Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Single Number Reach

[Omotayo]

Hello,

i have added he userid to the phone and now i can use the mobility button
but i still do not see "IN Use Remote"
Any ideas?

Regards
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Jeff Knuckle wrote:

>  Do you have and user account assigned to the IP Phone and does the user
> account have the ‘Enable Mobility’ option checked?
>
>
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_0_1/ccmfeat/fsmobmgr.html#wp1221200
>
>
>
> Jeff.
>
>
>
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Omotayo
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 10, 2009 2:17 AM
> *To:* OSL Group
> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Single Number Reach
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
> My works but i do not see "In Use Remote" when i pick from the PSTN phone.
> Also, when i try to use mobility feature, i get this message "you are not a
> valid mobile phone user"
>
>
> Any with any idea of what could be the cause
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST - Max Conference question

[Alex Hannah]

Hello everyone,

If you wanted to limit the number of conferences in SRST mode to 2, AND
limit those conferences to a maximum of 3 participants, would the following
be the proper approach?

!
call-manager-fallback
   max-conference 2  ( where X would represent the total number of
conferences allowed )
   max-dn 25 dual-line ( this should allow each line to have 3 people on
call )
!
!
dspfarm profile 2 conference
 codec g711ulaw
 codec g711alaw
 codec g729ar8
 codec g729abr8
 codec g729r8
 codec g729br8
 maximum sessions 2
 associate application SCCP
!

Would you need to register the hardware conference bridge  to SRST some
how?

Thanks,

Alex
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE#25711

[CCIE Downunder]

Congrats mate. That is a really big achievement, especially passing on the
first go ;)

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Aamir Panjwani <
aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au> wrote:

>  Just got my results and I have nailed it!  That was my first attempt for
> any ccie lab.  Huge relieve I still can’t believe it!
>
>
>
> Thanks to ipexpert for providing great study material. Special thanks to
> Vik, Mike C, Otto and everyone else who have been responding to my silly
> questions
>
>
>
> It’s party time now J
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
> *Aamir Panjwani*
>
> Cisco Voice Engineer
>
>
>
> [image: cid:91BCF466-356F-46B4-9497-FA2B6198A1BA]
>
> *
> iVision - Sydney*
>
> Level 14, 60 Carrington Street,
>
> Sydney, NSW 2000
>
>
>
> *P* +61 2 8296 6125
>
> *F *+61 2 9299 9585
>
> *E **aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au*
>
> *www.ivision.com.au* 
>
>
>
>
>
> __
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> __
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>


-- 
Sent from my MPhone
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Mobile Acess Configuration

[Omotayo]

Hello,

Am trying to configure Mobile Access. i cant seem to understand it.

Checking through the Feature and services of the Callmanager.

How to i Load the VXML application from the Cisco Unified Communications
Manager server (Publisher).

Any one wih an idea.

R2-RTR(config)#call application voice Unified CM
Warning: This command has been deprecated and will be automatically
converted to the following:
 service Unified CM
BR2-RTR(config)#
Nov 11 04:21:53.476: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_ifs_cb: hifs ifs could not open file
CM
Nov 11 04:21:53.476: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_free_idata: hifs_free_idata:
0x48E35760
Nov 11 04:21:53.476: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_hold_idata: hifs_hold_idata:
0x48E35760
Nov 11 04:21:53.476: Could not load IVR script
  CM
  errno=-1=hifs Failure

where do i input the http?

Also the mobile access voice DN you configure under the media resources. is
it same with the one specified in the service paramter

Any ideas pls

REgards
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Mobile Acess Configuration

[Aamir Panjwani]

HQ-RTR(config)#application

HQ-RTR(config)# service cmm http

 

Yes MVA number in service parameter and  media resources is same

 

 

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Omotayo
Sent: Wednesday, 11 November 2009 10:17 PM
To: OSL Group
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Mobile Acess Configuration

 

Hello,

 

Am trying to configure Mobile Access. i cant seem to understand it.

 

Checking through the Feature and services of the Callmanager.

 

How to i Load the VXML application from the Cisco Unified Communications
Manager server (Publisher). 

 

Any one wih an idea.

 

R2-RTR(config)#call application voice Unified CM
Warning: This command has been deprecated and will be automatically
converted to the following:
 service Unified CM

BR2-RTR(config)#
Nov 11 04:21:53.476: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_ifs_cb: hifs ifs could not open
file CM
Nov 11 04:21:53.476: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_free_idata: hifs_free_idata:
0x48E35760
Nov 11 04:21:53.476: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_hold_idata: hifs_hold_idata:
0x48E35760
Nov 11 04:21:53.476: Could not load IVR script
  CM
  errno=-1=hifs Failure

 

where do i input the http?

 

Also the mobile access voice DN you configure under the media resources.
is it same with the one specified in the service paramter

 

Any ideas pls

 

REgards


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
__


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
_
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Mobile Acess Configuration

[Omotayo]

Hello,

Am not going to input service Unified CM ?

i will try it and feed you back

Regards

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Aamir Panjwani <
aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au> wrote:

>  HQ-RTR(config)#application
>
> HQ-RTR(config)# service cmm http……..
>
>
>
> Yes MVA number in service parameter and  media resources is same
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Omotayo
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 11 November 2009 10:17 PM
> *To:* OSL Group
> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Mobile Acess Configuration
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Am trying to configure Mobile Access. i cant seem to understand it.
>
>
>
> Checking through the Feature and services of the Callmanager.
>
>
>
> How to i Load the VXML application from the Cisco Unified Communications
> Manager server (Publisher).
>
>
>
> Any one wih an idea.
>
>
>
> R2-RTR(config)#call application voice Unified CM
> Warning: This command has been deprecated and will be automatically
> converted to the following:
>  service Unified CM
>
> BR2-RTR(config)#
> Nov 11 04:21:53.476: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_ifs_cb: hifs ifs could not open file
> CM
> Nov 11 04:21:53.476: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_free_idata: hifs_free_idata:
> 0x48E35760
> Nov 11 04:21:53.476: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_hold_idata: hifs_hold_idata:
> 0x48E35760
> Nov 11 04:21:53.476: Could not load IVR script
>   CM
>   errno=-1=hifs Failure
>
>
>
> where do i input the http?
>
>
>
> Also the mobile access voice DN you configure under the media resources. is
> it same with the one specified in the service paramter
>
>
>
> Any ideas pls
>
>
>
> REgards
>
>
> __
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> __
>
> __
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> __
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] BLF/SpeedDial

