BGP Help! [7:70618]
Hi guys, What does this mean "BGP does not enable one AS to send traffic to a neighbor AS , intending that the traffic take a different route from that taken by traffic originating in the neighbor AS." Thank you very much! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70618&t=70618 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I will be taking BCRAN [7:70498]
I read the Cisco Press Exam certification guide for 640-505 three times, went through Knowledgenet CBT once and purchased Self-test software practise exam. Scored 950 on first attempt after 4 weeks study. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70616&t=70498 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VPN clinet 3.6.X can't connect VPN3000? [7:70589]
Hey.. my answers are... >Have you got the correct IP as the peer ? Yes--> It prompts me remote peer not responding. Immediately I uninstall 3.6.X and install 3.5.4, it works. I tried it many time, impossible for wrong IP >Have you setup the correct access method for that group ? PPTP/IPSEC/L2TP how to set the access method? PPTP/IPSEC/L2TP? in the VPN client software itself??? >Have you typed in the group password correctly ? Yes.. the password is correct, try many time >From: John Brandis >To: 'Richard Campbell' >Subject: RE: VPN clinet 3.6.X can't connect VPN3000? [7:70589] >Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 09:34:46 +1000 > >I have not had this problem, however I did have problems with 3.6.3 > >This may sound stupid, but: > >Have you got the correct IP as the peer ? >Have you setup the correct access method for that group ? PPTP/IPSEC/L2TP >Have you typed in the group password correctly ? > >Hope at least one of these solve your probelm, sorry if they make you feel >a >bit stupid > >-Original Message- >From: Richard Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, 13 June 2003 1:40 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: VPN clinet 3.6.X can't connect VPN3000? [7:70589] > > >Can I ask a question, my VPN client 3.6.4 (Rel) and 3.6.x can't connect to >VPN3000 concentrator and only to my PIX515. I have to use VPN client >version 3.5.4 in order to connect to VPN3000 and PIX 515. Why?? > >FYI.. my VPN3000 info is >Cisco Systems, Inc./VPN 3000 Concentrator Version 4.0.1.Rel May 06 2003 >13:13:03 > >_ >Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. >http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail >** > >This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is >confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you >cannot use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case, >please notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies >of the message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other >information in this message and attachments that do not relate to the >official business of Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it. > >* > _ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70617&t=70589 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP - remote access, 700 router quest included? [7:70607]
Jim, Just forget about that chapter. It's not in the exam anymore. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 June 2003 05:53 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCNP - remote access, 700 router quest included? [7:70607] Does anyone know if current CCNP remote access exame 640-604 includes questions from chapter 9, 700 routers? Thanks. -Jim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70614&t=70607 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: (no subject) [7:70561]
there are three kind of administrative distance for BGP: 1. external-distance: 20 2. internal-distance: 200 3. local-distance: 200 you can change that through the "distance bgp external-distance internal-distance local-distance" command For BGP the network used by the network x.x.x.x backdoor command will be treated as a locally assigned network except it will not be advertised via BGP updates. >Does the BGP backdoor command change the Administrative distance of EGBP >from 20 to 200 ? = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = VB @q#! chengpeng [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-13 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70615&t=70561 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unicast or multicast on p-to-mp network? [7:70613]
Hi,All expert I'm confused about a question below. On point-to-multipoint network type, are OSPF packets include hello and update sent using unicast or multicast ? Some books say it is sent using unicast and some books say multicast. Can someone give me the authority answer? Thanks. Regards, Grant Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70613&t=70613 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: UDP Forwarding [7:70606]
I think in global config, Router(Config)#ip forward-protocol udp 798 Router(Config)#ip forward-protocol udp 799 Research the "ip forward-protocol" command on cco. remember the "ip helper-address" is for specific ports/protocols only. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70611&t=70606 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Boson test 1,2 or #3 [7:70605]
#3 is the best in my opinion ""David Power"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I am thinking to buy boson tests for ccie 350-001 (R&S),if someone just want > to buy one which one it should be 1,2 or # 3. > Thanks, > David > > _ > MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70609&t=70605 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Boson test 1,2 or #3 [7:70605]
