OT: Satellite Modem [7:65830]
Hai, This is out of topic to Cisco. But it is related with Communication, so I dared to post this in Cisco group. I think knowledgable persons in Networking won't mind. If any one having experience in Satellite modems please help me. We have one Comstream CM701 modem, in that we are unable to configure the frequency, can any body guide me how to configure frequency in Comstream CM701. Thanks Regards, Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65830t=65830 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any 3662 routers.. [7:53946]
Hello, Please don't treat this as spam. If any one have a 3662 for sell at seconds rate, please let me know. Regards, Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=53946t=53946 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help:: Any procedure automated dialup in 3640 ?? [7:45122]
Hai, I am using 3640 with NM 16 AM module. I would like to implement a application with the following functionality. One computer dialin to cisco, and it will connect, and then from this I want to dialout to another NAS automatically. eg. Node A dials to Async 97 (of cisco), and then Async 104 (of cisco) should dialout to NAS (Node B), Then NOde A and Node B can communicate each other. Is it possible to do it using Cisco 3640 with NM 8 AM or NM 16 AM?? if possible how can I achieve this.. Does easy IP will help here ?? or any other possible ways... Thanks, Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45122t=45122 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated dialout from Cisco 3640 [7:45004]
Hai, I am using 3640 with NM 16 AM module. I would like to implement a application with the following functionality. One computer dialin to cisco, and it will connect, and then from this I want to dialout to another NAS automatically. eg. Node A dials to Async 97 (of cisco), and then Async 104 (of cisco) should dialout to NAS (Node B), Then NOde A and Node B can communicate each other. Is it possible to do it using Cisco 3640 with NM 8 AM or NM 16 AM?? if possible how can I achieve this.. Does easy IP will help here ?? or any other possible ways... Thanks, Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45004t=45004 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is the limitation in V.35 [7:44032]
Hai, Can any one suggest me what would be max. distance support in V.35 signalling. Is it possible to drive the signal approx. 30 to 35 mts. If not possible How can drive the signall with low investment... Thanks, Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44032t=44032 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What is the limitation in V.35 [7:44032]
Hai, Thank you for your quick response. I would like to have a speed of 256 Kbps to 512 Kbps. I would like to use copper, Does it support ?? What gauge is suggested ... Thanks, Kiran On Mon, 13 May 2002, Steve Watson wrote: The theoretical v.35 cable distance is 4000 feet (1219.2 meters) at speeds up to 100 kbps. The longest v.35 cable I use is 10 feet. Depending on distance and speed required Pairgains to drive copper and Fiber Modems to drive fiber. At 35 meters you shouldn't have to implement those. Steve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kiran Kumar M Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 10:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: What is the limitation in V.35 [7:44032] Hai, Can any one suggest me what would be max. distance support in V.35 signalling. Is it possible to drive the signal approx. 30 to 35 mts. If not possible How can drive the signall with low investment... Thanks, Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44041t=44032 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What is the limitation in V.35 [7:44032]
Hai, Thanks for your reply and link. What best we can do to support atleast 256 Kbps for 35 mts. in terms of cable gauge, etc... Thanks, Kiran On Mon, 13 May 2002, MADMAN wrote: Depends on the speed and you can often go further than the spec though you may not get vendor support if you do so and have issues. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_mod/cis2600/hw_inst/2600hig/2600ch2.htm#xtocid17 Dave Kiran Kumar M wrote: Hai, Can any one suggest me what would be max. distance support in V.35 signalling. Is it possible to drive the signal approx. 30 to 35 mts. If not possible How can drive the signall with low investment... Thanks, Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44043t=44032 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VOIP billing [7:38756]
Thanks for your reply. Any other external software that will compatible with cisco products also ?? Thanks, Kiran On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, George Siaw wrote: Check out the Avvid product line. I think Cisco Call manager has some functionality for billing. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kiran Kumar M Sent: 19 March 2002 05:43 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VOIP billing [7:38756] Hai, Is there any billing solution available for VOIP in cisco products.?? Thanks, Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=38760t=38756 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ANY alternate for Cisco VIC [7:38411]
Hai, Is there any alternate card in PC for voice communication, with similar functions like CISCO VIC2FXS. And also is it possible to use VIC2FXS in NM2FE2W. Thanks, Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=38411t=38411 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco equipment [7:33664]
