[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Changes to CCIE Lab and Written Exam Question Format and Scoring
Hi , Has anyone seen this yet? https://cisco.hosted.jivesoftware.com/docs/DOC-3834 Other CCIE tracks will change over the next year Even more potential changes to the CCIE Voice lab? Rob
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM
All, How can I achieve if a msg is left for GDM. Ph 1 (3001) and ph2 (3002) can listen to the msg but only PH1 (3001) can delete the msg for the mail box. Ph2 is not allowed to delete the msg. Is it possible if yes how, can I achieve this task ? Cheers Narinder CONFIDENTIALITY - The information contained in this electronic mail message is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not an authorised recipient of this message please contact Getronics Australia immediately by reply email and destroy/delete this message from your computer. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message, or part thereof, is strictly prohibited. DISCLAIMER - Unless specifically indicated otherwise, the views and opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not Getronics Australia. While we endeavour to protect our network from computer viruses, Getronics Australia does not warrant that this email or any attachments are free of viruses or any other defects or errors. It is the duty of the recipient to virus scan and otherwise test any information contained in this email before loading onto any computer system.
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] cannot add MOH server, host server cannot be selected
You have PUB and SUB already running MOH and you want to add 3rs server is that what you are asking? Do you have CIVMSA running on both pub and Sub, if you already are than you should have 2 MOH. Thanks Narinder From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of jeremy co Sent: Thursday, 15 January 2009 10:31 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] cannot add MOH server, host server cannot be selected Hi, when I want to add MOH server ,there is NOTHING under host server . I have only pub and sub as moh server so I cannot add another one for redundancy of unicast MOH. so I cannot add moh server any idea? Jeremy CONFIDENTIALITY - The information contained in this electronic mail message is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not an authorised recipient of this message please contact Getronics Australia immediately by reply email and destroy/delete this message from your computer. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message, or part thereof, is strictly prohibited. DISCLAIMER - Unless specifically indicated otherwise, the views and opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not Getronics Australia. While we endeavour to protect our network from computer viruses, Getronics Australia does not warrant that this email or any attachments are free of viruses or any other defects or errors. It is the duty of the recipient to virus scan and otherwise test any information contained in this email before loading onto any computer system.
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM
Ph1 and Ph 2 should be members of GDM and Ph1 should be owner as well.Remember,you would need to add a button(line) using GDM Extension on Ph1 and Ph2 for lighting up MWI there in order to check messages. On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Kumar, Narinder narinder.ku...@uxcg.com.au wrote: All, How can I achieve if a msg is left for GDM. Ph 1 (3001) and ph2 (3002) can listen to the msg but only PH1 (3001) can delete the msg for the mail box. Ph2 is not allowed to delete the msg. Is it possible if yes how, can I achieve this task ? Cheers Narinder -- CONFIDENTIALITY - The information contained in this electronic mail message is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not an authorised recipient of this message please contact Getronics Australia immediately by reply email and destroy/delete this message from your computer. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message, or part thereof, is strictly prohibited. DISCLAIMER - Unless specifically indicated otherwise, the views and opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not Getronics Australia. While we endeavour to protect our network from computer viruses, Getronics Australia does not warrant that this email or any attachments are free of viruses or any other defects or errors. It is the duty of the recipient to virus scan and otherwise test any information contained in this email before loading onto any computer system.
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM
I am already doing exactly what you are saying but I am still able to delete the msg from ph 3002 . When I look at GDM ph1(3001) is the owner, ph 2 (3002) is the member. I must be missing something From: kamal yousaf [mailto:lovingprin...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, 15 January 2009 10:56 PM To: Kumar, Narinder Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM Ph1 and Ph 2 should be members of GDM and Ph1 should be owner as well.Remember,you would need to add a button(line) using GDM Extension on Ph1 and Ph2 for lighting up MWI there in order to check messages. On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Kumar, Narinder narinder.ku...@uxcg.com.aumailto:narinder.ku...@uxcg.com.au wrote: All, How can I achieve if a msg is left for GDM. Ph 1 (3001) and ph2 (3002) can listen to the msg but only PH1 (3001) can delete the msg for the mail box. Ph2 is not allowed to delete the msg. Is it possible if yes how, can I achieve this task ? Cheers Narinder CONFIDENTIALITY - The information contained in this electronic mail message is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not an authorised recipient of this message please contact Getronics Australia immediately by reply email and destroy/delete this message from your computer. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message, or part thereof, is strictly prohibited. DISCLAIMER - Unless specifically indicated otherwise, the views and opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not Getronics Australia. While we endeavour to protect our network from computer viruses, Getronics Australia does not warrant that this email or any attachments are free of viruses or any other defects or errors. It is the duty of the recipient to virus scan and otherwise test any information contained in this email before loading onto any computer system. CONFIDENTIALITY - The information contained in this electronic mail message is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not an authorised recipient of this message please contact Getronics Australia immediately by reply email and destroy/delete this message from your computer. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message, or part thereof, is strictly prohibited. DISCLAIMER - Unless specifically indicated otherwise, the views and opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not Getronics Australia. While we endeavour to protect our network from computer viruses, Getronics Australia does not warrant that this email or any attachments are free of viruses or any other defects or errors. It is the duty of the recipient to virus scan and otherwise test any information contained in this email before loading onto any computer system.
