data access. > > Nope. See here: http://c7y.phparch.com/c/entry/1/art,mvc_and_cake While an interesting read, I don't see how that applies to my statement. The page is about combining different named actions into a single 'magic' action that auto-detects the content type and find parameters based on the request file extension. It doesn't seem to deal at all with my comment about the separation between the data access layer (where the rows are received and mapped to active record objects), the Domain Object layer (where objects are not associated to table rows), and the Mapping Gateway between them. For example, a Model is both an interface to a table, via the find methods, and a single row. I should not be able to call find on a row object. Or am I completely misunderstanding the current Cake framework? Please correct me if I am. > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: content-based ACL
> Latelly, I dont understand many users that complain about "ACL > Component is too hard, so I wont use it". The funny part is that they > end writing some system that is harder to get than Cake ACL > Componente, and absolutely cero re-usable. Come on, guys, it´s not > that hard, I dont consider myself a clever cake coder (actually, I > think I´m one of the dumbest :)) and I get it! It´s just a matter of > keep reading, and trying, and making mistakes, and it can be hard, but > the reward is not worrying about this topic anymore, because Cake > already solve for you! > > Cheers, > mbavio Thanks for the idea. I was thinking about something similar.Actually I WANT to use ACL, that's the reason why I ask this question. I just wanted to know if someone else had the same problem and how he solved it. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: inserting more layers into cake php
Nate wrote: > On Jun 21, 9:54 am, Ian Zepp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I do agree, on principle, that non-actions should be written as >> protected or private methods. I'm was just pointing out the convention >> differences (from Zend) and potential pitfalls of the cake dispatcher model. >> > > Uh, no? Wrong? > > You must be on a "special" PHP distro, because every version in the > 5.x series that I've ever used throws a fatal error if you try to call > a private method from outside the class it's declared in. > > The only pitfalls in Cake's dispatcher are not paying attention, but > that's gonna be a pitfall in pretty much any area of life. Yes, I realized that after I hit send. I was thinking of non-static being called statically (not non-public being called publically). > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: content-based ACL
On Jun 20, 11:32 am, gripen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I've spent a lot of time studying the ACL+auth, but I don't know how > to implement a such thing: There will be several posts in section and > I want to restrict access to those posts only for few chosen users. > How sholud I set up ACL/auth to work this way? You can set your own custom autentification method using ACL and Auth in "controller" mode... What I am thinking, set a tree of ACOs with Section as Father of Posts, and then allow some Users to that Section... And use the function isAuthorized to achieve the "is allowed?". Latelly, I dont understand many users that complain about "ACL Component is too hard, so I wont use it". The funny part is that they end writing some system that is harder to get than Cake ACL Componente, and absolutely cero re-usable. Come on, guys, it´s not that hard, I dont consider myself a clever cake coder (actually, I think I´m one of the dumbest :)) and I get it! It´s just a matter of keep reading, and trying, and making mistakes, and it can be hard, but the reward is not worrying about this topic anymore, because Cake already solve for you! Cheers, mbavio --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: partial recursion?
ok, sounds good to me! Thanx
Jonah
On Jun 21, 6:40 am, Ian Zepp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As a general rule, cake needs to know the DB table layouts in order to
> perform queries. As you've seen, unbinding the model associations
> prevents Cake from joining the tables at query time.
>
> RE the describe, however, I wouldn't worry about it for two reasons:
>
> (a) DESCRIBE is essentially a no-cost operation to the DB server. The
> table schema is already stored in memory, so it is returning results
> instantly with o overhead.
> (b) DESCRIBE is cached in a production environment. Only in a dev
> environment are the results not cached, and hence re-fetched each time,
> so that if you make changes to the table schema they are immediately used.
>
> Turnquist, Jonah wrote:
> > Should not have posted so fast. I seem to have found a solution:
>
> > $this->Script->unbindModel(
> > array('belongsTo' => array('Category'))
> > );
>
> > That temporally removes the relationship. Works perfectally to remove
> > the extra join. But it still performs quarry #2, "DESCRIBE
> > `categories`". humph. Why does it do that?
>
> > Thanks,
> > Jonah
>
> > On Jun 20, 9:54 pm, "Turnquist, Jonah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> BTW i am using CakePHP 1.2
>
> >> On Jun 20, 9:33 pm, "Turnquist, Jonah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>> Ok, so I have a Scripts table, holding php script entries (tutorials),
> >>> a Categories table, and a Users table. Each script has a category and
> >>> a user. I have all the hasMany belongsTo etc set up properly.
