Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I Pronounce You "CCIE in Voice"

[Ashar Siddiqui]

Congrats Tariq!

wow man...OSL is getting flooded with CCIE success stories...excellent..

Ash>

Tariq Ahmad wrote:
I
took Voice lab last Friday.Didn't get the results back Until Monday
afternoon. Voila , I passed !
  
  I have been
following this Study List ever since i started my preparation.It has
been very useful resource along the way.Even though i didn't use
IPExpert's Study Material, i have/had great time studying Vik's blog
posts & Free Vlectures . Vik, you are a great instructor !
  
  Finally, thanks
to Wayne for keeping up such an amazing OSL . Now, its time to start
working on my next track.
  
  Regards,
  
  Tariq Ahmad
CCIE V # 26141
  

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
  




___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I passed CCIE Voice (# 26199)

[Roger Källberg]

Hi A A,
I used the IPExpert End to End program and I read a lot of differnt Cisco Press 
books and other publications from Cisco, like the SRND and so on.

My next goal is to really relay and enjoy time with my family :-)

Roger Källberg
CCIE Voice (# 26199)
Consultant
Cygate AB
Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ

Direkt: +46108787498
Växel: +46108787400
roger.kallb...@cygate.se

Från: A A [...@hotmail.com]
Skickat: den 12 juni 2010 06:52
Till: Roger Källberg; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Ämne: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I passed CCIE Voice (# 26199)

Congrats mate!!

Hope you could share plans/materials you have used for preparations. Whats your 
next goal if i could ask?

Thanks,
Ahmad


From: roger.kallb...@cygate.se
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 14:13:23 +0200
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I passed CCIE Voice (# 26199)

I took my lab yesterday, first attempt, just got the score report. I passed :-)

I will write down my strategy once I have landed from the cloud that I'm 
currently flying on. :-D

Roger Källberg
Consultant
Cygate AB
Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ

Direkt: +46108787498
Växel: +46108787400
roger.kallb...@cygate.se


Get a new e-mail account with Hotmail - Free. Sign-up 
now.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] I Pronounce You "CCIE in Voice"

[Tariq Ahmad]

I took Voice lab last Friday.Didn't get the results back Until Monday
afternoon. Voila , I passed !

I have been following this Study List ever since i started my preparation.It
has been very useful resource along the way.Even though i didn't use
IPExpert's Study Material, i have/had great time studying Vik's blog posts &
Free Vlectures . Vik, you are a great instructor !

Finally, thanks to Wayne for keeping up such an amazing OSL . Now, its time
to start working on my next track.

Regards,

*Tariq Ahmad
CCIE V # 26141*
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper 4 Digit call

[Roger Källberg]

Hi,
Ash already made a really good explanation of what they do, but this is a Cisco 
statement regards to these commands that I got from one of my study mates 
during my preparation,

"Calls placed through a Cisco Unified Border Element may fail to connect when 
the originating or terminating H.323 device is a non-Cisco IOS VoIP device such 
as Cisco Unified Communications Manager.
The default behavior of H.323-to-H.323 calls through a Cisco Unified Border 
Element is to delay sending a H.225 Connect message to the originating H323 
device until the H245 TCS/MSD/OLC negotiation takes place. During this process, 
an H.225 Connect message with an H.245 address present from the terminating 
H.323 device is changed to an H.225 Progress message, followed by an H.225 
Facility message with the embedded H.245 address. This can cause connection 
failures if the originating H.323 device is waiting for the H.225 Connect 
message to begin the H245 TCS/MSD/OLC negotiation.
The h225 connect-passthru command is used to immediately pass H.225 connect 
messages from the trunking gateway to the outgoing gateway via a Cisco Unified 
Border Element.
Configuring the h225 connect-passthru command in H.323 voice-service 
configuration is recommended for all calls passed through the Cisco Unified 
Border Element. This command option will be present only when the 
allow-connections command is configured.
This command is often configured with the h245 passthru tcsnonstd-passthru 
command and emptycapability command when interworking is configured between 
non-Cisco IOS H.323 devices."


This lines summarize and explain the above pretty good

1. the remote phone is picking up . and sending an "H225 connect message" 
back to the CUBE.
2. The CUBE by default is not sending the H225 connect message back to the HQ 
phone because it is waiting for the H245 negotiation to take place.
3. The CUBE changes the H225 connect message to a progress message, followed by 
an H225 facility message and sends to the HQ phone.
4. The HQ phone is waiting for the H225 connect message to begin the H245 
negotiation.



Best of luck

Roger Källberg
CCIE Voice (# 26199)
Consultant
Cygate AB
Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ

Direkt: +46108787498
Växel: +46108787400
roger.kallb...@cygate.se

Från: ccieid1ot [ccieid...@gmail.com]
Skickat: den 11 juni 2010 21:30
Till: Roger Källberg
Kopia: Dani Bug; Angel Perez; osl osl
Ämne: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper 4 Digit call

Roger,

Could you explain what those commands do?

2010/6/11 Roger Källberg :
> Add this to your config
>
> voice service voip
>   h323
>   emptycapability
>   h225 connect-passthru
>   h245 passthru tcsnonstd-passthru
>
> Roger Källberg
> CCIE Voice (# 26199)
> Consultant
> Cygate AB
> Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ
>
> Direkt: +46108787498
> Växel: +46108787400
> roger.kallb...@cygate.se
> 
> Från: Dani Bug [daniyal.vo...@gmail.com]
> Skickat: den 11 juni 2010 17:43
> Till: Angel Perez
> Kopia: Roger Källberg; osl osl
> Ämne: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper 4 Digit call
>
> Hi Guys
> Thx for your help i reconfigure Router and now its working fine and didn't
> got the solution but trouble moved to in CUBE GW config same behaviour some
> time calls going sometime not now thinking to reconfigure the whole router
> again 
> also i am facing problem with CUBE when i call to UK phone is ringing i
> picked up phone no voice at UK site and HQ phone is still ringing  what
> could be the issue ...
> codec? or something else  ???
>
> any advise regarding CUBE call ?
>
> Thx
> Dani
>
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:56 AM, Angel Perez  wrote:
>>
>> Hi:
>>
>> I would brake your problems in two parts:
>>
>> - First: calls from ucm to ucme and ucme to ucm
>>
>> Delete the gateway command from the cube gateway, this should be enough to
>> make calls working from ucme to ucm,
>> if calls are still not working follow Kobel suggestion:
>>
>> zone prefix GK 2 GW-PRiority 10 GK_Trunk_1
>> zone prefix GK 2 GW-PRiority 0 CUCME
>>
>> zone prefix GK 3 GW-PRiority 10 GK_Trunk_1
>> zone prefix GK 3 GW-PRiority 0 CUCME
>>
>> You will need to add the tech prefix 1 for these calls (as you were doing)
>>
>> then for calls from ucm to ucme let say from 2001 to 4001 add the
>> following:
>>
>> zone prefix GK 4 GW-PRiority 10 CUCME
>> zone prefix GK 4 GW-PRiority 0 GK_Trunk_1
>>
>> I'm assuming that you have the correct route pattern, css and dial-peer
>> configuration on  ucm and ucme.
>>
>> - Second: after that explain a littel bit more your cube call (scenarion
>> number dialed, etc)
>>
>> hth
>> 
>> From: roger.kallb...@cygate.se
>> To: daniyal.vo...@gmail.com
>> Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 08:41:26 +0200
>> CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper 4 Digit call
>>
>> Hi Dani,
>>
>> Have you looked in the terminating gw, with deb voip dialpeer, do you see
>> i

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I passed CCIE Voice (# 26199)

[A A]

Congrats mate!!

 

Hope you could share plans/materials you have used for preparations. Whats your 
next goal if i could ask?

 

Thanks,

Ahmad 
 


From: roger.kallb...@cygate.se
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 14:13:23 +0200
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I passed CCIE Voice (# 26199)




I took my lab yesterday, first attempt, just got the score report. I passed :-)
 
I will write down my strategy once I have landed from the cloud that I'm 
currently flying on. :-D
 

Roger Källberg
Consultant
Cygate AB
Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ

Direkt: +46108787498
Växel: +46108787400
roger.kallb...@cygate.se  
_
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/19780/direct/01/
Do you have a story that started on Hotmail? Tell us now___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I passed CCIE Voice (# 26199)

[Tariq Ahmad]

Congrats !

2010/6/11 Roger Källberg 

>  I took my lab yesterday, first attempt, just got the score report. I
> passed :-)
>
> I will write down my strategy once I have landed from the cloud that I'm
> currently flying on. :-D
>
>  *Roger Källberg*
> Consultant
> Cygate AB
> Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ
>
> Direkt: +46108787498
> Växel: +46108787400
> roger.kallb...@cygate.se
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I passed CCIE Voice (# 26199)

[Marty Beutler]

Congratulations Roger!  That is great news!
-Marty






From: roger.kallb...@cygate.se
To: roger.kallb...@cygate.se; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 18:29:33 +0200
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I passed CCIE Voice (# 26199)









Write down of my strategy going in to the lab.
 

My strategy was to first put every question and the points on one of the scrap 
papers, even before I read the lab. I then crossed of each off these when I had 
configured it and most important verified that it
 work as requested. This was very much like Pushkar have written in his 
excellent blog,

http://pushkarbhatkoti.wordpress.com/category/ccie-voice-lab-strategies/.
Thank you Push for that very helpful post.
Then I read trough the entire lab, but just browsed trough the dial-plan 
section, to see if there were anything in it that I needed to take into 
consideration in the other section.
Then my strategy was this:

·
Do everything with infrastructure, including basic VGW config (incoming call 
and outgoing emergency service call. I also included basic setup of CUE in to 
this section.

·
Do QoS for both campus and wan. I didn’t really stick 100% to this, but that 
was my intension going in to it. I did some of the next bullet point before 
QoS, like media and SRST.

·
Configure everything, but the dial plan. This included every customisation of 
the phones, setup off VM, SRST, media, and every other think that has to do 
with applications and so on.
My goal was to finish this by lunch, I didn’t quite manage that, I needed about 
1-1½ hours after the break to finish this.
Next part of my strategy was this:

·
Configure dial-plan question by question, paying special attention to what the 
question asked for when it comes to type of number and number plan. I verified 
all along when I configured, shutting down the primary path if that was the 
case,
 and testing the backup path. I then redid the test of the primary path after I 
had brought that up again, just to see that it still worked.
Yet again I had a goal with this section and that was to finish the dial-plan 
with 1-1½ hours to spare. This time I planned to have used for going over each 
of the questions once more and marking them of on
 the scrap paper one more time.  But because of that I didn’t manage to stick 
to my pre lunch game plan I ended up configuring right to the very end off my 
lab. When the proctor announced that it was five minutes left
 I was just about wrap up my last dial plan question. Last thing I did was to 
verify that all ISDN links were in the up state, saved my switch and router 
config’s for the last time and then I removed all my text files that I had 
stored on the desktop. In the
 end I had 1-2 minutes to spare, luckily it ended up to be just enough to pass.


 
Thank you everyone that have congratulated me.
 
I also want to thank Vik, Amy and Mark for there hard work with the update of 
the material after the update of the blueprint last year. You guys rock.
 
Apart from this I would like to send a special thanks to my study mates, 
Matthew Berry, Patrick Fischer, Vishal Preenja, Jody Marshall and Sean 
Hurricane. Your help was invaluable and a
 monumental help in my preparation.
 
Regards



Roger Källberg

Consultant

Cygate AB

Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ



Direkt: +46108787498

Växel: +46108787400

roger.kallb...@cygate.se




Från: Roger Källberg [roger.kallb...@cygate.se]

Skickat: den 11 juni 2010 14:13

Till: OSL Group

Ämne: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I passed CCIE Voice (# 26199)






I took my lab yesterday, first attempt, just got the score report. I passed :-)
 
I will write down my 
strategy once I have landed from the cloud that I'm currently flying on. :-D
 

Roger Källberg

Consultant

Cygate AB

Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ



Direkt: +46108787498

Växel: +46108787400

roger.kallb...@cygate.se

  ___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 Lab 7 - CUC SIP Integration

[Matthew Berry]

I figured it out.  There were hunt pilot remnants of a SCCP integration 
existent on the VM image.


*Matthew Berry*

/A+, CCENT, CCNA, CCNA Voice, CCVP, CCIE Voice Written/

*_Vitals:_*

*GVoice: *+1.612.424.5044

*Gmail*: ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com

*Skype*: ciscovoiceguru

*Twitter*: ciscovoiceguru

*_Cert Stats:_*

Cisco Cert Journey Began: Jan 1, 2009

1st Lab Attempt: Aug 16, 2010


On 6/11/2010 6:42 PM, Matthew Berry wrote:
Anyone had any success with this?  I am following the Proctor Guide 
and only get a fast busy.


I also followed the Cisco document and have not been able to get a 
successful call over a SIP trunk into CUC.


Ideas?

This is what I have done in CUCM:
 - Create SIP Trunk Security Profile
Accept Out-of-Dialog REFER
Accept Unsolicited Notification
Accept Header Replacement
 - Create SIP Profile
 - Create SIP Trunk
Calling Search Space
Redirecting Diversion Header Delivery - Inbound
Redirecting Diversion Header Delivery - Outbound
Rerouting Calling Search Space
Out-of-Dialog Refer Calling Search Space
SIP Profile
 - Create Route List
 - Create Route Group
 - Create Route Pattern
On-Net
 - Create Voicemail Mail Pilot
 - Create Voicemail Profile
 - Create Application User
Accept Out-of-Dialog REFER
Accept Unsolicited Notification
Accept Header Replacement

I have also done the CUC-related steps but don't have them typed out.
--

*Matthew Berry*

/A+, CCENT, CCNA, CCNA Voice, CCVP, CCIE Voice Written/

*_Vitals:_*

*GVoice: *+1.612.424.5044

*Gmail*: ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com

*Skype*: ciscovoiceguru

*Twitter*: ciscovoiceguru

*_Cert Stats:_*

Cisco Cert Journey Began: Jan 1, 2009

1st Lab Attempt: Aug 16, 2010

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 Lab 7 - CUC SIP Integration

[Matthew Berry]

Anyone had any success with this?  I am following the Proctor Guide and 
only get a fast busy.


I also followed the Cisco document and have not been able to get a 
successful call over a SIP trunk into CUC.


Ideas?