Hai, I would like to purchase some second hand equipment for HOME lab. I got the following quotation from one of the vendor. NM-8A/S $ 750.00 NM-4A/S $ 400.00 WIC-2T $ 450.00 WS-C1924-A $ 400.00 ws-C2924-XL-EN $ 750.00 Cisco1603 $ 225.00 Cisco2501 $ 285.00 Cisco2610 $ 775.00 Please suggest me, should I buy the products at this price or any other place I can get at cheper price. Thanks kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33664t=33664 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NM8AS on 7500 series ?? [7:20722]
Hai, Is there any possible way to use NM8AS, and 2W2FE on 7505 RSP2 router ? If it supports what are the interface cards that I require to get. Thanks, Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20722t=20722 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Able to Traceroute but Unable to ping to IPs [7:16847]
Hai, Can anyone please response, I am facing following problem with the following IPs. I am able to traceroute to that IPs, but unable to ping. At the same time Mail and web servers on that IPs are also not accessible. Can any body suggest solution for this.. IPs : 202.65.134.161, 162,168 I am tryig to analyse a problem that is existing in my network. I have a link with PPP on WAN, Till four days back everything working fine. The problem started four days back, the problem is I am able to traceroute the IPs, but unable to ping to that network. I didn't restricted ICMP on end user. What could be the problem, Does any one had this kind of problem? Thanks in Advance, Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16847t=16847 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Able to Traceroute but Unable to ping to IPs [7:16847]
Did Anyone faced the following problem anytime? Hai, Can anyone please response, I am facing following problem with the following IPs. I am able to traceroute to that IPs, but unable to ping. At the same time Mail and web servers on that IPs are also not accessible. Can any body suggest solution for this.. IPs : 202.65.134.161, 162,168 I am tryig to analyse a problem that is existing in my network. I have a link with PPP on WAN, Till four days back everything working fine. The problem started four days back, the problem is I am able to traceroute the IPs, but unable to ping to that network. I didn't restricted ICMP on end user. What could be the problem, Does any one had this kind of problem? Thanks in Advance, Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16866t=16847 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Able to Traceroute but Unable to ping to IPs [7:16847]
Thank you Patrick, for your mail. I am not using any firewall or acl s on end router. And My Mainrouter is Cisco otherside router is Intel 9515. On Intel side we are unable to ping. Thanks, Kiran On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Patrick Ramsey wrote: Sounds like firewall issues... high icmp ports might be open, whereas low are not and smtp and web are not... maybe all low ip service ports are being blocked and all highs are being allowed from some freaky ACL Try removing all acl's and start from ground zero. -Patrick Kiran Kumar M 08/22/01 02:33PM Did Anyone faced the following problem anytime? Hai, Can anyone please response, I am facing following problem with the following IPs. I am able to traceroute to that IPs, but unable to ping. At the same time Mail and web servers on that IPs are also not accessible. Can any body suggest solution for this.. IPs : 202.65.134.161, 162,168 I am tryig to analyse a problem that is existing in my network. I have a link with PPP on WAN, Till four days back everything working fine. The problem started four days back, the problem is I am able to traceroute the IPs, but unable to ping to that network. I didn't restricted ICMP on end user. What could be the problem, Does any one had this kind of problem? Thanks in Advance, Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16941t=16847 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Able to Traceroute but Unable to ping [7:16706]
Hai, I am tryig to analyse a problem that is existing in my network. I have a link with PPP on WAN, Till four days back everything working fine. The problem started four days back, the problem is I am able to traceroute the IPs, but unable to ping to that network. I didn't restricted ICMP on end user. What could be the problem, Does any one had this kind of problem? Thanks in Advance, Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16706t=16706 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
Hai, I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular VLAN, and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not the problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable to locate the solution. Thanks in advance, Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13497t=13497 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
