Re: Squeeze not working in 12.0
This command only works on the higher end paltforms - 7200, 7500 etc... Although the delete command is present there is no way to squeeze the flash. So to free up some room you are going to have to erase the flash and start from scratch. Rich On Feb 22, 5:03pm, John Neiberger chatted about: Subject:Squeeze not working in 12.0 I just now deleted one of two IOS files on a 2611 running 12.0(5). When I tried to "squeeze" the file system, the CLI did not recognize the squeeze command. I tried to undelete that file and again, it did not recognize the command. So, I have a file that is marked as deleted and can't do anything with it. I checked CCO and the docs there say that both squeeze and undelete should be available in 12.0. Am I missing something obvious here? I need to free up some room on that file system so that I can do an upgrade. Any ideas? Thanks, John _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- End of waffle from John Neiberger -- *** Please copy your emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** #---# #.. .. | Richard Gallagher | Office:+32 2 704 5000 # #|| ||| Euro-CATS | Direct:+32 2 704 5421 # #|| ||| Cisco Systems Belgium | Fax: +32 2 704 6000 # # | Pegasus Park | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # #.:||:.:||:.| De Kleetlaan, 6A | # # Cisco Systems | BE 1831 Diegem| http://www.cisco.com/tac # #---# "Normal people believe that if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Engineers believe that if it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet." Check out this link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/63/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Squeeze not working in 12.0
Don't ask me either, I have no idea why they did this. I have wondered for some time!!! Yes it's OK to erase the flash whilst the router is running, just don't reload it - or bang bye bye network!! Rich On Feb 22, 5:12pm, John Neiberger chatted about: Subject:Re: Squeeze not working in 12.0 Well, that makes perfect sense! heh heh I won't even bother asking why they implemented the delete command if it doesn't really do anything. Since the 2611 IOS runs from RAM, I'd be okay deleting the entire flash, right? Geez, I hate doing stuff like that on a production router. :-) But, that's never really stopped me. "Richard Gallagher" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/22/01 9:05:24 AM This command only works on the higher end paltforms - 7200, 7500 etc... Although the delete command is present there is no way to squeeze the flash. So to free up some room you are going to have to erase the flash and start from scratch. Rich On Feb 22, 5:03pm, John Neiberger chatted about: Subject:Squeeze not working in 12.0 I just now deleted one of two IOS files on a 2611 running 12.0(5). When I tried to "squeeze" the file system, the CLI did not recognize the squeeze command. I tried to undelete that file and again, it did not recognize the command. So, I have a file that is marked as deleted and can't do anything with it. I checked CCO and the docs there say that both squeeze and undelete should be available in 12.0. Am I missing something obvious here? I need to free up some room on that file system so that I can do an upgrade. Any ideas? Thanks, John _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- End of waffle from John Neiberger -- *** Please copy your emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** #---# # .. .. | Richard Gallagher | Office:+32 2 704 5000 # #|| ||| Euro-CATS | Direct:+32 2 704 5421 # #|| ||| Cisco Systems Belgium | Fax: +32 2 704 6000 # # | Pegasus Park | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # #.:||:.:||:.| De Kleetlaan, 6A | # # Cisco Systems | BE 1831 Diegem| http://www.cisco.com/tac # #---# "Normal people believe that if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Engineers believe that if it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet." Check out this link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/63/ -- End of waffle from John Neiberger -- *** Please copy your emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** #---# #.. ..| Richard Gallagher | Office:+32 2 704 5000 # #|| ||| Euro-CATS | Direct:+32 2 704 5421 # #|| ||| Cisco Systems Belgium | Fax: +32 2 704 6000 # # | Pegasus Park | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # #.:||:.:||:.| De Kleetlaan, 6A | # # Cisco Systems | BE 1831 Diegem| http://www.cisco.com/tac # #---# "Normal people believe that if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Engineers believe that if it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet." Check out this link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/63/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RIPv2/BGP: Thinking out loud
Hi Drew, I have just had a word with Jeff (read this chapter) and what I understand is that although it does not say it, there is definatley redistribution going on here. When they mention the tag field, this shows that the route was tagged "when redistributed". Therefore they are all going to know about all networks. Is this what you were after, I did I completeley misread your question? Rich On Feb 13, 4:39pm, Ole Drews Jensen chatted about: Subject:RIPv2/BGP: Thinking out loud I am kind of just thinking out loud here, but if someone could confirm that I'm right, I would appreciate it. Jeff Doyle just joined me for lunch again as usual - his book that is, and there was an example in the beginning of the RIPv2 chapter where 3 routers (let's call them A, B and C) were connected on the same network, and a second network was connected to router C. Router A and B was setup with RIPv2 and router B and C with BGP. Since C are running only BGP and A only