Re: priscilla [7:56664]
Dudego to her website and find out for yourself, if she still has the ID there ofcourse.http://www.priscilla.com Hey Priscilla, lovely boat Priscilla behind you in the snap from Monterey. -- Chaoo, Cisco_Maniac Cable Guy wrote in message news:200211010842.IAA05901;groupstudy.com... Priscilla, your comments kept me busy all morning sniffing packets and reading RFCs. I'd like to ask you something off the list. I can't see your private email. Can you send me a private email please? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56801t=56664 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Looking for a job : Consultant/Architect [7:55249]
Friend, Romans (for all Eathlings), and CiscoMEN, Please I am not on this site for word-bashing some jerk. I am here to learn Technology and apply the same. As far as rest of the stuff goes, we dont want any racism (as was see a couple of weeks back) or bad-mounthing eachother. Some people dont have anything to contribute in technological discussion (cause they dont have any GREY in there) but like little kids want to draw attention. The only time they speak-out is when there is particularly no necessity. Actually there FOOLs open there mouth and prove it for us (with due apologies to Winston Churchill for mis-quoting his famous words). We are supposed to be Tech-Geeks not Word-Geeks.pitty that people like us are pulled into such silly things. Please friends end this conversation. Lets talk Cisco... -- Chaoo, Cisco_Maniac P.S. Theodore...sorry to disappoint you. I guess you have to stock up the beer for the next time. Or you could call me over to help you finish itChaootakecare...now back to work...sorry jobsearch.combye best of lucks guys. Bill thanks friend. Creighton Bill-BCREIGH1 wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Agreed - me thinks we're in for some firewords - I mean fireworks... ;) Actually, I've posted several opportunities to the jobs@groupstudy list... -Original Message- From: Theodore Stout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 2:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Looking for a job : Consultant/Architect [7:55249] I going to go out and get some burgers, hot dogs, and marshmellows and like roast them over the flames which are about to arrive. In fact, maybe I can get some beer on the way back. By then it should be nice and hot! Theo Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55356t=55249 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Looking for a job : Consultant/Architect [7:55249]
Period. -- Chaoo, Cisco_Maniac Mark W. Odette II wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Nice two-faced response You should practice what you preach. You were not assigned Hall Monitor privileges, so there was no need for you to step up to the plate and bash the folk that replied, even if they were a little on the rough side. Your comments were simply Foul and Rude. Rather than trying to suddenly make nice with everyone except the folk you initially replied to, you should be apologizing to those you scorned so eloquently. I can't believe your initial replies even got past the moderators! I have a wonderful motto that my elders taught me a long time ago- If you don't have anything nice to say, don't say it all. The best defense against someone speaking negative is to simply ignore them... as you could have done. All replies will be kill-filtered, so don't bother... you should have the point by now. -Original Message- From: Cisco_Maniac [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 3:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Looking for a job : Consultant/Architect [7:55249] Friend, Romans (for all Eathlings), and CiscoMEN, Please I am not on this site for word-bashing some jerk. I am here to learn Technology and apply the same. As far as rest of the stuff goes, we dont want any racism (as was see a couple of weeks back) or bad-mounthing eachother. Some people dont have anything to contribute in technological discussion (cause they dont have any GREY in there) but like little kids want to draw attention. The only time they speak-out is when there is particularly no necessity. Actually there FOOLs open there mouth and prove it for us (with due apologies to Winston Churchill for mis-quoting his famous words). We are supposed to be Tech-Geeks not Word-Geeks.pitty that people like us are pulled into such silly things. Please friends end this conversation. Lets talk Cisco... -- Chaoo, Cisco_Maniac P.S. Theodore...sorry to disappoint you. I guess you have to stock up the beer for the next time. Or you could call me over to help you finish itChaootakecare...now back to work...sorry jobsearch.combye best of lucks guys. Bill thanks friend. Creighton Bill-BCREIGH1 wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Agreed - me thinks we're in for some firewords - I mean fireworks... ;) Actually, I've posted several opportunities to the jobs@groupstudy list... -Original Message- From: Theodore Stout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 2:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Looking for a job : Consultant/Architect [7:55249] I going to go out and get some burgers, hot dogs, and marshmellows and like roast them over the flames which are about to arrive. In fact, maybe I can get some beer on the way back. By then it should be nice and hot! Theo Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55375t=55249 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looking for a job : Consultant/Architect [7:55249]
Respected Sir/Madam, I am a Network Consultant/Architect with 3.5 years experience in the IT industry. I am currently working for one of the Top 5 comapnies of Fortune 500. I am working as a Consultant doing both pre-sales post-sales and design/architect network (LAN/WAN/RAS/VPN/etc). I also do level-2 troubleshooting for our support engineers. I impliment VPN solutions, Cisco routers, Cisco Switches, Network Audit using H/W Analyzers and troubleshoot based on reports and give consulting, Wireless implimentation (Lucent and Intel), etc. Job can be anywhere. Currently I am in located in Bangalore, India. I am more than willing to relocate from India. Please let me know by e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] if anyone is interest in my CV. Thanking you. Regards, Cisco Maniac Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55249t=55249 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Looking for a job : Consultant/Architect [7:55249]
Hi Johnny, Well analyzing your observations, do not judge but try to analyze. One, 3.5 years in Consulting itself... Two, there is no one there on the groustudy.job except for spam mailers. -- Chaoo, Cisco_Maniac Johnny Routin wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Two observations... 3.5 years experience is a little light for a consultant/architect This list is not a job list... groupstudy has one of those but you did not find it... JR -- Johnny Routin Cisco_Maniac wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Respected Sir/Madam, I am a Network Consultant/Architect with 3.5 years experience in the IT industry. I am currently working for one of the Top 5 comapnies of Fortune 500. I am working as a Consultant doing both pre-sales post-sales and design/architect network (LAN/WAN/RAS/VPN/etc). I also do level-2 troubleshooting for our support engineers. I impliment VPN solutions, Cisco routers, Cisco Switches, Network Audit using H/W Analyzers and troubleshoot based on reports and give consulting, Wireless implimentation (Lucent and Intel), etc. Job can be anywhere. Currently I am in located in Bangalore, India. I am more than willing to relocate from India. Please let me know by e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] if anyone is interest in my CV. Thanking you. Regards, Cisco Maniac Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55342t=55249 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Looking for a job : Consultant/Architect [7:55249]
Hi Sam, I have better one for you...open your mouth when I shove the stuff into it...that way the garbage guy wouldnt be upset..and in between if I need to peeI would do in you mouth cause there is no other pleasure than that...anywhere in the world (NJ or wherever) peeing in Sam's mouth is fun.. I understand that lot of peole are looking for a job in this site. And lot of peole do understand the seriousness of the situation. Unfortunately jearks like you have fun on someone else problem. Take care you piece of shit and dont bother replying. -- Chaoo, Cisco_Maniac sam sneed wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I have job for you in Clifton NJ. I haven't cleaned my bathroom this week and its getting little unsightly. If your good with a mop and broom thats a big plus. Certifications are also a plus but not nescessary. and yes this is not hotjobs or monster so don't post here. Lots of people on this list are looking for work, if we all posted requests for work here it'd mess things up. Cisco_Maniac wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Respected Sir/Madam, I am a Network Consultant/Architect with 3.5 years experience in the IT industry. I am currently working for one of the Top 5 comapnies of Fortune 500. I am working as a Consultant doing both pre-sales post-sales and design/architect network (LAN/WAN/RAS/VPN/etc). I also do level-2 troubleshooting for our support engineers. I impliment VPN solutions, Cisco routers, Cisco Switches, Network Audit using H/W Analyzers and troubleshoot based on reports and give consulting, Wireless implimentation (Lucent and Intel), etc. Job can be anywhere. Currently I am in located in Bangalore, India. I am more than willing to relocate from India. Please let me know by e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] if anyone is interest in my CV. Thanking you. Regards, Cisco Maniac Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55343t=55249 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What's the Technical difference between Switch and [7:53531]
