Case Sensitive Passwords on Cisco IOS CLI [7:4718]
According to the book written by Karen Webb on page 65 it states that passwords on Cisco Swtiches using the Cisco IOS CLI AREN'T case sensitive, while passwords on the Cisco Switches using the set/clear CLI don't. I've tried this out myself and it seems to be both case sensitive. I've tried it on a 5505 and 2924. Is this a typo? I've looked for an errata on www.ciscopress.com and couldn't find anything.. And clarification would be appreciated. Thanks. "Virtually All Internet Porno flows through the systems of one company. Cisco Systems. Emporning the Internet Generation." Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=4718&t=4718 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Switch Classification [7:6412]
May be a question already answered many times, but I was just curious to what classification a switch falls under? Is it usually referred to as a DCE or a DTE. I would think a DCE because when you connect a Switch(DCE) to a ROUTER (DTE, could be DCE) you use a straight. When connecting Switch(DCE) to Switch/Hub(DCE) you use a crossover. Could someone elaborate on this issue? Is my train of though wrong on this one? The only reason I'm asking is because I've never read anyone refer to it as a DCE, a better question is can it be reffered to as one? Another question (may be a little off topic from this discussion group) does anyone out there know a *nix platform that supports EtherChannel? I know Data ONTAP for Netapps support it, but I just wanted to know if there are any *nix that do. Thanks group. -- "Sanity is calming, but madness is far more interesting." Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6412&t=6412 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: can we "ping" via MAC address? [7:6387]
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Susan Stone wrote: > Hi.. Dear all, > > If we have a MAC address, can we find out what is the IP address associated > with it? Given MAC find IP. Basically like ping via MAC address. Can it be > done? > > Susan > > _ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- "Sanity is calming, but madness is far more interesting." Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6471&t=6387 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Connecting Two 3548XL's with GigaEthernet [7:9098]
I recently accquired two 3548XL's I want to connect both via giga ethernet. The problem I'm facing is that the link light will go up on one, but not on the other. I had the TX/RX ports reversed ie RX going to the TX on the other switch and vice versa. I configured both 0/1 modules with no negoiation auto, and duplex full. When I bring an interface up say on 3548XL-A and 3548XL-B, the A comes up, the B comes up but goes down right away. The link light stays up on the 3548XLA. When I switch the cables around (multi mode fiber) the opposite happens. IE. B interace comes up, and A goes down. I can't provide configs right now, but I will in a few hours (I'm not at home right now). I've tried different fiber cables and no go. I know for a fact they work. If anyone who has this type of config or knows how I should tackle it could drop me a line, I would appreciate it. -- "Sanity is calming, but madness is far more interesting." Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9098&t=9098 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Connecting Two 3548XL's with GigaEthernet [7:9098]
Actually I got it working. SOMEONE at work here told me the cable I was using was good, and when I asked for another one he gave me another fiber cable which was sitting on a computer (without the caps on). Anyways, I got a new fiber cable (with the caps still protecting the fiber ends) and both interfaces came up. Thanks for the replies. On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Ole Drews Jensen wrote: > This might not help at all, but here it is anyway. > > I have the same setup, except that I am using GigaStack modules and a > GigaStack cable. This is working without any problems. > > I am not an expert in fiber cables, but I would suggest that you check that > GigaBit interfaces and make sure they're not disabled, they are using the > same encapsulation, and they are set for auto in duplex and speed. > > Hth, > > Ole > > ~~~ > Ole Drews Jensen > Systems Network Manager > CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I > RWR Enterprises, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ~~~ > http://www.OleDrews.com/CCNP > ~~~~~~~ > > > -Original Message- > From: Marco P Rodrigues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 2:33 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Connecting Two 3548XL's with GigaEthernet [7:9098] > > > I recently accquired two 3548XL's I want to connect both via giga > ethernet. The problem I'm facing is that the link light will go up on one, > but not on the other. I had the TX/RX ports reversed ie RX going to the TX > on the other switch and vice versa. I configured both 0/1 modules with no > negoiation auto, and duplex full. When I bring an interface up say on > 3548XL-A and 3548XL-B, the A comes up, the B comes up but goes down right > away. The link light stays up on the 3548XLA. When I switch the cables > around (multi mode fiber) the opposite happens. IE. B interace comes up, > and A goes down. I can't provide configs right now, but I will in a few > hours (I'm not at home right now). I've tried different fiber cables and > no go. I know for a fact they work. If anyone who has this type of config > or knows how I should tackle it could drop me a line, I would appreciate > it. > > -- "Sanity is calming, but madness is far more interesting." Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9130&t=9098 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Possible Errata Additions: CCIE(TM): Cisco Certified [7:74091]
Edition By Rob Payne; Kevin Manweiler If someone is reading this book can they confirm some inconsistencies I've come across while reading the book. I'm currently on Chapter 7 and I've found the following problems (at least I think they are problems) Pg 98. Paragraph Five last sentence reads: "DTE devices include terminals, PCs, routers, and bridges (customer-owned end node and internetworking devices) and DTE devices are devices such as packet switches" Shouldn't it read: ".. and DCE devices are devices such as packet switches" Pg. 193. Figure 6.1 Bit 46 should read U/L and not I/G as listed in bit 47. Pg. 194 Figure 6.2 (Ethernet II Frame) Sync (Pattern 11) should read 2 bits and not "11 bits" Pg. 207 set port duplex 2/10 full is issued in the config but the show port output lists the duplex speed as being half. All the other config changes match up with the output. Pg. 223 (Explanation of the command channel-group 1 mode desirable) Should read PAgP and not DTP. I've come across more , a few matched up with the Errata on Sybex's website. I just haven't been keeping track. I guess I'll start noting mistakes as I find them. If someone can confirm this with me I would appreciate it, and I'm sure the authors would too. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=74091&t=74091 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Possible Errata Additions: CCIE(TM): Cisco Certifi [7:74184]
I was hoping someone from the publishing company or even an author would have read my message. An author did and confirmed these errors and several more. I figured they were wrong just wanted to confirm. Just scary to think if mistakes like this are made on material I understand imagine stuff I'm actually trying to learn. .:probably have truly found some mistakes that you should report to the .:publisher. By the way, is the book good otherwise? The Amazon reviews look .:positive. Seems adequate so far. I'll find out if it's a great book if I pass my test on Monday. :) mpr. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=74184&t=74184 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