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Moh dead air on site B, counter incremented but silent
Hi, I configured MOH , g729 should be played to site B, but instead I have dead air(silent). Counter on perfmon incremented. MOh-- g711 region site B g729 G729 selected on voice streaming service multicast checked on audio source , MRG on server it incremented by address , hop 8 . CCM reloaded twice , voice streaming service restarted twice. same result. Am I miss sth? Jeremy
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Moh dead air on site B, counter incremented but silent
Hi Jeremy: Have you configured multicast in your network? Regards, Jose From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of jeremy co Sent: Jueves, Enero 15, 2009 8:58 AM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Moh dead air on site B,counter incremented but silent Hi, I configured MOH , g729 should be played to site B, but instead I have dead air(silent). Counter on perfmon incremented. MOh-- g711 region site B g729 G729 selected on voice streaming service multicast checked on audio source , MRG on server it incremented by address , hop 8 . CCM reloaded twice , voice streaming service restarted twice. same result. Am I miss sth? Jeremy
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Moh dead air on site B, counter incremented but silent
Hi Did you enabled multicast on path from CCM to Site B phones? Ante From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of jeremy co jeremy.coo...@gmail.com Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 2:58 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Moh dead air on site B, counter incremented but silent Hi, I configured MOH , g729 should be played to site B, but instead I have dead air(silent). Counter on perfmon incremented. MOh-- g711 region site B g729 G729 selected on voice streaming service multicast checked on audio source , MRG on server it incremented by address , hop 8 . CCM reloaded twice , voice streaming service restarted twice. same result. Am I miss sth? Jeremy
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Moh dead air on site B, counter incremented but silent
of course I did that , the point is I cannot see multicast packets even on HQ !!! sth strange happened on ccm that there is no traffic passed to HQ. Cheers Jeremy On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 1:00 AM, Ante Boras ante.bo...@combis.hr wrote: Hi Did you enabled multicast on path from CCM to Site B phones? Ante From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of jeremy co jeremy.coo...@gmail.com Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 2:58 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Moh dead air on site B, counter incremented but silent Hi, I configured MOH , g729 should be played to site B, but instead I have dead air(silent). Counter on perfmon incremented. MOh-- g711 region site B g729 G729 selected on voice streaming service multicast checked on audio source , MRG on server it incremented by address , hop 8 . CCM reloaded twice , voice streaming service restarted twice. same result. Am I miss sth? Jeremy
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Moh dead air on site B, counter incremented but silent
Sloved. My bad, forgot to enable multicast on server interface jeremy On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 12:57 AM, jeremy co jeremy.coo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I configured MOH , g729 should be played to site B, but instead I have dead air(silent). Counter on perfmon incremented. MOh-- g711 region site B g729 G729 selected on voice streaming service multicast checked on audio source , MRG on server it incremented by address , hop 8 . CCM reloaded twice , voice streaming service restarted twice. same result. Am I miss sth? Jeremy
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Moh dead air on site B, counter incremented but silent
Hi Jeremy: You have configured Multicast MOH for HQ also, right?, are the IP Phones in the same VLAN as the servers? Regards, Jose From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of jeremy co Sent: Jueves, Enero 15, 2009 9:04 AM To: Ante Boras Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Moh dead air on site B,counter incremented but silent of course I did that , the point is I cannot see multicast packets even on HQ !!! sth strange happened on ccm that there is no traffic passed to HQ. Cheers Jeremy On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 1:00 AM, Ante Boras ante.bo...@combis.hr wrote: Hi Did you enabled multicast on path from CCM to Site B phones? Ante From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of jeremy co jeremy.coo...@gmail.com Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 2:58 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Moh dead air on site B, counter incremented but silent Hi, I configured MOH , g729 should be played to site B, but instead I have dead air(silent). Counter on perfmon incremented. MOh-- g711 region site B g729 G729 selected on voice streaming service multicast checked on audio source , MRG on server it incremented by address , hop 8 . CCM reloaded twice , voice streaming service restarted twice. same result. Am I miss sth? Jeremy
