[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice Written Exam

[Shai Loufton]

Hello All

 

I was unsure if I could ask this - so if anyone can help please reply

 

I am looking for an organized book list to study and ready myself for the
CCIE Voice Written (not a Question and Answer engine) - so I could buy the
books and study them and once I know all that material I could start
learning for the IPERXPERT workbooks and CoD  (VoD) with the required
knowledge to pass eventually the Lab Exam

 

 

To make this short if anyone here who passed the written exam lately
(without cheating and learning the answers) can share which books they used
to pass I would be most grateful

 

P.S.

If anyone here is from Israel who has the books and finished with them I
would also be happy to buy them from him

 

Thanks All

 

Shai L (Israel.)

 

J

 

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCME - Web user subset admin

[Sergio Polizer]

Hi all,
 
Supose that we have to create a web custom administrator for CCME that has a 
subset of the system admin.
 
How could we get the xml.template from the CCME flash to edit it?
 
I've tried with copy flash: tftp: to CCM server to edit there, but w/ no 
success.
 
Regards, Sergio.
_
Receba GRÁTIS as mensagens do Messenger no seu celular quando você estiver 
offline. Conheça  o MSN Mobile!
http://mobile.live.com/signup/signup2.aspx?lc=pt-br

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Callmanager to unity integration problem

[jeremy co]

HI Mike,

I got what u said, I can see 8 ports that I defined in voice port section
when I click Find.

But still have problem, it's wired ,I can ping from both side but
integration did not work ,I used default names on both sides.

Every thing is clear and simple but still it doesn't work!

Jeremy


On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 1:18 AM, Michael Shavrov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

>  Jeremy,
>
> If you ran Voice Mail Port Wizard, but ports did not show up in the "Voice
> Mail Port" mnu, your integration will never work. Run the wizard again, and
> do all steps.
>
> Good luck,
>
> Mike
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* jeremy co <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> *To:* Michael Shavrov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 24, 2008 10:01 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Callmanager to unity integration problem
>
> Hi,
>
> what u mean by vm port wizard? if u mean ccm voice port wizard, yeah I ran
> it and I didn'tsee any part that search for ports in CCM voice port wizard.
>
> I don't get what u mean?
>
> Jeremy
>
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 8:41 PM, Michael Shavrov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>>  Did you run the VM Ports Wizard? If you don't see ports in the search,
>> then you either have a problem with database synchronization, or your wizard
>> didn't finish.
>>
>>  - Original Message -
>> *From:* jeremy co <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>   *To:* Michael Shavrov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 24, 2008 12:16 AM
>> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Callmanager to unity integration
>> problem
>>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> By the way, I can see status of "Not Found" in ccm voice port page.
>>
>>
>> Jeremy.
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 4:08 AM, Michael Shavrov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>>
>>>  Hi Jeremy,
>>>
>>> 1. Can you ping one server from another?
>>> 2. Did you use "default settings" or you modified names? (by default the
>>> name is "CiscoUM1-VI", not "CiscoUM1".
>>> 3. Do you have CallManager service running?
>>> 4. Try to remove integration on the Unity and redo it again.
>>>
>>> Good luck,
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>> *From:* jeremy co <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 23, 2008 1:27 PM
>>> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Callmanager to unity integration problem
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I followed regular procedure of configuring ccm (voice port wizard ,used
>>> name of CiscoUM1 ,4 ports MWI 1998,1999,pilot of 1600).
>>>
>>> both of CCM and unity are running on vmware on different laptops that
>>> connected to the same vlan on a switch.
>>>
>>> I configured unity with ip add of CCM ,MWI of 1998,1999.
>>>
>>> But when i want to verify connection it says "could not connect to the
>>> callmanager ,verify that the correct ip port is selected and all call
>>> services are started on the  callmanager server"
>>>
>>> all serviced is verified and all of them already started.
>>>
>>> Any idea?
>>>
>>>
>>> jeremy
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Antw: Re: IPPA URL

[Mohsen Lotfi]

>From CCIE News and Announcement:

22 August 2008
 CCIE labs changing from UniversCD to Cisco Documentation

On Sept 24 2008 CCIE labs will no longer support using the UniversCD
documentation for the lab exam.

All labs are migrating to Cisco Documentation only. For those scheduled to
take the CCIE lab prior to Sept 24 access will still be available for
UniversCD.

The Cisco Documentation pages have the same information that currently
resides on UniversCD, please refer to the links on the CCIE web pages to
view these pages and become familiar with the new format.

Cisco Documentation: http://www.cisco.com/web/psa/products/index.html

After Sept 24 2008 only the Cisco Documentation web pages will be available
for CCIE labs.

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 10:51 AM, kapil atrish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> This link doesn't even give access to SRND. Not sure, let's wait for
> someone who attends the lab to confirm.
>
> I got that URL info from cisco.com/go/certsupport. I raised a case
> specifially to know the new URL and they gave me this one.
>
> Thanks,
> Kapil Atrish
>
> *Robert Schuknecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>* wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> i thought the new Link, for documentation, is more restrictive and it lets
> you only go to:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/web/psa/products/tsd_products_support_configure.html
>
> And today (24th September) should be the first day to use the new
> documentation, in the LAB.
>
> Does anyone knows which link is the right one?
>
> /Robert
> >>> kapil atrish schrieb am Mittwoch, 24. September 2008 um
> 18:49 in Nachricht 94b3025f7ed9ac364355a477ec047e47:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Following is the URL available in Lab exam now:
> >
> > http://www.cisco.com/web/psa/products/index.html
> >
> > Go to Voice & Unified communications >> Cisco Unified CCM >> Maintain and
>
> > Operate Guides >> there you'll find features and services guide...
> >
> >
> >
> > Jacob Owen wrote:
> > It's been awhile since i sat for the lab and I can't remember if they
> > had removed the ability to use the UniverCD so I was wondering, if you
> can't
> > use it now where do find the URL's for the various IPT services like
> IPPA,
> > Extension Mobility, Fast Dials, and Personal Directory. If I am mistaken
> > that we can't use the UniverCD please let me know.
>
>
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPPA URL

[James Key]

Someone shared this technique for finding service URLs a little while
back.  Works well.

 

1. In Callmanager web page, open the "Help" (Help > Contents and Index)

2. Switch to "Search" tab

3. Search for the work "devicename"

 

You will get 5 links to documents.

