[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Slips on E1

2011-02-24 Thread Warren Heaviside (wheavisi)
Hi Vinay,

I would approach the slips and the D-channel issue separately.  Here is
a config snippet from a couple of lab boxes set up back to back using
T1's.  The important point is one side is clock source internal and the
other is clock source line (default).

For the D channel issue make sure you have one side set for network and
the other for user.  Hope that helps.

Warren 


controller T1 0/1/0
 clock source internal
 cablelength long 0db
 pri-group timeslots 1-3,24 service mgcp

interface Serial0/1/0:23
 no ip address
 encapsulation hdlc
 isdn switch-type primary-ni
 isdn incoming-voice voice
 isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager
 no cdp enable


controller T1 0/1/0
 pri-group timeslots 1-3,24

interface Serial0/1/0:23
 no ip address
 encapsulation hdlc
 isdn switch-type primary-ni
 isdn protocol-emulate network
 isdn incoming-voice voice
 isdn outgoing ie redirecting-number 
 no cdp enable



 

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 9:00 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 60, Issue 152

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...


Today's Topics:

   1. Slips on  E1 (Vinay Kumar6)


--

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 22:04:27 +0530
From: Vinay Kumar6 vinayjaisw...@in.ibm.com
To: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com,
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Slips on  E1
Message-ID:

ofbe65d695.f9e7988a-on65257841.0058e5a4-65257841.005b1...@in.ibm.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Hi,

I have connected two routers Back-to-Back using the E1 Cross over cable,

but I am unable to get the Multiple_Frame_Established.

I see on one of the side as slips are increasing, I tried to change the 
Clock source to Internal.


E1 0/1/0 is up.
Applique type is Channelized E1 - balanced
  No alarms detected.
  alarm-trigger is not set
  Version info Firmware: 20090113, FPGA: 20, spm_count = 0
  Framing is NO-CRC4, Line Code is HDB3, Clock Source is Internal.
  CRC Threshold is 320. Reported from firmware  is 320.
  Data in current interval (287 seconds elapsed):
 4 Line Code Violations, 1 Path Code Violations
 1 Slip Secs, 0 Fr Loss Secs, 2 Line Err Secs, 0 Degraded Mins
 3 Errored Secs, 0 Bursty Err Secs, 0 Severely Err Secs, 0 Unavail 
Secs


E1 0/2/0 is up.
  Applique type is Channelized E1 - balanced
  No alarms detected.
  alarm-trigger is not set
  Version info Firmware: 20090113, FPGA: 20, spm_count = 0
  Framing is NO-CRC4, Line Code is HDB3, Clock Source is Line Primary.
  CRC Threshold is 320. Reported from firmware  is 320.
  Data in current interval (137 seconds elapsed):
 0 Line Code Violations, 0 Path Code Violations
 29 Slip Secs, 0 Fr Loss Secs, 0 Line Err Secs, 0 Degraded Mins
 29 Errored Secs, 0 Bursty Err Secs, 0 Severely Err Secs, 0 Unavail 
Secs


Warm Regards, 
Vinay Kumar
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
/archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20110224/6c276441/attachment-0001.html


--

___
CCIE_Voice mailing list
CCIE_Voice@onlinestudylist.com
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice


End of CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 60, Issue 152
***
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME Transcoder for CUE

2010-10-12 Thread Warren Heaviside (wheavisi)
I'm having trouble invoking a Transcoding resource for an HQ to BR2-CUE
call.  When calling HQ to BR2 I've verified the call is established
using G729.  When RNA forwarding to CUE it goes fast busy due to not
invoking a Transcoder for G729/G711.  I can't see what's missing below.
I've included a show sccp at the bottom.  Thanks,

 

Warren

 

 

dspfarm

 dsp services dspfarm

!

voice-card 2

!

!

!

voice service voip 

 clid network-provided

 allow-connections h323 to h323

 allow-connections h323 to sip

 allow-connections sip to h323

 allow-connections sip to sip

 fax protocol cisco 

 h323

  h225 timeout setup 3

  no h225 timeout keepalive

 sip

  bind control source-interface GigabitEthernet0/0

  bind media source-interface GigabitEthernet0/0

!

!

!

voice class codec 1

 codec preference 1 g711ulaw

 codec preference 2 g711alaw

 codec preference 3 g729r8

 codec preference 4 g729br8

!

!

!

!

voice class h323 1

  h225 timeout tcp establish 3

!

!

!

!

voice class custom-cptone leave

 dualtone conference

  frequency 700

  cadence 300 250

!

voice class custom-cptone join

 dualtone conference

  frequency 900

  cadence 300 50 300 50

! 

!

!

!

!

!

!

voice register global

 system message SRST mode in effect

!

!

voice translation-rule 852

 rule 1 /.*\(4...\)/ /\1/

!

voice translation-rule 999

 rule 1 // // type any national plan any unknown

!

!

voice translation-profile in

 translate called 852

!

voice translation-profile national

 translate calling 999

 translate called 999

!

!

!

!

!

!

username wheavisi password 0 htts123

archive

 log config

  hidekeys

! 

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

interface GigabitEthernet0/0

 ip address 172.16.184.63 255.255.255.128

 duplex auto

 speed auto

 media-type rj45

 h323-gateway voip interface

 h323-gateway voip id GK ipaddr 172.16.184.78 1719

 h323-gateway voip h323-id CME

 h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 852

 h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 172.16.184.63

!

interface GigabitEthernet0/1

 no ip address

 shutdown

 duplex auto

 speed auto

 media-type rj45

!

interface Content-Engine1/0

 no ip address

 shutdown

!

interface Service-Engine4/0

 ip unnumbered GigabitEthernet0/0

 service-module ip address 172.16.184.64 255.255.255.128

 service-module ip default-gateway 172.16.184.63

 no keepalive

!

ip forward-protocol nd

ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.184.1

ip route 172.16.184.64 255.255.255.255 Service-Engine4/0

ip http server

ip http authentication local

no ip http secure-server

ip http path flash:gui

!

!

!

no logging trap

!

!

!

!

!

tftp-server flash:P00307010200.bin

tftp-server flash:P00307010200.loads

tftp-server flash:P00307010200.sb2

tftp-server flash:P00307010200.sbn

tftp-server flash:Desktops/320x212x16/SME_IP7965.png

tftp-server flash:Desktops/320x212x16/List.xml

tftp-server flash:Desktops/320x212x16/SME_IP7965_Thumbnail.png

!

control-plane

!

!

!

voice-port 0/0/0

!

voice-port 0/0/1

! 

!

mgcp fax t38 ecm

!

sccp local GigabitEthernet0/0

sccp ccm 172.16.184.63 identifier 1 version 7.0 

sccp

!

sccp ccm group 1

 associate ccm 1 priority 1

 associate profile 1 register htts-transcoder

 associate profile 2 register htts-conf

!

dspfarm profile 1 transcode  

 codec g711ulaw

 codec g711alaw

 codec g729ar8

 codec g729abr8

 codec g729r8

 codec g729br8

 maximum sessions 2

 associate application SCCP

!

dial-peer voice 911 pots

 translation-profile outgoing 911

 destination-pattern 911

 clid strip name

 no digit-strip

!

dial-peer voice 999 pots

 translation-profile outgoing 8digitANI

 destination-pattern 999

 progress_ind setup enable 3

!

dial-peer voice 1 voip

 voice-class codec 1

 voice-class h323 1

 incoming called-number .

! 

dial-peer voice 5009 voip

 preference 1

 destination-pattern 5009

 voice-class codec 1

 voice-class h323 1

 session target ipv4:172.16.184.135

 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric h245-signal

 ip qos dscp cs3 signaling

!

dial-peer voice 5 voip

 destination-pattern [23]...

 voice-class codec 1

 voice-class h323 1

 session target ras

 tech-prefix 2#

!

dial-peer voice 6 voip

 translation-profile incoming in

 voice-class codec 1

 voice-class h323 1

 session target ras

 incoming called-number 852.

!

dial-peer voice 7 voip

 destination-pattern 5009

 voice-class codec 1

 voice-class h323 1

 session target ras

 tech-prefix 2#

!

dial-peer voice 2300 voip

 preference 1

 destination-pattern [23]...

 voice-class codec 1

 session target ipv4:172.16.184.135

 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric h245-signal

 ip qos dscp cs3 signaling

!

dial-peer voice 5999 voip

 destination-pattern 5...

 b2bua

 session protocol sipv2

 session target ipv4:172.16.184.64

 incoming called-number .

 dtmf-relay sip-notify

 codec g711ulaw

 no vad

!

dial-peer voice 9 pots

 translation-profile outgoing 999

! 

