[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Changing your exam date
Hey guys, Not sure if this has ever been asked. I'm sure there is a policy that states you can't, but has anyone ever tried to move their lab date within the 3-month cut-off period? Just found out I need to be traveling on business around the time my lab is scheduled for. Do I have a shot at asking pretty please, move it out by a week, or am I down $1500? Thanks, Paul ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Question regarding dialing NATIONAL calls outside the U.S.
It definitely differs from country to country, but in the lab, or any practice lab, it should tell you exactly what the dialing format is for local, national, international. If you are struggling to find the difference between national and local, it's more than likely that they only require on or the other format to be configured and tested. Many times they'll ask that for the different sites, local should look like this, and national should look like that, and international should look like so. But when you get to configuration time, you only need to provision dialing for local and international (as an example). If all else fails, and you are required to configure (and test) calls in a certain format, but it's not clear on the exam paper what that format is, then your best bet would be to speak to the proctor to get clarity. HTH, Paul On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 6:08 PM, ccielab...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, It's probably a silly question, but it's some I struggle with more often than I like. Can some clarify for me how a LOCAL and NATIONAL call generally need to be dialed / presented outside the U.S. In all the practice labs I've done, dialing international is usually straight forward - something like 90014085551212. But my head spins when trying to understand what is a national call verus a local call. Lets say I have a International e164 phone number at +743 2202 4xxx at my Site C location. Is a local number anything in the format? What would a National number in this example ? It seems to me anything other than , would be a International call. So I don't see where National fits in. Also , when I see a number like XX on the PSTN phone, is that automatically a International call ? - Lab Rat ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call routing - There isn't just one way of doing it
As long as they get the result required, phone displaying the 'TO' and 'FROM' correctly (if they ask), and more importantly: debug isdn q931 messages showing the correct info, then it does not really matter how you configure it. Regards, Paul On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Steffen Bruening stbruen...@gmail.comwrote: Hi all, when ever I go through the call routing section I find several ways to answer the question, some straight, some inconvient. But I don't know for what I can get the points. Does the way matter to reach the goal/answer the question (as long as it not vialote the question itself)? Or is irrelevant as long as the phones ringing as they should and the isdn debug shows correct plan and type, channel and calling name? Regards Steffen ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Checking In
Welcome back Legendary One! How's life with a number? Relaxing more due to not studying, or more stress due to increased (advanced) work demands? Major job/position/salary changes after passing, or business as usual? Good to see you popping in! We (I) miss your regular blog updates. but I understand. Take care, Paul On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 3:31 AM, Matthew Berry matthew.be...@cdw.comwrote: Hi everyone. I thought I'd join the OSL again after being away for the past few months. Thought I'd say hi. * * *Matthew Berry* **Sr. Voice Engineer - CCIE 26721 *[image: cid:image003.jpg@01C97C0E.9597F500]*http://www.cdw.com/content/services/advanced-technology/default.aspx ** *CDW Advanced Technology Services* 7145 Boone Avenue North | Brooklyn Park, MN 55428 Single Number Reach: +1.763.592.5987 matthew.be...@cdw.com ben.c...@cdw.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com F906EF75-D025-431C-B55C-27FF496CF05D[47].png___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol1, Lab 4A GK
