Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voicemail Ports on SA

2013-03-28 Thread Steve Keller
Thanks Bill. All of that makes perfect sense. I was just curious if there
were something I was not considering about this. While yiu are there it
probably doesn't hurt to set it. Just making sure I am not totally
overlooking something.
On Mar 28, 2013 3:27 PM, "William Bell"  wrote:

> Steve,
>
> Not sure if you were presenting that question to me or the OP. I can
> answer from my perspective:
>
> I set the emask on the ports because I feel it is best practice and it is
> part of my base config. I am already dorking with the VM ports to assign a
> CSS, AAR CSS, and AAR group and while I am there I mod the emask and save
> the config.
>
> As far as relevance or how it is used. If you didn't toggle the "Display
> Original Calling Number on Transfer from Unity" from the default value then
> the port emask would be used for direct and transfer calls from CUC. If you
> toggled the aforementioned service parameter to true then the emask on the
> port would only be used for direct calls.
>
> A relevant IE question involving direct calls would be sending
> notification messages to a telephone number. Whether that question has been
> / is / will be on an IE exam is any one's guess.
>
> Again, I set the emask to the vmpilot number as part of base config
> template. Now, if I wasn't already going into the VM port for another
> reason then I'd likely say "screw it" unless there was a question that made
> me deal with it.
>
> -Bill
>
> --
> William Bell
> blog: http://ucguerrilla.com
> twitter: @ucguerrilla
>
>
>
> On Mar 28, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Steve Keller wrote:
>
> Would this only be used if there is a call outbound from Unity and you do
> not have the service parameter to "use original caller id" when call routes
> through unity? Not sure of the exact parameter name , but i think everyone
> is familiar with that one by now.
>
> Thus caller id would be Voicemail/+12025552002 for a call the came from
> Unity. Even in this case i would think you would want to change the service
> parameter to pass the original party caller id through.
>
> I cannot think of another place this value would get leveraged. For AAR or
> SRST you always call the pilot. No devices every really try to call the vm
> ports themselves.
>
> Please let me know if there is some other feature that would make setting
> the VM port external number mask useful. Very curious as to the motivation
> to set this.
>
> thanks
> steve
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:43 AM, William Bell wrote:
>
>> I follow the requirements for site A phones but I mask with the number of
>> the VM pilot.
>>
>> So, using ipExpert lab examples:
>>
>> Site A would be +1202555   for the phones
>>
>> Unity Connection VM Pilot number is 2600
>>
>> I set the external mask on vm ports to +12025552600.
>>
>>
>> -BIll
>> --
>> William Bell
>> blog: http://ucguerrilla.com
>> twitter: @ucguerrilla
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mar 27, 2013, at 9:50 PM, Barrera, Hugo wrote:
>>
>> Hi Guy’s,
>> ** **
>> For the voicemail ports on SA what do you recommend to put for the
>> external mask? Should it match the phones external mask OR should it be
>> only 10 digits because you’re not supposed to send the 1 out of SA?
>>  Thoughts would be appreciated?  
>> ** **
>> *- Hugo*
>> ** **
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>
>
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH Music On Hold source from local router issue

2013-03-28 Thread Hesham Abdelkereem
Dear Experts,

I am trying to configure MOH in order to make SB Router source its music on
hold from the local router.

thats my configs

A-Enable Multicast MOH for the audio stream:
Go to CUCM --->Media Resources--->Music On Hold Audo Source
Tick play continuously , Allow Multicasting

B-Enable Multicast MOH for the MOH server:
Publisher will be unicast MOH Server for HQ
Subscriber will be multicast for SB Site

Go to Media Resources ---> MOH Server--->MOH_3(Subscriber)
Make MOH Device Pool
Enable Multicast Audo Source on this MOH Server

C-Create a Media Resource Group (MRG) for unicast MOH:
Media Resources > Media Resource Group > Add New
Name: MOH_UNICAST
Selected Media Resources: MOH_2 (MOH)
Make sure use multicast in unticked

D-Create a Media Resource Group (MRG) for multicast MOH:
Media Resources > Media Resource Group > Add New
Name: MOH_MCAST
Selected Media Resources: MOH_3 (MOH)
Make sure use multicast in ticked

E-Assign the newly created MRGs to appropriate Media Resource Group List
(MRGL):
Under HQ MRGL Add MOH_UNICAST
Under SB MRGL Add MOH_MCAST

