RE: Lost Switch [7:63469]
Kevin, How about adding a secondary address to the router interface, that would allow you to telnet to the switch and change it's address. Dave Swink -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin Wigle Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 10:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Lost Switch [7:63469] Our group got a support call that a port wasn't working on a switch. A colleague started looking into the case and found that he couldn't connect to the switch. (or ping etc) He was able to get to another switch which is directly connected. Using CDP he was able to see that the switch is incorrectly configured with the wrong IP address. The real subnet is 10.235.x.x but CDP nei det says that the switch has 10.255.x.x configured. Is there a way we can get to the switch and fix it over the wire? Kevin Wigle Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63491t=63469 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: full duplex or half duplex, how can you tell [7:57431]
John, It will be half duplex unless it has been configured for full duplex. Setting an ethernet interface to full duplex is done in software and requires a recent IOS. I have forgotten the minimum rev required but I know 12.2.3 will work. Dave Swink -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nobody;groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of John Tafasi Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 4:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: full duplex or half duplex, how can you tell [7:57431] Hi, I have a cisco 2516 router with an ethernet interface. How can I find out if this inteface is full duplex or half duplex? Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57433t=57431 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Book: CCIE Troubleshooting IP Routing Protocols [7:47099]
It has some nice flow charts. They make the logical sequence of troubleshooting steps easier to understand. It helped me nail down a multicast routing problem the first day I had it. Dave Swink -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 6:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Book: CCIE Troubleshooting IP Routing Protocols [7:47099] Troubleshooting IP Routing Protocols (CCIE Professional Development Series) by Shamim, Aziz, Liu, and Martey. Does anyone have any feedback about this book? Is it good??? Thanks for any help!!! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47123t=47099 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: how useful is certificationzone ?
I have only tried the CCIE part of certificationzone. I think the study material is good quality and well written. I would recommend it. To study it all from scratch and to be prepared for the Written test in 3 months would be tough. Dave Swink -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mongol Blizzard Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 3:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: how useful is certificationzone ? hello all how many ccie wriiten aspirants have joined certificationzone.com? what is your opinion(with no marketing spices) about the note below? if i have a plan of taking the written in 3 months and start to study from scratch assuming all i have learnt in ccnp is forgottenthen at what level do i need to join certificationzone.com? all sincere answers appreciated. regards _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX in parallel with another appliance box
Pat, You can use a seperate hub or switch outside the PIX, or if the switch on the inside has a lot of available ports you could make another VLAN on it and have the new VLAN active on three ports; one for the ISP and one for each switch. Dave Swink -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of pat Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2001 1:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PIX in parallel with another appliance box Hello, My PIX is sitting directly on the internet. The cat5 connection from ISP is connected to external (ethernet) inerface of PIX. The inside(ethernet) interface is conneted to switch. From this switch internal network is connected. I have another Firewall appliance with 2 ethernet inerface which needs to be connected in parallel to PIX. Can anybody give some hints as how these connections are to made? I am thinking just to connect ISP connection to an ordinary hub from there take two connections to outside interface for both firewall. Connect inside interface of both firewall to same switch. Is this right way of doing it? My only concern is can both outside interface of firewall be connected on on same hub? In fact External IPs for both default gateway fall in same subnet. OR is there a requirement of any kind of a router or switch? Both firewalls need to be in parallel. One can't sit behind other OR can't be in DMZ of other. Thanks a lot for any advices... __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices. http://auctions.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DMZ
John, http://www.pcwebopedia.com/ will give you a brief description. It is not really too complex. A DMZ is an area of intermediate security between the Internet and the internal network. The idea is to allow access to some resources (Web servers, mail servers, etc) for users coming from the Internet without allowing them full access into your internal network. This link discusses setting up a PIX firewall with a DMZ: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/110/9.html Dave Swink -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Chang Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2001 3:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DMZ Does anyone know a good book or article on the web that explains DMZ in great detail? Thank you. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: switches
