RE: Deepest sympathy from Europe [7:19463]
I would like to say that I heartily agree with all of those sentiments. All of us in London have had to experience terrorism over the years, but never on such a scale, has such a despicable act of cowardice taken place. Rest assured, that all of the United Kingdom will stand alongside you, to make sure that these acts of barbarism never happen again. Our thoughts and prayers are with you. regards Iain Fomes Mellon Site Services - London 44 20 7397 9347 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cellphone 44 7887 750425 -Original Message- From: Heap, Neil [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 September 2001 13:41 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Deepest sympathy from Europe [7:19463] I'd just like to add some words of consolation again from Europe, I have never watched anything quite so despicable as yesterdays events unfolding. Words are simply not enough to express sympathy condolence to the families involved in the tragedy. I just hope that the civilised world can will eradicate terrorism to such an extent that events of yesterday can never be repeated. My thoughts go to out to the people anyone in the group affected. Met vriendelijke groet / Kind regards Neil _ Neil Heap Infrastructure - Datacommunications NIKE European Operations Netherlands BV Colosseum 1, 1213NL, Hilversum, The Netherlands [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19567t=19463 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797]
The most specific route- mask wise. Easy peasy lemon squeezy. Ask me another Bamber. -Original Message- From: Teresa Presutto [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 August 2001 16:50 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797] I bet 1$ on the static /26 Teresa - Original Message - From: Peter Slow To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 5:16 PM Subject: RE: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797] you're wrong. the /28 will be chosen. -humboldt -Original Message- From: Ednilson Rosa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 10:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797] In this case, if you want to communicate with the host 10.1.1.1, for instance, the route chosen will be the static... Regards, Ednilson Rosa - Original Message - From: Wright, Jeremy To: Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:17 AM Subject: RE: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797] So for example, if you have the following 10.1.1.0/28 OSPF 10.1.0.0/24 EIGRP 10.1.1.0/26 Static Which route will be chosen? Thanks for the help. -Original Message- From: McCallum, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 8:32 AM To: 'Wright, Jeremy'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797] In a nut shell yes and no. i.e. Admin distance is the winner by means that the lower the admin distance the better, so a route learned from EIGRP will get into the routing table despite having a longer match route which was learned from say OSPF. BUT if you have two routes learned from the same admin distance then the longest match ALWAYS wins. Basically once the route is in the routing table then the longest match is the outmost winner. -Original Message- From: Wright, Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 August 2001 14:19 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797] Does the longest match rule always override administrative distance?? [EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16829t=16797 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Age Challenge for Oldest CCNP/DP on Earth!! [7:14167]
Give up Ray. the guys a lawyer even if he was 12 and 1/2 he would win. -Original Message- From: Greg Macaulay [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 July 2001 15:33 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Age Challenge for Oldest CCNP/DP on Earth!! [7:14167] I need proof -- date of birth, place of birth, whether you are left-or right-handed or ambidextrous, etc. Without that -- I still claim the title. In fact, I am taking on the Republicans spin in Florida on this. My age has been broadcast over this list for months and no one successfully came forth and refuted my claim to the title. Thus, there has been an age count, and an age recount and even a recount on the age recount -- and there has not been anyone who can prove BRD (lawyers shorthand for Beyond a Reasonable Doubt!) that I am not the duly self-appointed and self-anointed oldest (albeit I concede not the wisest) CCNP/CCDP on this earth!! If necessary, I will call upon Ms. Katherine Harris (from Florida) to mediate this issue!!! See, we old folks have nothing on our plates so we can engage in this nonsensical, time-wasting behavior (at least while I'm having my first cuppa' tea this a.m. Then its on to work!!! Greg Macaulay Oldest CCNP/CCDP on Earth (pending recount!) Lifetime Member of AARP Retired Attorney/Law Professor -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2001 8:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: For those studying VoIP/CVoice! [7:14061] Greg, Good post on a reference URL for VoIP. I will be taking Cisco IP Voice class next week and will refer to some of these links. TNX Note: However, you'll have to revise your signature as I think for the moment I am most likely the Oldest and Bald CCIE wannabe ;-) at age 59 3/4 Ray Oldest CCNP/CCDP on Earth FYI I discovered this page on CCO by accident. Hope it helps those who are preparing for CVoice http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/788/voip/voip.shtml Greg Macaulay Oldest CCNP/CCDP on Earth Lifetime Member of AARP Retired Attorney/Law Professor * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14204t=14167 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Still having BRI stress! [7:11653]