This is what I have done in CUCM:
 - Create SIP Trunk Security Profile
Accept Out-of-Dialog REFER
Accept Unsolicited Notification
Accept Header Replacement
 - Create SIP Profile
 - Create SIP Trunk
Calling Search Space
Redirecting Diversion Header Delivery - Inbound
Redirecting Diversion Header Delivery - Outbound
Rerouting Calling Search Space
Out-of-Dialog Refer Calling Search Space
SIP Profile
 - Create Route List
 - Create Route Group
 - Create Route Pattern
On-Net
 - Create Voicemail Mail Pilot
 - Create Voicemail Profile
 - Create Application User
Accept Out-of-Dialog REFER
Accept Unsolicited Notification
Accept Header Replacement

I have also done the CUC-related steps but don't have them typed out.
--

*Matthew Berry*

/A+, CCENT, CCNA, CCNA Voice, CCVP, CCIE Voice Written/

*_Vitals:_*

*GVoice: *+1.612.424.5044

*Gmail*: ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com

*Skype*: ciscovoiceguru

*Twitter*: ciscovoiceguru

*_Cert Stats:_*

Cisco Cert Journey Began: Jan 1, 2009

1st Lab Attempt: Aug 16, 2010

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE - "Destination unreachable" error

[Pavan]

Can you ping it. Did you issue a no shut?

Sent from my phone

On Jun 11, 2010, at 1:56 PM, "Steve Denney (stdenney)" > wrote:



Working on Vol 2 Lab 2 Question 8.2.



When trying to session into the CUE, I get this error:

BR2-RTR#service-module service-Engine 0/0 sess

Trying 10.10.202.1, 2194 ...

% Destination unreachable; gateway or host down



Module status looks good:

BR2-RTR#service-module service-Engine 0/0 status

Service Module is Cisco Service-Engine0/0

Service Module supports session via TTY line 194

Service Module is in Steady state

Service Module heartbeat-reset is enabled

Getting status from the Service Module, please wait..



Cisco Unity Express 7.0.1

CUE Running on AIM



IP route looks good:

BR2-RTR#sh ip route 10.10.202.2

Routing entry for 10.10.202.2/32

  Known via "static", distance 1, metric 0 (connected)

  Routing Descriptor Blocks:

  * directly connected, via Service-Engine0/0

  Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1



Config is plain enough:

interface Service-Engine0/0

 ip unnumbered Vlan400

 service-module ip address 10.10.202.2 255.255.255.0

 service-module ip default-gateway 10.10.202.1



Have reloaded the router, and did a ser ser 0/0 reset – still no jo 
y.


What obvious thing am I missing?



cheers, sd



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,  
please visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] debug command h245 capability

[Ashar Siddiqui]

debug cch323 h225

Ash>

Shadow of Voice wrote:

  which command did u use to get this info
   
  thanks
   
  This is what those commands do:
  Jun 10 19:06:34.070:
//7/80750AE80100/H323/cch323_h225_set_new_state: Changing from
H225_ALERT state to H225_WAIT_FOR_H245 state
Jun 10 19:06:34.070: //7/80750AE80100/H323/run_h225_sm: Received event
H225_EV_NOTIFY while at state H225_WAIT_FOR_H245
Jun 10 19:06:34.070: //7/80750AE80100/H323/send_notify_msg: Notify data
found, mask=0x0007
Jun 10 19:06:34.070: //7/80750AE80100/H323/send_notify_msg: Sending
NOTIFY Display Info IE =
Jun 10 19:06:34.070: //7/80750AE80100/H323/send_notify_msg: Sending
NOTIFY Notification Indicator IE = 113
Jun 10 19:06:34.070: //7/80750AE80100/H323/send_notify_msg: Sending
NOTIFY Connected Number as IE
Jun 10 19:06:34.070: //7/80750AE80100/H323/send_notify_msg:
[cnum]/[oct]/[oct3a] = [01144208555]/[0x00]/[0x00]
Jun 10 19:06:34.462: //7/80750AE80100/H323/run_h225_sm: Received event
H225_EV_ H245_SUCCESS while at state H225_WAIT_FOR_H245
Jun 10 19:06:34.462: //7/80750AE80100/H323/cch323_h225_set_new_state:
Changing from H225_WAIT_FOR_H245 state to H225_ACTIVE state
Jun 10 19:06:34.466: //8/80750AE80100/H323/run_h225_sm: Received event
H225_EV_H245_SUCCESS while at state H225_WAIT_FOR_H245
Jun 10 19:06:34.466: //8/80750AE80100/H323/cch323_h225_set_new_state:
Changing from H225_WAIT_FOR_H245 state to H225_ACTIVE state
  



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper 4 Digit call

[ccieid1ot]

Ashar, thx for the clarification either way.

On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 3:25 PM, ccieid1ot  wrote:
> The reason I ask is, wouldn't unchecking the H.245 TCS on the Trunk
> resolved the ringback issue?
>
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Ashar Siddiqui  wrote:
>> This is what those commands do:
>>
>> Jun 10 19:06:34.070: //7/80750AE80100/H323/cch323_h225_set_new_state:
>> Changing from H225_ALERT state to H225_WAIT_FOR_H245 state
>> Jun 10 19:06:34.070: //7/80750AE80100/H323/run_h225_sm: Received event
>> H225_EV_NOTIFY while at state H225_WAIT_FOR_H245
>> Jun 10 19:06:34.070: //7/80750AE80100/H323/send_notify_msg: Notify data
>> found, mask=0x0007
>> Jun 10 19:06:34.070: //7/80750AE80100/H323/send_notify_msg: Sending NOTIFY
>> Display Info IE =
>> Jun 10 19:06:34.070: //7/80750AE80100/H323/send_notify_msg: Sending NOTIFY
>> Notification Indicator IE = 113
>> Jun 10 19:06:34.070: //7/80750AE80100/H323/send_notify_msg: Sending NOTIFY
>> Connected Number as IE
>> Jun 10 19:06:34.070: //7/80750AE80100/H323/send_notify_msg:
>> [cnum]/[oct]/[oct3a] = [01144208555]/[0x00]/[0x00]
>> Jun 10 19:06:34.462: //7/80750AE80100/H323/run_h225_sm: Received event
>> H225_EV_ H245_SUCCESS while at state H225_WAIT_FOR_H245
>> Jun 10 19:06:34.462: //7/80750AE80100/H323/cch323_h225_set_new_state:
>> Changing from H225_WAIT_FOR_H245 state to H225_ACTIVE state
>> Jun 10 19:06:34.466: //8/80750AE80100/H323/run_h225_sm: Received event
>> H225_EV_H245_SUCCESS while at state H225_WAIT_FOR_H245
>> Jun 10 19:06:34.466: //8/80750AE80100/H323/cch323_h225_set_new_state:
>> Changing from H225_WAIT_FOR_H245 state to H225_ACTIVE state
>>
>> Read my previous email as well.
>> Roger, now a CCIE, can further explain ;)
>>
>> Ash>
>>
>>
>> ccieid1ot wrote:
>>
>> Roger,
>>
>> Could you explain what those commands do?
>>
>> 2010/6/11 Roger Källberg :
>>
>>
>> Add this to your config
>>
>> voice service voip
>>   h323
>>   emptycapability
>>   h225 connect-passthru
>>   h245 passthru tcsnonstd-passthru
>>
>> Roger Källberg
>> CCIE Voice (# 26199)
>> Consultant
>> Cygate AB
>> Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ
>>
>> Direkt: +46108787498
>> Växel: +46108787400
>> roger.kallb...@cygate.se
>> 
>> Från: Dani Bug [daniyal.vo...@gmail.com]
>> Skickat: den 11 juni 2010 17:43
>> Till: Angel Perez
>> Kopia: Roger Källberg; osl osl
>> Ämne: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper 4 Digit call
>>
>> Hi Guys
>> Thx for your help i reconfigure Router and now its working fine and didn't
>> got the solution but trouble moved to in CUBE GW config same behaviour some
>> time calls going sometime not now thinking to reconfigure the whole router
>> again 
>> also i am facing problem with CUBE when i call to UK phone is ringing i
>> picked up phone no voice at UK site and HQ phone is still ringing  what
>> could be the issue ...
>> codec? or something else  ???
>>
>> any advise regarding CUBE call ?
>>
>> Thx
>> Dani
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:56 AM, Angel Perez  wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi:
>>
>> I would brake your problems in two parts:
>>
>> - First: calls from ucm to ucme and ucme to ucm
>>
>> Delete the gateway command from the cube gateway, this should be enough to
>> make calls working from ucme to ucm,
>> if calls are still not working follow Kobel suggestion:
>>
>> zone prefix GK 2 GW-PRiority 10 GK_Trunk_1
>> zone prefix GK 2 GW-PRiority 0 CUCME
>>
>> zone prefix GK 3 GW-PRiority 10 GK_Trunk_1
>> zone prefix GK 3 GW-PRiority 0 CUCME
>>
>> You will need to add the tech prefix 1 for these calls (as you were doing)
>>
>> then for calls from ucm to ucme let say from 2001 to 4001 add the
>> following:
>>
>> zone prefix GK 4 GW-PRiority 10 CUCME
>> zone prefix GK 4 GW-PRiority 0 GK_Trunk_1
>>
>> I'm assuming that you have the correct route pattern, css and dial-peer
>> configuration on  ucm and ucme.
>>
>> - Second: after that explain a littel bit more your cube call (scenarion
>> number dialed, etc)
>>
>> hth
>> 
>> From: roger.kallb...@cygate.se
>> To: daniyal.vo...@gmail.com
>> Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 08:41:26 +0200
>> CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper 4 Digit call
>>
>> Hi Dani,
>>
>> Have you looked in the terminating gw, with deb voip dialpeer, do you see
>> if the call reaches the CME box? To route the call to the end point in CME
>> and in the UCM you need to remove the tech prefix. This can be done
>> with either voice translation rule or num-exp on the CME and with a TP on
>> the UCM. Just make sure that this TP is in a PT that only the GK can see in
>> it's incoming CSS. This is not strictly needed, just makes it a lot easier
>> to troubleshoot if needed.
>>
>>
>> Brgds,
>> Roger Källberg
>> 
>> Från: Dani Bug [daniyal.vo...@gmail.com]
>> Skickat: den 8 juni 2010 01:08
>> Till: kobel
>> Kopia: osl osl
>> Ämne: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper 4 Digit call
>>
>> still no luck but in the debug even call is 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper 4 Digit call

[ccieid1ot]

The reason I ask is, wouldn't unchecking the H.245 TCS on the Trunk
resolved the ringback issue?

On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Ashar Siddiqui  wrote:
> This is what those commands do:
>
> Jun 10 19:06:34.070: //7/80750AE80100/H323/cch323_h225_set_new_state:
> Changing from H225_ALERT state to H225_WAIT_FOR_H245 state
> Jun 10 19:06:34.070: //7/80750AE80100/H323/run_h225_sm: Received event
> H225_EV_NOTIFY while at state H225_WAIT_FOR_H245
> Jun 10 19:06:34.070: //7/80750AE80100/H323/send_notify_msg: Notify data
> found, mask=0x0007
> Jun 10 19:06:34.070: //7/80750AE80100/H323/send_notify_msg: Sending NOTIFY
> Display Info IE =
> Jun 10 19:06:34.070: //7/80750AE80100/H323/send_notify_msg: Sending NOTIFY
> Notification Indicator IE = 113
> Jun 10 19:06:34.070: //7/80750AE80100/H323/send_notify_msg: Sending NOTIFY
> Connected Number as IE
> Jun 10 19:06:34.070: //7/80750AE80100/H323/send_notify_msg:
> [cnum]/[oct]/[oct3a] = [01144208555]/[0x00]/[0x00]
> Jun 10 19:06:34.462: //7/80750AE80100/H323/run_h225_sm: Received event
> H225_EV_ H245_SUCCESS while at state H225_WAIT_FOR_H245
> Jun 10 19:06:34.462: //7/80750AE80100/H323/cch323_h225_set_new_state:
> Changing from H225_WAIT_FOR_H245 state to H225_ACTIVE state
> Jun 10 19:06:34.466: //8/80750AE80100/H323/run_h225_sm: Received event
> H225_EV_H245_SUCCESS while at state H225_WAIT_FOR_H245
> Jun 10 19:06:34.466: //8/80750AE80100/H323/cch323_h225_set_new_state:
> Changing from H225_WAIT_FOR_H245 state to H225_ACTIVE state
>
> Read my previous email as well.
> Roger, now a CCIE, can further explain ;)
>
> Ash>
>
>
> ccieid1ot wrote:
>
> Roger,
>
> Could you explain what those commands do?
>
> 2010/6/11 Roger Källberg :
>
>
> Add this to your config
>
> voice service voip
>   h323
>   emptycapability
>   h225 connect-passthru
>   h245 passthru tcsnonstd-passthru
>
> Roger Källberg
> CCIE Voice (# 26199)
> Consultant
> Cygate AB
> Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ
>
> Direkt: +46108787498
> Växel: +46108787400
> roger.kallb...@cygate.se
> 
> Från: Dani Bug [daniyal.vo...@gmail.com]
> Skickat: den 11 juni 2010 17:43
> Till: Angel Perez
> Kopia: Roger Källberg; osl osl
> Ämne: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper 4 Digit call
>
> Hi Guys
> Thx for your help i reconfigure Router and now its working fine and didn't
> got the solution but trouble moved to in CUBE GW config same behaviour some
> time calls going sometime not now thinking to reconfigure the whole router
> again 
> also i am facing problem with CUBE when i call to UK phone is ringing i
> picked up phone no voice at UK site and HQ phone is still ringing  what
> could be the issue ...
> codec? or something else  ???
>
> any advise regarding CUBE call ?
>
> Thx
> Dani
>
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:56 AM, Angel Perez  wrote:
>
>
> Hi:
>
> I would brake your problems in two parts:
>
> - First: calls from ucm to ucme and ucme to ucm
>
> Delete the gateway command from the cube gateway, this should be enough to
> make calls working from ucme to ucm,
> if calls are still not working follow Kobel suggestion:
>
> zone prefix GK 2 GW-PRiority 10 GK_Trunk_1
> zone prefix GK 2 GW-PRiority 0 CUCME
>
> zone prefix GK 3 GW-PRiority 10 GK_Trunk_1
> zone prefix GK 3 GW-PRiority 0 CUCME
>
> You will need to add the tech prefix 1 for these calls (as you were doing)
>
> then for calls from ucm to ucme let say from 2001 to 4001 add the
> following:
>
> zone prefix GK 4 GW-PRiority 10 CUCME
> zone prefix GK 4 GW-PRiority 0 GK_Trunk_1
>
> I'm assuming that you have the correct route pattern, css and dial-peer
> configuration on  ucm and ucme.
>
> - Second: after that explain a littel bit more your cube call (scenarion
> number dialed, etc)
>
> hth
> 
> From: roger.kallb...@cygate.se
> To: daniyal.vo...@gmail.com
> Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 08:41:26 +0200
> CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper 4 Digit call
>
> Hi Dani,
>
> Have you looked in the terminating gw, with deb voip dialpeer, do you see
> if the call reaches the CME box? To route the call to the end point in CME
> and in the UCM you need to remove the tech prefix. This can be done
> with either voice translation rule or num-exp on the CME and with a TP on
> the UCM. Just make sure that this TP is in a PT that only the GK can see in
> it's incoming CSS. This is not strictly needed, just makes it a lot easier
> to troubleshoot if needed.
>
>
> Brgds,
> Roger Källberg
> 
> Från: Dani Bug [daniyal.vo...@gmail.com]
> Skickat: den 8 juni 2010 01:08
> Till: kobel
> Kopia: osl osl
> Ämne: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper 4 Digit call
>
> still no luck but in the debug even call is not hitting to CUBE not a
> single time so i would say it's not issue with load balancing even thu i
> took out CUBE config and try make a normal call but still no luck ..
> also i am facing problem with CUBE when i call to UK phone is ringi

