date:20110622

Can you name when on the lab would you ever configure two devices on same
route group?

I don't think this is ever done on the lab. Even if it did, its not a matter
of preference, but a matter of matching the task requirements.

On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 guys,

 for the lab, whenever you configure your route groups

 which distribution algorithm is better

 circular or  top down

 i use top down all the time, but i'd like to know your opinion on this

 thanks

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com




-- 
Randall da ill Saborio
CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] how to find b-acd on cisco documentation

Just having the link is not going to help you much. You need to learn how to
browse through the Cisco Doc.

Did you actually try to find it yourself?
If you start here:
http://www.cisco.com/cisco/web/psa/default.html?mode=prod

How would you not find it ? At what part do you get lost?
If you are going to cheat with not browsing through the support page, did
you even try Google ?

2011/6/22 Farkas Péter wormh...@sch.bme.hu

under CME config guides:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucme/bacd/configuration/guide/cme40tcl.html

Peter
- Original Message -
From: Chris Green voice5...@yahoo.com
Date: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 12:56 pm
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] how to find b-acd on cisco documentation
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

Hi All

Can you guid me to find b-acd on cisco documentation.

Is any one has the steps link. Thanks
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please visit www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

--
Randall da ill Saborio
CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH between HQ and BR1 Phones

2011-06-22 Thread Alex Goh

Hi Guys,


I was trying some MOH question just now and notice something which I don't
understand. Basically my HQ and BR1 phone registered to CUCM and resides in
device pool DP-HQ and DP-BR1, I've configured region between HQ and BR1 for
G729 only. My MOH server reside in DP-MOH, which have region codec G711 to
both HQ and SB.

If I don't enable MOH with G729 codec, HQ Phone been put on hold, MOH OK,
not before BR1 Phone. I hear Tone On Hold instead.

But if I enable MOH with G729, both HQ  BR1 phones been put on hold and MOH
working fine.

In my case, since I already have MOH on different DP and Region codec G711,
why would I need to enable G729 for MOH to work on BR1 phones?

By the way, I was testing unicast MOH.

Regards,
Alex
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH between HQ and BR1 Phones

2011-06-22 Thread Alex Goh

Guys,

Please disregards this message, I found out what's wrong already. Wrong
Region configured on MOH DP :P

Regards,
Alex

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Alex Goh ncsalex@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Guys,


 I was trying some MOH question just now and notice something which I don't
 understand. Basically my HQ and BR1 phone registered to CUCM and resides in
 device pool DP-HQ and DP-BR1, I've configured region between HQ and BR1 for
 G729 only. My MOH server reside in DP-MOH, which have region codec G711 to
 both HQ and SB.

 If I don't enable MOH with G729 codec, HQ Phone been put on hold, MOH OK,
 not before BR1 Phone. I hear Tone On Hold instead.

 But if I enable MOH with G729, both HQ  BR1 phones been put on hold and
 MOH working fine.

 In my case, since I already have MOH on different DP and Region codec G711,
 why would I need to enable G729 for MOH to work on BR1 phones?

 By the way, I was testing unicast MOH.

 Regards,
 Alex

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] how to find b-acd on cisco documentation

2011-06-22 Thread Peterson, Ryan

ip telephony
call control
comm manager express
configuration guides
bacd

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucme/bacd/configuration/guide/cme40tcl.html




Sent from my iPad

On Jun 22, 2011, at 3:56 AM, Chris Green 
voice5...@yahoo.commailto:voice5...@yahoo.com wrote:

Hi All

Can you guid me to find b-acd on cisco documentation.

Is any one has the steps link. Thanks
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
http://www.ipexpert.com www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.PlatinumPlacement.com
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

The information contained in this transmission is confidential. It is
intended solely for the use of the individual(s) or organization(s) to
whom it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or further distribution is
not permitted unless such privilege is explicitly granted in writing by
PC Mall, Inc. Furthermore, PC Mall, Inc. is not responsible for
the proper and complete transmission of the substance of this
communication, nor for any delay in its receipt. 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] sip trunk delay offer

2011-06-22 Thread Adam Frankel (afrankel)



G729 early offer was introduced in CUCM 7.0, an IOS G.729 capable MTP is 
required. In 8.5 and later CUCM can do early offer with multiple codecs 
by checking the Early Offer support for voice and video calls checkbox 
on the SIP Profile.   This was made possible by the addition of the 
StationPortReq,StationPortRes, and StationPortClose message being added 
to SCCPv20.


Regards,

Adam



Original Message--
From: Farkas Péter wormh...@sch.bme.hu
Sent: Wed, Jun 22, 2011 3:00:33 Am
To: Adam Frankel (afrankel) afran...@cisco.com
CC: wormh...@sch.hu, donny f f.faraday...@gmail.com, 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] sip trunk delay offer

You are right, I thought early offer when it is the case.

