[cfaussie] Re: Why Doesn't this Work
The return type should just be the name of the componentYou can fully qualify it, i.e. com.package.test, but since Test resides in the same directory as itself (I know that sounds weird, but it's the logic), you can just write returns="Test". MarkOn 7/28/06, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: A struct seems to work, but was expecting there might be a return type of object or component but there isn't Regards Dale Fraser http://dale.fraser.id.au From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto: cfaussie@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Mark Mandel Sent: Friday, 28 July 2006 15:04 PM To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Why Doesn't this Work Because init doesn't 'return this;' Mark On 7/28/06, Dale Fraser < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: test.cfm Test.cfc Gets Variable TEST is undefined. The error occurred in D:\CogStateWeb\dmf\test.cfm: line 2 1 : 2 : Regards Dale Fraser http://dale.fraser.id.au -- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.compoundtheory.com -- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]W: www.compoundtheory.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: Why Doesn't this Work
Ahh.. Now I know what you're doing.. I apologise.. You can set your return type to the component name/path.. -Original Message-From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Dale FraserSent: Friday, 28 July 2006 3:08 PMTo: cfaussie@googlegroups.comSubject: [cfaussie] Re: Why Doesn't this Work Doh, My bad, also what return type should the init function have, I normally leave it blank but is there a valid return type that should be used? RegardsDale Fraser http://dale.fraser.id.au From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:cfaussie@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Mark MandelSent: Friday, 28 July 2006 15:04 PMTo: cfaussie@googlegroups.comSubject: [cfaussie] Re: Why Doesn't this Work Because init doesn't 'return this;' Mark On 7/28/06, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: test.cfm Test.cfc Gets Variable TEST is undefined. The error occurred in D:\CogStateWeb\dmf\test.cfm: line 2 1 : 2 : RegardsDale Fraser http://dale.fraser.id.au -- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]W: www.compoundtheory.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: Why Doesn't this Work
Generally an init function returns the object itself.BlairOn 7/28/06, Joel Cass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Try using a cfreturn tag.. OR (with your component) You should have a look at cfdocs and try a few things out before posting.. That's my opinion anyway -Original Message-From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:cfaussie@googlegroups.com]On Behalf Of Mark MandelSent: Friday, 28 July 2006 3:04 PMTo: cfaussie@googlegroups.comSubject: [cfaussie] Re: Why Doesn't this WorkBecause init doesn't 'return this;' Mark On 7/28/06, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: test.cfm Test.cfc Gets Variable TEST is undefined. The error occurred in D:\CogStateWeb\dmf\test.cfm: line 2 1 : 2 : RegardsDale Fraser http://dale.fraser.id.au -- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]W: www.compoundtheory.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: Why Doesn't this Work
Try using a cfreturn tag.. OR (with your component) You should have a look at cfdocs and try a few things out before posting.. That's my opinion anyway -Original Message-From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Mark MandelSent: Friday, 28 July 2006 3:04 PMTo: cfaussie@googlegroups.comSubject: [cfaussie] Re: Why Doesn't this WorkBecause init doesn't 'return this;' Mark On 7/28/06, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: test.cfm Test.cfc Gets Variable TEST is undefined. The error occurred in D:\CogStateWeb\dmf\test.cfm: line 2 1 : 2 : RegardsDale Fraser http://dale.fraser.id.au -- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]W: www.compoundtheory.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: Why Doesn't this Work
A struct seems to work, but was expecting there might be a return type of object or component but there isn’t Regards Dale Fraser http://dale.fraser.id.au From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:cfaussie@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Mark Mandel Sent: Friday, 28 July 2006 15:04 PM To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Why Doesn't this Work Because init doesn't 'return this;' Mark On 7/28/06, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: test.cfm Test.cfc Gets Variable TEST is undefined. The error occurred in D:\CogStateWeb\dmf\test.cfm: line 2 1 : 2 : Regards Dale Fraser http://dale.fraser.id.au -- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.compoundtheory.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: Why Doesn't this Work
Doh, My bad, also what return type should the init function have, I normally leave it blank but is there a valid return type that should be used? Regards Dale Fraser http://dale.fraser.id.au From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:cfaussie@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Mark Mandel Sent: Friday, 28 July 2006 15:04 PM To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Why Doesn't this Work Because init doesn't 'return this;' Mark On 7/28/06, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: test.cfm Test.cfc Gets Variable TEST is undefined. The error occurred in D:\CogStateWeb\dmf\test.cfm: line 2 1 : 2 : Regards Dale Fraser http://dale.fraser.id.au -- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.compoundtheory.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: Why Doesn't this Work
Because init doesn't 'return this;' MarkOn 7/28/06, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: test.cfm Test.cfc Gets Variable TEST is undefined. The error occurred in D:\CogStateWeb\dmf\test.cfm: line 2 1 : 2 : Regards Dale Fraser http://dale.fraser.id.au -- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]W: www.compoundtheory.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Why Doesn't this Work
test.cfm Test.cfc Gets Variable TEST is undefined. The error occurred in D:\CogStateWeb\dmf\test.cfm: line 2 1 : 2 : Regards Dale Fraser http://dale.fraser.id.au --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: variables.instance
Exactly. Mark On 7/28/06, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Ok, > > > > So just to clarify for everyone. Cause it wasn't clear to me. > > > > variables IS private to a CFC, it just contains other CFC object related > into. Here's a sample that will make it easy to understand. > > > > Test.cfm > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Test.cfc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.compoundtheory.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: variables.instance
Ok,
So just to clarify for everyone. Cause it wasn't clear to me.
variables IS private to a CFC, it just contains other CFC object
related into. Here's a sample that will make it easy to understand.