Buy #4. :-) Shawn K. -Original Message- From: David Power [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 4:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Boson test 1,2 or #3 [7:70605] I am thinking to buy boson tests for ccie 350-001 (R&S),if someone just want to buy one which one it should be 1,2 or # 3. Thanks, David _ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70610&t=70605 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCNP - remote access, 700 router quest included? [7:70607]
Does anyone know if current CCNP remote access exame 640-604 includes questions from chapter 9, 700 routers? Thanks. -Jim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70607&t=70607 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UDP Forwarding [7:70606]
I have a need to forward UDP broadcasts for port 798 and 799 for one of our applications. Can someone lead me in the correct direction for the commands to do this? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70606&t=70606 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 99.999% network uptime [7:70595]
At 7:14 PM + 6/12/03, Aaron Ajello wrote: >every time I have seen a percentage uptime quoted, it has NOT included >regularly scheduled maintenance time. > >a year has 8760 hours. 99.999% of which is 8759.9 hours, which leaves .1 >hours (6 minutes) for downtime. that would be tough. > Organizations that seriously want to get this kind of uptime have to build in extra equipment so there's never a need to take services down for maintenance. There's a telephony motto "once up always up." A typical critical component in telephony, brokerage, etc., is triple-redundant. 1 active component 1 hot standby 1 standby or in maintenance. Depending on the system design, you may loadshare among the working resources. The key design decision is whether your users can accept degraded performance if not all resources are usable. In operational scenarios, you might, for example, take a standby router down and upgrade the IOS. You'd then designate it as the standby, and take the previous standby down and upgrade it. You'd then switch from the active to the standby and upgrade the active. Now, whether or not your executives still want five nines after seeing the cost is another question. Not infrequently, the way to get this is not to do it all yourself, but put resources at colo centers that can amortize the highly redundant equipment over many customers. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70604&t=70595 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Boson test 1,2 or #3 [7:70605]
I am thinking to buy boson tests for ccie 350-001 (R&S),if someone just want to buy one which one it should be 1,2 or # 3. Thanks, David _ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70605&t=70605 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 99.999% network uptime [7:70595]
Aaron, If you are talking in terms of a website, and you are running clustered servers, you could take down one server for maintenance and not disturb the website. Thanks, Michael Montiverdi -Original Message- From: Aaron Ajello [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 3:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 99.999% network uptime [7:70595] every time I have seen a percentage uptime quoted, it has NOT included regularly scheduled maintenance time. a year has 8760 hours. 99.999% of which is 8759.9 hours, which leaves .1 hours (6 minutes) for downtime. that would be tough. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70601&t=70595 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RJ48-RJ48 cable [7:70596]
Thomas, You can use a straight-through CAT5 or CAT3 patch cable. The difference is in the meaning of the pins. From a cabling perspective it doesn't matter. - Tom Thomas N wrote: > Hi All, > > I am wondering what is the difference between the RJ48 and RJ45 > connector/cable? I am setting a router with a integrated CSU/DSU > (WIC-1DSU-T1) with a T1 RJ48 connection hand off by the ISP. They however > do not provide the cable. Could I make a cable with RJ45 connectors for > this? What would be the pinout for both end of the cable? Does the > direction of the cable connection matter? It's urgent. Please help. Thanks > in advance! > > Thomas. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70600&t=70596 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RJ48-RJ48 cable [7:70596]
Thomas N 6/12/03 1:19:04 PM >>> >Hi All, > >I am wondering what is the difference between the RJ48 and RJ45 >connector/cable? I am setting a router with a integrated CSU/DSU >(WIC-1DSU-T1) with a T1 RJ48 connection hand off by the ISP. They however >do not provide the cable. Could I make a cable with RJ45 connectors for >this? What would be the pinout for both end of the cable? Does the >direction of the cable connection matter? It's urgent. Please help. Thanks >in advance! > >Thomas. An RJ48 connector is basically an RJ45 connector with only pins 1,2,4 and 5 terminated for a T-1. I don't recall if there are any other differences. I think just about any short, straight-thru, flat satin cable will work just fine. Many of them have ferrite rings on them for noise reduction, I believe. In a pinch a straight thru Cat 5 cable would work just fine. There may be some technical reasons why you wouldn't want to use twisted pair cable, but I don't know about them. I try not to use UTP unless I have to, though. Someone else here is bound to have more technical details and they can fill in what I've neglected to mention or correct any mistakes I made. HTH, John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70602&t=70596 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RJ48-RJ48 cable [7:70596]