RIPv2, no routing information would be sent from C directly to A and visa versa. Router B however would send information about the second network connected to router C to A, and let A know that it should send packets destined for the second network to router C. Hey, wait a minute I thought, router A can't send to router C - But then I thought about it again, and saw that I was wrong in my first assumption. Of course A can send to C, they just don't exchange routing information directly to each other. Am I right? Thanks for any comments on this, Ole Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.CiscoKing.com NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- End of waffle from Ole Drews Jensen -- *** Please copy your emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** #---# #.. .. | Richard Gallagher | Office:+32 2 704 5000 # #|| ||| Euro-CATS | Direct:+32 2 704 5421 # #|| ||| Cisco Systems Belgium | Fax: +32 2 704 6000 # # | Pegasus Park | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # #.:||:.:||:.| De Kleetlaan, 6A | # # Cisco Systems | BE 1831 Diegem| http://www.cisco.com/tac # #---# "Normal people believe that if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Engineers believe that if it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet." Check out this link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/63/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: show ver message
Add the two together to get the total DRAM in the system. The figure on the left is what has been allocated for "processor" memory (routing tables, IOS etc) The figure on the right is what has been allocated for "I/O" memory (buffers etc) Rich On Feb 12, 2:22pm, Albert Lu chatted about: Subject:show ver message Hi All, I would like to know what this 'show version' output means? Particularly the '4096K/2048K' part. Does it mean I have 4Dram or 6Dram? Some 2500s report it differently. cisco 2500 (68030) processor (revision B) with 4096K/2048K bytes of memory. Thanks Albert _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- End of waffle from Albert Lu -- *** Please copy your emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** #---# # .. .. | Richard Gallagher | Office:+32 2 704 5000 # #|| ||| Euro-CATS | Direct:+32 2 704 5421 # #|| ||| Cisco Systems Belgium | Fax: +32 2 704 6000 # # | Pegasus Park | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # #.:||:.:||:.| De Kleetlaan, 6A | # # Cisco Systems | BE 1831 Diegem| http://www.cisco.com/tac # #---# "Normal people believe that if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Engineers believe that if it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet." Check out this link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/63/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE RS Going to be Replaced..!!
Danial, Not replaced as far as I know, there have been some changes recently. Check the following link for details. http://www/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/routing.html#4 Rich On Feb 12, 5:33pm, Danial wood chatted about: Subject:CCIE RS Going to be Replaced..!! dear group I have heard a news abt the format of the CCIE RS exam is going to be changed in the next two months or so.Is that right? Danial __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- End of waffle from Danial wood -- *** Please copy your emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** #---# #.. ..| Richard Gallagher | Office:+32 2 704 5000 # #|| ||| Euro-CATS | Direct:+32 2 704 5421 # #|| ||| Cisco Systems Belgium | Fax: +32 2 704 6000 # # | Pegasus Park | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # #.:||:.:||:.| De Kleetlaan, 6A | # # Cisco Systems | BE 1831 Diegem| http://www.cisco.com/tac # #---# "Normal people believe that if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Engineers believe that if it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet." Check out this link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/63/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Clearing show buffer counters
There is no command to clear the buffer counters, and I do not think there i will ever be one. The only way to do it is to reload the box. Rich On Feb 8, 10:28am, Bulent Sahin chatted about: Subject:Clearing show buffer counters Hi,=20 I want to clear "show buffer" counters, but i couldn't find a command. = The command "clear counters" doesn't effect "show buffer" output. Thanks. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- End of waffle from Bulent Sahin -- *** Please copy your emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** #---# #.. ..| Richard Gallagher | Office:+32 2 704 5000 # #|| ||| Euro-CATS | Direct:+32 2 704 5421 # #|| ||| Cisco Systems Belgium | Fax: +32 2 704 6000 # # | Pegasus Park | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # #.:||:.:||:.| De Kleetlaan, 6A | # # Cisco Systems | BE 1831 Diegem| http://www.cisco.com/tac # #---# "Normal people believe that if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Engineers believe that if it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet." Check out this link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/63/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: System Flash Read Only