Test.cfm
Test.cfc
Outputs
---
struct
ME
HELLO
struct
INIT
function
init
Arguments:
none
Return Type:
Roles:
Access:
public
Output:
Yes
ME
THERE
THIS
component
dmf.Deck
INIT
function
init
Arguments:
none
Return Type:
Roles:
Access:
public
Output:
Yes
struct
ME
HELLO
THUS: the CFC can NOT access all variables. Scope and the CFM can NOT
access the CFC variables scope.
So the only reason to use the variables.instance would be to not have
the other local references such as INIT and THIS.
Regards
Dale Fraser
http://dale.fraser.id.au
-Original Message-
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
[mailto:cfaussie@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Mark Mandel
Sent: Friday, 28 July 2006 13:53 PM
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Subject: [cfaussie] Re: variables.instance
On 7/28/06, Dale Fraser
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Mark,
>
> But I thought that the variables scope was only accessible to the
CFC that
> you're using it in. Why then would you need to worry?
This is true, but maybe I didn't explain myself properly.
If I wanted to make a copy of the values in a CFC (assuming all it has
is basic types of values in the instance struct) having the instance
struct allows me to do this:
(in cfscript'ish for ease)
function getMemento() : Struct
{
return duplicate(variables.instance);
}
And it is very easy.
There is no way I could go duplicate(variables), as the variables
scope has reference to LOTS of things - including UDFS that are set to
that CFC, the 'this' scope, and various other pieces.
It's more of a personal preference thing. I like it because it keeps
things separate, and I don't have to worry about overlap.
>
> Can the CFC access all variables. Scope, ie ones from other pages
/ cfc's?
It can access shared scopes (application, session etc), although
getting to those from a CFC is another design discussion.
That make a bit more sense?
--
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: www.compoundtheory.com
ICQ: 3094740
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: (No Items) under ms sql server
Both the server and my PC run SQL 2000, and yes I have removed several times...and even tried to connect via IP address, but the guy I am working in conjunction with uses SQL 2005 to connect, so this may have something to do with it? I also have SQL 2005 on my PC and when I connect to the server I can see the databases..?? weird!!On 7/28/06, Dale Fraser < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ohh, That doesn't make sense then. Have you tried removing the server in enterprise manager and reconnecting it. Regards Dale Fraser http://dale.fraser.id.au From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto: cfaussie@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Carl Vanderpal Sent: Friday, 28 July 2006 12:39 PM To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com Subject: [cfaussie] Re: (No Items) under ms sql server Even though the server and my EM is 2K.. On 7/28/06, Dale Fraser < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If you have upgraded the DB to 2005 schema then 2000 has no idea how to read them. Regards Dale Fraser http://dale.fraser.id.au From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto: cfaussie@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Carl Vanderpal Sent: Friday, 28 July 2006 12:28 PM To: CF Aussie - Google Subject: [cfaussie] (No Items) under ms sql server Hello all, Just wondering why on Enterprise Manager MS SQL (2K) there shows ...(No Items) under the databases but when I was there a few days before there were datbases there? (this is on one of my webhosts), but when I log in under using MSSQL 2005 they are all there? Is this something from my end or theirs? Thanks Postal: Po Box 3462 Dural, NSW 2158 Email: mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: skype:carlos-amigos?call -- Postal: Po Box 3462 Dural, NSW 2158 Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: skype:carlos-amigos?call -- Postal: Po Box 3462 Dural, NSW 2158Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: skype:carlos-amigos?call --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: variables.instance
> Can the CFC access all variables. Scope, ie ones from other pages / cfc's?
unless it's been fixed reciently, it can access FORM and URL (and
probably cookie) scopes too.
I found out by accident that, if you've got an unscoped variable that
doesn;t exist in "variables" or "this" scope, it'll "walk down the
scope tree" looking for it...all the way to FORM and URL...
On 7/28/06, Mark Mandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 7/28/06, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Mark,
> >
> > But I thought that the variables scope was only accessible to the CFC that
> > you're using it in. Why then would you need to worry?
>
> This is true, but maybe I didn't explain myself properly.
>
> If I wanted to make a copy of the values in a CFC (assuming all it has
> is basic types of values in the instance struct) having the instance
> struct allows me to do this:
> (in cfscript'ish for ease)
>
> function getMemento() : Struct
> {
>return duplicate(variables.instance);
> }
>
> And it is very easy.
>
> There is no way I could go duplicate(variables), as the variables
> scope has reference to LOTS of things - including UDFS that are set to
> that CFC, the 'this' scope, and various other pieces.
>
> It's more of a personal preference thing. I like it because it keeps
> things separate, and I don't have to worry about overlap.
>
> >
> > Can the CFC access all variables. Scope, ie ones from other pages / cfc's?
>
> It can access shared scopes (application, session etc), although
> getting to those from a CFC is another design discussion.
>
> That make a bit more sense?
>
> --
> E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> W: www.compoundtheory.com
> ICQ: 3094740
>
> >
>
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: variables.instance
Ok,
Cool. Didn't realise that the cfc could access all the other suff in
variables. Just thought it could access stuff it created.
I'll have a play with this.
