RE: HSRP [7:10428]

2001-06-29 Thread Eric Hoffman

Here is a link that may answer some questions about HSRP groups, and what it
could be used for.

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/619/7.html



Best Regards,

Eric Hoffman
Senior Systems Engineer
MCP, CCNA, CCNP
Computer Professionals International

-Original Message-
From: Marc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 4:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HSRP [7:10428]


HSRP is for router redundancy, not WAN circuit redundancy. If you wanted to
have internet or WAN circuit redundacy, you would of course use two lines,
have equal-cost routes (two default routes...etc) and that's all that's
involved. HSRP not needed for WAN load-balancing/redundancy...

Marc


"Sam Sneed"  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I was doing a little research on HSRP and had a question for anyone who
has
> configured it. I read the whole RFC 2281 and could not find my answer
there.
> If you have two routers running HSRP with T1 lines to the internet, 1 is
the
> standby and one is the active. Does all traffic only go through the active
> at all times unless it dies? If so isn't it a waste not ever utilizing the
> T1 line thats on standby (of course until the active fails)?
>
> If bandwidth exceeded 1.5MB would the second router kick in to share the
> load or would it totally take over?
>
> With these 2 routers acting as a single virtual router would throughput
> ever be able to exceed 1.54 MB assuming each has its own T1 connection?
>
> thanks




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=10434&t=10428
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: serving websites through frame-relay [7:11941]

2001-07-11 Thread Eric Hoffman

You could always use  debugging for frame relay on the router, to see dlci's
you are being assigned from the frame switch.

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12supdoc/deb
ug_r/ddlsw.htm#xtocid2763771

debug frame relay packet

Make sure you only turn on debugging for frame relay packets, becuase you
can crash the router if you try to debug too much.  

To see what the router is running at (proccessor wise), the command is show
proc cpu.

Most of the time, the Dlci's that the ISP provide me are incorrect.  I use
this method of debugging from the frame switch , to save a lot of time and
headaches.

Best of luck!
Eric


-Original Message-
From: paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 10:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: serving websites through frame-relay [7:11941]


Greetings Wizards,

 I need to setup a webserver using a frame-relay "link" and was given 6 host
addresses to use for whatever services I needed. However, I wasn4t given any
dlci "details" ( I am already using a dlci # on one subinterface to access
the
internet from inside), do I need to get this from my SP or I am going about
this the wrong way (no dlci needed to config the subint for webserver?).
Can anyone "enlighten" me here, please.(or point me to sample config)




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11943&t=11941
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: serving websites through frame-relay [7:11941]

2001-07-11 Thread Eric Hoffman

I apologize for not understanding what was listed below.

You do not need to configure any additional dlci's on the router, if you are
adding a webserver to that existing link.

The only time you would need to configure new dlci's on an existing link, is
if you are adding a new pvc to that existing link.

-Original Message-
From: paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 10:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: serving websites through frame-relay [7:11941]


Greetings Wizards,

 I need to setup a webserver using a frame-relay "link" and was given 6 host
addresses to use for whatever services I needed. However, I wasn4t given any
dlci "details" ( I am already using a dlci # on one subinterface to access
the
internet from inside), do I need to get this from my SP or I am going about
this the wrong way (no dlci needed to config the subint for webserver?).
Can anyone "enlighten" me here, please.(or point me to sample config)




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11945&t=11941
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: WAN link funnies - UP UP but no comms- on same subnet!!! [7:12786]

2001-07-18 Thread Eric Hoffman

What version of ios are you running?

If you are running some flavor of 11, check to make sure you have the ip
classless on both routers.  



-Original Message-
From: Andrew Larkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 7:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: WAN link funnies - UP UP but no comms- on same subnet!!!
[7:12780]


the very weird thing here is at RTS DTS etc are all up both devices are
on a /30 subnet no problems here. I do not need any routing because these
are directly connected networks. NO crc errors on link flap/ interface
resets!!

Very confused

-Original Message-
From: Phil Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 July 2001 12:45
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: WAN link funnies - UP UP but no comms- on same subnet!!!
[7:12778]


Andrew,
 From what you say your remote end is working fine
both in Tx and Rx and your Tx is working fine since
remote end sees your cdp. Your Rx appears to be the
problem. Have you tried swapping out your local Serial
cable ? What about 'sh int serial xxx' to check your
pins ? DCD RTS etc.

regards,

Phil.
 --- Andrew Larkins 
wrote: > HI all, 
> 
> Strange problem here.
> 
> The serial interface are UP UP on both sides, but we
> are not able to ping
> each other  - even though directly connected. A
> "debug ip ICMP" on the
> remote site shows the ping coming through and
> replying, but the reply never
> gets back.
> Also the remote site saw my router using CDP, but I
> do not see him.
> 
> Any ideas??
> 
> I believe this is Telco related, but the line shows
> clean from the interface
> stats
> 
> Andrew
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12786&t=12786
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: ios features [7:12945]

2001-07-19 Thread Eric Hoffman

www.cisco.com/go/fn

feature navigator rules!

you need cco login to gain access.