> >>> On my /scripts page, under the index action it lists all of the
> >>> scripts, displaying the script title, and it's user that created it,
> >>> but not it's category. So it should not even fetch category data. So
> >>> this is what it needs to fetch:
> >>> [0] => Array
> >>> (
> >>> [Script] => Array
> >>> (
> >>> [id] => 1
> >>> [title] => DB connect
> >>> [created] => 2001-06-18 16:05:40
> >>> [description] => This class that will connect to the
> >>> database test
> >>> )
> >>> [User] => Array
> >>> (
> >>> [name] => man
> >>> [id] => 1
> >>> )
> >>> )
> >>> The find() code that is working and doing the above:
> >>> $this->set('scripts', $this->Script->find('all', array(
> >>> //'recursive' => -1, //this is commented out
> >>> 'fields' => array('Script.id', 'Script.title', 'Script.created',
> >>> 'Script.description', 'User.name', 'User.id'),
> >>> )
> >>> ));
> >>> Setting the 'fields' option kept it from returning any categories
> >>> data.
> >>> This successfully returns the correct data. BUT, when I looked at the
> >>> quarries, I saw a problem:
> >>> 1) DESCRIBE `scripts`
> >>> 2) DESCRIBE `categories` //not needed!
> >>> 3) DESCRIBE `users`
> >>> 4) SELECT `Script`.`id`, `Script`.`title`, `Script`.`created`,
> >>> `Script`.`description`, `User`.`name`, `User`.`id` FROM `scripts` AS
> >>> `Script` LEFT JOIN `categories` AS `Category` ON
> >>> (`Script`.`category_id` = `Category`.`id`) LEFT JOIN `users` AS `User`
> >>> ON (`Script`.`user_id` = `User`.`id`) WHERE 1 = 1 //excessive!
> >>> You see, it is doing a left join on categories in quarry #4, and
> >>> quarry #2 is not even needed. I understand joins can be slow. Thus I
> >>> am asking how can I get rid of it
> >>> I tried setting the option 'recursive' => -1 (you can see it commented
> >>> out), but that obviously stops it from collecting the user data too.
> >>> So I guess what I need is a partial recursion? So it performs
> >>> recursion to the Users table but not the Categories table? How can
> >>> this be done? any ideas?
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Jonah (is very new to cake BTW, try not to use big words lol
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Routes issue.
Thanks for the response, it helps a lot .
I will rethink the routes issue
Great input!
On Jun 21, 9:35 am, Ian Zepp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What you want is a route that defines a single-part URL as defaulting to
> the users controller:
>
> Router::connect('/:action', array( 'controller' => 'users' ));
>
> And it needs to be at the top of the routes file, because the Router
> scans from the top down.
>
> HOWEVER, you can't do this:
>
> Router::connect('/:action/*', array( 'controller' => 'users' ));
>
> Because then the router doesn't know the difference between these two
> routes:
>
> (1) /someAction/someId
> (2) /otherController/someAction
>
> In case (1), the router defaults to the users controller, but case (2)
> actually defines the controller to use. In this scenario, whichever
> route is matched first in the routes.php file will be the one that
> sticks. So don't ever get the order screwed up, or your routing will break.
>
> I don't personally suggest doing it the way you are trying. Define a URL
> standard that is appropriate for your site and stick with it, but it
> should be flexible enough to allow future growth without having to
> constantly redefine routes.
>
> As you say, you don't want to define routes for every action.
>
> Manu0310 wrote:
> > Hey I tried it and it works, thanks a lot.
>
> > The only small thing is that for every action I define in the users
> > controller I need to add to the routes.
>
> > Router::connect('/login', array('controller' => 'users', 'action' =>
> > 'login'));
>
> > Router::connect('/home', array('controller' => 'users', 'action' =>
> > 'home'));
>
> > etc ...
>
> > Is there any way to say any actions coming from the controller will
> > always have the above behavior, so that I can avoid having to add to
> > the routes for every action ?
>
> > Thanks a lot!