Sorry, I am testing it on 2620 not on 2610. You are correct in 2610 will not be having FE. So in my problem first router is 2620, and the second router is 2610 only. Thanks, Kiran On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Kiran Kumar M wrote: Thanks for your work. But I am sure that it is having the fast ethernet in 2610. And on the interface speed is auto, and duplex is auto. Other side (on switch side) it is also same i.e., both are in auto. I tried after removing the auto option, but it is same situation. Thanks, Kiran On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, John Neiberger wrote: I am having a lot of trouble interpreting your problem. However, one thing I noticed is that you say you have a fast ethernet interface on a 2610 router. According to the quick reference guide, there is no fast ethernet module available for the 2610. Unless they've come out with something new, this may be your problem. I'm guessing that you have your switch set for 100Mbps/full duplex and your router can only do 10Mbps. In addition, not only can you not do 100Mbps/full duplex on a 2610, that ethernet interface cannot be a trunk port. Those do not support ISL or 802.1q unless something has changed recently. If I'm wrong, someone please correct me. Regards, John Kiran Kumar M 7/24/01 8:27:12 AM Hai, I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular VLAN, and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not the problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable to locate the solution. Thanks in advance, Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13552t=13497 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
I am really very sorry for confusing all of you. My first router which is having FE is 2620, and second router is 2610. Sorry again. Thanks, Kiran On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, John Neiberger wrote: How are you accomplishing this? The 2610 has *no* fast ethernet ports and there are no fast ethernet modules available. So, with no built-in 100BaseTX ports and no modules available, where did you get this fast ethernet interface? Kiran Kumar M 7/24/01 11:40:42 AM Thanks for your work. But I am sure that it is having the fast ethernet in 2610. And on the interface speed is auto, and duplex is auto. Other side (on switch side) it is also same i.e., both are in auto. I tried after removing the auto option, but it is same situation. Thanks, Kiran On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, John Neiberger wrote: I am having a lot of trouble interpreting your problem. However, one thing I noticed is that you say you have a fast ethernet interface on a 2610 router. According to the quick reference guide, there is no fast ethernet module available for the 2610. Unless they've come out with something new, this may be your problem. I'm guessing that you have your switch set for 100Mbps/full duplex and your router can only do 10Mbps. In addition, not only can you not do 100Mbps/full duplex on a 2610, that ethernet interface cannot be a trunk port. Those do not support ISL or 802.1q unless something has changed recently. If I'm wrong, someone please correct me. Regards, John Kiran Kumar M 7/24/01 8:27:12 AM Hai, I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular VLAN, and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not the problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable to locate the solution. Thanks in advance, Kiran [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13557t=13497 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
Thanks for your work. But I am sure that it is having the fast ethernet in 2610. And on the interface speed is auto, and duplex is auto. Other side (on switch side) it is also same i.e., both are in auto. I tried after removing the auto option, but it is same situation. Thanks, Kiran On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, John Neiberger wrote: I am having a lot of trouble interpreting your problem. However, one thing I noticed is that you say you have a fast ethernet interface on a 2610 router. According to the quick reference guide, there is no fast ethernet module available for the 2610. Unless they've come out with something new, this may be your problem. I'm guessing that you have your switch set for 100Mbps/full duplex and your router can only do 10Mbps. In addition, not only can you not do 100Mbps/full duplex on a 2610, that ethernet interface cannot be a trunk port. Those do not support ISL or 802.1q unless something has changed recently. If I'm wrong, someone please correct me. Regards, John Kiran Kumar M 7/24/01 8:27:12 AM Hai, I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular VLAN, and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not the problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable to locate the solution. Thanks in advance, Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13562t=13497 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
Thanks for your mail. No, the default route is already there. It is already defined in that router. Infact I just copied it from the working router. Thanks, Kiran On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Patrick Ramsey wrote: sounds like you have missed a default route on the 2610. The 2610 will not be able to see any other vlans unless the vlan it is plugged into has an ip address assigned to it acting as a gateway. Then you need to set that ip address as the 2610's default gateway. (or at least specify a specific route to the other vlans) If this is a router conencted to the internet, you would defiantely want to keep the default gw out it's serial interface. -Patrick Kiran Kumar M 07/24/01 10:27AM Hai, I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular VLAN, and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not the problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable to locate the solution. Thanks in