Hi guys, Priscillia is correct. Yeah all marketing gimic's from different vendors. Either the device is a switch or it is a hub or a bridge. It cant be a combination. Hub is a hub = same broadcast domain and same collision domain. Switch is a switch = same broadcast domain but each port is a different collision domain. Hope that answers. Chaoo, Cisco_Maniac Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... R.S.Sundar wrote: Hello All, What's the Technical difference between Swich and Switching Hub. Generally we have hubs,switch and switching hub .In which situation a switching hub can be used. Can we use it instead of a switch. Switching hub isn't a technical term, so we can't answer the question with a technical answer. It sounds like it's specific to a particular product. So your best bet is to read the specs for that product. Cisco at one point used the term switching hub for some low-end switches that they had. They really were switches, not hubs. Each port provided dedicated bandwidth and connected just one device. The port couldn't connect a shared network or hub, just a single device. I guess Cisco used the term switching hub instead of switch because these low-end devices didn't have any fancy switching features to support VLANs, spanning tree, etc. Such a device could replace a hub and offer much higher performance, although, as mentioned, it must be placed into the topology in such a fashion that the ports connect just one device. It may support some uplink ports for connecting to other switches or shared networks. But the bottom line is that you need to read the specs for your actual product and see what the vendor means by this confusing, non-standard term switching hub. It's a shame that the vendor didn't stick to standard, technically-comprehensive terminology, which defines a switch as a data-link-layer device that offers dedicated bandwidth to each port, and a hub as a physical-layer device that offers shared bandwidth for the ports. Priscilla Regards, R.S.Sundar *** This message is proprietary to Future Software Limited (FSL) and is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged or confidential information and should not be circulated or used for any purpose other than for what it is intended. If you have received this message in error, please notify the originator immediately. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that you are strictly prohibited from using, copying, altering, or disclosing the contents of this message. FSL accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising from the use of the information transmitted by this email including damage from virus. *** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=53531t=53531 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Unicast flooding on switch ports [7:52907]
Hi Hitesh, I feel this traffic could be the replication traffic between the two Win2K server. What are the nature of the two servers? Also if possible edit and paste the output of the sniffer. This would help us decipher what is actually happening. Do you get any such statistics in traffic from A to B server if you put the sniffer on promiscuous mode? Chaoo, Cisco_Maniac Hitesh Pathak R wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Dear Group, I am having a setup like this :- cat6k -- cat6k | | | | | Cat5k| | Cat5k| I am connecting the sniffer on one of my core switches (cat6ks) and without doing port mirroring (SPAN) able to see the unicast packets flow between 2 Windows NT servers. Does this indicate unicast port flooding ??? or is this the default behavior of my Sniffer s/w. I am using Network associates Sniffer s/w. The port where the PC is connected is also in the same vlan in which the Windows NT servers are connected. Both the Servers are connected on the same switch. The servers are Win2k. Has anybody faced a similar problem like this ??? many thanks in advance Hitesh DISCLAIMER: Information contained and transmitted by this E-MAIL is proprietary to Wipro Limited and is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If this is a forwarded message, the content of this E-MAIL may not have been sent with the authority of the Company. If you are not the intended recipient, an agent of the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering the information to the named recipient, you are notified that any use, distribution, transmission, printing, copying or dissemination of this information in any way or in any manner is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please delete this mail notify us immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52915t=52907 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Interesting Situation with a 2948G-L3 and Inter-VL [7:51221]
