Re: [OT, Python Quote] Plum vs Fusebox4.1/Mach-II (was RE: Plum vs Adalon?)

2005-02-18 Thread Scott Barnes
To be blunt and i've been on Plum since i think adam invited me ages
past, I really dig the concept and cannot fault it for what its
achieved.

I do however hold back in reservation as simply put: I don't have the
time or energy to inherit something ontop of a language that  has its
own set of problems and issues. I've been thinking a lot as of late on
what i expect out of a framework or extension if you will via the
WEB/COLDFUSION and in the end I just want something light thats agile
enough for me to bolt on anything when it comes to the innerds.

Mach-II is much much more agile then plum in regards to ease of use
and comparing the two is like apples and plums (hehe couldn't resist).

PLUM in many ways is like a Developers CMS / IDE for automated mundane
tasks that we do day in day out and lets face it, get sick of rolling.
When given a project i tend to want to get straight into the hard
part, but like my Guidance Counselor in high school once said do the
easy tasks first, then come back and do the hard ones last as if you
run out of time, you have gotten more work done in the end didn't
understand at the time but daily in CFMX i find myself having to put
in stupid time to get to the point of writing the hard stuff and by
this time (I'm sure others would agree) you're basically over the
concept.

PLUM by appearances (i'm only 1 project in so i reserve the right to
change my un-informed opinion) seems to fast track you through the
crappy tasks and focus on the guts of it all.

I am still hanging out for the day when i can put together an XML
based concept that automates my view/presenter/partial model allowing
me time and energy to focus on the integration part(s) server-side. As
thats where the money is needed the most.

FLEX offers that in some way, and PLUM seems to hint and being in many
ways a similiar alternative (sure technologies are different).

So yeah Mach-II is different in so many ways and i wouldn't bother
trying to compare the two.

(PLEASE NOTE: THIS IS AN IGNORANT OPINION, I'VE USED IT ON AND OFF BUT
I CAN HONESTLY SAY, I HAVE MORE WORK AHEAD OF ME IN ITS USE hehehe).
-- 
Regards,
Scott Barnes
http://www.mossyblog.com

~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:195351
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations  Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


Plum vs Fusebox4.1/Mach-II (was RE: Plum vs Adalon?)

2005-02-17 Thread Damien McKenna
 -Original Message-
 From: Michael T. Tangorre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
 what are the selling points for Plum that would pull someone like
myself 
 from Fusebox over to Plum or maybe not even over to but rather in
addition
 to?

I guess another way of asking this would be:

How does the Plum framework compare to Fusebox 4.1 or Mach-II in terms
of functionality and extensibility of the core framework (excluding all
the extra modules, I'm thinking of the core)?

-- 
Damien McKenna - Web Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Limu Company - http://www.thelimucompany.com/ - 407-804-1014
#include stdjoke.h

~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:195195
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations  Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


Re: Plum vs Fusebox4.1/Mach-II (was RE: Plum vs Adalon?)

2005-02-17 Thread Joe Rinehart
I may be off in some details, but it really doesn't.

From what I've seen Plum is basically a code generator.  There's not
much of a framework to it.  I diddled with it for a little while, and
the 'framework' is more a set of custom tags that make it easier to
build forms, do validation, master/detail pages, etc.  Maybe I'm
missing something, but that's what I got out of it.

-Joe



On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:42:53 -0500, Damien McKenna
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  -Original Message-
  From: Michael T. Tangorre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  what are the selling points for Plum that would pull someone like
 myself
  from Fusebox over to Plum or maybe not even over to but rather in
 addition
  to?
 
 I guess another way of asking this would be:
 
 How does the Plum framework compare to Fusebox 4.1 or Mach-II in terms
 of functionality and extensibility of the core framework (excluding all
 the extra modules, I'm thinking of the core)?
 
 --
 Damien McKenna - Web Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 The Limu Company - http://www.thelimucompany.com/ - 407-804-1014
 #include stdjoke.h
 
 

~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:195210
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations  Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


Re: Plum vs Fusebox4.1/Mach-II (was RE: Plum vs Adalon?)

2005-02-17 Thread Adam Churvis
 From what I've seen Plum is basically a code generator.  There's not
 much of a framework to it.  I diddled with it for a little while, and
 the 'framework' is more a set of custom tags that make it easier to
 build forms, do validation, master/detail pages, etc.  Maybe I'm
 missing something, but that's what I got out of it.

You're missing 90% of Plum, Joe.

Plum is a *very* extensive product, and has about 400 pages of documentation
that accompany it.  The custom tag library is but a small part of Plum.  The
Plum Framework does quite a lot, I assure you.

Read the documentation in detail (if you have the time) and you'll see what
I mean.  Code generation and custom tags are just a small part of Plum.

There is a lot to Plum, yes, but there is also a lot to the .NET Framework
and J2EE, and you'd need to learn what each of these can really do in order
to make accurate assessments about them.

Respectfully,

Adam Phillip Churvis
Member of Team Macromedia
http://www.ProductivityEnhancement.com

Download Plum and other cool development tools,
and get advanced intensive Master-level training:

* C#  ASP.NET for ColdFusion Developers
* ColdFusion MX Master Class
* Advanced Development with CFMX and SQL Server 2000


~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:195225
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations  Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


Re: Plum vs Fusebox4.1/Mach-II (was RE: Plum vs Adalon?)