 

* Second link has URL for EM

* Fourth link has URL for IPMA

 

 

James

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jacob Owen
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 11:20 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPPA URL

 

It's been awhile since i sat for the lab and I can't remember if they
had removed the ability to use the UniverCD so I was wondering, if you
can't use it now where do find the URL's for the various IPT services
like IPPA, Extension Mobility, Fast Dials, and Personal Directory.  If I
am mistaken that we can't use the UniverCD please let me know. 

-- 
Jacob Owen
CCIE #14063 (R&S, Service Provider), CCDP, CCVP

NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are 
intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The message, 
together with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information.
Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, disclosure or 
distribution 
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please 
immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Antw: Re: Lost in Gatekeeper redundancy world

[Chris Parker]

Thanks  Very good to know..

-Original Message-
From: Robert Schuknecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 11:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jeff BCI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: OSL Group 
Subject: Antw: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lost in Gatekeeper redundancy world

Hi,

when using Alternate GK you do not need a 2nd CCM Trunk. CCM registers with 
both GK. Or in other words CCM gets told that there is an 2nd GK with which he 
should register if the 1st GK fails. (This is Cisco proprietary and does not 
work with every H323 System)

HTH
/Robert

>>> Chris Parker<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am Mittwoch, 24. September 2008 um
15:52 in Nachricht 8f2b1e3d0ad390ae420b45f0208a0dac:
> Then I think you can use alternate gatekeeper as described here:
> 
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3/vvf_c/cisco_ios_h323_configuration_ 
> guide/old_archives_h323/4gwconf.html#wp1036777
> 
> In CCM, I guess you would have 2 trunks to each GK and put both in a RL 
> to do the failover from the ccm side.
> 
> Though I'm not sure how this could come up on a lab given the topology. 
> The logical choice for the GK is HQ, BR1 and BR2seem like bad choices 
> for a redundant GK ... If HQ goes down you would lose connectivity to 
> BR1 and BR2
> 
> Chris
> 
> Jeff BCI wro
> te:
>> thought about that as well, but GKs will be in different subnets, hence
>> HSRP won't work.
>>
>> Wish it were that easy, rumor has it if I get a GK lab, this scenario is
>> there.
>>
>> Thanks, Jeff
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chris Parker
>> To: Jeff BCI; OSL Group
>> Sent: 9/23/08 8:53 PM
>> Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lost in Gatekeeper redundancy world
>>
>> I believe the way to do this is with HSRP? If a GK fails its IP moves to
>> the backup GK
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jeff BCI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 10:52 PM
>> To: Jeff BCI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; OSL Group
>> 
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lost in Gatekeeper redundancy world
>>
>> forgot to show the gateway's relevant config.
>>
>> -Jeff
>>
>> --
>> Branch-B-2611XM#
>> Branch-B-2611XM#sh run int lo0
>> Building configuration...
>>
>> Current configuration : 247 bytes
>> !
>> interface Loopback0
>>  ip address 10.255.255.5 255.255.255.255
>>  h323-gateway voip interface
>>  h323-gateway voip id Branch-B_ZONE ipaddr 10.255.255.10 1719
>>  h323-gateway voip h323-id Branch-B-2611XM
>>  h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 10.255.255.5
>> end
>>
>> Branch-B-2611XM#
>> 
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jeff BCI [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 10:48 PM
>> To: OSL Group
>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lost in Gatekeeper redundancy world
>>
>>
>> Greetings.
>>
>> Ok, all of my gatekeeper work is good, no problems there, but I'm trying
>> to
>> learn how to use two gatekeepers for redundancy (not load balancing)
>> such
>> that if GK_A croaks, the gateways registered to GK_A can then
>> automatically
>> move to GK_B without any manual intervention. I do have GK basic
>> redundancy
>> configured on GK_A and GK_B, I can see that this works fine, but the
>> gateways won't move over.
>>
>> Here's what I did.
>>
>> GK_A - the primary GK
>> configured in CUCM with trunk ccm-trunk, GK configured as well, works
>> fine
>> configured clustering to GK_B, that too works fine
>>
>> -- GK_01 config - 10.255.255.10
>> gatekeeper
>>  zone local GL_ZONE bciassoc.net 10.255.255.10
>>  zone local HQ_ZONE bciassoc.net
>>  zone local Branch-B_ZONE bciassoc.net
>>  zone cluster local GKC_GL_ZONE GL_ZONE
>>   element GL_ZONE_ATL_GK02 10.255.255.2 1719
>>  !
>>  zone prefix Branch-B_ZONE 1050..
>>  zone prefix HQ_ZONE 20..
>>  zone prefix HQ_ZONE 30..
>>  zone prefix HQ_ZONE 40..
>>  zone prefix Branch-B_ZONE 50..
>>  gw-type-prefix 999#*
>>  gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology
>>  bandwidth interzone default 672
>>  bandwidth check-destination
>>  no shutdown
>> !
>> -
>>
>>
>> did the exact same thing on GK_B
>>
>> - GK_02 config --- 10.255.255.2 
>>
>> !
>> gatekeeper
>>  zone local HQ_ZONE bciassoc.net 10.255.255.2
>>  zone local Branch-B_ZONE bciassoc.net
>>  zone local GL_ZONE_ATL_GK02 10.255.255.2
>>  zone cluster local GKC_GL_ZONE GL_ZONE_ATL_GK02
>>   element GL_ZONE 10.255.255.10 1719
>>  !
>>  zone prefix HQ_ZONE 20..
>>  zone prefix HQ_ZONE 30..
>>  zone prefix HQ_ZONE 40..
>>  zone prefix Branch-B_ZONE 50..
>>  gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology
>>  bandwidth interzone default 144
>>  bandwidth check-destination
>>  no shutdown
>> !
>> 
>>
>> GK01#
>> GK01#sh gatek clu
>>
>>CONFIGURED CLUSTERS
>>===
>> Cluster Name Type Local Zone Elements  IP
>>   --   --
>> GKC_GL_ZONE  LocalGL_ZONEGL_

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Antw: Re: IPPA URL

[kapil atrish]

Hi,
   
  This link doesn't even give access to SRND. Not sure, let's wait for someone 
who attends the lab to confirm.
   
  I got that URL info from cisco.com/go/certsupport. I raised a case 
specifially to know the new URL and they gave me this one.
   
  Thanks,
Kapil Atrish

Robert Schuknecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  Hi,

i thought the new Link, for documentation, is more restrictive and it lets you 
only go to:

http://www.cisco.com/web/psa/products/tsd_products_support_configure.html 

And today (24th September) should be the first day to use the new 
documentation, in the LAB.

Does anyone knows which link is the right one?