Hi Hans, The flash in the 2500 always said read-only. This platform runs the IOS from flash, therefore when the router is running the flash is read-only as not to write over the IOS. There is a boot helper mode (config register 0x2101) which you can go to, to change the IOS image. Rich On Feb 2, 11:37pm, Hans Stout chatted about: Subject:System Flash Read Only Hi colleagues, I just installed some third party flash memory into my 2501, and the 'sh ver' says that the system flash is read only. How can I change that to read/write ? Is that a configuration register setting ? Or a jumper setting ? Thanks for your advice in advance. Regards, Hans _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- End of waffle from Hans Stout -- *** Please copy your emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** #---# #.. ..| Richard Gallagher | Office:+32 2 704 5000 # #|| ||| Euro-CATS | Direct:+32 2 704 5421 # #|| ||| Cisco Systems Belgium | Fax: +32 2 704 6000 # # | Pegasus Park | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # #.:||:.:||:.| De Kleetlaan, 6A | # # Cisco Systems | BE 1831 Diegem| http://www.cisco.com/tac # #---# "Normal people believe that if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Engineers believe that if it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet." Check out this link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/63/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Switch Acceleration on 4006
Hi Jeff, It depends on the configuration that you use. Have a look at the following link for more details: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat5000/rel_5_5/sw_cfg/swacc.htm Rich On Feb 3, 6:16pm, Jeff Duchin chatted about: Subject:Switch Acceleration on 4006 Anyone done this before... asking because I was thinking about it but I'm not sure if it will hose my GB EtherChannel on 1/1-2? Jeff _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- End of waffle from Jeff Duchin -- *** Please copy your emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** #---# #.. ..| Richard Gallagher | Office:+32 2 704 5000 # #|| ||| Euro-CATS | Direct:+32 2 704 5421 # #|| ||| Cisco Systems Belgium | Fax: +32 2 704 6000 # # | Pegasus Park | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # #.:||:.:||:.| De Kleetlaan, 6A | # # Cisco Systems | BE 1831 Diegem| http://www.cisco.com/tac # #---# "Normal people believe that if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Engineers believe that if it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet." Check out this link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/63/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: why delete a access-list entry will delete all the entry
Sim, CT (Chee Tong) -- *** Please copy your emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** #---# #.. ..| Richard Gallagher | Office:+32 2 704 5000 # #|| ||| Euro-CATS | Direct:+32 2 704 5421 # #|| ||| Cisco Systems Belgium | Fax: +32 2 704 6000 # # | Pegasus Park | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # #.:||:.:||:.| De Kleetlaan, 6A | # # Cisco Systems | BE 1831 Diegem| http://www.cisco.com/tac # #---# "Normal people believe that if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Engineers believe that if it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet." Check out this link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/63/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: nat vs pat
Thomas, NAT (Network Address Translation) - every inside (private) address is directly translated to a valid (public) outside address - one to one. eg 10.1.1.1 144.1.1.1 10.1.1.2 144.1.1.2 PAT (Port Address Translation) - every inside address is translated using one or more addresses but using also the ports number also to specify the connection. Each ip address can have 4000 translations on it. eg 10.1.1.1 144.1.1.1:1025 10.1.1.2 144.1.1.1:1026 . . . . . . 10.1.255.1 - 144.1.2:2002 Rich On Feb 1, 4:57pm, Thomas Tran chatted about: Subject:nat vs pat Can someone please explain to me the difference between NAT and PAT. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- End of waffle from Thomas Tran -- *** Please copy your emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** #---# #.. ..| Richard Gallagher | Office:+32 2 704 5000 # #|| ||| Euro-CATS | Direct:+32 2 704 5421 # #|| ||| Cisco Systems Belgium | Fax: +32 2 704 6000 # # | Pegasus Park | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # #.:||:.:||:.| De Kleetlaan, 6A | # # Cisco Systems | BE 1831 Diegem| http://www.cisco.com/tac # #---# "Normal people believe that if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Engineers believe that if it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet." Check out this link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/63/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Inquires...
Mike, You need to look at NTP (Network Time Protocol). See the following link for more info: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios11/cbook/csysmgmt.htm#xtocid398114 Rich On Feb 1, 5:12pm, Mike Peterson chatted about: Subject:Inquires... Hi All, I am wandering what is the command line to put in main router to make the remote routers to syncronize the time with the main router.We are in east coast (Eastern time). Does anyone knows who is the Company that can install a DARKFIBER in New York area? Thanks, Mike _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- End of waffle from Mike Peterson -- *** Please copy your emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** #---# #.. ..| Richard Gallagher | Office:+32 2 704 5000 # #|| ||| Euro-CATS | Direct:+32 2 704 5421 # #|| ||| Cisco Systems Belgium | Fax: +32 2 704 6000 # # | Pegasus Park | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # #.:||:.:||:.| De Kleetlaan, 6A | # # Cisco Systems | BE 1831 Diegem| http://www.cisco.com/tac # #---# "Normal people believe that if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Engineers believe that if it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet." Check out this link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/63/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What should I block???
