Re: Authorize.net cfc/tag for recurring billing?

[f g wenger]

I've started using Billing Orchard for recurring billing.  It has an API and 
also a new feature called Checkout Pages where you can setup recurring billing 
(with a post back call on success).  Both are easy to code.

I used PayQuake.com for the merchant account/Authorize.net reseller.  They have 
a couple of low fee, low minimum plans for starters (rate is high, though).  
You can use any Authorize.net reseller.  The recurring billing (ARB) from 
Authorize.net is $10/mo.

http://www.billingorchard.com/default.cfm?pid=a2de1a17 is $19.99 for 250 
transactions/mo.  They also offer an interface to let users manage their 
subscription.

Pretty cool stuff. 


~|
Get the answers you are looking for on the ColdFusion Labs
Forum direct from active programmers and developers.
http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/webforums/forum/categories.cfm?forumid-72&catid=648

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:287769
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Re: Authorize.net card present account

[Arden Weiss]

>Hmm...so, let me get this straight:
>
>- A "card present" account is actually just an account that, if the card is 
>actually present, requires a bit less information (no address,cvv needed) 
>than a non-card present account, because the track information on the card 
>gets sent;
>
>- However if the card is not present, you can spoof it by sending more 
>information, i.e. the address and zip code.

Note: Depending on the "processor" either the "zip and addr" or the CVC number 
on the back of the card is required -- "First Data" wants the "zip and addr", 
"Sage" appears to want the CVC number. 

Regarding tests -- go for it -- guarrenteed to work -- it is in production here.
If you want to contact me offline [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- can send CFHTTP code 
snippets that work for us.

>
>-- Josh
>
>
>
>- Original Message - 
>From: "Arden Weiss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "CF-Talk" 
>Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 12:53 PM
>Subject: Re: Authorize.net card present account
>
>
>>

~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs 
http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:268561
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

RE: Authorize.net card present account

[Jacob]

 and with the "card present" account, you are probably getting a
reduction in fees.

-Original Message-
From: Josh Nathanson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 9:42 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: OT: Authorize.net card present account

Hi All,

At my work we have two Authorize.net accounts: one is the standard type to 
process web transactions and one is the "card present" type, which is 
supposed to require an actual credit card swipe.

For various dumb reasons my boss wants to use the card present account to 
process web transactions.

I tried bouncing a web transaction off the card present account, but not 
surprisingly got the error "account not authorized for that type of 
transaction" or some such.

My boss thinks that because you are basically doing the same thing with 
either account, IE sending a transaction request out over the web, you 
should be able to process a web transaction with the card present account.

I'm telling him that there is probably some information that gets sent along

to the card present account that lets it know it is coming from the swipe of

an actual credit card, so there's no way to "trick" Authorize.net.  If you 
could, it would obviate the whole idea of having a card present account.

Who's right, me or my boss?

-- Josh





~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs 
http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:268543
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Re: Authorize.net card present account

[Josh Nathanson]

Hmm...so, let me get this straight:

- A "card present" account is actually just an account that, if the card is 
actually present, requires a bit less information (no address,cvv needed) 
than a non-card present account, because the track information on the card 
gets sent;

- However if the card is not present, you can spoof it by sending more 
information, i.e. the address and zip code.

I will test this out and report back.

-- Josh



- Original Message - 
From: "Arden Weiss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" 
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 12:53 PM
Subject: Re: Authorize.net card present account


> >
>>For various dumb reasons my boss wants to use the card present account to
>>process web transactions.
>>
>>I tried bouncing a web transaction off the card present account, but not
>>surprisingly got the error "account not authorized for that type of
>>transaction" or some such.
>
> My experience with authorize.net is as follows:
>
> We are running AIM card pressent system and can enter card data manually 
> in those cases where the customer has phoned in a purchase and given 
> credit card information.
>
> In the case where the card is present and swiped, the contents of the 
> enire track 1 is sent to the bank as x_track1 variable (processing entity) 
> via authoize.net along with other required information via a CFHTTPS 
> transmission -- approvals or denials are sent back.
>
> In the case where the card is NOT present, the card number, expiration 
> info numeric part of the address and the zipcode is sent as separate 
> variables via the same process -- approvals or denials are received back.
>
> As far as we are concerned the process is transparent at authoize.net --  
> however, at the bank or processor, they do keep track of whether track1 or 
> the pieces comprising the contents of track1 and different rules apply 
> plus the cost of manual transactions are more than scanned transactions.
>
> If you have questions, I suggest you contact Corey Koeing at 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- he is the resident program that is familar with 
> CF and the what they do.
>
> Also, of interest is the fact that authorize.net does not handle Pin Debit 
> transacitons -- debit cards are handle just like credit cards transactions 
> and settle daily...
>
> Hope this was helpful...
>
> 

~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs 
http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:268540
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Re: Authorize.net card present account

[Arden Weiss]

>
>For various dumb reasons my boss wants to use the card present account to 
>process web transactions.
>
>I tried bouncing a web transaction off the card present account, but not 
>surprisingly got the error "account not authorized for that type of 
>transaction" or some such.

My experience with authorize.net is as follows:

We are running AIM card pressent system and can enter card data manually in 
those cases where the customer has phoned in a purchase and given credit card 
information.

In the case where the card is present and swiped, the contents of the enire 
track 1 is sent to the bank as x_track1 variable (processing entity) via 
authoize.net along with other required information via a CFHTTPS transmission 
-- approvals or denials are sent back.

In the case where the card is NOT present, the card number, expiration info 
numeric part of the address and the zipcode is sent as separate variables via 
the same process -- approvals or denials are received back.

As far as we are concerned the process is transparent at authoize.net -- 
however, at the bank or processor, they do keep track of whether track1 or the 
pieces comprising the contents of track1 and different rules apply plus the 
cost of manual transactions are more than scanned transactions.

If you have questions, I suggest you contact Corey Koeing at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
-- he is the resident program that is familar with CF and the what they do.

Also, of interest is the fact that authorize.net does not handle Pin Debit 
transacitons -- debit cards are handle just like credit cards transactions and 
settle daily...

Hope this was helpful...

~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs 
http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:268533
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Re: Authorize.net card present account

[Josh Nathanson]

Hi Will,

LOL -- he's not an idiot, just cheap and stubborn.

Yeah...I thought it would be impossible...but just wanted to confirm.  Good 
to hear from someone who was in the same boat.

-- Josh


- Original Message - 
From: "Will Tomlinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" 
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 10:23 AM
Subject: Re: Authorize.net card present account


> Josh, I can tell you from experience, your boss is an idiot and this will 
> not work.
>
> I had a client change the account type a while back so she could accept 
> presented cards. It screwed us royally when all of a sudden, the website 
> wouldnt process a transaction.
>
> She had to have auth.net change the account type back before it would 
> work.
>
> my .02
>
> Will
>
> 

~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs 
http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:268497
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4

Re: Authorize.net card present account

[Adam Churvis]

If I'm not mistaken, doing such a thing could constitute wire fraud (a federal 
offense), since you would be knowingly shortchanging a party, thereby violating 
the terms of your written agreement with them.

Check with an attorney, but I think this is correct, IIRC.

Respectfully,

Adam Phillip Churvis
Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX 7 Developer
BlueDragon Alliance Founding Committee



Get advanced intensive Master-level training in
C# & ASP.NET 2.0 for ColdFusion Developers at
ProductivityEnhancement.com

  - Original Message - 
  From: Josh Nathanson 
  To: CF-Talk 
  Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 12:41 PM
  Subject: OT: Authorize.net card present account


  Hi All,

  At my work we have two Authorize.net accounts: one is the standard type to 
  process web transactions and one is the "card present" type, which is 
  supposed to require an actual credit card swipe.

  For various dumb reasons my boss wants to use the card present account to 
  process web transactions.

  I tried bouncing a web transaction off the card present account, but not 
  surprisingly got the error "account not authorized for that type of 
  transaction" or some such.

  My boss thinks that because you are basically doing the same thing with 
  either account, IE sending a transaction request out over the web, you 
  should be able to process a web transaction with the card present account.

  I'm telling him that there is probably some information that gets sent along 
  to the card present account that lets it know it is coming from the swipe of 
  an actual credit card, so there's no way to "trick" Authorize.net.  If you 
  could, it would obviate the whole idea of having a card present account.

  Who's right, me or my boss?

  -- Josh



  

~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs 
http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:268496
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Re: Authorize.net card present account

[Eric Haskins]

Not to mention it is a violation of the terms the account was issued
Auth.net and Visa would frown on this. It makes your site look suspicious.

Eric


On 2/2/07, Will Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Josh, I can tell you from experience, your boss is an idiot and this will
> not work.
>
> I had a client change the account type a while back so she could accept
> presented cards. It screwed us royally when all of a sudden, the website
> wouldnt process a transaction.
>
> She had to have auth.net change the account type back before it would
> work.
>
> my .02
>
> Will
>
> 

~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs 
http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:268495
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Re: Authorize.net card present account

[Will Tomlinson]

Josh, I can tell you from experience, your boss is an idiot and this will not 
work. 

I had a client change the account type a while back so she could accept 
presented cards. It screwed us royally when all of a sudden, the website 
wouldnt process a transaction. 

She had to have auth.net change the account type back before it would work. 

my .02

Will

~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs 
http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:268490
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4

Re: Authorize.net v3.1 AIM URL info

[Will Tomlinson]

>Unfortunately I'm no longer sure which url in the settings of my account to
>set to https://mysite.com/ccrecieve.cfm and Live Help isn't very... helpful.
>They don't understand what I'm trying to do.

I went round n round with one of those Live help people the other day. I swear 
the dude was snortin' a line while typin. 

Will

~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:258493
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Re: Authorize.net v3.1 AIM URL info

[Tony Hicks]

Turns out, this is a disabled feature, so I'll employ another method for the
same result.

It took about eight ANet employees through the day for one to actually say
"No, the feature is disabled. But yes it did exist once" and to give me
enough information to create a new method.

Disabling such a massive feature they should have bumped the version so
folks at least knew what was going on.

Also, in my first day of working with Authorize.net in a few years, their
performance seems rather shoddy to me. General 500 errors everywhere on and
off for hours. Disgusting stuff from a company who has been around so long.

On 10/30/06, Tony Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Back in July '04, I had a payment gateway that interfaced with
> Authorize.net  AIM interface and I had my account
> setup like this...
>
> mysite.com/gw/index.cfm had a form that the customer filled out with their
> cc info, billing and shipping info.
> mysite.com/gw/ccpost.cfm validated that data and submitted it to
> authorize.net payment gateway via CFHTTP. The data returned told the
> customer whether or not the transaction was a success.
> Authorize.net 's system sent back to
> mysite.com/ccreceive.cfm because that's the url I specified to recieve
> transactions.
>
> Unfortunately I'm no longer sure which url in the settings of my account
> to set to https://mysite.com/ccrecieve.cfm and Live Help isn't very...
> helpful. They don't understand what I'm trying to do.


~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:258491
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Re: authorize.net

[Bryan Stevenson]

Yes Will...MANY card processor ignore expiry dates

Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
phone: 250.480.0642
fax: 250.480.1264
cell: 250.920.8830
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.electricedgesystems.com

~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:258118
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Re: Authorize.net processing refunds

[John C. Bland II]

He actually figured it out. (see his last email)

On 10/14/06, Arden Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, refunds work without the need for full CC -- key is having the
> Transaction ID that was used to do the original charge against which you
> want to do a credit/refund  full or partial.
>
> Note that if the charge being refunded has not yet gone to settlement,
> then, you must void out the sale and recharge a balance due.
>
>
> > I'm building my first refund processor for authorize.net, and it acts
> > like it wants the full CC # and the exp date. I do not and will not
> > ever store these anywhere.
> >
> > The docs say you can just send the last 4 digits of the #, the trans
> > ID, and the amount.
> >
> > not having any luck with it yet. I keep getting response code 3 and
> > reason code 6 - Credit card is invalid.
> >
> > Anybody else ever do this?
> >
> > Thanks,
> Will
>
> 

~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:256811
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Re: Authorize.net processing refunds

[Arden Weiss]

Yes, refunds work without the need for full CC -- key is having the Transaction 
ID that was used to do the original charge against which you want to do a 
credit/refund  full or partial.

Note that if the charge being refunded has not yet gone to settlement, then, 
you must void out the sale and recharge a balance due.


> I'm building my first refund processor for authorize.net, and it acts 
> like it wants the full CC # and the exp date. I do not and will not 
> ever store these anywhere. 
> 
> The docs say you can just send the last 4 digits of the #, the trans 
> ID, and the amount. 
> 
> not having any luck with it yet. I keep getting response code 3 and 
> reason code 6 - Credit card is invalid. 
> 
> Anybody else ever do this?
> 
> Thanks,
Will

~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:256810
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4

Re: Authorize.net processing refunds

[John C. Bland II]

lmbo. :-) No prob. We've all done it (or something similar).