advance, Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13563t=13497 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Peter Slow wrote: Guys, 261x series routers do NOT have fast ethernet, NOR will they accept ANY network module w/ a FE interface. neither will 262x routers, whic have 1 or two FE interfaces built in. the same goes for 265x. one or two built in, but it it not possible to add more. Yes it was 2620, not 2610. Sorry for mistake and confusing lot of people. i am assuming from your description that there is another router in your network on that switch. Yes I am having 2 more cisco routers (3660, and 2610) router and some Intel routers (excluding the two routers (2620 and 2610)that I am testing). Cisco routers are connected to L3 switch, and some of the Intel routers are connected to L3 switch (but on different VLANS)and some of them connected on L2 switch. if this is a true L3 switch, than your 2610 is NOT capable of being an MLS RP and there must be another one on the network somewhere. But here my second 2610 ( in my question) is perfectly able to communicate with others. your routers eth. interface will plug into a single VLAN, with an IP route either static or dynamic to those other VLANs via a next hop, the MLS RP on your layer three switch. yes.. But I am not sure about MSL RP in my L3 switch ( I am using Extreme networks Layer 3 switch) this is quite fundamental. is there an entry for the network you are trying to reach in your routing table. I'm goign to take a wild guess here and assume that there is not yet. No it is there, otherwise with the same configuration (my second) router will not be able communicate... tell us what kind of L3 switch you are using i need to know what equipment you have, exactly, in this case, in order to help you. It is Extreme Networks Summit Switch. i do not think that this is a default route probllem at all. Yes. he is not supposed to be trunking to the switch, he should in this case have a next hop on the VLAN that is connected to other VLANS, if this is a L3 switching scenario. I also think that what he thinks is a layer 3 switch is not capable of acting as one, or is not configured correctly. As far as concerning with Layer 3 switch, I am not finding any falut. Becuase it is perfectly working with the same port with the second router. I am only facing the problem when I am connected 2620, with this I am able to ping to that particular VLAN not beyond that. Kiran, tell us what equipment you have, and what network connections you have. 2620 Router-- L3switch -- other network If I replace 2620 with 2610, then it is working properly. In L3 Switch I am having 8 VLANS on port base. And I am using static routing in that. Thanks for your detailed mail. Kiran -Peter -Original Message- From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497] sounds like you have missed a default route on the 2610. The 2610 will not be able to see any other vlans unless the vlan it is plugged into has an ip address assigned to it acting as a gateway. Then you need to set that ip address as the 2610's default gateway. (or at least specify a specific route to the other vlans) If this is a router conencted to the internet, you would defiantely want to keep the default gw out it's serial interface. -Patrick Kiran Kumar M 07/24/01 10:27AM Hai, I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular VLAN, and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not the problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable to locate the solution. Thanks in advance, Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13566t=13497 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
It is not at all the routing problem. Because it is perfectly working with the same configuration with other router with out any changes. Thanks, Kiran On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Farhan Ahmed wrote: u need to setup static route in both direction u just put only 1 route to the 1st vlan u need more rotes in both direc on the other vlans u should have static routes to router via x -Original Message- From: Kiran Kumar M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497] Thanks for your mail. No, the default route is already there. It is already defined in that router. Infact I just copied it from the working router. Thanks, Kiran On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Patrick Ramsey wrote: sounds like you have missed a default route on the 2610. The 2610 will not be able to see any other vlans unless the vlan it is plugged into has an ip address assigned to it acting as a gateway. Then you need to set that ip address as the 2610's default gateway. (or at least specify a specific route to the other vlans) If this is a router conencted to the internet, you would defiantely want to keep the default gw out it's serial interface. -Patrick Kiran Kumar M 07/24/01 10:27AM Hai, I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular VLAN, and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not the problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable to locate the solution. Thanks in advance, Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13572t=13497 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