-Original Message-
From: Donald B Johnson jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 10:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ios features [7:12945]


Does anyone remember the link that allows you to search for a IOS version
based on a feature, say DHCP.


Don




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12947&t=12945
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Multilink Virtual-Templates [7:15091]

2001-08-07 Thread Eric Hoffman

You could set up profiles through your radius/acs server to assign ip
addresses to the users, based on their authentication information.

The profiles would then assign users the ip addresses, based on what is
listed in the profiles on the radius/acs server.

HTH,
Eric

-Original Message-
From: Hamid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 8:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Multilink Virtual-Templates [7:15091]


Hi group

 I have configured my access server to allow multilinks. I have created a
virtual template for the multilink users as follows:

!
interface Virtual-Template1
 description Template for Multilink users
 ip unnumbered Loopback1
 no ip directed-broadcast
 ip tcp header-compression passive
 peer default ip address pool ip-pool1
 ppp authentication pap ms-chap dial-in
 ppp multilink
!
AS-Alpha#sh ip local pool
 Pool Begin End
 ip-pool1   61.11.243.100  61.11.243.150
 ip-pool2   213.217.32.100213.217.32.150

The problem is that I have 2 type of users, which I have to assign different
classes of IP addresss. (as the above IP pools). The async lines are
different., the first group dials into the Group-Async 1 interfaces and the
second group dials into the Group-Async2 interfaces.

Can anyone tell me how I can assign these multilink users with different IP
address classes?

Thanx

Hamid




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15104&t=15091
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: CODE RED protection ! ! ! [7:15989]

2001-08-14 Thread Eric Hoffman

NBAR on the routers can help stop code red.

watch the wrap...

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/63/nbar_acl_codered.shtml

HTH
Eric



-Original Message-
From: Hamid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 6:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CODE RED protection ! ! ! [7:15989]


Hi group

I have some costumers whom I belive are infected with CODE RED. Any ideas
how I can deny any traffic related to CODE RED on my router?

Thanks

Hamid




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16004&t=15989
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: subinterfaces with v.35 [7:16202]

2001-08-15 Thread Eric Hoffman

You would need to configure one of the routers to act as a frame relay
switch.

This is a good article on how to convert a router into a frame relay switch,
and a setup...
Watch the wrap:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/125/fr_switching.html

HTH,
Eric


-Original Message-
From: george gittins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 1:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: subinterfaces with v.35 [7:16202]


can you make subinterfaces with v.35 back to back , i tried and no success
shows the  line down , works with point to point dough, any suggestions?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16203&t=16202
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cisco 3640 WIN 2000 IAS [7:16408]

2001-08-17 Thread Eric Hoffman

Hi,

Access-reject means that Raidus/IAS doesn't like either the person/username
or the client that is trying to authenticate... whether it is a bad username
or the configuration for the radius client is not setup on the server
correctly.  (I have found that IAS is really picky about the ip address.)

ie) 10.09.9.3 configured as the client on the server, will give you an error
(access-reject) if the ip address of the client is 10.9.9.3.

Check your event logs on the IAS server.  This will give you a good idea of
what is not working/where to look for misconfiguration.

HTH,
Eric



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 3:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cisco 3640 WIN 2000 IAS [7:16408]


I am trying to get a users dialing into a 3640 to authenticate to a Win 2000
IAS Radius Server.
 
IAS log Shows the Access-Request on the first line then Access-Reject on the
Second line
Is this Access-Reject referring to the user or the router?
The Cisco Running the Cisco debug tell me it fails local and logon fails for
the Radius "IAS"
 
I have checked the ports and password on the IAS as well as the Cisco.
WIN 2000
Clinent Client-Vender = CISCO
Remote Access Polices In the advance settings I have added the vender
specific parameters for Cisco.
Authentication I started with Chap, then went to unencrypted PAP SPAP
 
CISCO
IOS (tm) 3600 Software (C3640-I-M), Version 12.1(8), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
aaa new-model

aaa authentication login default local

aaa authentication login no_radius enable

aaa authentication ppp default if-needed group radius

aaa authorization network default group radius

aaa accounting exec start_stop start-stop group radius

aaa accounting network start_stop start-stop group radius
 
radius-server host 10.108.1.6 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646

radius-server retransmit 3

radius-server key AnDialRtr




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16417&t=16408
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: vlan [7:30189]

2001-12-27 Thread Eric Hoffman

A Native VLAN is used for sending and receiving untagged traffic on the
trunk port.

A Native VLAN Mismatch means that the trunk ports on each side are not
configured to use the same native vlan.

