Re: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question

2003-11-26 Thread Capt Crunch
Brian,
Did this dentination just start? I assume you hear it?
First off, when we talk detination, static compression means very little. 
You need your cam specs and then you can detirmine your dynamic compression 
ratio, which is what ultimately detirmines what fuel and timing you can run. 
The second thing I ask is if this is a newer combo what heads do you have? 
How far in the hole is you piston at TDC (some call this deck heighth) and 
what head gasket are you using? This will detirmine your quench distance 
which is crucial in avoiding detination. Head design makes a big difference. 
A newer heart shaped chamber can run a bit more compression with out 
detintation. Also are you running a cast or alum head? Again alum can take 
much more. If you have this info and send it my way I can do some 
calculations and get a better feel for what your combo should need. What 
engine temp does your engine run at when it detinates?

For working with what you got... more fuel will help with detination so I 
would fatten it up. I would also highly recomend running the premium grade 
and seeing ifthat helps. Your timing isn't much if you are running 10 and 16 
for a total of 26 degrees so I doubt that is your problem. I'm not real 
experienced at running at the altitude you are. I'm sure this plays a role 
in things as well.

Send out a bit more info of when this all started and your specs and I will 
see what I can do.
Mikey


From: Brian Zack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: The Chevelle Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 08:28:16 -0700
What are the things to look at to avoid detonation? I have a 350 w/ 9:1 
compression and a pretty mild cam. I run the med grade fuel. If I am 
getting some detonation under load, Do I need to look at timing, fuel 
mixture, jetting? I am at around 5000 to 5500 ft in altitude. I have a hei 
dist. w/ the pertronix kit and am running 10 degrees initial timing the 
factory setting on the adjustable vac. advance (I think its 16 degrees) and 
the lightest springs on the weights (The weights and springs came with the 
kit). At the strip trying to tune it, I had to use the lighter springs 
otherwise, my times were around a ½ sec. slower with the heavier springs. 
The carb is the edlebrock 600 cfm elec. choke and I put the 1 step leaner 
primary rods in. No actual jet changes. As far as going to the strip, I 
don't think I can make it out again til next year, (I think it already 
closed) so tuning there won't be an option. Right now, I do only have the 
2.73 gears and 28 tall tires, which is probably contributing to the extra 
load condition. Any opinions?

Brian Zack
'70 Chevelle Malibu
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Set yourself up for fun at home!  Get tips on home entertainment equipment, 
video game reviews, and more here.   
http://special.msn.com/home/homeent.armx




RE: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question

2003-11-26 Thread Brian Zack
This engine has the stock cast 76cc heads with the ports lightly smoothed out and your 
basic felpro head gaskets. I am running the flat top cast pistons. This engine has 
just under 20K miles on it. I think it is detonation I'm hearing. I seem to be able to 
hear it now with my flowmaster exhaust. (It seems I can kinda hear it through the 
exhaust). I am planning for and trying to save up for some s/r torquers and a bigger 
cam for hopefully next spring. I'm planning on the comp cams xe262. The cam I have now 
is the crane energizer cam w/ .440 lift and I think its 260 duration I'm not sure of 
the @ .050 dur. When I built the engine, I didn't measure how far down the bore the 
pistons are. At that time, I didn't know anything about the DCR and I asked for 9:1 
pistons and don't know if these pistons were manufactured a little further down than 
desirable or not. I can only guess at my measurements. Right now, What I can figure 
from my guesses is my DCR is around 7.4:1 to 7.5:1.When I was considering heads 
for the future, it was either the vortecs or the world s/r torquers, but, I think the 
vortecs would make me have to run a lot more expensive fuel because of going to a DCR 
of around 8.5:1. The total advance of 26 you have doesn't include how much advandce 
the weights and springs add. I'll have to check how much those add, but from memory, I 
think total was around 48 degrees.


Brian Zack
'70 Chevelle Malibu
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-Original Message-
From: Capt Crunch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 9:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question

Brian,
Did this dentination just start? I assume you hear it?
First off, when we talk detination, static compression means very little. 
You need your cam specs and then you can detirmine your dynamic compression 
ratio, which is what ultimately detirmines what fuel and timing you can run. 
The second thing I ask is if this is a newer combo what heads do you have? 
How far in the hole is you piston at TDC (some call this deck heighth) and 
what head gasket are you using? This will detirmine your quench distance 
which is crucial in avoiding detination. Head design makes a big difference. 
A newer heart shaped chamber can run a bit more compression with out 
detintation. Also are you running a cast or alum head? Again alum can take 
much more. If you have this info and send it my way I can do some 
calculations and get a better feel for what your combo should need. What 
engine temp does your engine run at when it detinates?

