RE: Juniper technical question [7:4398]
inline Stefano > -Original Message- > From: Marc-Andre Giroux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: lunedl 14 maggio 2001 14.19 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Juniper technical question [7:4398] > > > 2 questions the first is what is the equivalent of a "show run" in the > Junos world In user mode UID@SYSNAME> show configuration there isn't in juniper the concept of running config and startup config, configuration is only one (or at least one uncommitted config) in configuration mode UID@SYSNAME#show (the output is relevant on the portion of the tree you are) > and the second I am trying to turn on ICMP > debugging in cisco it > would be " debug packet icmp" does anyone know how to do this > in junos? In configuration mode look at "traceoption" command on protocol session, i don't remember the right flag to set, look in the possible options. > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=4404&t=4398 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Voice Over IP
Hi, until 12.0.5T the codec G729r8 was pre-IETF standard, from 12.0.5T the codec was standardized and the 2 codec are incompatible (different bit ordering) you must use the command "codec g729r8 pre-ietf" for interoperability but there are some negotiation problem (rink back tone for example). You must consider from 12.0.7T there are many new function very useful (codec, timing and debugging for example). My opinion check for 12.1.x because 12.0.7T reached the End of Engeneering so no more development are planned for this release. Check for memory. Stefano > -Original Message- > From: Amit Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: giovedì 28 dicembre 2000 06.44 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Voice Over IP > > > Hi everybody, > > I need assistance on the VoIP problem I am facing : > > We are planning to have a VoIP setup on the already > existing data link between our local and remote > office. > Both sites have Cisco 3640 routers configured for it. > > The router on the local site has IOS 11.3(9)T and the > remote router has 12.0(5)T1 on it. > > Is it necessary for the routers at both ends be > running a similar version of IOS for the Voice calls > to be successful. What kind of upgrade is required? > > Secondly the loopback test (hairpinning) was > successful for the local site but a similar test at > the remote site was unsuccessful. > Could that be due to any signalling problems ? > > Thanks & Regards > > Amit > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Photos - Share your holiday photos online! > http://photos.yahoo.com/ > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Voice Over IP
Hi, until 12.0.5T the codec G729r8 was pre-IETF standard, from 12.0.5T the codec was standardized and the 2 codec are incompatible (different bit ordering) you must use the command "codec g729r8 pre-ietf" for interoperability but there are some negotiation problem (rink back tone for example). You must consider from 12.0.7T there are many new function very useful (codec, timing and debugging for example). My opinion check for 12.1.x because 12.0.7T reached the End of Engeneering so no more development are planned for this release. Check for memory. Stefano > -Original Message- > From: Amit Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: giovedì 28 dicembre 2000 06.44 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Voice Over IP > > > Hi everybody, > > I need assistance on the VoIP problem I am facing : > > We are planning to have a VoIP setup on the already > existing data link between our local and remote > office. > Both sites have Cisco 3640 routers configured for it. > > The router on the local site has IOS 11.3(9)T and the > remote router has 12.0(5)T1 on it. > > Is it necessary for the routers at both ends be > running a similar version of IOS for the Voice calls > to be successful. What kind of upgrade is required? > > Secondly the loopback test (hairpinning) was > successful for the local site but a similar test at > the remote site was unsuccessful. > Could that be due to any signalling problems ? > > Thanks & Regards > > Amit > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Photos - Share your holiday photos online! > http://photos.yahoo.com/ > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Frame Relay Fragmentation
FRF.12 must be supported on both ends. One side make the fragmentation and the other end must be able to reassemble the original packet. You can do fragmentation only from one side but both must support FRF.12 to work properly. So the answer is you can trun on fragmentation on one side but it must be supported on both side. Stefano > -Original Message- > From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: martedì 19 dicembre 2000 00.07 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Frame Relay Fragmentation > > > I need to turn on FRF.12 on a remote router so that I can > make use of the > frame-relay ip rtp priority command. However, the PVC that I'll be > implementing that on connects to a router that cannot do FRF.12. > > Does FRF.12 need to be configured on both ends? It seems > that it probably > only needs to be configured on the end doing the fragmenting, > which would be > good news, but it I'm not positive about this. Will the near > end need to be > configured for FRF.12 so it knows how to reassemble those frame relay > frames? > > I'm guessing that I only have to do it on the end doing the > work, but I > wanted to check before I go break something on a production box. :-) > > Thanks as always, > John > > > > > > ___ > Send a cool gift with your E-Card > http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/ > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VoIP config