- Original Message -
From: Adam Frankel (afrankel)afran...@cisco.com
Date: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 12:22 am
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] sip trunk delay offer
To: wormh...@sch.hu, Farkas Péterwormh...@sch.bme.hu
Cc: donny ff.faraday...@gmail.com, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com


   This is false.  If region configuration is set to G729 and the calling
   device supports G729, CUCM can select G729 in its answer, if it is offered.

   Adam


   Original Message--
   From: Farkas Péterwormh...@sch.bme.hu
   Sent: Tue, Jun 21, 2011 3:32:21 Am
   To: donny ff.faraday...@gmail.com
   CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
   Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] sip trunk delay offer
 Have you introduce MTP to the call? By default CUCM only capable 
outgoing delay offer based
  on G.711.
   
 Peter
   
 - Original Message -
 From: donny ff.faraday...@gmail.com
 Date: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 1:09 am
 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] sip trunk delay offer
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
   
   
hi,
 
 
 anybody know why i did not see the G729  in debug ?  it only said 
PCMU in
 codec
 
 v=0
 o=CiscoSystemsSIP-GW-UserAgent 6036 5234 IN IP4 10.20.100.2
 s=SIP Call
 c=IN IP4 10.20.100.2
 t=0 0
 m=audio 16522 RTP/AVP 0
 c=IN IP4 10.20.100.2
 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000-codec
 a=ptime:20
___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, 
please visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, 
please visit www.ipexpert.com
   
 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] route group distribution algorithm

the reason why i am asking is because in the lab they're not that specific

2011/6/22 CCIE STUDENT cciefo...@hotmail.com

 You rarely even do it in the real world
 -Original Message-
 From: Randall Saborio ill2...@gmail.com
 Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:26:24
 To: cristobalpri...@gmail.com
 Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] route group distribution algorithm

 Can you name when on the lab would you ever configure two devices on same
 route group?

 I don't think this is ever done on the lab. Even if it did, its not a
 matter of preference, but a matter of matching the task requirements.


 On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Cristobal Priego 
 cristobalpri...@gmail.com mailto:cristobalpri...@gmail.com  wrote:
  guys,

 for the lab, whenever you configure your route groups

 which distribution algorithm is better

 circular or  top down

 i use top down all the time, but i'd like to know your opinion on this

 thanks

 ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com

  Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com



 --
 Randall da ill Saborio
  CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] route group distribution algorithm

Or maybe because it is never used or it never matters. If it would matter,
then they would be specific about it.

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 the reason why i am asking is because in the lab they're not that specific


 2011/6/22 CCIE STUDENT cciefo...@hotmail.com

 You rarely even do it in the real world
 -Original Message-
 From: Randall Saborio ill2...@gmail.com
 Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:26:24
 To: cristobalpri...@gmail.com
 Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] route group distribution algorithm

 Can you name when on the lab would you ever configure two devices on same
 route group?

 I don't think this is ever done on the lab. Even if it did, its not a
 matter of preference, but a matter of matching the task requirements.


 On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Cristobal Priego 
 cristobalpri...@gmail.com mailto:cristobalpri...@gmail.com  wrote:
  guys,

 for the lab, whenever you configure your route groups

 which distribution algorithm is better

 circular or  top down

 i use top down all the time, but i'd like to know your opinion on this

 thanks

 ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com

  Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com



 --
 Randall da ill Saborio
  CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811





-- 
Randall da ill Saborio
CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCM LOCATION QUESTION

2011-06-22 Thread Stephen Manuel

Experts, 

 

I have a somewhat basic question just clear up something that is lingering
in my mind. 

 

The example is this:

 

In a multiple remote location site company, with a Centralized UCM
architecture, each site has it's own device pool, region, and location
settings. 

 

All the DN's on the phones for all sites are in the same PT, meaning calls
between sites are on net via their existing WAN infrastructure and not the
SIP Trunk/PSTN. 

 

Remote site A is rather large 50-60 phones.

 

Remote site B is rather small 10-15 phones. 

 

Calls between regions use g729

Calls to the PSTN using a SIP Trunk use g711

 

The location setting for site A is unlimited.

The location setting for site B is 256

 

What I am wondering is this, Site B has 3 calls to the PSTN using the SIP
Trunk using g711 @ 80k per call which equals 240k. The SIP trunk is also in
it's own Device Pool, region, etc.

 

Now someone from Site A calls site B, the bandwidth at Site A is unlimited
so no issue there. 

According to the Cisco Research I've done, a call requires 2 streams. 

Since Site B is using 240 of 256k of bandwidth on the 3 PSTN/SIP Trunk
calls, when a g729 calls comes inbound  which requires 24k  which causes
Site B location setting to be exceeded, will the call fail or succeed ??

 

IMO, the call will fail.