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Moh dead air on site B, counter incremented but silent
What is the multicast packet TTL? Cheers Alex - Original Message - From: jeremy co To: Ante Boras Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 2:03 PM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Moh dead air on site B,counter incremented but silent of course I did that , the point is I cannot see multicast packets even on HQ !!! sth strange happened on ccm that there is no traffic passed to HQ. Cheers Jeremy On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 1:00 AM, Ante Boras ante.bo...@combis.hr wrote: Hi Did you enabled multicast on path from CCM to Site B phones? Ante From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of jeremy co jeremy.coo...@gmail.com Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 2:58 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Moh dead air on site B, counter incremented but silent Hi, I configured MOH , g729 should be played to site B, but instead I have dead air(silent). Counter on perfmon incremented. MOh-- g711 region site B g729 G729 selected on voice streaming service multicast checked on audio source , MRG on server it incremented by address , hop 8 . CCM reloaded twice , voice streaming service restarted twice. same result. Am I miss sth? Jeremy
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Question about faxing
In V1 Section 4, there is a portion where you set up faxing on a router. I've done this setup before for a customer, and as a result some of the config here is causing me confusion. I know, a little knowledge can be a dangerous thing Specifically, the module instruction 8 says Unity needs to accept in-bound faxes at the mailbox of incoming...@voip.lab The proctor guide shows in the MMOIP configuration the following: dial-peer voice 20 mmoip service fax_on_vfc_onramp_app outbound destination-pattern 617521280. information-type fax session target mailto:faxinboundmail...@voip.lab If we had used the destination number to create the alias, the last line would have bee: session target mailto:$...@voip.lab But when sent over to Unity, this would have created a mail alias on the message similar to fax=5551...@voip.lab (assuming 5551212 was the incoming DID) My questions are as follow on this: 1. Is the proctor guide wrong here? Should the session target be set to: session target mailto:inboundmail...@voip.lab (i.e. and not mailto:faxinboundmail...@voip.lab as shown in the protor guide? or does this application add FAX= to anything you put here? I'd think this would still be wrong though.) 2. I believe that if you use $d$, it prefaces with FAX= because it uses this as the CSID identifier on the page when you use the command: fax receive called-subscriber $d$ Am I correct on this in that the FAX= is part of the $d$ value and not required for the session target at all? Cliff
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to avoid the switches to Mark or Remark any packets ?
Hello All, What is the best approach to make sure that my switches are not going to mark or remark any packets coming and going to the endpoints ? Am I safe if I just configure the vlans on the interfaces and let the qos off ? Thanks in advance. _ Confira vídeos com notícias do NY Times, gols direto do Lance, videocassetadas e muito mais no MSN Video! http://video.msn.com/?mkt=pt-br
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to avoid the switches to Mark or Remark any packets ?
Thanks a lot Chris. Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:55:55 -0500 From: cpar...@cparker.us To: scarlo...@hotmail.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to avoid the switches to Mark or Remark any packets ? Thats right, if the QoS is globally disabled on the switch, It will not touch the COS or DSCP markings. You'll need to issue: no mls qos on CAT3550 set qos disable on CAT6500 However look carefully at what the lab wants you to do. You may need to create a policy in the MQC that will mark packets that go into the routers from the switches using either NBAR or ACLs to classify the traffic. Otherwise, the LLQ on serial interfaces may fail because packets aren't properly marked by the originating device. Chris o Ninja wrote: Hello All,What is the best approach to make sure that my switches are not going to mark or remark any packets coming and going to the endpoints ?Am I safe if I just configure the vlans on the interfaces and let the qos off ?Thanks in advance. Notícias direto do New York Times, gols do Lance, videocassetadas e muitos outros vídeos no MSN Videos! Confira já! http://video.msn.com/?mkt=pt-br _ Confira vídeos com notícias do NY Times, gols direto do Lance, videocassetadas e muito mais no MSN Video! http://video.msn.com/?mkt=pt-br
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to avoid the switches to Mark or Remark any packets ?