Does this happen for all calls inbound on CUCM, or only 1002? It might be that you have ext 1002 created as an auto-reg ext in no partition, and that this is getting matched and causing the conflict? On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 8:52 PM, Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com wrote: hello all i have an issue with my GK implementation i have the CCM cluster and br2 (CME) registered to a GK. when i make calls from CMM to CCME using the GK, i have no issues however when i try to call from CME to CCM. i always get your call cannot be completed as dialed I already checked the ptts assigned to the extensions the CSS for incoming calls on the Trunk that indeed matches the ptss of the extensions the significant digits set to 4 on the GK this is what i have gatekeeper zone local PL ipexpert.com 10.10.110.1 zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2 zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1 zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 0 BR2-RTR zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2 zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1 zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 0 BR2-RTR no shutdown ! HQ-RTR(config-gk)#do sh gateke end GATEKEEPER ENDPOINT REGISTRATION CallSignalAddr Port RASSignalAddr Port Zone Name Type Flags --- - --- - - - 10.10.110.3 1820 10.10.110.3 61408 PLH323-GW H323-ID: BR2-RTR Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 10.10.210.101720 10.10.210.1032785 PLVOIP-GW H323-ID: gk-trunk_1 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 10.10.210.111720 10.10.210.1132780 PLVOIP-GW H323-ID: gk-trunk_2 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 Total number of active registrations = 3 HQ-RTR(config-gk)#do sh gateke gw GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE = Prefix: 3* Zone PL master gateway list: 10.10.110.3:1820 BR2-RTR Prefix: 1#* Zone PL master gateway list: 10.10.210.10:1720 gk-trunk_1 10.10.210.11:1720 gk-trunk_2 Zone PL prefix 5... priority gateway list(s): Priority 10: 10.10.210.11:1720 gk-trunk_2 Priority 9: 10.10.210.10:1720 gk-trunk_1 Zone PL prefix 1... priority gateway list(s): Priority 10: 10.10.210.11:1720 gk-trunk_2 Priority 9: 10.10.210.10:1720 gk-trunk_1 HQ-RTR(config-gk)# on the debug main 10 i see that the GK is sending the call to CUCM i have the traces enabled on CUCM and indeed the CUCM is getting the call as 1#1002 what am i missing ? thanks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 1 4.1 Call issue
Yeah. What Tam said. Just to note: the MRGL used for your trunk should include the IOS MTP you configured, and this MUST be registered with CUCM. Keep this in mind, since the Xcoder would be registered to CUCME on HQ-RTR. On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Tam Nhu tamnhu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Amr, since you are doing lab 1, and it has CUBE involved right. So make sure the following need to check and configure Configure Xcoder and IOS MTP on HQ On the trunk, make sure to - Checked MTP - Unchecked 'Wait for H245 capacity set' - Checked Enable Inbound Fast Start Hope that help, TN. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 56, Issue 73
Hey Amr,, This is what i was trying to tell you earlier. You want to register the MTP in CUCM, right? But look at your address in the 2nd line of your config: sccp ccm 10.10.200.3 identifier 1 version 5.0.1 This is pointing to your GW, not CUCM. The MTP needs to be as part of another sccp ccm group. Try this: sccp ccm x.x.x.x id 2 ver 7 (where x.x.x.x is the IP of your Primary CPE/SUB) sccp ccm x.x.x.y id 3 ver 7 (where x.x.x.y is the IP of your Secondary CPE/PUB) ! sccp ccm group 2 associate ccm 2 priority 1 associate ccm 3 priority 2 associate profile 10 register hq-mtp And then try and reg it again. Let me know how it goes On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Amr Sherif miroale...@hotmail.com wrote: I created a software mtp on HQ-RTR ,create mtp on UCM (only had option for IOS ENHANCED MTP ) ,add it to a MRGL and applied to the GK device pool which is inserted in the GK trunk and check mtp required check mark but the MTP is not registered with UCM ,what am i missing here ?! is the codec right . *Here is my configuration:* sccp local FastEthernet0/0.20 sccp ccm 10.10.200.3 identifier 1 version 5.0.1 sccp ! sccp ccm group 1 bind interface FastEthernet0/0.20 associate ccm 1 priority 1 associate profile 10 register hq-mtp associate profile 1 register hq-xcode signaling dscp af31 dspfarm profile 1 transcode codec g711ulaw codec g711alaw codec g729ar8 codec g729abr8 maximum sessions 3 associate application SCCP ! dspfarm profile 10 mtp codec g729r8 maximum sessions software 4 associate application SCCP Best regards, Amr Sherif Senior Network Voice Engineer CCNA,CCNP,CCVP and CCIE Voice Written *(Certified)* CCIE Voice Lab *(In Progress)* CEL: +966501462699 Email: *miroale...@hotmail.com miroale...@hotmail.com* ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST to UC VoiceMail