Just do debug isdn events it gives you all that in one go. When you do Show ISDN status check that you have a TEI number and the Multiple frame IS established. If not your ISDN line is knackered. regards Iain Fomes [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Charlie Hartwell [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 July 2001 09:39 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Still having BRI stress! [7:11653] The config looks fine but we will need a bit more info to help. The error message isn't much use on it's own, so if you do show isdn status, then run debug isdn q931, debug isdn q921 and debug dialer, then try to make a call it should give you more information. If you have any trouble deciphering the output then paste it all in an email to the group and we'll try to help out some more. Cheers Charlie --- Uche Ishionwu wrote: Hello,... I changed my configuration somewhat, and removed a module. But my cisco 2620 still wont dial out.!!.can someone look at the configuration and the error out put and let me know what may still be the cause.(Layer 1. and layer 2. -isdn events- are ok, but theres still no connection) -Uche. config--- oksen Password: oks#sh conf Using 1496 out of 29688 bytes ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname oks ! no logging console no logging monitor enable secret 5 $1$IU9Q$qYwqs3CXuKmsl1y1GjcM30 enable password oks ! username msn password 0 msn ! ! ! ! memory-size iomem 15 ip subnet-zero no ip domain-lookup ! isdn switch-type basic-net3 ! ! ! interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 192.168.0.2 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast duplex auto speed auto ! interface BRI0/0 description OKS testing interface! no ip address no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp dialer pool-member 1 dialer pool-member 2 isdn switch-type basic-net3 ! interface Dialer1 description connected to ELSATEST ip address 192.168.8.2 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp dialer pool 1 dialer wait-for-carrier-time 90 dialer string 00192658 dialer hold-queue 10 dialer-group 1 ppp authentication chap ! interface Dialer2 ip address 192.168.8.3 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp dialer pool 2 dialer wait-for-carrier-time 90 dialer string 00192658 dialer hold-queue 10 dialer-group 2 no cdp enable ppp authentication chap ! ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer1 no ip http server ! access-list 99 permit any dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit dialer-list 1 protocol ipx permit dialer-list 2 protocol ip list 99 ! line con 0 transport input none line aux 0 line vty 0 4 password uche1 login ! no scheduler allocate end oks# 00:13:236223201280: ISDN ERROR: Module-CCBRI Function-_Go Error-Event receive d for an unrecognized call. Data- B6, 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11666t=11653 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CID beta [7:206]
Did someone say they had their results ? * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=206t=206 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CID beta
Anyone got their results yet? * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Beta results for CID
Anyone received anything yet ? regards Iain Fomes * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bridging IPX
Can anyone tell me whether or not ,if you are bridging IPX, whether this can take place with straight IP IOS or if it is not capable of handling this. I wish to turn off bridging which is enabled by default on all routers for IPX and turn on IP bridging but I am concerned i will flood my router if i do not have the opportunity to IPX bridging off which will require me to enter a command that will only be accepted by IP plus IOS version . Anyone's comments will be invaluable. regards Iain Fomes London Systems 44 20 7397 9347 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: THIS IS A CISCO STUDY GROUP
I cant believe all you people have got the time to write these emails about this crap. You obviously need more work to do. -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 December 2000 16:03 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: THIS IS A CISCO STUDY GROUP I agree, Leon should relax a little. Sure, this is a Cisco certification study group by name, but it has evolved to be more than that. This is natural considering the number of list members who have developed relationships with each other. We all know the regulars, and sometimes we go off on tangents--shop talk, that's all it is. We know that this list is here for cisco-specific topics, but it is also a great place to get the opinions of others who you respect and learn from, regardless of whether it is Cisco-specific or not. It would help if everyone made their off-topic posts very apparent by always including OT in the subject line. I try to, but I don't always remember. Besides, there are a large number of cisco-related questions that might not be specifically related to one of the Cisco certifications, and we certainly would not want to ban those topics. So, everyone should do three things: 1. Chill out a little 2. Be more specific with subject lines 3. Learn to use the Delete button Regards, John GEEZ Leonrelax. Its ok to go off on tangents every so often. - Original Message - From: "NP-BASS LEON" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 8:23 AM Subject: THIS IS A CISCO STUDY GROUP I have used this study group for a while now and I think someone needs to say this, this study group is called a CISCO study group, NOT EXTREME, NOT JUNIPER. NOT FOUNDRY or any other vendor you can think of, but CISCO, LET US NOT FORGET THIS "RIF" Reading is fundamental. If you are going to make a comparison because of compatibility issues fine, but don't waste the time of individuals that are trying to learn with your opinions about every other router and switch in the world, FRANKLY WHO CARES. Now if you want to discuss issues you have had with these devices being and there interoperability then fine, inform us, but degrading or using air time to be critical of Cisco, it's engineers or even it's support, then open up your own CHAT ROOM and do that on your own TIME. Not the time of individuals who want to advance and learn. I say this because in the past month, all I see and read is Cisco is in trouble because of this, Cisco isn't doing that, Cisco better do this, If you are fed up with Cisco and want to take your money other places then do it, I enjoy this sight for the technical knowledge that it provides, for individuals on this sight to continue to read negative statements, enforces the opposite of what this site is trying to build, it's obvious some of us have nothing better to do than put down Cisco don't have a lot of equitable knowledge to share anyway. Just my 2 cents. Reply if you like, but it will just once again make my point, provide something knowledgable, not your opinion, This is not a PHILOSOPHY study, we only need your Cisco experience, not what you think Cisco should, could or would do, Whatever they don't do, get it else where, and share that, but keep the PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH TO YOURSELVES. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Send a cool gift with your E-Card http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CID beta after 7 dec?