If that is the case Priscilla, then one might as well enable Port-Fast on a those ports and observe for a few days. If the switch activity stabilizes then it is surely a STP re-convergence problem. Am I on track? Chaoo, Cisco_Maniac Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... You say that the stations connected to the 2948G-L3 stop transmitting for 15 seconds. Could the Spanning Tree be reconverging for some reason? Since you're doing IRB with both bridging and routing, presumably STP is running and 15 seconds sticks out as the Forward Delay timer used by STP. It's also the timer for aging the bridging table when BPDUs arrive with the Topology Change Flag set. I can't see why the change you made would cause a problem, but maybe it did for some reason or maybe it caused you to hit a bug. You may want to try debug span events or the equivalent if that doesn't work on a 2948G-L3. If debug is too risky, show spantree might give you some hints as to when the last topology change occured. It's just a guess but that 15 seconds sure sticks out as a possible clue that something is up with Spanning Tree. Hopefully somebody else will have ideas too! Priscilla Don Pezet wrote: Hey guys, Well, I've been tinkering with the network again, and in search of performance increases I have come across something a little weird. Let me run it by you all and see if anyone can play spot the mistake for me. We have nine separate in house networks in our facility, each with roughly 20 network attached devices (PCs mostly). They are built up as follows: 10.10.10.0/24 - Administrative network (for me) (VLAN 1) 192.168.0.0/24 - Servers and NAS appliances (VLAN 2) 192.168.1.0/24 - Network 1 (VLAN 10) 192.168.2.0/24 - Network 2 (VLAN 20) 192.168.3.0/24 - Network 3 (VLAN 30) 192.168.4.0/24 - Network 4 (VLAN 40) 192.168.5.0/24 - Network 5 (VLAN 50) 192.168.6.0/24 - Network 6 (VLAN 60) 192.168.7.0/24 - Network 7 (VLAN 70) 192.168.8.0/24 - Network 8 (VLAN 80) The physical network is made up of the following: (1) Cisco 3620 with 10/100 Network Module (1) Cisco Catalyst 2948G-L3 (4) Cisco Catalyst 3548XL The physical arrangement is the 3620 connects via the 100MBit module to port F48 of the 2948G-L3. The four 3548XLs are linked via Cisco GigaStack Gbics in a non-clustered arrangement. One of the 3548s links to the 2948G-L3 via a standard 1000MBit Gbic from its G0/2 into the 2948G-L3's G49. The physical configuration is sound, all VLANs are present on all of the cisco equipment, and I have been having no issues from that end. Each network must be able to reach the server network (192.168.0.0/24). Initially, I configured ISL between all of the switches, and since I have the 100Mbit module on the 3620, created an ISL trunk to it with a sub-interface for each VLAN and began providing inter-VLAN routing and internet access through it. Well, on high-speed switches, hitting a 100Mbit bottleneck at the router during inter-VLAN communications was kind of a downer so I began looking for other options. Which is exactly how I ended up where I am now. My idea was, hey, the 2948G-L3 is fully Layer 3 capable, so why not make it do all of the routing so that I do not get the 100Mbit bottleneck created by going through the 3620. Then, the only traffic the 3620 would need to get is internet traffic. So I set it up (configs at the end of the letter, with scattered in-line comments). I configured the 2948G-L3 to do IRB and route between the VLANs using the BVIs. Then, I threw in a static default route so internet traffic would be routed to the 3620. Lastly, I configured OSPF to run between the 2948G-L3 and the 3620 so that the 3620 would know about any existing or new networks that I may create on the 2948G-L3. Now for the problem part. At first, everything was working great, but after a while I began watching performance and noticing that I did not gain that much in the way of improved performance except for machines that were plugged directly into the 2949G-L3. Machines connected to a 3548XL and following the ISL trunk to the 2948G-L3 still performed as if competing for a 100Mbit uplink. I was willing to live with that, even though I should have at least quadrupled my routing bandwidth by switching over to the 2948G-L3, but it was the next symptom that got me. I started getting reports from people who were plugged directly into the 2948G-L3 that occasionally their link would go dead for about 15 seconds and then come back up. About two minutes later it would happen again. Then things would be fine for a while, maybe an hour, and it would repeat. Well, the 2948G-L3 takes longer that 15 seconds to reboot, so it isn't rebooting and I'm kind of stumped as to what is happening. This is not o