[Omotayo]

Hello,

Am trying to get BLF/SpeedDial to work
Presence has been sucesfully integrated to the UCM

After assigning   the BLF to phone A to montor phone B on extension 5003

When there is a call on extension 5003. i do not receive any notification. i
guess am missing something out

Any ideas
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH spoofing at remote branch

[Michael Ciarfello]

Lol.  I'm still here.  I'm trying to get an IP phone to register to my 
Commodore 64.  I might need help.  Lol


From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Vik Malhi
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 12:13 AM
To: Aamir Panjwani; Kumar, Narinder; Robert McGhee; OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH spoofing at remote branch

Aamir- good to see you sticking around! It's like the KGB used to say- we will 
never let you leave (this list)! I'm sure Michael, Jonathan, Daniel, Otto et al 
are still addicted too.

My two cents: no mgcp / mgcp.

Also one more: the router is not multicasting and you do not need 
pim/multicast-routing enabled on the router since the router is the MOH server 
and we are flooding the multicast packets onto the subnets defined in the 
"multicast moh route" statement.


--
Vik Malhi - CCIE #13890
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com


Join our free online support and peer group communities:
http://www.IPexpert.com/communities
IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand 
and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S Lab, CCIE 
Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab 
Certifications.







From: Aamir Panjwani 
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:50:21 +1100
To: "Kumar, Narinder" , Robert McGhee 
, OSL Group 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH spoofing at remote branch

In addition to what Narinder suggested, by default MOH file name is 
"music-on-hold.au" NOT "music_on_hold.au" unless you manually renamed it. If 
you are playing from flash there is no need to enable multicast/pim dense mode.

Turn on "debug ccm-manager music-on-hold events" and "debug ip igmp" then make 
a test call

If you hear "tone on hold" as opposed to dead silence, that usually means UCM 
config problem. Double check you mrg/mrgl/moh server/regions etc.




From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Kumar, Narinder
Sent: Wednesday, 11 November 2009 3:43 PM
To: Robert McGhee; 'OSL Group'
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH spoofing at remote branch

Robert,
You need to change the command " multicast moh 239.1.1.1 port 16384"
To  multicast moh 239.1.1.1 port 16384 router  ( Voice Vlan)  ( 
loopback)

Voice vlan for PSTN users and loopback for MOH between ip phones.
Also if it is h323 gw you need ccm-manager music-on-hold.

You need to "no" the existing commands and then add again, that's the way of 
resetting MOH from flash.



From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Robert McGhee
Sent: Wednesday, 11 November 2009 3:36 PM
To: 'OSL Group'
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH spoofing at remote branch




Hi,

   Anyone run into issues getting MOH to play from flash for remote 
sites, spoofing the multicast address?  I have MOH setup for multicast on CUCM 
and MRGL is assigned to remote site phones.  Here's remote configuration:

call-manager-fallback
 max-conferences 8 gain -6
 transfer-system full-consult
 ip source-address 10.0.200.1 port 2000
 max-ephones 2
 max-dn 4
 moh music_on_hold.au
 multicast moh 239.1.1.1 port 16384

ip multicast-routing

int f0/0
ip pim dense-mode


Nothing shows up with "show ip mroute" I don't see anything for 239.1.1.1:

For giggles I added ccm-manager music-on-hold. Still nothing just the "beeps".  
The MOH file does play when the phones are in SRST mode.  I reset the streaming 
service and nothing, any ideas?

Thanks!!!




CONFIDENTIALITY - The information contained in this electronic mail message is 
confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not an 
authorised recipient of this message please contact UXC Getronics Australia 
immediately by reply email and destroy/delete this message from your computer. 
Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message, or part thereof, is 
strictly prohibited.
DISCLAIMER - Unless specifically indicated otherwise, the views and opinions 
expressed in this email are those of the sender and not UXC Getronics 
Australia. While we endeavour to protect our network from computer viruses, UXC 
Getronics Australia does not warrant that this email or any attachments are 
free of viruses or any other defects or errors. It is the duty of the recipient 
to virus scan and otherwise test any information contained in this email before 
loading onto any computer system.

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BLF/SpeedDial

[Kumar, Narinder]

Yes you are missing subscriber CSS.

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Omotayo
Sent: Wednesday, 11 November 2009 11:47 PM
To: OSL Group
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BLF/SpeedDial

Hello,

Am trying to get BLF/SpeedDial to work
Presence has been sucesfully integrated to the UCM

After assigning   the BLF to phone A to montor phone B on extension 5003

When there is a call on extension 5003. i do not receive any notification. i 
guess am missing something out

Any ideas


CONFIDENTIALITY - The information contained in this electronic mail message is 
confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not an 
authorised recipient of this message please contact UXC Getronics Australia 
immediately by reply email and destroy/delete this message from your computer. 
Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message, or part thereof, is 
strictly prohibited.
DISCLAIMER - Unless specifically indicated otherwise, the views and opinions 
expressed in this email are those of the sender and not UXC Getronics 
Australia. While we endeavour to protect our network from computer viruses, UXC 
Getronics Australia does not warrant that this email or any attachments are 
free of viruses or any other defects or errors. It is the duty of the recipient 
to virus scan and otherwise test any information contained in this email before 
loading onto any computer system.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] 2. BLF/SpeedDial (Omotayo)

[Ken McCoy]

Integrating Presence server has nothing really to do with BLF/Speed dial 
configuration.