tta also find that whitepaper on FW's. Concidering this will be my first time coming anywhere near a FW (FW Virgin) I'm a little nervous and hope you guys can help out. Thanks all, =o) Mark Z... _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- End of waffle from Jim Deane -- *** Please copy your emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** #-------# #.. ..| Richard Gallagher | Office:+32 2 704 5000 # #|| ||| Euro-CATS | Direct:+32 2 704 5421 # #|| ||| Cisco Systems Belgium | Fax: +32 2 704 6000 # # | Pegasus Park | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # #.:||:.:||:.| De Kleetlaan, 6A | # # Cisco Systems | BE 1831 Diegem| http://www.cisco.com/tac # #---# "Normal people believe that if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Engineers believe that if it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet." Check out this link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/63/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IOS Version question
Hi Stuart, The 12.0.7-XK1 is only supported on 2610-2621 and not the two models that you have have mentioned. Is there any particular reason that you need this image?? You are correct in that the image requires 32MB of DRAM and 8MD of Flash The 2600 series has two slots for DRAM, so if they are both full you are going to have to change them for 2 x 16MB. Rich On Jan 31, 2:24pm, Stuart Laubstein chatted about: Subject:IOS Version question I have just bought an IOS 12.0(7)XK1 IP/FW Feature Pack. My first question is if I am correct in assuming that I will need to have 8mb of flash and 32 mb of ram. My second question is how difficult is it for me to install the new RAM if I had it. I think I only have 16 mb but I could buy 2 more 8 mb modules (or is the number of modules limited) couldnt I? This would be on a Cisco 2503 or 2501. thanks stu _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- End of waffle from Stuart Laubstein -- *** Please copy your emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** #---# #.. ..| Richard Gallagher | Office:+32 2 704 5000 # #|| ||| Euro-CATS | Direct:+32 2 704 5421 # #|| ||| Cisco Systems Belgium | Fax: +32 2 704 6000 # # | Pegasus Park | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # #.:||:.:||:.| De Kleetlaan, 6A | # # Cisco Systems | BE 1831 Diegem| http://www.cisco.com/tac # #---# "Normal people believe that if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Engineers believe that if it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet." Check out this link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/63/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AW: IOS Version question
Hi Stu, The image that you have for the 3600, will not run on the 2600 (if that is what you mean). The best image depends on what features you are intending on running. If it's just usual routing etc... then 12.0(15) would be the one i'd recommend. Not sure on the price of an IOS!!! Rich On Jan 31, 2:44pm, Stuart Laubstein chatted about: Subject:AW: IOS Version question I have it for a new 3640 we are getting. I wanted to install it so that I could test it on a non production machine as I only have 11.2 on my lab and that didnt offer the options of 12.0. Is there version of 12 that will work on my cisco 2500's? How much does the IOS alone cost anyways? stu -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Richard Gallagher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet am: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 2:32 PM An: Stuart Laubstein; '[EMAIL PROTECTED] ' Betreff: Re: IOS Version question Hi Stuart, The 12.0.7-XK1 is only supported on 2610-2621 and not the two models that you have have mentioned. Is there any particular reason that you need this image?? You are correct in that the image requires 32MB of DRAM and 8MD of Flash The 2600 series has two slots for DRAM, so if they are both full you are going to have to change them for 2 x 16MB. Rich On Jan 31, 2:24pm, Stuart Laubstein chatted about: Subject:IOS Version question I have just bought an IOS 12.0(7)XK1 IP/FW Feature Pack. My first question is if I am correct in assuming that I will need to have 8mb of flash and 32 mb of ram. My second question is how difficult is it for me to install the new RAM if I had it. I think I only have 16 mb but I could buy 2 more 8 mb modules (or is the number of modules limited) couldnt I? This would be on a Cisco 2503 or 2501. thanks stu _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- End of waffle from Stuart Laubstein -- *** Please copy your emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** #---# #.. ..| Richard Gallagher | Office:+32 2 704 5000 # #|| ||| Euro-CATS | Direct:+32 2 704 5421 # #|| ||| Cisco Systems Belgium | Fax: +32 2 704 6000 # # | Pegasus Park | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # #.:||:.:||:.| De Kleetlaan, 6A | # # Cisco Systems | BE 1831 Diegem| http://www.cisco.com/tac # #---# "Normal people believe that if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Engineers believe that if it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet." Check out this link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/63/ -- End of waffle from Stuart Laubstein -- *** Please copy your emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** #---# #.. .. | Richard Gallagher | Office:+32 2 704 5000 # #|| ||| Euro-CATS | Direct:+32 2 704 5421 # #|| ||| Cisco Systems Belgium | Fax: +32 2 704 6000 # # | Pegasus Park | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # #.:||:.:||:.| De Kleetlaan, 6A | # # Cisco Systems | BE 1831 Diegem| http://www.cisco.com/tac # #---# "Normal people believe that if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Engineers believe that if it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet." Check out this link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/63/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RIP Config Question - Doyle's Book