/Robert
>>> kapil atrish schrieb am Mittwoch, 24. September 2008 um
18:49 in Nachricht 94b3025f7ed9ac364355a477ec047e47:
> Hi,
> 
> Following is the URL available in Lab exam now:
> 
> http://www.cisco.com/web/psa/products/index.html 
> 
> Go to Voice & Unified communications >> Cisco Unified CCM >> Maintain and 
> Operate Guides >> there you'll find features and services guide...
> 
> 
> 
> Jacob Owen wrote:
> It's been awhile since i sat for the lab and I can't remember if they 
> had removed the ability to use the UniverCD so I was wondering, if you can't 
> use it now where do find the URL's for the various IPT services like IPPA, 
> Extension Mobility, Fast Dials, and Personal Directory. If I am mistaken 
> that we can't use the UniverCD please let me know. 


   

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Antw: GDM/Hunt Group/MWI Questions

[Robert Schuknecht]

Hi Kelly,

AFAIK, the MWI will never light up for GDM. The onlys thing you will see is the 
envelope, on the line.
And i think the GDM Voicemail-No. should be different than the Hunt-Pilot 
Number (you can use Translation-Rules for this).

HTH

/Robert

>>> Kelly Nguyen<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am Mittwoch, 24. September 2008 um
18:21 in Nachricht 02d2060cb74a8230486c87f8d525acf4:
> All,
> 
> 1) Looking for a little clarification on the GDM, MWI and Hunt Group
> Configuration. Is there a way to have a Hunt Group which uses a GDM reflect
> MWI on the phones?  I tried putting a different E164 number for the GDM and
> assigning it to a phone but I don't get a envelope or MWI.
> 
> 2) I have seen a couple of posts previously on this MWI, GDM issue but I am
> still trying to clarify things. If I have a GDM what are the ways that I can
> get it to light up my MWI?  Per everything I have read if I put the GDM
> number as  a extension on the phone it lights up. However, I can't get this
> to work but it may be that my GDM number is for a hunt group.  When people
> are using GDM's to light up are they not using it with hunt groups? Are they
> only accessing the GDM via scripts or other hunt capabilities but not using
> hunt-groups?
> 
> Thanks.

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Antw: Re: IPPA URL

[Robert Schuknecht]

Hi,

i thought the new Link, for documentation, is more restrictive and it lets you 
only go to:

http://www.cisco.com/web/psa/products/tsd_products_support_configure.html 

And today (24th September) should be the first day to use the new 
documentation, in the LAB.

Does anyone knows which link is the right one?

/Robert
>>> kapil atrish<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am Mittwoch, 24. September 2008 um
18:49 in Nachricht 94b3025f7ed9ac364355a477ec047e47:
> Hi,
>
>   Following is the URL available in Lab exam now:
>
>   http://www.cisco.com/web/psa/products/index.html 
>
>   Go to Voice & Unified communications >> Cisco Unified CCM >> Maintain and 
> Operate Guides >> there you'll find features and services guide...
>
>   
> 
> Jacob Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's been awhile since i sat for the lab and I can't remember if they 
> had removed the ability to use the UniverCD so I was wondering, if you can't 
> use it now where do find the URL's for the various IPT services like IPPA, 
> Extension Mobility, Fast Dials, and Personal Directory.  If I am mistaken 
> that we can't use the UniverCD please let me know. 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Antw: Re: Lost in Gatekeeper redundancy wo rld

[Jeff BCI]

true, but the problem is in getting the gateway itself to re-register to
the alternate GK, that's what's not working.

Thanks, Jeff

-Original Message-
From: Robert Schuknecht
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jeff BCI
Cc: OSL Group
Sent: 9/24/08 10:43 AM
Subject: Antw: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lost in Gatekeeper redundancy world

Hi,

when using Alternate GK you do not need a 2nd CCM Trunk. CCM registers
with both GK. Or in other words CCM gets told that there is an 2nd GK
with which he should register if the 1st GK fails. (This is Cisco
proprietary and does not work with every H323 System)

HTH
/Robert

>>> Chris Parker<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am Mittwoch, 24. September
2008 um
15:52 in Nachricht 8f2b1e3d0ad390ae420b45f0208a0dac:
> Then I think you can use alternate gatekeeper as described here:
> 
>
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3/vvf_c/cisco_ios_h323_configurat
ion_ 
> guide/old_archives_h323/4gwconf.html#wp1036777
> 
> In CCM, I guess you would have 2 trunks to each GK and put both in a
RL 
> to do the failover from the ccm side.
> 
> Though I'm not sure how this could come up on a lab given the
topology. 
> The logical choice for the GK is HQ, BR1 and BR2seem like bad choices 
> for a redundant GK ... If HQ goes down you would lose connectivity to 
> BR1 and BR2
> 
> Chris
> 
> Jeff BCI wro
> te:
>> thought about that as well, but GKs will be in different subnets,
hence
>> HSRP won't work.
>>
>> Wish it were that easy, rumor has it if I get a GK lab, this scenario
is
>> there.
>>
>> Thanks, Jeff
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chris Parker
>> To: Jeff BCI; OSL Group
>> Sent: 9/23/08 8:53 PM
>> Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lost in Gatekeeper redundancy world
>>
>> I believe the way to do this is with HSRP? If a GK fails its IP moves
to
>> the backup GK
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jeff BCI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 10:52 PM
>> To: Jeff BCI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; OSL Group
>> 
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lost in Gatekeeper redundancy world
>>
>> forgot to show the gateway's relevant config.
>>
>> -Jeff
>>
>> --
>> Branch-B-2611XM#
>> Branch-B-2611XM#sh run int lo0
>> Building configuration...
>>
>> Current configuration : 247 bytes
>> !
>> interface Loopback0
>>  ip address 10.255.255.5 255.255.255.255
>>  h323-gateway voip interface
>>  h323-gateway voip id Branch-B_ZONE ipaddr 10.255.255.10 1719
>>  h323-gateway voip h323-id Branch-B-2611XM
>>  h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 10.255.255.5
>> end
>>
>> Branch-B-2611XM#
>> 
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jeff BCI [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 10:48 PM
>> To: OSL Group
>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lost in Gatekeeper redundancy world
>>
>>
>> Greetings.
>>
>> Ok, all of my gatekeeper work is good, no problems there, but I'm
trying
>> to
>> learn how to use two gatekeepers for redundancy (not load balancing)
>> such
>> that if GK_A croaks, the gateways registered to GK_A can then
>> automatically
>> move to GK_B without any manual intervention. I do have GK basic
>> redundancy
>> configured on GK_A and GK_B, I can see that this works fine, but the
>> gateways won't move over.
>>
>> Here's what I did.
>>
>> GK_A - the primary GK
>> configured in CUCM with trunk ccm-trunk, GK configured as well, works
>> fine
>> configured clustering to GK_B, that too works fine
>>
>> -- GK_01 config - 10.255.255.10
>> gatekeeper
>>  zone local GL_ZONE bciassoc.net 10.255.255.10
>>  zone local HQ_ZONE bciassoc.net
>>  zone local Branch-B_ZONE bciassoc.net
>>  zone cluster local GKC_GL_ZONE GL_ZONE
>>   element GL_ZONE_ATL_GK02 10.255.255.2 1719
>>  !
>>  zone prefix Branch-B_ZONE 1050..
>>  zone prefix HQ_ZONE 20..
>>  zone prefix HQ_ZONE 30..
>>  zone prefix HQ_ZONE 40..
>>  zone prefix Branch-B_ZONE 50..
>>  gw-type-prefix 999#*
>>  gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology
>>  bandwidth interzone default 672
>>  bandwidth check-destination
>>  no shutdown
>> !
>> -
>>
>>
>> did the exact same thing on GK_B
>>
>> - GK_02 config --- 10.255.255.2 
>>
>> !
>> gatekeeper
>>  zone local HQ_ZONE bciassoc.net 10.255.255.2
>>  zone local Branch-B_ZONE bciassoc.net
>>  zone local GL_ZONE_ATL_GK02 10.255.255.2
>>  zone cluster local GKC_GL_ZONE GL_ZONE_ATL_GK02
>>   element GL_ZONE 10.255.255.10 1719
>>  !
>>  zone prefix HQ_ZONE 20..
>>  zone prefix HQ_ZONE 30..
>>  zone prefix HQ_ZONE 40..
>>  zone prefix Branch-B_ZONE 50..
>>  gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology
>>  bandwidth interzone default 144
>>  bandwidth check-destination
>>  no shutdown
>> !
>> 
>>
>> GK01#
>> GK01#sh gatek clu
>>
>>CONFIGURED CLUSTERS
>>===
>> Cluster Name Type Local Zone Elements  IP
>>   --   --
>> GKC_G