On 10/14/06, Will Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Can you paste your code? (just the cfhttp)
>
>
> Duhh again! lol! Dave n bobby are gonna eat this up!
>
> I forgot to change the x_type to CREDIT! LMAO!
>
> Thanks,
> Will
>
> 

~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:256809
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4

Re: Authorize.net processing refunds

[Will Tomlinson]

>Can you paste your code? (just the cfhttp)


Duhh again! lol! Dave n bobby are gonna eat this up!

I forgot to change the x_type to CREDIT! LMAO!

Thanks,
Will

~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:256805
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4

Re: Authorize.net processing refunds

[Will Tomlinson]

>Can you paste your code? (just the cfhttp)
>

I've been using reading the docs trying to get this to work. 


 







I'm ommitting some of the irrelevant fields. I dumped the data being 
transmitted and it looks good. 

Username
Trans key
Transaction ID
Amount

If I send just the last 4 digits it tells me the credit card number is invalid. 

Just for the heckuvit, I tried sending a full CC #. That produced a new error. 

Response code: 3 ERROR | Reason code: 33 | Text - Expiration date is required.

Expiration date? I haven't seen anything bout that being required. I talked to 
auth.net support  about as useful as talkin with my 11 year old about it. 

I guess the next step is to pass the exp date and see if it wants the CCV code. 
lol!

Thanks,
Will

~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:256804
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Re: Authorize.net processing refunds

[John C. Bland II]

Can you paste your code? (just the cfhttp)

Here is what the docs say. Are you passing all required fields?

This transaction is also referred to as a "Refund" and indicates to the
gateway that money should flow from the merchant to the customer. The
gateway will accept a credit or a refund request if the transaction
submitted meets the following conditions:
• The transaction is submitted with the ID of the original transaction
against which the credit is being issued (x_trans_id).
• The gateway has a record of the original transaction.
• The original transaction has been settled.
• The sum of the amount submitted in the Credit transaction and all credits
submitted against the original transaction is less than the original
transaction amount.
• The full or last four digits of the credit card number submitted with the
credit transaction match the full or last four digits of the credit card
number used in the original transaction.
• The transaction is submitted within 120 days of the settlement date and
time of the original transaction.
A transaction key is required to submit a credit to the system (i.e.,
x_tran_key should have a valid value when a CREDIT transaction is
submitted).


On 10/14/06, Will Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm building my first refund processor for authorize.net, and it acts like
> it wants the full CC # and the exp date. I do not and will not ever store
> these anywhere.
>
> The docs say you can just send the last 4 digits of the #, the trans ID,
> and the amount.
>
> not having any luck with it yet. I keep getting response code 3 and reason
> code 6 - Credit card is invalid.
>
> Anybody else ever do this?
>
> Thanks,
> Will
>
> 

~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:256796
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Re: Authorize.net integration

[John C. Bland II]

Here's a blog post I did earlier this year:
http://blogs.katapultmedia.com/jb2/2006/03/authorizenetcfc_card_charging.html


On 10/13/06, Nick Gleason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> I know this topic has been covered recently and unfortunately I didn't
> take
> notes.
>
> We're facing an authorize.net integration and would appreciate learning
> from
> anyone else's experiences or talking to people who have done this before.
>
> If this info would be searchable in the archives, we could certainly look
> there.
>
> Very best,
>
> Nick
>
>
> .
> ..
>
> Nick Gleason | CitySoft, Inc. | http://www.citysoft.com
>
> Direct: (617) 899-5395 | Fax: (617) 507-0444
>
>
> Spend Less >> Do More - Community Enterprise
> combines great features with an affordable price.
>
> .
> ..
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Snake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 8:14 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: mySql connector J
>
> Perhaps these may help
> http://russ.michaels.me.uk/index.cfm/2005/10/25/Using-CFMX-with-MySQL-4x-
>
>
> http://russ.michaels.me.uk/index.cfm/2006/3/7/Using-connectorJ-drivers-with-
> MySQL
>
> Russ
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 13 October 2006 01:05
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: mySql connector J
>
> Can someone tell me what they have listed in CF for the mySql connector?
>
> Here is what I have
>
> CF DataSource = myDsn
> JDBC URL = jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/myDsn Driver Class =
> com.mysql.jdbc.Driver Driver Name = blank Username = ROOT Password =
> ***
>
> I get the following error
>
> Connection verification failed for data source: 
> java.sql.SQLException: No suitable driver available for , please check
> the driver setting in resources file, error: null The root cause was that:
> java.sql.SQLException: No suitable driver available for nexbid, please
> check
> the driver setting in resources file, error: null
>
>
>
>
>
> 

~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:256785
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4

Re: Authorize.net integration

[Teddy Payne]

Try this link:

http://www.houseoffusion.com/search/index.cfm?domains=www.houseoffusion.com%3Bwww.fusionauthority.com%3Bwww.blogoffusion.com&q=authorize.net&sitesearch=www.houseoffusion.com&client=pub-9987223904467795&forid=1&channel=3811075283&ie=ISO-8859-1&oe=ISO-8859-1&cof=GALT%3A%23008000%3BGL%3A1%3BDIV%3A%2366%3BVLC%3A663399%3BAH%3Acenter%3BBGC%3AEE%3BLBGC%3A66%3BALC%3A00%3BLC%3A00%3BT%3AFF%3BGFNT%3AFF%3BGIMP%3AFF%3BLH%3A50%3BLW%3A500%3BL%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.houseoffusion.com%2Fimages%2Fhof_google.gif%3BS%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.houseoffusion.com%3BFORID%3A11&hl=en&sa=Site+Search

It is long but it the search for Authorize.net from house of fusion =)

Teddy

On 10/13/06, Nick Gleason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> I know this topic has been covered recently and unfortunately I didn't
> take
> notes.
>
> We're facing an authorize.net integration and would appreciate learning
> from
> anyone else's experiences or talking to people who have done this before.
>
> If this info would be searchable in the archives, we could certainly look
> there.
>
> Very best,
>
> Nick
>
>
> .
> ..
>
> Nick Gleason | CitySoft, Inc. | http://www.citysoft.com
>
> Direct: (617) 899-5395 | Fax: (617) 507-0444
>
>
> Spend Less >> Do More - Community Enterprise
> combines great features with an affordable price.
>
> .
> ..
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Snake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 8:14 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: mySql connector J
>
> Perhaps these may help
> http://russ.michaels.me.uk/index.cfm/2005/10/25/Using-CFMX-with-MySQL-4x-
>
>
> http://russ.michaels.me.uk/index.cfm/2006/3/7/Using-connectorJ-drivers-with-
> MySQL
>
> Russ
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 13 October 2006 01:05
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: mySql connector J
>
> Can someone tell me what they have listed in CF for the mySql connector?
>
> Here is what I have
>
> CF DataSource = myDsn
> JDBC URL = jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/myDsn Driver Class =
> com.mysql.jdbc.Driver Driver Name = blank Username = ROOT Password =
> ***
>
> I get the following error
>
> Connection verification failed for data source: 
> java.sql.SQLException: No suitable driver available for , please check
> the driver setting in resources file, error: null The root cause was that:
> java.sql.SQLException: No suitable driver available for nexbid, please
> check
> the driver setting in resources file, error: null
>
>
>
>
>
> 

~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:256700
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4

RE: Authorize.net CFC

[Emmet McGovern]

Nevermind.  I looked it up in the dictionary.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/google 

-e

-Original Message-
From: Robert Feyerherm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 4:58 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Authorize.net CFC

Use the google define tool to define itself..

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=define%3Agoogle



-Original Message-
From: Josh Nathanson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 2:51 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Authorize.net CFC

If you Google "google" you can probably find out what it means.  :0)

Wait, I just spun myself into an infinite loop... 

-- Josh


- Original Message - 
From: "Emmet McGovern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" 
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 12:36 PM
Subject: RE: Authorize.net CFC


> O.  I'm so mad at you right now Ferg  I just forgot to
mention
> that.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 3:42 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Authorize.net CFC
>
> I was hoping that's how you'd take that comment Emmet! Too many people
> would have been offended by my backhand slap.
>
> --Ferg
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Emmet McGovern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 2:01 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Authorize.net CFC
>
> What the hell is a google?
>
> -e
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 2:44 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Authorize.net CFC
>
> Hey check that out. I Googled Authorize.net cfc and it was like the
> second listing. I guess some people just can't match my mad googling
> skills, huh?
>
> http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/thread.cfm/threadid:43531
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ken Ferguson
> 214.636.6126
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Emmet McGovern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 1:24 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Authorize.net CFC
>
> Has anyone made a CFC yet for authorize.net?  Free or Paid.
>
> Emmet
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 





~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:248845
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4

RE: Authorize.net CFC

[Robert Feyerherm]

Use the google define tool to define itself..

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=define%3Agoogle



-Original Message-
From: Josh Nathanson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 2:51 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Authorize.net CFC

If you Google "google" you can probably find out what it means.  :0)

Wait, I just spun myself into an infinite loop... 

-- Josh


- Original Message - 
From: "Emmet McGovern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" 
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 12:36 PM
Subject: RE: Authorize.net CFC


> O.  I'm so mad at you right now Ferg  I just forgot to
mention
> that.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 3:42 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Authorize.net CFC
>
> I was hoping that's how you'd take that comment Emmet! Too many people
> would have been offended by my backhand slap.
>
> --Ferg
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Emmet McGovern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 2:01 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Authorize.net CFC
>
> What the hell is a google?
>
> -e
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 2:44 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Authorize.net CFC
>
> Hey check that out. I Googled Authorize.net cfc and it was like the
> second listing. I guess some people just can't match my mad googling
> skills, huh?
>
> http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/thread.cfm/threadid:43531
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ken Ferguson
> 214.636.6126
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Emmet McGovern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 1:24 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Authorize.net CFC
>
> Has anyone made a CFC yet for authorize.net?  Free or Paid.
>
> Emmet
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 



~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:248843
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4

Re: Authorize.net CFC

[Josh Nathanson]

If you Google "google" you can probably find out what it means.  :0)

Wait, I just spun myself into an infinite loop... 

-- Josh


- Original Message - 
From: "Emmet McGovern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" 
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 12:36 PM
Subject: RE: Authorize.net CFC


> O.  I'm so mad at you right now Ferg  I just forgot to mention
> that.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 3:42 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Authorize.net CFC
>
> I was hoping that's how you'd take that comment Emmet! Too many people
> would have been offended by my backhand slap.
>
> --Ferg
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Emmet McGovern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 2:01 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Authorize.net CFC
>
> What the hell is a google?
>
> -e
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 2:44 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Authorize.net CFC
>
> Hey check that out. I Googled Authorize.net cfc and it was like the
> second listing. I guess some people just can't match my mad googling
> skills, huh?
>
> http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/thread.cfm/threadid:43531
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ken Ferguson
> 214.636.6126
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Emmet McGovern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 1:24 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Authorize.net CFC
>
> Has anyone made a CFC yet for authorize.net?  Free or Paid.
>
> Emmet
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 

~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:248839
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

RE: Authorize.net CFC

[Emmet McGovern]

O.  I'm so mad at you right now Ferg  I just forgot to mention
that.

-Original Message-
From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 3:42 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Authorize.net CFC

I was hoping that's how you'd take that comment Emmet! Too many people
would have been offended by my backhand slap.

--Ferg



-Original Message-
From: Emmet McGovern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 2:01 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Authorize.net CFC

What the hell is a google?

-e

-Original Message-
From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 2:44 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Authorize.net CFC

Hey check that out. I Googled Authorize.net cfc and it was like the
second listing. I guess some people just can't match my mad googling
skills, huh?

http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/thread.cfm/threadid:43531

Thanks,
 
Ken Ferguson
214.636.6126



-Original Message-
From: Emmet McGovern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 1:24 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Authorize.net CFC

Has anyone made a CFC yet for authorize.net?  Free or Paid.

Emmet













~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:248838
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4

RE: Authorize.net CFC

[Emmet McGovern]

Thanks everyone for the supportive answers.  

Without the valuable members of this list my quest to do as little work as
possible on a Friday would be an utter failure.  I will lift my glass to you
all in the forthcoming happy hour I will soon embark upon. 

I will look into this thing called Google although I question its ability to
provide me with answers which I seek.

Good Day!

-emmet



-Original Message-
From: Will Tomlinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 3:22 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Authorize.net CFC

>Has anyone made a CFC yet for authorize.net?  Free or Paid.
>
>Emmet

Yep, I have one. Email me offlist. 

Will



~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:248837
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

RE: Authorize.net CFC

[Ken Ferguson]

I was hoping that's how you'd take that comment Emmet! Too many people
would have been offended by my backhand slap.

--Ferg



-Original Message-
From: Emmet McGovern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 2:01 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Authorize.net CFC

What the hell is a google?

-e

-Original Message-
From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 2:44 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Authorize.net CFC

Hey check that out. I Googled Authorize.net cfc and it was like the
second listing. I guess some people just can't match my mad googling
skills, huh?

http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/thread.cfm/threadid:43531

Thanks,
 
Ken Ferguson
214.636.6126



-Original Message-
From: Emmet McGovern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 1:24 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Authorize.net CFC

Has anyone made a CFC yet for authorize.net?  Free or Paid.