RJ-45 and RJ-48 as used for a T1 circuit are effectively the same. As long as the distance is not too great from the demarc to the router, Cat 5 UTP cable can be used. For long distances, shielded UTP is called for. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas N Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 1:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RJ48-RJ48 cable [7:70596] Hi All, I am wondering what is the difference between the RJ48 and RJ45 connector/cable? I am setting a router with a integrated CSU/DSU (WIC-1DSU-T1) with a T1 RJ48 connection hand off by the ISP. They however do not provide the cable. Could I make a cable with RJ45 connectors for this? What would be the pinout for both end of the cable? Does the direction of the cable connection matter? It's urgent. Please help. Thanks in advance! Thomas. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70599&t=70596 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RJ48-RJ48 cable [7:70596]
A regular cat5 ethernet cable would work. It used pin 1,2,4,5. Scott -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Thomas N Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 2:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RJ48-RJ48 cable [7:70596] Hi All, I am wondering what is the difference between the RJ48 and RJ45 connector/cable? I am setting a router with a integrated CSU/DSU (WIC-1DSU-T1) with a T1 RJ48 connection hand off by the ISP. They however do not provide the cable. Could I make a cable with RJ45 connectors for this? What would be the pinout for both end of the cable? Does the direction of the cable connection matter? It's urgent. Please help. Thanks in advance! Thomas. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70598&t=70596 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 99.999% network uptime [7:70595]
every time I have seen a percentage uptime quoted, it has NOT included regularly scheduled maintenance time. a year has 8760 hours. 99.999% of which is 8759.9 hours, which leaves .1 hours (6 minutes) for downtime. that would be tough. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70597&t=70595 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RJ48-RJ48 cable [7:70596]
Hi All, I am wondering what is the difference between the RJ48 and RJ45 connector/cable? I am setting a router with a integrated CSU/DSU (WIC-1DSU-T1) with a T1 RJ48 connection hand off by the ISP. They however do not provide the cable. Could I make a cable with RJ45 connectors for this? What would be the pinout for both end of the cable? Does the direction of the cable connection matter? It's urgent. Please help. Thanks in advance! Thomas. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70596&t=70596 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tunnel interface Problem [7:70590]
You should have a route between the source and the destination of the tunnel. You must be able to ping them before you can set up the tunnel. Aurelian Georgescu -Original Message- From: Skarphedinsson Arni V. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 12:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tunnel interface Problem [7:70590] Hi all I am trying to bring up a tunnel interface, I get up and up, but the folowing statement is shown when i do a show int tunnel Tunnel protocol/transport uninitialized and I can not get any traffic to flow through the tunnel, any thoughts ? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70592&t=70590 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tunnel interface Problem [7:70590]
If you could post your configuration, it would be a lot easier for us to help you troubleshoot the problem. Skarphedinsson Arni V. wrote: > Hi all > > I am trying to bring up a tunnel interface, I get up and up, but the > folowing statement is shown when i do a show int tunnel > > Tunnel protocol/transport uninitialized > > and I can not get any traffic to flow through the tunnel, any thoughts ? -- Thomas Crowe Senior Engineer / Senior Architect EMC Proven Professional, Master Architect EMC Proven Professional, Master+ Operator CTS Professional Services, Atlanta Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70593&t=70590 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2501 Integration. [7:70594]
Dear all, Hello all.I am working for an ISP.We give Shared Internet connectivity to the Home Segment.I have got a MUX which has an E1 connected to it.Then there is a channel Bank through which the 64 KBPS DSL Modems are connected.From the RJ-45 in the modem additional Hubs are being connected through which the home segment is catered apart from persons who want dedicated 64 KBPS connectivity. Thats my Network. The issue that I have is that all the modems are scattered and this makes troubleshooting very difficult.So we are thinking of consolidating the Modems at the data center & from there connecting them to the required hubs spread across a radius of 500 meters. My network Design: ISP-E1-->MUX>MUX---Channel Bank---20 64 kbps DSL Modems with RJ-45->Connected to Various Hubs--->Distributed to various homes. I have a few questions that I would like the group to answer: 1.Is my network design in order?If not please give me suggestions. 2.If I want to consolidate the modems at the data center what has to be done. 3.Can I remove the channel bank.Use a Output from the Mux connect it to a switch and spread it to the various modems?? 4.I have an old 2501.How can I integrate it to my network?? I have read a lot of stuff but never have had the oppurtunity to implement the stuff.So I am stuck.Please help. Thanking you all in advance.Your help is very much appreciated. -- Regards, Rajagopal. 95250-2463729/02502463729/912502463729. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70594&t=70594 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Lab equipment for rent at $50 an hour [7:70550]
Could you indicate that lab? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70591&t=70550 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tunnel interface Problem [7:70590]
