VIC-2FXO-EU vs. VIC-2FXO [7:56164]
Does anyone already tried to use a VIC-2FXO anywhere outside USA? I've searched cisco.com but I can't find the real difference between VIC-2FXO-EU and VIC-2FXO. I know the -EU was suppouse to be used in Europe but wouldn't a VIC-2FXO be able to make/receive calls there? I want to save big bucks and make calls to my family in Brazil :) I've got a 2620 @ home (USA) with an NM-2V and VIC-2FXS and VIC-2FXO. And I got a 2620 in a company there. I just have to buy the FXO and the NM. I'm just trying to figure out if I could use my VIC-2FXO over there. ideas? Thanks. Daniel Lafraia Network Engineer, CCNP / CCDP Earthlink Network Engineering Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56164t=56164 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Show running-config all at once [7:54367]
terminal length 0 should help you: mycisco1#terminal length ? Number of lines on screen (0 for no pausing) cya Daniel Lafraia www.lafraia.com A customer asked me if I knew of a way to show the running configuration all at once, not page-at-a-time (-more-). I have no idea, but any hints, clues, or outright answers would be appreciated. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54376t=54367 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: FXO FXS terminology - comments? [7:54331]
I'm wondering about buying a couple of Cisco Phones 7960 and a FXS card for 2600 and play with it. Will I be able to have a good voice lab only with that? Maybe a FXO card and connect it in a regular phone line, is it possible? - Original Message - From: Priscilla Oppenheimer To: Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 3:25 PM Subject: Re: OT: FXO FXS terminology - comments? [7:54331] [...] Yes, you connect a phone to a router's FXS port. That's not because the phone is a station, however. (That's what the NO referred to.) It's becaue the phone is an FXO device. FXS goes to FXO and vice versa. Yes a PBX connects to a router's FXO port. The PBX uses an FXS port in this case. From the PBX point of view, it's connecting a phone. Makes sense right? What do PBXes connect? Phones. From the router's point of view, the router is getting dial tone, etc. from the PBX. The router is an FXO in this case. The router interface is labeled with what it is, as mentioned. OK, I will stop writing messages on this topic. I should just turn my computer off. ;-) [...] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54377t=54331 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Passed CID yesterday [7:54238]
Hey folks, I passed CID (CCDP) yesterday. For those who are studying for this test, don't spend your time with Appletalk, IPX, StrataCom, SNA and Voice. I got no questions about these subjects. I think this test was easier that CCDA (DCN is really tough because of the case studies). I got a lot of Frame Relay, IGRP/EIGRP, IP Address issues and Hierarquical design questions. Total of 75 questions to complete in 90 minutes. Used Cisco Internetwork Design book (Cisco Press) by Matthew H. Birkner and Bernard's Boson CID#1 and that should be enough. -- Daniel Lafraia Senior Software Developer CCNP/CCDP Earthlink MIS Group Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54238t=54238 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP Calculator [7:53564]
For those who use PHP, I wrote a simple function to calculate IP broadcast, wildcard mask, hosts, etc... You can test it at http://www.lafraia.com/ipcalc/ (the function is available there too). The page explanation is in portuguese, but you may be able to understand the structure. cya Daniel Lafraia CCNA,CCNP,CCDA Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=53564t=53564 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE preparation and exams [7:48585]
Hello Michael, If the new beta exam (351-001) will have its number changed to 350-001 how would you know for sure if you're going to take the new/old one? I mean. I called Prometric and they said you're able to register for the 350-001 even after August 1st (Maybe the registration date?). I missed the beta by 7% and I'd like to take the old test before it's retired. :) cya Daniel Michael L. Williams wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Tom Scott wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... * Is there a new exam that will replace the R/S qualifying exam 350-001? I heard it might be renumbered 351-001 but there are no references to 351-001 on cisco.com. Does anyone have information about this? Specifically, if there is, or will be, a new qualifier, how will it differ from the current 350-001? Tom, No offense, but have you been in a cave the past 4 months or so? There is a new version of the R/S written exam and it will taking over the old exam soon. There have been many discussions and posts regarding the new format, it's difficulty, the topics, etc Search the archives and you'll see many conversations regarding the new exam. It was indeed numbered the 351-001 while it was in beta, but once it takes over the old exam, it will also assume the 350-001 number. If you're new to Groupstudy, then don't be offended at my been in a cave statement. just check the archives... If you're NOT new to Groupstudy, then feel free take offense at my comment because you haven't been watching very closely if you're asking about the new R/S exam this late in the game... =) HTH, Mike W. [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.371 / Virus Database: 206 - Release Date: 6/13/02 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48762t=48585 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP update-source question [7:43043]