Sure. It is very simple configuration. 2610 Router: Current configuration: ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname Router ! enable secret 5 x enable password ! ip subnet-zero ip domain-name xx.xxx ip name-server xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx ! ! interface Loopback0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast ! interface Ethernet0/0 ip address 192.168.2.2 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ! interface Serial0/0 no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache shutdown ! interface Serial0/1 ip address 192.168.1.61 255.255.255.252 no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache ! ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.2.1 ip route 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.1 ! ! ! line con 0 transport input none line aux 0 line vty 0 4 password xx login ! end Here I replaced the passwords and IP address ( Actually I am using public IP address, here I mention the private IP addresses). The very same is following on 2620 router also. Except one change. That is Ethernet is replaced with Fast ethernet. Thanks, Kiran On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Farhan Ahmed wrote: cAN U SEND YR CONFIGS -Original Message- From: Kiran Kumar M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:40 PM To: Farhan Ahmed Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497] It is not at all the routing problem. Because it is perfectly working with the same configuration with other router with out any changes. Thanks, Kiran On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Farhan Ahmed wrote: u need to setup static route in both direction u just put only 1 route to the 1st vlan u need more rotes in both direc on the other vlans u should have static routes to router via x -Original Message- From: Kiran Kumar M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497] Thanks for your mail. No, the default route is already there. It is already defined in that router. Infact I just copied it from the working router. Thanks, Kiran On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Patrick Ramsey wrote: sounds like you have missed a default route on the 2610. The 2610 will not be able to see any other vlans unless the vlan it is plugged into has an ip address assigned to it acting as a gateway. Then you need to set that ip address as the 2610's default gateway. (or at least specify a specific route to the other vlans) If this is a router conencted to the internet, you would defiantely want to keep the default gw out it's serial interface. -Patrick Kiran Kumar M 07/24/01 10:27AM Hai, I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular VLAN, and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not the problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable to locate the solution. Thanks in advance, Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13579t=13497 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Farhan Ahmed wrote: WHAT DO u mean by another router with ethernet card I have 5 Cisco routers with me. Out of that two are in real network, and three or spare. I am facing problem with 2620 only, If I replace this router with other router, it is not giving any problem.. Kiran nd unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another ethernet card in first router), -Original Message- From: Kiran Kumar M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:40 PM To: Farhan Ahmed Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497] It is not at all the routing problem. Because it is perfectly working with the same configuration with other router with out any changes. Thanks, Kiran On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Farhan Ahmed wrote: u need to setup static route in both direction u just put only 1 route to the 1st vlan u need more rotes in both direc on the other vlans u should have static routes to router via x -Original Message- From: Kiran Kumar M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497] Thanks for your mail. No, the default route is already there. It is already defined in that router. Infact I just copied it from the working router. Thanks, Kiran On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Patrick Ramsey wrote: sounds like you have missed a default route on the 2610. The 2610 will not be able to see any other vlans unless the vlan it is plugged into has an ip address assigned to it acting as a gateway. Then you need to set that ip address as the 2610's default gateway. (or at least specify a specific route to the other vlans) If this is a router conencted to the internet, you would defiantely want to keep the default gw out it's serial interface. -Patrick Kiran Kumar M 07/24/01 10:27AM Hai, I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular VLAN, and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not the problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable to locate the solution. Thanks in advance, Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13580t=13497 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco IP/TV 3400 series [7:7240]
Hi, I am looking for a video and audio broadcaster over internet. When I am searching for that product I came to know that cisco is having a product that will provide me a solution, but it is expensive. So I am looking for alternative. If it is not available I will go with cisco. Does any one worked on Cisco IP/TV 3400 series. How is the performance in the real network. How much bandwidth is required. Is there any similar products available ? Thanks in advance. Thanks, Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7240t=7240 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Strange Problem with router... [7:6293]