Emmet











~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:248836
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Re: Authorize.net CFC

[Will Tomlinson]

>Has anyone made a CFC yet for authorize.net?  Free or Paid.
>
>Emmet

Yep, I have one. Email me offlist. 

Will

~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:248834
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

RE: Authorize.net CFC

[Andy Matthews]

Just this website...



-Original Message-
From: Emmet McGovern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 2:01 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Authorize.net CFC


What the hell is a google?

-e

-Original Message-
From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 2:44 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Authorize.net CFC

Hey check that out. I Googled Authorize.net cfc and it was like the
second listing. I guess some people just can't match my mad googling
skills, huh?

http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/thread.cfm/threadid:43531

Thanks,
 
Ken Ferguson
214.636.6126



-Original Message-
From: Emmet McGovern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 1:24 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Authorize.net CFC

Has anyone made a CFC yet for authorize.net?  Free or Paid.

Emmet











~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:248833
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

RE: Authorize.net CFC

[Emmet McGovern]

What the hell is a google?

-e

-Original Message-
From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 2:44 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Authorize.net CFC

Hey check that out. I Googled Authorize.net cfc and it was like the
second listing. I guess some people just can't match my mad googling
skills, huh?

http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/thread.cfm/threadid:43531

Thanks,
 
Ken Ferguson
214.636.6126



-Original Message-
From: Emmet McGovern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 1:24 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Authorize.net CFC

Has anyone made a CFC yet for authorize.net?  Free or Paid.

Emmet









~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:248829
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

RE: Authorize.net CFC

[Ken Ferguson]

Hey check that out. I Googled Authorize.net cfc and it was like the
second listing. I guess some people just can't match my mad googling
skills, huh?

http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/thread.cfm/threadid:43531

Thanks,
 
Ken Ferguson
214.636.6126



-Original Message-
From: Emmet McGovern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 1:24 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Authorize.net CFC

Has anyone made a CFC yet for authorize.net?  Free or Paid.

Emmet







~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:248827
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4

Re: Authorize.net costs question

[John C. Bland II]

Just fill out the gateway application, merchant account information form,
and fax it to Auth.net. Rest is up to them.

Email me offline: johnatkatapult media dot com

On 4/28/06, Steve Kahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> John
>
> My client already has merchant account from a large bank, what do you need
> for us to purchase an auth.net account from you if they approve?
>
> Thanks
> Steve
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John C. Bland II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 9:26 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Authorize.net costs question
>
> We, Katapult Media, are a reseller so the pricing (for people we sign up)
> is:
> $149 setup ($1 less) :-)
> $20 monthly
> $0.10 per-transaction
>
> On 4/27/06, Steve Kahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > My records might be outdated:
> > I have Authorize.net costs as
> > $150 setup
> > $20 monthly
> > $0.20 per transaction
> >
> > But when I ask for their price they quote
> > $300 setup
> > $20 monthly
> > $0.10 per trans
> >
> > Does anyone have any promotional links for them?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.5.0/325 - Release Date: 4/26/2006
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> 

~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:239072
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

RE: Authorize.net costs question

[Steve Kahn]

John

My client already has merchant account from a large bank, what do you need
for us to purchase an auth.net account from you if they approve?

Thanks
Steve 

-Original Message-
From: John C. Bland II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 9:26 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Authorize.net costs question

We, Katapult Media, are a reseller so the pricing (for people we sign up)
is:
$149 setup ($1 less) :-)
$20 monthly
$0.10 per-transaction

On 4/27/06, Steve Kahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My records might be outdated:
> I have Authorize.net costs as
> $150 setup
> $20 monthly
> $0.20 per transaction
>
> But when I ask for their price they quote
> $300 setup
> $20 monthly
> $0.10 per trans
>
> Does anyone have any promotional links for them?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.5.0/325 - Release Date: 4/26/2006
>
>
> 



~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:239038
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Authorize.net costs question

[John C. Bland II]

Auth.net has different levels of resellers. We aren't focused on being
resellers so we don't need to whole co-branded site, etc.

On 4/27/06, Stan Winchester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Take a look at http://www.merchant.com/ (This is authorize.net, but a
> whole lot less expensive).
>
> >We, Katapult Media, are a reseller so the pricing (for people we sign up)
> >is:
> >$149 setup ($1 less) :-)
> >$20 monthly
> >$0.10 per-transaction
> >
> >On 4/27/06, Steve Kahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
>
> 

~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:239024
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Authorize.net costs question

[Stan Winchester]

Take a look at http://www.merchant.com/ (This is authorize.net, but a whole lot 
less expensive).

>We, Katapult Media, are a reseller so the pricing (for people we sign up)
>is:
>$149 setup ($1 less) :-)
>$20 monthly
>$0.10 per-transaction
>
>On 4/27/06, Steve Kahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>

~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:239022
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Authorize.net costs question

[John C. Bland II]

We, Katapult Media, are a reseller so the pricing (for people we sign up)
is:
$149 setup ($1 less) :-)
$20 monthly
$0.10 per-transaction

On 4/27/06, Steve Kahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My records might be outdated:
> I have Authorize.net costs as
> $150 setup
> $20 monthly
> $0.20 per transaction
>
> But when I ask for their price they quote
> $300 setup
> $20 monthly
> $0.10 per trans
>
> Does anyone have any promotional links for them?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.5.0/325 - Release Date: 4/26/2006
>
>
> 

~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:239018
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

RE: Free SSl certs was: Re: Authorize.net request

[Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)]

You can also just generate a cert yourself for testing anyway - I use
OpenSSL- works a treat. 




-Original Message-
From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 30 November 2005 22:29
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Free SSl certs was: Re: Authorize.net request

> Bryan, when I click join at CACert, I get a possible bogus certificate
> warning from Firefox.  Is this something all CAcert users are going to
> have to subject their users too, or is it just the way that CAcert setup
> their site?  I noticed that Firefox complained about *.cacert.org, maybe
> if you actually tie it to a FQDN (www.cacert.org instead of
> *.cacert.org) you won't see the warning.  Have you tried their
> certificates?

I haven't used 'em yet...only recently heard about them myself...so here's
the 
loose tidbits I've heard:

Folks like Verisign have a deal with browser makers to check the maker of
the 
cert before showing that warningif they find that the maker is say
Verisign 
that warning does not show.  This is why certs cost so much for something
that 
is pretty basic.

This is something that the CACert folks have been trying to get around and I

think they have...but with NS and IE..perhaps not Firefox yet

So some users may get that warning...others may notbut hey...if they do 
they'll know your site is secure ;-)

You're probably better off reading their news or forums than listening to my

ramblings...but hopefully that's enough info to find reality ;-)

Cheers

Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
phone: 250.480.0642
fax: 250.480.1264
cell: 250.920.8830
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.electricedgesystems.com 




~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225907
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

RE: Free SSL (was Re: Authorize.net request)

[Dave Watts]

> I thought that the reason you paid for certificates wasn't 
> really anything to do with the cert, but more to do with 
> the indemnity insurance that the issuer is offering if the 
> cert gets cracked and your SSL connections reveal info to 
> someone sniffing the packets... Could it happen? 
> Theoretically, Yes... Is it likely? Probably not

Actually, I think that verifiability is much more important than that.
Certificates purchased from trusted vendors indicate that your web site is
what it says it is.

Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/

Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized 
instruction at our training centers in Washington DC, Atlanta, 
Chicago, Baltimore, Northern Virginia, or on-site at your location. 
Visit http://training.figleaf.com/ for more information!


~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225899
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Free SSL (was Re: Authorize.net request)

[John C. Bland II]

Hey, I'd agree. The insurance is a great feature. I've used
instantssl.comfor many certs. Their price is pretty nice and they do
have some good
insurance (see below).


   - Fully validated, High Assurance
   - 1024 bit industry standard SSL Certificate
   - Trusted by all popular browsers
   - 99.3% browser ubiquity
   - $100,000 warranty
   - 30 day refund policy
   - Email and web support
   - SecuritySpace free audit
   - Starting at ONLY $79.95 per Certificate per annum
   - Unlimited Reissuance Policy
   - 128/256 bit encryption



On 11/30/05, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Wow, agreed. I had to visit multiple people with photo IDs and other
> ID just to get a free Email cert from Thawte.
>
> If any muggins can get a cert with any name, that CA should not be in
> the trusted certs list. Certs do more than just provide for
> encryption; they also verify identity.
>
> On 12/1/05, Russ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > I don't' think th ey should be included in the trusted CA list as they
> do
> > not do any form of identify verification.
> --
> CFAJAX docs and other useful articles:
> http://jr-holmes.coldfusionjournal.com/
>
> 

~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225799
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Free SSL (was Re: Authorize.net request)

[James Holmes]

Wow, agreed. I had to visit multiple people with photo IDs and other
ID just to get a free Email cert from Thawte.

If any muggins can get a cert with any name, that CA should not be in
the trusted certs list. Certs do more than just provide for
encryption; they also verify identity.

On 12/1/05, Russ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
>
> I don't' think th ey should be included in the trusted CA list as they do
> not do any form of identify verification.
--
CFAJAX docs and other useful articles:
http://jr-holmes.coldfusionjournal.com/

~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225786
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

RE: Free SSL (was Re: Authorize.net request)

[Russ]

I don't know... Isn't the whole point of verisign is that they verify your
identity on some level?  Otherwise, I could just order a certificate from
these guys for Amazon.com, somehow get your computer to recognize amazon.com
as my ip (either through the hosts file, dns poisoning or other means) and
your browser will think that you are at the amazon.com site.  The whole
point of verisign, is when they issue a cert to amazon.com, they verify and
make sure that it's really someone from amazon ordering the cert.  (Lame as
their verification methods may be).  

I don't' think th ey should be included in the trusted CA list as they do
not do any form of identify verification. 

Russ

-Original Message-
From: John C. Bland II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 7:13 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Free SSL (was Re: Authorize.net request)

Oh, and the fact that they will most likely be included in the browsers as
"trusted" before you or your company is. :-)

On 11/30/05, John C. Bland II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Knowledge. :-)
>
> On 11/30/05, Russ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I'm confused... What's the difference between getting the 
> > certificate from that site and generating one yourself?  I've gotten 
> > a warning in IE as well, so if a browser is going to give users a 
> > warning, why not just generate your own?
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 5:45 PM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: Re: Free SSL (was Re: Authorize.net request)
> >
> > > All, the bad cert warning is because CACert is not included as a 
> > > trusted certification authority by default in IE or Firefox
> > certificate
> > settings.
> > > So yes, that warning will probably pop up for most people landing 
> > > on a site which uses their certs.  Note that one of their primary 
> > > goals is "inclusion into mainstream browsers."  No word of when 
> > > they expect to
> > hit
> > that goal.
> > >
> > > Regarding the little lock in the corner...I think 90% of web 
> > > surfers have no idea about the difference between SSL and not SSL.  
> > > But I use SSL too on my sites that do credit card transactions, 
> > > just for the 10%
> >
> > > of the users who do notice that little lock.
> > >
> > > -- Josh
> >
> > Regardless...it's my arse as the developer if I don't set it up 
> > right and a client gets hackedin this case I could care less 
> > what the user knows or doesn't...I know better so I use certs ;-)
> >
> > Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
> > VP & Director of E-Commerce Development Electric Edge Systems Group 
> > Inc.
> > phone: 250.480.0642
> > fax: 250.480.1264
> > cell: 250.920.8830
> > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > web: www.electricedgesystems.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 



~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225783
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

RE: Free SSL (was Re: Authorize.net request)

[Paul Vernon]

I thought that the reason you paid for certificates wasn't really anything
to do with the cert, but more to do with the indemnity insurance that the
issuer is offering if the cert gets cracked and your SSL connections reveal
info to someone sniffing the packets... Could it happen? Theoretically,
Yes... Is it likely? Probably not

This to me is the major difference between all of the cert providers, after
all, the cert itself is just a text file to install on your server and they
all offer 128/256 bit certs with 1024 bit keys etc... So their only
differential is the amount they charge and the amount of insurance they
offer...

I don't see any insurance being offered on the cacert site and, in the
unlikely event that an SSL communication was intercepted and hacked I would
be pretty grateful for the SSL insurance that the commercial providers give
when the credit card owner/company comes knocking on my door...