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper 4 Digit call

[Ashar Siddiqui]

This is what those commands do:

Jun 10 19:06:34.070: //7/80750AE80100/H323/cch323_h225_set_new_state:
Changing from H225_ALERT state to H225_WAIT_FOR_H245 state
Jun 10 19:06:34.070: //7/80750AE80100/H323/run_h225_sm: Received event
H225_EV_NOTIFY while at state H225_WAIT_FOR_H245
Jun 10 19:06:34.070: //7/80750AE80100/H323/send_notify_msg: Notify data
found, mask=0x0007
Jun 10 19:06:34.070: //7/80750AE80100/H323/send_notify_msg: Sending
NOTIFY Display Info IE =
Jun 10 19:06:34.070: //7/80750AE80100/H323/send_notify_msg: Sending
NOTIFY Notification Indicator IE = 113
Jun 10 19:06:34.070: //7/80750AE80100/H323/send_notify_msg: Sending
NOTIFY Connected Number as IE
Jun 10 19:06:34.070: //7/80750AE80100/H323/send_notify_msg:
[cnum]/[oct]/[oct3a] = [01144208555]/[0x00]/[0x00]
Jun 10 19:06:34.462: //7/80750AE80100/H323/run_h225_sm: Received event
H225_EV_ H245_SUCCESS while at state H225_WAIT_FOR_H245
Jun 10 19:06:34.462: //7/80750AE80100/H323/cch323_h225_set_new_state: Changing from H225_WAIT_FOR_H245 state to H225_ACTIVE
state
Jun 10 19:06:34.466: //8/80750AE80100/H323/run_h225_sm: Received event
H225_EV_H245_SUCCESS while at state H225_WAIT_FOR_H245
Jun 10 19:06:34.466: //8/80750AE80100/H323/cch323_h225_set_new_state:
Changing from H225_WAIT_FOR_H245 state to H225_ACTIVE state

Read my previous email as well.
Roger, now a CCIE, can further explain ;)

Ash>


ccieid1ot wrote:

  Roger,

Could you explain what those commands do?

2010/6/11 Roger Källberg :
  
  
Add this to your config

voice service voip
  h323
  emptycapability
  h225 connect-passthru
  h245 passthru tcsnonstd-passthru

Roger Källberg
CCIE Voice (# 26199)
Consultant
Cygate AB
Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ

Direkt: +46108787498
Växel: +46108787400
roger.kallb...@cygate.se

Från: Dani Bug [daniyal.vo...@gmail.com]
Skickat: den 11 juni 2010 17:43
Till: Angel Perez
Kopia: Roger Källberg; osl osl
Ämne: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper 4 Digit call

Hi Guys
Thx for your help i reconfigure Router and now its working fine and didn't
got the solution but trouble moved to in CUBE GW config same behaviour some
time calls going sometime not now thinking to reconfigure the whole router
again 
also i am facing problem with CUBE when i call to UK phone is ringing i
picked up phone no voice at UK site and HQ phone is still ringing  what
could be the issue ...
codec? or something else  ???

any advise regarding CUBE call ?

Thx
Dani

On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:56 AM, Angel Perez  wrote:


  Hi:

I would brake your problems in two parts:

- First: calls from ucm to ucme and ucme to ucm

Delete the gateway command from the cube gateway, this should be enough to
make calls working from ucme to ucm,
if calls are still not working follow Kobel suggestion:

zone prefix GK 2 GW-PRiority 10 GK_Trunk_1
zone prefix GK 2 GW-PRiority 0 CUCME

zone prefix GK 3 GW-PRiority 10 GK_Trunk_1
zone prefix GK 3 GW-PRiority 0 CUCME

You will need to add the tech prefix 1 for these calls (as you were doing)

then for calls from ucm to ucme let say from 2001 to 4001 add the
following:

zone prefix GK 4 GW-PRiority 10 CUCME
zone prefix GK 4 GW-PRiority 0 GK_Trunk_1

I'm assuming that you have the correct route pattern, css and dial-peer
configuration on  ucm and ucme.

- Second: after that explain a littel bit more your cube call (scenarion
number dialed, etc)

hth

From: roger.kallb...@cygate.se
To: daniyal.vo...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 08:41:26 +0200
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper 4 Digit call

Hi Dani,

Have you looked in the terminating gw, with deb voip dialpeer, do you see
if the call reaches the CME box? To route the call to the end point in CME
and in the UCM you need to remove the tech prefix. This can be done
with either voice translation rule or num-exp on the CME and with a TP on
the UCM. Just make sure that this TP is in a PT that only the GK can see in
it's incoming CSS. This is not strictly needed, just makes it a lot easier
to troubleshoot if needed.


Brgds,
Roger Källberg

Från: Dani Bug [daniyal.vo...@gmail.com]
Skickat: den 8 juni 2010 01:08
Till: kobel
Kopia: osl osl
Ämne: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper 4 Digit call

still no luck but in the debug even call is not hitting to CUBE not a
single time so i would say it's not issue with load balancing even thu i
took out CUBE config and try make a normal call but still no luck ..
also i am facing problem with CUBE when i call to UK phone is ringing i
picked up phone no voice at UK site and HQ phone is still ringing  what
could be the issue ...
codec? or something else  ???
any idea .. about that advise/question appreciated 

thanks
Dani
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 5:27 PM, kobel  wrote:

try configuring higher preference for CUCM trunk for prefix 2* . It seems
that GK performs load balancing between the CUBE an

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper 4 Digit call

[Ashar Siddiqui]

This is an issue where the CUBE waits in H225_WAIT_FOR_H245
status for the initiating h323 GW (CUCM) to do h245 negotiation
while CUCM on other hand is waiting for H225 connect message and hence
the deadlock. Besides adding what Roger hinted below, I would also go
ahead and uncheck "wait for h245 TCS at GK Trunk".

Ash>

Roger Källberg wrote:

  
  
  
  Add this
to your config
   
  voice service voip 
  h323
  emptycapability
  h225 connect-passthru
  h245 passthru tcsnonstd-passthru
   
  
  
  Roger Källberg
  CCIE
Voice (# 26199)
  Consultant
  Cygate AB
  Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ
  
Direkt: +46108787498
Växel: +46108787400
  roger.kallb...@cygate.se
  
  
  
  Från: Dani Bug
[daniyal.vo...@gmail.com]
  Skickat: den 11 juni 2010 17:43
  Till: Angel Perez
  Kopia: Roger Källberg; osl osl
  Ämne: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper 4 Digit call
  
  
  
  Hi Guys
  Thx for
your help i reconfigure Router and now its working fine and didn't got
the solution but trouble moved to in CUBE GW config same behaviour some
time calls going sometime not now thinking to reconfigure the whole
router again 
  also i am
facing problem with CUBE when i call to UK phone is ringing i picked up
phone no voice at UK site and HQ phone is still ringing  what could
be the issue ...
  
codec? or something else  ??? 
   
  any advise
regarding CUBE call ?
   
  Thx 
  Dani
  
  
  On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:56 AM, Angel Perez 

wrote:
  
Hi:
 
I would brake your problems in two parts:
 
- First: calls from ucm to ucme and ucme to ucm
 
Delete the gateway command from the cube gateway, this should be enough
to make calls working from ucme to ucm,

if calls are still not working follow Kobel suggestion:
 
zone prefix GK 2 GW-PRiority 10 GK_Trunk_1 
zone prefix GK 2 GW-PRiority 0 CUCME
 
zone prefix GK 3 GW-PRiority 10 GK_Trunk_1 
zone prefix GK 3 GW-PRiority 0 CUCME
 
You will need to add the tech prefix 1 for these calls (as you were
doing)
 
then for calls from ucm to ucme let say from 2001 to 4001 add the
following:
 
zone prefix GK 4 GW-PRiority 10 CUCME
zone prefix GK 4 GW-PRiority 0 GK_Trunk_1 

I'm assuming that you have the correct route pattern, css and dial-peer
configuration on  ucm and ucme.
 
- Second: after that explain a littel bit more your cube call
(scenarion number dialed, etc)
 
hth

From: roger.kallb...@cygate.se
To: daniyal.vo...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 08:41:26 +0200

CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com


Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper 4 Digit
call

Hi Dani,

Have you
looked in the terminating gw, with deb voip dialpeer, do you see if the
call reaches the CME box? To route the call to the end point in CME and
in the UCM you need to remove the tech prefix. This can be done
with either voice translation rule or num-exp on the CME and with a TP
on the UCM. Just make sure that this TP is in a PT that only the GK can
see in it's incoming CSS. This is not strictly needed, just makes it a
lot easier to troubleshoot if needed.

 
Brgds,


Roger Källberg




Från: Dani Bug [daniyal.vo...@gmail.com]
Skickat: den 8 juni 2010 01:08
Till: kobel
Kopia: osl osl
Ämne: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper 4 Digit call



still no
luck but in the debug even call is not hitting to CUBE not a single
time so i would say it's not issue with load balancing even thu i took
out CUBE config and try make a normal call but still no luck ..
also i
am facing problem with CUBE when i call to UK phone is ringing i picked
up phone no voice at UK site and HQ phone is still ringing  what
could be the issue ...

codec?
or something else  ???
any idea
.. about that advise/question appreciated 

 
thanks 
Dani 

On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 5:27 PM, kobel 
wrote:
try
configuring higher preference for CUCM trunk for prefix 2* . It seems
that GK performs load balancing between the CUBE and this trunk and
only one of them works.
  
  
regards
  
  
  
  On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Dani Bug 
wrote:
  
I
tried without invia/outvia still no luck ...:(
 
HQ-R1#sh
gatekeeper gw

GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE
=
Prefix: 1*
  Zone GK master gateway list:
    142.102.64.254:1720 CUBE

    172.25.105.101:1720 GK_Trunk_1

Prefix:
852*
  Zone GK master gateway list:
    142.102.66.254:1720 CUCME


 
Here
is debug success call from 4001 to 2001

HQ-R1#
Jun  7 22:07:34.108: ////GK/gk_process:
QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup
Jun  7 22:07:34.172: ////GK/gk_process:
QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup
Jun  7 22:07:34.172: ////GK/gk_rassrv_arq:
arqp=0x49E870B4,crv=0

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] X-Lite SIP Client not registering to BR2 CME [RESOLVED]

[Steve Denney (stdenney)]

Just responding for the archives:

 

Interface Vlan400 was up | down. I had shut down the phones connected to
the BR2 ESW and never brought them back up. This put Vlan400 in up |
down state, preventing my local client from registering.

Doing a no shut on one of the BR2 phones (fa0/3/0 or 0/3/1) brought the
Vlan400 up | up, and the X-Lite registered immediately. :)

 

cheers, sd

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Steve
Denney (stdenney)
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 8:38 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] X-Lite SIP Client not registering to BR2 CME

 

I've noticed some odd behavior the last few weeks with my X-Lite SIP
client (BR2 Ph4, DN 3006; using software VPN to connect to the vRacks).

The X-Lite SIP client doesn't seem to want to register to the CME. It
comes up with the error "Registration error 408 - Request Timeout" on
the display.

 

The only other time I've hit this symptom was a couple of months ago,
when I and a few other folks hit the IP addressing issue discussed in
this thread:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com/msg16149.html

 

Since then I've been careful to run this "fix" on the HQ and BR2 routers
before each lab, and none of the other symptoms mentioned in that thread
have occurred. 

But the "Registration error 408 - Request Timeout" has popped up again
for the last few weeks. 

Different pods, too: twice on pod 14 and twice on pod 12. 

 

As per another archive thread, I removed "type 7960" from the voice
register pool 2 - didn't help. Have reloaded the router, no create prof
/ create prof (all the usual fixes). 

No issues with the BR2 SCCP (IPblue) softclient. 

Searched the archives and the Web but no further hits. Any ideas?

 

cheers, sd

 

 

Steve Denney, CISSP

Systems Engineer - Technology Solutions Network

Voice and Unified Communications Products

Cisco Systems, Inc.

125 High Street, 21st Floor

Boston, MA  02110

978-936-4048 (Office)

617-872-5031 (Mobile)

stden...@cisco.com   

 

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper 4 Digit call

[ccieid1ot]

Roger,

Could you explain what those commands do?