Hi, I am facing a strange problem from last two days. One of my 3640 router is behaving in a strange manner. Sudenly it is becoming 60 - 99 % CPU utilization.(Usally 20 - 30 %) at the same time It is droping the output packets on Main Serial link (which is using for uplink/downlink) and input packets on fastethernet (Used for LAN) port. Even these Interfaces are not overloading.. On the same router I am having 17 more serial links, and 1 more fast ethernet, and one ethernet interfaces and all are in working. I am using wccp v1, and BGP also on the same router. After Observing the problem I did the following things. 1) Increased the hold-queue to 4096 2) stopped the wccp and observed the status. But there is no use. It behaved in the same pasion. So I kept the things back. I am wondering.. if anybody help me.. The traffic is same and not varying.. but it is very much flutuating.. Please give me suggestions.. if anybody have any idea.. Thanks, Kiran PS: The router is not giving this problem continuously.. for 2 mins.. its working properly.. next 2 or 3 mins.. dropping the packets.. and next 2 mins.. working properly.. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=6293t=6293 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
continuation : Strange Problem with router... [7:6295]
I checked the buffers, there are buffer failures, in the router.. I think this could be because of that particular moment processor might be overloaded so it might not allocate the time for buffer allocating.. It was fine, and no problems with the same router and same interfaces.. but the problem arised only for last two days.. Any ideas to overcome this problem.. thanks, Kiran On Wed, 30 May 2001, Kiran Kumar M wrote: Hi, I am facing a strange problem from last two days. One of my 3640 router is behaving in a strange manner. Sudenly it is becoming 60 - 99 % CPU utilization.(Usally 20 - 30 %) at the same time It is droping the output packets on Main Serial link (which is using for uplink/downlink) and input packets on fastethernet (Used for LAN) port. Even these Interfaces are not overloading.. On the same router I am having 17 more serial links, and 1 more fast ethernet, and one ethernet interfaces and all are in working. I am using wccp v1, and BGP also on the same router. After Observing the problem I did the following things. 1) Increased the hold-queue to 4096 2) stopped the wccp and observed the status. But there is no use. It behaved in the same pasion. So I kept the things back. I am wondering.. if anybody help me.. The traffic is same and not varying.. but it is very much flutuating.. Please give me suggestions.. if anybody have any idea.. Thanks, Kiran PS: The router is not giving this problem continuously.. for 2 mins.. its working properly.. next 2 or 3 mins.. dropping the packets.. and next 2 mins.. working properly.. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=6295t=6295 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Strange Problem with router... [7:6293]
Hi Peter, Thanks for your mail. But I was using the same for last 16 months, almost with same setup. I never faced this problem. mtu is default, pps it can support upto 40,000 to 70,000 (according to cisco site), in my case it never reached to that point.. Thanks, Kiran On Tue, 29 May 2001, Peter I. Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist wrote: yup. thats going to happen when you plug that many serial links into the 3640. look at the mtu, look at your pps, and look at the 2640's forwarding capabilities. i have a cusdtomer who's 2640 freaks out the same way with 8 t-1s coming into it... Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist Network Engineer Planetary Networks 535 West 34th Street New York, NY 10001 Cell:(516) 782.1535 Desk: (646) 792.2395 Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax:(646) 792.2396 - Original Message - From: Kiran Kumar M To: Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 4:19 PM Subject: Strange Problem with router... [7:6293] Hi, I am facing a strange problem from last two days. One of my 3640 router is behaving in a strange manner. Sudenly it is becoming 60 - 99 % CPU utilization.(Usally 20 - 30 %) at the same time It is droping the output packets on Main Serial link (which is using for uplink/downlink) and input packets on fastethernet (Used for LAN) port. Even these Interfaces are not overloading.. On the same router I am having 17 more serial links, and 1 more fast ethernet, and one ethernet interfaces and all are in working. I am using wccp v1, and BGP also on the same router. After Observing the problem I did the following things. 1) Increased the hold-queue to 4096 2) stopped the wccp and observed the status. But there is no use. It behaved in the same pasion. So I kept the things back. I am wondering.. if anybody help me.. The traffic is same and not varying.. but it is very much flutuating.. Please give me suggestions.. if anybody have any idea.. Thanks, Kiran PS: The router is not giving this problem continuously.. for 2 mins.. its working properly.. next 2 or 3 mins.. dropping the packets.. and next 2 mins.. working properly.. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=6304t=6293 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco 3640 and Dialup Connection.. TAC failed to solve.. [7:4657]