PS: I'm assuming that instance is something you need to create ie in the
init
Regards
Dale Fraser
http://dale.fraser.id.au
-Original Message-
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Mark Mandel
Sent: Friday, 28 July 2006 13:53 PM
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Subject: [cfaussie] Re: variables.instance
On 7/28/06, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Mark,
>
> But I thought that the variables scope was only accessible to the CFC that
> you're using it in. Why then would you need to worry?
This is true, but maybe I didn't explain myself properly.
If I wanted to make a copy of the values in a CFC (assuming all it has
is basic types of values in the instance struct) having the instance
struct allows me to do this:
(in cfscript'ish for ease)
function getMemento() : Struct
{
return duplicate(variables.instance);
}
And it is very easy.
There is no way I could go duplicate(variables), as the variables
scope has reference to LOTS of things - including UDFS that are set to
that CFC, the 'this' scope, and various other pieces.
It's more of a personal preference thing. I like it because it keeps
things separate, and I don't have to worry about overlap.
>
> Can the CFC access all variables. Scope, ie ones from other pages / cfc's?
It can access shared scopes (application, session etc), although
getting to those from a CFC is another design discussion.
That make a bit more sense?
--
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: www.compoundtheory.com
ICQ: 3094740
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: variables.instance
On 7/28/06, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Mark,
>
> But I thought that the variables scope was only accessible to the CFC that
> you're using it in. Why then would you need to worry?
This is true, but maybe I didn't explain myself properly.
If I wanted to make a copy of the values in a CFC (assuming all it has
is basic types of values in the instance struct) having the instance
struct allows me to do this:
(in cfscript'ish for ease)
function getMemento() : Struct
{
return duplicate(variables.instance);
}
And it is very easy.
There is no way I could go duplicate(variables), as the variables
scope has reference to LOTS of things - including UDFS that are set to
that CFC, the 'this' scope, and various other pieces.
It's more of a personal preference thing. I like it because it keeps
things separate, and I don't have to worry about overlap.
>
> Can the CFC access all variables. Scope, ie ones from other pages / cfc's?
It can access shared scopes (application, session etc), although
getting to those from a CFC is another design discussion.
That make a bit more sense?
--
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: www.compoundtheory.com
ICQ: 3094740
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: variables.instance
Mark, But I thought that the variables scope was only accessible to the CFC that you're using it in. Why then would you need to worry? Can the CFC access all variables. Scope, ie ones from other pages / cfc's? Regards Dale Fraser http://dale.fraser.id.au -Original Message- From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Mandel Sent: Friday, 28 July 2006 13:28 PM To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com Subject: [cfaussie] Re: variables.instance The only difference dale is that some people (myself included) like to place all their instance variables inside a struct found on the variables scope - more often than not variables.instance. This makes life easy when looking to push / pull a bunch of them on or off the object, as the variables scope holds a bunch of stuff (including functions). That make sense? Mark On 7/28/06, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > Anyone explain the difference between > > > > variables.instance and just plain old variables. > > > > To me it looks like they are the same thing. > > > Regards > Dale Fraser > > http://dale.fraser.id.au > > > > > > > > -- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.compoundtheory.com ICQ: 3094740 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: variables.instance
The only difference dale is that some people (myself included) like to place all their instance variables inside a struct found on the variables scope - more often than not variables.instance. This makes life easy when looking to push / pull a bunch of them on or off the object, as the variables scope holds a bunch of stuff (including functions). That make sense? Mark On 7/28/06, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > Anyone explain the difference between > > > > variables.instance and just plain old variables. > > > > To me it looks like they are the same thing. > > > Regards > Dale Fraser > > http://dale.fraser.id.au > > > > > > > > -- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.compoundtheory.com ICQ: 3094740 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] variables.instance
Hi, Anyone explain the difference between variables.instance and just plain old variables. To me it looks like they are the same thing. Regards Dale Fraser http://dale.fraser.id.au --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: (No Items) under ms sql server
Connecting to SQL 2005 with EM is not supported. http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms174190.aspx http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms173738.aspx I would suggest installing the SQL Server Management Studio that ships with SQL server 2005. It can administer SQL 2000 as well and is a much cleaner interface and it's also less buggy then EM. hth Rod - Original Message - From: Dale Fraser To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 12:48 PM Subject: [cfaussie] Re: (No Items) under ms sql server Ohh, That doesn’t make sense then. Have you tried removing the server in enterprise manager and reconnecting it. RegardsDale Fraser http://dale.fraser.id.au From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:cfaussie@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Carl VanderpalSent: Friday, 28 July 2006 12:39 PMTo: cfaussie@googlegroups.comSubject: [cfaussie] Re: (No Items) under ms sql server Even though the server and my EM is 2K.. On 7/28/06, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If you have upgraded the DB to 2005 schema then 2000 has no idea how to read them. RegardsDale Fraser http://dale.fraser.id.au From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto: cfaussie@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Carl VanderpalSent: Friday, 28 July 2006 12:28 PMTo: CF Aussie - GoogleSubject: [cfaussie] (No Items) under ms sql server Hello all,Just wondering why on Enterprise Manager MS SQL (2K) there shows ...(No Items) under the databases but when I was there a few days before there were datbases there? (this is on one of my webhosts), but when I log in under using MSSQL 2005 they are all there? Is this something from my end or theirs?ThanksPostal: Po Box 3462 Dural, NSW 2158Email: mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: skype:carlos-amigos?call -- Postal: Po Box 3462 Dural, NSW 2158Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: skype:carlos-amigos?call --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: Changing HTTP responses