To get notification for a "ringing" call, you must select the "Call Pickup" 
checkbox on the BLF\Speed dial DN setup page.  You'll get an "orange" flashing 
light.

Check you ICON status, if you are not getting an "off hook" notification (red 
light) when the phone goes off hook, you need to check and make sure the 
SUBSCRIBE search spaces are set correctly for each device.

If your ICON status is a bunch of dots, more than likely your SUBSCRIBE search 
spaces for the phone are not set.

Ken



Message: 2
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:46:32 +0100
From: Omotayo 
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BLF/SpeedDial
To: OSL Group 
Message-ID:
<3082f9d4090446j27f09b58q472b6e46062aa...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hello,

Am trying to get BLF/SpeedDial to work
Presence has been sucesfully integrated to the UCM

After assigning   the BLF to phone A to montor phone B on extension 5003

When there is a call on extension 5003. i do not receive any notification. i
guess am missing something out

Any ideas
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/2009/c011d099/attachment-0001.htm
 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST - Max Conference question

[Kumar, Narinder]

The adhoc conference in SRST is only 3 party conference.
Max-conference 2 - Good for 2 ..3 party conference

No need of any dspfarm profile 2 conf etc.

BTW did you jump into the command section of call-man-fallback and actually see 
any commands about registering the hardware conf.

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Alex Hannah
Sent: Wednesday, 11 November 2009 8:06 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST - Max Conference question

Hello everyone,

If you wanted to limit the number of conferences in SRST mode to 2, AND limit 
those conferences to a maximum of 3 participants, would the following be the 
proper approach?

!
call-manager-fallback
   max-conference 2  ( where X would represent the total number of conferences 
allowed )
   max-dn 25 dual-line ( this should allow each line to have 3 people on call )
!
!
dspfarm profile 2 conference
 codec g711ulaw
 codec g711alaw
 codec g729ar8
 codec g729abr8
 codec g729r8
 codec g729br8
 maximum sessions 2
 associate application SCCP
!

Would you need to register the hardware conference bridge  to SRST some how?

Thanks,

Alex


CONFIDENTIALITY - The information contained in this electronic mail message is 
confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not an 
authorised recipient of this message please contact UXC Getronics Australia 
immediately by reply email and destroy/delete this message from your computer. 
Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message, or part thereof, is 
strictly prohibited.
DISCLAIMER - Unless specifically indicated otherwise, the views and opinions 
expressed in this email are those of the sender and not UXC Getronics 
Australia. While we endeavour to protect our network from computer viruses, UXC 
Getronics Australia does not warrant that this email or any attachments are 
free of viruses or any other defects or errors. It is the duty of the recipient 
to virus scan and otherwise test any information contained in this email before 
loading onto any computer system.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH spoofing at remote branch

[Daniel Rodriguez]

I'm still around.. just in stealth mode :)

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Vik Malhi
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 12:13 AM
To: Aamir Panjwani; Kumar, Narinder; Robert McGhee; OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH spoofing at remote branch

Aamir- good to see you sticking around! It's like the KGB used to say- we will 
never let you leave (this list)! I'm sure Michael, Jonathan, Daniel, Otto et al 
are still addicted too.

My two cents: no mgcp / mgcp.

Also one more: the router is not multicasting and you do not need 
pim/multicast-routing enabled on the router since the router is the MOH server 
and we are flooding the multicast packets onto the subnets defined in the 
"multicast moh route" statement.


--
Vik Malhi - CCIE #13890
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com


Join our free online support and peer group communities:
http://www.IPexpert.com/communities
IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand 
and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S Lab, CCIE 
Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab 
Certifications.







From: Aamir Panjwani 
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:50:21 +1100
To: "Kumar, Narinder" , Robert McGhee 
, OSL Group 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH spoofing at remote branch

In addition to what Narinder suggested, by default MOH file name is 
"music-on-hold.au" NOT "music_on_hold.au" unless you manually renamed it. If 
you are playing from flash there is no need to enable multicast/pim dense mode.

Turn on "debug ccm-manager music-on-hold events" and "debug ip igmp" then make 
a test call

If you hear "tone on hold" as opposed to dead silence, that usually means UCM 
config problem. Double check you mrg/mrgl/moh server/regions etc.




From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Kumar, Narinder
Sent: Wednesday, 11 November 2009 3:43 PM
To: Robert McGhee; 'OSL Group'
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH spoofing at remote branch

Robert,
You need to change the command " multicast moh 239.1.1.1 port 16384"
To  multicast moh 239.1.1.1 port 16384 router  ( Voice Vlan)  ( 
loopback)

Voice vlan for PSTN users and loopback for MOH between ip phones.
Also if it is h323 gw you need ccm-manager music-on-hold.

You need to "no" the existing commands and then add again, that's the way of 
resetting MOH from flash.



From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Robert McGhee
Sent: Wednesday, 11 November 2009 3:36 PM
To: 'OSL Group'
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH spoofing at remote branch




Hi,

   Anyone run into issues getting MOH to play from flash for remote 
sites, spoofing the multicast address?  I have MOH setup for multicast on CUCM 
and MRGL is assigned to remote site phones.  Here's remote configuration:

call-manager-fallback
 max-conferences 8 gain -6
 transfer-system full-consult
 ip source-address 10.0.200.1 port 2000
 max-ephones 2
 max-dn 4
 moh music_on_hold.au
 multicast moh 239.1.1.1 port 16384

ip multicast-routing

int f0/0
ip pim dense-mode


Nothing shows up with "show ip mroute" I don't see anything for 239.1.1.1:

For giggles I added ccm-manager music-on-hold. Still nothing just the "beeps".  
The MOH file does play when the phones are in SRST mode.  I reset the streaming 
service and nothing, any ideas?