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lost in Gatekeeper redundancy world

[Jeff BCI]

It must be a bug in the code because I've tried that very section, and it
barks at me that a gatekeeper zone is already configured and bounces me out
of the config. I was able to make it work by registering the gateway to the
two gatekeepers using different zones, but the problem is in the prefixes.

ok, obviously we can't say if this scenario would or would not be on the
test, I thought that I should at least be prepared to handle it since I
have two gatekeepers in my lab and can try it out.

Thanks, Jeff

-Original Message-
From: Chris Parker
To: Jeff BCI
Cc: OSL Group
Sent: 9/24/08 8:52 AM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lost in Gatekeeper redundancy world

Then I think you can use alternate gatekeeper as described here:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3/vvf_c/cisco_ios_h323_configurat
ion_guide/old_archives_h323/4gwconf.html#wp1036777

In CCM, I guess you would have 2 trunks to each GK and put both in a RL 
to do the failover from the ccm side.

Though I'm not sure how this could come up on a lab given the topology. 
The logical choice for the GK is HQ, BR1 and BR2seem like bad choices 
for a redundant GK ... If HQ goes down you would lose connectivity to 
BR1 and BR2

Chris

Jeff BCI wro
te:
> thought about that as well, but GKs will be in different subnets,
hence
> HSRP won't work.
>
> Wish it were that easy, rumor has it if I get a GK lab, this scenario
is
> there.
>
> Thanks, Jeff
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Parker
> To: Jeff BCI; OSL Group
> Sent: 9/23/08 8:53 PM
> Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lost in Gatekeeper redundancy world
>
> I believe the way to do this is with HSRP? If a GK fails its IP moves
to
> the backup GK
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff BCI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 10:52 PM
> To: Jeff BCI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; OSL Group
> 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lost in Gatekeeper redundancy world
>
> forgot to show the gateway's relevant config.
>
> -Jeff
>
> --
> Branch-B-2611XM#
> Branch-B-2611XM#sh run int lo0
> Building configuration...
>
> Current configuration : 247 bytes
> !
> interface Loopback0
>  ip address 10.255.255.5 255.255.255.255
>  h323-gateway voip interface
>  h323-gateway voip id Branch-B_ZONE ipaddr 10.255.255.10 1719
>  h323-gateway voip h323-id Branch-B-2611XM
>  h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 10.255.255.5
> end
>
> Branch-B-2611XM#
> 
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff BCI [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 10:48 PM
> To: OSL Group
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lost in Gatekeeper redundancy world
>
>
> Greetings.
>
> Ok, all of my gatekeeper work is good, no problems there, but I'm
trying
> to
> learn how to use two gatekeepers for redundancy (not load balancing)
> such
> that if GK_A croaks, the gateways registered to GK_A can then
> automatically
> move to GK_B without any manual intervention. I do have GK basic
> redundancy
> configured on GK_A and GK_B, I can see that this works fine, but the
> gateways won't move over.
>
> Here's what I did.
>
> GK_A - the primary GK
> configured in CUCM with trunk ccm-trunk, GK configured as well, works
> fine
> configured clustering to GK_B, that too works fine
>
> -- GK_01 config - 10.255.255.10
> gatekeeper
>  zone local GL_ZONE bciassoc.net 10.255.255.10
>  zone local HQ_ZONE bciassoc.net
>  zone local Branch-B_ZONE bciassoc.net
>  zone cluster local GKC_GL_ZONE GL_ZONE
>   element GL_ZONE_ATL_GK02 10.255.255.2 1719
>  !
>  zone prefix Branch-B_ZONE 1050..
>  zone prefix HQ_ZONE 20..
>  zone prefix HQ_ZONE 30..
>  zone prefix HQ_ZONE 40..
>  zone prefix Branch-B_ZONE 50..
>  gw-type-prefix 999#*
>  gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology
>  bandwidth interzone default 672
>  bandwidth check-destination
>  no shutdown
> !
> -
>
>
> did the exact same thing on GK_B
>
> - GK_02 config --- 10.255.255.2 
>
> !
> gatekeeper
>  zone local HQ_ZONE bciassoc.net 10.255.255.2
>  zone local Branch-B_ZONE bciassoc.net
>  zone local GL_ZONE_ATL_GK02 10.255.255.2
>  zone cluster local GKC_GL_ZONE GL_ZONE_ATL_GK02
>   element GL_ZONE 10.255.255.10 1719
>  !
>  zone prefix HQ_ZONE 20..
>  zone prefix HQ_ZONE 30..
>  zone prefix HQ_ZONE 40..
>  zone prefix Branch-B_ZONE 50..
>  gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology
>  bandwidth interzone default 144
>  bandwidth check-destination
>  no shutdown
> !
> 
>
> GK01#
> GK01#sh gatek clu
>
>CONFIGURED CLUSTERS
>===
> Cluster Name Type Local Zone Elements  IP
>   --   --
> GKC_GL_ZONE  LocalGL_ZONEGL_ZONE_ATL_G 10.255.255.2
1719
>
> GK01#
> -
> GK02#sh gatek clu
>
>CONFIGURED CLUSTERS
>===
> Cluster Name  