On your HQ GW (or whatever GW is used to reach the CUC) you need to check: Redirecting Number IE Delivery - Inbound Redirecting Number IE Delivery - Outbound HTH, Paul On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 4:53 PM, ayman labib ayman_la...@yahoo.com wrote: Greetings, SRST to Unity Connection VM question. I put my site in SRST, Everything works as expected except when I hit the message button to go to my VM box in UC. It goes to the general UC message. Under my HQ gateway, I have Redirecting number IE inbound and outbound checked. Am I missing any step? Any ideas or suggestion is greatly appreciated My config: interface Serial0/1/0:23 no ip address isdn switch-type primary-ni isdn incoming-voice voice isdn outgoing display-ie isdn outgoing ie redirecting-number no cdp enable ! call-manager-fallback secondary-dialtone 9 max-conferences 8 gain -6 transfer-system full-consult ip source-address 192.168.31.10 port 2000 strict-match max-ephones 10 max-dn 10 transfer-pattern .T voicemail 912123945020 call-forward pattern .T call-forward busy 912123945020 call-forward noan 912123945020 timeout 20 moh music-on-hold.au multicast moh 239.1.1.1 port 16384 route 192.168.31.10 192.168.31.10 time-zone 8 ! ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST to UC VoiceMail
What is the extension configured in CUC? 4 digits? If so, then it won't work. Your number you have configured here in SRST is the full 10-dig extension. You would have to add a redirecting voice translation-pattern to match 4-digits to go out and hit the correct extension in CUC. On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 5:10 PM, ayman labib ayman_la...@yahoo.com wrote: Thanks for the reply, I have already done that. I reset the gateway(HQ) and still no luck. Below is my debug from the HQ router (CUC is located in HQ) 6178631002 -- User phone number in SRST 2123945020 -- CUC Pilot number Sep 16 15:04:14.631: ISDN Se2/0:23 Q931: RX - SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x00A3 Bearer Capability i = 0x9090A2 Standard = CCITT Transfer Capability = 3.1kHz Audio Transfer Mode = Circuit Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s Channel ID i = 0xA98381 Exclusive, Channel 1 Progress Ind i = 0x8583 - Origination address is non-ISDN Display i = '+16178631002' Calling Party Number i = 0x2180, '6178631002' Plan:ISDN, Type:National Called Party Number i = 0xA1, '2123945020' Plan:ISDN, Type:National Sep 16 15:04:14.643: ISDN Se2/0:23 Q931: TX - CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0x80A3 Channel ID i = 0xA98381 Exclusive, Channel 1 Central-GWY# Sep 16 15:04:14.647: ISDN Se2/0:23 Q931: TX - ALERTING pd = 8 callref = 0x80A3 Progress Ind i = 0x8088 - In-band info or appropriate now available Sep 16 15:04:14.779: ISDN Se2/0:23 Q931: TX - CONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x80A3 Display i = 'VoiceMail' Sep 16 15:04:14.787: ISDN Se2/0:23 Q931: RX - CONNECT_ACK pd = 8 callref = 0x00A3 Central-GWY# Sep 16 15:04:17.151: ISDN Se2/0:23 Q931: RX - DISCONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x00A3 Cause i = 0x8290 - Normal call clearing Sep 16 15:04:17.179: ISDN Se2/0:23 Q931: TX - RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0x80A3 Sep 16 15:04:17.183: ISDN Se2/0:23 Q931: RX - RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0x00A3 -- *From:* Paul Kruger pauld.kru...@gmail.com *To:* ayman labib ayman_la...@yahoo.com *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Sent:* Thu, September 16, 2010 11:00:25 AM *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST to UC VoiceMail On your HQ GW (or whatever GW is used to reach the CUC) you need to check: Redirecting Number IE Delivery - Inbound Redirecting Number IE Delivery - Outbound HTH, Paul On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 4:53 PM, ayman labib ayman_la...@yahoo.comwrote: Greetings, SRST to Unity Connection VM question. I put my site in SRST, Everything works as expected except when I hit the message button to go to my VM box in UC. It goes to the general UC message. Under my HQ gateway, I have Redirecting number IE inbound and outbound checked. Am I missing any step? Any ideas or suggestion is greatly appreciated My config: interface Serial0/1/0:23 no ip address isdn switch-type primary-ni isdn incoming-voice voice isdn outgoing display-ie isdn outgoing ie redirecting-number no cdp enable ! call-manager-fallback secondary-dialtone 9 max-conferences 8 gain -6 transfer-system full-consult ip source-address 192.168.31.10 port 2000 strict-match max-ephones 10 max-dn 10 transfer-pattern .T voicemail 912123945020 call-forward pattern .T call-forward busy 912123945020 call-forward noan 912123945020 timeout 20 moh music-on-hold.au multicast moh 239.1.1.1 port 16384 route 192.168.31.10 192.168.31.10 time-zone 8 ! ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE #26721 - I PASSED!
