RE: BSCI - % of "work" towards CCNP? [7:66976]
I would focus heavily on the Routing. The time and effort you put in to the routing topics will make it easier for you to apply it to the other tests such as the Support exam.. or if you decide to go for your CCIE down the road.. Knowing the ins and outs now, will make it easier to spot the tricks later.. and believe me there are a lot of tricks Cisco will throw at you with extremely vague scenarios. After all, you will get many questions that will rely on a basic understanding of routing protocols even if it does not correlate to the routing test. Really focus on the questions they ask, you'd be suprised how a one syllable word can change the answer completely. All the best! Sal Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66982&t=66976 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Pinging local frame interface [7:66975]
Is your PVC up?? you can ping your own interface for multipoint connections if you create a frame-relay map statement to your own IP address pointing to one of the DLCIs that you have allocated. This will force the ICMP packets to be sent on the DLCI you've mapped the IP to, sending it to the other router then get an echo-reply from the remote routers map statement back to you.. if I am not mistaken point-to-point connections should be able to reply to your icmp request bouncing back from the remote router if the pvc's up. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66981&t=66975 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GRE OR IPSEC? [7:66980]
I have following topo: lan a---router a---router b--lan brouter crouter d---lan c lan a will communicate with lan c with ip protocol.But I don't want lan c can communicate with lan b.How could I do ? I setup gre tunnel between lan a and lan c,but lan c can also visit lan b. any comment are apprecatied,thanks! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66980&t=66980 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Certification Zone [7:66967]
what is the url for cert zone? Pius M. Oguori CCNA, CCNP And my speech and my preaching was not with enticing words of man's wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power: That your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God. (1 Corinthians 2:4) >From: "J B" >Reply-To: "J B" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Certification Zone [7:66967] >Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 17:53:52 GMT >Received: from mc4-f21.law16.hotmail.com ([65.54.237.156]) by mc4-s18.law16.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Sun, 6 Apr 2003 12:01:49 -0700 >Received: from groupstudy.com ([66.220.63.9]) by mc4-f21.law16.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Sun, 6 Apr 2003 12:01:48 -0700 >Received: from groupstudy.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])by groupstudy.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h36HrqDl010675GroupStudy Mailer; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 17:53:52 GMT >Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])by groupstudy.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) id h36HrqNs010674GroupStudy Submission Server; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 17:53:52 GMT >Received: from groupstudy.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])by groupstudy.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h36HrqDl010668GroupStudy Mailer; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 17:53:52 GMT >Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])by groupstudy.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) id h36Hrqgo010667GroupStudy Submission Server; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 17:53:52 GMT >X-Message-Info: om02fMZCHc1OPWg9wrEK5WOuZF7oC7N2 >Message-Id: >X-GroupStudy-Version: 3.1.1a >X-GroupStudy: Network Technical >Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Precedence: bulk >Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Apr 2003 19:01:48.0811 (UTC) FILETIME=[F9D875B0:01C2FC6E] > >I'm thinking in getting a subscription to the Certification Zone website in >my preparation for my IE Lab and I was wondering if someone can offer some >input about their study guides a misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66979&t=66967 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please confirm (conf#66aec0d7b00944f79a20a2235b8a0893) [7:66978]
- Original Message - From: To: Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2003 10:31 AM Subject: Please confirm (conf#66aec0d7b00944f79a20a2235b8a0893) > Hi, > > You have tried to post to GroupStudy.com's Professional mailing list. Because > the server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster, you will be required > to authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail address and are not a > spammer. By confirming this e-mail you certify that you are not sending > Unsolicited Bulk Email (UBE). > > PLEASE DO NOT SEND YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE AGAIN! BY CONFIRMING THIS EMAIL > YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE (WHICH IS NOW QUEUED IN THE SERVER) WILL BE POSTED. > > > By confirming this e-mail you also certify the following: > > 1. The message does NOT break Cisco's Non-Disclosure requirements. > > 2. The message is NOT designed to advertise a commercial product. > > 3. You understand all postings become property of GroupStudy.com > > 4. You have searched the archives prior to posting. > > 5. The message is NOT inflammatory. > > 6. The message is NOT a test message. > > To confirm, simply reply to this message. No editing is necessary. Once > confirmed, you will be able to post without additional confirmations. > > > Welcome to GroupStudy.com! > > > --ORIGINAL MESSAGE- > > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 6 17:31:34 2003 > Received: from groupstudy.