take a look at http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/788/signalling/21.html http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_mod/cis3600/voice /4712voic.htm#xtocid221719 Stefano > -Original Message- > From: Rodgers Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: martedì 14 novembre 2000 04.59 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: VoIP config > > > Believe it or not, yes I do, and it's only hard copy. Cisco > TAC has this > document, again only in hard copy form. That's where I got > my copy from. > If you don't already know this, the wiring is different for > each E&M type. > If and when I get to it, I'll create an electronic version. > I might be > persuaded to share it too. ;) > > Rodgers Moore > > ""pinoal"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > 8unip9$j3t$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8unip9$j3t$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Rodgers , > > > > > > Do you have the wiring diagrams for E&M 4 wire. I have done a few > > installations and got the > > wiring right by trial and error. > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > > > ""Rodgers Moore"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > 8uhh3t$76f$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8uhh3t$76f$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Reply in-line. > > > > > > Rodgers Moore > > > > > > "Amit Gupta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > Need some help in configuring VoIP > > > > I am testing the loopback connectivity between my > > > > router and EPABX by dialing a local extension number. > > > > > > > > As Soon as I dial the seizing code I get connected to > > > > the router. > > > > When I dial the destination pattern my call gets > > > > transferred to the router,s next port > > > > > > Right here. Do you hear PBX dial-tone? When you dial > the first digit > > does > > > dial-tone go away? > > > > > > Also at this point you should do a "show voice calls", > "show voice dps". > > > What is the state of all of the ports & dsp's? Does > everything look > good? > > > > > > 90% of the time I see this problem it is incomplete or > incorrect PBX > > > programming. > > > 9% its that the PBX set for 2 wire and router 4 wire, or > the reverse, or > > > incorrect wiring in a 4 wire config. (Cisco was putting > out incorrect > > > wiring diagrams for E&M 4 wire a year ago. I assume that > it's been > fixed, > > I > > > reported it to TAC) > > > Low volume level, the PBX can't hear the DTMF digits. > > > PBX is made by NEC or Lucent. Both are rather picky about DTMF > frequency > > > accuracy and volume. To test, change the codec to G.711 > on the ports so > > > that no compression is being used. Or turn on local call > compression > > > bypass. This way the PBX's DTMF just passes through > unmolested back to > > > itself. > > > > > > > When I dial the local extension i do not get a > > > > response. > > > > I am using tone dialing,the Interface model is Type- 5 > > > > E& M > > > > Type of Signalling is Immediate > > > > > > > > Thanks for your clues in advance. > > > > > > > > Amit > > > > > > > > __ > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > > Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. All in one Place. > > > > http://shopping.yahoo.com/ > > > > > > > > _ > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Spanning tree screw up
i had a similar problem with a cat 5500 the problem was a encapsulation mismatch on a trunk. Correct the mismatch and the messagge go away (but for me wasn't occasionally but every 5 seconds) hope this help Stefano > -Original Message- > From: alex campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: giovedì 31 agosto 2000 14.52 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Spanning tree screw up > > > hello ppl > I have a cat 5500 with 12 ethernet cards and an RSM > over the weekend I repatched the whole network and added a couple new > vlans...it all seems to work. > However > > this message seems to come up occasionally > %MLS-4-RESUMESC:Resume MLS after detecting too many moves > %MLS-4-MOVEOVERFLOW:Too many moves, stop MLS for 5 sec (200) > > my telnet connection to the switch seems to disconnect when > it feels like it > (which is SO enjoyable when configuring VLANs :)) > on looking through the Cisco Web Site, I understand that its > a spanning tree > problem. However, do any of you guys know if rebooting the > switch would > solve the problem ? and if not, what will ? > Thanks > Alex > > __ > ___ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A question about IPSec