For working with what you got... more fuel will help with detination so I 
would fatten it up. I would also highly recomend running the premium grade 
and seeing ifthat helps. Your timing isn't much if you are running 10 and 16 
for a total of 26 degrees so I doubt that is your problem. I'm not real 
experienced at running at the altitude you are. I'm sure this plays a role 
in things as well.

Send out a bit more info of when this all started and your specs and I will 
see what I can do.
Mikey


From: Brian Zack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: The Chevelle Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 08:28:16 -0700

What are the things to look at to avoid detonation? I have a 350 w/ 9:1 
compression and a pretty mild cam. I run the med grade fuel. If I am 
getting some detonation under load, Do I need to look at timing, fuel 
mixture, jetting? I am at around 5000 to 5500 ft in altitude. I have a hei 
dist. w/ the pertronix kit and am running 10 degrees initial timing the 
factory setting on the adjustable vac. advance (I think its 16 degrees) and 
the lightest springs on the weights (The weights and springs came with the 
kit). At the strip trying to tune it, I had to use the lighter springs 
otherwise, my times were around a ½ sec. slower with the heavier springs. 
The carb is the edlebrock 600 cfm elec. choke and I put the 1 step leaner 
primary rods in. No actual jet changes. As far as going to the strip, I 
don't think I can make it out again til next year, (I think it already 
closed) so tuning there won't be an option. Right now, I do only have the 
2.73 gears and 28 tall tires, which is probably contributing to the extra 
load condition. Any opinions?


Brian Zack
'70 Chevelle Malibu
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
Set yourself up for fun at home!  Get tips on home entertainment equipment, 
video game reviews, and more here.   
http://special.msn.com/home/homeent.armx





Re: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question

2003-11-26 Thread Clint Hooper
If you're trying to run 48 degrees of advance in that engine,there's your
problem right there. Try to pull it back to somewhere around 36-38,total.
Clint Hooper
HH Custom,owner
LT5 Registry Director
http://www.LT5Registry.net/
ACES #1650
http://dalesplace.com/misc/friends/clint_hooper.htm
- Original Message -
From: Brian Zack [EMAIL PROTECTED]


This engine has the stock cast 76cc heads with the ports lightly smoothed
out and your basic felpro head gaskets. I am running the flat top cast
pistons. This engine has just under 20K miles on it. I think it is
detonation I'm hearing. I seem to be able to hear it now with my flowmaster
exhaust. (It seems I can kinda hear it through the exhaust). I am planning
for and trying to save up for some s/r torquers and a bigger cam for
hopefully next spring. I'm planning on the comp cams xe262. The cam I have
now is the crane energizer cam w/ .440 lift and I think its 260 duration I'm
not sure of the @ .050 dur. When I built the engine, I didn't measure how
far down the bore the pistons are. At that time, I didn't know anything
about the DCR and I asked for 9:1 pistons and don't know if these pistons
were manufactured a little further down than desirable or not. I can only
guess at my measurements. Right now, What I can figure from my guesses is my
DCR is around 7.4:1 to 7.5:1.When I was considering heads for the
future, it was either the vortecs or the world s/r torquers, but, I think
the vortecs would make me have to run a lot more expensive fuel because of
going to a DCR of around 8.5:1. The total advance of 26 you have doesn't
include how much advandce the weights and springs add. I'll have to check
how much those add, but from memory, I think total was around 48 degrees.


Brian Zack
'70 Chevelle Malibu
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]





RE: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question

2003-11-26 Thread Brian Zack
Where would you suggest taking it out of? Weights and springs? Vacuum
advance? Or initial? Or a little out of each?