Thats right, if the QoS is globally disabled on the switch, It will not touch the COS or DSCP markings. You'll need to issue: no mls qos on CAT3550 set qos disable on CAT6500 However look carefully at what the lab wants you to do. You may need to create a policy in the MQC that will mark packets that go into the routers from the switches using either NBAR or ACLs to classify the traffic. Otherwise, the LLQ on serial interfaces may fail because packets aren't properly marked by the originating device. Chris o Ninja wrote: Hello All, What is the best approach to make sure that my switches are not going to mark or remark any packets coming and going to the endpoints ? Am I safe if I just configure the vlans on the interfaces and let the qos off ? Thanks in advance. Notícias direto do New York Times, gols do Lance, videocassetadas e muitos outros vídeos no MSN Videos! Confira já! http://video.msn.com/?mkt=pt-br
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to avoid the switches to Mark or Remark any packets ?
Just more one thought, how about the traffic that goes back to the CCM or Phones from the serial interfaces ? Should I create other policy to mark packets in that direction too ? Thanks in advance. Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:55:55 -0500 From: cpar...@cparker.us To: scarlo...@hotmail.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to avoid the switches to Mark or Remark any packets ? Thats right, if the QoS is globally disabled on the switch, It will not touch the COS or DSCP markings. You'll need to issue: no mls qos on CAT3550 set qos disable on CAT6500 However look carefully at what the lab wants you to do. You may need to create a policy in the MQC that will mark packets that go into the routers from the switches using either NBAR or ACLs to classify the traffic. Otherwise, the LLQ on serial interfaces may fail because packets aren't properly marked by the originating device. Chris o Ninja wrote: Hello All,What is the best approach to make sure that my switches are not going to mark or remark any packets coming and going to the endpoints ?Am I safe if I just configure the vlans on the interfaces and let the qos off ?Thanks in advance. Notícias direto do New York Times, gols do Lance, videocassetadas e muitos outros vídeos no MSN Videos! Confira já! http://video.msn.com/?mkt=pt-br _ Organize seus contatos! O jeito mais fácil de manter a sua lista de amigos sempre em ordem! http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/events.aspx
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST in CME only deployment??
List, I've tried in vain to convince my friend with a lot of pain, pointing out links at Cisco.com and even suggesting that I lend him my Voice books, that you cannot have SRST fallback with only two sites with only CME. That indeed you MUST have CM to do SRST fallback and that this is not a CME feature. He has offered $100 to prove this to him and I feel so bad taking money from him. He's in the Cisco Voice world and I would like him to get a good foundation on the basics as he plans to pursue his CCIE Voice Lab soon. Regards Rogers
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST in CME only deployment??
From Cisco's web site: Cisco Unified Survivable Remote Site Telephony is a unique feature set embedded in the software running on Cisco routers. It takes advantage of a remote office's existing network to provide multi feature call-processing redundancy for centralized Cisco Unified Communications Manager and Cisco Unified Communications Manager Business Edition deployments if the office's or the teleworker's home WAN connection is lost.** Note that CME is specifically NOT mentioned. SRST is for backing up Centralized CallManager/Communications Manager deployments. Cliff - Original Message - From: Rogers O. OCHIENG To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Cc: jnde...@westconafrica.com Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 4:51 PM Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST in CME only deployment?? List, I've tried in vain to convince my friend with a lot of pain, pointing out links at Cisco.com and even suggesting that I lend him my Voice books, that you cannot have SRST fallback with only two sites with only CME. That indeed you MUST have CM to do SRST fallback and that this is not a CME feature. He has offered $100 to prove this to him and I feel so bad taking money from him. He's in the Cisco Voice world and I would like him to get a good foundation on the basics as he plans to pursue his CCIE Voice Lab soon. Regards Rogers
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST in CME only deployment??