2010/6/11 Roger Källberg :
> Add this to your config
>
> voice service voip
>   h323
>   emptycapability
>   h225 connect-passthru
>   h245 passthru tcsnonstd-passthru
>
> Roger Källberg
> CCIE Voice (# 26199)
> Consultant
> Cygate AB
> Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ
>
> Direkt: +46108787498
> Växel: +46108787400
> roger.kallb...@cygate.se
> 
> Från: Dani Bug [daniyal.vo...@gmail.com]
> Skickat: den 11 juni 2010 17:43
> Till: Angel Perez
> Kopia: Roger Källberg; osl osl
> Ämne: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper 4 Digit call
>
> Hi Guys
> Thx for your help i reconfigure Router and now its working fine and didn't
> got the solution but trouble moved to in CUBE GW config same behaviour some
> time calls going sometime not now thinking to reconfigure the whole router
> again 
> also i am facing problem with CUBE when i call to UK phone is ringing i
> picked up phone no voice at UK site and HQ phone is still ringing  what
> could be the issue ...
> codec? or something else  ???
>
> any advise regarding CUBE call ?
>
> Thx
> Dani
>
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:56 AM, Angel Perez  wrote:
>>
>> Hi:
>>
>> I would brake your problems in two parts:
>>
>> - First: calls from ucm to ucme and ucme to ucm
>>
>> Delete the gateway command from the cube gateway, this should be enough to
>> make calls working from ucme to ucm,
>> if calls are still not working follow Kobel suggestion:
>>
>> zone prefix GK 2 GW-PRiority 10 GK_Trunk_1
>> zone prefix GK 2 GW-PRiority 0 CUCME
>>
>> zone prefix GK 3 GW-PRiority 10 GK_Trunk_1
>> zone prefix GK 3 GW-PRiority 0 CUCME
>>
>> You will need to add the tech prefix 1 for these calls (as you were doing)
>>
>> then for calls from ucm to ucme let say from 2001 to 4001 add the
>> following:
>>
>> zone prefix GK 4 GW-PRiority 10 CUCME
>> zone prefix GK 4 GW-PRiority 0 GK_Trunk_1
>>
>> I'm assuming that you have the correct route pattern, css and dial-peer
>> configuration on  ucm and ucme.
>>
>> - Second: after that explain a littel bit more your cube call (scenarion
>> number dialed, etc)
>>
>> hth
>> 
>> From: roger.kallb...@cygate.se
>> To: daniyal.vo...@gmail.com
>> Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 08:41:26 +0200
>> CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper 4 Digit call
>>
>> Hi Dani,
>>
>> Have you looked in the terminating gw, with deb voip dialpeer, do you see
>> if the call reaches the CME box? To route the call to the end point in CME
>> and in the UCM you need to remove the tech prefix. This can be done
>> with either voice translation rule or num-exp on the CME and with a TP on
>> the UCM. Just make sure that this TP is in a PT that only the GK can see in
>> it's incoming CSS. This is not strictly needed, just makes it a lot easier
>> to troubleshoot if needed.
>>
>>
>> Brgds,
>> Roger Källberg
>> 
>> Från: Dani Bug [daniyal.vo...@gmail.com]
>> Skickat: den 8 juni 2010 01:08
>> Till: kobel
>> Kopia: osl osl
>> Ämne: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper 4 Digit call
>>
>> still no luck but in the debug even call is not hitting to CUBE not a
>> single time so i would say it's not issue with load balancing even thu i
>> took out CUBE config and try make a normal call but still no luck ..
>> also i am facing problem with CUBE when i call to UK phone is ringing i
>> picked up phone no voice at UK site and HQ phone is still ringing  what
>> could be the issue ...
>> codec? or something else  ???
>> any idea .. about that advise/question appreciated 
>>
>> thanks
>> Dani
>> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 5:27 PM, kobel  wrote:
>>
>> try configuring higher preference for CUCM trunk for prefix 2* . It seems
>> that GK performs load balancing between the CUBE and this trunk and only one
>> of them works.
>>
>>
>> regards
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Dani Bug  wrote:
>>
>> I tried without invia/outvia still no luck ...:(
>>
>> HQ-R1#sh gatekeeper gw
>> GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE
>> =
>> Prefix: 1*
>>   Zone GK master gateway list:
>>     142.102.64.254:1720 CUBE
>>     172.25.105.101:1720 GK_Trunk_1
>> Prefix: 852*
>>   Zone GK master gateway list:
>>     142.102.66.254:1720 CUCME
>>
>> Here is debug success call from 4001 to 2001
>> HQ-R1#
>> Jun  7 22:07:34.108: ////GK/gk_process:
>> QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup
>> Jun  7 22:07:34.172: ////GK/gk_process:
>> QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup
>> Jun  7 22:07:34.172: ////GK/gk_rassrv_arq:
>> arqp=0x49E870B4,crv=0x59, answerCall=0
>> Jun  7 22:07:34.172: ////GK/gk_rassrv_sep_arq: ARQ
>> Didn't use GK_AAA_PROC
>> Jun  7 22:07:34.172: //E801AC8F8482/E80248B78484/GK/gk_dns_query: No Name
>> servers
>> Jun  7 22:07:34.172: //E801AC8F8482/E80248B78484/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo:
>> (12001) Matched tech-prefix 1
>> Jun  7 22:07:34.176:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE - "Destination unreachable" error

[Dani Bug]

Thx Amy, I had this issue before i tried all solutions but no luck finally
power cycle worked for me but i remember before configure the CUE my phone
was working perfectly even they were in the rite Vlan  usually i am
configuring CUE after configure the CME  i think ... sorry i couldn't
understand pls explain Amy ,,,

well next time i will look closely 

On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Steve Denney (stdenney)  wrote:

>  Thanks Dani – Amy found it :)  Vlan400 was down. D’oh...
>
>
>
> cheers, sd
>
>
>
> *From:* Dani Bug [mailto:daniyal.vo...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, June 11, 2010 3:03 PM
> *To:* Steve Denney (stdenney)
> *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE - "Destination unreachable" error
>
>
>
> power cycle the CUE module 
>
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Steve Denney (stdenney) <
> stden...@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> Working on Vol 2 Lab 2 Question 8.2.
>
>
>
> When trying to session into the CUE, I get this error:
>
> BR2-RTR#service-module service-Engine 0/0 sess
>
> Trying 10.10.202.1, 2194 ...
>
> *% Destination unreachable; gateway or host down*
>
>
>
> Module status looks good:
>
> BR2-RTR#service-module service-Engine 0/0 status
>
> Service Module is Cisco Service-Engine0/0
>
> Service Module supports session via TTY line 194
>
> Service Module is in Steady state
>
> Service Module heartbeat-reset is enabled
>
> Getting status from the Service Module, please wait..
>
>
>
> Cisco Unity Express 7.0.1
>
> CUE Running on AIM
>
>
>
> IP route looks good:
>
> BR2-RTR#sh ip route 10.10.202.2
>
> Routing entry for 10.10.202.2/32
>
>   Known via "static", distance 1, metric 0 (connected)
>
>   Routing Descriptor Blocks:
>
>   * directly connected, via Service-Engine0/0
>
>   Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
>
>
>
> Config is plain enough:
>
> interface Service-Engine0/0
>
>  ip unnumbered Vlan400
>
>  service-module ip address 10.10.202.2 255.255.255.0
>
>  service-module ip default-gateway 10.10.202.1
>
>
>
> Have reloaded the router, and did a ser ser 0/0 reset – still no joy.
>
> What obvious thing am I missing?
>
>
>
> cheers, sd
>
>
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE - "Destination unreachable" error

[Steve Denney (stdenney)]

By the way - This fix had the added bonus of also fixing my "X-Lite SIP
Client not registering to BR2 CME" issue from earlier.

 

Amazing how much stuff breaks when the Vlan is down...sheesh :)

 

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Steve
Denney (stdenney)
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 3:09 PM
To: Amy Ryan; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE - "Destination unreachable" error

 

Bingo!  I had shut down both of the remote BR2 phones earlier, thus no
active endpoints on Vlan400, and thus...Vlan400 was up | down. Great
catch Amy, thanks!

 

cheers, sd

 

 

From: Amy Ryan [mailto:ar...@ipexpert.com] 
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 3:03 PM
To: Steve Denney (stdenney); ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE - "Destination unreachable" error

 

Do a "sh ip int bri"  is vlan 400 up up?

---
Amy Ryan - CCIE #24677 (Voice)
Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Mailto: ar...@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
 
eFax: +1.810.454.0130 

IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand,
Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco
CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider) certification(s) with
training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and
Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at
www.ipexpert.com/communities   and
our public website at www.ipexpert.com   





From: "Steve Denney (stdenney)" 
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:56:42 -0500
To: 
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE - "Destination unreachable" error

Working on Vol 2 Lab 2 Question 8.2.
 
When trying to session into the CUE, I get this error:
BR2-RTR#service-module service-Engine 0/0 sess  
Trying 10.10.202.1, 2194 ... 
% Destination unreachable; gateway or host down

Module status looks good:
BR2-RTR#service-module service-Engine 0/0 status
Service Module is Cisco Service-Engine0/0
Service Module supports session via TTY line 194
Service Module is in Steady state
Service Module heartbeat-reset is enabled
Getting status from the Service Module, please wait..
 
Cisco Unity Express 7.0.1
CUE Running on AIM
 
IP route looks good:
BR2-RTR#sh ip route 10.10.202.2
Routing entry for 10.10.202.2/32
 Known via "static", distance 1, metric 0 (connected)
 Routing Descriptor Blocks:
 * directly connected, via Service-Engine0/0
 Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
 
Config is plain enough:
interface Service-Engine0/0
 ip unnumbered Vlan400
 service-module ip address 10.10.202.2 255.255.255.0
 service-module ip default-gateway 10.10.202.1
 
Have reloaded the router, and did a ser ser 0/0 reset - still no joy.
What obvious thing am I missing?
 
cheers, sd



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please visit www.ipexpert.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE - "Destination unreachable" error

[Steve Denney (stdenney)]

Bingo!  I had shut down both of the remote BR2 phones earlier, thus no
active endpoints on Vlan400, and thus...Vlan400 was up | down. Great
catch Amy, thanks!

 

cheers, sd

 

 

From: Amy Ryan [mailto:ar...@ipexpert.com] 
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 3:03 PM
To: Steve Denney (stdenney); ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE - "Destination unreachable" error

 

Do a "sh ip int bri"  is vlan 400 up up?

---
Amy Ryan - CCIE #24677 (Voice)
Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Mailto: ar...@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
 
eFax: +1.810.454.0130 

IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand,
Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco
CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider) certification(s) with
training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and
Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at
www.ipexpert.com/communities   and
our public website at www.ipexpert.com   






From: "Steve Denney (stdenney)" 
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:56:42 -0500
To: 
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE - "Destination unreachable" error

Working on Vol 2 Lab 2 Question 8.2.
 
When trying to session into the CUE, I get this error:
BR2-RTR#service-module service-Engine 0/0 sess  
Trying 10.10.202.1, 2194 ... 
% Destination unreachable; gateway or host down

Module status looks good:
BR2-RTR#service-module service-Engine 0/0 status
Service Module is Cisco Service-Engine0/0
Service Module supports session via TTY line 194
Service Module is in Steady state
Service Module heartbeat-reset is enabled
Getting status from the Service Module, please wait..
 
Cisco Unity Express 7.0.1
CUE Running on AIM
 
IP route looks good:
BR2-RTR#sh ip route 10.10.202.2
Routing entry for 10.10.202.2/32
 Known via "static", distance 1, metric 0 (connected)
 Routing Descriptor Blocks:
 * directly connected, via Service-Engine0/0
 Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
 
Config is plain enough:
interface Service-Engine0/0
 ip unnumbered Vlan400
 service-module ip address 10.10.202.2 255.255.255.0
 service-module ip default-gateway 10.10.202.1
 
Have reloaded the router, and did a ser ser 0/0 reset - still no joy.
What obvious thing am I missing?
 
cheers, sd





___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please visit www.ipexpert.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE - "Destination unreachable" error

[Amy Ryan]

Do a ³sh ip int bri²  is vlan 400 up up?

---
Amy Ryan ­ CCIE #24677 (Voice)
Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Mailto: ar...@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat

eFax: +1.810.454.0130

IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand,
Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco
CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider) certification(s) with
training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and
Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at
www.ipexpert.com/communities   and our
public website at www.ipexpert.com 




From: "Steve Denney (stdenney)" 
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:56:42 -0500
To: 
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE - "Destination unreachable" error

Working on Vol 2 Lab 2 Question 8.2.
 
When trying to session into the CUE, I get this error:
BR2-RTR#service-module service-Engine 0/0 sess
Trying 10.10.202.1, 2194 ...
% Destination unreachable; gateway or host down
 
Module status looks good:
BR2-RTR#service-module service-Engine 0/0 status
Service Module is Cisco Service-Engine0/0
Service Module supports session via TTY line 194
Service Module is in Steady state
Service Module heartbeat-reset is enabled
Getting status from the Service Module, please wait..
 
Cisco Unity Express 7.0.1
CUE Running on AIM
 
IP route looks good:
BR2-RTR#sh ip route 10.10.202.2
Routing entry for 10.10.202.2/32
 Known via "static", distance 1, metric 0 (connected)
 Routing Descriptor Blocks:
 * directly connected, via Service-Engine0/0
 Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
 
Config is plain enough:
interface Service-Engine0/0
 ip unnumbered Vlan400
 service-module ip address 10.10.202.2 255.255.255.0
 service-module ip default-gateway 10.10.202.1
 
Have reloaded the router, and did a ser ser 0/0 reset ­ still no joy.
What obvious thing am I missing?
 
cheers, sd
 


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE - "Destination unreachable" error

[Dani Bug]

power cycle the CUE module 

On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Steve Denney (stdenney)  wrote:

>  Working on Vol 2 Lab 2 Question 8.2.
>
>
>
> When trying to session into the CUE, I get this error:
>
> BR2-RTR#service-module service-Engine 0/0 sess
>
> Trying 10.10.202.1, 2194 ...
>
> *% Destination unreachable; gateway or host down*
>
>
>
> Module status looks good:
>
> BR2-RTR#service-module service-Engine 0/0 status
>
> Service Module is Cisco Service-Engine0/0
>
> Service Module supports session via TTY line 194
>
> Service Module is in Steady state
>
> Service Module heartbeat-reset is enabled
>
> Getting status from the Service Module, please wait..
>
>
>
> Cisco Unity Express 7.0.1
>
> CUE Running on AIM
>
>
>
> IP route looks good:
>
> BR2-RTR#sh ip route 10.10.202.2
>
> Routing entry for 10.10.202.2/32
>
>   Known via "static", distance 1, metric 0 (connected)
>
>   Routing Descriptor Blocks:
>
>   * directly connected, via Service-Engine0/0
>
>   Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
>
>
>
> Config is plain enough:
>
> interface Service-Engine0/0
>
>  ip unnumbered Vlan400
>
>  service-module ip address 10.10.202.2 255.255.255.0
>
>  service-module ip default-gateway 10.10.202.1
>
>
>
> Have reloaded the router, and did a ser ser 0/0 reset – still no joy.
>
> What obvious thing am I missing?
>
>
>
> cheers, sd
>
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE - "Destination unreachable" error

[Steve Denney (stdenney)]

Working on Vol 2 Lab 2 Question 8.2.

 

When trying to session into the CUE, I get this error:

BR2-RTR#service-module service-Engine 0/0 sess  

Trying 10.10.202.1, 2194 ... 

% Destination unreachable; gateway or host down

 

Module status looks good:

BR2-RTR#service-module service-Engine 0/0 status

Service Module is Cisco Service-Engine0/0

Service Module supports session via TTY line 194

Service Module is in Steady state

Service Module heartbeat-reset is enabled

Getting status from the Service Module, please wait..

 

Cisco Unity Express 7.0.1

CUE Running on AIM

 

IP route looks good:

BR2-RTR#sh ip route 10.10.202.2

Routing entry for 10.10.202.2/32

  Known via "static", distance 1, metric 0 (connected)

  Routing Descriptor Blocks:

  * directly connected, via Service-Engine0/0

  Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1

 

Config is plain enough:

interface Service-Engine0/0

 ip unnumbered Vlan400

 service-module ip address 10.10.202.2 255.255.255.0

 service-module ip default-gateway 10.10.202.1

 

Have reloaded the router, and did a ser ser 0/0 reset - still no joy.

What obvious thing am I missing?