Paul


~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225782
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Free SSL (was Re: Authorize.net request)

[John C. Bland II]

Oh, and the fact that they will most likely be included in the browsers as
"trusted" before you or your company is. :-)

On 11/30/05, John C. Bland II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Knowledge. :-)
>
> On 11/30/05, Russ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I'm confused... What's the difference between getting the certificate
> > from
> > that site and generating one yourself?  I've gotten a warning in IE as
> > well,
> > so if a browser is going to give users a warning, why not just generate
> > your
> > own?
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 5:45 PM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: Re: Free SSL (was Re: Authorize.net request)
> >
> > > All, the bad cert warning is because CACert is not included as a
> > > trusted certification authority by default in IE or Firefox
> > certificate
> > settings.
> > > So yes, that warning will probably pop up for most people landing on a
> > > site which uses their certs.  Note that one of their primary goals is
> > > "inclusion into mainstream browsers."  No word of when they expect to
> > hit
> > that goal.
> > >
> > > Regarding the little lock in the corner...I think 90% of web surfers
> > > have no idea about the difference between SSL and not SSL.  But I use
> > > SSL too on my sites that do credit card transactions, just for the 10%
> >
> > > of the users who do notice that little lock.
> > >
> > > -- Josh
> >
> > Regardless...it's my arse as the developer if I don't set it up right
> > and a
> > client gets hackedin this case I could care less what the user knows
> > or
> > doesn't...I know better so I use certs ;-)
> >
> > Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
> > VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
> > Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
> > phone: 250.480.0642
> > fax: 250.480.1264
> > cell: 250.920.8830
> > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > web: www.electricedgesystems.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 

~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225781
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Free SSL (was Re: Authorize.net request)

[John C. Bland II]

Knowledge. :-)

On 11/30/05, Russ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm confused... What's the difference between getting the certificate from
> that site and generating one yourself?  I've gotten a warning in IE as
> well,
> so if a browser is going to give users a warning, why not just generate
> your
> own?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 5:45 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Free SSL (was Re: Authorize.net request)
>
> > All, the bad cert warning is because CACert is not included as a
> > trusted certification authority by default in IE or Firefox certificate
> settings.
> > So yes, that warning will probably pop up for most people landing on a
> > site which uses their certs.  Note that one of their primary goals is
> > "inclusion into mainstream browsers."  No word of when they expect to
> hit
> that goal.
> >
> > Regarding the little lock in the corner...I think 90% of web surfers
> > have no idea about the difference between SSL and not SSL.  But I use
> > SSL too on my sites that do credit card transactions, just for the 10%
> > of the users who do notice that little lock.
> >
> > -- Josh
>
> Regardless...it's my arse as the developer if I don't set it up right and
> a
> client gets hackedin this case I could care less what the user knows
> or
> doesn't...I know better so I use certs ;-)
>
> Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
> VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
> Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
> phone: 250.480.0642
> fax: 250.480.1264
> cell: 250.920.8830
> e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> web: www.electricedgesystems.com
>
>
>
>
> 

~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225780
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

RE: Free SSL (was Re: Authorize.net request)

[Russ]

I'm confused... What's the difference between getting the certificate from
that site and generating one yourself?  I've gotten a warning in IE as well,
so if a browser is going to give users a warning, why not just generate your
own?

-Original Message-
From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 5:45 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Free SSL (was Re: Authorize.net request)

> All, the bad cert warning is because CACert is not included as a 
> trusted certification authority by default in IE or Firefox certificate
settings.
> So yes, that warning will probably pop up for most people landing on a 
> site which uses their certs.  Note that one of their primary goals is 
> "inclusion into mainstream browsers."  No word of when they expect to hit
that goal.
>
> Regarding the little lock in the corner...I think 90% of web surfers 
> have no idea about the difference between SSL and not SSL.  But I use 
> SSL too on my sites that do credit card transactions, just for the 10% 
> of the users who do notice that little lock.
>
> -- Josh

Regardless...it's my arse as the developer if I don't set it up right and a
client gets hackedin this case I could care less what the user knows or
doesn't...I know better so I use certs ;-)

Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
phone: 250.480.0642
fax: 250.480.1264
cell: 250.920.8830
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.electricedgesystems.com 




~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225779
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Free SSL (was Re: Authorize.net request)

[Bryan Stevenson]

> All, the bad cert warning is because CACert is not included as a trusted
> certification authority by default in IE or Firefox certificate settings.
> So yes, that warning will probably pop up for most people landing on a site
> which uses their certs.  Note that one of their primary goals is "inclusion
> into mainstream browsers."  No word of when they expect to hit that goal.
>
> Regarding the little lock in the corner...I think 90% of web surfers have no
> idea about the difference between SSL and not SSL.  But I use SSL too on my
> sites that do credit card transactions, just for the 10% of the users who do
> notice that little lock.
>
> -- Josh

Regardless...it's my arse as the developer if I don't set it up right and a 
client gets hackedin this case I could care less what the user knows or 
doesn't...I know better so I use certs ;-)

Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
phone: 250.480.0642
fax: 250.480.1264
cell: 250.920.8830
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.electricedgesystems.com 


~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225773
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Free SSl certs was: Re: Authorize.net request

[John C. Bland II]

Ok. Here's the deal.

1) Very confusing to get a cert setup using their admin. (will add steps
below)
2) Once you figure it out it is a piece of cake to setup (can be done with 5
minutes, including validation sent by email)
3) https://katapultmedia.com/ shows the message.
https://www.katapultmedia.com spits at you. :-)

Steps to create cert:
1) Add domain to your account 1st (verified via email)
2) Create your csr on your server
3) Paste csr into text area under Server Certificates -> New section
4) If your domain is verified they will double check to make sure you are
ready to create it and everything is correct. If so, click Submit.
5) Paste your cert info to a text file on your server.
6) Finish the cert setup process within your server

So, it was very easy to do but it was very irritating to figure out their
system. But...for saving me $XXX.XX I am definitely grateful. :-)

Now, how would you go about doing wildcard certs? Can you get them trusted
by doing something on your server?

On 11/30/05, John C. Bland II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm trying them now. I'll post about my experience.
>
> On 11/30/05, Bryan Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> >
> > > Bryan, when I click join at CACert, I get a possible bogus certificate
> >
> > > warning from Firefox.  Is this something all CAcert users are going to
> > > have to subject their users too, or is it just the way that CAcert
> > setup
> > > their site?  I noticed that Firefox complained about *.cacert.org,
> > maybe
> > > if you actually tie it to a FQDN (www.cacert.org instead of
> > > *.cacert.org) you won't see the warning.  Have you tried their
> > > certificates?
> >
> > I haven't used 'em yet...only recently heard about them myself...so
> > here's the
> > loose tidbits I've heard:
> >
> > Folks like Verisign have a deal with browser makers to check the maker
> > of the
> > cert before showing that warningif they find that the maker is say
> > Verisign
> > that warning does not show.  This is why certs cost so much for
> > something that
> > is pretty basic.
> >
> > This is something that the CACert folks have been trying to get around
> > and I
> > think they have...but with NS and IE..perhaps not Firefox yet
> >
> > So some users may get that warning...others may notbut hey...if they
> > do
> > they'll know your site is secure ;-)
> >
> > You're probably better off reading their news or forums than listening
> > to my
> > ramblings...but hopefully that's enough info to find reality ;-)
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
> > VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
> > Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
> > phone: 250.480.0642
> > fax: 250.480.1264
> > cell: 250.920.8830
> > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > web: www.electricedgesystems.com
> >
> >
> > 

~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225772
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Free SSL (was Re: Authorize.net request)

[Josh Nathanson]

All, the bad cert warning is because CACert is not included as a trusted 
certification authority by default in IE or Firefox certificate settings. 
So yes, that warning will probably pop up for most people landing on a site 
which uses their certs.  Note that one of their primary goals is "inclusion 
into mainstream browsers."  No word of when they expect to hit that goal.

Regarding the little lock in the corner...I think 90% of web surfers have no 
idea about the difference between SSL and not SSL.  But I use SSL too on my 
sites that do credit card transactions, just for the 10% of the users who do 
notice that little lock.

-- Josh





- Original Message - 
From: "Munson, Jacob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" 
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 1:54 PM
Subject: RE: Authorize.net request


> Bryan, when I click join at CACert, I get a possible bogus certificate
> warning from Firefox.  Is this something all CAcert users are going to
> have to subject their users too, or is it just the way that CAcert setup
> their site?  I noticed that Firefox complained about *.cacert.org, maybe
> if you actually tie it to a FQDN (www.cacert.org instead of
> *.cacert.org) you won't see the warning.  Have you tried their
> certificates?
>
>> On 11/30/05, Bryan Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > np...and a Google of "free SSL certificate" turns up a
>> bunch of hits...but
>> > they
>> > all look like directory sites or re-direct sites (damn I hate those)
>> >
>> > Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
>> > VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
>> > Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
>> > phone: 250.480.0642
>> > fax: 250.480.1264
>> > cell: 250.920.8830
>> > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > web: www.electricedgesystems.com
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
> 

~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225770
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

RE: Free SSl certs was: Re: Authorize.net request

[Munson, Jacob]

> You're probably better off reading their news or forums than 
> listening to my 
> ramblings...but hopefully that's enough info to find reality ;-)

Well, I don't know that I'll be using them anytime soon (or any other
certificate, for that matter).  I was just curious.


[INFO] -- Access Manager:
This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential 
and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you are not the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any 
reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in 
error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its 
entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format.  Thank you.   A2



~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225769
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Free SSl certs was: Re: Authorize.net request

[John C. Bland II]

I'm trying them now. I'll post about my experience.

On 11/30/05, Bryan Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Bryan, when I click join at CACert, I get a possible bogus certificate
> > warning from Firefox.  Is this something all CAcert users are going to
> > have to subject their users too, or is it just the way that CAcert setup
> > their site?  I noticed that Firefox complained about *.cacert.org, maybe
> > if you actually tie it to a FQDN (www.cacert.org instead of
> > *.cacert.org) you won't see the warning.  Have you tried their
> > certificates?
>
> I haven't used 'em yet...only recently heard about them myself...so here's
> the
> loose tidbits I've heard:
>
> Folks like Verisign have a deal with browser makers to check the maker of
> the
> cert before showing that warningif they find that the maker is say
> Verisign
> that warning does not show.  This is why certs cost so much for something
> that
> is pretty basic.
>
> This is something that the CACert folks have been trying to get around and
> I
> think they have...but with NS and IE..perhaps not Firefox yet
>
> So some users may get that warning...others may notbut hey...if they
> do
> they'll know your site is secure ;-)
>
> You're probably better off reading their news or forums than listening to
> my
> ramblings...but hopefully that's enough info to find reality ;-)
>
> Cheers
>
> Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
> VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
> Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
> phone: 250.480.0642
> fax: 250.480.1264
> cell: 250.920.8830
> e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> web: www.electricedgesystems.com
>
>
> 

~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225768
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Free SSl certs was: Re: Authorize.net request

[Bryan Stevenson]

> Bryan, when I click join at CACert, I get a possible bogus certificate
> warning from Firefox.  Is this something all CAcert users are going to
> have to subject their users too, or is it just the way that CAcert setup
> their site?  I noticed that Firefox complained about *.cacert.org, maybe
> if you actually tie it to a FQDN (www.cacert.org instead of
> *.cacert.org) you won't see the warning.  Have you tried their
> certificates?

I haven't used 'em yet...only recently heard about them myself...so here's the 
loose tidbits I've heard:

Folks like Verisign have a deal with browser makers to check the maker of the 
cert before showing that warningif they find that the maker is say Verisign 
that warning does not show.  This is why certs cost so much for something that 
is pretty basic.

This is something that the CACert folks have been trying to get around and I 
think they have...but with NS and IE..perhaps not Firefox yet

So some users may get that warning...others may notbut hey...if they do 
they'll know your site is secure ;-)

You're probably better off reading their news or forums than listening to my 
ramblings...but hopefully that's enough info to find reality ;-)

Cheers

Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
phone: 250.480.0642
fax: 250.480.1264
cell: 250.920.8830
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.electricedgesystems.com 


~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225767
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Authorize.net request

[Tony]

i know, i just HATE that we have to do this. and i wanted to vent.

and yes, im psycho nazi about security, so dont worry, no converting needed
here, im in the choir.

:) tw

On 11/30/05, Dave Carabetta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/30/05, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > just a wild question but how many of us on here has ever had a situation 
> > where
> > someone was sniffing the packets on the wire, had the know how to decipher
> > what was there, and then use the data?
> >
> > really?
> >
>
> Respectfully, it's that sort of thought process that allows such
> hacking to continue to thrive across the internet. Further I would
> wager that most sites that have this happen to them don't even know
> (and probably still don't know) that it's even happening.
>
> Regards,
> Dave.
>
> 

~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225759
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

RE: Authorize.net request

[Munson, Jacob]

Bryan, when I click join at CACert, I get a possible bogus certificate
warning from Firefox.  Is this something all CAcert users are going to
have to subject their users too, or is it just the way that CAcert setup
their site?  I noticed that Firefox complained about *.cacert.org, maybe
if you actually tie it to a FQDN (www.cacert.org instead of
*.cacert.org) you won't see the warning.  Have you tried their
certificates?

> On 11/30/05, Bryan Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > np...and a Google of "free SSL certificate" turns up a 
> bunch of hits...but
> > they
> > all look like directory sites or re-direct sites (damn I hate those)
> >
> > Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
> > VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
> > Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
> > phone: 250.480.0642
> > fax: 250.480.1264
> > cell: 250.920.8830
> > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > web: www.electricedgesystems.com
> >
> >
> > 
> 
> 

~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225756
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Authorize.net request

[John C. Bland II]

yeah, I did the same and found a lot of "try for free" (verisign), etc.