That's the weird thing. I don't see it in the routing table even with a route to the 4.4.4.0/30 network. RouterB#show ip route Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2 E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter area * - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR P - periodic downloaded static route Gateway of last resort is 2.2.2.1 to network 0.0.0.0 102.0.0.0/25 is subnetted, 1 subnets B 102.102.102.0 [20/0] via 2.2.2.1, 21:29:29 103.0.0.0/25 is subnetted, 1 subnets D EX103.103.103.0 [170/2297856] via 3.3.3.1, 21:29:47, Serial0 2.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks D EX2.2.2.0/30 [170/2681856] via 3.3.3.1, 21:29:47, Serial0 D EX2.2.2.1/32 [170/2681856] via 3.3.3.1, 21:29:47, Serial0 3.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks D 3.0.0.0/8 is a summary, 21:29:48, Null0 C 3.3.3.0/30 is directly connected, Serial0 101.0.0.0/25 is subnetted, 1 subnets B 101.101.101.0 [20/0] via 2.2.2.1, 21:29:29 4.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks C 4.4.4.0/30 is directly connected, Serial1 C 4.4.4.2/32 is directly connected, Serial1 C192.168.254.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0 104.0.0.0/25 is subnetted, 1 subnets C 104.104.104.0 is directly connected, Loopback0 B* 0.0.0.0/0 [20/0] via 2.2.2.1, 21:29:30 RouterB#show ip bgp BGP table version is 5, local router ID is 104.104.104.1 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, best, i - internal Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete Network Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path * 0.0.0.0 2.2.2.10 65000 i * i101.101.101.0/25 5.5.5.2 0100 0 65000 i * 2.2.2.10 65000 i * i102.102.102.0/25 5.5.5.2 0100 0 65000 i * 2.2.2.1 0 0 65000 i * 104.104.104.0/25 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i * i105.105.105.0/25 4.4.4.2 0100 0 i Kane, Christopher A. wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Wouldn't it be because the IP address you see in your BGP table is indeed the next-hop. If you instead look at a specific route sh ip rou x.x.x.x I would think you would see the BGP neig as you have listed (loopback1's ip address) and then the router has to do a recursive-lookup to find out how to get to that loopback address. -chris -Original Message- From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 6:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BGP update-source question [7:43043] Did you restart BGP? -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Get in my head: http://sar.dynu.com Daniel Lafraia wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hello, How come I see the interface address in the show ip bgp if I've specified an update-source for a neighbor? Thanks! Daniel Here is the config: RouterA interface Loopback0 ip address 105.105.105.1 255.255.255.128 interface Loopback1 ip address 41.41.41.1 255.255.255.255 interface Serial0 ip address 4.4.4.2 255.255.255.252 router bgp 55000 no synchronization network 105.105.105.0 mask 255.255.255.128 neighbor 4.4.4.1 remote-as 55000 neighbor 4.4.4.1 update-source Loopback1 RouterB interface Loopback0 ip address 104.104.104.1 255.255.255.128 interface Serial1 ip address 4.4.4.1 255.255.255.252 clockrate 64000 router bgp 55000 network 104.104.104.0 mask 255.255.255.128 neighbor 4.4.4.2 remote-as 55000 -- Please ignore other updates, these are other stuff I have in my lab :) -- RouterA#show ip bgp BGP table version is 42, local router ID is 105.105.105.1 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, best, i - internal Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path * i0.0.0.0 2.2.2.1 100 0 65000 i * i101.101.101.0/25 2.2.2.1 100 0 65000 i * 5.5.5.20 0 65000 i * i102.102.102.0/25 2.2.2.10100 0 65000 i * 5.5.5.2 0 65000 i *i104.104.104.0/25 4.4.4.10100 0 i *
Re: BGP question [7:43163]