Absolutely brilliant! Well done Matthew! Really! In my honest opion - your blog has set the standard. Not only have you contributed greatly to the OSL, but the amount of effort you've put in on your blog to share your gained experience and knowledge with the rest of the world - Amazing! Especially for the IPexpert followers, as you digest and make notes on every practice lab you completed. I think it was James Key with his posts on blindhog that kept everybody glued to his site to see updates with what he's been studying, and what he's gonna show us next. For the last couple of months, it's been yours! And hopefully this will inspire a lot of guys to also start their blogs, and share their knowledge with the world. Once again - thank you and well done!!! PS - when can we expect ciscosecurityguru.com? :) On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:05 AM, Matthew Berry ciscovoiceg...@gmail.comwrote: I just got my score report. I passed guys. More follow-up to come later. Right now I'm now on cloud nine. :) CCIE #26271 Thanks, Matthew Berry ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com http://ciscovoiceguru.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] When you pass the lab, is there anything different in the e-mails they send you?
Yeah, from what I've heard, the Friday test-takers usually wait until Tuesday to get their report. For the rest, it's the next day. You should be getting a mail fairly soon. Log in, and let us know? :) All the best! On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Scott Newberry sc...@meganandscott.comwrote: Good luck to you! If you're not sure, that's good. I'm at the airport waiting to go home, knowing I'll be back in a month. :) Matthew Berry should be out soon. Hope he has a good report! Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse my brevity and any spelling errors. On Aug 16, 2010 5:15 PM, Shahid Shafi ssh...@gmail.com wrote: Whether you pass or fail, the email will ask you to login to cert portal and verify status CCIE status from there. On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Edwin Dotson edot...@ams.net wrote: I took the lab Friday and am still awaiting my results, the question is if you pass does the e-mail indicate it or do you still have to check the web site? Im on the road and accessing the cisco website is a little hard from my phone. Thanks, *Edwin Dotson* Senior Systems Engineer CCNA, CCVP Cisco Unity Support and IP Contact Center Express Specialist *AMS.NET* 925-245-6144 – Office 925-960-6644 – Fax www.ams.net *New Content Information* Events, Webinars, Videos, Case Studies, Downloads More! Click Here http://www.ams.net/ *Cisco Award Winner *Vertical Partner of the Year, Voice Partner of the Year… Read More http://www.ams.net/company/News.asp ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Mgcp
Hi Pithog, All the settings you see there on the CCM page under the section Product Specific Configuration Layout will be downloaded by your gw if you have these two commands configured: ccm-manager config server x.x.x.x and ccm-manager config. By putting those two cmds in, the gw will download an xml file with all the settings you configured under Product Specific Configuration Layout. If you are configuring your gw manually it will honor whatever isdn switch-type you configured it for. Just note that you can specify this command globally as a default for all your pots interfaces, or you can specify the switch-type per interface. Card-type will only be used if you have a card that supports both E1 and T1. Then you gotta tell the gw which one you want it to be configured for. An example would be: NM-HDV2-2T1/E1 If you only have cards that support just E1 and just T1, then that command is not needed. Now for your question on network-clock-select 1 T1 0/0/0, I'm going to use Graham's approach, and ask YOU: What do you think it means? Questions are always welcome, and probably the core use of this mailing list. But I think you will get a lot more (and quicker) help, and understand your question a lot better, if you do a bit of research first, and then post here. Start your questions with something to the tune of: I'm trying to understand command *so-and-so* and went to cisco's web site, and found *doc-so-and-so* which gave me this explanation: *quote on the doc*. But I don't understand what they mean with: *sub quote of the doc*. Can anyone explain that a bit better? That usually invokes a fair bit of assistance. Otherwise people might think you're just asking to be spoon-fed. :) HTH On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 7:21 AM, Pithog Oil pithog...@yahoo.com wrote: MGCP config under Glogal isdn switch type on CCM, do i have to adjust the switch type always , i know i need to adjust it when doing pri-net5, what about when doing pri-ni. By default its usually 4ESS. Folks please i need to know when to adjust this parameter. when do i need to use this commands network-clock-select 1 T1 0/0/0 Card type i understand the use of the other one with participate. network-clock-participate wic 0 Thanks to you all Pithog oil ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] First attempt