2005-02-17 Thread Adam Churvis
 How does the Plum framework compare to Fusebox 4.1 or Mach-II in terms
 of functionality and extensibility of the core framework (excluding all
 the extra modules, I'm thinking of the core)?

Plum does quite a bit more in its core framework than either Fusebox or
Mach-ii.

The best way for everyone to assess this is to download and install Plum,
then thorooughly read the Plum documentation.

There's a lot there, but that's what will answer your questions.

Respectfully,

Adam Phillip Churvis
Member of Team Macromedia
http://www.ProductivityEnhancement.com

Download Plum and other cool development tools,
and get advanced intensive Master-level training:

* C#  ASP.NET for ColdFusion Developers
* ColdFusion MX Master Class
* Advanced Development with CFMX and SQL Server 2000


~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:195226
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations  Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


Re: Plum vs Fusebox4.1/Mach-II (was RE: Plum vs Adalon?)

2005-02-17 Thread Joe Rinehart
 You're missing 90% of Plum, Joe.

Adam, you're very much underestimating what I've done with Plum.  I
wouldn't talk about it if I hadn't looked at it in great detail.  I've
probably looked at the docs more extensively than most of your users,
examined the custom tag library, used tools like the component and
storedproc generator, read the Plum methodology (I think FLiP has you
beat), and I can even tell you what Help node is simply labelled
Psych!.  I took a great interest in Plum in its Beta stages because
it similar to something I was thinking of releasing.

This post asked for a comparison between Plum and other frameworks /
tools.  I wouldn't add my opinion if I didn't feel I was informed
enough to have one.  I'm probably in a better place to compare FB and
Plum than most users of either.  Because my opinion doesn't match
yours is no reason to call me ignorant or uninformed.



-- 
For Tabs, Trees, and more, use the jComponents:
http://clearsoftware.net/client/jComponents.cfm

~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:195256
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations  Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


Re: Plum vs Fusebox4.1/Mach-II (was RE: Plum vs Adalon?)

2005-02-17 Thread Scott Stroz
I also tried Plum during the beta phase. 
I didn't like it...then again, I don't like lobster either. (and in
both cases, I don't get all the hype)



On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:23:26 -0500, Joe Rinehart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  You're missing 90% of Plum, Joe.
 
 Adam, you're very much underestimating what I've done with Plum.  I
 wouldn't talk about it if I hadn't looked at it in great detail.  I've
 probably looked at the docs more extensively than most of your users,
 examined the custom tag library, used tools like the component and
 storedproc generator, read the Plum methodology (I think FLiP has you
 beat), and I can even tell you what Help node is simply labelled
 Psych!.  I took a great interest in Plum in its Beta stages because
 it similar to something I was thinking of releasing.
 
 This post asked for a comparison between Plum and other frameworks /
 tools.  I wouldn't add my opinion if I didn't feel I was informed
 enough to have one.  I'm probably in a better place to compare FB and
 Plum than most users of either.  Because my opinion doesn't match
 yours is no reason to call me ignorant or uninformed.
 
 --
 For Tabs, Trees, and more, use the jComponents:
 http://clearsoftware.net/client/jComponents.cfm
 
 

~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:195302
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations  Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


Re: Plum vs Fusebox4.1/Mach-II (was RE: Plum vs Adalon?)

2005-02-17 Thread Sean Corfield
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:53:51 -0500, Adam Churvis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The best way for everyone to assess this is to download and install Plum,
 then thorooughly read the Plum documentation.

Assuming you are running a Windows machine with .NET installed...
-- 
Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/
Team Fusebox -- http://www.fusebox.org/
Breeze Me! -- http://www.corfield.org/breezeme
Got Gmail? -- I have 50, yes 50, invites to give away!

If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive.
-- Margaret Atwood

~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:195319
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations  Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


Re: Plum vs Fusebox4.1/Mach-II (was RE: Plum vs Adalon?)

2005-02-17 Thread Sean Corfield
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:23:26 -0500, Joe Rinehart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Because my opinion doesn't match
 yours is no reason to call me ignorant or uninformed.

I have to say that Adam's habit of jumping on anyone who dares to
criticize Plum is getting a bit tiring. I made some comments about it
and he jumped straight down my throat (and later he apologized).

Adam, I think you need to chill a bit dude. Plum is not for everyone.
Fusebox is not for everyone. Mach II is not for everyone. Don't get
upset when some people say they don't like what Plum does or doesn't
do for them.
-- 
Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/
Team Fusebox -- http://www.fusebox.org/
Breeze Me! -- http://www.corfield.org/breezeme
Got Gmail? -- I have 50, yes 50, invites to give away!

If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive.
-- Margaret Atwood

~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:195320
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations  Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


RE: Plum vs Fusebox4.1/Mach-II (was RE: Plum vs Adalon?)

2005-02-17 Thread James Holmes
Follow the gourd!

No, Follow the sandal!

~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:195323
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations  Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


[OT, Python Quote] Plum vs Fusebox4.1/Mach-II (was RE: Plum vs Adalon?)

2005-02-17 Thread Joe Rinehart
We are all individuals.

I'm not!


On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:59:35 +0800, James Holmes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Follow the gourd!
 
 No, Follow the sandal!
 
 

~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:195334
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations  Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54