>
> > On Jun 21, 12:42 am, "Dr. Tarique Sani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Manu0310 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>> Router::connect('/users/:action/*', array('controller' => 'users'));
> >>> Router::connect('/*', array('controller' => 'users', 'action' =>
> >>> 'login'));
> >> Router::connect('/login', array('controller' => 'users', 'action' =>
> >> 'login'));
>
> >> T
>
> >> --
> >> =
> >> Cheesecake-Photoblog:http://cheesecake-photoblog.org
> >> PHP for E-Biz:http://sanisoft.com
> >> =
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Missing database table
@Joel
I'd never fully read the API documentation on Model::find and Model::findAll
before, thanks for the advice, find('all') works a lot better for what I
needed done!
In the name of Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of my sanity.
Siebren Bakker(Aevum Decessus)
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 12:58, Joel Perras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jun 20, 11:52 am, "Siebren Bakker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm not selecting more information than I need. findAll > find in most
> > situations, especially because of the recursive option.
>
> Really? That's odd, because findAll() is nothing more than a
> (deprecated) wrapper for find('all'). Actually, there are things that
> you can do with Model::find('all', ..) that are impossible with
> Model::findAll(), such as providing options to the new Containable
> behavior.
>
> Read the API if you have some free time. It's often quite
> enlightening.
>
> -Joel.
> >
>
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: inserting more layers into cake php
On Jun 21, 9:54 am, Ian Zepp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I do agree, on principle, that non-actions should be written as > protected or private methods. I'm was just pointing out the convention > differences (from Zend) and potential pitfalls of the cake dispatcher model. > Uh, no? Wrong? You must be on a "special" PHP distro, because every version in the 5.x series that I've ever used throws a fatal error if you try to call a private method from outside the class it's declared in. The only pitfalls in Cake's dispatcher are not paying attention, but that's gonna be a pitfall in pretty much any area of life. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: inserting more layers into cake php
On Jun 20, 10:24 am, Ian Zepp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unlike Zend (with uses an Action suffix to designate controller > actions), Cake doesn't have any such thing and instead uses a blacklist > of 'private' controller actions (defined in the dispatcher). Here at the Cake project, we tend to prefer "simple and intuitive" over "ugly method names" and "extra pain in the ass that I shouldn't have to put up with". > As such, be aware that new methods defined in the controller could > 'potentially' be called as an action, even if that is not the expected > behavior. Yup, if they're public methods, they should be callable. If they're private or protected methods, they should be prefixed with _. Isn't it awesome that you don't have to be a rocket surgeon to use Cake? > My firm actually uses a full-blown domain model / pattern, and uses Cake > only for the active record layer, while the Business Logic is largely > held in a separate layout above Cake's data access. Nope. See here: http://c7y.phparch.com/c/entry/1/art,mvc_and_cake --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Url problem
Whatever it is will most likely involve routes. You can do almost any form of redirect with that. Like Ian says, a little bit more information would help. On Jun 21, 2:41 pm, Ian Zepp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You are going to have to provide more context than that, sorry. > > AbhinavZone wrote: > > hi. > > > I am working on website in cakephp. everything is going fine. > > but I got stuck with an issue. > > > 1. Client requirement is to rewrite all pages as > >http://websitename.com/xx/yy.html > > > 2. Add back link to website such as > >http://websitename.com/username > > > please help me out . --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: inserting more layers into cake php
Marcin Domanski aka kabturek wrote: > hey > > On Jun 20, 4:24 pm, Ian Zepp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Unlike Zend (with uses an Action suffix to designate controller >> actions), Cake doesn't have any such thing and instead uses a blacklist >> of 'private' controller actions (defined in the dispatcher). > We don't ? We've got something that is called convention here ;) > try calling a "__myAction" from the url. > Perhaps I could have written more clearly. In the Dispatcher the test is called a $privateAction, and is checked on the presence of a '_' in the action. See line 169 in libs/dispatcher.php (cake v1.2) My blacklist comment comes from an older version of Cake, apparently. That particular portion is in 1.1 but doesn't seem to be in 1.2: See line 171 in libs/dispatcher.php (cake v1.1) >> As such, be aware that new methods defined in the controller could >> 'potentially' be called as an action, even if that is not the expected >> behavior. > as long as you _don't_ follow the rules ;) True, but that still doesn't change my statement. Only methods prefixed with a '_' are denied access. A function without a '_' is still a valid action to be called, even if it is not intended to be an action, and EVEN if it scoped as a protected or private member, since PHP5 still doesn't prevent you from calling private methods as public. It just warns you if E_STRICT is on. I do agree, on principle, that non-actions should be written as protected or private methods. I'm was just pointing out the convention differences (from Zend) and potential pitfalls of the cake dispatcher model. > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: partial recursion?