!

presence

 presence call-list

!

gateway 

 timer receive-rtp 1200

!


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Prompt

2010-10-08 Thread Warren Heaviside (wheavisi)
Hi Mark,

Do a search on *.wav and look for try-again.wav

Warren

Warren Heavisidewheav...@cisco.com
ENGINEER.CUSTOMER SUPPORT
High Touch Technical Support
Phone: +1 408 853 7995

For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 11:57 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 56, Issue 93

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...


Today's Topics:

   1. How do you determine what the sccp version is (Randall Crumm)
   2. Proxy Domain Parameter on CUPS (Tamer Ismail)
   3. UCCX Prompt (Mark Holloway)
   4. MVA and MGCP (CCIE Voice GMAIL)
   5. Unity Connection - Error when trying to record a  customer
  greeting (Mark Holloway)


--

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 09:13:27 -0700
From: Randall Crumm randall.cr...@harmonicinc.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How do you determine what the sccp version
is
Message-ID:
9473270a65ca67458d287f3da3c9f37d11a3368...@exch-cms.hlit.local
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Hi is there a command to run to see the version of sccp on the router?

Thanks,
RC


--

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 18:22:22 +0200
From: Tamer Ismail tih...@gmail.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Proxy Domain Parameter on CUPS
Message-ID: 00a601cb6704$fddf48b0$f99dda...@com
Content-Type: text/plain;   charset=us-ascii

Hello Experts,
I found that I have to modify Proxy Domain parameter in Presence service
parameter.
And to set it as CUCM enterprise parameter.
Actually I don't know the value of that parameter.

Please advice.

Tamer,



--

Message: 3
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 10:17:38 -0700
From: Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com
To: CCIE Voice Maillist ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Prompt
Message-ID: 32e05610-e8c7-41fd-9400-8e2a8ced8...@markholloway.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Does anyone know if/what UCCX wav file says Please try again later

Thanks,
Mark



--

Message: 4
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 11:29:28 -0700
From: CCIE Voice GMAIL givemeccievoice2...@gmail.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA and MGCP
Message-ID: 000601cb6716$befe9d50$3cfbd7...@com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Hi everyone,

 

 

I am trying to figure out how I can configure an MGCP GW to work with
MVA.
I have a two sites, HQ (MGCP) and SB (H323) that I am configuring to
work
with MVA.  

 

I have successfully configure my SB router (H323) to allow MVA
capability
with this configuration:

 

Service Parameters  CallManager  Clusterwide Parameters - Mobility

Enable Mobile Voice Access - True

Mobile Voice Access Number - 3777

 

Media Resouces  Mobile Voice Access 

MVA Directory Number - 3777

Partition - None 

Locale - English United States

 

application 

service MVA http://172.21.51.204:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml

 

voice translation-rule 1

rule 1 /^1312301\(3777$\)/ /\1/

 

voice translation-profile MVA

translate called 1

 

dial-peer voice 6 pots

description IN MVA

incoming called 13123013777

service MVA

translation-profile out MVA

 

dial-peer voice 7 voip

description TO SUB MVA

destination-pattern 3777

session target ipv4:172.21.51.205

preference 1

codec g711ulaw

no vad

dtmf-relay h245-signal

 

dial-peer voice 8 voip

description TO PUB MVA

destination-pattern 3777

session target ipv4:172.21.51.204

preference 2

codec g711ulaw

no vad

dtmf-relay h245-signal

 

I have also configured a Remote Destination Profile and Remote
Destination
that is working completely.

 

I only have a single interface on the HQ gateway (MGCP) that can be used
for
communications with CUCM as my lab is hooked up to a corporate network.
Every time I try to add the H323 GW for this router to the CUCM database
I
get an error saying that a required field matches an existing database
entry.  I assume that this error is related to the fact that I have the
HQ
GW registered as MGCP with the same interface's IP address.

 

Is there any way to get this working with MGCP?

 

Thanks 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How do you determine what the sccp version is

2010-10-08 Thread Warren Heaviside (wheavisi)
Hi Randall,

You can see the sccp version in the show run.  If you want to know the
DSP firmware version you can use show voice dsp detail.

Warren

Warren Heavisidewheav...@cisco.com
ENGINEER.CUSTOMER SUPPORT
High Touch Technical Support
Phone: +1 408 853 7995

For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html


-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 11:57 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 56, Issue 93

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...


Today's Topics:

   1. How do you determine what the sccp version is (Randall Crumm)
   2. Proxy Domain Parameter on CUPS (Tamer Ismail)
   3. UCCX Prompt (Mark Holloway)
   4. MVA and MGCP (CCIE Voice GMAIL)
   5. Unity Connection - Error when trying to record a  customer
  greeting (Mark Holloway)


--

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 09:13:27 -0700
From: Randall Crumm randall.cr...@harmonicinc.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How do you determine what the sccp version
is
Message-ID:
9473270a65ca67458d287f3da3c9f37d11a3368...@exch-cms.hlit.local
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Hi is there a command to run to see the version of sccp on the router?

Thanks,
RC


--

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 18:22:22 +0200
From: Tamer Ismail tih...@gmail.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Proxy Domain Parameter on CUPS
Message-ID: 00a601cb6704$fddf48b0$f99dda...@com
Content-Type: text/plain;   charset=us-ascii

Hello Experts,
I found that I have to modify Proxy Domain parameter in Presence service
parameter.
And to set it as CUCM enterprise parameter.
Actually I don't know the value of that parameter.

Please advice.

Tamer,



--

Message: 3
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 10:17:38 -0700
From: Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com
To: CCIE Voice Maillist ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Prompt
Message-ID: 32e05610-e8c7-41fd-9400-8e2a8ced8...@markholloway.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Does anyone know if/what UCCX wav file says Please try again later

Thanks,
Mark



--

Message: 4
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 11:29:28 -0700
From: CCIE Voice GMAIL givemeccievoice2...@gmail.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA and MGCP
Message-ID: 000601cb6716$befe9d50$3cfbd7...@com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Hi everyone,

 

 

I am trying to figure out how I can configure an MGCP GW to work with
MVA.
I have a two sites, HQ (MGCP) and SB (H323) that I am configuring to
work
with MVA.  

 

I have successfully configure my SB router (H323) to allow MVA
capability
with this configuration:

 

Service Parameters  CallManager  Clusterwide Parameters - Mobility

Enable Mobile Voice Access - True

Mobile Voice Access Number - 3777

 

Media Resouces  Mobile Voice Access 

MVA Directory Number - 3777

Partition - None 

Locale - English United States

 

application 

service MVA http://172.21.51.204:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml

 

voice translation-rule 1

rule 1 /^1312301\(3777$\)/ /\1/

 

voice translation-profile MVA

translate called 1

 

dial-peer voice 6 pots

description IN MVA

incoming called 13123013777

service MVA

translation-profile out MVA

 

dial-peer voice 7 voip

description TO SUB MVA

destination-pattern 3777

session target ipv4:172.21.51.205

preference 1

codec g711ulaw

no vad

dtmf-relay h245-signal

 

dial-peer voice 8 voip

description TO PUB MVA

destination-pattern 3777

session target ipv4:172.21.51.204

preference 2

codec g711ulaw

no vad

dtmf-relay h245-signal

 

I have also configured a Remote Destination Profile and Remote
Destination
that is working completely.

 

I only have a single interface on the HQ gateway (MGCP) that can be used
for
communications with CUCM as my lab is hooked up to a corporate network.
Every time I try to add the H323 GW for this router to the CUCM database
I
get an error saying that a required field matches an existing database
entry.  I assume that this error is related to the fact that I have the
HQ
GW registered as MGCP with the same 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX challenges

2010-10-06 Thread Warren Heaviside (wheavisi)
It could be something as simple as having uploaded and changed your
script being referenced under Applications Application Management and
then not checking the box CSQ and placing CSQ between the quotes.  It
could also be the script itself.  Start with the ICD.aef as a known good
and build from there.  Make sense?

Warren

Warren Heavisidewheav...@cisco.com
ENGINEER.CUSTOMER SUPPORT
High Touch Technical Support
Phone: +1 408 853 7995

For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 2:20 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 56, Issue 66

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...