 

Thanks, 

Stephen Manuel

 

 

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] route group distribution algorithm

2011-06-22 Thread givemeccievoice2010

If they aren't specific in the lab, then it's not a requirement of the
solution.  I don't believe I've ever seen or heard of this in the lab, more
of a written exam question, if anything.

 

Jeff

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Cristobal
Priego
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 8:59 AM
To: CCIE STUDENT
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] route group distribution algorithm

 

the reason why i am asking is because in the lab they're not that specific

2011/6/22 CCIE STUDENT cciefo...@hotmail.com

You rarely even do it in the real world

-Original Message-
From: Randall Saborio ill2...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:26:24
To: cristobalpri...@gmail.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] route group distribution algorithm

Can you name when on the lab would you ever configure two devices on same
route group?

I don't think this is ever done on the lab. Even if it did, its not a matter
of preference, but a matter of matching the task requirements.



On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com
mailto:cristobalpri...@gmail.com  wrote:
 guys,

for the lab, whenever you configure your route groups

which distribution algorithm is better

circular or  top down

i use top down all the time, but i'd like to know your opinion on this

thanks

___

 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com




--
Randall da ill Saborio
 CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCM LOCATION QUESTION

Stephen,

the call will fail
you're going to get a message on the phone saying not enough bandwidth and
the call will drop

2011/6/22 Stephen Manuel srman...@bellsouth.net

 Experts, 

 ** **

 I have a somewhat basic question just clear up something that is lingering
 in my mind. 

 ** **

 The example is this:

 ** **

 In a multiple remote location site company, with a Centralized UCM
 architecture, each site has it’s own device pool, region, and location
 settings. 

 ** **

 All the DN’s on the phones for all sites are in the same PT, meaning calls
 between sites are on net via their existing WAN infrastructure and not the
 SIP Trunk/PSTN. 

 ** **

 Remote site A is rather large 50-60 phones.

 ** **

 Remote site B is rather small 10-15 phones. 

 ** **

 Calls between regions use g729

 Calls to the PSTN using a SIP Trunk use g711

 ** **

 The location setting for site A is unlimited.

 The location setting for site B is 256

 ** **

 What I am wondering is this, Site B has 3 calls to the PSTN using the SIP
 Trunk using g711 @ 80k per call which equals 240k. The SIP trunk is also in
 it’s own Device Pool, region, etc…

 ** **

 Now someone from Site A calls site B, the bandwidth at Site A is unlimited
 so no issue there. 

 According to the Cisco Research I’ve done, a call requires 2 streams. 

 Since Site B is using 240 of 256k of bandwidth on the 3 PSTN/SIP Trunk
 calls, when a g729 calls comes inbound  which requires 24k  which causes
 Site B location setting to be exceeded, will the call fail or succeed ??**
 **

 ** **

 IMO, the call will fail.

 ** **

 Thanks, 

 Stephen Manuel

 ** **

 ** **

 ** **

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCM LOCATION QUESTION

2011-06-22 Thread Stephen Manuel

That's what I thought, but have not tested it to know for sure. 

 

As a follow up, as a general design what would be better. 

 

Using the Location setting as a form of Call-Admission-Control, or use
various QOS and IOS mechanisms to implement CAC on the Gateway Routers. 

 

IMO, I would rather have CAC implemented on the Routers, leaving UCM to
process calls, which is why I have usually set the Audio Bandwidth setting
under Locations to Unlimited. 

 

Thanks, 

 

Stephen Manuel

 

From: Cristobal Priego [mailto:cristobalpri...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 2:37 PM
To: Stephen Manuel
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCM LOCATION QUESTION

 

Stephen,

the call will fail
you're going to get a message on the phone saying not enough bandwidth and
the call will drop

2011/6/22 Stephen Manuel srman...@bellsouth.net

Experts, 

 

I have a somewhat basic question just clear up something that is lingering
in my mind. 

 

The example is this:

 

In a multiple remote location site company, with a Centralized UCM
architecture, each site has it's own device pool, region, and location
settings. 

 

All the DN's on the phones for all sites are in the same PT, meaning calls
between sites are on net via their existing WAN infrastructure and not the
SIP Trunk/PSTN. 

 

Remote site A is rather large 50-60 phones.

 

Remote site B is rather small 10-15 phones. 

 

Calls between regions use g729

Calls to the PSTN using a SIP Trunk use g711

 

The location setting for site A is unlimited.

The location setting for site B is 256

 

What I am wondering is this, Site B has 3 calls to the PSTN using the SIP
Trunk using g711 @ 80k per call which equals 240k. The SIP trunk is also in
it's own Device Pool, region, etc.

 

Now someone from Site A calls site B, the bandwidth at Site A is unlimited
so no issue there. 

According to the Cisco Research I've done, a call requires 2 streams. 