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) > by groupstudy.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h36HVYDl006414 > GroupStudy Mailer; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 17:31:34 GMT > Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > by groupstudy.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) id h36HVYDM006413 > GroupStudy Submission Server; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 17:31:34 GMT > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Path: not-for-mail > From: "sturzaci" > Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco > Subject: MPLS IOS > Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 10:31:34 -0700 > Organization: GroupStudy.com Discussion Groups > Lines: 11 > Message-ID: > NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-101-204-197.sd.sd.cox.net > X-Trace: groupstudy.com 1049650294 6401 68.101.204.197 (6 Apr 2003 17:31:34 GMT) > X-Complaints-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > NNTP-Posting-Date: 6 Apr 2003 17:31:34 GMT > X-Priority: 3 > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal > X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 > X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 > > Hi to all, > > I am preparing for CCIE lab and need to find an IOS image, which support > MPLS for 26xx routers. > Does anybody know where can I find this IOS? > > Thanks. > > Constantine Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66978&t=66978 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Lab - Boson Router Simulator [7:66367]
I just wanted to let you know that I purchased the Boson Router Simulator when I was preparing for my CCNP exams. Looking back, I feel it was certainly not worth the investment. I thought that this may save me some money over buying a couple of routers on eBay, but I would have been better off with the routers. I spent a lot of time trying to figure out what was wrong with the simulator. Things as simple as configuring a P-P Frame Relay circuit. I was never able to get frame-relay to activate. Some IP routes would not refresh correctly until a different routing protocol was loaded and unloaded. I could go into more detail, but I do not think it is necessary. Then I would have to document these issues and send them on to tech support and wait a day or so for a response. It seemed to slow me down in my progress. Do not get me wrong, the simulator is a good idea (I think if you are trying to get your CCNA). For the complex scenarios we have to learn for the CCNP or CCIE, there is no replacement other than a network of actual routers. Hope this helps! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66977&t=66367 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Going For BCRAN Beta Exam [7:66945]
You do have a valid point! I wouldn't contact the testing center but I would confirm it with Prometric or VUE on Monday (the next business day after original expiration date?). You could also pose the question directly to the Cisco T&C group here; http://ciscocert.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/ciscocert.cfg/php/enduser/std_alp. php As a matter of fact, there is a BCRAN beta exam FAQ posting listed towards the top and it states April 4, 2003! I hoped you used a credit card to register. :) -Original Message- From: Kenneth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2003 7:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Going For BCRAN Beta Exam [7:66945] Good question. Well, if you searched Cisco under the keyword "Beta Exam", you'll end up in this page: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/learning/le3/le11/learning_beta_certifcation_ exam09186a00800a382d.html The BCRAN beta will expire on the 4th. However, if you were to search using the keyword "643-821", another page appears, which is: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/learning/le3/learning_recent_article09186a008 0157630.html For this one, it expires on the 15th. I am puzzled myself, but, since I registered on Friday, which is the 4th, and have obtained the 'Candidate Receipt', I guess I'm guaranteed a seat for the exam :) But, just to be safe, I guess I'll give my testing centre a call. Thanks again Andy, for pointing this out. Regards, Kenneth Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66964&t=66945 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP AS removal [7:66928]