Let my chip in and give my 2c. Disclaimer: This might have changed since last I wrote (Jan 2010) In my first attempt I failed the dial plan miserably and got 0, which in itself, is a section that if you get 0, getting 100% for the rest still isn't enough to pass. Yet I had sections marked throughout with some 0, some perfect and some in between all the way to the end. On my second attempt, I failed the OEQ section, which also if you can remember is a fail this and you fail the exam section. Still, the rest of my exam was scored all the way through. During lunch I realized that I made a mistake on my OEQ's and would fail, and asked the proctor what the policy was, and it was quite the reverse from what the perception is on this forum. He said. if you have earned enough points to pass you, they stop marking. You've passed. But they will keep marking all the way through if you have not. And after my first attempt, I couldn't believe getting 0 for dialplan, as I tested and tested everything, except for one question which I couldn't get working. So thought at the least, I should get a few marks for that section. But then spent a lot of time trying to figure out what I did wrong in dial-plan, and sure enough the error was with me. There was one small little thing that I did not include in any of my dialplan answers that bit me and got me a zero. Second time around, I just read the questions a lot more thoroughly and my dial plan score was great! Still didn't have enough to pass, but at least I had gained the belief that if a section was scored badly, I needed to pay attention to that area. HTH Paul On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Ashar Siddiqui siddas...@gmail.com wrote: I don’t buy that 0% theory that once they come to conclusion that you can’t make it , they will start giving 0%...just a rumour I guess.. In my first attempt, I had few 0% spread across which means they graded my full lab otherwise they should have stopped at the beginning.. One more thing...If you get 0% in some section..it is all justified once you start looking into your solution from every angle.. Ash *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Daniel Berlinski *Sent:* 29 July 2010 23:15 *To:* CCIE Voice GMAIL *Cc:* OSL Group *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] First attempt I've heard this from Cisco employees as well that when the proctors reach the conclusion that the candidate cannot make it up the 80% they just stop the correction. This is something I will definetely ask whenever there is another ask the expert forum. By the way has anyone ever looked for this info in the ask the expert archives? I know this forum is packed with Cisco staff. Can any of you clarify this for us? On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 7:29 AM, CCIE Voice GMAIL givemeccievoice2...@gmail.com wrote: I have heard this from a couple of people and even on this mailer. That is why I am bringing it up. I am not 100% sure if it is accurate or not. *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Graham Hopkins *Sent:* Thursday, July 29, 2010 12:09 PM *To:* OSL Group *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] First attempt I don't see how this can be correct, if it is it makes the report meaningless. You could screw up a few early sections, fail on 79% and still have most of the report as 0. Of course as the score report is subject to NDA we'll never know. Still Ohamien keep working on it and you will get there. Graham On 29 Jul 2010, at 19:59, CCIE Voice GMAIL wrote: It’s also important to note, and correct me if I’m wrong, that the 0’s don’t necessarily mean you configured that section incorrectly. To my knowledge, once you lose more than 20 points, they simply stop grading your exam. So the later section may have 0’s but you configured them correctly. I feel like this is a big problem with the already vague score reports. I wish they would change this. If you are paying $1400, you deserve a full report in my opinion. *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Ashar Siddiqui *Sent:* Thursday, July 29, 2010 11:25 AM *To:* Ohamien Uhakheme *Cc:* OSL Group *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] First attempt I am sure you will figure out what mistakes you made which resulted in 0%. I know its very hard to find out when you are sure your solution is 100% but believe me I have been through this and you will come to know how a tiny mistake in that particular section or may be in some other section resulted in 0% for this section :) I hope you pass in 2nd attempt. Don't forget to break down your scores and analyze exactly which question you lost points. That will help you to work out on specific areas. Ash Ohamien Uhakheme wrote: Hey guys -- I've been lurking for a
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] incoming VoIP dial-peer matching not based on session protocol
Not 100% sure, but think it is only applicable for outbound, and inbound will match on matched digits. From the Cisco IOS Voice Command Reference: session protocol cisco - The cisco keyword is applicable only to VoIP on the Cisco 1750, Cisco 1751, Cisco 3600 series, and Cisco 7200 series routers. 2010/5/3 Peter Farkas wormh...@sch.hu Hi, I'm a bit confused why the session protocol command is not necessary for an incoming VoIP dial-peer. Even if it is H.323 dial-peer (session protocol cisco) a SIP call can match. Any ANI/DNIS matching rule is enough. Sb can makes me clear? thx P ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security] Great New Offers from IPexpert