Since Site B is using 240 of 256k of bandwidth on the 3 PSTN/SIP Trunk
calls, when a g729 calls comes inbound  which requires 24k  which causes
Site B location setting to be exceeded, will the call fail or succeed ??

 

IMO, the call will fail.

 

Thanks, 

Stephen Manuel

 

 

 


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCM LOCATION QUESTION

The call will fail.

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Stephen Manuel srman...@bellsouth.netwrote:

 Experts, 

 ** **

 I have a somewhat basic question just clear up something that is lingering
 in my mind. 

 ** **

 The example is this:

 ** **

 In a multiple remote location site company, with a Centralized UCM
 architecture, each site has it’s own device pool, region, and location
 settings. 

 ** **

 All the DN’s on the phones for all sites are in the same PT, meaning calls
 between sites are on net via their existing WAN infrastructure and not the
 SIP Trunk/PSTN. 

 ** **

 Remote site A is rather large 50-60 phones.

 ** **

 Remote site B is rather small 10-15 phones. 

 ** **

 Calls between regions use g729

 Calls to the PSTN using a SIP Trunk use g711

 ** **

 The location setting for site A is unlimited.

 The location setting for site B is 256

 ** **

 What I am wondering is this, Site B has 3 calls to the PSTN using the SIP
 Trunk using g711 @ 80k per call which equals 240k. The SIP trunk is also in
 it’s own Device Pool, region, etc…

 ** **

 Now someone from Site A calls site B, the bandwidth at Site A is unlimited
 so no issue there. 

 According to the Cisco Research I’ve done, a call requires 2 streams. 

 Since Site B is using 240 of 256k of bandwidth on the 3 PSTN/SIP Trunk
 calls, when a g729 calls comes inbound  which requires 24k  which causes
 Site B location setting to be exceeded, will the call fail or succeed ??**
 **

 ** **

 IMO, the call will fail.

 ** **

 Thanks, 

 Stephen Manuel

 ** **

 ** **

 ** **

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com




-- 
Randall da ill Saborio
CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco Contcat Center Express VM

Hi,

 

I need your guys help to get Cisco Contact center express VM machine, for
CCIE study.

Can anyone help me to get this.

 

Raj.

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCM LOCATION QUESTION

my thoughts are if you want to use QoS you actually can't do a lot ob CAC
with QoS
you will degrade the quality of the call, but i don't think you can fully
implement CAC with QoS. this is just my thought though.
i've used only 2 types of CAC mechanisim. locations CAC or GK CAC
my 2 cents
hth

2011/6/22 Stephen Manuel srman...@bellsouth.net

 That’s what I thought, but have not tested it to know for sure. 

 ** **

 As a follow up, as a general design what would be better. 

 ** **

 Using the Location setting as a form of Call-Admission-Control, or use
 various QOS and IOS mechanisms to implement CAC on the Gateway Routers. **
 **

 ** **

 IMO, I would rather have CAC implemented on the Routers, leaving UCM to
 process calls, which is why I have usually set the Audio Bandwidth setting
 under Locations to Unlimited. 

 ** **

 Thanks, 

 ** **

 Stephen Manuel

 ** **

 *From:* Cristobal Priego [mailto:cristobalpri...@gmail.com]
 *Sent:* Wednesday, June 22, 2011 2:37 PM
 *To:* Stephen Manuel
 *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCM LOCATION QUESTION

 ** **

 Stephen,

 the call will fail
 you're going to get a message on the phone saying not enough bandwidth
 and the call will drop

 2011/6/22 Stephen Manuel srman...@bellsouth.net

 Experts, 

  

 I have a somewhat basic question just clear up something that is lingering
 in my mind. 

  

 The example is this:

  

 In a multiple remote location site company, with a Centralized UCM
 architecture, each site has it’s own device pool, region, and location
 settings. 

  

 All the DN’s on the phones for all sites are in the same PT, meaning calls
 between sites are on net via their existing WAN infrastructure and not the
 SIP Trunk/PSTN. 

  

 Remote site A is rather large 50-60 phones.

  

 Remote site B is rather small 10-15 phones. 

  

 Calls between regions use g729

 Calls to the PSTN using a SIP Trunk use g711

  

 The location setting for site A is unlimited.

 The location setting for site B is 256

  

 What I am wondering is this, Site B has 3 calls to the PSTN using the SIP
 Trunk using g711 @ 80k per call which equals 240k. The SIP trunk is also in
 it’s own Device Pool, region, etc…

  

 Now someone from Site A calls site B, the bandwidth at Site A is unlimited
 so no issue there. 

 According to the Cisco Research I’ve done, a call requires 2 streams. 

 Since Site B is using 240 of 256k of bandwidth on the 3 PSTN/SIP Trunk
 calls, when a g729 calls comes inbound  which requires 24k  which causes
 Site B location setting to be exceeded, will the call fail or succeed ??**
 **

  

 IMO, the call will fail.