At 01:53 AM 4/6/2003 +, Bullwinkle wrote: >In other words, for purposes of testing, there are ONLY two ways to remove >things from the AS_PATH. 1) the technique you describe, which is to create Both these techniques are invalid in my opinion. If you create a new route, you haven't changed the AS-PATH on another route at all. In these cases, you have two routes, not one modified one. >an aggregate and advertise that aggregate only ( although refresh my >memory - an aggregate might still contain full AS_PATH information - don't >have my book handy ) OR to create an appropriate route to null 0, then enter >that route into the BGP process, while filtering those that contain the >AS_PATH you want to remove. > > >AS1-AS2-AS3 > >192.168.x.x subnets --advertised into AS2 > > ip route 192.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 >null 0 >bgp process command: network 192.0.0.0 mask 255.0.0.0 > >filter the more specific BGP routes. > >AS3 should see just the route to null 0, which does originate in AS2 > >do I have that right? Do you agree? > >-- >- > >Bullwinkle: Hey, Rocky, watch me pull a CCIE out of my hat! > >Rocky: Bullwinkle, that trick NEVER works > >Bullwinkle: This time FOR SURE!!! >( pulls snarling Proctor out of hat ) >No doubt about it. I gotta get me a new hat! > > > >""Salvatore De Luca"" wrote in message >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I hear ya.. that's why if this was a TEST situation, the statement: > > > > ip as-path access-list 1 permit _2_ & ! _2_ _1$ would permit routes > > traversing AS2 but deny any routes traversed though AS2 Originating in >AS1. > > In which case 150.50.200.0 aggregated element should be the nlri "Fresh > > Route" point for AS3's knowledge. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66965&t=66928 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Going For BCRAN Beta Exam [7:66945]
Good question. Well, if you searched Cisco under the keyword "Beta Exam", you'll end up in this page: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/learning/le3/le11/learning_beta_certifcation_exam09186a00800a382d.html The BCRAN beta will expire on the 4th. However, if you were to search using the keyword "643-821", another page appears, which is: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/learning/le3/learning_recent_article09186a0080157630.html For this one, it expires on the 15th. I am puzzled myself, but, since I registered on Friday, which is the 4th, and have obtained the 'Candidate Receipt', I guess I'm guaranteed a seat for the exam :) But, just to be safe, I guess I'll give my testing centre a call. Thanks again Andy, for pointing this out. Regards, Kenneth Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66963&t=66945 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 10/100/1000 Switch? [7:66851]
Larry, There are a couple of new 10/100/1000 blades coming out for the 6500. The "module for value" version runs directly off of the 32gig backplane. There is also a higher speed version that requires the 256gig backplane. "48-port 10/100/1000 Ethernet module for value--oriented wiring closets-This module utilizes the Catalyst 6500 32 Gbps backplane. A single Cisco Catalyst 6500 chassis can cost-effectively support 48 to 576 10/100/1000 ports using any generation of Cisco Catalyst 6500 supervisor engine. It also features TDR and will offer a field-upgradeable IEEE 802.3af standards based in-line power daughter card" All of the pricing and additional information can be found here: http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/prod_033103.html Tim CCIE 9015, CSS1 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Larry Letterman Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2003 4:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 10/100/1000 Switch? [7:66851] The new 48 port 10/100/1000 module will require a new SUP720 or sup-3 as some are calling it.. It may also require a SFM module. The sup 3 will require a new fan tray and I believe power supplies... The info is a little sketchy at this time, but that is what we have heard..thats a lot of upgrading for 48 gig ports..and most servers cant really fill a 100FD pipe anyway... Larry Letterman Network Engineer Cisco Systems > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Jeffrey Reed > Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2003 8:27 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: 10/100/1000 Switch? [7:66851] > > > Larry, what's the "costly upgrade" all about? I saw two 48-port > 10/100/1000 blades introduced. One is for "performance" and the other > for "value". Do both need the upgrade to the chassis? > > Thanks!! > > > Jeffrey Reed > Classic Networking, Inc. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Larry Letterman > Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 7:11 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: 10/100/1000 Switch? [7:66851] > > we have had the 16 port 10/100/1000 blade for a while in the cat 6000 > line. As DRE says, the 48 port version will be out soon..however it > will require a costly upgrade to the chassis... > > > Larry Letterman > Network Engineer > Cisco Systems > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf > > Of dre > > Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 3:04 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: 10/100/1000 Switch? [7:66851] > > > > > > ""Greg Rend"" wrote in message ... > > > Does anyone know if/when Cisco is going to announce a standalone > > > (2950, 3550), triple speed switch? If there is already one out > > > there from Cisco (standalone) please excuse my ignorance. I > > > haven't been about to track one down. I know Cisco has a 3550-12T > > > Switch but ony 12 10/100/1000 ports. Word on the street is that > > > Cisco is going to announce a higher density, anyone have any news? > > > > Well considering Cisco just came out with the Sup720 and have > > 10/100/1000 modules for the 6500 platform finally on the official > > roadmap (announcement in May) -- I don't forsee them having it on > > smaller switches in bulk until much later. 10/100/1000 has been > > available on the Catalyst 4000 series for quite some time now, > > however, so that would likely be the platform of choice for > > 10/100/1000 applications. Or maybe another vendor. > > > > -dre Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66962&t=66851 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: More debug confusion.. [7:66867]