Brian Zack
'70 Chevelle Malibu
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-Original Message-
From: Clint Hooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 11:05 AM
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question

If you're trying to run 48 degrees of advance in that engine,there's
your
problem right there. Try to pull it back to somewhere around
36-38,total.
Clint Hooper
HH Custom,owner
LT5 Registry Director
http://www.LT5Registry.net/
ACES #1650
http://dalesplace.com/misc/friends/clint_hooper.htm
- Original Message -
From: Brian Zack [EMAIL PROTECTED]


This engine has the stock cast 76cc heads with the ports lightly
smoothed
out and your basic felpro head gaskets. I am running the flat top cast
pistons. This engine has just under 20K miles on it. I think it is
detonation I'm hearing. I seem to be able to hear it now with my
flowmaster
exhaust. (It seems I can kinda hear it through the exhaust). I am
planning
for and trying to save up for some s/r torquers and a bigger cam for
hopefully next spring. I'm planning on the comp cams xe262. The cam I
have
now is the crane energizer cam w/ .440 lift and I think its 260 duration
I'm
not sure of the @ .050 dur. When I built the engine, I didn't measure
how
far down the bore the pistons are. At that time, I didn't know anything
about the DCR and I asked for 9:1 pistons and don't know if these
pistons
were manufactured a little further down than desirable or not. I can
only
guess at my measurements. Right now, What I can figure from my guesses
is my
DCR is around 7.4:1 to 7.5:1.When I was considering heads for the
future, it was either the vortecs or the world s/r torquers, but, I
think
the vortecs would make me have to run a lot more expensive fuel because
of
going to a DCR of around 8.5:1. The total advance of 26 you have doesn't
include how much advandce the weights and springs add. I'll have to
check
how much those add, but from memory, I think total was around 48
degrees.


Brian Zack
'70 Chevelle Malibu
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]






Re: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question

2003-11-26 Thread Clint Hooper
How much initial advance did you say the engine has?
Clint Hooper
HH Custom,owner
LT5 Registry Director
http://www.LT5Registry.net/
ACES #1650
http://dalesplace.com/misc/friends/clint_hooper.htm
- Original Message - 
From: Brian Zack [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Where would you suggest taking it out of? Weights and springs? Vacuum
advance? Or initial? Or a little out of each?
Brian Zack
'70 Chevelle Malibu
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 



RE: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question

2003-11-26 Thread Dave Corgill


At 12:18 PM 11/26/2003, you wrote:
Where would you suggest taking it
out of? Weights and springs? Vacuum
advance? Or initial? Or a little out of each?

Brian Zack
'70 Chevelle Malibu
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Vacuum don't count as total advance. When I read your post I
thought you were adding vacuum advance to the mix because 48
is way to much. If it pings at light throttle take some out
of vacuum . On my vortex head 383 max is 32 degs, 10 ini with
22 degs distributor, vacuum I use 10 deg pod. If you add it all
up = 42. You need to ck the advance at 3500-4000 rpm with the
vacuum plugged.  



RE: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question

2003-11-26 Thread Brian Zack
10 degrees at damper + 22 at weights and springs (I think) + 16 vacuum advance. That 
is where I got 48. Is that not correct? Is total not including vacuum too? 


Brian Zack 
Structural Technician 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Dekker/Perich/Sabatini 
architecture  interiors  planning  engineering 
505.761.9700  fax 505.761.4222. 
Visit our Website at www.dpsabq.com 


-Original Message-
From: Clint Hooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 11:51 AM
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question

How much initial advance did you say the engine has?
Clint Hooper
HH Custom,owner
LT5 Registry Director
http://www.LT5Registry.net/
ACES #1650
http://dalesplace.com/misc/friends/clint_hooper.htm
- Original Message - 
From: Brian Zack [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Where would you suggest taking it out of? Weights and springs? Vacuum
advance? Or initial? Or a little out of each?
Brian Zack
'70 Chevelle Malibu
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 




RE: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question

2003-11-26 Thread Brian Zack








Ok. Maybe I can try taking some out of the
vacuum.







Brian Zack 
'70 Chevelle Malibu 
mailto:brianz@dpsabq.com 



-Original Message-
From: Dave Corgill
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday,
 November 26, 2003 11:49 AM
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list]
Detonation question



At 12:18 PM 11/26/2003, you wrote:



Where would you suggest taking it out of? Weights and
springs? Vacuum
advance? Or initial? Or a little out of each?


Brian Zack
'70 Chevelle Malibu
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


Vacuum don't count as total advance. When I read your post I
thought you were adding vacuum advance to the mix because 48
is way to much. If it pings at light throttle take some out
of vacuum . On my vortex head 383 max is 32 degs, 10 ini with
22 degs distributor, vacuum I use 10 deg pod. If you add it all
up = 42. You need to ck the advance at 3500-4000 rpm with the
vacuum plugged.  