  

 Thanks, 

 Stephen Manuel

  

  

  


 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

 ** **

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] reg. Plus dialing issue

Hi,

 

In my last lab attempt, I had qution about plus dialing .

 

Q. when PSTN calls SB-PH1 we should not answer this call and call will be in
missed call list, when we dial missed call from SB-PH1 , first it should
select SB-GW and if SB-GW E1 is down then call should go via HQ-GW.

 

I configured below:

 

1.   I added +1 in SB GW Incoming calling party national number prefix

2.   Then I created plus-pt and added into plus-css

3.   Plus-css I used in SB-device pool configuration .

4.   I created Transformation-pattern --àcalling party
\+1972.[2-9]XX and selected plus-pt here

5.   Created plus-rl route list and added SB-RG and HQ-RW route group

6.   Under SB-RG I selected Default,NANP.Predot,Prifixdigit 9

7.   Under HQ-RG I selected ON,XX,NANP Predot, Prifix digit
outgoing = 972

8.   I created route pattern=   \+1972.[2-9]XX and select plus-RL

 

With SB-GW is working fine, when my SB gw PRI down it is not going with
HQ-GW.

 

Could you please help me on this issue.

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco Contcat Center Express VM

2011-06-22 Thread Ravindra Lakpriya

Whats the issue you are facing ?


On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:32 PM, shelesh shel...@hotmail.com wrote:
 Hi,



 I need your guys help to get Cisco Contact center express VM machine, for
 CCIE study.

 Can anyone help me to get this.



 Raj.

 __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
 database 6033 (20110411) __

 The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

 http://www.eset.com

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com




-- 
Ravindra Lakpriya
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco Contcat Center Express VM

I need help to get Cisco Contact center express 7 virtual machine so I can
work in my home lab, I have Cisco Contact center express 7 installer but I
don't have OS installer, If someone can help me to get direct Virtual
Machine (VM) that will be fine.

-Original Message-
From: Ravindra Lakpriya [mailto:lakpr...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 11:38 PM
To: shelesh
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco Contcat Center Express VM

Whats the issue you are facing ?

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:32 PM, shelesh shel...@hotmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 I need your guys help to get Cisco Contact center express VM machine, for
 CCIE study.

 Can anyone help me to get this.

 Raj.

 __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature
 database 6033 (20110411) __

 The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

 http://www.eset.com

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

-- 
Ravindra Lakpriya

__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 6033 (20110411) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 6033 (20110411) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] how to find b-acd on cisco documentation

2011-06-22 Thread Chris Green

Actually, this is ended with PDF file, can we open PDF file during exam time.

From: ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com 
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Wed, 22 June, 2011 11:37:28
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 64, Issue 177

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...

Today's Topics:

   1. Re: route group distribution algorithm (Randall Saborio)
   2. UCM LOCATION QUESTION (Stephen Manuel)
   3. Re: route group distribution algorithm
  (givemeccievoice2...@gmail.com)
   4. Re: UCM LOCATION QUESTION (Cristobal Priego)

--

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:06:48 -0600
From: Randall Saborio ill2...@gmail.com
To: Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] route group distribution algorithm
Message-ID: BANLkTin5zSzWXV08XPM=+x5je2tspgf...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Or maybe because it is never used or it never matters. If it would matter,
then they would be specific about it.

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 the reason why i am asking is because in the lab they're not that specific

 2011/6/22 CCIE STUDENT cciefo...@hotmail.com

 You rarely even do it in the real world
 -Original Message-
 From: Randall Saborio ill2...@gmail.com
 Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:26:24
 To: cristobalpri...@gmail.com
 Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] route group distribution algorithm

 Can you name when on the lab would you ever configure two devices on same
 route group?

 I don't think this is ever done on the lab. Even if it did, its not a
 matter of preference, but a matter of matching the task requirements.

 On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Cristobal Priego 
 cristobalpri...@gmail.com mailto:cristobalpri...@gmail.com  wrote:
  guys,

 for the lab, whenever you configure your route groups

 which distribution algorithm is better

 circular or  top down

 i use top down all the time, but i'd like to know your opinion on this

 thanks

 ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com

  Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com

 --
 Randall da ill Saborio
  CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811

-- 
Randall da ill Saborio
CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20110622/650f2f6f/attachment-0001.html

--

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:18:18 -0400
From: Stephen Manuel srman...@bellsouth.net
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCM LOCATION QUESTION
Message-ID: 007201cc3100$615f7a70$241e6f50$@bellsouth.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Experts, 

I have a somewhat basic question just clear up something that is lingering
in my mind. 

The example is this:

In a multiple remote location site company, with a Centralized UCM
architecture, each site has it's own device pool, region, and location
settings. 