 

cheers, sd

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper 4 Digit call

[Roger Källberg]

Add this to your config

voice service voip
  h323
  emptycapability
  h225 connect-passthru
  h245 passthru tcsnonstd-passthru

Roger Källberg
CCIE Voice (# 26199)
Consultant
Cygate AB
Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ

Direkt: +46108787498
Växel: +46108787400
roger.kallb...@cygate.se

Från: Dani Bug [daniyal.vo...@gmail.com]
Skickat: den 11 juni 2010 17:43
Till: Angel Perez
Kopia: Roger Källberg; osl osl
Ämne: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper 4 Digit call

Hi Guys
Thx for your help i reconfigure Router and now its working fine and didn't got 
the solution but trouble moved to in CUBE GW config same behaviour some time 
calls going sometime not now thinking to reconfigure the whole router again 
also i am facing problem with CUBE when i call to UK phone is ringing i picked 
up phone no voice at UK site and HQ phone is still ringing  what could be 
the issue ...
codec? or something else  ???

any advise regarding CUBE call ?

Thx
Dani

On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:56 AM, Angel Perez 
mailto:gorr...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
Hi:

I would brake your problems in two parts:

- First: calls from ucm to ucme and ucme to ucm

Delete the gateway command from the cube gateway, this should be enough to make 
calls working from ucme to ucm,
if calls are still not working follow Kobel suggestion:

zone prefix GK 2 GW-PRiority 10 GK_Trunk_1
zone prefix GK 2 GW-PRiority 0 CUCME

zone prefix GK 3 GW-PRiority 10 GK_Trunk_1
zone prefix GK 3 GW-PRiority 0 CUCME

You will need to add the tech prefix 1 for these calls (as you were doing)

then for calls from ucm to ucme let say from 2001 to 4001 add the following:

zone prefix GK 4 GW-PRiority 10 CUCME
zone prefix GK 4 GW-PRiority 0 GK_Trunk_1

I'm assuming that you have the correct route pattern, css and dial-peer 
configuration on  ucm and ucme.

- Second: after that explain a littel bit more your cube call (scenarion number 
dialed, etc)

hth

From: roger.kallb...@cygate.se
To: daniyal.vo...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 08:41:26 +0200

CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper 4 Digit call

Hi Dani,

Have you looked in the terminating gw, with deb voip dialpeer, do you see if 
the call reaches the CME box? To route the call to the end point in CME and in 
the UCM you need to remove the tech prefix. This can be done with either voice 
translation rule or num-exp on the CME and with a TP on the UCM. Just make sure 
that this TP is in a PT that only the GK can see in it's incoming CSS. This is 
not strictly needed, just makes it a lot easier to troubleshoot if needed.


Brgds,
Roger Källberg

Från: Dani Bug [daniyal.vo...@gmail.com]
Skickat: den 8 juni 2010 01:08
Till: kobel
Kopia: osl osl
Ämne: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper 4 Digit call

still no luck but in the debug even call is not hitting to CUBE not a single 
time so i would say it's not issue with load balancing even thu i took out CUBE 
config and try make a normal call but still no luck ..
also i am facing problem with CUBE when i call to UK phone is ringing i picked 
up phone no voice at UK site and HQ phone is still ringing  what could be 
the issue ...
codec? or something else  ???
any idea .. about that advise/question appreciated 

thanks
Dani
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 5:27 PM, kobel 
mailto:findko...@gmail.com>> wrote:
try configuring higher preference for CUCM trunk for prefix 2* . It seems that 
GK performs load balancing between the CUBE and this trunk and only one of them 
works.


regards


On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Dani Bug 
mailto:daniyal.vo...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I tried without invia/outvia still no luck ...:(

HQ-R1#sh gatekeeper gw
GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE
=
Prefix: 1*
  Zone GK master gateway list:
142.102.64.254:1720 CUBE
172.25.105.101:1720 GK_Trunk_1
Prefix: 852*
  Zone GK master gateway list:
142.102.66.254:1720 CUCME

Here is debug success call from 4001 to 2001
HQ-R1#
Jun  7 22:07:34.108: ////GK/gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT 
(minor 0) wakeup
Jun  7 22:07:34.172: ////GK/gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT 
(minor 0) wakeup
Jun  7 22:07:34.172: ////GK/gk_rassrv_arq: 
arqp=0x49E870B4,crv=0x59, answerCall=0
Jun  7 22:07:34.172: ////GK/gk_rassrv_sep_arq: ARQ 
Didn't use GK_AAA_PROC
Jun  7 22:07:34.172: //E801AC8F8482/E80248B78484/GK/gk_dns_query: No Name 
servers
Jun  7 22:07:34.172: //E801AC8F8482/E80248B78484/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo: 
(12001) Matched tech-prefix 1
Jun  7 22:07:34.176: //E801AC8F8482/E80248B78484/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo: 
(12001) Matched zone prefix 2

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPC and presence status

[Pavan]

Thanks angel.

Sent from my phone

On Jun 11, 2010, at 10:55 AM, Angel Perez  wrote:


Hi:

No, to view presence status of your contacts:

Add ippm service at ucm
Subscribe to desired phones
From phone access ippm service and finally add contacts from there  
(you will see the option in the menu)


Or better integrate with ad, search from upc and double click on the  
contac :)


thx

Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 10:34:31 -0500
From: pav.c...@gmail.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPC and presence status

CUPC installed and working. It is not integrated into AD.

I can view status between two CUPC users (i.e status of user1 in  
CUPC2 and vice versa
If i create my own contacts (Local contacts) on CUPC, should i be  
able to view their presence status ?


Subscribe CSS on SIP trunk has been set appropriately.

--
- Pavan

Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection. Si 
gn up now.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I passed CCIE Voice (# 26199)

[Roger Källberg]

Write down of my strategy going in to the lab.

My strategy was to first put every question and the points on one of the scrap 
papers, even before I read the lab. I then crossed of each off these when I had 
configured it and most important verified that it work as requested. This was 
very much like Pushkar have written in his excellent blog, 
http://pushkarbhatkoti.wordpress.com/category/ccie-voice-lab-strategies/. Thank 
you Push for that very helpful post.
Then I read trough the entire lab, but just browsed trough the dial-plan 
section, to see if there were anything in it that I needed to take into 
consideration in the other section.
Then my strategy was this:

· Do everything with infrastructure, including basic VGW config 
(incoming call and outgoing emergency service call. I also included basic setup 
of CUE in to this section.

· Do QoS for both campus and wan. I didn’t really stick 100% to this, 
but that was my intension going in to it. I did some of the next bullet point 
before QoS, like media and SRST.

· Configure everything, but the dial plan. This included every 
customisation of the phones, setup off VM, SRST, media, and every other think 
that has to do with applications and so on.
My goal was to finish this by lunch, I didn’t quite manage that, I needed about 
1-1½ hours after the break to finish this.
Next part of my strategy was this:

· Configure dial-plan question by question, paying special attention to 
what the question asked for when it comes to type of number and number plan. I 
verified all along when I configured, shutting down the primary path if that 
was the case, and testing the backup path. I then redid the test of the primary 
path after I had brought that up again, just to see that it still worked.
Yet again I had a goal with this section and that was to finish the dial-plan 
with 1-1½ hours to spare. This time I planned to have used for going over each 
of the questions once more and marking them of on the scrap paper one more 
time.  But because of that I didn’t manage to stick to my pre lunch game plan I 
ended up configuring right to the very end off my lab. When the proctor 
announced that it was five minutes left I was just about wrap up my last dial 
plan question. Last thing I did was to verify that all ISDN links were in the 
up state, saved my switch and router config’s for the last time and then I 
removed all my text files that I had stored on the desktop. In the end I had 
1-2 minutes to spare, luckily it ended up to be just enough to pass.

Thank you everyone that have congratulated me.

I also want to thank Vik, Amy and Mark for there hard work with the update of 
the material after the update of the blueprint last year. You guys rock.

Apart from this I would like to send a special thanks to my study mates, 
Matthew Berry, Patrick Fischer, Vishal Preenja, Jody Marshall and Sean 
Hurricane. Your help was invaluable and a monumental help in my preparation.

Regards
Roger Källberg
Consultant
Cygate AB
Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ

Direkt: +46108787498
Växel: +46108787400
roger.kallb...@cygate.se

Från: Roger Källberg [roger.kallb...@cygate.se]
Skickat: den 11 juni 2010 14:13
Till: OSL Group
Ämne: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I passed CCIE Voice (# 26199)

I took my lab yesterday, first attempt, just got the score report. I passed :-)

I will write down my strategy once I have landed from the cloud that I'm 
currently flying on. :-D

Roger Källberg
Consultant
Cygate AB
Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ

Direkt: +46108787498
Växel: +46108787400
roger.kallb...@cygate.se
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPC and presence status

[Angel Perez]

Hi:

 

No, to view presence status of your contacts:

 

Add ippm service at ucm

Subscribe to desired phones

>From phone access ippm service and finally add contacts from there (you will 
>see the option in the menu)

 

Or better integrate with ad, search from upc and double click on the contac :)

 

thx
 


Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 10:34:31 -0500
From: pav.c...@gmail.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPC and presence status


CUPC installed and working. It is not integrated into AD.


I can view status between two CUPC users (i.e status of user1 in CUPC2 and vice 
versa
If i create my own contacts (Local contacts) on CUPC, should i be able to view 
their presence status ?


Subscribe CSS on SIP trunk has been set appropriately.


-- 
- Pavan
  
_
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper 4 Digit call

[Dani Bug]

Hi Guys
Thx for your help i reconfigure Router and now its working fine and didn't
got the solution but trouble moved to in CUBE GW config same behaviour some
time calls going sometime not now thinking to reconfigure the whole router
again 
also i am facing problem with CUBE when i call to UK phone is ringing i
picked up phone no voice at UK site and HQ phone is still ringing  what
could be the issue ...
codec? or something else  ???

any advise regarding CUBE call ?

Thx
Dani

On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:56 AM, Angel Perez  wrote:

> Hi:
>
> I would brake your problems in two parts:
>
> - First: calls from ucm to ucme and ucme to ucm
>
> Delete the gateway command from the cube gateway, this should be enough to
> make calls working from ucme to ucm,
> if calls are still not working follow Kobel suggestion:
>
> zone prefix GK 2 GW-PRiority 10 GK_Trunk_1
> zone prefix GK 2 GW-PRiority 0 CUCME
>
> zone prefix GK 3 GW-PRiority 10 GK_Trunk_1
> zone prefix GK 3 GW-PRiority 0 CUCME
>
> You will need to add the tech prefix 1 for these calls (as you were doing)
>
> then for calls from ucm to ucme let say from 2001 to 4001 add the
> following:
>
> zone prefix GK 4 GW-PRiority 10 CUCME
> zone prefix GK 4 GW-PRiority 0 GK_Trunk_1
>
> I'm assuming that you have the correct route pattern, css and dial-peer
> configuration on  ucm and ucme.
>
> - Second: after that explain a littel bit more your cube call (scenarion
> number dialed, etc)
>
> hth
> --
> From: roger.kallb...@cygate.se
> To: daniyal.vo...@gmail.com
> Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 08:41:26 +0200
>
> CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>  Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper 4 Digit call
>
> Hi Dani,
>
> Have you looked in the terminating gw, with deb voip dialpeer, do you see
> if the call reaches the CME box? To route the call to the end point in CME
> and in the UCM you need to remove the tech prefix. This can be done
> with either voice translation rule or num-exp on the CME and with a TP on
> the UCM. Just make sure that this TP is in a PT that only the GK can see in
> it's incoming CSS. This is not strictly needed, just makes it a lot easier
> to troubleshoot if needed.
>
> Brgds,
>  *Roger Källberg*
>  --
> *Från:* Dani Bug [daniyal.vo...@gmail.com]
> *Skickat:* den 8 juni 2010 01:08
> *Till:* kobel
> *Kopia:* osl osl
> *Ämne:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper 4 Digit call
>
>  still no luck but in the debug even call is not hitting to CUBE not a
> single time so i would say it's not issue with load balancing even thu i
> took out CUBE config and try make a normal call but still no luck ..
> also i am facing problem with CUBE when i call to UK phone is ringing i
> picked up phone no voice at UK site and HQ phone is still ringing  what
> could be the issue ...
> codec? or something else  ???
> any idea .. about that advise/question appreciated 
>
> thanks
> Dani
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 5:27 PM, kobel  wrote:
>
> try configuring higher preference for CUCM trunk for prefix 2* . It seems
> that GK performs load balancing between the CUBE and this trunk and only one
> of them works.
>
>
> regards
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Dani Bug  wrote:
>
> I tried without invia/outvia still no luck ...:(
>
> HQ-R1#sh gatekeeper gw
> GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE
> =
> Prefix: 1*
>   Zone GK master gateway list:
> 142.102.64.254:1720 CUBE
> 172.25.105.101:1720 GK_Trunk_1
> Prefix: 852*
>   Zone GK master gateway list:
> 142.102.66.254:1720 CUCME
>
> Here is debug success call from 4001 to 2001
> HQ-R1#
> Jun  7 22:07:34.108: ////GK/gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT
> (minor 0) wakeup
> Jun  7 22:07:34.172: ////GK/gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT
> (minor 0) wakeup
> Jun  7 22:07:34.172: ////GK/gk_rassrv_arq:
> arqp=0x49E870B4,crv=0x59, answerCall=0
> Jun  7 22:07:34.172: ////GK/gk_rassrv_sep_arq: ARQ
> Didn't use GK_AAA_PROC
> Jun  7 22:07:34.172: //E801AC8F8482/E80248B78484/GK/gk_dns_query: No Name
> servers
> Jun  7 22:07:34.172: //E801AC8F8482/E80248B78484/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo:
> (12001) Matched tech-prefix 1
> Jun  7 22:07:34.176: //E801AC8F8482/E80248B78484/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo:
> (12001) Matched zone prefix 2 and remainder 001
> Jun  7 22:07:34.176:
> ////GK/gk_rassrv_get_ingress_network: ARQ non-std
> ingress network = 1
> Jun  7 22:07:34.176:
> //E801AC8F8482/E80248B78484/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check the
> source side, src_zonep=0x49FFA4B8
> Jun  7 22:07:34.176: //E801AC8F8482/E80248B78
> HQ-R1#484/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone is GK, and
> z_invianamelen=2
> Jun  7 22:07:34.176:
> //E801AC8F8482/E80248B78484/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone  and
> z_invianamep=GK
> Jun  7 22:07:34.176:
> //E801AC8F8482/E80248B78484/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check the
> destination side, dst_zonep=0x49FFA4B8

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP on UCCX

[Pavan K]

you generally use them if you are doing NTP authentication and using ACL to
control who your NTP peers are.
Doesn't hurt to add but technically they are not required.