Then Reset Device Pool to take effect

On your SRST make sure that you make multicast
SB
call-manager-fallback
moh music-on-hold.au
multicast moh 239.1.1.1 port 16384 route 142.1.65.254 142.102.65.254
loopback -to  voice vlan
exit

ccm-manager music-on-hold
ip multicast-routing
int vlan 302
ip pim dense-mode
int lo0
ip pim dense-mode

I created a Region called MOH and it's G711 with all sites HQ , SB , SC


When I call and place on hold and try to issue
show ccm-manager music-on-hold
i see 0 active calls
knowing that also on the HQ Phone 1 and SB Phone 1 I put a music on hold
source and without.
All phones are in the correct Device pool , region and location.

I have noticed it's beeping while on hold that means it's unable to invoke
the moh
knowing that i checked the flash: of the router it has the moh file
correclty
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voicemail Ports on SA

2013-03-28 Thread William Bell
Steve,

Not sure if you were presenting that question to me or the OP. I can answer 
from my perspective:

I set the emask on the ports because I feel it is best practice and it is part 
of my base config. I am already dorking with the VM ports to assign a CSS, AAR 
CSS, and AAR group and while I am there I mod the emask and save the config. 

As far as relevance or how it is used. If you didn't toggle the "Display 
Original Calling Number on Transfer from Unity" from the default value then the 
port emask would be used for direct and transfer calls from CUC. If you toggled 
the aforementioned service parameter to true then the emask on the port would 
only be used for direct calls.

A relevant IE question involving direct calls would be sending notification 
messages to a telephone number. Whether that question has been / is / will be 
on an IE exam is any one's guess. 

Again, I set the emask to the vmpilot number as part of base config template. 
Now, if I wasn't already going into the VM port for another reason then I'd 
likely say "screw it" unless there was a question that made me deal with it.

-Bill

--
William Bell
blog: http://ucguerrilla.com
twitter: @ucguerrilla



On Mar 28, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Steve Keller wrote:

> Would this only be used if there is a call outbound from Unity and you do not 
> have the service parameter to "use original caller id" when call routes 
> through unity? Not sure of the exact parameter name , but i think everyone is 
> familiar with that one by now.
>  
> Thus caller id would be Voicemail/+12025552002 for a call the came from 
> Unity. Even in this case i would think you would want to change the service 
> parameter to pass the original party caller id through.
>  
> I cannot think of another place this value would get leveraged. For AAR or 
> SRST you always call the pilot. No devices every really try to call the vm 
> ports themselves.
>  
> Please let me know if there is some other feature that would make setting the 
> VM port external number mask useful. Very curious as to the motivation to set 
> this.
>  
> thanks
> steve
> 
> 
>  
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:43 AM, William Bell  wrote:
> I follow the requirements for site A phones but I mask with the number of the 
> VM pilot.
> 
> So, using ipExpert lab examples:
> 
> Site A would be +1202555   for the phones
> 
> Unity Connection VM Pilot number is 2600
> 
> I set the external mask on vm ports to +12025552600.
> 
> 
> -BIll
> --
> William Bell
> blog: http://ucguerrilla.com
> twitter: @ucguerrilla
> 
> 
> 
> On Mar 27, 2013, at 9:50 PM, Barrera, Hugo wrote:
> 
>> Hi Guy’s,
>>  
>> For the voicemail ports on SA what do you recommend to put for the external 
>> mask? Should it match the phones external mask OR should it be only 10 
>> digits because you’re not supposed to send the 1 out of SA?  Thoughts would 
>> be appreciated?  
>>  
>> - Hugo
>>  
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>> 
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> 
> 
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Exam Speed Strategy

2013-03-28 Thread Barrera, Hugo
What has been the turning corner for me regarding speed is don't "run around 
the tree". What I mean by this is when you come across something in the lab try 
to plan ahead and pre-configure as much as you can.

For example when you go thru call routing in cucm don't just set up partitions 
and css's...pre-build your RP's, RL's, RG's, AAR grp's, calling party TP's, 
TP's...

Really try to nail things and pre-config when you hit any section in the lab. 
What has also helped me is drilling notepad for IOS configurations as well.