from http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/protocol-numbers PROTOCOL NUMBERS In the Internet Protocol version 4 (IPv4) [RFC791] there is a field, called "Protocol", to identify the next level protocol. This is an 8 bit field. In Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6) [RFC1883] this field is called the "Next Header" field. Stefano > -Original Message- > From: George Zhang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: giovedì 31 agosto 2000 16.33 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: A question about IPSec > > > I read the following form Cisco documentation about IPSec: > > "IKE uses UDP port 500. The IPSec ESP and AH protocols use PROTOCOL > numbers 50 and 51. Ensure that your access-list are > configured so that > 50, 51 and UDP port 500 traffic is not blocked ..." > > My question is, what are the PROTOCOL numbers? This is the > first time I > read or heard about "PROTOCOL number"? I know many protocols by names > such as TCP, UDP, ICMP etc, by I have never heard about PROTOCOL > numbers? What protocols 50 and 51 are associated with? Could someone > please explain that to me? Thanks. > > George Zhang, CCNP > > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Practicing DLSw
i made a mistake, with /30 subnet mask you can have max 2 host on network so eth1-R0 10.10.66.1 ethx-R1 10.10.66.2 there isn't space for a PC. so i think you have connected the PC on eth0 on R0 but eth0 don't have an IP address so you can't have IP connectivity on eth0 and you can't ping trought this interface. Remeber that dlsw make incapsulation of SNA packet (802.3 SSAP 04 - ?? i forgot the range) and Netbios (SSAP F0 )and don't do encapsulation for IP (SSAP AA and SNAP 0x800). the same for R5 sorry for mistake, hope i'm right now. Stefano > -----Original Message- > From: Bosio Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: giovedì 31 agosto 2000 9.57 > To: 'Jairo Nuvan'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: Practicing DLSw > > > PING reachability is an IP problem and is not related with > DLSw, try disable > DLSw config and see that nothing change. > > if you have reachability between Lo i think tha problem is in > PC, check for > address and default gateway > PC0 must be 10.10.66.2 and 10.10.66.1 attached on R0-Eth1 segment > PC5 must be 10.10.66.6 and 10.10.66.5 attached on R0-Eth1 segment > > Remember ip subnet-zero on router R0 (for network 10.10.66.0/30) > > Stefano > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jairo Nuvan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: martedì 29 agosto 2000 22.43 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Practicing DLSw > > > > > > Hi,I'm practicing DLSw in my laboratory, I have the following > > problem. I am > > configuring DLSw on an IP network, so that two LANs can have > > NetBIOs and > > directions of same IP network address space. > > > > > > > > R2 > > / \ > > /\ > > -et0-R0-et1-R1R4---et1-R5-et0--- > > \/ > > \ / > > R3 > > > > > > The R0's config is: > > > > dlsw local-peer peer-id 192.168.1.1 > > dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 192.168.2.1 > > dlsw bridge-group 1 > > > > interface loopback 0 > > ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 > > > > interface ethernet 0 > > no ip address > > bridge-group 1 > > > > interface ethernet 1 > > ip address 10.10.66.1 255.255.255.252 > > 1 > > router eigrp 1 > > network 10.10.66.0 0.0.0.3 > > network 192.168.1.0 > > > > bridge 1 protocol ieee > > > > In router R5, the config is this: > > > > dlsw local-peer peer-id 192.168.2.1 > > dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 192.168.1.1 > > dlsw bridge-group 1 > > > > interface loopback 0 > > ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0 > > > > interface ethernet 0 > > no ip address > > bridge-group 1 > > > > interface ethernet 1 > > ip address 10.10.66.5 255.255.255.252 > > > > router eigrp 1 > > network 10.10.66.4 0.0.0.3 > > network 192.168.2.0 > > > > bridge 1 protocol ieee > > > > In the routers R1, R2, R3 and R4, I have EIGRP routing with > > ID 1 and I do > > not have problems with reachability of the loopback > > interfaces. When I use a > > PC with an IP address connected to router R0 and another one > > to interface > > Et1 in R5, they cannot see each other with a PING. > > > > Can you help me, what is the problem in this configuration? > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > Jairo Nuvan > > > > > > __ > > FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com > > Sign up at http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup > > > > ___ > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help on Frame-relay Traffic-shaping command
yes. you are right but this command exist
frame-relay traffic-rate average [peak]
not
Frame-relay traffic-rate [bit-rate [burst-size][excess-burst-size]]
the difference is in the option (the meaning are about the same but the
syntax is different).
The options "bit-rate [burst-size [excess-burst-size]]" are related to
traffic-shape rate bit-rate [burst-size [excess-burst-size]]
and is Generic Traffic Shaping not Frame-Relay Traffic Shaping.
Stefano
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: mercoledì 30 agosto 2000 20.26
> To: Bosio Stefano
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Help on Frame-relay Traffic-shaping command
>
>
>
> Actually, The "frame-relay traffic-rate" command DOES exist.
> It is used as
> a simpler alternative to using the three commands for setting
> up traffic
> shaping on Frame Relay ("frame-relay cir out", "frame-relay
> be out", and
> "frame-relay bc out").