All the DN's on the phones for all sites are in the same PT, meaning calls
between sites are on net via their existing WAN infrastructure and not the
SIP Trunk/PSTN. 

Remote site A is rather large 50-60 phones.

Remote site B is rather small 10-15 phones. 

Calls between regions use g729

Calls to the PSTN using a SIP Trunk use g711

The location setting for site A is unlimited.

The location setting for site B is 256

What I am wondering is this, Site B has 3 calls to the PSTN using the SIP
Trunk using g711 @ 80k per call which equals 240k. The SIP trunk is also in
it's own Device Pool, region, etc.

Now someone from Site A calls site B, the bandwidth at Site A is unlimited
so no issue there. 

According to the Cisco Research I've done, a call requires 2 streams. 

Since Site B is using 240 of 256k of bandwidth on the 3 PSTN/SIP Trunk
calls, when a g729 calls comes inbound  which requires 24k  which causes
Site B location setting to be exceeded, will the call fail or succeed ??

IMO, the call will fail.

Thanks, 

Stephen Manuel

-- next part --
An HTML attachment

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 64, Issue 177

2011-06-22 Thread Stern, Larry

06:30

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 22, 2011, at 3:48 PM, ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com 
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com wrote:

 Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 
 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
 
 You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
 
 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
 than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...
 
 
 Today's Topics:
 
   1. Re: route group distribution algorithm (Randall Saborio)
   2. UCM LOCATION QUESTION (Stephen Manuel)
   3. Re: route group distribution algorithm
  (givemeccievoice2...@gmail.com)
   4. Re: UCM LOCATION QUESTION (Cristobal Priego)
 
 
 --
 
 Message: 1
 Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:06:48 -0600
 From: Randall Saborio ill2...@gmail.com
 To: Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com
 Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] route group distribution algorithm
 Message-ID: BANLkTin5zSzWXV08XPM=+x5je2tspgf...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
 
 Or maybe because it is never used or it never matters. If it would matter,
 then they would be specific about it.
 
 On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
 the reason why i am asking is because in the lab they're not that specific
 
 
 2011/6/22 CCIE STUDENT cciefo...@hotmail.com
 
 You rarely even do it in the real world
 -Original Message-
 From: Randall Saborio ill2...@gmail.com
 Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:26:24
 To: cristobalpri...@gmail.com
 Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] route group distribution algorithm
 
 Can you name when on the lab would you ever configure two devices on same
 route group?
 
 I don't think this is ever done on the lab. Even if it did, its not a
 matter of preference, but a matter of matching the task requirements.
 
 
 On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Cristobal Priego 
 cristobalpri...@gmail.com mailto:cristobalpri...@gmail.com  wrote:
 guys,
 
 for the lab, whenever you configure your route groups
 
 which distribution algorithm is better
 
 circular or  top down
 
 i use top down all the time, but i'd like to know your opinion on this
 
 thanks
 
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com
 
 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com
 
 
 
 --
 Randall da ill Saborio
 CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811
 
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Randall da ill Saborio
 CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811
 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL: /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20110622/650f2f6f/attachment-0001.html
 
 --
 
 Message: 2
 Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:18:18 -0400
 From: Stephen Manuel srman...@bellsouth.net
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCM LOCATION QUESTION
 Message-ID: 007201cc3100$615f7a70$241e6f50$@bellsouth.net
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 
 Experts, 
 
 
 
 I have a somewhat basic question just clear up something that is lingering
 in my mind. 
 
 
 
 The example is this:
 
 
 
 In a multiple remote location site company, with a Centralized UCM
 architecture, each site has it's own device pool, region, and location
 settings. 
 
 
 
 All the DN's on the phones for all sites are in the same PT, meaning calls
 between sites are on net via their existing WAN infrastructure and not the
 SIP Trunk/PSTN. 
 
 
 
 Remote site A is rather large 50-60 phones.
 
 
 
 Remote site B is rather small 10-15 phones. 
 
 
 
 Calls between regions use g729
 
 Calls to the PSTN using a SIP Trunk use g711
 
 
 
 The location setting for site A is unlimited.
 
 The location setting for site B is 256
 
 
 
 What I am wondering is this, Site B has 3 calls to the PSTN using the SIP
 Trunk using g711 @ 80k per call which equals 240k. The SIP trunk is also in
 it's own Device Pool, region, etc.
 
 
 
 Now someone from Site A calls site B, the bandwidth at Site A is unlimited
 so no issue there. 
 
 According to the Cisco Research I've done, a call requires 2 streams. 
 
 Since Site B is using 240 of 256k of bandwidth on the 3 PSTN/SIP Trunk
 calls, when a g729 calls comes inbound  which requires 24k  which causes
 Site B location setting to be exceeded, will the call fail or succeed ??
 
 
 
 IMO, the call will fail.
 