Thanks Charlie. We use IIS. I'll have a read through that and see if that helps. I'm open to all ideas. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: (No Items) under ms sql server
yeah Win2k EM wont work with windows20005 SQL server I hear the one at http://www.sqlmanager.net/ is not too bad Steve -Original Message-From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Carl VanderpalSent: Friday, July 28, 2006 12:39 PMTo: cfaussie@googlegroups.comSubject: [cfaussie] Re: (No Items) under ms sql serverEven though the server and my EM is 2K.. On 7/28/06, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If you have upgraded the DB to 2005 schema then 2000 has no idea how to read them. RegardsDale Fraser http://dale.fraser.id.au From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto: cfaussie@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Carl VanderpalSent: Friday, 28 July 2006 12:28 PMTo: CF Aussie - GoogleSubject: [cfaussie] (No Items) under ms sql server Hello all,Just wondering why on Enterprise Manager MS SQL (2K) there shows ...(No Items) under the databases but when I was there a few days before there were datbases there? (this is on one of my webhosts), but when I log in under using MSSQL 2005 they are all there? Is this something from my end or theirs?ThanksPostal: Po Box 3462 Dural, NSW 2158Email: mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: skype:carlos-amigos?call -- Postal: Po Box 3462 Dural, NSW 2158Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: skype:carlos-amigos?call --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: (No Items) under ms sql server
Ohh, That doesn’t make sense then. Have you tried removing the server in enterprise manager and reconnecting it. Regards Dale Fraser http://dale.fraser.id.au From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:cfaussie@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Carl Vanderpal Sent: Friday, 28 July 2006 12:39 PM To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com Subject: [cfaussie] Re: (No Items) under ms sql server Even though the server and my EM is 2K.. On 7/28/06, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If you have upgraded the DB to 2005 schema then 2000 has no idea how to read them. Regards Dale Fraser http://dale.fraser.id.au From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto: cfaussie@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Carl Vanderpal Sent: Friday, 28 July 2006 12:28 PM To: CF Aussie - Google Subject: [cfaussie] (No Items) under ms sql server Hello all, Just wondering why on Enterprise Manager MS SQL (2K) there shows ...(No Items) under the databases but when I was there a few days before there were datbases there? (this is on one of my webhosts), but when I log in under using MSSQL 2005 they are all there? Is this something from my end or theirs? Thanks Postal: Po Box 3462 Dural, NSW 2158 Email: mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: skype:carlos-amigos?call -- Postal: Po Box 3462 Dural, NSW 2158 Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: skype:carlos-amigos?call --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: Changing HTTP responses
Thanks. Both good ideas but I don't want to use any type of client side scripting because it also needs to track click throughs accurately and some users may have javascript turned off. But I think I may just be able to put the invisible link (http://www.thesitesname.com.au";>) just for the search engine and then also have my regular link for tracking click throughs for normal users. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: (No Items) under ms sql server
Even though the server and my EM is 2K..On 7/28/06, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If you have upgraded the DB to 2005 schema then 2000 has no idea how to read them. Regards Dale Fraser http://dale.fraser.id.au From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto: cfaussie@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Carl Vanderpal Sent: Friday, 28 July 2006 12:28 PM To: CF Aussie - Google Subject: [cfaussie] (No Items) under ms sql server Hello all, Just wondering why on Enterprise Manager MS SQL (2K) there shows ...(No Items) under the databases but when I was there a few days before there were datbases there? (this is on one of my webhosts), but when I log in under using MSSQL 2005 they are all there? Is this something from my end or theirs? Thanks Postal: Po Box 3462 Dural, NSW 2158 Email: mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: skype:carlos-amigos?call -- Postal: Po Box 3462 Dural, NSW 2158Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: skype:carlos-amigos?call --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: Changing HTTP responses
What web server are you using? There are ways in both IIS (and even easier in Apache) to handle this in the web server. Some resources: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/misc/rewriteguide.html http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;313074&sd=tech Hope that helps. /charlie http://www.carehart.org/blog/ -Original Message- From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Beenish Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 10:01 PM To: cfaussie Subject: [cfaussie] Changing HTTP responses Hi, I'm pretty sure this can't be done but hoping someone can prove me wrong. I need to track click throughs on a link accurately without it having any url parameters attached to it. It has to be a clean link straight to "http://www.thesitesname.com.au"; for the purposes of search engine optimisation. It has been suggested to me to look at a way of changing http responses. So, the link redirects to a page to track a click and then change the http response so that it looks like it never went to the click tracking page and redirect to the "http://www.thesitesname.com.au"; as if it was where it was going there in the first place. In a way I'm trying to "fool" the search engine into thinking it's a link straight to "http://www.thesitesname.com.au";. I don't see how this can be done. In fact I don't think it can be done. Please prove me wrong and tell me how to do it or else prove me right. Thanks Beenish --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: (No Items) under ms sql server
If you have upgraded the DB to 2005 schema then 2000 has no idea how to read them. Regards Dale Fraser http://dale.fraser.id.au From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:cfaussie@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Carl Vanderpal Sent: Friday, 28 July 2006 12:28 PM To: CF Aussie - Google Subject: [cfaussie] (No Items) under ms sql server Hello all, Just wondering why on Enterprise Manager MS SQL (2K) there shows ...(No Items) under the databases but when I was there a few days before there were datbases there? (this is on one of my webhosts), but when I log in under using MSSQL 2005 they are all there? Is this something from my end or theirs? Thanks Postal: Po Box 3462 Dural, NSW 2158 Email: mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: skype:carlos-amigos?call --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] (No Items) under ms sql server