RE: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question

2003-11-26 Thread Tom and Sue Tomlinson
Your original post said the detonation occurred under load. If this is the
case, changing the vacuum advance may not help since it will not be
kicked-in under load. In that case, you need to change the initial (damper)
advance, and/or total advance by the springs and weights (or the advance
curve).

Tom Tomlinson

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Brian Zack
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 2:11 PM
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question


10 degrees at damper + 22 at weights and springs (I think) + 16 vacuum
advance. That is where I got 48. Is that not correct? Is total not including
vacuum too?


Brian Zack
Structural Technician
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dekker/Perich/Sabatini
architecture  interiors  planning  engineering
505.761.9700  fax 505.761.4222.
Visit our Website at www.dpsabq.com


-Original Message-
From: Clint Hooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 11:51 AM
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question

How much initial advance did you say the engine has?
Clint Hooper
HH Custom,owner
LT5 Registry Director
http://www.LT5Registry.net/
ACES #1650
http://dalesplace.com/misc/friends/clint_hooper.htm
- Original Message -
From: Brian Zack [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Where would you suggest taking it out of? Weights and springs? Vacuum
advance? Or initial? Or a little out of each?
Brian Zack
'70 Chevelle Malibu
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]






RE: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question

2003-11-26 Thread Brian Zack
Yes, it seems to do it taking off from a start up hill a little heavy footed and when 
accelerating without downshifting. OK, Dumb question. Do I need more or less timing? 
It's been a long, short week.


Brian Zack
'70 Chevelle Malibu
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-Original Message-
From: Tom and Sue Tomlinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 1:05 PM
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question

Your original post said the detonation occurred under load. If this is the
case, changing the vacuum advance may not help since it will not be
kicked-in under load. In that case, you need to change the initial (damper)
advance, and/or total advance by the springs and weights (or the advance
curve).

Tom Tomlinson

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Brian Zack
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 2:11 PM
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question


10 degrees at damper + 22 at weights and springs (I think) + 16 vacuum
advance. That is where I got 48. Is that not correct? Is total not including
vacuum too?


Brian Zack
Structural Technician
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dekker/Perich/Sabatini
architecture  interiors  planning  engineering
505.761.9700  fax 505.761.4222.
Visit our Website at www.dpsabq.com


-Original Message-
From: Clint Hooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 11:51 AM
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question

How much initial advance did you say the engine has?
Clint Hooper
HH Custom,owner
LT5 Registry Director
http://www.LT5Registry.net/
ACES #1650
http://dalesplace.com/misc/friends/clint_hooper.htm
- Original Message -
From: Brian Zack [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Where would you suggest taking it out of? Weights and springs? Vacuum
advance? Or initial? Or a little out of each?
Brian Zack
'70 Chevelle Malibu
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]







RE: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question

2003-11-26 Thread Tom and Sue Tomlinson
You need less advance. An easy check would be to change the initial timing
at the damper to 5-6 deg instead of 10 deg. One of the other posts suggested
upgrading the gas. I would try that too.

Tom

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Brian Zack
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 3:28 PM
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question


Yes, it seems to do it taking off from a start up hill a little heavy footed
and when accelerating without downshifting. OK, Dumb question. Do I need
more or less timing? It's been a long, short week.


Brian Zack
'70 Chevelle Malibu
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Tom and Sue Tomlinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 1:05 PM
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question

Your original post said the detonation occurred under load. If this is the
case, changing the vacuum advance may not help since it will not be
kicked-in under load. In that case, you need to change the initial (damper)
advance, and/or total advance by the springs and weights (or the advance
curve).

Tom Tomlinson

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Brian Zack
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 2:11 PM
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question


10 degrees at damper + 22 at weights and springs (I think) + 16 vacuum
advance. That is where I got 48. Is that not correct? Is total not including
vacuum too?