Scott, This is a typo as far as I can tell. Rich On Jan 30, 4:34am, Scott Froese wrote: Subject: RIP Config Question - Doyle's Book Hi all- I'm having a lot of trouble figuring out a configuration exercise and am hoping someone here can help. Can someone please explain to me why the RIP config for router RTF on page 222 of "Routing TCP/IP Vol 1" is: router rip network 192.168.4.0 network 192.168.6.0 It looks to me like it should be: router rip network 192.168.4.0 network 192.168.5.0 I checked the errata and didn't see anything about it. Thanks in advance, Scott _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- End of excerpt from Scott Froese -- *** Please copy your emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** #---# #.. .. | Richard Gallagher | Office:+32 2 704 5000 # #|| ||| Euro-CATS | Direct:+32 2 704 5421 # #|| ||| Cisco Systems Belgium | Fax: +32 2 704 6000 # # | Pegasus Park | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # #.:||:.:||:.| De Kleetlaan, 6A | # # Cisco Systems | BE 1831 Diegem| http://www.cisco.com/tac # #---# "Normal people believe that if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Engineers believe that if it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet." Check out this link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/63/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 7507 RSP RAM
But 100% needed but it is recommended. If you want the slave to come up after a primary fails and then run the same setup it seems sensible to have the same amount in both. Rich On Jan 30, 12:46pm, mak wrote: Subject: 7507 RSP RAM Hi, Is it a must the primary and secondary RSP should have the same RAM capacity? Is it ok if I install more RAM on primary RSP temporarily? Thanks Regards, Raymond _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- End of excerpt from mak -- *** Please copy your emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** #---# #.. ..| Richard Gallagher | Office:+32 2 704 5000 # #|| ||| Euro-CATS | Direct:+32 2 704 5421 # #|| ||| Cisco Systems Belgium | Fax: +32 2 704 6000 # # | Pegasus Park | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # #.:||:.:||:.| De Kleetlaan, 6A | # # Cisco Systems | BE 1831 Diegem| http://www.cisco.com/tac # #---# "Normal people believe that if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Engineers believe that if it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet." Check out this link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/63/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DLSW+ question
You are currently on the ethernet interface, try adding the following command on both routers: bridge irb brigde 1 route ip Rich On Jan 30, 6:48pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] chatted about: Subject:DLSW+ question I am trying to setup two routers with DLSW+ , when I do with routing ,I can'= t=20 ping each other loopback interfaces for some reason.=20 Hostname DCE_Router dlsw local-peer peer-id 10.1.1.1 dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 10.1.1.2 dlsw bridge-group 1 Loopback0 =A0 ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 interface Ethernet0 ip address 150.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 bridge-group 1 interface Serial0 ip address 10.1.2.1 255.255.255.0 encapsulation ppp clockrate 64000 bridge 1 protocol ieee router eigrp 100 network 10.0.0.0 redistribute connected ___ Hostname DTE_Router dlsw local-peer peer-id 10.1.1.2 dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 10.1.1.1 dlsw bridge-group 1 Loopback0 =A0 ip address 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 interface Ethernet0 ip address 160.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 bridge-group 1 interface Serial0 ip address 10.1.2.2 255.255.255.0 encapsulation ppp bridge 1 protocol ieee router eigrp 100 network 10.0.0.0 redistribute connected _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- End of waffle from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- *** Please copy your emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** #---# #.. ..| Richard Gallagher | Office:+32 2 704 5000 # #|| ||| Euro-CATS | Direct:+32 2 704 5421 # #|| ||| Cisco Systems Belgium | Fax: +32 2 704 6000 # # | Pegasus Park | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # #.:||:.:||:.| De Kleetlaan, 6A | # # Cisco Systems | BE 1831 Diegem| http://www.cisco.com/tac # #---# "Normal people believe that if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Engineers believe that if it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet." Check out this link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/63/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Written
Could you be a little more presice about what you want to know??? Rich On Jan 30, 9:43pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] chatted about: Subject:CCIE Written Has anyone taken it? If so I would like to speak to you so please email me @ [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you have taken it. Thank You. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- End of waffle from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- *** Please copy your emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** #---# #.. ..| Richard Gallagher | Office:+32 2 704 5000 # #|| ||| Euro-CATS | Direct:+32 2 704 5421 # #|| ||| Cisco Systems Belgium | Fax: +32 2 704 6000 # # | Pegasus Park | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # #.:||:.:||:.| De Kleetlaan, 6A | # # Cisco Systems | BE 1831 Diegem| http://www.cisco.com/tac # #---# "Normal people believe that if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Engineers believe that if it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet." Check out this link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/63/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Frame Relay - Lessons Learned...