He's French so maybe it's a language barrier thing? J Is Cisco.com available in french? From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Cliff McGlamry Sent: 16 January 2009 01:01 To: r.ochi...@smoothtel.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Cc: jnde...@westconafrica.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST in CME only deployment?? From Cisco's web site: Cisco Unified Survivable Remote Site Telephony is a unique feature set embedded in the software running on Cisco routers. It takes advantage of a remote office's existing network to provide multi feature call-processing redundancy for centralized Cisco Unified Communications Manager and Cisco Unified Communications Manager Business Edition deployments if the office's or the teleworker's home WAN connection is lost.** Note that CME is specifically NOT mentioned. SRST is for backing up Centralized CallManager/Communications Manager deployments. Cliff - Original Message - From: Rogers O. OCHIENG mailto:r.ochi...@smoothtel.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Cc: jnde...@westconafrica.com Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 4:51 PM Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST in CME only deployment?? List, I've tried in vain to convince my friend with a lot of pain, pointing out links at Cisco.com and even suggesting that I lend him my Voice books, that you cannot have SRST fallback with only two sites with only CME. That indeed you MUST have CM to do SRST fallback and that this is not a CME feature. He has offered $100 to prove this to him and I feel so bad taking money from him. He's in the Cisco Voice world and I would like him to get a good foundation on the basics as he plans to pursue his CCIE Voice Lab soon. Regards Rogers
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST in CME only deployment??
It may not be called SRST, but could your friend be referencing to the 'ip source-address x.x.x.x secondary' command? http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucme/command/reference/cme_i1ht.html#wp1012400 ** (Optional) Second Cisco Unified CME router with which phones can register if the primary Cisco Unified CME router fails. On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Rogers O. OCHIENG r.ochi...@smoothtel.comwrote: He's French so maybe it's a language barrier thing? J Is Cisco.com available in french? *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Cliff McGlamry *Sent:* 16 January 2009 01:01 *To:* r.ochi...@smoothtel.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Cc:* jnde...@westconafrica.com *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST in CME only deployment?? From Cisco's web site: Cisco Unified Survivable Remote Site Telephony is a unique feature set embedded in the software running on Cisco routers. It takes advantage of a remote office's existing network to provide multi feature call-processing redundancy for centralized Cisco Unified Communications Manager and Cisco Unified Communications Manager Business Edition deployments if the office's or the teleworker's home WAN connection is lost.** Note that CME is specifically NOT mentioned. SRST is for backing up Centralized CallManager/Communications Manager deployments. Cliff - Original Message - *From:* Rogers O. OCHIENG r.ochi...@smoothtel.com *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Cc:* jnde...@westconafrica.com *Sent:* Thursday, January 15, 2009 4:51 PM *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST in CME only deployment?? List, I've tried in vain to convince my friend with a lot of pain, pointing out links at Cisco.com and even suggesting that I lend him my Voice books, that you cannot have SRST fallback with only two sites with only CME. That indeed you MUST have CM to do SRST fallback and that this is not a CME feature. He has offered $100 to prove this to him and I feel so bad taking money from him. He's in the Cisco Voice world and I would like him to get a good foundation on the basics as he plans to pursue his CCIE Voice Lab soon. Regards Rogers
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Confusion over trunks...
Team, I am confused over when to use (in CCM V4.1(3)) - h225 Trunk (gatekeeper controlled) - inter-cluster Trunk (gatekeeper controlled) Can someone explain the reasons for choosing either? Thanks in advance, John..
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST in CME only deployment??
