RE: Update, Delete, Insert recordcount?
Why multiple statements, why not single statements? Ade -Original Message- From: Jim Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 January 2006 01:08 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Update, Delete, Insert recordcount? Also always a good idea to use SET NOCOUNT around multiple SQL statements to suppress informational messages... cfquery name=yourQuery datesource=yourDS SET NOCOUNT ON UPDATE yourTable SET YourColumn = 'Something' SELECT @@ROWCOUNT AS RowsUpdated SET NOCOUNT OFF /cfquery On 1/21/06, Adrian Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My name's not Bobby, but here goes: cfquery name=yourQuery datesource=yourDS UPDATE yourTable SET YourColumn = 'Something' SELECT @@ROWCOUNT 'RowsUpdated' /cfquery cfoutput #yourQuery.RowsUpdated# /cfoutput Untested, and for SQL Server, but might be ok for Access. Adrian ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:230188 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
RE: BlueDragon License Change
On a side note, as this version is for development, what if you intend to deploy on .net? Wouldn't it be useful to have a free *not for commercial use* of the .net version as well, as you are developing on the same platform you intend to deploy on. It could have the same restrictions that CFMx has, i.e. only xx number of IP's can access it, or perhaps restrict it to local LAN IP's. or some other solution altogether. Russ -Original Message- From: charles arehart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 January 2006 05:51 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: BlueDragon License Change No, Tony. I wasn't saying that the free version wasn't getting updates. I was only saying that one who wanted to use it for commercial use could continue to use the 6.1 edition (without updates, of course). On the other hand, yes, the free version has always been updated just like the other editions. /charlie so the free version will stay at its current development point and stop? and newer updated versions are going to cost money? or will the free version be privvy to the upgrades that you make in the sever codebase? tony On 1/21/06, charles arehart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:230189 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
Re: BlueDragon License Change
Hi there, And the free version could still be used to non-commercial use? Yves On 1/22/06, charles arehart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, Tony. I wasn't saying that the free version wasn't getting updates. I was only saying that one who wanted to use it for commercial use could continue to use the 6.1 edition (without updates, of course). On the other hand, yes, the free version has always been updated just like the other editions. /charlie so the free version will stay at its current development point and stop? and newer updated versions are going to cost money? or will the free version be privvy to the upgrades that you make in the sever codebase? tony On 1/21/06, charles arehart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:230190 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
[Fwd: Problem with CFIMPORT]
All, I'm brand new to BlueDragon, but not to CF in general. I've just set up a local BD test server and uploaded one of my apps to see how it works. I'm running into some problems with CFIMPORT. The code that works fine with CFMX: CFIMPORT taglib='/myroot/modules/' prefix='module' cfoutput module:calendarModule /cfoutput But this doesn't work in BD. If I change the CFOUTPUT block above to a simple include, it works fine. CFINCLUDE template=calendarModule.cfm Any idea how to get the CFIMPORT working right? Thanks! ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:230191 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
Re: BlueDragon License Change
Anyone else feel that we're somehow going in circles? :-) Yes, Yves, you certainly may. Nothing has changed about the use of the free Server edition for non-commercial use. /charlie Hi there, And the free version could still be used to non-commercial use? Yves On 1/22/06, charles arehart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:230192 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
Re: BlueDragon License Change
Russ, we do already do that. :-) Again, I feel we're going in circles. The note you quote below was a response by Tony to one where I had said, in conclusion: And to clarify, as some miss this, *all* the editions (including Server JX, and the enterprise-class J2EE and .NET editions) are free forever for single IP development use (after a 30 day trial that's not IP restricted, just like CF). Folks, let's not confuse the free Server edition (which can be deployed for free in production except for commercial, hosting, and redistribution use) from the Server JX, J2EE, and .NET editions which are all also free to use for development, but which require a license for deployment. Hope that explains things. /charlie On a side note, as this version is for development, what if you intend