The first problem that you encountered was due the fact of the network type mismatch - different network types uses different timers. For point-multipoint and non-broadcast: Hello 30, Dead 120, Wait 120 For point-point: Hello 10, Dead 40, Wait 40 So if you have differnt configuration at either end of the link, then there will be no adjaceny formed between the two neighbours and as a result there will be no routing info/LSA's transfered between then. I would suggest that for this setup you should use the ospf network type "point to mulitpoint", this way each connected is treated and a single point to point network. This way you also rule and problems with DR election if using broadcast (in this setuo you would need to make sure the hub was the DR to ensure that the routing worked properly). For some more info and a some sample configs have a look at the following link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/104/22.html Rich On Jan 29, 1:58am, Bill Moran wrote: Subject: RE: Frame Relay - Lessons Learned... I too discovered this last night. I believe that part of the problem may be in the absence of frame map statements, more specifically the lack of the broadcast parameter, the LSAs are not getting propagated to the neighbors. Any thoughts to this theory? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Nigel Taylor Sent: Monday, December 25, 2000 11:21 AM To: CCIE_Lab Group Study; Cisco Group Study Cc: Bryant Andrews Subject: Frame Relay - Lessons Learned... Well, =20 I hope buy now everyone has opened all their gifts and already = know what it is they want for christmas next year. In joy of the spirit I decided to work on some areas which I believe as = mentioned by numerous member on list is of crucial importance in CCIE = lab. In this spirit I've learned another lesson, which goes as = follows... In this lab scenario the goal was to connect 3 routers R1, R2, and R3 in = the typical HUB and Spoke topology. In a partial=20 mesh all routers should be able to ping each other with out the use of = the "frame-relay map" command with only sub-interfaces allowed in the = HUB device. Now, this is reasonably easy as this leaves 2 options to complete the = required task. Configurations as follows=20 could get this done. The use of various sub-interfaces with the = "frame-relay interface-dlci" command depending=20 on other lab specific requirements(i.e multiple nets/subnets) or the use = of a multi-point sub-interface to support both=20 spoke(s) over one network address assignment. =20 I used 2 sub- interfaces to specify 2 networks. What I observed was, = although I had a neighbor adjacency between both spokes and the HUB(R1), the spokes was not learning the other = network through OSPF. I could ping the=20 HUB(R1) from both spokes, but could not ping through to R3(spoke) and = vise-versa. I know.. no ospf what do you expect..! =20 Another observation was from the Spoke devices R2 and R3 the HUB(R1) = showed up as a BDR in full state.=20 As well from the HUB the both spokes(R2,R3) showed up as adjacent = neighbors in FULL state. =20 Closer investigation showed that from the HUB both sub-interfaces were = using ospf network type point-to -point, however=20 from the spokes(R2,R3) being physical interfaces and using the default = of broadcast. Well, this really doesn't stand as both of these network types use a 10 sec Hello timer and a 40 sec = Dead timer.. right! Wrong, apparently although the ospf network types hello/dead values = matched this did not allow ospf to propagate the other networks to the = spokes. What solved this was either changing the spokes ospf network = type to p-t-p as to match the HUB, or=20 changing the HUB links to broadcast. When this was done the spokes both = now knew of the other net work. =20 In doing some quick research Calsow's book makes mention of setting all = interfaces to point-to-multipoint. He also=20 mentions the problems faced with ospf network type mis-matches. If one = is not careful this could present a few problems and being not overly = confident in my frame-relay skill-set would likely look to something in = that part of the config for the answer to my problem Thoughts anyone...or is this common knowledge? Nigel. ___ To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing: unsubscribe ccielab _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- End of excerpt from Bill Moran -- *** Please copy your emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** #---# #.. ..| Richard Ga
Re: IS IS
As far as understand it has not been removed from the lab. ISIS for CLNS has been removed, but there is still the possibility of "Integrated ISIS - for IP" questions being asked. Rich On Jan 29, 9:52am, Vadim Tulinov wrote: Subject: Re: IS IS Hello, http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/routing.html Effective immediately, the following topics have been removed from the lab exam content: LAT DECnet Apollo Banyan VINES ISO CLNS XNS ATM LANE X.25 Effective February 1, 2001, the following topic will be removed from the lab exam content: Appletalk http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/itg_v1/tr1912.htm#xtocid27250 As far as, I understand, this is meaning IS-IS was removed from lab. Groupstudy wrote: Certainly is. - Original Message - From: Dave E. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 3:04 PM Subject: IS IS Is IS-IS on the R/S lab exam? Thanks. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ___ Best regards, Vadim Tulinov. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- End of excerpt from Vadim Tulinov -- *** Please copy your emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** #---# #.. .. | Richard Gallagher | Office:+32 2 704 5000 # #|| ||| Euro-CATS | Direct:+32 2 704 5421 # #|| ||| Cisco Systems Belgium | Fax: +32 2 704 6000 # # | Pegasus Park | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # #.:||:.:||:.| De Kleetlaan, 6A | # # Cisco Systems | BE 1831 Diegem| http://www.cisco.com/tac # #---# "Normal people believe that if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Engineers believe that if it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet." Check out this link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/63/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF Wildcard mask
