Stupid Question time [7:41465]
All, im studying for my CCIE. Can someone point me in the direction of information about RIF's..I've got the Rossi Paper but its unclear at the start. Am I right in saying, a RIF is a Routing Information Field, its used to determine the list of rings and bridges a frame has travelled through a token ring network? The RIF field is the first byte of the Source Mac address? Foggy topic! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41465&t=41465 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: xon/xoff [7:41433]
Use the show line command to find out what the line number is and you can set the flow control for the line in the line configuration. conf t line xxx<--- line number flowcontrol software|hardware|none software for xon/xoff hardware for cts/rts none for well none =P HTH Don Nguyen Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41464&t=41433 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Aboutthe processingp power of 2621 and 827 routers [7:41461]
2621, 50mhz processor from memory? mate, its all listed on Cisco.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41463&t=41461 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: WINS replication problem across PPP network [7:41410]
IP helper for WINS ? How is that going to help ? Cisco doesn't understand WINS either ""Sean Knox"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I'm sure someone can provide a more detailed and accurate answer, but > hopefully I can help. > > WINS is a TCP and UDP protocol. I imagine an IP HELPER-ADDRESS command might > be of use here. Try a search for WINS on CCO at www.cisco.com. > > hth, > Sean > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Mayo, Simer > Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 10:19 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: WINS replication problem across PPP network [7:41410] > > > I'm having problem with WINS replication to 2 differ servers > Server 1 in Network 1 in Phx (PDC...WINS Server) > Server 2 in Network 2 in LA (BDC...WINS Server) > > server1.cisco2600---PPP---cisco2600.server2 > > The server2 can browse all machines in network 1 and 2 but server 1 cant see > network 2. > > I have enabled the TCP ports 42 and 135 on both the routers but still no > success. > > The network is NT 4 domain. > > Thanks in advance for help > > Simer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41462&t=41410 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aboutthe processingp power of 2621 and 827 routers [7:41461]
Hi, I would like to have an idea about the processing power of Cisco 2621 and 827 routers if they are used for VPN connection. Any input would be nice, thank you!! Cheung III Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41461&t=41461 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 100Mbit cable can't shorter than 6 feets????? [7:41448]
Chee, I've never heard of anything like that. YOu do have to be carefull with fiber though. I've got 10baset cables that are less than a foot and 100baset cables that are 10. I think there is a restriction (51.2 bittimes) for fast ethernet on the long end but nothing stated as to how short it can be. Tim -Original Message- From: Sim, CT (Chee Tong) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 10:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 100Mbit cable can't shorter than 6 feets? [7:41448] Hi.. everyone, My friend told me that 100Mbit cable can't SHORTER than 6 feets. Have everyone heard that this theory ? If yes, what is the reason or he is bull shitting. Tong == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41460&t=41448 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Written Beta Announcement [7:41340]
I appreciate the info. I'm eager to see this new beta. But as you know tomorrow is the 15th, and I'm shocked to see nothing on Cisco's website about it, as usually Cisco is very forthcoming with information about beta exams, what they cover, when they start/stop, etc. I'll call Prometric tomorrow to see if I can schedule and keep my eyes on Cisco's website for more info. Thanks! Mike W. PS: I'm surprised the cost isn't $150 (1/2 of the normal $300). Perhaps they just price all betas at $50 and I just assumed $50 was 1/2 price of $100 (for CCNP exams before they went to $125) "Daniel Cotts" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I posted the original announcement. > My source is a Cisco SE who does training for the Channel Partners. He was > forwarding an announcement from an individual at Cisco who is part of the > CCIE program. Rather than forward the e-mail that I received - I decided to > pass on the information with the source names not included. > The cost is $50. > If you are interested then contact Prometric or Vue. The first day for the > exam is April 15. I'd expect an announcement by then. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Michael Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 7:32 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: CCIE Written Beta Announcement [7:41340] > > > > > > I would like to second the question "Is this official"? I > > can't find any > > info on Cisco website. This would be surprising since they > > usually post > > info on the beta exam (like a blueprint, dates it's available, etc). > > > > Please post more info. > > > > IMHO, I would speculate that the price would be 50% ($150) > > which is what all > > of the CCNP beta exams I took were (after going up from the > > lovely price of > > $0) > > > > Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41459&t=41340 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 100Mbit cable can't shorter than 6 feets????? [7:41448]
I checked the web, and saw some places that say a minimum of .5M (1.5Ft), but I also ran into another place that says 2M (~6Ft). I know that we have and do commonly use 3Ft patch cables for 100Mbps ethernet and it works fine, so between the two, I'd say that 1.5Ft could indeed be a minimum. However, I believe that in the olden days, the minimum distance between stations on 10Base-2 was something like 6Ft, but modern ethernet uses a different electrical technology that 10Base-2. Here's an URL talking about this topic: http://www.duxcw.com/faq/network/cablng.htm Mike W. "Sim, CT (Chee Tong)" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi.. everyone, > > My friend told me that 100Mbit cable can't SHORTER than 6 feets. Have > everyone heard that this theory ? If yes, what is the reason or he is bull > shitting. > > Tong > > > > > > == > De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en > is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht > onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en > de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. > == > The information contained in this message may be confidential > and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you > receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents > herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. > > > == Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41458&t=41448 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP Training? [7:41456]
Go Switching, Remote and Support are a piece of cake, actually Remote Access I enjoyed reading, it was a great read.. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41457&t=41456 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCNP Training? [7:41456]