Thanks!!!




CONFIDENTIALITY - The information contained in this electronic mail message is 
confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not an 
authorised recipient of this message please contact UXC Getronics Australia 
immediately by reply email and destroy/delete this message from your computer. 
Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message, or part thereof, is 
strictly prohibited.
DISCLAIMER - Unless specifically indicated otherwise, the views and opinions 
expressed in this email are those of the sender and not UXC Getronics 
Australia. While we endeavour to protect our network from computer viruses, UXC 
Getronics Australia does not warrant that this email or any attachments are 
free of viruses or any other defects or errors. It is the duty of the recipient 
to virus scan and otherwise test any information contained in this email before 
loading onto any computer system.

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email S

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Ephone registration problem

[CCIETalk.com]

I had a similar problem in my home lab while redoing lab 1a and had to reset
like Amp said.

On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 3:27 PM, vccie2010  wrote:

> Seems like phone must have been reg as SIP in previous session and was not
> able to load SCCP FW from CME. May be someone from IPX can shed some light
> on this. Just want to make sure this does not happen in real lab and know
> that we will have physical access to phones there so can do fact reset
> ourself but just wanted to get to the root of the issue.
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Arun Kumar  wrote:
>
>> I had the same issue and I asked support to reset my phones to factory
>> default and that fixed the issue.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 3:33 AM, Gobind Singh Gill  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I had all the necessary commands in telephony service like max-dn,
>>> max-ephone, ip source-address etc. but there was problem with Proctor
>>> Labs phone, it is fixed now. This was driving me crazy as I had
>>> everything
>>> configured correctly. But thanks for your input!
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> --Gobind
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 10:52 PM,
>>>  wrote:
>>> > Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
>>> >ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>>> >
>>> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>> >http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
>>> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>> >ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
>>> >
>>> > You can reach the person managing the list at
>>> >ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
>>> >
>>> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>> > than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Today's Topics:
>>> >
>>> >   1. Re: Thank you everyone (Kumar, Narinder)
>>> >   2. Re: Ephone registration problem (Berry, Matthew J.)
>>> >   3. Re: Blocking Outbound VoIP calls. (Jeff Knuckle)
>>> >   4. Re: Ephone registration problem (Amp)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> >
>>> > Message: 1
>>> > Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 07:17:22 +1100
>>> > From: "Kumar, Narinder" 
>>> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Thank you everyone
>>> > To: Michael Ciarfello ,
>>> >"ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" <
>>> ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
>>> > Message-ID:
>>> ><9e7dd48644dd594da5ff12ffa0d2dbe23a5cc30...@exmsyd01.aus.local>
>>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>> >
>>> > Hey Michael,
>>> > Great news, congratulations man !!
>>> >
>>> > Cheers
>>> > Narinder
>>> >
>>> > From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
>>> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Michael Ciarfello
>>> > Sent: Friday, 6 November 2009 1:52 AM
>>> > To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>>> > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Thank you everyone
>>> >
>>> > I took my lab attempt in San Jose on Tuesday.  I am proud to say I met
>>> Cisco's requirements to validate my expertise.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks to IPExpert for providing a great baseline of practice material
>>> and very inventive and thoughtful questions.  Thanks for everyone on this
>>> list for answering my questions and also ASKING great questions.  Keep up
>>> the good work on a great forum and tool for pursuing this certification.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks again everyone.
>>> >
>>> > Michael Ciarfello (CCIE Voice 25698)
>>> > Unified Communications
>>> > Subject Matter Expert
>>> > IPLogic, Inc.
>>> > www.iplogic.com
>>> >
>>> > Connect . Communicate . Compete . BetterTM
>>> >
>>> > 
>>> > CONFIDENTIALITY - The information contained in this electronic mail
>>> message is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you
>>> are not an authorised recipient of this message please contact UXC Getronics
>>> Australia immediately by reply email and destroy/delete this message from
>>> your computer. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message, or
>>> part thereof, is strictly prohibited.
>>> > DISCLAIMER - Unless specifically indicated otherwise, the views and
>>> opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not UXC
>>> Getronics Australia. While we endeavour to protect our network from computer
>>> viruses, UXC Getronics Australia does not warrant that this email or any
>>> attachments are free of viruses or any other defects or errors. It is the
>>> duty of the recipient to virus scan and otherwise test any information
>>> contained in this email before loading onto any computer system.
>>> > -- next part --
>>> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> > URL:
>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20091106/870eed15/attachment-0001.htm
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> >
>>> > Message: 2
>>> > Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 14:59:23 -0600
>>> > From: "Berry, Matthew J." 
>>> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Ephone registration problem
>>> > To

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS Question

[Alex Hannah]

Hello everyone.

I am attempting to create the following QoS policy on a 3750  port with an
IP Phone plugged in behind it.

The policy will police signalling ( SCCP ) 32k down to 8k and remark to DSCP
8.  I have read through most of the SRND guide for the 3750, the model I am
following is the:

2970/3560/3750—Conditionally-Trusted IP Phone + PC + Scavenger (Basic) Model
Configuration on page 105 of the 3.3 QoS SRND.