to deploy on .net? Wouldn't it be useful to have a free *not for commercial use* of the .net version as well, as you are developing on the same platform you intend to deploy on. It could have the same restrictions that CFMx has, i.e. only xx number of IP's can access it, or perhaps restrict it to local LAN IP's. or some other solution altogether. Russ -Original Message- From: charles arehart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 January 2006 05:51 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: BlueDragon License Change No, Tony. I wasn't saying that the free version wasn't getting updates. I was only saying that one who wanted to use it for commercial use could continue to use the 6.1 edition (without updates, of course). On the other hand, yes, the free version has always been updated just like the other editions. /charlie ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:230193 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
Re: [Fwd: Problem with CFIMPORT]
Jake, CFIMPORT is certainly supported and should work. Is it possible that you've defined /myroot to be a mapping in the CF Admin? Since CFIMPORT can leverage that, you may just be suffering because you forgot to create a mapping for that. A common mistake people make when testing on BD is they forget to make the same sort of changes in the Admin they'd need to make if moving from, say, CF5 to CFMX (datasources, mappings, custom tag paths, CFXs, etc.) Of course, if /myroot really is the name of a root directory off your web site's docroot, then you shouldn't need a mapping. If the suggestion above doesn't resolve things for you, can I ask you to please raise this question on our interest list (a low-volume list where several of our engineers and hundreds of our customers gather to help with such questions, rather than here where only a few BD folks may see it)? Thanks. /charlie All, I'm brand new to BlueDragon, but not to CF in general. I've just set up a local BD test server and uploaded one of my apps to see how it works. I'm running into some problems with CFIMPORT. The code that works fine with CFMX: CFIMPORT taglib='/myroot/modules/' prefix='module' cfoutput module:calendarModule /cfoutput But this doesn't work in BD. If I change the CFOUTPUT block above to a simple include, it works fine. CFINCLUDE template=calendarModule.cfm Any idea how to get the CFIMPORT working right? Thanks! ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:230194 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
Re: [Fwd: Problem with CFIMPORT]
Just a follow-up: I found after responding to this note that Jake had indeed also posted the question on our Interest List. (Just happened to see this posting first, sorry.) Anyway, the info shared (and the sentiment) is still useful. Also, many will recommend that one does NOT cross-post the same question to multiple lists. Sure, it may seem better for you because you get more and different answers, but it leads to confusion like this (and sometimes the poster gets multiple useful answers but the readers of only one list don't benefit). Instead, a recommendation is to start with the one list most likely to give a targeted answer (the BD list for a BD question, for instance) and then if you don't get an adequate reply, start spreading out. We're all free to do what we want, of course. It's just a suggestion from 20 years in IT and on mailing lists--yes, they existed even back in the 80's before the internet as we know it. :-) /charlie Jake, CFIMPORT is certainly supported and should work. Is it possible that you've defined /myroot to be a mapping in the CF Admin? Since CFIMPORT can leverage that, you may just be suffering because you forgot to create a mapping for that. A common mistake people make when testing on BD is they forget to make the same sort of changes in the Admin they'd need to make if moving from, say, CF5 to CFMX (datasources, mappings, custom tag paths, CFXs, etc.) Of course, if /myroot really is the name of a root directory off your web site's docroot, then you shouldn't need a mapping. If the suggestion above doesn't resolve things for you, can I ask you to please raise this question on our interest list (a low-volume list where several of our engineers and hundreds of our customers gather to help with such questions, rather than here where only a few BD folks may see it)? Thanks. /charlie All, I'm brand new to BlueDragon, but not to CF in general. I've just set up a local BD test server and uploaded one of my apps to see how it works. I'm running into some problems with CFIMPORT. The code that works fine with CFMX: CFIMPORT taglib='/myroot/modules/' prefix='module' cfoutput module:calendarModule /cfoutput But this doesn't work in BD. If I change the CFOUTPUT block above to a simple include, it works fine. CFINCLUDE template=calendarModule.cfm Any idea how to get the CFIMPORT working right? Thanks! ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:230195 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
Re: BlueDragon License Change