Brian Zack
Structural Technician
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dekker/Perich/Sabatini
architecture  interiors  planning  engineering
505.761.9700  fax 505.761.4222.
Visit our Website at www.dpsabq.com


-Original Message-
From: Clint Hooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 11:51 AM
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question

How much initial advance did you say the engine has?
Clint Hooper
HH Custom,owner
LT5 Registry Director
http://www.LT5Registry.net/
ACES #1650
http://dalesplace.com/misc/friends/clint_hooper.htm
- Original Message -
From: Brian Zack [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Where would you suggest taking it out of? Weights and springs? Vacuum
advance? Or initial? Or a little out of each?
Brian Zack
'70 Chevelle Malibu
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]









Re: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question

2003-11-26 Thread Capt Crunch
Too much advance Brian... like Clint said pull the total back to the 32-36 degree area. I would say more like 32 if you want to run your current fuel.  First thing first brian disconnect the vac advance for now cause it will make no difference at WOT or for total advance. I assume your engine is liking 10 degrees inital timing more then 6 or 8 degrees? If that is the case leave it at ten. Then change yourcentrifugal to get you total advance (initial+ centrifugal) to equal 32 degrees. Hope this helps  Mikey - Original Message  From: Brian Zack Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 2:24 PM To: The Chevelle Mailing List Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question Yes, it seems to do it taking off from a start up hill a little heavy footed and when accelerating without downshifting. OK, Dumb question. Do I need more or less timing? It's been a long, short week.Brian Zack'70 Chevelle Malibumailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Tom and Sue Tomlinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 1:05 PMTo: The Chevelle Mailing ListSubject: RE: [Chevelle-list] Detonation questionYour original post said the detonation occurred under load. If this is thecase, changing the vacuum advance may not help since it will not bekicked-in under load. In that case, you need to change the initial (damper)advance, and/or total advance by the springs and weights (or the advancecurve).Tom Tomlinson-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Brian ZackSent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 2:11 PMTo: The Chevelle Mailing ListSubject: RE: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question10 degrees at damper + 22 at weights and springs (I think) + 16 vacuumadvance. That is where I got 48. Is that not correct? Is total not includingvacuum too?Brian ZackStructural Technicianmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Dekker/Perich/Sabatiniarchitecture interiors planning engineering505.761.9700 fax 505.761.4222.Visit our Website at www.dpsabq.com-Original Message-From: Clint Hooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 11:51 AMTo: The Chevelle Mailing ListSubject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Detonation questionHow much initial advance did you say the engine has?Clint HooperHH Custom,ownerLT5 Registry Directorhttp://www.LT5Registry.net/ACES #1650http://dalesplace.com/misc/friends/clint_hooper.htm- Original Message -From: "Brian Zack" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Where would you suggest taking it out of? Weights and springs? Vacuumadvance? Or initial? Or a little out of each?Brian Zack'70 Chevelle Malibumailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question

2003-11-26 Thread Brian Zack








It is already at 32 degrees. 10 initial +
22 centrifugal. Doesnt the vacuum advance help with gas mileage? It does
sound like maybe the vacuum advance is too much. Is that why you said to
disconnect it for now? I have tried premium and it didnt make much
difference. I think Ill try a few of the things mentioned here both
separately and together and see what happens. Thanks all for the knowledge and
help on this There is a really great knowledge base here. Hope everyone has a
great Thanksgiving and GOD Bless!







Brian Zack 
'70 Chevelle Malibu 
mailto:brianz@dpsabq.com 



-Original Message-
From: Capt Crunch
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday,
 November 26, 2003 1:59 PM
To: Chevelle List
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list]
Detonation question





Too much advance Brian... like
Clint said pull the total back to the 32-36 degree area. I would say more like
32 if you want to run your current fuel.











First thing first brian disconnect
the vac advance for now cause it will make no difference at WOT or for total
advance. I assume your engine is liking 10 degrees inital timing more then 6 or
8 degrees? If that is the case leave it at ten. Then change yourcentrifugal
to get you total advance (initial+ centrifugal) to equal 32 degrees.





Hope this helps











Mikey

























- Original Message 





From: Brian
Zack





Sent: Wednesday,
 November 26, 2003 2:24 PM





To: The
Chevelle Mailing List





Subject: RE:
[Chevelle-list] Detonation question









Yes,
it seems to do it taking off from a start up hill a little heavy footed and
when accelerating without downshifting. OK, Dumb question. Do I need more or
less timing? It's been a long, short week.


Brian Zack
'70 Chevelle Malibu
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-Original Message-
From: Tom and Sue Tomlinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 1:05 PM
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question

Your original post said the detonation occurred under load. If this is the
case, changing the vacuum advance may not help since it will not be
kicked-in under load. In that case, you need to change the initial (damper)
advance, and/or total advance by the springs and weights (or the advance
curve).

Tom Tomlinson

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Brian Zack
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 2:11 PM
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question


10 degrees at damper + 22 at weights and springs (I think) + 16 vacuum
advance. That is where I got 48. Is that not correct? Is total not including
vacuum too?