Hi there, I've just done 503, and now ready for the next one. I've got the budget of an instructer lead training course but only one. I want to spend the money wisely by going to the one that's most worth it. Could any please tell me which course I should go to? Remote, switch, or Trouble shooting? Thanks, Joy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41456&t=41456 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Written Beta Announcement [7:41340]
What do you need it for? Wanna see if you are still sharp? You must have got tired of changing light bulbs. I ain't heard from Rob since he left. Guess he is having fun in New Mexico or wherever he is. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 1:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE Written Beta Announcement [7:41340] How much are the beta exams ? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41455&t=41340 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BGP route info Question [7:41454]
Ok, now I'm even more confused:- When I do a show ip bgp summary, it clearly shows that my AS is 7496 (I've confirmed this with show run). Also, my only EBGP neighbor is from AS 1221 (all the others are IBBP neighbors), which does not match any of the values in 3840 703 2764 4648. It would be greatly appreciated if someone can shed some light on this. Best Regards, Hunt Lee System Engineer WebCentral br1.bne#sh ip bgp summary BGP router identifier 203.X.X.X, local AS number 7496 BGP table version is 405452, main routing table version 405452 7650 network entries and 23974 paths using 1701010 bytes of memory 1822 BGP path attribute entries using 109320 bytes of memory 1034 BGP AS-PATH entries using 27252 bytes of memory 1 BGP community entries using 24 bytes of memory 528 BGP route-map cache entries using 8448 bytes of memory 6 BGP filter-list cache entries using 72 bytes of memory 6037 received paths for inbound soft reconfiguration BGP activity 96332/491991 prefixes, 389268/365294 paths, scan interval 15 secs NeighborVAS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd 139.130.64.85 4 1221 117111 76236 4054520 0 7w3d 5939 203.X.X.X 4 7496 122386 122542 40545200 7w3d 5948 203.X.X.X 4 7496 274338 123297 40545200 4w6d 6033 203.X.X.X 4 7496 0 00 0 0 neverActive 203.X.X.X 4 7496 73359 118408 4054520 0 6w2d6 203.X.X.X 4 7496 76221 122542 4054520 0 7w3d6 br1.bne# ""J ACH"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > This is AS path. The router br1.bne is in AS 3840. > > Hope this helps > Jana. ""Hunt Lee"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all, > > I have a question about BGP Aggregate Routes, it would be great if someone > can shed some light on this: > > I understand that in "3840 703 2764 4648, (aggregated by 4648 > 202.37.247.45)", 4648 is where the AS Number that originates this aggregate > route (219.88.0.0), while 202.37.247.45 is the Router_ID who creates this > aggregate. > > But what does the front bit say - 3840 703 2764 4648??? > > > br1.bne#sh ip bgp 219.88.0.0 > BGP routing table entry for 219.88.0.0/16, version 376147 > Paths: (4 available, best #1) > Not advertised to any peer > 3840 703 2764 4648, (aggregated by 4648 202.37.247.45) > 203.147.255.131 (metric 3) from 203.147.255.131 (203.147.255.131) > Origin IGP, metric 5, localpref 100, valid, internal, > atomic-aggregate, best > Community: 703:1020 > 1221 2764 4648, (aggregated by 4648 202.37.247.45) > 203.147.255.130 (metric 3) from 203.147.255.130 (203.147.255.130) > Origin IGP, localpref 80, valid, internal, atomic-aggregate > 1221 2764 4648, (aggregated by 4648 202.37.247.45) > 139.130.64.85 from 139.130.64.85 (203.14.8.12) > Origin IGP, localpref 80, valid, external, atomic-aggregate > 1221 2764 4648, (aggregated by 4648 202.37.247.45), (received-only) > 139.130.64.85 from 139.130.64.85 (203.14.8.12) > Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external, atomic-aggregate > > > Please help... > > Best Regards, > Hunt Lee Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41454&t=41454 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP Aggregate Routes [7:41269]
Ok, now I'm even more confused:- When I do a show ip bgp summary, it clearly shows that my AS is 7496 (I've confirmed this with show run). Also, my only EBGP neighbor is from AS 1221 (all the others are IBBP neighbors), which does not match any of the values in 3840 703 2764 4648. It would be greatly appreciated if someone can shed some light on this. Best Regards, Hunt Lee System Engineer WebCentral br1.bne#sh ip bgp summary BGP router identifier 203.X.X.X, local AS number 7496 BGP table version is 405452, main routing table version 405452 7650 network entries and 23974 paths using 1701010 bytes of memory 1822 BGP path attribute entries using 109320 bytes of memory 1034 BGP AS-PATH entries using 27252 bytes of memory 1 BGP community entries using 24 bytes of memory 528 BGP route-map cache entries using 8448 bytes of memory 6 BGP filter-list cache entries using 72 bytes of memory 6037 received paths for inbound soft reconfiguration BGP activity 96332/491991 prefixes, 389268/365294 paths, scan interval 15 secs NeighborVAS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd 139.130.64.85 4 1221 117111 76236 4054520 0 7w3d 5939 203.X.X.X 4 7496 122386 122542 40545200 7w3d 5948 203.X.X.X 4 7496 274338 123297 40545200 4w6d 6033 203.X.X.X 4 7496 0 00 0 0 neverActive 203.X.X.X 4 7496 73359 118408 4054520 0 6w2d6 203.X.X.X 4 7496 76221 122542 4054520 0 7w3d6 br1.bne# ""J ACH"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > This is AS path. The router br1.bne is in AS 3840. > > Hope this helps > Jana. ""Hunt Lee"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all, > > I have a question about BGP Aggregate Routes, it would be great if someone > can shed some light on this: > > I understand that in "3840 703 2764 4648, (aggregated by 4648 > 202.37.247.45)", 4648 is where the AS Number that originates this aggregate > route (219.88.0.0), while 202.37.247.45 is the Router_ID who creates this > aggregate. > > But what does the front bit say - 3840 703 2764 4648??? > > > br1.bne#sh ip bgp 219.88.0.0 > BGP routing table entry for 219.88.0.0/16, version 376147 > Paths: (4 available, best #1) > Not advertised to any peer > 3840 703 2764 4648, (aggregated by 4648 202.37.247.45) > 203.147.255.131 (metric 3) from 203.147.255.131 (203.147.255.131) > Origin IGP, metric 5, localpref 100, valid, internal, > atomic-aggregate, best > Community: 703:1020 > 1221 2764 4648, (aggregated by 4648 202.37.247.45) > 203.147.255.130 (metric 3) from 203.147.255.130 (203.147.255.130) > Origin IGP, localpref 80, valid, internal, atomic-aggregate > 1221 2764 4648, (aggregated by 4648 202.37.247.45) > 139.130.64.85 from 139.130.64.85 (203.14.8.12) > Origin IGP, localpref 80, valid, external, atomic-aggregate > 1221 2764 4648, (aggregated by 4648 202.37.247.45), (received-only) > 139.130.64.85 from 139.130.64.85 (203.14.8.12) > Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external, atomic-aggregate > > > Please help... > > Best Regards, > Hunt Lee Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41453&t=41269 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017]