> http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios12
0/12cgcr/wan_r/wrfrelay.htm#6354
frame-relay traffic-rate average [peak]
average = average rate in bits per second; equivalent to specifying the
contracted CIR
peak = (Optional) Peak rate, in bits per second; equivalent to CIR + Be/Tc
= CIR (1 + Be/Bc) = CIR + EIR.
the configured peak and average rates are converted to the equivalent CIR,
excess burst size (Be), and committed burst size (Bc) values
Karen E Young
Network Engineer
ELF Technologies, Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: deferred packets on eth on C7206vxr
Deffered packet is normal on a CSMA/CD network like ethernet. When packet must be trasmitted out on a ethernet interface the carrier are sensed if it is busy the interface wait to send (deffer), the deffered packet counter are incremented by 1, after a random time the interface recheck for carrier and if it is free send the packet. Stefano > -Original Message- > From: Nodir Nazarov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: mercoledì 30 agosto 2000 18.29 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: deferred packets on eth on C7206vxr > > > Hello, > > I have number of deferred packets increasing on my ethernet > interface on > C7206vxr. I don't see any noticeable disruptions on the network, but > this pattern bothers me. What am I overlooking ?? > > Nodir > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Practicing DLSw
PING reachability is an IP problem and is not related with DLSw, try disable DLSw config and see that nothing change. if you have reachability between Lo i think tha problem is in PC, check for address and default gateway PC0 must be 10.10.66.2 and 10.10.66.1 attached on R0-Eth1 segment PC5 must be 10.10.66.6 and 10.10.66.5 attached on R0-Eth1 segment Remember ip subnet-zero on router R0 (for network 10.10.66.0/30) Stefano > -Original Message- > From: Jairo Nuvan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: martedì 29 agosto 2000 22.43 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Practicing DLSw > > > Hi,I'm practicing DLSw in my laboratory, I have the following > problem. I am > configuring DLSw on an IP network, so that two LANs can have > NetBIOs and > directions of same IP network address space. > > > > R2 > / \ > /\ > -et0-R0-et1-R1R4---et1-R5-et0--- > \/ > \ / > R3 > > > The R0's config is: > > dlsw local-peer peer-id 192.168.1.1 > dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 192.168.2.1 > dlsw bridge-group 1 > > interface loopback 0 > ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 > > interface ethernet 0 > no ip address > bridge-group 1 > > interface ethernet 1 > ip address 10.10.66.1 255.255.255.252 > 1 > router eigrp 1 > network 10.10.66.0 0.0.0.3 > network 192.168.1.0 > > bridge 1 protocol ieee > > In router R5, the config is this: > > dlsw local-peer peer-id 192.168.2.1 > dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 192.168.1.1 > dlsw bridge-group 1 > > interface loopback 0 > ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0 > > interface ethernet 0 > no ip address > bridge-group 1 > > interface ethernet 1 > ip address 10.10.66.5 255.255.255.252 > > router eigrp 1 > network 10.10.66.4 0.0.0.3 > network 192.168.2.0 > > bridge 1 protocol ieee > > In the routers R1, R2, R3 and R4, I have EIGRP routing with > ID 1 and I do > not have problems with reachability of the loopback > interfaces. When I use a > PC with an IP address connected to router R0 and another one > to interface > Et1 in R5, they cannot see each other with a PING. > > Can you help me, what is the problem in this configuration? > > Thanks > > > > > Jairo Nuvan > > > __ > FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com > Sign up at http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help on Frame-relay Traffic-shaping command
comment inline
Stefano
>Original Message-
>From: myccie Lian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: mercoledì 30 agosto 2000 7.22
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Help on Frame-relay Traffic-shaping command
>
>
>Hi,
>I have studied following command at cisco website but I still have problem
>to understand how the parameters work.
>If you can give me some example of those command, I will really appreciate
>that.
>
>
>1.
>Frame-relay traffic-rate [bit-rate [burst-size][excess-burst-size]]
>frame-relay traffic-rate 32000 64000 16000
>look like 32000 is CIR. what about 64000 and 16000.
>Is there any different to use "frame-relay cir" command ?
>
---S---
Frame-relay traffic-rate [bit-rate [burst-size][excess-burst-size]]
don't exist the command is
traffic-shape rate bit-rate [burst-size [excess-burst-size]]
and is Generic Trafic Shaping (GTS)not frame relay specific
in the example frame-relay traffic-rate 32000 64000 16000
32000 is the CIR
64000 is the Committed burst=CIR*Tc=32000*2=64000
Tc - committed rate measurement interval
16000 is the Excess burst (usually Eb=port speed - CIR)
---
>
>
>2.