-Original Message- From: GNOME [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 December 2000 10:25 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CID beta after 7 dec? Is that so i have scheduled it on 15 Dec "Andrei Hladki" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 915meu$7b0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:915meu$7b0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi All, Did somebody take CID beta after 7 dec 2000? Cisco web site says it's last day to test but I was registered for 15 dec 2000. Its annoy me vey well. best regards Andrei _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Possible phoney CCIE
Absolutely..Whats the point of us sweating our balls off doing this when someone can just claim to be one and get it away with it.If you need some contacts at cisco i'll be happy to put you in touch with some. -Original Message- From: Ben Lovegrove [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 October 2000 09:17 To: Mark Cohen; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Possible phony CCIE I think you should contact your local Cisco representative and press this matter forward urgently. Such con artists do enormous damage to the credibility of genuine CCIEs, not to mention the damage they could do to a client's network. Don't hestitate - shout loudly! --- Mark Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greetings- I recently worked on a project with a fellow who claimed to be a CCIE. He even gave me his card with the CCIE logo on it. At least I think it is the CCIE logo. It is a router symbol surrounded with laurels and has the words Cisco Certified Internetwork Engineer circling it as well. After asking this person a few questions, I became suspicious of his credentials due to his apparent lack of knowledge of the fundamentals. (I never asked for his CCIE number because I attempted verification only after I left the account). I faxed a copy of the business card he gave me (homemade BTW) to someone in the CCIE program at Cisco. She told me the card is bogus and that she would send the card to the Cisco lawyers. That was three months ago and this person is STILL working on site there. What do you people think I should do now? Send e-mail to the persons that are contracting him there? He is charging a very high bill rate. The people he is working don't have enough knowledge to confirm his credentials. Should I let this go? Isn't part of my cert agreement with Cisco to protect the logo? I feel that Cisco isn't doing anything to protect us here. Mark Cohen CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I = Ben Lovegrove, CCNP (+ Security) Redspan Solutions Ltd http://www.redspan.com http://www.bensbookmarks.com Cisco: Products, Training, Jobs, Study Guides, Resources. Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3DES
Anyone working on this ? Anyone had problems? Give me a shout please.Help required. regards Iain Fomes London Systems 44 20 7397 9347 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: what is dark fiber?
this is a misconception. Dark fiber or Dark fibre as we can it here in England.God save the Queen an all that is actually a fibre based product that enables long distances to be covered.Where as fibre has approximatley a 2km depth, Dark fibre is able to run for much longer lengths. i have seen it used for up to 20 30 40 miles -Original Message- From: Richard Dennard [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 September 2000 19:53 To: bahadir korkmaz Cc: Cisco Subject: RE: what is dark fiber? dark fiber is a term usually used by providers to indicate fiber that does not have light passing over it (unused). Richard Dennard Network Engineer HY_SPEED_DATA phone 814-260-3966 fax 814-274-7370 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of bahadir korkmaz Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 11:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: what is dark fiber? hi. what is dark fiber? i found some sites that says dark fiber means unused fiber. is it so? i think dark fiber must be different then unused fiber. i mean for example. 10gigabit ethernet runs on dark fiber. dark must be something related to bandwidth or wavelength. if someone knows dark fiber definition i ll be happy. _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: FRS 2.0
https://www.galton.com/~cisco_s/login.html If you haven't an account set up you can set a password on that page use your Sylvan Prometric testing ID or your Cisco testing ID -Original Message- From: Alan McCrank [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 August 2000 23:56 To: Fomes Iain Subject: Re: FRS 2.0 What is the Galton site.. URL please.. - Original Message - From: "Fomes Iain" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "'Henrique Issamu Terada'" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2000 3:17 AM Subject: RE: FRS 2.0 GO TO THE GALTON SITE AND CHECK MY SCORE IS NOT THERE BUT THERE IS A PASS OR FAIL NEXT TO THE 640-509 EXAM HISTORY -Original Message- From: Henrique Issamu Terada [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 August 2000 15:43 To: Kevin Wigle; Cisco Subject: Re: FRS 2.0 Hi list Does anybody know about the results of FRS 2.0 Beta ? Is it already available ? Henrique Issamu Terada CPM Comunicações - Brazil CCNA Certified - Original Message - From: Kevin Wigle [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Cisco [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 11:13 AM Subject: re: FRS 2.0 How comes we don't get many posts relating to this subject ? mostly because FNDN - exam 640-509 is not a "live" exam yet. There was a beta I believe but Cisco hasn't released the new version yet. Kevin Wigle ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IP classless/Default routes