I'm notoriously flaky with dial-up, but still interested. I haven't got your earlier e-mails. Have we got both configs. Presumably, for some reason, RouterB doesn't recognise that it is already connected to RouterA so it dials a second channel for the return traffic. Are the dialer-map statements spot on. Have you tried using ppp sent username? Let us know the outcome. Gaz ""James Gosnold"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Show PPP mulitlink says there are no active bundles. > > I tried debug isdn q931 and this is what I got: > > RouterA#debug isdn q931 > ISDN Q931 packets debugging is on > RouterA# > 8w3d: %ISDN-6-LAYER2UP: Layer 2 for Interface BR0, TEI 70 changed to up > 8w3d: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0:1, changed state to up > 8w3d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface BRI0:1, changed state > to up > 8w3d: ISDN BR0: llc valid, speed 64, call type is DATA speed:0 async:N > 8w3d: ISDN BR0: Event: Received a DATA call from on B2 at 64 Kb/s > 8w3d: ISDN BR0: Event: Accepting the call id 0x153C > 8w3d: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0:2, changed state to up > 8w3d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface BRI0:2, changed state > to up > 8w3d: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0:1 is now connected to 01419865623 > RouterB > 8w3d: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0:2 is now connected to unknown > > So, not anywhere near enough debug output AND this also shows how 2 x B > channels are coming up, BRI0:1 seems to call and then BRI0:2 seems to > receive a call. > > I don't understand why this is happening, the led's confirm there are 2 > channels up, I don't have any callback features configured or anything like > that. > > It's frustrating really, I'm going over ISDN technologies for my CCNP exams > at the moment, you think you understand it and then the only 2 real-life > Cisco ISDN routers I have to look after don't seem to back up what I've > learned! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66960&t=66867 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Odd # ACL with minimal statements [7:66927]
How about these: 192.168.0.0 0.0.14.255 192.168.16.0 0.0.2.255 I'm open to correction. I do them in my head which is quick, but not always accurate with wildcard masks. Makes it hard to check them. I know I should do it from first principles :-), but you can't teach an old dog new tricks. Gaz ""Salvatore De Luca"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > If you were given the networks: > > 192.168.1.0 > 192.168.2.0 > 192.168.3.0 > 192.168.4.0 > 192.168.5.0 > 192.168.6.0 > 192.168.7.0 > 192.168.8.0 > 192.168.9.0 > 192.168.10.0 > 192.168.11.0 > 192.168.12.0 > 192.168.13.0 > 192.168.14.0 > 192.168.15.0 > 192.168.16.0 > 192.168.17.0 > 192.168.18.0 > 192.168.19.0 > > How would I create a filter that refrences a distribute-list into rip so > that my router would only accepted the odd# networks with using a minimal > amount of statements, say one or two?? > > Regards, > Sal Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66961&t=66927 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE voice written and lab [7:66948]
I took the beta exam and was quite surprised how easy it was. I didn't study because I wanted to just take it to get a feel for if it was a realistic test or not. I probably didn't pass it, but I wouldn't be completely surprised if I did pass it. If not, I will pass it next time as it is an extremely passable test. I'd say it is mostly a hybrid test comprised of the material covered in dqos, cipt, cvoice, unity, and evodd, with some basic ccnp/ccdp level stuff. Nothing earth shattering, at least not in the beta. Cheers, Vance ""Mic shoeps"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sorry I don't have an answer for you, just a question. > How was the written exam? Was it mostly protocols remembering, or was it > more of a CCNP level questions (configurations, troubleshootings, etc.)? > Would you say the exam was tougher than you anticipated (CCIE R&S level)? > > Regards Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66959&t=66948 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF NSSA [7:66957]
Yep. You'll need a virtual-link between R1 and R2. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66958&t=66957 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSPF NSSA [7:66957]
Hi to all, I have a question that I think I know the answer but need feedback to make certain. Here is the scenario: R1 - S1 (Area 0) R1 - S0(Area 1) to R2 S0(Area 1) ! R2 - S1 (Area 2) to R3 S1 (Area 2) If R2 and R3 Area 2 are defined as a NSSA will I still need a virtual-link for Area 2? I would have to think yes, virtual-link is needed. Thanks very much. Danny Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66957&t=66957 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