(i hate those too)

On 11/30/05, Bryan Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> np...and a Google of "free SSL certificate" turns up a bunch of hits...but
> they
> all look like directory sites or re-direct sites (damn I hate those)
>
> Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
> VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
> Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
> phone: 250.480.0642
> fax: 250.480.1264
> cell: 250.920.8830
> e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> web: www.electricedgesystems.com
>
>
> 

~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225753
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Authorize.net request

[Bryan Stevenson]

np...and a Google of "free SSL certificate" turns up a bunch of hits...but they 
all look like directory sites or re-direct sites (damn I hate those)

Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
phone: 250.480.0642
fax: 250.480.1264
cell: 250.920.8830
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.electricedgesystems.com 


~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225750
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Authorize.net request

[John C. Bland II]

Coo. That's not the one I saw but I'll check them out.

Thx...

On 11/30/05, Bryan Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Bryan, I saw something about free certs somewhere but didn't save the
> link.
> > Mind passing the resource along?
>
> http://www.cacert.org/
>
> Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
> VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
> Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
> phone: 250.480.0642
> fax: 250.480.1264
> cell: 250.920.8830
> e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> web: www.electricedgesystems.com
>
> 

~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225748
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Authorize.net request

[Bryan Stevenson]

> Bryan, I saw something about free certs somewhere but didn't save the link.
> Mind passing the resource along?

http://www.cacert.org/

Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
phone: 250.480.0642
fax: 250.480.1264
cell: 250.920.8830
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.electricedgesystems.com

~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225747
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Authorize.net request

[John C. Bland II]

Bryan, I saw something about free certs somewhere but didn't save the link.
Mind passing the resource along?

On 11/30/05, Bryan Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > just a wild question but how many of us on here has ever had a situation
> where
> > someone was sniffing the packets on the wire, had the know how to
> decipher
> > what was there, and then use the data?
> >
> > really?
> >
> > tw
>
> To me or any of my clients..never...but I use SSL
>
> Now that you can get FREE SSL certs...there is just no excuse...and if
> Tony's
> scenario happens once it's too many times!! ;-)
>
> my 2 cents
>
> Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
> VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
> Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
> phone: 250.480.0642
> fax: 250.480.1264
> cell: 250.920.8830
> e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> web: www.electricedgesystems.com
>
>
> 

~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225746
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Authorize.net request

[Bryan Stevenson]

> just a wild question but how many of us on here has ever had a situation where
> someone was sniffing the packets on the wire, had the know how to decipher
> what was there, and then use the data?
>
> really?
>
> tw

To me or any of my clients..never...but I use SSL

Now that you can get FREE SSL certs...there is just no excuse...and if Tony's 
scenario happens once it's too many times!! ;-)

 my 2 cents

Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
phone: 250.480.0642
fax: 250.480.1264
cell: 250.920.8830
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.electricedgesystems.com 


~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225743
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Authorize.net request

[John C. Bland II]

Ray, it was a huge issue on another list somewhere about it not being
secure. I think it was the user group manager list. Someone was irate about
not seeing the lock and they pretty much spit on MM for not having it until
someone (MM employee) spoke up about how its done.

Coo on the original point.

On 11/30/05, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well, no I haven't bought anything from them, but I do get what your
> original point is now.
>
> I'm actually a little surprised to hear that...
>
> John C. Bland II wrote:
> > Have you bought from MM's online store? The button to checkout says
> Secure
> > Checkout but there is no lock. Why? Because the swf uses an https call
> to
> > process the order. The swf isn't viewed in an https setting.
> >
> > I agree with you guys whole heartedly. We were just dealing with a
> > completely different side of things and I was clearing up a
> misconception.
> >
> > On 11/30/05, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Not to mention the fact that if I am putting gin my credit card and
> >>personal info into a form, I NEED to see the lock down there in the
> >>corner.  If I don't, you won't see me typing my credit card info into
> >>that form.  So, it can lose you customers too.
> >>
> >>
> >>Mark A Kruger wrote:
> >>
> >>>Actually that is not correct... at least not practical.
> >>>
> >>>While it's true that the POST to authorize.net is secure, you have to
> >>>collect the data somehow first. That means the user would submit an
> >>
> >>insecure
> >>
> >>>form to US and we would turn around and post the data to auth.net.
> >>>
> >>>-mark
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>-Original Message-
> >>>From: John C. Bland II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 12:56 PM
> >>>To: CF-Talk
> >>>Subject: Re: Authorize.net request
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>You don't have to be in a secure site to post with AIM. If you notice
> >>
> >>the
> >>
> >>>url to the dll is secure (
> >>
> >>https://secure.authorize.net/gateway/transact.dll
> >>
> >>>).
> >>>
> >>>If SIM is what you want then I'll bow out gracefully. :-) I haven't
> used
> >>>SIM.
> >>>
> >>>Thx...
> >>>
> >>>On 11/30/05, Jason Herbolsheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>The problem we (Mike and I) were having was that we are unable to use
> >>
> >>AIM
> >>
> >>>>because we are not in a secure environment, so we needed to post to
> >>>>auth.net
> >>>>to finish the process (SIM).
> >>>>The problem we were having was building the fingerprint
> >>
> >>items(transaction
> >>
> >>>>key, loginid, sequence, amount) to pass to auth.net.  The API didn't
> >>>>provide
> >>>>the necessary cf code to complete the fingerprint  The function
> >>
> >>(InsertFP)
> >>
> >>>>was written for ASP, PERL and PHP, but not CF.  I found some examples
> >>>>(custom tags) that someone had already written to complete this
> process
> >>
> >>at
> >>
> >>>>the following link.
> >>>>After using these items the process went through flawlessly.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> http://www.experts-exchange.com/Web/WebDevSoftware/ColdFusion/Q_21626531.htm
> >>
> >>>>l
> >>>>
> >>>>Jason
> >>>>
> >>>>-Original Message-
> >>>>From: Stephen Hait [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 11:46 AM
> >>>>To: CF-Talk
> >>>>Subject: Re: Authorize.net request
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>I'd be interested in this, too. Please post here or send the example
> >>
> >>code
> >>
> >>>>to
> >>>>my address if you can.
> >>>>
> >>>>Thanks,
> >>>>Stephen
> >>>>
> >>>>On 11/30/05, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>back authorized or declined.  I can share the code with you once I
> get
> >>>>>to work in about an hour.  I'll email you off list when I get there,
> if
> >>>>>you'd like.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> 

~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225742
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Authorize.net request

[John C. Bland II]

Ha! :-) Good one...

On 11/30/05, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> dude!  that's like saying "how many of you have been hit by a bus?" and
> when no one answers, we all decide to stop looking both ways before
> crossing the street.
>
> i mean, *I've* never heard of it happening, but it *is* possible.
>
> Tony wrote:
> > just a wild question but how many of us on here has ever had a situation
> where
> > someone was sniffing the packets on the wire, had the know how to
> decipher
> > what was there, and then use the data?
> >
> > really?
> >
> > tw
> >
> > On 11/30/05, Mark A Kruger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Actually that is not correct... at least not practical.
> >>
> >>While it's true that the POST to authorize.net is secure, you have to
> >>collect the data somehow first. That means the user would submit an
> insecure
> >>form to US and we would turn around and post the data to auth.net.
> >>
> >>-mark
> >>
> >>
> >>-Original Message-
> >>From: John C. Bland II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 12:56 PM
> >>To: CF-Talk
> >>Subject: Re: Authorize.net request
> >>
> >>
> >>You don't have to be in a secure site to post with AIM. If you notice
> the
> >>url to the dll is secure (
> https://secure.authorize.net/gateway/transact.dll
> >>).
> >>
> >>If SIM is what you want then I'll bow out gracefully. :-) I haven't used
> >>SIM.
> >>
> >>Thx...
> >>
> >>On 11/30/05, Jason Herbolsheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>>The problem we (Mike and I) were having was that we are unable to use
> AIM
> >>>because we are not in a secure environment, so we needed to post to
> >>>auth.net
> >>>to finish the process (SIM).
> >>>The problem we were having was building the fingerprint
> items(transaction
> >>>key, loginid, sequence, amount) to pass to auth.net.  The API didn't
> >>>provide
> >>>the necessary cf code to complete the fingerprint  The function
> (InsertFP)
> >>>was written for ASP, PERL and PHP, but not CF.  I found some examples
> >>>(custom tags) that someone had already written to complete this process
> at
> >>>the following link.
> >>>After using these items the process went through flawlessly.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> http://www.experts-exchange.com/Web/WebDevSoftware/ColdFusion/Q_21626531.htm
> >>
> >>>l
> >>>
> >>>Jason
> >>>
> >>>-Original Message-
> >>>From: Stephen Hait [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 11:46 AM
> >>>To: CF-Talk
> >>>Subject: Re: Authorize.net request
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>I'd be interested in this, too. Please post here or send the example
> code
> >>>to
> >>>my address if you can.
> >>>
> >>>Thanks,
> >>>Stephen
> >>>
> >>>On 11/30/05, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>back authorized or declined.  I can share the code with you once I get
> >>>>to work in about an hour.  I'll email you off list when I get there,
> if
> >>>>you'd like.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> 

~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225741
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Authorize.net request

[John C. Bland II]

We haven't.

We did a large e-commerce site for a leading cell phone provider (it was
internal to their employees) and they didn't care about https for a whole
year. Version 2 had https which took all of 10 minutes to update the site
but for version 1 over 100k (or there about) was bought and no one cared.

In general, I always tell clients they NEED it to protect themselves from an
attack and their customers.

On 11/30/05, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> just a wild question but how many of us on here has ever had a situation
> where
> someone was sniffing the packets on the wire, had the know how to decipher
> what was there, and then use the data?
>
> really?
>
> tw
>
> On 11/30/05, Mark A Kruger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Actually that is not correct... at least not practical.
> >
> > While it's true that the POST to authorize.net is secure, you have to
> > collect the data somehow first. That means the user would submit an
> insecure
> > form to US and we would turn around and post the data to auth.net.
> >
> > -mark
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: John C. Bland II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 12:56 PM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: Re: Authorize.net request
> >
> >
> > You don't have to be in a secure site to post with AIM. If you notice
> the
> > url to the dll is secure (
> https://secure.authorize.net/gateway/transact.dll
> > ).
> >
> > If SIM is what you want then I'll bow out gracefully. :-) I haven't used
> > SIM.
> >
> > Thx...
> >
> > On 11/30/05, Jason Herbolsheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > The problem we (Mike and I) were having was that we are unable to use
> AIM
> > > because we are not in a secure environment, so we needed to post to
> > > auth.net
> > > to finish the process (SIM).
> > > The problem we were having was building the fingerprint
> items(transaction
> > > key, loginid, sequence, amount) to pass to auth.net.  The API didn't
> > > provide
> > > the necessary cf code to complete the fingerprint  The function
> (InsertFP)
> > > was written for ASP, PERL and PHP, but not CF.  I found some examples
> > > (custom tags) that someone had already written to complete this
> process at
> > > the following link.
> > > After using these items the process went through flawlessly.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.experts-exchange.com/Web/WebDevSoftware/ColdFusion/Q_21626531.htm
> > > l
> > >
> > > Jason
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Stephen Hait [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 11:46 AM
> > > To: CF-Talk
> > > Subject: Re: Authorize.net request
> > >
> > >
> > > I'd be interested in this, too. Please post here or send the example
> code
> > > to
> > > my address if you can.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Stephen
> > >
> > > On 11/30/05, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > back authorized or declined.  I can share the code with you once I
> get
> > > > to work in about an hour.  I'll email you off list when I get there,
> if
> > > > you'd like.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> 

~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225740
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Authorize.net request

[Dave Carabetta]

On 11/30/05, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> just a wild question but how many of us on here has ever had a situation where
> someone was sniffing the packets on the wire, had the know how to decipher
> what was there, and then use the data?
>
> really?
>

Respectfully, it's that sort of thought process that allows such
hacking to continue to thrive across the internet. Further I would
wager that most sites that have this happen to them don't even know
(and probably still don't know) that it's even happening.

Regards,
Dave.

~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225739
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Authorize.net request

[Ray Champagne]

Well, no I haven't bought anything from them, but I do get what your 
original point is now.

I'm actually a little surprised to hear that...