100% On Jan 29, 2:19pm, David Richard wrote: Subject: OSPF Wildcard mask If I want to configure OSPF for my serial interface having Ip-address of 183.23.45.46 255.255.255.224 Am I correct to choose its wild card mask as 0.0.0.31??? DR. Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- End of excerpt from David Richard -- *** Please copy your emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** #---# #.. ..| Richard Gallagher | Office:+32 2 704 5000 # #|| ||| Euro-CATS | Direct:+32 2 704 5421 # #|| ||| Cisco Systems Belgium | Fax: +32 2 704 6000 # # | Pegasus Park | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # #.:||:.:||:.| De Kleetlaan, 6A | # # Cisco Systems | BE 1831 Diegem| http://www.cisco.com/tac # #---# "Normal people believe that if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Engineers believe that if it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet." Check out this link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/63/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Voice
The RFC should provide you will all the detail you need. http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2705.html Rich On Jan 29, 3:43pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Subject: Voice Hi all, I am looking for in depth information of the MGCP protocol any help will be appreciated. Thank you in advance Gil _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- End of excerpt from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- *** Please copy your emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** #---# #.. ..| Richard Gallagher | Office:+32 2 704 5000 # #|| ||| Euro-CATS | Direct:+32 2 704 5421 # #|| ||| Cisco Systems Belgium | Fax: +32 2 704 6000 # # | Pegasus Park | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # #.:||:.:||:.| De Kleetlaan, 6A | # # Cisco Systems | BE 1831 Diegem| http://www.cisco.com/tac # #---# "Normal people believe that if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Engineers believe that if it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet." Check out this link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/63/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Early Token release
From CCO: "Early token release is a method whereby the Token Ring interfaces can release the token back onto the ring immediately after transmitting, rather than waiting for the frame to return" Therefore you do not need to wait for the frame to return to see if the frame has been copied or not (frame status field) and then removed from the ring. On Jan 29, 4:17pm, Jim Dixon wrote: Subject: RE: Early Token release I thought that Early Token Release was when the Token was released prior to acknoledgement being received? -Original Message- From: Nathan Casassa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2001 12:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Early Token release Early Token Release will release the token when the last bit of the frame has been sent out: Faisal Athar wrote: Hi, Please solve my confusion for this as I am getting different answers from different resources.. Early token release (1) allows one token and more than one frames. (2) Allows more than one token and more than one frames. (3)allows more than two tokens and one data frame. Thanks a lot in advance... Faisal. Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- End of excerpt from Jim Dixon -- *** Please copy your emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** #---# #.. .. | Richard Gallagher | Office:+32 2 704 5000 # #|| ||| Euro-CATS | Direct:+32 2 704 5421 # #|| ||| Cisco Systems Belgium | Fax: +32 2 704 6000 # # | Pegasus Park | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # #.:||:.:||:.| De Kleetlaan, 6A | # # Cisco Systems | BE 1831 Diegem| http://www.cisco.com/tac # #---# "Normal people believe that if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Engineers believe that if it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet." Check out this link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/63/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF over frame relay
Hi Sami, Have a look at: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/104/22.html Rich On Jan 29, 9:10pm, sami natour wrote: Subject: OSPF over frame relay All , I am studying configuring OSPF over NBMA ,POINT-POINT and point-multiple point ,boradcast. Does any one has examples of configuration with diagrams. Best Regards , sami __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices. http://auctions.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- End of excerpt from sami natour -- *** Please copy your emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** #---# #.. ..| Richard Gallagher | Office:+32 2 704 5000 # #|| ||| Euro-CATS | Direct:+32 2 704 5421 # #|| ||| Cisco Systems Belgium | Fax: +32 2 704 6000 # # | Pegasus Park | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # #.:||:.:||:.| De Kleetlaan, 6A | # # Cisco Systems | BE 1831 Diegem| http://www.cisco.com/tac # #---# "Normal people believe that if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Engineers believe that if it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet." Check out this link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/63/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Strange Router CPU Utilisation