Hi, I have Cisco 3640 with three 16 modems Network Modules. My problem with this box is Not able to connect at first time. After negotiation (Handshaking) it is disconnecting the user, if I try with the same userid and password it is connecting. I raised the case to TAC, but not successful to solve the problem. They asked for search protecters, and separate earthing for router. We did it, but the problem is not solved. Here is the configuration that I am using at my router end... aaa new-model aaa authentication login default group radius enable aaa authentication login root local aaa authentication ppp default group radius aaa accounting network default start-stop group radius modem country microcom_hdms india . . chat-script rst ATFS0=1 OK . . interface Group-Async1 ip unnumbered Ethernet0/0 no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp ip tcp header-compression passive autodetect encapsulation ppp async mode dedicated peer default ip address pool setup_pool no cdp enable ppp authentication pap group-range 33 48 ! interface Group-Async2 ip unnumbered Ethernet0/0 no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp ip tcp header-compression passive autodetect encapsulation ppp async mode dedicated peer default ip address pool setup_pool no cdp enable ppp authentication pap group-range 65 80 ! interface Group-Async3 ip unnumbered Ethernet0/0 no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp ip tcp header-compression passive autodetect encapsulation ppp async mode dedicated peer default ip address pool setup_pool no cdp enable ppp authentication pap group-range 97 112 ... ... ip local pool setup_pool xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx ip classless radius-server configure-nas radius-server host xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646 radius-server key For authentication I am using the cistron radius. Can anyone help me to solve this problem... Regards, Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=4657t=4657 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco 3640 and Dialup Connection.. TAC failed to solve [7:4659]
Sorry, in my earlier mail i didn't given the line configuration that is using for the current situation.. I am pasting it here again.. line 33 48 script reset rst modem InOut transport input all flowcontrol hardware line 65 80 script reset rst modem InOut transport input all flowcontrol hardware line 97 112 script reset rst modem InOut transport input all flowcontrol hardware Please provide me a solution.. Thanks, Kiran Hi, I have Cisco 3640 with three 16 modems Network Modules. My problem with this box is Not able to connect at first time. After negotiation (Handshaking) it is disconnecting the user, if I try with the same userid and password it is connecting. I raised the case to TAC, but not successful to solve the problem. They asked for search protecters, and separate earthing for router. We did it, but the problem is not solved. Here is the configuration that I am using at my router end... aaa new-model aaa authentication login default group radius enable aaa authentication login root local aaa authentication ppp default group radius aaa accounting network default start-stop group radius modem country microcom_hdms india . . chat-script rst ATFS0=1 OK . . interface Group-Async1 ip unnumbered Ethernet0/0 no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp ip tcp header-compression passive autodetect encapsulation ppp async mode dedicated peer default ip address pool setup_pool no cdp enable ppp authentication pap group-range 33 48 ! interface Group-Async2 ip unnumbered Ethernet0/0 no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp ip tcp header-compression passive autodetect encapsulation ppp async mode dedicated peer default ip address pool setup_pool no cdp enable ppp authentication pap group-range 65 80 ! interface Group-Async3 ip unnumbered Ethernet0/0 no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp ip tcp header-compression passive autodetect encapsulation ppp async mode dedicated peer default ip address pool setup_pool no cdp enable ppp authentication pap group-range 97 112 ... ... ip local pool setup_pool xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx ip classless radius-server configure-nas radius-server host xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646 radius-server key For authentication I am using the cistron radius. Can anyone help me to solve this problem... Regards, Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=4659t=4659 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Having problem with tftp to flash : URGENT [7:3455]
Hi, I have a router which is having a flash card (8 MB), but not having the flash memory in it. I am trying to upload a flash file from tftp. I am trying to use tftpdnld command, but it is not taking.. Here is the message that I am getting while booting.. System Bootstrap, Version 11.3(2)XA4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. TAC:Home:SW:IOS:Specials for info C2600 platform with 32768 Kbytes of main memory device does not contain a valid magic number boot: cannot open flash: boot: cannot determine first file name on device flash: System Bootstrap, Version 11.3(2)XA4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. TAC:Home:SW:IOS:Specials for info C2600 platform with 32768 Kbytes of main memory device does not contain a valid magic number boot: cannot open flash: boot: cannot determine first file name on device flash: System Bootstrap, Version 11.3(2)XA4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. TAC:Home:SW:IOS:Specials for info C2600 platform with 32768 Kbytes of main memory rommon Can anyone please give me a solution to solve this problem.. It is very URGENT.. please help me.. Thanks, Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=3455t=3455 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Having problem with tftp to flash : URGENT [7:3455]