 
 
 Thanks, 
 
 Stephen Manuel
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL: /archives

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab result status

2011-06-22 Thread Pablo Meneses

Can you believe that I haven't received the answer yet!
This has been the longest wait ever.
I even opened a ticket with Cert Support and so far I have just received
templates.
Does someone else have gone through this?
I'm starting to think that they messed up on my exam.

-Pablo Meneses.

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:47 AM, Julien Krieger krieger.jul...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi Pablo,
 How did it go? Have you passed?


 2011/6/21 Pablo Meneses pmenese...@gmail.com

 Thanks Cris.

 Looking forward to getting my result.


 On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Cristobal Priego 
 cristobalpri...@gmail.com wrote:

 i know man
 i took my last attempt on a Friday as well In San Jose

 i didn't get my score until next Monday at 14:45 PST


 2011/6/21 Pablo Meneses pmenese...@gmail.com

 Hopefully that's true. Longest wait EVER!!!

 -Pablo Meneses.


 On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Cristobal Priego 
 cristobalpri...@gmail.com wrote:

 you will get today, wait 2.5 more hours
 that's what happens when you take it on Friday

 2011/6/21 Pablo Meneses pmenese...@gmail.com

 Hi experts,

 I am wondering how long it takes for you to received your score report
 this days. I've taken my lab last Friday and I have NOT received the 
 answer
 yet. Yesterday I logged to the CCIE Online Tool and it said HOLD on the
 PASS/FAIL field, does someone know what that means? Has someone else gone
 through this?

 I will look forward to your reply as I figure most of you understand
 the feeling of not having the answer.

 Regards.

 -Pablo Meneses.

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com






 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] how to find b-acd on cisco documentation

2011-06-22 Thread Barry Fivelson

 on the PASS/FAIL field, does someone know 
 what that means? Has someone else gone through this?

 I will look forward to your reply as I figure most of you 
 understand the feeling of not having the answer.

 Regards.

 -Pablo Meneses.

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, 
 please visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com






 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, 
 please visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20110622/acd13d89/attachment-0001.html

--

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:40:41 +0100 (BST)
From: Chris Green voice5...@yahoo.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] how to find b-acd on cisco documentation
Message-ID: 475331.34068...@web132408.mail.ird.yahoo.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Hi All

Can you guid me to find b-acd on cisco documentation.

Is any one has the steps link. Thanks
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20110622/b5ba9404/attachment-0001.html

--

Message: 4
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:39:16 +0200
From: Farkas P?ter wormh...@sch.bme.hu
To: Chris Green voice5...@yahoo.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] how to find b-acd on cisco
documentation
Message-ID: 7773e5951fa7.4e01f...@sch.bme.hu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

under CME config guides:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucme/bacd/configuration/guide/cme40tcl.html

Peter
- Original Message -
From: Chris Green voice5...@yahoo.com
Date: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 12:56 pm
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] how to find b-acd on cisco documentation
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com


 Hi All
  
  Can you guid me to find b-acd on cisco documentation.
  
  Is any one has the steps link. Thanks 
 ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, 
 please visit www.ipexpert.com
  
  Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com


--

Message: 5
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:16:31 +0200
From: Shady Hasan shady@gmail.com
To: Chris Green voice5...@yahoo.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] how to find b-acd on cisco
documentation
Message-ID: banlktin7o+r2hp2y12sxu6cqn0fyv0s...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Cisco Doc  Products  Voice and UC  IP Telephony  Call Control  CME  
Config Guides  CME B-ACD and TCL

RE,

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Chris Green voice5...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Hi All

 Can you guid me to find b-acd on cisco documentation.

 Is any one has the steps link. Thanks

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, 
 please visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20110622/09375d8d/attachment-0001.html

--

Message: 6
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:34:09 -0400
From: Paul Dardinski pa...@marshallcomm.com
To: Chris Green voice5...@yahoo.com,
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] how to find b-acd on cisco
documentation
Message-ID:
faa9add5b9aaa344b429eced83560fa0e01...@mcc-s-ops-exch1.ma-inc.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

SupportVoice and Unified CommunicationsSupportProduct SupportVoice 
Supportand Unified CommunicationsCisco Unified Communications Manager 
SupportExpressConfigureConfiguration GuidesCisco Unified CME B-ACD 
Supportand Tcl Call-Handling Applications

 

Paul (RS/Sec #16842)

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Chris Green
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 5:41 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] how to find b-acd on cisco documentation

 

Hi All

Can you guid me to find b-acd on cisco documentation.

Is any one has the steps link. Thanks

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20110622/eba9cc5e/attachment.html

--

___
CCIE_Voice mailing list
CCIE_Voice@onlinestudylist.com
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice


End of CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 64, Issue 174

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 64, Issue 179

Thanks for your info, I just now solve the issue, actually I should
configure attached below in service parameter, the movement I added this
call is working using HQ gw. Thanks again for your reply.