I usually add them

-Pavan

On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Dani Bug  wrote:

> thx i forgot to add these cmd
> but wondering if we need to add
> ntp source loopback0
> ntp server x.x.x.x source int fa0/0.100
> these cmd also required ??
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Pavan K  wrote:
>
>> you would also need clock timezone and summertime (if asked)
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Dani Bug wrote:
>>
>>> go with option 2 NTP UCCX
>>> also i just want to confirm in NTP on R1 R2 and R3 which commands we
>>> required lab perspective view ...
>>>
>>> ntp server x.x.x.x
>>> wht else command we required to configure 
>>>
>>> Thx
>>> Dani
>>>
>>>  On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Pavan K  wrote:
>>>
  When configuring NTP on the UCCX server, i see two approaches when
 asked to configure NTP.

 Which way would you go ?


 - Configure NTP on the Windows OS (Using windows registry hack) (More
 Involved)

 - Configure NTP on the UCCX app itself during Integration. (Faster &
 Seems to work)
(Disadvantage : windows time does not seem to sync up since only app
 is synced)


 --
 - Pavan

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please visit www.ipexpert.com


>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> - Pavan
>>
>
>


-- 
- Pavan
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPC and presence status

[Pavan K]

CUPC installed and working. It is not integrated into AD.

I can view status between two CUPC users (i.e status of user1 in CUPC2 and
vice versa
If i create my own contacts (Local contacts) on CUPC, should i be able to
view their presence status ?

Subscribe CSS on SIP trunk has been set appropriately.

-- 
- Pavan
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP on UCCX

[Dani Bug]

thx i forgot to add these cmd
but wondering if we need to add
ntp source loopback0
ntp server x.x.x.x source int fa0/0.100
these cmd also required ??


On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Pavan K  wrote:

> you would also need clock timezone and summertime (if asked)
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Dani Bug wrote:
>
>> go with option 2 NTP UCCX
>> also i just want to confirm in NTP on R1 R2 and R3 which commands we
>> required lab perspective view ...
>>
>> ntp server x.x.x.x
>> wht else command we required to configure 
>>
>> Thx
>> Dani
>>
>>  On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Pavan K  wrote:
>>
>>>  When configuring NTP on the UCCX server, i see two approaches when
>>> asked to configure NTP.
>>>
>>> Which way would you go ?
>>>
>>>
>>> - Configure NTP on the Windows OS (Using windows registry hack) (More
>>> Involved)
>>>
>>> - Configure NTP on the UCCX app itself during Integration. (Faster &
>>> Seems to work)
>>>(Disadvantage : windows time does not seem to sync up since only app
>>> is synced)
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> - Pavan
>>>
>>> ___
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> - Pavan
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Better Voice Lab Locations

[Pavan K]

In SJ they generally take you to the cafe.
In RTP they generally get the food catered and serve it inside an ancillary
room. (atleast they used to)

On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Jeff Price (jeffpric)
wrote:

> I believe it depends on your location, but normally they walk you to a
> local Cisco cafeteria with a voucher for your lunch (up to a certain
> price).
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jon1992
> Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 4:10 AM
> To: Amp; ccie voice
> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; Mouhammad Nasser
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Better Voice Lab Locations
>
> During lunch are we stuck in the lab area or can we go and buy?
>
> --
> From: "Amp" 
> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 11:01 PM
> To: "ccie voice" 
> Cc: ; "Mouhammad Nasser"
> 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Better Voice Lab Locations
>
> > No not based on lunch. With the longer lunch time I will be able to
> have
> > some time to think about what I have completed, what I need to
> complete,
> > and if I need to change anything that I have done.
> >
> > Quoting ccie voice :
> >
> >> @Amp
> >>
> >> So you choose a lab location based on lunch?
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Amp  wrote:
> >>
> >>> I live here in the RTP area but have decided to take the lab in San
> >>> Jose.
> >>> Here are my reasons:
> >>>
> >>> 1. Later Start Time
> >>> 2. Longer Lunch
> >>> 3. Better Weather
> >>> 4. Just have a gut feeling about SJC
> >>>
> >>> Amp
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Quoting Jeff Garvas :
> >>>
> >>>  I heard that the West coast facility starts later, so someone east
> of
> >>> that
>  location would gain the time zone benefits as well as the late
> start.
>  RTP
>  supposedly starts first thing in the morning bright and early.
> 
>  2010/6/9 Mouhammad Nasser 
> 
>    Hi,
> >
> > I think it is better to take one that is closest to one's
> timezone!
> > this
> > will eliminate the factor of travel sickness, and one may go to
> exam
> > awake
> > enough!
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --
> > Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. Sign up
> now.<
> > https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969>
> >
> >
> > ___
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>
> > please
> > visit www.ipexpert.com
> >
> >
> >
> 
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ___
> >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> >>> please
> >>> visit www.ipexpert.com
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please
> > visit www.ipexpert.com
> >
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>



-- 
- Pavan
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP on UCCX

[Dani Bug]

go with option 2 NTP UCCX
also i just want to confirm in NTP on R1 R2 and R3 which commands we
required lab perspective view ...

ntp server x.x.x.x
wht else command we required to configure 

Thx
Dani

On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Pavan K  wrote:

> When configuring NTP on the UCCX server, i see two approaches when asked to
> configure NTP.
>
> Which way would you go ?
>
>
> - Configure NTP on the Windows OS (Using windows registry hack) (More
> Involved)
>
> - Configure NTP on the UCCX app itself during Integration. (Faster & Seems
> to work)
>(Disadvantage : windows time does not seem to sync up since only app is
> synced)
>
>
> --
> - Pavan
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP on UCCX

[Pavan K]

you would also need clock timezone and summertime (if asked)


On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Dani Bug  wrote:

> go with option 2 NTP UCCX
> also i just want to confirm in NTP on R1 R2 and R3 which commands we
> required lab perspective view ...
>
> ntp server x.x.x.x
> wht else command we required to configure 
>
> Thx
> Dani
>
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Pavan K  wrote:
>
>> When configuring NTP on the UCCX server, i see two approaches when asked
>> to configure NTP.
>>
>> Which way would you go ?
>>
>>
>> - Configure NTP on the Windows OS (Using windows registry hack) (More
>> Involved)
>>
>> - Configure NTP on the UCCX app itself during Integration. (Faster & Seems
>> to work)
>>(Disadvantage : windows time does not seem to sync up since only app is
>> synced)
>>
>>
>> --
>> - Pavan
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>


-- 
- Pavan
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Better Voice Lab Locations

[Jeff Price (jeffpric)]

I believe it depends on your location, but normally they walk you to a
local Cisco cafeteria with a voucher for your lunch (up to a certain
price).

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jon1992
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 4:10 AM
To: Amp; ccie voice
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; Mouhammad Nasser
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Better Voice Lab Locations

During lunch are we stuck in the lab area or can we go and buy?

--
From: "Amp" 
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 11:01 PM
To: "ccie voice" 
Cc: ; "Mouhammad Nasser" 

Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Better Voice Lab Locations

> No not based on lunch. With the longer lunch time I will be able to
have 
> some time to think about what I have completed, what I need to
complete, 
> and if I need to change anything that I have done.
>
> Quoting ccie voice :
>
>> @Amp
>>
>> So you choose a lab location based on lunch?
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Amp  wrote:
>>
>>> I live here in the RTP area but have decided to take the lab in San 
>>> Jose.
>>> Here are my reasons:
>>>
>>> 1. Later Start Time
>>> 2. Longer Lunch
>>> 3. Better Weather
>>> 4. Just have a gut feeling about SJC
>>>
>>> Amp
>>>
>>>
>>> Quoting Jeff Garvas :
>>>
>>>  I heard that the West coast facility starts later, so someone east
of 
>>> that
 location would gain the time zone benefits as well as the late
start.
 RTP
 supposedly starts first thing in the morning bright and early.

 2010/6/9 Mouhammad Nasser 

   Hi,
>
> I think it is better to take one that is closest to one's
timezone! 
> this
> will eliminate the factor of travel sickness, and one may go to
exam
> awake
> enough!
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. Sign up
now.<
> https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969>
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,

> please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>

>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, 
>>> please
>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VPIM problem

[Angel Perez]

Thanks the reboot made the trick

 

regards
 


From: pav.c...@gmail.com
To: gorr...@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VPIM problem
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 08:19:59 -0500
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com


I ve had the exact same problem couple of days back.
You can fix it by changing the smtp domain name in ucon and rebooting it.

Sent from my phone

On Jun 11, 2010, at 7:49 AM, Angel Perez  wrote:




Hi:
 
I've the following DNS configuration:
 
cue->  cue.cisco.lab 
cuc->  cuc.cisco.lab (ip address 150.200.30.13)
 
Both cue and cuc have properly dns address and domain configured 
 
Cue config:
 
network location id "440"
 email domain cue.cisco.lab
 name "cue"
 end location
 
 
network location id "330"
 email domain cuc.cisco.lab
 name "cuc"
 end location
 
 
network local location id 440
 
 
Cuc config:
 
-smtp server addres cuc.cisco.lab 
-vpim location added for cue (440)
-converstion manager reloaded
-smtp server reloaded
-remote users added (to dial by number to remote ext)
-If I check cuc user I can see: hq2 @ cuc.cisco.lab (extension 6002)
-Also I reloaded the box
 
 
At this point I can send vpim messages from cue to cuc but when I try to send 
it in the opposite direction (cuc to cue) I get this error on cue:
 
cue# show trace buffer tail 
Press  to exit...

4402 06/11 20:14:05.584 netw smtp 2
4402 06/11 20:14:05.601 netw smtp 3 socket hostName: 150.200.30.13, 
hostAddress: 150.200.30.13
4402 06/11 20:14:05.601 netw smtp 3 hostname: 150.200.30.13 found in good 
address cache
4402 06/11 20:14:05.603 netw smtp 1
10444 06/11 20:14:05.604 netw smtp 5 Initial connection message
10444 06/11 20:14:05.631 netw smtp 6 UNKNOWN: EHLO cuc
10444 06/11 20:14:05.632 netw smtp 5 250-cue
10444 06/11 20:14:05.665 netw smtp 6 EHLO : MAIL FROM:<6002 @ cisco.lab>
10444 06/11 20:14:05.675 netw smtp 5 554 5.1.8 Bad senders system address
10444 06/11 20:14:05.697 netw smtp 6 MAIL FROM:: QUIT
10444 06/11 20:14:05.698 netw smtp 5 221 closing channel
 
 
Although everything looks like it is configured correctly on CUC the smtp 
address I'm reciving at CUE is  @ cisco.lab instead of  @ cuc.cisco.lab, so CUE 
is rejecting the message
 
This looks like a limatition/problem of cuc smtp server to send the full domain 
name to CUE the only workaround i have found to make this work with this dns 
configuration is adding the following at CUE side:
 
 
network location id "666"
 email domain cisco.lab
 name "fake"
 end location
 
This way messages are accepted and working in both directions
 
Any idea would be apreciated
 
Thanks



Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now. 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com
  
_
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I passed CCIE Voice (# 26199)

[wolfsrudel]

congratulations man!!!
indeed it's inspiring!!!

On 6/11/10, Steve Sarrick  wrote:
> Congrats!  Its inspiring to see the consistent passes on this list!
>
>
>
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Roger Källberg
> Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 8:13 AM
> To: OSL Group
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I passed CCIE Voice (# 26199)
>
>
>
> I took my lab yesterday, first attempt, just got the score report. I passed
> :-)
>
>
>
> I will write down my strategy once I have landed from the cloud that I'm
> currently flying on. :-D
>
>
>
> Roger Källberg
> Consultant
> Cygate AB
> Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ
>
> Direkt: +46108787498
> Växel: +46108787400
> roger.kallb...@cygate.se 
>
>

-- 
Sent from my mobile device
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I passed CCIE Voice (# 26199)

[Steve Sarrick]

Congrats!  Its inspiring to see the consistent passes on this list!

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Roger Källberg
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 8:13 AM
To: OSL Group
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I passed CCIE Voice (# 26199)

 

I took my lab yesterday, first attempt, just got the score report. I passed :-)

 

I will write down my strategy once I have landed from the cloud that I'm 
currently flying on. :-D

 

Roger Källberg
Consultant
Cygate AB
Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ

Direkt: +46108787498
Växel: +46108787400
roger.kallb...@cygate.se  

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP on UCCX

[Tanner Ezell]

Use the IP Address of your CUCM Publisher (as it runs an NTP server).

On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Pavan K  wrote:
> When configuring NTP on the UCCX server, i see two approaches when asked to
> configure NTP.
> Which way would you go ?
>
> - Configure NTP on the Windows OS (Using windows registry hack) (More
> Involved)
> - Configure NTP on the UCCX app itself during Integration. (Faster & Seems
> to work)
>    (Disadvantage : windows time does not seem to sync up since only app is
> synced)
>
> --
> - Pavan
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>



-- 
Cheers,

Tanner Ezell
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP on UCCX

[Pavan K]

When configuring NTP on the UCCX server, i see two approaches when asked to
configure NTP.

Which way would you go ?


- Configure NTP on the Windows OS (Using windows registry hack) (More
Involved)

- Configure NTP on the UCCX app itself during Integration. (Faster & Seems
to work)
   (Disadvantage : windows time does not seem to sync up since only app is
synced)


-- 
- Pavan
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VPIM problem

[Pavan]

I ve had the exact same problem couple of days back.
You can fix it by changing the smtp domain name in ucon and rebooting  
it.


Sent from my phone

On Jun 11, 2010, at 7:49 AM, Angel Perez  wrote:


Hi:

I've the following DNS configuration:

cue->  cue.cisco.lab
cuc->  cuc.cisco.lab (ip address 150.200.30.13)

Both cue and cuc have properly dns address and domain configured

Cue config:

network location id "440"
 email domain cue.cisco.lab
 name "cue"
 end location


network location id "330"
 email domain cuc.cisco.lab
 name "cuc"
 end location


network local location id 440


Cuc config:

-smtp server addres cuc.cisco.lab
-vpim location added for cue (440)
-converstion manager reloaded
-smtp server reloaded
-remote users added (to dial by number to remote ext)
-If I check cuc user I can see: hq2 @ cuc.cisco.lab (extension 6002)
-Also I reloaded the box


At this point I can send vpim messages from cue to cuc but when I  
try to send it in the opposite direction (cuc to cue) I get this  
error on cue:


cue# show trace buffer tail
Press  to exit...