Thanks, xmodem did it.. Thanks, Kiran On Mon, 7 May 2001, Donald B Johnson jr wrote: try xmodem that works Don - Original Message - From: Jason Baker To: Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 8:45 AM Subject: Re: Having problem with tftp to flash : URGENT [7:3455] flash card has no IOS image on it. so the router is trying to boot from flash card but cannot find IOS image on it. if you have another router running copy IOS to flash card. But looking from your config you are using a 2600 and from memory they do not use flash cards then again i could be wrong. Regards, Jason Baker - Original Message - From: Kiran Kumar M To: Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 12:53 AM Subject: Having problem with tftp to flash : URGENT [7:3455] Hi, I have a router which is having a flash card (8 MB), but not having the flash memory in it. I am trying to upload a flash file from tftp. I am trying to use tftpdnld command, but it is not taking.. Here is the message that I am getting while booting.. System Bootstrap, Version 11.3(2)XA4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. TAC:Home:SW:IOS:Specials for info C2600 platform with 32768 Kbytes of main memory device does not contain a valid magic number boot: cannot open flash: boot: cannot determine first file name on device flash: System Bootstrap, Version 11.3(2)XA4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. TAC:Home:SW:IOS:Specials for info C2600 platform with 32768 Kbytes of main memory device does not contain a valid magic number boot: cannot open flash: boot: cannot determine first file name on device flash: System Bootstrap, Version 11.3(2)XA4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. TAC:Home:SW:IOS:Specials for info C2600 platform with 32768 Kbytes of main memory rommon Can anyone please give me a solution to solve this problem.. It is very URGENT.. please help me.. Thanks, Kiran FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=3543t=3455 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WCCP and Routing [7:636]
Hi, I am using WCCP v1, and I have two links one is for uplink as well as downlink(say Network A), and the other is only for downlink (say Network B). And I have different 'Class C' address. Lets say X, Y, and Z. WCCP is implemented on Serial interface where my uplink is connected. And router and Cache (wccp box) are on Y network. My Y (one class C ip block), is uplink on Network A, and Downlink on Netowrk B. The router I am using is Cisco, and Netapp Cache machine. With the above setup I want to achieve the following tasks.. I want to pass X ( 256 Ips) network through Network A for uplink, and Downlink also from Network A. And the Z (256 IPs) should pass through Network A for uplink, and Downlink should from Netwrok B. Thanks, Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=636t=636 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: network response time
www.netsaint.org Kiran On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Gayathri wrote: Hi , I am trying to monitor network utilization on LAN for a particular application. The server is connected to a CAT55 switch . The intention here is to see the response time from the time the users starts using the application, till the server replies. When I contacted my vendor, they said I have to use a software called end point. But he also mentioned this can go upto the network layer only. Moreover, this utilization is for the whole vlan. But the end result I want is , how much time the server has taken to reply back to the client? What is the network response time and breakdown of the time by server, network and application. is there any way to acheive this result? thanks and regards Gayathri _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Serial port Full Duplex or Half duplex?
Hi, Can anyone tell me In cisco routers, serial interface with v.35 will work in Full Deuplex or Half Duplex? Thanks, Kiran _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With WCCP
Hi, I am using a Cache machine with WCCP version 1. My network is having 1 uplink and 2 downlinks. My network structure is as follows. Let me say A, B are the existing links, where A is with Uplink and downlink, and B Downlink only. Group X -- Will use Uplink through A and Downlink through A only Group Y -- Will use Uplink through A and Downlink through B Now My cache as well as my router are on 'Group X'. If I make the changes such that cache and router will come to 'Group Y', and also I want give the access to 'Group X' network also. Now my doubt is if I give the access to cache for 'Group X', does they are able browse? Is it faster? (I am sure that B is faster than A). Is there any better way to approch.. But I don't want to keep entire 'Group X' on B. Thanks, Kiran _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Where can I get list of CCIE members
Hi, It might be a bit outoff topic. Where can I get all the list of CCIE members. Is there any site pointing the link. In the cisco site I am getting the numbers, but I want to know members details. Thanks, Kiran _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
