[cfaussie] Re: Safari for Windows
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 12:00:33PM +1000, Dale Fraser wrote: Here's an idea. Don't support safari. Catering to such a small minority is a waste of time. Get the mac users to use a different browser. Regards Dale Fraser Do remember that your site's statistics may reflect its current behaviour instead of your potential audience. On the other hand, if the Safari support is really only to satisfy the quirks of manager X who happens to be a fanatic, maybe the client should know what that support is costing them. Might change their minds on how important it is. For javascript issues, I *prefer* to test my code on as many platforms as possible, if only to help identify areas that are not as robust as they could be. IEmac is another issue entirely... /$0.02 -T --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups cfaussie group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: Safari for Windows
This is a pretty handy testing tool http://www.browsercam.com/ They have a variety of OS/browsers setup which you can access via remote desktop. Cheers, Pete On 4/19/06, Tom Kerr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 12:00:33PM +1000, Dale Fraser wrote: Here's an idea. Don't support safari. Catering to such a small minority is a waste of time. Get the mac users to use a different browser. Regards Dale FraserDo remember that your site's statistics may reflect its current behaviour instead of your potential audience.On the other hand, if theSafari support is really only to satisfy the quirks of manager X whohappens to be a fanatic, maybe the client should know what that support is costing them.Might change their minds on how important it is.For _javascript_ issues, I *prefer* to test my code on as many platformsas possible, if only to help identify areas that are not as robust as they could be.IEmac is another issue entirely.../$0.02-T --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups cfaussie group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] OT: Anyone here from Macquarie bank?
Heya all, Is there anyone on the list who is working from behind the firewall at Macquarie Bank? I'm trying to sort out a strange issue that only they are having with a site we've developed. Or else, does anyone have a contact within Macq Bank that wouldn't mind an email from me? thanks. Ryan Sabir Technical Director Newgency Pty Ltd Web | Multimedia | eMarketing 224 Riley St Surry Hills NSW 2010 Sydney, Australia --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups cfaussie group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: comparing two queries - which records are different
Hi Barry Select * from new_query where id not in (select id from old_query) HTH Antony On 4/20/06, Barry Beattie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi allI have 2 multi-tabled queries that I need to compare.the origional is horribly written and returns 1242 results. the new improved query returns 1245 results.I want to see what the 3 different results are.any suggestions? SQLServer2000thanxbarry.b --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups cfaussie group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: comparing two queries - which records are different
can you left outer joins in query-of-queries? I don't know if you can, but if so, that would be a good palce to start. otherwise, order the fields the same, paste the results into excel, and run your eye over it. :-0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20/04/2006 11:37 am hi all I have 2 multi-tabled queries that I need to compare. the origional is horribly written and returns 1242 results. the new improved query returns 1245 results. I want to see what the 3 different results are. any suggestions? SQLServer2000 thanx barry.b --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups cfaussie group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: comparing two queries - which records are different
Andrew: Select field_1 , field_2 ... , field_17 from new_query where field_1 not in (select field_1 from old_query) AND (...the other 16 fields?) the uniqueness may not be confined to just one field/column. I think it's a unique row that's different OR (more likely) duplicate rows of the same data (but unique in a table) Scott: the Excel idea is a worthy fall-back plan. wouldn't mind seeing if there was a simpler SQL way first if it was SQLServer2005 I could use the new Except keyword On 4/20/06, Scott Thornton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: can you left outer joins in query-of-queries? I don't know if you can, but if so, that would be a good palce to start. otherwise, order the fields the same, paste the results into excel, and run your eye over it. :-0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20/04/2006 11:37 am hi all I have 2 multi-tabled queries that I need to compare. the origional is horribly written and returns 1242 results. the new improved query returns 1245 results. I want to see what the 3 different results are. any suggestions? SQLServer2000 thanx barry.b --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups cfaussie group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