Re: Switch based Routing [7:50105]
Absolutely Chuck. Dave, any comments on the sameand can you get packet statistics from the PFC card if you add it to increase teh features available? Regards, Cisco_Maniac Chuck wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... when in doubt, check the docs on CCO ( although as I delve deeper into the 3550 docs, I am finding many things that don't jibe ) http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat6000/12_1e/comref/m1. htm#69312 watch the wrap mls rp ip (global configuration mode) Use the mls rp ip command to enable external systems to establish IP shortcuts to the MSFC. Use the no form of this command to remove a prior entry. mls rp ip [input-acl | route-map] no mls rp ip not that I have a clue what you are talking about - but thre is the command ( and the no form of the command. ) There is also an interface command of the same name. Cisco_Maniac wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Dave, I am sure the command 'no mls rp ip' would work in the Cat 6509. I have seem it in the Todd Lamle guide for switching. Boy, I am currently studying for S/W I got to remember stuff from the study material, unless have started aging and my memory has started to fail. Could you just check on that? I am sure there was something about disabling MLS on Cat5000 and Cat6000 seriessomething on 'Right way' and 'Wrong way'. Just check. You are correct in Cat5000 MLS is disabled by default and in Cat6000 it is enabled by default. Ok, you dont get I/O stat on VLAN interface but if you have Plicy Feature Card, you should be able to get a lot more information isnt it. PFC is used for billing information gathering and that means you have a lot of info which you need to decifer. Isnt it? Over to you Dave... Cisco_Maniac MADMAN wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Cisco_Maniac wrote: Agreed Dave. RSM and MSM are bothe blades and occupy a slot of Cat 5XXX and Cat 6XXX series chassis. Also the MSFC and RSFC are daughter cards as you rightly pointed out. I did a bit or reserch myself and came to the conclusion that the mother cards are basically Internal Routers and nothing else, running Cisco IOS and having virtual interfaces having MAC address from a shared global pool. They act as Router-on-a-stick model. But, the daughter cards mentioned above are like Route-once-Switch-many kind of MLS modules. They route the first time and then create a flow by cashing the entry in memory. This is the feature of NetFlow Feature Card inbuilt into RSFC and MSFC. Along with MSFC now Cisco also has Policy Feature Card that does much more in Policy and QoS. Am I correct guys? But guys, does this mean: - 1. RSFC card function = RSM card function + NSFC card function 2. MSFC card function = MSM card function + NSFC card function Are the above ideas true? I am confused, so help me!! Roughly I would say your correct. The RFSC and MSFC are also higher performing and you cannot run an MSFC without the PFC. I got a call last week from a customer who was wondering why his HSRP wasn't working. HSRP was running between a 5500 w/RSM and a 6509 w/MSFC. When transfering files he would not see any traffic on the MSFC VLAN interface. The reason is that MLS is enabled by default and you can't disable it on the 6500 so after the first packet is routed by the MSFC all subsequent packets are switched in hardware hence no input/output statistics on the VLAN interface. Dave Thanks guys, Cisco_Maniac MADMAN wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... The RSM takes up a slot and is used in CAT5000's and 5500's. The RSFC if I recall correctly is a daughter board on certain supII and supIII G's in the 5500 chassis. The MSM also eats up a slot in the 6000, 6500 chassis whereas the MSFC is a daughter board in the sup cards in the 6500 line. There is a ton of info on CCO concerning these if you want detailed info. Dave Cisco_Maniac wrote: Hi, Can someone explain to me when should RSM, MSM, RSFC, MSFC, etc be used? Basically does anyone know where the comparison (feature wise) on Cisco site including CCO? I want to know from Switching exam point of view. Regards, Amit -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com
Re: router vs packet forwarding [7:50471]