HTH

Regards,
Hugo

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of CCIEing
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 12:44 AM
To: Jamie Parr (jamparr)
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Exam Speed Strategy

Hi Jamie,

Would you please explain this more :

"  You have to setup most devices with little or no prior configuration, there 
are things that cannot change. Know these things and practice them over and 
over so you do not have to think about them "

Thanks in advance



On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Jamie Parr (jamparr) 
mailto:jamp...@cisco.com>> wrote:
First attempt I was very slow - did not use the device based approach, did not 
finish all tasks. Second I was much faster - using the device based approach, 
finished with 3 hours to test. Third attempt I finished with more than 3 hours 
to test and pick up the issues - Passed

My advice:

* I found the more I practiced the faster I got, practice practice 
practice

* Use notepad to write all your device configs first, you can copy and 
paste large sections of config saving a lot of time

* Do not be so strict to the device based approach, use it as a base 
and create your own hybrid

* You have to setup most devices with little or no prior configuration, 
there are things that cannot change. Know these things and practice them over 
and over so you do not have to think about them

* Persevere, it's not easy and it sucks most of the time but you will 
get there

Hope this helps

Jamie Parr
CCIE #38633 (voice)
Engineer - IT
jamp...@cisco.com
Phone: +44 20 8824 2641
Mobile: +44 7590622049

From: 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com]
 On Behalf Of Dane Warner
Sent: 26 March 2013 23:41
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Exam Speed Strategy

To All,

I took my second attempt on Monday, March 25 and did not pass.
I was hoping for some insight on concrete suggestions to get faster.
I didn't get hung up on any one task, I seemed to keep moving forward and tried 
to type as fast as I could, using CLI shortcuts, etc.
I used the device-based methodology and I feel pretty confident of my technical 
knowledge.
Yet I didn't even get to many tasks at all, I would have needed another 2-3 
hours to complete all tasks.
I hear of candidates completing all tasks in 6-7 hours, which means I would 
need to become twice as fast as my last attempt.
It almost sounds insurmountable. Do I need to take typing classes?

Any recommendations that don't break the NDA would be greatly appreciated.

Regards,

Dane Warner, CCVP
Sr. Network Engineer
Epoch Universal, Inc.
(909)226-0755
dwar...@epochuniversal.com
[Epoch_Logo_Smaller_Transparent]

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

<>___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voicemail Ports on SA

2013-03-28 Thread Steve Keller
Would this only be used if there is a call outbound from Unity and you do
not have the service parameter to "use original caller id" when call routes
through unity? Not sure of the exact parameter name , but i think everyone
is familiar with that one by now.

Thus caller id would be Voicemail/+12025552002 for a call the came from
Unity. Even in this case i would think you would want to change the service
parameter to pass the original party caller id through.

I cannot think of another place this value would get leveraged. For AAR or
SRST you always call the pilot. No devices every really try to call the vm
ports themselves.

Please let me know if there is some other feature that would make setting
the VM port external number mask useful. Very curious as to the motivation
to set this.

thanks
steve



On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:43 AM, William Bell  wrote:

> I follow the requirements for site A phones but I mask with the number of
> the VM pilot.
>
> So, using ipExpert lab examples:
>
> Site A would be +1202555   for the phones
>
> Unity Connection VM Pilot number is 2600
>
> I set the external mask on vm ports to +12025552600.
>
>
> -BIll
> --
> William Bell
> blog: http://ucguerrilla.com
> twitter: @ucguerrilla
>
>
>
> On Mar 27, 2013, at 9:50 PM, Barrera, Hugo wrote:
>
> Hi Guy’s,
> ** **
> For the voicemail ports on SA what do you recommend to put for the
> external mask? Should it match the phones external mask OR should it be
> only 10 digits because you’re not supposed to send the 1 out of SA?
>  Thoughts would be appreciated?  
> ** **
> *- Hugo*
> ** **
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] B-ACD drop through to loop ephone hunt a second time

2013-03-28 Thread Suresh Bhandari
You got the beast Ajay! It worked as expected


Thanks.