Hello all,Just wondering why on Enterprise Manager MS SQL (2K) there shows ...(No Items) under the databases but when I was there a few days before there were datbases there? (this is on one of my webhosts), but when I log in under using MSSQL 2005 they are all there? Is this something from my end or theirs?ThanksPostal: Po Box 3462 Dural, NSW 2158Email: mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: skype:carlos-amigos?call --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: Changing HTTP responses
Beenish, I'm not sure how search engines are handling form-action attributes. But if they are treated the same way as a regular link I would simply wrap the link into a form and submit the form onClick with some hidden input fields. Ex. http://www.thesitesname.com.au"; method="post"> http://www.thesitesname.com.au /Max On 7/28/06, Beenish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm pretty sure this can't be done but hoping someone can prove me > wrong. > > I need to track click throughs on a link accurately without it having > any url parameters attached to it. It has to be a clean link straight > to "http://www.thesitesname.com.au"; for the purposes of search engine > optimisation. > > It has been suggested to me to look at a way of changing http > responses. So, the link redirects to a page to track a click and then > change the http response so that it looks like it never went to the > click tracking page and redirect to the > "http://www.thesitesname.com.au"; as if it was where it was going there > in the first place. In a way I'm trying to "fool" the search engine > into thinking it's a link straight to "http://www.thesitesname.com.au";. > > I don't see how this can be done. In fact I don't think it can be done. > Please prove me wrong and tell me how to do it or else prove me right. > > Thanks > > Beenish > > > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: Changing HTTP responses
how about:http://www.thesitesname.com.au"> www.thesitesname.com.authe span would need some stylesheet work to make it look and behave like a linkOn 7/28/06, Beenish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi,I'm pretty sure this can't be done but hoping someone can prove mewrong.I need to track click throughs on a link accurately without it havingany url parameters attached to it. It has to be a clean link straight to "http://www.thesitesname.com.au" for the purposes of search engineoptimisation.It has been suggested to me to look at a way of changing httpresponses. So, the link redirects to a page to track a click and then change the http response so that it looks like it never went to theclick tracking page and redirect to the"http://www.thesitesname.com.au" as if it was where it was going there in the first place. In a way I'm trying to "fool" the search engineinto thinking it's a link straight to "http://www.thesitesname.com.au".I don't see how this can be done. In fact I don't think it can be done. Please prove me wrong and tell me how to do it or else prove me right.ThanksBeenish --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Changing HTTP responses
Hi, I'm pretty sure this can't be done but hoping someone can prove me wrong. I need to track click throughs on a link accurately without it having any url parameters attached to it. It has to be a clean link straight to "http://www.thesitesname.com.au"; for the purposes of search engine optimisation. It has been suggested to me to look at a way of changing http responses. So, the link redirects to a page to track a click and then change the http response so that it looks like it never went to the click tracking page and redirect to the "http://www.thesitesname.com.au"; as if it was where it was going there in the first place. In a way I'm trying to "fool" the search engine into thinking it's a link straight to "http://www.thesitesname.com.au";. I don't see how this can be done. In fact I don't think it can be done. Please prove me wrong and tell me how to do it or else prove me right. Thanks Beenish --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: CFUG / CDD User Group Meeting Location
Haha, Sounds like will chillax at steve's crib. * What did he say "Chillax" * Man act like you know, Slang 101: http://youtube.com/watch?v=eBXal1GAA4A&mode=related&search= Regards, Bjorn Schultheiss Senior Flash Developer QDC Technologies -Original Message- From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Mandel Sent: Friday, 28 July 2006 11:00 AM To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com Subject: [cfaussie] Re: CFUG / CDD User Group Meeting Location How is that any worse than VTR's place? Can we put a sign at the bottom saying 'call XXX number for a good time, or to get into CFUG meeting' ? Mark On 7/28/06, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We have an office, > > Problem is it goes into lockdown mode at 6pm. Doors and Elevators. > > Regards > Dale Fraser > > http://dale.fraser.id.au > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Mark Mandel > Sent: Friday, 28 July 2006 10:48 AM > To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com > Subject: [cfaussie] Re: CFUG / CDD User Group Meeting Location > > > Yeah, I figured that would be the case... > > So scrap that idea. > > I agree, CIty would be best. > > I can't believe nobody has an office we can take over for the > evening... :/ > > Mark > > On 7/28/06, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > You could count me out. > > > > RMIT would be ideal, inner city location, someone must know someone. > > > > Regards > > Dale Fraser > > > > http://dale.fraser.id.au > > -- > E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > W: www.compoundtheory.com > ICQ: 3094740 > > > > > > > -- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.compoundtheory.com ICQ: 3094740 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: CFUG / CDD User Group Meeting Location