No I am not a manager, and in the term that I used, we, meaning Cisco in general as a company. I am sorry my wording was not clear enough for you understand thatand I guess you think everyone that post a message on this list a few times a day must not be doing anything at work or home but chatting or surfing the web...All I can say is I am glad I dont work where you work... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: To: Cc: "Larry Letterman" Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 1:34 AM Subject: Re: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017] > Quoting Larry Letterman : > > > .. altho we wont do layoffs..we are not > > replacing any body that leaves or does not make it on the performance > > issues... > > > Hey Larry, > > Who is "we"? > Are you telling me that you are a mangager or a director at Cisco with the > power to hire and fire? > and even at a managerial position you do not have enough work to do other than > surf and chat and evaluate Hyper Terminals? > > You must be kidding me, you are not a manger at Cisco, are you? > Or, may be you are. > > A Strobel > > > > -_-_-_ Mail3000 gives you 30 Megs of Email space free -_-_- > This mail sent through http://mail3000.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41451&t=41017 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017]
I couldn't agree more... and to answer your questions, tools and time mgmt allow me to be part of this great list, not a lack of work on the job... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Kevin Cullimore" To: Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 3:06 PM Subject: Re: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017] > I'm a little frightened at the equation of expressing corporate values with > managerial authority. If the organization is subject to such catastrophic > change due to personal whims or poorly-planned reactions to clearly > discernible macroecenomic trends, I'm not sure their issues and/or plight > are worth your attention/ire. > > The higher up someone resides within a corporate structure, the more > valuable their "networking" (meant to invoke the non-technical use of the > term) skills are likely to be. > > On balance, I'd MUCH PREFER the scenario in which managers participate in > newsgroups to exploit the interaction potential and make good use of their > time rather than the situation you depict. In this case, I suspect we're > dealing with an individual not neccessarily associated with the management > hierarchy who merely manages their time well enough to accomodate these > online conversations. > > On a technical note, if more people paid attention to the free HT upgrade or > sought out an acceptable alternative, helpdesks would either find themselves > free to work on more interesting problems or pare themselves down to the > margin that you and your compatriots scream out for. > > - Original Message - > From: > To: > Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 4:39 AM > Subject: Re: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017] > > > > Quoting Larry Letterman : > > > > > .. altho we wont do layoffs..we are not > > > replacing any body that leaves or does not make it on the performance > > > issues... > > > > > > Hey Larry, > > > > Who is "we"? > > Are you telling me that you are a mangager or a director at Cisco with the > > power to hire and fire? > > and even at a managerial position you do not have enough work to do other > > than > > surf and chat and evaluate Hyper Terminals? > > > > You must be kidding me, you are not a manger at Cisco, are you? > > Or, may be you are. > > > > A Strobel > > > > > > > > -_-_-_ Mail3000 gives you 30 Megs of Email space free -_-_- > > This mail sent through http://mail3000.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41452&t=41017 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Memory [7:41266]
thanks for this, phil! i've got the memory in hand, now... eddie -Original Message- From: Circusnuts_1999 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 2:48 PM To: 'Jorge Rodriguez'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco Memory [7:41266] Importance: High The best place for FLASH would be Ebay. I think if you're shopping for 2500- you will find an 8 Meg stick ranges from $35 to $50. This is a far cry from the $100 to $150 it once sold for just a few short years ago. As far as RAM- that's and easy one. The specs are: 16 Megs/ 72 Pin/ 60ns/ Parity You should be able to pick up a 16 Meg stick for less than $10. I have ordering RAM from M.C. Howard Electronics [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] for approximately 3 years now. You'll need to know the specs when dealing with these guys (refer to the above paragraph). On the topic of FLASH and RAM- I have had nothing short of perfect service from Jeff @ PC Wholesale [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]. I buy most all my FLASH and RAM for the 2600s from him. I have found both of these sellers so trustworthy- that I generally E-mail them with what I need and pay them without directly (without using Ebay). All the best !!! Phil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jorge Rodriguez Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 12:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco Memory [7:41266] www.layer7labs.com www.kg2.com Jorge The Edward Groove wrote: > Has anyone done any research on cheaper, yet compatible memory for the > 2500 series routers? I'm looking for some cheap flash and DRAM for this > line. Does anyone have any specs--or even better--manufacturer model > names that you've tested that works? > > Thanks, in advance... > > Eddie > > > > _ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41447&t=41266 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Written Beta Announcement [7:41340]
Replying to my own post. There was a URL on the original e-mail that I should have included. After some padding it might not be dropped. Pretty soon now. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/RoutingBeta.html > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 9:05 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: CCIE Written Beta Announcement [7:41340] > > > I posted the original announcement. > My source is a Cisco SE who does training for the Channel > Partners. He was > forwarding an announcement from an individual at Cisco who is > part of the > CCIE program. Rather than forward the e-mail that I received > - I decided to > pass on the information with the source names not included. > The cost is $50. > If you are interested then contact Prometric or Vue. The > first day for the > exam is April 15. I'd expect an announcement by then. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Michael Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 7:32 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: CCIE Written Beta Announcement [7:41340] > > > > > > I would like to second the question "Is this official"? I > > can't find any > > info on Cisco website. This would be surprising since they > > usually post > > info on the beta exam (like a blueprint, dates it's available, etc). > > > > Please post more info. > > > > IMHO, I would speculate that the price would be 50% ($150) > > which is what all > > of the CCNP beta exams I took were (after going up from the > > lovely price of > > $0) > > > > Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41450&t=41340 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: GIAC Certification [7:41445]
I went to www.computerworld.com and did a search on GIAC. It brought up six articles. Yo might want to review them. > -Original Message- > From: Rodney Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 9:08 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: GIAC Certification [7:41445] > > > Does anyone out there have any feedback about the GIAC > Certification tracks? > I'm thinking of taking their online courses but wanted to see > if you guys > heard any thing negative or positive about them. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41449&t=41445 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
100Mbit cable can't shorter than 6 feets????? [7:41448]