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPPA URL

[kapil atrish]

For IPPA URL:
   

   PRODUCT SUPPORT
  VOICE AND UNIFIED COMMUNICATIONS
 CISCO AGENT DESKTOP
INSTALL AND UPGRADE
   Install and Upgrade Guides




  See CAD installation guide.
   
   
  

kapil atrish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
   
  Following is the URL available in Lab exam now:
   
  http://www.cisco.com/web/psa/products/index.html
   
  Go to Voice & Unified communications >> Cisco Unified CCM >> Maintain and 
Operate Guides >> there you'll find features and services guide...
   
  

Jacob Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's been awhile since i sat for the lab and I can't remember if they had 
removed the ability to use the UniverCD so I was wondering, if you can't use it 
now where do find the URL's for the various IPT services like IPPA, Extension 
Mobility, Fast Dials, and Personal Directory.  If I am mistaken that we can't 
use the UniverCD please let me know. 

-- 
Jacob Owen
CCIE #14063 (R&S, Service Provider), CCDP, CCVP


  


   

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPPA URL

[kapil atrish]

Hi,
   
  Following is the URL available in Lab exam now:
   
  http://www.cisco.com/web/psa/products/index.html
   
  Go to Voice & Unified communications >> Cisco Unified CCM >> Maintain and 
Operate Guides >> there you'll find features and services guide...
   
  

Jacob Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's been awhile since i sat for the lab and I can't remember if they had 
removed the ability to use the UniverCD so I was wondering, if you can't use it 
now where do find the URL's for the various IPT services like IPPA, Extension 
Mobility, Fast Dials, and Personal Directory.  If I am mistaken that we can't 
use the UniverCD please let me know. 

-- 
Jacob Owen
CCIE #14063 (R&S, Service Provider), CCDP, CCVP



   

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM/Hunt Group/MWI Questions

[Kelly Nguyen]

All,

1) Looking for a little clarification on the GDM, MWI and Hunt Group
Configuration. Is there a way to have a Hunt Group which uses a GDM reflect
MWI on the phones?  I tried putting a different E164 number for the GDM and
assigning it to a phone but I don't get a envelope or MWI.

2) I have seen a couple of posts previously on this MWI, GDM issue but I am
still trying to clarify things. If I have a GDM what are the ways that I can
get it to light up my MWI?  Per everything I have read if I put the GDM
number as  a extension on the phone it lights up. However, I can't get this
to work but it may be that my GDM number is for a hunt group.  When people
are using GDM's to light up are they not using it with hunt groups? Are they
only accessing the GDM via scripts or other hunt capabilities but not using
hunt-groups?

Thanks.

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPPA URL

[Jacob Owen]

It's been awhile since i sat for the lab and I can't remember if they had
removed the ability to use the UniverCD so I was wondering, if you can't use
it now where do find the URL's for the various IPT services like IPPA,
Extension Mobility, Fast Dials, and Personal Directory.  If I am mistaken
that we can't use the UniverCD please let me know.

-- 
Jacob Owen
CCIE #14063 (R&S, Service Provider), CCDP, CCVP

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Antw: Re: Lost in Gatekeeper redundancy world

[Robert Schuknecht]

Hi,

when using Alternate GK you do not need a 2nd CCM Trunk. CCM registers with 
both GK. Or in other words CCM gets told that there is an 2nd GK with which he 
should register if the 1st GK fails. (This is Cisco proprietary and does not 
work with every H323 System)

