Re: iomega usb cdrw not recognized
On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Joerg Schilling wrote:
{
{ From: P [EMAIL PROTECTED]
{
{ Thanks again for the suggestion. I should have reported back that I=20
{ have it running now. I had to upgrade my cdrecord from v1.10-11 to=20
{ v1.11alpha24. Now everything works great.
{
{
{ Another proof, that the way most Linux ditributors act is wrong:
{
{ They distribute cdrecord-1.10 together with Linux-2.4
{
{ Although they should know that cdrecord -1.10 is sooo old that it cannot
{ know about the Linux-2.4 kernel bugs :-(
But then why do you call it v1.11alpha if it's not alpha quality code?
With this naming scheme one could reasonably assume that v1.10 is the
stable version and v1.11alpha is the development/unstable version and
so should not be included in a stable release of a distribution.
Denis
___
Denis Pelletier
Étudiant au doctorat
sciences économiques, Université de Montréal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: iomega usb cdrw not recognized
On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Joerg Schilling wrote:
{ But then why do you call it v1.11alpha if it's not alpha quality code?=20
{ With this naming scheme one could reasonably assume that v1.10 is the=20
{ stable version and v1.11alpha is the development/unstable version and=20
{ so should not be included in a stable release of a distribution.
{
{ But cannot Linux-2.4 really called a development kernel?
Why do you talk about the series 2.4 of the Linux kernel? The discussion
is on the alpha name tage that you add to version 1.11 of cdrecord.
{ I believe that any cdrecord release is more stable than current Linux
{ kernels that brought even massive VM changes _after_ the official
{ release has been brought out.
Again, I don't see the link with the VM changes in the 2.4 Linux kernels.
You urge everyone to use the latest alpha release. This is very
inconsistent.
I beleive (and I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one) that there is noting
alpha about the latest v1.11 of cdrecord. If you would drop the alpha
name tag every Linux distribution that does not already include v1.11 in
their latest/next release would do so. The number of emails about problems
with v1.10 (on this list) would decrease.
Denis
___
Denis Pelletier
Étudiant au doctorat
sciences économiques, Université de Montréal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: burning problems..
On 12 Jun 2002, gabor wrote:
{ hi,
{
{ i have mandrake8.2 here...
{
{ i'm using a HP9100 ( 32read/8write/4rewrite ) eide cd-burner..
{
{ the problem is that i didn't manage to create a perfect cd yet..
{ the cd's mostly work, but aren't perfect..
{
{ in windows i have burned something like 300 cd's without problems..
{
{ in linux, i have to use the scsi emulation...
{
{ burning the cd's produce various errors, like:
{
{ -cdrecord wasn't able to blank an rw, which was burnt using the same
{ cdrecord.
{
{ -i burned the iso image of the first Mandrake82 cd. i mounted the iso
{ file, it was ok. after burning it, i got the following problem:
{
{ i went into my cd-directory ( /mnt/cdrom) and issued a simple 'ls'
{ command.. i got the following:
{ ls: .: Stale NFS file handle...
{ i can browse the cd for example with midnight commander, i can copy any
{ file from the cd to my harddisk.. i can even boot from that cd ( it's a
{ bootable one ).. but i can't 'ls' it, and there is a .rr_moved empty
{ folder on the cd, which shouldn't be there... there isn't a folder like
{ that in the iso image...
Hello,
I think your problem is related to supermount and has no link to cdrecord
and your cd-burner. Are you able to use 'ls' with a regular cd?
I can't help you with any supermount problem because it's one of the first
thing I disable on my Mandrake machine. If it's a supermount problem you
could send your question to http://www.mandrakeexpert.com (Mandrake
support channel).
Denis
___
Denis Pelletier
Étudiant au doctorat
sciences économiques, Université de Montréal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: priveledges
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Alexander Skwar wrote:
{ I have the same setup (Mandrake) as you, and those are my permissions:
{
{ [askwar@teich RPM]$ ls -la /usr/bin/cdrecord /dev/scd0
{ brw-rw1 askwar cdwriter 11, 0 Aug 30 11:54 /dev/scd0
{ -rwsr-s---1 root cdwriter 183324 Aug 2 20:56 /usr/bin/cdrecord*
{
{ Mandrake does some magic things with the /dev files, that's why
{ /dev/scd0 is owned by me.
