RE: ip default-network [7:49619]
Here is a helpfull link. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/default.html Oleg Oz. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49699&t=49619 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: EIGRP [7:49678]
I had a conversation with a cisco engineer about why there are so many undocumented commands. He basically told me that before a command is documented it needs to be documented (no pun intended) by the engineer, this as it turns out is not as easy as it would sounds. There is a process that needs to be completed on the engineers side that documents all possible output, provides debugs and command syntax in all possible compinations. The fact that this is so time consuming many engineers avoid doing it! Oleg Oz. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49688&t=49678 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VLAN Trunk Protocol [7:49647]
VTP - is only used to disseminate information among switches in the same VTP domain - or manage VLAN configurations. Setting a switch as a server allows you to add/delete/modify VLAN's from that switch for the entire VTP domain. If the VTP domain server dies :( no problem, your domain will be fine, however you will not be able to perform your add/deletes/modifys on that domain. This can be remedied by making another switch a SERVER. Hope that answers you question. Oleg Oz. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49657&t=49647 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: Passed CCIE written at Networkers in San D [7:47791]
Sorry, I should have been more clear. What I meant to say was the CCIE Power Session Manual - you get this when you attend the CCIE power session at Networkers (Cisco's networking event) Oleg Oz. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47792&t=47791 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Passed CCIE written at Networkers in San Diego [7:47764]
Yes, I meant the book that you get when you attend the CCIE Power Session. My company did not want to pay for it either, until I said I would pay for it myself. Go figure, beside 450 bucks is nothing with respect to the information that you get out of it! Oleg Oz. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47790&t=47764 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Passed CCIE written at Networkers in San Diego [7:47764]
Frank, Like you I did not study for the beta exam (I wanted to know what it was all about and not loose 300 bucks.) I have not received my graded beta exam yet not did I expect to pass (however if the pass grade was 45, I may have passed.) You are on target with saying that the current exam was much easier (mostly becasue the beta had newly added subjects that I have no practical experiance with.) BTW: I highly recommend attending the PS session (or atleast trying to get your hand on a copy of the PS CCIE book) Oleg Oz. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47782&t=47764 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Passed CCIE written at Networkers in San Diego [7:47764]
I wanted to drop a line to the group and thank everyone for adding thier 2 cents! I mean it! Having other folks point out potential issues/uses of a specific technology really helps fill in the picture. So Thanks again! I took the beta (351-001) exam at the beginging of May (have not recived the officialy graded exam yet) and did not feel like I passed so I took the current exam (350-001) at networkers and passed !!! Oleg Oz. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47764&t=47764 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Networkers San Diego [7:45885]
My pigeons wont fly :( I'm not compliant :( Oleg. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46045&t=45885 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Networkers San Diego [7:45885]
I will be in the Multicast Power session on Monday and the Router Architecture Power session in Friday. Arriving Saturday Night. So if you are in either class just yell out my name :) Oleg. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46003&t=45885 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE beta results [7:45853]
I spoke with another person at Prometric. She basically said dont count your chickens before they hatch. Also, she said they sometimes put a P in there just for giggles and . (pardon my periods) So, if you took the test out of curiosity and never expected to pass you probably did'nt. :( Oleg. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45941&t=45853 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Networkers San Diego [7:45885]
I think I saw a thread on this a few weeks ago but can no longer find it.. Is anyone going to networkers in San Diego.. Taking power sessions? Oleg. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45885&t=45885 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE beta results [7:45853]
Does anyone want to admit to taking the beta calling prometric and getting an F??? My attitude is much like yours. I also took the exam just to get a sample. I never expected to pass! (It would be nice but...) Either way ... Break a leg or something. Oleg. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45874&t=45853 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Checksum failure [7:45856]
Try to download another version of the same image or a another image alltogether. Your image may corrupted. Oleg. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45858&t=45856 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE beta results [7:45853]
I took the CCIE beta exam at the begining on May (a day beofore the end) and could wait no more. I called prometric to see if they had a grade in thier system, they told me that thier system showed a "P" for pass (I called twice to confirm.) Cisco's system does not show anything yet (I know it can take up to ten days to show up.) Now, I still do not belive that I passed (until I have the printed copy in my hand) and wanted to check with the group to see if anyone else had this experience. That is, not getting the official results and calling prometric to get the results (and the finding out the the info prometric had was not correct. Thanks Oleg. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45853&t=45853 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Not the whole domain - Re: Delete VLAN [7:37254]
One more thing I forgot to mention. If a Client is powered off and disconnected (physicaly) from the network and then powered on. The client will retain the last known VTP domain/VLAN configuration. Oleg oz Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37309&t=37254 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Not the whole domain - Re: Delete VLAN [7:37254]
When I say changes, I mean changes with regard to a VTP domain. Oleg Oz... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37307&t=37254 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Not the whole domain - Re: Delete VLAN [7:37254]
I belive that the part about a VTP client not saving VLAN information
is not correct. Yes, a client gets updates from the VTP server and Yes
"changes" (add,delete,mods) can only be initaited on a server. But, I belive
that the client does save the most current revision of the VTP domain config
in memory. Also, If a VTP server reloads and some how loses (or has cleared)
its VLAN info but retains the VTP domain configuration and its revision
number somehow is lower than a clients revision, the server will accept
config the VLAN conifguration from the client.
Atleast that is what I think/remember.
Oleg Oz...
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37305&t=37254
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ethernet or FastEthernet [7:35245]
Mike, yes the IEEE802.1Q does insert the VLAN tag into the frame (ISL encapsulates the frame.) I am going to try and get this part right. The max frame size for an ethernet frame is 1518, however if you are going to insert the 801.1Q Vlan tag you would require an additional 4 bytes. 2 bytes for Length/Type = 802.1Q Tag Type 2 bytes for Tag Control Information) Bringing the grand total to 1522. I belive that the older chip sets supported a max of 1518 (later the standard was changed to support 1522.) So, I belive that the age on the hardware has a bit to do with this as the change to the frame size (or the IEEE standard change) did not occur until sometime in '98. Now Cisco's ISL came along and decided to take it a bit further. Cisco's implementation encapsulates the frame (the original 1518 byte frame) and by doing so adds 30 more bytes. This 1548 byte max. frame again presents a problem to older Ethernet chip sets. So you may find certine Ethernet HW that will support the 1522 byte size and not the 1548 byte size (I am pretty sure of this but will not swear to it) and hence some hardware will support 802.1Q and not ISL. I hope I am not wrong about this. Oleg Oz... http://www.techfest.com/networking/lan/ethernet2.htm http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/741_4.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35404&t=35245 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ethernet or FastEthernet [7:35245]
I also belive that it is possible to run isl/802.1Q over ethernet. I seem to remember reading that the limiting factor was the age of the ethernet hardware. The originally ethernet chips used in cisco network modules only supported a fixed frame size. When ISL/802.1Q came along, the hardware needed to support some additional space to accomadate the VLAN info. This was a problem with older ethernet chips sets however the newer hardware supports this. The chip sets used on the FE board did not have this problem because they were already designed to allow for a larger frame. Can anyone verify my recollection??? Oleg Oz.. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35311&t=35245 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