-Original Message-
From: James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: vlan [7:30189]


Can any on tell me what a "Native VLan Mismatch" is




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30197&t=30189
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: FECN/BECN below a CIR [7:18444]

2001-09-05 Thread Eric Hoffman

If you feel that you maybe going over your CIR, I would suggest configuring
traffic shaping on the router interface.  

The way I understand it, is that it will throttle the amount of traffic sent
to the frame provider.  If you see FECN and BECN's after configuring traffic
shaping, you may have a case to contact the frame provider

Watch the wrap.

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/qos_c
/qcpart4/qcfrts.htm

HTH,
Eric





-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 10:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FECN/BECN below a CIR [7:18444]


Don't forget as well that the time over which the CIR usage is calculated
(I've forgotten the formal term and don't feel like searching for it right
now) is generally of the order of a second (at least in this part of the
world), while the load reported by the router is generally averaged over
five minutes.  If you have bursty traffic (routing updates, for example),
you may be going above CIR for some periods, even though your five-minute
average may be well under CIR.

More relevant for DE rather than FECN/BECN, but something to keep in mind.

JMcL
- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 05/09/2001 09:48 am -
 

"Karen
E
Young"   To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: FECN/BECN below a CIR
[7:18444]
Sent
by:
   
nobody@groups
   
tudy.com
 

 

   
05/09/2001
05:42
am
   
Please
respond
to
"Karen
E
   
Young"
 

 





If you're getting FECN/BECN traffic then its experiencing congestion.
Congestion on the FR network prior to CIR being met is indeed a good sign
of
oversubscription. If its only occasional then it may simply have been a
spike on the switch. However, if you're getting it fairly regularly, then
you need to talk to your provider. There's NO reason to set FECN/BECN when
there isn't congestion.

Ask them how they determine subscription load. Some providers (such as
Sprint last I heard) use the CIR to determine load on a switch, not the
actual traffic. If they have alot of customers with 0 CIR then the switch
can easily get oversubscribed to the point that the provider can no longer
meet the CIR of their customers.

HTH,
   Karen

*** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***

On 9/4/2001 at 2:19 PM Paul Borghese wrote:

>Does anyone know if a Frame Relay provider will send FECN/BECN messages
even
>if the CIR is not oversubscribed?
>
>Is looking at the FECN/BECN traffic a good determination of CIR
>oversubscription?
>
>Paul




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=18630&t=18444
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Telnet on PIX outside interface [7:20271]

2001-09-18 Thread Eric Hoffman

With version 5.1, you can setup a vpdn/pptp connection to telnet to the
outside interface of the pix.

Watch the wrap.

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/110/pptppix.html



-Original Message-
From: Magdy H. Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 10:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Telnet on PIX outside interface [7:20271]


Hi,

If your inside servers run W2k then you can setup the remote access service
on the W2k server and add static command on your PIX with conduit command to
permit remote access from outside to your W2k server. then permit telnetting
for this server to the inside interface...

if you want exactly the command mail me again and I'll be pleased to help..
Bytheway there is no way to telnet on the outside interface...

Magdy H. Ibrahim



""NRB""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Guys/Gurus,
>
> Can  anyone please help me in setting up Telnet  access on outside
interface
> of PIX.
> I heard that we need to uses IPSec and Cisco VPN  client.  I do not have
VPN
> client,
> can it  still be done. Please help.
>
> Thanks,
> NRB




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=20281&t=20271
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: ip dhcp-server under e0?? [7:22250]

2001-10-05 Thread Eric Hoffman

I was able to get it to work on 12.2(1)T on a 1605.

Try feature Navigator to find DCHP client.

www.cisco.com/go/fn

Watch the wrap

HTH,
Eric

-Original Message-
From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 3:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ip dhcp-server under e0?? [7:22250]


Hello,
A couple of weeks back someone had successfully configured his 2514 router 
to get a dhcp ip addr. from his cable service provider, configured nat on 
the router for his laptop to go out on the internet. I tried to do the same 
on my 2514 but I cannot type the command under e0 for my router to get the 
dhcp ip addr. from the service provider. I initially thought that it was the

ios ver. (was using 11.3.(3)) I upgraded to 12.0.(9) but it still will not 
let me type the command. Will this command only work on higher routers like 
the 2600 and the 3600 series. Please advise.
Thank you.
Kind regards.

Output from the router:

RTA(config-if)#ip dhcp ?
% Unrecognized command


RTA#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
RTA(config)#int e0
RTA(config-if)#ip ?
Interface IP configuration subcommands:
  access-groupSpecify access control for packets
  accounting  Enable IP accounting on this interface
  address Set the IP address of an interface
  authentication  authentication subcommands
  bandwidth-percent   Set EIGRP bandwidth limit
  broadcast-address   Set the broadcast address of an interface
  cgmpEnable/disable CGMP
  directed-broadcast  Enable forwarding of directed broadcasts
  dvmrp   DVMRP interface commands
  hello-interval  Configures IP-EIGRP hello interval




_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=22254&t=22250
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]