Folks, let's not confuse the free Server edition (which can be deployed for free in production except for commercial, hosting, and redistribution use) from the Server JX, J2EE, and .NET editions which are all also free to use for development, but which require a license for deployment. Hope that explains things. /charlie Charlie...the confusion for me is the line above ...(which can be deployed for free in production except for commercial, hosting, and redistribution use) To me production generally means commercial with the exception of putting an app into production in your own office for internal use. I just think there needs to be a VERY clear seperation there and IMHO that line is not straightforward ;-) I'd also say the hosting bit is a tad vague. I'm sure you mean ISPs can't use it to host their customers sites. It could me mistaken for hosting an app in production ;-) my 2 cents from the side lines Cheers Bryan Stevenson B.Comm. VP Director of E-Commerce Development Electric Edge Systems Group Inc. phone: 250.480.0642 fax: 250.480.1264 cell: 250.920.8830 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: www.electricedgesystems.com - Original Message - From: charles arehart [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 7:31 AM Subject: Re: BlueDragon License Change Russ, we do already do that. :-) Again, I feel we're going in circles. The note you quote below was a response by Tony to one where I had said, in conclusion: And to clarify, as some miss this, *all* the editions (including Server JX, and the enterprise-class J2EE and .NET editions) are free forever for single IP development use (after a 30 day trial that's not IP restricted, just like CF). Folks, let's not confuse the free Server edition (which can be deployed for free in production except for commercial, hosting, and redistribution use) from the Server JX, J2EE, and .NET editions which are all also free to use for development, but which require a license for deployment. Hope that explains things. /charlie On a side note, as this version is for development, what if you intend to deploy on .net? Wouldn't it be useful to have a free *not for commercial use* of the .net version as well, as you are developing on the same platform you intend to deploy on. It could have the same restrictions that CFMx has, i.e. only xx number of IP's can access it, or perhaps restrict it to local LAN IP's. or some other solution altogether. Russ -Original Message- From: charles arehart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 January 2006 05:51 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: BlueDragon License Change No, Tony. I wasn't saying that the free version wasn't getting updates. I was only saying that one who wanted to use it for commercial use could continue to use the 6.1 edition (without updates, of course). On the other hand, yes, the free version has always been updated just like the other editions. /charlie ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:230196 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
Re: Announce: Harlan Ad Server Released
Ray, This came as great timing for me as well. I am building a site for our company, which has just merged with another company and has created a new identity. The new site, with the new identity, will need something just like this. Like Kay, I will need to downgrade this to be compatible to 6.1 because we are (mostlikely) moving to BlueDragon. Thanks, Aaron On 1/21/06, Kay Smoljak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/22/06, Raymond Camden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is CFMX7. To be honest, it has been a while since I looked at the code. It does use Flash Forms, but I think you could downgrade it pretty quickly. I'd suggest you take a look at my datatable custom tag in LHP. Thats what I replaced the flash forms with. Awesome. Thanks Ray, I'll try it out. -- Kay Smoljak http://kay.zombiecoder.com/ ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:230197 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
Re: BlueDragon License Change
Folks, can we please take this aspect of the discussion off the list here and over to the BD Interest list? Besides not wanting to bother folks who may not be interested in the subject, when we stretch into the realm of not just asking/answering simple questions to instead making suggestions for how New Atlanta ought to word its licensing agreement or position the product, those REALLY need to go to the executives in the company and the product management team, who are not all watching this. Please don't take this as somehow dodging the question. I'm not. It's just not my decision to make, so you need to get it to the right people, and I don't want to try to play operator between the parties who need to speak to each other. :-) Also, if someone is really, sincerely interested in BD, they ought to be on that list (as indeed Steven is already), so I'm not really asking for extra effort or proposing some additional email load. /charlie Folks, let's not confuse the free Server edition (which can be deployed for free in production except for commercial, hosting, and redistribution use) from the Server JX, J2EE, and .NET editions which are all also free to use for development, but which require a license for deployment. Hope that explains things. /charlie Charlie...the confusion for me is the line above ...