Today's Topics:

   1. using CIPC for PSTN Phone on Proctorlabs (Ryan Schwab)
   2. CCIE Remote LAB (Saeed IDris)
   3. CUCM - UCCS upgrading options (Saeed IDris)
   4. Fwd: CUCM - UCCS upgrading options (Saeed IDris)
   5. UCCX challenges (Pithog Oil)
   6. Re: UCCX challenges (Prashant Patel)


--

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 14:05:20 -0600
From: Ryan Schwab schwab...@shaw.ca
To: OSL Group ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] using CIPC for PSTN Phone on Proctorlabs
Message-ID: 01cb6591$cd983a00$68c8ae...@shaw.ca
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Hi,

 

Does anyone have any experience registering CIPC as their PSTN phone
while
using Proctorlabs? If so, which model did you register it as via the
http
control session?

 

Thanks,

Ryan

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
/archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20101006/3afb48b8/attachment-0001.html


--

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 23:44:26 +0300
From: Saeed IDris saee...@gmail.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Remote LAB
Message-ID:
aanlkti=t9onkq8cq9ph-cg4f7eu54mnwzjm-cfzms...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

*Hi everyone,*

* I'm seeking for a advice, I'm planning to prepare for the lab, if I
book
remote CCIE lab, what is kind of limitation and what is work around
(product)? *

*I'm planning to use in my lab:*

-  *Cisco ISR Routers *4 (Router HQ, Router BR1, Router BR2 
Router
PSTN).*

-  *Servers (CUCM, Unity Connection, Presence, UCCX).*

-  *Interface Telephony (E1 , T1)*
-  *Cisco IP Communicator (I will run it from Virtual machine).*
*Regards,*
*SAEED*
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
/archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20101006/9cd8d07f/attachment-0001.html


--

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 23:48:14 +0300
From: Saeed IDris saee...@gmail.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM - UCCS upgrading options
Message-ID:
aanlktikfkc+jypoy7mt+0kcltyuswvzg6g5afukba...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252

*Hi everyone,*

*I need to ask regarding Cisco UCCS, is it enough to include the below
part
number according to number of users in case this is new implementation:*

*Other question, one of my clients already is hosted CUCMBE version
6.5.1
but now they plan to upgrade their CUCM to version 8.0 ?..They didn?t
have
UCCS ?.what is the possible Scenario to achieve such upgrade?*

**

*Regards,*

*Saeed *
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
/archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20101006/0ab50a93/attachment-0001.html


--

Message: 4
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 23:51:31 +0300
From: Saeed IDris saee...@gmail.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fwd: CUCM - UCCS upgrading options
Message-ID:
aanlktinjtruhlmebc0=x18sybbmdtvk=rf-46h3ip...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252

 Oppss..sorry i forget to include the part number:

UCSS-UCM-1-10 UCSS for UCM for One Year - 10 users UCSS-UCM-1-100
UCSS
for UCM for One Year - 100 users

  -- Forwarded message --
From: Saeed IDris saee...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:48 PM
Subject: CUCM - UCCS upgrading options
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com


 *Hi everyone,*

*I need to ask regarding Cisco UCCS, is it 

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME Transcoder

2010-09-29 Thread Warren Heaviside (wheavisi)
Question on Transcoder configuration for CME.  When do you configure the
device to register as MTP+MAC vs. a random name?  Thanks in advance.
Examples below:

 

sccp local FastEthernet 0/1

sccp

sccp ccm 10.5.49.160 identifier 1

sccp ccm group 123

associate ccm 1 priority

associate profile 1 register mtp123456792012 MTP+MAC

keepalive retries 5

switchover method immediate

switchback method immediate

switchback interval 5

dspfarm profile 1 transcode

codec g711ulaw

codec g711alaw

codec g729ar8

codec g719abr8

maximum sessions 6

associate application sccp

 



 

sccp local GigabitEthernet0/0

sccp ccm 172.16.184.135 identifier 2 version 7.0 

sccp

!

sccp ccm group 2

 associate ccm 2 priority 1

 associate profile 1 register br2-trans  random name

!

!

dspfarm profile 1 transcode  

 codec g711ulaw

 codec g711alaw

 codec g729ar8

 codec g729abr8

 codec g729r8

 codec g729br8

 maximum sessions 2

 associate application SCCP

!

 

Warren Heavisidewheav...@cisco.com

ENGINEER.CUSTOMER SUPPORT

High Touch Technical Support

Phone: +1 408 853 7995

Office Hour 9 am - 5 pm Pacific Monday - Friday

 

For corporate legal information go to:

http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] So close, yet so far away..

2010-09-29 Thread Warren Heaviside (wheavisi)
The 30 day plan is a good onekeep at it.  :)

Warren

Warren Heavisidewheav...@cisco.com
ENGINEER.CUSTOMER SUPPORT
High Touch Technical Support
Phone: +1 408 853 7995
Office Hour 9 am - 5 pm Pacific Monday - Friday

For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html


-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 12:15 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 55, Issue 104

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...


Today's Topics:

   1. CME Transcoder (Warren Heaviside (wheavisi))
   2. So close, yet so far away.. (Mark Holloway)
   3. Re: CME Transcoder (Peter Slow)
   4. Re: So close, yet so far away.. (dew.s...@gmail.com)
   5. No enough bandwidht - Proctor Labs (Peterson Gomes)
   6. Re: No enough bandwidht - Proctor Labs (Cristobal Priego)
   7. Re: No enough bandwidht - Proctor Labs (Peterson Gomes)


--

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:07:32 -0700
From: Warren Heaviside (wheavisi) wheav...@cisco.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME Transcoder
Message-ID:

8ff1c5c3a84dea4a8a1b3c77d11214b50b8d3...@xmb-sjc-22b.amer.cisco.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Question on Transcoder configuration for CME.  When do you configure the
device to register as MTP+MAC vs. a random name?  Thanks in advance.
Examples below:

 

sccp local FastEthernet 0/1

sccp

sccp ccm 10.5.49.160 identifier 1

sccp ccm group 123

associate ccm 1 priority

associate profile 1 register mtp123456792012 MTP+MAC

keepalive retries 5

switchover method immediate

switchback method immediate

switchback interval 5

dspfarm profile 1 transcode

codec g711ulaw

codec g711alaw

codec g729ar8

codec g719abr8

maximum sessions 6

associate application sccp

 



 

sccp local GigabitEthernet0/0

sccp ccm 172.16.184.135 identifier 2 version 7.0 

sccp

!

sccp ccm group 2

 associate ccm 2 priority 1

 associate profile 1 register br2-trans  random name

!

!

dspfarm profile 1 transcode  

 codec g711ulaw

 codec g711alaw

 codec g729ar8

 codec g729abr8

 codec g729r8

 codec g729br8

 maximum sessions 2

 associate application SCCP

!

 

Warren Heavisidewheav...@cisco.com

ENGINEER.CUSTOMER SUPPORT

High Touch Technical Support

Phone: +1 408 853 7995

Office Hour 9 am - 5 pm Pacific Monday - Friday

 

For corporate legal information go to:

http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html

 

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
/archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20100929/15f4dd33/attachment-0001.html


--

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:09:01 -0700
From: Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com
To: osl osl ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] So close, yet so far away..
Message-ID: 19bda80a-3bf5-4920-be6d-2f9f3e8fb...@markholloway.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

FAIL. Based on my score report it was not by much. I will go back in 30
days to try again. It was my first Voice attempt. Next time I will go to
San Jose instead of RTP just because it's closer. Although, the proctor
in RTP was very nice and helpful. I wish she would go to San Jose.




--

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:41:15 -0400
From: Peter Slow peter.s...@gmail.com
To: Warren Heaviside (wheavisi) wheav...@cisco.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME Transcoder
Message-ID:
aanlktimylbdcq0g-epijzbrxqp+qpd8194_jb-j3q...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

the MAC address only needs to be used for the old style transcoders
that used the original PVDMs. on these types of devices, there was no
sccp group / associate profile 1 register command TO configure the
name it'd register as.

the people that did all the documentation kept that practice alive
unwittingly when putting together the new documentation.  in reality,
with PVDM2 / 3 type devices, you can always use whatever name you
want, as long as it's not past the maximum length and uses allowed
characters... this goes for CME and CUCM configurations. the only
exception is the CMM, because

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 4A, task 4.4 Trouble with T1

2010-09-23 Thread Warren Heaviside (wheavisi)
Did you try removing?:

mgcp bind control source-interface 
mgcp bind media source-interface 

Warren

Warren Heavisidewheav...@cisco.com
ENGINEER.CUSTOMER SUPPORT
High Touch Technical Support
Phone: +1 408 853 7995
Office Hour 9 am - 5 pm Pacific Monday - Friday

For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 4:33 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 55, Issue 92

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: CCIE Voice PASSED !!! (Tom)
   2. VPIM broadcast from UC to CUE (vcciev)
   3. Lab 4A, task 4.4 Trouble with T1 (Ilya Rubinchik)
   4. Re: Lab 4A, task 4.4 Trouble with T1 (Erik Goppel)


--

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 07:41:53 +0400
From: Tom tom.c...@gmail.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice PASSED !!!
Message-ID:
aanlktinnjn4f_8jqymx8ovdqp=bhszsu49ov2ixus...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Dear All,

I suggest all the ccie voice candidate should buy ip expert ccie voice
workbook vol 1 and 2.