Can anyone validate my work below and let me know if you think this meets
those requirements?  Also, in this scenerio, Auto Qos would not need to be
applied over top of it correct?

mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 24 32 46 48 56
mls qos map policed-dscp 0 24 to 8

class-map match-all VVLAN-VOICE
 !Was in SRND but not using match access-group name VVLAN-VOICE
 match ip dscp ef

class-map match-all VVLAN-CALL-SIGNALING
 !Was in SRND but not using match access-group name VVLAN-CALL-SIGNALLING
 match ip dscp cs3 af31

class-map match-all VVLAN-ANY
  match access-group name VVLAN-ANY

policy-map IPPHONE+PC-BASIC
 class VVLAN-VOICE
  set ip dscp 46
  police 128000 8000
  exceed-action drop
 class VVLAN-CALL-SIGNALING
  set ip dscp 24
  police 32000 8000
  exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit
 class VVLAN-ANY
  set ip dscp 0
  police 32000 8000
  exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit

 class class-default
  set ip dscp 0
  police 500 8000
  exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit

interface FastEthernet0/1
 service-policy input IPPHONE+PC-BASIC

ip access list extended VVLAN-VOICE
 permit udp x.x.x.x 0.0.0.255 any range 16384 32767

ip access list extended VVLAN-CALL-SIGNALING
 permit tcp x.x.x.x 0.0.0.255 any range 2000 2002

ip access list extended VVLAN-ANY
 permit ip x.x.x.x 0.0.0.255 any



Thanks,

Alex

 *


*
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol1 Lab 1a - DHCP issues with CUCM 7 - Follow up Question

[Jefferson Wilson]

Based on the fact the UCM doesn't have a "show ip dhcp binding" command
of some sorts I wonder if there is a run slq * command of some kind.

 

I found once that I had to reset the DHCP monitor service for DHCP to
work.  I had a good config but stressed over "what am I missing."

 

What is a good way to see if the UCM server is even seeing the DHCP
request?  That way we know if the request is making it and if the UCM is
mis configured.

 

Thank you,

 

Jefferson

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol1 Lab 1a - DHCP issues with CUCM 7 - Follow up Question

[CCIETalk.com]

>From my understanding there is no real way of seeing that on CUCM. You
can possible do some ACL logging to the closest point aka HQ 3750 to
see if dhcp requests are indeed flowing.

On 11/11/09, Jefferson Wilson  wrote:
> Based on the fact the UCM doesn't have a "show ip dhcp binding" command
> of some sorts I wonder if there is a run slq * command of some kind.
>
>
>
> I found once that I had to reset the DHCP monitor service for DHCP to
> work.  I had a good config but stressed over "what am I missing."
>
>
>
> What is a good way to see if the UCM server is even seeing the DHCP
> request?  That way we know if the request is making it and if the UCM is
> mis configured.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
>
>
> Jefferson
>
>

-- 
Sent from my mobile device

www.ccietalk.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] ASA 5505 config (Jefferson Wilson) - Follow up

[Jefferson Wilson]

I have heard from anyone as of yet.  Does anyone have working ASA config
they are using for PL for HW phone access?

 

Thank you,

 

Jefferson

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS Question

[Michael Ciarfello]

Here are some hints for you to research:

I believe there is an error in one of the class-maps.  See if you can find it 
or agree.

I believe you have too much extra stuff configured, let’s eliminate the 
unneeded stuff.

How about use match IP protocol instead of access-lists?

Are you sure your access-list is correct for the inbound / outbound traffic you 
have?

I think the data vlan people are going to be pissed and complain about 
slowness.  I know it’s a lab.  I believe you can get the entire config down to 
a much simplier 10-15 lines instead of all the stuff you have.

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Alex Hannah
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 2:41 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS Question

Hello everyone.

I am attempting to create the following QoS policy on a 3750  port with an IP 
Phone plugged in behind it.

The policy will police signalling ( SCCP ) 32k down to 8k and remark to DSCP 8. 
 I have read through most of the SRND guide for the 3750, the model I am 
following is the:

2970/3560/3750—Conditionally-Trusted IP Phone + PC + Scavenger (Basic) Model 
Configuration on page 105 of the 3.3 QoS SRND.

Can anyone validate my work below and let me know if you think this meets those 
requirements?  Also, in this scenerio, Auto Qos would not need to be applied 
over top of it correct?

mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 24 32 46 48 56
mls qos map policed-dscp 0 24 to 8

class-map match-all VVLAN-VOICE
 !Was in SRND but not using match access-group name VVLAN-VOICE
 match ip dscp ef

class-map match-all VVLAN-CALL-SIGNALING
 !Was in SRND but not using match access-group name VVLAN-CALL-SIGNALLING
 match ip dscp cs3 af31

class-map match-all VVLAN-ANY
  match access-group name VVLAN-ANY

policy-map IPPHONE+PC-BASIC
 class VVLAN-VOICE
  set ip dscp 46
  police 128000 8000
  exceed-action drop
 class VVLAN-CALL-SIGNALING
  set ip dscp 24
  police 32000 8000
  exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit
 class VVLAN-ANY
  set ip dscp 0
  police 32000 8000
  exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit

 class class-default
  set ip dscp 0
  police 500 8000
  exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit

interface FastEthernet0/1
 service-policy input IPPHONE+PC-BASIC

ip access list extended VVLAN-VOICE
 permit udp x.x.x.x 0.0.0.255 any range 16384 32767

ip access list extended VVLAN-CALL-SIGNALING
 permit tcp x.x.x.x 0.0.0.255 any range 2000 2002

ip access list extended VVLAN-ANY
 permit ip x.x.x.x 0.0.0.255 any



Thanks,

Alex　

　

　

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab open ended questions (sean hurricane) - Follow up

[Jefferson Wilson]

Monday nights and 5 AM to 6 AM in the morning are my SRND times along
with reading all of the e-mails from the group.

 

I am assuming that is enough for OEQ. (Insert "assume" joke here.)  I
have also read the Enterprise parameters and am about halfway through
the Service parameters for UCM.

 

That is my plan and I am sticking to it for the OEQ.

 

Jefferson

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Link Loss Type explanation

[Kevin Damisch]

Was this ever answered?  I agree that the built in doc and PDFs don't go into 
any detail.  I think I remember briefly talking about it in bootcamp, but 
everybody pretty much said they've never changed it.