Hi Mike, While your logic seems air-tight, I just want to let you guys know that you shouldn't count on the OEQ's giving you 21 points anymore. They've changed it to 4 points only. At least for the Voice Lab. I can't vouch for the other tracks. But! It is still mandatory pass this section to pass the lab. Even if it is only 4 points. If you fail this and get full 96 points from the lab, you still fail. Keep that in mind. It's an important bit to know, as it makes the test harder. I had my second attempt at the end of Jan, and this was implemented already. Third attempt: Aug/Sep. On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Mike Thompson mthompson...@gmail.comwrote: Everyone keeps talking about the ‘free OEQ’, but they’re forgetting a key thing. The OEQ is 30 minutes. There are 4 questions that are, if you’re actually prepared for the exam, elementary questions. Each of these questions take a few minutes to answer on average. I mean there isn’t much calculation to ‘what is the TCP port used to control an IP Phone’ (not an actual question I received). It’s not like they want you to calculate the airspeed of an unlaiden swallow. In all reality, the 4 OEQ questions take less than 15 minutes and give you a 21 point head start on your exam (and yes, it’s not really a head start, but you get the gist). More importantly, you get an extra 15 minutes to get that critical 69 or more points to get your number. Would you rather spend 480 minutes getting 100 points (.2083 points per minute) Or 465 minutes getting 89 points (.1914 points per minute). Just my 2 cents folks *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Tyson Scott *Sent:* Wednesday, March 17, 2010 1:46 AM *To:* 'Nadeem Rafi'; 'Brandon Carroll' *Cc:* 'CCIE_RS OnlineStudyList'; 'ccie OSL'; ccie...@onlinestudylist.com; ccie_secur...@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security] Great New Offers from IPexpert But wait haha. Thanks Marko. Regards, Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 RS, Security, and SP Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Mailto: tsc...@ipexpert.com Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208 Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat eFax: +1.810.454.0130 IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand, Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco CCIE (RS, Voice, Security Service Provider) certification(s) with training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com *From:* ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Nadeem Rafi *Sent:* Wednesday, March 17, 2010 12:53 AM *To:* Brandon Carroll *Cc:* CCIE_RS OnlineStudyList; ccie OSL; ccie_secur...@onlinestudylist.com; ccie...@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security] Great New Offers from IPexpert a good answer to purchase your ccie kind stuff. On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Brandon Carroll bcarr...@ipexpert.com wrote: Really Marko, when you step back and look at it this just reenforces what we all know: Time on the racks is more valuable than anything when you are preparing for the CCIE. Regards, Brandon Carroll - CCIE #23837 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert Mailto: bcarr...@ipexpert.com Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat eFax: +1.810.454.0130 IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand, Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco CCIE (RS, Voice, Security Service Provider) certification(s) with training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Marko Milivojevic mar...@ipexpert.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 04:39, Brandon Carroll bcarr...@ipexpert.com wrote: Do you know what 400 hours of rack time cost me when I was a student? Not only from an instructor point of view, but also from a former students point of viewWOW. Unbelievable! Yeah. It's a $1400 right there, only in rack time. We're practically giving away this deal. -- Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert YES! We include 400 hours of REAL rack time with our Blended Learning Solution! Mailto: mar...@ipexpert.com Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security] Great New Offers from IPexpert
I think about two months ago. I didn't see ANY announcements on it. I just saw it in my test. And thought - cool! Only 4 points. What a bonus - there goes some pressure. I stuffed up one of my four questions. And well... there was another one I which didn't have a clue. So stuffing up that question was a big mistake. It was an easy question, and one that I kinda brushed aside and figured - too easy. Only during lunch, I realized that I had answered it wrong! But thought, 4 points wasted, not too bad. But then during lunch the proctor also told us that even though the Core Knowledge section is only worth 4 points, you still have to pass it to pass the exam. It sucked knowing for 5hours that no matter what I'm busy with now, it won't change my result. I pushed through just to practice speed, and see gotchas with the lab. And there were a couple... On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Mike Thompson mthompson...@gmail.comwrote: ??? When did that change take place?and why? Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos. On Mar 18, 2010, at 4:11 AM, Paul Kruger pauld.kru...