Hi all I am trying to bring up a tunnel interface, I get up and up, but the folowing statement is shown when i do a show int tunnel Tunnel protocol/transport uninitialized and I can not get any traffic to flow through the tunnel, any thoughts ? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70590&t=70590 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Traffic Shaping web traffic will this work? [7:70559]
(this from my usenet post on kazaa) apply source/dest ip when making traffic shaping decisions!) the problem is the response from the user in your org to the internet is not going back over port 1214.. usually it will hit 1214 and go back like 2000 to 4000 tcp (assuming windoze boxes) your best best is using "ranges" of a subnet or one whole subnet for just users.. then use traffic shaping to slow down bw upload... see (say users are .129 to .254 in 10.0.1.0/24 access-list 102 permit ip 10.0.1.128 0.0.0.127 any int s0/0 traffic-shape group 102 64000 8000 8000 1000 Just make sure to remember traffic shaping effect data going OUT of an Interface... also check order of operation, find out if nat comes before or after traffic shaping (i think after) then you would need to match THE IP the users nat to on your OUTSIDE interface.. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70588&t=70559 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VPN clinet 3.6.X can't connect VPN3000? [7:70589]
Can I ask a question, my VPN client 3.6.4 (Rel) and 3.6.x can't connect to VPN3000 concentrator and only to my PIX515. I have to use VPN client version 3.5.4 in order to connect to VPN3000 and PIX 515. Why?? FYI.. my VPN3000 info is Cisco Systems, Inc./VPN 3000 Concentrator Version 4.0.1.Rel May 06 2003 13:13:03 _ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70589&t=70589 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCSP Certification [7:70587]
Hi Group, I am planning to purse the CCSP certification soon. I will be taking the training class locally and I want to make sure that I am schedule the class in the right order. Thanks a lot in advance. Philip Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70587&t=70587 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Lab equipment for rent at $50 an hour [7:70550]
Sounds like a great deal!! Sales wrote: > > Surely you are joking right? There are plenty of labs out > there that > rent rack time for as little as $3/hr. > > > Ian > www.ccie4u.com > Rack Rentals and Lab Scenarios > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of > Todd Johnson > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 7:21 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Lab equipment for rent at $50 an hour [7:70550] > > All, > > I have assorted cisco lab equipment for rent (26xx to 12xxx) at > $50 an > hour. > > If you are interested, please email [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70583&t=70550 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: isdn backup query [7:70443]
Use a floating static route with a higher metric - around 200 etc -Original Message- From: Julian.P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 2:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: isdn backup query [7:70443] Hi all I just have a query about configuring an isdn backup link to an isp. I am going to use the backup interface bri0 with the backup delay command on the serial link. My question is what routing would i have to add if there is already a default route going out the serial interface. Thanks in advance guys Julian FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70584&t=70443 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BSTUN [7:70582]
This is a good one. I have a 3640 and a 1721 connected over point-to-point T1. Everything is up and up, no problems. Each of the routers listed above have another serial port. The 3640 is connected to an IBM host (9000) and the 1721 is connected to an ATM cash money machine (Diebold) (located at a bank). Everything on that circuit, which uses BSTUN tunneling through the HDLC is up and up...but I can not get the BSTUN peer groups to talk. I know that this scenario is pretty vague, but any input would help. I have peer groups, and static routes. But when I do a show bstun all I get is the IP address of my peer, and the fact that the tunnel is closed. I can ping, telnet, everything else, but I can not get the BSTUN to show a valid connection. It is a simple point to point setup. Any ideas? When I do a debug BSTUN events, debug BSTUN packets, debug BSC events, and debug BSC packets on my router with the AS400 connected, I do not see any traffic. This is my secondary router. (Does the polling). Would this be a problem on the AS400 or router? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70582&t=70582 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Policy routing with route map [7:70567]
If the first interface specified with the set interface command is down, the optionally specified interfaces are tried in turn. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fiprrp_r/ind_r/1rfindp2.htm#1020572 Thanks...Nabil "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." Chiam Chin Tiong cc: Sent by: Subject: Policy routing with route map [7:70567] [EMAIL PROTECTED] .com 06/12/2003 01:17 AM Please respond to Chiam Chin Tiong Hi guys , Just wanna to ask can loading balacing achieve in this config. Or e1 is use only , follow by e2 unless e1 is down. interface serial e0 ip policy route-map ABC ! route-map ABC match ip address X.X.X.X set interface e1 e2 e3 e4 Thank you ! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70581&t=70567 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dynamic VLAN [7:70445]