(which can be deployed for free in production except for commercial, hosting, and redistribution use) To me production generally means commercial with the exception of putting an app into production in your own office for internal use. I just think there needs to be a VERY clear seperation there and IMHO that line is not straightforward ;-) I'd also say the hosting bit is a tad vague. I'm sure you mean ISPs can't use it to host their customers sites. It could me mistaken for hosting an app in production ;-) my 2 cents from the side lines Cheers Bryan Stevenson B.Comm. VP Director of E-Commerce Development Electric Edge Systems Group Inc. phone: 250.480.0642 fax: 250.480.1264 cell: 250.920.8830 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: www.electricedgesystems.com - Original Message - From: charles arehart [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 7:31 AM Subject: Re: BlueDragon License Change ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:230198 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
Re: CFEclipse and Snippets question
Great stuff.. let me know how that works and I shall check it out. There are a lot of HS+ snippets at my work that I want to get converted. MD On 20/01/06, Larry Lyons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was able to convert all my HS+ snippets to Dreamweaver snippets using Massimo Foti's Import Snippets DW extention. (http://www.antiwrap.com/?854) Then I used Rob Rohan's (and your) instructions on how to import DW snippets to eclipse. On the cf-guru mailing list, Rob Rohan gave me some suggestions on how to convert the dreamweaver snippets to CFeclipse. Here's what he said: On 1/21/06,Rob Rohan wrote: Message: 4 Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:10:39 -0800 From: Rob Rohan Subject: Re: CFGURU: CFEclipse and Snippets Question To: ColdFusion Guru List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed It doesn't do HomeSite snippets - as for dreamweaver snippets you can either set the snippet path to where your dreamweaver snippets are either per project (right click on the project folder, properites, cfeclipse properites), or globally (WindowPreferencesCFEclipse). They should just work from that point. So basically it turned out to be a 2 stage process, import the HS+ snippets into Dreamweaver, then importing those snippets into CFEclipse. regards, larry ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:230199 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
Re: Problem with CFIMPORT
All, I'm brand new to BlueDragon, but not to CF in general. .and apparently typing too. I just realized that I had a simple typing error. Sorry to bother. Jake ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:230200 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
Re: Announce: Harlan Ad Server Released
Just an FYI, a user on my forums (sneakylama) found 2 small bugs. (Well, one is big for IE.) I will have an update tonight. On 1/22/06, Aaron Roberson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ray, This came as great timing for me as well. I am building a site for our company, which has just merged with another company and has created a new identity. The new site, with the new identity, will need something just like this. -- === Raymond Camden, Director of Development for Mindseye, Inc (www.mindseye.com) Member of Team Macromedia (http://www.macromedia.com/go/teammacromedia) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blog : ray.camdenfamily.com Yahoo IM : cfjedimaster My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is. - Yoda ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:230201 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
CF Gateways GoogleTalk
Hi, Are there any more requests from Google Talk that CF can listen to besides these default ones: - onIncomingMessage() - onAddBuddyRequest() - onAddBuddyResponse() - onBuddyStatus() - onIMServerMessage() - onAdminMessage() For example, a listener to detect the Baz is Typing a Message function (i.e. onBuddyTyping()) Or any others? Thanks, Baz ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:230202 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
RE: BlueDragon License Change