As a general rule, cake needs to know the DB table layouts in order to
perform queries. As you've seen, unbinding the model associations
prevents Cake from joining the tables at query time.
RE the describe, however, I wouldn't worry about it for two reasons:
(a) DESCRIBE is essentially a no-cost operation to the DB server. The
table schema is already stored in memory, so it is returning results
instantly with o overhead.
(b) DESCRIBE is cached in a production environment. Only in a dev
environment are the results not cached, and hence re-fetched each time,
so that if you make changes to the table schema they are immediately used.
Turnquist, Jonah wrote:
> Should not have posted so fast. I seem to have found a solution:
>
> $this->Script->unbindModel(
> array('belongsTo' => array('Category'))
> );
>
> That temporally removes the relationship. Works perfectally to remove
> the extra join. But it still performs quarry #2, "DESCRIBE
> `categories`". humph. Why does it do that?
>
> Thanks,
> Jonah
>
> On Jun 20, 9:54 pm, "Turnquist, Jonah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> BTW i am using CakePHP 1.2
>>
>> On Jun 20, 9:33 pm, "Turnquist, Jonah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, so I have a Scripts table, holding php script entries (tutorials),
>>> a Categories table, and a Users table. Each script has a category and
>>> a user. I have all the hasMany belongsTo etc set up properly.
>>> On my /scripts page, under the index action it lists all of the
>>> scripts, displaying the script title, and it's user that created it,
>>> but not it's category. So it should not even fetch category data. So
>>> this is what it needs to fetch:
>>> [0] => Array
>>> (
>>> [Script] => Array
>>> (
>>> [id] => 1
>>> [title] => DB connect
>>> [created] => 2001-06-18 16:05:40
>>> [description] => This class that will connect to the
>>> database test
>>> )
>>> [User] => Array
>>> (
>>> [name] => man
>>> [id] => 1
>>> )
>>> )
>>> The find() code that is working and doing the above:
>>> $this->set('scripts', $this->Script->find('all', array(
>>> //'recursive' => -1, //this is commented out
>>> 'fields' => array('Script.id', 'Script.title', 'Script.created',
>>> 'Script.description', 'User.name', 'User.id'),
>>> )
>>> ));
>>> Setting the 'fields' option kept it from returning any categories
>>> data.
>>> This successfully returns the correct data. BUT, when I looked at the
>>> quarries, I saw a problem:
>>> 1) DESCRIBE `scripts`
>>> 2) DESCRIBE `categories` //not needed!
>>> 3) DESCRIBE `users`
>>> 4) SELECT `Script`.`id`, `Script`.`title`, `Script`.`created`,
>>> `Script`.`description`, `User`.`name`, `User`.`id` FROM `scripts` AS
>>> `Script` LEFT JOIN `categories` AS `Category` ON
>>> (`Script`.`category_id` = `Category`.`id`) LEFT JOIN `users` AS `User`
>>> ON (`Script`.`user_id` = `User`.`id`) WHERE 1 = 1 //excessive!
>>> You see, it is doing a left join on categories in quarry #4, and
>>> quarry #2 is not even needed. I understand joins can be slow. Thus I
>>> am asking how can I get rid of it
>>> I tried setting the option 'recursive' => -1 (you can see it commented
>>> out), but that obviously stops it from collecting the user data too.
>>> So I guess what I need is a partial recursion? So it performs
>>> recursion to the Users table but not the Categories table? How can
>>> this be done? any ideas?
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jonah (is very new to cake BTW, try not to use big words lol
> >
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Url problem
You are going to have to provide more context than that, sorry. AbhinavZone wrote: > hi. > > I am working on website in cakephp. everything is going fine. > but I got stuck with an issue. > > > 1. Client requirement is to rewrite all pages as > http://websitename.com/xx/yy.html > > 2. Add back link to website such as > http://websitename.com/username > > > please help me out . > > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Routes issue.
What you want is a route that defines a single-part URL as defaulting to
the users controller:
Router::connect('/:action', array( 'controller' => 'users' ));
And it needs to be at the top of the routes file, because the Router
scans from the top down.
HOWEVER, you can't do this:
Router::connect('/:action/*', array( 'controller' => 'users' ));
Because then the router doesn't know the difference between these two
routes:
(1) /someAction/someId
(2) /otherController/someAction
In case (1), the router defaults to the users controller, but case (2)
actually defines the controller to use. In this scenario, whichever
route is matched first in the routes.php file will be the one that
sticks. So don't ever get the order screwed up, or your routing will break.