HTH
/Robert

>>> Chris Parker<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am Mittwoch, 24. September 2008 um
15:52 in Nachricht 8f2b1e3d0ad390ae420b45f0208a0dac:
> Then I think you can use alternate gatekeeper as described here:
> 
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3/vvf_c/cisco_ios_h323_configuration_ 
> guide/old_archives_h323/4gwconf.html#wp1036777
> 
> In CCM, I guess you would have 2 trunks to each GK and put both in a RL 
> to do the failover from the ccm side.
> 
> Though I'm not sure how this could come up on a lab given the topology. 
> The logical choice for the GK is HQ, BR1 and BR2seem like bad choices 
> for a redundant GK ... If HQ goes down you would lose connectivity to 
> BR1 and BR2
> 
> Chris
> 
> Jeff BCI wro
> te:
>> thought about that as well, but GKs will be in different subnets, hence
>> HSRP won't work.
>>
>> Wish it were that easy, rumor has it if I get a GK lab, this scenario is
>> there.
>>
>> Thanks, Jeff
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chris Parker
>> To: Jeff BCI; OSL Group
>> Sent: 9/23/08 8:53 PM
>> Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lost in Gatekeeper redundancy world
>>
>> I believe the way to do this is with HSRP? If a GK fails its IP moves to
>> the backup GK
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jeff BCI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 10:52 PM
>> To: Jeff BCI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; OSL Group
>> 
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lost in Gatekeeper redundancy world
>>
>> forgot to show the gateway's relevant config.
>>
>> -Jeff
>>
>> --
>> Branch-B-2611XM#
>> Branch-B-2611XM#sh run int lo0
>> Building configuration...
>>
>> Current configuration : 247 bytes
>> !
>> interface Loopback0
>>  ip address 10.255.255.5 255.255.255.255
>>  h323-gateway voip interface
>>  h323-gateway voip id Branch-B_ZONE ipaddr 10.255.255.10 1719
>>  h323-gateway voip h323-id Branch-B-2611XM
>>  h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 10.255.255.5
>> end
>>
>> Branch-B-2611XM#
>> 
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jeff BCI [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 10:48 PM
>> To: OSL Group
>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lost in Gatekeeper redundancy world
>>
>>
>> Greetings.
>>
>> Ok, all of my gatekeeper work is good, no problems there, but I'm trying
>> to
>> learn how to use two gatekeepers for redundancy (not load balancing)
>> such
>> that if GK_A croaks, the gateways registered to GK_A can then
>> automatically
>> move to GK_B without any manual intervention. I do have GK basic
>> redundancy
>> configured on GK_A and GK_B, I can see that this works fine, but the
>> gateways won't move over.
>>
>> Here's what I did.
>>
>> GK_A - the primary GK
>> configured in CUCM with trunk ccm-trunk, GK configured as well, works
>> fine
>> configured clustering to GK_B, that too works fine
>>
>> -- GK_01 config - 10.255.255.10
>> gatekeeper
>>  zone local GL_ZONE bciassoc.net 10.255.255.10
>>  zone local HQ_ZONE bciassoc.net
>>  zone local Branch-B_ZONE bciassoc.net
>>  zone cluster local GKC_GL_ZONE GL_ZONE
>>   element GL_ZONE_ATL_GK02 10.255.255.2 1719
>>  !
>>  zone prefix Branch-B_ZONE 1050..
>>  zone prefix HQ_ZONE 20..
>>  zone prefix HQ_ZONE 30..
>>  zone prefix HQ_ZONE 40..
>>  zone prefix Branch-B_ZONE 50..
>>  gw-type-prefix 999#*
>>  gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology
>>  bandwidth interzone default 672
>>  bandwidth check-destination
>>  no shutdown
>> !
>> -
>>
>>
>> did the exact same thing on GK_B
>>
>> - GK_02 config --- 10.255.255.2 
>>
>> !
>> gatekeeper
>>  zone local HQ_ZONE bciassoc.net 10.255.255.2
>>  zone local Branch-B_ZONE bciassoc.net
>>  zone local GL_ZONE_ATL_GK02 10.255.255.2
>>  zone cluster local GKC_GL_ZONE GL_ZONE_ATL_GK02
>>   element GL_ZONE 10.255.255.10 1719
>>  !
>>  zone prefix HQ_ZONE 20..
>>  zone prefix HQ_ZONE 30..
>>  zone prefix HQ_ZONE 40..
>>  zone prefix Branch-B_ZONE 50..
>>  gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology
>>  bandwidth interzone default 144
>>  bandwidth check-destination
>>  no shutdown
>> !
>> 
>>
>> GK01#
>> GK01#sh gatek clu
>>
>>CONFIGURED CLUSTERS
>>===
>> Cluster Name Type Local Zone Elements  IP
>>   --   --
>> GKC_GL_ZONE  LocalGL_ZONEGL_ZONE_ATL_G 10.255.255.2 1719
>>
>> GK01#
>> -
>> GK02#sh gatek clu
>>
>>CONFIGURED CLUSTERS
>>===
>> Cluster Name Type Local Zone Elements  IP
>>   -- 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Callmanager to unity integration problem

[Michael Shavrov]

Jeremy,

If you ran Voice Mail Port Wizard, but ports did not show up in the "Voice Mail 
Port" mnu, your integration will never work. Run the wizard again, and do all 
steps.

Good luck,

Mike
  - Original Message - 
  From: jeremy co 
  To: Michael Shavrov 
  Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 10:01 AM
  Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Callmanager to unity integration problem


  Hi,

  what u mean by vm port wizard? if u mean ccm voice port wizard, yeah I ran it 
and I didn'tsee any part that search for ports in CCM voice port wizard.

  I don't get what u mean?

  Jeremy


  On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 8:41 PM, Michael Shavrov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Did you run the VM Ports Wizard? If you don't see ports in the search, then 
you either have a problem with database synchronization, or your wizard didn't 
finish. 
  - Original Message - 
  From: jeremy co 
  To: Michael Shavrov 
  Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 12:16 AM
  Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Callmanager to unity integration problem


  Hi Mike,

  By the way, I can see status of "Not Found" in ccm voice port page.


  Jeremy.


  On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 4:08 AM, Michael Shavrov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:

Hi Jeremy,

1. Can you ping one server from another? 
2. Did you use "default settings" or you modified names? (by default 
the name is "CiscoUM1-VI", not "CiscoUM1". 
3. Do you have CallManager service running?
4. Try to remove integration on the Unity and redo it again.

Good luck,

Mike
  - Original Message - 
  From: jeremy co 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 1:27 PM
  Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Callmanager to unity integration problem


  Hi,

  I followed regular procedure of configuring ccm (voice port wizard 
,used name of CiscoUM1 ,4 ports MWI 1998,1999,pilot of 1600).

  both of CCM and unity are running on vmware on different laptops that 
connected to the same vlan on a switch.

  I configured unity with ip add of CCM ,MWI of 1998,1999.

  But when i want to verify connection it says "could not connect to 
the callmanager ,verify that the correct ip port is selected and all call 
services are started on the  callmanager server"

  all serviced is verified and all of them already started.

  Any idea?


  jeremy

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lost in Gatekeeper redundancy world

[Chris Parker]

Then I think you can use alternate gatekeeper as described here:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3/vvf_c/cisco_ios_h323_configuration_guide/old_archives_h323/4gwconf.html#wp1036777

In CCM, I guess you would have 2 trunks to each GK and put both in a RL 
to do the failover from the ccm side.


Though I'm not sure how this could come up on a lab given the topology. 
The logical choice for the GK is HQ, BR1 and BR2seem like bad choices 
for a redundant GK ... If HQ goes down you would lose connectivity to 
BR1 and BR2


Chris

Jeff BCI wro
te:

thought about that as well, but GKs will be in different subnets, hence
HSRP won't work.

Wish it were that easy, rumor has it if I get a GK lab, this scenario is
there.

Thanks, Jeff

-Original Message-
From: Chris Parker
To: Jeff BCI; OSL Group
Sent: 9/23/08 8:53 PM
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lost in Gatekeeper redundancy world

I believe the way to do this is with HSRP? If a GK fails its IP moves to
the backup GK

-Original Message-
From: Jeff BCI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 10:52 PM
To: Jeff BCI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; OSL Group

Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lost in Gatekeeper redundancy world

forgot to show the gateway's relevant config.

-Jeff

--
Branch-B-2611XM#
Branch-B-2611XM#sh run int lo0
Building configuration...

Current configuration : 247 bytes
!
interface Loopback0
 ip address 10.255.255.5 255.255.255.255
 h323-gateway voip interface
 h323-gateway voip id Branch-B_ZONE ipaddr 10.255.255.10 1719
 h323-gateway voip h323-id Branch-B-2611XM
 h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 10.255.255.5
end

Branch-B-2611XM#


-Original Message-
From: Jeff BCI [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 10:48 PM
To: OSL Group
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lost in Gatekeeper redundancy world


Greetings.