John C. Bland II wrote:
> Have you bought from MM's online store? The button to checkout says Secure
> Checkout but there is no lock. Why? Because the swf uses an https call to
> process the order. The swf isn't viewed in an https setting.
> 
> I agree with you guys whole heartedly. We were just dealing with a
> completely different side of things and I was clearing up a misconception.
> 
> On 11/30/05, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>>Not to mention the fact that if I am putting gin my credit card and
>>personal info into a form, I NEED to see the lock down there in the
>>corner.  If I don't, you won't see me typing my credit card info into
>>that form.  So, it can lose you customers too.
>>
>>
>>Mark A Kruger wrote:
>>
>>>Actually that is not correct... at least not practical.
>>>
>>>While it's true that the POST to authorize.net is secure, you have to
>>>collect the data somehow first. That means the user would submit an
>>
>>insecure
>>
>>>form to US and we would turn around and post the data to auth.net.
>>>
>>>-mark
>>>
>>>
>>>-Original Message-
>>>From: John C. Bland II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 12:56 PM
>>>To: CF-Talk
>>>Subject: Re: Authorize.net request
>>>
>>>
>>>You don't have to be in a secure site to post with AIM. If you notice
>>
>>the
>>
>>>url to the dll is secure (
>>
>>https://secure.authorize.net/gateway/transact.dll
>>
>>>).
>>>
>>>If SIM is what you want then I'll bow out gracefully. :-) I haven't used
>>>SIM.
>>>
>>>Thx...
>>>
>>>On 11/30/05, Jason Herbolsheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>The problem we (Mike and I) were having was that we are unable to use
>>
>>AIM
>>
>>>>because we are not in a secure environment, so we needed to post to
>>>>auth.net
>>>>to finish the process (SIM).
>>>>The problem we were having was building the fingerprint
>>
>>items(transaction
>>
>>>>key, loginid, sequence, amount) to pass to auth.net.  The API didn't
>>>>provide
>>>>the necessary cf code to complete the fingerprint  The function
>>
>>(InsertFP)
>>
>>>>was written for ASP, PERL and PHP, but not CF.  I found some examples
>>>>(custom tags) that someone had already written to complete this process
>>
>>at
>>
>>>>the following link.
>>>>After using these items the process went through flawlessly.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>http://www.experts-exchange.com/Web/WebDevSoftware/ColdFusion/Q_21626531.htm
>>
>>>>l
>>>>
>>>>Jason
>>>>
>>>>-Original Message-
>>>>From: Stephen Hait [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 11:46 AM
>>>>To: CF-Talk
>>>>Subject: Re: Authorize.net request
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I'd be interested in this, too. Please post here or send the example
>>
>>code
>>
>>>>to
>>>>my address if you can.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks,
>>>>Stephen
>>>>
>>>>On 11/30/05, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>back authorized or declined.  I can share the code with you once I get
>>>>>to work in about an hour.  I'll email you off list when I get there, if
>>>>>you'd like.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> 
> 

~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225738
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Authorize.net request

[John C. Bland II]

Have you bought from MM's online store? The button to checkout says Secure
Checkout but there is no lock. Why? Because the swf uses an https call to
process the order. The swf isn't viewed in an https setting.

I agree with you guys whole heartedly. We were just dealing with a
completely different side of things and I was clearing up a misconception.

On 11/30/05, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Not to mention the fact that if I am putting gin my credit card and
> personal info into a form, I NEED to see the lock down there in the
> corner.  If I don't, you won't see me typing my credit card info into
> that form.  So, it can lose you customers too.
>
>
> Mark A Kruger wrote:
> > Actually that is not correct... at least not practical.
> >
> > While it's true that the POST to authorize.net is secure, you have to
> > collect the data somehow first. That means the user would submit an
> insecure
> > form to US and we would turn around and post the data to auth.net.
> >
> > -mark
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: John C. Bland II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 12:56 PM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: Re: Authorize.net request
> >
> >
> > You don't have to be in a secure site to post with AIM. If you notice
> the
> > url to the dll is secure (
> https://secure.authorize.net/gateway/transact.dll
> > ).
> >
> > If SIM is what you want then I'll bow out gracefully. :-) I haven't used
> > SIM.
> >
> > Thx...
> >
> > On 11/30/05, Jason Herbolsheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>The problem we (Mike and I) were having was that we are unable to use
> AIM
> >>because we are not in a secure environment, so we needed to post to
> >>auth.net
> >>to finish the process (SIM).
> >>The problem we were having was building the fingerprint
> items(transaction
> >>key, loginid, sequence, amount) to pass to auth.net.  The API didn't
> >>provide
> >>the necessary cf code to complete the fingerprint  The function
> (InsertFP)
> >>was written for ASP, PERL and PHP, but not CF.  I found some examples
> >>(custom tags) that someone had already written to complete this process
> at
> >>the following link.
> >>After using these items the process went through flawlessly.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> http://www.experts-exchange.com/Web/WebDevSoftware/ColdFusion/Q_21626531.htm
> >
> >>l
> >>
> >>Jason
> >>
> >>-Original Message-
> >>From: Stephen Hait [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 11:46 AM
> >>To: CF-Talk
> >>Subject: Re: Authorize.net request
> >>
> >>
> >>I'd be interested in this, too. Please post here or send the example
> code
> >>to
> >>my address if you can.
> >>
> >>Thanks,
> >>Stephen
> >>
> >>On 11/30/05, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>back authorized or declined.  I can share the code with you once I get
> >>>to work in about an hour.  I'll email you off list when I get there, if
> >>>you'd like.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> 

~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225737
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Authorize.net request

[Ray Champagne]

dude!  that's like saying "how many of you have been hit by a bus?" and 
when no one answers, we all decide to stop looking both ways before 
crossing the street.

i mean, *I've* never heard of it happening, but it *is* possible.

Tony wrote:
> just a wild question but how many of us on here has ever had a situation where
> someone was sniffing the packets on the wire, had the know how to decipher
> what was there, and then use the data?
> 
> really?
> 
> tw
> 
> On 11/30/05, Mark A Kruger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>>Actually that is not correct... at least not practical.
>>
>>While it's true that the POST to authorize.net is secure, you have to
>>collect the data somehow first. That means the user would submit an insecure
>>form to US and we would turn around and post the data to auth.net.
>>
>>-mark
>>
>>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: John C. Bland II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 12:56 PM
>>To: CF-Talk
>>Subject: Re: Authorize.net request
>>
>>
>>You don't have to be in a secure site to post with AIM. If you notice the
>>url to the dll is secure (https://secure.authorize.net/gateway/transact.dll
>>).
>>
>>If SIM is what you want then I'll bow out gracefully. :-) I haven't used
>>SIM.
>>
>>Thx...
>>
>>On 11/30/05, Jason Herbolsheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>The problem we (Mike and I) were having was that we are unable to use AIM
>>>because we are not in a secure environment, so we needed to post to
>>>auth.net
>>>to finish the process (SIM).
>>>The problem we were having was building the fingerprint items(transaction
>>>key, loginid, sequence, amount) to pass to auth.net.  The API didn't
>>>provide
>>>the necessary cf code to complete the fingerprint  The function (InsertFP)
>>>was written for ASP, PERL and PHP, but not CF.  I found some examples
>>>(custom tags) that someone had already written to complete this process at
>>>the following link.
>>>After using these items the process went through flawlessly.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>http://www.experts-exchange.com/Web/WebDevSoftware/ColdFusion/Q_21626531.htm
>>
>>>l
>>>
>>>Jason
>>>
>>>-Original Message-
>>>From: Stephen Hait [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 11:46 AM
>>>To: CF-Talk
>>>Subject: Re: Authorize.net request
>>>
>>>
>>>I'd be interested in this, too. Please post here or send the example code
>>>to
>>>my address if you can.
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>Stephen
>>>
>>>On 11/30/05, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>back authorized or declined.  I can share the code with you once I get
>>>>to work in about an hour.  I'll email you off list when I get there, if
>>>>you'd like.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 

~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225736
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Authorize.net request

[John C. Bland II]

The practicality isn't what I was referring to. It seemed as if the thought
was "we're not behind https so we can't use AIM," which I was pointing out
is incorrect. I agree...posting to a form not behind https isn't good but I
wasn't dealing with that aspect.

On 11/30/05, Mark A Kruger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Actually that is not correct... at least not practical.
>
> While it's true that the POST to authorize.net is secure, you have to
> collect the data somehow first. That means the user would submit an
> insecure
> form to US and we would turn around and post the data to auth.net.
>
> -mark
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John C. Bland II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 12:56 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Authorize.net request
>
>
> You don't have to be in a secure site to post with AIM. If you notice the
> url to the dll is secure (
> https://secure.authorize.net/gateway/transact.dll
> ).
>
> If SIM is what you want then I'll bow out gracefully. :-) I haven't used
> SIM.
>
> Thx...
>
> On 11/30/05, Jason Herbolsheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The problem we (Mike and I) were having was that we are unable to use
> AIM
> > because we are not in a secure environment, so we needed to post to
> > auth.net
> > to finish the process (SIM).
> > The problem we were having was building the fingerprint
> items(transaction
> > key, loginid, sequence, amount) to pass to auth.net.  The API didn't
> > provide
> > the necessary cf code to complete the fingerprint  The function
> (InsertFP)
> > was written for ASP, PERL and PHP, but not CF.  I found some examples
> > (custom tags) that someone had already written to complete this process
> at
> > the following link.
> > After using these items the process went through flawlessly.
> >
> >
> >
>
> http://www.experts-exchange.com/Web/WebDevSoftware/ColdFusion/Q_21626531.htm
> > l
> >
> > Jason
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Stephen Hait [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 11:46 AM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: Re: Authorize.net request
> >
> >
> > I'd be interested in this, too. Please post here or send the example
> code
> > to
> > my address if you can.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Stephen
> >
> > On 11/30/05, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > back authorized or declined.  I can share the code with you once I get
> > > to work in about an hour.  I'll email you off list when I get there,
> if
> > > you'd like.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> 

~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225735
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Authorize.net request

[Tony]

just a wild question but how many of us on here has ever had a situation where
someone was sniffing the packets on the wire, had the know how to decipher
what was there, and then use the data?

really?

tw

On 11/30/05, Mark A Kruger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually that is not correct... at least not practical.
>
> While it's true that the POST to authorize.net is secure, you have to
> collect the data somehow first. That means the user would submit an insecure
> form to US and we would turn around and post the data to auth.net.
>
> -mark
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John C. Bland II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 12:56 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Authorize.net request
>
>
> You don't have to be in a secure site to post with AIM. If you notice the
> url to the dll is secure (https://secure.authorize.net/gateway/transact.dll
> ).
>
> If SIM is what you want then I'll bow out gracefully. :-) I haven't used
> SIM.
>
> Thx...
>
> On 11/30/05, Jason Herbolsheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The problem we (Mike and I) were having was that we are unable to use AIM
> > because we are not in a secure environment, so we needed to post to
> > auth.net
> > to finish the process (SIM).
> > The problem we were having was building the fingerprint items(transaction
> > key, loginid, sequence, amount) to pass to auth.net.  The API didn't
> > provide
> > the necessary cf code to complete the fingerprint  The function (InsertFP)
> > was written for ASP, PERL and PHP, but not CF.  I found some examples
> > (custom tags) that someone had already written to complete this process at
> > the following link.
> > After using these items the process went through flawlessly.
> >
> >
> >
> http://www.experts-exchange.com/Web/WebDevSoftware/ColdFusion/Q_21626531.htm
> > l
> >
> > Jason
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Stephen Hait [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 11:46 AM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: Re: Authorize.net request
> >
> >
> > I'd be interested in this, too. Please post here or send the example code
> > to
> > my address if you can.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Stephen
> >
> > On 11/30/05, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > back authorized or declined.  I can share the code with you once I get
> > > to work in about an hour.  I'll email you off list when I get there, if
> > > you'd like.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> 

~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225734
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Authorize.net request

[Ray Champagne]

Not to mention the fact that if I am putting gin my credit card and 
personal info into a form, I NEED to see the lock down there in the 
corner.  If I don't, you won't see me typing my credit card info into 
that form.  So, it can lose you customers too.


Mark A Kruger wrote:
> Actually that is not correct... at least not practical.
> 
> While it's true that the POST to authorize.net is secure, you have to
> collect the data somehow first. That means the user would submit an insecure
> form to US and we would turn around and post the data to auth.net.
> 
> -mark
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: John C. Bland II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 12:56 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Authorize.net request
> 
> 
> You don't have to be in a secure site to post with AIM. If you notice the
> url to the dll is secure (https://secure.authorize.net/gateway/transact.dll
> ).
> 
> If SIM is what you want then I'll bow out gracefully. :-) I haven't used
> SIM.
> 
> Thx...
> 
> On 11/30/05, Jason Herbolsheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>>The problem we (Mike and I) were having was that we are unable to use AIM
>>because we are not in a secure environment, so we needed to post to
>>auth.net
>>to finish the process (SIM).
>>The problem we were having was building the fingerprint items(transaction
>>key, loginid, sequence, amount) to pass to auth.net.  The API didn't
>>provide
>>the necessary cf code to complete the fingerprint  The function (InsertFP)
>>was written for ASP, PERL and PHP, but not CF.  I found some examples
>>(custom tags) that someone had already written to complete this process at
>>the following link.
>>After using these items the process went through flawlessly.
>>
>>
>>
> 
> http://www.experts-exchange.com/Web/WebDevSoftware/ColdFusion/Q_21626531.htm
> 
>>l
>>
>>Jason
>>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Stephen Hait [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 11:46 AM
>>To: CF-Talk
>>Subject: Re: Authorize.net request
>>
>>
>>I'd be interested in this, too. Please post here or send the example code
>>to
>>my address if you can.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Stephen
>>
>>On 11/30/05, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>back authorized or declined.  I can share the code with you once I get
>>>to work in about an hour.  I'll email you off list when I get there, if
>>>you'd like.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 

~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225732
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

RE: Authorize.net request

[Mark A Kruger]

Actually that is not correct... at least not practical.