4402 06/11 20:14:05.584 netw smtp 2
4402 06/11 20:14:05.601 netw smtp 3 socket hostName: 150.200.30.13,  
hostAddress: 150.200.30.13
4402 06/11 20:14:05.601 netw smtp 3 hostname: 150.200.30.13 found in  
good address cache

4402 06/11 20:14:05.603 netw smtp 1
10444 06/11 20:14:05.604 netw smtp 5 Initial connection message
10444 06/11 20:14:05.631 netw smtp 6 UNKNOWN: EHLO cuc
10444 06/11 20:14:05.632 netw smtp 5 250-cue
10444 06/11 20:14:05.665 netw smtp 6 EHLO : MAIL FROM:<6002 @  
cisco.lab>
10444 06/11 20:14:05.675 netw smtp 5 554 5.1.8 Bad senders system  
address

10444 06/11 20:14:05.697 netw smtp 6 MAIL FROM:: QUIT
10444 06/11 20:14:05.698 netw smtp 5 221 closing channel


Although everything looks like it is configured correctly on CUC the  
smtp address I'm reciving at CUE is  @ cisco.lab instead of  @  
cuc.cisco.lab, so CUE is rejecting the message


This looks like a limatition/problem of cuc smtp server to send the  
full domain name to CUE the only workaround i have found to make  
this work with this dns configuration is adding the following at CUE  
side:



network location id "666"
 email domain cisco.lab
 name "fake"
 end location

This way messages are accepted and working in both directions

Any idea would be apreciated

Thanks

Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,  
please visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX reporting

[kobel]

Thanks, I had the same idea. But the generality of this task made me think
if I'm not missing any built-in feature.


2010/6/11 Mouhammad Nasser 

>  Hi,
>
> Well, I cannot think of something other than recording customized prompts
> like: "The choice with the highest number of clicks is", followed by another
> prompt saying the name of the queue. We need if statements here to
> choose the correct CSQ to mention the name of
>
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I passed CCIE Voice (# 26199)

[Rogers Ochieng]

Congratulations!

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Roger Källberg
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 3:13 PM
To: OSL Group
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I passed CCIE Voice (# 26199)

 

I took my lab yesterday, first attempt, just got the score report. I passed
:-)

 

I will write down my strategy once I have landed from the cloud that I'm
currently flying on. :-D

 

Roger Källberg
Consultant
Cygate AB
Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ

Direkt: +46108787498
Växel: +46108787400
  roger.kallb...@cygate.se

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] X-Lite SIP Client not registering to BR2 CME

[Steve Denney (stdenney)]

Forgot to attach BR2 config, sorry.

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Steve
Denney (stdenney)
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 8:38 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] X-Lite SIP Client not registering to BR2 CME

 

I've noticed some odd behavior the last few weeks with my X-Lite SIP
client (BR2 Ph4, DN 3006; using software VPN to connect to the vRacks).

The X-Lite SIP client doesn't seem to want to register to the CME. It
comes up with the error "Registration error 408 - Request Timeout" on
the display.

 

The only other time I've hit this symptom was a couple of months ago,
when I and a few other folks hit the IP addressing issue discussed in
this thread:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com/msg16149.html

 

Since then I've been careful to run this "fix" on the HQ and BR2 routers
before each lab, and none of the other symptoms mentioned in that thread
have occurred. 

But the "Registration error 408 - Request Timeout" has popped up again
for the last few weeks. 

Different pods, too: twice on pod 14 and twice on pod 12. 

 

As per another archive thread, I removed "type 7960" from the voice
register pool 2 - didn't help. Have reloaded the router, no create prof
/ create prof (all the usual fixes). 

No issues with the BR2 SCCP (IPblue) softclient. 

Searched the archives and the Web but no further hits. Any ideas?

 

cheers, sd

 

 

Steve Denney, CISSP

Systems Engineer - Technology Solutions Network

Voice and Unified Communications Products

Cisco Systems, Inc.

125 High Street, 21st Floor

Boston, MA  02110

978-936-4048 (Office)

617-872-5031 (Mobile)

stden...@cisco.com   

 

 

BR2-RTR#
BR2-RTR#sh cdp ne
Capability Codes: R - Router, T - Trans Bridge, B - Source Route Bridge
  S - Switch, H - Host, I - IGMP, r - Repeater

Device IDLocal Intrfce HoldtmeCapability  Platform  Port ID
SEP001193B6EC51  Fas 0/3/0  157   H   IP Phone  Port 1
SEP0002FD3BA793  Fas 0/3/1  161   H   IP Phone  Port 1
HQ-RTR   Ser 0/1/0:0.1  129 R S I 2811  Ser 
0/0/1:0.2


BR2-RTR#sh run
Building configuration...

Current configuration : 6564 bytes
!
version 12.4
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
!
hostname BR2-RTR
!
boot-start-marker
warm-reboot
boot-end-marker
!
logging message-counter syslog
logging buffered 4096
!
no aaa new-model
memory-size iomem 20
clock timezone CET 1
clock summer-time CET recurring 1 Sun Apr 1:00 last Sun Oct 1:00
network-clock-participate wic 0 
no network-clock-participate wic 1 
!
dot11 syslog
ip source-route
!
!
ip cef
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.1 10.10.202.49
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.70 10.10.202.254
!
ip dhcp pool CME
   network 10.10.202.0 255.255.255.0
   default-router 10.10.202.1 
   option 150 ip 10.10.110.3 
!
!
no ip domain lookup
no ipv6 cef
!
multilink bundle-name authenticated
!
!
isdn switch-type primary-net5
!
!
!
voice service voip 
 sip
  registrar server
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
voice register global
 mode cme
 source-address 10.10.202.1 port 5060
 max-dn 2
 max-pool 2
 load 7960-7940 P0S3-08-9-00
 authenticate register
 timezone 13
 time-format 24
 date-format D/M/Y
 tftp-path flash:
 create profile sync 300632851775
 ntp-server 10.10.100.2 mode unicast
!
voice register dn  1
 number 3005
 name br2 phn2
!
voice register dn  2
 number 3006
 name br2 phn4
!
voice register template  1
 dialplan 1
!
voice register dialplan  1
 type 7940-7960-others
 pattern 1 3...
!
voice register pool  1
 id mac 001B.D4C6.C139
 type 7960
 number 1 dn 1
 template 1
 dtmf-relay rtp-nte
 username 3005 password cisco
 description 32143005
 codec g711ulaw
!
voice register pool  2
 id mac 000D.299D.348C
 number 1 dn 2
 template 1
 dtmf-relay rtp-nte
 username 3006 password cisco
 description 32143006
 codec g711ulaw
!
!
!
voice-card 0
 no dspfarm
 dsp services dspfarm
!
!
!
!
!
archive
 log config
  hidekeys
! 
!
!
!
!
controller E1 0/0/0
 pri-group timeslots 1-3,16
!
controller T1 0/1/0
 framing esf
 linecode b8zs
 channel-group 0 timeslots 1-24
!
!
!
!
!
interface Loopback0
 ip address 10.10.110.3 255.255.255.255
 ip ospf network point-to-point
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
 no ip address
 shutdown
 duplex auto
 speed auto
!
interface Service-Engine0/0
 no ip address
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
 no ip address
 shutdown
 duplex auto
 speed auto
!
interface FastEthernet0/3/0
 switchport trunk native vlan 200
 switchport mode trunk
 switchport voice vlan 400
 switchport priority extend cos 0
 shutdown
!
interface FastEthernet0/3/1
 switchport trunk native vlan 200
 switchport mode trunk
 switchport voice vlan 400
 switchport priority extend cos 0
 shutdown
!
interface FastEthernet0/3/2
 shutdown
!
interface FastEthernet0/3/3
 shutdown
!
interface Serial0/0/0:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I passed CCIE Voice (# 26199)

[mike deal]

Awesome, congrats!

2010/6/11 Roger Källberg 

>  I took my lab yesterday, first attempt, just got the score report. I
> passed :-)
>
> I will write down my strategy once I have landed from the cloud that I'm
> currently flying on. :-D
>
>  *Roger Källberg*
> Consultant
> Cygate AB
> Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ
>
> Direkt: +46108787498
> Växel: +46108787400
> roger.kallb...@cygate.se
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I passed CCIE Voice (# 26199)

[Ashar Siddiqui]

Congrats man! You had everything in you to pass the lab..good job!

wolfsrudel wrote:

  www!!! congratulations!!!

On 6/11/10, Roger Källberg  wrote:
  
  
I took my lab yesterday, first attempt, just got the score report. I passed
:-)

I will write down my strategy once I have landed from the cloud that I'm
currently flying on. :-D

Roger Källberg
Consultant
Cygate AB
Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ

Direkt: +46108787498
Växel: +46108787400
roger.kallb...@cygate.se


  
  
  




___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] PGW in vmware (I know way out of scope !!!)

[Ravindra Lakpriya]

Hi Guys,

I know this is nothing related to CCIE voice. But i have to study this
as well for my job.

Have any of you installed PGW in vmware. ?

Sorry for the silly question.

-- 
Ravindra Lakpriya
+94 773 532 094
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] VPIM problem

[Angel Perez]

Hi:

 

I've the following DNS configuration:

 

cue->  cue.cisco.lab 

cuc->  cuc.cisco.lab (ip address 150.200.30.13)

 

Both cue and cuc have properly dns address and domain configured 

 

Cue config:

 

network location id "440"
 email domain cue.cisco.lab
 name "cue"
 end location

 

 

network location id "330"
 email domain cuc.cisco.lab
 name "cuc"
 end location

 

 

network local location id 440

 

 

Cuc config:

 

-smtp server addres cuc.cisco.lab 

-vpim location added for cue (440)

-converstion manager reloaded

-smtp server reloaded

-remote users added (to dial by number to remote ext)

-If I check cuc user I can see: hq2 @ cuc.cisco.lab (extension 6002)

-Also I reloaded the box

 

 

At this point I can send vpim messages from cue to cuc but when I try to send 
it in the opposite direction (cuc to cue) I get this error on cue:

 

cue# show trace buffer tail 
Press  to exit...

4402 06/11 20:14:05.584 netw smtp 2
4402 06/11 20:14:05.601 netw smtp 3 socket hostName: 150.200.30.13, 
hostAddress: 150.200.30.13
4402 06/11 20:14:05.601 netw smtp 3 hostname: 150.200.30.13 found in good 
address cache
4402 06/11 20:14:05.603 netw smtp 1
10444 06/11 20:14:05.604 netw smtp 5 Initial connection message
10444 06/11 20:14:05.631 netw smtp 6 UNKNOWN: EHLO cuc
10444 06/11 20:14:05.632 netw smtp 5 250-cue
10444 06/11 20:14:05.665 netw smtp 6 EHLO : MAIL FROM:<6002 @ cisco.lab>
10444 06/11 20:14:05.675 netw smtp 5 554 5.1.8 Bad senders system address
10444 06/11 20:14:05.697 netw smtp 6 MAIL FROM:: QUIT
10444 06/11 20:14:05.698 netw smtp 5 221 closing channel

 

 

Although everything looks like it is configured correctly on CUC the smtp 
address I'm reciving at CUE is  @ cisco.lab instead of  @ cuc.cisco.lab, so CUE 
is rejecting the message

 

This looks like a limatition/problem of cuc smtp server to send the full domain 
name to CUE the only workaround i have found to make this work with this dns 
configuration is adding the following at CUE side:

 

 

network location id "666"
 email domain cisco.lab
 name "fake"
 end location

 

This way messages are accepted and working in both directions

 

Any idea would be apreciated

 

Thanks
  
_
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I passed CCIE Voice (# 26199)

[Dew Swen]

Congrats man !! Please share your experinces with us whenever you land :)

--
Dew Swen
CCVP, CCNP



11.06.2010 15:34, wolfsrudel yazmış:

www!!! congratulations!!!

On 6/11/10, Roger Källberg  wrote:
   

I took my lab yesterday, first attempt, just got the score report. I passed
:-)

I will write down my strategy once I have landed from the cloud that I'm
currently flying on. :-D

Roger Källberg
Consultant
Cygate AB
Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ

Direkt: +46108787498
Växel: +46108787400
roger.kallb...@cygate.se

 
   



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] X-Lite SIP Client not registering to BR2 CME

[Steve Denney (stdenney)]

I've noticed some odd behavior the last few weeks with my X-Lite SIP
client (BR2 Ph4, DN 3006; using software VPN to connect to the vRacks).

The X-Lite SIP client doesn't seem to want to register to the CME. It
comes up with the error "Registration error 408 - Request Timeout" on
the display.

 

The only other time I've hit this symptom was a couple of months ago,
when I and a few other folks hit the IP addressing issue discussed in
this thread:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com/msg16149.html

 

Since then I've been careful to run this "fix" on the HQ and BR2 routers
before each lab, and none of the other symptoms mentioned in that thread
have occurred. 

But the "Registration error 408 - Request Timeout" has popped up again
for the last few weeks. 

Different pods, too: twice on pod 14 and twice on pod 12. 

 

As per another archive thread, I removed "type 7960" from the voice
register pool 2 - didn't help. Have reloaded the router, no create prof
/ create prof (all the usual fixes). 

No issues with the BR2 SCCP (IPblue) softclient. 

Searched the archives and the Web but no further hits. Any ideas?

 

cheers, sd

 

 

Steve Denney, CISSP

Systems Engineer - Technology Solutions Network

Voice and Unified Communications Products

Cisco Systems, Inc.

125 High Street, 21st Floor

Boston, MA  02110

978-936-4048 (Office)

617-872-5031 (Mobile)

stden...@cisco.com   

 

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I passed CCIE Voice (# 26199)

[wolfsrudel]

www!!! congratulations!!!

On 6/11/10, Roger Källberg  wrote:
> I took my lab yesterday, first attempt, just got the score report. I passed
> :-)
>
> I will write down my strategy once I have landed from the cloud that I'm
> currently flying on. :-D
>
> Roger Källberg
> Consultant
> Cygate AB
> Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ
>
> Direkt: +46108787498
> Växel: +46108787400
> roger.kallb...@cygate.se
>

-- 
Sent from my mobile device
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I passed CCIE Voice (# 26199)

[Angel Perez]

Very very good job Roger :)
 


From: roger.kallb...@cygate.se
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 14:13:23 +0200
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I passed CCIE Voice (# 26199)




I took my lab yesterday, first attempt, just got the score report. I passed :-)
 
I will write down my strategy once I have landed from the cloud that I'm 
currently flying on. :-D
 

Roger Källberg
Consultant
Cygate AB
Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ

Direkt: +46108787498
Växel: +46108787400
roger.kallb...@cygate.se  
_
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I passed CCIE Voice (# 26199)

[Brian Chips]

Congratulations man,

It must have been an exciting journey. I hope one day I will be feeling like
you are doing now. Congrats once more

2010/6/11 Roger Källberg 

>  I took my lab yesterday, first attempt, just got the score report. I
> passed :-)
>
> I will write down my strategy once I have landed from the cloud that I'm
> currently flying on. :-D
>
>  *Roger Källberg*
> Consultant
> Cygate AB
> Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ
>
> Direkt: +46108787498
> Växel: +46108787400
> roger.kallb...@cygate.se
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>


-- 
B
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] I passed CCIE Voice (# 26199)

[Roger Källberg]

I took my lab yesterday, first attempt, just got the score report. I passed :-)

I will write down my strategy once I have landed from the cloud that I'm 
currently flying on. :-D

Roger Källberg
Consultant
Cygate AB
Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ

Direkt: +46108787498
Växel: +46108787400
roger.kallb...@cygate.se
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Better Voice Lab Locations

[Rogers Ochieng]

Lunch at the lab is traditional lunch break where one gets to eat not the
modern lunch which has become a time period. It's paid for in your $1400,
that's why we say you get to have a very expensive lunch if you don't pass
the lab. 