Lo, Dynamic VLANs are based on MAC address, so a PC with one NIC will have one MAC even if you have two IP addresses configured on it. The switch will put the PC in the correct VLAN based on its database. The PC will end up in one VLAN, and as such will only be able to communicate with one of the servers. - Tom Lo Ching wrote: > Dear All, > > Suppose there is a PC have 2 IP address configured in single NIC (10.x, > 20.x) and connect catalyst 35xx switch that configured with dynamic vlan. > (NOT tagged) > > And there are 2 servers with IP 10.x and 20.x connected to the same switch > as well. The server belongs to VLAN 10 and VLAN 20 based on the IP address. > > Can the client PC connect to both server in the same time? In other words, > can the switch port allow both VLAN 10 and VLAN 20? > > Thanks. > > rgds, > LoChing Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70579&t=70445 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Traffic Shaping web traffic will this work? [7:70559]
I would have to agree with Dom. CBWFQ is probably your best bet as you can set up your classes for the various traffic types that you have sniffed out. ""Elijah Savage"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Not to mention I just realized after posting this my access-list is > screwed up it should be. > > Access-list should actually look like this > > Access-list 199 permit tcp any any eq www > > -Original Message- > From: Dom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:49 PM > To: Elijah Savage; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Traffic Shaping web traffic will this work? [7:70559] > > It looks like a job for Class Based Weighted Fair Queueing (CBWFQing). > As you have already put a sniffer on to identify the legitimate traffic > etc it should be no problem to setup. > > If you require further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me > off-list. > > Best regards, > > Dom Stocqueler > Zoo Keeper - SysDom Technologies > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Elijah Savage > Sent: 12 June 2003 02:50 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Traffic Shaping web traffic will this work? [7:70559] > > > All, > > Long story short we have a point to point t1 back to corporate. While > using nbar on the router along with sniffers 90% of the traffic is web > based and things like sql transfers and legitimate business traffic is > timing out because of congestion basically the t1 is maxed out during > working hours. At night legit traffic runs great no one in the office > and no http traffic and things are great. > > I know this is a management problem about appropriate use and management > knows also after I presented them with this data but they want to do > something short term to throttle http traffic. > > > Can I use generic traffic shaping like below so that http does not > consume no more than half of the link see below. > > Example > > int s0/0 > traffic-shape group 199 50 62500 62500 > > access-list 199 permit 80 any any > > > On CCO I can only find this done with standard access-list nothing about > extended access-list is mentioned that I can find. > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1831/products_configur > ation_guide_chapter09186a00800c60cc.html > > Thank you Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70580&t=70559 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with backup line... [7:70386]
Hi Iwan, I think you mentioned in your last mail that you were pinging serial interface's IP, and, I will presume that once the serial interface goes down, you can not ping it. So try pinging some IP sitting on remote side LAN, or some virtual interface IP at remote router. HTH Vikram -Original Message- From: Iwan Hoogendoorn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 5:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Problem with backup line... [7:70386] Ok but if i do an extended ping of 1000 pings and if i disconnect the serial cable the ISDN interface comes up and the strange thing is it wont ping any further ...i only see ... So that is my problem Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70578&t=70386 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Traffic Shaping web traffic will this work? [7:70559]
Something else to remember is that with web traffic, the outgoing request is tiny, the return traffic from the server is what is going to utilize the majority of the bandwidth. If you are going to use GTS, it only works on outbound traffic on an interface, so you would apply this to the Ethernet port that goes back to your users and would configure your access list to match any source using tcp port 80 to any destination any port. Access-list 199 permit tcp any eq 80 any -Original Message- From: Elijah Savage [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 12:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Traffic Shaping web traffic will this work? [7:70559] Not to mention I just realized after posting this my access-list is screwed up it should be. Access-list should actually look like this Access-list 199 permit tcp any any eq www -Original Message- From: Dom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:49 PM To: Elijah Savage; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Traffic Shaping web traffic will this work? [7:70559] It looks like a job for Class Based Weighted Fair Queueing (CBWFQing). As you have already put a sniffer on to identify the legitimate traffic etc it should be no problem to setup. If you require further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me off-list. Best regards, Dom Stocqueler Zoo Keeper - SysDom Technologies -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Elijah Savage Sent: 12 June 2003 02:50 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Traffic Shaping web traffic will this work? [7:70559] All, Long story short we have a point to point t1 back to corporate. While using nbar on the router along with sniffers 90% of the traffic is web based and things like sql transfers and legitimate business traffic is timing out because of congestion basically the t1 is maxed out during working hours. At night legit traffic runs great no one in the office and no http traffic and things are great. I know this is a management problem about appropriate use and management knows also after I presented them with this data but they want to do something short term to throttle http traffic. Can I use generic traffic shaping like below so that http does not consume no more than half of the link see below. Example int s0/0 traffic-shape group 199 50 62500 62500 access-list 199 permit 80 any any On CCO I can only find this done with standard access-list nothing about extended access-list is mentioned that I can find. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1831/products_configur ation_guide_chapter09186a00800c60cc.html Thank you Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70577&t=70559 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: isdn backup query [7:70443]