>frame-relay traffic-rate 1544000
>frame-relay adaptive 64000
>Documentation tell me CIR is 64000 and access rate is 1544000. What is the
>different with the command " frame-relay traffic-rate 32000 64000 16000" ?
>
S---
frame-relay traffic-rate average [peak]
Define the traffic rate for the map class.
average=CIR
[peak]=the max rate (CIR+EIR) if omitted is the port speed
in your example 1544000 is the CIR (suppose CIR=port speed don't need
command)
frame-relay adaptive-shaping {becn|foresight}
depending on the BECN recieved 64000 is the rate to which traffic shaping
will adapt
traffic-rate 32000 64000 16000
=
frame-relay traffic-rate 32000 48000
>
>3.
>frame-relay cir 64000
>frame-relay mincir 64000
>Is that these two command have any relationship with "frame-relay traffic-
>rate" ?
>
S--
This command replaces "frame-relay traffic-rate" and have the same meaning
frame-relay traffic-rate 32000 48000
=
frame-relay cir 32000
frame-relay bc 32000
frame-relay be 16000
--
>
>
>4.
>If I want to get at least 16k of bandwidth but not more than 32k at serial
>link s0, how can I use the traffic-shaping command.
>
S---
in a map class use
frame-relay traffic-rate 16000 32000
=
frame-relay cir 16000
frame-relay bc 16000
frame-relay be 16000
-
hope this help.
Correct me if i'm wrong
>Thanks for your help.
>
>
>Gerry Lian
___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: why the prompt is different for 5505 switches? any one know?
1) The first one > SOMETAROU#sh conf > Using 1961 out of 126968 bytes > ! > version 11.2 > no service password-encryption . is the configuration of RSM module (internal router) the second one > sometarou> (enable) sh conf > . > .. > .. > .. > > begin > set password $1$PEV9$MXJwjj4umvPJ7aj.0KeUa. > set enablepass $1$3Las$CDZgLGUVTKg7qozn9jnsK0 > set prompt Console> ... is the configuratione of the switch (supervisor) 2) 5505> (enable) session (es. session 4) Stefano > -Original Message- > From: Sim, CT (Chee Tong) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: martedì 8 agosto 2000 9.59 > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: why the prompt is different for 5505 switches? any one know? > > > Hi..Dear friends, I was very confused with the confuration > file of 5505, my > colleages send me two configuration file in Tokyo. > > One start with SOMETAROU#sh conf > > Another one start with sometarou> (enable) sh conf > > and two of them give me different configuration, (see below) > > 1)can any one tell me, what is the different? > > 2)I can telnet to my backbone switches, after I type 5505>en > password > it gives me 5505>(enable) prompt then what should I type to > get the 5505# > prompt > > 3)What is the special function 5505 back bone switch? Can > you use normal > switch like 1900, 2900 to replace it? (optional) > > > && > && > && > SOMETAROU#sh conf > Using 1961 out of 126968 bytes > ! > version 11.2 > no service password-encryption > no service udp-small-servers > no service tcp-small-servers > ! > hostname SOMETAROU > ! > enable secret 5 $1$0U5tyfSAgpNPpsjXQ4xGI/ > ! > ! > interface Vlan1 > description RABO-JP > ip address 57.198.45.251 255.255.255.0 > ip broadcast-address 57.198.45.255 > no ip redirects > standby 1 priority 100 > standby 1 preempt > standby 1 ip 57.198.45.250 > ! > && > && > > sometarou> (enable) sh conf > . > .. > . > .. > .. > .. > .. > > begin > set password $1$PEV9$MXJwjj4umvPJ7aj.0KeUa. > set enablepass $1$3Las$CDZgLGUVTKg7qozn9jnsK0 > set prompt Console> > set length 24 default > set logout 20 > set banner motd ^C > > > * Catalyst 5505 #2 * > * SupervisorEngine * > *sometarou * > > ^C > ! > #system > set system baud 9600 > set system modem disable > set system name sometarou > set system location > set system contact > ! > #snmp > set snmp community read-only public > set snmp community read-write private > set snmp community read-write-all secret > set snmp rmon disable > set snmp trap disable module > set snmp trap disable chassis > set snmp trap disable bridge > > > == > De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en > is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht > onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en > de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. > == > The information contained in this message may be confidential > and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you > receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents > herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. > > > == > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