On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Ajay Viswanath
wrote:

> Suresh,
>
> Make sure you enable the music on hold under the cme. If the moh is not
> specified the BACD will drop the second time it attempts again.
>
> Thanks
>
> --- On *Thu, 28/3/13, ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com <
> ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com>* wrote:
>
>
> From: ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com <
> ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com>
> Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 85, Issue 104
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Date: Thursday, 28 March, 2013, 4:08 AM
>
> Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
> 
> ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 
> ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 
> ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>1. B-ACD drop through to loop ephone hunt a secondtime
>   (Suresh Bhandari)
>2. Re: QOS big question (ikizoo4 kwon)
>3. MVA functionality (CCIEing)
>4. Re: B-ACD drop through to loop ephone hunt asecond time
>   (William Bell)
>5. Re: MVA partial match issue (William Bell)
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:56:11 +0545
> From: Suresh Bhandari 
> http://mc/compose?to=bring...@gmail.com>
> >
> To: 
> "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com"
> http://mc/compose?to=ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
> >
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] B-ACD drop through to loop ephone hunt a
> secondtime
> Message-ID:
> 
> http://mc/compose?to=k2f...@mail.gmail.com>
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Experts!
>
> I configured the embedded drop-through script to match the requirement that
> if, for the first time, both the agents do not pickup the call, it should
> once more attempt to send the call to the agents.
>
> Succeeded for one time only. On the calling phone, I hear the "all of our
> agents ..." or so, and goes on hook, never attempts a second time.
>
> Somewhere I read to tweak the second-greeting-timer to 35secs or less. Did
> it, but no avail.
>
> can anyone shed light on what should i do to achieve the results?
>
> TIA
> --
> Suresh Bhandari
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> 
>
> --
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:19:30 -0700
> From: ikizoo4 kwon 
> http://mc/compose?to=ikiz...@hotmail.com>
> >
> To: Suresh Bhandari 
> http://mc/compose?to=bring...@gmail.com>
> >
> Cc: 
> "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com"
> http://mc/compose?to=ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
> >,
> singh http://mc/compose?to=singh8...@in.com>>, "
> ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
> "
> 
> http://mc/compose?to=ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com>
> >
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS big question
> Message-ID: 
> http://mc/compose?to=bay172-w45ba04dce7f1bb3edccf0cea...@phx.gbl>
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> i am not talking about theory, as you know there is lot of theory around.
> as you can see i enabled FRF.12 and cRTP , then make 1 g729 call, the
> bandwidth priority queue has 25K ( not even close to 12)
>
>
>
> sh policy-map int  Serial0/3/0.2 Serial0/3/0.2: DLCI 103 -
>   Service-policy output: AutoQoS-Policy-Trust
> queue stats for all priority classes:
>   queue limit 64 packets  (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer
> drops) 0/0/0  (pkts output/bytes output) 0/0
> Class-map: AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust (match-any)  15075 packets,
> 964800 bytes  5 minute offered rate 25000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
> <= 25K   Match: ip dscp ef (46)
> 15075 packets, 964800 bytes5 minute rate 25000 bps  Priority:
> 70% (537 kbps), burst bytes 13400, b/w exceed drops: 0
>   compress:  header ip rtp  UDP/RTP (compression on,
> Cisco, RTP)Sent:15075 total, 15074 compressed,
> <== cRTP working 572780
> bytes saved, 331720 bytes sent 2.72 efficiency
> improvement factor 99% hit ratio, five minute miss rate
> 0 misses/sec, 0 max  rate 8000 bps
>
> Class-map: AutoQoS-VoIP-Control-Trust (m

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] B-ACD drop through to loop ephone hunt a second time

2013-03-28 Thread Ajay Viswanath
Suresh,

Make sure you enable the music on hold under the cme. If the moh is not 
specified the BACD will drop the second time it attempts again.

Thanks

--- On Thu, 28/3/13, ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com 
 wrote:

From: ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com 

Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 85, Issue 104
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Thursday, 28 March, 2013, 4:08 AM

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
    ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
    http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
    ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
    ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. B-ACD drop through to loop ephone hunt a second    time
      (Suresh Bhandari)
   2. Re: QOS big question (ikizoo4 kwon)
   3. MVA functionality (CCIEing)
   4. Re: B-ACD drop through to loop ephone hunt a    second time
      (William Bell)
   5. Re: MVA partial match issue (William Bell)


--

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:56:11 +0545
From: Suresh Bhandari 
To: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] B-ACD drop through to loop ephone hunt a
    second    time
Message-ID:
    
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Experts!

I configured the embedded drop-through script to match the requirement that
if, for the first time, both the agents do not pickup the call, it should
once more attempt to send the call to the agents.

Succeeded for one time only. On the calling phone, I hear the "all of our
agents ..." or so, and goes on hook, never attempts a second time.