Charles, You are right, you would install the Catalyst 1900 by connecting it to the HP switch with a crossover cable. I don't know much about HP switches either but the 1900 runs STP by default. Here's a configuration link for the 1900. Watch word wrap!http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/28201900/1928v9x/19 icg9x/19icoutb.htm#xtocid625518 Dave Swink -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Charles Paver Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2001 9:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: switches Hi. I have two questions: 1. Does anyone know where on the web we can have some free access to switches so that we may telnet into them? FirewallKing.com has only router access as far as I could tell. 2. At work, We are running an IBM 2210 router, with two hubs (ethernet 10bt) and one HP switch. I wnat to install a cisco catalyst 1900 series switch as well. Need I run the crossover cable from switch to switch/hub? Is there any ohte rway I can implement it? Also, can I run stp on just the 1900 series? I dont know that much about HP switches, and am focusing on cisco at this time. THanks __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices. http://auctions.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Still doesn't work: tough VPN question
This site has the best info on LMHOSTS that I have found. It helped me with router to client VPNs. http://home.att.net/~j.buchan/index.htm Dave Swink -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Patrick Dooley Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 2:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Still doesn't work: tough VPN question Are you sure the PDC has a route back to the VPN client? "Justin Menga" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, Are you using NAT anywhere in the setup - NAT breaks some NetBIOS stuff, particularly domain logons and NT trusts. NAT meaning are you referencing the DC by a false IP address, or by it's valid address. If you are not using NAT, then forget about the IPSec, just think of it as a router to router link. You will be attempting to talk to the DC using internal addressing, so really all that is required on the remote end is that the WINS server entries are configured correctly OR a manual LMHOSTS entry. -Original Message- From: Jim Bond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 6:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Still doesn't work: tough VPN question Hello, Thank you guys for the help. Unfortunately, I tried to put LMHOST file, still doesn't work. We use WINS and I can ping domain controller using name so I don't think it's naming issue. I used a sniffer captured some data, client is sending logon request to domain controller but didn't get any response. Looks like PIX blocks it. How do I open it(port 137, 138, 139)? Thanks in advance. Jim --- Scott Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your problem is likely the propgation of broadcasts... Or lack thereof. One thing you can do (I'm assuming you have a router before (LAN-side) the PIX) is set up an ip-helper address to forward UDP-level broadcasts (like 138/139 Netbios) to the NT server. The other thing you can do is bypass that broadcast thought process by using LMHosts files on the workstations at the branch office. That will pre-load (if you use the #PRE designation) the NetBIOS cache and give you IP addresses to go to. So if you have IP reachability, things will work just fine then. In LMHOSTS. : (ip address) (Netbios name) #PRE #DOM:(domain name if domain controller) Also, to refresh without rebooting the PCs, "nbtstat -R" Hope this helps! Scott -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Bond Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 1:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: tough VPN question Hello, I'm trying to set up a IPSec between a PIX (branch office) and router (central office). All PCs at branch office share 1 ip address. IPSec seems to be working fine because clients can ping/telnet/email/map drives from/to central office. The problem is they can't logon NT domain. They can ping domain controller though. Any idea why they can't log on NT domain? (The machines were already added to domain) Thanks in advance. Jim __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. http://shopping.yahoo.com/ ___ To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing: unsubscribe ccielab _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. http://shopping.yahoo.com/ ___ To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing: unsubscribe ccielab _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: On topic: Am I the only one that would like Pradeep Kumar to eithershut up or go away?
Pradeep, Your immature, fantastically egotistical, and vicious comments are a frequent cause of discord on this list. You have been reprimanded several times. Take it to heart and change your behavior. Or go away. I remember several months ago when you were desperately searching for a job. Have you ever stopped to think about how many potential employers are getting an incredibly bad impression of you? This field is surprisingly small at the senior level. If you have a hard time with courtesy, at least try some enlightened self-interest. Dave Swink -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Day Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2001 6:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: On topic: Am I the only one that would like Pradeep Kumar to eithershut up or go away? Dear Pradeep Kumar, If you don't start to act like a responsible member of this message group, I am going to ask the moderator of the group to remove you. You don't add anything positive to the discussion, and in fact, only cause trouble. Please go away. You appear to be a thoroughly disagreeable chap. You also seem to ask some stupid questions of your own from time to time, like the one about starting a thread on snmp. If you want a thread on something, then START ONE. Otherwise, If you don't have anything positive to contribute, then keep your mouth shut. You obviously don't understand "normal" discussion group conduct. You also obviously don't understand acceptable versus unacceptable comments. I doubt that you are anything close to being a "protocol guru". If you were, you wouldn't act like such a JERK. FYI, regarding your latest stupid comments, I am the senior manager of a global network. For your information, I have fully funded a large CCIE study lab at my office, and also buy my Cisco people books, pay for their exams (passing grades only) and send them to schools. Any my VP didn't kick me in the butt for doing it. jd102750 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Port Flapping