I don't personally suggest doing it the way you are trying. Define a URL
standard that is appropriate for your site and stick with it, but it
should be flexible enough to allow future growth without having to
constantly redefine routes.
As you say, you don't want to define routes for every action.
Manu0310 wrote:
> Hey I tried it and it works, thanks a lot.
>
> The only small thing is that for every action I define in the users
> controller I need to add to the routes.
>
> Router::connect('/login', array('controller' => 'users', 'action' =>
> 'login'));
>
> Router::connect('/home', array('controller' => 'users', 'action' =>
> 'home'));
>
> etc ...
>
> Is there any way to say any actions coming from the controller will
> always have the above behavior, so that I can avoid having to add to
> the routes for every action ?
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
> On Jun 21, 12:42 am, "Dr. Tarique Sani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Manu0310 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Router::connect('/users/:action/*', array('controller' => 'users'));
>>> Router::connect('/*', array('controller' => 'users', 'action' =>
>>> 'login'));
>> Router::connect('/login', array('controller' => 'users', 'action' =>
>> 'login'));
>>
>> T
>>
>> --
>> =
>> Cheesecake-Photoblog:http://cheesecake-photoblog.org
>> PHP for E-Biz:http://sanisoft.com
>> =
> >
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: inserting more layers into cake php
hey On Jun 20, 4:24 pm, Ian Zepp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unlike Zend (with uses an Action suffix to designate controller > actions), Cake doesn't have any such thing and instead uses a blacklist > of 'private' controller actions (defined in the dispatcher). We don't ? We've got something that is called convention here ;) try calling a "__myAction" from the url. > As such, be aware that new methods defined in the controller could > 'potentially' be called as an action, even if that is not the expected > behavior. as long as you _don't_ follow the rules ;) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: have any project source code using CakePHP
Here is a great place to find them : http://tinyurl.com/1c2 You've got a page here (google groups) with apps built in cake and you have cakeforge.org - do some research/search before asking questions. On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 8:11 AM, sumon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I m a beginner of cakephp. Now i need a prject which has completed > using CakePHP. Specially I m working on e-mail and chat management web > application. So if there have any source code (using CakePHP) plz send > me the link to download. > > Cheers > > > > -- Marcin Domanski http://kabturek.info --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: No model use in components?
Hey, Component is the C (not exactly but its an extension to the C layer;) in MVC and you should avoid mixing the 3 layers. in some _very_ rare cases it's allowed (that's why the possiblity exists) Maybe you want to use behaviors ? Apart from that this topic was brought up many times. HTH, On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 2:45 PM, dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > according to the manual, it is generally not recommended to access > models from components: > > "To access/use a model in a component is not generally recommended;" > > Why is that? > > I am looking for a way to cleanly create a framework for my new apps. > That framework should contain functions e.g. for billing and > accounting. > > So, is it a smart way to capsule these functions into Cake > components? > > I dont want to run in a trap as future versions of cake may lose model > access for design reasons. > > Thank you! > > > > -- Marcin Domanski http://kabturek.info --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
problem while baking the views
slaams first tell me that whether i can use the under scores in the name of the tables in databse while using the cake line_items when ever i use this name convention i face the following warning issues in the baking the views Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in D:\wamp\www\line \cake\libs\c ontroller\controller.php on line 666 Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in D:\wamp\www\line \cake\libs\c ontroller\controller.php on line 801 Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in D:\wamp\www\line \cake\script s\bake.php on line 1001 Warning: array_merge(): Argument #1 is not an array in D:\wamp\www\line \cake\scr ipts\bake.php on line 1027 Warning: array_merge(): Argument #2 is not an array in D:\wamp\www\line \cake\scr ipts\bake.php on line 1027 Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in D:\wamp\www\line \cake\script s\bake.php on line 1029 Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in D:\wamp\www\line \cake\libs\c ontroller\controller.php on line 666 Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in D:\wamp\www\line \cake\libs\c ontroller\controller.php on line 801 Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in D:\wamp\www\line \cake\script s\bake.php on line 1077 Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in D:\wamp\www\line \cake\libs\c ontroller\controller.php on line 666 Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in D:\wamp\www\line \cake\libs\c ontroller\controller.php on line 801 Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in D:\wamp\www\line \cake\script s\bake.php on line 1099 please help me in this regrds thanks --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
problem while baking the views