Dale, if it's any comfort, that's how the Bris CFUG and MMUG's work. it's a hassel, to be sure but to be honest, it's unlikely ppl will arrive much more than 1/2 hour after the start. On 7/28/06, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Well, > > > > It is a bit worse as you can't buzz anyone up, so everyone would need a > mobile. And someone would need to keep needing to go down to let people back > up. > > > > Also the phones go to answering machine @ 5pm. So we would need a mobile to > call. > > > > There are also security issues; everyone would need to sign in / out. > > > > > Regards > > Dale Fraser > > > > http://dale.fraser.id.au > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Mark Mandel > Sent: Friday, 28 July 2006 11:00 AM > To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com > Subject: [cfaussie] Re: CFUG / CDD User Group Meeting Location > > > > > > > > > How is that any worse than VTR's place? > > > > Can we put a sign at the bottom saying 'call XXX number for a good > > time, or to get into CFUG meeting' > > > > ? > > > > Mark > > > > On 7/28/06, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > We have an office, > > > > > > Problem is it goes into lockdown mode at 6pm. Doors and Elevators. > > > > > > Regards > > > Dale Fraser > > > > > > http://dale.fraser.id.au > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf > > > Of Mark Mandel > > > Sent: Friday, 28 July 2006 10:48 AM > > > To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com > > > Subject: [cfaussie] Re: CFUG / CDD User Group Meeting Location > > > > > > > > > Yeah, I figured that would be the case... > > > > > > So scrap that idea. > > > > > > I agree, CIty would be best. > > > > > > I can't believe nobody has an office we can take over for the evening... > :/ > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > On 7/28/06, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > You could count me out. > > > > > > > > RMIT would be ideal, inner city location, someone must know someone. > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > Dale Fraser > > > > > > > > http://dale.fraser.id.au > > > > > > -- > > > E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > W: www.compoundtheory.com > > > ICQ: 3094740 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > W: www.compoundtheory.com > > ICQ: 3094740 > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: CFUG / CDD User Group Meeting Location
Well, It is a bit worse as you can’t buzz anyone up, so everyone would need a mobile. And someone would need to keep needing to go down to let people back up. Also the phones go to answering machine @ 5pm. So we would need a mobile to call. There are also security issues; everyone would need to sign in / out. Regards Dale Fraser http://dale.fraser.id.au -Original Message- From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:cfaussie@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Mark Mandel Sent: Friday, 28 July 2006 11:00 AM To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com Subject: [cfaussie] Re: CFUG / CDD User Group Meeting Location How is that any worse than VTR's place? Can we put a sign at the bottom saying 'call XXX number for a good time, or to get into CFUG meeting' ? Mark On 7/28/06, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We have an office, > > Problem is it goes into lockdown mode at 6pm. Doors and Elevators. > > Regards > Dale Fraser > > http://dale.fraser.id.au > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:cfaussie@googlegroups.com] On Behalf > Of Mark Mandel > Sent: Friday, 28 July 2006 10:48 AM > To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com > Subject: [cfaussie] Re: CFUG / CDD User Group Meeting Location > > > Yeah, I figured that would be the case... > > So scrap that idea. > > I agree, CIty would be best. > > I can't believe nobody has an office we can take over for the evening... :/ > > Mark > > On 7/28/06, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > You could count me out. > > > > RMIT would be ideal, inner city location, someone must know someone. > > > > Regards > > Dale Fraser > > > > http://dale.fraser.id.au > > -- > E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > W: www.compoundtheory.com > ICQ: 3094740 > > > > > > > -- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.compoundtheory.com ICQ: 3094740 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: CFUG / CDD User Group Meeting Location
How is that any worse than VTR's place? Can we put a sign at the bottom saying 'call XXX number for a good time, or to get into CFUG meeting' ? Mark On 7/28/06, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We have an office, > > Problem is it goes into lockdown mode at 6pm. Doors and Elevators. > > Regards > Dale Fraser > > http://dale.fraser.id.au > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Mark Mandel > Sent: Friday, 28 July 2006 10:48 AM > To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com > Subject: [cfaussie] Re: CFUG / CDD User Group Meeting Location > > > Yeah, I figured that would be the case... > > So scrap that idea. > > I agree, CIty would be best. > > I can't believe nobody has an office we can take over for the evening... :/ > > Mark > > On 7/28/06, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > You could count me out. > > > > RMIT would be ideal, inner city location, someone must know someone. > > > > Regards > > Dale Fraser > > > > http://dale.fraser.id.au > > -- > E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > W: www.compoundtheory.com > ICQ: 3094740 > > > > > > > -- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.compoundtheory.com ICQ: 3094740 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: CFUG / CDD User Group Meeting Location
We have an office, Problem is it goes into lockdown mode at 6pm. Doors and Elevators. Regards Dale Fraser http://dale.fraser.id.au -Original Message- From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Mandel Sent: Friday, 28 July 2006 10:48 AM To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com Subject: [cfaussie] Re: CFUG / CDD User Group Meeting Location Yeah, I figured that would be the case... So scrap that idea. I agree, CIty would be best. I can't believe nobody has an office we can take over for the evening... :/ Mark On 7/28/06, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You could count me out. > > RMIT would be ideal, inner city location, someone must know someone. > > Regards > Dale Fraser > > http://dale.fraser.id.au -- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.compoundtheory.com ICQ: 3094740 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: CFUG / CDD User Group Meeting Location
I am considering contacting some scout halls or RSL venues to see if they have anything. Looks like the next meeting will be at my place if we cant find anything which is in Southbank, City Road. Steve -Original Message- From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark Mandel Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 10:48 AM To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com Subject: [cfaussie] Re: CFUG / CDD User Group Meeting Location Yeah, I figured that would be the case... So scrap that idea. I agree, CIty would be best. I can't believe nobody has an office we can take over for the evening... :/ Mark On 7/28/06, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You could count me out. > > RMIT would be ideal, inner city location, someone must know someone. > > Regards > Dale Fraser > > http://dale.fraser.id.au -- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.compoundtheory.com ICQ: 3094740 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: CFUG / CDD User Group Meeting Location