IP  expert workbook really complex and  awesome to go beyond ccie Lab.I
felt
ccie voice lab exam was much simpler than those workbooks.Once you
finished
each IP expert workbook lab (lab 1 to 10) without any refernce and  in
the
proper time , you are ready to go for the exam.

I had  never attend any ccie voice bootcamp as I was unable to manage
the
cost for that.
But What I did was arranged entire Lab including CUE with me at home.

I really appreciate the ip expert team for  the way they made  such
wonderful and strong CCIE Voice Workbooks.


Regards
Tom
CCIE # 27003 (Voice)






On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Tom tom.c...@gmail.com wrote:

 I wanted to let everyone know that I passed my CCIE Voice Today!!
  I couldnt believe it!  I wanted to thank everyone from this list that
 helped out in my studying forthe last one Year. Thank you all
again

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
/archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20100923/cd684776/attachment-0001.html


--

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 17:09:06 +0800
From: vcciev vcc...@gmail.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VPIM broadcast from UC to CUE
Message-ID:
aanlktim-+2+jrckgmffsgtsbs-grxu7a56a-w_v5h...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Hi,

  When I send message from UC to CUE at the voicemail broadcast
vpim-id
configured at CUE, CUE replies

  Status: 5.1.1 (Mailbox does not exist)

  If the VPIM id is configured as general delivery mailbox, it works.

  But it doesn't work if I configure
  1) the VPIM id as a PDL number
  2) not to configure any object associated to the VPIM id

  Please help. Thanks.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
/archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20100923/6894bf52/attachment-0001.html


--

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 11:21:07 +
From: Ilya Rubinchik ilya.rubinc...@followmars.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 4A, task 4.4 Trouble with T1
Message-ID:
53570d63f48a224b910f4ca40f5b7427037a4...@mars2.followmars.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r

Hi, All!

I faced a weird trouble with my HQ T1 connection doing 4.4 task.
T1 link looks be flapping: every 5 minutes it came up 10 seconds and
then falls again, with RAI errors on PSTN router console, and this
status on HQ side:

HQ-RTR#sh isdn status
Global ISDN Switchtype = primary-ni
ISDN Serial0/0/0:23 interface
dsl 0, interface ISDN Switchtype = primary-ni
Layer 1 Status:
DEACTIVATED
Layer 2 Status:
TEI = 0, Ces = 1, SAPI = 0, State = TEI_ASSIGNED
Layer 3 Status:
0 Active Layer 3 Call(s)
Active dsl 0 CCBs = 0
The Free Channel Mask:  0x
Number of L2 Discards = 0, L2 Session ID = 0
Total Allocated ISDN CCBs = 0

HQ-RTR#sh isdn service
PRI Channel Statistics:
ISDN Se0/0/0:23, Channel [1-24]
  Configured Isdn Interface (dsl) 0
   Channel 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I've got a new favorite number!

2010-09-15 Thread Warren Heaviside (wheavisi)
Way to go Mike

Warren

Warren Heavisidewheav...@cisco.com
ENGINEER.CUSTOMER SUPPORT
High Touch Technical Support
Phone: +1 408 853 7995
Office Hour 9 am - 5 pm Pacific Monday - Friday

For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 6:59 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 55, Issue 56

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Layer 2 Overhead brainstorm (Daniel Berlinski)
   2. Re: SCCP to SIP conversion on CME (groganhockey)
   3. I've got a new favorite number! (groganhockey)
   4. Re: I've got a new favorite number! (Amp)
   5. Re: I've got a new favorite number! (Amy Ryan)


--

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 07:15:53 +1200
From: Daniel Berlinski dberlin...@gmail.com
To: ShinGei Yong shingei.y...@gmail.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Layer 2 Overhead brainstorm
Message-ID:
aanlkti=zzucfkjqzktu4ynhtzffha9mup9szjr9xo...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Not confuse.

Ben Ng himself talks about his preference in this link
https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3010632

As he is the one who designs this exam, I think it is safe to follow his
suggestions.

On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 7:08 AM, ShinGei Yong
shingei.y...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi all,

 This is obviously an old question has been repeated N times, but
varies 
 varies answer anywhere.

 According to the QoS SRND, page 1-15 stated:

 * Multilink PPP (MLP) add 13bytes of layer 2 overhead.
 * Frame Relay adds 4 bytes of Layer 2 overhead; Frame Relay with
FRF.12
 adds 8 bytes.

 My first question is, is this MLP included the the FR overhead as
well? So
 MLP (9 bytes) + FR (4 bytes) = 13 bytes

 According to Cisco web page: VoIP Per Call Bandwidth consumption, 6
bytes
 is selected for MLP overhead, which one should follow?

 Per Call Bandwidth
Consumptionhttp://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk698/technologies_tec
h_note09186a0080094ae2.shtml

 Second question is, what is the layer 2 overhead for MLP w/ LFI?

 According to Cisco End-to-End QoS Network Design book,under chapter
16, the
 MLP listed here is 10 bytes, + 3 for MLP LFI, total would be 13 bytes
for
 MLP LFI.

 Confuse?

 Shingei

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please
 visit www.ipexpert.com


-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
/archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20100915/d14b9fc4/attachment-0001.html


--

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:25:16 -0500
From: groganhockey groganhoc...@gmail.com
To: linuxboss.9 linuxbos...@gmail.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SCCP to SIP conversion on CME
Message-ID:
aanlktiknjpqw_h9bpm9vmec67exjeo+vw10beodp_...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Awesome..can't quite see straight today.

Glad to hear that you got it working. I do believe I saw (in the
IPExpert
blog after the CCIE Voice techtorial?) that Ben Ng stated that the
phones
would be setup with the correct firmware, so conversion shouldn't be an
issue.

Always good to know the process, though.

mike


On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 2:11 PM, linuxboss.9 linuxbos...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Amy..Brian..Mike et all,

 Thanks to all for your responses.

 no create profile
 create profile

 commands under voice register global resolved the issue.

 I provided wrong tftp-server parameters before. Instead of cleaning it
I
 tried to troubleshoot it in the existing state which took around 5
hours.
 Nevertheless a good exercise. Now I am SCCP-SIP conversion specialist
:-)

 Have a wonderful day !

 -Shrini




 On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Brian Valentine
bkvalent...@gmail.comwrote:

 Gig0/0.11 is 10.21.200.1?  You might want to make that the source
 address for your tftp server.

 Looks like the LOAD statement is already there, but you need to serve
 the files via tftp.  you also need an ntp server command under voice
 register global.  Make sure the firmware files are served up using
the
 tftp-server global config commands.

 I will typically look in the 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GateKeeper Problems

2010-08-28 Thread Warren Heaviside (wheavisi)
When interpreting SDI traces and you see NoPotentialMatchesExist it's
a bit misleading.  What it actually means is no more potential matches
exist and the Digit Analysis process is complete and has made a match.  

Warren

Warren Heavisidewheav...@cisco.com
ENGINEER.CUSTOMER SUPPORT
High Touch Technical Support
Phone: +1 408 853 7995
Office Hour 9 am - 5 pm Pacific Monday - Friday

For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html


-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2010 1:41 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 54, Issue 95

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: GateKeeper Problems (ccieid1ot)
   2. Re: GateKeeper Problems (Pavan)
   3. Proctorlabs.com is not loading (Aug 28,   1600 hours EST)
  (David Lee)
   4. Re: Proctorlabs.com is not loading (Aug 28,   1600 hours EST)
  (David Lee)
   5. proctor lab down ??? (Erwan Erwan)


--

Message: 1
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 13:12:15 -0500
From: ccieid1ot ccieid...@gmail.com
To: Josmar Ramirez jrami...@ccsinet.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com,
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GateKeeper Problems
Message-ID:
aanlktimvnzvdwu+o_hcp0-j57hfgjgqssexs4gwoq...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Yes, digit manipulation or sig dig 4.