Ok, all of my gatekeeper work is good, no problems there, but I'm trying
to
learn how to use two gatekeepers for redundancy (not load balancing)
such
that if GK_A croaks, the gateways registered to GK_A can then
automatically
move to GK_B without any manual intervention. I do have GK basic
redundancy
configured on GK_A and GK_B, I can see that this works fine, but the
gateways won't move over.

Here's what I did.

GK_A - the primary GK
configured in CUCM with trunk ccm-trunk, GK configured as well, works
fine
configured clustering to GK_B, that too works fine

-- GK_01 config - 10.255.255.10
gatekeeper
 zone local GL_ZONE bciassoc.net 10.255.255.10
 zone local HQ_ZONE bciassoc.net
 zone local Branch-B_ZONE bciassoc.net
 zone cluster local GKC_GL_ZONE GL_ZONE
  element GL_ZONE_ATL_GK02 10.255.255.2 1719
 !
 zone prefix Branch-B_ZONE 1050..
 zone prefix HQ_ZONE 20..
 zone prefix HQ_ZONE 30..
 zone prefix HQ_ZONE 40..
 zone prefix Branch-B_ZONE 50..
 gw-type-prefix 999#*
 gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology
 bandwidth interzone default 672
 bandwidth check-destination
 no shutdown
!
-


did the exact same thing on GK_B

- GK_02 config --- 10.255.255.2 


!
gatekeeper
 zone local HQ_ZONE bciassoc.net 10.255.255.2
 zone local Branch-B_ZONE bciassoc.net
 zone local GL_ZONE_ATL_GK02 10.255.255.2
 zone cluster local GKC_GL_ZONE GL_ZONE_ATL_GK02
  element GL_ZONE 10.255.255.10 1719
 !
 zone prefix HQ_ZONE 20..
 zone prefix HQ_ZONE 30..
 zone prefix HQ_ZONE 40..
 zone prefix Branch-B_ZONE 50..
 gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology
 bandwidth interzone default 144
 bandwidth check-destination
 no shutdown
!


GK01#
GK01#sh gatek clu

   CONFIGURED CLUSTERS
   ===
Cluster Name Type Local Zone Elements  IP
  --   --
GKC_GL_ZONE  LocalGL_ZONEGL_ZONE_ATL_G 10.255.255.2 1719

GK01#
-
GK02#sh gatek clu

   CONFIGURED CLUSTERS
   ===
Cluster Name Type Local Zone Elements  IP
  --   --
GKC_GL_ZONE  LocalGL_ZONE_ATL_GK0GL_ZONE   10.255.255.10
1719

GK02#
-

so they see each other, registered and whatnot, but I can't figure it
out
nor find out why. I bought a Cisco Press book "Cisco Voice Gateways and
Gatekeepers" and found a wealth of tips and things that cleared up my
understanding of gatekeepers, but it is completely missing anything on
actually showing this redundancy function in use.

Thanks, Jeff





  

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TEST EMAIL

[Jacob Owen]

Vik,
It really isn't dependent on the pod.  I worked on 26 last night and it
seemed alot better, but their are times when it acts slowly.  Like I said
though, it's just a small nuisance really and nothing I am "complaining"
about. :)

On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 6:43 PM, Vik Malhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Jacob...what pod and server were you setting up the dhcp scope. I just
> checked on my server and all seemed ok. Thanks.
>
> Vik Malhi - CCIE#13890Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert Inc
>
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> Mailto: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Join IPexpert's Free CCIE Peer Groups & Study Communities at
> www.IPexpert.com/communities
>
> On Sep 23, 2008, at 12:27 PM, "Jacob Owen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Mark,
> Have you had any complaints about slow response with Proctorlabs?  It used
> to be smoking fast using RDP, telnet etc.. but now I am noticing some
> serious lag time when RDP'ing in.  As an example, if I am building a DHCP
> scope and come to the page where I enter to low and high IP's for the range
> I can type out 10.x.x.x before the 1 in 10 catches up.  Just wondering,
> still by far the best lab rentals out there, just wondering if it was an
> issue mentioned by anyone else.
>
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Mark Snow < <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hey Scott
>> We were down last week due to a storm that wiped out our server - but we
>> have recovered now so the traffic should pick up quite a bit now.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --
>> Mark Snow
>> CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security)
>>
>> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
>>
>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
>> Fax: +1.309.413.4097
>> Mailto: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> --
>> Join our free online support and peer group communities:
>> http://www.IPexpert.com/communities
>> --
>> IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based,
>> Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE
>> R&S Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and
>> CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.
>> --
>>
>> On Sep 23, 2008, at 9:25 AM, Hardesty, Scott wrote:
>>
>>
>> Have not seen a post in a while just checking my account.
>>
>>
>> *Scott Hardesty | Cisco Engineer | MidAtlantic | Presidio Networked
>> Solutions*
>> *7601 Ora Glen Drive, Suite 100, Greenbelt, MD  20770 | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> *D: 301.313.2041 | C: 443.789.1219 |  
>> www.presidio.com*
>> **
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Jacob Owen
> CCIE #14063 (R&S, Service Provider), CCDP, CCVP
>
>


-- 
Jacob Owen
CCIE #14063 (R&S, Service Provider), CCDP, CCVP

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity VPIM

[Balamurugan Singaram]

You can get a demo license from your local Cisco-AM

--- On Wed, 24/9/08, Paul and Bobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

From: Paul and Bobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity VPIM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Wednesday, 24 September, 2008, 3:25 PM

HI All

Does anyone have a demo license for Unity with VPIM that I could use
to get it working in the lab.

Cheers

Paul



  New Email addresses available on Yahoo!
Get the Email name you've always wanted on the new @ymail and @rocketmail. 
Hurry before someone else does!
http://mail.promotions.yahoo.com/newdomains/aa/

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 31, Issue 82

[Paul and Bobs]

Hi All

Firstly checking to see whether site i back up and secondly have a question

on page 374 of the IPEXPERT book there is some cme ephone config for CUE GDM

I am trying to work out if this is needed if the AA script is not in use

What is the extra DN used for that is mapped to the key 4:20

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity VPIM

[Paul and Bobs]

HI All

Does anyone have a demo license for Unity with VPIM that I could use
to get it working in the lab.

Cheers

Paul

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lost in Gatekeeper redundancy world

[Jeff BCI]

thought about that as well, but GKs will be in different subnets, hence
HSRP won't work.