Take a look at the following page, it may help you track down the problem. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/63/highcpu.html Rich -- #--# # Cisco Systems | Richard Gallagher | Office: +32 2 704 5000 # # Euro-CATS | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Direct: +32 2 704 5421 # #--# "Normal people believe that if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Engineers believe that if it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet." On Jan 27, 4:28am, Hugh Pringle wrote: Subject: Re: Strange Router CPU Utilisation Try doing a sh processes cpu whil the high utilization occurs. This may add some insight to what is causing the high utilization. I ahve seen a misconfigured SNMP server cause a situation similar to this. Hugh Pringle CCNA, CCDA ""Deloso, Elmer G (WPNSTA Yorktown)"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hello, gang. I'd like to know if anyone has seen this behaviour of a 4505 (v.11.2) where it is able to handle heavy traffic throughout the day with no more than a 50% cpu utilisation max but shows a few periods of spikes up to 98% when there is no WAN traffic say 4am or 9pm. These spikes show up as "outgoing" traffic which lasts ~15 to 20 mins on MRTG chart. Nothing shows up on the syslogs. I once tried sniffer before the router "crashed" and all i saw was a build up of ICMP and "other" packets. My guess is this is because the router is not responding to client requests thus it keeps getting a barage of "ICMP". This only shows up on the ethernet ports, i.e. coming in from e0, out e1 in reference to MRTG. Any ideas would help. Thanks. Elmer Deloso _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- End of excerpt from Hugh Pringle _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Timed Access Lists]
Hi Guys, Best have a look at the following page, it should explain everything you want to know: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/120newft/120t/120t1/timerang.htm Rich -- #--# # Cisco Systems | Richard Gallagher | Office: +32 2 704 5000 # # Euro-CATS | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Direct: +32 2 704 5421 # #--# "Normal people believe that if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Engineers believe that if it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet." On Jan 27, 8:20am, Ravi Kumar wrote: Subject: Re: [Timed Access Lists] hi friends I am also looking for this type of solution I want to give www access to specific users at one time and other group of users at another time. Please give me few tips. bye ravee [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Timothy Metz) wrote: Has anyone ever used timed access lists? I'm wondering if I can specify multiple times and days and still process through the list or will I exit the list after a test condition is compared... This is getting hard to verbalize but I'll give it a shot... ie: I want to limit www browsing on one time schedule during the week and a different time schedule during the weekend. Setting up two time ranges is not a problem Now I need to write the access list deny tcp any any eq http time-range no-http-weekdays deny tcp any any eq http time-range no-http-weekends permit ip any any will this work or will http traffic exit the list after the first test condition? Thanks Tim _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- End of excerpt from Ravi Kumar _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF cost and scalability to Gigabit ?
Phil, With regards to your question on the cost of GigE interface, it is "1". Here is an output from one of our routers: GigabitEthernet5/2 is down, line protocol is down Internet Address 10.99.99.1/16, Area 0 Process ID 666, Router ID 111.3.0.1, Network Type BROADCAST, Cost: 1 --- Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State DOWN, Priority 1 No designated router on this network No backup designated router on this network Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 40, Wait 40, Retransmit 5 Rich -- #--# # Cisco Systems | Richard Gallagher | Office: +32 2 704 5000 # # Euro-CATS | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Direct: +32 2 704 5421 # #--# "Normal people believe that if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Engineers believe that if it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet. On Jan 27, 4:53pm, Phil Barker wrote: Subject: Re: OSPF cost and scalability to Gigabit ? Found it ... http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/np1_c/1cprt1/1cospf.htm#6793 Phil. --- Phil Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Group, Just been studying OSPF this week and have come accross the 'Cost' metric as being 10^8/bandwidth bps post 11.3 (bandwidth configured on the interface). My question is : Using the above equation 10 Meg Ethernet The Cost is 10 i.e 10^8/10^7. It then follows that 100 Mbit Eth The Cost is 1 !!! So it would follow that the cost of 1 Gig interface would be 0.1 ??? I only have 11.2 in my lab currently and the 'ip ospf cost' parameter is an integer 16 bit value i.e range is 1 - 65535. Has this parameter changed in a later version of IOS ? Checked Cisco but cannot find relevant info. Regards, Phil. Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- End of excerpt from Phil Barker -- *** Please copy your emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** #---# #.. ..| Richard Gallagher | Office:+32 2 704 5000 # #|| ||| Euro-CATS | Direct:+32 2 704 5421 # #|| ||| Cisco Systems Belgium | Fax: +32 2 704 6000 # # | Pegasus Park | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # #.:||:.:||:.| De Kleetlaan, 6A | # # Cisco Systems | BE 1831 Diegem| http://www.cisco.com/tac # #---# "Normal people believe that if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Engineers believe that if it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet." Check out this link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/63/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