Somewhere I read to tweak the second-greeting-timer to 35secs or less. Did
it, but no avail.

can anyone shed light on what should i do to achieve the results?

TIA
-- 
Suresh Bhandari
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 

--

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:19:30 -0700
From: ikizoo4 kwon 
To: Suresh Bhandari 
Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" ,
    singh , "ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com"
    
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS big question
Message-ID: 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

i am not talking about theory, as you know there is lot of theory around. 
as you can see i enabled FRF.12 and cRTP , then make 1 g729 call, the bandwidth 
priority queue has 25K ( not even close to 12)



sh policy-map int  Serial0/3/0.2 Serial0/3/0.2: DLCI 103 -
  Service-policy output: AutoQoS-Policy-Trust
    queue stats for all priority classes:
      queue limit 64 packets      (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 
0/0/0      (pkts output/bytes output) 0/0
    Class-map: AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust (match-any)      15075 packets, 964800 
bytes      5 minute offered rate 25000 bps, drop rate 0 bps 
<= 25K       Match: ip dscp ef (46)        15075 
packets, 964800 bytes        5 minute rate 25000 bps      Priority: 70% (537 
kbps), burst bytes 13400, b/w exceed drops: 0
      compress:          header ip rtp          UDP/RTP (compression on, Cisco, 
RTP)            Sent:    15075 total, 15074 compressed, 
<== cRTP working                     572780 
bytes saved, 331720 bytes sent                     2.72 efficiency improvement 
factor                     99% hit ratio, five minute miss rate 0 misses/sec, 0 
max                      rate 8000 bps

    Class-map: AutoQoS-VoIP-Control-Trust (match-any)      343 packets, 20788 
bytes      5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps      Match: ip dscp cs3 
(24)        343 packets, 20788 bytes        5 minute rate 0 bps      Match: ip 
dscp af31 (26)        0 packets, 0 bytes        5 minute rate 0 bps      
Queueing      queue limit 64 packets      (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer 
drops) 0/0/0      (pkts output/bytes output) 0/0      bandwidth 5% (38 kbps)
    Class-map: class-default (match-any)      430 packets, 47701 bytes      5 
minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps      Match: any      Queueing      
queue limit 64 packets      (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops/flowdrops) 
0/0/0/0      (pkts output/bytes output) 5/6516      Fair-queue: per-flow queue 
limit 16

Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:42:00 +0545
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS big question
From: bring...@gmail.com
To: ikiz...@hotmail.com
CC: singh8...@in.com; ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com; 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

Actually it was ?5% overhead. So it comes to 48.72 for 4 calls. So 49 is my fav.

HTH



On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:30 AM, Suresh Bhandari  wrote:

In the lab, I really don't know.

But your calculation of the bandwidth is correct. And somewh

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voicemail Ports on SA

2013-03-28 Thread William Bell
I follow the requirements for site A phones but I mask with the number of the 
VM pilot.

So, using ipExpert lab examples:

Site A would be +1202555   for the phones

Unity Connection VM Pilot number is 2600

I set the external mask on vm ports to +12025552600.


-BIll
--
William Bell
blog: http://ucguerrilla.com
twitter: @ucguerrilla



On Mar 27, 2013, at 9:50 PM, Barrera, Hugo wrote:

> Hi Guy’s,
>  
> For the voicemail ports on SA what do you recommend to put for the external 
> mask? Should it match the phones external mask OR should it be only 10 digits 
> because you’re not supposed to send the 1 out of SA?  Thoughts would be 
> appreciated?  
>  
> - Hugo
>  
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB 10.1 VOL1 - RSVP enabled location

2013-03-28 Thread Tariq Joe
Hi Experts,

It’s my first email (first impression WOW) I’m recently start preparing for
the LAB hopefully I will pass from the first attempt.

I’m facing very strange issue with LAB 10.1 VOL1 - RSVP enabled location
…the lab is asking to configure and test RSVP between Phone HQ and Phone
BR1 using VOIP over WAN and here is the call flow:

Phone-HQCUCM ---H323 (HQ-VGW) --H323(BR1-VGW)Phone-BR1 …the
VOIP call is working fine and i configured everything correctly
(MTP,MRGL….etc) even I have checked DSG for lab but I’m facing the
following two issues:

1-  1-I got busy tone once I press any button for supplementary service
(Hold, Transfer ….etc) from both sites. (HQ & BR1).