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Josmar Ramirez
jrami...@ccsinet.comwrote:

 Of course I meant on the incoming digits on the ccm trunck

 - Original Message -
 From: Josmar Ramirez
 To: 'edot...@ams.net' edot...@ams.net; 'pav.c...@gmail.com' 
 pav.c...@gmail.com; 'ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com' 
 ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com; 'dcrayto...@comcast.net' 
 dcrayto...@comcast.net
 Cc: 'ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com' ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
  Sent: Fri Aug 27 22:39:20 2010
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GateKeeper Problems

 On the callmanager make sure you set the significant digits to 4 so
that it
 strips the 1# when it hits the trunk on ccm. Careful this might break
any
 teho config that you might be sending to ccm.


 - Original Message -
 From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
 ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
 To: Pavan pav.c...@gmail.com; ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com

 ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com; dcrayto...@comcast.net 
 dcrayto...@comcast.net
 Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Sent: Fri Aug 27 21:55:40 2010
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GateKeeper Problems

 Are you doing any digit translation to remove the prefix. That was
tripping
 me up.
 Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

 -Original Message-
 From: Pavan pav.c...@gmail.com
 Sender: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
 Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 20:19:04
 To: dcrayto...@comcast.netdcrayto...@comcast.net
 Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.comccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GateKeeper Problems

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please
 visit www.ipexpert.com


 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please
 visit www.ipexpert.com
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
/archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20100828/e8fb1298/attachment-0001.html


--

Message: 2
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 13:25:46 -0500
From: Pavan pav.c...@gmail.com
To: DeShon Crayton dcrayto...@gmail.com
Cc: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com,
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GateKeeper Problems
Message-ID: 0bb72b5d-bb5d-4a38-a909-44eabddf6...@gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Well looks like either the css did not take effect(i.e. No reset issued
after change) or no tp exists.
Can you post the complete da signals.
The little bit you posted doesnt help.


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE #26721 - I PASSED!

2010-08-17 Thread Warren Heaviside (wheavisi)
Hey Matthew congrats and I'm not a bit surprised.  You've set the bar
awfully high for the rest of us though!  First shot at it and all.

Warren

Warren Heavisidewheav...@cisco.com
ENGINEER.CUSTOMER SUPPORT
High Touch Technical Support
Phone: +1 408 853 7995
Office Hour 9 am - 5 pm Pacific Monday - Friday

For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 3:20 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 54, Issue 60

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...


Today's Topics:

   1. 3750 Sw - Queuing Threshold2  Threshold1. What   would happen
  ? (Pavan K)
   2. Gatekeeper-Controlled ICT  MTP (groganhockey)
   3. CCIE #26721 - I PASSED! (Matthew Berry)
   4. Re: CCIE #26721 - I PASSED! (Ryan Barnum)
   5. Re: CCIE #26721 - I PASSED! (Ohamien Uhakheme)
   6. Re: CCIE #26721 - I PASSED! (Wayne Lawson)
   7. Re: CCIE #26721 - I PASSED! (Graham Hopkins)
   8. Re: CCIE #26721 - I PASSED! (Matthew Hall)


--

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:15:39 -0500
From: Pavan K pav.c...@gmail.com
To: osl osl ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com,
cisco-v...@puck.nether.net
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 Sw - Queuing Threshold2  Threshold1.
Whatwould happen ?
Message-ID:
aanlktikqvk-o3=ygm=nxcs5ftehh+2opak2-bzgu4...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Folks,

When Configuring QOS Thresholds on the 3750 Switch,
I noticed that the switch allows us to configure Threshold 2 to be a
lower
number than Threshold 1


What would happen in this scenario ?

Would COS/DSCP levels assigned to Threshold 2 be dropped at 10% while
those
assigned to Threshold 1 be dropped at 20%
or
Something else ?


HQ-SW(config)#mls qos srr-queue input thres
HQ-SW(config)#mls qos srr-queue input threshold 1 20 10
HQ-SW(config)#do sh mls qos input-q
Queue :   1   2
--
buffers   :90  10
bandwidth :  90  10
priority  : 10   0
threshold1:  *20* 100
threshold2:  *10* 100


-- 
- Pavan
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
/archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20100817/4b7a74ae/attachment-0001.html


--

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:13:13 -0500
From: groganhockey groganhoc...@gmail.com
To: OSL Group ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper-Controlled ICT  MTP
Message-ID:
aanlktikmosrzncf9t+tf2cgy_kd0fdw40o-tfw=kz...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

All,

I'm trying to understand a behavior I'm seeing in setting up a
GK-controlled
ICT between UCM clusters.

When I place a call across the GK-ICT, the receiving cluster attempts to
allocate an MTP for the call.
On the trunk:
MTP Required is not checked
Inbound/Outbound Fast Start are not checked


From reviewing the traces, I see the MediaManager and
MediaTerminationPointControl services working to allocate an MTP, so it
does
not appear to be a transcoding issue. It appears that the software MTP
allocation fails and the system allocates a HW transcoder.

This is confirmed if I set the regions to all G711. The call still
invokes a
transcoder, but the streams are both reported as g711u.

If I take the transcoders offline, the call completes without the
transcoder, with the media stream directly between the two phones,
albeit
there are supplementary services issues.

Is this a function of the GK-ICT in general? Or is the UCM trying to add
an
MTP for additional capabilities?

Any thoughts are welcome while I continue to test.

mike
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
/archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20100817/43c930c8/attachment-0001.html


--

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:05:53 -0500
From: Matthew Berry ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com
To: CCIE Voice OSL ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE #26721 - I PASSED!
Message-ID: af215e97-882f-4988-aab4-4a4ce6ba7...@gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

I just got my score report. I passed guys.

More follow-up to come later.  Right now I'm now on cloud 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS bandwidth calculations

2010-08-15 Thread Warren Heaviside (wheavisi)
Here's what I have in my notes on QOS BW calculations.  I also included
a formula for LFI when using FRF.12. 

The bandwidth is calculated as follows for Frame Relay:

L2 overhead= 11 bytes
IP/UDP/RTP= 2 bytes
G729= 20 bytes

Total= 33 bytes per packet
bits per packet= 8
50 packets per second

so 33 X 8 X 50 = 13.2kbps (round up to 14Kbps per call)

__

LFI Calculation:

When using FRF.12 (auto qos voip or auto qos voip trust) you will
need to calculate the actual fragment size in Bytes using the following
formula:

Fragment size=(PVC Link speed X 10ms) divided by 8

Example (56k X 10) divided by 8 = 70 Bytes


_

Warren Heavisidewheav...@cisco.com
ENGINEER.CUSTOMER SUPPORT
High Touch Technical Support
Phone: +1 408 853 7995
Office Hour 9 am - 5 pm Pacific Monday - Friday

For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html


-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2010 9:00 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 54, Issue 53

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...


Today's Topics:

   1. Is this workable for the lab (Pithog Oil)
   2. Re: QoS bandwidth calculations (Daniel Berlinski)
   3. Service URLs (Brian Valentine)
   4. Unable to reload the CUE license file (David Lee)
   5. Re: Service URLs (Miron Kobelski)
   6. SIP phones and CUCM again (Duncan Hamilton-Walker)


--

Message: 1
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 12:47:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Pithog Oil pithog...@yahoo.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Is this workable for the lab
Message-ID: 519887.49740...@web120411.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

putting my CFA CSS ACTIVATION POLICY to with activating device/line css 

so i will not need to use css whenever am doing a voicemail config or
CFUR.

Pithog oil


  
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
/archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20100814/6442cafb/attachment-0001.html


--

Message: 2
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 10:08:58 +1200
From: Daniel Berlinski dberlin...@gmail.com
To: Stutz, Bernhard st...@pandacom.de
Cc: OSL Group ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS bandwidth calculations
Message-ID:
aanlktikn=nkddfjo5khp97uthtdsh2eoemqhepoes...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

As a suggestion I would check for the overheads sizing at page 33 of QoS
SRND and for the formulas I would check UCM7 SRND page 134
HTH
Daniel

On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Stutz, Bernhard st...@pandacom.de
wrote:

  Hi,

 that's what i found at proctorlabs solutions. That's why i am asking,
i
 want to know for sure how to calculate these values.

 cheers,
 Bernhard

 --
 *Von:* Trying 2nd CCIE [mailto:dukelon...@gmail.com]
 *Gesendet:* Sa 14.08.2010 15:41
 *An:* Stutz, Bernhard
 *Cc:* OSL Group
 *Betreff:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS bandwidth calculations

 Hi,

 What about the default 10ms sampling rate? What is the calculation
formula?