Sorry, but it is hard to keep up with all the posts on this list. -Original Message- From: charles arehart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 January 2006 15:31 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: BlueDragon License Change Russ, we do already do that. :-) Again, I feel we're going in circles. The note you quote below was a response by Tony to one where I had said, in conclusion: And to clarify, as some miss this, *all* the editions (including Server JX, and the enterprise-class J2EE and .NET editions) are free forever for single IP development use (after a 30 day trial that's not IP restricted, just like CF). Folks, let's not confuse the free Server edition (which can be deployed for free in production except for commercial, hosting, and redistribution use) from the Server JX, J2EE, and .NET editions which are all also free to use for development, but which require a license for deployment. Hope that explains things. /charlie On a side note, as this version is for development, what if you intend to deploy on .net? Wouldn't it be useful to have a free *not for commercial use* of the .net version as well, as you are developing on the same platform you intend to deploy on. It could have the same restrictions that CFMx has, i.e. only xx number of IP's can access it, or perhaps restrict it to local LAN IP's. or some other solution altogether. Russ -Original Message- From: charles arehart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 January 2006 05:51 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: BlueDragon License Change No, Tony. I wasn't saying that the free version wasn't getting updates. I was only saying that one who wanted to use it for commercial use could continue to use the 6.1 edition (without updates, of course). On the other hand, yes, the free version has always been updated just like the other editions. /charlie ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:230203 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
Re: BlueDragon License Change
Thanks.. That is what I thought this thread just kind of confused me I guess... ;-) Yves On 1/22/06, charles arehart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone else feel that we're somehow going in circles? :-) Yes, Yves, you certainly may. Nothing has changed about the use of the free Server edition for non-commercial use. /charlie Hi there, And the free version could still be used to non-commercial use? Yves On 1/22/06, charles arehart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:230204 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
Re: Announce: Harlan Ad Server Released
Hi Raymond... Where do you set the Datasource Username and Password? On a shared environment I'm going to need set this in the script, but some quick searching through your scripts and I cannot locate a base dsn area... I was thinking on just these lines the other day. I can't wait for Viux to update my reseller package which will be tonight, so I can play with this application since it runs 7.0. It runs exactly with my frame of thought and if you read on you'll see what I mean. From the Webmasta point of view: ~ You never want to give away advertising for free on your website but, how much is that space really worth? Then again when people are purchasing ad placement by impression or like sites like Albany.com which is a per/year structure. You wonder if letting the advertisers fight over certain areas of the site could generate more revenue than maybe just hosting google ads. From the Advertiser point of view: ~ I loved being in control of my adds Before moving back to Saratoga Springs, NY I was E-commerce Coordinator for Stratton Mountain Resort. What I loved most about that spot, outside of my office in the welcome center, which was home to my Hayes Brothers Snowboard, was buying advertising on websites. Sure google adwords were ok, although I saw huge advantages in Overture aka Yahoo vs google in ROI, and stragicic placement of ads on websites outside of those networks. Take http://www.industrybrains.com/ as an example... they host ads on sites like usatoday, travel leisure, golf.com amongst others. I loved the fact that i could bid on the placement of my ads. It was a mini adwords campaign... Now lets take sites like Boston.com, which are pay per impression and you want a homepage ad... They quote you a package deal since your advertising in their newspaper but your still running your ad for Thousands of $$$ more then other sites where you are in charge of your bidding style with more qualified leads. Sure your getting Millions of Impressions but... You in Marketing know what I'm saying. I could go on, and on, and on... Long story short, it's Pay per Click, not Pay per Impression. Let your advertisers fight over the space and let your sales team sell your site, not what the ROI is going to be for the advertiser. Thank you Raymond, I look forward to checking this out soon! Casey Dougall On 1/22/06, Raymond Camden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just an FYI, a user on my forums (sneakylama) found 2 small bugs. (Well, one is big for IE.) I will have an update tonight. On 1/22/06, Aaron Roberson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ray, This came as great timing for me as well. I am building a site for our company, which has just merged with another company and has created a new identity. The new site, with the new identity, will need something just like this. -- === Raymond Camden, Director of Development for Mindseye, Inc (www.mindseye.com) Member of Team Macromedia (http://www.macromedia.com/go/teammacromedia) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blog : ray.camdenfamily.com Yahoo IM : cfjedimaster My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is. - Yoda ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:230205 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