Hi.. everyone, My friend told me that 100Mbit cable can't SHORTER than 6 feets. Have everyone heard that this theory ? If yes, what is the reason or he is bull shitting. Tong == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41448&t=41448 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2500 won't boot...any ideas? [7:41414]
I've tried an 11.0 version of the IOS, but i can't remember now what was on there before to create the startup-config... regarding interrupting the boot process...you guys will kill me, but i can't remember the ctrl-break option on bootup. maybe this would solve my issue altogether? haha...i thought it was the ctrl-shift-6-x, but if not, i've tried ctrl-c, esc, and a few others. can someone refresh my memory? i will go ahead and try another GR IOS after i send this email... i'm sure it's not the ram, b/c i've tried to boot up with 2 different ram chips (one that i know is working on another box), and it still does the same thing... funny thing you mention the "read-only" status...this is probably what got me into trouble in the first place. after seeing that, i thought to myself "hey, someone makes non-writeable flash chips?" so, i did my little mixing and matching of several different chips, only to find it on other "imaged" flash chips, as well. anyway, correct me if i'm wrong, but i believe that the "read-only" listing is because the flash has an image in it that takes up most of the 16megs. in other words, i saw it where i had 16megs of flash in another router, and the bootup listed the first 8megs as "read only" and the 2nd 8megs as "read/write". and that router was running version 10.x or something like that. so this led me to believe that only the space taken up makes the flash list as "read only" or "read/write", accordingly. i put this to the test by loading a fresh 16MB flash in a router, and sure enough, it listed as "read/write". after i loaded a 12.x image, it listed as "read only." anyway, i hope i wasn't too confusing on that explanation... thanks for all the help, everyone. i'm going to try another image, and i'll post my results... ed -Original Message- From: Circusnuts_1999 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 2:34 PM To: 'Edward Sohn'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 2500 won't boot...any ideas? [7:41414] Importance: High Ed- I'm trying to make sense of the output and your trouble shooting steps, as explained in your E-mail. If the 2511 did not have 11.0(10c) ROMs, then the router would more or less hang-up when upgraded beyond 11.3 or 12.0 (I don't remember the cutoff for the 10.0 ROMs). If the router seems to be choking with the use of 12.2, issue the Cntrl BREAK upon bootup and reload an older IOS (say 12.0 or 12.1) to rule out some sort of bug. Though I have not had issues with 12.2 in my 2500s, this code is not a GR (General Release) and most definitely could be reacting with the FLASH and RAM "manufacturer" combination that have going on in your 2511. There is also a slim chance you have zapped the RAM (rare but true). Anywho- I "believe" what you are showing us here is an issue where the memory works fine in the 2522. The "Read Only" seems a little weird (after the 16 Megs FLASH), but then again... certain versions of code read this way and in the upgrade process automatically call for a software reload that enables the "Read Only" to change upon coming back up. If I've missed the boat, please offer more info. For better or worse, I have probably upgraded no less than a 100 2500s and 3000s (Y2K) in the few short years I have been working on Cisco. All the best !!! Phil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Edward Sohn Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 2:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 2500 won't boot...any ideas? [7:41414] my 2511 was working fine a few days ago with--i believe--11.0xx software. i created a configuration and saved it. yesterday, i upgraded the RAM so that i could load 12.2xx. the router won't fully boot up, and it never goes into the config or into rommon. i don't get it. again, it was working a few days ago. unfortunately, i can't put the old chips back in b/c i overwrote them already--ugh. i loaded up 12.2.7 onto the flash via another router and tried to boot it up again in the 2522... here's the output from when i start up the router, to where it hangs... System Bootstrap, Version 11.0(10c), SOFTWARE Copyright (c) 1986-1996 by cisco Systems 2500 processor with 14336 Kbytes of main memory %SYS-4-CONFIG_NEWER: Configurations from version 12.0 may not be correctly understood. F3: 14576440+958356+908736 at 0x360 Restricted Rights Legend Use, duplication, or disclosure by the Government is subject to restrictions as set forth in subparagraph (c) of the Commercial Computer Software - Restricted Rights clause at FAR sec. 52.227-19 and subparagraph (c) (1) (ii) of the Rights in Technical Data and Computer Software clause at DFARS sec. 252.227-7013. cisco Systems, Inc. 170 West Tasman Drive San Jose, California 95134-1706 Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-JS-L), Version 12.2(7b), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1986-2002 by cisco Systems, Inc. Co
GIAC Certification [7:41445]
Does anyone out there have any feedback about the GIAC Certification tracks? I'm thinking of taking their online courses but wanted to see if you guys heard any thing negative or positive about them. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41445&t=41445 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Written Beta Announcement [7:41340]
I posted the original announcement. My source is a Cisco SE who does training for the Channel Partners. He was forwarding an announcement from an individual at Cisco who is part of the CCIE program. Rather than forward the e-mail that I received - I decided to pass on the information with the source names not included. The cost is $50. If you are interested then contact Prometric or Vue. The first day for the exam is April 15. I'd expect an announcement by then. > -Original Message- > From: Michael Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 7:32 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: CCIE Written Beta Announcement [7:41340] > > > I would like to second the question "Is this official"? I > can't find any > info on Cisco website. This would be surprising since they > usually post > info on the beta exam (like a blueprint, dates it's available, etc). > > Please post more info. > > IMHO, I would speculate that the price would be 50% ($150) > which is what all > of the CCNP beta exams I took were (after going up from the > lovely price of > $0) > > Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41444&t=41340 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: network security [7:41440]
IHMO, both points you made aren't really applicable to what you're asking. You're asking if you should use CiscoSecure on NT for AAA, and I'd say fine, go for it. Here's why I discount what your friend said: 1) Security holes, security schmoles. You're not wanting to use NT as a firewall or WWW/FTP server in the DMZ, and the fact is, you should have a firewall that's NATing (or at least a router that's NATing) you to any outside network (internet or other company's private network), so the only security threats would be from internal sources (not to discount that, but again it's not like every hacker wannabe from the internet will have access to this box). If you want, you can even put an access list on the router that would be this boxes gateway and restrict traffic going to this box to only TACACS. BAM! Done! 2) NT4/2000 are as stable as it needs to be for doing AAA. I mean, we're not talking about a server that's going to be doing many complex things at once (WWW/DNS, CGI-BIN, scripts, etc). It will run ONE thing, CiscoSecure. Stability shouldn't be a problem. And the fact is, for (way) under $1,000 you can setup a second server running CiscoSecure, then in your TACACS setup on the devices, simply point to both servers in case one fails. Again, BAM! Done! My 2 cents =) Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41443&t=41440 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Written Beta Announcement [7:41340]