Brian Zack
Structural Technician
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dekker/Perich/Sabatini
architecture interiors planning engineering
505.761.9700 fax 505.761.4222.
Visit our Website at www.dpsabq.com


-Original Message-
From: Clint Hooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 11:51 AM
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question

How much initial advance did you say the engine has?
Clint Hooper
HH Custom,owner
LT5 Registry Director
http://www.LT5Registry.net/
ACES #1650
http://dalesplace.com/misc/friends/clint_hooper.htm
- Original Message -
From: Brian Zack [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Where would you suggest taking it out of? Weights and springs? Vacuum
advance? Or initial? Or a little out of each?
Brian Zack
'70 Chevelle Malibu
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]















Re: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question

2003-11-26 Thread yenkochevelle



What temp. is engine running at? Do you have an 
accuate temp guage? Do you notice a difference when air temp is high vs 
low?

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Brian Zack 
  
  To: The Chevelle Mailing List 
  Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 5:08 
  PM
  Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] Detonation 
  question
  
  
  It is already at 32 
  degrees. 10 initial + 22 centrifugal. Doesn’t the vacuum advance help with gas 
  mileage? It does sound like maybe the vacuum advance is too much. Is that why 
  you said to disconnect it for now? I have tried premium and it didn’t make 
  much difference. I think I’ll try a few of the things mentioned here both 
  separately and together and see what happens. Thanks all for the knowledge and 
  help on this There is a really great knowledge base here. Hope everyone has a 
  great Thanksgiving and GOD Bless!
  
  
  
  Brian 
  Zack 
  '70 
  Chevelle Malibu mailto:brianz@dpsabq.com 
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Capt 
  Crunch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 
  26, 2003 1:59 
  PMTo: Chevelle 
  ListSubject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Detonation 
  question
  
  
  Too much advance Brian... like 
  Clint said pull the total back to the 32-36 degree area. I would say more like 
  32 if you want to run your current fuel.
  
  
  
  First thing first brian 
  disconnect the vac advance for now cause it will make no difference at WOT or 
  for total advance. I assume your engine is liking 10 degrees inital timing 
  more then 6 or 8 degrees? If that is the case leave it at ten. Then change 
  yourcentrifugal to get you total advance (initial+ centrifugal) to 
  equal 32 degrees.
  
  Hope this 
  helps
  
  
  
  Mikey
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

- Original Message 


From: Brian 
Zack

Sent: 
Wednesday, November 26, 
2003 2:24 
PM

To: The 
Chevelle Mailing List

Subject: RE: 
[Chevelle-list] Detonation question


Yes, 
it seems to do it taking off from a start up hill a little heavy footed and 
when accelerating without downshifting. OK, Dumb question. Do I need more or 
less timing? It's been a long, short week.Brian Zack'70 
Chevelle Malibumailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
-Original Message-From: Tom and Sue Tomlinson 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 
November 26, 2003 1:05 
PMTo: The Chevelle Mailing 
ListSubject: RE: [Chevelle-list] Detonation questionYour 
original post said the detonation occurred under load. If this is 
thecase, changing the vacuum advance may not help since it will not 
bekicked-in under load. In that case, you need to change the initial 
(damper)advance, and/or total advance by the springs and weights (or the 
advancecurve).Tom Tomlinson-Original 
Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Behalf Of Brian ZackSent: Wednesday, November 26, 
2003 2:11 
PMTo: The Chevelle Mailing 
ListSubject: RE: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question10 
degrees at damper + 22 at weights and springs (I think) + 16 
vacuumadvance. That is where I got 48. Is that not correct? Is total not 
includingvacuum too?Brian ZackStructural 
Technicianmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Dekker/Perich/Sabatiniarchitecture 
interiors planning engineering505.761.9700 fax 
505.761.4222.Visit our Website at 
www.dpsabq.com-Original Message-From: Clint Hooper 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, 
November 26, 2003 11:51 AMTo: The Chevelle Mailing 
ListSubject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Detonation questionHow much 
initial advance did you say the engine has?Clint HooperHH 
Custom,ownerLT5 Registry Directorhttp://www.LT5Registry.net/ACES 
#1650http://dalesplace.com/misc/friends/clint_hooper.htm- 
Original Message -From: "Brian Zack" 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Where would you suggest taking it out of? 
Weights and springs? Vacuumadvance? Or initial? Or a little out of 
each?Brian Zack'70 Chevelle Malibumailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question

2003-11-26 Thread Brian Zack









I hadnt really started listening
that closely till lately, so I didnt notice if it was worse at high temp
or not. Right now, my temps arent getting over 180. But, during the
summer with the air on and sitting in traffic, it climbs to about 215-220. When
I change the heads and cam this spring, Im going to put on a high flow
water pump and reduce the ratio for the summer along with water wetter. I wont
have acces to my e-mail again till Monday, So Happy Thanksgiving.