AFAIK, they couldn't. In this case you would have to apply for your own independent range of addresses and ISP1 and ISP2 would have to advertise these routes for you. In this case you would use communities, med, as_path prepend and other stuff to influence the incoming traffic. Steven A. Ridder wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Here's a question I can't seem to answer. I came up with a scenario in my head, and now I can't find a solution. Example: I have a dual homed network via BGP. I have ISP 1 and they give me 209.21.220.1/20 for use, and ISP gives me 199.33.23.1/21. Say I use the 209.x.x.x for my web servers, mail server, etc, and advertise that back out to the Internet via ISP 1 (the ISP that assigned me the block) and in DNS. I'm assuming ISP 2 will not advertise that block for me, as it's ISP 1's block. So, now the whole world knows to get to me via ISP 1. Then let's say ISP 1 goes down, how would the world know how to get to me, if they only knew how to get to me Via ISP 1 and it's IP's? -- RFC 1149 Compliant Get in my head: http://sar.dynu.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=43165t=43163 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE Written Beta [7:43164]
Hello, I just took the new CCIE Written Beta test. That's really a very hard test (everything that we've been hearing about this test is true ). You have 180 minutes (I've used 179 minutes and a few seconds! YES, that's full 3 hours without going to the bathroom ) for 150 questions. It really seems that everything in networking is covered in this test. From some basic questions to the most complex questions about IPX, MPLS, VLAN, BGP, OSPF, EIGRP, DLSw+, ATM, LANE, NAT, Queueing (all WFQ, RSVP, Traffic Shaping and Load Balancing), VoIP, Frame Relay, ISDN, Token Ring, EtherChannels, IPSec and everything else you can think. I didn't get any type the command type of question, altough you may find some questions like what's the command that likely would fix this problem. Basically more than 60% of these questions have its own lab scenario. For those who will take this test: Even though that's the new format (351-001), you really should take a look at the blueprint for the (350-001) before taking this test http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/rsblueprint.html I've used Boson tests CCIE practice test #2, Caslow's book, Routing TCP/IP volume I and II, Halabi's book and a lot of reserch on cisco.com :) Well. I hope this helps! :) Now I have to wait 6-8 weeks for the result :) cya Daniel Lafraia Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=43164t=43164 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BGP update-source question [7:43043]
Hello, How come I see the interface address in the show ip bgp if I've specified an update-source for a neighbor? Thanks! Daniel Here is the config: RouterA interface Loopback0 ip address 105.105.105.1 255.255.255.128 interface Loopback1 ip address 41.41.41.1 255.255.255.255 interface Serial0 ip address 4.4.4.2 255.255.255.252 router bgp 55000 no synchronization network 105.105.105.0 mask 255.255.255.128 neighbor 4.4.4.1 remote-as 55000 neighbor 4.4.4.1 update-source Loopback1 RouterB interface Loopback0 ip address 104.104.104.1 255.255.255.128 interface Serial1 ip address 4.4.4.1 255.255.255.252 clockrate 64000 router bgp 55000 network 104.104.104.0 mask 255.255.255.128 neighbor 4.4.4.2 remote-as 55000 -- Please ignore other updates, these are other stuff I have in my lab :) -- RouterA#show ip bgp BGP table version is 42, local router ID is 105.105.105.1 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, best, i - internal Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path * i0.0.0.0 2.2.2.1 100 0 65000 i * i101.101.101.0/25 2.2.2.1 100 0 65000 i * 5.5.5.20 0 65000 i * i102.102.102.0/25 2.2.2.10100 0 65000 i * 5.5.5.2 0 65000 i *i104.104.104.0/25 4.4.4.10100 0 i * 105.105.105.0/25 0.0.0.00 32768 i RouterB#sh ip bgp BGP table version is 5, local router ID is 104.104.104.1 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, best, i - internal Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete Network Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path * 0.0.0.0 2.2.2.10 65000 i * i101.101.101.0/25 5.5.5.2 0100 0 65000 i * 2.2.2.10 65000 i * i102.102.102.0/25 5.5.5.2 0100 0 65000 i * 2.2.2.1 0 0 65000 i * 104.104.104.0/25 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i * i105.105.105.0/25 4.4.4.2 0100 0 i Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=43043t=43043 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ccie written [7:5225]
I could see in your signature that you have CCNA and CCIE written. Don't you have to have CCNP before applying to CCIE tests? cya Daniel Lafraia Stefano Andrello wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Today I passed my CCIE written, score 95%. Thanks to the group and to boson test. Let's go for the lab Stefano Andrello CCIE written, CCNA FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=5289t=5225 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have your home lab? [7:5287]
I think it's good to have a home lab and it shouldn't be so expensive. I'm selling some stuff on ebay, check this out http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1239104057 Two 1005, one 2501, 3com hub, cables and much more! cya Daniel Lafraia Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=5287t=5287 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