Well to tell you the truth a NT box with IP forwarding enabled and dual NIC cards is truely a router with L3 functinality. But Cisco or Juniper or Nortel add a lot of extra features in to the boxes to enhance the routing performance features like latency, QoS and stuff like that. These boxes are made to do only L3 functionailty not a NT box with 2 E or FE ports. A router can have virtually any kind of interface that can be thought off. A router has a much faster RAM called the Flash (expensive too). Now I would anyday use a NT box for computing only anad a specialist router to do L3 routing between networks. I am sure the amount of traffic that can pass through the L3 devices in todays networks (20/80 rule) will toast the NT box. Chaoo, Cisco_Maniac John Green wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... what is the difference between router and a device that does packet forwarding between its interfaces. example: can a plain NT box with two network cards (with IP forwarding enabled) be called as a router ? or it is just doing packet forwarding. in my understanding even routers like say cisco router does such packet forwarding though it can make a decision on such packet forwarding based on a routing protocol. would that be correct to say ? __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better http://health.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=50511t=50471 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Switch based Routing [7:50105]
Dave, I am sure the command 'no mls rp ip' would work in the Cat 6509. I have seem it in the Todd Lamle guide for switching. Boy, I am currently studying for S/W I got to remember stuff from the study material, unless have started aging and my memory has started to fail. Could you just check on that? I am sure there was something about disabling MLS on Cat5000 and Cat6000 seriessomething on 'Right way' and 'Wrong way'. Just check. You are correct in Cat5000 MLS is disabled by default and in Cat6000 it is enabled by default. Ok, you dont get I/O stat on VLAN interface but if you have Plicy Feature Card, you should be able to get a lot more information isnt it. PFC is used for billing information gathering and that means you have a lot of info which you need to decifer. Isnt it? Over to you Dave... Cisco_Maniac MADMAN wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Cisco_Maniac wrote: Agreed Dave. RSM and MSM are bothe blades and occupy a slot of Cat 5XXX and Cat 6XXX series chassis. Also the MSFC and RSFC are daughter cards as you rightly pointed out. I did a bit or reserch myself and came to the conclusion that the mother cards are basically Internal Routers and nothing else, running Cisco IOS and having virtual interfaces having MAC address from a shared global pool. They act as Router-on-a-stick model. But, the daughter cards mentioned above are like Route-once-Switch-many kind of MLS modules. They route the first time and then create a flow by cashing the entry in memory. This is the feature of NetFlow Feature Card inbuilt into RSFC and MSFC. Along with MSFC now Cisco also has Policy Feature Card that does much more in Policy and QoS. Am I correct guys? But guys, does this mean: - 1. RSFC card function = RSM card function + NSFC card function 2. MSFC card function = MSM card function + NSFC card function Are the above ideas true? I am confused, so help me!! Roughly I would say your correct. The RFSC and MSFC are also higher performing and you cannot run an MSFC without the PFC. I got a call last week from a customer who was wondering why his HSRP wasn't working. HSRP was running between a 5500 w/RSM and a 6509 w/MSFC. When transfering files he would not see any traffic on the MSFC VLAN interface. The reason is that MLS is enabled by default and you can't disable it on the 6500 so after the first packet is routed by the MSFC all subsequent packets are switched in hardware hence no input/output statistics on the VLAN interface. Dave Thanks guys, Cisco_Maniac MADMAN wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... The RSM takes up a slot and is used in CAT5000's and 5500's. The RSFC if I recall correctly is a daughter board on certain supII and supIII G's in the 5500 chassis. The MSM also eats up a slot in the 6000, 6500 chassis whereas the MSFC is a daughter board in the sup cards in the 6500 line. There is a ton of info on CCO concerning these if you want detailed info. Dave Cisco_Maniac wrote: Hi, Can someone explain to me when should RSM, MSM, RSFC, MSFC, etc be used? Basically does anyone know where the comparison (feature wise) on Cisco site including CCO? I want to know from Switching exam point of view. Regards, Amit -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=50356t=50105 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cat5505 Super III Uplink-to-Uplink [7:49530]