Well, this is the page, but it's not available in French: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps2169/index.html# There is another page that is in French, but it links to the English page for more details: http://www.cisco.com/web/FR/products/ip_tel/ip_tel_home.html#5 Cliff - Original Message - From: Rogers O. OCHIENG To: cl...@mcglamry.net ; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Cc: jnde...@westconafrica.com Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 5:04 PM Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST in CME only deployment?? He's French so maybe it's a language barrier thing? J Is Cisco.com available in french? From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Cliff McGlamry Sent: 16 January 2009 01:01 To: r.ochi...@smoothtel.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Cc: jnde...@westconafrica.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST in CME only deployment?? From Cisco's web site: Cisco Unified Survivable Remote Site Telephony is a unique feature set embedded in the software running on Cisco routers. It takes advantage of a remote office's existing network to provide multi feature call-processing redundancy for centralized Cisco Unified Communications Manager and Cisco Unified Communications Manager Business Edition deployments if the office's or the teleworker's home WAN connection is lost.** Note that CME is specifically NOT mentioned. SRST is for backing up Centralized CallManager/Communications Manager deployments. Cliff - Original Message - From: Rogers O. OCHIENG To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Cc: jnde...@westconafrica.com Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 4:51 PM Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST in CME only deployment?? List, I've tried in vain to convince my friend with a lot of pain, pointing out links at Cisco.com and even suggesting that I lend him my Voice books, that you cannot have SRST fallback with only two sites with only CME. That indeed you MUST have CM to do SRST fallback and that this is not a CME feature. He has offered $100 to prove this to him and I feel so bad taking money from him. He's in the Cisco Voice world and I would like him to get a good foundation on the basics as he plans to pursue his CCIE Voice Lab soon. Regards Rogers
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP CM
thanks Christian.. I will check tonigth and let you know. On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Christian Hennrich christian.hennr...@intact-is.com wrote: Hi, I'm using VMware server and I noticed the same behaviour. In VMWare Server you can disable to sync the vm with the host, aka linux vmware server. Since then I haven't had problems any more. This is in one of the sub settings of vmware machine. I do not know, where to find it in the esx box. Ryan Trauernicht schrieb: That did not help Digging alittle bit further into this I see that my CM is actually pulling clock from my ESX box. Not sure why that is happening. Anyone else running ESX for their Call Manager having the same issue? On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:41 PM, karuna durai karu...@gmail.commailto: karu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, After editing the ntp.conf file please fo to CMD as C:\Prog file\cisco\xntp ntpdate -b IPADD of NTP pls try this and let me know On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:33 AM, Ryan Trauernicht ryanstudyvo...@gmail.com mailto:ryanstudyvo...@gmail.com wrote: Any reason why CM will not keep its NTP clock. I have a local router with the following commands: ntp master 3 ntp source loopback0 (IP address is 192.168.187.1) I have edited the c:\WINNT\System32\Drivers\Etc\ntp.config My file looks like: server 192.168.187.1 # Set Local Clock to Authoritive Time Source fudge 192.168.187.1 stratum 5 # Resets Stratum from default 3 to 5 driftfile C:\WINNT\system32\drivers\etc\ntp.drift # path for drift file I stopped the Network Time Protocol service and I run ntpdate.exe 192.168.187.1 command from the cmd. That sets the clock to sync to NTP router just fine. After I reboot CM it goes back to GMT it looks like. I see it trying to sync but it never does. I have waited over 15mins and nothing. Thanks, Ryan Trauernicht __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unable to download IPMA Console
It should be 1 / http://10.22.200.21/ma/Install/IPMAConsoleInstall.jsp What SR are you on? It is SR depend for 4.13 also. Thanks, Ryan Trauernicht On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:06 PM, anil batra anil...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi All, I am trying to download IPMA Conlsoe from the follwoing URL. It shows me The page cannot be found Tried downloading on CCM server / from my laptop.. http://10.22.200.21//ma/Install/IPMAConsoleInstall.jsp Am I missing somehting here. regds // anil
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST in CME only deployment??
Could also be thinking of the CME as SRST feature. This where CME is used instead of SRST as a failover for UCM. Chris wafers44 wrote: It may not be called SRST, but could your friend be referencing to the 'ip source-address x.x.x.x secondary' command? http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucme/command/reference/cme_i1ht.html#wp1012400 (Optional) Second Cisco Unified CME router with which phones can register if the primary Cisco Unified CME router fails. On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Rogers O. OCHIENG r.ochi...@smoothtel.com mailto:r.ochi...@smoothtel.com wrote: He's French so maybe it's a language barrier thing? J Is Cisco.com available in french? *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Cliff McGlamry *Sent:* 16 January 2009 01:01 *To:* r.ochi...@smoothtel.com mailto:r.ochi...@smoothtel.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Cc:* jnde...@westconafrica.com mailto:jnde...@westconafrica.com *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST in CME only deployment?? From Cisco's web site: Cisco Unified Survivable Remote Site Telephony is a unique feature set embedded in the software running on Cisco routers. It takes advantage of a remote office's existing network to provide multi feature call-processing redundancy for centralized Cisco Unified Communications Manager and Cisco Unified Communications Manager Business Edition deployments if the office's or the teleworker's home WAN connection is lost.** Note that CME is specifically NOT mentioned. SRST is for backing up Centralized CallManager/Communications Manager deployments. Cliff - Original Message - *From:* Rogers O. OCHIENG mailto:r.ochi...@smoothtel.com *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Cc:* jnde...@westconafrica.com mailto:jnde...@westconafrica.com *Sent:* Thursday, January 15, 2009 4:51 PM *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST in CME only deployment?? List, I've tried in vain to convince my friend with a lot of pain, pointing out links at Cisco.com and even suggesting that I lend him my Voice books, that you cannot have SRST fallback with only two sites with only CME. That indeed you MUST have CM to do SRST fallback and that this is not a CME feature. He has offered $100 to prove this to him and I feel so bad taking money from him. He's in the Cisco Voice world and I would like him to get a good foundation on the basics as he plans to pursue his CCIE Voice Lab soon. Regards Rogers
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to avoid the switches to Mark or Remark any packets ?