While it's true that the POST to authorize.net is secure, you have to
collect the data somehow first. That means the user would submit an insecure
form to US and we would turn around and post the data to auth.net.

-mark


-Original Message-
From: John C. Bland II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 12:56 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Authorize.net request


You don't have to be in a secure site to post with AIM. If you notice the
url to the dll is secure (https://secure.authorize.net/gateway/transact.dll
).

If SIM is what you want then I'll bow out gracefully. :-) I haven't used
SIM.

Thx...

On 11/30/05, Jason Herbolsheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The problem we (Mike and I) were having was that we are unable to use AIM
> because we are not in a secure environment, so we needed to post to
> auth.net
> to finish the process (SIM).
> The problem we were having was building the fingerprint items(transaction
> key, loginid, sequence, amount) to pass to auth.net.  The API didn't
> provide
> the necessary cf code to complete the fingerprint  The function (InsertFP)
> was written for ASP, PERL and PHP, but not CF.  I found some examples
> (custom tags) that someone had already written to complete this process at
> the following link.
> After using these items the process went through flawlessly.
>
>
>
http://www.experts-exchange.com/Web/WebDevSoftware/ColdFusion/Q_21626531.htm
> l
>
> Jason
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Hait [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 11:46 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Authorize.net request
>
>
> I'd be interested in this, too. Please post here or send the example code
> to
> my address if you can.
>
> Thanks,
> Stephen
>
> On 11/30/05, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > back authorized or declined.  I can share the code with you once I get
> > to work in about an hour.  I'll email you off list when I get there, if
> > you'd like.
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>



~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225731
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

RE: Authorize.net request

[Emmet McGovern]

Who uses ninjas these days!?  That's so 1980's.  You might as well break out
the "Plumbers Helper" while you're at it.  

-e

-Original Message-
From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 2:57 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Authorize.net request

i mean, i didnt need to use any ninja for it.

tw





~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225730
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Authorize.net request

[Tony]

its VERY simple code.  its just a cfhttp with some parameters...

right?

i mean, i didnt need to use any ninja for it.

tw

On 11/30/05, John C. Bland II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ah, coo.
>
> On 11/30/05, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > you're fine.  that's just a warning, it goes through anyways.
> >
> > John C. Bland II wrote:
> > > Was my email with the code received? I got an email back about the body
> > > being too long.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> 

~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225729
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Authorize.net request

[John C. Bland II]

Ah, coo.

On 11/30/05, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> you're fine.  that's just a warning, it goes through anyways.
>
> John C. Bland II wrote:
> > Was my email with the code received? I got an email back about the body
> > being too long.
> >
> >
> >
>
> 

~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225725
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Authorize.net request

[Ray Champagne]

you're fine.  that's just a warning, it goes through anyways.

John C. Bland II wrote:
> Was my email with the code received? I got an email back about the body
> being too long.
> 
> 
> 

~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225724
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Authorize.net request

[John C. Bland II]

Was my email with the code received? I got an email back about the body
being too long.


~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225723
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Authorize.net request

[John C. Bland II]

You don't have to be in a secure site to post with AIM. If you notice the
url to the dll is secure (https://secure.authorize.net/gateway/transact.dll
).

If SIM is what you want then I'll bow out gracefully. :-) I haven't used
SIM.

Thx...

On 11/30/05, Jason Herbolsheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The problem we (Mike and I) were having was that we are unable to use AIM
> because we are not in a secure environment, so we needed to post to
> auth.net
> to finish the process (SIM).
> The problem we were having was building the fingerprint items(transaction
> key, loginid, sequence, amount) to pass to auth.net.  The API didn't
> provide
> the necessary cf code to complete the fingerprint  The function (InsertFP)
> was written for ASP, PERL and PHP, but not CF.  I found some examples
> (custom tags) that someone had already written to complete this process at
> the following link.
> After using these items the process went through flawlessly.
>
>
> http://www.experts-exchange.com/Web/WebDevSoftware/ColdFusion/Q_21626531.htm
> l
>
> Jason
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Hait [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 11:46 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Authorize.net request
>
>
> I'd be interested in this, too. Please post here or send the example code
> to
> my address if you can.
>
> Thanks,
> Stephen
>
> On 11/30/05, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > back authorized or declined.  I can share the code with you once I get
> > to work in about an hour.  I'll email you off list when I get there, if
> > you'd like.
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> 

~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225722
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Authorize.net request

[Ray Champagne]

You might want to think about asking Authorize.NET to add the cf code 
you found into the ir online docs.  Not sure if they'll do it or not, 
but if it was a choice in the sample scripts, I bet we could get more 
ppl to either switch to Cf or use it over PHP and ASP or :::shudder::: PERL.

It's all about spreading the CF love... :)

Ray

Jason Herbolsheimer wrote:
> The problem we (Mike and I) were having was that we are unable to use AIM
> because we are not in a secure environment, so we needed to post to auth.net
> to finish the process (SIM).
> The problem we were having was building the fingerprint items(transaction
> key, loginid, sequence, amount) to pass to auth.net.  The API didn't provide
> the necessary cf code to complete the fingerprint  The function (InsertFP)
> was written for ASP, PERL and PHP, but not CF.  I found some examples
> (custom tags) that someone had already written to complete this process at
> the following link.
> After using these items the process went through flawlessly.
> 
> http://www.experts-exchange.com/Web/WebDevSoftware/ColdFusion/Q_21626531.htm
> l
> 
> Jason
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Hait [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 11:46 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Authorize.net request
> 
> 
> I'd be interested in this, too. Please post here or send the example code to
> my address if you can.
> 
> Thanks,
> Stephen
> 
> On 11/30/05, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>>
>>back authorized or declined.  I can share the code with you once I get
>>to work in about an hour.  I'll email you off list when I get there, if
>>you'd like.
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225721
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

RE: Authorize.net request

[Jason Herbolsheimer]

The problem we (Mike and I) were having was that we are unable to use AIM
because we are not in a secure environment, so we needed to post to auth.net
to finish the process (SIM).
The problem we were having was building the fingerprint items(transaction
key, loginid, sequence, amount) to pass to auth.net.  The API didn't provide
the necessary cf code to complete the fingerprint  The function (InsertFP)
was written for ASP, PERL and PHP, but not CF.  I found some examples
(custom tags) that someone had already written to complete this process at
the following link.
After using these items the process went through flawlessly.

http://www.experts-exchange.com/Web/WebDevSoftware/ColdFusion/Q_21626531.htm
l

Jason

-Original Message-
From: Stephen Hait [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 11:46 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Authorize.net request


I'd be interested in this, too. Please post here or send the example code to
my address if you can.

Thanks,
Stephen

On 11/30/05, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> back authorized or declined.  I can share the code with you once I get
> to work in about an hour.  I'll email you off list when I get there, if
> you'd like.
>
>




~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225720
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Authorize.net request

[John C. Bland II]

I would suggest using AIM (read docs...Auth.net suggests it too). You can
create an MD5 in their control panel and use that in your code to make the
call. Below is code I used the other day from an old project kinda "redone"
a bit for this new project. I'm open to any suggestions someone may have
about my coding techniques as well.

Oh, Base.cfc (which this extends) is simply a function with a generic init()
so all cfc's extend it to receive their init() method.



(instead of StructNew pass in a struct with settings if needed; in this case
the ordersEmail is used in the cfc so that's a needed setting)

Hope it helps






























https://secure.authorize.net/gateway/transact.dll"; method="post">

































































~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225716
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Authorize.net request

[Stephen Hait]

I'd be interested in this, too. Please post here or send the example code to
my address if you can.

Thanks,
Stephen

On 11/30/05, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> back authorized or declined.  I can share the code with you once I get
> to work in about an hour.  I'll email you off list when I get there, if
> you'd like.
>
>


~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225709
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Authorize.net request

[Ray Champagne]

Hi Mike:

There's an easier way to do this than worrying about generating a 
fingerprint and all that stuff.  I just set up a payment gateway 
yesterday at Authorize.NET for a nonprofit client who wanted to take 
donations via the web.  Basically, it's just an http call that returns 
back authorized or declined.  I can share the code with you once I get 
to work in about an hour.  I'll email you off list when I get there, if 
you'd like.

Ray

Mike Klostermeyer wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> I'm hoping someone out there has an example they could share
> for a SIM request to authorize.net that generates the required fingerprint.
> 
> Mike Klostermeyer
> 
> 
> 

~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225685
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Authorize.net request

[Tony]

not sure what you mean, or what you are looking for.
for my wifes business www.mydinnercompany.com
i built the order processing around auth.net.

what EXACTLY are you looking for.
id scan my fingerprint, but im not sure thats what you want :)

tony

On 11/30/05, Mike Klostermeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm hoping someone out there has an example they could share
> for a SIM request to authorize.net that generates the required fingerprint.
>
> Mike Klostermeyer
>
>
> 

~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225674
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Authorize.net

[Rick Root]

Alex Sherwood wrote:
> 
> But the form data they type into your form that is then CFHTTP'd to 
> Auth.net * should * be encrypted. For this, you'll need a cert.

Not on the server making the request you don't.  CFHTTP uses SSL when 
you call an https:// url.  The form fields are sent encrypted.

Obviously, you need a certificate to protect YOUR web page, but that has 
nothing to do with the CFHTTP call.

  - Rick



~|
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place 
for dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=11

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:189673
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

RE: Authorize.net

[Tim Laureska]

Ryan... Authorize.net sent me some sample scripts to use... if you're
interested email me off list, plus they provide detail instructions
right on their site if you're a reseller or merchant

Tim

-Original Message-
From: Ryan Mannion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 11:51 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Authorize.net

Has anyone used authorize.net for thier payment processing gateway?

I sent an email asking about how the control would work. I've only
used Verisign Pay Flow Pro in the past. This is thier response.

"This is the flow of control for AIM:
- The customer submits the order form on your web site.
- This form will post into a script on your server.

This script must do the following:
- Make a Direct Socket Connection to our Transact.DLL using SSL.
- Submit the transaction details. - Transact.DLL processes the
transaction and
generates the results.
- The results are returned directly to the script that created the
connection.
- Generate the receipt page using the results of the transaction that
were
returned."


How would I make a direct socket connection to thier transact.dll
using SSL? I know how to install and configure the SSL cert, but how
would I make a Direct Socket Connection in Cold Fusion?

Any suggestions would be welcomed!



~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:189551
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Authorize.net

[Alex Sherwood]

Rick Root wrote:

>Ryan Mannion wrote:
>  
>
>>How would I make a direct socket connection to thier transact.dll
>>using SSL? I know how to install and configure the SSL cert, but how
>>would I make a Direct Socket Connection in Cold Fusion?
>>
>>
>
>You don't need to do anything as far as installing and configuration an 
>SSL cert.
>
>Just use  to call their dll
>
>  
>

But the form data they type into your form that is then CFHTTP'd to 
Auth.net * should * be encrypted. For this, you'll need a cert.

>It's really very easy.
>
>  - Rick
>  
>

-- 
Alex Sherwood
Director, Internet Services
PHS Collection Agency
Phone: 813-283-4579
Web: www.phs-net.com


~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:189550
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Authorize.net

[Alex Sherwood]

Ryan Mannion wrote:

>Has anyone used authorize.net for thier payment processing gateway?
>
>
>
>How would I make a direct socket connection to thier transact.dll
>using SSL? I know how to install and configure the SSL cert, but how
>would I make a Direct Socket Connection in Cold Fusion?
>

I've used Auth.net for 3+ years.

You post transactions to their server via a standard HTTP post over 
HTTPs. They return a comma delimited list of result fields. They have 
good docs on the field names, requirements, etc. on their site.

Because CFHTTP is absolutely worthless, we use a COM control to connect. 
Check it out at www.xauthorize.com. You use createObject to get a handle 
on the object, set it properties and call the charge() method. You then 
read the properties of the object to get your results.

Hope this helps.

--
Alex Sherwood

~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:189549
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Authorize.net

[Rick Root]

Ryan Mannion wrote:
> 
> How would I make a direct socket connection to thier transact.dll
> using SSL? I know how to install and configure the SSL cert, but how
> would I make a Direct Socket Connection in Cold Fusion?

You don't need to do anything as far as installing and configuration an 
SSL cert.

Just use  to call their dll

It's really very easy.