Wish it were that easy, rumor has it if I get a GK lab, this scenario is
there.

Thanks, Jeff

-Original Message-
From: Chris Parker
To: Jeff BCI; OSL Group
Sent: 9/23/08 8:53 PM
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lost in Gatekeeper redundancy world

I believe the way to do this is with HSRP? If a GK fails its IP moves to
the backup GK

-Original Message-
From: Jeff BCI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 10:52 PM
To: Jeff BCI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; OSL Group

Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lost in Gatekeeper redundancy world

forgot to show the gateway's relevant config.

-Jeff

--
Branch-B-2611XM#
Branch-B-2611XM#sh run int lo0
Building configuration...

Current configuration : 247 bytes
!
interface Loopback0
 ip address 10.255.255.5 255.255.255.255
 h323-gateway voip interface
 h323-gateway voip id Branch-B_ZONE ipaddr 10.255.255.10 1719
 h323-gateway voip h323-id Branch-B-2611XM
 h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 10.255.255.5
end

Branch-B-2611XM#


-Original Message-
From: Jeff BCI [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 10:48 PM
To: OSL Group
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lost in Gatekeeper redundancy world


Greetings.

Ok, all of my gatekeeper work is good, no problems there, but I'm trying
to
learn how to use two gatekeepers for redundancy (not load balancing)
such
that if GK_A croaks, the gateways registered to GK_A can then
automatically
move to GK_B without any manual intervention. I do have GK basic
redundancy
configured on GK_A and GK_B, I can see that this works fine, but the
gateways won't move over.

Here's what I did.

GK_A - the primary GK
configured in CUCM with trunk ccm-trunk, GK configured as well, works
fine
configured clustering to GK_B, that too works fine

-- GK_01 config - 10.255.255.10
gatekeeper
 zone local GL_ZONE bciassoc.net 10.255.255.10
 zone local HQ_ZONE bciassoc.net
 zone local Branch-B_ZONE bciassoc.net
 zone cluster local GKC_GL_ZONE GL_ZONE
  element GL_ZONE_ATL_GK02 10.255.255.2 1719
 !
 zone prefix Branch-B_ZONE 1050..
 zone prefix HQ_ZONE 20..
 zone prefix HQ_ZONE 30..
 zone prefix HQ_ZONE 40..
 zone prefix Branch-B_ZONE 50..
 gw-type-prefix 999#*
 gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology
 bandwidth interzone default 672
 bandwidth check-destination
 no shutdown
!
-


did the exact same thing on GK_B

- GK_02 config --- 10.255.255.2 

!
gatekeeper
 zone local HQ_ZONE bciassoc.net 10.255.255.2
 zone local Branch-B_ZONE bciassoc.net
 zone local GL_ZONE_ATL_GK02 10.255.255.2
 zone cluster local GKC_GL_ZONE GL_ZONE_ATL_GK02
  element GL_ZONE 10.255.255.10 1719
 !
 zone prefix HQ_ZONE 20..
 zone prefix HQ_ZONE 30..
 zone prefix HQ_ZONE 40..
 zone prefix Branch-B_ZONE 50..
 gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology
 bandwidth interzone default 144
 bandwidth check-destination
 no shutdown
!


GK01#
GK01#sh gatek clu

   CONFIGURED CLUSTERS
   ===
Cluster Name Type Local Zone Elements  IP
  --   --
GKC_GL_ZONE  LocalGL_ZONEGL_ZONE_ATL_G 10.255.255.2 1719

GK01#
-
GK02#sh gatek clu

   CONFIGURED CLUSTERS
   ===
Cluster Name Type Local Zone Elements  IP
  --   --
GKC_GL_ZONE  LocalGL_ZONE_ATL_GK0GL_ZONE   10.255.255.10
1719

GK02#
-

so they see each other, registered and whatnot, but I can't figure it
out
nor find out why. I bought a Cisco Press book "Cisco Voice Gateways and
Gatekeepers" and found a wealth of tips and things that cleared up my
understanding of gatekeepers, but it is completely missing anything on
actually showing this redundancy function in use.

Thanks, Jeff

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Services where to host? Pub or Sub?

[Martijn Arrachart]

In real life, set the servers to a DNS server so it can be resolved to
another server automatically (EM for CUCM v6.1...)

Martijn Arrachart

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Bartosz
Sokolowski
Verzonden: woensdag 24 september 2008 11:01
Aan: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Onderwerp: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Services where to host? Pub or Sub?

Hello,

A question regarding services of any kind like Personal Address Book,
Extension Mobility etc.
I can configure any server in a cluster to host services. In real world
I prefer to put one of the subscribers to host such services. If the
server goes down I can quickly reconfigure the service to another sub or
even pub by changing the URL. If the service is to be put on Pub and the
server goes down there is nothing we can do about it - no URL reconfig
possible.
Is this rule of putting services on sub is good or bad for the LAB?
-- 
Best regards,
Bartosz Sokolowski


--
Doladuj w promocji telefon! 
Sprawdz >> http://link.interia.pl/f1f18 

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Services where to host? Pub or Sub?

[Bartosz Sokolowski]

Hello,

A question regarding services of any kind like Personal Address Book, Extension 
Mobility etc.
I can configure any server in a cluster to host services. In real world I 
prefer to put one of the subscribers to host such services. If the server goes 
down I can quickly reconfigure the service to another sub or even pub by 
changing the URL. If the service is to be put on Pub and the server goes down 
there is nothing we can do about it - no URL reconfig possible.
Is this rule of putting services on sub is good or bad for the LAB?
-- 
Best regards,
Bartosz Sokolowski


--
Doladuj w promocji telefon!
Sprawdz >> http://link.interia.pl/f1f18

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Callmanager to unity integration problem

[Bartosz Sokolowski]

Hello,Remember one important thing.On Unity side default CallManager Device name prefix is "CiscoUM1-VI" and unity atomatically adds port number to that eg. 1,2,3 and so on.On CCM side default port name prefix is "CiscoUM1" and CCM adds "-VIx" suffix for that, where x is a port number (1,2,3 and so on).Maybe that's the issue?-- Best regards,Bartosz SokolowskiHi Mike,I can ping from both sidesDefault setting is used, Device names is displayed like Cisco-UM1-VI1I checked service activation page and all of services is runningI deleted integration, and create it again but again during installation I couldn't verify it.
So still same error msg.Any idea?Jeremy



--

Znajdź mieszkanie w Twoim regionie!

kliknij >>> http://link.interia.pl/f1f19