Thanks,
Kevin

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Cotter
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 12:51 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Link Loss Type explanation

Looking for an explanation or a good document that explains this setting under 
Region configuration.  Can someone point me in the right direction on this.  
Thanks


Jeff


This communication (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of 
the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information 
that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable 
law. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify Vital Support Systems at 515 334 5700 and 
delete or destroy all copies and the original document.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS Question

[Alex Hannah]

Michael and Farkas,

Okay, I have thought about what you mentioned.  Here is my revised
approach.  Let me know what you think about this way:

!
mls qos map policed-dscp  0 24 to 8
mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 24 32 46 48 56
mls qos
!
!
class-map match-any SCCP-Traffic
  match ip dscp cs3  af31
!
!
policy-map POLICE-MAP
  class SCCP-Traffic
police 32 8000 exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit
   set dscp cs3
!
!
interface FastEthernet0/6
  service-policy input POLICE-MAP
!

What is the signifigance of matching both ip dscp cs3  af31?  Since I have
match-any will it match on both?  New CUCM 7.x servers should send SCCP out
at cs3 correct?

Thanks,

Alex


2009/11/11 "Farkas Péter" 

> AutoQoS cannot be configured until service-policy is attached to the
> interface so you cannot use it for correction. Also, AutoQos does not work
> on Eth.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Michael Ciarfello 
> Date: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 8:56 pm
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS Question
> To: Alex Hannah , "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com"
> 
>
>
> > Here are some hints for you to research:
> >
> >  I believe there is an error in one of the class-maps.  See if you can
> find it or agree.
> >
> >  I believe you have too much extra stuff configured, let’s eliminate the
> unneeded stuff.
> >
> >  How about use match IP protocol instead of access-lists?
> >
> >  Are you sure your access-list is correct for the inbound / outbound
> traffic you have?
> >
> >  I think the data vlan people are going to be pissed and complain about
> slowness.  I know it’s
> > a lab.  I believe you can get the entire config down to a much simplier
> 10-15 lines instead of
> > all the stuff you have.
> >
> >  From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [ On Behalf Of Alex Hannah
>  >  Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 2:41 PM
> >  To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> >  Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS Question
> >
> >  Hello everyone.
> >
> >  I am attempting to create the following QoS policy on a 3750  port with
> an IP Phone plugged in
> > behind it.
> >
> >  The policy will police signalling ( SCCP ) 32k down to 8k and remark to
> DSCP 8.  I have read
> > through most of the SRND guide for the 3750, the model I am following is
> the:
> >
> >  2970/3560/3750–Conditionally-Trusted IP Phone + PC + Scavenger (Basic)
> Model Configuration on
> > page 105 of the 3.3 QoS SRND.
> >
> >  Can anyone validate my work below and let me know if you think this
> meets those requirements?
> > Also, in this scenerio, Auto Qos would not need to be applied over top of
> it correct?
> >
> >  mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 24 32 46 48 56
> >  mls qos map policed-dscp 0 24 to 8
> >
> >  class-map match-all VVLAN-VOICE
> >   !Was in SRND but not using match access-group name VVLAN-VOICE
> >   match ip dscp ef
> >
> >  class-map match-all VVLAN-CALL-SIGNALING
> >   !Was in SRND but not using match access-group name
> VVLAN-CALL-SIGNALLING
> >   match ip dscp cs3 af31
> >
> >  class-map match-all VVLAN-ANY
> >match access-group name VVLAN-ANY
> >
> >  policy-map IPPHONE+PC-BASIC
> >   class VVLAN-VOICE
> >set ip dscp 46
> >police 128000 8000
> >exceed-action drop
> >   class VVLAN-CALL-SIGNALING
> >set ip dscp 24
> >police 32000 8000
> >exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit
> >   class VVLAN-ANY
> >set ip dscp 0
> >police 32000 8000
> >exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit
> >
> >   class class-default
> >set ip dscp 0
> >police 500 8000
> >exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit
> >
> >  interface FastEthernet0/1
> >   service-policy input IPPHONE+PC-BASIC
> >
> >  ip access list extended VVLAN-VOICE
> >   permit udp x.x.x.x 0.0.0.255 any range 16384 32767
> >
> >  ip access list extended VVLAN-CALL-SIGNALING
> >   permit tcp x.x.x.x 0.0.0.255 any range 2000 2002
> >
> >  ip access list extended VVLAN-ANY
> >   permit ip x.x.x.x 0.0.0.255 any
> >
> >
> >
> >  Thanks,
> >
> >  Alex
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> >  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS Question

[Michael Ciarfello]

That's looking better.  Check your policed-dscp line to ONLY meet your 
requirements.

Check the command reference and 3750 Switch COnfiguration guide - QoS chapter 
on that police command. I haven't looked at that or remember if it's correct.

Pay attention to what Farkas said.  Look at other documents to find the source 
of that.  Maybe the document I mentioned above on what he is saying is in there.

Why CS3 and AF31?  If you have a home lab or a partial home lab, use a sniffer 
and sniff around.  Let us know what you find.

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Alex Hannah 
[alex.han...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 6:56 PM
To: Farkas Péter
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS Question

Michael and Farkas,

Okay, I have thought about what you mentioned.  Here is my revised approach.  
Let me know what you think about this way:

!
mls qos map policed-dscp  0 24 to 8
mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 24 32 46 48 56
mls qos
!
!
class-map match-any SCCP-Traffic
  match ip dscp cs3  af31
!
!
policy-map POLICE-MAP
  class SCCP-Traffic
police 32 8000 exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit
   set dscp cs3
!
!
interface FastEthernet0/6
  service-policy input POLICE-MAP
!

What is the signifigance of matching both ip dscp cs3  af31?  Since I have 
match-any will it match on both?  New CUCM 7.x servers should send SCCP out at 
cs3 correct?