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jon1992
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 2:10 PM
To: Amp; ccie voice
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; Mouhammad Nasser
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Better Voice Lab Locations

During lunch are we stuck in the lab area or can we go and buy?

--
From: "Amp" 
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 11:01 PM
To: "ccie voice" 
Cc: ; "Mouhammad Nasser" 

Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Better Voice Lab Locations

> No not based on lunch. With the longer lunch time I will be able to  have 
> some time to think about what I have completed, what I need to  complete, 
> and if I need to change anything that I have done.
>
> Quoting ccie voice :
>
>> @Amp
>>
>> So you choose a lab location based on lunch?
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Amp  wrote:
>>
>>> I live here in the RTP area but have decided to take the lab in San 
>>> Jose.
>>> Here are my reasons:
>>>
>>> 1. Later Start Time
>>> 2. Longer Lunch
>>> 3. Better Weather
>>> 4. Just have a gut feeling about SJC
>>>
>>> Amp
>>>
>>>
>>> Quoting Jeff Garvas :
>>>
>>>  I heard that the West coast facility starts later, so someone east of 
>>> that
 location would gain the time zone benefits as well as the late start.
 RTP
 supposedly starts first thing in the morning bright and early.

 2010/6/9 Mouhammad Nasser 

   Hi,
>
> I think it is better to take one that is closest to one's timezone! 
> this
> will eliminate the factor of travel sickness, and one may go to exam
> awake
> enough!
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. Sign up  now.<
> https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969>
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, 
> please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>

>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, 
>>> please
>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Better Voice Lab Locations

[Jon1992]

During lunch are we stuck in the lab area or can we go and buy?

--
From: "Amp" 
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 11:01 PM
To: "ccie voice" 
Cc: ; "Mouhammad Nasser" 


Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Better Voice Lab Locations

No not based on lunch. With the longer lunch time I will be able to  have 
some time to think about what I have completed, what I need to  complete, 
and if I need to change anything that I have done.


Quoting ccie voice :


@Amp

So you choose a lab location based on lunch?

On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Amp  wrote:

I live here in the RTP area but have decided to take the lab in San 
Jose.

Here are my reasons:

1. Later Start Time
2. Longer Lunch
3. Better Weather
4. Just have a gut feeling about SJC

Amp


Quoting Jeff Garvas :

 I heard that the West coast facility starts later, so someone east of 
that

location would gain the time zone benefits as well as the late start.
RTP
supposedly starts first thing in the morning bright and early.

2010/6/9 Mouhammad Nasser 

  Hi,


I think it is better to take one that is closest to one's timezone! 
this

will eliminate the factor of travel sickness, and one may go to exam
awake
enough!



Regards,

--
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. Sign up  now.<
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969>


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, 
please

visit www.ipexpert.com








___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, 
please

visit www.ipexpert.com







___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
visit www.ipexpert.com



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX reporting

[Mouhammad Nasser]

Hi,

 

Well, I cannot think of something other than recording customized prompts like: 
"The choice with the highest number of clicks is", followed by another prompt 
saying the name of the queue. We need if statements here to choose the correct 
CSQ to mention the name of

 

 

Regards,
 


Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 11:31:02 +0200
Subject: Re: UCCX reporting
From: findko...@gmail.com
To: engnasse...@hotmail.com
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

OK, this might work. But another part of the task is providing this information 
to the customer. The task is vague about this - how would you do this?


2010/6/11 Mouhammad Nasser 


Hi Kobel,
 
In the "Get Reporting Statistic" step, one can retrieve the number of total 
contacs in queue, which is defined as: 
 
" Number of total contacts since the statistics were last reset for this CSQ "
 
 
But I didn't try it before, so I am not sure if one can choose which CSQ to 
retrieve information about, or we have to:
 
- apply select resource (with no connect)
 
- Retrieve the required statistics
 
- dequeue the call from that queue
 
and repeat the above till all informatoin is available
 
 
HTH
 
Mouhammad,




Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now.
  
_
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX reporting

[kobel]

OK, this might work. But another part of the task is providing this
information to the customer. The task is vague about this - how would you do
this?

2010/6/11 Mouhammad Nasser 

>  Hi Kobel,
>
> In the "Get Reporting Statistic" step, one can retrieve the number of total
> contacs in queue, which is defined as:
>
> " Number of total contacts since the statistics were last reset for this
> CSQ "
>
>
> But I didn't try it before, so I am not sure if one can choose which CSQ to
> retrieve information about, or we have to:
>
> - apply select resource (with no connect)
>
> - Retrieve the required statistics
>
> - dequeue the call from that queue
>
> and repeat the above till all informatoin is available
>
>
> HTH
>
> Mouhammad,
>
> --
> Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it 
> now.
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME CUCM call hold problems

[Angel Perez]

Hi again:

 

I'm not sure of your exact topolgy, are using cube with gatekeepers? or just 
two gateways (ucme, ucm) registered to gw?

 

thx
 


From: gorr...@hotmail.com
To: dberlin...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 08:52:59 +
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME CUCM call hold problems



Hi Daniel:
 
Let my check it during the day
 
thx
 


Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 18:35:14 +1200
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME CUCM call hold problems
From: dberlin...@gmail.com
To: gorr...@hotmail.com
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

Hello Angel

Thanks a lot for this it has worked by configuring IOS MTP.  

May I ask you if call transfers worked fine for you as well?

In my setup call transfers are not working properly.  If for instance I send a 
call from a CME phone to a CUCM phone then press transfer, the CME phone 
remains on hold after call is completed with the transfer-to party.  The only 
way to complete transfer is by pressing hold twice on the CME phone.  Anyone 
got call transfers to work perfectly? Same behaviour seen with Supervised or 
Blind xfer.

My CME configs as follows:
voice service voip 
 allow-connections h323 to h323
 allow-connections h323 to sip
 allow-connections sip to h323
 allow-connections sip to sip
 supplementary-service h450.12 > This was added in an attempt to get 
call xfers to work flawlessly
 h323
  emptycapability > This was added in an attempt to get call xfers to 
work flawlessly
  h225 id-passthru > This was added in an attempt to get call xfers to 
work flawlessly
  h225 connect-passthru > This was added in an attempt to get call 
xfers to work flawlessly
  no call service stop
  h245 passthru tcsnonstd-passthru> This was added in an attempt to get 
call xfers to work flawlessly
 sip
  bind control source-interface Vlan400
  bind media source-interface Vlan400
  registrar server
!
telephony-service
 sdspfarm units 1
 sdspfarm transcode sessions 3
 sdspfarm tag 1 br2-xcoder
 no auto-reg-ephone
 load 7960-7940 P00308000500
 load 7965 SCCP45.8-3-3S
 max-ephones 3
 max-dn 6 no-reg
 ip source-address 10.10.110.3 port 2000
 time-format 24
 date-format dd-mm-yy
 max-conferences 8 gain -6
 call-forward pattern .T
 transfer-system full-consult
 transfer-pattern .T
 create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 Jun 11 2010 08:11:35
!
sccp local Vlan400
sccp ccm 10.10.110.3 identifier 1 version 5.0.1 
sccp ip precedence 3
sccp
!
sccp ccm group 1
 associate ccm 1 priority 1
 associate profile 1 register br2-xcoder
 signaling dscp af31
!
dspfarm profile 1 transcode  
 codec g711ulaw
 codec g711alaw
 codec g729ar8
 codec g729abr8
 maximum sessions 19
 associate application SCCP


Cheers


On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Angel Perez  wrote:


Hi:
 
You need software mtp from ios not from ucm, make sure that ios mtp are 
configured and registered, to be sure that mtp is working verify it with sh 
sccp or from ucm.
 
Once you have ios mtp registered add a mrg and include all ucm software mtp and 
cnf, then do not include this mrg to any mrgl, this way you will be sure that 
this resources are not available for your trunk/phones. 
 
Also be sure that in the trunk/phones mrgl the ios mtp rosource is above other 
ucm software resources.
 
Then place a call, press hold and verify  with sh sccp con
 
For more information check:
 
CUCM 7 SRND page 5-11 (H.323 Trunks with Media Termination Points )

http://www.mail-archive.com/ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com/msg15970.html
 
 
hth 
 


Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19:17:48 +1200
From: dberlin...@gmail.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME CUCM call hold problems 




Hello all

After completing lab 2 of volume 2 Gatekeeper section I found the following 
behaviour when testing call hold between phones registered to CUCM and CME 
respectively:
By saying successful I mean the ability to place call on hold and resume
Calls from CUCM phones bound for CME phones placed on hold by either CUCM or 
CME phones are successful
Calls from CME phones bound for CUCM phones placed on hold by CUCM phones are 
not successful. The problem manifestates as not allowing me to resume the call.
Same scenario but pushing hold from a CME phone is successful.

With this scenario in mind the following was done:
MTP required checkbox in trunk is checked and added to MRL of trunk's device 
pool and the trunk page itself, software MTPs and Hardware IOS xcoders

While testing with these Media Resources configured show perf query class 
counters were not incrementing at all when I pushed hold on the CUCM phone - I 
was expecting to see MTP usage once pushing the  hold.button - Am I right to 
expect it to happen?  show sccp connections did not show anything either as I 
thought that the xcoder was being used instead. 

In addition, wait for TCS on trunk were unchecked and outbound faststart was 
also configured as last resort to see if any difference could be seen in 
behaviour.


r

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME CUCM call hold problems

[Angel Perez]

Hi Daniel:

 

Let my check it during the day

 

thx
 


Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 18:35:14 +1200
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME CUCM call hold problems
From: dberlin...@gmail.com
To: gorr...@hotmail.com
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

Hello Angel

Thanks a lot for this it has worked by configuring IOS MTP.  

May I ask you if call transfers worked fine for you as well?

In my setup call transfers are not working properly.  If for instance I send a 
call from a CME phone to a CUCM phone then press transfer, the CME phone 
remains on hold after call is completed with the transfer-to party.  The only 
way to complete transfer is by pressing hold twice on the CME phone.  Anyone 
got call transfers to work perfectly? Same behaviour seen with Supervised or 
Blind xfer.

My CME configs as follows:
voice service voip 
 allow-connections h323 to h323
 allow-connections h323 to sip
 allow-connections sip to h323
 allow-connections sip to sip
 supplementary-service h450.12 > This was added in an attempt to get 
call xfers to work flawlessly
 h323
  emptycapability > This was added in an attempt to get call xfers to 
work flawlessly
  h225 id-passthru > This was added in an attempt to get call xfers to 
work flawlessly
  h225 connect-passthru > This was added in an attempt to get call 
xfers to work flawlessly
  no call service stop
  h245 passthru tcsnonstd-passthru> This was added in an attempt to get 
call xfers to work flawlessly
 sip
  bind control source-interface Vlan400
  bind media source-interface Vlan400
  registrar server
!
telephony-service
 sdspfarm units 1
 sdspfarm transcode sessions 3
 sdspfarm tag 1 br2-xcoder
 no auto-reg-ephone
 load 7960-7940 P00308000500
 load 7965 SCCP45.8-3-3S
 max-ephones 3
 max-dn 6 no-reg
 ip source-address 10.10.110.3 port 2000
 time-format 24
 date-format dd-mm-yy
 max-conferences 8 gain -6
 call-forward pattern .T
 transfer-system full-consult
 transfer-pattern .T
 create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 Jun 11 2010 08:11:35
!
sccp local Vlan400
sccp ccm 10.10.110.3 identifier 1 version 5.0.1 
sccp ip precedence 3
sccp
!
sccp ccm group 1
 associate ccm 1 priority 1
 associate profile 1 register br2-xcoder
 signaling dscp af31
!
dspfarm profile 1 transcode  
 codec g711ulaw
 codec g711alaw
 codec g729ar8
 codec g729abr8
 maximum sessions 19
 associate application SCCP


Cheers


On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Angel Perez  wrote:


Hi:
 
You need software mtp from ios not from ucm, make sure that ios mtp are 
configured and registered, to be sure that mtp is working verify it with sh 
sccp or from ucm.
 
Once you have ios mtp registered add a mrg and include all ucm software mtp and 
cnf, then do not include this mrg to any mrgl, this way you will be sure that 
this resources are not available for your trunk/phones. 
 
Also be sure that in the trunk/phones mrgl the ios mtp rosource is above other 
ucm software resources.
 
Then place a call, press hold and verify  with sh sccp con
 
For more information check:
 
CUCM 7 SRND page 5-11 (H.323 Trunks with Media Termination Points )

http://www.mail-archive.com/ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com/msg15970.html
 
 
hth 
 


Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19:17:48 +1200
From: dberlin...@gmail.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME CUCM call hold problems




Hello all

After completing lab 2 of volume 2 Gatekeeper section I found the following 
behaviour when testing call hold between phones registered to CUCM and CME 
respectively:
By saying successful I mean the ability to place call on hold and resume
Calls from CUCM phones bound for CME phones placed on hold by either CUCM or 
CME phones are successful
Calls from CME phones bound for CUCM phones placed on hold by CUCM phones are 
not successful. The problem manifestates as not allowing me to resume the call.
Same scenario but pushing hold from a CME phone is successful.

With this scenario in mind the following was done:
MTP required checkbox in trunk is checked and added to MRL of trunk's device 
pool and the trunk page itself, software MTPs and Hardware IOS xcoders

While testing with these Media Resources configured show perf query class 
counters were not incrementing at all when I pushed hold on the CUCM phone - I 
was expecting to see MTP usage once pushing the  hold.button - Am I right to 
expect it to happen?  show sccp connections did not show anything either as I 
thought that the xcoder was being used instead. 

In addition, wait for TCS on trunk were unchecked and outbound faststart was 
also configured as last resort to see if any difference could be seen in 
behaviour.


rebooting servers did not help either.

Anyone experienced this? 

Cheers





Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now.
  
_
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
https://sign

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX reporting

[Mouhammad Nasser]

Hi Kobel,

 

In the "Get Reporting Statistic" step, one can retrieve the number of total 
contacs in queue, which is defined as: 

 

"  Number of total contacts since the statistics were last reset for this CSQ "

 

 

But I didn't try it before, so I am not sure if one can choose which CSQ to 
retrieve information about, or we have to:

 

- apply select resource (with no connect)

 

- Retrieve the required statistics

 

- dequeue the call from that queue

 

and repeat the above till all informatoin is available

 

 

HTH

 

Mouhammad,
  
_
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com