I would like to second the question "Is this official"? I can't find any info on Cisco website. This would be surprising since they usually post info on the beta exam (like a blueprint, dates it's available, etc). Please post more info. IMHO, I would speculate that the price would be 50% ($150) which is what all of the CCNP beta exams I took were (after going up from the lovely price of $0) Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41442&t=41340 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
network security [7:41440]
Hi Dear Friends, My company is considering using CiscoSecure to do AAA and we are not sure which one we should use, Windows or UNIX. I have the following questions, please help me to clarify: 1. My friend told me Windows has a lot of security holes. My question is if Windows is only using TCP/IP, it only has IP based security holes, like SNMP vulnerability. But UNIX is also IP based, it also has this kind of security holes, right? So if I put all the security patches from Microsoft, this shouldn't be a problem. Is this statement valid? 2. My friend also told me that Windows is easier to crash. I knew NT 4 is not stable, but as far as I know, 2000 and XP are pretty stable. The problem is if we have to hire a UNIX guy, it costs more than an NT guy, right? So what other advantages UNIX buy me? We definitely don't want to use any free AAA server since we couldn't get any vendor support. Thank you very much. Yoshi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41440&t=41440 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CIT Exam [7:41437]
I passed this exam about 2 weeks ago, it isnt difficult. I used the Cisco Exam Cert guide for Support , the Brainbuzz cram is useless. Read the book, maybe do Boson 1 and its a piece of cake. This compelted my CCNP :) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41439&t=41437 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: win98 pptp connection to cisco concentrator 3005 only at [7:41438]
Which modem pool device you are using for accepting dialup service ? ""suaveguru"" hi all, > > anyone can tell me why whenever I connect a win98 pptp > client to a cisco concentrator vpn server 3005 via a > pstn connection at 56kbps I always only able to > connect it at 9.6kbps . Whereas connecting to win2k > vpn server can yield at round the same speed as the > pstn connection which is around 56kbps > > any form of inputs will be greatly appreciated > > suaveguru > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax > http://taxes.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41438&t=41438 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CIT Exam [7:41437]
Hello.. i'm going to take 640-506 exam next week and i would like to know about some good exam cram... someone could recommend good material for pass this exam? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41437&t=41437 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCDA exam updated- who knew [7:41263]
Thanks. I saw the objectives, and it looks like I am going to just have to cram the new stuff in at the last minute. I am taking the exam tomorrow at 2:45PM, so I will report back with what I discover. Too late to change it now! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41436&t=41263 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE [7:41399]
Siva, You dont reply to your messages, this same message was posted not long ago by you, and you never responded. I think you are underestimating the complexity and difficulty of the CCIE Lab.. Regards Kris Sydney, Australia Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41435&t=41399 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2500 won't boot...any ideas? [7:41414]
Issue a break and stop the bootup sequence. Go into rommon mode and change the config-reg to 0x142. Reload and erase your config (WR E) when it goes into bootrom mode. Change your config-reg back to 0x2102 and reboot the router. Let me know if that does not work. thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.optsys.net (Cisco hardware) ""Edward Sohn"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > my 2511 was working fine a few days ago with--i believe--11.0xx > software. i created a configuration and saved it. yesterday, i > upgraded the RAM so that i could load 12.2xx. > > the router won't fully boot up, and it never goes into the config or > into rommon. i don't get it. again, it was working a few days ago. > unfortunately, i can't put the old chips back in b/c i overwrote them > already--ugh. i loaded up 12.2.7 onto the flash via another router and > tried to boot it up again in the 2522... > > here's the output from when i start up the router, to where it hangs... > > > System Bootstrap, Version 11.0(10c), SOFTWARE > Copyright (c) 1986-1996 by cisco Systems > 2500 processor with 14336 Kbytes of main memory > > %SYS-4-CONFIG_NEWER: Configurations from version 12.0 may not be > correctly understood. > F3: 14576440+958356+908736 at 0x360 > > Restricted Rights Legend > > Use, duplication, or disclosure by the Government is > subject to restrictions as set forth in subparagraph > (c) of the Commercial Computer Software - Restricted > Rights clause at FAR sec. 52.227-19 and subparagraph > (c) (1) (ii) of the Rights in Technical Data and Computer > Software clause at DFARS sec. 252.227-7013. > >cisco Systems, Inc. >170 West Tasman Drive >San Jose, California 95134-1706 > > > > Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software > IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-JS-L), Version 12.2(7b), RELEASE SOFTWARE > (fc1) > Copyright (c) 1986-2002 by cisco Systems, Inc. > Compiled Tue 05-Mar-02 05:10 by pwade > Image text-base: 0x030794BC, data-base: 0x1000 > > cisco 2511 (68030) processor (revision M) with 14336K/2048K bytes of > memory. > Processor board ID 17604021, with hardware revision > Bridging software. > X.25 software, Version 3.0.0. > SuperLAT software (copyright 1990 by Meridian Technology Corp). > TN3270 Emulation software. > 1 Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) > 2 Serial network interface(s) > 16 terminal line(s) > 32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. > 16384K bytes of processor board System flash (Read ONLY) > > 00:00:09: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Ethernet0, changed state to up > 00:00:09: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Serial0, changed state to down > 00:00:09: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Serial1, changed state to down > 00:00:27: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Ethernet0, > changed state to down > 00:00:34: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Serial0, changed state to > administratively down > 00:00:35: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from memory by console > 00:00:35: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Serial1, changed state to > administratively down > 00:00:35: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial0, > changed state to down > 00:00:38: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial1, > changed state to down > 00:01:18: %SYS-5-RESTART: System restarted -- > Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software > IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-JS-L), Version 12.2(7b), RELEASE SOFTWARE > (fc1) > Copyright (c) 1986-2002 by cisco Systems, Inc. > Compiled Tue 05-Mar-02 05:10 by pwade > 00:01:18: %SNMP-5-COLDSTART: SNMP agent on host Terminal_Server is > undergoing a cold start > > > > _ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41429&t=41414 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: WINS replication problem across PPP network [7:41410]