Thanks,

Alex


2009/11/11 "Farkas Péter" mailto:wormh...@sch.bme.hu>>
AutoQoS cannot be configured until service-policy is attached to the interface 
so you cannot use it for correction. Also, AutoQos does not work on Eth.

- Original Message -
From: Michael Ciarfello 
Date: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 8:56 pm
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS Question
To: Alex Hannah mailto:alex.han...@gmail.com>>, 
"ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 
mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>>


> Here are some hints for you to research:
>
>  I believe there is an error in one of the class-maps.  See if you can find 
> it or agree.
>
>  I believe you have too much extra stuff configured, let’s eliminate the 
> unneeded stuff.
>
>  How about use match IP protocol instead of access-lists?
>
>  Are you sure your access-list is correct for the inbound / outbound traffic 
> you have?
>
>  I think the data vlan people are going to be pissed and complain about 
> slowness.  I know it’s
> a lab.  I believe you can get the entire config down to a much simplier 10-15 
> lines instead of
> all the stuff you have.
>
>  From: 
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
>  [ On Behalf Of Alex Hannah
>  Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 2:41 PM
>  To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>  Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS Question
>
>  Hello everyone.
>
>  I am attempting to create the following QoS policy on a 3750  port with an 
> IP Phone plugged in
> behind it.
>
>  The policy will police signalling ( SCCP ) 32k down to 8k and remark to DSCP 
> 8.  I have read
> through most of the SRND guide for the 3750, the model I am following is the:
>
>  2970/3560/3750�CConditionally-Trusted IP Phone + PC + Scavenger (Basic) 
> Model Configuration on
> page 105 of the 3.3 QoS SRND.
>
>  Can anyone validate my work below and let me know if you think this meets 
> those requirements?
> Also, in this scenerio, Auto Qos would not need to be applied over top of it 
> correct?
>
>  mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 24 32 46 48 56
>  mls qos map policed-dscp 0 24 to 8
>
>  class-map match-all VVLAN-VOICE
>   !Was in SRND but not using match access-group name VVLAN-VOICE
>   match ip dscp ef
>
>  class-map match-all VVLAN-CALL-SIGNALING
>   !Was in SRND but not using match access-group name VVLAN-CALL-SIGNALLING
>   match ip dscp cs3 af31
>
>  class-map match-all VVLAN-ANY
>match access-group name VVLAN-ANY
>
>  policy-map IPPHONE+PC-BASIC
>   class VVLAN-VOICE
>set ip dscp 46
>police 128000 8000
>exceed-action drop
>   class VVLAN-CALL-SIGNALING
>set ip dscp 24
>police 32000 8000
>exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit
>   class VVLAN-ANY
>set ip dscp 0
>police 32000 8000
>exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit
>
>   class class-default
>set ip dscp 0
>police 500 8000
>exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit
>
>  interface FastEthernet0/1
>   service-policy input IPPHONE+PC-BASIC
>
>  ip access list extended VVLAN-VOICE
>   permit udp x.x.x.x 0.0.0.255 any range 16384 32767
>
>  ip access list extended VVLAN-CALL-SIGNALING
>   permit tcp x.x.x.x 0.0.0.255 any range 2000 2002
>
>  ip access list extended VVLAN-ANY
>   permit ip x.x.x.x 0.0.0.255 any
>
>
>
>  Thanks,
>
>  Alex　
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
>  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Link Loss Type explanation

[Michael Ciarfello]

wikipedia is probably a good start.  From there you can go directly to the 
source, etc.

I guess since Cisco uses "standards based" (for the most part) protocols, etc 
they leave it up to the reader to seek out and find information for certain 
topics that are not explained in their documentation or at the least for the 
document you are reading.  Sometimes you have to read multiple documents to 
fully understand a topic.

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Damisch 
[kevin.dami...@vitalsite.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 3:04 PM
To: Jeff Cotter; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Link Loss Type explanation

Was this ever answered?  I agree that the built in doc and PDFs don’t go into 
any detail.  I think I remember briefly talking about it in bootcamp, but 
everybody pretty much said they’ve never changed it.

Thanks,
Kevin

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Cotter
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 12:51 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Link Loss Type explanation

Looking for an explanation or a good document that explains this setting under 
Region configuration.  Can someone point me in the right direction on this.  
Thanks


Jeff


This communication (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of 
the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information 
that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable 
law. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify Vital Support Systems at 515 334 5700 and 
delete or destroy all copies and the original document.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Copying VM messages on CUE

[anil batra]

Are the voice messages on CUE stored in .wave files, I am in a situation where 
I need to copy the user voicemessages ( if it's some .wave files) and send them 
as an attachement to their emails. I don't have acces to CUE and will 
appreciate if someone can help me verify it.
 
Appreciate your help on this...
 
-AB


  ___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS Question

[Alex Hannah]

Michael,

My understanding was older CUCM servers ( 4.x and early 5.x ) sent
signalling out at AF31, also I thought I remembered something about CIPC not
sending traffic out with right markings.  I was trying to do a "catch all"
to match any type of signaling be it either CS3 or AF31.

And the police statement I have verified on my 2811 running 12.4(22) T2 (
Same as v3 lab last month ).  So I believe this to be correct.  What exactly
did you mean by checking it to meet "ONLY" my requirements?  The exceed
action would remark traffic above 32k down to 8k correct?