 Thanks and Regards,
 John

 On 14 August 2010 21:36, Stutz, Bernhard st...@pandacom.de wrote:

  Hi,

 Has somebody found an overview of actual bandwidth consumption
including
 L2 overhead per packet?

 What i know so far is following:

 all at 20ms sampling rate
 When FRF.12 LFI and RTP:
  L2 (FR)  = 7 bytes
  IP/UDP/RTP = 40 bytes
 ilbc codec =38 bytes

  When FRF.12 LFI and cRTP:
 L2(FR) = 7bytes
 IP/UDP/RTP = 2bytes
  G729 codec = 20 bytes

 when MLP LFI and cRTP:
 L2(FR) = 9bytes
 IP/UDP/RTP = 2bytes
 G729 codec = 20 bytes


 cheers,
 Bernhard

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please
 visit www.ipexpert.com



 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please
 visit www.ipexpert.com


-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP Fallback in SRST

2010-08-08 Thread Warren Heaviside (wheavisi)
That is a really good question Matthew.  It's been one I've had and put
on the back burner for awhile.  So here's what I think based on the
docs and poking around in config.


__

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk1077/technologies_configuration_exampl
e09186a008012ecc6.shtml

From the above doc link:
R(config)#application
R(config-app)#global
R(config-app-global)#service alternate Default

(H.323 is the default signaling protocol)

_

From a lab router (ignore the hostname):

CUBE(config)#application
CUBE(config-app)#global
CUBE(config-app-global)#service alternate ?
  dsapp
  ipsla-responder
  clid_authen
  clid_col_npw_npw
  AFW_THIRD_PARTY_CC
  CALLIndSs_SErviCe
  Default
  RetrProxy
  CTAPP
  clid_authen_col_npw
  fax_hop_on
  ipsla-testcall
  app-b-acd-aa
  clid_authen_npw
  session
  app-b-acd
  clid_authen_collect
  clid_col_npw_3
  WORD  Name of the alternate service



So it looks like the command ccm-manager fallback-mgcp without the
commands we're wondering about
Will implicitly cause the router/gateway to fallback to H.323.  With the
command it explicitly
Causes fallback to H.323.

The reason for the command in question even existing seems to be based
on the ability to fallback to an
Application other than the default (H.323).  service alternate
XX.  

Your thoughts?




Warren Heavisidewheav...@cisco.com
ENGINEER.CUSTOMER SUPPORT
High Touch Technical Support
Phone: +1 408 853 7995
Office Hour 9 am - 5 pm Pacific Monday - Friday

For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html


-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2010 8:09 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 54, Issue 32

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...


Today's Topics:

   1. MGCP Fallback in SRST (Matthew Berry)
   2. Re: MGCP Fallback in SRST (Miron Kobelski)
   3. Re: Cbarge and SRST (Again) (Again) and (Again)   what am I
  missing??? (cisco voip)


--

Message: 1
Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2010 19:31:04 -0500
From: Matthew Berry ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com
To: CCIE Voice OSL ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP Fallback in SRST
Message-ID: 5b736afb-1912-49fe-aeb1-6ae0c4f67...@gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Guys -

I need some clarification on MGCP configuration for SRST.  Looking
through Cisco documentation, I see the following snippet from time to
time:

application
  global
service alternate Default

In my studies the past year, I have never used those commands and my
testing has always worked as expected.  Typically, I will configure the
following:

mgcp
mgcp call-agent 10.10.210.11 service-type mgcp version 0.1
mgcp dtmf-relay voip codec all mode out-of-band
no mgcp timer receive-rtcp
mgcp bind control source-interface Loopback0
mgcp bind media source-interface Loopback0
!
ccm-manager switchback immediate
ccm-manager fallback-mgcp 
ccm-manager redundant-host 10.10.210.10
ccm-manager mgcp
ccm-manager music-on-hold

HQ-RTR#show ccm-manager fallback-mgcp 
Current active Call Manager:10.10.210.11
MGCP Fallback mode: Enabled/OFF 
Last MGCP Fallback start time:  None
Last MGCP Fallback end time:None

Can anyone shed light on the commands I mentioned at the beginning of
this email?  

I understand that the command is supposed to let MGCP transition into
H.323 and terminate the L3 backhaul to CUCM.  But does it actually work
and is it actually required?

Thanks,
 
Matthew Berry
ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com
http://ciscovoiceguru.com

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
/archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20100807/f5d64c7c/attachment-0001.html


--

Message: 2
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 04:37:33 +0200
From: Miron Kobelski findko...@gmail.com
To: Matthew Berry ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com
Cc: CCIE Voice OSL ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP Fallback in SRST
Message-ID:

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPC won't TFTP

2010-08-08 Thread Warren Heaviside (wheavisi)
All,

 

I'm working through Vol. 1 lab 13A (Presence).  Integration is complete.
In CUPS DiagnosticsSystem Dashboard shows all systems good.  Trouble is
the CUPC won't make it through the TFTP process.  After launching CUPC
I'm looking at HelpShow Server Health on the client itself.  The
connection/authentication to the CUPS itself is fine but it fails TFTP.
I've disabled IPS on my laptop and verified TFTP Server (CUCM) settings
in CUPS.  I'm discounting my home based 871 due to the physical phones
being able to TFTP.  Thanks,

 

Warren

 

Warren Heavisidewheav...@cisco.com

ENGINEER.CUSTOMER SUPPORT

High Touch Technical Support

Phone: +1 408 853 7995

Office Hour 9 am - 5 pm Pacific Monday - Friday

 

For corporate legal information go to:

http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RTMT for Dummies

2010-08-07 Thread Warren Heaviside (wheavisi)
Here's a place to start with RTMT.

http://cco/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/service/7_1_2/rtmt/RTMT.html

Warren Heavisidewheav...@cisco.com
ENGINEER.CUSTOMER SUPPORT
High Touch Technical Support
Phone: +1 408 853 7995
Office Hour 9 am - 5 pm Pacific Monday - Friday

For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 9:13 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 54, Issue 21

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: MGCP Debug Packets (Ashar Siddiqui)
   2. RTMT for Dummies (ccielabrat)
   3. Re: RTMT for Dummies (Miron Kobelski)
   4. Re: RTMT for Dummies (Tapan Gautam (tgautam))
   5. Re: RTMT for Dummies (Tanner Ezell)
   6. Unity message issue (Erwan Erwan)


--

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 22:07:00 +0100
From: Ashar Siddiqui siddas...@gmail.com
To: Miron Kobelski findko...@gmail.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP Debug Packets
Message-ID: 4c5c7974.4090...@gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
/archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20100806/309d50b7/attachment-0001.html


--

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 17:08:32 -0400
From: ccielabrat ccielab...@gmail.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RTMT for Dummies
Message-ID:
aanlkti=xg4qn1xqg-yuo99eh0henzwh5pub3q=xbc...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Can anyone point me towards a good RTMT link that will give the basics
of
how to collect a trace from CUCM 7.x ?
I'm looking into a GK related issue and what to see what messaging is
happening on the CUCM side.

I'm stumbling badly with RTMT.

Any help  or links are greatly appreciated.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
/archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20100806/0e61c594/attachment-0001.html


--

Message: 3
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 23:18:39 +0200
From: Miron Kobelski findko...@gmail.com
To: ccielabrat ccielab...@gmail.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RTMT for Dummies
Message-ID:
aanlkti=bnkyiumhuffvuwhjtco+9ngm7wpsmbn=lt...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

ssh to sub and issue:
file rail activelog /cm/trace/ccm/sdi recent

no quicker way :) no time for rtmt on exam.

regards
kobel
--
Sent from my mobile device.

On Aug 6, 2010 11:08 PM, ccielabrat ccielab...@gmail.com wrote:

Can anyone point me towards a good RTMT link that will give the basics
of
how to collect a trace from CUCM 7.x ?
I'm looking into a GK related issue and what to see what messaging is
happening on the CUCM side.

I'm stumbling badly with RTMT.

Any help  or links are greatly appreciated.