 



 

Raj

image001.jpg___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCM LOCATION QUESTION

If you want to be serious about doing an implementation, then you should get
your answers from reading the SRND. are you familiar with that document?

If you read the proper chapter, you would know the answer already and would
not need to read guess recommendations where we just don't know everything
about your deployment.

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Stephen Manuel srman...@bellsouth.netwrote:

 That’s what I thought, but have not tested it to know for sure. 

 ** **

 As a follow up, as a general design what would be better. 

 ** **

 Using the Location setting as a form of Call-Admission-Control, or use
 various QOS and IOS mechanisms to implement CAC on the Gateway Routers. **
 **

 ** **

 IMO, I would rather have CAC implemented on the Routers, leaving UCM to
 process calls, which is why I have usually set the Audio Bandwidth setting
 under Locations to Unlimited. 

 ** **

 Thanks, 

 ** **

 Stephen Manuel

 ** **

 *From:* Cristobal Priego [mailto:cristobalpri...@gmail.com]
 *Sent:* Wednesday, June 22, 2011 2:37 PM
 *To:* Stephen Manuel
 *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCM LOCATION QUESTION

 ** **

 Stephen,

 the call will fail
 you're going to get a message on the phone saying not enough bandwidth
 and the call will drop

 2011/6/22 Stephen Manuel srman...@bellsouth.net

 Experts, 

  

 I have a somewhat basic question just clear up something that is lingering
 in my mind. 

  

 The example is this:

  

 In a multiple remote location site company, with a Centralized UCM
 architecture, each site has it’s own device pool, region, and location
 settings. 

  

 All the DN’s on the phones for all sites are in the same PT, meaning calls
 between sites are on net via their existing WAN infrastructure and not the
 SIP Trunk/PSTN. 

  

 Remote site A is rather large 50-60 phones.

  

 Remote site B is rather small 10-15 phones. 

  

 Calls between regions use g729

 Calls to the PSTN using a SIP Trunk use g711

  

 The location setting for site A is unlimited.

 The location setting for site B is 256

  

 What I am wondering is this, Site B has 3 calls to the PSTN using the SIP
 Trunk using g711 @ 80k per call which equals 240k. The SIP trunk is also in
 it’s own Device Pool, region, etc…

  

 Now someone from Site A calls site B, the bandwidth at Site A is unlimited
 so no issue there. 

 According to the Cisco Research I’ve done, a call requires 2 streams. 

 Since Site B is using 240 of 256k of bandwidth on the 3 PSTN/SIP Trunk
 calls, when a g729 calls comes inbound  which requires 24k  which causes
 Site B location setting to be exceeded, will the call fail or succeed ??**
 **

  

 IMO, the call will fail.

  

 Thanks, 

 Stephen Manuel

  

  

  


 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

 ** **

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com




-- 
Randall da ill Saborio
CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] reg. Plus dialing issue

Do you know what the NDA is about? (not that I want you to answer me. if you
don't know, please find out)

Even so, you have the question, why can't you figure it out on a practice
lab on your own?

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:37 PM, shelesh shel...@hotmail.com wrote:

 Hi,

 ** **

 In my last lab attempt, I had qution about “plus” dialing .

 ** **

 Q. when PSTN calls SB-PH1 we should not answer this call and call will be
 in missed call list, when we dial missed call from SB-PH1 , first it should
 select SB-GW and if SB-GW E1 is down then call should go via HQ-GW.

 ** **

 I configured below:

 ** **

 **1.   **I added +1 in SB GW “Incoming calling party national number
 prefix”

 **2.   **Then I created plus-pt and added into plus-css

 **3.   **Plus-css I used in SB-device pool configuration .

 **4.   **I created “Transformation-pattern --àcalling party
 \+1972.[2-9]XX and selected plus-pt here

 **5.   **Created “plus-rl” route list and added SB-RG and HQ-RW route
 group

 **6.   **Under SB-RG I selected Default,NANP.Predot,Prifixdigit 9

 **7.   **Under HQ-RG I selected ON,XX,NANP Predot, Prifix
 digit  outgoing = 972

 **8.   **I created route pattern=   \+1972.[2-9]XX and select
 plus-RL

 ** **

 With SB-GW is working fine, when my SB gw PRI down it is not going with
 HQ-GW.

 ** **

 Could you please help me on this issue.


 __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
 signature database 6033 (20110411) __

 The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

 http://www.eset.com

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com




-- 
Randall da ill Saborio
CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] conversation in UNITY

2011-06-22 Thread donny f

hi,

anyone know how to modify the Conversation setting  just for 1 user in
Unity Cnnection.

We need to get one user to keep enter PIN after mistake with PIN input
(rather than go to USER ID)

tks
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] how to find b-acd on cisco documentation