Re: Announce: Harlan Ad Server Released
There is a base DSN set in the defaults.cfm file. However, I do not support DSNs that require usernames and passwords. However - only a few files have query tags in them. If you did a global search and replace, it would work fine. I'll look into adding this in the next update. On 1/22/06, Casey Dougall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Raymond... Where do you set the Datasource Username and Password? On a shared environment I'm going to need set this in the script, but some quick searching through your scripts and I cannot locate a base dsn area... I was thinking on just these lines the other day. I can't wait for Viux to update my reseller package which will be tonight, so I can play with this application since it runs 7.0. It runs exactly with my frame of thought and if you read on you'll see what I mean. From the Webmasta point of view: ~ You never want to give away advertising for free on your website but, how much is that space really worth? Then again when people are purchasing ad placement by impression or like sites like Albany.com which is a per/year structure. You wonder if letting the advertisers fight over certain areas of the site could generate more revenue than maybe just hosting google ads. From the Advertiser point of view: ~ I loved being in control of my adds Before moving back to Saratoga Springs, NY I was E-commerce Coordinator for Stratton Mountain Resort. What I loved most about that spot, outside of my office in the welcome center, which was home to my Hayes Brothers Snowboard, was buying advertising on websites. Sure google adwords were ok, although I saw huge advantages in Overture aka Yahoo vs google in ROI, and stragicic placement of ads on websites outside of those networks. Take http://www.industrybrains.com/ as an example... they host ads on sites like usatoday, travel leisure, golf.com amongst others. I loved the fact that i could bid on the placement of my ads. It was a mini adwords campaign... Now lets take sites like Boston.com, which are pay per impression and you want a homepage ad... They quote you a package deal since your advertising in their newspaper but your still running your ad for Thousands of $$$ more then other sites where you are in charge of your bidding style with more qualified leads. Sure your getting Millions of Impressions but... You in Marketing know what I'm saying. I could go on, and on, and on... Long story short, it's Pay per Click, not Pay per Impression. Let your advertisers fight over the space and let your sales team sell your site, not what the ROI is going to be for the advertiser. Thank you Raymond, I look forward to checking this out soon! Casey Dougall On 1/22/06, Raymond Camden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just an FYI, a user on my forums (sneakylama) found 2 small bugs. (Well, one is big for IE.) I will have an update tonight. On 1/22/06, Aaron Roberson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ray, This came as great timing for me as well. I am building a site for our company, which has just merged with another company and has created a new identity. The new site, with the new identity, will need something just like this. -- === Raymond Camden, Director of Development for Mindseye, Inc (www.mindseye.com) Member of Team Macromedia (http://www.macromedia.com/go/teammacromedia) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blog : ray.camdenfamily.com Yahoo IM : cfjedimaster My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is. - Yoda ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:230206 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
Re: BlueDragon License Change
Sorry to add to an already blunted topic but for those who wish to get rid of licencing agreements... please check out my previous question on this crap. http://houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/messages.cfm/forumid:4/threadid:43959 Someone must be using Coral Web Builder. Other than that, get over it and Buy Coldfusion or BlueDragon Casey On 1/22/06, Yves Arsenault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks.. That is what I thought this thread just kind of confused me I guess... ;-) Yves On 1/22/06, charles arehart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone else feel that we're somehow going in circles? :-) Yes, Yves, you certainly may. Nothing has changed about the use of the free Server edition for non-commercial use. /charlie Hi there, And the free version could still be used to non-commercial use? Yves On 1/22/06, charles arehart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:230207 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
RE: Monitoring JRun Memory Usage