Yeah, I figured that would be the case... So scrap that idea. I agree, CIty would be best. I can't believe nobody has an office we can take over for the evening... :/ Mark On 7/28/06, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You could count me out. > > RMIT would be ideal, inner city location, someone must know someone. > > Regards > Dale Fraser > > http://dale.fraser.id.au -- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.compoundtheory.com ICQ: 3094740 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: CFUG / CDD User Group Meeting Location
You could count me out. RMIT would be ideal, inner city location, someone must know someone. Regards Dale Fraser http://dale.fraser.id.au -Original Message- From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Mandel Sent: Friday, 28 July 2006 10:37 AM To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com Subject: [cfaussie] Re: CFUG / CDD User Group Meeting Location I *may* have a connection to someone at Caulfield Monash, but I'm guessing that won't be a good place for people to attend? (I'm not even sure if we can get room there once a month or not) How does the location grab people? Mark On 7/28/06, Bjorn Schultheiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Cant say I do. > > It would bbe good if you guys can find a venue in the city. > > Personally I don't have any locations to use. > > > Regards, > > Bjorn Schultheiss > Senior Flash Developer > QDC Technologies > > -Original Message- > From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Mark Mandel > Sent: Friday, 28 July 2006 10:02 AM > To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com > Subject: [cfaussie] Re: CFUG / CDD User Group Meeting Location > > > Having a chat this morning, a good idea came up - > > Anyone got any connections to any Universities? Taking over a lecture hall > for a few hours in the evening could be a nice possibility. > > This would be especially nice if the Uni is in the city. > > Just a thought, > > Mark > > On 7/28/06, George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Anyway I couldn't go to last meeting because of location. I hope we > > can find a better one... > > > > > > > > On 26/07/06, Bjorn Schultheiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > What a dissapoinment! > > > Hopefully we get another venue. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Bjorn Schultheiss > > > Senior Flash Developer > > > QDC Technologies > > > > > > > > > > > From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Behalf Of Steve Onnis > > > Sent: Monday, 24 July 2006 12:10 PM > > > To: CFAussie Mailing List > > > Subject: [cfaussie] CFUG / CDD User Group Meeting Location > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello and greetings from beyond the stars > > > > > > First and foremost I would like to thank all the people who came > > > last week > > to the meeting. I was really great to see the support of the members, > > both the presenters and the guests. The up coming presentations look > > to be very exciting and informative for everyone. > > > > > > Unfortunately I received word today that VTR Consulting who have > > > been > > gracious enough to allow us to use there premises for many years now > > are no longer able to allow us to use the building for our meetings so > > I am putting the call out there for anyone who knows of someone or > > somewhere that we might be able to use for our meetings. > > > > > > I am hoping we can have something organised ready for next months > > presentation. > > > > > > Please contact me asap if you know of anywhere, or even have > > > somewhere > > yourself at [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Regards > > > Steve Onnis > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > W: www.compoundtheory.com > ICQ: 3094740 > > > > > -- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.compoundtheory.com ICQ: 3094740 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: CFUG / CDD User Group Meeting Location
I *may* have a connection to someone at Caulfield Monash, but I'm guessing that won't be a good place for people to attend? (I'm not even sure if we can get room there once a month or not) How does the location grab people? Mark On 7/28/06, Bjorn Schultheiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Cant say I do. > > It would bbe good if you guys can find a venue in the city. > > Personally I don't have any locations to use. > > > Regards, > > Bjorn Schultheiss > Senior Flash Developer > QDC Technologies > > -Original Message- > From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Mark Mandel > Sent: Friday, 28 July 2006 10:02 AM > To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com > Subject: [cfaussie] Re: CFUG / CDD User Group Meeting Location > > > Having a chat this morning, a good idea came up - > > Anyone got any connections to any Universities? Taking over a lecture hall > for a few hours in the evening could be a nice possibility. > > This would be especially nice if the Uni is in the city. > > Just a thought, > > Mark > > On 7/28/06, George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Anyway I couldn't go to last meeting because of location. I hope we > > can find a better one... > > > > > > > > On 26/07/06, Bjorn Schultheiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > What a dissapoinment! > > > Hopefully we get another venue. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Bjorn Schultheiss > > > Senior Flash Developer > > > QDC Technologies > > > > > > > > > > > From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Behalf Of Steve Onnis > > > Sent: Monday, 24 July 2006 12:10 PM > > > To: CFAussie Mailing List > > > Subject: [cfaussie] CFUG / CDD User Group Meeting Location > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello and greetings from beyond the stars > > > > > > First and foremost I would like to thank all the people who came > > > last week > > to the meeting. I was really great to see the support of the members, > > both the presenters and the guests. The up coming presentations look > > to be very exciting and informative for everyone. > > > > > > Unfortunately I received word today that VTR Consulting who have > > > been > > gracious enough to allow us to use there premises for many years now > > are no longer able to allow us to use the building for our meetings so > > I am putting the call out there for anyone who knows of someone or > > somewhere that we might be able to use for our meetings. > > > > > > I am hoping we can have something organised ready for next months > > presentation. > > > > > > Please contact me asap if you know of anywhere, or even have > > > somewhere > > yourself at [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Regards > > > Steve Onnis > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > W: www.compoundtheory.com > ICQ: 3094740 > > > > > -- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.compoundtheory.com ICQ: 3094740 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: CFUG / CDD User Group Meeting Location
