3600 with dialin security
Dear Group, I need a suggestion. I have one 3600 series router & wants to setup callback setup wherein my remote users can dial to the network & access my local LAN. I also want to install some security software that will control & monitor the access thru normal PSTN dialup. Which s/w should I go for.TACACS+ or cisco securecan anybody tell me the sample config or tell me the link on the website Thanks in advance IT Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inter vlan routing [7:308]
Group Pls help me with this config:- cat 4k switch--->cat6509<-- cat 4k switch vlan 1 Vlan2 NT PDC 1NT PDC 2 USERx USERy I have a small setup of 3 catalyst switches. CAT6509 main switch is having 2 SUP module (one for redundancy & 2 MSFC card for routing purpose. There are 2 cat4003 switches installed at 2 diff floors & both are part of diff vlan's - VLAN1 & VLAN2. My users are facing problem when they try to access opposite side vlan when actually sitting in one vlan. they sometimes not able to login. The error they get is domain server not available & also does not get IP address from DHCP server. But they can login to local domain which is part of local VLAN. This problem is only faced by users having laptop (IBM). Does anybody faced this problem ever. On both of my servers NT 2 way trust relationship is established so that users can login to any domain. I have also specified ip helper-address in my main 6509 MSFC card. The switches are connected via gigabit uplink ports. It is not login id problem because I am able to login to both the server when I physically go to opposite vlan & managed to login to both the server. help appreciated... regds HP Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=308&t=308 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Too many broadcasts [7:453]
Dear Group, I have a small query: Is it advisable to disable broadcast on all the ports of switches. I have 3 catalyst series 6509/5500/5505 in my network running all the WINNT servers 4.0 with all win98/win95 as clients. With the help of CWSI I have observed that many a times the broadcast increases very much & I experience lot of response delay in my network. can I use the command: switch> (enable)# set port broadcast 0% Will this put any impact on my network like nodes won't be able to talk to server or problem in finding the servers. I have also created VLAN's in my network to limit the broadcasts. Should I doit on all the ports... many thanks in advance HP Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=453&t=453 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks....Re: [RE: Too many broadcasts [7:453]
"Chuck Larrieu" wrote: Broadcasts are not necessarily bad. How do you suppose ARP works? Not to mention all the things that make life under windows so enjoyable? Such as network browsing? Do not be so hasty. Understand first. How many servers? How many pc's? all on one flat network? No VLANs or inter-vlan routing? Chuck Once worked in a brokerage firm where during market hours 90% of my traffic was broadcast - and a good thing, too! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Infotech Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 10:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Too many broadcasts [7:453] Dear Group, I have a small query: Is it advisable to disable broadcast on all the ports of switches. I have 3 catalyst series 6509/5500/5505 in my network running all the WINNT servers 4.0 with all win98/win95 as clients. With the help of CWSI I have observed that many a times the broadcast increases very much & I experience lot of response delay in my network. can I use the command: switch> (enable)# set port broadcast 0% Will this put any impact on my network like nodes won't be able to talk to server or problem in finding the servers. I have also created VLAN's in my network to limit the broadcasts. Should I doit on all the ports... many thanks in advance HP Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3022&t=453 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks....Re: [Re: Inter vlan routing [7:308]
Ping wrote: > - > Attachment: > MIME Type: multipart/alternative > - make sure the ip helper is set up on both interfaves to each vlan. also add ip helper to your wins serverif you have one Infotech wrote: > Group Pls help me with this config:- > > cat 4k switch--->cat6509 vlan 1 Vlan2 > NT PDC 1NT PDC 2 > > USERx USERy > > I have a small setup of 3 catalyst switches. CAT6509 main switch is > having 2 SUP module (one for redundancy & 2 MSFC card for routing purpose. > There are 2 cat4003 switches installed at 2 diff floors & both are part of > diff vlan's - VLAN1 & VLAN2. > My users are facing problem when they try to access opposite side vlan when > actually sitting in one vlan. they sometimes not able to login. The error > they get is domain server not available & also does not get IP address > from DHCP server. But they can login to local domain which is part of local > VLAN. This problem is only faced by users having laptop (IBM). > Does anybody faced this problem ever. > > On both of my servers NT 2 way trust relationship is established so that > users can login to any domain. I have also specified ip helper-address in > my main 6509 MSFC card. The switches are connected via gigabit uplink ports. > It is not login id problem because I am able to login to both the server > when I physically go to opposite vlan & managed to login to both the server. > > help appreciated... > > regds > HP > > > Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3024&t=308 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Re: Inter vlan routing [7:308]