I had already tested all the configs (with WINS server and other) earlier but it didn't worked out. Resolution: I had on the following entry on e0/0 on Network 1 router: no ip directed-broadcast Once i enabled it, it started working. Thanks again for your help. I did learned few more troubleshooting tips. Simer Mayo 'Each failure is a stepping stone towards bettering oneself' -Original Message- From: Joseph Brunner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 12:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: WINS replication problem across PPP network [7:41410] wins is a directed tcp connection. wins dosent need ip helper address. most likely his wins is incorrectly configured. he should have a push (and or pull) relation defined in wins manager between the two servers. I didnt get what he said about adding the ports. maybe his access lists are killing wins replication. Joseph Brunner ASN 21572 MortgageIT MITLending New York, NY 10038 (212) 651 - 7695 Voice -Original Message- From: Sean Knox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 2:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: WINS replication problem across PPP network [7:41410] I'm sure someone can provide a more detailed and accurate answer, but hopefully I can help. WINS is a TCP and UDP protocol. I imagine an IP HELPER-ADDRESS command might be of use here. Try a search for WINS on CCO at www.cisco.com. hth, Sean -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mayo, Simer Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 10:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: WINS replication problem across PPP network [7:41410] I'm having problem with WINS replication to 2 differ servers Server 1 in Network 1 in Phx (PDC...WINS Server) Server 2 in Network 2 in LA (BDC...WINS Server) server1.cisco2600---PPP---cisco2600.server2 The server2 can browse all machines in network 1 and 2 but server 1 cant see network 2. I have enabled the TCP ports 42 and 135 on both the routers but still no success. The network is NT 4 domain. Thanks in advance for help Simer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41434&t=41410 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017]
This thread is taking an unhappy turn. We're all friends here and there's plenty of money to be made. Every company has its good side and its bad side. Same for employees. I'm proud to consider myself in the cisco family, meaning, I've taken the 8-semester Cisco Academy courses and I'm just about to take the CIT certification in a coupla weeks. This is the place to be. I even know some employees of Cisco competitors who subscribe to this list. Everybody, give the person next to yoou a hug. :-) Cheers, -- TT "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote: > Quoting Larry Letterman : > > > .. altho we wont do layoffs..we are not > > replacing any body that leaves or does not make it on the performance > > issues... > > Hey Larry, > > Who is "we"? > Are you telling me that you are a mangager or a director at Cisco with the > power to hire and fire? > and even at a managerial position you do not have enough work to do other > than > surf and chat and evaluate Hyper Terminals? > > You must be kidding me, you are not a manger at Cisco, are you? > Or, may be you are. > > A Strobel > > -_-_-_ Mail3000 gives you 30 Megs of Email space free -_-_- > This mail sent through http://mail3000.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41423&t=41017 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Memory [7:41266]
The best place for FLASH would be Ebay. I think if you're shopping for 2500- you will find an 8 Meg stick ranges from $35 to $50. This is a far cry from the $100 to $150 it once sold for just a few short years ago. As far as RAM- that's and easy one. The specs are: 16 Megs/ 72 Pin/ 60ns/ Parity You should be able to pick up a 16 Meg stick for less than $10. I have ordering RAM from M.C. Howard Electronics [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] for approximately 3 years now. You'll need to know the specs when dealing with these guys (refer to the above paragraph). On the topic of FLASH and RAM- I have had nothing short of perfect service from Jeff @ PC Wholesale [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]. I buy most all my FLASH and RAM for the 2600s from him. I have found both of these sellers so trustworthy- that I generally E-mail them with what I need and pay them without directly (without using Ebay). All the best !!! Phil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jorge Rodriguez Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 12:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco Memory [7:41266] www.layer7labs.com www.kg2.com Jorge The Edward Groove wrote: > Has anyone done any research on cheaper, yet compatible memory for the > 2500 series routers? I'm looking for some cheap flash and DRAM for this > line. Does anyone have any specs--or even better--manufacturer model > names that you've tested that works? > > Thanks, in advance... > > Eddie > > > > _ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41432&t=41266 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Collapsed Backbone [7:41418]
Georg Pauwen wrote: > 4A collapsed backbone has high-bandwidth uplinks from all segments and > subnetworks to a single device, such as a Gigabit switch, which serves as a > single point for monitoring and controlling the network4. > > The following link contains a figure detailing the collapsed backbone design > using a Cat4908G-L3: > > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c2900xl/29_35wc/sc/swgover.htm Another way to look at collapsed backbones is to consider why it's called "collapsed". Cisco uses a hierarchical campus model that scales down to small one-room networks and up to enterprise-wide networks that include multiple buildings. The full model has three "tiers" or "layers" (access, distribution, core) and multiple types of building blocks (switch block, core block, server block, mainframe block, WAN block). I don't have statistics but I've seen a lot more collapsed networks than networks that fit the full 3-tiered multi-block multi-building campus model. The collapsed model is very popular and can scale up to hundreds of endsystems and dozens of workgroups (VLANs). All you need is a high-end switch, gigabit cabling (preferably fiber but cat 5e/6 works just fine if you keep the cable lengths in the 90m range and if you don't have EMI to worry about), and a high-end router to serve as a firewall and gateway to the outside. Some of the endsystems can be home-run directly back to the main switch, or they can be aggregated at active or passive consolidation points. The router can be a standalone or can be included in the same chassis as the main switch such as a "route service module" or "layer 3 services module". Cheers, -- TT Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41422&t=41418 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Written Beta Announcement [7:41340]