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Mike, While your logic seems air-tight, I just want to let you guys know that you shouldn't count on the OEQ's giving you 21 points anymore. They've changed it to 4 points only. At least for the Voice Lab. I can't vouch for the other tracks. But! It is still mandatory pass this section to pass the lab. Even if it is only 4 points. If you fail this and get full 96 points from the lab, you still fail. Keep that in mind. It's an important bit to know, as it makes the test harder. I had my second attempt at the end of Jan, and this was implemented already. Third attempt: Aug/Sep. On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Mike Thompson mthompson...@gmail.com mthompson...@gmail.com wrote: Everyone keeps talking about the ‘free OEQ’, but they’re forgetting a key thing. The OEQ is 30 minutes. There are 4 questions that are, if you’re actually prepared for the exam, elementary questions. Each of these questions take a few minutes to answer on average. I mean there isn’t much calculation to ‘what is the TCP port used to control an IP Phone’ (not an actual question I received). It’s not like they want you to calculate the airspeed of an unlaiden swallow. In all reality, the 4 OEQ questions take less than 15 minutes and give you a 21 point head start on your exam (and yes, it’s not really a head start, but you get the gist). More importantly, you get an extra 15 minutes to get that critical 69 or more points to get your number. Would you rather spend 480 minutes getting 100 points (.2083 points per minute) Or 465 minutes getting 89 points (.1914 points per minute). Just my 2 cents folks *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Tyson Scott *Sent:* Wednesday, March 17, 2010 1:46 AM *To:* 'Nadeem Rafi'; 'Brandon Carroll' *Cc:* 'CCIE_RS OnlineStudyList'; 'ccie OSL'; ccie...@onlinestudylist.comccie...@onlinestudylist.com; ccie_secur...@onlinestudylist.comccie_secur...@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security] Great New Offers from IPexpert But wait haha. Thanks Marko. Regards, Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 RS, Security, and SP Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Mailto: tsc...@ipexpert.comtsc...@ipexpert.com Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208 Live Assistance, Please visit: http://www.ipexpert.com/chat www.ipexpert.com/chat eFax: +1.810.454.0130 IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand, Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco CCIE (RS, Voice, Security Service Provider) certification(s) with training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at http://www.ipexpert.com/communitieswww.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at http://www.ipexpert.com/www.ipexpert.com *From:* ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Nadeem Rafi *Sent:* Wednesday, March 17, 2010 12:53 AM *To:* Brandon Carroll *Cc:* CCIE_RS OnlineStudyList; ccie OSL; ccie_secur...@onlinestudylist.comccie_secur...@onlinestudylist.com; ccie...@onlinestudylist.comccie...@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security] Great New Offers from IPexpert a good answer to purchase your ccie kind stuff. On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Brandon Carroll bcarr...@ipexpert.com bcarr...@ipexpert.com wrote: Really Marko, when you step back and look at it this just reenforces what we all know: Time on the racks is more valuable than anything when you are preparing for the CCIE
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE's WorldWide Historical...
Yeah, I agree. I think crap loads of people got their number those last few weeks before the big change. BTW Are there any stats that show you how many type of CCIE's per country? I know they show you how many total per country, but not individually. As in how many voice CCIE's per country. On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Jonathan Charles jonv...@gmail.com wrote: http://www.ccie18473.net/wwccies/wwccies.htm Kinda cool... Interesting note, in the past 35 days, the number of RS CCIEs has dropped by 52 so, either someone is hunting CCIEs or people are letting their certs expire... For Voice, since the live date of July 16th for v3, less than 62 have passed the lab (less than because we should presume that some number 0 passed the V2 lab from June 26th to July 16th). Jonathan ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] actual lab phone models
All the phones are 7965's. All of them are in front of you. On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 3:16 AM, Chuck mechuck...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone know what type of phones the actual lab uses? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] actual lab phone models
Yup, I wouldn't know about all locations, but Brussels, definitely yes. On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Phil G pgciscov...@gmx.net wrote: In Brussels, yes. Omotayo wrote: In all the locations ( Brussels)? On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Paul Kruger pauld.kru...@gmail.commailto: pauld.kru...@gmail.com wrote: All the phones are 7965's. All of them are in front of you. On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 3:16 AM, Chuck mechuck...@gmail.com mailto:mechuck...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone know what type of phones the actual lab uses? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