HI Julian, I think a floating static route will serve your purpose fine. HTH Vikram -Original Message- From: Julian.P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 2:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: isdn backup query [7:70443] Hi all I just have a query about configuring an isdn backup link to an isp. I am going to use the backup interface bri0 with the backup delay command on the serial link. My question is what routing would i have to add if there is already a default route going out the serial interface. Thanks in advance guys Julian FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70576&t=70443 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AAA Problem [7:70448]
Hi Shane, Can you post your router config please and outputs for : "debug aaa authentication" Raj Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70575&t=70448 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: (no subject) [7:70562]
It certainly prefers IGP to EBGP ,but not sure about changing metric ...any one has any idea??? ramesh ,ccnp "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote: Does the BGP backdoor command change the administrative distance of EBGP from 20 to 200 ? Get Your Private, Free E-mail from Indiatimes at http://email.indiatimes.com Buy The Best In BOOKS at http://www.bestsellers.indiatimes.com Bid for Air Tickets @ Re.1 on Air Sahara Flights. Just log on to http://airsahara.indiatimes.com and Bid Now ! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70574&t=70562 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: (no subject) [7:70562]
bgp backdoor has got a specific use ..suppose you have a network that you have learnt both from igp(ospf) & egp(ebgp), then your router prepers egbp route as it is having less metric .If you want to force your router to prefer igp router,you need to add router backdoor entry in bgp config of your router ramesh ccnp "grant grant123nj" wrote: Hi, Srivathsan As I know, Cisco network backdoor command in BGP is to generate a local BGP route, of which administrative distance is 200. The only difference between the network and the network backdoor command is that the later route is not advertised to EBGP peer. Regards, Grant Get Your Private, Free E-mail from Indiatimes at http://email.indiatimes.com Buy The Best In BOOKS at http://www.bestsellers.indiatimes.com Bid for Air Tickets @ Re.1 on Air Sahara Flights. Just log on to http://airsahara.indiatimes.com and Bid Now ! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70573&t=70562 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco & Third Party H323 Device [7:70568]
Yes. As long as you have the right codecs running. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kengie Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco & Third Party H323 Device [7:70568] Dear All, Can Cisco VoIP Box connect to third party H323 devices? For example, Cisco AS5300 -> H323 -> Clarent or Cisco AS5300 -> H323 -> Audio Code MP200 and vice versa? Just wondering since all these device working via standard H323 protocol. Many thanks. Regards, Kengie Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70571&t=70568 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco & Third Party H323 Device [7:70568]
Another good question? Cisco sent H323 calls via Destination-Pattern. Will Clarent still accept this? And between two different vendors, will the negotiation level be okie (during the calls setup).. Many thanks, you guys. Because my co-worker always argue with me, that between two vendors. You will need a gatekeeper between the call setup and call tear down are different. Is this true? Regards, Kengie >From: "Jack Nalbandian" >Reply-To: >To: "Kengie" , >Subject: RE: Cisco & Third Party H323 Device [7:70568] >Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 00:08:26 -0700 > >Yes. As long as you have the right codecs running. > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of >Kengie >Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:57 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Cisco & Third Party H323 Device [7:70568] > > >Dear All, > >Can Cisco VoIP Box connect to third party H323 devices? For example, Cisco >AS5300 -> H323 -> Clarent or Cisco AS5300 -> H323 -> Audio Code MP200 and >vice versa? Just wondering since all these device working via standard >H323 >protocol. Many thanks. > > >Regards, >Kengie _ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70572&t=70568 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi.. [7:70570]
Hi, this is regarding my ccnp I have completed the cisco foundation 2.0 FRS that is equivaent to the RAS,BSCI and BCMSN .I want to take the CIT a little later may be the new version.My basic query is if complete CIT in new version is it fine or again I have to complete the RAS,BSCI,and BSCMN. pls reply me at the earliest as I am in Big dilema... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70570&t=70570 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