Hi, Is it official yet ? I couldn't find any information from the Cisco site about the CCIE Beta announcement and therefore would appreciate if someone would shed more input in this. Zahid ""Don Nguyen"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... How much are the beta exams ? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41428&t=41340 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Olicom and 3900 IOS [7:41424]
Has anyone tried to run Cisco 3900 IOS on the Olicom 8610s ??? Should I dare try ??? Thanks Phil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41424&t=41424 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Written Beta Announcement [7:41340]
they r usually 50 bucks but they might offer it free after Juniper offered their beta free. Lets wait and see. Shahid --- Don Nguyen wrote: > How much are the beta exams ? [EMAIL PROTECTED] = Shahid Muhammad Shafi "Every man dies; not every man really lives" Please help feed hungry people worldwide http://www.hungersite.com/ A small thing each of us can do to help others less fortunate than ourselves __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41425&t=41340 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2500 won't boot...any ideas? [7:41414]
Ed- I'm trying to make sense of the output and your trouble shooting steps, as explained in your E-mail. If the 2511 did not have 11.0(10c) ROMs, then the router would more or less hang-up when upgraded beyond 11.3 or 12.0 (I don't remember the cutoff for the 10.0 ROMs). If the router seems to be choking with the use of 12.2, issue the Cntrl BREAK upon bootup and reload an older IOS (say 12.0 or 12.1) to rule out some sort of bug. Though I have not had issues with 12.2 in my 2500s, this code is not a GR (General Release) and most definitely could be reacting with the FLASH and RAM "manufacturer" combination that have going on in your 2511. There is also a slim chance you have zapped the RAM (rare but true). Anywho- I "believe" what you are showing us here is an issue where the memory works fine in the 2522. The "Read Only" seems a little weird (after the 16 Megs FLASH), but then again... certain versions of code read this way and in the upgrade process automatically call for a software reload that enables the "Read Only" to change upon coming back up. If I've missed the boat, please offer more info. For better or worse, I have probably upgraded no less than a 100 2500s and 3000s (Y2K) in the few short years I have been working on Cisco. All the best !!! Phil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Edward Sohn Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 2:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 2500 won't boot...any ideas? [7:41414] my 2511 was working fine a few days ago with--i believe--11.0xx software. i created a configuration and saved it. yesterday, i upgraded the RAM so that i could load 12.2xx. the router won't fully boot up, and it never goes into the config or into rommon. i don't get it. again, it was working a few days ago. unfortunately, i can't put the old chips back in b/c i overwrote them already--ugh. i loaded up 12.2.7 onto the flash via another router and tried to boot it up again in the 2522... here's the output from when i start up the router, to where it hangs... System Bootstrap, Version 11.0(10c), SOFTWARE Copyright (c) 1986-1996 by cisco Systems 2500 processor with 14336 Kbytes of main memory %SYS-4-CONFIG_NEWER: Configurations from version 12.0 may not be correctly understood. F3: 14576440+958356+908736 at 0x360 Restricted Rights Legend Use, duplication, or disclosure by the Government is subject to restrictions as set forth in subparagraph (c) of the Commercial Computer Software - Restricted Rights clause at FAR sec. 52.227-19 and subparagraph (c) (1) (ii) of the Rights in Technical Data and Computer Software clause at DFARS sec. 252.227-7013. cisco Systems, Inc. 170 West Tasman Drive San Jose, California 95134-1706 Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-JS-L), Version 12.2(7b), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1986-2002 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Tue 05-Mar-02 05:10 by pwade Image text-base: 0x030794BC, data-base: 0x1000 cisco 2511 (68030) processor (revision M) with 14336K/2048K bytes of memory. Processor board ID 17604021, with hardware revision Bridging software. X.25 software, Version 3.0.0. SuperLAT software (copyright 1990 by Meridian Technology Corp). TN3270 Emulation software. 1 Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) 2 Serial network interface(s) 16 terminal line(s) 32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. 16384K bytes of processor board System flash (Read ONLY) 00:00:09: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Ethernet0, changed state to up 00:00:09: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Serial0, changed state to down 00:00:09: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Serial1, changed state to down 00:00:27: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Ethernet0, changed state to down 00:00:34: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Serial0, changed state to administratively down 00:00:35: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from memory by console 00:00:35: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Serial1, changed state to administratively down 00:00:35: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial0, changed state to down 00:00:38: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial1, changed state to down 00:01:18: %SYS-5-RESTART: System restarted -- Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-JS-L), Version 12.2(7b), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1986-2002 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Tue 05-Mar-02 05:10 by pwade 00:01:18: %SNMP-5-COLDSTART: SNMP agent on host Terminal_Server is undergoing a cold start _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41431&t=41414 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
win98 pptp connection to cisco concentrator 3005 only at [7:41426]
hi all, anyone can tell me why whenever I connect a win98 pptp client to a cisco concentrator vpn server 3005 via a pstn connection at 56kbps I always only able to connect it at 9.6kbps . Whereas connecting to win2k vpn server can yield at round the same speed as the pstn connection which is around 56kbps any form of inputs will be greatly appreciated suaveguru __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41426&t=41426 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Collapsed Backbone [7:41418]