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please
visit www.ipexpert.com
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
/archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20100806/daa014c4/attachment-0001.html


--

Message: 4
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 14:20:00 -0700
From: Tapan Gautam (tgautam) tgau...@cisco.com
To: ccielabrat ccielab...@gmail.com,
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RTMT for Dummies
Message-ID:

a0cdbe69a8dd5d47af53c6c4bb2846f9099ea...@xmb-sjc-228.amer.cisco.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Try this

 

https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-9283

 

On a side note, RTMT will collect what is enabled on CUCM side. So make
sure that appropriate traces are turned on under CUCM Serviceability.

 

Hth,

Tapan

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of ccielabrat
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 4:09 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RTMT for Dummies

 

Can anyone point me towards a good RTMT link that will give the basics
of how to collect a trace from CUCM 7.x ?

I'm looking into a GK related issue and what to see what messaging is
happening on the CUCM side.

 

I'm 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SDI SDL trace interpretation

2010-08-07 Thread Warren Heaviside (wheavisi)
Here's the best place to start.  There's a good section on interpreting
traces.  The book is a bit dated but keep in mind the SDI and SDL trace
formats have not changed too much.  
 
Warren

http://my.safaribooksonline.com/1587050757

Warren Heavisidewheav...@cisco.com
ENGINEER.CUSTOMER SUPPORT
High Touch Technical Support
Phone: +1 408 853 7995
Office Hour 9 am - 5 pm Pacific Monday - Friday

For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html


-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2010 10:55 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 54, Issue 28

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 54, Issue 23 (Afzal Bhutta)


--

Message: 1
Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2010 13:55:14 -0400
From: Afzal Bhutta azhar.bhu...@gmail.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 54, Issue 23
Message-ID:
aanlktincycthurwrnzhqz-c4t0gh8c0mnzcp-rori...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

RTMT,
This is good suggestion to use,
ssh to sub/pub and issue:
admin:file tail activelog /cm/trace/ccm/sdi recent

My question is how we can read this file it is too long what section we
have
to focus on.
Any suggestion please,Thanks




On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 12:00 PM,
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.comwrote:

 Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

 You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
 than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...


 Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Unity message issue (Erwan Erwan)
   2. Re: RTMT for Dummies (Warren Heaviside (wheavisi))


 --

 Message: 1
 Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2010 08:44:43 -0700 (PDT)
 From: Erwan Erwan e_er...@yahoo.com
 To: Miron Kobelski findko...@gmail.com
 Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity message issue
 Message-ID: 437419.49818...@web120519.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

 what quota setting, u mean? related to  mask setting?

 --- On Sat, 8/7/10, Miron Kobelski findko...@gmail.com wrote:


 From: Miron Kobelski findko...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity message issue
 To: Erwan Erwan e_er...@yahoo.com
 Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Date: Saturday, August 7, 2010, 2:49 PM



 hi,
 i've seen this too and wasnt able to solve it. the message gets
recorded,
 you can listen to it, you get confirmation it was sent, but it never
gets tp
 the destination mailbox.
 note, that this is visible when caller is unknown to cuc. if you add
 calling number as an alternate extension or as another user, it works.
 i found one setting for checking quota for external caller, but have
not
 tried it yet.
 any other ideas?
 regards
 --
 Sent from my mobile device.

 On Aug 7, 2010 6:13 AM, Erwan Erwan e_er...@yahoo.com wrote:






 hi all,
 ?
 I configure Unity as usual,however this time?.
 ?
 When I called from BR-2 or PSTN and leave message to HQ and BR-1,?? it
said
 message left, but when I check the Voicemail is not there.
 ?
 but when?the call between HQ and BR-1 (message left is ok)
 ?
 What could I have missed in the config ?
 ?
 ?
 I check in Port Monitor, call hit the port in Unity when I left
message
 with PSTN and BR-2.
 ?
 tks

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please
 visit www.ipexpert.com






 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL:

/archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20100807/09774401/attachment-0001.html


 --

 Message: 2
 Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2010 08:49:19 -0700
 From: Warren Heaviside (wheavisi) wheav...@cisco.com
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RTMT for Dummies
 Message-ID

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] interface GigabitEthernet1/0/2

2010-07-30 Thread Warren Heaviside (wheavisi)
Two cents worth guys

Warren

interface GigabitEthernet1/0/2
 srr-queue bandwidth share 10 10 60 20   (When the expedite queue, queue
1 has a value other than 0 it is enabled.  So this overrides both
shaping and sharing
  for this queue on this port.
Queue 1 will always be serviced first until empty.  Unlike shaping where
the queue is
  limited to the amount defined,
sharing allows a queue to share unused buffer space from other queues if
available.)

Warren Heavisidewheav...@cisco.com
ENGINEER.CUSTOMER SUPPORT
Phone: +1 408 853 7995
Office Hour 9 am - 5 pm Pacific Monday - Friday

For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 5:48 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 53, Issue 143

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Layer 2 QOS (Jeff Cotter)
   2. Re: Layer 2 QOS (Matthew Berry)
   3. Re: Layer 2 QOS (Miron Kobelski)
   4. Re: First attempt (Ashar Siddiqui)


--

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:21:48 -0700
From: Jeff Cotter jcot...@voxns.com
To: Daniel Berlinski dberlin...@gmail.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Layer 2 QOS
Message-ID: 54cc1bd3093b6e41b86926c1657432f1a6264...@ssfex1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Interesting..Thanks Daniel great thought!

From: Daniel Berlinski [mailto:dberlin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 7:03 PM
To: Jeff Cotter
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Layer 2 QOS

In my opinion this is done by adjusting the buffer size for queue 1 and
applying it to a queue-set.  srr shape statement in my opinion means
nothing in relation to adjusting priority queue size.

http://onlinestudylist.com/archives/ccie_voice/2010-July/069398.html


On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Jeff Cotter
jcot...@voxns.commailto:jcot...@voxns.com wrote:
How would you enable the priority queue AND make sure queue 1 has 10% of
the bandwidth.  The documentation states that if the priority queue in
enabled, shape and share configuration for that queue is ignored.  So
how do you accomplish this without using Shape command.

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please visit www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
/archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20100729/df9a012e/attachment-0001.html


--

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:44:46 -0500
From: Matthew Berry ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com
To: Jeff Cotter jcot...@voxns.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com,
Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Layer 2 QOS
Message-ID: af0891c2-aa9c-44c3-8765-42b89b7d2...@gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

So what's the answer? Vik/Amy - Opinions?


Matthew Berry

**Sent from my iPhone**
Skype/Twitter: ciscovoiceguru
Google Voice: +1 612 424 5044

On Jul 29, 2010, at 21:21, Jeff Cotter jcot...@voxns.com wrote:

 Interesting??Thanks Daniel great thought!
 
  
 
 From: Daniel Berlinski [mailto:dberlin...@gmail.com] 
 Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 7:03 PM
 To: Jeff Cotter
 Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Layer 2 QOS
 
  
 
 In my opinion this is done by adjusting the buffer size for queue 1
and applying it to a queue-set.  srr shape statement in my opinion means
nothing in relation to adjusting priority queue size.
 
 http://onlinestudylist.com/archives/ccie_voice/2010-July/069398.html
 
 
 
 On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Jeff Cotter jcot...@voxns.com
wrote:
 
 How would you enable the priority queue AND make sure queue 1 has 10%
of the bandwidth.  The documentation states that if the priority queue
in enabled, shape and share configuration for that queue is ignored.  So
how do you accomplish this without using Shape command.
 
 
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please visit 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QoS Priority and buffer size

2010-07-24 Thread Warren Heaviside (wheavisi)
Have a look at the marked up config below.  The config is the result of
running auto qos voip trust with just a bit of tweaking afterward.  If
anyone has corrections or comments that would be great.  Hope it helps.