John, This could be a very serious problem. It looks like you have a bridging loop. Check both ends of the trunk to make sure everything is set the same: duplex, speed, native vlan, FastetherChannel settings, trunk encapsulation, VLANs allowed on the trunk, etc. This problem can grow to crash your whole network. Very important: do not reboot any of your switches until you have resolved the conflict. A lot of Spanning Tree traffic is definitely to be avoided until the problem is fixed. Try this URL: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/16.html Dave Swink -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of john hudson Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 4:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Port Flapping Guy`s i have a problem .. some of my trunk port`s keep reporting this message. port 2/1 joined bridge port 2/1 port 2/1 left bridge port 2/1 any idea`s (i think it`s simple,but just don`t know) john _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DHCP Spanning Tree
No, but I have seen issues where Spanning Tree hampered DHCP, especially on Catalyst 2900XL switches. PortFast is Cisco's fix for the problem but be sure to read the precautions first. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/12.html I apologize if this answer is taking the wrong track, I just couldn't figure how DHCP would hinder Spanning Tree. Dave Swink -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of A. Ward Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 10:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DHCP Spanning Tree Has anyone had issues where DHCP limited the use of the Spanning tree = protocol? Can you send me a lead to a white paper or give me any information on = this issue? Thanks. A. Ward _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: cannot create vlan in a VTP server
Wiz, To create a new VLAN try: set vlan 2 name (the name of the VLAN). All Cisco switches are VTP servers by default. VLANs are created with the same command if the switch is in transparent mode. Dave Swink -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lists Wizard Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 10:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Cisco group study'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cannot create vlan in a VTP server I have a problem creating a vlan can some one help me. Here is the output of the command that I executed. 6501 (enable) set vlan 2 Cannot add/modify VLANs on a VTP server without a domain name. 6501 (enable) _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Pix Telnet Access
Paul, A PIX will not allow a telnet session to the outside interface unless it is running IPSEC. I will usually open a hole for telnet from the management station address (with the conduit command or an access list) to a Cisco device on the inside subnet. Allow that device to telnet into the PIX by applying the telnet command on the PIX. It's a little convoluted but more secure. Dave Swink -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of p s Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 1:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco Pix Telnet Access To Cisco Study Group I have a Cisco 515 Pix Firewall that I cannot Telnet to from my 10.10.9.0 network. I just created VLAN 2 on my Cisco 6503 Switch, VLAN 2 contains the entire 10.10.9.0 network. VLAN1 contains the 10.10.10.0 network. My 6503 switch connects through an MSFC interface to a T1 which connects to our Data Center where the Pix Firewall is located. Does anyone have any ideas on what would cause this Telnet issue? Thanks for your help Paul Stapleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Get Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: about cisco3524
Gary, This link should help. Read it over post any questions. Dave Swink watch word wrap: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c2900xl/29_35xu/scg/kivl an.htm#xtocid244238 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of gary Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 2:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: about cisco3524 hi guys: anyone can tell me how to config a vlan in catalyst 3524 ,including trunk vtp domain , i know the catalyst3524 use IOS, but it seem the command is not similar with 1900 or 2800, i once search the www.cisco.com ,but don't get useful information. best regard **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Networking jobs, Austin, Texas
My company (a co-location facility) is in need of several second and third level Cisco engineers. The positions offer a lot of hands-on experience with a wide variety of Cisco equipment and the company has recently purchased us a very nice lab (has everything but ATM). Please email me if you would like more information or want to get in touch with the company's recruiter (that's not me, I just play with the Cisco stuff). Sorry, but they are not looking for entry level folks at the moment. Nothing against entry level, but we already have a couple of good folks at those positions. Dave Swink CCNP, CCDA **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: booksamillion
Tony, I have purchased 10 or 12 Cisco books from them and had good experiences. Dave Swink -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of tv Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 9:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: booksamillion Could anyone share their experiences with me with booksamillion.com? I am looking to update my library with some newer Cisco books as well as some protocol books. They just seem to good to be true :) Thanks! Tony **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apology
I apologize to the group for posting to the wrong list. I actually went to http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/list/jobs.html and clicked where it said "Send an e-mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]" It opened up a blank email and I just typed away without noticing that address it had was the study list rather than the jobs list. Sorry. Dave Swink **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Pix Failover Question
Brad, If the DMZ interface is not being used at the moment you need to connect any unused interfaces to the same unused interfaces on the standby PIX with a crossover cable. Dave Swink -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of BE Sent: Friday, September 15, 2000 8:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Pix Failover Question Hey gang! Any Pix gurus out there? I've been playing with a couple of Pixs (510s) trying to get the failover to work. I thought it would be a piece of cake, but it just isn't showing me any love. Ive got (2) Pix 510s that each have 3 NICs in them (internal, untrusted, DMZ) each running 4.4. Everything seems all fine and dandy until about 10 minutes later when the standby PIX starts stealing the DMZ connections. Any thoughts? -Brad bellis@opts ys.net used cisco hardware: www.opt sys.net cisco hardware newsgroup: news://news.opts ys.net/cisco.hardware **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MSFC