Ping wrote: > - > Attachment: > MIME Type: multipart/alternative > - make sure the ip helper is set up on both interfaves to each vlan. also add ip helper to your wins serverif you have one Infotech wrote: > Group Pls help me with this config:- > > cat 4k switch--->cat6509 vlan 1 Vlan2 > NT PDC 1NT PDC 2 > > USERx USERy > > I have a small setup of 3 catalyst switches. CAT6509 main switch is > having 2 SUP module (one for redundancy & 2 MSFC card for routing purpose. > There are 2 cat4003 switches installed at 2 diff floors & both are part of > diff vlan's - VLAN1 & VLAN2. > My users are facing problem when they try to access opposite side vlan when > actually sitting in one vlan. they sometimes not able to login. The error > they get is domain server not available & also does not get IP address > from DHCP server. But they can login to local domain which is part of local > VLAN. This problem is only faced by users having laptop (IBM). > Does anybody faced this problem ever. > > On both of my servers NT 2 way trust relationship is established so that > users can login to any domain. I have also specified ip helper-address in > my main 6509 MSFC card. The switches are connected via gigabit uplink ports. > It is not login id problem because I am able to login to both the server > when I physically go to opposite vlan & managed to login to both the server. > > help appreciated... > > regds > HP > > > Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3023&t=308 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISDN config [7:4521]
Dear Group need your help. ### R1 -- R2 - ISDN modem type TA device ## R1:- Cisco 1700 with One Leased Line (S0) as primary link One BRI (BRI0) as backup to Leased Line R2 :- Cisco 1700 with Leased Line (S0) One BRI (BRI0) ISDN TA(Modem) With one BRI line Present scenario :- Primary link connectivity is established between Router R1 and Router R2 via Leased Line. If Leased line goes down then ISDN line from R1 (Configured as Backup )comes up and dials to R2 and establishes the connectivity. Requirement:- In the existing setup also want to connect one remote location via some ISDN TA type device which will dial to R2 and will use either of the B channel from one BRI line available and remain connected. Same time if Router R1's Leased line goes down then BRI should come up and should connect to Router R2's one of the available B channels. In this case Router R2 will act as central office router and R1 plus remote ISDN TA / Modem will dial to it. Is it possible to have this kind of setup. Do I need to create dialer rotery group or dialer pool on router R2. Can I get a sample config of this type if its available on CISCO's web site. Many thanks in advance IT Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=4521&t=4521 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Multiple Backup Interfaces [7:4948]
Friends, Is is possible to have multiple backup interfaces defined for one single interface. If it's possible then how to set the priority. any suggestions. regds Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=4948&t=4948 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CAT 6509 urg help required [7:6384]
Dear Group I am having one 6509 switch with 2 sup module cards (one in redudent mode). All of a sudden from past couple of days i am observing that my SUP 1 modules status LED is not glowing. Same time my sup2 modules management LED is glowing RED. But still my switch is working fine. When I give SH MOD command it shows status as ok for all the cards including SUP MODULE 1. For sup mod 2 the status shows as standby. I am also having MSFC-2 and PFC cards in the same SUP modules. My both sup modules are exactly identical. Does that mean that either of mine sup module is faulty. Any mod can fail at any time ???. How can I verify that my modules are working fine. Does anybody faced problem like this. many thanks in advance regds Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6384&t=6384 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Re: CAT 6509 urg help required [7:6384]
Thanks for replying. I have already tried this many times. But the status remains the same. Let me tell you more in details: on sup1 mod only status LED is not glowing where all 3 LED's are gree. on sup2(redudent) mod status LED is Orange , system LED is green , 3rd LED is not glowing and 4ht is RED. what else can u suggest... regds "Arun" wrote: hi You can try taking out the modules and putting them back i have seen that this do the job most of the timedo this and see if it works ... Regards Arun Sharma ""Infotech"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Dear Group > > I am having one 6509 switch with 2 sup module cards (one in redudent mode). > All of a sudden from past couple of days i am observing that my SUP 1 modules > status LED is not glowing. Same time my sup2 modules management LED is > glowing > RED. But still my switch is working fine. > When I give SH MOD command it shows status as ok for all the cards including > SUP MODULE 1. For sup mod 2 the status shows as standby. I am also having > MSFC-2 and PFC cards in the same SUP modules. My both sup modules are exactly > identical. > > Does that mean that either of mine sup module is faulty. Any mod can fail at > any time ???. > > How can I verify that my modules are working fine. Does anybody faced problem > like this. > > many thanks in advance > > regds > > > > Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6397&t=6384 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
connectivity between SUN and CISCO with X.25 [7:12482]
Dear Group, Has anybody worked on this type of connectivity:- x.25 Ethernet x.25 SUN BOX>CISCO2620cisco2620