Warren
!
!
mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 26 32 46 48 56  (this maps a COS to DSCP
value)


mls qos srr-queue input bandwidth 90 10(this is the weighted ratio
not percentage that the queues are serviced to send packets from each
queue)


mls qos srr-queue input threshold 1 8 16   (this is the percentage at
which input/ingress queue 1 will begin tail dropping for thresholds 1
and 2.  Threshold 3 is not configurable and
has a value of 100% assigned
to it so it is not shown)


mls qos srr-queue input threshold 2 34 66   (this is the percentage at
which input/ingress queue 2 will begin tail dropping for thresholds 1
and 2.  Threshold 3 is not configurable and
has a value of 100% assigned
to it so it is not shown)
 
mls qos srr-queue input buffers 67 33 (this is where you define how
the two input/ingress queues will share the buffer space between them
using percentage)


mls qos srr-queue input cos-map queue 1 threshold 2  1   (this is
mapping COS's to either input/ingress queues 1 or 2 and to thresholds
1,2 or 3 where 3 is the highest 
mls qos srr-queue input cos-map queue 1 threshold 3  0threshhold and
3 has the lowest drop probability)
mls qos srr-queue input cos-map queue 2 threshold 1  2
mls qos srr-queue input cos-map queue 2 threshold 2  4 6 7
mls qos srr-queue input cos-map queue 2 threshold 3  3 5


mls qos srr-queue input dscp-map queue 1 threshold 2  9 10 11 12 13 14
15   (this is mapping DSCP's to either input/ingress queues 1 or 2 and
to thresholds 1,2 or 3 where 3 is the highest
mls qos srr-queue input dscp-map queue 1 threshold 3  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
threshold and 3 has the lowest drop probability)
mls qos srr-queue input dscp-map queue 1 threshold 3  32
mls qos srr-queue input dscp-map queue 2 threshold 1  16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23
mls qos srr-queue input dscp-map queue 2 threshold 2  33 34 35 36 37 38
39 48
mls qos srr-queue input dscp-map queue 2 threshold 2  49 50 51 52 53 54
55 56
mls qos srr-queue input dscp-map queue 2 threshold 2  57 58 59 60 61 62
63
mls qos srr-queue input dscp-map queue 2 threshold 3  24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31
mls qos srr-queue input dscp-map queue 2 threshold 3  40 41 42 43 44 45
46 47


mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 1 threshold 3  5 (this is
mapping COS's to one of four output/egress queues and to thresholds 1,2
or 3 where 3 is the highest 
mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 2 threshold 3  3 6 7  threshhold
and 3 has the lowest drop probability)
mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 3 threshold 3  2 4
mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 4 threshold 2  1
mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 4 threshold 3  0


mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue 1 threshold 3  40 41 42 43 44 45
46 47   (this is mapping DSCP's to one of four output/egress queues and
to thresholds 1,2 or 3 where 3 is the highest
mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue 2 threshold 3  24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31threshhold and 3 has the lowest drop probability)
mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue 2 threshold 3  48 49 50 51 52 53
54 55
mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue 2 threshold 3  56 57 58 59 60 61
62 63
mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue 3 threshold 3  16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23
mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue 3 threshold 3  32 33 34 35 36 37
38 39
mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue 4 threshold 1  8
mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue 4 threshold 2  9 10 11 12 13 14
15
mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue 4 threshold 3  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7



mls qos queue-set output 1 threshold 1 138 138 92 138  
mls qos queue-set output 1 threshold 2 138 138 92 400
mls qos queue-set output 1 threshold 3 36 77 100 318
mls qos queue-set output 1 threshold 4 20 50 67 400


mls qos queue-set output 2 threshold 1 149 149 100 149
mls qos queue-set output 2 threshold 2 118 118 100 235
mls qos queue-set output 2 threshold 3 41 68 100 272
mls qos queue-set output 2 threshold 4 42 72 100 242


mls qos queue-set output 1 buffers 10 10 26 54  (this is the percent
amount of buffer space for queue set 1 allocated to to each of the
four queues
 so in this case the
expedite queue 1 is getting 10%)


mls qos queue-set output 2 buffers 16 6 17 61   (this is the percent
amount of buffer space for queue set 2 allocated to to each of the
four queues)
 so in this case the
expedite queue 1 is getting 16%)


mls qos   (this turns on qos globally for the switch, but the auto QOS
macro does this)  
!
!
no file verify auto
spanning-tree mode pvst
spanning-tree extend system-id
!
vlan internal allocation policy ascending
!
! 
interface 

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Mobile Voice Access

2010-07-19 Thread Warren Heaviside (wheavisi)
Experts,

 

I'm configuring MVA and having the following issue:

 

PSTN call comes into HQ H.323 G/W from 415-888-4343.  Caller hears the
VXML script prompt to enter the Remote Destination (4158884343) followed
by pound, then a prompt for their PIN followed by #.  The next prompt is
to press 1# to place a call.  After the number is dialed I can see the
line appearance for HQ Phone x5002 go offhook but hear the Cisco reorder
verbiage your call cannot.  The number unsuccessfully being dialed
via MVA can be successfully dialed directly from the same HQ phone
x5002. My MVA number is 5009 in CUCM.  The POTS and VOIP dial peers
are below.  Thanks for looking.

 

dial-peer voice 5009 pots

 service ccm

 incoming called-number 5009

 no digit-strip

 

dial-peer voice 5000 voip

 destination-pattern 5...$

 voice-class codec 1

 session target ipv4:10.10.210.11

 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric

 no vad 

 

application

  service CCM http://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml

 

Warren Heavisidewheav...@cisco.com

ENGINEER.CUSTOMER SUPPORT

Phone: +1 408 853 7995

Office Hour 9 am - 5 pm Pacific Monday - Friday

 

For corporate legal information go to:

http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Offering to ProctorLabs Clients

2010-07-02 Thread Warren Heaviside (wheavisi)
Great idea Tyson, so long as it doesn't break or over complicate the
homes based VPN configuration (871 in my case).  Thanks,

Warren

Warren Heavisidewheav...@cisco.com
ENGINEER.CUSTOMER SUPPORT
Phone: +1 408 853 7995
Office Hour 9 am - 5 pm Pacific Monday - Friday

For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html


-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 3:27 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 53, Issue 11

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...


Today's Topics:

   1. Offering to ProctorLabs Clients (Tyson Scott)
   2. lab5 vol2 transformation over sip trunk (amr thabt)
   3. Re: Offering to ProctorLabs Clients
  (=?utf-8?B?Ymt2YWxlbnRpbmVAZ21haWwuY29t?=)
   4. Re: Offering to ProctorLabs Clients (Tyson Scott)


--

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 17:21:47 -0400
From: Tyson Scott tsc...@ipexpert.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Offering to ProctorLabs Clients
Message-ID: 005901cb1a2c$95013a80$bf03af...@com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Hey Voice Team,

 

We recently made some design changes to our Voice bootcamp offerings to
extend our PL infrastructure directly to the bootcamp phones.  Meaning
The
Voice candidates in our bootcamps are able to test QoS, SRST, and other
services offered at each branch site using the phones in the classes as
if
they were connected to the rack equipment.

 

We can extend this same service to you as voice customers but I first
wanted
to check into the interest of you all to see if there is interest in the
ability to do this. 

 

What it would provide is the phones that you have at your remote
location,
physical phones, would be able to appear as though they are directly
connected to the PL devices.  Now obviously this is going to add a lot
of
complexity that I will need to resolve so I want to first find if the
interest is there.

 

Please respond if interested.  I will test this with a few students once
we
have the infrastructure in place to support this capability.  It would
be
later next week.

 

Regards,

 

Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 RS, Security, and SP

Managing Partner / Sr. Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.

Mailto: tsc...@ipexpert.com

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208

Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat

eFax: +1.810.454.0130

 

IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand,
Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco
CCIE (RS, Voice, Security  Service Provider) certification(s) with
training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and
Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at
www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com
http://www.ipexpert.com/ 

 

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20100702/d7
4a03ef/attachment-0001.html

--

Message: 2
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2010 00:27:21 +0300
From: amr thabt amrth...@gmail.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab5 vol2 transformation over sip trunk
Message-ID:
aanlktikakk4u5i-ff6z8ih6wgb1dhc9qc5idquzlt...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Hi,
  I face a problem over a sip trunk, add transformation pattern
calling
and calles css under Outbound Calls (I uncheck use device pool.tcss..)

When I try to do tranformation for called and calling party under the rp
it
worked fine.

please advice
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20100703/3b
ec5b4b/attachment-0001.html

--

Message: 3
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 18:02:23 -0400
From: =?utf-8?B?Ymt2YWxlbnRpbmVAZ21haWwuY29t?=
bkvalent...@gmail.com
To: =?utf-8?B?VHlzb24gU2NvdHQ=?= tsc...@ipexpert.com,
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Offering to ProctorLabs Clients
Message-ID: 4c2e61dd.c9acdc0a.7c58.1...@mx.google.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

I think its easy to test with a simple acl on hq-rtr.

If br1phn2 is 192.168.5.13, my acl is 

ip