Cant say I do. It would bbe good if you guys can find a venue in the city. Personally I don't have any locations to use. Regards, Bjorn Schultheiss Senior Flash Developer QDC Technologies -Original Message- From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Mandel Sent: Friday, 28 July 2006 10:02 AM To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com Subject: [cfaussie] Re: CFUG / CDD User Group Meeting Location Having a chat this morning, a good idea came up - Anyone got any connections to any Universities? Taking over a lecture hall for a few hours in the evening could be a nice possibility. This would be especially nice if the Uni is in the city. Just a thought, Mark On 7/28/06, George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyway I couldn't go to last meeting because of location. I hope we > can find a better one... > > > > On 26/07/06, Bjorn Schultheiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > What a dissapoinment! > > Hopefully we get another venue. > > > > Regards, > > > > Bjorn Schultheiss > > Senior Flash Developer > > QDC Technologies > > > > > > > From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Steve Onnis > > Sent: Monday, 24 July 2006 12:10 PM > > To: CFAussie Mailing List > > Subject: [cfaussie] CFUG / CDD User Group Meeting Location > > > > > > > > > > Hello and greetings from beyond the stars > > > > First and foremost I would like to thank all the people who came > > last week > to the meeting. I was really great to see the support of the members, > both the presenters and the guests. The up coming presentations look > to be very exciting and informative for everyone. > > > > Unfortunately I received word today that VTR Consulting who have > > been > gracious enough to allow us to use there premises for many years now > are no longer able to allow us to use the building for our meetings so > I am putting the call out there for anyone who knows of someone or > somewhere that we might be able to use for our meetings. > > > > I am hoping we can have something organised ready for next months > presentation. > > > > Please contact me asap if you know of anywhere, or even have > > somewhere > yourself at [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Regards > > Steve Onnis > > > > > > > > > > > -- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.compoundtheory.com ICQ: 3094740 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: CFUG / CDD User Group Meeting Location
Having a chat this morning, a good idea came up - Anyone got any connections to any Universities? Taking over a lecture hall for a few hours in the evening could be a nice possibility. This would be especially nice if the Uni is in the city. Just a thought, Mark On 7/28/06, George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyway I couldn't go to last meeting because of location. I hope we can find > a better one... > > > > On 26/07/06, Bjorn Schultheiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > What a dissapoinment! > > Hopefully we get another venue. > > > > Regards, > > > > Bjorn Schultheiss > > Senior Flash Developer > > QDC Technologies > > > > > > > From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Steve Onnis > > Sent: Monday, 24 July 2006 12:10 PM > > To: CFAussie Mailing List > > Subject: [cfaussie] CFUG / CDD User Group Meeting Location > > > > > > > > > > Hello and greetings from beyond the stars > > > > First and foremost I would like to thank all the people who came last week > to the meeting. I was really great to see the support of the members, both > the presenters and the guests. The up coming presentations look to be very > exciting and informative for everyone. > > > > Unfortunately I received word today that VTR Consulting who have been > gracious enough to allow us to use there premises for many years now are no > longer able to allow us to use the building for our meetings so I am putting > the call out there for anyone who knows of someone or somewhere that we > might be able to use for our meetings. > > > > I am hoping we can have something organised ready for next months > presentation. > > > > Please contact me asap if you know of anywhere, or even have somewhere > yourself at [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Regards > > Steve Onnis > > > > > > > > > > > -- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.compoundtheory.com ICQ: 3094740 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: CFUG / CDD User Group Meeting Location
Anyway I couldn't go to last meeting because of location. I hope we can find a better one... On 26/07/06, Bjorn Schultheiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What a dissapoinment! Hopefully we get another venue. Regards, Bjorn Schultheiss Senior Flash Developer QDC Technologies From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto: cfaussie@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steve OnnisSent: Monday, 24 July 2006 12:10 PMTo: CFAussie Mailing ListSubject: [cfaussie] CFUG / CDD User Group Meeting Location Hello and greetings from beyond the stars First and foremost I would like to thank all the people who came last week to the meeting. I was really great to see the support of the members, both the presenters and the guests. The up coming presentations look to be very exciting and informative for everyone. Unfortunately I received word today that VTR Consulting who have been gracious enough to allow us to use there premises for many years now are no longer able to allow us to use the building for our meetings so I am putting the call out there for anyone who knows of someone or somewhere that we might be able to use for our meetings. I am hoping we can have something organised ready for next months presentation. Please contact me asap if you know of anywhere, or even have somewhere yourself at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regards Steve Onnis --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: CF to ASP programmer wanted
Here's my update from my original post. 2 people emailed me offering their services, and I have selected one to do the job for me. I started life programming CF and had done very limited ASP, but ASP is what the client wants. I have not done any serious programming for over 5 years and only do "rough cut" develoment. My main skills are instructional design, competency apping and accessibility. >From my limited knowledge of ASP using vairables within a sql query in ASP is not implemented in the same way as in CF. That was my reference to reworking the sql (plus my rusty sql knowledge) Re the comment fro Joe Cass. About not coming back to the list, well Joe, I have withi 24 hours. I have just had other little issues like having had to travel from Melbourne to Canberra and back today, and doing a demanding job. Re your observation re the heated discussion, I totally agree. None of the people posting their comments were the two who emailed me directly and enquired about the contract. Thankyou to those two, without you all we have is a lot of hot air and no resolution to my problem. Thanks to you two genuine enquirers I have been able to solve my problem and I will be asisting in some small way someone in pursuit of their chosen profession. Cheers Graham --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