Thanks again,

Alex

2009/11/11 Michael Ciarfello 

>  That's looking better.  Check your policed-dscp line to ONLY meet your
> requirements.
>
> Check the command reference and 3750 Switch COnfiguration guide - QoS
> chapter on that police command. I haven't looked at that or remember if it's
> correct.
>
> Pay attention to what Farkas said.  Look at other documents to find the
> source of that.  Maybe the document I mentioned above on what he is saying
> is in there.
>
> Why CS3 and AF31?  If you have a home lab or a partial home lab, use a
> sniffer and sniff around.  Let us know what you find.
>  --
>  *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Alex Hannah [
> alex.han...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 11, 2009 6:56 PM
> *To:* Farkas Péter
> *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS Question
>
>Michael and Farkas,
>
> Okay, I have thought about what you mentioned.  Here is my revised
> approach.  Let me know what you think about this way:
>
> !
> mls qos map policed-dscp  0 24 to 8
> mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 24 32 46 48 56
> mls qos
> !
> !
> class-map match-any SCCP-Traffic
>   match ip dscp cs3  af31
> !
> !
> policy-map POLICE-MAP
>   class SCCP-Traffic
> police 32 8000 exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit
>set dscp cs3
> !
> !
> interface FastEthernet0/6
>   service-policy input POLICE-MAP
> !
>
> What is the signifigance of matching both ip dscp cs3  af31?  Since I have
> match-any will it match on both?  New CUCM 7.x servers should send SCCP out
> at cs3 correct?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alex
>
>
> 2009/11/11 "Farkas Péter" 
>
>> AutoQoS cannot be configured until service-policy is attached to the
>> interface so you cannot use it for correction. Also, AutoQos does not work
>> on Eth.
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: Michael Ciarfello 
>> Date: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 8:56 pm
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS Question
>> To: Alex Hannah , "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com"
>> 
>>
>>
>> > Here are some hints for you to research:
>> >
>> >  I believe there is an error in one of the class-maps.  See if you can
>> find it or agree.
>> >
>> >  I believe you have too much extra stuff configured, let’s eliminate the
>> unneeded stuff.
>> >
>> >  How about use match IP protocol instead of access-lists?
>> >
>> >  Are you sure your access-list is correct for the inbound / outbound
>> traffic you have?
>> >
>> >  I think the data vlan people are going to be pissed and complain about
>> slowness.  I know it’s
>> > a lab.  I believe you can get the entire config down to a much simplier
>> 10-15 lines instead of
>> > all the stuff you have.
>> >
>> >  From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [ On Behalf Of Alex
>> Hannah
>>  >  Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 2:41 PM
>> >  To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> >  Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS Question
>> >
>> >  Hello everyone.
>> >
>> >  I am attempting to create the following QoS policy on a 3750  port with
>> an IP Phone plugged in
>> > behind it.
>> >
>> >  The policy will police signalling ( SCCP ) 32k down to 8k and remark to
>> DSCP 8.  I have read
>> > through most of the SRND guide for the 3750, the model I am following is
>> the:
>> >
>> >  2970/3560/3750–Conditionally-Trusted IP Phone + PC + Scavenger (Basic)
>> Model Configuration on
>> > page 105 of the 3.3 QoS SRND.
>> >
>> >  Can anyone validate my work below and let me know if you think this
>> meets those requirements?
>> > Also, in this scenerio, Auto Qos would not need to be applied over top
>> of it correct?
>> >
>> >  mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 24 32 46 48 56
>> >  mls qos map policed-dscp 0 24 to 8
>> >
>> >  class-map match-all VVLAN-VOICE
>> >   !Was in SRND but not using match access-group name VVLAN-VOICE
>> >   match ip dscp ef
>> >
>> >  class-map match-all VVLAN-CALL-SIGNALING
>> >   !Was in SRND but not using match access-group name
>> VVLAN-CALL-SIGNALLING
>> >   match ip dscp cs3 af31
>> >
>> >  class-map match-all VVLAN-ANY
>> >match access-group name VVLAN-ANY
>> >
>> >  policy-map IPPHONE+PC-BASIC
>> >   class VVLAN-VOICE
>> >set ip dscp 46
>> >police 128000 8000
>> >exceed-action drop
>> >   class VVLAN-CALL-SIGNALING
>> >set ip dscp 24
>> >police 32000 8000
>> >exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit
>> > 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity Connection User Import

[Kumar, Narinder]

I am still waiting on response, Anyone got idea ??

Thanks

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Kumar, Narinder
Sent: Wednesday, 11 November 2009 5:25 PM
To: 'OSL Group'
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity Connection User Import

All,
Integrated Unity connection with UCM and imported the users I wanted to import 
everything was working as I wanted.

I end up rebuilding my unity connection box while the UCM stay as it is, 
integrated the Unity connection part again with the UCM.
When I try to import the users from Unity Connection,  I am only seeing the 
user which I did NOT import last time.

Am I missing something ?  can't find the reason  why ?

Any help much appreciated

Thanks
Narinder


CONFIDENTIALITY - The information contained in this electronic mail message is 
confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not an 
authorised recipient of this message please contact UXC Getronics Australia 
immediately by reply email and destroy/delete this message from your computer. 
Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message, or part thereof, is 
strictly prohibited.
DISCLAIMER - Unless specifically indicated otherwise, the views and opinions 
expressed in this email are those of the sender and not UXC Getronics 
Australia. While we endeavour to protect our network from computer viruses, UXC 
Getronics Australia does not warrant that this email or any attachments are 
free of viruses or any other defects or errors. It is the duty of the recipient 
to virus scan and otherwise test any information contained in this email before 
loading onto any computer system.


CONFIDENTIALITY - The information contained in this electronic mail message is 
confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not an 
authorised recipient of this message please contact UXC Getronics Australia 
immediately by reply email and destroy/delete this message from your computer. 
Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message, or part thereof, is 
strictly prohibited.
DISCLAIMER - Unless specifically indicated otherwise, the views and opinions 
expressed in this email are those of the sender and not UXC Getronics 
Australia. While we endeavour to protect our network from computer viruses, UXC 
Getronics Australia does not warrant that this email or any attachments are 
free of viruses or any other defects or errors. It is the duty of the recipient 
to virus scan and otherwise test any information contained in this email before 
loading onto any computer system.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com