hi whenever i try to bake the views of a datatable name with underscore line_items i am recieving the following errors while baking the views Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in D:\wamp\www\line \cake\libs\c ontroller\controller.php on line 666 Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in D:\wamp\www\line \cake\libs\c ontroller\controller.php on line 801 Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in D:\wamp\www\line \cake\script s\bake.php on line 1001 Warning: array_merge(): Argument #1 is not an array in D:\wamp\www\line \cake\scr ipts\bake.php on line 1027 Warning: array_merge(): Argument #2 is not an array in D:\wamp\www\line \cake\scr ipts\bake.php on line 1027 Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in D:\wamp\www\line \cake\script s\bake.php on line 1029 Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in D:\wamp\www\line \cake\libs\c ontroller\controller.php on line 666 Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in D:\wamp\www\line \cake\libs\c ontroller\controller.php on line 801 Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in D:\wamp\www\line \cake\script s\bake.php on line 1077 Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in D:\wamp\www\line \cake\libs\c ontroller\controller.php on line 666 Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in D:\wamp\www\line \cake\libs\c ontroller\controller.php on line 801 Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in D:\wamp\www\line \cake\script s\bake.php on line 1099 thanks --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
problems while baking the cake
hi my first question is that whather i can keep the name of table with uderscore eg line_items while working with cake when ever i do this i receive following error while baking the view Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in D:\wamp\www\line \cake\libs\c ontroller\controller.php on line 666 Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in D:\wamp\www\line \cake\libs\c ontroller\controller.php on line 801 Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in D:\wamp\www\line \cake\script s\bake.php on line 1001 Warning: array_merge(): Argument #1 is not an array in D:\wamp\www\line \cake\scr ipts\bake.php on line 1027 Warning: array_merge(): Argument #2 is not an array in D:\wamp\www\line \cake\scr ipts\bake.php on line 1027 Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in D:\wamp\www\line \cake\script s\bake.php on line 1029 Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in D:\wamp\www\line \cake\libs\c ontroller\controller.php on line 666 Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in D:\wamp\www\line \cake\libs\c ontroller\controller.php on line 801 Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in D:\wamp\www\line \cake\script s\bake.php on line 1077 Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in D:\wamp\www\line \cake\libs\c ontroller\controller.php on line 666 Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in D:\wamp\www\line \cake\libs\c ontroller\controller.php on line 801 Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in D:\wamp\www\line \cake\script s\bake.php on line 1099 thanks --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
No model use in components?
Hello, according to the manual, it is generally not recommended to access models from components: "To access/use a model in a component is not generally recommended;" Why is that? I am looking for a way to cleanly create a framework for my new apps. That framework should contain functions e.g. for billing and accounting. So, is it a smart way to capsule these functions into Cake components? I dont want to run in a trap as future versions of cake may lose model access for design reasons. Thank you! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
have any project source code using CakePHP
I m a beginner of cakephp. Now i need a prject which has completed using CakePHP. Specially I m working on e-mail and chat management web application. So if there have any source code (using CakePHP) plz send me the link to download. Cheers --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Caching, the proper way to do it
Hi,
Now that I've finished my site in php, I'd like to take a closer look
at caching.
I've installed APC, and this seems to work, but am I doing this the
right way?
Links to articles etc would help greatly, the chapter of caching
hasn't been written in the documentation and can't seem to find
anything usefull using google.
In the config file I have uncommented this:
Cache::config('default', array(
'engine' => 'Apc', //[required]
'duration'=> 3600, //[optional]
'probability'=> 100, //[optional]
'prefix' => Inflector::slug(APP_DIR) . '_', //
[optional] prefix every cache file with this string
));
I also see stuff in the config like "Memcache" and Cake Model/File
caching, is there any benefit in enabling more then 1?(haven't tried),
or is this not possible and everything is already cached by APC?
I've also run into the problem of running multiple app's with APC
caching enabled, I'm getting(in error_log):
[apc-error] Cannot redeclare class cakesession
They do use the same database and tables, but otherwise are completely
seperate.
Any suggestions on improving it are welcome, this is the first time
I'm using caching(only had shared hosting before:p)
Crazy
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Containable Behaviour
Hi Is it possible in the containable behaviour extract only the number of the records of the association models that match the conditions instead all the records? Thanks --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Url problem
hi. I am working on website in cakephp. everything is going fine. but I got stuck with an issue. 1. Client requirement is to rewrite all pages as http://websitename.com/xx/yy.html 2. Add back link to website such as http://websitename.com/username please help me out . --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