That shouldn't be necessary because the switches aren't paying attention to the markings or doing any queuing with QoS turned off. o Ninja wrote: Just more one thought, how about the traffic that goes back to the CCM or Phones from the serial interfaces ? Should I create other policy to mark packets in that direction too ? Thanks in advance. Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:55:55 -0500 From: cpar...@cparker.us To: scarlo...@hotmail.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to avoid the switches to Mark or Remark any packets ? Thats right, if the QoS is globally disabled on the switch, It will not touch the COS or DSCP markings. You'll need to issue: no mls qos on CAT3550 set qos disable on CAT6500 However look carefully at what the lab wants you to do. You may need to create a policy in the MQC that will mark packets that go into the routers from the switches using either NBAR or ACLs to classify the traffic. Otherwise, the LLQ on serial interfaces may fail because packets aren't properly marked by the originating device. Chris o Ninja wrote: Hello All, What is the best approach to make sure that my switches are not going to mark or remark any packets coming and going to the endpoints ? Am I safe if I just configure the vlans on the interfaces and let the qos off ? Thanks in advance. Notícias direto do New York Times, gols do Lance, videocassetadas e muitos outros vídeos no MSN Videos! Confira já! http://video.msn.com/?mkt=pt-br É fácil compartilhar suas fotos com o Windows LiveT Arraste e solte http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/photos.aspx
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] VPIM using IP Addres
Hello Group, Anyone out threre please who has done CUE -Unity integration uing IP Address and can helps us..will be very kind of you. regds // anil
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VPIM using IP Addres
What do you need help with? Kind of need to be alittle more specific. On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 9:05 PM, anil batra anil...@yahoo.com wrote: Hello Group, Anyone out threre please who has done CUE -Unity integration uing IP Address and can helps us..will be very kind of you. regds // anil
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VPIM using IP Addres
I have confiured the Unity and CUE for VPIM networking , 1 I entered IP Address whereever it says domain name, on CUE I see it shows email domain ---domain name/IP address which shd be good I beleive 2. On Unity I entered IP Address whereevr it needed domain name Have you done it please... --- On Fri, 1/16/09, Ryan Trauernicht ryanstudyvo...@gmail.com wrote: From: Ryan Trauernicht ryanstudyvo...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VPIM using IP Addres To: anil...@yahoo.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Friday, January 16, 2009, 8:46 AM What do you need help with? Kind of need to be alittle more specific. On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 9:05 PM, anil batra anil...@yahoo.com wrote: Hello Group, Anyone out threre please who has done CUE -Unity integration uing IP Address and can helps us..will be very kind of you. regds // anil
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VPIM using IP Addres
Vik - did give some clue on this doing static mapping of IP Address --- On Fri, 1/16/09, Ryan Trauernicht ryanstudyvo...@gmail.com wrote: From: Ryan Trauernicht ryanstudyvo...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VPIM using IP Addres To: anil...@yahoo.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Friday, January 16, 2009, 8:46 AM What do you need help with? Kind of need to be alittle more specific. On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 9:05 PM, anil batra anil...@yahoo.com wrote: Hello Group, Anyone out threre please who has done CUE -Unity integration uing IP Address and can helps us..will be very kind of you. regds // anil
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Something strange on the 6608
I have a 6608 in slot 5 of the catalyst.I've configured 5/2 as a conf bridge and 5/3 as a transcoder. When I issue a Show port 5 , port 5/3 displays type as Conf Bridge Under the CCM interface , the transcoder display an unknown registration status. Anyone run into this? It's as if CM is passing it the wrong load. - Scott