could be its missing it's weight i.e a weighted default gateway to prevent it dropping the packet if the interface is not up ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 162.16.40.2 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 162.16.20.1 3 3 being the weight -Original Message- From: Donald B Johnson Jr [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday 08 August 2000 19:15 To: Dave Page; 'Cisco List' Subject: Re: IP classless/Default routes I believe that is a mistake in Todd's book. You can only have one default gateway set. Otherwise the packet would not know where to send the packet. Duck - Original Message - From: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Cisco List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 07, 2000 5:05 PM Subject: IP classless/Default routes In Todd Lammle's book for CCNA 640-407, on p. 202 he has set a default route of BOTH 172.16.40.2 and 172.16.20.1. How does one do this, just enter the IP route command as such, one right after the other (??): ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 162.16.40.2 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 162.16.20.1 ??? The reason I ask is that in his book for CCNA 640-507, he states on page 253, "Default routing is used to send packets with a remote destination network not in the routing table to the next hop router. You can only use default routing on stub networks, which means that they have only one exit port out of the network." The two books seem to say contradictory things. Is it because the 507 exam is based on a different IOS? What gives? Dave Page ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BSCN Books ?
There are no cisco training guides out yet for Building Scalable Ciso Networks they are due to published the middle of this month BSCMN has been out for about 2 months iIf you want to study BSCN i.e the new routing exam study OSPF BGP and EIGRP and forget the rest Use the Cisco web site that is what it is there for.It is almost always as well more up to date than even the Cisco Press books yet to be published There is not a book that will teach you what you need to be able to understand it properly.. You need to do the hard work yourselves -Original Message- From: ed smith [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 August 2000 15:28 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BSCN Books ? Go to www.borders.com search on ISBN: 1578700930 they have the best price and Barnes and Noble doesn't even carry it yet. Ed From: "Rah Sta" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "Rah Sta" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BSCN Books ? Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 12:47:36 EDT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [162.64.254.254] Received: from [208.242.122.8] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id MHotMailBB4EFE8C007BD82197B1D0F27A0872762; Mon Jul 31 10:13:12 2000 Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA19535;Mon, 31 Jul 2000 12:53:18 -0400 Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.12); Mon, 31 Jul 2000 12:46:10 -0400 Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA17328GroupStudy Mailer; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 12:45:55 -0400 Received: from hotmail.com (f119.law4.hotmail.com [216.33.149.119])by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA17291GroupStudy Mailer; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 12:45:48 -0400 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 09:47:36 -0700 Received: from 162.64.254.254 by lw4fd.law4.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 GMT From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 31 10:14:52 2000 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Jul 2000 16:47:36.0442 (UTC) FILETIME=[07D935A0:01BFFB0F] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] What book should I use to study for BSCN ? From: "Edward Solomon" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "Edward Solomon" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ACRC Vs. BSCN Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 09:27:39 -0400 ""Anil Panjwani"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... hi that's the impression i get from exam outline. but cisco is notorious for putting up Qs which are remotely connected to exam outlines can anyone clarify if IPX, ISDN DDR, Bridges access-lists are actually removed? I teach BSCN and the IPX, ISDN, bridging and access-list topics have been removed. You are still required to have an understanding of how to construct access-lists as these are used for route filtering and route maps (policy-based routing). The questions in the Routing 2.0 test map exactly to the topic areas in the course and I found nothing untoward or unexpected turning up in the test. This is a much better-constructed course than ACRC and has brand new labs and case studies to supplement the course material. The student/equipment ratio is also far better. Instead of having one router between two students, there is now a whole student pod of three routers (in our lab at IBM Canada, one 3640 and two 2522s) to be managed by two students. There really isn't a single topic that hasn't been revised or rewritten. To my mind, having attended ACRC and seen BSCN, there is only one major area of difference between the two: ACRC touched on BGP in about 20 pages. BSCN has two very sizeable chapeters on BGP, replete with labs and case studies. The last day of the course is pretty much one gigantic superlab with everything learned in the course being configured. -- Edward Solomon CCNA, CCSI Senior I/T Specialist Networking Solutions IBM Canada Ltd. - Learning Services Tel.: (905) 316-3241 Fax: (905) 316-3101 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.can.ibm.com/services/learning/net_internet.html ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
3DES encryption
Does anyone know a good web site with a brief overview of 3DES encryption and how it works ? Regards Iain Fomes London Systems 44 207 397 9347 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3DES encryption
Does anyone know a good web site with a brief overview of 3DES encryption and how it works ? ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