Jeff, Try this link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/14.html , it has the recovery procedures if you have erased the msfc's bootloader flash. It is not too bad if you have a 4500/4700 router to reinstall the image. Otherwise you can try the xmodem procedure (it did not work for me). I had to have TAC RMA a replacement flash. It's embarrassing but there is just not a good recovery procedure if you don't have a 4500/4700 handy. Dave Swink -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff Duchin Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 6:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MSFC Hello all. Quick question... I cleared my running-config and then foolishly gave my start-up config the boot as well. I can still access the msfc, but it shows: Router(boot)# I tried to change the hostname and it's still showing this. Also, I tried to go ahead and configure from global ip routing and no dice! I can't configure any routing period. Any clue as to how to fix this? Cheers, Jeff **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NO. of CCIE
Earl Aboytes announced achieving his CCIE status (congrats Earl!) in groupstudy just yesterday and gave his new CCIE number as #6097. Since Cisco started numbering CCIEs at 1025 that would make the worldwide total just about 5,072. Still a pretty elite group. Dave Swink -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of William E Gragido Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 2:44 PM To: Brian; Gavin Payne Cc: 'wind'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: NO. of CCIE Thats right, there are only like 7800 or something. I guy I work with just passed his lab last week and he is 78xx if I remember correctly. 3, c'mon, the site would state that. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2000 7:24 AM To: Gavin Payne Cc: 'wind'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: NO. of CCIE On Sun, 27 Aug 2000, Gavin Payne wrote: Thats the number of CCIE's with specialisations. Apparently there are over 30,000 normal CCIEs umm, no. When have you ever seen a CCIE with a number like "CCIE #28382" -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of wind Sent: 27 August 2000 08:46 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NO. of CCIE Hi; I checked with Cisco web site, they indicated that the no. of CCIE is just 4996. As of July 31, 2000. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/ccie_pr esent.html Thanks Vincent Chong CCxx ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Brian Feeny, CCNA, CCDA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DELL
Clark, Thanks for bringing some interesting opportunities to the list. Come again. Michael, Do you know something negative about these jobs or this recruiter that you are not telling us? Have you already corresponded with Clark to verify that these jobs do not involve Cisco or internetworking? If you are just being rude because Clark is not offering anything that works for you today, then I would suggest your Delete button will do the job with less fuss. Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cisco God Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 6:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: DELL The job titles have little importance, but I don't see anywhere in your job description where the word "Cisco" shows up. So, unless the positions you offer have anything to do with the subject of this mailing list... please go spam elsewhere. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: DELL Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 08:23:15 -0500 We are aware NT and Novell are not networks-that they are operating systems to facilitate utilization of particular systems that are networked together. Most everyone understands job titles are hacked, cobbled and abbreviated...Network Systems Admin, Systems Admin, with the billions of acronyms floating about I'm sure we will disagree on the best usage of all-but at the end of the day...where does this issue stand in relative importance? Clark -Original Message- From: Dollard Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 2:59 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: DELL totally unrelated, im sorry but in my book novell and NT are not NETWORKS, nor are they NEtworking positions. its system. i do like the idea that job offers can be sent out to the list, thats pretty cool. -Message d'origine- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Date: mardi 23 mai 2000 19:33 À:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet:DELL Positions for which I am currently sourcing: 2 More H/A Mission Critical admins w experience in a true 24/7 Mission Critical environment (examples would be airlines networks, banks, or heavy traffic e-commerce ebay, aol or equivalent) NT with former Unix highly desireable Network Admins .COM= experience in supporting start-up ventures. I don't have a lot of details regarding this one-I will tomorrow-but I'm extrapolating that we are looking for admins that have experience scaling networks with growth and keping them highly avail. Network Operating Specialists= well heeled admins that understand raid,connectivity and know NT or Novell well. The above positions are all Austin based. And if you have pals that are : OEM or VAR Sales with analogous experience to what Dell does, are at an AE or MAM level and have excellent rapport with: FED, K-12, HIGHER ED or STATE LOCAL have them contact me. The sales positions are home based-offices in many different cities in the US. Best, Clark Westerman DELL Staffing, Public, Americas and International [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ To unsubscribe from the Jobs list, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing: unsubscribe jobs ___ To unsubscribe from the Jobs list, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing: unsubscribe jobs Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ To unsubscribe from the Jobs list, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing: unsubscribe jobs ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