First, I wonder who comes up with these terms? Collapsed backbone sounds like something that needs the immediate attention of an orthopedist or chiropractor, while "router on a stick" sounds like something from the Autobiography of Vlad the Impaler. At 3:49 AM -0400 4/14/02, Georg Pauwen wrote: >Hi Ismail, > >here is what I found on CCO: > >%A collapsed backbone has high-bandwidth uplinks from all segments and >subnetworks to a single device, such as a Gigabit switch, which serves as a ^^^ First key point. The backbone or core device is defined by topology rather than product line. That point being made, it is true that Cisco does position products for access, distribution, and core applications generally based on the requirements of large enterprises. But a core switch could be quite slow and small, if everything else in the network is small and slow, yet still be a reasonable design approach. >single point for monitoring and controlling the network%. Second point: as defined, it's also a single point of failure. With a campus network large enough to justify a gigabit switch in a core, this is a bad idea. It's usually better to plan on at least two physical switches that normally loadshare (e.g., switch 1 is the primary for odd-numbered VLANs and switch 2 is the primary for even-numbered), but either can take over the entire load. > >The following link contains a figure detailing the collapsed backbone design >using a Cat4908G-L3: > >http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c2900xl/29_35wc/sc/swgover.htm > >Regards, > >Georg -- "What Problem are you trying to solve?" ***send Cisco questions to the list, so all can benefit -- not directly to me*** Howard C. Berkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chief Technology Officer, GettLab/Gett Communications http://www.gettlabs.com Technical Director, CertificationZone.com http://www.certificationzone.com "retired" Certified Cisco Systems Instructor (CID) #93005 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41427&t=41418 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
xon/xoff [7:41433]
Anyone familiar with how to set hardware on/off on an async connection ??? More specifically- I have a LS100 connected via an octal cable to my 2611 access server. The LS100 needs the hardware on/off setting to stop a huge asterisk string that occurs after typing each character. Thanks Phil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41433&t=41433 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017]
I'm a little frightened at the equation of expressing corporate values with managerial authority. If the organization is subject to such catastrophic change due to personal whims or poorly-planned reactions to clearly discernible macroecenomic trends, I'm not sure their issues and/or plight are worth your attention/ire. The higher up someone resides within a corporate structure, the more valuable their "networking" (meant to invoke the non-technical use of the term) skills are likely to be. On balance, I'd MUCH PREFER the scenario in which managers participate in newsgroups to exploit the interaction potential and make good use of their time rather than the situation you depict. In this case, I suspect we're dealing with an individual not neccessarily associated with the management hierarchy who merely manages their time well enough to accomodate these online conversations. On a technical note, if more people paid attention to the free HT upgrade or sought out an acceptable alternative, helpdesks would either find themselves free to work on more interesting problems or pare themselves down to the margin that you and your compatriots scream out for. - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 4:39 AM Subject: Re: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017] > Quoting Larry Letterman : > > > .. altho we wont do layoffs..we are not > > replacing any body that leaves or does not make it on the performance > > issues... > > > Hey Larry, > > Who is "we"? > Are you telling me that you are a mangager or a director at Cisco with the > power to hire and fire? > and even at a managerial position you do not have enough work to do other > than > surf and chat and evaluate Hyper Terminals? > > You must be kidding me, you are not a manger at Cisco, are you? > Or, may be you are. > > A Strobel > > > > -_-_-_ Mail3000 gives you 30 Megs of Email space free -_-_- > This mail sent through http://mail3000.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41430&t=41017 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Written Reading.. [7:41017]
Quoting Larry Letterman : > .. altho we wont do layoffs..we are not > replacing any body that leaves or does not make it on the performance > issues... Hey Larry, Who is "we"? Are you telling me that you are a mangager or a director at Cisco with the power to hire and fire? and even at a managerial position you do not have enough work to do other than surf and chat and evaluate Hyper Terminals? You must be kidding me, you are not a manger at Cisco, are you? Or, may be you are. A Strobel -_-_-_ Mail3000 gives you 30 Megs of Email space free -_-_- This mail sent through http://mail3000.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41420&t=41017 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Collapsed Backbone [7:41418]
Hi Ismail, here is what I found on CCO: ´A collapsed backbone has high-bandwidth uplinks from all segments and subnetworks to a single device, such as a Gigabit switch, which serves as a single point for monitoring and controlling the network´. The following link contains a figure detailing the collapsed backbone design using a Cat4908G-L3: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c2900xl/29_35wc/sc/swgover.htm Regards, Georg Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41419&t=41418 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Collapsed Backbone [7:41418]
Hi all I want some reference website explaining how collapsed backbone model work in details and how the redundancy take place I will be glad for some body to help me. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41418&t=41418 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2500 boot ROM's [7:41394]
On Sep 3, 5:14pm, "The Edward Groove" wrote: } } Does anyone have any *extra* of the latest boot ROM's for the 2500 } series routers? I can't load 16 MB memory until I upgrade it. I know } they're free from Cisco, but they said the lead time is about 3 weeks } (probably more). Does anyone have any they could send me ASAP? They show up on eBay quite regularly. }-- End of excerpt from "The Edward Groove" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41413&t=41394 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: WINS replication problem across PPP network [7:41410]
wins is a directed tcp connection. wins dosent need ip helper address. most likely his wins is incorrectly configured. he should have a push (and or pull) relation defined in wins manager between the two servers. I didnt get what he said about adding the ports. maybe his access lists are killing wins replication. Joseph Brunner ASN 21572 MortgageIT MITLending New York, NY 10038 (212) 651 - 7695 Voice -Original Message- From: Sean Knox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 2:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: WINS replication problem across PPP network [7:41410] I'm sure someone can provide a more detailed and accurate answer, but hopefully I can help. WINS is a TCP and UDP protocol. I imagine an IP HELPER-ADDRESS command might be of use here. Try a search for WINS on CCO at www.cisco.com. hth, Sean -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mayo, Simer Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 10:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: WINS replication problem across PPP network [7:41410] I'm having problem with WINS replication to 2 differ servers Server 1 in Network 1 in Phx (PDC...WINS Server) Server 2 in Network 2 in LA (BDC...WINS Server) server1.cisco2600---PPP---cisco2600.server2 The server2 can browse all machines in network 1 and 2 but server 1 cant see network 2. I have enabled the TCP ports 42 and 135 on both the routers but still no success. The network is NT 4 domain. Thanks in advance for help Simer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41416&t=41410 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