Brian Zack 
'70 Chevelle Malibu 
mailto:brianz@dpsabq.com 



-Original Message-
From: yenkochevelle
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday,
 November 26, 2003 4:48 PM
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list]
Detonation question





What temp. is engine running at? Do
you have an accuate temp guage? Do you notice a difference when air temp is
high vs low?







- Original Message - 





From: Brian Zack 





To: The
Chevelle Mailing List 





Sent: Wednesday,
 November 26, 2003 5:08 PM





Subject: RE:
[Chevelle-list] Detonation question









It is already at 32
degrees. 10 initial + 22 centrifugal. Doesnt the vacuum advance help
with gas mileage? It does sound like maybe the vacuum advance is too much. Is
that why you said to disconnect it for now? I have tried premium and it
didnt make much difference. I think Ill try a few of the things
mentioned here both separately and together and see what happens. Thanks all
for the knowledge and help on this There is a really great knowledge base here.
Hope everyone has a great Thanksgiving and GOD Bless!







Brian Zack 
'70 Chevelle Malibu 
mailto:brianz@dpsabq.com 



-Original Message-
From: Capt Crunch
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday,
 November 26, 2003 1:59 PM
To: Chevelle List
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list]
Detonation question





Too much advance Brian... like
Clint said pull the total back to the 32-36 degree area. I would say more like
32 if you want to run your current fuel.











First thing first brian disconnect
the vac advance for now cause it will make no difference at WOT or for total
advance. I assume your engine is liking 10 degrees inital timing more then 6 or
8 degrees? If that is the case leave it at ten. Then change
yourcentrifugal to get you total advance (initial+ centrifugal) to
equal 32 degrees.





Hope this helps











Mikey

























- Original Message 





From: Brian
Zack





Sent: Wednesday,
 November 26, 2003 2:24 PM





To: The
Chevelle Mailing List





Subject: RE:
[Chevelle-list] Detonation question









Yes, it seems to do it taking off from a start up hill a little heavy
footed and when accelerating without downshifting. OK, Dumb question. Do I need
more or less timing? It's been a long, short week.


Brian Zack
'70 Chevelle Malibu
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-Original Message-
From: Tom and Sue Tomlinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 1:05 PM
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question

Your original post said the detonation occurred under load. If this is the
case, changing the vacuum advance may not help since it will not be
kicked-in under load. In that case, you need to change the initial (damper)
advance, and/or total advance by the springs and weights (or the advance
curve).

Tom Tomlinson

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Brian Zack
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 2:11 PM
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question


10 degrees at damper + 22 at weights and springs (I think) + 16 vacuum
advance. That is where I got 48. Is that not correct? Is total not including
vacuum too?


Brian Zack
Structural Technician
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dekker/Perich/Sabatini
architecture interiors planning engineering
505.761.9700 fax 505.761.4222.
Visit our Website at www.dpsabq.com


-Original Message-
From: Clint Hooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 11:51 AM
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question

How much initial advance did you say the engine has?
Clint Hooper
HH Custom,owner
LT5 Registry Director
http://www.LT5Registry.net/
ACES #1650
http://dalesplace.com/misc/friends/clint_hooper.htm
- Original Message -
From: Brian Zack [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Where would you suggest taking it out of? Weights and springs? Vacuum
advance? Or initial? Or a little out of each?
Brian Zack
'70 Chevelle Malibu
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
















Re: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question

2003-11-26 Thread Rollerclutch
I think the vacuum advance does come on under load because the off idle (ported) vacuum is strong at part throttle. 


Re: [Chevelle-list] Detonation question

2003-11-26 Thread Rollerclutch
 Maybe try 10 initial + 15 centrifugal and leave the vacuum advance connected and see what happens. You said you have the lightest springs in the kit? 
 Keep experimenting. I like 10 deg initial because of the snappy throttle response I get around town, but you gotta fix that detonation at WOT cause thats hell on pistons and valves. Keep tweakin it!