First reaction: OutOfMemory errors are *usually* the result of a low PermGen setting on your JVM. Now, on to your question. If you're running unmodified CFMX, then you're using the 1.4.2 JDK, so your options are limited. If you've upgraded to the 1.5 JDK then you have many options for probing deeper into the JVM guts to find the problem. With the 1.4, then all you have is the code the Gabriel posted earlier. -Original Message- From: Rick Root [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 10:00 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Monitoring JRun Memory Usage I'm running CFMX7.0.1 Enterprise on Windows Server 2003. I'd like to monitor - and log - JRun memory usage. coldfusion died on us this morning for some reason - I can't find any indication of what caused the error other than the time it occurred (9:16am) when an OutOfMemory error occurred. I thought it would be useful to monitor memory usage every minute or so and record it to a log... timestamp,memory Anyone got any ideas of the simplest way to do this? I do have Perl installed on the server so that might be an option. Rick ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:230208 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
Firefox Sessions
OK, this is boggling - I have two directories I'm working with: /root/ /root/admin Each of those two directories has an Application.cfm file, each with a CFAPPLICATION tag, both of which are named the same. I login to the /root/admin/ and create a CF session variable. When I go to the /root/somepage.cfm, I should see the same session variables as when I visit /root/admin/somepage.cfm, right? This doesn't actually happen... at least not in Firefox. In Internet Explorer I see all session variables in the root for the /admin and vice versa. This is beyond perplexing - usually it's IE causing issues, not FF! Thanks in advance, Jake ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:230209 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
CFC access
Hi all, We have a CFC set up on our test server, and are able to successfully access it as a web service from PHP and ASP (on other servers). All good. Trying to bring up the CFC in the browser kicks you to the CFIDE login screen, and on successful login you get the wsdl docs. Great. However, our live server does not the cfide directory (it's multihomed). PHP and ASP cannot access the CFC at all, and trying to bring it up in the browser results in a 404 error. CF code can still access the CFC. I don't want to allow browsing of the CFC - I was going to set up Spike's tool to do that - I just want ASP and PHP code to be able to access the methods. We've tried copying the CFIDE directory to the root of the site in question and adding an IIS mapping to it, but no luck. This is Windows 2003 server with CF Standard. Any help would be greatly appreciated! -- Kay Smoljak http://kay.smoljak.com/ http://kay.zombiecoder.com/ ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:230210 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
RE: CFC access
We have a CFC set up on our test server, and are able to successfully access it as a web service from PHP and ASP (on other servers). All good. Trying to bring up the CFC in the browser kicks you to the CFIDE login screen, and on successful login you get the wsdl docs. Great. However, our live server does not the cfide directory (it's multihomed). PHP and ASP cannot access the CFC at all, and trying to bring it up in the browser results in a 404 error. CF code can still access the CFC. I don't want to allow browsing of the CFC - I was going to set up Spike's tool to do that - I just want ASP and PHP code to be able to access the methods. We've tried copying the CFIDE directory to the root of the site in question and adding an IIS mapping to it, but no luck. You don't need the CFIDE directory to publish a CFC web service. If you browse the CFC directly, you need to be able to log in, but to use it as a web service, just make sure that you have access=public in the methods you want, and use the URL http://yourserver/your.cfc?wsdl;. This doesn't require a login. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized instruction at our training centers in Washington DC, Atlanta, Chicago, Baltimore, Northern Virginia, or on-site at your location. Visit http://training.figleaf.com/ for more information! ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:230211 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
Re: CFC access
Hi Dave, On 1/23/06, Dave Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You don't need the CFIDE directory to publish a CFC web service. If you browse the CFC directly, you need to be able to log in, but to use it as a web service, just make sure that you have access=public in the methods you want, and use the URL http://yourserver/your.cfc?wsdl;. This doesn't require a login. Thanks for that. As it turns out, the issue was that there was no IIS mapping for .cfc - adding one has solved the problem! -- Kay Smoljak http://kay.zombiecoder.com/ http://kay.smoljak.com/ ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:230212 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