2-  2-During VOIP call I cant see any RSVP connection from both VGW.

3-  3-In case I replace BR1-VGW from H323 to MGCP how can I configured
VOIP call from Phone-BR1 - MGCP (BR1-VGW) --H323(HQ-VGW)Phone-HQ
: I noticed that there is an issue with MGCP (BR1-VGW) once I tried VOIP
call.

Thanks in advance.

T-Joe


On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Tariq Joe  wrote:

> Hi Experts,
>
> It’s my first email (first impression WOW) I’m recently start preparing
> for the LAB hopefully I will pass from the first attempt.
>
> I’m facing very strange issue with LAB 10.1 VOL1 - RSVP enabled location
> …the lab is asking to configure and test RSVP between Phone HQ and Phone
> BR1 using VOIP over WAN and here is the call flow:
>
> Phone-HQCUCM ---H323 (HQ-VGW) --H323(BR1-VGW)Phone-BR1 …the
> VOIP call is working fine and i configured everything correctly
> (MTP,MRGL….etc) even I have checked DSG for lab but I’m facing the
> following two issues:
>
> 1-  1-I got busy tone once I press any button for supplementary
> service (Hold, Transfer ….etc) from both sites. (HQ & BR1).
>
> 2-  2-During VOIP call I cant see any RSVP connection from both VGW.
>
> 3-  3-In case I replace BR1-VGW from H323 to MGCP how can I
> configured VOIP call from Phone-BR1 - MGCP (BR1-VGW)
> --H323(HQ-VGW)Phone-HQ  : I noticed that there is an issue with
> MGCP (BR1-VGW) once I tried VOIP call.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> T-Joe
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Exam Speed Strategy

2013-03-28 Thread CCIEing
Hi Jamie,

Would you please explain this more :

"  ***You have to setup most devices with little or no prior configuration,
there are things that cannot change. Know these things and practice them
over and over so you do not have to think about them* "

Thanks in advance




On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Jamie Parr (jamparr) wrote:

>  First attempt I was very slow – did not use the device based approach,
> did not finish all tasks. Second I was much faster – using the device based
> approach, finished with 3 hours to test. Third attempt I finished with more
> than 3 hours to test and pick up the issues – Passed
>
> ** **
>
> My advice:
>
> **· **I found the more I practiced the faster I got, practice
> practice practice
>
> **· **Use notepad to write all your device configs first, you can
> copy and paste large sections of config saving a lot of time
>
> **· **Do not be so strict to the device based approach, use it as
> a base and create your own hybrid
>
> **· **You have to setup most devices with little or no prior
> configuration, there are things that cannot change. Know these things and
> practice them over and over so you do not have to think about them
>
> **· **Persevere, it’s not easy and it sucks most of the time but
> you will get there
>
> ** **
>
> Hope this helps
>
> ** **
>
> *Jamie Parr*
>
> CCIE #38633 (voice)
> Engineer - IT
> jamp...@cisco.com
> Phone: *+44 20 8824 2641*
> Mobile: *+44 7590622049*
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Dane Warner
> *Sent:* 26 March 2013 23:41
> *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Exam Speed Strategy
>
> ** **
>
> To All,
>
> ** **
>
> I took my second attempt on Monday, March 25 and did not pass.
>
> I was hoping for some insight on concrete suggestions to get faster. 
>
> I didn’t get hung up on any one task, I seemed to keep moving forward and
> tried to type as fast as I could, using CLI shortcuts, etc.
>
> I used the device-based methodology and I feel pretty confident of my
> technical knowledge.
>
> Yet I didn’t even get to many tasks at all, I would have needed another
> 2-3 hours to complete all tasks.
>
> I hear of candidates completing all tasks in 6-7 hours, which means I
> would need to become twice as fast as my last attempt.
>
> It almost sounds insurmountable. Do I need to take typing classes?
>
> ** **
>
> Any recommendations that don’t break the NDA would be greatly appreciated.
> 
>
> ** **
>
> Regards,
>
> ** **
>
> *Dane Warner, CCVP*
>
> *Sr. Network Engineer*
>
> *Epoch Universal, Inc.*
>
> *(909)226-0755*
>
> *dwar...@epochuniversal.com  *
>
> *[image: Epoch_Logo_Smaller_Transparent]*
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
<>___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com