But Dave, can we use a 2nd SUP III? I was under the inpression that Cisco-Cat doesnt allow a 2nd SUP III. It disables the blade if inserted. Cisco_Maniac MADMAN wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... That was a common approach back in the heydays of the 5500s!! No spanning issues unless you disable spanning ;) Dave Mohsin Hussain wrote: I have two Cat5505 with Supervisor III with two GIGBIT uplinks on each switch. The Super IIIs do not support GIG EtherChannel. In order to address single point of failure between these switches, chould I add another Super III on each switch and connect all the ports. Will this will create spanning tree issues. Also are there issues when connecting SuperIII uplinks to SuperIII uplinks? Can anyone suggest solution? Thanks -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=50102t=49530 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Switch based Routing [7:50105]
Hi, Can someone explain to me when should RSM, MSM, RSFC, MSFC, etc be used? Basically does anyone know where the comparison (feature wise) on Cisco site including CCO? I want to know from Switching exam point of view. Regards, Amit Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=50105t=50105 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Switch based Routing [7:50105]
Agreed Dave. RSM and MSM are bothe blades and occupy a slot of Cat 5XXX and Cat 6XXX series chassis. Also the MSFC and RSFC are daughter cards as you rightly pointed out. I did a bit or reserch myself and came to the conclusion that the mother cards are basically Internal Routers and nothing else, running Cisco IOS and having virtual interfaces having MAC address from a shared global pool. They act as Router-on-a-stick model. But, the daughter cards mentioned above are like Route-once-Switch-many kind of MLS modules. They route the first time and then create a flow by cashing the entry in memory. This is the feature of NetFlow Feature Card inbuilt into RSFC and MSFC. Along with MSFC now Cisco also has Policy Feature Card that does much more in Policy and QoS. Am I correct guys? But guys, does this mean: - 1. RSFC card function = RSM card function + NSFC card function 2. MSFC card function = MSM card function + NSFC card function Are the above ideas true? I am confused, so help me!! Thanks guys, Cisco_Maniac MADMAN wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... The RSM takes up a slot and is used in CAT5000's and 5500's. The RSFC if I recall correctly is a daughter board on certain supII and supIII G's in the 5500 chassis. The MSM also eats up a slot in the 6000, 6500 chassis whereas the MSFC is a daughter board in the sup cards in the 6500 line. There is a ton of info on CCO concerning these if you want detailed info. Dave Cisco_Maniac wrote: Hi, Can someone explain to me when should RSM, MSM, RSFC, MSFC, etc be used? Basically does anyone know where the comparison (feature wise) on Cisco site including CCO? I want to know from Switching exam point of view. Regards, Amit -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=50243t=50105 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
New CCNP-Switching Exam [7:49987]
Hi Guys, Would be going for my Switching exam (640-604) in a week's time. Could anyone let me know what are the changes taht has happened w.r.t. 640-504? Any information on the no of questions and passing score? Any other funny or disaponting incidents people want to share with me? Anything. Rgds, Cisco_Maniac Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49987t=49987 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New CCNP-Switching Exam [7:49987]
Anyone guy's.. --Cisco_Maniac Cisco_Maniac wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi Guys, Would be going for my Switching exam (640-604) in a week's time. Could anyone let me know what are the changes taht has happened w.r.t. 640-504? Any information on the no of questions and passing score? Any other funny or disaponting incidents people want to share with me? Anything. Rgds, Cisco_Maniac Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=50002t=49987 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VLAN Trunk Protocol [7:49647]
Hi, When I have VLAN configured in my network and I have only one switch in VTP mode Server. What happens when it goes down? Does another switch take over or dows my network crumble? If I have to have more than one switch configured as VTP Server switch, how does the switch elect themselves to be the primary server switch and how does the back up server switch upgrade itself to primary position, is it automatic or is it manually configured. Regards, Cisco_Maniac Not: Forgive me for asking such simple technical doubt (as I can see a lot of CCIE's and people like Priscilla). I have not hands-on on Cisco's. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49647t=49647 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