  - Rick

~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:189548
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Authorize.net

[Paul Malan]

I've used Authorizenet a few times.  Here's a test script that is a
bit dated - I think it'll still work as is but they may have made some
minor changes in the past year...

https://secure.authorize.net/gateway/transact.dll";
METHOD="POST" RESOLVEURL="no">






 


































On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:50:56 -0500, Ryan Mannion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone used authorize.net for thier payment processing gateway?
> 
> I sent an email asking about how the control would work. I've only
> used Verisign Pay Flow Pro in the past. This is thier response.
> 
> "This is the flow of control for AIM:
> - The customer submits the order form on your web site.
> - This form will post into a script on your server.
> 
> This script must do the following:
> - Make a Direct Socket Connection to our Transact.DLL using SSL.
> - Submit the transaction details. - Transact.DLL processes the transaction and
> generates the results.
> - The results are returned directly to the script that created the connection.
> - Generate the receipt page using the results of the transaction that were
> returned."
> 
> How would I make a direct socket connection to thier transact.dll
> using SSL? I know how to install and configure the SSL cert, but how
> would I make a Direct Socket Connection in Cold Fusion?
> 
> Any suggestions would be welcomed!
> 
> 

~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:189547
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: authorize.net processing

[Tim Laureska]

thanks Mark

>-Original Message-
>From: Mark A Kruger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 12:32 PM
>To: 'CF-Talk'
>Subject: RE: authorize.net processing
>
>Tim, 
> 
>Nope - you use the password in the old "3.0" implimentation. The x_tran_key 
>is created by you in the merchant terminal. You answer a "secret question" 
>and they use your answer to give you a hash or encrypted string. That string 
>is then used as your x_tran_key. This is the version 3.1 implimentation 
>(which you should be following). You can use AIM with username, password 
>and trans key - or just username and transkey (I think that's right). If 
>you want to change the x_tran_key - go to the merchant terminal, log in, and 
>answer the secret question you provided last time. If you have never done 
>this, use your username as the answer. 
> 
>-Mark 
> 
> 
>-Original Message- 
>From: Tim Laureska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 5:28 PM 
>To: CF-Talk 
>Subject: RE: authorize.net processing 
> 
> 
>Mark/Damien... I'm reading thru the AIM PDF now... is the x_tran_key the 
>same as the password provided by Authorize.net... they provided me with 
>just a merchant username & password 
> 
>-----Original Message- 
>From: Mark A Kruger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 5:35 PM 
>To: CF-Talk 
>Subject: RE: authorize.net processing 
> 
>AIM stands for "advanced implimentation" and SIM stands for SIMPLE. If 
>you 
>are using the "advanced" connection method - where your web server makes 
>a 
>request and handles the response without the browser ever being directed 
>to 
>Authorize.net - then AIM is the one you want. Spend a little time with 
>the 
>AIM implimentation guide to familiarize yourself with the process. 
>Basically 
>you get back data in a delimited form and you figure out how the 
>transaction 
>was handled. 
> 
>-Mark 
> 
> 
>-Original Message- 
>From: Tim Laureska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 4:24 PM 
>To: CF-Talk 
>Subject: RE: authorize.net processing 
> 
> 
>Thanks for the response Mark...Well... I guess for starters, 
>authorize.net gave me two sample tags cf_aim.cfm and a SIM tag... I'm 
>pretty sure I use the AIM tag for a Windows server environment... is 
>that right? Looks like the SIM tag relates to a unix environment 
> 
>-Original Message- 
>From: Mark A Kruger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 5:03 PM 
>To: CF-Talk 
>Subject: RE: authorize.net processing 
> 
>What do you need to know? I use them for several clients of ours. 
> 
>-Mark 
> 
>-Original Message- 
>From: Tim Laureska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 3:36 PM 
>To: CF-Talk 
>Subject: authorize.net processing 
> 
> 
>Hey.. anyone have experience with the CF tags provided by authorize.net 
>to facilitate their CC processing - and willing to lend a hand getting 
>started to making it work? 
> 
>Tim 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

~|
Protect your mail server with built in anti-virus protection. It's not only good for 
you, it's good for everybody.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=39

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:182803
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

RE: authorize.net processing

[Mark A Kruger]

Tim,

Nope - you use the password in the old "3.0" implimentation. The x_tran_key
is created by you in the merchant terminal. You answer a "secret question"
and they use your answer to give you a hash or encrypted string. That string
is then used as your x_tran_key.  This is the version 3.1 implimentation
(which you should be following).  You can use AIM with username, password
and trans key - or just username and transkey (I think that's right).  If
you want to change the x_tran_key - go to the merchant terminal, log in, and
answer the secret question you provided last time.  If you have never done
this, use your username as the answer.

-Mark


-Original Message-
From: Tim Laureska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 5:28 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: authorize.net processing


Mark/Damien... I'm reading thru the AIM PDF now... is the x_tran_key the
same as the password provided by Authorize.net... they provided me with
just a merchant username & password

-Original Message-
From: Mark A Kruger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 5:35 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: authorize.net processing

AIM stands for "advanced implimentation" and SIM stands for SIMPLE. If
you
are using the "advanced" connection method - where your web server makes
a
request and handles the response without the browser ever being directed
to
Authorize.net - then AIM is the one you want. Spend a little time with
the
AIM implimentation guide to familiarize yourself with the process.
Basically
you get back data in a delimited form and you figure out how the
transaction
was handled.

-Mark


-Original Message-
From: Tim Laureska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 4:24 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: authorize.net processing


Thanks for the response Mark...Well... I guess for starters,
authorize.net gave me two sample tags cf_aim.cfm and a SIM tag... I'm
pretty sure I use the AIM tag for a Windows server environment... is
that right?  Looks like the SIM tag relates to a unix environment

-Original Message-
From: Mark A Kruger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 5:03 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: authorize.net processing

What do you need to know?  I use them for several clients of ours.

-Mark

-Original Message-
From: Tim Laureska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 3:36 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: authorize.net processing


Hey.. anyone have experience with the CF tags provided by authorize.net
to facilitate their CC processing -  and willing to lend a hand getting
started to making it work?

Tim













~|
Purchase from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and support the CF 
community.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=34

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:182797
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: authorize.net processing

[Rick Root]

fwiw, I've never used a custom tag for authorize.net.

It's a pretty simply CFHTTP call ..

Unfortunately since I'm running BlueDragon right now, and BlueDRagon 
CFHTTP doesn't support SSL connections, I'm doing my credit card 
authorizations with a php page.

  - Rick


~|
Sams Teach Yourself Regular Expressions in 10 Minutes  by Ben Forta 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=40

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:182778
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

RE: authorize.net processing

[Tim Laureska]

Mark/Damien... I'm reading thru the AIM PDF now... is the x_tran_key the
same as the password provided by Authorize.net... they provided me with
just a merchant username & password

-Original Message-
From: Mark A Kruger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 5:35 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: authorize.net processing

AIM stands for "advanced implimentation" and SIM stands for SIMPLE. If
you
are using the "advanced" connection method - where your web server makes
a
request and handles the response without the browser ever being directed
to
Authorize.net - then AIM is the one you want. Spend a little time with
the
AIM implimentation guide to familiarize yourself with the process.
Basically
you get back data in a delimited form and you figure out how the
transaction
was handled.

-Mark


-Original Message-
From: Tim Laureska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 4:24 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: authorize.net processing


Thanks for the response Mark...Well... I guess for starters,
authorize.net gave me two sample tags cf_aim.cfm and a SIM tag... I'm
pretty sure I use the AIM tag for a Windows server environment... is
that right?  Looks like the SIM tag relates to a unix environment

-Original Message-
From: Mark A Kruger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 5:03 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: authorize.net processing

What do you need to know?  I use them for several clients of ours.

-Mark

-Original Message-
From: Tim Laureska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 3:36 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: authorize.net processing


Hey.. anyone have experience with the CF tags provided by authorize.net
to facilitate their CC processing -  and willing to lend a hand getting
started to making it work?

Tim











~|
Purchase from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and support the CF 
community.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=34

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:182774
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

RE: authorize.net processing

[Mark A Kruger]

AIM stands for "advanced implimentation" and SIM stands for SIMPLE. If you
are using the "advanced" connection method - where your web server makes a
request and handles the response without the browser ever being directed to
Authorize.net - then AIM is the one you want. Spend a little time with the
AIM implimentation guide to familiarize yourself with the process. Basically
you get back data in a delimited form and you figure out how the transaction
was handled.

-Mark


-Original Message-
From: Tim Laureska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 4:24 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: authorize.net processing


Thanks for the response Mark...Well... I guess for starters,
authorize.net gave me two sample tags cf_aim.cfm and a SIM tag... I'm
pretty sure I use the AIM tag for a Windows server environment... is
that right?  Looks like the SIM tag relates to a unix environment

-Original Message-
From: Mark A Kruger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 5:03 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: authorize.net processing

What do you need to know?  I use them for several clients of ours.

-Mark

-Original Message-
From: Tim Laureska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 3:36 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: authorize.net processing


Hey.. anyone have experience with the CF tags provided by authorize.net
to facilitate their CC processing -  and willing to lend a hand getting
started to making it work?

Tim









~|
Sams Teach Yourself Regular Expressions in 10 Minutes  by Ben Forta 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=40

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:182767
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: authorize.net processing

[Damien McKenna]

Tim Laureska wrote:

>I'm pretty sure I use the AIM tag for a Windows server environment... is
>that right?  Looks like the SIM tag relates to a unix environment
>  
>
AIM vs SIM are two different ways of doing credit card processing via 
Authorize.net and can be used with any server side programming system 
you may be using.  Read up on their support site and you'll get a better 
idea of it.
-- 
*Damien McKenna* - Web Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

The Limu Company - http://www.thelimucompany.com/ - 407-804-1014
"Nothing endures but change." - Heraclitus

~|
Purchase from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and support the CF 
community.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=36

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:182766
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

RE: authorize.net processing

[Tim Laureska]

Thanks for the response Mark...Well... I guess for starters,
authorize.net gave me two sample tags cf_aim.cfm and a SIM tag... I'm
pretty sure I use the AIM tag for a Windows server environment... is
that right?  Looks like the SIM tag relates to a unix environment

-Original Message-
From: Mark A Kruger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 5:03 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: authorize.net processing

What do you need to know?  I use them for several clients of ours.

-Mark

-Original Message-
From: Tim Laureska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 3:36 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: authorize.net processing


Hey.. anyone have experience with the CF tags provided by authorize.net
to facilitate their CC processing -  and willing to lend a hand getting
started to making it work?

Tim







~|
Sams Teach Yourself Regular Expressions in 10 Minutes  by Ben Forta 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=40

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:182764
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

RE: authorize.net processing

[Mark A Kruger]

What do you need to know?  I use them for several clients of ours.

-Mark

-Original Message-
From: Tim Laureska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 3:36 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: authorize.net processing


Hey.. anyone have experience with the CF tags provided by authorize.net
to facilitate their CC processing -  and willing to lend a hand getting
started to making it work?

Tim





~|
Protect your mail server with built in anti-virus protection. It's not only good for 
you, it's good for everybody.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=39

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:182762
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: authorize.net processing

[Damien McKenna]

Tim Laureska wrote:

>Hey.. anyone have experience with the CF tags provided by authorize.net
>to facilitate their CC processing -  and willing to lend a hand getting
>started to making it work? 
>  
>
Are there any CFCs for Authorize.net?  It would seem an obvious idea...  
There's CF_OpenAuthNet but it looks like it hasn't been updated since 2001.
-- 
*Damien McKenna* - Web Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

The Limu Company - http://www.thelimucompany.com/ - 407-804-1014
"Nothing endures but change." - Heraclitus

~|
The annual ColdFusion User Conference is being held Sat 6/26 - Sun 6/27/04 8am-5pm in 
the Washington DC Area. 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=44

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:182761
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Re: Authorize.net Tag Problem

[Jacob]

Since September 15th...

At 07:18 AM 9/23/2004, you wrote:
>Authorize.net is currently suffering from intermittent outages caused by
>distributed denial of service attacks.
>
>   - Rick
>
>--
>[Todays Threads] 
>[This Message] 
>[Subscription] 
>[Fast 
>  Unsubscribe] [User Settings] 
>[Donations 
>and Support]
>
>--
>
>28b96b1a.jpg
>
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]
 [Donations and Support]

Re: Authorize.net Tag Problem

[Jerry Johnson]

Darn. That was supposed to go direct.

Stupid reply-all!

Jerry Johnson
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]
 [Donations and Support]

Re: Authorize.net Tag Problem

[Jerry Johnson]

Eron,

Are you still using https://www.authorize.net?

We were told yesterday by tech cupport that the address needs to be https://secure.authorize.net

This instantly speeded up the requests, and many more are going through. (Note: we are still having intermittent problems, but much less than on www.)

Jerry Johnson
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]
 [Donations and Support]

Re: Authorize.net Tag Problem

[Rick Root]

Authorize.net is currently suffering from intermittent outages caused by 
distributed denial of service attacks.

  - Rick
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]
 [Donations and Support]