The magic is called pam. I doubt that it's exclusive to Mandrake.
Denis
___
Denis Pelletier
Étudiant au doctorat
sciences économiques, Université de Montréal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cdrtools RPM
On Sat, 17 Nov 2001, Joerg Schilling wrote:
{ From: Danilo Godec [EMAIL PROTECTED]
{
{ On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Karol Pietrzak wrote:
{
{ I have created RPMs for the latest cdrtools (now 1.11a11) and
{ posted them on my website at
{ http://home.earthlink.net/~noodlez84/rpm_packages.html . I have
{ been doing this for the last couple of weeks, actually.
{
{ How about a src.rpm or a spec fiel? I have an alpha platform and I'd like
{ to build the new cdrtools...
{
{ Do you have any problem?
{
{ I don't understand your statement: cdrtools compiles out of the box
{ on ~ 30 different platforms. Linux/alpha and True64 included
The only thing available on his web site is a i386 binary rpm. What Danilo
would want is a src.rpm (or the spec file to build the src.rpm) so that he
could recompile the src.rpm on his alpha platform and get an alpha.rpm. I
guees that he is using an rpm based linux distribution on his alpha.
Denis
___
Denis Pelletier
Étudiant au doctorat
sciences économiques, Université de Montréal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Pioneer S201 vs A03
On Thu, 25 Oct 2001, Brian Sullivan wrote:
{ Thats not what I am claiming. I am just stating that
{ since the IDE bus and hard drive is under such a heavy
{ usage already that adding an extra 4.7 GB of
{ throughput to another IDE device on the bus could
[snip]
So put the DVD-R on another IDE bus like someone suggested earlier.
Denis
___
Denis Pelletier
Étudiant au doctorat
sciences économiques, Université de Montréal
an ordinary boy an ordinary name
but ordinary's just not good enough today
--Our Lady Peace, Superman's Dead
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is anyone using a Teac CDW516EB?
Hello, I'm about to buy a new CD-RW. My first idea was to buy a Plextor but considering the price, a Teac CDW516EB (16x10x32x ATAPI) seems a better buy. Is anyone using this model? A small question for Jörg. From what I read in the source of the cdrtools you don't know if cdrecord can use the Burn Proof mode of Teac drives. Anything new about that since the latest release of cdrecord? Thanks. Denis ___ Denis Pelletier Étudiant au doctorat sciences économiques, Université de Montréal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ide-scsi problem!
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Bill Davidsen wrote:
{ The relationship between Redhat, et al, and developers is musch like
{ the relationship between a car dealer and the factory... The
{ distributions are packaging of the base Linux kernel and associated
{ software. While some distributors make changes or minor corrections to
{ the kernel and software, I don't think anyone will take over writing and
{ maintaining a while new IDE and SCSI implementation, particularly as
{ Alan has indicated that this is likely to change by 2.6.
I'm a bit lost now. I taught that the main request of Joerg is that the
kernel should treat all ATAPI cdrom as ide-scsi devices dy default so
Linux users would not need to give the option hdX=ide-scsi when booting
if they want to use a cd burner. If someone would want to use the ide-cd
module, they would have to use the option hdX=ide-cd.
If it is so then I don't see the need for a new IDE and SCSI
implementation. Am I missing something?
Denis
___
Denis Pelletier
Étudiant au doctorat
sciences économiques, Université de Montreal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cdrecord help
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Kent Vander Velden wrote:
{ Recently, I received a CD image from a friend and I am trying to burn
{ it now with cdrecord and am having a bit of trouble. The image was
{ generated using cdrwin 3.8c in "binary mode." The associated .cue file
{ implies it is in mode1 but with 2352 bytes/block. I treated this as
{ both an iso and an audio file and burned it to disk but the disks are
{ unusable. It is possible that this is some proprietary format and that
{ there is nothing that I can do, but if you happen to know what it is
{ and if cdrecord can burn it, could you please let me know?
Hi,
cdrecord can't use bin/cue files. Cdrdao can.
Denis
_______
Denis Pelletier
tudiant au doctorat
sciences conomiques, Universit de Montreal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
